Thursday, September 16, 2010

GOLD THE NEXT ULTIMATE BUBBLE-SOROS

DOCTOR DOCTORIAN FROM ANGEL OF GOD
then the angel said, Financial crisis will come to Asia. I will shake the world.

JAMES 5:1-3
1 Go to now, ye rich men, weep and howl for your miseries that shall come upon you.
2 Your riches are corrupted, and your garments are motheaten.
3 Your gold and silver is cankered; and the rust of them shall be a witness against you, and shall eat your flesh as it were fire. Ye have heaped treasure together for the last days.

REVELATION 18:10,17,19
10 Standing afar off for the fear of her torment, saying, Alas, alas that great city Babylon, that mighty city! for in one hour is thy judgment come.
17 For in one hour so great riches is come to nought. And every shipmaster, and all the company in ships, and sailors, and as many as trade by sea, stood afar off,
19 And they cast dust on their heads, and cried, weeping and wailing, saying, Alas, alas that great city, wherein were made rich all that had ships in the sea by reason of her costliness! for in one hour is she made desolate.

EZEKIEL 7:19
19 They shall cast their silver in the streets, and their gold shall be removed: their silver and their gold shall not be able to deliver them in the day of the wrath of the LORD: they shall not satisfy their souls, neither fill their bowels: because it is the stumblingblock of their iniquity.

REVELATION 13:16-18
16 And he(FALSE POPE) causeth all,(WORLD SOCIALISM) both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:(CHIP IMPLANT)
17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.(6-6-6) A NUMBER SYSTEM

WORLD MARKET RESULTS
http://money.cnn.com/data/world_markets/
CNBC VIDEOS
http://www.cnbc.com/id/15839263/?tabid=15839796&tabheader=false

HALF HOUR DOW RESULTS THU SEPT 16,2010

09:30 AM -1.43
10:00 AM -43.70
10:30 AM -14.68
11:00 AM -9.80
11:30 AM -17.55
12:00 PM -17.89
12:30 PM -16.95
01:00 PM -1.28
01:30 PM -15.70
02:00 PM -14.07
02:30 PM +1.48
03:00 PM +10.22
03:30 PM +13.29
04:00 PM +22.10 10,594.83

S&P 500 1124.66 -0.41

NASDAQ 2303.25 +1.93

GOLD 1,276.50 +7.80

OIL 74.40 -1.62

TSE 300 12,173.30 +28.50

CDNX 1650.34 +20.10

S&P/TSX/60 706.70 +0.62

MORNING,NEWS,STATS

YEAR TO DATE PERFORMANCE
Dow -15 points at 4 minutes of trading today.
Dow -49 points at low today.
Dow -1 points at high today so far.
GOLD opens at $1,275.60.OIL opens at $75.27 today.
GOLD HITS ALLTIME HIGH AGAIN TODAY 1,278.30

AFTERNOON,NEWS,STATS
Dow -49 points at low today so far.
Dow +32 points at high today so far.

WRAPUP,NEWS,STATS
Dow -49 points at low today.
Dow +32 points at high today.

GOLD ALLTIME HIGH $1,278.30 (NOT AT CLOSE)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0NEWERgqg0&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03MZG9vK0W8&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snPExUJl6po&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6WQtRI7A064&feature=player_embedded
http://www.infowars.com/bill-gates-death-panels-tip-of-the-iceberg/LINKS-VIDEOS)

Bill Gates Death Panels Tip of Iceberg Paul Joseph Watson, Kurt Nimmo & Alex Jones Infowars.com September 15, 2010

Bill Gates’ advocacy for death panels has caused controversy amongst conservative commentators, but the real outrage behind the story has been completely overlooked – the fact that Gates is a hardcore eugenicist and has called for lowering the global population through vaccines which his foundation funds to the tune of billions.
Gates’ death panel comments were actually made over two months ago at the Aspen Ideas Festival in Aspen Colorado, but they only garnered attention when the video clip appeared on numerous conservative websites on Sunday, including Breitbart.tv and The Blaze.The Aspen Ideas Festival is a project of the Aspen Institute. The Aspen Institute is primarily funded by foundations such as the Carnegie Corporation, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund and the Ford Foundation. In 1952, the Rockefellers established the Population Council, a eugenics operation.Jurriaan Maessen and other researchers have documented how the Rockefeller Foundation has pioneered anti-fertility vaccines and worked with the UN Population Fund, World Bank and World Health Organization to reduce world population. Just four years after the Rockefeller Foundation launched massive funding-operations into anti-fertility vaccines, the Task Force was created under auspices of the World Health Organization, World Bank and UN Population Fund,writes Maessen.

The Carnegie Institution established a laboratory complex at Cold Spring Harbor on Long Island in 1904 that stockpiled millions of index cards on ordinary Americans, as researchers carefully plotted the removal of families, bloodlines and whole peoples. From Cold Spring Harbor, eugenics advocates agitated in the legislatures of America, as well as the nation’s social service agencies and associations, Edwin Black wrote for the San Francisco Chronicle in 2003.In the United States, key eugenic organizations funded by the Rockefeller, Harriman and Carnegie families included the American Eugenics Society, and its sister organization, the American Society of Human Genetics established in 1947, the above mentioned Cold Springs Harbor Experimental Station for the Study of Evolution, the Eugenic Record Office, and the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research.During a question and answer session at the Aspen Ideas Festival, Gates implied that elderly patients undergoing expensive health care treatments should be killed and the money spent elsewhere.

Gates said there was a lack of willingness to consider the question of choosing between spending a million dollars on that last three months of life for that patient or laying off ten teachers.But that’s called the death panel and you’re not supposed to have that discussion, added Gates.The Microsoft owner’s advocacy for killing granny in the name of spending the money elsewhere strikes at the root of why so many Americans are outraged over Obamacare, which contains as one of its core components a cost/benefit board which will be able to refuse care to elderly patients, proving that death panels will indeed come into force despite establishment media PR campaigns to convince the public otherwise.Prior to the passage of Obamacare, the corporate media excoriated critics of the plan for mentioning inclusion of death panels. As Joseph Ashby notes, however, death panels were established before Obamacare was enacted.The Recovery and Reinvestment Act, commonly known as the Stimulus Bill, provided more than a billion dollars to fund the Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research. The Council was devised by former Health and Human Services Secretary Nominee Tom Daschle. Daschle’s stated purpose (and therefore President Obama’s purpose) for creating the Council is to empower an unelected bureaucracy to make the hard decisions about health care rationing that elected politicians are politically unable to make, writes Ashby.

Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, the brother of White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, sits on the Council. Under the rubric of social justice, Emanuel advocates denying medical care to patients who are no longer participating citizens, that is to say people who are considered useless eaters by the state. Unlike allocation by sex or race, allocation by age is not invidious discrimination,writes Emanuel, every person lives through different life stages rather than being a single age. Even if 25-year-olds receive priority over 65-year-olds, everyone who is 65 years now was previously 25 years.Denying medical care to patients is not a recent phenomenon. Wesley J. Smith, an award winning author and a Senior Fellow in Human Rights and Bioethics at the Discovery Institute, has written extensively about bioethicists and others among the medical intelligentsia who have rationalized denying medical care to dependent people and the growing number of our elderly. Smith documents how the bioethics movement” has successfully changed the classification for human care to medical care and in the process has paved the way for denial of health care and the establishment of death panels.Obamacare is intent on cutting costs, Smith writes in a blog post entitled Obamacare: Harardous Pathway,The Road to Death Panels.The great danger is that while the government will never ration its own spending, never cut its own perks, never decide that a program has outlived its usefulness, it will readily cut the most vulnerable among us out of life itself.On September 12, Alex covered hospitals denying care to citizens while offering it to illegal aliens. Alex makes his comments at 11:20 in the above video.Although Americans will be subject to the whims of death panels, the federal government will continue to require hospitals to provide emergency treatment to illegal immigrants at taxpayer expense, the New York Times reported.

However, the wider significance of Gates’ comments has gone completely unnoticed by those outraged over what he said.Gates is an avowed eugenicist who is committed to drastically reducing the world’s population in the name of combating global warming. This is alarming given the fact that the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation funds the production and distribution of vaccines to the third world.During a February 2010 TED conference, Gates openly stated that vaccines would be used to reduce global population and lower CO2 emissions.Stating that the global population was heading towards 9 billion, Gates said, If we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services (abortion), we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 per cent.Watch the clip.Quite how an improvement in health care and vaccines that supposedly save lives would lead to a lowering in global population is an oxymoron, unless Gates was referring to vaccines that sterilize people, which is precisely the same method advocated in White House science advisor John P. Holdren’s 1977 textbook Ecoscience, which calls for a dictatorial planetary regime to enforce draconian measures of population reduction via all manner of oppressive techniques, including sterilization.Indeed, As Natural News’ Mike Adams revealed, one of the Gates Foundation’s current projects revolves around the funding of a sterilization program that would use sharp blasts of ultrasound directed against a man’s scrotum to render him infertile for six months.Now, the foundation has funded a new sweat-triggered vaccine delivery program based on nanoparticles penetrating human skin, writes Adams. The technology is describes as a way to …develop nanoparticles that penetrate the skin through hair follicles and burst upon contact with human sweat to release vaccines.The Microsoft founder’s advocacy for death panels is a shocking admission, but it pales in significance when one considers that Gates, as one of the richest men on the planet who routinely meets with other billionaires to discuss population reduction efforts, has publicly stated his intention to use the billions of dollars worth of vaccines that he funds to lower global population in the third world, which could only be achieved if the vaccines were designed to forcibly sterilize people without their consent or induce forced abortions.

Justice Breyer Suggests Globalization Trumps First Amendment - Koran burning may not be protected free speech, indicates Supreme Court Associate Paul Joseph Watson Prison Planet.com Wednesday, September 15, 2010

Supreme Court Associate Justice Stephen Breyer was indecisive when answering a question about whether or not Pastor Terry Jones’ proposed Koran burning was protected by free speech, suggesting that globalization now trumps the First Amendment in the eyes of lawmakers.During an appearance on ABC’s Good Morning America to promote his book, Breyer was asked by host George Stephanopoulos if Jones’ ability to broadcast his actions in an age of global media poses a challenge to the First Amendment.[W]hen we spoke several years ago, you talked about how the process of globalization was changing our understanding of the law, Stephanopoulos began.When you think about the Internet and when you think about the possibility that, you know, a pastor in Florida with a flock of 30 can threaten to burn the Koran, and that leads to riots and killings in Afghanistan, does that pose a challenge to the First Amendment—to how you interpret it? Does it change the nature of…what we can allow and protect?

Watch the clip.
http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/checker.aspx?v=hdkUnz6Unz

Well, in a sense, yes; in a sense, no, responded Breyer indecisively People can express their views in debate, no matter how awful those views are — in debate, a conversation, people exchanging ideas. That’s the model so that, in fact, we are better informed when we cast that ballot.Breyer went on to say that while the core values remain, the application of the First Amendment can change over time.Breyer compared Jones’ actions to yelling fire in a crowded theatre, an action not protected by the First Amendment by legal precedent because it could lead directly to violence and harm.And what is the crowded theater today? Breyer asked. What is being trampled to death? Whether you support or abhor the actions of Pastor Jones, his right to burn a book in public can hardly be compared to yelling fire in a crowded theater, which is an action clearly intended to cause mayhem and unrest, whereas Jones’ stated reason for burning the Koran is a form of protest against the ground zero mosque controversy.

Jones’ actions are clearly protected under the First Amendment because they represent a form of political protest.As we have documented, the ground zero mosque controversy is clearly being contrived in an effort to goad extremists on both sides of the religious divide into committing acts of violence which then give authorities the pretext to crush everyone’s free speech.Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf is a globalist stooge, being a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and also having direct ties to a myriad of elitist organizations.There is also a direct relationship between the group behind the mosque and CIA front companies, as well as the U.S. military.This is about getting everybody at each other’s throats and provocateuring situations that demand the strong arm of the state to respond to the consequences of these artificially manufactured tensions. It is also about stoking resentment against Arabs to grease the skids for an expansion of war in the middle east.

Constitutionally speaking, the mosque should be allowed to be built and Pastor Jones should be free to burn the Koran, but this story goes far deeper than those surface issues because people on both sides of the debate are being deliberately manipulated into advocating positions that will only harm the liberty and livelihood of both Muslims and Christians in the long run.Hat Tip: CNS News-Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com.

Globalist Soros Declares Gold Is The Ultimate Bubble… Again - If the prole scum are financially sound how will we further rape them? Steve Watson Prisonplanet.com Wednesday, Sept 15th, 2010
http://www.prisonplanet.com/globalist-soros-declares-gold-is-the-ultimate-bubble-again.html (LINKS)

Billionaire globalist George Soros wants you to think that investing in Gold is unsafe and that the rallies the precious metal has seen in the wake of the economic implosion are abnormal.While admitting that gold prices could continue to rise following yesterday’s surge on the back of increased inflation figures in the United Kingdom and bad news from a report indicating a weaker-than-expected eurozone industrial production.Soros told a crowd at a Reuters conference:It will be very interesting to see if there is a decline in the next few weeks… It’s certainly not safe and it’s not going to last forever.Gold is the ultimate bubble, Soros said at the New York event.Soros has consistentlymade the same statements in the past and has been consistently proven wrong.Meanwhile, European investment giant UniCredit has upgraded their target price for gold from $1,250 to $1,600 by the end of 2012 – citing three powerful trends in the shape of fear over money printing at the Fed (QE), the idea that the Euro sovereign debt crisis represents a condemnation of fiat money and increasing demand for gold from China.

Other investors have also echoed these projections.On Tuesday the gold price traded as high as $1,261.90 and as low as $1,246.The U.S. dollar index was adding 0.03% to $81.90 while the euro was losing 0.19% to $1.28 vs. the dollar. The spot gold price was rising $14.30, according to Kitco’s gold index, writes Alix Steel for The Street.
Silver also experienced a boost, rising 14 cents to $20.31.

Globalist Foundation Exploits Angry Child to Blame Adults for Fake Climate Change Kurt Nimmo Infowars.com September 16, 2020
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgvnqv1-_D4&feature=player_embedded

In a video produced by Greenpeace, the environmental organization funded by the eugenicists at the Rockefeller Brothers Fund and Ted Turner Foundation, an angry boy blames selfish adults for climate change.Greenpeace also takes money from John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, Charles Stewart Mott Foundation, the John Merck Fund, the Wallace Genetic Foundation, and the Foundation for Deep Ecology, and others.Basing his argument on discredited quasi-science, the boy donning a gangbanger hoodie warns that adults have had their chance to save the earth and now it will be the responsibility of the next generation to set things right — or set them right according to the globalist eugenicists. If the child’s facial expression is any indication, the effort will be less than kind.I am reminded of the school children of Mao’s Red Guard when I look at this boy. Mao’s brainwashed young zombies killed around 7 million people during the Cultural Revolution. All told, Mao was responsible for murdering around 70 million people.The threatening video arrives more than a year after Al Gore instructed children to confront their parents over so-called climate change.Climate change was redefined as global climate disruption recently by Obama’s director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, John Holdren.A massive program with its tentacles embedded into almost every corner of education and popular culture is underway to use the green agenda to brainwash children and turn them against their own parents, as the state moves towards the creation of a Stasi-style informant society using methods that have been repeated in every totalitarian state throughout history,Paul Joseph Watson wrote after Gore aimed his speech at impressionable children.Kurt Nimmo edits Infowars.com. He is the author of Another Day in the Empire: Life In Neoconservative America.

Fourteen killed in Koran protests across Indian Kashmir Mon, Sep 13 2010 By Sheikh Mushtaq SRINAGAR, India | Mon Sep 13, 2010 12:11pm EDT

SRINAGAR, India (Reuters) - Police shot dead at least 13 people Monday in anti-government and Koran demonstrations across Indian Kashmir in the biggest single death toll from protests in the disputed region in years.The toll includes nine people killed in police clashes after Muslim protesters set fire to a Christian missionary school and government buildings in two districts to denounce reports that copies of the Koran had been damaged in the United States.One policeman was also killed by stone-throwing protesters defying a curfew in the Muslim-majority Kashmir valley.The deaths are a huge challenge for the Congress-led government, which has been criticized for failing to treat the protests seriously, underscoring a policy limbo in New Delhi that may spill over into tension with Pakistan, which claims Kashmir.The nuclear-armed neighbors have twice gone to war over Kashmir since independence.Police said these Koran demonstrations, attended by thousands in western Kashmir, quickly turned into separatist protests against the Indian central government -- a day after authorities slapped a curfew on much of the restive Himalayan region.Protesters, many wearing green headbands, shouted There is no God but Allah and Death to America. Witnesses said crowds in Budgam burned an effigy of U.S. President Barack Obama.At least 113 policemen and 45 protesters were injured. Police in Kashmir said separatist leaders were inciting the violence.Kashmir has seen mass rallies against Indian rule in the last three months and at least 70 protesters had been killed by police. Demonstrations on other issues -- such as the Koran -- can often balloon into wider anti-government sentiment.

Sunday, two people were killed in a third straight day of violent protests in Afghanistan sparked by a U.S. pastor's threat to burn copies of the Koran, the Muslim holy book.While pastor Terry Jones dropped his plans, there were at least two incidents of abuse of the Koran in Lower Manhattan in New York Saturday. Two evangelical preachers not affiliated with any mainstream church burned two copies of the Koran in Tennessee.It was unclear which incidents the Kashmiri demonstrators were denouncing. Iranian TV reports were aired in Kashmir on Sunday about alleged desecrations of the Koran - a grave insult to Muslims who believe the Koran to be the literal word of God.

DEFYING A CURFEW

A new generation of young Kashmiris, who have grown up with house raids, police killings and army checkpoints, feel increasingly angry at Indian rule and champion street protests rather than the violent militancy that characterized the 1990s.The protests unfolded as Indian authorities extended a curfew Monday in most of Kashmir, deployed thousands of troops to quell protests and prevented a planned march by separatists to a U.N. office in the region's biggest city.The latest incident today shows they have not learnt from past mistakes and things have clearly gone out of hand, said political analyst Amulya Ganguli.In Srinagar, Kashmir's main city, troops patrolled streets, erected barricades and blocked roads leading to the offices of U. N. Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan.In a sign of increasing concern in New Delhi, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh made a rare public statement on Kashmir, although a cabinet meeting failed to come up with any public decision.The youth of Kashmir are our citizens and their grievances have to be addressed.... We are willing to talk to every person or group which abjures violence, within the framework of our constitution, Singh said.In a potential embarrassment for the government, the New Delhi-backed leader of Kashmir state Chief Minister Omar Abdullah, was reportedly under pressure to resign for failing to contain deadly anti-government protests.But there is little risk for the Congress-led Indian government. Most Indians show little interest for what is happening in Kashmir and there is a general consensus in the country that Kashmir should remain part of India.The government is considering a partial lifting of the Armed Forces Special Powers Act in Kashmir as part of a peace initiative expected in the next few days.The law gives security forces sweeping powers to shoot, arrest, search and detain people in battling a separatist insurgency. But the army appears opposed to any relaxation and Monday's protests may have also dampened the chance of reform.(Writing by Alistair Scrutton; Editing by Paul de Bendern and Ron Popeski)

Russian TV Channel Pushes Patriot Conspiracy Theories.Browse All Issues
.By Sonia Scherr SEPT 16,10

http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2010/fall/from-russia-with-love

Five years ago, Russia Today made its debut as a news network aimed at enhancing Russia's image in the West.Recently, however, the Kremlin-financed television channel has devoted considerable airtime not only to coverage that makes Russia look good, but to coverage that makes the United States look bad. Over the past year and a half, Russia Today has reported with boosterish zeal on conspiracy theories popular in the resurgent Patriot movement, whose adherents typically advocate extreme antigovernment doctrines. Its slickly packaged stories suggest that a legitimate debate is under way in the United States about who perpetrated the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, for instance, and about President Obama's eligibility for high office. Russia Today's vision of the U.S. - a Byzantine nation animated by all kinds of dark conspiracies - is beamed out to as many as 200 million people.It also frequently quotes U.S. extremists as authorities on world events or interviews them at length without asking anything more than softball questions. One British journalist called Russia Today a strange propaganda outfit after appearing on a show in which the host injected Sept. 11 revisionism.

Unlike most U.S.-based Patriot radio shows that do the same, the Moscow-headquartered Russia Today has a large global audience tuning in via cable, satellite and the Internet. In North America, Europe and South Africa, some 200 million paying viewers — including a growing number in the United States — have access to the network. Last year, more Washington, D.C.-area viewers told Nielsen Media Research they preferred to watch primetime news on Russia Today than on such other English-language foreign networks as Deutsche Welle (Germany), France 24, Euronews (France), CCTV News (China) and Al Jazeera English (Qatar). On YouTube, Russia Today ranks among the top 10 most-viewed news and political channels of all time. It employs some 2,000 staff worldwide, including about 100 in its recently opened Washington, D.C., office. (That makes its staff larger than Fox News, which reports a worldwide staff of 1,200, and about half the size of that of cable news pioneer CNN.) Russia Today has launched sister networks in Arabic and Spanish in addition to its flagship English broadcasting service. Though a spokeswoman for Russia Today declined to give the amount of its annual budget, the Russian government has pumped millions into the network since its inception in 2005. Kathryn Stoner-Weiss, deputy director of the Center on Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law at Stanford University's Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, said the network's target audience appears to be second- and third-generation members of the Russian diaspora in the United States and abroad, along with foreign investors and international media. It's clearly a pro-Russian perspective; that's the purpose of Russia Today, she said. Sometimes, a pro-Russia perspective involves an anti-somebody-else perspective — and we're the most useful target at certain times.

Plugging 9/11 Plots
Russia Today's officials, who have long insisted that they operate without government influence despite multimillion-dollar subsidies, contend that the network is simply presenting a fresh take on the news. (Full disclosure: Intelligence Report Editor Mark Potok appeared on the April 26 edition of Russia Today's CrossTalk program to discuss the rise of militias. The network also aired an interview with a militia leader who criticized the Southern Poverty Law Center's characterization of militia groups.) In a statement to the Intelligence Report, Russia Today Editor-in-Chief Margarita Simonyan called the network's editorial policy open and balanced and dismissed criticism that the channel gives undue airtime to fringe ideas. We don't talk about 9/11 any more than U.S. media discusses who was behind the 1999 explosions in Moscow, she wrote, referring to a series of deadly apartment bombings that helped spark the Second Chechen War.Moreover, our own journalists have never claimed or even as much as hinted that the U.S. government may have been behind the tragedy of 9/11.That last claim is debatable at best. Russia Today has churned out dozens of stories that focus solely on the perspective of 9/11 truthers — the small minority that, despite overwhelming evidence, rejects the government's finding that the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks were perpetrated by al-Qaeda terrorists flying planes into buildings. Last year, for instance, independent producer Lori Harfenist, whose program The Resident is carried regularly on Russia Today, interviewed New Yorkers on the street about whether they thought Sept. 11 was an inside job.Eight years after the attacks on U.S. soil on Sept. 11, 2001, questions still loom as to whether there were more people involved or if the U.S. government had anything to do with it, she said in her introduction to that program. Do you think the events were purely terrorist attacks or do you think there were conspiratorial forces behind them? The following statement appeared on the television screen throughout the segment: New Yorkers unsure whether 9/11 was terrorist attack or inside job.

Russia Today has regularly featured 9/11 truthers, Obama-bashing birthers, conspiracy theorists and white supremacists.Russia Today also appears to give credence to the Sept. 11 truthers in its news and commentary. For instance, the network reported on Oct. 13, 2009, that a judge would not let New Yorkers vote on whether to launch a new investigation into Sept. 11. If a government by the people ignores the people, many wonder if here democracy is becoming a hypocrisy, the reporter concluded. The channel also spoke extensively with Luke Rudkowski, the founder of We Are Change, a group that not only seeks the truth behind the Sept. 11 attacks but also frets about a looming one world order, a classic Patriot fear. We go up to members … we shake their hands and we ask them what happens when you meet with the world's elites and banking media corporations and governments all around the world in secret, Rudkowski said in the April 13, 2009, interview. The Russia Today host did not challenge Rudkowski's suggestion of international conspiracies by world elites, a common theme on the U.S. radical right. On Feb. 11, Russia Today interviewed another We Are Change activist. Manny Badillo claimed that newly released Sept. 11 photos prove that explosives, not planes, brought down the buildings.At the time of the last anniversary of Sept. 11, the channel published a four-part series on its website titled 911 Reasons why 9/11 was (probably) an inside job. The articles, by Russia Today commentator Robert Bridge, report uncritically on discredited notions about Sept. 11, including the possibility that a bomb inside the towers contributed to their collapse and that the CIA had advance knowledge of the attack. On March 10, one of Russia Today's top stories was headlined Americans continue to fight for 9/11 truth. That story, about a Pennsylvania gathering of Sept. 11 truthers, reported incorrectly that the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) listed Rudkowski's We Are Change as a hate group along with the Ku Klux Klan. (In fact, this year the SPLC added We Are Change to its Patriot group listing, which is distinct from the hate group listing and includes hard-line antigovernment organizations that engage in groundless conspiracy theorizing.)Russia Today's focus on Sept. 11 truth hasn't gone unnoticed. Douglas Murray, a British journalist and conservative political commentator, posted a withering blog item earlier this year about his CrossTalk appearance. You can probably imagine, he wrote on Feb. 15, indeed can see, the look of astonishment that I and my fellow guest felt when the presenter declared to us, in the middle of a discussion about a totally different subject, that the people that perpetrated 9/11 were not even fundamentalists at all.(The show's host, Peter Lavelle, told The Moscow Times that show had been a fiasco because bad weather had prevented him from lining up guests to argue both sides of the issue under discussion.)

Russia Today editor-in-chief Simonyan told the Intelligence Report that the last time we talked about it [the Sept. 11 truthers movement] was in March.On May 20, however, the channel published another article by Bridge on its website that again questioned the 9/11 Commission Report. The article asserted that the official report has only served to fuel suspicions about that watershed moment that will dominate U.S. foreign and domestic policy for many years to come.Simonyan is by no means a seasoned veteran of the practice of objective journalsim. Born in Russia of Armenian parents, Simonyan was only 25 when the Kremlin named her editor-in-chief of the new network five years ago. Washington Post Moscow correspondent Peter Finn, quoted in a September 2008 article on the website Russia Beyond the Headlines, called the network a breathless cheerleader for the Kremlin, one which carefully avoided topics deemed too critical of then-President Vladimir Putin. The article continued: During the [2008] conflict in South Ossetia, one of Russia Today's foreign journalists resigned, claiming that his reports were being censored to meet the official line. Even longtime Kremlin adviser Vyacheslav Nikonov at first referred to Russia Today as too amateurish.

Birthers, Militiamen and Racists
It's not just conspiracy theories about Sept. 11 that preoccupy Russia Today. The channel has also reported on the false notion that Obama was born outside the United States and therefore is ineligible for the presidency. The channel in March interviewed Dr. Orly Taitz, an émigré from the former Soviet republic of Moldova and a chief proponent of the birther movement who gained notoriety in August 2009 by unveiling Obama's supposed Kenyan birth certificate — a document quickly exposed as a laughable forgery — and also has made a whole raft of other completely unsupported claims. Though the host noted that major American media outlets have refuted birther claims, he did not state that Obama has made public his birth certificate, even when Taitz asserted that Obama himself owed allegiance to three other nations.Taitz has made other appearances on Russia Today.Sometimes Russia Today seems to want to have it two ways. A July 31, 2009, article on its website reported that Hawaii officials had confirmed that Obama was born there. It went on to state, however, that Obama was being asked a lot of questions, including the particularly embarrassing one about his birthplace. It quoted a correspondent for the far-right website World Net Daily who suggested that, if the birth certificate exists, Obama should display it. The article didn't mention that White House spokesman Robert Gibbs told World Net Daily that the birth certificate is posted on the Internet.In addition, a Nov. 25, 2009, Russia Today story reported that James David Manning, the black pastor of a Harlem church, not only sees pure evil in Obama — but also contends he's not a U.S. citizen. The story noted Manning's views are controversial, but concluded, Pastor Manning remains undeterred in his rhetoric, despite the criticism of his community. (Manning is apparently a friend of Taitz, joining her for a tiny 2009 protest in front of Fox News' offices in New York after Fox's Bill O'Reilly called Taitz a nut.)

Manning isn't the only fringe figure to whom Russia Today has given exposure. Conspiracy-minded radio host Alex Jones makes frequent appearances. In a softball interview last year, Jones rehashed a signature Patriot conspiracy theory when he described the United States as a tool of the New World Order and asserted that the world is controlled by the Bilderberg Group.(The Bilderberg Group is an international, invitation-only group of influential business and government figures that meets privately every year. Many on the American radical right, including a number of anti-Semites, have long seen the Bilderberg group as being behind all kinds of nefarious plots.) The New World Order,Jones said in his April 7, 2009, show, is just a super-rich international mafia of oligarchs that are playing God, who want to abolish and bankrupt nation states so they can set up an international order, where the planet is owned by a private bank.The host, Anastasia Churkina, did not challenge any of Jones' claims. In fact, Russia Today has sought Jones' opinion on topics ranging from Internet security to a Philadelphia school district's webcam spying scandal to the BP oil spill response. (He sees a federal conspiracy in all these cases.) An April 16 story headlined Alex Jones reacts to news of potential oil shortages gives odd weight to the opinion of the self-described truth teller. Consider the story's opening paragraph: In a new report, U.S. military officials are warning of a drop in oil production as early as 2012, but Alex Jones says that this may be true, and if so, it is the result of a conspiracy.Longtime militia organizer Jim Stachowiak — a controversial figure even in Patriot circles — also is a regular guest on Russia Today. Earlier this year, the Georgia-based radio host appeared on the network to defend Charles Dyer, a prominent associate of the Patriot group Oath Keepers until Dyer was charged with child sex abuse in January. We're standing by Dyer, said Stachowiak, who wore a Don't Tread on Me hat and referred to the ATF (the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives) as the American Terrorism Force.
Even white nationalist Jared Taylor has found a platform on Russia Today. On Feb. 8 of this year, when Taylor participated in a CrossTalk discussion of whether Obama is a post-racial president, host Lavelle introduced him as an author and editor of American Renaissance journal but made no mention of his blatantly racist views. (In 2005, for instance, Taylor wrote in his journal: Blacks and whites are different. When blacks are left entirely to their own devices, Western civilization — any kind of civilization — disappears.) Russia Today was also the only major media outlet to interview Taylor after multiple hotels cancelled his magazine's biannual conference in February. It did not seek comment from the activists behind the campaign to shut down the conference, which brings together prominent white supremacists and academic racists from the United States and abroad.

But editor-in-chief Simonyan denied the channel is providing a forum for extremists. We don't give airtime to public figures who you call extremist any more than CNN and other channels give airtime to people who many in Russia consider extremists, she said.Yet Russia Today is clearly serving the interests of those who promote the ideas that animate the burgeoning Patriot movement. The channel gets rave reviews on Patriot websites, including Jones' Prison Planet Forum. This is what mainstream news should be like,one forum poster declared on May 7 — ironically overlooking that his ideal media outlet is heavily subsidized by and very likely beholden to a government. Russia Today,he said, gets many kudos from me.

O’Reilly Says 9/11 Truth Activists Are Dangerous Radicals
Kurt Nimmo Infowars.com September 16, 2010


Anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan recently said she believes the 9/11 attacks were an inside job. Maybe O’Reilly would have the government keep her away from Ground Zero? Photo: Bob With.Bill O’Reilly is at it again. Remember when he called for squashing the First Amendment of Americans opposed to the illegal invasion of Iraq? And it is our duty as loyal Americans to shut up once the fighting begins, unless — unless facts prove the operation wrong, as was the case in Vietnam, said Bill on March 3, 2003.Facts soon revealed that the neocons had bamboozled the nation into invading Iraq under false pretense, but we didn’t get a retraction from Bill. Now O’Reilly is characterizing 9/11 Truth activists as dangerous radicals.Earlier this week, O’Reilly linked the Ground Zero imam Feisal Abdul Rauf — who worked with the FBI on its counterterrorism effort in March of 2003 and engages in conversations with the Council On Foreign Relations — to the truther Faiz Khan, a Muslim scholar and educator who was a first responder on September 11, 2001. Khan participated in two memorial services for the victims of 9/11 and is involved with the New York group Muslims Against Terrorism.Bill O’Reilly would restrict Khan’s freedom of movement for his assertion that 9/11 was an inside job. Khan should not be allowed within ten miles of Ground Zero,said the Fox News teleprompter reader.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YwV9J13kMU&feature=player_embedded
We can only assume that O’Reilly would extend this ban to all people who believe 9/11was an inside job and possibly those who have reservations about the official fairy tale that pins the blame on Muslim cave-dwellers half way around the world.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PuHfpZ1h6js&feature=player_embedded
According to a Zogby poll conducted in 2006, 42% of Americans believe the U.S. government and the 9/11 commission covered up the truth behind the attacks. Is it possible O’Reilly and Fox News consider millions of Americans to be dangerous radicals and would prevent them from traveling to Manhattan? Maybe a yellow star is in order?

Mary Katharine Ham, a scribe for the neocon house organ, the Weekly Standard, told O’Reilly Khan’s relationship with his buddy Feisal Abdul Rauf is problematic and Khan is making a blatant excuse for terrorism.In other words, if you don’t accept the official government version of September 11 as gospel, you are a terrorism facilitator, at least according to the neocons who apparently also consider millions of Americans as little more than apologists for Islamic terror.The hyped-up Ground Zero Mosque affair was designed not only to further demonize Muslims and create religious tension and spread xenophobia and thus promote the phony war on terror, it is also an effort to criminalize the 9/11 truth movement.Fox News attempted to demonize the 9/11 truth movement earlier this year when the mental case John Patrick Bedell was killed outside of the Pentagon. On March 7, Fox’s Geraldo Rivera linked Bedell’s violent rampage to truthers. Rivera invited Alex Jones on his show to refute this absurd accusation.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69g8TnG6Qzw&feature=player_embedded

Doctor shot at Johns Hopkins hospital in Baltimore By ALEX DOMINGUEZ, Associated Press Writer - SEPT 16,10

BALTIMORE – A man shot a doctor and then barricaded himself inside a room at Johns Hopkins hospital, where he remained holed up two hours after the shooting Thursday, police said.The doctor was rushed to surgery and is expected to survive, police spokesman Anthony Guglielmi said.The doctor will be OK, Guglielmi said.He's in the best place in the world — at Johns Hopkins hospital.He said he did not know the relationship between the gunman and the doctor. The hospital said in a statement that the doctor is a faculty physician but it could not release more information because of privacy policies.Guglielmi said a small area of the hospital remained locked down and police were preparing a tactical operation to deal with the gunman. People with appointments in other parts of the hospital were encouraged to keep them.

Hopkins spokesman Gary Stephenson said the affected area was the eighth floor of the Nelson building, the main hospital tower.About a dozen officers wearing vests and helmets and carrying assault weapons prepared to enter the hospital at midday.The rest of the massive hospital, research and medical education complex remained open, including the emergency department.With more than 30,000 employees, Johns Hopkins Medicine is among Maryland's largest private employers and the largest in Baltimore. The hospital has more than 1,000 beds and more than 1,700 full-time doctors.

ALLTIME