JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.GET SAVED NOW- CALL ON JESUS TODAY.THE ONLY SAVIOR OF THE WHOLE EARTH - NO OTHER.
1 COR 15:23-JESUS THE FIRST FRUITS-CHRISTIANS RAPTURED TO JESUS-FIRST FRUITS OF THE SPIRIT-23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.ROMANS 8:23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.(THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE)
JEREMEIAH 49:35-37 (IN IRAN AT THE BUSHEHR OR ARAK NUKE SITE SOME BELIEVE)
35 Thus saith the LORD of hosts; Behold, I will break the bow of Elam,(IRAN/BUSHEHR NUCLEAR SITE) the chief of their might.(MOST DANGEROUS NUKE SITE IN IRAN)
36 And upon Elam will I bring the four winds from the four quarters of heaven,(IRANIANS SCATTERED OR MASS IMIGARATION) and will scatter them toward all those winds; and there shall be no nation whither the outcasts of Elam shall not come.(WORLD IMMIGRATION)
37 For I will cause Elam (IRAN-BUSHEHR NUKE SITE) to be dismayed before their enemies, and before them that seek their life: and I will bring evil upon them, even my fierce anger,(ISRAELS NUKES POSSIBLY) saith the LORD; and I will send the sword after them, till I have consumed them:(IRAN AND ITS NUKE SITES DESTROYED)
ZECHARIAH 14:12-13
12 And this shall be the plague wherewith the LORD will smite all the people that have fought against Jerusalem; Their flesh shall consume away while they stand upon their feet,(DISOLVED FROM ATOMIC BOMB) and their eyes shall consume away in their holes,(DISOLVED FROM ATOMIC BOMB) and their tongue shall consume away in their mouth.(DISOLVED FROM ATOMIC BOMB)(BECAUSE NUKES HAVE BEEN USED ON ISRAELS ENEMIES)(GOD PROTECTS ISRAEL AND ALWAYS WILL)
13 And it shall come to pass in that day, that a great tumult from the LORD shall be among them; and they shall lay hold every one on the hand of his neighbour, and his hand shall rise up against the hand of his neighbour.(1/2-3 BILLION DIE IN WW3)(THIS IS AN ATOMIC BOMB EFFECT)
EZEKIEL 38:4-7
4 And I will turn thee back, and put hooks into thy jaws,(GOD FORCES THE RUSSIA-MUSLIMS TO MARCH) and I will bring thee forth, and all thine army, horses and horsemen, all of them clothed with all sorts of armour, even a great company with bucklers and shields, all of them handling swords:
5 Persia,(IRAN,IRAQ) Ethiopia, and Libya with them; all of them with shield and helmet:
6 Gomer,(GERMANY) and all his bands; the house of Togarmah (TURKEY) of the north quarters, and all his bands: and many people with thee.(AFRICAN MUSLIMS,SUDAN,TUNESIA ETC)
7 Be thou prepared, and prepare for thyself, thou, and all thy company that are assembled unto thee, and be thou a guard unto them.
EZEKIEL 39:2-3,6
2 And I will turn thee back,(RUSSIA-ARAB MUSLIM ISRAEL HATERS) and leave but the sixth part of thee,(5/6TH OR 300 MILLION DEAD RUSSIAN/ARAB/MUSLIMS I BELIEVE) and will cause thee to come up from the north parts,(RUSSIA) and will bring thee upon the mountains of Israel:
3 And I will smite thy bow out of thy left hand, and will cause thine arrows to fall out of thy right hand.
6 And I will send a fire on Magog,(NUCLEAR ATOMIC BOMB) and among them that dwell carelessly in the isles: and they shall know that I am the LORD.
Boehner: Unprecedented Demand for Tickets to Bibi Speech-House Speaker says White House has worsened relations with Israel in the last 5-6 weeks.By Gil Ronen-First Publish: 3/1/2015, 7:58 PM-ISRAELNATIONALNEWS
House Speaker John Boehner said Sunday that there is unprecedented demand for seats in the House for Binyamin Netanyahu's speech Tuesday."I've never seen anything like it,” he said on CBS's Face the Nation. “Everybody wants to be there.”"What I do wonder is why the White House feels threatened because the Congress wants to support Israel and wants to hear what our trusted ally has to say.”Support for Israel continues to be bipartisan, he stressed, and Democratic support for the Jewish state has not receded. "Really," he added, "the only conflict here is between the White House and Israel."
Has the Israel-US Relationship Been Damaged Irreparably?-Perhaps now, says expert, but speech at Congress could expose divisions among Democrats in particular.By Gedalyah Reback-First Publish: 3/1/2015, 8:52 PM-ISRAELNATIONALNEWS
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu's upcoming speech to Congress has, to say the least, been controversial. Before he has taken the podium and begun to speak, analysts are wondering if his mere presence could finish unraveling the US-Israel relationship that has been said to be fraying over the last six years.Dr. Jonathan Rynhold of the Begin Sadat Center for Strategic Studies is not inclined to say that the relationship is doomed, however difficult things have become between the personalities of President Obama and Prime Minister Netanyahu. He is more concerned though that as Netanyahu takes the podium, he might have weakened his ability to reach Congressional Democrats."If anything, it has made it more difficult for the Prime Minister to use Congress to pressure the Administration because he's lost a lot of Congressional Democrats. He's played right into President Obama's hand, being able to frame this as a partisan political attack on his administration."He noted that the Democratic Party is not monolithic by any means - roughly a third of Congressional Democrats are centrists who might be inclined to join a Republican-leaning vote on issues like sanctions against Iran. But if the party is in discord, it will be difficult to cross the aisle."Bipartisanship is like the O-Zone layer. If you find a hole, you have to repair it quickly or there will take a long time to repair the rift. If you lose the Dems (Democrats), you're suddenly left making it a partisan issue."He says that the defense relationship between the two countries though is much stronger than either leader to dismantle even if they wanted to. The two countries will continue to consult each other and the US will continue to sell Israel weaponry (and advanced weaponry at that), but the Obama Administration could continue to relax defending Israel on the diplomatic front.When asked what could improve things, he suggests that the Prime Minister might benefit “if he has Labor in the government. That would definitely help. If the government’s backing of two states is serious, then the Prime Minister’s overall foreign policy will be taken seriously.”But he doesn’t discount the real possibility that the Prime Minister won’t be dependent on that sort of scenario. When asked if there would be any thinking in either government that this latest spat should motivate a change in the relationship, he was pessimistic.“We’re beyond the point where the two governments can improve things between them on their own. Without common interest, it’s hard to see how things will improve.”Yet, he was quick to point to good chance a number of common interests could push off pressure on the Prime Minister.“If the Iran deal falls through or ISIS seriously threatens Jordan, the equation changes. Yitzhak Shamir and George H W Bush had a terrible relationship, but Shamir’s coordination with Bush during the Gulf War improved things for a while. Mahmoud Abbas could also balance the equation. If he continues with his ICC move, he could equally frustrate the White House.”The issues of Iran and ISIS, which seemed to have caught the United States in a bind on how to handle both rivals, have also pushed the Arab governments of the region to take issue with the Obama Administration on similar issues as the Israeli Prime Minister.“They don’t see him being assertive enough. If we compare the relationship Netanyahu has with Obama and the relationship other Middle Eastern governments have with his administration, we realize theirs are equally strained, but less public.”Assuming that the US and Iran do strike an undesirable deal, he wondered what Israel’s policy going forward would be. What might be critical is just how much time Iran would need to make a bomb based on the conditions of the final deal. If it is long enough, Israel’s defense establishment might consider it “livable.” But he noted there is a major difference between being a year from the bomb and only six months. Israel will likely become the deal’s fiercest critic, but if Israel presents itself as holding Iran to it, it could change perceptions of Israel’s arguments.You can be sure Israel will be monitoring things on the ground very closely. If they see a hint of Iranian cheating (on the deal), they would immediately raise a flag.”
ISRAEL SATAN COMES AGAINST
1 CHRONICLES 21:1
1 And Satan stood up against Israel, and provoked David to number Israel.
ISAIAH 41:11
11 Behold, all they that were incensed against thee (ISRAEL) shall be ashamed and confounded: they shall be as nothing;(DESTROYED) and they that strive with thee shall perish.(ISRAEL HATERS WILL BE TOTALLY DESTROYED)
ISRAELS TROUBLE
JEREMIAH 30:7
7 Alas! for that day is great, so that none is like it: it is even the time of Jacob’s trouble;(ISRAEL) but he shall be saved out of it.
DANIEL 12:1,4
1 And at that time shall Michael(ISRAELS WAR ANGEL) stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people:(ISRAEL) and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation(May 14,48) even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.
4 But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro,(WORLD TRAVEL,IMMIGRATION) and knowledge shall be increased.(COMPUTERS,CHIP IMPLANTS ETC)
ISAIAH 41:11
11 Behold, all they that were incensed against thee (ISRAEL) shall be ashamed and confounded: they shall be as nothing;(DESTROYED) and they that strive with thee shall perish.(ISRAEL HATERS WILL BE TOTALLY DESTROYED)
Report: Obama Threatened to Shoot Down IAF Iran Strike-Kuwaiti paper claims unnamed Israeli minister with good ties with the US administration 'revealed the attack plan to John Kerry.'By Mark Langfan-First Publish: 3/1/2015, 4:18 PM-ISRAELNATIONALNEWS
The Bethlehem-based news agency Ma’an has cited a Kuwaiti newspaper report Saturday, that US President Barack Obama thwarted an Israeli military attack against Iran's nuclear facilities in 2014 by threatening to shoot down Israeli jets before they could reach their targets in Iran.Following Obama's threat, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu was reportedly forced to abort the planned Iran attack.According to Al-Jarida, the Netanyahu government took the decision to strike Iran some time in 2014 soon after Israel had discovered the United States and Iran had been involved in secret talks over Iran’s nuclear program and were about to sign an agreement in that regard behind Israel's back.The report claimed that an unnamed Israeli minister who has good ties with the US administration revealed the attack plan to Secretary of State John Kerry, and that Obama then threatened to shoot down the Israeli jets before they could reach their targets in Iran.Al-Jarida quoted "well-placed" sources as saying that Netanyahu, along with Minister of Defense Moshe Yaalon, and then-Foreign Minister Avigdor Liberman, had decided to carry out airstrikes against Iran's nuclear program after consultations with top security commanders.According to the report, “Netanyahu and his commanders agreed after four nights of deliberations to task the Israeli army's chief of staff, Benny Gantz, to prepare a qualitative operation against Iran's nuclear program. In addition, Netanyahu and his ministers decided to do whatever they could do to thwart a possible agreement between Iran and the White House because such an agreement is, allegedly, a threat to Israel's security.”The sources added that Gantz and his commanders prepared the requested plan and that Israeli fighter jets trained for several weeks in order to make sure the plans would work successfully. Israeli fighter jets reportedly even carried out experimental flights in Iran's airspace after they managed to break through radars.
Brzezinski's idea
Former US diplomat Zbigniew Brzezinski, who enthusiastically campaigned for Obama in 2008, called on him to shoot down Israeli planes if they attack Iran. “They have to fly over our airspace in Iraq. Are we just going to sit there and watch?” said the former national security advisor to former President Jimmy Carter in an interview with the Daily Beast. “We have to be serious about denying them that right,” he said. “If they fly over, you go up and confront them. They have the choice of turning back or not. No one wishes for this but it could be a 'Liberty' in reverse.’"Israel mistakenly attacked the American Liberty ship during the Six-Day War in 1967.Brzezinski was a top candidate to become an official advisor to President Obama, but he was downgraded after Republican and pro-Israel Democratic charges during the campaign that Brzezinski’s anti-Israel attitude would damage Obama at the polls.
Netanyahu so wrong in confronting Obama, so right on Iran-Op-ed: With the US-Israel train wreck unavoidable on Tuesday, the challenge now is to pick up the pieces and refocus on thwarting Tehran-By David Horovitz March 1, 2015, 5:52 pm-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL
Arriving in Washington for the AIPAC conference ahead of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s address to Congress on Tuesday is akin to looking down on a looming train crash and being powerless to stop it. The conflicting forces are converging upon each other insistently, inevitably. The efforts to prevent the collision have failed. All that’s left now is to watch the disaster unfold, and then try to recover.The words of doom and gloom you hear from some of the people most closely involved in nurturing the American-Israel partnership are simply unprecedented. How bad is Netanyahu’s speech for US-Israel ties? I asked one such activist. Well, it’s only decades of painstakingly constructed bipartisan relations smashed to smithereens, he replied bitterly.The prime minister has created the dismal situation whereby even his speech to AIPAC, a day prior to Tuesday’s address to Congress, becomes somewhat problematic. Not only are America’s legislators being asked to choose between their president and the Israeli prime minister, as the veteran administration official Dennis Ross observed at the weekend. But AIPAC’s 16,000-strong, overwhelmingly Jewish audience, in mightily applauding Netanyahu, will be seen by some critics as endorsing a stance against the White House — even though many of those 16,000 have no desire to be torn in this way.Netanyahu’s handling of this face-off has been staggeringly inept, another activist volunteered, and it follows a pattern of his alienating of world leaders — including but not limited to Nicolas Sarkozy and Francois Hollande and Joe Biden — and of exacerbating problems for Jewish communities — notably those in Europe that he has been urging to immigrate to Israel en masse.‘Forcing the ayatollahs to abandon the bomb was not unrealistic, is not unrealistic, if it is clear to them that their pursuit of nuclear arms would endanger the very survival of their regime. That stark choice has not been brought home to them. That is the heart of the negotiators’ failure’ There’s a good deal of truth in these critiques. There’s a great deal of truth, too, in the assertions from critics at home that this trip, this poking of a finger in the eye of President Barack Obama, is a calculated electoral gambit, designed to bolster support for the ostensibly unflinching Netanyahu among right-wing voters back home, to prevent them from defecting to rival parties and denying him victory on March 17. There’s no doubting the political machinations that saw the Prime Minister’s Office release a short clip of Netanyahu “writing his speech” for broadcast on the main Friday evening Channel 2 news, or the rather cynical decision to have the prime minister filmed at the Western Wall ahead of this trip — co-opting Judaism’s holiest place of worship to his campaign.Along with the concern and the cynicism, however, there is one other fairly important aspect of the prime minister’s trip to DC that should be borne in mind: The US-led international community has failed Israel, and failed itself, in its handling of Iran’s drive to nuclear weapons. It is on the point of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. And Netanyahu has been trying desperately to warn against this misguided course of action.Anonymous US administration officials gave a briefing on Friday at which they reportedly sniped that Netanyahu, for all his criticisms, had failed to suggest alternative terms for a deal with Iran. Indeed, many news reports of the Obama-Netanyahu dispute have flatly asserted that the prime minister opposes any and every diplomatic accord with Tehran.In truth, however, Netanyahu has incessantly stressed that a good deal — a deal, that is, that denies Iran the capacity to break out to the bomb — is infinitely preferable to the resort to military action. He has campaigned relentlessly for a deal that dismantles Iran military nuclear infrastructure, highlighting that energy-rich Iran has no need whatsoever for its claimed “peaceful” nuclear program, that it has repeatedly misled the world about the program, and that it can be guaranteed to continue lying and manipulating and deceiving all the way to the bomb if it is left with the opportunity to do so.
Netanyahu was at the forefront of the effort behind the highly effective sanctions regime which forced Iran to the negotiating table, and his increasingly distraught recent rhetoric is the consequence of his horrified realization that the P5+1 negotiators, having had Iran “on the ropes,” as he put it in his UN address in 2013, was allowing the Islamist regime to evade the necessary diplomatic knockout.Netanyahu’s “alternative” deal is one in which Iran is required to acknowledge that it was seeking nuclear weapons, and to halt and dismantle all the processes that could give it the bomb. Ongoing concerted enforcement of the sanctions regime could yield that result, he was and remains convinced, but the US-led negotiators have failed to pursue that goal with sufficient resolution — at terrible potential cost for Israel, other threatened states in the region, and the rest of the free world.The US-led counterargument is that Netanyahu is unrealistic; the deal he envisages could never have been attained; Iran would not have conceded; the international coalition against Iran would have collapsed.And there’s no doubting that Netanyahu — lecturing Obama in public at a White House meeting here, unwilling to freeze settlements there, alienating European leaders, unresponsive to Arab peace overtures — has often undermined his own self-described central mission of thwarting Iran.But forcing the ayatollahs to abandon the bomb was not unrealistic, is not unrealistic, if it is clear to them that their pursuit of nuclear arms would endanger the very survival of their regime. That stark choice was not, has not been, brought home to them. That is the heart of the negotiators’ failure.Quite the reverse. While the Obama administration will be boycotting Netanyahu here this week, Secretary of State John Kerry will be earnestly negotiating with the polished, avuncular Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif. Israel’s most important ally is hoping to see the ouster of the prime minister who is such an irritant on Iran, even as it moves toward an accord that would ensure the survival of a rapacious, murderous, terrorist-funding regime in Tehran that has its heart set on the destruction of Israel.Iran is laughing, the United States is torn, and Israel watches with trepidation. The challenge, the imperative, after this week’s now unavoidable train wreck, is to pick up the pieces — to heal a rift with the US leadership that Israel simply cannot afford, and to refocus joint efforts on thwarting Iran’s drive to the bomb. It is not too late. It very soon will be.
JEREMEIAH 49:35-37 (IN IRAN AT THE BUSHEHR OR ARAK NUKE SITE SOME BELIEVE)
35 Thus saith the LORD of hosts; Behold, I will break the bow of Elam,(IRAN/BUSHEHR NUCLEAR SITE) the chief of their might.(MOST DANGEROUS NUKE SITE IN IRAN)
36 And upon Elam will I bring the four winds from the four quarters of heaven,(IRANIANS SCATTERED OR MASS IMIGARATION) and will scatter them toward all those winds; and there shall be no nation whither the outcasts of Elam shall not come.(WORLD IMMIGRATION)
37 For I will cause Elam (IRAN-BUSHEHR NUKE SITE) to be dismayed before their enemies, and before them that seek their life: and I will bring evil upon them, even my fierce anger,(ISRAELS NUKES POSSIBLY) saith the LORD; and I will send the sword after them, till I have consumed them:(IRAN AND ITS NUKE SITES DESTROYED)
ZECHARIAH 14:12-13
12 And this shall be the plague wherewith the LORD will smite all the people that have fought against Jerusalem; Their flesh shall consume away while they stand upon their feet,(DISOLVED FROM ATOMIC BOMB) and their eyes shall consume away in their holes,(DISOLVED FROM ATOMIC BOMB) and their tongue shall consume away in their mouth.(DISOLVED FROM ATOMIC BOMB)(BECAUSE NUKES HAVE BEEN USED ON ISRAELS ENEMIES)(GOD PROTECTS ISRAEL AND ALWAYS WILL)
13 And it shall come to pass in that day, that a great tumult from the LORD shall be among them; and they shall lay hold every one on the hand of his neighbour, and his hand shall rise up against the hand of his neighbour.(1/2-3 BILLION DIE IN WW3)(THIS IS AN ATOMIC BOMB EFFECT)
EZEKIEL 38:4-7
4 And I will turn thee back, and put hooks into thy jaws,(GOD FORCES THE RUSSIA-MUSLIMS TO MARCH) and I will bring thee forth, and all thine army, horses and horsemen, all of them clothed with all sorts of armour, even a great company with bucklers and shields, all of them handling swords:
5 Persia,(IRAN,IRAQ) Ethiopia, and Libya with them; all of them with shield and helmet:
6 Gomer,(GERMANY) and all his bands; the house of Togarmah (TURKEY) of the north quarters, and all his bands: and many people with thee.(AFRICAN MUSLIMS,SUDAN,TUNESIA ETC)
7 Be thou prepared, and prepare for thyself, thou, and all thy company that are assembled unto thee, and be thou a guard unto them.
EZEKIEL 39:2-3,6
2 And I will turn thee back,(RUSSIA-ARAB MUSLIM ISRAEL HATERS) and leave but the sixth part of thee,(5/6TH OR 300 MILLION DEAD RUSSIAN/ARAB/MUSLIMS I BELIEVE) and will cause thee to come up from the north parts,(RUSSIA) and will bring thee upon the mountains of Israel:
3 And I will smite thy bow out of thy left hand, and will cause thine arrows to fall out of thy right hand.
6 And I will send a fire on Magog,(NUCLEAR ATOMIC BOMB) and among them that dwell carelessly in the isles: and they shall know that I am the LORD.
Boehner: Unprecedented Demand for Tickets to Bibi Speech-House Speaker says White House has worsened relations with Israel in the last 5-6 weeks.By Gil Ronen-First Publish: 3/1/2015, 7:58 PM-ISRAELNATIONALNEWS
House Speaker John Boehner said Sunday that there is unprecedented demand for seats in the House for Binyamin Netanyahu's speech Tuesday."I've never seen anything like it,” he said on CBS's Face the Nation. “Everybody wants to be there.”"What I do wonder is why the White House feels threatened because the Congress wants to support Israel and wants to hear what our trusted ally has to say.”Support for Israel continues to be bipartisan, he stressed, and Democratic support for the Jewish state has not receded. "Really," he added, "the only conflict here is between the White House and Israel."
Has the Israel-US Relationship Been Damaged Irreparably?-Perhaps now, says expert, but speech at Congress could expose divisions among Democrats in particular.By Gedalyah Reback-First Publish: 3/1/2015, 8:52 PM-ISRAELNATIONALNEWS
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu's upcoming speech to Congress has, to say the least, been controversial. Before he has taken the podium and begun to speak, analysts are wondering if his mere presence could finish unraveling the US-Israel relationship that has been said to be fraying over the last six years.Dr. Jonathan Rynhold of the Begin Sadat Center for Strategic Studies is not inclined to say that the relationship is doomed, however difficult things have become between the personalities of President Obama and Prime Minister Netanyahu. He is more concerned though that as Netanyahu takes the podium, he might have weakened his ability to reach Congressional Democrats."If anything, it has made it more difficult for the Prime Minister to use Congress to pressure the Administration because he's lost a lot of Congressional Democrats. He's played right into President Obama's hand, being able to frame this as a partisan political attack on his administration."He noted that the Democratic Party is not monolithic by any means - roughly a third of Congressional Democrats are centrists who might be inclined to join a Republican-leaning vote on issues like sanctions against Iran. But if the party is in discord, it will be difficult to cross the aisle."Bipartisanship is like the O-Zone layer. If you find a hole, you have to repair it quickly or there will take a long time to repair the rift. If you lose the Dems (Democrats), you're suddenly left making it a partisan issue."He says that the defense relationship between the two countries though is much stronger than either leader to dismantle even if they wanted to. The two countries will continue to consult each other and the US will continue to sell Israel weaponry (and advanced weaponry at that), but the Obama Administration could continue to relax defending Israel on the diplomatic front.When asked what could improve things, he suggests that the Prime Minister might benefit “if he has Labor in the government. That would definitely help. If the government’s backing of two states is serious, then the Prime Minister’s overall foreign policy will be taken seriously.”But he doesn’t discount the real possibility that the Prime Minister won’t be dependent on that sort of scenario. When asked if there would be any thinking in either government that this latest spat should motivate a change in the relationship, he was pessimistic.“We’re beyond the point where the two governments can improve things between them on their own. Without common interest, it’s hard to see how things will improve.”Yet, he was quick to point to good chance a number of common interests could push off pressure on the Prime Minister.“If the Iran deal falls through or ISIS seriously threatens Jordan, the equation changes. Yitzhak Shamir and George H W Bush had a terrible relationship, but Shamir’s coordination with Bush during the Gulf War improved things for a while. Mahmoud Abbas could also balance the equation. If he continues with his ICC move, he could equally frustrate the White House.”The issues of Iran and ISIS, which seemed to have caught the United States in a bind on how to handle both rivals, have also pushed the Arab governments of the region to take issue with the Obama Administration on similar issues as the Israeli Prime Minister.“They don’t see him being assertive enough. If we compare the relationship Netanyahu has with Obama and the relationship other Middle Eastern governments have with his administration, we realize theirs are equally strained, but less public.”Assuming that the US and Iran do strike an undesirable deal, he wondered what Israel’s policy going forward would be. What might be critical is just how much time Iran would need to make a bomb based on the conditions of the final deal. If it is long enough, Israel’s defense establishment might consider it “livable.” But he noted there is a major difference between being a year from the bomb and only six months. Israel will likely become the deal’s fiercest critic, but if Israel presents itself as holding Iran to it, it could change perceptions of Israel’s arguments.You can be sure Israel will be monitoring things on the ground very closely. If they see a hint of Iranian cheating (on the deal), they would immediately raise a flag.”
ISRAEL SATAN COMES AGAINST
1 CHRONICLES 21:1
1 And Satan stood up against Israel, and provoked David to number Israel.
ISAIAH 41:11
11 Behold, all they that were incensed against thee (ISRAEL) shall be ashamed and confounded: they shall be as nothing;(DESTROYED) and they that strive with thee shall perish.(ISRAEL HATERS WILL BE TOTALLY DESTROYED)
ISRAELS TROUBLE
JEREMIAH 30:7
7 Alas! for that day is great, so that none is like it: it is even the time of Jacob’s trouble;(ISRAEL) but he shall be saved out of it.
DANIEL 12:1,4
1 And at that time shall Michael(ISRAELS WAR ANGEL) stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people:(ISRAEL) and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation(May 14,48) even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.
4 But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro,(WORLD TRAVEL,IMMIGRATION) and knowledge shall be increased.(COMPUTERS,CHIP IMPLANTS ETC)
ISAIAH 41:11
11 Behold, all they that were incensed against thee (ISRAEL) shall be ashamed and confounded: they shall be as nothing;(DESTROYED) and they that strive with thee shall perish.(ISRAEL HATERS WILL BE TOTALLY DESTROYED)
Report: Obama Threatened to Shoot Down IAF Iran Strike-Kuwaiti paper claims unnamed Israeli minister with good ties with the US administration 'revealed the attack plan to John Kerry.'By Mark Langfan-First Publish: 3/1/2015, 4:18 PM-ISRAELNATIONALNEWS
The Bethlehem-based news agency Ma’an has cited a Kuwaiti newspaper report Saturday, that US President Barack Obama thwarted an Israeli military attack against Iran's nuclear facilities in 2014 by threatening to shoot down Israeli jets before they could reach their targets in Iran.Following Obama's threat, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu was reportedly forced to abort the planned Iran attack.According to Al-Jarida, the Netanyahu government took the decision to strike Iran some time in 2014 soon after Israel had discovered the United States and Iran had been involved in secret talks over Iran’s nuclear program and were about to sign an agreement in that regard behind Israel's back.The report claimed that an unnamed Israeli minister who has good ties with the US administration revealed the attack plan to Secretary of State John Kerry, and that Obama then threatened to shoot down the Israeli jets before they could reach their targets in Iran.Al-Jarida quoted "well-placed" sources as saying that Netanyahu, along with Minister of Defense Moshe Yaalon, and then-Foreign Minister Avigdor Liberman, had decided to carry out airstrikes against Iran's nuclear program after consultations with top security commanders.According to the report, “Netanyahu and his commanders agreed after four nights of deliberations to task the Israeli army's chief of staff, Benny Gantz, to prepare a qualitative operation against Iran's nuclear program. In addition, Netanyahu and his ministers decided to do whatever they could do to thwart a possible agreement between Iran and the White House because such an agreement is, allegedly, a threat to Israel's security.”The sources added that Gantz and his commanders prepared the requested plan and that Israeli fighter jets trained for several weeks in order to make sure the plans would work successfully. Israeli fighter jets reportedly even carried out experimental flights in Iran's airspace after they managed to break through radars.
Brzezinski's idea
Former US diplomat Zbigniew Brzezinski, who enthusiastically campaigned for Obama in 2008, called on him to shoot down Israeli planes if they attack Iran. “They have to fly over our airspace in Iraq. Are we just going to sit there and watch?” said the former national security advisor to former President Jimmy Carter in an interview with the Daily Beast. “We have to be serious about denying them that right,” he said. “If they fly over, you go up and confront them. They have the choice of turning back or not. No one wishes for this but it could be a 'Liberty' in reverse.’"Israel mistakenly attacked the American Liberty ship during the Six-Day War in 1967.Brzezinski was a top candidate to become an official advisor to President Obama, but he was downgraded after Republican and pro-Israel Democratic charges during the campaign that Brzezinski’s anti-Israel attitude would damage Obama at the polls.
Netanyahu so wrong in confronting Obama, so right on Iran-Op-ed: With the US-Israel train wreck unavoidable on Tuesday, the challenge now is to pick up the pieces and refocus on thwarting Tehran-By David Horovitz March 1, 2015, 5:52 pm-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL
Arriving in Washington for the AIPAC conference ahead of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s address to Congress on Tuesday is akin to looking down on a looming train crash and being powerless to stop it. The conflicting forces are converging upon each other insistently, inevitably. The efforts to prevent the collision have failed. All that’s left now is to watch the disaster unfold, and then try to recover.The words of doom and gloom you hear from some of the people most closely involved in nurturing the American-Israel partnership are simply unprecedented. How bad is Netanyahu’s speech for US-Israel ties? I asked one such activist. Well, it’s only decades of painstakingly constructed bipartisan relations smashed to smithereens, he replied bitterly.The prime minister has created the dismal situation whereby even his speech to AIPAC, a day prior to Tuesday’s address to Congress, becomes somewhat problematic. Not only are America’s legislators being asked to choose between their president and the Israeli prime minister, as the veteran administration official Dennis Ross observed at the weekend. But AIPAC’s 16,000-strong, overwhelmingly Jewish audience, in mightily applauding Netanyahu, will be seen by some critics as endorsing a stance against the White House — even though many of those 16,000 have no desire to be torn in this way.Netanyahu’s handling of this face-off has been staggeringly inept, another activist volunteered, and it follows a pattern of his alienating of world leaders — including but not limited to Nicolas Sarkozy and Francois Hollande and Joe Biden — and of exacerbating problems for Jewish communities — notably those in Europe that he has been urging to immigrate to Israel en masse.‘Forcing the ayatollahs to abandon the bomb was not unrealistic, is not unrealistic, if it is clear to them that their pursuit of nuclear arms would endanger the very survival of their regime. That stark choice has not been brought home to them. That is the heart of the negotiators’ failure’ There’s a good deal of truth in these critiques. There’s a great deal of truth, too, in the assertions from critics at home that this trip, this poking of a finger in the eye of President Barack Obama, is a calculated electoral gambit, designed to bolster support for the ostensibly unflinching Netanyahu among right-wing voters back home, to prevent them from defecting to rival parties and denying him victory on March 17. There’s no doubting the political machinations that saw the Prime Minister’s Office release a short clip of Netanyahu “writing his speech” for broadcast on the main Friday evening Channel 2 news, or the rather cynical decision to have the prime minister filmed at the Western Wall ahead of this trip — co-opting Judaism’s holiest place of worship to his campaign.Along with the concern and the cynicism, however, there is one other fairly important aspect of the prime minister’s trip to DC that should be borne in mind: The US-led international community has failed Israel, and failed itself, in its handling of Iran’s drive to nuclear weapons. It is on the point of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. And Netanyahu has been trying desperately to warn against this misguided course of action.Anonymous US administration officials gave a briefing on Friday at which they reportedly sniped that Netanyahu, for all his criticisms, had failed to suggest alternative terms for a deal with Iran. Indeed, many news reports of the Obama-Netanyahu dispute have flatly asserted that the prime minister opposes any and every diplomatic accord with Tehran.In truth, however, Netanyahu has incessantly stressed that a good deal — a deal, that is, that denies Iran the capacity to break out to the bomb — is infinitely preferable to the resort to military action. He has campaigned relentlessly for a deal that dismantles Iran military nuclear infrastructure, highlighting that energy-rich Iran has no need whatsoever for its claimed “peaceful” nuclear program, that it has repeatedly misled the world about the program, and that it can be guaranteed to continue lying and manipulating and deceiving all the way to the bomb if it is left with the opportunity to do so.
Netanyahu was at the forefront of the effort behind the highly effective sanctions regime which forced Iran to the negotiating table, and his increasingly distraught recent rhetoric is the consequence of his horrified realization that the P5+1 negotiators, having had Iran “on the ropes,” as he put it in his UN address in 2013, was allowing the Islamist regime to evade the necessary diplomatic knockout.Netanyahu’s “alternative” deal is one in which Iran is required to acknowledge that it was seeking nuclear weapons, and to halt and dismantle all the processes that could give it the bomb. Ongoing concerted enforcement of the sanctions regime could yield that result, he was and remains convinced, but the US-led negotiators have failed to pursue that goal with sufficient resolution — at terrible potential cost for Israel, other threatened states in the region, and the rest of the free world.The US-led counterargument is that Netanyahu is unrealistic; the deal he envisages could never have been attained; Iran would not have conceded; the international coalition against Iran would have collapsed.And there’s no doubting that Netanyahu — lecturing Obama in public at a White House meeting here, unwilling to freeze settlements there, alienating European leaders, unresponsive to Arab peace overtures — has often undermined his own self-described central mission of thwarting Iran.But forcing the ayatollahs to abandon the bomb was not unrealistic, is not unrealistic, if it is clear to them that their pursuit of nuclear arms would endanger the very survival of their regime. That stark choice was not, has not been, brought home to them. That is the heart of the negotiators’ failure.Quite the reverse. While the Obama administration will be boycotting Netanyahu here this week, Secretary of State John Kerry will be earnestly negotiating with the polished, avuncular Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif. Israel’s most important ally is hoping to see the ouster of the prime minister who is such an irritant on Iran, even as it moves toward an accord that would ensure the survival of a rapacious, murderous, terrorist-funding regime in Tehran that has its heart set on the destruction of Israel.Iran is laughing, the United States is torn, and Israel watches with trepidation. The challenge, the imperative, after this week’s now unavoidable train wreck, is to pick up the pieces — to heal a rift with the US leadership that Israel simply cannot afford, and to refocus joint efforts on thwarting Iran’s drive to the bomb. It is not too late. It very soon will be.
