EUROPE - MUSLIM BY 2020

EU CALLS FOR WORLD GOVERNMENT
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7D21rPpBrk&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Feuro%2Dmed%2Edk%2F%3Fp%3D1277&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wFs99zBTRO0&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTfv6uOHgqQ&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVeMBNB0cII&feature=related
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4291770489472554607&ei=iaRTSrzHAoqUqQL1gMGqDw&q=EU&hl=en
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVeMBNB0cII&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aVmtbLc4t6M&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Feuro%2Dmed%2Edk%2F%3Fp%3D1277&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uv5cqh26CC0&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Feuro%2Dmed%2Edk%2F%3Fp%3D1277&feature=player_embedded
EXCELLENT EU REVIEW - WORLD REGIONS,GLOBAL CURRENCY
http://exposureroom.com/members/cybersilence.aspx/assets/d37a8ebc60694cc98173b8f32cfe898d/
EU-NEW SOVIET UNION
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bM2Ql3wOGcU&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6Cj1b-rp1E&feature=player_embedded
WORLD GOVERNMENT UNDER TREATYS-INTERNATIONAL LAW
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_government
TRANSATLANTIC POLICY
http://www.tpnonline.org/

JOAN VEON ON TAMAR YONAH 2008 (WORLD GOVERNMENT)
http://britanniaradio.blogspot.com/2009/07/we-are-already-under-global-government.html#links
UNDERSTANDING WORLD GOVERNMENT
http://www.womensgroup.org/
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=504526035342184251
BANK OF INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENT PRESS
http://www.bis.org/events/agm2009/pcvideo.htm
HISTORY OF WAR AND THE FEDERAL RESERVE
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1874212534444628577&hl=en

DANIEL 7:23-24
23 Thus he said, The fourth beast(THE EU,REVIVED ROME) shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth,(7TH WORLD EMPIRE) which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces.(TRADE BLOCKS)
24 And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise:(10 NATIONS) and another shall rise after them;(#11 SPAIN) and he shall be diverse from the first, and he shall subdue three kings.(BE HEAD OF 3 KINGS OR NATIONS).

JOHN LOEFFLER THE RUSH TO CHINESE CAPITALISM
http://britanniaradio.blogspot.com/2009/08/john-loeffler-steel-on-steel-rush-to.html#links

THE BIBLE SAYS THE EU WILL MAKE THE LAWS OF THE WORLD.

What percentage of laws come from the EU? Posted on 02 June 2009 by nosemonkey
http://www.jcm.org.uk/blog/?p=2230

Last week on the BBC’s Question Time, eurosceptic Conservative MEP Daniel Hannan mentioned 84%; UKIP leader Nigel Farrage said it was 75%, the figure most often mentioned by anti-EU types (such as French National Front leader Jean Marie Le Pen or theLibertas Party) is that 80% of our laws come from the EU, while in a speech elsewhere last week, Conservative leader David Cameron said that Almost half of all the regulations affecting our businesses come from the EU.These figures (or, at least, figures in this rough ballpark) are widely accepted, with everyone fromuniversities to charities seeming to accept them at face value.But are any of them actually true? And which is it? 84%? 80%? 75%? 50%? Or some other figure? Because they can’t ALL be right.

Daniel Hannan: 84% of all laws come from the EU

Let’s take the biggest figure first. If 84% sounds ridiculously high, that’s because it is. Even eurosceptic thinktank Open Europe have dismissed this claim as unrealistic – explaining in detail where the calculation originated.In short, it comes from a reply by the Parliamentary Undersecretary of the German Parliament, Alfred Hartenbach, given on 29 April 2005 – relating specifically (and exclusively) to Germany, where he stated that from 1998 until 2004, 18,187 EU regulations and 750 EU directives were adopted in Germany. During the same period the German Parliament passed in total 1,195 laws (as well as 3,055 Rechtsverordnungen – which are like Primary and Secondary legislation). This was seized on by former German President Roman Herzog and Luder Gurken of the Centrum für Europäische Politik, who used these figures to work out 84% of all German laws originate in Brussels. As Open Europe explains:750 (directives) + 18,187 (regulations) = 18,917 EU legislative acts
1,195 (Gesetze) + 3,055 (Verordnungen) – 750 (directives) = 3,500 German legislative acts= 84%.The 750 directives were substracted as they require seperate implementing laws in Germany (assuming a directive/implementing law ratio of 1:1).Open Europe goes on to explain why this figure is, at best, misleading. And remember, Open Europe is a eurosceptic thinktank:to conclude that 4 out 5 laws originate in Brussels is probably a step too far. Germany, for instance, is a federal system, meaning that the individual Lander has substantial powers to legislate autonomously. The many laws adopted on the Lander-level would have to be included in any all laws count, which isn’t the case here. In addition, this count says nothing about the nature of the laws.It’s also important to keep in mind that the EU’s powers are mainly regulatory, as opposed to budgetary. This means that most issues that relate to spending and taxation (health bills, crime bills, educational reform, pensions, welfare, etc) – the wallet issues if you will – are mostly beyond the realm of the EU, but must also be included in any count that includes all laws.So, the 84% figure is based on a calculation about German laws (and is therefore not directly transferable to Britain, as Hannan and others would like us to believe), and that calculation in any case left out a huge chunk of German legislation, rendering the final figure utterly obsolete.

So the 84% figure can safely be discounted.UKIP: 75% of all laws come from the EU
Next up, the second highest figure. Where did UKIP get their 75% claim from? Well, handily they provide a video on YouTube which shows it comes from Hans-Gert Pottering, EPP MEP and President of the European Parliament from January 2007 to June 2009:If we were not that influential,the subtitles show Pottering as saying, then we would not be the legislator of 75% of all laws in Europe.But where it suits UKIP’s purpose to interpret this as literally meaning that, EU-wide, 75% of ALL laws stem from the EU, had they included more of Pottering’s speech the context – and therefore the meaning – would have become far more apparent. For what Pottering was actually saying was that the European Parliament (not the EU) legislates on 75% of laws passed by the European Union. Not passed by EU member states – just by the EU itself, at EU level. Because the European Parliament has little say in something like 20-25% of EU legislation (something the Lisbon Treaty would rectify, but that’s for another day). German speakers will also be able to confirm that the subtitles on UKIP’s video of Pottering are not 100% accurate.So the 75% figure does not apply to the percentage of laws in individual member states that stem from the EU, but the percentage of laws that stem from the EU that the European Parliament has a say in. That’s an entirely different kettle of fish – and so the 75% figure can safely be dismissed as based on a (deliberate?) misunderstanding.

David Cameron: Almost half

It is worth noting again here that Cameron says almost half of all regulations affecting our businesses come from the EU. Some laws may be regulations, but not all regulations are laws, so we need to tread a little more carefully here. Where did Cameron get his figure from? I genuinely have no idea. I can’t track down an original source for it anywhere – though it is a claim made on the website of the Institute of Directors – albeit with the qualification that estimates vary, something Cameron neglected to mention.But what is the real figure? How much say does the EU have in business regulations? Well, handily enough, last month the British Chambers of Commerce produced a report (PDF) investigating precisely this issue, Worlds Apart: The British and EU Regulatory Systems – their seventh annual report into the subject, and the fifth comparing the British and EU systems. Their conclusion? In terms of the number of regulations, the EU this year accounted for only 20%. The reduction from the previous EU level of about 30% is the primary reason for the overall decline in 2007/8.Hmmm… Only 20%, you say? And the proportion of EU regulations is declining, you say? So where did Cameron get his almost half from?

The House of Commons Library’s 9.1% claim

Also on Question Time last week was Europe Minister Caroline Flint, who trotted out the usual defence against the above eurosceptic claims about the EU’s influence that just 9.1% of UK laws stem from the EU. the report in question can be found as a PDF in the depths of the UK Parliament site.The study was conducted by the (politically independent) House of Commons Library between 1998 and 2005, based on the statutory instruments passed with references to European legislation, because The vast majority of EC legislation is enacted by statutory instruments under section 2 (2) of the European Communities Act.It also helpfully breaks these laws down by department – the most affected of which are Defra – which deals with the Common Agricultural and Common Fisheries Policies, so no surprises there – and the Department of Trade and Industry – hardly surprising with the Common Market and all. Both departments saw about 50% of their legislation having some kind of EU origin – which could, via the DTI, be where Cameron got his almost half figure from, perhaps? But is the 9.1% figure accurate? Is just looking at statutory instruments fair, when this means that normal legislation, via parliament itself, can be left out? Open Europe (in the same post where they discussed and dismissed the 84% claim) make four key points:

1) They do not seperate between budgetary and regulatory legislation, therefore comparing apples and oranges.
2) They also compare apples and oranges in another respect: Directives are usually far-reaching measures with a big impact on the economy. SIs, in contrast, can cover a variety of issues, including public administration – for example a road closure or changing arrangements for parish elections.
3) EU Regulations (as opposed to Directives) usually don’t give rise to a new UK law but are directly applicable. Therefore, most EU Regulations are not included in the 9%figure.
4) One Directive does not mean one SI. The Motor Vehicles Regulations in 2007 implemented four different Directives, for instance, making a one-for-one comparison tricky.
On point 1), of course, the EU has no say in the British budget and has no revenue-raising powers, so I’m not sure what they’re trying to say. On point 2) they have a point – but how do you measure the far-reaching implications and economic impact of a directive, exactly? On point 3) they also have a point – which might explain why the British Chambers of Commerce have a higher estimate of 20%. Point 4), if we’re hunting down the percentage of British laws that have an EU origin, is irrelevant.But considering that we’re looking for a percentage of the number of laws that stem from the EU, it is worth bearing in mind that Statutory Instruments make up the bulk of all UK legislation, with an average of around 3,500 passed every year for much of the last two decades. In 2008, 3,389 Statutory Instruments were passed, while the UK Statute Law Database lists 2,414 results for the same year. With no study (that I’m aware of) having been conducted on how many of those have an EU origin, it is hard to tell the percentage.However, with Statutory Instruments making up the bulk of UK legislation, and with most EU legislation brought into force via this method (having already been passed at EU level, there’s generally no need for EU legislation to then be re-enacted at national level, after all), it’s no great leap to suggest that the final percentage wouldn’t be that much higher than 9%. Indeed, Labour MEPRichard Corbett has noted other studies in other EU member states:6.3 percent according to the Swedish parliament, 12 percent according to the Finnish parliament and between 12 and 19 percent according to the Lithuanian parliament.This would suggest that something in the region of 10-20% would be a fair guess for the UK as well (a range that has the added benefit of being backed up by the British Chambers of Commerce’s recent study of regulations).

Bonus: How much does the EU cost us?

I’ve already discussed the actual costs of EU membership based on the UK’s annual contribution, showing that the net cost is around £4 billion a year. But what about the cost to business and to the economy? This is, of course, a hugely complex issue. How to estimate the impact of legislation on an entire country’s economy? It’s practically impossible, as without a control sample we can’t tell how beneficial or detrimental any individual piece of legislation may be – let alone the impact of other pieces of legislation that may affect the same general area.Nonetheless, the more enthusiastic among you may have noted, in the Open Europe piece quoted above, that the same post also gives Open Europe’s own estimate that 72% of the cost of regulation is EU derived. Is this fair? Well, it’s only an estimate, and I haven’t seen their workings, so it’s hard to tell.However, let’s return to that British Chambers of Commerce report, also linked above. What do they have to say about the costs of EU regulation? By value, EU legislation was only responsible for about 0.1% (£1.9m) of regulatory net costs in 2007/8 and virtually all business burdening regulatory activity can be attributed to Whitehall.Oh… would you look at that?

Conclusion

No one agrees on how much legislation and regulation stems from the EU. The 9.1% figure stated by the House of Commons Library is too low, as it only covers Statutory Instruments, not ALL laws; the higher figures of 84%, 75% and even 50% claimed by the likes of Hannan, Farrage and Cameron are based on miscalculations, misunderstandings, or sources unknown, and often derive from parts of the EU other than just the UK – and so with no hard evidence to support them must be dismissed as either too high or inapplicable to the British situation.What is the true figure? No one knows. So any claims that state hard and fast percentages should – if we’re being intellectually honest – be treated with equal suspicion.Not that any of this is likely to change the opinions of those eurosceptics convinced of the malicious and all-pervading influence of the EU on our daily lives, of course. But still. I’ve looked for the evidence, and this is what I’ve tracked down. If you know different, please do let me know – I’m interested in the truth of the situation, as without total transparency, such misinformation, misunderstandings and resentments are only going to grow.Popularity: 24% [?]

How José Manuel Barroso quietly transformed the world's financial future
The European Commission and its president played a crucial but behind-the-scenes role in G20 agreement.By Adrian Michaels 6:50PM BST 03 Apr 2009

Reuters-José Manuel Barroso was a student revolutionary while growing up in Portugal. His other middle name – Durão – even means hard. That he is now 53 and the centre-right president of the European Commission, could be viewed as the well-worn dilution of incendiary youthful ideals. But it doesn't make it any less odd that while Mr Barroso was holed up in London's Docklands hammering out the G20 communiqué with world leaders this week, his eldest son Luís, 25, was among the protesters on the streets of the City of London angered by the excesses of capitalism. Mr Barroso told the story in his usual light and amiable way. His son, who is studying European law in London, was not protesting though he was with protesters, he said. In any case, the son was rather more right-wing than the father at a similar age. I don't know why my son was born conservative,he joked.I was a radical.G20 Summit: Timeline of main eventsPerhaps Luís, like everyone else, is converging on a view of the world as espoused by the European Union, at whose centre sits his father. Mr Barroso, while conscious of the need to appear modest, was clearly delighted that from either end – the Russians and Chinese on one side, the Americans on the other – the G20 nations were coming together in their vision of the global economy. We need open, competitive, market economies… but at the same time with effective regulation and supervision,he told The Daily Telegraph in his first newspaper interview since the G20summit. That, combined with an important level of social commitment, strong international institutions and mechanisms of corporate governance… is the economic culture of Europe.Of course this convergence, as expressed in large parts of the G20's final communiqué, is driven by a world experiencing its greatest economic crisis in decades. Globalisation, which has lifted millions from poverty, has also spread misery everywhere as economy after economy has tipped into recession. The blackest eyes are being worn by the US and UK, whose versions of what Mr Barroso called unbridled capitalism seemed to have made matters far worse than they might have been.

The outside world has been focused on the pronouncements of international leaders – press conferences by Nicolas Sarkozy, the president of France, or Barack Obama, US president. The polticians have had in mind domestic audiences and the need to appear to be fighting for their national interests. Angela Merkel, the German chancellor who is facing an election this year, has been stridently opposed to US and UK calls for a larger fiscal stimulus for her economy, even while injecting more money into it than any other country in Europe.But as all the nations move towards a common vision of the future global financial system, Mr Barroso and his team have had a quiet but immensely influential role in the whole process. Many of the words adopted by the G20 were drafted in his office. Much of the thinking on the future of financial regulation came out of a European Commission report on the subject. If you look at the conclusions of [the Commission's] spring council one week ago and the conclusions of the G20, you will find they are [almost the same]… word for word,he said. Now the Commission has been given the task of drafting proposals on executive pay, hedge fund regulation and private equity. It will make plans for a new global financial architecture and it will host a summit on job creation next month in Prague. Though there will be months of negotiation to come, and numerous attempts by politicians to steal credit and publicity, Mr Barroso's office will be writing many of the drafts.

It could have been very different. When the crisis seemed completely out of control at the end of last year, a rash of unilateral measures by members of the EU seemed to call into question the whole single market project.Mr Barroso admitted that in December there had been a quasi-panic. The UK, Ireland and other countries had announced huge bail-outs of their banks, and shown no signs of worrying about infringing EU rules on competition and budget deficits. There was talk of the need to give huge amounts of aid to car companies. Mr Sarkozy was openly hostile to the Czech Republic, to which he had just handed the EU presidency.Brussels had to make countries understand that internal protectionism in Europe would be deadly, really a disaster for European economies, Mr Barroso said.The internal market is the bedrock of our prosperity.He maintained on Friday that the message had been taken in. Oh, we have done it. It is well understood… Now after a good debate I see a real commitment. He said that an informal summit last month had actually handed more authority to the Commission. Some Eurosceptics, he said, had come round to the view that the real threat is not an overcentralised Europe, [but] the fragmentation of the internal market.Of course critics could argue that Mr Barroso would say that. But it is true that governments could look at the strict EU rules on budgets and acknowledge their role in allowing billions to be poured into ailing economies. Government budget deficits in the EU's 27 countries fell from an average 2.9pc in 2004 to 0.9pc in 2007, putting them in a better position to combat the crisis when it struck. Another important lesson would have been the different experiences of Iceland and Ireland, which were both hugely over-extended in the years of cheap credit. Iceland, outside the eurozone and the EU, had gone bankrupt amid the crisis. Ireland, while still in considerable pain, had not.Ireland would be in a situation of near bankruptcy if it had not been in the euro,said Mr Barroso.It had a credible currency [unlike Iceland] and benefited from massive injections of liquidity from the European Central Bank.

Some commentators say the euro is still in trouble, and that countries could still come under enough economic pressure to force them out of the currency. EU and non-EU members in eastern Europe have experienced political upheaval and changes of government. But Mr Barroso said that, far from seeing a break-up of the euro, he had been asked by countries wishing to speed their entry into the currency, such as Denmark.He admitted that the G20 had much work left, in particular on world trade, which will see a reduction in its volume in 2009 for the first time in 25 years. Mr Barroso said that the World Trade Organisation had made a presentation to the G20 in which it stated that rising protectionism had not yet had a significant impact on trade volumes. Reading between the lines of the communiqué, it seems as if restarting the Doha round of trade negotiations will be top of the agenda when the G8 group of largest economies, and several guests, gathers near Sardinia in July. Another item barely on the agenda, Mr Barroso admitted, was discussion of the macroeconomic imbalances that had created much of the world's economic problems. Countries such as Germany and China have become overdependent on being able to sell their exports to countries too eager to consume, such as America. The broken financial system with its excessive risk-taking and inadequate oversight, arguably, merely made the crisis worse rather than created it.Mr Barroso said that he thought China and Germany had recognised the need to lessen their dependence on exports.I think the Chinese are moving in the right direction… Germany is completely aware that it is important not just to rely on exports.But he admitted that economic culture stood in the way of permanent reform. If you give a tax reduction in Germany most people will save it and not use it to stimulate their consumption.Miss Merkel has acknowledged that Germany's economic structure cannot be changed quickly.Mr Barroso was therefore cautious in his assessment of the summit, steering clear of talk of green shoots and recoveries. Millions more are still expected to be added to the jobless numbers throughout the world.We cannot expect a miracle from the [G20] summit but I think we took the right decisions and I think we should concentrate on implementation and co-ordination of the measures. Then we can see the light at the end of the tunnel.José Manuel Durão Barroso ,Born Lisbon, March 23, 1956 ,Family married to Margarida Sousa Uva. The couple have three children: Luís, Guilherme and Francisco.Education University of Lisbon, Diploma in European Studies at the European University Institute, University of Geneva, Master's degree in Political Science, University of Geneva.

EU plots Lisbon Process life-support – but are grand science and technology schemes worth the candle? Saturday, 08 August 2009 05:31 International News Services sources: By David Haworth, in Brussels

Among many things the ambitious Swedish presidency of the European Union hopes to achieve in the next five months is a revival of the so-called Lisbon Process.The what?

A few may recall this initiative was launched in 2000 to chart the way the EU would become the world’s most dynamic, knowledge-based economy.Rhetorically it became a bouncy castle for politicians, left and right, who could jump up and down with Lisbon, confident of its crowd-pleasing potential, in Brussels and Strasbourg at least.But the applause soon died – so much so the whole effort had to be revived a mere five years after it began.It hasn’t been going great guns since then, either. Not unreasonably, however, EU officials think it’s worth taking out of the drawer in the context of the worst recession since the war.Stronger economic cooperation is essential,said the economy Commissioner Joaquin Almunia recently, noting that EU unemployment is currently at 8.5% and rising.Also, this year has been dubbed the ‘European Year of Creativity and Innovation’ – so surely that’s relevant? Then along come the do-gooding Swedes (now holding the EU’s rotating six-monthly presidency), keen to give the high five to green growth which will make the environment a new priority of the Lisbon Process. To that will be added labour market reform, R&D and education and skills.The centerpiece of this latest revision will be an Internet-based consultation throughout the EU organised by the European Commission whose results, officials hope, will allow them to make formal proposals for the another Lisbon phoenix which should take wing early in 2010 under the next EU chairmanship, Spain.Does this mean the subsequent stage of the Lisbon Process could be transformed into a Madrid Accord. a Concordat of Brussels or some such?

But if these plans truly constitute a revival, it’s clear the exercise has to be re-branded. It’s a political and diplomatic conceit – or evasion – that far-reaching deals should be named after the city (or even a village, like Schengen, Luxembourg) in which they were made.In this case multi-millions of voters confuse the Lisbon Process with the Lisbon Treaty when they have absolutely nothing to do with each other. Secondly, it’s unhelpful that this pathway to the stars should be associated with one of the worst performing economies in the 27-nation bloc.A new name should define what the initiative is about; Lisbon is meaningless and Lisbon 2 would be perverse. After a while such place names are bleached of any significance in the minds of voters. The Treaty of Paris, anyone? (You see.)However, it seems the EU mantra for the coming five years will be science, technology and innovation (STI) – and who could disagree with that in the present crisis? Any mantra in a storm, EU’s leaders seem to believe.Not so, says a group of Irish academics, Government appointed, who were asked whether the failed Celtic Tiger’s STI investment in a knowledge economy is value for money.Led by Professor Colm McCarthy, University College Dublin, they concluded there is scant evidence that all the STI expenditure is a good way to spend taxpayers’ money – thus mauling one of the main assumptions of the Lisbon Process.Any return on this STI investment cannot be known with confidence at the start,these experts claim.The evidence adduced to date for the impact of STI investment on actual economic activity has not been compelling.In other words, it’s as scientific as pot-luck.Then they go on to say that the Irish government’s declared aim to produce 20% more PhDs might be counterproductive because there’s no clear business need for so many graduates to be educated up to fourth level qualifications.

What is the point of post graduate waiters or shop assistants with a handful of diplomas? There’s almost no demand in the economy for so many clever-clogs; producing even more of them could have two effects, the Irish committee points out. The graduates might have to take jobs, as many do in the Nordic countries, for which they are over-qualified or, frustrated, they may emigrate to find work in which case the country gets no return on its investment in their education.Almost a decade after the high tech wake-up call was first heard from Portugal, it’s unclear how these elements will be played out.And it remains a quirky coincidence that two things most associated with the EU’s recent ideological overreach – the Process and the Treaty – should both bear a Lisbon label.ENDS

REVELATION 13:1
1 And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.(THE EU AND ITS DICTATOR IS GODLESS)

Thursday August 6, 2009 Irish Government Pressing Hard for Yes Vote on Lisbon while Other EU States Hesitate By Hilary White

DUBLIN, August 6, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The Irish government's broadcasting regulator has told No campaigners on the upcoming Lisbon Treaty referendum that there will be no equal time for both sides of the debate. Broadcasting Commission of Ireland (BCI) chief executive Michael O'Keeffe said in a statement that the agency is under no obligation to allocate an absolute equality of airtime to opposing sides of the referendum debate during editorial coverage.Guidelines require only that the allocation of airtime to opposing sides be fair.While the move was welcomed by Yes campaigners, one leading pro-life No campaign group has said that the decision is plainly government interference in the democratic process. Cóir Campaign called it a politically motivated attack on democracy and described the new rule as a much weaker provision of fairness which is wide open to abuse.Government Yes material on the internet and in print posted to people's homes threaten financial disaster for Ireland if the Treaty is rejected again. The solution to Ireland's financial woes in the face of the global downturn in the economy is assumed by some Irish leaders to be bailouts from the EU. However, a recent well-publicised poll in Germany, the country that holds much of the EU's purse-strings, showed that 70 percent of German taxpayers would not approve of future financial bailouts for Ireland in the global economic crisis.Cóir has accused the Labour Party of gross hypocrisy on the re-running of the Lisbon referendum, pointing out that last year Labour Party leader Eamon Gilmore rushed forward to say the Lisbon Treaty was dead following the 2008 referendum. Yet now he is boasting that Labour's campaign to push the same treaty through will be run like a ground war and is determined to make the Irish people vote again, said Greene

Despite a clear No vote last year, Ireland's second referendum is scheduled to be held on October 2 after heavy pressure from the EU on the Irish government.The government's promise to EU officials to go all-out to promote Lisbon has some campaigners questioning how far they will go. The blog of the group Open Europe (OE), a democracy campaign group and clearinghouse of EU skeptic news, asks where the funding is coming from for the dozens of suspiciously similar Yes campaign websites that have recently cropped up on the net, such as Women for Europe, Generation Yes and Ireland for Europe. In its fevered desperation to pass the Lisbon Treaty, the Irish government has now gone into total overkill,the group said. It's the latest shot in the European Commission-backed onslaught to make sure Irish people don't cock up its carefully-laid plans to grab control over dozens of new policy areas. No doubt many will fall for it,the authors write. The Irish government, OE said, is making absolutely no attempt to appear neutral or objective on the question, launching websites at taxpayer expense to push the Yes campaign, including eumatters.ie describing what the EU has done for Ireland,including EU regulations on every aspect of life from children's toy manufacturing to water and food.Democracy advocates are warning that Lisbon hands most of a country's legal rights over to a largely unelected and unaccountable body of bureaucrats. Ireland is one of the last member states to retain the requirement of a public referendum to make decisions regarding the nation's sovereignty under EU dominance. After the defeat in 2005 of the European Constitution by referenda in France and the Netherlands, most EU states abolished public plebiscites under pressure from the EU. Ireland's EU commissioner, Charlie McCreevy, said the Treaty would have been rejected in most EU countries had their populations retained the right to vote on it. I think all of the politicians of Europe would have known quite well that if a similar question had been put to their electorate in a referendum the answer in 95 percent of countries would have been No as well,he said in June. He said EU heads of state were glad they didn't have to put the question themselves to their people.

Despite efforts to remove power from individual states, as many EU officials feared, the legal guarantees granted to the Irish to help make the Treaty more palatable to Irish voters have emboldened other states to ask for similar concessions, slowing down the process of ratification and implementation. Germany may be the next country to hold up Lisbon's progress, with strongly pro-Europe and pro-Lisbon Chancellor Angela Merkel facing an election in September. . In 2007 an independent poll of 27 EU countries found that an average of 75 percent of all Europeans want a referendum on any new Treaty which transfers more power to Brussels. At the end of June, a poll of German voters showed that 77 percent want a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty. Shortly after the announcement of the Irish guarantees, the German Constitutional Court ruled, in a case brought by a number of German MPs, that the Lisbon Treaty cannot be ratified until laws were passed guaranteeing parliamentary input in the adoption of EU laws. The court statement said that parliament's Lisbon ratification document may not be adopted until the sufficient legal groundwork for parliamentary participation as foreseen in the constitution has been laid.The German parliament has already ratified the treaty, but President Horst Koehler has not yet signed. In June, Czech President Vaclav Klaus, who has refused to sign the Treaty, said he plans to refer it to the Czech Constitutional Court in August. Pro-life and democracy campaigners in Ireland continue to warn that acceptance of Lisbon would put an end to the ability of member states to defend their sovereignty, including their laws protecting human life and the natural family.This week, EU abortion campaigner Birgitta Ohlsson, the head of the group Make Noise for Free Choice that is pushing to have abortion recognized as a human right among all member states, told the Times of Malta that even if the campaign is successful, abortion cannot be imposed on Malta.Malta, with the tiny principality of Monaco and Ireland, remains one of the few remaining EU countries that retain their traditional laws protecting human life from conception. But Patrick Buckley, EU spokesman for the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, told LifeSiteNews.com that such assurances, including those that have come from the Irish government, are meaningless.

Buckley explained that promises to individual states that they can retain their own laws are moot since it is up to the European Court of Justice to interpret all such laws, which court has the ability to overturn the laws of member states. In addition, he said, there will be little protection from the EU Parliament. There is a very strong support in the Parliament for the concept of abortion as a human right, he said.Cóir spokesman Richard Greene backed this statement, saying that assurances or declarations from the European Union on concerns such as abortion or taxation cannot improve the Lisbon Treaty. Greene called mistaken the assumption that the guarantees would protect Ireland, saying they would have no legal standing and would be as much use as a politician's promise.He pointed out that the Irish public had not asked for modifications to the Treaty, they had simply voted No.It is an abiding disgrace - and an expression of the contempt in which this government holds the people - that an Taoiseach has refused to state that the Lisbon Treaty is dead and that ratification must end,said Greene.

DISEASES

REVELATION 6:7-8
7 And when he had opened the fourth seal, I heard the voice of the fourth beast say, Come and see.
8 And I looked, and behold a pale horse:(CHLORES GREEN) and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with sword,(WEAPONS) and with hunger,(FAMINE) and with death,(INCURABLE DISEASES) and with the beasts of the earth.(ANIMAL TO HUMAN DISEASE).

HEGELIAN DIALECTIC,PANDEMIC & CREATIVE DESTRUCTION By Nancy Levant
August 7, 2009 NewsWithViews.com

Creative Destruction

Creative Destruction is not a new concept. It is, however, a new-age term for the Hegelian Dialectic. Call it what you want, the global results are the same.In order to achieve one-world governance, existing systems all over the globe had to be dismantled and eliminated. For instance, national sovereignty, national loyalty, national patriotism, personally selected lifestyles, individual beliefs and preferences, and naturally occurring communities versus socially engineered communities had to be dismantled, eliminated, and redefined by think tankers financed by philanthropic and government money.In order to achieve such a tremendous undertaking, money (specifically wages) had to be strategically controlled. Hence, the wildly successful America had to eliminate its jobs. Jobs = wages. Wages = personally selected lifestyles, individual beliefs and preferences, and naturally occurring communities.Next, the one-world think tankers told us that love of country and specifically patriotism led to ethnic battles, conflicts, and domestic terrorism. They also told us that the political expression of and belief in individual freedom was the religious concept of chronically stupid and terrorist-leaning radicals. Keeping in mind that America always accepted immigrants from every country - immigrants and their religious beliefs - the wealthy think tankers decided to incorporate illegal immigration in order that America could be far more multicultural and at the same time elevate racism to new definitions and levels.

Multi-million illegal immigrants + multi-million jobs eliminated + multi-million nationals losing jobs and homes = a new and improved recipe for racism. Why, you ask? The reasons why are obvious: 1) People are blamers by nature, 2) race cards have always been political manipulators and weapons for all kinds of people and agendas, and 3) all people are more comfortable around life-kinds, which is exactly why the world is divided up into like-kind regions. It is called human nature. In the natural world, it is called biology. However, in the world of social engineering on a global scale, it is called the collection of private property, individual freedom, privately owned guns, personal opinions, and middle class wages. It is called the assured collecting of global wealth and natural resources from the world's people. It is called socially engineered theft on a highly professional scale. The wealthy think tankers and the Caucasian powers behind them claim they stand for fairness and equity for the rabble work forces of the world. However, the world remains embroiled in non-stop wars, genocides, death by unusual disease and unnecessary hunger, and growing poverty--except for the world's top and constant one or two percent.Creative Destruction commands the slow death of nature. In order to achieve the global collection of private property under corporate global governance, nature had to become terminally ill, so we were told, by the merciless treatment of the land-owning rabble. However, before we the rabble were told of our merciless treatment of nature, hundreds of millions of acres all over the world were locked down, without our knowledge, in the form of Biosphere Reserves, conservation corridors, and World Heritage Sites. (To this day, ask your neighbors about Biosphere Reserves. They've never heard of them).Add to these hundreds of millions of acres every individual burg's watershed systems, state, local, and Federal parks, all the governed wetlands, not to mention 90% of the American West and 95% of the State of Alaska and the international territories of the Great Lakes region,Cascadian region,and the now infamous Southwestern International Border region where America's first Third World guerilla war between international drug cartels is currently taking place as the Creative Destruction mechanism for assisting the United Nations to eliminate the Second Amendment. Isn't it amazing to watch America become a Third World loser nation by Creative Destructive design? Who would have thought it, and it took a bunch of Ivy Leaguers to come up with this extraordinary plan to enrich themselves through financial service to their billionaire masters. You go, boys and girls!

Creative Destruction is actually an excellent oxymoron - certainly one of the top ten best of all time - but it is still and only the Hegelian Dialectic. For me, it is sad to think of those who could have stood for and funded truth. Imagine what could have happened if the world's criminal governing cartels would have been exposed by their many insiders, flunkies, prostitutes, and the few who surely understood The Plan in action. Specifically, think of America's wealth in Hollywood, for instance, or in the music or publishing businesses. Think of the many people who were blessed with great success in this country. How sad that not one person came forward to champion freedom from criminal governing cartels and elite thieves. How sad that they ran with the pack to protect themselves instead of championing truth and actual freedom for the world's people. How sad that we are crushed over and over and over again by the mind and heart-numbing sin of greed. How sad that wealth-based arrogance leads to the fear of humanity, which always leads to inhumanity.As we walk ourselves straight into another dark period of human history, freedom will disappear from our consciousness as we experience the Creative Destruction of the potential for global human freedom. Once the best government that the world ever produced is forgotten, and the last generation of Constitution-understanding people is gone, Socialism/Fascism/Communism, or as the wealthy think tankers like to call it - Communitarianism - will once again try to repress the world's masses by reducing them to useful (translation: lowly paid) laborers for the sole advantage of the world's one percent. This we call democracy.Creative Destruction has produced world democracy. And this is why America now hires and operates a homeland paramilitary consisting of international forces - a new system which holds practice drills in our cities and rural areas in case of, what?...who knows? Ask the wealthy think tankers. My guess is the much advertised pandemic, which will make triple billionaires of even more pharmaceutical corporations while ensuring the democracy of massive global depopulation goals. At any rate, I'm sure the paramilitary connection is thoroughly mapped out as that reality continues to internationalize its growing forces.It is also important to understand that Creative Destruction works in unexpected ways. For example, you will find this article disturbing:Couple this article with current military plans to assist FEMA with new and forthcoming quarantine laws, and the plot sickens. Just realize that something is afoot in this new nation of ours, and all is seemingly planned. There should be nothing as frightening to you as 1) a seemingly planned pandemic, 2) a new homeland paramilitary for American civilians, 3) forcing vaccines into your bodies, and 4) plans to force-quarantine (translation: imprison) American people for being sick with a designer virus.Creative Destruction? I would say so.

EARTH DESTROYED WITH THE EARTH

GENESIS 6:11-13
11 The earth also was corrupt before God, and the earth was filled with violence.(WORLD TERRORISM,MURDERS)
12 And God looked upon the earth, and, behold, it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth.
13 And God said unto Noah, The end of all flesh is come before me; for the earth is filled with violence (TERRORISM) through them; and, behold, I will destroy them with the earth.

REVELATION 8:7
7 The first angel sounded, and there followed hail and fire mingled with blood, and they were cast upon the earth: and the third part of trees was burnt up, and all green grass was burnt up.

OZONE DEPLETION JUDGEMENT ON THE EARTH DUE TO SIN

ISAIAH 30:26-27
26 Moreover the light of the moon shall be as the light of the sun, and the light of the sun shall be sevenfold, as the light of seven days, in the day that the LORD bindeth up the breach of his people, and healeth the stroke of their wound.
27 Behold, the name of the LORD cometh from far, burning with his anger, and the burden thereof is heavy: his lips are full of indignation, and his tongue as a devouring fire:

MATTHEW 24:21-22,29
21 For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.
22 And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect’s sake (ISRAELS SAKE) those days shall be shortened (Daylight hours shortened)
29 Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken:

REVELATION 16:7-9
7 And I heard another out of the altar say, Even so, Lord God Almighty, true and righteous are thy judgments.
8 And the fourth angel poured out his vial upon the sun; and power was given unto him to scorch men with fire.
9 And men were scorched with great heat, and blasphemed the name of God, which hath power over these plagues: and they repented not to give him glory.

POISONED WATERS

REVELATION 8:8-11
8 And the second angel sounded, and as it were a great mountain burning with fire was cast into the sea: and the third part of the sea became blood;
9 And the third part of the creatures which were in the sea, and had life, died; and the third part of the ships were destroyed.
10 And the third angel sounded, and there fell a great star from heaven, burning as it were a lamp, and it fell upon the third part of the rivers, and upon the fountains of waters;
11 And the name of the star is called Wormwood:(bitter,Poisoned) and the third part of the waters became wormwood; and many men died of the waters, because they were made bitter.(poisoned)

REVELATION 16:3-7
3 And the second angel poured out his vial upon the sea; and it became as the blood of a dead man: and every living soul died in the sea.(enviromentalists won't like this result)
4 And the third angel poured out his vial upon the rivers and fountains of waters; and they became blood.
5 And I heard the angel of the waters say, Thou art righteous, O Lord, which art, and wast, and shalt be, because thou hast judged thus.
6 For they(False World Church and Dictator) have shed the blood of saints and prophets, and thou hast given them blood to drink; for they are worthy.

1/3RD OF SHIPS DESTROYED

REVELATION 8:8-9
8 And the second angel sounded, and as it were a great mountain burning with fire was cast into the sea: and the third part of the sea became blood;
9 And the third part of the creatures which were in the sea, and had life, died; and the third part of the ships were destroyed.

WW3 THE 3 WAVES THAT MARCH TO ISRAEL

AMOS 9:10
10 All the sinners of my people shall die by the sword, which say, The evil shall not overtake nor prevent us.

DANIEL 11:40-45
40 And at the time of the end shall the king of the south( EGYPT) push at him:(EU DICTATOR IN ISRAEL) and the king of the north (RUSSIA AND MUSLIM HORDES OF EZEK 38+39) shall come against him like a whirlwind, with chariots, and with horsemen, and with many ships; and he shall enter into the countries, and shall overflow and pass over.
41 He shall enter also into the glorious land, and many countries shall be overthrown: but these shall escape out of his hand, even Edom, and Moab, and the chief of the children of Ammon.(JORDAN)
42 He shall stretch forth his hand also upon the countries: and the land of Egypt shall not escape.
43 But he shall have power over the treasures of gold and of silver, and over all the precious things of Egypt: and the Libyans and the Ethiopians shall be at his steps.
44 But tidings out of the east(CHINA 2ND WAVE OF WW3) and out of the north(RUSSIA, MUSLIMS WHATS LEFT FROM WAVE 1) shall trouble him:(EU DICTATOR IN ISRAEL) therefore he shall go forth with great fury to destroy, and utterly to make away many.( 1/3RD OF EARTHS POPULATION)
45 And he shall plant the tabernacles of his palace between the seas in the glorious holy mountain; yet he shall come to his end, and none shall help him.

REVELATION 14:18-20
18 And another angel came out from the altar, which had power over fire; and cried with a loud cry to him that had the sharp sickle, saying, Thrust in thy sharp sickle, and gather the clusters of the vine of the earth; for her grapes are fully ripe.
19 And the angel thrust in his sickle into the earth, and gathered the vine of the earth, and cast it into the great winepress of the wrath of God.
20 And the winepress was trodden without the city,(JERUSALEM) and blood came out of the winepress, even unto the horse bridles, by the space of a thousand and six hundred furlongs.(200 MILES) (THE SIZE OF ISRAEL)

The Third and Final Wave of WW3 is when all Nations march to Jerusalem, but JESUS bodily returns to earth and destroys them,sets up his KINGDOM OF RULE FOR 1000 YEARS THEN FOREVER.

Saturday, 8 August 2009-The main posting below is an extraordinary letter from 60 German Scientists dissenting over global warming claims, who call climate fears pseudo religion and urge the German chancellor to reconsider her views.I thought I should send this out before receiving details of the scientists themselves but any scientists - or, indeed any readers at all! - amongst those who see this and who want the list when I get it, please let me know! The second piece is a note about John Howard, the last Australian prime minister , who is campaigning strongly on the stifling of discussion on this pseudo religion.(It’s a brief note since it only formed part of a fascinating speech on the media in general.The whole is worth reading!] The truth about this great scam is gradually filtering out and as the dreadful costs of the utterly futile remedies sinks in here Britons will get even more sceptical! Christina

CLIMATE DEPOT .com 4.8.09 AND European Institute for Climate and Energy 26.7.09 Consensus' Takes Another Hit! More than 60 German Scientists Dissent Over Global Warming Claims! Call Climate Fears Pseudo Religion; Urge Chancellor to reconsider views Growing body of evidence shows anthropogenic CO2 plays no measurable role

More than 60 prominent German scientists have publicly declared their dissent from man-made global warming fears in an Open Letter to German Chancellor Angela Merkel. The more than 60 signers of the letter include several United Nations IPCC scientists.
The scientists declared that global warming has become a pseudo religion and they noted that rising CO2 has had no measurable effect on temperatures. The German scientists, also wrote that the UN IPCC has lost its scientific credibility.This latest development comes on the heels of a series of inconvenient developments for the promoters of man-made global warming fears, including new peer-reviewed studies, real world data, a growing chorus of scientists dissenting (including more UN IPCC scientists), open revolts in scientific societies and the Earth's failure to warm. In addition, public opinion continues to turn against climate fear promotion.The July 26, 2009 German scientist letter urged Chancellor Merkel to strongly reconsider her position on global warming and requested a convening of an impartial panel that is free of ideology to counter the UN IPCC and review the latest climate science developments.The scientists, from many disciplines, including physicists, meteorology, chemistry, and geology, explain that humans have had no measurable effect on global warming through CO2 emissions. Instead the temperature fluctuations have been within normal ranges and are due to natural cycles.More importantly, there's a growing body of evidence showing anthropogenic CO2 plays no measurable role,the scientists wrote.Indeed CO2's capability to absorb radiation is already exhausted by today's atmospheric concentrations. If CO2 did indeed have an effect and all fossil fuels were burned, then additional warming over the long term would in fact remain limited to only a few tenths of a degree,they added.The IPCC had to have been aware of this fact, but completely ignored it during its studies of 160 years of temperature measurements and 150 years of determined CO2 levels. As a result the IPCC has lost its scientific credibility,the scientists wrote.

Indeed the atmosphere has not warmed since 1998 – more than 10 years, and the global temperature has even dropped significantly since 2003. Not one of the many extremely expensive climate models predicted this. According to the IPCC, it was supposed to have gotten steadily warmer, but just the opposite has occurred,the scientists wrote.
The belief of climate change, and that it is manmade, has become a pseudo-religion, the scientists wrote.The German media has sadly taken a leading position in refusing to publicize views that are critical of anthropogenic global warming,they added.Do you not believe, Madam Chancellor, that science entails more than just confirming a hypothesis, but also involves testing to see if the opposite better explains reality? We strongly urge you to reconsider your position on this subject and to convene an impartial panel for the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, one that is free of ideology, and where controversial arguments can be openly debated. We the undersigned would very much like to offer support in this regard.Full Text of Translated Letter By 61 German Scientists: (emphasis added)

Open Letter – Climate Change Bundeskanzleramt Frau Bundeskanzerlin Dr. Angela Merkel
Willy-Brandt-Strabe 110557 Berlin#Vizerprasident> Dipl. Ing. Michael Limburg> 14476 Grob Glienicke> Richard-Wagner-Str. 5a E-mail: limburg@grafik-system.de Grob Glienicke 26.07.09

To the attention of the Honorable Madam Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany

When one studies history, one learns that the development of societies is often determined by a zeitgeist, which at times had detrimental or even horrific results for humanity. History tells us time and again that political leaders often have made poor decisions because they followed the advice of advisors who were incompetent or ideologues and failed to recognize it in time. Moreover evolution also shows that natural development took a wide variety of paths with most of them leading to dead ends. No era is immune from repeating the mistakes of the past.Politicians often launch their careers using a topic that allows them to stand out. Earlier as Minister of the Environment you legitimately did this as well by assigning a high priority to climate change. But in doing so you committed an error that has since led to much damage, something that should have never happened, especially given the fact you are a physicist. You confirmed that climate change is caused by human activity and have made it a primary objective to implement expensive strategies to reduce the so-called greenhouse gas CO2. You have done so without first having a real discussion to check whether early temperature measurements and a host of other climate related facts even justify it.A real comprehensive study, whose value would have been absolutely essential, would have shown, even before the IPCC was founded, that humans have had no measurable effect on global warming through CO2 emissions. Instead the temperature fluctuations have been within normal ranges and are due to natural cycles. Indeed the atmosphere has not warmed since 1998 – more than 10 years, and the global temperature has even dropped significantly since 2003.Not one of the many extremely expensive climate models predicted this. According to the IPCC, it was supposed to have gotten steadily warmer, but just the opposite has occurred.More importantly, there's a growing body of evidence showing anthropogenic CO2 plays no measurable role. Indeed CO2's capability to absorb radiation is already exhausted by today's atmospheric concentrations. If CO2 did indeed have an effect and all fossil fuels were burned, then additional warming over the long term would in fact remain limited to only a few tenths of a degree.The IPCC had to have been aware of this fact, but completely ignored it during its studies of 160 years of temperature measurements and 150 years of determined CO2 levels. As a result the IPCC has lost its scientific credibility. The main points on this subject are included in the accompanying addendum.In the meantime, the belief of climate change, and that it is manmade, has become a pseudo-religion.Its proponents, without thought, pillory independent and fact-based analysts and experts, many of whom are the best and brightest of the international scientific community.

Fortunately in the internet it is possible to find numerous scientific works that show in detail there is no anthropogenic CO2 caused climate change. If it was not for the internet, climate realists would hardly be able to make their voices heard. Rarely do their critical views get published.The German media has sadly taken a leading position in refusing to publicize views that are critical of anthropogenic global warming. For example, at the second International Climate Realist Conference on Climate in New York last March, approximately 800 leading scientists attended, some of whom are among the world's best climatologists or specialists in related fields. While the US media and only the Wiener Zeitung (Vienna daily) covered the event, here in Germany the press, public television and radio shut it out. It is indeed unfortunate how our media have developed - under earlier dictatorships the media were told what was not worth reporting. But today they know it without getting instructions.Do you not believe, Madam Chancellor, that science entails more than just confirming a hypothesis, but also involves testing to see if the opposite better explains reality? We strongly urge you to reconsider your position on this subject and to convene an impartial panel for the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, one that is free of ideology, and where controversial arguments can be openly debated. We the undersigned would very much like to offer support in this regard.Respectfully yours,Prof. Dr.rer.nat. Friedrich-Karl Ewert EIKE Diplom-Geologe
Universität. - GH - Paderborn, Abt. Höxter (ret.)# Dr. Holger Thuß EIKE President
European Institute for Climate and Energy http://www.eike-klima-energie.eu/
Signed by Marc Morano Executive Editor/Chief Correspondent Climate Depot
1875 Eye Street, NW Fifth Floor Washington, D.C. 20006 202-536-5052
Morano@ClimateDepot.com www.ClimateDepot.com

MUSLIM NATIONS

EZEKIEL 38:1-12
1 And the word of the LORD came unto me, saying,
2 Son of man, set thy face against Gog,(RULER) the land of Magog,(RUSSIA) the chief prince of Meshech(MOSCOW)and Tubal,(TOBOLSK) and prophesy against him,
3 And say, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I am against thee, O Gog, the chief prince of Meshech(MOSCOW) and Tubal:
4 And I will turn thee back, and put hooks into thy jaws,(GOD FORCES THE RUSSIA-MUSLIMS TO MARCH) and I will bring thee forth, and all thine army, horses and horsemen, all of them clothed with all sorts of armour, even a great company with bucklers and shields, all of them handling swords:
5 Persia,(IRAN,IRAQ) Ethiopia, and Libya with them; all of them with shield and helmet:
6 Gomer,(GERMANY) and all his bands; the house of Togarmah (TURKEY)of the north quarters, and all his bands:(SUDAN,AFRICA) and many people with thee.
7 Be thou prepared, and prepare for thyself, thou, and all thy company that are assembled unto thee, and be thou a guard unto them.
8 After many days thou shalt be visited: in the latter years thou shalt come into the land that is brought back from the sword, and is gathered out of many people, against the mountains of Israel, which have been always waste: but it is brought forth out of the nations, and they shall dwell safely all of them.
9 Thou shalt ascend and come like a storm, thou shalt be like a cloud to cover the land, thou, and all thy bands, and many people with thee.(RUSSIA-EGYPT AND MUSLIMS)
10 Thus saith the Lord GOD; It shall also come to pass, that at the same time shall things come into thy mind, and thou shalt think an evil thought:
11 And thou shalt say, I will go up to the land of unwalled villages; I will go to them that are at rest, that dwell safely, all of them dwelling without walls, and having neither bars nor gates,
12 To take a spoil, and to take a prey; to turn thine hand upon the desolate places that are now inhabited, and upon the people that are gathered out of the nations, which have gotten cattle and goods, that dwell in the midst of the land.

ISAIAH 17:1
1 The burden of Damascus. Behold, Damascus is taken away from being a city, and it shall be a ruinous heap.

PSALMS 83:3-7
3 They (ARABS,MUSLIMS) have taken crafty counsel against thy people,(ISRAEL) and consulted against thy hidden ones.
4 They have said, Come, and let us cut them off from being a nation; that the name of Israel may be no more in remembrance.
5 For they (MUSLIMS) have consulted together with one consent: they are confederate against thee:(TREATIES)
6 The tabernacles of Edom,(JORDAN) and the Ishmaelites;(ARABS) of Moab, PALESTINIANS,JORDAN) and the Hagarenes;(EGYPT)
7 Gebal,(HEZZBALLOH,LEBANON) and Ammon,(JORDAN) and Amalek;(SYRIA,ARABS,SINAI) the Philistines (PALESTINIANS) with the inhabitants of Tyre;(LEBANON)

DANIEL 11:40-43
40 And at the time of the end shall the king of the south( EGYPT) push at him:(EU DICTATOR IN ISRAEL) and the king of the north (RUSSIA AND MUSLIM HORDES OF EZEK 38+39) shall come against him like a whirlwind, with chariots, and with horsemen, and with many ships; and he shall enter into the countries, and shall overflow and pass over.
41 He shall enter also into the glorious land, and many countries shall be overthrown: but these shall escape out of his hand, even Edom, and Moab, and the chief of the children of Ammon.(JORDAN)
42 He shall stretch forth his hand also upon the countries: and the land of Egypt shall not escape.
43 But he shall have power over the treasures of gold and of silver, and over all the precious things of Egypt: and the Libyans and the Ethiopians shall be at his steps.

EZEKIEL 39:1-8
1 Therefore, thou son of man, prophesy against Gog,(LEADER OF RUSSIA) and say, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I am against thee, O Gog, the chief prince of Meshech (MOSCOW) and Tubal: (TUBOLSK)
2 And I will turn thee back, and leave but the sixth part of thee, and will cause thee to come up from the north parts,(RUSSIA) and will bring thee upon the mountains of Israel:
3 And I will smite thy bow out of thy left hand, and will cause thine arrows to fall out of thy right hand.
4 Thou shalt fall upon the mountains of Israel, thou, and all thy bands,( ARABS) and the people that is with thee: I will give thee unto the ravenous birds of every sort, and to the beasts of the field to be devoured.
5 Thou shalt fall upon the open field: for I have spoken it, saith the Lord GOD.
6 And I will send a fire on Magog,(NUCLEAR BOMB) and among them that dwell carelessly in the isles: and they shall know that I am the LORD.
7 So will I make my holy name known in the midst of my people Israel; and I will not let them pollute my holy name any more: and the heathen shall know that I am the LORD, the Holy One in Israel.
8 Behold, it is come, and it is done, saith the Lord GOD; this is the day whereof I have spoken.

JOEL 2:3,20,30-31
3 A fire(NUCLEAR BOMB) devoureth before them;(RUSSIA-ARABS) and behind them a flame burneth: the land is as the garden of Eden before them, and behind them a desolate wilderness; yea, and nothing shall escape them.
20 But I will remove far off from you the northern army,(RUSSIA,MUSLIMS) and will drive him into a land barren and desolate, with his face toward the east sea, and his hinder part toward the utmost sea, and his stink shall come up, and his ill savour shall come up, because he hath done great things.(SIBERIAN DESERT)
30 And I will shew wonders in the heavens and in the earth, blood, and fire, and pillars of smoke.(NUCLEAR BOMB)
31 The sun shall be turned into darkness, and the moon into blood, before the great and the terrible day of the LORD come.

WORLD TERRORISM

GENESIS 6:11-13
11 The earth also was corrupt before God, and the earth was filled with violence.
12 And God looked upon the earth, and, behold, it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth.
13 And God said unto Noah, The end of all flesh is come before me; for the earth is filled with violence through them; and, behold, I will destroy them with the earth.

2 PETER 2:5
5 And spared not the old world, but saved Noah the eighth person, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood upon the world of the ungodly;

2 PETER 3:7
7 But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men

LEVITICUS 26:16
16 I also will do this unto you; I will even appoint over you( sudden) terror, consumption, and the burning ague, that shall consume the eyes, and cause sorrow of heart: and ye shall sow your seed in vain, for your enemies shall eat it.

GENESIS 16:11-12
11 And the angel of the LORD said unto her, Behold, thou art with child, and shalt bear a son, and shalt call his name Ishmael; because the LORD hath heard thy affliction.
12 And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him; and he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren.

ISAIAH 33:1,18-19 Woe to thee that spoilest,(destroys) and thou wast not spoiled;(destroyed) and dealest treacherously, and they dealt not treacherously with thee! when thou shalt cease to spoil,(destroy) thou shalt be spoiled;(destroyed) and when thou shalt make an end to deal treacherously, they shall deal treacherously with thee.
18 Thine heart shall meditate terror. Where is the scribe? where is the receiver? where is he that counted the towers?
19 Thou shalt not see a fierce people, a people of a deeper speech than thou canst perceive; of a stammering tongue, that thou canst not understand.

JOHN 16:2
2 They shall put you out of the synagogues: yea, the time cometh, that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service.

3RD JIHAD TRAILER
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJy9tpGHGXM&feature=player_embedded
3RD JIHAD MOVIE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Gt9UGB1-tQ&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbnaWpSS8Dk&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1d0Lx8MPtI&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZdhKcFk5vg&feature=player_embedded
SHARIA LAW IN AMERICA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fuEy0uiyvNw&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ppTo-TTtJQo&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eVqV-CtEVUU&feature=player_embedded

A fifth of European Union will be Muslim by 2050 Britain, Spain and Holland will have an even higher proportion of Muslims in a shorter amount of time, an investigation by The Telegraph shows.By Adrian Michaels 10:56AM BST 08 Aug 2009

Last year, five per cent of the total population of the 27 EU countries was Muslim. But rising levels of immigration from Muslim countries and low birth rates among Europe's indigenous population mean that, by 2050, the figure will be 20 per cent, according to forecasts.Data gathered from various sources indicate that Britain, Spain and Holland will have an even higher proportion of Muslims in a shorter amount of time.The UK, which currently has 20 million fewer people than Germany, is also projected to be the EU's most populous country by 2060, with 77 million people.The findings have led to allegations that policy-makers are failing to confront the widespread challenges of the demographic time bomb.Experts say that there has been a lack of debate on how the population changes will affect areas of life from education and housing to foreign policy and pensions.Although some polls have pointed to a lack of radicalisation in the Muslim community, little attention is being given to the integration of migrants, it is claimed, with fears of social unrest in years to come.

Muslim Europe: the demographic time bomb transforming our continent
The EU is facing an era of vast social change, reports Adrian Michaels, and few politicians are taking notice By Adrian Michaels 11:11AM BST 08 Aug 2009

Europe's low white birth rate, coupled with faster multiplying migrants, will change fundamentally what we take to mean by European culture and society. Photo: AFP/GETTY
Britain and the rest of the European Union are ignoring a demographic time bomb: a recent rush into the EU by migrants, including millions of Muslims, will change the continent beyond recognition over the next two decades, and almost no policy-makers are talking about it.The numbers are startling. Only 3.2 per cent of Spain's population was foreign-born in 1998. In 2007 it was 13.4 per cent. Europe's Muslim population has more than doubled in the past 30 years and will have doubled again by 2015. In Brussels, the top seven baby boys' names recently were Mohamed, Adam, Rayan, Ayoub, Mehdi, Amine and Hamza.Europe's low white birth rate, coupled with faster multiplying migrants, will change fundamentally what we take to mean by European culture and society. The altered population mix has far-reaching implications for education, housing, welfare, labour, the arts and everything in between. It could have a critical impact on foreign policy: a study was submitted to the US Air Force on how America's relationship with Europe might evolve. Yet EU officials admit that these issues are not receiving the attention they deserve.Jerome Vignon, the director for employment and social affairs at the European Commission, said that the focus of those running the EU had been on asylum seekers and the control of migration rather than the integration of those already in the bloc. It has certainly been underestimatede SLps there is a general rhetoric that social integration of migrants should be given as much importance as monitoring the inflow of migrants.But, he said, the rhetoric had rarely led to policy.The countries of the EU have long histories of welcoming migrants, but in recent years two significant trends have emerged. Migrants have come increasingly from outside developed economies, and they have come in accelerating numbers.

The growing Muslim population is of particular interest. This is not because Muslims are the only immigrants coming into the EU in large numbers; there are plenty of entrants from all points of the compass. But Muslims represent a particular set of issues beyond the fact that atrocities have been committed in the West in the name of Islam.America's Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life, part of the non-partisan Pew Research Center, said in a report: These [EU] countries possess deep historical, cultural, religious and linguistic traditions. Injecting hundreds of thousands, and in some cases millions, of people who look, speak and act differently into these settings often makes for a difficult social fit.How dramatic are the population changes? Everyone is aware that certain neighbourhoods of certain cities in Europe are becoming more Muslim, and that the change is gathering pace. But raw details are hard to come by as the data is sensitive: many countries in the EU do not collect population statistics by religion.EU numbers on general immigration tell a story on their own. In the latter years of the 20th century, the 27 countries of the EU attracted half a million more people a year than left. Since 2002, however, the latest EU report says, net migration into the EU has roughly tripled to between 1.6 million and two million people per year.The increased pace has made a nonsense of previous forecasts. In 2004 the EU thought its population would decline by 16 million by 2050. Now it thinks it will increase by 10 million by 2060. Britain is expected to become the most populous EU country by 2060, with 77 million inhabitants. Right now it has 20 million fewer people than Germany. Italy's population was expected to fall precipitously; now it is predicted to stay flat.The study for the US Air Force by Leon Perkowski in 2006 found that there were at least 15 million Muslims in the EU, and possibly as many as 23 million. They are not uniformly distributed, of course. According to the US's Migration Policy Institute, residents of Muslim faith will account for more than 20 per cent of the EU population by 2050 but already do so in a number of cities. Whites will be in a minority in Birmingham by 2026, says Christopher Caldwell, an American journalist, and even sooner in Leicester. Another forecast holds that Muslims could outnumber non-Muslims in France and perhaps in all of western Europe by mid-century. Austria was 90 per cent Catholic in the 20th century but Islam could be the majority religion among Austrians aged under 15 by 2050, says Mr Caldwell.Projected growth rates are a disputed area. Birth rates can be difficult to predict and migrant numbers can ebb and flow. But Karoly Lorant, a Hungarian economist who wrote a paper for the European Parliament, calculates that Muslims already make up 25 per cent of the population in Marseilles and Rotterdam, 20 per cent in Malmo, 15 per cent in Brussels and Birmingham and 10 per cent in London, Paris and Copenhagen.

Recent polls have tended to show that the feared radicalisation of Europe's Muslims has not occurred. That gives hope that the newcomers will integrate successfully. Nonetheless, second and third generations of Muslims show signs of being harder to integrate than their parents. Policy Exchange, a British study group, found that more than 70 per cent of Muslims over 55 felt that they had as much in common with non-Muslims as Muslims. But this fell to 62 per cent of 16-24 year-olds.The population changes are stirring unease on the ground. Europeans often tell pollsters that they have had enough immigration, but politicians largely avoid debate.France banned the wearing of the hijab veil in schools and stopped the wearing of large crosses and the yarmulke too, so making it harder to argue that the law was aimed solely at Muslims. Britain has strengthened its laws on religious hatred. But these are generally isolated pieces of legislation.Into the void has stepped a resurgent group of extreme-Right political parties, among them the British National Party, which gained two seats at recent elections to the European Parliament. Geert Wilders, the Dutch politician who speaks against Islam and was banned this year from entering Britain, has led opinion polls in Holland.The Pew Forum identified the mainstream silence in 2005: The fact that [extreme parties] have risen to prominence at all speaks poorlye SLps about the state and quality of the immigration debate. [Scholars] have argued that European elites have yet to fully grapple with the broader issues of race and identity surrounding Muslims and other groups for fear of being seen as politically incorrect.The starting point should be greater discussion of integration. Does it matter at all? Yes, claims Mr Vignon at the European Commission. Without it, polarisation and ghettoes can result.It's bad because it creates antagonism. It antagonises poor people against other poor people: people with low educational attainment feel threatened,he says.The EU says employment rates for non-EU nationals are lower than for nationals, which holds back economic advancement and integration. One important reason for this is a lack of language skills. The Migration Policy Institute says that, in 2007, 28 per cent of children born in England and Wales had at least one foreign-born parent. That rose to 54 per cent in London. Overall in 2008, 14.4 per cent of children in primary schools had a language other than English as their first language.Muslims, who are a hugely diverse group, have so far shown little inclination to organise politically on lines of race or religion. But that does not mean their voices are being ignored. Germany started to reform its voting laws 10 years ago, granting certain franchise rights to the large Turkish population. It would be odd if that did not alter the country's stance on Turkey's application to join the EU. Mr Perkowski's study says: Faced with rapidly growing, disenfranchised and increasingly politically empowered Muslim populations within the borders of some of its oldest and strongest allies, the US could be faced with ever stronger challenges to its Middle East foreign policies.Demography will force politicians to confront these issues sooner rather than later. Recently, some have started to nudge the debate along. Angel Gurría, the OECD secretary-general, said in June: Migration is not a tap that can be turned on and off at will. We need fair and effective migration and integration policies; policies that work and adjust to both good economic times and bad ones.

Gaddafi attacks Sarkozy plan for Union of the Med ,Nicolas Sarkozy's plans for a Mediterranean Union will fuel Islamist terrorism and will be regarded as imperialism by many in Africa and the Arab world, Colonel Muammar Gaddafi warned yesterday. By Bruno Waterfield in Tripoli 12:41AM BST 10 Jul 2008

The comments by the Libyan leader are a major setback to the French President's Mediterranean project, his highest-profile initiative during France's turn at the European Union's six-month rotating presidency which began last week.Mr Sarkozy has invited all the EU's 27 leaders plus premiers from 17 Mediterranean countries to a summit launching the new Union in Paris next week. We shall have another Roman empire and imperialist design,Col Gaddafi said in Tripoli, the Libyan capital, yesterday. There are imperialist maps and designs that we have already rolled up. We should not have them again.Speaking at the Bab Alazizya palace, the same building that was attacked by US fighter planes over 20 years ago in retaliation for a Libyan-sponsored bombing in Berlin, Col Gaddafi predicted that that the EU blueprint for the Mediterranean will be a pretext for a new generation of terrorists. I believe this project of the Union for the Mediterranean would increase illegal migration and terrorism and give a justification to Islamist extremists to step up Jihad attacks. These extremists would explain it as crusade against Islam and European colonisation, he said.They will talk about jihad in Europe. This project is frightening. This project is dangerous.They will interpret it as a new crusade to contain Muslim forces. They will see it as a new colonialism and they will accuse the Arabs that they are traitors, who have abandoned principles and sold out their countries. Col Gaddafi is angry that original plans to build closer co-operation among a only few southern European and North African states that border the Mediterranean were changed to include the whole EU, the Middle East - and Israel - in the new Union.

It is unbelievable that I would come to my own country and people and say that I have a union with Israel. It is very dangerous,he said. We Arabs have not been able to unite together. How can we have a union with Scotland or Scandinavia or Israel?Germany had blocked Mr Sarkozy's first plan for a Union involving Portugal, France, Spain, Italy, Cyprus and Malta, all European countries bordering the Mediterranean, with North African countries and Turkey because Berlin feared dividing the EU. Col Gaddafi, along with other Arab and Middle Eastern leaders, has felt left out of discussions in Brussels over the Mediterranean Union's membership, scope and subordination to the wider EU. They ask us just to come and sign it. That is just an insult,he said. They decide and then they tell us. The headquarters will be in Brussels. Should I come and say I handed over the capital city of my country to Brussels? Mr Sarkozy is hoping that he can focus the Union for the Mediterranean on concrete and non-controversial issues such as maritime co-operation, tackling pollution, solar energy projects and civil security co-operation. I predict this project will be a complete failure,said Col Gaddafi. A French official said: The Libyans are the only country that is not sending the head of government of state but it is sending a representative.

EU FREE MUSLIM IMMIGRATION
http://balder.org/avisartikler/Barcelona-Declaration-Euro-Mediterranean-English.php

Free Muslim Immigration to Europe.Secret European Union-agreements with 10 European and North African Countries.Abstract from the Barcelona - Euro Mediterranean Declaration of 1995:

The Euro Mediterranean Declaration was agreed upon by the EU, Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Egypt, Jordan, the Palestinian Authority, Syria, Lebanon, Turkey and Israel and comprises:Comprehensive political partnership, among other things about: Establishing a free trade area and economic integration to begin in the year of 2010
Considerably more money for the partners ,Cultural partnership.Respect for Islam Is Guaranteed by the EU.Multiculturalism is to be respected in order to promote tolerance between different ethnic groups in society. The importance of a resolute common campaign against racism, xenophobia and intolerance is emphasized. [Breaking News - January 2008 !!!]Close mutual European-Muslim influence on radio, television, newspapers and magazines is to bring about cultural understanding. The EU will actively promote such mutual influences. Youth exchange is one of the instruments for cooperation between future Euro Mediterranean generations. Barcelona declaration adopted at the Euro-Mediterranean Conference [27-28/11/95] [Story continues beyond image insert]Title page of flyer produced by the Association Dansk Kultur.

The Danish text reads:Free Muslim Immigration to Europe Secret EU-deals with 10 Asian and Northafrican countries The original flyer (pdf) in Danish containing the text of this article .Open letter to the Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen from Anders Bruun Laursen June 27. 2006 To the Prime Minister Allow me the following three questions:Question 1: Why have you, our politicians, and the media told us nothing about the Euromediterranean Project, which has been in existence for more than 10 years now? Question 2: Why is our 1000-year-old identity, religion and culture to be removed and replaced by islam? [...] thus dismantling our religion and culture, which are called 'stereotypes and prejudices'.Question 3: Do you believe, that the credibility of your government and confidence in the undemocratic EU will grow, as we 'grassroots' spread knowledge about the Euromediterranean/Euro-Arabian project? Do you not think it is about time for you and your government to start informing us thoroughly about the Euromediterranean Project and its propaganda machinery?

E-Mail Answers from the Danish Prime Minister – Aug. 29.2006: The goal of establishing a free-trade area implies that the southern members of the cooperation can obtain gradual integration into the expanded European internal market and the possibility of ultimately reaching the EUs four fundamental freedoms: free movement of goods, services, capital and people - in exchange for tangible political and economic reforms. [...] Read all of Anders Bruun Laursen's questions and the Danish Prime Minister Fogh Rasmussen's answers here.[continued] The EU Offers the Populations of 9 Muslim Countries Free Movement of Goods, Services, Capital and People into the EU.In return for concrete political and economic changes the EU offers integration in the expanded internal market of the EU and the possibility to obtain free movement for goods, services, money and people. Association agreements have been made with all partner countries except Syria (Abstract from 28.11.2003 account of Euro Mediterranean Foreign Minister Conference in Naples held on 2.-3.12.2003!!).

Negotiations about Turkish EU entrance began in 2005.

Note: The account was published by the EU-commission 6 days before the Foreign Minister Conference! So – who rules the EU? Read the account here: 6th Conference of Euro-Mediterranean Foreign Ministers Naples, 2-3 December, 2003.Confirmed by the Danish Prime Minister on 29.08.06 in correspondence. However, the Prime Minister twice refused to inform why he, our governments and the media have kept absolutely silent about the Euro Mediterranean Project.Three weeks after the terror attack in 2001 on the WTO Center in New York, the EU knelt before Islam, and the Euro Mediterranean Project is now being used as a lightning conductor.The ministers declined as both dangerous and unfounded any connection between terror and the Arab and Muslim world. In this context the importance of the Barcelona Process was emphasized by everybody as a suitable and recognized instrument to promote a dialogue between equal partners and civilizations.The ministers agreed to work on deepening the on-going dialogue between the cultures and civilizations, especially wanting to direct attention towards youth, education, and the media.Account from the 5.-6.10.2001- Euro Mediterranean Foreign Conference in Brussels.The European Union and the European Council Want to Remove Our Ancient Identity.Cultural policy must avoid the popular distinction between them and us, even mentioning the other, as this opens the gate for imposing collective identity on the individual.Traugott Schoefthaler, head of the Anna Lindh Foundation, a Euro Mediterranean propaganda apparatus)
See Dialogue to Hospitality (pdf).

Identity is the root of all conflicts-(World Culture Forum Alliance, founded by the Ford Foundation, which is inextricably tied to the US Council on Foreign Relations and the CIA. The EU and the European Council are also attached to the WCFA)The Danish Foreign Ministry is educating us from our 'stereotypes and prejudices' towards Islamic culture – and so reflects the program of the Euro Mediterranean propaganda apparatus: the Anna Lindh Foundation, founded by the Arab League, the EU, European Council, and the UNESCO:

Norwegian Flag EU Model
We will tackle stereotypes and prejudices and ignorance and change the daily 'news journalism' to portray every-day life of ordinary people, which can create identification and fascination – and intercultural understanding. We will tackle our stereotypic images of people from foreign cultures and make new experiments with pictures in public places, in the media, and advertising. And we will have common projects with people from other cultures. We will develop the intercultural skills of journalists, school pupils and artists and exchange people from these groups with (muslim) colleagues. We will manage art and cultural productions. We will train the school teachers and influence their education to be multicultural.And we will influence the curricula of the schools to become multicultural by means of revision of existing textbooks and educational materials. We will arrange giant Muslim Youth Festivals - like the Images of The Middle East, which lasted 6 weeks in 2006 in Denmark. (Also read Speech by the head of the 'Danish Center for Culture and Development' (CKD) - run by the Danish Foreign Ministry - on the 13.05.2005 in Rabat). Olaf Gerlach Hansens speech in Rabat, Morocco 13. Juni 2005 | Danish version

In a correspondence the Danish Prime Minister on the 12.09.2006 refused to inform why his government gives in to the above educational policy initiated the Arab League and the EU.The EU and the CKD of the Danish Foreign Ministry have made cooperation agreements with the Islamic Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, which aims – according to article 5a of its charter – to spread Muslim ways of thinking and living in the entire world. Charter of the Islamic Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization - ISESCO | ISESCO aftale underskrevet.The Euro Mediterranean Project is a Great Step towards the One-World State.When limitless continental democracies and cooperative assemblies are possible global democracy is just around the corner' (tranlated quote from Bud på en helt ny dagsorden(pdf)Zealous Muslim immigrants crowding to Denmark are being heartily welcomed by the Danish government
(Caption under the flyer's reverse side image)Our Politicians Believe That Our and Islam's Aim (i.e. the aim of the 'Holy' Quran) Is the Same.Our obligation to the values that mean most to us – freedom, tolerance and justice – has grown even stronger and deeper since the London bombs. So has our relationship with the Islamic world, which also shares our common ideals, today.(Margaret Beckett, the UK's Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs in the Danish paper Jyllands-Posten on the July 7 2006)Our Media Are Managed by Higher Authorities and Keep Totally Silent on the Euro Mediterranean Project.The Freedom of expression is central to the values and traditions of Europe. But its preservation depends on responsible behaviors by individuals.By extension, we do not believe the media should be regulated from outside, but rather that you find ways to regulate yourselves.In considering the question of self-regulation, I would also ask you to think about the need for monitoring from within your own professional bodies.I am convinced that will have a significant impact.(Benita Ferrero Waldner, European Commissioner for External Relations and European Neighborhood Policy to selected media representatives from all over Europe) Benita Ferrero-Waldner - Intercultural dialogue: the media’s role Speech/06/321 [scroll down on that page] We will identify a nucleus of journalists and analysts around which to develop a structured, sustainable system of information exchange and publication focused on North-South understanding.From Euromed & The Media (pdf) September 2005 Where do they learn this? In 2005 the Audio Visual Observatory of the European Council held a Symposium in Moscow to learn all the tricks from the Russians, who have great experience in this field. Euromed & The Media (pdf)All internet links were valid June 11. 2007

THE EU DICTATOR

REVELATION 6:1-2,13:1-3,7-9,16
1 And I saw when the Lamb opened one of the seals, and I heard, as it were the noise of thunder, one of the four beasts saying, Come and see.
2 And I saw, and behold a white horse: and he that sat on him had a bow; and a crown was given unto him: and he went forth conquering, and to conquer.(THIS IS THE EU DICTATOR)
1 And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.(7 HEADS ARE THE 7TH WORLD EMPIRE IN HISTORY (THE EU) AS WELL AS THE VATICAN WHICH IS BUILT ON 7 HILLS. 10 HORNS ARE 10 KINGS THAT ARISE FROM THE EU, THEN #11 COMES ON THE SCENE BECOMES THE HEAD OF 3 OUNTRIES AND THEN THE EU DICTATOR, COMES FROM 1 OF THE 3 COUNTRIES THAT RULE FOR THIS TERM. I BELIEVE THE 3 COUNTRIES RULING AT THE TIME ARE SPAIN AND 2 OF THE ORIGINAL 6 THAT STARTED THE EU. FROM 1 OF THESE 3 COUNTRIES COME THE FUTURE EU DICTATOR PRESIDENT OF THE EUROPEAN UNION WHO GUARENTEES ISRAELS SECURITY FOR A LAND FOR PEACE 7 YEAR TREATY.
2 And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.(THE JEWISH EU DICTATOR GETS HIS POWER FROM SATAN,HE COMES FROM THE OCCULT).
3 And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast.(THE DICTATOR HAS A FALSE RESURRECTION. JUST LIKE JESUS HAD A LITERAL RESURRECTION THIS DICTATOR GETS MURDERED AT THE 3 1/2 YR MARK OF THR 7 YEAR TREATY AND COMES BACK TO LIFE. THIS IS HOW HE CAN CLAIM TO BE GOD AND GET AWAY WITH IT AND CONTROL THE WHOLE EARTH.
7 And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations.
8 And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.
9 If any man have an ear, let him hear.
16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

DANIEL 11:36-40
36 And the king shall do according to his will;(EU PRESIDENT) and he shall exalt himself, and magnify himself above every god, and shall speak marvellous things against the God of gods, and shall prosper till the indignation be accomplished: for that that is determined shall be done.
37 Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers,(THIS EU DICTATOR IS A EUROPEAN JEW) nor the desire of women, nor regard any god: for he shall magnify himself above all.
38 But in his estate shall he honour the God of forces:(HES A MILITARY GINIUS) and a god whom his fathers knew not shall he honour with gold, and silver, and with precious stones, and pleasant things.
39 Thus shall he do in the most strong holds (CONTROL HEZBOLLAH,AL-QUAIDA MURDERERS ETC) with a strange god, whom he shall acknowledge and increase with glory: and he shall cause them to rule over many,(HIS ARMY LEADERS) and shall divide the land for gain.
40 And at the time of the end shall the king of the south(EGYPT) push at him:(EU DICTATOR PROTECTING ISRAELS SECURITY) and the king of the north(RUSSIA) shall come against him like a whirlwind, with chariots, and with horsemen, and with many ships; and he shall enter into the countries, and shall overflow and pass over.

We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.James Paul Warburg appearing before the Senate on 7th February 1950

Like a famous WWII Belgian General,Paul Henry Spock said in 1957:We need no commission, we have already too many. What we need is a man who is great enough to be able to keep all the people in subjection to himself and to lift us out of the economic bog into which we threaten to sink. Send us such a man. Be he a god or a devil, we will accept him.And today, sadly, the world is indeed ready for such a man.

EUROPEAN UNION ARMY

DANIEL 7:23-25
23 Thus he said, The fourth beast (EU,REVIVED ROME) shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth,(7TH WORLD EMPIRE) which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces.(TRADING BLOCKS)
24 And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings(10 NATIONS) that shall arise: and another shall rise after them;(#11 SPAIN) and he shall be diverse from the first, and he shall subdue three kings.( BE HEAD OF 3 NATIONS)
25 And he (EU PRESIDENT) shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time.(3 1/2 YRS)

DANIEL 8:23-25
23 And in the latter time of their kingdom, when the transgressors are come to the full, a king (EU DICTATOR) of fierce countenance, and understanding dark sentences,(FROM THE OCCULT) shall stand up.
24 And his power shall be mighty, but not by his own power:(SATANS POWER) and he shall destroy wonderfully, and shall prosper, and practise, and shall destroy the mighty and the holy people.
25 And through his policy also he shall cause craft to prosper in his hand; and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by peace shall destroy many: he shall also stand up against the Prince of princes;(JESUS) but he shall be broken without hand.

DANIEL 11:36-39
36 And the king (EU DICTATOR) shall do according to his will; and he shall exalt himself, and magnify himself above every god, and shall speak marvellous things against the God of gods, and shall prosper till the indignation be accomplished: for that that is determined shall be done.
37 Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers,(THIS EU DICTATOR IS JEWISH) nor the desire of women, nor regard any god: for he shall magnify himself above all.(CLAIM TO BE GOD)
38 But in his estate shall he honour the God of forces:(WAR) and a god whom his fathers knew not shall he honour with gold, and silver, and with precious stones, and pleasant things.
39 Thus shall he do in the most strong holds with a strange god,(DESTROY TERROR GROUPS) whom he shall acknowledge and increase with glory: and he shall cause them to rule over many,(HIS ARMY LEADERS) and shall divide the land for gain.

REVELATION 19:19
19 And I saw the beast,(EU LEADER) and the kings of the earth, and their armies, gathered together to make war against him that sat on the horse,(JESUS) and against his army.(THE RAPTURED CHRISTIANS)

The EU’s Militarized AUG 8,09Policehttp://www.britsattheirbest.com/freedom/f_eu_sos_feb_2008_1_2008.htm

The Eurogendarmerie practise their street-fighting tactics in battle formation. George Orwell’s novel 1984 describes the typical totalitarian police state, where the prime purpose of the police is not really to stop crimes against people and their property, but crimes against the State, which is whatever the State calls a crime.

S O S

With the 2nd reading of the EU Amendment Bill underway, I have changed the format of this issue to accommodate two reports on the threats it will pose to one thousand years of democracy if it is ratified by Parliament.The first, which follows, is by Torquil Dick-Erikson,(1.8.07; updated 5.1.08) a commentator on legal affairs and by extension continental inquisitorial vs Anglo-Saxon systems, who writes in English and Italian law journals and was a contributor to the House of Lords report on Corpus Juris (HL 62, 9th Session 1998-99).His report has been compiled primarily from the Eurogendarmerie’s official website, the Treaty of Velsen (esp. articles 6.3 and 44) and the Portuguese Presidency website. The second report, by Professor Anthony Coughlan, Dublin, describes the supranational state created by the Lisbon Treaty. ~ Iris Binstead

1984 TO COME TRUE SOON? by Torquil Dick-Erikson, MA Oxon

In the image above, you will notice two nationalities of policemen - the ones on the right are Italian Carabinieri (it is written across their shields), military police in Italy under a centralised national command. Though part of military police and Italian army, they are used as a civilian police force, and they are stationed in every borough and hamlet, tasked to keep public order. The ones on the left are from one of the other four countries that so far have decided to participate in the Eurogendarmerie force. They are still wearing their national uniforms, since a single harmonised EU gendarme uniform has not yet been issued, but they have the EU armbands (see above) which they all wear over their national uniforms. They are standing here in locked-shield formation, like ancient Roman legionaries, to protect themselves from assaults by demonstrators, or from stones or other objects which might be thrown at them. The little patch of flames in front of them is presumably a Molotov cocktail which in their simulation some subversive demonstrator has thrown at them.They are being trained to deal with this sort of thing. From this formation they can fire tear-gas grenades over the heads of, or straight into, a crowd to disperse it (they are wearing gas-masks so as not to breathe in the gas themselves), or indeed rubber, or more usually lead, bullets; and when ordered they will charge forward swinging their batons, and anybody who is in their path is likely to get pretty seriously injured.

Today, as the nation states of Europe lose their borders and prepare to merge into one single European State, we must realise that the continental traditions of policing, like their traditions of criminal justice, are very, very different from ours. And since they are the majority, it will inevitably happen – if the planned merger goes ahead with the new Treaty – that their system will be imposed on us.Not many know that, for example, the first chapter of the Italian criminal code (listing of course the most important and heinous crimes) is entitled Of crimes against the personality of the State. The code used today is still the one left by Mussolini, tinkered with over the last sixty years but never properly overhauled, let alone replaced. And in its overall approach Mussolini actually took his cue from the French, that is, Napoleon, of course.There has been concern in Britain about surveillance cameras etc, of which there are more in the UK than in any other EU state. Well, we do feel uneasy with them at present, but not too alarmed because we feel we still have a government we can trust not to abuse them in fundamental ways. . .But what if a future, more tyrannical, government comes in? The line of reasoning that most people take in Britain when debating this issue is based on the assumption that in any case the government we shall have will always be a British government, that is, elected by, and dismissible by, the British voters.

But this assumption is no longer justified.

In discussions earlier this year we heard Angela Merkel quoted as saying that The EU needs more and better defined powers than it has at present: in energy policy, in foreign policy, in justice and home affairs,- the key here being the last item, JHA. And Blair raised no objections to that. So the risk is looming of indeed a future, unknown and unfamiliar, government in charge of our JHA, and it not being a British government, but an EU government. How would the people of Britain feel about their CCTV footage being scrutinised, not by British bobbies, but by German policemen, wearing EU uniforms or EU armbands over their German uniforms?

This is not just a theoretical risk.

And something we must realise is that German/French/Spanish/Italian etc policemen are not just like our own, only wearing different uniforms and speaking another language.

The fact is that the whole continental tradition of policing is different from ours, as a glance at the European Gendarmerie Force website will make clear. And we can see from this website that they have already set up the nucleus of their paramilitary, armed, anti-riot battalions, organised in the continental style. So the high-surveillance machinery is set up in Britain, the heavily repressive police forces and the unelected and undismissible government apparatus is set up in Brussels, and our own government seems to be ready to hand over and join these two together.We are very nearly in 1984.The EU is preparing for that moment, of physical confrontation with dissent against its authority, and intending to suppress it with sheer, overpowering, paramilitary, brute force, in a way that British people who have always lived in Britain will find astounding.Have a look at the pictures on the European Gendarmerie Force website. This sort of use of paramilitary police is quite common in continental European countries and people there are accustomed to it. Indeed these photographs, which are possibly a bit shocking for us Brits, are taken from the Eurogendarmerie's own official website. They think this is all quite normal. They have published these photographs, evidently not thinking that anyone would be at all shocked or surprised by them.On the 18th October 2007, the same day as the new EU “Reform Treaty” was agreed in Lisbon under the media spotlight, another Treaty was signed in Velsen, Holland, between the 5 EU member states participating in the Eurogendamerie, to put it on an official footing. Britain was not amongst the signatories, because not having a militarised police force the UK is not entitled to take part.

EU military police can enter Britain

However, article 6.3 of this Treaty, the full text of which can be accessed through a link on the European Gendarmerie Force website, provides that other member states can join in with this particular form of presumably enhanced cooperation, simply by agreement of the country concerned. Since our Parliament already approved the provisions on enhanced cooperation (whereby states that wish to forge ahead in certain areas may do so without waiting for the agreement of all the others) with the Treaty of Nice, it is possible that this simply means with the agreement of the government of the day, that is, without need for any new specific Act of Parliament.

EU military police will only leave if the EU orders them to leave

On December 11th 2007 Bob Spink MP in the Commons debate (Hansard, col 188) prior to the signing of the Treaty of Lisbon asked Miliband for an assurance that the Eurogendarmerie will never be allowed into the UK. No such assurance was given, and Miliband confirmed that they could enter Britain with Britain’s consent, presumably just the consent of the government. What he did not mention and what was not spelt out was the (obvious) fact that once the EGF is inside a country, it will not leave that country simply because that country’s national authorities tell it to leave, for it will not recognise those authorities, but only its own supreme authority in Brussels.

EU military police may be Turks

Another disturbing element of the Treaty of Velsen is in article 44 which provides for the recruitment of Eurogendarmes not only from member states but also from candidate states.Indeed the Portuguese EU Presidency’s website, announcing the signing of this Treaty, stated that Turkey had already shown interest. So when the EGF does come over to Britain, we could find ourselves being policed by Turks in EU uniform. Even if they are excluded from being full members of the EU because their human rights record is not good enough, and torture in Turkish police stations is reported to be commonplace, the Turks are evidently considered good enough to be recruited as policemen to police us.Please note - these are not soldiers, they are European riot-control policemen. They are actually members of the Spanish Guardia Civil as you can see from the flashes on their left shoulders, and it is written on the flak jacket of the man standing on the left of the picture, but if you look at their right upper arms you will just glimpse the royal-blue armband of the European Gendarmerie Force - which has as its emblem a circle of little yellow stars, and in the middle a sword and a flaming grenade, symbolising the common military root of European police (this logo and the armband are fully explained on their website).

This military root we need hardly say, may be common to the police forces of continental Europe, but it is utterly alien to our own policing traditions. Note their steel helmets, and their heavy automatic rifles, carried here by the Guardia Civil, by what they are pleased to call a civilian police force. . .

Europeans distrust police

In continental Europe, our idea of policing by consent is considered a bizarre and incomprehensible contradiction in terms. Of course one of the duties of continental police is to tackle crime. But they are also regularly and normally considered to be a fairly blunt instrument whereby the State imposes its will on the citizenry in general. It has always been that way. They are occasionally admired, more often feared, and sometimes hated by the population at large, law-abiding and criminal elements alike.They are seldom recruited locally.One unfortunate result is that whenever they try to investigate a crime, they often receive little help from the public - people are most unwilling to step forward (hence the phenomenon of omertá - which is a tremendous obstacle to any serious police detective work). So the extent to which crime goes unchecked is often higher on the continent than in the UK, although it is worsening in the UK as we are being brought into line with continental practice, with our own policemen being taken off the beat and so out of that daily contact with the local population, which would enable confidence and trust to be built.As we know, unlike in Britain, all continental police carry lethal weapons at all times. In the simulated exercise above, the protester has been handcuffed and arrested, and is being led off to prison.

EU criminal code - Corpus Juris - no Habeas Corpus

Incidentally, under the proposed Corpus Juris EU criminal code, which reflects most continental procedures, on arrest a person may be held for up to six months in prison, renewable for three months at a time, with no right to a public hearing in the meantime, nor any obligation on the prosecution to exhibit any evidence. This is what happens when there is no Habeas Corpus, as indeed there is no Habeas Corpus in the nations of continental Europe to this day.I remember reading a few years ago that the present UK government started a centralised militarised police force of sorts with a Ministry of Defence police – who at once got called ModPlods.Until we get a centrally commanded British paramilitary police force, we won't be allowed to join the Eurogendarmerie. This is doubtless why the Home Secretary made the announcement earlier this year about the centralising of police under government control which caused the letter of protest published in the Times from former Deputy Assistant Commissioner Roach. The criteria for a national force to join the EGF are displayed on their website.

Combating fellow-countrymen

The fact of having different nationalities drilling side by side is clearly part of a harmonisation of police plan, so as to create a unified European military police force. This is frightening because the European Union is not democratic and not accountable. The possibility that sooner or later the military police will be manipulated and will be fighting the people is very high. The CV of the former French general who led the force indicates that his main professional expertise was in confronting and combating his fellow-countrymen when they try to riot in the streets.

The best way to stop these fellows from coming over to the UK and demonstrating their skills on a high street near you, is - as a very first step - to make sure that as many people in Britain see the European Gendarmerie Force website.This will help people to realise with some urgency that the EU is NOT just about our prosperity, it is about our very basic freedoms, and what in an old-fashioned phrase used to be called our national security - the safety of each and every one of us. And it should help each and every one of us to realise that a merger with our continental neighbours will NOT just mean that things will carry on much as before, only on a larger scale.We must realise that our continental neighbours have a very different history from ours and do not share many of our traditions, in particular our traditions of policing, and in a merger their voice will prevail over ours, and our traditions will be uprooted and erased, and their traditions, new, unfamiliar and alien to us, will be imposed on us. Their ability to control the EU's military police will be lost as well because they will have lost their own national controls over their police just as we will . This makes us all extremely vulnerable. Let us persevere in the defence of freedom. SOS SAVE OUR SOVEREIGNTY ,5 Battery Park, Polruan-by-Fowey, Cornwall PL23 1PT Tel: 01726 870850 Contributions to SOS are welcome.e-mail: iric.binstead@virgin.net