JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.GET SAVED NOW- CALL ON JESUS TODAY.THE ONLY SAVIOR OF THE WHOLE EARTH - NO OTHER. 1 COR 15:23-JESUS THE FIRST FRUITS-CHRISTIANS RAPTURED TO JESUS-FIRST FRUITS OF THE SPIRIT-23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.ROMANS 8:23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.(THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE)
AZT KILLER-THE BEGGING OF THE DEATH KILL SHOT AND PILLS.
DISEASES-ANIMAL TO HUMAN ( 500 million Dead )
REVELATION 6:7-8
7 And when he had opened the fourth seal, I heard the voice of the fourth beast say, Come and see.
8
And I looked, and behold a pale horse:(CHLORES GREEN) and his name that
sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given
unto them over the fourth part of the earth,(2 billion) of (8 billion)
to kill with sword,(WEAPONS)(500 million) and with hunger,(FAMINE)(500
million) and with death,(INCURABLE DISEASES)(500 million) and with the
beasts of the earth.(ANIMAL TO HUMAN DISEASE)(500 million).
DRUG PUSHERS AND ADDICTS
1 PET 5:8
8
Be sober,(NOT DRUGED UP OR ALCOHOLICED) be vigilant; because your
adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he
may devour:
REVELATION 18:23
23 And the light of a candle
shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and
of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants
were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries (DRUGS) were all
nations deceived.
REVELATION 9:21 (RAGE OF THE LAST DAYS AGE SATAN WORSHIP AND DRUG SELLING AND JUNKIES)(THEY REFUSE TO REPENT OF THESE SINS)
21
Neither repented they of their murders,(KILLING) nor of their sorceries
(DRUG ADDICTS AND DRUG PUSHERS), nor of their fornication,(SEX OUTSIDE
MARRIAGE OR PROSTITUTION FOR MONEY) nor of their thefts.(STEALING)
WHO MAY 2024 SOVERIGNTY STEALING CONTROL
https://apps.who.int/gb/inb/pdf_files/inb4/A_INB4_3-en.pdf
https://apps.who.int/gb/inb/pdf_files/inb5/A_INB5_6-en.pdf
Tedros
Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director general of WHO, at a press conference in
Geneva.World Health Organization-Global pandemic agreement at risk of
falling apart, WHO warns-The accord, aimed at preventing another health
catastrophe, is losing momentum due to ‘lies and conspiracy theories’AFP
in Geneva-Mon 22 Jan 2024 20.02 GMT
Plans for a global pandemic
preparedness agreement risk falling apart amid wrangling and
disinformation, according to the chief of the World Health Organization,
who has warned that future generations “may not forgive us”.Shaken by
the Covid-19 pandemic, the WHO’s 194 member states decided more than two
years ago to start negotiating an international accord aimed at
ensuring countries are better equipped to deal with the next health
catastrophe, or to prevent it altogether.The plan was to seal the
agreement at the 2024 World Health Assembly, the WHO’s decision-making
body, which convenes on 27 May.However, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the
WHO’s director-general, said the momentum had been slowed down by
entrenched positions and “a torrent of fake news, lies, and conspiracy
theories”.He warned that if nobody was prepared to seize the initiative
or give ground, the whole project risked going nowhere.Tedros told the
WHO’s executive board in Geneva on Monday: “Time is very short. And
there are several outstanding issues that remain to be resolved.”Failure
to strike an agreement would be “a missed opportunity for which future
generations may not forgive us”, he said.Tedros said all countries
needed the capacity to detect and share pathogens presenting a risk, and
timely access to tests, treatments and vaccines.He called for a “strong
agreement that will help to protect our children and grandchildren from
future pandemics”.Tedros said claims that the accord would cede
sovereignty to the WHO or give it the power to impose lockdowns and
vaccine mandates were “completely false”.“We cannot allow this historic
agreement, this milestone in global health, to be sabotaged.”WHO member
states decided in December 2021 to create a new international instrument
on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response, aimed at ensuring
the flaws that turned Covid-19 into a global crisis could never happen
again.The WHO emergencies director, Michael Ryan, reminded countries how
the pandemic “ripped apart our social, economic and political systems
and became a multi-trillion dollar problem”.In the midst of major
geopolitical conflicts, “this is one thing the world agrees on”, he
said.Roland Driece, who is co-chairing the negotiations, said the
project had condensed a seven-year process into two years.He said the
accord should be ambitious, innovative and with clear commitments.On the
disagreements, he said European countries wanted more money invested in
pandemic prevention, while Africa wanted the knowledge and financing to
make that work, plus proper access to pandemic “countermeasures” such
as vaccines and treatments.He said there were two sessions of two weeks
left to do an “extreme” amount of work.Parallel negotiations are also
going on to reform the international health regulations (IHR), which
many countries felt had been found badly wanting.Under these, Tedros
declared Covid-19 a public health emergency of international concern on
30 January 2020 – the highest level of alert available under the
regulations.boy in front of a mural about covid-But it was not until
March 2020 when he described the worsening situation as a pandemic – a
word that does not exist in the IHR vocabulary – that the world jolted
into action, by which time the virus was already widespread.Tedros
declared an end to the international emergency in May 2023.Ashley
Bloomfield, the chief executive of New Zealand’s health ministry during
the pandemic, is co-chairing the IHR negotiations.Like Tedros, he
criticised a “coordinated and sophisticated campaign” of misinformation
and disinformation attempting to undermine the process.He said there
were 300 proposed amendments to plough through during the talks.Well,
2023 didn’t exactly go to plan, did it?Here in the UK, the prime
minister, Rishi Sunak, had promised us a government of stability and
competence – not forgetting professionalism, integrity and
accountability – after the rollercoaster ride of Boris Johnson and Liz
Truss. Remember Liz? These days she seems like a long forgotten comedy
act. Instead, Sunak took us even further through the looking-glass into
the Conservative psychodrama. Elsewhere, the picture has been no better.
In the US, Donald Trump is now many people’s favourite to become
president again. In Ukraine, the war has dragged on with no end in
sight. The danger of the rest of the world getting battle fatigue and
losing interest all too apparent. Then there is the war in the Middle
East and not forgetting the climate crisis …But a new year brings new
hope. There are elections in many countries, including the UK and the
US. We have to believe in change. That something better is possible. The
Guardian will continue to cover events from all over the world and our
reporting now feels especially important. But running a news gathering
organisation doesn’t come cheap. So this year, I am asking you – if you
can afford it – to give money. Well, not to me personally – though you
can if you like – but to the Guardian. The average monthly support in
Canada is around CA$4, however much you give, all that matters is you’re
choosing to support open, independent journalism.With your help, we can
make our journalism free to everyone. You won’t ever find any of our
news reports or comment pieces tucked away behind a paywall. We couldn’t
do this without you. Unlike our politicians, when we say we are in this
together we mean it.Happy new year! John Crace-Guardian columnist
WHO
‘Pandemic Treaty’ Draft Reaffirms Nations’ Sovereignty to Dictate
Health Policy-By Catalina Jaramillo-Posted on March 2, 2023-SciCheck
Digest-Members of the World Health Organization are in the process of
developing a new agreement to prevent, prepare for and respond to
pandemics. A preliminary draft presented in February reaffirms nations’
sovereign right to make their own health policies during global
pandemics, contrary to false claims online.
An intergovernmental
negotiating body formed by member states of the World Health
Organization is gathering this week to continue the discussions on a new
pandemic-related agreement.WHO members acknowledged the need for what
the organization called “a new international treaty for pandemic
preparedness and response” in 2021, although whether the agreement will
formally be a treaty, which requires approval by the Senate, remains to
be seen. In a preliminary draft presented by the WHO on Feb. 1, members
recognized the “catastrophic failure of the international community in
showing solidarity and equity in response to the coronavirus disease
(COVID-19) pandemic.” The 32-page draft, also known as the “Zero Draft,”
proposes mechanisms to prevent and prepare for future pandemics, while
ensuring a better coordinated response and equal access to vaccines,
treatments, and diagnostics. The draft, which is a preliminary version
to start negotiations, explicitly reaffirms each nation’s sovereign
right “in addressing public health matters” and will be discussed for
over a year. A first draft is expected by June.“This is a
once-in-a-generation chance to fix some of the big weaknesses that we
saw during COVID-19,” Suerie Moon, co-director of the Global Health
Centre at the Geneva Graduate Institute in Switzerland, told Nature. It
could “make a tremendous difference for the next pandemic,” she added.
As we explained in 2022, the WHO has no authority to dictate U.S. health
policy or to interfere in any nation’s sovereignty. Neither the accord
nor amendments proposed to the legally binding agreement that defines
countries rights and obligations during health emergencies, known as the
International Health Regulations, would give the WHO control over how
the U.S. governs domestic health policies.Yet, once again, conservatives
are falsely claiming the agreement will do exactly that, while also
giving the wrong impression that it is about to be ratified. A widely
shared article published in the Epoch Times, a conservative media outlet
owned by a Chinese religious group, falsely claims the Biden
administration “is preparing to sign up” the U.S. to an accord that
“would give the Geneva-based United Nations health agency the authority
to dictate America’s policies during a pandemic.”The Gateway Pundit,
another conservative news site, takes the Epoch Times’s article further
in a post titled: “END OF AMERICAN SOVEREIGNTY: Biden Regime Negotiates
‘Legally Binding’ Deal To Give Chinese-Backed World Health Organization
Full Authority Over US Pandemic Policies – No Senate Approval
Needed.”The false allegations are also spreading in social media.
According to an incorrect Instagram post, “194 countries, all of the
member states of the U.N., would give up their sovereignty to the World
Health Organization over healthcare,” which is what former Republican
congresswoman Michele Bachmann said during a conservative Christian show
that aired on Feb. 20. And a viral video posted on YouTube falsely
claims: “BREAKING: US To Sign Over Sovereignty To W.H.O.”Lawrence O.
Gostin, a global health law professor at Georgetown University, told us
all of these claims are “utterly untrue and unfounded.”Gostin, who is on
the IHR review committee and is involved in the drafting of the
agreement, told us the WHO can provide guidance, give recommendations
and technical advice to member nations. But countries, he said, retain
“all of their sovereign right to make their own domestic health
policies, ranging from treatment to mass mandates and lockdowns and
everything in between.” In addition, the agreement is far from
ratification. The intergovernmental negotiating body is currently
meeting from Feb. 27 to March 3 to discuss the Zero Draft for the first
time. Experts have said it is highly likely the draft will go through
numerous modifications before reaching its final version. The goal is to
present a final draft to the World Health Assembly in May 2024.The
third meeting of the intergovernmental negotiating body at the World
Health Organization headquarters in Geneva on Dec. 5, 2022. Photo by
Christopher Black/WHO.Gostin told us in an interview that there is no
indication right now that the U.S. would even sign it. And he added that
it would probably need to be approved by the Senate. A spokesperson for
the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services confirmed the claims
spreading online are baseless. “It is false to claim that the World
Health Organization has now, or will have by virtue of these activities,
any authority to direct U.S. health policy or national health emergency
response actions,” HHS said in a statement, adding that “actions at the
national level will remain reserved to sovereign states, including the
United States.”Although the legal nature of the accord has not been
decided yet, the Zero Draft stipulates that it “should be legally
binding and contain both legally binding as well as non-legally binding
elements.” But again, that doesn’t mean member states won’t be able to
govern themselves.The draft, which has 38 articles and eight chapters,
starts by “[r]eaffirming the principle of sovereignty of States Parties
in addressing public health matters, notably pandemic prevention,
preparedness, response and health systems recovery,” (emphasis is in the
draft text). Sovereignty is also defined as one of its guiding
principles and rights.“States have, in accordance with the Charter of
the United Nations and the principles of international law, the
sovereign right to determine and manage their approach to public health,
notably pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of
health systems, pursuant to their own policies and legislation, provided
that activities within their jurisdiction or control do not cause
damage to their peoples and other countries. Sovereignty also covers the
rights of States over their biological resources,” reads Article 4 of
the Zero Draft. The text, as presented now, establishes what members
“should,” “shall,” or are “encouraged” to do in the case of a health
emergency. That is the norm for any international treaty, Gostin told
us. The mandates, he said, have to do with international obligations,
such as reporting of outbreaks, but not with domestic policies. And
there are no enforcement mechanisms that would allow the WHO to keep
member nations accountable — which is why critics have said the rules
lack teeth. “The precursor to this draft, the conceptual zero draft,
provides important ideas, including about equity, intellectual property
rights, and benefit sharing. However, it contains little on holding
countries accountable for the obligations they sign up to, suggesting
instead that the governing body of the accord should agree to
accountability measures after the accord is implemented,” health policy
analysts wrote in a letter published in the Lancet. Emphasis on Equity,
Cooperation-One of the main focuses of the Zero Draft is a more
equitable distribution of pandemic-related products such as vaccines,
therapeutics and diagnostics.It proposes creating a WHO Global Pandemic
Supply Chain and Logistics Network in response of a need for a more
“adequate, equitable, transparent, robust, agile, effective and diverse
global supply chain and logistics network.”The network would, for
example, determine the demand and build a reliable supply of
pandemic-related products, as well as develop ways to ensure an
equitable distribution. Among other things, the draft encourages nations
to promote and incentivize transfer of technology and know-how for
production of these products to “capable manufacturers” in developing
countries. During a pandemic, measures include supporting temporary
waivers of intellectual property rights to accelerate or scale up the
production of products, such as vaccines. And to encourage holders of
patents, especially manufacturers with public funding, to waive payments
of royalties. The preliminary draft also states that members “shall
establish” a global compensation mechanism for injuries resulting from
vaccines. In addition, the Zero Draft proposes creating a WHO Pathogen
Access and Benefit-Sharing System, a “multilateral, fair, equitable and
timely system” for sharing of pathogens and genomic sequences in a
“rapid, systematic and timely manner.” The benefits of this access
should be shared, according to the draft. One of the options of doing
that would be to give the WHO “real-time access” to 20% of the
production of pandemic-related products so that it can distribute it to
poorer countries — 10% of them as a donation and the other 10% at
affordable prices.Some of the other chapters propose measures for
strengthening and sustaining health systems, particularly in developing
countries, and to promote coordination, collaboration and cooperation.
Article 17, for example, stipulates that member nations should
strengthen pandemic and public health literacy and “tackle false,
misleading, misinformation or disinformation.” All of these measures
will be discussed during the fourth meeting of the intergovernmental
negotiating body. At the opening session on Feb. 27, Dr. Tedros Adhanom
Ghebreyesus, the WHO director-general, said that although there are
divisions on some issues, negotiations should focus on addressing the
gaps highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic. “This pandemic accord should
have all the lessons that we have learned from this pandemic. Because
the key indicator should be that we should not repeat the same mistake
again,” he said in his opening remarks, adding that to repeat them would
“be unforgivable.”Editor’s note: SciCheck’s articles providing accurate
health information and correcting health misinformation are made
possible by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The
foundation has no control over FactCheck.org’s editorial decisions, and
the views expressed in our articles do not necessarily reflect the views
of the foundation.Sources-“Global leaders unite in urgent call for
international pandemic treaty.” WHO. Press release. 30 Mar 2021.World
Health Assembly agrees to launch process to develop historic global
accord on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.” WHO. Press
release. 1 dec 2021. Rigby, Jennifer, and Gabrielle Tétrault-Farber.
“Draft WHO pandemic deal pushes for equity to avoid COVID ‘failure’
repeat.” Reuters. 2 Feb 2023. “Zero draft of the WHO CA+ for the
consideration of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body at its fourth
meeting.” WHO. 1 Feb 2023.Lei Ravelo, Jenny. “Pandemic treaty zero draft
wins NGO approval, compliance will be key.” Devex. 2 Feb 2023.
Mallapaty, Smriti. “What the WHO’s new treaty could mean for the next
pandemic.” Nature. 7 Feb 2023.
Jaramillo, Catalina. “‘WHO Has No
Authority to Dictate U.S. Health Policy.’’ FactCheck.org. 25 May 2023.
International Health Regulations. WHO website. Accessed 28 Feb 2023.
Tolentino, Jia. “Stepping Into the Uncanny, Unsettling World of Shen
Yun.” The New Yorker. 19 Mar 2019. Gostin, Lawrence O. Phone interview
with FactCheck.org. 23 Feb 2023. Intergovernmental Negotiating Body. WHO
website. Accessed 1 Mar 2023. Hanbali, Layth, et al. “Independent
monitoring for the pandemic accord: a non-negotiable provision.” The
Lancet. 31 Jan 2023. Imparato, Sergio, and Sarosh Nagar. ‘The WHO’s new
pandemic treaty is good for the world — and the U.S.” Stat. 20 Jan 2023.
Friedman, Eric A., et al. “Pandemic Treaty: The Conceptual Zero Draft.”
O’Neill Insititue for National & Global Health. Georgetown Law. 5
Dec 2022.
ANTHONY FAUCCI MURDERS 250K GAYS WITH AZT
An Open
Letter to Dr. Anthony Fauci-"You are responsible for all government
funded AIDS treatment research. In the name of right, you make decisions
that cost the lives of others. I call the decisions you are making acts
of murder."Larry Kramer "An Open Letter to Dr. Anthony Fauci"San
Francisco Examiner, June 26, 1988
Anthony Fauci, you are a
murderer and should not be the guest of honor at any event that reflects
on the past decade of the AIDS crisis. Your refusal to hear the screams
of AIDS activists early in the crisis resulted in the deaths of
thousands of Queers. Your present inaction is causing today's increase
in HIV infection outside of the Queer community. We are outraged that
Project Inform, an organization that supposedly works on behalf of the
infected community, would insult us by bringing you to our city. You
can't hide the fact that you are nothing but a despicable Reagan-era
holdover and drug company mouthpiece. With 270,000 dead from AIDS and
millions more infected with HIV, you should not be honored at a dinner.
You should be put before a firing squad.Clinical trials: government
sanctioned mass murder of PWAs-Anthony Fauci, you are a murderer because
you oversee government sponsored clinical trials that test and retest
combinations of immunosuppressive, toxic therapies that kill people with
HIV. The majority of U.S. clinical trials involve worthless antivirals
like AZT combined with some other drug (generally another toxic
antiviral). What these tests have proven is that you are able to piss
away billions of dollars testing dangerous compounds that DO NOTHING to
improve the quality of life, to stop opportunistic infections or to
extend survival for people with HIV. AZT, 3TC, ddI, ddC, d4T and the
current crop of protease inhibitors are nothing but poison. Ten years of
the plague has shown us that trying to kill the virus kills people with
AIDS, and you, Dr. Fauci, know it.How long will it take you to start
focusing on the immune system, how to boost it and how to prevent the
opportunistic infections that are killing people with AIDS? Even you
admit that "the immune response against HIV is extremely powerful and is
clearly more effective than any of the therapeutic approaches currently
available in controlling virus replication." Still , you give your
blessing to clinical trials of highly profitable toxins that destroy
PWAs' already compromised immune systems.CD4s and viral load: a
marketing exec's wet dream-Anthony Fauci, you are a liar because you
have known for years that CD4 counts are a travesty of a surrogate
marker that, through drug company coercion, have been elevated to the
status of "a standard." Now that everyone else knows it too, you and
your corporate drug company cronies are urging researchers to foist
another useless marker, peripheral blood viral load counts, on our
frightened, desperate community. Peripheral blood viral load fluctuates
in blood circulation and offers virtually no indication of the health or
disease progression in HIV+ people. According to a recent article in
the April 1995 issue of Lancet concerning viral replication, "the
principle that virus suppression will produce a major clinical benefit
must remain an article of faith." Information like that isn't stopping
doctors of death like Marcus Conant from insisting that "patients should
be treated earlier with combination therapy, and we should be using
markers such as PCR and branched DNA to measure viral load as surrogate
markers in clinical trials."Your scheme isn't too difficult to figure
out; promote another invalid surrogate marker that has no relation to
health or life expectancy of PWAs; develop a test that costs $200-$300
to measure this invalid marker; encourage the creation of more deadly
drugs that effect this invalid marker; and then compare the pathetic
results you get from these deadly drugs to the more pathetic results you
got from AZT and other nukes. In the eyes of the
government
everybody wins. Companies that sell drugs and market tests get rich and
PWAs who sacrifice their bodies in your trials of death are eliminated
from the face of the earth.The fact that your clinical trials aren't
meant to save our lives is no secret. A December 1994 BETA article "A
Remarkable Combination: AZT plus 3TC"reports that the Phase II/III
studies of these drugs were "designed to evaluate the effect of the
combination on laboratory markers of HIV disease progression, such as
viral load and CD4 counts, not critical endpoints, such as opportunistic
infections and survival."AIDS activists from ACT UP San Francisco and
DNCB Now! have been screaming for over a year that HIV+ people need to
activate their cell mediated immunity and raise their CD8 counts. These
activists were invited to the NIH to present a forum and share their
knowledge and experience with researchers.Finally some researchers are
coming around and hearing our voices. Doctors like Susan Buchbinder who
in the August 1994 issue of AIDS stated that "elevated levels of CD8
cells in healthy long-term HIV+ individuals suggest that these cells
play an important role in delaying disease progression."Because of your
1995 Annual Review of Immunology article we know that you know this, Dr.
Fauci, but still you prattle on about those CD4s that tell us nothing
at all.Selling out: from "Murderer" to "Tony"One thing that 10 years of
the plague has taught us is how easily people and organizations can be
bought off. You are one of those people, Dr. Fauci.Project Inform is one
of those organizations. During this time of crisis you are complacent;
part of a government bureaucracy that values thriving pharmaceutical
company entrepreneurism over the health of people with HIV. You are a
pill-pushing pimp that cooperates with drug companies in forcing
dangerous concoctions down the throats of a desperate community that is
brainwashed into believing that taking a pill, any pill, will help them.
AIDS drugs are not sold to help people, they are sold to make a profit.
The situation is so out of control that drug companies now create and
sell drugs like Marinol, a synthetic derivative of the natural compound
marijuana.The conflict of interest, so apparent between you and the
pharmaceutical corporations, has now been embraced by those in the AIDS
community who claim that they are leaders. In their present state,
organizations like Project Inform, San Francisco AIDS Foundation, and
ACT UP Golden Gate are all so embroiled in conflict of interest that
they must be viewed as enemies by PWAs. Project Inform is still pushing
AZT. San Francisco AIDS Foundation's BETA reads like a promo piece for
Glaxo. And many of today's so-called AIDS activists are nothing more
than public relations representatives whose job it is to create a demand
for the latest overpriced cure du jour. In the meantime, grassroots
efforts like the AIDS Cure Act are assailed by these sellout AIDS
organizations that have no desire to ever see a cure.Ten years of hope?
F- that. Try a decade of death and greed. Go back to Washington you
bastard.Description:Letter to Anthony Fauci condemning the way he has
dealt with the AIDS epidemic and its sufferers.Creators / Group:Act Up
San Francisco-Date:1988-06-26
The Johns Hopkins Center for Health
Security hosted the Clade X pandemic tabletop exercise on May 15, 2018,
in Washington, DC. The purpose of the exercise was to illustrate
high-level strategic decisions and policies that the United States and
the world will need to pursue in order to prevent a pandemic or diminish
its consequences should prevention fail.
About Clade X-Clade X
was a day-long pandemic tabletop exercise that simulated a series of
National Security Council–convened meetings of 10 US government leaders,
played by individuals prominent in the fields of national security or
epidemic response.Drawing from actual events, Clade X identified
important policy issues and preparedness challenges that could be solved
with sufficient political will and attention. These issues were
designed in a narrative to engage and educate the participants and the
audience.Lessons learned were distilled and shared broadly following the
exercise.Purpose-Faced with a rapidly evolving biological threat
landscape, government leaders in the United States and abroad are eager
to identify long-term policy commitments that will strengthen
preparedness and mitigate risk. Clade X illustrated high-level strategic
decisions and policies needed to prevent a severe pandemic or diminish
its consequences should prevention fail.Similar to findings from the
Center's two previous exercises, Dark Winter and Atlantic Storm, key
takeaways from Clade X will educate senior leaders at the highest level
of the US government, as well as members of the global policy and
preparedness community and the general public. This is distinct from
many other forms of tabletop exercises that test protocols or technical
policies of a specific organization.In addition, exercises like Clade X
are a particularly effective way to help policymakers gain a fuller
understanding of the urgent challenges they could face in a dynamic,
real-world crisis.Clade X logo-When/where-Tuesday, May 15, 2018-9 a.m. -
5 p.m.Mandarin Oriental Hotel-Washington, DC-Audience-An
invitation-only audience of nearly 150 people attended the exercise, and
a livestream of the event on Facebook was available to
everyone.Exercise team Eric Toner, MD, is the exercise team
lead.Exercise team members are Tom Inglesby, MD; Anita Cicero, JD; Randy
Larsen, USAF (retired); Crystal Watson, DrPH, MPH; Gigi Kwik Gronvall,
PhD; Jennifer Nuzzo, DrPH, SM; Monica Schoch-Spana, PhD; Tara Kirk Sell,
PhD, MA; Amesh Adalja, MD; Caitlin Rivers, PhD, MPH; Christopher
Hurtado, MHS; Diane Meyer, RN, MPH; Sanjana Ravi, MPH; Matthew Shearer,
MPH; Michael Snyder, MALD; Matthew Watson; Richard E. Waldhorn, MD;
Jackie Fox; Andrea Lapp; Nick Alexopulos, MBA; and Julia Cizek.Clade X
is supported by funding from the Open Philanthropy Project
