KING JESUS IS COMING FOR US ANY TIME NOW. THE RAPTURE. BE PREPARED TO GO.
Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
December 28, 2012
In response to criticism of NRA VP Wayne LaPierre‘s suggestion that armed guards be placed in schools following the Sandy Hook massacre and the double standard presented by the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990, nationally syndicated
radio talk show host Alex Jones has posted a petition on We the People:
Your Voice in Our Government, the federal government’s petition
website.
Alex’s petition reads as follows:
“Since the government has bought over a billion rounds of ammo and armed vehicles and is hardening facilities, we are calling for them to all to turn their guns in, including all federal police… and the military,” Jones said on Friday prior to the petition post on the White House site.The petition follows remarks made by corporate media host David Gregory over the weekend. Gregory criticized LaPierre for his armed guards in schools idea. Following Gregory’s dismissive remarks, it was reported that the Meet the Press host enrolled his children in an elite school – the same D.C.-based Sidwell Friends attended by Obama’s children – where students are protected by no less than 11 armed security guards.“Gregory isn’t the only one putting himself in this hypocritical box, though,” writes Warner Todd Huston. “Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel was reportedly ‘outraged’ at the NRA’s security guard plan. But Emanuel also sends his kids to a school that has armed guards plying the hallways every school day. (Not to mention his fully armed personal security detail that shadows him everywhere he goes.)”Jones said on Friday that if the government truly believes in gun free zones, Obama should insist that Sidwell Friends and other elite schools disarm in order to comply with the federal law. “Because, according to them, that’s what makes us all safe,” Jones told Infowars.com.
Proponents of gun free zones and the 1990 law mandating them never mention the fact that mass murderers specifically target defenseless schools, theaters and malls because they know there will be little resistance to their rampages if a defense-free rule is in effect.“We must stop blinding ourselves to the obvious: Most of these mass killings are happening at schools where self-defense is prohibited,” Carla Howell, executive director of the Libertarian Party, said in a statement following the Sandy Hook massacre. “Gun prohibition sets the stage for the slaughter of innocent children. We must repeal these anti-self-defense laws now to minimize the likelihood they will occur in the future and to the limit the damage done when they do.”
Despite Gregory’s dismissal and that of government officials and the corporate media, hiring armed security guards — and in lieu of that allowing teachers to carry firearms — is the only rational solution to mass shootings at schools.For some time now teachers in Israel have carried firearms in response to terrorist attacks. “Two (armed) teachers would have kept (the Newtown shooter) occupied for 45 seconds each,” Oren Shemtov, CEO of Israel’s Academy of Security and Investigation, told Fox News on December 27.
During his Sunday Show, Alex originally called for a government gun free zone and others posted petitions on the White House site in response (see Eliminate armed guards for the President, Vice-President, and their families, and establish Gun Free Zones around them). On Friday, Infowars.com journalist Adan Salazar covered this petition.
|
EPHESIANS 6:10-13
10 Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might.
11 Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil.
12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities,(DEMONIC ANGELS IN HIGH PLACES) against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.(SPIRTIUAL DEMONIC PERSONS)
13 Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.
LUKE 4:5-7(BECAUSE SATAN OFFERS WORLD POWER, WORLD ORDERERS HAVE ACCEPTED SATANS GIFT)
5 And the devil, taking him (JESUS) up into an high mountain, shewed unto him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time.
6 And the devil said unto him, All this power will I give thee, and the glory of them: for that is delivered unto me; and to whomsoever I will I give it.
7 If thou therefore wilt worship me, all shall be thine.
DANIEL 7:23-25
23 Thus he said, The fourth beast shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth, which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces.(10 DIVISION WORLD GOVERNMENT)(10 TRADE BLOCS I BELIEVE)
24 And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise: and another shall rise after them; and he shall be diverse from the first, and he shall subdue three kings.
25 And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time.
DANIEL 12:4,1
4 But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased.
1 And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.
REVELATION 13:1-3,7,8,12,16-18(ALL THE WORLDS CITIZENS UNDER DICTATORSHIP)
1 And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.
2 And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.
3 And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast.
7 And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations.
8 And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.
12 And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed.
16 And he causeth all,(WORLD SOCIALISM) both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.
REVELATION 17:3,7,9-10,12,18
3 So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns.
7 And the angel said unto me, Wherefore didst thou marvel? I will tell thee the mystery of the woman, and of the beast that carrieth her, which hath the seven heads and ten horns.
9 And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth.
10 And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space.
12 And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast.
18 And the woman which thou sawest is that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth.
We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.James Paul Warburg appearing before the Senate on 7th February 1950
Like a famous WWII Belgian General,Paul Henry Spock said in 1957:We need no commission, we have already too many. What we need is a man who is great enough to be able to keep all the people in subjection to himself and to lift us out of the economic bog into which we threaten to sink. Send us such a man. Be he a god or a devil, we will accept him.And today, sadly, the world is indeed ready for such a man.
By working together, the EU and Russia can make a decisive contribution to global governance and regional conflict resolution, to global economic governance in the G 8 and G 20, and to a broad range of international and regional issues. I would like to congratulate President Putin for taking over the presidency of G 20.
As we have reported in this magazine many times, the term “global governance” is an intentionally deceptive term, used by political ruling elites because it is more vague and mushy and sounds less threatening than “global government” or “world government.” Hence, there will be less political opposition mounted to “global governance” than “world government.”“Global governance” came into vogue in the late 1990s, following the publication in 1995 of Our Global Neighborhood, a report of the UN-appointed Commission on Global Governance. That report attempted emphatically to assure readers that they had nothing to fear; they were not proposing world government. It claimed:Global governance is not global government. No misunderstanding should arise from the similarity of the terms. We are not proposing movement towards world government.United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan practiced the same semantic sleight-of-hand and false assurance at the UN Millennium Summit in New York City in 2000. In his report We the Peoples: The Role of the United Nations in the 21st Century, Annan called for “new forms of global governance,” “a new ethic of global stewardship,” “global norms,” and “global rules” — all of which assume a role for the UN as global legislator.Then Annan addressed the rational apprehension that many people would harbor concerning these new proposals for restructuring the world. “What do we mean by ‘governance’ when applied to the international realm?” he asked. “In the minds of some,” he said, “the term still conjures up images of world government, of centralized bureaucratic behemoths trampling on the rights of people and states.” These fearful conjurations, he assured us, have no basis in reality. “Nothing is less desirable” than world government, said Annan, insisting that “the very notion of centralizing hierarchies is itself an anachronism in our fluid, highly dynamic and extensively networked world — an outmoded remnant of nineteenth century mindsets.”However, only months prior to the Millennium Summit and Kofi Annan’s report, on February 26, 1999, Sir Shridath Ramphal, a co-chairman of the Commission on Global Governance, addressed the Commission’s meeting in Barcelona, Spain, and gave a very different take on the matter. Ramphal stated:The point I am making is that when we talk of “governance” and “democracy,” we have to look beyond governance within countries and democracy within states. We have to look to Global Governance and Democracy within the Global State.A Global “State” with a capital “S” signifies a world “State,” a world government. And Ramphal emphasized that in the conclusion of his talk by celebrating the end of the “Nation State.” He declared:As the Century of the Nation State ends, however, to a far greater degree than their governments, people recognize … they understand that the roads to justice and survival are conjoined; that the task is to bring the mutual interests and the moral impulses of mankind together.Many of the political elites who formerly dismissed concerns that “global governance” is a ruse for “global government,” now matter-of-factly admit that they are one and the same. Jacques Attali, an ardent globalist and an adviser to former President Nicolas Sarkozy of France, for instance, has said: “Global governance is just a euphemism for global government.”
Van Rompuy — Tapped by Bilderbergers
Attali is a veteran attendee of the annual meetings of the super-secret, super-elite Bilderberg Group. Which brings us back to Herman Van Rompuy, frequently referred to as “Bilderberg Van Rompuy,” a reference to his having received his current job title through the actions and influence of the Bilderbergers. In a November 17, 2009 article for the U.K.’s Guardian, entitled “Who speaks for Europe? Criticism of ‘shambolic’ process to fill key jobs,” Ian Traynor wrote:Van Rompuy met Kissinger at a closed session of international policymakers and industrialists chaired by Viscount Etienne Davignon, a discreetly powerful figure in Brussels who was vice-president of the European commission in the 1980s. The viscount currently chairs the Bilderberg Group, the shadowy global freemasonry of politicians and bankers who meet to discuss world affairs in the strictest privacy, spawning innumerable conspiracy theories. Van Rompuy, it seems, attended the Bilderberg session to audition for the European job, calling for a new system of levies to fund the EU and replace the perennial EU budget battles.Jon Ronson, another reporter at the Guardian, interviewed Lord Denis Healey, one of the founders of the Bilderberg Group, for a 2001 article entitled, “Who Pulls the Strings?” Although Lord Healey insisted the group was not conspiratorial at all, he confirmed that they are working in the direction of world government. Ronson wrote:This is how Denis Healey described a Bilderberg person to me: “To say we were striving for a one-world government is exaggerated, but not wholly unfair. Those of us in Bilderberg felt we couldn’t go on forever fighting one another for nothing and killing people and rendering millions homeless. So we felt that a single community throughout the world would be a good thing.”He said, “Bilderberg is a way of bringing together politicians, industrialists, financiers and journalists. Politics should involve people who aren’t politicians. We make a point of getting along younger politicians who are obviously rising, to bring them together with financiers and industrialists who offer them wise words. It increases the chance of having a sensible global policy.”David Rockefeller, a longtime leader at Bilderberg conclaves, was even more explicit when addressing the 1991 meeting of the Bilderberg group. Rockefeller stated:We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.That statement and other remarks from the Bilderberg meeting were obtained by French intelligence agents, who were tasked with monitoring the gathering, because of the obvious implications for French national interests and security. The information was then leaked to two French publications. Hilaire du Berrier, a contributing editor to The New American, verified the authenticity of the reports through his friend, former head of French intelligence, Count Alexander de Marenches, and other sources, and provided the first account in English in his Monaco-based monthly HduB Reports in September 1991. It was then published shortly thereafter in The New American. What seemed outlandish to many people at the time, and was frequently dismissed as kooky “conspiracy theory,” is being confirmed daily in unfolding events — and admissions from those who are causing the events to happen
Reason for owning an “assault weapon”
In Pursuit of the Truth.
December 27, 2012
Photo: Michael Saechang.
California Democrat Dianne Feinstein will introduce legislation in January calling for the fingerprinting and registering of all gun owners in the United States.On her Senate web page, Feinstein states her proposed legislation will add fingerprinting and photo identification to the National Firearms Act.A firearms seller must currently submit Form 4473 to the government containing the name, address, driver license information, NICS background check transaction number, serial number and model of the firearm, and a short federal affidavit stating that the purchaser is eligible to purchase firearms under federal law. Feinstein’s bill will add a substantial layer of bureaucracy to the existing regulations.The effort to expand firearms registration will include weapons grandfathered prior to the enactment of Feinstein’s proposed legislation. In other words, all gun owners will be required to register their constitutionally guaranteed firearms with a federal government inimical to the Second Amendment.Feinstein’s registration process will likely surpass New York City’s handgun permit process, which is a bureaucratic nightmare. In addition to non-refundable fees totaling over $500, the permit process demands two recent color photos, a birth certificate, proof of citizenship and residence, a blizzard of affidavits, and other red-tape hurdles. Applications are routinely denied for spurious reasons, including non-violent misdemeanors and depression.As Dean Weingarten notes, gun registration is de facto gun confiscation. Following mandatory gun registration, the government “will know who has legal possession of each firearm. They will know where the firearm is stored. When physical possession of the gun is desired, they can order you to turn it in. This has happened repeatedly,” most notably in Nazi Germany, Red China and Soviet Russia.More recently, it has occurred in Kosovo, Great Britain, Australia, New York, and California. If Feinstein has her way next month, it will happen across America.Democrats and their Republican co-conspirators are going all out to ban firearms. Feinstein’s bill will ban the sale, transfer, importation, and manufacturing of 120 specifically-named firearms, including semiautomatic rifles, handguns, and shotguns that can accept detachable and fixed magazines and have “one military characteristic.”
In addition, Feinstein’s bill will outlaw flash suppressors, bayonet mounts, thumbhole stocks and bullet buttons on firearms.Make no mistake about it. Obama and his anti-Second Amendment allies in Congress are coming for your guns. If they have their way, the only legal firearms in America will be rifles with 10 round magazines and single shot and bolt-action rifles – and those firearms will be registered with the government and may be confiscated at any moment.This article was posted: Thursday, December 27, 2012 at 1:15 pm
WHY WOULD THE USA GOVERNMENT BUY UP 1.6 BILLION ROUNDS OF AMMO http://www.naturalnews.com/038407_ammunition_homeland_security_civil_war.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=1Xk0j4LMzrQ
Natural News
Dec 28, 2012
While the U.S. government is desperately attempting to disarm the American population by rolling out Adolf Hitler-style gun control, it is simultaneously arming itself to the teeth, buying up 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition and now stockpiling it at ammo depot stations around the country.The hypocrisy of it all is stunning. While screaming, “GUNS ARE BAD!” to American farmers, ranchers and citizens, the government is buying up billions of dollars worth of guns and ammo itself. This isn’t ammo to be used in a foreign theater of war, by the way, it’s ammo that can only be used domestically, against the American people. (The hollow point ammo violates international war treaties and so cannot be used in international war actions.)
To help us all visualize the hypocrisy in the government’s gun control schemes, I came up with our latest Counterthink cartoon.
Here’s the cartoon:
Feel free to post this cartoon on your own website, but please give credit to the original source, which is NaturalNews.com / Counterthink.com.In addition to purchasing 450 million rounds of hollow point .40 caliber ammo, the U.S. government has also purchased:
• Over one million rounds of hollow-point .223 rifle ammo
• Over half a million rounds of non-hollow-point .223 rifle ammo
• 220,000 rounds of 12 gauge shotgun #7 ammo (target ammo)
• Over 200,000 rounds of 12 gauge shotgun #00 buckshot ammo (tactical anti-personnel ammo)
• 66,000 rounds of 12 gauge shotgun slugs (tactical anti-personnel, anti-vehicle rounds)
• Over two million rounds of hollow-point .357 Sig JPH (hollow-point) pistol ammo (anti-personnel)
• Over four million rounds of .40 S&W JPH (hollow-point) pistol ammo (anti-personnel)
• Over 60,000 rounds of .308 match grade anti-personnel sniper rounds (BTHP)
• Plus, hundreds of thousands of additional rounds of .38 special, .45 auto, 9mm, 7.62×39 (AK rifle) ammo, and others.
Petition Calls for Gun Free Zone at White House and Federal Buildings
Infowars.com
December 28, 2012
In response to criticism of NRA VP Wayne LaPierre‘s suggestion that armed guards be placed in schools following the Sandy Hook massacre and the double standard presented by the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990, nationally syndicated
radio talk show host Alex Jones has posted a petition on We the People:
Your Voice in Our Government, the federal government’s petition
website.Alex’s petition reads as follows:
We Demand Obama Issue Executive Order Making White House, Federal Buildings and Events Gun Free ZonesYou can sign the petition here.
Journalist Alex Jones and Infowars.com are calling for President Barack Obama to issue an executive order amending the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990. The executive order will establish the White House, all federal buildings and federal events as gun free zones and all federal security personnel will turn in their guns. We also demand the order apply to private schools such as Sidwell Friends School attended by the president’s daughters. This petition is a response to government and corporate media dismissing a call for armed guards at schools following the Sandy Hook shooting. Jones and Infowars.com believe there should not be a double standard. If the government believes gun free zones are a solution for citizens, the same standard should apply to government servants and employees.
“Since the government has bought over a billion rounds of ammo and armed vehicles and is hardening facilities, we are calling for them to all to turn their guns in, including all federal police… and the military,” Jones said on Friday prior to the petition post on the White House site.The petition follows remarks made by corporate media host David Gregory over the weekend. Gregory criticized LaPierre for his armed guards in schools idea. Following Gregory’s dismissive remarks, it was reported that the Meet the Press host enrolled his children in an elite school – the same D.C.-based Sidwell Friends attended by Obama’s children – where students are protected by no less than 11 armed security guards.“Gregory isn’t the only one putting himself in this hypocritical box, though,” writes Warner Todd Huston. “Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel was reportedly ‘outraged’ at the NRA’s security guard plan. But Emanuel also sends his kids to a school that has armed guards plying the hallways every school day. (Not to mention his fully armed personal security detail that shadows him everywhere he goes.)”Jones said on Friday that if the government truly believes in gun free zones, Obama should insist that Sidwell Friends and other elite schools disarm in order to comply with the federal law. “Because, according to them, that’s what makes us all safe,” Jones told Infowars.com.
Proponents of gun free zones and the 1990 law mandating them never mention the fact that mass murderers specifically target defenseless schools, theaters and malls because they know there will be little resistance to their rampages if a defense-free rule is in effect.“We must stop blinding ourselves to the obvious: Most of these mass killings are happening at schools where self-defense is prohibited,” Carla Howell, executive director of the Libertarian Party, said in a statement following the Sandy Hook massacre. “Gun prohibition sets the stage for the slaughter of innocent children. We must repeal these anti-self-defense laws now to minimize the likelihood they will occur in the future and to the limit the damage done when they do.”
Despite Gregory’s dismissal and that of government officials and the corporate media, hiring armed security guards — and in lieu of that allowing teachers to carry firearms — is the only rational solution to mass shootings at schools.For some time now teachers in Israel have carried firearms in response to terrorist attacks. “Two (armed) teachers would have kept (the Newtown shooter) occupied for 45 seconds each,” Oren Shemtov, CEO of Israel’s Academy of Security and Investigation, told Fox News on December 27.
During his Sunday Show, Alex originally called for a government gun free zone and others posted petitions on the White House site in response (see Eliminate armed guards for the President, Vice-President, and their families, and establish Gun Free Zones around them). On Friday, Infowars.com journalist Adan Salazar covered this petition.
DNA of Sandy Hook killer Adam Lanza to be examined for 'evil' gene in first study of its kind ever conducted on a mass murderer
- The study will be the first one of its kind and will evaluate any genetic evidence for the mass killing of 20 first graders, six members of staff at Sandy Hook Elementary School and his own mother.
|
Scientists
have been asked to study the DNA of Newtown school killer Adam Lanza to see if
has an 'evil' gene that led him to carry out the massacre.The study,
which will look at any abnormalities or mutations in his individual DNA, is
believed to be the first of its kind ever carried out on a mass murderer.Lanza
slaughtered 20 children and six adults in one of America's worst ever school
shootings on December 14, 2012.The 20 year
old also shot dead his mother Nancy before taking his own life as police closed
in on him at the Sandy Hook elementary school in Connecticut.The
massacre prompted President Obama to look into new gun controls and banning
assault rifles such as AR-15 Bushmaster used by Lanza in his rampage.The study
of the killer's DNA has been ordered by Connecticut Medical Examiner H. Wayne
Carver who carried out the post mortems on all the victims.He has
contacted geneticists at University of Connecticut's to conduct the study.Geneticists
said they are likely looking at Lanza's DNA to detect a mutation or abnormality
that could increase the risk of aggressive or violent behavior.They could
analyse Lanza's entire genome in great detail and try to find any unexpected
mutations.Arthur
Beaudet, a professor at Baylor College of Medicine, said the University of
Connecticut geneticists are most likely trying to 'detect clear
abnormalities of what we would call a mutation in a gene'.He added: 'Or gene abnormalities and there are some abnormalities that are related
to aggressive behavior.
'They
might look for mutations that might be associated with mental illnesses and
ones that might also increase the risk for violence.Beaudet,
who is also the chairman of Baylor College of Medicine's department of
molecular and human genetics in Houston, Texas said geneticists should be doing
this type of research because there are 'some mutations that are known to
be associated with at least aggressive behavior if not violent behavior.''I
don't think any one of these mutations would explain all of (the mass
shooters), but some of them would have mutations that might be causing both
schizophrenia and related schizophrenia violent behavior,' Beaudet said. 'I think we could learn more about it and we should learn more about
it.'
Beaudet,who
is chairman of the Baylor College department of molecular and human genetics,
said studying the genes of murderers is controversial because there is a risk
that those with similar genetic characteristics could possibly be discriminated
against or stigmatized.But he said
the research into Lanza would be helpful even if only a "fraction"
may have the abnormality or mutation.'Not
all of these people will have identifiable genetic abnormalities,' Beaudet
told ABC News in America.'By
studying genetic abnormalities we can learn more about conditions better and
who is at risk and what might be dramatic treatments,' Beaudet said,
adding if the gene abnormality is defined the 'treatment to stop'
other mass shootings or 'decrease the risk is much approved.'Police have
so far failed to find a motive for Lanza going on the deadly rampage.Although
known to be shy and social inept Lanza had not shown any violent streak
although he was known to spend hours in the basement of his home playing
violent video games.His
mental
condition may also have been affected by his 52 year old mum who was a
'prepper' and had stockpiled food and guns in readiness for a disaster.A six year
old British boy, Dylan Hockley, was among the young victims gunned down the
week before Christmas.
EPHESIANS 6:10-13
10 Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might.
11 Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil.
12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities,(DEMONIC ANGELS IN HIGH PLACES) against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.(SPIRTIUAL DEMONIC PERSONS)
13 Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.
LUKE 4:5-7(BECAUSE SATAN OFFERS WORLD POWER, WORLD ORDERERS HAVE ACCEPTED SATANS GIFT)
5 And the devil, taking him (JESUS) up into an high mountain, shewed unto him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time.
6 And the devil said unto him, All this power will I give thee, and the glory of them: for that is delivered unto me; and to whomsoever I will I give it.
7 If thou therefore wilt worship me, all shall be thine.
DANIEL 7:23-25
23 Thus he said, The fourth beast shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth, which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces.(10 DIVISION WORLD GOVERNMENT)(10 TRADE BLOCS I BELIEVE)
24 And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise: and another shall rise after them; and he shall be diverse from the first, and he shall subdue three kings.
25 And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time.
DANIEL 12:4,1
4 But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased.
1 And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.
REVELATION 13:1-3,7,8,12,16-18(ALL THE WORLDS CITIZENS UNDER DICTATORSHIP)
1 And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.
2 And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.
3 And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast.
7 And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations.
8 And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.
12 And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed.
16 And he causeth all,(WORLD SOCIALISM) both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.
REVELATION 17:3,7,9-10,12,18
3 So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns.
7 And the angel said unto me, Wherefore didst thou marvel? I will tell thee the mystery of the woman, and of the beast that carrieth her, which hath the seven heads and ten horns.
9 And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth.
10 And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space.
12 And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast.
18 And the woman which thou sawest is that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth.
We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.James Paul Warburg appearing before the Senate on 7th February 1950
Like a famous WWII Belgian General,Paul Henry Spock said in 1957:We need no commission, we have already too many. What we need is a man who is great enough to be able to keep all the people in subjection to himself and to lift us out of the economic bog into which we threaten to sink. Send us such a man. Be he a god or a devil, we will accept him.And today, sadly, the world is indeed ready for such a man.
Bilderberg-picked EU Leader Van Rompuy Calls for Global Governance With Russia
William F. Jasper New American Dec 28, 2012
While much of the Christian and post-Christian worlds were busy
rushing about in last-minute preparations for Christmas celebrations, an
important event took place in Brussels, Belgium, that went largely
unnoticed and unreported. Leaders of the European Union and Russia met
in Brussels on December 20 and 21 for the 30th EU-Russia Summit, continuing a process of convergence and interdependence that is leading toward political, economic, and social merger.In his remarks at the conclusion of the summit, Herman Van Rompuy,
president of the European Council, made repeated reference to progress
toward the goal of “global governance,” which has always been code in
globalist circles for world government. Van Rompuy stated:
By working together, the EU and Russia can make a decisive contribution to global governance and regional conflict resolution, to global economic governance in the G 8 and G 20, and to a broad range of international and regional issues. I would like to congratulate President Putin for taking over the presidency of G 20.
As we have reported in this magazine many times, the term “global governance” is an intentionally deceptive term, used by political ruling elites because it is more vague and mushy and sounds less threatening than “global government” or “world government.” Hence, there will be less political opposition mounted to “global governance” than “world government.”“Global governance” came into vogue in the late 1990s, following the publication in 1995 of Our Global Neighborhood, a report of the UN-appointed Commission on Global Governance. That report attempted emphatically to assure readers that they had nothing to fear; they were not proposing world government. It claimed:Global governance is not global government. No misunderstanding should arise from the similarity of the terms. We are not proposing movement towards world government.United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan practiced the same semantic sleight-of-hand and false assurance at the UN Millennium Summit in New York City in 2000. In his report We the Peoples: The Role of the United Nations in the 21st Century, Annan called for “new forms of global governance,” “a new ethic of global stewardship,” “global norms,” and “global rules” — all of which assume a role for the UN as global legislator.Then Annan addressed the rational apprehension that many people would harbor concerning these new proposals for restructuring the world. “What do we mean by ‘governance’ when applied to the international realm?” he asked. “In the minds of some,” he said, “the term still conjures up images of world government, of centralized bureaucratic behemoths trampling on the rights of people and states.” These fearful conjurations, he assured us, have no basis in reality. “Nothing is less desirable” than world government, said Annan, insisting that “the very notion of centralizing hierarchies is itself an anachronism in our fluid, highly dynamic and extensively networked world — an outmoded remnant of nineteenth century mindsets.”However, only months prior to the Millennium Summit and Kofi Annan’s report, on February 26, 1999, Sir Shridath Ramphal, a co-chairman of the Commission on Global Governance, addressed the Commission’s meeting in Barcelona, Spain, and gave a very different take on the matter. Ramphal stated:The point I am making is that when we talk of “governance” and “democracy,” we have to look beyond governance within countries and democracy within states. We have to look to Global Governance and Democracy within the Global State.A Global “State” with a capital “S” signifies a world “State,” a world government. And Ramphal emphasized that in the conclusion of his talk by celebrating the end of the “Nation State.” He declared:As the Century of the Nation State ends, however, to a far greater degree than their governments, people recognize … they understand that the roads to justice and survival are conjoined; that the task is to bring the mutual interests and the moral impulses of mankind together.Many of the political elites who formerly dismissed concerns that “global governance” is a ruse for “global government,” now matter-of-factly admit that they are one and the same. Jacques Attali, an ardent globalist and an adviser to former President Nicolas Sarkozy of France, for instance, has said: “Global governance is just a euphemism for global government.”
Van Rompuy — Tapped by Bilderbergers
Attali is a veteran attendee of the annual meetings of the super-secret, super-elite Bilderberg Group. Which brings us back to Herman Van Rompuy, frequently referred to as “Bilderberg Van Rompuy,” a reference to his having received his current job title through the actions and influence of the Bilderbergers. In a November 17, 2009 article for the U.K.’s Guardian, entitled “Who speaks for Europe? Criticism of ‘shambolic’ process to fill key jobs,” Ian Traynor wrote:Van Rompuy met Kissinger at a closed session of international policymakers and industrialists chaired by Viscount Etienne Davignon, a discreetly powerful figure in Brussels who was vice-president of the European commission in the 1980s. The viscount currently chairs the Bilderberg Group, the shadowy global freemasonry of politicians and bankers who meet to discuss world affairs in the strictest privacy, spawning innumerable conspiracy theories. Van Rompuy, it seems, attended the Bilderberg session to audition for the European job, calling for a new system of levies to fund the EU and replace the perennial EU budget battles.Jon Ronson, another reporter at the Guardian, interviewed Lord Denis Healey, one of the founders of the Bilderberg Group, for a 2001 article entitled, “Who Pulls the Strings?” Although Lord Healey insisted the group was not conspiratorial at all, he confirmed that they are working in the direction of world government. Ronson wrote:This is how Denis Healey described a Bilderberg person to me: “To say we were striving for a one-world government is exaggerated, but not wholly unfair. Those of us in Bilderberg felt we couldn’t go on forever fighting one another for nothing and killing people and rendering millions homeless. So we felt that a single community throughout the world would be a good thing.”He said, “Bilderberg is a way of bringing together politicians, industrialists, financiers and journalists. Politics should involve people who aren’t politicians. We make a point of getting along younger politicians who are obviously rising, to bring them together with financiers and industrialists who offer them wise words. It increases the chance of having a sensible global policy.”David Rockefeller, a longtime leader at Bilderberg conclaves, was even more explicit when addressing the 1991 meeting of the Bilderberg group. Rockefeller stated:We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.That statement and other remarks from the Bilderberg meeting were obtained by French intelligence agents, who were tasked with monitoring the gathering, because of the obvious implications for French national interests and security. The information was then leaked to two French publications. Hilaire du Berrier, a contributing editor to The New American, verified the authenticity of the reports through his friend, former head of French intelligence, Count Alexander de Marenches, and other sources, and provided the first account in English in his Monaco-based monthly HduB Reports in September 1991. It was then published shortly thereafter in The New American. What seemed outlandish to many people at the time, and was frequently dismissed as kooky “conspiracy theory,” is being confirmed daily in unfolding events — and admissions from those who are causing the events to happen
Savage behavior
28 December 2012: Gun
and ammunition sales have been rising over the last few years, as have
the number of concealed weapon permits being issued across the country.
Please note I am not referring to the recent panic buying spree of
semi-automatic weapons since the Sandy Hook school shooting. What the
real reason behind the rise of weapon sales and increase in concealed
carry permits? Who might be to blame, or if you a manufacturer or gun
store owner, who could be thanked? What if I told you it is national
talk show host Michael Savage? Don’t believe me? Read on.
Contrary to the recent claims by
Progressives, err, Socialists is that men who own such big and scary
guns is to compensate for physical deficiencies below the waist, owning a
semi-automatic weapon is due to the realization that the government
will not be able to protect you when needed, or will simply not protect you at all.
While everyone points to major visible natural disasters and man-made
crises from hurricanes to riots, there is a much more subtle and
arguably, much more serious threat that everyone seems to be missing. It
is no better illustrated by the situation of well-known talk show host
Michael Savage.Regardless of what you think of him or
his beliefs, everyone should be paying very close attention to his
plight, especially if you have strong opinions and are willing to voice
them. In May of 2009, Dr. Savage learned that he was banned from
traveling to Great Britain “because his views might provoke violence.”
He was on a list of 22 people, the names of 16 which were released by
Great Britain Home Secretary Jacqui Smith. After three-and-a-half years,
he is still banned for having legitimate opinions and voicing them. Our
government has done absolutely nothing to intervene on his behalf or
protect his right to freedom of speech. Wait, you might ask, what does
this have to do with the push to ban certain weapons in the U.S? Plenty,
if you understand the actual agenda of those behind the coming weapons
ban, and not the official story line spewed ad nauseum by our elected
officials and their lapdog media.
They are not JUST coming for your guns
To most Americans, including those who
have been paying attention, it would seem that the core issue is the
prohibition of certain types of weapons, ostensibly to avert another
mass shooting. Upon closer scrutiny, however, it is much more. It is a
magic act being performed right in front of you, and Michael Savage was
the first talk show host to be tossed into the global cauldron of forced
tolerance and involuntary censorship. He was added to a witch’s brew
with real terrorists with evil intent, whose possession of roadside
bombs far outnumber their opinions and whose ability to cause death and
destruction exist by their actions, not by someone else’s reaction. Of
those on the banned travel list stewing in the global “mind-think,” Dr
Savage is the sole “tincture of opinion” in the brew, and there’s room for you in the cauldron. The recipe even demands it.Have you noticed that anyone who has
recently voiced support for an American’s Second Amendment rights has
been systematically vilified by those in opposition, such that it is
virtually impossible to have an honest, intelligent conversation about
the issue? This is not an accident, but an agenda. It
is an agenda of vilification, of the planned prohibition of not only
“scary guns,” but of “scary talk.” It is characterizing vocal resistance
to a government agenda as a prohibited behavior. It is forcing
tolerance to fit a very specific, government sanctioned ideology, beyond
which becomes not only an exhibit of intolerance, but of an intent
intolerable to the government.The issue of banning weapons is only the
visible part of the magic act where the weapons are only the props. The
real act is taking place behind the smoke onstage, where a legitimate
and rational opinion that happens to be at odds with the government’s
agenda is the real target. It is the plight of Dr. Savage in living color.As the rights bestowed upon Americans by
the First and Second Amendments to the U.S. Constitution are
inextricably linked, the government is not only intending to prohibit
our possession of certain weapons, but of certain opinions. This is not
merely an attack on our Second Amendment rights, but a method to take
away our ability to exercise those granted to us by the First Amendment.
It is YOU they are after, if your opinions don’t conform to their
purpose.
First they came for Michael Savage…
The government of the United States of
America has failed to protect the First Amendment rights Michael Savage,
as an American citizen. They willfully and knowingly failed to
stand up for the rights of an American citizen who has done nothing
more than voice his opinions while standing on American soil. They
permitted the ideology of one nation, the very nation from which we
fought and won independence, to violate the rights of one man of high
profile and visibility. Moreover, they tolerated Mr. Savage being listed
among the most heinous criminals to walk the earth for the appearance
of “balance,” a fact admitted in official government correspondence,
because the list contained so many Muslim extremists.The issue here goes well beyond the
prohibition of guns. It is the intended prohibition of any ideology
antithetical to the government which has been guaranteed through our
right to bear arms, including that right itself. For his opinions,
Michael Savage has been banned from traveling to the U.K. and apparently
everybody, including the U.S. government, is okay with that. It is an
acquiescence or even a tacit approval of tyranny. We must never forget
that the reason for the Second Amendment is to fight tyranny.While Michael Savage is the most visible
victim of such tyranny, it will not end with him. Absent of taking a
firm, united and unmovable stand now for our rights as Americans under
the Second Amendment, there will be more talk show hosts, more writers,
more people with opinions to fall victim of government sanctioned
oppression. If they can do what they’ve done to a man of his visibility,
just imagine what they can do to you.We are the real targets, and as
exhibited by the restrictions placed on Mr. Savage, it is clear that the
U.S. government will not protect us. We must protect ourselves and each
other. Clearly, it is us who are the real targets and
the planned prohibition of our guns is just the most expedient means to
an end. His current plight, that of being on a list of terrorists and
evildoers just for having and speaking an opinion contrary that some
find intolerant, unacceptable and soon to be prohibited, is an active
example of what every American who has recently bought a gun sees
unfolding. They are seeing through the magician’s fog, and the
government must maintain the magic show at all costs.
They came for Savage, and no one spoke out. When they come for you, who will be left?Their tactics are clear. The government
wants to prevent “Savage behavior”, or the behavior of possessing and
expressing opinions. It begins with vilification, will proceed to
confiscation, and then to elimination. History is repeating itself.
In Pursuit of the Truth. The Christmas link to 9/11
25 December 2012: Merry
Christmas, everyone. Well, sort of. I ask that you slowly back away
from your eggnog and take a few minutes to consider what you are about
to read. Let me warn you, though, that you might not like what I am
about to write, as it could turn your way of looking at things upside
down. Regardless, it is important to know and understand as it just
might answer some very important questions and concerns about events
currently taking place around us.
As Christians, we have been led to
celebrate the birth of our Lord and Savior Jesus on this day, December
25. As a believer myself in the Holy Bible and a believer that Jesus was
born, died and rose from the dead, I believe the birth of Jesus is
to be celebrated. My Christian faith is solid and unshakable. My belief
in the birth, death and resurrection of Jesus is also unshakeable.
As an investigator, however, I have a
quality that some people find at times to be bothersome – a desire for
details and truth, especially of historical events and facts related to
such events. During my nearly 30 years as an investigator, I’ve been
compared to “Columbo” more than once by people I’ve interviewed, and it
was never meant to be complimentary. I don’t like to be lied to, and
suspect that you don’t either.
So, what does Christian faith and the
trait of persistence for truth have to do with Christmas and the actual
date of the birth of Jesus? Even more appropriately, why should you, the reader, care or give it a second thought? Because it figures into present day events more than you realize.Lest you believe what I am about to
write is irrelevant to the present, read on, because it might very well
change the manner in which you look at recent events of major historical
significance. Accepted with an open mind and pure spirit, it might even
shake you to your core. It will not upset your Christian faith, but
perhaps strengthen it. It will help you put into context certain
historical and current events that until now, have been surrounded by
questions and whose questioners labeled as conspiracy nuts. Such
revelations will help you understand certain lies that we have been
forced to believe as fact, and just how exceedingly deep those lies go.Before proceeding, I wish to acknowledge
the magnificent research of Gary Bell, commonly referred to ‘the
Spaceman” and the host of A View from Space. His program is
broadcast live every Saturday night on AM 640 in Toronto. Not to be
confused with Art Bell, Gary Bell does a three-and-a-half hour weekly
radio program. In a refreshing but demanding departure from the norm, he
takes no calls and has no guests. This format allows him to delve
deeply into important topics and lay out evidence in a manner that would
make even Columbo proud. His program last Saturday was dedicated to the
actual date of the birth of Jesus, and the evidence he presented was
outstanding. For better or worse, so too were his findings, which is the
inspiration for my report.
Where’s the Birth Certificate?
Unlike Barack Hussein Obama II or Barry
Soetoro, Jesus was never issued a Certificate of Live Birth (COLB), yet
more historical evidence exists for His date and place of birth than the
current occupant of the White House. Like the current denizen of the
White House, however, there has always been some level of controversy
over His birth. Not the location or his parentage, both which have been
well recorded, but the actual date of His birth.For over a millennium, Christians have
been led to celebrate the birth of Jesus on December 25., and the Julian
and Gregorian calendars are fashioned after the year of His birth with
the designation of “Anno Domini,” or A.D., and B.C., or “Before Christ.”
Hence, we are currently in the year 2012 A.D. based on the birth of
Jesus. But is this accurate and if not, who really cares? As it happens,
we all should, as the findings relative to the actual birth date of
Jesus will open an entirely new aspect of questions of current events,
and reveal the sinister agenda of those behind the lies we are watching
play out before us every day. Unsettling questions about significant and
stunning events.Last month, Pope Benedict XVI caused a bit of a stir when he released his book Jesus of Nazareth: The Infancy Narratives,
which questioned the accuracy of the date of the birth of Jesus.
Despite not being the intent of the book, it was a topic on which many
people seemed to focus. Perhaps without such intent, the book opened new
questions into the topic. It also caused many people to re-examine the
Biblical and historical account of Jesus’ birth. Interesting timing at
the very least.
The real birth date of Jesus: a key to understanding good & evil
There are several keys to identifying
the exact date and even a two-hour window of time of the birth of Jesus.
The investigative research required to detail the exact date of the
birth of Jesus is well outside the scope of this column, but it is
available for those wanting to perform such research. A good place to
start is, of course, the Holy Bible. From there, one is able to match
astronomical charts based on the famous “star” signifying the birth of
Jesus. Again, that is simply for starters as there is much more evidence
that exists.
But so what? What if Jesus was not born
on December 25, what does it matter? Does that make His birth any less
real, or does that diminish our belief in Him in any way? Of course not,
and of this I wish to be absolutely and perfectly clear.However, I want to be abundantly clear
about something else. We are presently engaged in a battle between good
and evil. It is as much a spiritual war as it is a real, earthly war.
Those with spiritual discernment can sense it. If you cannot, I would
kindly ask you to simply stop reading now, go back to your eggnog, and
accept my apology for the few minutes you invested to this point. To all
others, please read on.According to extensive research and
investigation, all of which has been well documented, the actual date of
the birth of Jesus Christ, our Lord and Savior was on September 11
in the year known by today’s calendar as 3 B.C. This date alone has
tremendous historical significance beyond being the birth date of Jesus.September 11, 3 B.C. is recorded as
Tishri 1 on Jewish calendar – the Jewish New Year’s Day, the Day of
Trumpets or Rosh Hashanah. That day holds significant and profound
importance for the birth of the Messiah as it marks a “new beginning”
for earth and the anniversary or renewal of creation. It’s also Noah’s
accepted birth date as well as the date that Noah removed the cover from
the ark.That’s right, September 11 is not only
the birth date of Jesus, but a date of significant Judeo-Christian
spiritual importance as a “new beginning.” Please contemplate that for a
moment.
“Illuminating” the darkness
Understanding that September 11 is the
actual birth date of our Lord and Savior, a date of pure goodness and
Godliness and a date signifying a new beginning, it should open your
eyes to the evil forces that are working to pervert and mock God, to
advance the agenda of the very people who want to convolute good into
evil, and to fool us into believing lies. I know I am treading on some
very tricky ground here, but I’ll take the risk and ask you to look at
the larger picture.For generations, talk of the end of
days, the anti-Christ and Armageddon have held people’s interest.
There’s always been a fascination of this final battle between good and
evil. Believers of the Holy Bible know how the battle ends, but we often
fail to consider the details of the battle. Evil is built on subtle
deception, and often the devil is in the details.To expose evil is to illuminate its
lies. To defeat evil is to understand how it works. And part of that
understanding is to identify the people and groups behind the forces of
evil. Such talk is often associated with conspiracy theories and shadowy
figures, including the talk of a “New World Order.” Such references are
usually mocked and the topic is marginalized and the messengers
attacked as nuts. Considering what you’ve just read, might you
reconsider your previous dismissals and reevaluate the facts and
official narratives of certain events?
The day the world changed
Consider the implications of the true
date of the birth of Jesus, identified as September 11 in the year 3
B.C. according to our current calendar. A birth that marked the change
of the world over two thousand years ago. The beginning of a new age.Now consider the purveyors of evil, in
their most audacious and grandiose objective, to use the birth date of
Jesus to bring down the Judeo-Christian nation of the United States.
September 11, 2001 is often referred to as the day that changed the
world. Could this be one of the most grand mockeries of God ever
perpetuated on the world? Could the attacks of September 11, 2001, have
been used to kick off the start of a third world war – the very actions
we are seeing taking shape today?
Is it not the trait of evil to hide in
plain sight, and to deceive even the very elect if possible? While
everyone is looking for a hidden evil, would it not be the ultimate
deception to hide, or exist and even flourish in plain sight? Could it be that the talk of a New World
Order” is actually the ushering in of a new age of evil at the sound of
the final trumpet? Just what are the odds of the day that changed the
world in 2001 falling on the birth date of Jesus and the day that
changed the world two millennia ago? Something evil this way comes. The truth
has been buried beneath lies and evil is rapidly on the march right
before our very eyes. It is necessary for each of us to search for the
truth with spiritual discernment, and to open our eyes to the lies
before us – before it is too late.It is time to re-examine everything
we’ve been told and reassess every person and every event through the
prism of spiritual discernment and Biblical principles. It is time to
identify evil for what it is, the purveyors of evil for who they are,
and accept nothing but truth over lies and deception. Not only does our
earthly existence depend upon it, but so does our eternal salvation.We should celebrate the birth of our
Savior, but not fall victim to a false narrative. We must know the
difference to avoid falling for an even bigger deception from whence
there is no return.
American Gun Owners to be Fingerprinted and Registered: Feinstein Announces Nightmare Plan
Infowars.comDecember 27, 2012
Photo: Michael Saechang.
California Democrat Dianne Feinstein will introduce legislation in January calling for the fingerprinting and registering of all gun owners in the United States.On her Senate web page, Feinstein states her proposed legislation will add fingerprinting and photo identification to the National Firearms Act.A firearms seller must currently submit Form 4473 to the government containing the name, address, driver license information, NICS background check transaction number, serial number and model of the firearm, and a short federal affidavit stating that the purchaser is eligible to purchase firearms under federal law. Feinstein’s bill will add a substantial layer of bureaucracy to the existing regulations.The effort to expand firearms registration will include weapons grandfathered prior to the enactment of Feinstein’s proposed legislation. In other words, all gun owners will be required to register their constitutionally guaranteed firearms with a federal government inimical to the Second Amendment.Feinstein’s registration process will likely surpass New York City’s handgun permit process, which is a bureaucratic nightmare. In addition to non-refundable fees totaling over $500, the permit process demands two recent color photos, a birth certificate, proof of citizenship and residence, a blizzard of affidavits, and other red-tape hurdles. Applications are routinely denied for spurious reasons, including non-violent misdemeanors and depression.As Dean Weingarten notes, gun registration is de facto gun confiscation. Following mandatory gun registration, the government “will know who has legal possession of each firearm. They will know where the firearm is stored. When physical possession of the gun is desired, they can order you to turn it in. This has happened repeatedly,” most notably in Nazi Germany, Red China and Soviet Russia.More recently, it has occurred in Kosovo, Great Britain, Australia, New York, and California. If Feinstein has her way next month, it will happen across America.Democrats and their Republican co-conspirators are going all out to ban firearms. Feinstein’s bill will ban the sale, transfer, importation, and manufacturing of 120 specifically-named firearms, including semiautomatic rifles, handguns, and shotguns that can accept detachable and fixed magazines and have “one military characteristic.”
In addition, Feinstein’s bill will outlaw flash suppressors, bayonet mounts, thumbhole stocks and bullet buttons on firearms.Make no mistake about it. Obama and his anti-Second Amendment allies in Congress are coming for your guns. If they have their way, the only legal firearms in America will be rifles with 10 round magazines and single shot and bolt-action rifles – and those firearms will be registered with the government and may be confiscated at any moment.This article was posted: Thursday, December 27, 2012 at 1:15 pm
WHY WOULD THE USA GOVERNMENT BUY UP 1.6 BILLION ROUNDS OF AMMO http://www.naturalnews.com/038407_ammunition_homeland_security_civil_war.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=1Xk0j4LMzrQ
‘Guns are bad!’ CounterThink cartoon reveals hypocrisy of government gun confiscation schemes
Mike AdamsNatural News
Dec 28, 2012
While the U.S. government is desperately attempting to disarm the American population by rolling out Adolf Hitler-style gun control, it is simultaneously arming itself to the teeth, buying up 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition and now stockpiling it at ammo depot stations around the country.The hypocrisy of it all is stunning. While screaming, “GUNS ARE BAD!” to American farmers, ranchers and citizens, the government is buying up billions of dollars worth of guns and ammo itself. This isn’t ammo to be used in a foreign theater of war, by the way, it’s ammo that can only be used domestically, against the American people. (The hollow point ammo violates international war treaties and so cannot be used in international war actions.)
To help us all visualize the hypocrisy in the government’s gun control schemes, I came up with our latest Counterthink cartoon.
Here’s the cartoon:
Feel free to post this cartoon on your own website, but please give credit to the original source, which is NaturalNews.com / Counterthink.com.In addition to purchasing 450 million rounds of hollow point .40 caliber ammo, the U.S. government has also purchased:
• Over one million rounds of hollow-point .223 rifle ammo
• Over half a million rounds of non-hollow-point .223 rifle ammo
• 220,000 rounds of 12 gauge shotgun #7 ammo (target ammo)
• Over 200,000 rounds of 12 gauge shotgun #00 buckshot ammo (tactical anti-personnel ammo)
• 66,000 rounds of 12 gauge shotgun slugs (tactical anti-personnel, anti-vehicle rounds)
• Over two million rounds of hollow-point .357 Sig JPH (hollow-point) pistol ammo (anti-personnel)
• Over four million rounds of .40 S&W JPH (hollow-point) pistol ammo (anti-personnel)
• Over 60,000 rounds of .308 match grade anti-personnel sniper rounds (BTHP)
• Plus, hundreds of thousands of additional rounds of .38 special, .45 auto, 9mm, 7.62×39 (AK rifle) ammo, and others.
