JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.GET SAVED NOW- CALL ON JESUS TODAY.THE ONLY SAVIOR OF THE WHOLE EARTH - NO OTHER.
1 COR 15:23-JESUS THE FIRST FRUITS-CHRISTIANS RAPTURED TO JESUS-FIRST FRUITS OF THE SPIRIT-23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.ROMANS 8:23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.(THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE)
SCOFFERS MOCKING CHRISTS LITERAL 2ND COMING TO EARTH BODILY.
2 PETER 3:3-7
3 Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts,
4 And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation.
5 For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water:(NOTICE EVOLUTION IS THE GODLESS'BELIEF)
6 Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished:
7 But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.
SEX SINS
1 CORINTHIANS 6:9,14-18
9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,
10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.
14 And God hath both raised up the Lord, and will also raise up us by his own power.
15 Know ye not that your bodies are the members of Christ? shall I then take the members of Christ, and make them the members of an harlot? God forbid.
16 What? know ye not that he which is joined to an harlot is one body? for two, saith he, shall be one flesh.
17 But he that is joined unto the Lord is one spirit.
18 Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body.
GALATIONS 5:19-21
19 Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness,
20 Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies,
21 Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.
UPDATED JULY 10,2015-06:34AM
SINCE THE SODOMITES ARE ALLOWED TO MARRY IN ALL 50 STATES.NOW THE LEFT-WING,LIBERAL-DEMOCRATES WANT A NEW LAW THAT SAYS YOU CAN NOT USE THE WORDS HUSBAND OR WIFE IN A MARRIAGE CEREMONY.THEY WANT EQUAL GENDER RIGHTS FOR SODOMITES.SO IN A MARRIAGE CEREMONY YOU MUST ONLY CALL EACH OTHER SPOUSES.NO MORE HUSBAND-WIFE IN A MARRIAGE CEREMONY.THIS WILL BE THE NEXT BIG COURT FIGHT.NEXT THE LEFT-WING GODLESS LUNATICS WILL BE SAYING SINCE EVERYTHING IS GENDER NEUTRAL.ALL ON EARTH WILL JUST GO BY A NUMBER.NO BOY-GIRL-MAN-WOMAN ON EARTH.THESE LEFT-WING-GODLESS AND THEIR POLITICALLY CORRECT NONSENSE.IS LEADING US TO THE FAMILY BEING TOTALLY DESTROYED.AND EVEN THE MALE-FEMALE BEING TURNED INTO A THING.AND NOT A PERSON.
LANGUAGE-A FEMENIST GUIDE
https://debuk.wordpress.com/2015/05/30/the-world-and-his-or-her-wife/
Democrats Introduce Bill to Ban ‘Husband’ and ‘Wife’ as ‘Anti-Gay’ Words-"Gendered terms" would be removed from federal law by Paul Joseph Watson | July 10, 2015-INFOWARS
Fresh off the Supreme Court ruling on gay marriage, Democrats in California have introduced a bill that would ban the words “husband” and “wife” from being used in federal law because they are “gendered terms” and discriminate against gay people.The words husband and wife were deleted from California state law last year in order to accommodate same sex marriage.Under new legislation proposed by over two dozen Democrats, that same rule would be applied federally. The bill, introduced by Rep. Lois Capps, D-Calif, would introduce new “gender-neutral” terms such as “spouse” or “married couple.”“The Amend the Code for Marriage Equality Act recognizes that the words in our laws have meaning and can continue to reflect prejudice and discrimination even when rendered null by our highest courts,” Capps said. “Our values as a country are reflected in our laws. I authored this bill because it is imperative that our federal code reflect the equality of all marriages.”Capps said that amending the language used was necessary to reflect “the equality of all marriages” following last month’s Supreme Court ruling on gay marriage that mandated all states to license same sex marriages.“Now that compulsory gay marriage is the law of the land thanks to the U.S. Supreme Court, liberals are reaching out from that decision to see where else they can force the gay lobby’s agenda on the country,” writes Warner Todd Huston.Meanwhile, a Toledo Municipal Court judge who refused to marry a same sex couple because of his religious beliefs is seeking an advisory opinion from the Ohio Supreme Court on whether he can opt out of performing gay marriages.“On Monday, July 6, I declined to marry a non-traditional couple during my duties assignment. The declination was based upon my personal and Christian beliefs established over many years. I apologize to the couple for the delay they experienced and wish them the best,” Judge C. Allen McConnell, a Democrat, said in a statement.Gay group Equality Toledo said the couple were “humiliated” by the incident, despite the fact that they were married by another judge shortly afterwards.Paul Joseph Watson is the editor at large of Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com.
Husband' and 'wife' words to be illegal in US-10.07.2015 | Source: Pravda.Ru
After the same-sex marriages legalization in all the US states, the law is suggested to be extended.A 77-year-old Lois Capps, member of the US House of Representatives from California, has applied to eliminate such terms as "wife" and "spouse" from the federal law, so that, gays and heterosexuals will have equal rights.Instead, neutral "spouse", or "married couple" may be used, not to discriminate the LGBT community.California has already adopted the initiative.Pravda.Ru has reported, that such terms as "mother" and "father" are illegal in the US since 2011. It was noticed by the State Department, that more and more same-sex couples raise children.Capps said her bill would also have other benefits if it became law. In one example, she noted that U.S. law says it's illegal to threaten the president's wife, but says nothing about the president's husband. "Capps' bill would update the code to make it illegal to threaten the president's spouse," her office said.In case of Clinton's winning presidential elections in 2016, Bill Clinton may be called as the "first spouse".Similar measures have been introduced by the Royal Bank of Scotland, that decided to address the clients as Mx (Mixter), instead of gendered Mr, Mrs, Ms or Miss..
School Threatens to Call DHS if Parents Show Up Late-It is time for schools to become a lot more direct with parents who fail to meet their obligations toward their children? by EAG News | Steve Gunn | July 10, 2015
SALEM, Oregon – It is time for schools to become a lot more direct with parents who fail to meet their obligations toward their children? A recent letter, sent to the parents of students at Swegle Elementary in Salem, Oregon, was rather blunt and tactless, but nonetheless honest.It tells parents that law enforcement will be notified if their children are not picked up promptly from school, and includes a clarification of when their children need to be at school if they want to eat free breakfast, the Statesman Journal reports.The letter included the following paragraphs:salem letter“Children must be picked up on time. If they are not picked up on time we will call (the Department of Human Services) and you will then have to pick them up at court the next day.”“We will be serving breakfast at 7:45 a.m. at no cost. The Cafeteria will close at 8:15 a.m. for breakfast. If your child is running late, please feed them at home before sending them to school. Please do not drop your children off before this time. There will not be supervision. If children are dropped before 7:40 the staff will call the authorities.”The response to the letter was swift and negative.“Some parents at an elementary school are outraged over a letter sent home saying that DHS will be called if they don’t pick up their child on time next year,” said a report fromKATU.Jay Remy, a spokesman for the Salem-Keizer school district, told the media that the letter was sent out in error because the building principal had not reviewed or approved it.An office worker reportedly wrote the letter.Remy predictably backed down from the wording, telling StatesmanJournal.com, “It doesn’t strike the right tone. There will be an apology.”Remy also said the points made in the letter were overstated.“Any grain of truth to that is in an extreme case, like if parents are habitually not picking their kids up,” Remy was quoted as saying. “Even then, those actions (described in the letter) would not be taken.”One parent told KATU that she received a robocall from the district, offering an apology for the letter.Perhaps an apology is appropriate, considering the language that was used. But could such language be useful, particularly if the school followed up on its threat to alert authorities about children who are left to wait without supervision for their parents to retrieve them from school? If blunt words could prevent a tragedy – like the kidnapping of a waiting child – should they be blocked or censored?
Gender Neutral Wording-Foothills Wedding Chapel
It was only in 2001 that the Netherlands became the first country to same-sex marriage legal. Within 10 years, 11 countries had recognized same-sex marriage. There are 646,000 same-sex-couple households in the U.S. in 2010, according to the U.S. census. That's an 80.4% increase since 2000. 115,064 of these U.S. households have children. In the face of such dramatic cultural change, a whole new language is emerging. Revs. Chris and Karen Mohr believe that the easiest way to keep up with these changes is just to ask you: how would the two of you, your family and friends like to be addressed? We also have contracts specially designed for LGBTQ couples.There are no rules you must follow. You may prefer gender-neutral terms, or retain more traditional terms. Smiling Gay Men You may want to have a gay or same-sex wedding and call each other husband or wife. You may prefer to have a civil union ceremony and call each other partners. I have performed a wedding for a gay couple where they wanted to be called bride and groom. We can work together on creating a ceremony where everyone's "title" is recognized and used.Here are some traditional wedding-related terms and possible new terms to reflect the needs of the LGBTQ community:Young Lesbians Hold Hands on Beach-Bride/Groom: Spouse, Partner, Husband, Wife, Mate- Bridesmaid/ groomsman: attendants, bridesman, groomsmaid, bridesperson, groomsperson, best person, person of honor-Best man/Maid of honor: Best person, Best woman, Best woman, man of honor, Person of honor, attendant of honor-Wedding: Civil Union, Holy Union, Commitment Ceremony-Acronyms MOB, MOG, FOB, FOG (mother of the bride/groom; father of the bride/groom): Parents of [Name]-I Pronounce Man and Wife: I Pronounce you are married-Vows: I take you as my husband/wife; You are my beloved... Rainbows and Pink Triangles: Rainbows and pink triangles have important meaning in LGBTQ history. The rainbow is a symbol of liberation and freedom and is widely recognized as a gay symbol. Pink triangles are also a widely recognized gay symbol that has its origins during the Holocaust. Some GLBTQ couples now consider these symbols dated unless they are used in an imaginative way.Remember, no one can tell you you have to be gender-neutral with each other! You can both be each other's husbands or wives instead of the more neutral "partner" or "mate." After all, the gender of the love of your life may be very important to you. How you describe yourselves to each other and the world is completely up to you! Lesbian Wedding with Tuxedo and Dress-Who marches down the aisle? In some gay or lesbian weddings, one person is in a bride's dress and the other in a tuxedo or suit. The one in the bride's dress usually chooses to walk down the aisle. If both are dressed similarly, you can also walk down the aisle together, or even flip a coin! Family escorts: the father or fathers (or mothers or any other family member or friend) can escort their sons or daughters in together or separately.Is one of you changing your name? Please let us know how you wish to be referred; by either one last name or by a hyphenated version of both of your last names.We will not call you "bride and groom" or, within contracts, the parties not identified as the "bride" and "groom" individually, unless this is your choice. We use inclusive language such as "name, the couple, the clients, brides and grooms, etc" when appropriate.Foothills Chapel and Banquet Room is a LGBTQ-friendly wedding venue; we are happy to serve the same-sex wedding market. We are proud members of coloradogayweddings.com. A gay wedding planner, Mark Paquette operates the site and prescreens the wedding professionals who advertise to ensure they understand gender neutrality and the importance of working with same-sex couples.As more states pass laws, the wedding market will grow to embrace loving couples everywhere. Patience and education is a requirement, and supporting wedding professionals who value your business is essential.
Husband and Wife’ now gender neutral in California Constitution-Politicians meddling with people's lives-July 9, 2014-by Katy Grimes
“I now declare you legal partners,” will be what California judges say at weddings in California. “You may now kiss your gender-neutral partner.”California’s historic decline is not just limited to bad economic policy; California politicians have been meddling in people’s bedrooms, churches, women’s wombs, classrooms, kitchens, autos, bank accounts, and the courtroom.In the spirit of this creepy meddling, Gov. Jerry Brown signed a bill on Monday to do away with California’s legal references to traditional marriage between a husband and wife. SB 1306 by state Sen. Mark Leno, D-San Francisco, replaces references to “husband and wife” with “gender-neutral” language in California’s marriage code.This legislation is from the same Sen. Leno who authored a bill in 2012 which would allow a child to have multiple parents… more than two parents, to be exact.“Under the concept of ‘new families,’ Leno’s bill goes hand-in-hand with other same-sex legislation, only this one redefines the family legally,” I wrote in 2012. “Critics say that since voters would not pass same-sex marriage, now Leno and other gay rights activists are trying another route to their goals, but this one is through children and the courts.”Leno has attempted many times to redefine marriage in California.SB 1140, also from 2012, and also by Sen. Leno, attempted to redefine marriage, and even create new types of legal marriages.“The bill would stipulate ‘that marriage is a personal relation arising out of a civil, and not religious, contract’ and affirms that no clergyman would be required to perform a marriage that conflicts with his beliefs,” I wrote. “Opponents of SB 1140 pointed out that the bill appears to introduce an inappropriate and perhaps even unconstitutional definition of marriage, and that clergy already have religious liberty guarantees in both the state and the federal constitutions.”Leno has introduced this same bill four previous times.Brown signs new marriage bill… and others-“This legislation removes outdated and biased language from state codes and recognizes all married spouses equally, regardless of their gender,” Leno said in a press statement about the just-signed SB 1306.Leno’s bill was sponsored by California Attorney General Kamala Harris, Equality California, a statewide Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender advocacy organization, and the National Center for Lesbian Rights.“Although there is no question that same-sex couples can marry in California, the discriminatory language that remains on the statutory books creates confusion about the rights of same-sex couples,” NCLR Executive Director Kate Kendell was quoted in Leno’s news release. “This law makes it clear to everyone that same-sex couples can marry and that all spouses have the exact same rights and responsibilities under the law, regardless of gender.”“While we have achieved many milestones in the journey towards full equality for LGBT people – including the freedom to marry for same-sex couples – it’s important that we completely erase discrimination from the books,” said Rick Zbur, executive director of Equality California.School “sexual indoctrination” bill-Leno also authored SB 48, described as “the worst school sexual indoctrination ever” and requires school children be taught about lesbian, gay, bisexual and transsexual role models, which Gov. Brown signed SB 48 into law in 2011.Critics said SB 48 was just an attempt to brainwash students into becoming pro-gay political activists and ensure that government, not parents, has the final word on teaching kids about moral values.In addition to undermining parental authority in California schools, many parents said SB 48 promotes gender confusion and experimentation, inappropriately classifies LGBT as a cultural ethnic group, and would brainwash children into adopting the LGBT community’s political agenda, rather than just teaching about homosexuals’ historical accomplishments without being forced to discuss their sexual orientation.The bill language does not allow for teachers to discuss opposition to the LGBT movement or warn against “the negative consequences, that male homosexuality is the largest transmitter of HIV and sexually transmitted diseases.”SB 48 would require California textbooks to include the historical contributions of LGBT individuals throughout history.During the 2011 Assembly debate on SB 48, then-Assemblyman Chris Norby, R-Fullerton, reminded Assembly colleagues that he was a former high school history and government teacher. He said the Assembly was “micromanaging” school instruction every time a bill like this was introduced.“I don’t think this helps the teaching of history,” Norby said. “I think it’s a distraction.” He asked how teachers could ascribe sexual orientation to historic figures after the fact. “Am I supposed to ‘out’ James Buchanan after the fact? Do I identify Milton Friedman as a straight Economist?” Norby asked. “This doesn’t help the teaching of history.”Then-Assemblywoman Linda Halderman, R-Fresno, said she was not going to speak, but changed her mind when she kept hearing the only reason to oppose the bill was out of “intolerance.” Halderman said that some have referred to her as a “Jewish doctor” and “that says we are different.” Halderman said that, instead of race or sexual orientation, people’s actions should be considered. The mandated classifications, she said, say “that you should not think first whether someone is honest, has integrity, does good work.”Halderman objected to one particular class being singled out and instead said she was looking forward to a day when “I tell about who I am as a person.”
THIS POLITICAL CORRECTNESS IS TOTALLY NUTS AND RIGHT FROM THE PITS OF HELL.TO DESTROY THE FAMILY AND HUMANITY.
Remember Storm? We check in on the baby being raised gender-neutral-Storm, 2, is a busy, chatty, toddler whose current infatuations include peanut butter and playing with sock puppets.Storm, centre, with siblings Jazz, left, and Kio. Jazz, now almost 8, always gravitated to dresses, the colour pink and long hair.By: Jayme Poisson News reporter, Published on Fri Nov 15 2013
It’s been more than two years since we first met a chubby-cheeked 4-month-old named Storm.Back then, Storm’s parents weren’t saying whether their child was a boy or a girl. In an attempt to mitigate at least some of the gendered messages children are blitzed with, only a handful of people knew the baby’s sex. “A tribute to freedom and choice in place of limitation, a standup to what the world could become in Storm’s lifetime (a more progressive place? ...),” parents Kathy Witterick and David Stocker wrote in an email to family and friends after their third child’s birth.The Toronto couple wanted Storm to share his or her gender when the time felt right.These days, they’re sticking with that plan.Storm — who turns 3 in January — is a busy, chatty, toddler whose current infatuations include peanut butter and playing with sock puppets.For Halloween, Storm wanted to be a monster, because it provided the best opportunity to roar as loudly as possible.“When I made the decision around (not sharing Storm’s sex) it felt right for my family and to my heart,” Witterick tells the Star in an interview prompted by the launch of a book containing a chapter she contributed. (Click here for an excerpt from her chapter in that book, called Chasing Rainbows: Exploring Gender Fluid Parenting Practices.)-After the Star ran a May 2011 story about the family’s unconventional choice, it sparked an international debate. Critics accused Witterick and Stocker of conducting a social experiment on their child, more rabid ones went as far as calling what they were doing child abuse.But the intense scrutiny and notoriety also connected the family with a community of like-minded activists and academics working on issues around gender and parenting.“Now that I have that exposure I realize what a great choice we made. At the time, I didn’t know it was such a great choice,” she says.For example, the argument made by California-based academic Jane Ward in Chasing Rainbows that every child has a right to not be “gender diagnosed,” resonates with Witterick more today than ever before.“If a young person puts on a tutu, why are we saying they are behaving like a girl ... instead of just letting them be?” she asks, rhetorically.Her eldest son, Jazz, now almost 8, always gravitated to dresses, the colour pink and opted for long hair often fixed into braids. Jazz’s questions about gender were, in part, what inspired the couple’s controversial decision about Storm.Recently, Jazz requested to go by the pronoun “she.”“And for now we honour that,” says Witterick.As for Storm, “sometimes Storm says ‘I’m a girl,’ and sometimes Storm says ‘I’m a boy,’” says Witterick, emphasizing the point that, contrary to what one might think, the topic of gender doesn’t actually take up a lot of air time in her family.“The rest of the world is still talking about it but actually we’re doing something else. We’re in the forest looking at bugs and finding salamanders and seeing turtles hatch out of eggs,” she says, referencing a recent four-month-long adventure where the family lived in tents in the forest and, with the help of extended family and friends, built themselves a straw-bale cabin.“It was like a wedding. It was so wonderful,” she says of the rotating door of visitors.Witterick still “unschools” her children. The offshoot of home-schooling is centred on the belief that learning should be driven by a child’s curiosity.Now living off the grid in the forest northeast of Parry Sound, Jazz, Kio (the couple’s middle child, now 5) and Storm, learned about different kinds of trees and how to cook for big groups with no electricity. Building a cabin out of bales of straw, a low-carbon, environmentally friendly option, taught the kids about measurement and math, says Witterick. This year, while Stocker is on sabbatical from his teaching job, they wanted to do something different, hence “Strawhaven,” as they call it.Rolling out of the “media hoopla” that followed the Star story (the family received interview and reality TV show pitches from around the world, people would yell “boy” or “girl” at Storm on the street) there was a sense, says Witterick, that people felt sorry for her family because what they were trying to do seemed difficult, and particularly because it came with an onslaught of criticism.“The world we live in, it’s a very joyful happy place of sort of celebrating who everybody is,” she says.Because she was reticent about reopening the “media circus” around her family, Witterick almost pulled the chapter she wrote for Chasing Rainbows. She grapples with her decisions, in part because she thinks some of the criticisms are valid — most notably that Storm wasn’t old enough to give consent. “Some day will Storm say ‘No I didn’t want to be the centre of media attention,’ ” she asks.On the other hand, Witterick believes diverse stories like her family’s will give people another way of thinking about gender.“Until we tell this narrative others who are living this experience won’t understand they’re not alone,” she says.And so, every word she wrote was read aloud to her three children and partner during family meetings. And her writing would focus on her own experiences as a mother. This would be a “love letter” to her children.Plus, she really liked the idea of the book, which is rooted in feminism, and its editors, two university professors who were inspired to put together the collection because of the interest and debate that sprung from the Star’s 2011 story.“I feel like this book has so much to offer in helping parents open up the world to their child,” she says, referencing another chapter, written by a trans-man who shares his successes and tribulations while trying to provide his toddler Stanley with gender choices.“I know I have celebrity status and if that helps get the book out there ... but it’s not like my chapter is the best one!”
SCOFFERS MOCKING CHRISTS LITERAL 2ND COMING TO EARTH BODILY.
2 PETER 3:3-7
3 Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts,
4 And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation.
5 For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water:(NOTICE EVOLUTION IS THE GODLESS'BELIEF)
6 Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished:
7 But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.
SEX SINS
1 CORINTHIANS 6:9,14-18
9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,
10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.
14 And God hath both raised up the Lord, and will also raise up us by his own power.
15 Know ye not that your bodies are the members of Christ? shall I then take the members of Christ, and make them the members of an harlot? God forbid.
16 What? know ye not that he which is joined to an harlot is one body? for two, saith he, shall be one flesh.
17 But he that is joined unto the Lord is one spirit.
18 Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body.
GALATIONS 5:19-21
19 Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness,
20 Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies,
21 Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.
UPDATED JULY 10,2015-06:34AM
SINCE THE SODOMITES ARE ALLOWED TO MARRY IN ALL 50 STATES.NOW THE LEFT-WING,LIBERAL-DEMOCRATES WANT A NEW LAW THAT SAYS YOU CAN NOT USE THE WORDS HUSBAND OR WIFE IN A MARRIAGE CEREMONY.THEY WANT EQUAL GENDER RIGHTS FOR SODOMITES.SO IN A MARRIAGE CEREMONY YOU MUST ONLY CALL EACH OTHER SPOUSES.NO MORE HUSBAND-WIFE IN A MARRIAGE CEREMONY.THIS WILL BE THE NEXT BIG COURT FIGHT.NEXT THE LEFT-WING GODLESS LUNATICS WILL BE SAYING SINCE EVERYTHING IS GENDER NEUTRAL.ALL ON EARTH WILL JUST GO BY A NUMBER.NO BOY-GIRL-MAN-WOMAN ON EARTH.THESE LEFT-WING-GODLESS AND THEIR POLITICALLY CORRECT NONSENSE.IS LEADING US TO THE FAMILY BEING TOTALLY DESTROYED.AND EVEN THE MALE-FEMALE BEING TURNED INTO A THING.AND NOT A PERSON.
LANGUAGE-A FEMENIST GUIDE
https://debuk.wordpress.com/2015/05/30/the-world-and-his-or-her-wife/
Democrats Introduce Bill to Ban ‘Husband’ and ‘Wife’ as ‘Anti-Gay’ Words-"Gendered terms" would be removed from federal law by Paul Joseph Watson | July 10, 2015-INFOWARS
Fresh off the Supreme Court ruling on gay marriage, Democrats in California have introduced a bill that would ban the words “husband” and “wife” from being used in federal law because they are “gendered terms” and discriminate against gay people.The words husband and wife were deleted from California state law last year in order to accommodate same sex marriage.Under new legislation proposed by over two dozen Democrats, that same rule would be applied federally. The bill, introduced by Rep. Lois Capps, D-Calif, would introduce new “gender-neutral” terms such as “spouse” or “married couple.”“The Amend the Code for Marriage Equality Act recognizes that the words in our laws have meaning and can continue to reflect prejudice and discrimination even when rendered null by our highest courts,” Capps said. “Our values as a country are reflected in our laws. I authored this bill because it is imperative that our federal code reflect the equality of all marriages.”Capps said that amending the language used was necessary to reflect “the equality of all marriages” following last month’s Supreme Court ruling on gay marriage that mandated all states to license same sex marriages.“Now that compulsory gay marriage is the law of the land thanks to the U.S. Supreme Court, liberals are reaching out from that decision to see where else they can force the gay lobby’s agenda on the country,” writes Warner Todd Huston.Meanwhile, a Toledo Municipal Court judge who refused to marry a same sex couple because of his religious beliefs is seeking an advisory opinion from the Ohio Supreme Court on whether he can opt out of performing gay marriages.“On Monday, July 6, I declined to marry a non-traditional couple during my duties assignment. The declination was based upon my personal and Christian beliefs established over many years. I apologize to the couple for the delay they experienced and wish them the best,” Judge C. Allen McConnell, a Democrat, said in a statement.Gay group Equality Toledo said the couple were “humiliated” by the incident, despite the fact that they were married by another judge shortly afterwards.Paul Joseph Watson is the editor at large of Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com.
Husband' and 'wife' words to be illegal in US-10.07.2015 | Source: Pravda.Ru
After the same-sex marriages legalization in all the US states, the law is suggested to be extended.A 77-year-old Lois Capps, member of the US House of Representatives from California, has applied to eliminate such terms as "wife" and "spouse" from the federal law, so that, gays and heterosexuals will have equal rights.Instead, neutral "spouse", or "married couple" may be used, not to discriminate the LGBT community.California has already adopted the initiative.Pravda.Ru has reported, that such terms as "mother" and "father" are illegal in the US since 2011. It was noticed by the State Department, that more and more same-sex couples raise children.Capps said her bill would also have other benefits if it became law. In one example, she noted that U.S. law says it's illegal to threaten the president's wife, but says nothing about the president's husband. "Capps' bill would update the code to make it illegal to threaten the president's spouse," her office said.In case of Clinton's winning presidential elections in 2016, Bill Clinton may be called as the "first spouse".Similar measures have been introduced by the Royal Bank of Scotland, that decided to address the clients as Mx (Mixter), instead of gendered Mr, Mrs, Ms or Miss..
School Threatens to Call DHS if Parents Show Up Late-It is time for schools to become a lot more direct with parents who fail to meet their obligations toward their children? by EAG News | Steve Gunn | July 10, 2015
SALEM, Oregon – It is time for schools to become a lot more direct with parents who fail to meet their obligations toward their children? A recent letter, sent to the parents of students at Swegle Elementary in Salem, Oregon, was rather blunt and tactless, but nonetheless honest.It tells parents that law enforcement will be notified if their children are not picked up promptly from school, and includes a clarification of when their children need to be at school if they want to eat free breakfast, the Statesman Journal reports.The letter included the following paragraphs:salem letter“Children must be picked up on time. If they are not picked up on time we will call (the Department of Human Services) and you will then have to pick them up at court the next day.”“We will be serving breakfast at 7:45 a.m. at no cost. The Cafeteria will close at 8:15 a.m. for breakfast. If your child is running late, please feed them at home before sending them to school. Please do not drop your children off before this time. There will not be supervision. If children are dropped before 7:40 the staff will call the authorities.”The response to the letter was swift and negative.“Some parents at an elementary school are outraged over a letter sent home saying that DHS will be called if they don’t pick up their child on time next year,” said a report fromKATU.Jay Remy, a spokesman for the Salem-Keizer school district, told the media that the letter was sent out in error because the building principal had not reviewed or approved it.An office worker reportedly wrote the letter.Remy predictably backed down from the wording, telling StatesmanJournal.com, “It doesn’t strike the right tone. There will be an apology.”Remy also said the points made in the letter were overstated.“Any grain of truth to that is in an extreme case, like if parents are habitually not picking their kids up,” Remy was quoted as saying. “Even then, those actions (described in the letter) would not be taken.”One parent told KATU that she received a robocall from the district, offering an apology for the letter.Perhaps an apology is appropriate, considering the language that was used. But could such language be useful, particularly if the school followed up on its threat to alert authorities about children who are left to wait without supervision for their parents to retrieve them from school? If blunt words could prevent a tragedy – like the kidnapping of a waiting child – should they be blocked or censored?
Gender Neutral Wording-Foothills Wedding Chapel
It was only in 2001 that the Netherlands became the first country to same-sex marriage legal. Within 10 years, 11 countries had recognized same-sex marriage. There are 646,000 same-sex-couple households in the U.S. in 2010, according to the U.S. census. That's an 80.4% increase since 2000. 115,064 of these U.S. households have children. In the face of such dramatic cultural change, a whole new language is emerging. Revs. Chris and Karen Mohr believe that the easiest way to keep up with these changes is just to ask you: how would the two of you, your family and friends like to be addressed? We also have contracts specially designed for LGBTQ couples.There are no rules you must follow. You may prefer gender-neutral terms, or retain more traditional terms. Smiling Gay Men You may want to have a gay or same-sex wedding and call each other husband or wife. You may prefer to have a civil union ceremony and call each other partners. I have performed a wedding for a gay couple where they wanted to be called bride and groom. We can work together on creating a ceremony where everyone's "title" is recognized and used.Here are some traditional wedding-related terms and possible new terms to reflect the needs of the LGBTQ community:Young Lesbians Hold Hands on Beach-Bride/Groom: Spouse, Partner, Husband, Wife, Mate- Bridesmaid/ groomsman: attendants, bridesman, groomsmaid, bridesperson, groomsperson, best person, person of honor-Best man/Maid of honor: Best person, Best woman, Best woman, man of honor, Person of honor, attendant of honor-Wedding: Civil Union, Holy Union, Commitment Ceremony-Acronyms MOB, MOG, FOB, FOG (mother of the bride/groom; father of the bride/groom): Parents of [Name]-I Pronounce Man and Wife: I Pronounce you are married-Vows: I take you as my husband/wife; You are my beloved... Rainbows and Pink Triangles: Rainbows and pink triangles have important meaning in LGBTQ history. The rainbow is a symbol of liberation and freedom and is widely recognized as a gay symbol. Pink triangles are also a widely recognized gay symbol that has its origins during the Holocaust. Some GLBTQ couples now consider these symbols dated unless they are used in an imaginative way.Remember, no one can tell you you have to be gender-neutral with each other! You can both be each other's husbands or wives instead of the more neutral "partner" or "mate." After all, the gender of the love of your life may be very important to you. How you describe yourselves to each other and the world is completely up to you! Lesbian Wedding with Tuxedo and Dress-Who marches down the aisle? In some gay or lesbian weddings, one person is in a bride's dress and the other in a tuxedo or suit. The one in the bride's dress usually chooses to walk down the aisle. If both are dressed similarly, you can also walk down the aisle together, or even flip a coin! Family escorts: the father or fathers (or mothers or any other family member or friend) can escort their sons or daughters in together or separately.Is one of you changing your name? Please let us know how you wish to be referred; by either one last name or by a hyphenated version of both of your last names.We will not call you "bride and groom" or, within contracts, the parties not identified as the "bride" and "groom" individually, unless this is your choice. We use inclusive language such as "name, the couple, the clients, brides and grooms, etc" when appropriate.Foothills Chapel and Banquet Room is a LGBTQ-friendly wedding venue; we are happy to serve the same-sex wedding market. We are proud members of coloradogayweddings.com. A gay wedding planner, Mark Paquette operates the site and prescreens the wedding professionals who advertise to ensure they understand gender neutrality and the importance of working with same-sex couples.As more states pass laws, the wedding market will grow to embrace loving couples everywhere. Patience and education is a requirement, and supporting wedding professionals who value your business is essential.
Husband and Wife’ now gender neutral in California Constitution-Politicians meddling with people's lives-July 9, 2014-by Katy Grimes
“I now declare you legal partners,” will be what California judges say at weddings in California. “You may now kiss your gender-neutral partner.”California’s historic decline is not just limited to bad economic policy; California politicians have been meddling in people’s bedrooms, churches, women’s wombs, classrooms, kitchens, autos, bank accounts, and the courtroom.In the spirit of this creepy meddling, Gov. Jerry Brown signed a bill on Monday to do away with California’s legal references to traditional marriage between a husband and wife. SB 1306 by state Sen. Mark Leno, D-San Francisco, replaces references to “husband and wife” with “gender-neutral” language in California’s marriage code.This legislation is from the same Sen. Leno who authored a bill in 2012 which would allow a child to have multiple parents… more than two parents, to be exact.“Under the concept of ‘new families,’ Leno’s bill goes hand-in-hand with other same-sex legislation, only this one redefines the family legally,” I wrote in 2012. “Critics say that since voters would not pass same-sex marriage, now Leno and other gay rights activists are trying another route to their goals, but this one is through children and the courts.”Leno has attempted many times to redefine marriage in California.SB 1140, also from 2012, and also by Sen. Leno, attempted to redefine marriage, and even create new types of legal marriages.“The bill would stipulate ‘that marriage is a personal relation arising out of a civil, and not religious, contract’ and affirms that no clergyman would be required to perform a marriage that conflicts with his beliefs,” I wrote. “Opponents of SB 1140 pointed out that the bill appears to introduce an inappropriate and perhaps even unconstitutional definition of marriage, and that clergy already have religious liberty guarantees in both the state and the federal constitutions.”Leno has introduced this same bill four previous times.Brown signs new marriage bill… and others-“This legislation removes outdated and biased language from state codes and recognizes all married spouses equally, regardless of their gender,” Leno said in a press statement about the just-signed SB 1306.Leno’s bill was sponsored by California Attorney General Kamala Harris, Equality California, a statewide Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender advocacy organization, and the National Center for Lesbian Rights.“Although there is no question that same-sex couples can marry in California, the discriminatory language that remains on the statutory books creates confusion about the rights of same-sex couples,” NCLR Executive Director Kate Kendell was quoted in Leno’s news release. “This law makes it clear to everyone that same-sex couples can marry and that all spouses have the exact same rights and responsibilities under the law, regardless of gender.”“While we have achieved many milestones in the journey towards full equality for LGBT people – including the freedom to marry for same-sex couples – it’s important that we completely erase discrimination from the books,” said Rick Zbur, executive director of Equality California.School “sexual indoctrination” bill-Leno also authored SB 48, described as “the worst school sexual indoctrination ever” and requires school children be taught about lesbian, gay, bisexual and transsexual role models, which Gov. Brown signed SB 48 into law in 2011.Critics said SB 48 was just an attempt to brainwash students into becoming pro-gay political activists and ensure that government, not parents, has the final word on teaching kids about moral values.In addition to undermining parental authority in California schools, many parents said SB 48 promotes gender confusion and experimentation, inappropriately classifies LGBT as a cultural ethnic group, and would brainwash children into adopting the LGBT community’s political agenda, rather than just teaching about homosexuals’ historical accomplishments without being forced to discuss their sexual orientation.The bill language does not allow for teachers to discuss opposition to the LGBT movement or warn against “the negative consequences, that male homosexuality is the largest transmitter of HIV and sexually transmitted diseases.”SB 48 would require California textbooks to include the historical contributions of LGBT individuals throughout history.During the 2011 Assembly debate on SB 48, then-Assemblyman Chris Norby, R-Fullerton, reminded Assembly colleagues that he was a former high school history and government teacher. He said the Assembly was “micromanaging” school instruction every time a bill like this was introduced.“I don’t think this helps the teaching of history,” Norby said. “I think it’s a distraction.” He asked how teachers could ascribe sexual orientation to historic figures after the fact. “Am I supposed to ‘out’ James Buchanan after the fact? Do I identify Milton Friedman as a straight Economist?” Norby asked. “This doesn’t help the teaching of history.”Then-Assemblywoman Linda Halderman, R-Fresno, said she was not going to speak, but changed her mind when she kept hearing the only reason to oppose the bill was out of “intolerance.” Halderman said that some have referred to her as a “Jewish doctor” and “that says we are different.” Halderman said that, instead of race or sexual orientation, people’s actions should be considered. The mandated classifications, she said, say “that you should not think first whether someone is honest, has integrity, does good work.”Halderman objected to one particular class being singled out and instead said she was looking forward to a day when “I tell about who I am as a person.”
THIS POLITICAL CORRECTNESS IS TOTALLY NUTS AND RIGHT FROM THE PITS OF HELL.TO DESTROY THE FAMILY AND HUMANITY.
Remember Storm? We check in on the baby being raised gender-neutral-Storm, 2, is a busy, chatty, toddler whose current infatuations include peanut butter and playing with sock puppets.Storm, centre, with siblings Jazz, left, and Kio. Jazz, now almost 8, always gravitated to dresses, the colour pink and long hair.By: Jayme Poisson News reporter, Published on Fri Nov 15 2013
It’s been more than two years since we first met a chubby-cheeked 4-month-old named Storm.Back then, Storm’s parents weren’t saying whether their child was a boy or a girl. In an attempt to mitigate at least some of the gendered messages children are blitzed with, only a handful of people knew the baby’s sex. “A tribute to freedom and choice in place of limitation, a standup to what the world could become in Storm’s lifetime (a more progressive place? ...),” parents Kathy Witterick and David Stocker wrote in an email to family and friends after their third child’s birth.The Toronto couple wanted Storm to share his or her gender when the time felt right.These days, they’re sticking with that plan.Storm — who turns 3 in January — is a busy, chatty, toddler whose current infatuations include peanut butter and playing with sock puppets.For Halloween, Storm wanted to be a monster, because it provided the best opportunity to roar as loudly as possible.“When I made the decision around (not sharing Storm’s sex) it felt right for my family and to my heart,” Witterick tells the Star in an interview prompted by the launch of a book containing a chapter she contributed. (Click here for an excerpt from her chapter in that book, called Chasing Rainbows: Exploring Gender Fluid Parenting Practices.)-After the Star ran a May 2011 story about the family’s unconventional choice, it sparked an international debate. Critics accused Witterick and Stocker of conducting a social experiment on their child, more rabid ones went as far as calling what they were doing child abuse.But the intense scrutiny and notoriety also connected the family with a community of like-minded activists and academics working on issues around gender and parenting.“Now that I have that exposure I realize what a great choice we made. At the time, I didn’t know it was such a great choice,” she says.For example, the argument made by California-based academic Jane Ward in Chasing Rainbows that every child has a right to not be “gender diagnosed,” resonates with Witterick more today than ever before.“If a young person puts on a tutu, why are we saying they are behaving like a girl ... instead of just letting them be?” she asks, rhetorically.Her eldest son, Jazz, now almost 8, always gravitated to dresses, the colour pink and opted for long hair often fixed into braids. Jazz’s questions about gender were, in part, what inspired the couple’s controversial decision about Storm.Recently, Jazz requested to go by the pronoun “she.”“And for now we honour that,” says Witterick.As for Storm, “sometimes Storm says ‘I’m a girl,’ and sometimes Storm says ‘I’m a boy,’” says Witterick, emphasizing the point that, contrary to what one might think, the topic of gender doesn’t actually take up a lot of air time in her family.“The rest of the world is still talking about it but actually we’re doing something else. We’re in the forest looking at bugs and finding salamanders and seeing turtles hatch out of eggs,” she says, referencing a recent four-month-long adventure where the family lived in tents in the forest and, with the help of extended family and friends, built themselves a straw-bale cabin.“It was like a wedding. It was so wonderful,” she says of the rotating door of visitors.Witterick still “unschools” her children. The offshoot of home-schooling is centred on the belief that learning should be driven by a child’s curiosity.Now living off the grid in the forest northeast of Parry Sound, Jazz, Kio (the couple’s middle child, now 5) and Storm, learned about different kinds of trees and how to cook for big groups with no electricity. Building a cabin out of bales of straw, a low-carbon, environmentally friendly option, taught the kids about measurement and math, says Witterick. This year, while Stocker is on sabbatical from his teaching job, they wanted to do something different, hence “Strawhaven,” as they call it.Rolling out of the “media hoopla” that followed the Star story (the family received interview and reality TV show pitches from around the world, people would yell “boy” or “girl” at Storm on the street) there was a sense, says Witterick, that people felt sorry for her family because what they were trying to do seemed difficult, and particularly because it came with an onslaught of criticism.“The world we live in, it’s a very joyful happy place of sort of celebrating who everybody is,” she says.Because she was reticent about reopening the “media circus” around her family, Witterick almost pulled the chapter she wrote for Chasing Rainbows. She grapples with her decisions, in part because she thinks some of the criticisms are valid — most notably that Storm wasn’t old enough to give consent. “Some day will Storm say ‘No I didn’t want to be the centre of media attention,’ ” she asks.On the other hand, Witterick believes diverse stories like her family’s will give people another way of thinking about gender.“Until we tell this narrative others who are living this experience won’t understand they’re not alone,” she says.And so, every word she wrote was read aloud to her three children and partner during family meetings. And her writing would focus on her own experiences as a mother. This would be a “love letter” to her children.Plus, she really liked the idea of the book, which is rooted in feminism, and its editors, two university professors who were inspired to put together the collection because of the interest and debate that sprung from the Star’s 2011 story.“I feel like this book has so much to offer in helping parents open up the world to their child,” she says, referencing another chapter, written by a trans-man who shares his successes and tribulations while trying to provide his toddler Stanley with gender choices.“I know I have celebrity status and if that helps get the book out there ... but it’s not like my chapter is the best one!”
