THE J6 SCAMMERS ARE AFTER TRUMP-HIS FAMILY AND MIKE LINDELL NOW.

THE J6 SCAMMERS ARE AFTER TRUMP-HIS FAMILY AND MIKE LINDELL NOW.

YOU NEVER HEAR MEADOWS-JONES OR ANY OF THE OTHER 8 NAMES THE J6 DEMOLIBNUT SAY ON TV ANY MORE. THAT ARE SUING THE J6 COMMITTEE FOR BEING AFTER THEIR PRIVACY ISSUES.NO MENTION OF DONALD JOHN TRUMP EITHER BECAUSE HES SUING THE LIBERAL BABY MURDERER-SODOMITE SUCK UP J6 COMMITTEE ALSO. SO NOW THEIR GOING AFER KIMBERLEY GUILFOIL-ERIC TRUMP-MIKE LINDELL AND OTHER TRUMP ASSOCIATES. SO FAR SYDNEY POWELL IS THE ONLY ONE I HEARD IS TALKING WITH THE AMERICA DESTROYING-3RD WORLD COUNTRY LOVERS  J6 BRAIN DEAD LIBERAL PROPAGANDA-COMMUNIST-HITLER 3RD COMMITTEE. I HOPE MIKE LINDELL, THE TRUMPS AND KIMBERLEY GUILFOIL SUE THESE COMMUNIST HITLERS LIKE THE OTHER 10 ARE DOING AGAINST THEIR PRIVACY.  

MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell says he's 'disgusted' with 2 banks he claims are cutting ties with him over 'cancel culture' after his phone records were subpoenaed by the January 6 committee-Cheryl Teh and Jake Lahut-Jan 17, 2022, 1:34 AM

Mike Lindell, the founder and CEO of MyPillow, told Insider on Friday that he's been told by two financial institutions to "leave their bank."Lindell said Minnesota Bank & Trust and Heartland Financial USA told him they no longer wanted to do business with him. Lindell is one of the most vocal supporters of former President Donald Trump; he recently told Insider he's spent $25 million pushing Trump's baseless voter-fraud claims.Earlier this month, the January 6 House select committee subpoenaed the pillow CEO's phone records over his ties to the former president.According to Lindell, this raised concerns at Minnesota Bank & Trust. "But what if somebody came in and said, 'You know what? We're going to subpoena all of his account records and this and that,' and we make the news?" a man whom Lindell identified as Tom Cardle, a senior vice president at Minnesota Bank & Trust, said in recordings obtained by Insider.Cardle also referred to the bank's continued relationship with Lindell as a "reputation risk." Cardle didn't respond to Insider's multiple requests for comment on whether he was in the recordings. But Insider independently verified that the phone number was linked to an office line associated with Cardle."What happens with accounts is between bankers and their clients. Decisions about bank accounts will be left to the account holders," a Minnesota Bank & Trust representative told Insider when reached for comment on Friday. "These guys have an agenda. There's something wrong, or they would have done something before," Lindell told Insider on Friday, responding to the call. "They would have done something last year or a year ago. Like on January 9, when I was at the White House, running around with papers from a lawyer that said 'martial law,' they would have done this."Lindell was actually photographed at the White House carrying notes about martial law on January 15. "Why did they wait until now?" he continued. "There's something behind this, and we can't let everyone get debanked in our country."Lindell added that he thought the banks wanting to terminate their relationship with him was about the First Amendment, floating a theory that "somebody got to them."The banks "never had a problem with the cyber symposium. They didn't have a problem last year when all the box stores canceled me," Lindell said, referring to his 72-hour cyber symposium in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, and Costco and other retailers pulling MyPillow products from their shelves. "Isn't this weird? You know, give me a break. These guys are disgusting."The pillow executive said he does not intend to comply with the bank's entreaties to close the accounts."I'm not closing my accounts. They're going to have to throw me out," Lindell told Insider, adding that he thought the banks were taking these actions because of "cancel culture."

Exclusive: Eric Trump and Kimberly Guilfoyle's phone records subpoenaed by January 6 committee-By Jamie Gangel, Jeremy Herb and Elizabeth Stuart, CNN (PEDOPHILE-GAY-PERVERTED NETWORK)-Updated 7:48 PM ET, Tue January 18, 2022

Washington (CNN)The House committee investigating the January 6 attack on the US Capitol has subpoenaed and obtained records of phone numbers associated with one of former President Donald Trump's children, Eric Trump, as well as Kimberly Guilfoyle, who is engaged to Donald Trump Jr., sources tell CNN.It appears to be the first time the select committee has issued a subpoena that targeted a member of the Trump family, in what marks a significant escalation of the investigation into Trump's role in the January 6 insurrection. The decision to subpoena communication records involving the Trump family underscores the aggressive tack the committee is taking as it races to complete its investigation while battling Trump in court over access to documents from his administration.The phone records obtained by the committee are part of a new round of call detail records subpoenaed from communication companies, multiple sources tell CNN. These records provide the committee with logs that show incoming and outgoing calls, including the date, time and length of calls. The records also show a log of text messages, but not the substance or content of the messages.Still, the information can be a critical investigative tool for the committee in piecing together a road map of who was communicating before, during and after January 6.Both Eric Trump and Guilfoyle played prominent roles in Trump's "Stop the Steal" efforts, including Guilfoyle fundraising off the lie that the election was stolen. Both spoke at the January 6 rally on the Ellipse that preceded the attack on the Capitol.The records may also help the committee flesh out the text messages and phone records it has received from others, like former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, as well as fundraisers and rally organizers.CNN reported last month that the committee had already subpoenaed the phone records of more than 100 people as part of its investigation.In some cases, communication companies have notified the targets of subpoenas from the select committee, which led to several lawsuits to try to prevent panel from obtaining the call detail records.The newly obtained records include the cell phone number used by Eric Trump, according to sources familiar with the number. The cell phone number for Guilfoyle was confirmed by sources familiar with her number and her text messages. The committee previously identified this number as Guilfoyle's number in text message exchanges with other witnesses.There is no indication the committee has directly subpoenaed either Eric Trump or Guilfoyle for interviews or documents. Nor is there any evidence that the committee has subpoenaed communication records related to Trump's other children, Ivanka Trump or Donald Trump Jr., or his son-in-law Jared Kushner.The committee did release text messages that Donald Trump Jr. sent to Meadows as the January 6 attack was unfolding, which Meadows voluntarily provided to the committee before he stopped cooperating.Reached by CNN on Tuesday afternoon, the committee declined to comment on the new Trump and Guilfoyle subpoenas.But in an interview with CNN's Don Lemon on Monday night, select committee member Zoe Lofgren, a California Democrat, said, "We're piecing together information from the President's inner circle and others who were in a position to see and hear what the plot was leading up to the riot."Lofgren declined to say whether the committee had received information from the Trump family, while adding, "nothing is off the table."According to a source familiar with Eric Trump's thinking about the subpoena of his call records, "He's not losing any sleep over it."An attorney for Guilfoyle said she had not been notified of any subpoena being issued for her records. The attorney, Joseph Tacopina, said the subpoena is "of no consequence to her because she has absolutely nothing to hide or be concerned about."Trump, Guilfoyle roles in 'Stop the Steal'The committee is interested in Eric Trump due to his involvement with the events of January 6, including efforts related to "Stop the Steal," according to a source familiar with the investigation. Eric Trump spoke at the January 6 rally at the Ellipse, quoting his father's tweet calling rally participants "patriots" and questioning the legitimacy of President Joe Biden's win."I've got a question for you. Is there any person here that actually thinks that Joe Biden won this election?" Eric Trump asked at the rally. "I don't either, guys, I don't either."Guilfoyle, who was involved in raising money for the Trump campaign and the January 6 rally, also spoke at the Ellipse. "Look at all of us out here, God-loving, freedom-loving, liberty-loving patriots, that will not let them steal this election," Guilfoyle said. "We will not allow the liberals and the Democrats to steal our dream or steal our elections."he committee has identified Guilfoyle's number in text message exchanges with other witnesses, according to two sources. In November, ProPublica first reported that Guilfoyle bragged over text messages about raising millions for the January 6 rally.Guilfoyle's attorney denied to ProPublica that the texts were related to the January 6 rally or that Guilfoyle was involved with fundraising or approving speakers.Trump has amassed a war chest of more than $100 million in the months after he left the White House, raising tens of millions of dollars while spreading his lies about the 2020 election being stolen.The batch of texts the committee released last month included one exchange between Donald Trump Jr. and Meadows as the January 6 attack was unfolding. Trump Jr. wrote to Meadows, "He's got to condemn this sh*t ASAP. The Capitol Police tweet is not enough.""I'm pushing it hard. I agree," Meadows responded.The content of those texts was revealed in December by Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney, the panel's top Republican, during the House vote to hold Meadows in contempt. Cheney said that Trump Jr. texted "again and again," including texting Meadows, "We need an Oval office address. He has to lead now. It has gone too far and gotten out of hand."Cheney has said that the committee has "firsthand testimony" that Ivanka Trump went to the Oval Office on "at least two occasions" to try to get her father to say something to stop the attack on the Capitol.Clarification: This story has been updated to clarify the committee's interest in Kimberly Guilfoyle and Eric Trump.CNN's Kara Scannell and Christie Johnson contributed to this report.

ALEX JONES - MARK MEADOWS - ROGER STONE - ALI ALEXANDER -TRUMP LAWYER JOHN EASTMAN - AND OTHERS SUE NANCY PELIOSY AND J-6 COMMITTEE FOR INVASION OF PRIVACY.

LIZ CHENEY PAID FOR THE J6 RIOTERS.NO WONDER SHE ROLLS OVER AND SPREAD HER LEGS TO THE WHORE LIBERALS ON THE J6 COMMITTEE.AND ONE OF THE MEN ON THE COMMITTEE HAS COMPLETE TIES WITH CHINA.

APR 27,21 - CNN)Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney has made no secret of her opinion that the riot at the US Capitol on January 6 was incited by then-President Donald Trump -- and that for her party to maintain any sort of credibility with voters it must acknowledge that fact -- and try to move on from Trump with all due haste.

MEMBERS OF THE FRAUD J6 SCAM COMMITTEE
Bennie Thompson, committee chairman
Zoe Lofgren
Adam Schiff (DUNG SNIFFER)
Jamie Raskin
Pete Aguilar
Stephanie Murphy (DONE SOMETHING WRONG)
Elaine Luria
Liz Cheney (PAID FOR THE J6 RIOTS)
Adam Kinzinger

POCHAHONTAS LIZ WARREN AND AOL AND THE 2 MUSLIM FRAUDS IN THE HOUSE. I'M SURPRISED THEIR NOT ON THE J6 COMMITTEE TO.

Alex Jones sues Jan. 6 committee, indicates plan to plead the Fifth By KYLE CHENEY and JOSH GERSTEIN Updated: 12/20/2021 06:51 PM EST

Pro-Trump broadcaster and conspiracy theorist Alex Jones is suing the Jan. 6 select committee to block the panel from obtaining his phone records and compelling his testimony at a deposition next month.In the suit, Jones says he intends to assert his Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination — confirming a statement he made on his show — and that the committee rejected his offer to provide “written responses” to their questions.The panel, he says, has asked him to appear for a deposition on Jan. 10 and has suggested it is considering offering immunity to compel his testimony. He also says he doesn’t intend to produce documents, claiming his “journalistic activity” is protected under the First Amendment.“With respect to his deposition subpoena, Jones has informed the Select Committee that he will assert his First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendment rights to decline to produce the documents requested by the Select Committee, asserting that he engaged in constitutionally protected political and journalistic activity under the First Amendment, that the Fourth Amendment guarantees him a right of privacy in his papers, and that he is entitled to due process and the right to remain silent under the Fifth Amendment,” he argues.The panel is seeking Jones’ phone records from his carrier, AT&T.Jones’ lawsuit is the latest in a flood of litigation by targets of the Jan. 6 committee seeking to prevent them from enforcing its subpoenas and obtaining phone records from private carriers. Several organizers of the Jan. 6 rally that preceded the violent attack at the Capitol have jointly sued the panel. John Eastman, the attorney who helped Trump develop plans to pressure Mike Pence to overturn the results of last year's presidential election, has sued to protect his phone records, as well. Ali Alexander, the founder of the “Stop the Steal” movement, has sued, as has Amy Harris, a freelance photographer who was working on a project about the Proud Boys.On Monday afternoon, Cleta Mitchell, a prominent conservative attorney who joined Trump's early January call with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, sued to quash a subpoena from the Jan. 6 select committee for her private phone records, calling it an "unwarranted intrusion" on her privacy and privileged communications.Notably, Mitchell indicated she doesn't dispute the "legitimacy" of the Jan. 6 committee probe — which she pointed out was recently supported by a federal appeals court panel — but she said the subpoena itself was too broad. Mitchell said she spent months performing legal work on Trump's behalf, with a focus on Georgia, which led to a Dec. 4 lawsuit that was ultimately dismissed.Jones led hundreds of supporters on a march to the Capitol on Jan. 6. He’s not accused of any crimes related to the attack on the Capitol. One of his close associates, however, Owen Shroyer, who accompanied Jones for most of the day, is facing misdemeanor charges for breaching police lines at the Capitol.Shroyer was in court via video Monday afternoon seeking to dismiss the case against him. In an hour-long hearing, his attorney made the case to U.S. District Court Judge Timothy Kelly that the charges against Shroyer amount to “vindictive” prosecution of Shroyer for his political views. But Kelly seemed skeptical of that position, noting that prosecutors have charged hundreds of people in connection with the events at the Capitol on Jan. 6."They've been charging a heck of a lot of people," Kelly said. While more than 700 people have been charged, the vast majority of charges have been brought against those accused of entering the Capitol or battling with police. Very few, besides Shroyer, are charged only with minor offenses on Capitol grounds.Shroyer is facing a series of misdemeanor charges that he crossed police lines, refused directions to leave the restricted grounds and exacerbated the situation by chanting “1776” near the top of the steps on the Capitol’s east side.

Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) listens.Insurrection Fallout-The Jan. 6 puzzle piece that's going largely ignored-By KYLE CHENEY

Shroyer had previously entered a “deferred prosecution agreement” with the government for his disruption of impeachment proceedings in 2019. At the time, he stood up and shouted at the impeachment investigators during a public hearing. The agreement prohibited Shroyer from future disruptive acts on Capitol grounds.Shroyer has claimed he was with Jones during the attack and circled the Capitol looking for places Jones could use to calm the crowd and urge participants to leave. Shroyer's attorney, Norman Pattis, said video supports that claim, showing a security aide to Jones asking police officers if Jones could climb up on a pedestal to address the crowd. At one point, according to lawyers involved in the case, an officer replied: "If you can get him up there, go for it.“"We view that as condonation," Pattis said. "I’m not sure that the magistrate who authorized the arrest warrant would have signed the warrant had that comment been highlighted."However, prosecutors contend that an officer's remark amid an unfolding crisis didn't amount to permission to cross the police lines. "Even if this were permission, it’s not permission for Owen Shroyer," Assistant U.S. Attorney Troy Edwards Jr. said.Edwards insisted that prosecutors were not targeting Shroyer over his speech. "These charges target his conduct," the prosecutor said.But Pattis said that claim was absurd. "I found that shocking. There's no evidence that he did anything other than speak," the defense attorney said. "I don't think this court can ignore the speech-drenched character of this ... It is our contention that Mr. Shroyer was doing nothing other than petitioning for redress of grievances."Kelly did not rule immediately on the defense's motions to toss out the charges. He suggested at the outset that some of Pattis' claims might be useful defenses at trial, but didn't seem to be sufficient to have a judge throw out the case. However, shortly before the hearing recessed, Kelly added: "The parties have given me little more to chew on than I had thought."Jones' new lawsuit indicates that the committee offered him a chance to speak “informally” about a limited set of topics but he refused, contending that the panel “has not treated others that it has offered the same deal to fairly and with respect.”“Jones has good and substantial reason to fear that the Select Committee may cite him for contempt of Congress if he refuses to answer its questions on grounds of constitutional privilege,” his suit argues.

Science & Tech-FOIA Emails Reveal Doctors Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins Worked to Smear Anti-Lockdown Scientists by Breitbart December 22nd 2021, 5:45 am

Newly uncovered emails show that federal health officials Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Francis Collins launched a smear attack against a group of scientists who warned about the health dangers of public lockdowns.Collins was deeply disturbed after a group of scientists teamed up to criticize the lockdowns and propose a different strategy to handle the pandemic: Protect the elderly and the vulnerable and allow children and young people to return to work and school.The statement released by a group of scientists was called the “Great Barrington Declaration,” and caught the attention of some in President Donald Trump’s administration.Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar and Scott Atlas, a neuroradiologist advising Trump on the pandemic, met with the group of scientists.If Edward Bernays is the father of “Public Relations” Anthony Fauci is the father of “Cancel Culture”Collins appeared deeply upset.“There needs to be a quick and devastating published takedown of its premises,” Collins warned in an October 2020 email from Collins to Fauci and other officials.Dr Fauci and Dr. Collins emails from NIH / aier.orgThe Fauci and Collins emails were obtained and released in response to a FOIA request submitted by the American Institute for Economic Research.Collins called the proposal “fringe” and “dangerous” in a Washington Post article, sending it around to Fauci and the NIH group, warning that it “will not be appreciated” by the Trump White House.Dr. Fauci/Francis Collins emails/ aier.org