KING JESUS IS COMING FOR US ANY TIME NOW. THE RAPTURE. BE PREPARED TO GO.
ISAIAH 17:1,11-14
1 The burden of Damascus. Behold, Damascus is taken away from being a city, and it shall be a ruinous heap.
11 In the day shalt thou make thy plant to grow, and in the morning shalt thou make thy seed to flourish: but the harvest shall be a heap in the day of grief and of desperate sorrow.
12 Woe to the multitude of many people, which make a noise like the noise of the seas; and to the rushing of nations,(USELESS U.N) that make a rushing like the rushing of mighty waters!
13 The nations shall rush like the rushing of many waters: but God shall rebuke them, and they shall flee far off, and shall be chased as the chaff of the mountains before the wind, and like a rolling thing before the whirlwind.
14 And behold at evening tide trouble; and before the morning he is not.(ASSAD) This is the portion of them that spoil us,(ISRAEL) and the lot of them that rob us.
JEREMEIAH 49:23-27
23 Concerning Damascus.(SYRIA) Hamath is confounded, and Arpad: for they have heard evil tidings: they are fainthearted; there is sorrow on the sea;(WAR SHIPS WITH NUKES COMING ON SYRIA) it cannot be quiet.
24 Damascus is waxed feeble, and turneth herself to flee, and fear hath seized on her: anguish and sorrows have taken her, as a woman in travail.
25 How is the city of praise not left, the city of my joy!
26 Therefore her young men shall fall in her streets, and all the men of war shall be cut off in that day, saith the LORD of hosts.
27 And I will kindle a fire (NUKES OR BOMBS) in the wall of Damascus, and it shall consume the palaces of Benhadad.(ASSADS PALACES POSSIBLY IN DAMASCUS)
THE US AND UK ARE READY TO BOMB SYRIA.THEY MIGHT STRIKE BRIDGES,AND OTHER INFASTRUCTURES AND I HEARD THEY MIGHT BOMB ASSADS PALACES ALSO.IS THIS THE TIME TO FULFILL ISA 17:1 TO ITS FINALE.WE WILL SEE.IF THAT COWARD OBAMA DOES NOT BACK OUT AND GIVE ASSAD A FREE REIGN TO CHEMICALIZE MORE INNOCENT PEOPLE.OR WILL OBAMA FINALLY KEEP HIS HYPOCRITICAL WORD AND BOMB ASSAD FOR CROSSING HIS RED LINE OF WHEN CHEMICAL WEAPONS USED ON PEOPLE-ASSAD GETS NUKED.
ISAIAH 17:1,11-14
1 The burden of Damascus. Behold, Damascus is taken away from being a city, and it shall be a ruinous heap.
11 In the day shalt thou make thy plant to grow, and in the morning shalt thou make thy seed to flourish: but the harvest shall be a heap in the day of grief and of desperate sorrow.
12 Woe to the multitude of many people, which make a noise like the noise of the seas; and to the rushing of nations,(USELESS U.N) that make a rushing like the rushing of mighty waters!
13 The nations shall rush like the rushing of many waters: but God shall rebuke them, and they shall flee far off, and shall be chased as the chaff of the mountains before the wind, and like a rolling thing before the whirlwind.
14 And behold at evening tide trouble; and before the morning he is not.(ASSAD) This is the portion of them that spoil us,(ISRAEL) and the lot of them that rob us.
JEREMEIAH 49:23-27
23 Concerning Damascus.(SYRIA) Hamath is confounded, and Arpad: for they have heard evil tidings: they are fainthearted; there is sorrow on the sea;(WAR SHIPS WITH NUKES COMING ON SYRIA) it cannot be quiet.
24 Damascus is waxed feeble, and turneth herself to flee, and fear hath seized on her: anguish and sorrows have taken her, as a woman in travail.
25 How is the city of praise not left, the city of my joy!
26 Therefore her young men shall fall in her streets, and all the men of war shall be cut off in that day, saith the LORD of hosts.
27 And I will kindle a fire (NUKES OR BOMBS) in the wall of Damascus, and it shall consume the palaces of Benhadad.(ASSADS PALACES POSSIBLY IN DAMASCUS)
THE US AND UK ARE READY TO BOMB SYRIA.THEY MIGHT STRIKE BRIDGES,AND OTHER INFASTRUCTURES AND I HEARD THEY MIGHT BOMB ASSADS PALACES ALSO.IS THIS THE TIME TO FULFILL ISA 17:1 TO ITS FINALE.WE WILL SEE.IF THAT COWARD OBAMA DOES NOT BACK OUT AND GIVE ASSAD A FREE REIGN TO CHEMICALIZE MORE INNOCENT PEOPLE.OR WILL OBAMA FINALLY KEEP HIS HYPOCRITICAL WORD AND BOMB ASSAD FOR CROSSING HIS RED LINE OF WHEN CHEMICAL WEAPONS USED ON PEOPLE-ASSAD GETS NUKED.
Kerry makes justification for military strike in Syria, says chemical arms use an ‘obscenity’
Secretary of State John Kerry on Monday outlined the clearest
justification yet for U.S. military action in Syria, saying there was
“undeniable” evidence of a large-scale chemical weapons attack, with
intelligence strongly signalling that President Bashar Assad’s regime
was responsible.Kerry, speaking to reporters at the State Department, said last week’s attack “should shock the conscience” of the world.“The indiscriminate slaughter of civilians, the killing of women and
children and innocent bystanders by chemical weapons is a moral
obscenity. By any standard, it is inexcusable and — despite the excuses
and equivocations that some have manufactured — it is undeniable,” said
Kerry, the highest-ranking U.S. official to confirm the attack in the
Damascus suburbs that activists say killed hundreds of people.“This international norm cannot be violated without consequences,” he added.Officials
said President Barack Obama has not decided how to respond to the use
of deadly gases, a move the White House said last year would cross a
“red line.” But the U.S., along with allies in Europe, appeared to be
laying the groundwork for the most aggressive response since Syria’s
civil war began more than two years ago.Two administration
officials said the U.S. was expected to make public a more formal
determination of chemical weapons use on Tuesday, with an announcement
of Obama’s response likely to follow quickly. The officials insisted on
anonymity because they were not authorized to publicly discuss the
internal deliberations.The international community appeared to be
considering action that would punish Assad for deploying deadly gases,
not sweeping measures aimed at ousting the Syrian leader or
strengthening rebel forces. The focus of the internal debate underscores
the scant international appetite for a large-scale deployment of forces
in Syria and the limited number of other options that could
significantly change the trajectory of the conflict.“We continue
to believe that there’s no military solution here that’s good for the
Syrian people, and that the best path forward is a political solution,”
State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf said. “This is about the
violation of an international norm against the use of chemical weapons
and how we should respond to that. ”The Obama administration was
moving ahead even as a United Nations team already on the ground in
Syria collected evidence from last week’s attack. The U.S. said Syria’s
delay in giving the inspectors access rendered their investigation
meaningless and officials said the administration had its own
intelligence confirming chemical weapons use.“What is before us
today is real and it is compelling,” Kerry said. “Our understanding of
what has already happened in Syria is grounded in facts.”The U.S.
assessment is based in part on the number of reported victims, the
symptoms of those injured or killed and witness accounts. Administration
officials said the U.S. had additional intelligence confirming chemical
weapons use and planned to make it public in the coming days.Officials
stopped short of unequivocally stating that Assad’s government was
behind the attack. But they said there was “very little doubt” that it
originated with the regime, noting that Syria’s rebel forces do not
appear to have access to the country’s chemical weapons stockpile.Assad
has denied launching a chemical attack. The U.N. team came under sniper
fire Monday as it travelled to the site of the Aug. 21 attack.It’s
unclear whether Obama would seek authority from the U.N. or Congress
before using force. The president has spoken frequently about his
preference for taking military action only with international backing,
but it is likely Russia and China would block U.S. efforts to authorize
action through the U.N. Security Council.Kerry on Monday made
several veiled warnings to Russia, which has propped up Assad’s regime,
blocked action against Syria at the U.N., and disputed evidence of the
government’s chemical weapons use.“Anyone who can claim that an
attack of this staggering scale can be contrived or fabricated needs to
check their conscience and their own moral compass,” he said.British
Prime Minister David Cameron, who like Kerry cut short his vacation
because of the attack, spoke Monday with Russian President Vladimir
Putin to outline the evidence of chemical weapons use by Assad’s regime.Cameron’s
office also said the British government would decide on Tuesday whether
the timetable for the international response means it will be necessary
to recall lawmakers to Parliament before their scheduled return next
week. That decision could offer the clearest indication of how quickly
the U.S. and allies plan to respond.More than 100,000 people have
died in clashes between forces loyal to Assad and rebels trying to oust
him from power over the past two and a half years. While Obama has
repeatedly called for Assad to leave power, he has resisted calls for a
robust U.S. intervention, and has largely limited American assistance to
humanitarian aid. The president said last year that chemical weapons
use would cross a “red line” and would likely change his calculus in
deciding on a U.S. response.Last week’s attack in the Damascus
suburbs is a challenge to Obama’s credibility. He took little action
after Assad used chemical weapons on a small scale earlier this year and
risks signalling to countries like Iran that his administration does
not follow through on its warnings.Syrian activists say the Aug. 21 attack killed hundreds; the group Doctors Without Borders put the death toll at 355 people.The
most likely U.S. military action would be to launch Tomahawk cruise
missiles off U.S. warships in the Mediterranean. The Navy last week
moved a fourth destroyer into the eastern Mediterranean.Officials
said it was likely the targets would be tied to the regime’s ability to
launch chemical weapons attacks. Possible targets would include weapons
arsenals, command and control centres, radar and communications
facilities, and other military headquarters. Less likely was a strike on
a chemical weapons site because of the risk of releasing toxic gases.Military
experts and U.S. officials on Monday said that the precision strikes
would probably come during the night and target key military sites.The
president has ruled out putting American troops on the ground in Syria
and officials say they also are not considering setting up a unilateral
no-fly zone.
Navy ready to launch first strike on Syria
Britain is planning to join forces with America and launch military action against Syria within days in response to the gas attack believed to have been carried out by President Bashar al-Assad’s forces against his own people.
The Royal Navy's helicopter carrier HMS Illustrious is currently deployed in the Mediterranean Photo: REUTERS
10:00PM BST 26 Aug 2013
Royal Navy vessels are being readied to take part in a possible series of
cruise missile strikes, alongside the United States, as military commanders
finalise a list of potential targets.Government sources said talks between the Prime Minister and international
leaders, including Barack Obama, would continue, but that any military
action that was agreed could begin within the next week.As the preparations gathered pace, William Hague, the Foreign Secretary,
warned that the world could not stand by and allow the Assad regime to use
chemical weapons against the Syrian people “with impunity”.Britain, the US and their allies must show Mr Assad that to perpetrate such an
atrocity “is to cross a line and that the world will respond when that line
is crossed”, he said.British forces now look likely to be drawn into an intervention in the Syrian
crisis after months of deliberation and international disagreement over how
to respond to the bloody two-year civil war.
The possibility of such intervention will provoke demands for Parliament to be
recalled this week.The escalation comes as a direct response to what the Government is convinced
was a gas attack perpetrated by Syrian forces on a civilian district of
Damascus last Wednesday.The Assad regime has been under mounting pressure to allow United Nations
inspectors on to the site to establish who was to blame for the atrocity.
One international agency said it had counted at least 355 people dead and
3,600 injured following the attack, while reports suggested the true death
toll could be as high as 1,300.Syrian state media accused rebel forces of using chemical agents, saying some
government soldiers had suffocated as a result during fighting.
After days of delay, the Syrian government finally offered yesterday to allow a team of UN inspectors access to the area. However, Mr Hague suggested that this offer of access four days after the attack had come too late.“We cannot in the 21st century allow the idea that chemical weapons can be used with impunity, that people can be killed in this way and that there are no consequences for it,” he said.The Foreign Secretary said all the evidence “points in one direction”, to the use of illegal chemical agents by Assad regime forces.
A Government source added that even if UN inspectors visited the site of the attack, “we would need convincing by the UN team that this was not the regime’s attack because we believe everything points to the fact that it was”.Officials said the Assad regime has continued bombarding the area in the days since the attack, making it likely that any evidence which could establish who was responsible will have been destroyed.Mr Cameron interrupted his holiday in Cornwall for talks with Mr Obama, François Hollande, the French president, and Angela Merkel, the German chancellor. After discussions via a secure telephone line over the weekend, all the leaders agreed on the need for a “serious response”. Government sources confirmed that military action was among the options “on the table” but said no decisions had been taken.
The Prime Minister, however, is believed to have abandoned hope of securing any further meaningful response from the UN amid opposition from Russia.Labour said Parliament must be recalled if Mr Cameron was considering a military response, but Downing Street sources said this may not be necessary as the Prime Minister retained the right to act urgently if required.Mr Cameron will face criticism for any British military involvement from many MPs, who believe the Armed Forces are already overstretched and must not be committed to another distant conflict.Any retaliatory attack would be likely to be launched from the sea as the Syrian air force is judged to be strong enough to shoot down enemy jets.A Royal Navy nuclear-powered submarine is said to be in the region while a number of warships recently left Britain for exercises in the Mediterranean.Commanders may also need to make use of the RAF base at Akrotiri, Cyprus for air support.If military action is approved, the first wave of missiles could start within a week.Military sources suggested the early hours of the 2011 campaign against Col Muammar Gaddafi could form a template for any operation. The Libya campaign began with a blitz of Tomahawk cruise missiles from US warships and from a British Trafalgar Class submarine.The Royal Navy declined to comment on the current positions of its submarines, but they regularly pass through the area on their way to the Suez Canal.America’s Sixth Fleet currently has four guided missile destroyers in the area, each of which could join the attack.The Royal Navy also has its rapid response task force in the Mediterranean. The group includes two frigates and the helicopter carrier HMS Illustrious.Navy sources said there were no plans to change the exercises, but the group provided “strategic contingency” if needed.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-202_162-57600101/fearing-a-u.s-strike-syria-warns-of-global-chaos/
After days of delay, the Syrian government finally offered yesterday to allow a team of UN inspectors access to the area. However, Mr Hague suggested that this offer of access four days after the attack had come too late.“We cannot in the 21st century allow the idea that chemical weapons can be used with impunity, that people can be killed in this way and that there are no consequences for it,” he said.The Foreign Secretary said all the evidence “points in one direction”, to the use of illegal chemical agents by Assad regime forces.
A Government source added that even if UN inspectors visited the site of the attack, “we would need convincing by the UN team that this was not the regime’s attack because we believe everything points to the fact that it was”.Officials said the Assad regime has continued bombarding the area in the days since the attack, making it likely that any evidence which could establish who was responsible will have been destroyed.Mr Cameron interrupted his holiday in Cornwall for talks with Mr Obama, François Hollande, the French president, and Angela Merkel, the German chancellor. After discussions via a secure telephone line over the weekend, all the leaders agreed on the need for a “serious response”. Government sources confirmed that military action was among the options “on the table” but said no decisions had been taken.
The Prime Minister, however, is believed to have abandoned hope of securing any further meaningful response from the UN amid opposition from Russia.Labour said Parliament must be recalled if Mr Cameron was considering a military response, but Downing Street sources said this may not be necessary as the Prime Minister retained the right to act urgently if required.Mr Cameron will face criticism for any British military involvement from many MPs, who believe the Armed Forces are already overstretched and must not be committed to another distant conflict.Any retaliatory attack would be likely to be launched from the sea as the Syrian air force is judged to be strong enough to shoot down enemy jets.A Royal Navy nuclear-powered submarine is said to be in the region while a number of warships recently left Britain for exercises in the Mediterranean.Commanders may also need to make use of the RAF base at Akrotiri, Cyprus for air support.If military action is approved, the first wave of missiles could start within a week.Military sources suggested the early hours of the 2011 campaign against Col Muammar Gaddafi could form a template for any operation. The Libya campaign began with a blitz of Tomahawk cruise missiles from US warships and from a British Trafalgar Class submarine.The Royal Navy declined to comment on the current positions of its submarines, but they regularly pass through the area on their way to the Suez Canal.America’s Sixth Fleet currently has four guided missile destroyers in the area, each of which could join the attack.The Royal Navy also has its rapid response task force in the Mediterranean. The group includes two frigates and the helicopter carrier HMS Illustrious.Navy sources said there were no plans to change the exercises, but the group provided “strategic contingency” if needed.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-202_162-57600101/fearing-a-u.s-strike-syria-warns-of-global-chaos/
