Showing posts with label COVID WAS MADE IN A LAB BY MODERNA IN 2016. Show all posts
Showing posts with label COVID WAS MADE IN A LAB BY MODERNA IN 2016. Show all posts

Friday, August 26, 2022

MODERNA PATENED THE VACCINE IN 2016.AND BILL GATES DAD LEAD BABY MURDERING FOR YEARS AS THE HEAD OF PLANNDED PARENTHOOD.

JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.GET SAVED NOW- CALL ON JESUS TODAY.THE ONLY SAVIOR OF THE WHOLE EARTH - NO OTHER. 1 COR 15:23-JESUS THE FIRST FRUITS-CHRISTIANS RAPTURED TO JESUS-FIRST FRUITS OF THE SPIRIT-23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.ROMANS 8:23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.(THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE)

 MODERNA PATENED THE VACCINE IN 2016.AND BILL GATES DAD LEAD BABY MURDERING FOR YEARS AS THE HEAD OF PLANNDED PARENTHOOD.

DISEASES-ANIMAL TO HUMAN

REVELATION 6:7-8 (500 MILLION DEAD EACH FROM THE 4 JUDGEMENTS)(2 BILLION TOT DEAD HERE)
7 And when he had opened the fourth seal, I heard the voice of the fourth beast say, Come and see.
8 And I looked, and behold a pale horse:(CHLORES GREEN) and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth,(2 billion) of (8 billion) to kill with sword,(WEAPONS)(500 million) and with hunger,(FAMINE)(500 million) and with death,(INCURABLE DISEASES)(500 million) and with the beasts of the earth.(ANIMAL TO HUMAN DISEASE)(500 million).

THE COVID-19 TOTALS.
WORLD OVER ALL CASES-600,782,010 - DEAD 6,471,169 - AS OF WED AUG 21,2022-THESES ARE THE BLOOD TOTALS ON THE HEADS OF FAUCI-DRUG DEALERS MODERNA AND PFIZER. AND ALL THE LEADERS OF THE WORLD THAT SCAMMED THEIR CITIZENS TO TAKE THE POISON KILLER VACCINE SHOTS FOR THE CHILDREN SAKE AND THE EARTH OF COURSE.AS THE LIBBYDEMS PLAY ANY SIN GOES.
THE MONKEY POX SCAM TOTALS (ROUND 2 OF DEATH BY VACCINES)
WORLD OVER ALL CASES-2,103 - DEAD 01 - SCAM VACCINE SHOTS HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS FOR MONKEY POX - MOSTLY  GAY BOYS. NO MORE GAYS OR HOMOSEXUALS.THERE BACK IN THE CLOSET WITH THE WHOLE ALPHABET. ANOTHER LIBERAL MENTAL GENDER-THEIR MEN HAVING SODOMY SEX WITH MEN.THE NEW LIBERAL MADE UP SCAM. THE GAYS AND HOMOSEXUALS AND EVERY LETTER OF THE ALPHABET IS BACK IN THE CLOSET AGAIN.

LAB LEAK PROOF STILL GOOD OF COVID SCAM-NO ONE CAN PROOVE IT WASN'T MADE IN A LAB.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xy9BAbH2BA
THE COVID KILL SHOT CLOTS
https://www.banned.video/watch?id=62a7a9a671d5801bf19beb91

THE RATS ARE HIGH TAILING THE SHIP REAL QUICK. MASS MURDERER ANTHONY FAUCI IS RETIRING. WHIITE HOUSE WORKERS SAY THEY DECIEVED TRUMP ON PURPOSE TO DO LOCKDOWNS AND VACCINE SHOTS. THE WH WORKERS NEW THE VACCINES WOULD BE USELESS. BUT SCAMMED TRUMP INTO ALLOWING THEM DONE ANY WAY. MASKING AND 6 FEET AWAY WAS JUST MADE UP. IT WAS ALL A SCAM RIGHT FROM THE BEGINING TO CONTROL EVERYBODY. AND KILL OFF THE POPULATION OF EARTH. BY BILL (MASS MURDERER) GATES AND ANTHONG (MASS MURDERER) FAUCI. WHO WILL BE BE BURNING ALIVE IN THE LAKE OF FIRE FOREVER WITH THEIR NEVER DYING BODIES.GOD GET REVENGE ON MASS MURDERERS AND LIBERAL BABY MURDERERS TO.MODERNA AND GATES AND SNAKE OIL SALEMAN FAUCCI. HAD 3 YRS TO INVENT IN THE CHINESE LAB. THE VACCINE KILLER SHOT. THIS IS THE BIGGEST SCAM EARTH CITIZENS GOT ON THEM SINCE THE WORLD BEGAN.

Moderna sues Pfizer over patents behind COVID-19 vaccine-By TOM MURPHYtoday

COVID-19 vaccine maker Moderna is suing Pfizer and the German drugmaker BioNTech, accusing its main competitors of copying Moderna’s technology in order to make their own vaccine.Moderna said Friday that Pfizer and BioNTech’s vaccine Comirnaty infringes on patents Moderna filed several years ago protecting the technology behind its preventive shot, Spikevax. The company filed patent infringement lawsuits in both U.S. federal court and a German court.A Pfizer spokeswoman declined to comment, saying the company had not been served with a copy of the litigation.Moderna and Pfizer’s two-shot vaccines both use mRNA technology to help patients fight the coronavirus.The mRNA vaccines work by injecting a genetic code for the spike protein that coats the surface of the coronavirus. That code, the mRNA, is encased in a little ball of fat, and instructs the body’s cells to make some harmless spike copies that train the immune system to recognize the real virus.Moderna CEO Stephane Bancel said in a prepared statement that the vaccine developer pioneered that technology and invested billions of dollars in creating it.The company said it believes its rivals’ vaccine infringes on patents Moderna filed between 2010 and 2016.

Covid vaccination linked to new and recurrent cancer – the jabs cause severe damage to the immune system-Monday, August 22, 2022 by: Ethan Huff    

(Natural News) People who got “vaccinated” for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) while in remission for cancer are finding that their cancer has returned.Bonnie Eisenberg, a 73-year-old who has been eight years in remission for breast cancer, is one such person who thought she was done with her disease in 2014. Up until the time she got jabbed, Eisenberg’s cancer appeared to be gone – but no longer.Her tumor markers have increased, including levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), which is common to cancers of not only the breast but also the colon, rectum, prostate, ovary, lung, thyroid, and liver.Every month since 2014, Eisenberg has dutifully taken a monthly CEA test along with others to monitor her cancer status. Before she got injected, her test results were always in the normal range during this time, ranging anywhere from 0 to 4.0 ng/mL.Not long after she got “fully vaccinated” to “protect” against the Fauci Flu, Eisenberg’s levels shot up to 3.7 ng/mL, which is still technically in a “normal” range. Then, they shot up even more to 5.2 ng/mL. (Related: Covid jabs are also linked to baldness.)-Even though 5.2 ng/mL is outside the normal range, Eisenberg and her doctor dismissed the results, a decision that Eisenberg now regrets.“Maybe I should have been a little more on the doctor,” she is quoted as saying. “Since I was so good, we weren’t really that concerned about it.”Is it worth getting cancer to potentially avoid a few covid sniffles? Eisenberg had only received the two primary injections of covid up until this point, and would later receive a “booster” despite suffering adverse reactions to the first ones.This decision pushed Eisenberg over the edge, resulting in a CEA test result of 17.6 ng/mL.“When you’re getting a phone call that early in the morning, something’s wrong,” Eisenberg recalls about hearing the bad news. “He says to me: ‘Bonnie, we have to scan you.’ What’s the matter? [I asked]. My mark was up to 17.6 [ng/mL] – I was in trouble.”Eisenberg was immediately sent in for a CAT scan along with an MRI and PET scans. One of the PET scans revealed that her previously dormant breast cancer had “metastasized,” meaning it spread outside the breast to other tissues in her body.“When he hit me with this, even now … it’s just a very hard thing to accept,” Eisenberg says. “It’s just something that should have never taken place.”“[The cancer] went to all my bones … it didn’t go to any of my body organs, but it was over every bone you could think of. On the PET scan I lit up like a Christmas tree.”Fearing that she could die from the consequences of this – a metastasizing breast cancer is automatically considered to be stage 4 – Eisenberg has committed to never get vaccinated again. It could already be too late, though.The drug that Eisenberg takes as part of her targeted therapy costs roughly $14,000 per month, though she only pays a small copayment for it. She also has to receive a monthly injection of denosumab, which costs another $3,000 per shot, to prevent bone fractures, though this is also covered by her insurance.Since restarting these treatments, Eisenberg’s tumor count dropped to 4.7 ng/mL at the start of this year, and continued to drop even further to less than 1 ng/mL in June.“I have to be on [medication] for the rest of my life,” she laments. “I can’t stop it … he [the doctor] can lower the milligrams and stuff like that … but you always have to be watched. What I have is not going away.”

Tiny mineral particles are better vehicles for promising gene therapy-July 1, 2020 By Chris Barncard

University of Wisconsin–Madison researchers have developed a safer and more efficient way to deliver a promising new method for treating cancer and liver disorders and for vaccination — including a COVID-19 vaccine from Moderna Therapeutics that has advanced to clinical trials with humans.The technology relies on inserting into cells pieces of carefully designed messenger RNA (mRNA), a strip of genetic material that human cells typically transcribe from a person’s DNA in order to make useful proteins and go about their business. Problems delivering mRNA safely and intact without running afoul of the immune system have held back mRNA-based therapy, but UW–Madison researchers are making tiny balls of minerals that appear to do the trick in mice.“These microparticles have pores on their surface that are on the nanometer scale that allow them to pick up and carry molecules like proteins or messenger RNA,” says William Murphy, a UW–Madison professor of biomedical engineering and orthopedics. “They mimic something commonly seen in archaeology, when we find intact protein or DNA on a bone sample or an eggshell from thousands of years ago. The mineral components helped to stabilize those molecules for all that time.”Photo: Bill Murphy seated in a lab-William Murphy-Murphy and UW–Madison collaborators used the mineral-coated microparticles (MCMs) — which are 5 to 10 micrometers in diameter, about the size of a human cell — in a series of experiments to deliver mRNA to cells surrounding wounds in diabetic mice. Wounds healed faster in MCM-treated mice, and cells in related experiments showed much more efficient pickup of the mRNA molecules than other delivery methods.The researchers described their findings today in the journal Science Advances.In a healthy cell, DNA is transcribed into mRNA, and mRNA serves as the instructions the cell’s machinery uses to make proteins. A strip of mRNA created in a lab can be substituted into the process to tell a cell to make something new. If that something is a certain kind of antigen, a molecule that alerts the immune system to the presence of a potentially harmful virus, the mRNA has done the job of a vaccine.The UW–Madison researchers coded mRNA with instructions directing cell ribosomes to pump out a growth factor, a protein that prompts healing processes that are otherwise slow to unfold or nonexistent in the diabetic mice (and many severely diabetic people).mRNA is short-lived in the body, though, so to deliver enough to cells typically means administering large and frequent doses in which the mRNA strands are carried by containers made of molecules called cationic polymers.“Oftentimes the cationic component is toxic. The more mRNA you deliver, the more therapeutic effect you get, but the more likely it is that you’re going to see toxic effect, too. So, it’s a trade-off,” Murphy says. What we found is when we deliver from the MCMs, we don’t see that toxicity. And because MCM delivery protects the mRNA from degrading, you can get more mRNA where you want it while mitigating the toxic effects.”The new study also paired mRNA with an immune-system-inhibiting protein, to make sure the target cells didn’t pick the mRNA out as a foreign object and destroy or eject it.Successful mRNA delivery usually keeps a cell working on new instructions for about 24 hours, and the molecules they produce disperse throughout the body. That’s enough for vaccines and the antigens they produce. To keep lengthy processes like growing replacement tissue to heal skin or organs, the proteins or growth factors produced by the cells need to hang around for much longer.“What we’ve seen with the MCMs is, once the cells take up the mRNA and start making protein, that protein will bind right back within the MCM particle,” Murphy says. “Then it gets released over the course of weeks. We’re basically taking something that would normally last maybe hours or even a day, and we’re making it last for a long time.”And because the MCMs are large enough that they don’t enter the bloodstream and float away, they stay right where they are needed to keep releasing helpful therapy. In the mice, that therapeutic activity kept going for more than 20 days.“They are made of minerals similar to tooth enamel and bone, but designed to be reabsorbed by the body when they’re not useful anymore,” says Murphy, whose work is supported by the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation and a donation from UW–Madison alums Michael and Mary Sue Shannon.“We can control their lifespan by adjusting the way they’re made, so they dissolve harmlessly when we want.”The technology behind the microparticles was patented with the help of the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation and is licensed to Dianomi Therapeutics, a company Murphy co-founded.The researchers are now working on growing bone and cartilage and repairing spinal cord injuries with mRNA delivered by MCMs.This research was supported by grants from the Environmental Protection Agency (S3.TAR grant 83573701), the National Institutes of Health (R01AR059916, R21EB019558, NIH 5 T32 GM008349) and the National Science Foundation (DMR 1105591, DGE-1256259).

EXCLUSIVE: Natural News releases post-vaccine clot ICP-MS elemental analysis results, comparing clots to human blood … findings reveal these clots are NOT “blood” clots-Wednesday, August 17, 2022 by: Mike Adams    

This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author-(Natural News) We are now releasing ICP-MS lab test results that compare the elemental composition of human blood to the elemental composition of a clot sample taken from the body of a person who received a covid vaccination and then subsequently died. This clot was provided by embalmer Richard Hirschman, and these clots are being widely reported in the bodies of people who have “died suddenly” in the weeks or months after receiving one or more covid vaccinations.According to rigorous analysis based on excess death data — summarized nicely by Steve Kirsh at Substack — there are currently around 10,000 people dying each day from covid vaccines. Anywhere from 5 to 12 million fatalities have likely occurred worldwide so far, and with these self-assembling clots continuing to gain size and mass inside the bodies of those who have received the mRNA experimental medicine injections, it is certain that many people who have not yet died from the vaccines will experience death in the coming months and years.Kirsch has roughly estimated that 1 person is currently dead for every 1,000 doses of covid vaccines that are administered. This number will almost certainly increase with time, as the clots that are causing so much death appear to be continuing to “grow” (self-assemble) inside the blood vessels and arteries of vaccine victims. Thus, the final toll of covid vaccines will only be experienced over a period of several years and could be orders of magnitude higher, potentially 1 in 100 or even 1 in 10, although we will have to watch excess deaths carefully over the next several years to know where this post-vaccine death phenomenon levels out.-Brighteon.TV-So far, over 12 billion covid vaccine doses have been administered worldwide. Over 600 million doses have been administered in the United States, and Kirsch estimates that 600,000 Americans have likely already been killed by covid vaccines in the USA alone. (That’s about 12 times higher than the total casualties of US soldiers in the Vietnam War, for comparison.)-Pursuing the mystery of the post-vaccine clots-Dr. Jane Ruby has been one of the researchers at the forefront of attempting to determine the composition of these clots as well as their mechanism of action in causing fatalities in victims. Dr. Ruby connected us with Hirschman and helped arrange for the clot samples which we have tested via ICP-MS in our ISO-accredited, 17025 approved laboratory which specializes in food and water analysis.In full disclosure, our laboratory is accredited, audited, inspected and validated for ICP-MS testing in food and water samples, as well as other areas such as cannabinoid quantitation analysis in hemp extract samples. However, the accreditation scope of our lab does not specifically encompass human biological samples, as we do not offer such testing to the public. Nevertheless, we routinely test dog food and cat food samples which are, of course, composed of animal flesh and ground blood vessels, meat tissue, cartilage and other animal-derived biological structures, and we are using the exact same sample preparation, digestion, analysis and reporting methods for post-vaccine clot samples. We also routinely test beef, poultry, fish and other meat samples. Thus, we are highly confident in the accuracy of these results. Furthermore, we did not see any failures during the sample prep process. The entire clot was dissolved in nitric acid, meaning its elements went into solution and were able to be analyzed via ICP-MS.These ICP-MS tests were conducted on June 23 of this year. We have delayed public release of the results in order to allow time to share these numbers with colleagues and to invite feedback from others. These PDFs have also been shared privately with Dr. Jane Ruby and others. No one with expertise in this field has indicated any apparent problems or concerns about this analysis. If anything, the ICP-MS analysis is rather straightforward: Samples are “digested” into nitric acid, this acid is nebulized into a liquid stream which goes through a plasma torch, gets ionized and then directed through a quadrupole assembly that sorts the elements by their mass-to-charge ratios. Each individual element is scanned and counted on a PMT (Photo Multiplier Tube) which translates individual elements into electrical current that can be accurately counted. These results are mapped against external standards which are NIST traceable to provide very accurate calibration curves, which means the quantitation data are extremely reliable.We used 0.4528 grams of the clot as the sample mass in this case:For a primer on ICP-MS and why it is so accurate, see this NIH article.ICP-MS analysis results reveal that these clots are not made of blood – they are not “blood clots”Although we intend to conduct more tests on clots and blood samples, the data we see so far make it clear that these clots are not “blood clots.” They are not simply made of congealed blood.How do we know this? Because the elemental ratios and densities are vastly different. Consider the following comparison chart, based on our ICP-MS results (see full results below), and notice the stark differences between the elemental concentrations in blood vs. clot among nutritive “marker” elements such as iron and magnesium:Element-Blood Results-Clot Results-Mg (magnesium) 35 ppm-1.7 ppm-K (potassium)-1893 ppm-12.5 ppm-Fe (iron)-462 ppm-20.6 ppm-Zn (zinc)-7.9 ppm-2.4 ppm-Cl (chlorine) 930,000 ppm-290,000 ppm-P (phosphorous)-1130 ppm-4900 ppm-As you can see, the post-vaccine clot sample only contains 4.4% of the iron that would be seen in human blood. This alone is confirmation that this clots is not a “blood clot.” In addition, note the near-total lack of potassium (K) in the clot sample. The clot contains less than 0.6% of the potassium as human blood. It’s a similar story with magnesium, too.Several electrically conductive elements were higher in the clot-In addition to the nutritive elements shown above, we noticed a peculiar pattern among electrically conductive elements such as sodium (Na), aluminum (Al) and tin (Sn). For the following table, please note that the tin and sodium results come from a separate “semiquant” report which is less accurate than the “fullquant” analysis used for all the other elements shown here. In essence, the semiquant numbers are accurate in terms of relative concentrations from one sample to the next, but they are not compared to calibrated external samples, so the actual (absolute) concentration reported does not have the confidence interval of the fullquant results:Element Blood Results     Clot Results-Na (sodium) -1050 ppm*1500 ppm* Sn (tin)-163 ppb*-942 ppb*Al (aluminum)-1.3 ppm-1.6 ppm-* = SemiQuant results, not FullQuant-With sodium being nearly 50% higher in the clot, and tin showing an increase of 588%, we can only conclude that the self-assembling clot is, in effect, “harvesting” or concentrating certain elements from circulating blood as clot assembly is taking place. It is noteworthy that many of these elements are conductive. Aluminum, for example, is the most common alternative to copper for use in electrical wiring. Sodium is an alkali metal that is highly conductive, and tin is used as the primary component in solder alloys used to manufacture or repair circuit boards.You can see the numbers on elemental conductivity at this electrical conductivity reference table from Angstrom Sciences.One conclusion is inescapable: The clot is almost entirely lacking key marker elements that would be present in human blood (such as iron and potassium) yet shows significantly higher concentrations of elements that are used in electronics and circuitry.We invite the reader to draw your own conclusion of the explanation behind that, merely noting that the patents of Dr. Charles Lieber may be of special interest.This analysis, notably, does not answer any question of whether these clots are “alive” or dead (like hair and nails). My own professional opinion is that these clots are not living structures. They appear to be self-assembling dead biostructures, from what we can see so far. But that’s just an initial assessment and may change with additional observations or findings. Prions, for example, are self-assembling but non-living biostructures too. They are essentially mis-folded proteins that spread throughout the brain (or other regions), causing morphological alterations that nullify both the normal structure and function of neurological cells. Something does not have to be alive in order to be self-assembling. Even viruses, as described by traditional virology, are dead structures which are nevertheless self-assembling and can “grow” in size and mass in terms of their aggregate population.The following microscopy picture, taken at our lab at around 1500 x magnification, shows what appears to be a repeating structure on a wire-looking protrusion from one of these clots. In case you were wondering, is not a human hair. It is connected to the clot:For those not familiar with the units being reported here: ppb = parts per billion-ppm = parts per million-1,000 ppb = 1 ppm (because the metric system)-The units used by the instrument are mass over volume (m/v) and the “mass” is technically mass-to-charge ratio (m/z).Here’s a screen shot of a section from the PDF report of the ICP-MS results for live human blood:You can also download the full PDF document for the blood analysis here.And here’s the screen shot of the results from the clot analysis, showing ICP-MS analysis for the post-vaccine clot:Share these results and keep asking questions… more analysis yet to come-Feel free to share these results, incorporate them into your own videos or podcasts, and offer your own explanations for what might explain this apparent anomaly. Please give credit to NaturalNews.com as the source, as we conducted this exclusive analysis in order to help resolve the mystery of these clots that seem to be killing a large number of people.We welcome any feedback on these results, including corrections if any errors are found.We also encourage other labs to replicate these tests for yourself and publicly publish your findings as we have done here.More analysis results are coming shortly, including additional microscopy images.One year later: How the Biden admin, big tech, and Pfizer fooled Americans into taking “FDA approved” COVID vaccines that never actually existed-About the author: Mike Adams (aka the “Health Ranger“) is a best selling author (#1 best selling science book on Amazon.com called “Food Forensics“), an environmental scientist, a patent holder for a cesium radioactive isotope elimination invention, a multiple award winner for outstanding journalism, a science news publisher and influential commentator on topics ranging from science and medicine to culture and politics. Follow his videos, podcasts, websites and science projects at the links below.Mike Adams serves as the founding editor of NaturalNews.com and the lab science director of an internationally accredited (ISO 17025) analytical laboratory known as CWC Labs. There, he was awarded a Certificate of Excellence for achieving extremely high accuracy in the analysis of toxic elements in unknown water samples using ICP-MS instrumentation. Adams is also highly proficient in running liquid chromatography, ion chromatography and mass spectrometry time-of-flight analytical instrumentation. He has also achieved numerous laboratory breakthroughs in the programming of automated liquid handling robots for sample preparation and external standards prep.The U.S. patent office has awarded Mike Adams patent NO. US 9526751 B2 for the invention of “Cesium Eliminator,” a lifesaving invention that removes up to 95% of radioactive cesium from the human digestive tract. Adams has pledged to donate full patent licensing rights to any state or national government that needs to manufacture the product to save human lives in the aftermath of a nuclear accident, disaster, act of war or act of terrorism. He has also stockpiled 10,000 kg of raw material to manufacture Cesium Eliminator in a Texas warehouse, and plans to donate the finished product to help save lives in Texas when the next nuclear event occurs. No independent scientist in the world has done more research on the removal of radioactive elements from the human digestive tract.Adams is a person of color whose ancestors include Africans and American Indians. He is of Native American heritage, which he credits as inspiring his “Health Ranger” passion for protecting life and nature against the destruction caused by chemicals, heavy metals and other forms of pollution.Adams is the author of the world’s first book that published ICP-MS heavy metals analysis results for foods, dietary supplements, pet food, spices and fast food. The book is entitled Food Forensics and is published by BenBella Books.In his laboratory research, Adams has made numerous food safety breakthroughs such as revealing rice protein products imported from Asia to be contaminated with toxic heavy metals like lead, cadmium and tungsten. Adams was the first food science researcher to document high levels of tungsten in superfoods. He also discovered over 11 ppm lead in imported mangosteen powder, and led an industry-wide voluntary agreement to limit heavy metals in rice protein products.In addition to his lab work, Adams is also the (non-paid) executive director of the non-profit Consumer Wellness Center (CWC), an organization that redirects 100% of its donations receipts to grant programs that teach children and women how to grow their own food or vastly improve their nutrition. Through the non-profit CWC, Adams also launched Nutrition Rescue, a program that donates essential vitamins to people in need. Click here to see some of the CWC success stories.With a background in science and software technology, Adams is the original founder of the email newsletter technology company known as Arial Software. Using his technical experience combined with his love for natural health, Adams developed and deployed the content management system currently driving NaturalNews.com. He also engineered the high-level statistical algorithms that power SCIENCE.naturalnews.com, a massive research resource featuring over 10 million scientific studies.Adams is well known for his incredibly popular consumer activism video blowing the lid on fake blueberries used throughout the food supply. He has also exposed “strange fibers” found in Chicken McNuggets, fake academic credentials of so-called health “gurus,” dangerous “detox” products imported as battery acid and sold for oral consumption, fake acai berry scams, the California raw milk raids, the vaccine research fraud revealed by industry whistleblowers and many other topics.

John Robson: Ontario’s New Health Care Plan Is Nothing but More of the Same-August 24, 2022

Commentary-It seems finally to have dawned on Ontario’s political leadership that our crumbling health care system is crumbling. Brilliant. You learned a simple word and after 40 years of denying waiting lists existed while promising to fix them and failing miserably, recognized an obvious situation. You must have an IQ of 16.Unfair, you say? They have a plan? Bosh. There’s just five pious wishes for desirable outcomes like “providing the right care in the right place” and “reducing surgical waitlists” followed by arm-waving gooblahoy.Essentially the “plan” is to have socialism work this time. And the herd of independent minds is stampeding that way, again. For instance CTV’s “’I thought I might die at home’: Canada’s health-care system is crumbling, experts say” is one of six million hits I got by Googling “Canada health care crumbling.” And these experts must be very smart to diagnose acute crumbolism when the only symptom is a woman in excruciating pain being told her provincial virtual health line had a 9-hour wait to speak to a nurse, she called 911 and no ambulance came, and the ER wait was projected at 16 hours if she dragged herself there.She resorted to prayer. And while she’s in Nova Scotia, prayer might be Ontarians’ best plan too because their Premier Doug Ford is currently out east to confer with Nova Scotia’s premier about how to fix health care. How would he know? Why isn’t Ford in Europe talking to people whose systems offer more mundane options than a literal “Hail Mary”? Duh. Because those premiers will then gather with two others to decide, again, that if only Ottawa gave them more cash from its magic money tree they could watch the system crumble in peace.The National Post ran a substantive piece that avoided the “crumbling” cliché. Alas it was marred by the presence of Michael Rachlis, one of the endlessly cited “experts who say” (a typical deep Radio Moscow-like thought: “Jeffrey Simpson’s somewhat pathetic column on user fees on Wednesday … is more than mischievous as he regurgitates others’ arguments for user fees.”). And by the headline “‘The lifeboat is full’: Canada’s health-care system is failing. There is no easy solution.”Of course there is. Quite a few, in fact, because every OECD country except the United States has a universal system better than ours. Just ask how they do it in Australia, France, Sweden, or Switzerland; move that way and we’d get better care and pay less.I don’t want anyone going “But Canadian health care is free.” It consumes over 40 percent of program spending in nearly every province and territory and costs Canadians around $5,000 per capita. It varies by income, but the Fraser Institute estimates that a middle-class family of four pays about $15,000 a year. Which is a pretty good bargain unless you actually need treatment and aren’t well-connected. Then it stinks.The CBC weighed in with a meme even more obnoxious than “experts say,” namely “Advocates, critics warn Ontario’s planned changes to long-term care are a violation of patient rights.” (Oddly, advocates and critics who get calls from mainstream journalists, like experts, hold views typical of mainstream journalists. Hence the CBC’s “Changes won’t solve core problem, critics say” verdict on Ford’s lack of plan.) But in this particular case they almost have a point, because the plan to force people into “Long-Term Care” homes they didn’t choose is ghastly.Just “temporarily,” of course. A word here meaning “only until you die and stop costing us money. P.S. Euthanasia is one service we do provide and promptly.” But the B.C. Court of Appeal just ruled that being Canadian you don’t have any “patient rights.” Except the glorious charter equality right patiently to suffer and die on a waiting list even when you could afford treatment from someone willing to help you, along with all the other schlubs who lack the wealth to go abroad or the “pull” to jump the queue. And the herd of independent minds was in favour of that ruling. Boo Cambie Clinic. Boo private care. Boo United States.So what is to be done? Nothing, of course. Ontario Health Minister Sylvia Jones claimed “all options are on the table” then had to run it back as experts and advocates swooped. But in fairness, it never occurred to her that the cool kids would think she meant we might, say, adopt private for-profit hospitals like that MAGA hotbed Sweden. Heck no. She meant all options to keep doing what we already are but this time magically it works. Thus her dreaded private care option was “Ontario is investing more to increase surgeries in paediatric hospitals and existing private clinics covered by OHIP.” Existing clinics. Covered by OHIP. Same old same old.Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.

The mass culling of the HUMAN HERD is now under way… here’s exactly how it’s being accomplished to achieve mass extermination-Monday, August 22, 2022 by: Mike Adams-This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author

(Natural News) Globalists see humanity as cattle (or sheeple) to be exploited for as long as needed, then culled like cattle herds when they are no longer useful. As globalist advisor Yuval Harari is now saying (paraphrased), the age of humans is coming to an end on planet Earth, and globalists have activated a multi-faceted plan to “cleanse” the planet of all human beings.If someone were to have some sick, twisted desire to kill off a herd of cattle, they could simply shut off the water and the food. Death would come in a matter of days or weeks at most. The same is happening right now to humans.The water supply is being cut off via geoengineering, causing global droughts and widespread crop failures. Entire cities like Los Angeles and Los Vegas are being threatened with a terminated water supply in the years ahead.The food supply is being decimated by cutting off fertilizer supplies and causing diesel fuel prices to go sky high while also attacking the supply chain that supplies agricultural equipment partsThe result? Both the water supplies and food supplies are being cut off. The human herd is being culled in some of the same ways a herd of cattle might be eliminated.Vaccines are designed to kill the gullible billions, and starvation will get the restVaccines represent another kill vector for global depopulation. Because vaccines are voluntary, they are intended to easily kill off the gullible masses who are so ill-informed that they actually believe Big Government and Big Pharma wants to save their lives. In reality, of course, the vaccines are biological weapons designed for infertility and depopulation. A huge percentage — we don’t yet know the final number — of those who have already taken the vaccines will die from self-assembling clots that we now know contain high concentrations of conductive elements such as Aluminum, Tin and Sodium.Those who resist the vaccines are harder to kill because they don’t line up and beg for death injections like the vaccine zealots do. Globalists intend to starve them to death with global food scarcity.Right now, we already know there isn’t enough food in the pipeline to feed the world throughout 2023. It simply isn’t getting planted and harvested in sufficient quantities to feed 8 billion people.Continued government attacks on the food supply — such as The Netherlands ordering ranchers to cull their herds — are designed to worsen food scarcity and accelerate mass starvation.Relatively few people are getting prepared with backup food supplies. When the shelves are empty, they will panic.Store plug: The Health Ranger Store will be releasing a few thousand “Ranger Buckets” during our Labor Day event starting Sep. 1. These are certified organic, laboratory-tested food supplies, containing NO MSG, no soy, no textured vegetable protein, no yeast extract, no refined carbohydrates or sugars, no artificial colors, etc. You can enter your email to be alerted when these are back in stock at this Ranger Buckets product page. (Click on the “Notify Me About Restock” button near the very bottom of the page to be alerted via email when these are back in stock.)-Globalists know a massive civilian uprising is just months away-In today’s Situation Update podcast (below), I explain that the globalist vaccine depopulation scheme has failed to kill off billions of people in the short amount of time that was intended. With food scarcity, energy scarcity and water scarcity now reaching critical levels, mass uprisings are mere months away. Western Europe, in particular, is going to see civilian revolts this coming winter as millions find themselves freezing and starving.The globalists know that worldwide food scarcity is already baked in. They also know the mass uprisings will commence as starvation and scarcity worsen. Thus, there is a countdown timeline in play that cannot be rescheduled.As a result, they are in a huge hurry to kill off billions of human beings before the uprisings get out of hand and snowball beyond the ability of these governments to contain.This is the real purpose behind the recruiting and arming of 87,000 new IRS agents who are being told they will need to use “deadly force” against the American people. In France, the Ministry of the Interior is hiring thousands of “green police” who will join armed brigades to supposedly prosecute “environmental crimes.” Yet the real purpose of all these armed government agencies in the USA, France, UK, Germany, Canada, Australia, etc. is to carry out mass executions of civilians as the government’s war on humanity kicks into high gear.The purpose of having a rogue FBI, armed IRS agents (armed with a massive new cache of ammunition and firearms), armed ATF agents, etc., is to have a private army that answers to the executive branch of government and that doesn’t fall under the jurisdiction of the US military, which cannot legally wage war on US soil. Federal agencies, however, can and will wage war against the American people. They are already doing it, with ATF agents now going door to door, demanding civilians surrender gun parts they legally purchased, for example. It’s going to be up to state governors to defend their residents against these federal tyrants, and that will spark regional warfare with states literally going to war with rogue federal agencies run by the illegitimate fake “resident in chief” Joe Biden.-Democrats, media and government are preparing to call for mass executions of all Christians and conservatives-Even right now, democrats, government and the media are claiming that all conservatives are terrorists, implying they all deserve to be exterminated. As Everett Piper writes in the Washington Times:This past Tuesday, Democrat adviser Kurt Bardella called all Republicans a “domestic terrorist cell.” MSNBC’s Tiffany Cross agreed and said there should be no distinction between Republicans and “right-wing extremists.” At the same time, Peter Wehner, a contributing writer for The Atlantic, likened the Republican Party to a “dagger pointed at the throat of American democracy.” All this while the FBI Director Christopher Wray added that any American flying the Gadsden — “Don’t Tread On Me” — flag is suspect of violent extremism.Does it concern you that a group of Democrats holding power is now defining all Republicans as being “right-wing extremists” and a “threat to American democracy?”Democrats, government and the media are gearing up to try to morally justify their “purge” of all conservatives, Christians, gun owners, pro-lifers and Trump supporters.Remember, these Democrats are the same people who mutilate the genitalia of their own children in the name of transgenderism. If they will mutilate their children, what do you think they will do to their perceived political enemies? …Especially if they can convince themselves that their enemies represent a “threat to democracy.”To the skeptics who say ignorant things like, “The IRS is going to use those guns and ammo on the American people,” we ask: Who else would they be planning to use it on? Of course it’s intended to use on Americans! Anyone who hasn’t yet come to realize that simple fact is probably not going to survive the next year in America.Other vectors of depopulation being accelerated-If you’re wondering what can kill billions of people faster than mass starvation and crop failures, think grid down scenarios. Any western government can sabotage their own domestic power grid and blame the Russians for “cyber attacks.” When the power grid is down, the financial system grinds to a halt. Chaos ensues. Mass looting and violence in the streets. Cops bug out. Civilians who are left behind get murdered, robbed and raped. This will happen in nearly every blue city in America.Within just a few months of a grid down scenario, up to 90% of the population is dead from violence, starvation, exposure or disease. Understand that heating and air conditioning will not function. Municipal water systems won’t work, meaning there will be no tap water. Cell towers will not function. If you need to charge an electronic device, you’ll need solar panels and a solar generator. If you want to enjoy communications, you’ll need a satellite phone or satellite text messaging device (like the Bivy stick from our sponsor SAT123.com). If you want to eat, you’ll need stored food. If you don’t want to die from dehydration, you’ll need a water filter and a water source that you can safely and frequently access. You’ll also need lots of containers for storing and transporting water, because you’ll need far more water than you think. (Figure 10 gallons per person per day as an absolute minimum.)-Understand that the globalists have only just begun to deploy their weapons against humanity. There’s much more they can unleash as needed, and if they don’t get the kill rate they’re wanting, they will just crank up the chaos until a sufficient number of billions are dead.Humanity is being culled like cattle. Those who don’t see it will be among the first to be exterminated by it. But those who prepare have a realistic chance of making it through the genocide and participating in the rebuilding of human civilization on the other side.

Saturday, February 26, 2022

BREAKING NEWS-CNN PROPAGANDISES BIGTIME OVER A AIRPORT LIGHT.COVID 19 WAS MADE BY MODERNA IN A LAB IN 2016 ALREADY

JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.GET SAVED NOW- CALL ON JESUS TODAY.THE ONLY SAVIOR OF THE WHOLE EARTH - NO OTHER. 1 COR 15:23-JESUS THE FIRST FRUITS-CHRISTIANS RAPTURED TO JESUS-FIRST FRUITS OF THE SPIRIT-23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.ROMANS 8:23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.(THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE)

 BREAKING NEWS-CNN PROPAGANDISES BIGTIME OVER A AIRPORT LIGHT.

CNN CLAIMES THERES BOMBS GOING OFF IN KVIV LEFT RIGHT AND CENTER. THEY HAD THEIR PROPAGANDA BULL SHITTERS SO CALLED REPORTERS. MILES AWAY FROM AN AIRPORT. WITH CLOUDS LIGHTING UP EVERY FEW SECONDS. AND THE PROPAGANDA BULLSHITTER REPORTER HAD AN ARMY HELMET ON WHILE REPORTING THE SCAM TO CRAP HEAD WOLFF BLITZER. AND THEN FROM THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE AIRPORT. CNN HAD THIS 2ND PROPAGANDIST CLARIISSA WARD SAYING OH BEHIND ME THE CLOUDS ARE LIGHTED UP FROM ALL THE BOMBS GOING OFF FROM RUSSIA. SHE WAS FARTHER AWAY. FROM THE AIRPORT THEN THAT ARMY BOY  BRAIN DEAD PUPPET ON THE OTHER SIDE. AND NOW HERES THE KICKER. THEM SO CALLED BOMBS GOING OFF IN KVIV-ARE NOTHING BUT THE LIGHT AT THE AIRPORT GOING AROUND EVERY FEW SECONDS. SEE HOW THESE BULL SHIT PEOPHILE NETWORK CNN TRYS TO MAKE YOU BELIEVE. RUSSIA IS SHOOTING BOMBS ON KVIV.  WHEN ALL IT IS-IS THE LIGHT FROM THE AIRPORT HITTING THE CLOUDS AND LIGHTING IT UP. COMPLETE PROPAGANDA BULL SHIT. AND DON'T BELIEVE A WORD OR PICTURE CNN DOES FROM UKLRAINE. ITS ALL PROPAGANDA LIES AND BULL CRAP. AND I HOPE RUSSIA READS THIS AND NUKES THE HOTEL WERE THE PROPAGANDA BULL SHITTERS CNN ARE STAYING IN KVIV.

BREAKING NEWS-CNN TONIGHT SUN FEB 27 IS DOING A HIT PIECE ATTACK AGAINST ALEX JONES.AND ALL HIS FOLLOWERS.

WELL LAST NIGHT I CAUGHT CNN FAKING RUSSIAN BOMBS ON UKRAINE. AND TONIGHT THE PROPAGANDA PEDOPHILE COMMUNIST-NAZI LIBERAL WHORE MEDIA CNN. WILL BE DOING A DOMESTIC TERRORIST HIT PIECE AGAINST ALEX JONES AND HIS LISTENERS AT 10PM TONIGHT. YOU JUST READ HOW CNN PEDOPHILE NETWORK FAKED THE BOMBS LAST NIGHT. WELL DON'T BELIEVE A THING THIS LEG SPREADER WHORE OF PROPAGANDA CNN SAYS OR DOES. IT IS JUST TO DIVIDE, TO PROMOTE RACIST-BIGOTED-CHRISTIANPHOBES HATE AGAINST EVERYBODY. WHILE SITTING AS THE QUEEN WHORE HITLARY CLINTON AND SODOMITE MUSLIM OBAMA AS THE OWNERS OF CNN. MIGHT AS WELL BE.

COVID 19 WAS MADE UP IN A LAB BY MODERNA IN 2016 ALREADY.
https://www.banned.video/watch?id=62195fa680e6a52c84a0a376

SMOKING GUN: Genetic sequence in COVID-19 spike protein was patented by Moderna three years earlier-02/25/2022 / By Mary Villareal

New evidence shows that the Wuhan coronavirus may have been tinkered with in a lab when scientists found genetic material owned by Moderna in the spike protein of the virus.The group of scientists detected a small snippet of code identical to the gene they patented three years before the pandemic even hit. They discovered the unique furin cleavage site of the virus, which makes it easier to infect people and separate it from other coronaviruses.Furin is a protease enzyme encoded in the FURIN gene. Some proteins are inactive when synthesized, but they may become active when sections are removed. This gene is responsible for proteolytic cleavage of HIV prior to viral assembly and is also thought to play a role in tumor progression.The structure of the virus has been one of the focal points of debate about its origin, as some scientists claimed that it could not have been acquired naturally. An international team of researchers suggested that the virus may have mutated to have a furin cleavage site during experiments on human cells in a lab.The team said there is a one-in-three trillion chance that Moderna’s sequence randomly appeared through natural evolution. There is also some debate about whether or not the match is as rare as the study claims, as other experts described it as a “quirky coincidence” rather than a “smoking gun.” (Related: If the spike protein facilitates entry of a gain-of-function coronavirus into cells, then why are we coerced to submit to spike protein-generating vaccines?) The SARS-CoV-2 virus, which causes COVID, has all the information it needs to spread in around 30,000 letters of the RNA (genetic code). The virus shares a sequence of 19 specific letters with a genetic section that is owned by Moderna, and 12 of the shared letters make up the structure of the virus’s furin cleavage site. The rest match with nucleotides in a nearby part of the genome sequence.-Moderna filed a patent similar to virus genetic material in 2016 - What makes this interesting, however, is that Moderna filed a patent in February 2016 as part of its cancer research. The patented sequence is part of a gene called MSH3, which is known to influence the repair of damaged cells in the body. The patent was approved in March the following year. (Related: Vaccine researcher admits ‘big mistake,’ says spike protein is dangerous ‘toxin.’) In a new study, researchers compared the COVID-19 makeup to millions of sequenced proteins on an online database, and of the 30,000 letters of genetic code that made the virus, it is the only one of its type to carry 12 unique letters that allow its spike protein to be activated by the common furin enzyme, which made it easier to spread between human cells.Analysis of the original COVID genome also found that the virus shares a sequence of 19 specific letters with a genetic section owned by Moderna.Dr. Balamurali Ambati of the University of Oregon and one of the authors of the paper said the matching code may have originally been introduced to the COVID genome through infected human cells expressing the MSH3 gene.Professor Lawrence Young, a virologist from the University of Warwick, admitted that while the finding was interesting, it is not significant enough to suggest lab manipulation.“We’re talking about a very, very, very small piece made up of 19 nucleotides. So it doesn’t mean very much to be frank, if you do these types of searches you can always find matches,” he said.However, a microbiologist at the University of Reading, Dr. Simone Clarke, questioned whether the find was as rare as the study claims. He said there can only be a certain number of genetic combinations within furin cleavage sites, and they do so like a lock and key in the cell. “The two only fit together in a limited number of combinations.”He also said that while it is an interesting coincidence, it is surely not entirely coincidental.

Chinese whistleblower warns the CCP has several virus bioweapons ready to be released at any time-02/25/2022 / By Arsenio Toledo

A Chinese virologist and whistleblower claims the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has engineered weaponized versions of several viruses that it is prepared to release at a moment’s notice to start the next global pandemic.This information was revealed during the Feb. 22 episode of “Brighteon Conversations” with Mike Adams and his guest Dr. Yan Li-Meng.Yan, a virologist from Hong Kong, fled to the United States in 2020 after she became a whistleblower and began accusing Beijing of actively withholding research critical to the understanding of the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19).According to Yan, the CCP’s bioweapons program is working on overdrive to release a new bioweapon that will cripple the world. While she has not been able to confirm it, stories have recently come out that the People’s Liberation Army, China’s armed forces, may have released a hemorrhagic fever virus during the recently concluded Beijing Winter Olympics. (Related: The next plandemic? China’s People’s Liberation Army launches hemorrhagic fever viral attack during Olympics, says source.) Yan was able to confirm through her team’s investigation that the CCP believed the Winter Olympics is the ideal event to release a bioweapon, as thousands of athletes from around the world converged in Beijing. According to Yan’s sources, the CCP was prepared to launch the bioweapon.However, they were unable to confirm if the CCP pushed through with its bioterror attack.Chinese bioweapons pose a great threat to the world-Even if the CCP did not release a bioweapon during the Winter Olympics, Yan warned that China is still “fully prepared” to launch an attack at any time.But there is still a lot of mystery surrounding these bioweapons, Yan pointed out. She is still not sure what specific pathogen the CCP will release. She mentioned the bioweapon will most likely cause hemorrhagic fever, but that only narrows it down slightly as the CCP has several types of engineered viruses that can cause hemorrhagic fever.“I cannot tell you what kind of pathogens they have already used and what haven’t … and I cannot tell you what exactly changed, gain-of-function or not, they have done in their labs,” said Yan.She then pointed out that the CCP has been experimenting with different kinds of viruses, including parvoviruses, hantaviruses, the measles virus and even the Ebola virus.Without treatment, Yan warned that the CCP’s engineered viruses could cause death rates of up to 90 percent.Fortunately, according to Yan, there is already a cure for most of these viruses. It is a drug known as daratumumab, which is sold by Johnson & Johnson under the brand name Darzalex. The CCP is trying to procure as much of this drug as possible because the communist party’s experiments on its people found that it is effective against the engineered viruses.In a parting statement, Yan said the only way the CCP’s aggression can be countered is for people to wake up and stand together against the threat it poses.She said: “We face the Chinese Communist Party and their worldwide allies. They are very rich, they are very powerful… So we must work together, and at this moment, I think the biggest power is when people wake up, when people understood the importance of their rights and their freedom. And what we can do is we need to stand up to protect our future and our kids future. That’s the most important thing.”

Fully vaccinated individuals are SHEDDING GRAPHENE and infecting the unvaccinated, causing serious health complications-02/25/2022 / By Arsenio Toledo

A physician has warned the public that the graphene in Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines is transforming within people’s bodies. Worse yet, the fully vaccinated are now starting to infect the unvaccinated with vaccine toxins through shedding.Dr. Philippe Van Welbergen, medical director of Biomedics Clinic in the United Kingdom, recently demonstrated that the graphene in the COVID-19 vaccines is organizing and growing into large fibers and structures, gaining magnetic properties and becoming more complex.In mid-2021, Van Welbergen first noticed a problem when he started receiving more and more patients who exhibited an unusual array of symptoms. He explained in an interview with a South African media outlet that his patients started complaining about chronic fatigue, dizziness, memory issues, paralysis and even late-onset of heavy menstruation for women in their 60s.Van Welbergen was concerned that it may have something to do with structural changes in their blood, and so he took blood samples from all of them.Upon examining the blood samples under a microscope, he found that their blood was clumping up and forming strange shapes not typically seen in healthy blood. The shape of individual red blood cells was also not round, but more “crumpled.”Van Welbergen also found that the nuclei of the cells were destroyed and many of them were starting to form large gold tubular structures.All of his patients were vaccinated with Moderna’s mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. They all reported feeling extreme fatigue, dizziness, tiredness, a general aura of “not feeling well” and mental confusion.Thick graphene fibers found in the blood of vaccinated individuals-Van Welbergen explained that the gold tube-like structures resemble the graphene oxide samples found by Spanish researchers. He described them as resembling “folded over toilet paper under paint.” (Related: Researcher sounds alarm after finding PARASITES, nanobots and graphene in COVID-19 vaccines.) During another interview with the same media outlet, Van Welbergen presented images of his latest blood slides and explained what happened to the blood of his vaccinated patients.In one image of a blood sample Van Welbergen shared, he pointed out that the vaccinated individual’s blood was coagulated, the red blood cells were badly misshapen and clumped together and the blood was filled with graphene fibers which dwarfed the red blood cells in size. He warned that graphene fibers these massive could block small blood vessels and cause serious health complications.Van Welbergen also warned that he was starting to notice a magnetic or electric polarity effect on different sides of the graphene fibers. This behavior was not present when he first started examining the blood of his vaccinated patients, but they were now popping up out of nowhere.“These things have changed,” he said. “Their reaction with surrounding blood cells has changed … and I don’t know what triggered it.”-The vaccinated are “shedding” and infecting the unvaccinated-Worse yet, during one interview Van Welbergen showed a blood sample from an unvaccinated three-year-old patient. He examined the blood and found thin shards of clear material that resemble smaller versions of the graphene fibers he found in the blood of his vaccinated patients.The three-year-old’s parents were both fully vaccinated. This led Van Welbergen to speculate that the unvaccinated are now being contaminated by fully vaccinated individuals who were “shedding” graphene.Van Welbergen also had another unvaccinated patient – an eight-year-old child – who came to him because of serious health concerns. The child’s right arm and upper right leg were paralyzed and the child was unable to properly move the affected limbs.When he examined the child’s blood, he found a large mass of graphene that was forcing the red blood cells around it to clump together and get squished. This large mass of graphene is most likely preventing the child from properly using the affected limbs.What this shows is that not only are the fully vaccinated in danger of experiencing severe health complications due to the material in the COVID-19 vaccines, but they are now clear threats to the health of unvaccinated individuals as well.

More Evidence Covid Originated in a Chinese Lab-23 Feb 2022

BUCK: There is more evidence covid was tinkered with in a lab now as scientists find virus contained a tiny chunk of DNA that matches a sequence patented by Moderna three years before the pandemic actually began. This is leading to fresh suspicion that this was a manipulated virus. So China may have been responsible, Clay, through its recklessness and perhaps even worse, and we had to find out exactly what happened here.Fresh lab leak fears as study finds genetic code in Covid’s spike protein linked to Moderna patent | Daily Mail Online https://t.co/uQTsnitu3s— lucy johnston (@thelucyjohnston) February 23, 2022-Unleashing a plague on the world that did take millions of lives and shut down billions of people’s day-to-day lives. But you’ll notice the media cannot summon the same kind of outrage or anger about China no matter what the storyline, whether we’re talking about Uyghurs in concentration camps or anything else. “Russia, Russia, Russia” as a media issue has long-lasting consequences.CLAY: Well, a big reason why — and we had a big discussion surrounding this — is there’s so much feeding at the Chinese trough when it comes to American Big Business. The interaction between Russia and the United States from an economic perspective is relatively small, whereas just think about use as an example Apple or Nike or the NBA and their relationships that exist right now in China, NBC with their acquiring of the Olympic Games when they virtually uttered no criticism whatsoever of anything surrounding China.There is such economic might, such economic power that exists surrounding China that they won’t even pick Asian bad guys now for movies out of Hollywood. You noticed James Bond movies, every villain remains Eastern European. The Russian bad guys were going all the way back to the sixties, the seventies, the eighties, the Cold War era. They won’t even make a bad guy Asian for fear that they might offend their bosses in China.And, Buck, this is where we talk about, we need rigorous investigations of Dr. Fauci because, in addition to this virus escaping from a Chinese lab, it may well have partially been funded by our own tax dollars, and we don’t know because it appears that Dr. Fauci and all of his cohorts have helped to cover up all of the early lineage of this story. That’s why we think that Fauci’s gonna retire sometime in the summer and try to ride off into the sunset and claim victory over covid rather than be held accountable in the Senate and in the House.Which is what he should be for this entire mess, not only the response to covid, but the fact that we may well have funded this through gain-of-function research helped to create covid. And, by the way, Buck, do you feel comfortable, the fact that Moderna, who we have try to mandate you get a Moderna or a Pfizer vaccine that, according to this story out of England, that there is a part of a Moderna DNA code or whatever you want to call it…? Again, I’m not an expert when it comes to how we craft unique viruses — but that that could be included in the genome of this covid virus? I mean, this is, I believe, such a monumentally huge story. And we have, I feel like, still only touched the very outskirts of this story for fear from so many big companies out there of what China will say if we really figure out what happened here.BUCK: The implications of the virus being engineered by what is a very often in communication and even tightly knit international health apparatus of sorts, state health apparatus of these different countries, is tremendous. You mentioned the funding of the Wuhan Institute of Virology lab, receiving some funding U.S. based sources or a third party intermediary and what that would mean. But also I think that there’s gonna be enormous pressure brought to bear all over the world, but particularly — and let’s focus in on America for a second here at home — to just move past all of this, to move on.CLAY: Pretend this didn’t happen.BUCK: Pretend like they didn’t put us through all this.CLAY: “It doesn’t matter how it got out. It happened. Let’s move on.”BUCK: And also what we did in response to it. I mean, the first country to lockdown was China, and somehow we looked at that and said, “You know what? Let’s mirror image the Chinese Communist Party’s authoritarianism here to protect people from an aerosolized virus.” That was the thinking of the supposed smartest health and medical minds in the world. This is a stunning failure, and people aren’t going to have faith going forward.And they shouldn’t have faith going forward in public health authorities not being deeply politicized. What a lot of folks found out was the same way that over time you’ve seen journalists are basically second-tier gender studies and social studies majors or socialism majors, maybe, from Northeastern colleges for the most part — and we’re talking about the major national news outlets — and so they’re incredibly left wing.The people that work at the top of the CDC and NIAID, the NIH, they’re also very Democrat aligned and left wing in their thinking. And what’s worse is that this ties into — and you can go back a hundred years, and there were certainly in earlier times in the federal bureaucracy in this country there was a sense that if you only put them in charge, right? The statist, authoritarian left has always wanted greater authority in the bureaucracy with the experts because how can you argue with “experts,” Clay? How can you argue with the people that are supposed to be making these scientists for everybody else? They’re the super smart ones. Look at this. They got the pandemic’s origins wrong, they got lockdown wrong, they got masks wrong, they certainly got components of the vaccine and how well it would work wrong. And all the while, they promised us that they were keeping us so safe.And there were all these benefits from it, and I think people that look at the data and really take a moment of reflection to realize, Clay, they just made it all worse, really. I mean, we should have just worked on therapeutics, protecting the elderly. The Great Barrington Declaration — which they buried online after it came out — was right and the people that slandered it were wrong.CLAY: They were 100% right on the Great Barrington Declaration. But, Buck, even leaving aside the Great Barrington Declaration, how much attention did you see given to the Johns Hopkins study that actually looked at specifically whether lockdowns had in any way been beneficial? Because early on you and I were some of the first people who said this, that every choice you make in a public policy setting has a balancing act. In other words, remember when there were so many people early in the covid situation where they said, “Well, if we can save just one life”? How many times did you hear or see people say, “Well, if we can save just one life,” and if you said something very honest and straightforward, which would have been like, “Well if we made the speed limits on cars 5 miles an hour, nobody would ever die in a car accident. You would have to be a moron to kill yourself driving 5 miles an hour.” I guess you could drive off a cliff but, by and large, in an accident setting it would be virtual impossible.We make balancing decisions all the time based on living life and analyzing risk and not putting everybody in bubble wrap all day. But, Buck, when you or I back in March or April say, “Hey, you know what? Let’s consider the economic impacts of this shutdown.” Nobody was even allowed to have that conversation.

Opinions-The Plandemic Is Imploding And The Rats Who Committed Crimes Against Humanity Are Panicking-by Ethan Huff | Natural News-February 25th 2022, 12:29 pm

A lot is happening these days with the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) plandemic, which is rapidly unraveling amid escalating civil unrest and continued revelations about the crimes against humanity that have been perpetrated on the world.The Freedom Convoy trucker convergence on Ottawa, for example, continues to grow, which prompted Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to invoke the Emergencies Act, giving him new dictatorial powers.Trudeau has already used these powers to terrorize the protesters by arresting some of them and even stripping them of their banking rights.The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has also been forced to admit that the Operation Warp Speed “vaccines” create negative efficacy, meaning they damage the immune system and render it less able to ward off disease.Figure 3 in this study by the CDC that was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) corroborates a study out of Denmark, both of which show that covid jabs make a person more prone to infection, not less.Pfizer whistleblower Brooke Jackson also revealed recently that the drug giant committed massive fraud with its covid jab clinical trials. This revelation dovetailed with an announcement by government authorities in Scotland that covid jab injury and death data will no longer be published because it shows undeniably that the injections are killing people.They can try to flee, but the plandemic rats will eventually pay for their crimes against humanityThe corporate-controlled media, in a desperate attempt to deter people from protesting against covid jab mandates, is now harassing Freedom Convoy protesters by doxing their identities in fake news articles.Since it is now obvious that the plandemic sham is falling apart as people wake up to the truth, the lying media has resorted to bullying people who engage in free speech against the government’s dictates.Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.), one of the leading congressional voices against the covid sham, has still not heard back from the Department of Defense (DoD) about a letter he sent to the agency about the massive spike in injuries and deaths being seen in the U.S. military due to its jab mandates.The Pentagon’s highly accurate and credible Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) clearly shows that heart problems, neurological damage and other conditions are skyrocketing among fully vaccinated servicemen, and yet the DoD refuses to acknowledge this, let alone provide any explanation for it.The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is also overflowing with jab injury cases, but you will not hear a peep about it from the government or from the media because it rips to shreds the Biden regime’s continued false claim that the injections are “safe and effective.”Excess deaths are also up at least 40 percent, according to the latest life insurance data. This revelation comes as Democrats are suddenly starting to backtrack on their beloved face mask mandates, and possibly soon the jab mandates as well.A mass awakening is happening, and the perpetrators behind this global hoax are starting to bail. Those fleeing are hoping to exit stage left unnoticed, but it will not be that easy for them once the culmination of their lies catches up with them.On the other hand, there are many who are now doubling down even as the ship sinks. History will be especially unkind to them, and rightfully so once they are forced to face the music for their crimes against humanity.“There’s a mind boggling number of guilty people; but fear not, there are people who know what you’ve done and the world community will get the justice it deserves,” is how one of Steve Kirsch’s followers so beautifully put it.

Original Investigation-January 21, 2022-Association Between 3 Doses of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine and Symptomatic Infection Caused by the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron and Delta Variants-Emma K. Accorsi, PhD1,2; Amadea Britton, MD1,2; Katherine E. Fleming-Dutra, MD1; et al Zachary R. Smith, MA1; Nong Shang, PhD1; Gordana Derado, PhD1; Joseph Miller, PhD1; Stephanie J. Schrag, DPhil1; Jennifer R. Verani, MD, MPH1
Author Affiliations Article Information-JAMA. 2022;327(7):639-651. doi:10.1001/jama.2022.0470

Question  What is the association between 3 doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine and symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection with the Omicron and Delta variants? Findings  In this test-negative case-control analysis that included 70 155 tests from symptomatic adults, the likelihood of vaccination with 3 mRNA vaccine doses (vs unvaccinated) was significantly lower among both Omicron (odds ratio, 0.33) and Delta (odds ratio, 0.065) cases than SARS-CoV-2–negative controls; a similar pattern was observed with 3 vaccine doses vs 2 doses (Omicron odds ratio, 0.34; Delta odds ratio, 0.16). Meaning  These findings suggest that vaccination with 3 doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, compared with being unvaccinated and with receipt of 2 doses, was associated with protection against both the Omicron and Delta variants, although higher odds ratios for the association with Omicron infection suggest less protection for Omicron than for Delta.Abstract-Importance  Assessing COVID-19 vaccine performance against the rapidly spreading SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant is critical to inform public health guidance.Objective  To estimate the association between receipt of 3 doses of Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 or Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccine and symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, stratified by variant (Omicron and Delta).Design, Setting, and Participants  A test-negative case-control analysis among adults 18 years or older with COVID-like illness tested December 10, 2021, through January 1, 2022, by a national pharmacy-based testing program (4666 COVID-19 testing sites across 49 US states).Exposures  Three doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (third dose ≥14 days before test and ≥6 months after second dose) vs unvaccinated and vs 2 doses 6 months or more before test (ie, eligible for a booster dose).Main Outcomes and Measures  Association between symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection (stratified by Omicron or Delta variants defined using S-gene target failure) and vaccination (3 doses vs unvaccinated and 3 doses vs 2 doses). Associations were measured with multivariable multinomial regression. Among cases, a secondary outcome was median cycle threshold values (inversely proportional to the amount of target nucleic acid present) for 3 viral genes, stratified by variant and vaccination status.Results  Overall, 23 391 cases (13 098 Omicron; 10 293 Delta) and 46 764 controls were included (mean age, 40.3 [SD, 15.6] years; 42 050 [60.1%] women). Prior receipt of 3 mRNA vaccine doses was reported for 18.6% (n = 2441) of Omicron cases, 6.6% (n = 679) of Delta cases, and 39.7% (n = 18 587) of controls; prior receipt of 2 mRNA vaccine doses was reported for 55.3% (n = 7245), 44.4% (n = 4570), and 41.6% (n = 19 456), respectively; and being unvaccinated was reported for 26.0% (n = 3412), 49.0% (n = 5044), and 18.6% (n = 8721), respectively. The adjusted odds ratio for 3 doses vs unvaccinated was 0.33 (95% CI, 0.31-0.35) for Omicron and 0.065 (95% CI, 0.059-0.071) for Delta; for 3 vaccine doses vs 2 doses the adjusted odds ratio was 0.34 (95% CI, 0.32-0.36) for Omicron and 0.16 (95% CI, 0.14-0.17) for Delta. Median cycle threshold values were significantly higher in cases with 3 doses vs 2 doses for both Omicron and Delta (Omicron N gene: 19.35 vs 18.52; Omicron ORF1ab gene: 19.25 vs 18.40; Delta N gene: 19.07 vs 17.52; Delta ORF1ab gene: 18.70 vs 17.28; Delta S gene: 23.62 vs 20.24).Conclusions and Relevance  Among individuals seeking testing for COVID-like illness in the US in December 2021, receipt of 3 doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (compared with unvaccinated and with receipt of 2 doses) was less likely among cases with symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection compared with test-negative controls. These findings suggest that receipt of 3 doses of mRNA vaccine, relative to being unvaccinated and to receipt of 2 doses, was associated with protection against both the Omicron and Delta variants, although the higher odds ratios for Omicron suggest less protection for Omicron than for Delta.

Introduction-On November 24, 2021, health authorities in South Africa reported the emergence of a new SARS-CoV-2 variant, B.1.1.529 (Omicron).1 Omicron has spread rapidly, and as of January 6, 2022, was identified in 149 countries across all 6 World Health Organization regions.2 Omicron was first detected in the US on December 1, 2021, and by January 1, 2022, was estimated to be responsible for 95% of sequenced new cases.3,4Sequencing of early Omicron strains documented more than 30 mutations in the spike protein, including in the receptor binding domain.5,6 These mutations, combined with observed exponential growth in case counts, even in settings with substantial rates of COVID-19 vaccination or previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, raised concerns about potential for increased transmissibility and immune escape.2,7-10 There is an urgent need to understand the protection provided by current vaccination regimens against Omicron, including any additional protection derived from booster doses.In this analysis, a subset of data from the national Increasing Community Access to Testing (ICATT) platform was used to estimate the association of receipt of 3 doses of a mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (vs unvaccinated and vs 2 doses) with symptomatic infection with the Omicron and Delta variants, using an internally validated genetic proxy for variant identification.Methods-Study Protocol Approval-The human subjects advisor for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases determined that this analysis met the requirements for public health surveillance as outlined in 45 CFR §46.102(l)(2). Because data were collected during routine operational procedures, this secondary data analysis did not require informed consent and was conducted consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy.Data Source-Data from the ICATT platform11—a Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) partnership facilitating no-cost, drive-through SARS-CoV-2 testing at pharmacies across all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico—were analyzed. Testing sites were selected by HHS to prioritize access in racially and ethnically diverse communities and areas with moderate-to-high social vulnerability. Data for this analysis were limited to tests occurring between December 10, 2021, and January 1, 2022, at testing sites that collected booster vaccination history and sent specimens to a single laboratory chain (Aegis Sciences Corp) for processing. The laboratory used the TaqPath COVID-19 Combo Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), which identifies SARS-CoV-2 infections by detecting 3 targets from the viral ORF1ab, S, and N gene regions. The laboratory reported overall test results and cycle threshold (Ct) values for each of these targets for SARS-CoV-2–positive specimens.Individuals registered online for testing at drive-through sites where nasal swabs were collected. During registration, individuals self-reported symptom status (asymptomatic or symptomatic with ≥1 COVID-like symptom), race, ethnicity, sex, age, state of residence, history of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, and underlying conditions. Fixed categories were used to capture data for symptoms, race, ethnicity, and underlying chronic conditions including the presence of an immunocompromising condition (defined in the questionnaire as “such as from immunocompromising medications, solid organ or blood stem cell transplant, HIV, or other immunocompromising conditions”). Race and ethnicity were collected as required data elements under HHS COVID-19 laboratory reporting requirements.12 The testing program geocoded testing sites to identify their census tract Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) score.13 Patients also self-reported COVID-19 vaccination status, including the number of doses (up to 4), product, and month and year of receipt for each dose. For doses received in the same month or the month prior to testing, an additional question was asked to specify whether the dose was received 14 days or more before testing. Vaccination reporting was not mandatory, and information was not verified. Data were reported to HHS with an estimated 3-day lag and were deidentified to remove any personally identifying information.Study Design-A retrospective test-negative case-control analysis was conducted on samples collected from December 10, 2021, to January 1, 2022, from adults 18 years or older with symptomatic COVID-like illness. The test-negative design is a commonly used observational method for evaluating the performance of vaccines in which participants are enrolled based on a clinical case definition, tested for the vaccine-preventable outcome of interest, and classified as cases or controls based on that testing; the odds of prior vaccination among cases and controls are compared as an estimate of the association between vaccination and the outcome.14,15 A strength of the test-negative design is that all participants seek care (or testing) for a common clinical case definition, which can help reduce bias resulting from confounding by differential care-seeking behavior.16,17-The unit of analysis for this study was tests; positive results were classified as cases, and negative results as controls. The short study period and restriction to symptomatic individuals limited the probability of individuals contributing more than 1 test.Because protection from mRNA COVID-19 vaccines is substantially lower in immunocompromised individuals18 and the recommended vaccine dosing regimen is different from that of immunocompetent individuals,19 tests from individuals reporting an immunocompromising condition were excluded. Tests from persons reporting a positive COVID-19 test result within the previous 90 days were excluded to reduce potential misclassification. Tests with unknown vaccination status or incomplete vaccination data (ie, missing vaccination dates or products), from individuals reporting prior receipt of 1 or 4 mRNA vaccine doses or of non-mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, or from persons with improbable ages (defined as >100 years) were also excluded.Additionally, among tests with positive results, Ct values were described by variant and by vaccination status (3 doses, 2 doses, and unvaccinated). Ct values reflect the number of cycles during polymerase chain reaction amplification needed to detect viral genetic material and are inversely proportional to the amount of target nucleic acid in the tested sample.20 Ct values were examined to better understand the relative amounts of genetic material present in positive samples by variant and vaccination status.Exposure-The exposure of interest was self-report of any 3 doses of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) or mRNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccine (including mixed-product regimens) vs unvaccinated and vs any 2 doses of BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccine. For individuals reporting 2 vaccine doses, tests were excluded if the second dose was received less than 6 months prior to test date to ensure eligibility for a booster dose. For those reporting 3 doses, tests were excluded if the interval between second and third doses was less than 6 months, as per recommendations during the analysis period for booster doses among immunocompetent individuals,19 or if the most recent dose was received less than 14 days before testing. Another exposure examined was any 2 doses of BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccine, with the second dose received 14 days or more before testing vs unvaccinated; assessment of this exposure did not limit to those eligible for a booster dose (ie, did not limit to those with 6 or more months elapsed between the second dose and date of testing).Outcomes-The primary outcome was symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection with the Omicron or Delta variant. For this analysis, an Omicron case was defined as presence of S-gene target failure (SGTF) in the test sample and a Delta case as absence of SGTF in the test sample. All samples that were determined by the processing laboratory to be SARS-CoV-2 positive had Ct values for at least 2 of the N, ORF1ab, and S genes. SARS-CoV-2–positive samples were considered to have SGTF if they had Ct values for the N and ORF1ab genes but not for the S gene; otherwise, samples were considered not to have SGTF.SGTF may serve as a proxy for the presence of the Omicron variant in samples tested with the TaqPath COVID-19 Combo Kit assay because of the presence of deletions in the S-gene region for Omicron that are not present in Delta2,21; the deletions lead to S-gene–negative results in Omicron lineages BA.1 and B.1.1.529 but not the majority of Delta samples. While levels of non-Delta circulating variants other than Omicron remain low, samples with SGTF may be presumed to be Omicron.22 At the time of this analysis 99.9% of sequenced samples in the US prior to the emergence of Omicron were Delta.4 To validate the use of SGTF as a proxy for Omicron in the ICATT data, the frequency of SGTF was examined in a randomly selected subset of tests with positive results that were sequenced during the same period as the analysis. The sequenced subset was drawn from the complete database of test results from the laboratory, including tests not eligible for the main analysis. Sequencing data were not available for most cases included in the main analysis, which is why SGTF was used as a proxy. The sensitivity of SGTF for detecting Omicron (B.1.1.529 or BA.1 lineage) was 83.4% and the specificity was 99.2% (eTable 1 in the Supplement).Secondary outcome measures included Ct values for the N and ORF1ab genes among Omicron and Delta cases and S gene among Delta cases.Statistical Analysis-The association between symptomatic infection with the Omicron or Delta variants and vaccination was estimated by comparing the odds of prior 3-dose vaccination vs unvaccinated and the odds of prior 3-dose vaccination vs 2-dose vaccination in cases vs controls using multivariable multinomial logistic regression. The odds ratio (OR) for 3 doses vs unvaccinated was used as an estimate of 3-dose vaccine effectiveness (effectiveness = [1 – OR] × 100%), with lower ORs suggesting more protection. The OR for 3 doses vs 2 doses was used as an estimate of relative vaccine effectiveness, reflecting additional protection from a booster dose relative to 2 doses. ORs were estimated for any combination of mRNA vaccine and separately for BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273.Models included the number of days between the start of the analysis period and test date (as a continuous variable), age group, sex, race, ethnicity, testing site HHS region, testing site census tract SVI (dichotomized as 0 to <0.5 and ≥0.5-1), and number of underlying chronic conditions (0, 1, or ≥2) as covariates to adjust for potential confounding bias. Unknown race and ethnicity were coded as categories of their respective variables instead of null values to retain these records in regression models. Data with missing values for other model covariates (specifically, sex and SVI) were coded as null values and therefore dropped from adjusted regression models.Two-sided 95% CIs were calculated for each reported OR, with 95% CIs that excluded 1 considered statistically significant. Two-sided P values for the association between vaccination and symptomatic infection with Omicron compared with Delta were corrected for false-discovery rate (FDR) using the Benjamini-Hochberg method (to account for type I error due to multiple comparisons), and results with Q values (ie, P values adjusted for the FDR) less than .001 were considered statistically significant.To aid in the interpretation of associations of 3 vaccine doses vs unvaccinated and vs 2 vaccine doses, a secondary analysis was performed examining the association between 2 doses vs unvaccinated by time since receipt of second dose. The association between infection and 2 mRNA vaccine doses vs unvaccinated was examined separately for each product-variant combination by logistic regression incorporating the same covariates as above as well as month (0-11) since second dose using a 2-knot spline at months 3.5 and 7.5.For comparison of Ct values among cases by variant and exposure status (3 doses vs unvaccinated, 3 doses vs 2 doses, and 2 doses vs unvaccinated), the 2-sided Mann-Whitney U test was used to identify significant differences in median Ct values. Correction for FDR was applied for each comparison of exposure status, and results with Q < .001 were considered statistically significant.Statistical analyses were performed in RStudio and R, version 4.0.3 (R Foundation). Multinomial logistic regression was performed using the nnet R package, version 7.3-16.-Results-A total of 70 155 tests from 4666 sites on samples collected between December 10 and January 1 across 49 states met inclusion criteria (Figure 1), including 23 391 cases (13 098 Omicron; 10 293 Delta) and 46 764 controls (Table 1) (mean age, 40.3 [SD, 15.6] years; 42 050 [60.1%] women). Included tests were most frequently performed on persons aged 25 to 34 years (30.4%), followed by those aged 35 to 44 years (19.3%), and on persons who reported being of White race (75.5%). More than one-third of tests (36.4%) were from people with reported underlying health conditions, with high blood pressure most common, followed by overweight. Compared with controls, cases were more frequently tests from persons aged 25 to 34 years (Omicron 35.1% and Delta 31.0% vs controls 28.9%), of Black/African American race (Omicron 24.4% and Delta 14.9% vs controls 11.9%), and of Hispanic/Latino ethnicity (Omicron 22.5% and Delta 17.7% vs controls 17.4%) (Table 1).For vaccination history, the most common combination of 2 doses was BNT162b2/BNT162b2 (63.4% of 2-dose regimens), followed by mRNA-1273/mRNA-1273 (36.4%); the most common 3-dose combination was BNT162b2/BNT162b2/BNT162b2 (57.5% of 3-dose regimens) (Table 1). Among individuals receiving 2 doses only, the median time between the second dose and test date was 8 months. Among those receiving 3 doses, the median time between the second dose and test date was 8 months, between the second and third dose was 7 months, and between the third dose and test date was 1 month. Prior receipt of 3 vaccine doses was reported for 18.6% (2441/13 098) of Omicron cases, 6.6% (679/10 293) of Delta cases, and 39.7% (18 587/46 764) of controls (Table 1).Comparison of 3 Doses vs Unvaccinated-Among Omicron cases and controls, the adjusted OR for prior receipt of 3 mRNA vaccine doses vs unvaccinated was 0.33 (95% CI, 0.31-0.35); among Delta cases and controls, the adjusted OR was 0.065 (95% CI, 0.059-0.071; Q < .001 for comparison of ORs for Omicron and Delta) (Table 2). When models were stratified by mRNA product, the adjusted ORs for Omicron were 0.35 (95% CI, 0.32-0.38) for 3 doses of BNT162b2 vs unvaccinated and 0.28 (95% CI, 0.26-0.31) for 3 doses of mRNA-1273 vs unvaccinated. For Delta, the adjusted ORs were 0.077 (95% CI, 0.070-0.086) for 3 doses of BNT162b2 vs unvaccinated and 0.045 (95% CI, 0.038-0.053) for 3 doses of mRNA-1273 vs unvaccinated. Q values for all comparisons (Omicron vs Delta) of product-specific ORs were less than .001 (Table 2). An adjusted OR less than 1 indicates that relatively fewer test-positive cases had prior receipt of 3 doses (vs unvaccinated), with values closer to 0 representing a stronger magnitude of association.Comparison of 3 Doses vs 2 Doses-Among Omicron cases and controls, the adjusted OR for prior receipt of 3 mRNA vaccine doses vs 2 doses was 0.34 (95% CI, 0.32-0.36); among Delta cases and controls, the adjusted OR was 0.16 (95% CI, 0.14-0.17; Q < .001) (Table 2). When models were stratified by mRNA product, the adjusted ORs for Omicron were 0.35 (95% CI, 0.32-0.37) for 3 doses of BNT162b2 vs 2 doses and 0.31 (95% CI, 0.28-0.34) for 3 doses of mRNA-1273 vs 2 doses. For Delta, the adjusted ORs were 0.17 (95% CI, 0.16-0.19) for 3 doses of BNT162b2 vs 2 doses and 0.13 (95% CI, 0.11-0.15) for 3 doses of mRNA-1273 vs 2 doses. Q values for all comparisons (Omicron vs Delta) of product-specific ORs were less than .001 (Table 2). An adjusted OR less than 1 indicates that relatively fewer test-positive cases had prior receipt of 3 doses (vs 2 doses), with values closer to 0 representing a stronger magnitude of association.Comparison of 2 Doses vs Unvaccinated by Time Since Vaccination-Among Omicron cases and controls, the adjusted OR for prior receipt of any 2 mRNA vaccine doses vs unvaccinated was lowest soon after the second dose and generally increased over time since vaccination (Figure 2). The upper bound of the 95% CI was consistently greater than 1 starting at 3 months after second dose for BNT162b2 and at 6 months after second dose for mRNA-1273. For Delta, the OR for any 2 doses vs unvaccinated was also lowest soon after receipt of second dose; however, the ORs remained less than 0.46 for BNT162b2 and less than 0.40 for mRNA-1273, with 95% CIs that did not include 1 (Figure 2).Comparison of Ct Values-Among Omicron cases, median Ct values were significantly higher in samples from persons reporting 3 mRNA vaccine doses vs unvaccinated for the ORF1ab gene (19.25 vs 18.58; Q < .001) but not for the N gene (19.35 vs 18.71; Q = .002) (eTable 2 in the Supplement). Among Delta cases, median Ct values of the N, ORF1ab, and S genes were significantly higher in samples from persons receiving 3 doses vs unvaccinated (N gene: 19.07 vs 18.28; ORF1ab gene: 18.70 vs 17.84; S gene: 23.62 vs 19.58; Q < .001 for all comparisons) (Figure 3; eTable 2 in the Supplement). In comparing median Ct values in samples from persons reporting 3 mRNA vaccine doses vs 2 doses, all were significantly higher (Omicron N gene, 19.35 vs 18.52; Omicron ORF1ab gene, 19.25 vs 18.40; Delta N gene, 19.07 vs 17.52; Delta ORF1ab gene, 18.70 vs 17.28; Delta S gene, 23.62 vs 20.24; Q < .001 for all comparisons) (Figure 3; eTable 2 in the Supplement).Discussion-In this analysis of SARS-CoV-2 tests performed at sites across the US during a 23-day period when incidence of Omicron was rapidly increasing, vaccination with a third dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine was significantly less common among individuals infected with either the Omicron or Delta variants compared with uninfected individuals. Because of the timing of booster recommendations in the US, most booster recipients had recent vaccination (median of 1 month since booster).The magnitude of the association between vaccination and infection depended on the referent group and variant. For 3 doses vs unvaccinated, the ORs corresponded to an estimated effectiveness (1 – OR) of 67.3% (95% CI, 65.0%-69.4%) for Omicron and 93.5% (95% CI, 92.9%-94.1%) for Delta. For 3 doses vs 2 doses, the ORs corresponded to an estimated relative effectiveness of 66.3% (95% CI, 64.3%-68.1%) for Omicron and 84.5% (95% CI, 83.1%-85.7%) for Delta. For Omicron, the similarity between ORs for 3 doses using the unvaccinated referent group and the 2-dose referent group is consistent with the attenuation of the OR for 2 doses vs unvaccinated with time since second dose, which reflected no significant association by 6 months after second dose for both products. For Delta, the association between infection and 2 doses vs unvaccinated also attenuated over time since second dose, which is consistent with previous reports23-26; however, the ORs were statistically significant even up to 11 months after the second dose.Although these findings provide evidence supporting that 3-dose schedules are protective and that booster doses are more protective than primary series alone, the significantly higher OR for Omicron suggests that booster doses are less protective against Omicron than against Delta. These results are consistent with in-vitro neutralization assays that suggested the potential for immune evasion with Omicron.27-30 They also highlight that, in the setting of Omicron, higher booster coverage rates may be needed to achieve the same public health benefit as during Delta predominance. Additionally, nonpharmaceutical interventions may provide an important adjunct to slow the spread of Omicron.Among both Omicron and Delta variant cases, Ct values were generally higher (reflecting less genetic material detected) among those with 3 vaccine doses compared with unvaccinated or to 2 doses; with 1 exception (N gene for Omicron, 3 doses vs unvaccinated), all comparisons were statistically significant. Ct values are not a direct measure of viral load or infectiousness and can vary for a range of reasons including timing of sample collection relative to infection onset, specimen transport times, and laboratory assays and conditions. However, they have previously been used as a crude indicator of transmission potential, with higher values representing decreased likelihood of a case being infectious.31-37 In this analysis, the Ct values were based on 2 targets from a single assay, performed at a single laboratory chain, increasing their comparability. The significantly higher Ct values found in individuals reporting receipt of 3 doses vs unvaccinated or 2 doses, for both the Omicron and Delta variants, may suggest decreased infectiousness in those receiving an mRNA booster dose. However, caution should be taken in interpreting these differences between groups as epidemiologically meaningful because all differences were less than 1 unit on the log scale.-Limitations-This study has several limitations. First, vaccination status and symptoms were based on patient self-reported data, potentially leading to misclassification. Second, because the testing data do not include identifiers, tests rather than persons were used as the unit of analysis, and individuals may have been included more than once. However, the analysis was restricted to symptomatic individuals to reduce inclusion of individuals serially testing for reasons other than symptomatic disease, and the short study period (23 days) reduces the probability of individuals contributing multiple test results.Third, individuals remaining unvaccinated or unboosted may differ from individuals with 3 doses in ways that cannot be adjusted for with the variables in this data set. Fourth, some factors that could potentially be associated with both vaccination and risk of infection and thus confound the observed associations (eg, masking and social distancing) were not measured. Fifth, US adults were recommended to receive booster doses at different dates depending on age, underlying conditions, and occupation; therefore, some subgroups may have had greater access to boosters before broader recommendations were made.Sixth, sequencing data were limited for tests included in this analysis so SGTF was used as a proxy for Omicron infection; however, sensitivity of 83.4% and specificity of 99.2% in internal validation suggest that samples classified as Omicron by SGTF were almost always Omicron. Although some Omicron samples may have been misclassified as Delta, this would not affect the association between Omicron and vaccination status and would bias the association of Delta and vaccination toward that of Omicron such that the reported differences between Omicron and Delta are conservative.Seventh, the analysis of the association between symptomatic infection and 3 vs 2 doses did not directly account for waning of the primary series, although all tests were performed at least 6 months after receipt of a primary series, at which point protection from 2 doses was quite reduced, particularly for the Omicron variant. Eighth, associations between infection and vaccination are not constant and will likely continue to change with time since last dose.-Conclusions-Among individuals seeking testing for COVID-like illness in the US in December 2021, receipt of 3 doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (compared with unvaccinated and with receipt of 2 doses) was less likely among cases with symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection compared with test-negative controls. These findings suggest that receipt of 3 doses of mRNA vaccine, relative to being unvaccinated and to receipt of 2 doses, was associated with protection against both the Omicron and Delta variants, although the higher odds ratios for Omicron suggest less protection for Omicron than for Delta.Corresponding Author: Emma K. Accorsi, PhD, COVID-19 Response, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd Mailstop H24-6, Atlanta, GA 30329 (vgi0@cdc.gov).Accepted for Publication: January 13, 2022.Published Online: January 21, 2022. doi:10.1001/jama.2022.0470Author Contributions: Drs Accorsi and Britton had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Drs Accorsi and Britton contributed equally as co–first authors; Drs Verani and Schrag contributed equally as co–senior authors.Concept and design: Accorsi, Britton, Fleming-Dutra, Shang, Miller, Schrag, Verani.Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Accorsi, Britton, Fleming-Dutra, Smith, Shang, Derado, Schrag, Verani.Drafting of the manuscript: Accorsi, Britton, Schrag, Verani.Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.Statistical analysis: Accorsi, Britton, Shang, Derado.Obtained funding: Miller.Administrative, technical, or material support: Britton, Smith, Miller, Verani.Supervision: Miller, Schrag, Verani.Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.Funding/Support: Funding for the Increasing Community Access to Testing platform was provided by the US Department of Health and Human Services. Funding for this analysis was provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The CDC was involved in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, and approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. CDC controlled publication decisions.Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the CDC.References-World Health Organization. Classification of Omicron (B.1.1.529): SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern. Updated November 26, 2021. Accessed December 23, 2021. https://www.who.int/news/item/26-11-2021-classification-of-omicron-(b.1.1.529)-sars-cov-2-variant-of-concern 2.World Health Organization. Enhancing response to OMICRON (COVID-19 variant B.1.1.529): Technical brief and priority actions for Member States. January 7, 2022. Accessed January 11, 2022. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/enhancing-readiness-for-omicron-(b.1.1.529)-technical-brief-and-priority-actions-for-member-states-3-CDC COVID-19 Response Team.  SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 (Omicron) variant—United States, December 1-8, 2021.   MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70(50):1731-1734. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm7050e1PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref-4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. COVID Data Tracker. Accessed January 7, 2021. https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#variant-proportions 5.Wang  L, Cheng  G.  Sequence analysis of the emerging SARS-CoV-2 variant Omicron in South Africa.   J Med Virol. 2021;1-6. doi:10.1002/jmv.27516PubMedGoogle Scholar-6.GISAID. Tracking of variants. Accessed December 23, 2021. https://www.gisaid.org/hcov19-variants/ 7.National Institute for Communicable Diseases. COVID-19 weekly epidemiology brief, South Africa: week 47 2021. November 27, 2021. https://www.nicd.ac.za/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/COVID-19-Weekly-Epidemiology-Brief-week-47-2021.pdf-8.UK Health Security Agency. SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern and variants under investigation in England. Technical briefing 33. December 23, 2021. Accessed December 23, 2021. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1043807/technical-briefing-33.pdf-9.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Implications of the further emergence and spread of the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 variant of concern (Omicron) for the EU/EEA—first update. Updated December 2, 2021. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/threat-assessment-covid-19-emergence-sars-cov-2-variant-omicron-december-2021.pdf-10.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Potential Rapid increase of Omicron variant infections in the United States. Updated December 20, 2021. Accessed December 23, 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/forecasting/mathematical-modeling-outbreak.html-11.Miller  MF, Shi  M, Motsinger-Reif  A, Weinberg  CR, Miller  JD, Nichols  E.  Community-based testing sites for SARS-CoV-2—United States, March 2020-November 2021.   MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70(49):1706-1711. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm7049a3PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref-12.US Department of Health and Human Services. COVID-19 Pandemic Response, Laboratory Data Reporting: CARES Act Section 18115. Updated January 8, 2021. Accessed

ALLTIME