JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.GET SAVED NOW- CALL ON JESUS TODAY.THE ONLY SAVIOR OF THE WHOLE EARTH - NO OTHER.
1 COR 15:23-JESUS THE FIRST FRUITS-CHRISTIANS RAPTURED TO JESUS-FIRST FRUITS OF THE SPIRIT-23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.ROMANS 8:23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.(THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE)
LISTEN NOW TO HITLARY QUESTIONS ABOUT BENGHAZI LIBYA
http://www.c-span.org/networks/?channel=radio
JAN 23,2013 CLINTON BENGHAZI QUESTIONING TEXT
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2013/01/23/text-of-hillary-clintons-senate-testimony-on-benghazi/
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2015/10/22/hillary-clinton-testifies-in-benghazi-hearing-live-blog-and-video/
CLINTON-WHAT DIFFERENCE AT THIS POINT DOES IT MAKE.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ka0_nz53CcM
Trey Gowdy and ranking Democrat Elijah Cummings are now bickering wildly, sitting right next to each other.“Why don’t we just put the entire transcript out there and let the world see it? What do we have to hide!”Gowdy gets defensive, asks what about all the other transcripts, rambles about parliamentary procedures, etc. His pate shines with sweat. “The only transcript you want released is this emails and Sidney Blumenthal.”Cummings is fed up: “I’d like to have all of them released!”Clinton watches, the hint of a smile on her face as she watches committee disintegrates out of Gowdy’s control. Gowdy threatens “if you think you’ve heard about Sidney Blumenthal, wait until the next round, and with that we’re adjourned.”-Trey Gowdy, the Republican chairman, is now chasing Clinton about emails from Sidney Blumenthal, a Clinton family friend who was banned from working at the State Department from the White House, and who often sent Clinton memos about Libya and many other topics.Gowdy asks many questions about Blumenthal, and whether Clinton listened him, about “credibility and whether to assess how credible that source is”.“He was not advising me and I have no reason to ever mention that or to know that the president knew that,” she says.“I don’t know what this line of questioning does to help us get to the bottom the deaths of four Americans,” Clinton says, getting frustrated with Gowdy.“It’s relevant because our ambassador was asked to read and respond to Sidney Blumenthal’s drivel,” Gowdy replies.“I think it’s fair to ask why Sidney Blumenthal had unfettered access to you … and why there was no access between you and the ambassador.” I’ve lost more sleep than all of you put together’Republican chairman Trey Gowdy asks her whether she has anything she wants to say about losing a friend, Chris Stevens, in the attack.“I’ve lost more sleep than all of you put together,” she says. “I have been wracking my brain for what more could have been done, or should have been one. When I took responsibility I took it as a challenge and as an obligation to make sure that when I left the State Department [we reformed measures].”“I would like to get back to that time” of bipartisan concord, Clinton continues.People rose above politics, a Democratic Congress worked with a Republican administration to say what have we learned. Similarly when we lost more Americans, the bombings in east Africa, again, the Republicans and Democrats worked together.So again, I’m an optimist, congressman, I’m hoping that that will be the outcome of this and the effort so that we really do honor the effort, not only of those we lost but those who are serving as we speak.”Gowdy gets upset. He insists nobody has made any conclusions about anything, that “this is not a prosecution, this is an investigation,” and there’s nothing – never mind this Republican shouting at a Democrat – partisan about it.
Rep. Elijah Cummings' full opening statements at the House Benghazi panel, delivered by Cummings' office:-OCT 22,15-HITLARY CLINTON QUESTIONED ON BENGHAZI.
Secretary Clinton, thank you very much for being here today to testify before Congress on this issue—now for the third time.This week, our Chairman, Mr. Gowdy, was interviewed for a lengthy media profile. During this interview, he complained that he has “an impossible job.” He said it is impossible to conduct a serious, fact-centric investigation in such a “political environment.”I have great respect for the Chairman, but on this score, he is wrong. In fact, it has been done by his own Republican colleagues in the House on this very issue—Benghazi.The Republican Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee conducted an extensive, bipartisan, two-year investigation and issued a detailed report. The Senate Intelligence Committee and the Senate Homeland Security Committee also conducted bipartisan investigations.Those bipartisan efforts respected and honored the memories of the four brave Americans who were killed in Benghazi: Ambassador Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods, and Glen Doherty.The problem is that Speaker Boehner did not like the answers he got from those investigations. So he set up this new Select Committee—with no rules, no deadline, and an unlimited budget—and he set it loose on Secretary Clinton because she is running for president.Clearly, it is possible to conduct a serious, bipartisan investigation. What is impossible is for any reasonable person to continue denying that Republicans are squandering millions of taxpayer dollars on this abusive effort to derail Secretary Clinton’s presidential campaign.In the Chairman’s interview, he tried to defend against this criticism by attempting to cast himself as the victim, and he complained about attacks on the credibility of the Select Committee. His argument would be more compelling if Republicans weren’t leading the charge.As we all know, Rep. Kevin McCarthy—Speaker Boehner’s second-in-command and the Chairman’s close friend—admitted that they established the Select Committee to drive down Secretary Clinton’s poll numbers.Republican Congressman Richard Hanna said the Select Committee was “designed” to go after Secretary Clinton.And one of the Chairman’s own investigators—a conservative Republican—charged that he was fired in part for not going along with these plans to “hyper focus on Hillary Clinton.” These stark admissions reflect exactly what we have seen inside the Select Committee for the past year. Just look at the facts.Since January, Republicans have canceled every single hearing on our schedule for the entire year—except for this one with Secretary Clinton.They also canceled numerous interviews that they had planned with Defense Department and CIA officials.Instead of doing what they said they were going to do, Republicans zeroed in on Secretary Clinton, her speechwriters, her IT staffers, and her campaign officials. This is what Republicans did—not Democrats.When Speaker Boehner established this Select Committee, he justified it by arguing that it would be “cross-jurisdictional.” I assumed he meant we would focus on more than just Secretary Clinton and the State Department.But Madam Secretary, you are sitting here by yourself. The Secretary of Defense is not on your left, and the Director of the CIA is not on your right. That’s because Republicans abandoned their own plans to question those top officials. So instead of being “cross-jurisdictional,” Republicans just crossed them off the list.Last weekend, the Chairman told his Republican colleagues to “shut up” and stop talking about the Select Committee.What I want to know is this—why tell Republicans to shut up when they are telling the truth, but not when they are attacking Secretary Clinton with reckless accusations that are demonstrably false? Carly Fiorina has said that Secretary Clinton “has blood on her hands,” Mike Huckabee accused her of “ignoring the warning calls from dying Americans in Benghazi,” Senator Rand Paul said “Benghazi was a 3:00 a.m. phone call that she never picked up,” and Senator Lindsay Graham tweeted, “Where the hell were you on the night of the Benghazi attack?”Everyone on this panel knows these accusations are baseless—from our own investigation and all those before it. Yet Republican Members of this Select Committee remain silent.On Monday, the Democrats issued a report showing that none of the 54 witnesses the Committee interviewed substantiated these wild Republican claims. Secretary Clinton did not order the military to stand down, and she neither approved nor denied requests for additional security.I ask that our report be included in the official record for today’s hearing.What is so telling is that we issued virtually the same report a year ago. When we first joined the Select Committee, I asked my staff to put together a complete report and database setting forth the primary questions that have been asked about the attacks and all of the answers that were provided in the eight previous investigations.I ask that this report also be included in today’s hearing record.The problem is that rather than accepting these facts, Republicans continue to spin new conspiracy theories that are just as outlandish and inaccurate. For example, the Chairman recently tried to argue that Sidney Blumenthal was Secretary Clinton’s primary advisor on Libya, and this past Sunday, Rep. Pompeo claimed on national television that Secretary Clinton relied on Sidney Blumenthal for most of her intelligence on Libya.Earlier this week, the Washington Post Fact Checker awarded this claim “four pinocchios”—its worst rating.Here is the bottom-line. The Select Committee has spent 17 months and $4.7 million in taxpayer funds. We have held four hearings and conducted 54 interviews and depositions. Yes, we have received some new emails—from Secretary Clinton, Ambassador Stevens, and others. And yes, we have conducted some new interviews.But these documents and interviews do not show any nefarious activity. In fact, it’s just the opposite. The new information we have obtained confirms and corroborates the core facts we already knew from the eight previous investigations. They provide more detail, but they do not change the basic conclusions.It is time for Republicans to end this taxpayer-funded fishing expedition. We need to come together and shift from politics to policy. We need to finally make good on our promises to the families, and we need to start focusing on what we here in Congress can do to improve the safety and security of our diplomatic corps in the future.Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/10/elijah-cummings-benghazi-hillary-clinton-hearing-transcript-full-text-215051#ixzz3pJMd18i8
LISTEN NOW TO HITLARY QUESTIONS ABOUT BENGHAZI LIBYA
http://www.c-span.org/networks/?channel=radio
RIGHT OFF ELIJAH CUMMINGS BLAMES THE REPULICANS FOR ENDLESS MONEY FOR THIS INVESTIGATION.CRYS THAT THE REPUBLICANS ARE COMPLAINING ABOUT HITLARYS E-MAIL SERVICE FROM HER HOUSE.AND CUMMINGS COMPLAINS THE REPUBLICANS ARE TRYING TO DESTROY CLINTON IN THIS ELECTION.HE SAYS THE REPUBLICANS ARE JUST GOING AFTER HITLARY HERSELF. THEIR NOT WORRIED ABOUT BENGHAZI OR THE E-MAIL SCANDEL.THEY JUST WANT QUEEN WITH HER NOSE IN THE AIR HITLER THE 2ND CLINTON OUT OF THIS YEARS ELECTIONS.
JAN 23,2013 CLINTON BENGHAZI QUESTIONING TEXT
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2013/01/23/text-of-hillary-clintons-senate-testimony-on-benghazi/
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2015/10/22/hillary-clinton-testifies-in-benghazi-hearing-live-blog-and-video/
CLINTON-WHAT DIFFERENCE AT THIS POINT DOES IT MAKE.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ka0_nz53CcM
Trey Gowdy and ranking Democrat Elijah Cummings are now bickering wildly, sitting right next to each other.“Why don’t we just put the entire transcript out there and let the world see it? What do we have to hide!”Gowdy gets defensive, asks what about all the other transcripts, rambles about parliamentary procedures, etc. His pate shines with sweat. “The only transcript you want released is this emails and Sidney Blumenthal.”Cummings is fed up: “I’d like to have all of them released!”Clinton watches, the hint of a smile on her face as she watches committee disintegrates out of Gowdy’s control. Gowdy threatens “if you think you’ve heard about Sidney Blumenthal, wait until the next round, and with that we’re adjourned.”-Trey Gowdy, the Republican chairman, is now chasing Clinton about emails from Sidney Blumenthal, a Clinton family friend who was banned from working at the State Department from the White House, and who often sent Clinton memos about Libya and many other topics.Gowdy asks many questions about Blumenthal, and whether Clinton listened him, about “credibility and whether to assess how credible that source is”.“He was not advising me and I have no reason to ever mention that or to know that the president knew that,” she says.“I don’t know what this line of questioning does to help us get to the bottom the deaths of four Americans,” Clinton says, getting frustrated with Gowdy.“It’s relevant because our ambassador was asked to read and respond to Sidney Blumenthal’s drivel,” Gowdy replies.“I think it’s fair to ask why Sidney Blumenthal had unfettered access to you … and why there was no access between you and the ambassador.” I’ve lost more sleep than all of you put together’Republican chairman Trey Gowdy asks her whether she has anything she wants to say about losing a friend, Chris Stevens, in the attack.“I’ve lost more sleep than all of you put together,” she says. “I have been wracking my brain for what more could have been done, or should have been one. When I took responsibility I took it as a challenge and as an obligation to make sure that when I left the State Department [we reformed measures].”“I would like to get back to that time” of bipartisan concord, Clinton continues.People rose above politics, a Democratic Congress worked with a Republican administration to say what have we learned. Similarly when we lost more Americans, the bombings in east Africa, again, the Republicans and Democrats worked together.So again, I’m an optimist, congressman, I’m hoping that that will be the outcome of this and the effort so that we really do honor the effort, not only of those we lost but those who are serving as we speak.”Gowdy gets upset. He insists nobody has made any conclusions about anything, that “this is not a prosecution, this is an investigation,” and there’s nothing – never mind this Republican shouting at a Democrat – partisan about it.
Rep. Elijah Cummings' full opening statements at the House Benghazi panel, delivered by Cummings' office:-OCT 22,15-HITLARY CLINTON QUESTIONED ON BENGHAZI.
Secretary Clinton, thank you very much for being here today to testify before Congress on this issue—now for the third time.This week, our Chairman, Mr. Gowdy, was interviewed for a lengthy media profile. During this interview, he complained that he has “an impossible job.” He said it is impossible to conduct a serious, fact-centric investigation in such a “political environment.”I have great respect for the Chairman, but on this score, he is wrong. In fact, it has been done by his own Republican colleagues in the House on this very issue—Benghazi.The Republican Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee conducted an extensive, bipartisan, two-year investigation and issued a detailed report. The Senate Intelligence Committee and the Senate Homeland Security Committee also conducted bipartisan investigations.Those bipartisan efforts respected and honored the memories of the four brave Americans who were killed in Benghazi: Ambassador Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods, and Glen Doherty.The problem is that Speaker Boehner did not like the answers he got from those investigations. So he set up this new Select Committee—with no rules, no deadline, and an unlimited budget—and he set it loose on Secretary Clinton because she is running for president.Clearly, it is possible to conduct a serious, bipartisan investigation. What is impossible is for any reasonable person to continue denying that Republicans are squandering millions of taxpayer dollars on this abusive effort to derail Secretary Clinton’s presidential campaign.In the Chairman’s interview, he tried to defend against this criticism by attempting to cast himself as the victim, and he complained about attacks on the credibility of the Select Committee. His argument would be more compelling if Republicans weren’t leading the charge.As we all know, Rep. Kevin McCarthy—Speaker Boehner’s second-in-command and the Chairman’s close friend—admitted that they established the Select Committee to drive down Secretary Clinton’s poll numbers.Republican Congressman Richard Hanna said the Select Committee was “designed” to go after Secretary Clinton.And one of the Chairman’s own investigators—a conservative Republican—charged that he was fired in part for not going along with these plans to “hyper focus on Hillary Clinton.” These stark admissions reflect exactly what we have seen inside the Select Committee for the past year. Just look at the facts.Since January, Republicans have canceled every single hearing on our schedule for the entire year—except for this one with Secretary Clinton.They also canceled numerous interviews that they had planned with Defense Department and CIA officials.Instead of doing what they said they were going to do, Republicans zeroed in on Secretary Clinton, her speechwriters, her IT staffers, and her campaign officials. This is what Republicans did—not Democrats.When Speaker Boehner established this Select Committee, he justified it by arguing that it would be “cross-jurisdictional.” I assumed he meant we would focus on more than just Secretary Clinton and the State Department.But Madam Secretary, you are sitting here by yourself. The Secretary of Defense is not on your left, and the Director of the CIA is not on your right. That’s because Republicans abandoned their own plans to question those top officials. So instead of being “cross-jurisdictional,” Republicans just crossed them off the list.Last weekend, the Chairman told his Republican colleagues to “shut up” and stop talking about the Select Committee.What I want to know is this—why tell Republicans to shut up when they are telling the truth, but not when they are attacking Secretary Clinton with reckless accusations that are demonstrably false? Carly Fiorina has said that Secretary Clinton “has blood on her hands,” Mike Huckabee accused her of “ignoring the warning calls from dying Americans in Benghazi,” Senator Rand Paul said “Benghazi was a 3:00 a.m. phone call that she never picked up,” and Senator Lindsay Graham tweeted, “Where the hell were you on the night of the Benghazi attack?”Everyone on this panel knows these accusations are baseless—from our own investigation and all those before it. Yet Republican Members of this Select Committee remain silent.On Monday, the Democrats issued a report showing that none of the 54 witnesses the Committee interviewed substantiated these wild Republican claims. Secretary Clinton did not order the military to stand down, and she neither approved nor denied requests for additional security.I ask that our report be included in the official record for today’s hearing.What is so telling is that we issued virtually the same report a year ago. When we first joined the Select Committee, I asked my staff to put together a complete report and database setting forth the primary questions that have been asked about the attacks and all of the answers that were provided in the eight previous investigations.I ask that this report also be included in today’s hearing record.The problem is that rather than accepting these facts, Republicans continue to spin new conspiracy theories that are just as outlandish and inaccurate. For example, the Chairman recently tried to argue that Sidney Blumenthal was Secretary Clinton’s primary advisor on Libya, and this past Sunday, Rep. Pompeo claimed on national television that Secretary Clinton relied on Sidney Blumenthal for most of her intelligence on Libya.Earlier this week, the Washington Post Fact Checker awarded this claim “four pinocchios”—its worst rating.Here is the bottom-line. The Select Committee has spent 17 months and $4.7 million in taxpayer funds. We have held four hearings and conducted 54 interviews and depositions. Yes, we have received some new emails—from Secretary Clinton, Ambassador Stevens, and others. And yes, we have conducted some new interviews.But these documents and interviews do not show any nefarious activity. In fact, it’s just the opposite. The new information we have obtained confirms and corroborates the core facts we already knew from the eight previous investigations. They provide more detail, but they do not change the basic conclusions.It is time for Republicans to end this taxpayer-funded fishing expedition. We need to come together and shift from politics to policy. We need to finally make good on our promises to the families, and we need to start focusing on what we here in Congress can do to improve the safety and security of our diplomatic corps in the future.Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/10/elijah-cummings-benghazi-hillary-clinton-hearing-transcript-full-text-215051#ixzz3pJMd18i8
