JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.GET SAVED NOW- CALL ON JESUS TODAY.THE ONLY SAVIOR OF THE WHOLE EARTH - NO OTHER. 1 COR 15:23-JESUS THE FIRST FRUITS-CHRISTIANS RAPTURED TO JESUS-FIRST FRUITS OF THE SPIRIT-23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.ROMANS 8:23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.(THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE)
THE MAFIA KILLER GATES FAMILY OF MOLEC LEADING ABORTION TO VACCINE KILL SHOTS.
IF YOU DID NOT KNOW. WELL HERES A DOSE OF REALITY ABOUT THE KILLER GATES FAMILY MONEY..
Bill
Gates Father, Once A Head of Planned Parenthood, Inspired His Son’s
Abortion And Population Control Eugenics Worldview, His Mother Created
Microsoft.Published 2 years ago-on March 25, 2020-By Geoffrey Grider
Bill
Gates presents himself as the ‘geeky nerd’ who stumbled his way into
becoming one of the most-powerful and richest man on earth, with the
time-worn fable of how he got that life-changing contract with IBM for
Microsoft purely by dumb luck. But nothing could be further from the
truth, as you will see here today. Everywhere you look in the current
coronavirus pandemic, you see Bill Gates right around the corner. To
date, we have already showed you his connection to ID2020, Event 201,
and a plan to include a digital ID with vaccinations.Come with us now as
we meet Bill Gates parents, Bill Sr. and Mary, whose vast wealth and
influence made sure their legacy of eugenics would be carried on in
their son who is doing exactly that. Now, if you don’t know what
eugenics is, it is the practice of controlling the population through
medicine and science to weed out the undesirables so that only the
strong and healthy survive. It is exactly what the Nazis did, and it is
what Margaret Sanger believed and practiced all her life.Bill Gates was
born into a family a tremendous wealth, position and power, a family
that strongly believed in reducing the global population through
medicine, science and abortion. Today in 2020, Bill Gates is using his
billions made possible by his mother, to create a One World System where
everyone is vaccinated, everyone has a digital ID, and where abortion
flows freely through every nation. He is an end times player par
excellence, today you will see the forces that created him as he rose to
global power.What does all this have to do with the current coronavirus
outbreak that has 33% of the entire world on lockdown as you read this?
I will leave that for you to decide, but today he called for the
economy to stay shut down. Bill Gates rebuked proposals, floated over
the last two days by leaders like Donald Trump, to reopen the global
economy despite the Covid-19 coronavirus outbreak, saying that this
approach would be “very irresponsible.” Hmm, Looks like he is intent on
crashing the whole thing. When you’re done with this article, take a
trip here to seal the deal.Bill Gates Sr. Saves Starbucks-Bill Gates Sr.
stood imposingly tall at 6’6″, and has a resume that reads like a Who’s
Who of accomplishments both in America and around the world. Starbucks
as we know it today would not exist if it weren’t for the help of Bill
Gates Sr., said executive chairman Howard Schultz. Not only did Bill
Gates Sr. save Starbucks, he then instructed his son to invest with him.
This is the level of power and influence that the Gates family has
always operated on.-Mary Gates Gets IBM Contract For Fledgling
Microsoft-Bill Gates’ mom, Mary Gates, helped her son form a lucrative
relationship with I.B.M., securing a contract with his fledgling
company, Microsoft, according to the New York Times Mary Maxwell Gates
was a regent at the University of Washington since 1975. That year she
became the first woman to serve as a director of First Interstate Bank
and the first woman to serve as the president of the King County’s
United Way. Gates was later appointed to the board of the United Way of
America. In 1983, she became the first woman to lead it, according to
the New York Times.Mary Gates built a relationship with John Opel, the
CEO of IBM, who also served on the United Way board. Opel mentioned
Gates to some of his fellow IBM executives, according to some accounts,
and the company decided to “take a chance” with Microsoft. IBM hired
Microsoft to build an operating system for its first personal computer.
At the time, Microsoft was a small software company. The Microsoft Disc
Operating System (MS-DOS) was Microsoft’s first success, the New York
Times reported.Now you know the truth about how Microsoft got their
billions, courtesy of Mary Gates who pulled the strings. Bill Gates has
been only too happy to carry on his parent’s legacy of eugenics as
payback for making him one of the world’s wealthiest men.-Bill Gates
Father Once Ran Planned Parenthood-In a lengthy interview on May 9, 2003
with Bill Moyers, Microsoft billionaire Bill Gates reveals the
inspiration for his funding of pro-abortion population control
measures.Responding to a question by Moyers on how he came to fund
“reproductive issues” Gates answered, “When I was growing up, my parents
were always involved in various volunteer things. My dad was head of
Planned Parenthood. And it was very controversial to be involved with
that. And so it’s fascinating. At the dinner table my parents are very
good at sharing the things that they were doing. And almost treating us
like adults, talking about that.”In the interview Gates says he is moved
by measurable progress and on “safe birth reproductive family planning
issues” he says. “There’s a measurable impact when you can go in and
educate families, but primarily women, about their different choices.
There’s real impact that you can have in this area. Anything to do with
reproductive health.”He claims he has seen beyond Malthusian conceptions
of useless eaters since, he says, he has seen that by improving health
and education population decreases as parents decide to have less
children. Despite all his distancing from Malthus, Gates remains
steadfast to the unfounded Malthusian fear of overpopulation.
Billionaires-MacKenzie Scott, Michael Bloomberg Among The Biggest Billionaire Donors To Abortion-Rights Groups-Rachel Sandler-Forbes Staff-May 12, 2022,06:30am EDT
When MacKenzie Scott, the ex-wife of Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, donated $275 million to Planned Parenthood earlier this year, it broke records. The gift was the largest in the organization’s history from a single donor, a sum meant to bolster Planned Parenthood’s operations just as the anti-abortion movement closed in on its decades-long quest to overturn Roe v. Wade.The U.S. Supreme Court now appears on the verge of striking down the landmark decision, allowing states to ban abortion outright for the first time in nearly five decades. Though the nation’s wealthiest philanthropists have been giving to reproductive rights groups for decades, the cause constitutes a relatively small portion of overall philanthropic giving. According to the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy, $1.7 billion went to reproductive rights nonprofits from 2015 to 2019. That’s 2.2% of the $76 billion from foundations during that time period.Even less money, $361 million, was earmarked specifically for abortion rights and services, as opposed to other forms of reproductive healthcare. Much of that funding comes from the Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation, the largest single donor supporting abortion rights in the U.S., according to the NCRP. Funded by investor Warren Buffett, the fourth-richest person in the U.S., and named after his late wife, the foundation keeps a low profile when it comes to its pro-choice giving. Its website doesn’t even mention reproductive healthcare and instead focuses on college scholarships to students in Nebraska. The foundation didn’t respond to requests for comment.The Gates Foundation is also a big contributor to Planned Parenthood. Since its founding in 2000, the charity has given $81 million to the pro-choice organization. Most of that money went to Planned Parenthood’s international affiliates, according to the foundation’s grants database. The foundation’s U.S. donations to Planned Parenthood, which totaled $14.1 million, stopped in 2007. Though Bill Gates and Melinda French Gates themselves are staunchly pro-choice, a Gates Foundation spokesperson told Forbes their foundation doesn’t fund abortion directly.“Every woman should have the right to decide whether and when to have children,” the spokesperson said. “Our focus is on ensuring women’s health and access to family planning.”The Gates Foundation has also given money to pro-life organizations, such as World Vision International, a Christian aid group that promotes other forms of family planning like cycle-tracking and education to help women space out their pregnancies.Since the Hyde Amendment prevents federal dollars from being used for abortions, providers often turn to philanthropy as their main source of funding. Conversely, Crisis Pregnancy Centers, which seeks to steer people away from abortions, often receive state and federal funding, making them less reliant on private donations.It’s difficult to make an apples-to-apples comparison of pro-choice philanthropic spending to anti-abortion spending because those funding streams are categorized differently on Candid, the sector’s primary source of foundation data. Candid’s “Right to Life” category, for example, doesn’t capture donations to Crisis Pregnancy Centers, which are categorized under maternal health, prenatal care or other labels, and don’t always operate as nonprofits. According to the NCRP, the National Christian Foundation is the top funder of pro-life groups. As a sponsor of donor-advised funds, it’s not required to disclose either its donors or recipients.Forbes reviewed tax filings and public grants databases wherever possible to identify billionaires who have donated to pro-choice nonprofits in the U.S since 2000. Here are some of the biggest billionaire donors to date:-Warren Buffett-Net worth: $113.9 billion-Donations: $2 billion-The largest funder of abortion groups in the U.S., the Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation has poured $2 billion into the cause since 2000, the earliest year tax filings for the foundation are available. The foundation has given $650 million to Planned Parenthood’s national organization and regional offices as well as $136 million to the National Abortion Federation’s Hotline Fund, which operates the largest abortion referral service in the U.S. In 2020 alone, half of the foundation’s grants, $214 million, went toward pro-choice groups in the U.S.MacKenzie Scott-Net worth: $32.7 billion-Donations: $300 million-Since divorcing Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, Scott has become one of the most prolific philanthropists in the world. In addition to the $275 million unrestricted grant to Planned Parenthood, she also donated $25 million to the Collaborative for Gender + Reproductive Equity in February.-Barbara Picower-Donations: $125 million-Barbara Picower, the widow of one of Bernie Madoff's biggest beneficiaries, is donating the ill-gotten proceeds from the infamous Ponzi scheme to charity. Through the JBP Foundation, Picower is systematically unloading hundreds of millions per year to a variety of causes, including a $40 million donation to the Collaborative for Gender + Reproductive Equity in 2018 and $6.5 million annually to Planned Parenthood. Founded in 2011, JBP is funded by the billions left over from her late husband’s estate after she settled a $7.2 billion lawsuit to compensate Madoff’s victims.Hewlett Family-Donations: $118 million-Funded by the late HP cofounder Bill Hewlett and his wife, the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation is among the largest foundations in the U.S., with a $14.4 billion endowment. Nearly every year for the past two decades, the foundation has given money to Planned Parenthood, the National Abortion Federation and pro-choice research firm The Guttmacher Institute. In 2020, $2.6 million, or 0.5% of its grants, went to groups working to increase abortion access in the U.S. In 2015, Forbes valued the family at $2.3 billion.-Michael Bloomberg-Net worth: $82 billion-Donations: $50 million-In an op-ed published last week, the media mogul and onetime Democratic presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg called on Congress to codify abortion rights into federal law. He’s spent $50 million on the issue during his lifetime, including at least $11 million to Planned Parenthood through the Bloomberg Family Foundation since 2015.George Soros-Net worth: $8.6 billion-Donations: $17.3 million-Through the Open Society Foundations, Democratic megadonor George Soros makes regular contributions to Planned Parenthood’s political advocacy arm, the Planned Parenthood Action Fund. His largest gift to the organization was in 2017 for $10 million.Lynn & Stacy Schusterman-Net worth: $3.5 billion-Donations: $5.6 million-Run by the widow and daughter of oil billionaire Charles Schusterman, who died in 2000, the Charles and Lynn Schusterman Family Philanthropies has given money to Planned Parenthood, Collaborative for Gender + Reproductive Equity and If/When/How, a nonprofit that works with law students and lawyers to advocate for reproductive justice.Sheryl Sandberg-Net worth: $1.6 billion-Donations: $2 million-The Facebook executive made a pair of $1 million donations to Planned Parenthood in 2017 and 2019. After the draft decision on Roe was leaked, Sandberg wrote in a Facebook post that “one of our most fundamental rights will be taken away” if Roe v. Wade is overturned.Elaine Wynn-Net worth: $1.6 billion-Donations: $1 million-The casino magnate donated $1 million to Planned Parenthood in 2017 after the Women’s March on Washington. Wynn told Fortune at the time that “as a woman, a mother and a grandmother, I’m proud to do what I can to help protect access to reproductive health care.”
MARGRET SANGER THE BIGEST EUGENASIST RACIST IN HISTORY - THE LEADER OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD.
Newsletter #28 (Fall 2001)-"Birth Control or Race Control? Sanger and the ''Negro Project"The Negro Project, instigated in 1939 by Margaret Sanger, was one of the first major undertakings of the new Birth Control Federation of America (BCFA), the product of a merger between the American Birth Control League and Sanger's Birth Control Clinical Research Bureau, and one of the more controversial campaigns of the birth control movement. Developed by white birth control reformers, who consulted with AfricanAmericans for help in promoting the project only well after its inception, the Negro Project and associated campaigns were, nevertheless, widely supported by such black leaders as Mary McLeod Bethune, W. E. B. DuBois, and Rev. Adam Clayton Powell, Jr. Influenced strongly by both the eugenics movement and the progressive welfare programs of the New Deal era, the Negro Project was, from the start, largely indifferent the needs of the black community and constructed in terms and with perceptions that today smack of racism. What it became was not the project Sanger had first envisioned. As she wrote in an initial fund-raising request to Albert Lasker, the wealthy advertising executive just beginning his post-business career in medical philanthropy, she simply hoped to help "a group notoriously underprivileged and handicapped to a large measure by a ‘caste' system that operates as an added weight upon their efforts to get a fair share of the better things in life. To give them the means of helping themselves is perhaps the richest gift of all. We believe birth control knowledge brought to this group, is the most direct, constructive aid that can be given them to improve their immediate situation." Sanger viewed the Negro Project as another effort to help African-Americans gain better access to safe contraception and maintain birth control services in their community as she had attempted to do in Harlem a decade earlier when Sanger's Birth Control Clinical Research Bureau (BCCRB), in cooperation with the New York Urban ned a birth control clinic there. (MS to Lasker, July 10, 1939, Mary Lasker Papers, Columbia University (to be microfilmed in a later addendum to the MSM) http://www.nyu.edu/projects/sanger/articles/bc_or_race_control.php MSPP / Newsletter / Newsletter #28 (Fall 2001) By the late 1930s, the birth control activists began to focus on high birth rates and poor quality of life in the South, alerted to alarming Southern poverty by a 1938 U.S. National Resource Committee report which asserted that Southern poverty drained resources from other parts of the country. Starting in the mid-1930s, Sanger sent field workers into the rural South to establish birth control services in poor communities and conduct research. She sought to test various contraceptive jellies and foam powders to see if they could effectively be used without a diaphragm, which would be cheaper and easier for poor women to use. Physician and philanthropist Clarence Gamble (1894-1966), who was on a quest to find the best birth control for the "uneducated masses," funded and supervised several of these rural Southern projects. The birth control movement also looked to Southern states as the ideal region in which to secure funding under New Deal legislation and to establish birth control services as part of state and federal public health programs. These birth control initiatives were designed, in part, to demonstrate to government bureaucrats on the county, state and federal levels that contraceptive clinics were essential in impoverished Southern communities and could be successfully duplicated in other regions. In 1937, North Carolina became the first state to incorporate birth control services into a statewide public health program, followed by six other southern states. However, these successes were clouded by the failure of birth controllers to overcome segregated health services and improve African-Americans' access to contraceptives. Hazel Moore, a veteran lobbyist and health administrator, ran a birth control project under Sanger's direction and ound that black women in several Virginia counties were very responsive to birth control education. A 1938 trip to Tennessee further convinced Sanger of the desire of African-Americans in that region to control their fertility and the need for specific programs in birth control education aimed at the black community. (Hazel Moore, "Birth Control for the Negro," 1937, Sophia Smith Collection, Florence Rose Papers.) In 1939 Sanger teamed with Mary Woodward Reinhardt, secretary of the newly formed BCFA, to secure a large donor to fund an educational campaign to teach AfricanAmerican women in the South about contraception. Sanger, Reinhardt and Sanger's secretary, Florence Rose, drafted a report on "Birth Control and the Negro," skillfully using language that appealed both to eugenicists fearful of unchecked black fertility and progressives committed to shepherding African-Americans into middle-class culture. The report stated that "[N]egroes present the great problem of the South," as they are the group with "the greatest economic, health and social problems," and outlined a practical birth control program geared toward a population characterized as largely illiterate and that "still breed carelessly and disastrously," a line borrowed from a June 1932 Birth Control Review article by W.E.B. DuBois. Armed with this paper, Reinhardt initiated contact between Sanger and Albert Lasker (soon to be Reinhardt's husband), who pledged $20,000 starting in Nov. 1939. ("Birth Control and the Negro," July 1939, Lasker Papers)-However, once funding was secured, the project slipped from Sanger's hands. She had proposed that the money go to train "an up and doing modern minister, colored, and an up and doing modern colored medical man" at her New York clinic who would then tour "as many Southern cities and organizations and churches and medical societies as they can get before" and "preach and preach and preach!" She believed that after a year of such "educational agitation" the Federation could support a "practical campaign for sulying mothers with contraceptives." Before going in and establishing clinics, Sanger thought it critical to gain the support and involvement of the African-American community (not just its leaders) and establish a foundation of trust. Her proposal derived from the work of activists in the field, discussions with black leaders and her experience with the New York clinics. Sanger understood the concerns of some within the black community about having Northern whites intervene in the most intimate aspect of their lives. "I do not believe" she warned, "that this project should be directed or run by white medical men. The Federation should direct it with the guidance and assistance of the colored group – perhaps, particularly and specifically formed for the purpose." To http://www.nyu.edu/projects/sanger/articles/bc_or_race_control.php MSPP / Newsletter / Newsletter #28 (Fall 2001) succeed, she wrote, "It takes a very strong heart and an individual well entrenched in the community. . . ." (MS to Gamble, Nov. 26, 1939, and MS to Robert Seibels, Feb. 12, 1940 [MSM S17:514, 891].) Sanger reiterated the need for black ministers to head up the project in a letter to Clarence Gamble in Dec. 1939, arguing that: "We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members." This passage has been repeatedly extracted by Sanger's detractors as evidence that she led a calculated effort to reduce the black population against their will. From African-American activist Angela Davis on the left to conservative commentator Dinesh D'Souza on the right, this statement alone has condemned Sanger to a perpetual waltz with Hitler and the KKK. Davis quoted the incendiary passage in her 1983 Women, Race and Class, claiming that the Negro Project "confirmed the ideological victory of the racism associated with eugenic ideas." D'Souza used the quote to buttress erroneous claims that Sanger called blacs "human weeds" and a "menace to civilization" in his best-selling 1995 book The End of Racism. The argument that Sanger co-opted black clergy and community leaders to exterminate their own race not only gives Sanger unwarranted credit as a remarkably cunning manipulator, but also suggests that African-Americans were passive receptors of birth control reform, incapable of making their own decisions about family size; and that black leaders were ignorant and gullible. In the end, Sanger's plan for an educational campaign to precede the demonstration project lost out to the white medical and public relations men running the new Federation. They were particularly swayed by Robert Seibels (1890-1955), chairman of the Committee on Maternal Welfare of the South Carolina Medical Association, who was chosen by the BCFA to direct a Negro demonstration project in that state. Seibels distrusted Sanger and her loyal crew of field workers, calling them "dried-up female fanatics" who had the gall to tell doctors what to do.Robert E. Seibels to Frederick C. Holden, Jan. 28, 1939, Sophia Smith Collection, Records of PPFA.) He saw no need for prerequisite education and propaganda and advised incorporating birth control services for blacks into a general public health program. The BCFA then dismissed the notion of building a community-based, black-staffed demonstration clinic that could become permanent, and instead set in motion a plan that closely resembled the vaccination and VD caravans that swept in and out of the region. Lasker's money was used to set up demonstration projects between 1940 and 1942 in several rural South Carolina counties, under Seibels's direction, and in urban Nashville, TN under the auspices of the Nashville City Health Department. In South Carolina, the BCFA hired two African-American nurses to make house calls and meet with women in groups at schools and community centers to encourage them to visit a clinic, but contraceptives were dispensed by white doctors only. In Nashville, demonstration clinics were opened at the Bethlehem Center, a black settlement house, and later at Fisk University, and black nurses were eventually employed with some success there as well. The Federation immediately claimed that the Negro Project had exceeded its expectations and even persuaded Life Magazine to carry a photo spread of the demonstration clinics in South Carolina in May 1940. But relatively few women, (only about 3,000) visited the demonstration clinics to receive contraceptive instruction. And among those that did, the dropout rates were high as many women would not return to white doctors for follow-up exams, though the black nurses in both Nashville and South Carolina met with greater success. In 1942 the Federation ended funding for the demonstration clinics claiming to have developed "workable procedures" for providing contraception to African-Americans in both rural and urban communities; but no other clinics appear to have opened as a result of the Project. ("Better Health for 13,000,000," PPFA Report, April 16,943, Rose Papers; John Overton, "A Birth Control Service Among Urban Negroes," Human Fertility, Aug. 1942, 97-101.) However, the "Division of Negro Service," a department created at the BCFA initially to oversee the Negro Project, did implement some of the educational goals Sanger http://www.nyu.edu/projects/sanger/articles/bc_or_race_control.php MSPP / Newsletter / Newsletter #28 (Fall 2001) outlined. Under the direction of Florence Rose, with money raised by Sanger, and inspired by an advisory council of eminent black leaders, educators and health professionals, the Division undertook significant education projects from 1940-1943. Rose flooded every black organization in the country with planned parenthood literature, set up exhibits, instigated local and national press coverage and hired a black woman doctor, Mae McCarroll, to teach birth control techniques to black doctors and lobby medical groups. Though still stinging from the rejection of her earlier proposal for the Negro Project, Sanger wrote enthusiastically to Albert Lasker in July of 1942 about what she now framed as a pioneering effort: "I believe that the Negro question is coming definitely to the fore in America, not only because of the war, but in anticipation of the place the Negro will occupy after the peace. I think it is magnificent that we are in on the ground floor, helping Negroes to control their birth rate, to reduce their high infant and maternal death rate, to maintain better standards of health and living for those already born, and to create better opportunities for those who will be born. In other words, we're giving Negroes an opportunity to help themselves, and to rise to their own heights through education and the principles of a democracy." (MS to Lasker, July 9, 1942, MSM S21:404) But the BCFA (which changed its name to the Planned Parenthood Federation of America in 1942) forced Florence Rose to leave in 1943 – a result of her inability to follow new bureaucratic procedures and her allegiance to Sanger, who was immersed ir own clashes with Federation staff. With Rose's departure, the Division of Negro Service floundered and soon shut down. The Federation delegated "Negro" work to other departments and eventually passed off remnants of the program to state affiliates. Arguments persist about whether or not the Negro Project was purely a racist endeavor (search for "Sanger" "Negro Project" and "racism" on the Internet and be prepared for the onslaught). Certainly the patriarchal racism of the time that guided many of the social policies in Washington and the practices of philanthropic and charitable organizations working to "lift up" African-Americans, dictated both the Federation's and Sanger's approach to blacks and birth control. The public rationale for the Project was rooted in economics, tax-payer burden, and the social threats posed by what was perceived to be an exploding black underclass, rather than the health and sexual liberation of black women (though it should be notes that the birth control movement largely ignored the issue of women's —black or white— sexual autonomy in the interwar years). And there is no doubt that a good number of medical professionals involved in the birth control movement exhibited strong racist sentiments, some of them arguing for and even carrying out compulsory sterilization on black women considered to be of low intelligence and therefore not capable of choosing not to control their fertility, as well as on those deemed morally or behaviorally deviant. But there is no evidence that Sanger or even the Federation coerced or intended to coerce black women into using birth control. The fundamental belief, underscored at every meeting, mentioned in much of the behind-thescenes correspondence, and evident in all the printed material put out by the Division of Negro Service, was that uncontrolled fertility presented the greatest burden to the poor, and Southern blacks were among the poorest Americans. In fact, the Negro Project did not differ very much from the earlier birth control campaigns in the rural South designed to test simpler methods on poor, uneducated and mostly white agricultural communities. Following these other efforts in the South, it would have been more racist, in Sanger's mind, to ignore African-Americans in the South than to fail at trying to raise the health and economic standards of their communities.
JANES REVENGE A RADICAL EXTREMIST HOME GROWN GROUP OF TERRORISTS IN AMERICA. TO BURN AMERICA FOR OVERTURNING ROE VS WADE.LIKE ANTIFA AND BLACK LIVES MATTER CULTS DO.
THE MUSIC BAND THAT MIGHT BE BEHIND JANES REVENGE IS CALLED RAGE AGAINST THE MACHINE. IT SOUNDS LIKE BY THE LYRICS I LISTENED 2 IN A COUPLE OF VIDEOS OF THIS DEMON POSSESSED BAND. THEY ARE A BUNCH OF CHRISTAN HATERS. AND THIS CULT BAND IS GOING TO GIVE MILLIONS OF DOLLARS TOWARD ABORTION THE MURDER OF BABIES.
Rage Against the Machine slams SCOTUS abortion ruling, donates $475K to abortion rights groups-Caroline Vakil-Sat, June 25, 2022 at 1:13 PM-THE HILL
Rage Against the Machine criticized the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade on Friday and said it would be donating $475,000 to abortion rights groups.“We are disgusted by the repeal of Roe v. Wade and the devastating impact it will have on tens of millions of people,” the band said in a statement on Instagram.“To date, our fans have raised $475,000.00 from the sale of our charity tickets at Alpine Valley and the United Center. We are donating that money to reproductive rights organizations in Wisconsin and Illinois,” it added.Rage Against the Machine is scheduled to play at Alpine Valley Music Theatre in East Troy, Wisc. on July 9 and the United Center in Chicago on July 11 and July 12.“Like the many women who have organized sophisticated railroads of resistance to challenge these attacks on our collective reproductive freedom, we must continue to resist,” the band wrote.The development comes as the high court on Friday eliminated the 50-year precedent of a constitutional right to an abortion, sparking a mix of celebration among conservatives and anger and fear among Democrats.After signing the bipartisan gun bill on Saturday, President Biden lamented that “I think the Supreme Court has made some terrible decisions” after he was asked if the Supreme Court was broken.Democrats have urged Biden to take executive action to protect abortion, calls of which were renewed by at least two senators on Saturday. The president has previously said he has been mulling executive action, though it is unclear what form that might take.
Jane’s Revenge-Night of Rage-An Autonomous Call to Action Against Patriarchal Supremacy
Within the month we anticipate a verdict will be issued that overturns Roe v. Wade, setting in motion an evisceration of abortion access across the so-called United States.This is an event that should inspire rage in millions of people who can get pregnant…and yet, the response thus far has been tepid.We have agonized over this apparent absence of indignation. Why is it that we are so afraid to unleash hell upon those who are destroying us? Fear of state repression is valid, but this goes deeper than that.Your anger has been stolen from you.To this we say: no more. We need to get angry.We need the state to feel our full wrath.We need to express this madness fully and with ferocity. We need to quit containing ourselves.We need them to be afraid of us.Last week, an evil creature slaughtered 19 children and two teachers in their classroom in Texas. While some may call this horrific act “senseless” or “random,” we know that’s not the case. We know that this was an act of male domination and patriarchal violence, meant to make women, children and teachers live in fear. We know it is deeply connected to the reproductive violence about to be unleashed on this land by an illegitimate institution founded in white male supremacy.We cannot think of a clearer example in this time of the need for autonomously organized self-defense networks. We cannot think of a clearer example of the desperate need for those who can get pregnant to learn how to confront misogynistic violence directly. We also believe this unlearning of our self-containment can begin in the streets when we organize alongside one another to confront state forces of evil and domination.Several weeks ago, we watched and waited as self-proclaimed “feminist organizations” and non-profits took the lead on arranging their demure little rallies for freedom. We were told to let them handle it, and to defer to the political machinery that has thusfar failed to secure our liberation. In a world where the news media has an attention span of about 24 hours on their best day, we knew these hollow gestures would fail to capture attention. We knew we were witnessing counterinsurgency in action. We cannot sit idly by anymore while our anger is yet again channeled into Democratic party fundraisers and peace parades with the police.We were even told we must cooperate with them because they work alongside abortion providers and clinic escorts…a group of people who, at this moment in time, cannot possibly risk their lives or their livelihoods any further than they already are. We honor these providers and their service. We do not honor those who would use them as a shield against direct and militant action. We believe the greatest honor we could give them would be to act meaningfully in their name.The time to act was decades ago. The next best time is now.Whatever form your fury takes, the first step is feeling it.The next step is carrying that anger out into the world and expressing it physically.Consider this your call to action.On the night the final ruling is issued——a specific date we cannot yet predict, but we know is arriving imminently——we are asking for courageous hearts to come out after dark.Whoever you are and wherever you are, we are asking for you to do what you can to make your anger known.We have selected a time of 8pm for actions nationwide to begin, but know that this is a general guideline. There may be other considerations involved in planning time and place. We do not claim to speak for every community or crew. We are simply calling out to you. And we hope you answer our cries.To the cis male allies who would be interested in joining us in the streets, we say: you are certainly welcome, but you must use your privilege to shield and support us in a way that also enables us to get angry. Do not police us. Do not tell us what is and isn’t appropriate. But do aid us when we are in need.We must also say: do not wait until the verdict arrives to organize.Make plans now. Take action now.It is not enough to share images on Twitter and Instagram (though that is still important to do). We cannot sustain this movement any longer with the same few hundred people who have been beaten down over and over again. We must not only circulate this call on social media, but reach out to communities who may not be in touch with “radical circles” online.Mass action requires mass outreach.We would not be issuing this call if we did not believe in our bones that this kind of action is possible. We have witnessed the wom*n of Argentina, Mexico and Poland organize autonomously for their reproductive liberation. We know it can be done…but we need every soul reading this to do their part.To those who work to oppress us: If abortion isn’t safe, you aren’t either. We are everywhere.Signed,JANE’S REVENGE.
