JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.
I HAD TO PUT THIS STORY BACK UP BECAUSE THE EX UKRAINE LEADER WHO SKIPPED TO RUSSIA NOW IS SAYING THE SAME THING I'M SAYING HERE.THAT THE WEST CREATES THESE ARAB SPRINGS TO OVER THROW DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENTS TO BRING IN RADICAL MUSLIM LOVING SHARIA LAW CULT DICTATORS TO CONTROL THE WORLD.
THE FRUIT OF OBAMA
WELL NOW I SEE IN THE NEWS THAT AMERICA WANTS TO TAKE ALL ITS TROOPS OUT OF AFGHANISTAN.WHY COULD THIS BE.MAYBE BECAUSE OBAMA NEVER GOT HIS OWN WAY OF NOT ALLOWING THE 65 FREED PRISONERS IN AFGHANISTAN BY KARZAI.NOT TO BE DONE.BUT OBAMA COULD SURE QUICKLY FORCE ISRAEL TO FREE 78 ARAB MURDERERS FROM THEIR PRISONS IN THE NAME OF A SO CALLED PEACE PROCESS.BUT WHEN AFGHAN MURDERERS ARE SET FREE THAT MURDERERD AMERICAN SOLDIERS.OBAMA WAS CRYING FOWL AND NOW TAKING THEIR TROOPS OUT OF AFGHANISTAN.
THE WAY OBAMA WORKS.IS WE CAN EXPECT AFTER THE AMERICANS TAKE THEIR TROOPS OUT.THAT THERE WILL JUST SUDDENLY BE AN ARAB SPRING IN AFGHANISTAN.SURPRISE-SURPRISE.OBAMAS REVENGE WILL THEN BE TO OVER THROW KARZAI IN THE NAME OF DEMOCROCY FOR THE PEOPLE OF AFGHANISTAN.JUST WAIT AND SEE.AND IF NOT-IT WILL BE BECAUSE I AM TIPPING USE OFF TO OBAMAS TRUE FRUIT HERE.I'M STARTING TO BE ABLE TO READ THIS FRAUD-MUSLIM SYMPATHIZER IN OFFICE OBAMA FOR WHAT HE TRUELY IS.....A DICTATOR CONTROL FREAK.WHO IF YOU GO AGAINST-YOUR COUNTRY ENDS UP WITH AN ARAB SPRING AND THEIR GOVERNMENT OVERTHROWN.AND MUSLIM LEADERS INCERTED INSTEAD OF DEMOCRATIC LEADERS.
No bluff: U.S. planning possible withdrawal of all troops from Afghanistan
By Barbara Starr and Tom Cohen, CNN-updated 8:57 PM EST, Tue February 25, 2014
-President Obama calls Afghan leader to discuss security agreement
-Obama orders planning for bringing home all U.S. troops at the end of 2014
-Afghan President Karzai refuses to sign a deal to keep some troops there
-The White House says an agreement could happen after Karzai leaves office in April
Washington (CNN) -- We're not bluffing, the Obama administration told Afghanistan on Tuesday in announcing for the first time it has started planning for the possible withdrawal of all U.S. troops by the end of the year if no security agreement is signed.Statements by the White House and Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel showed President Barack Obama's impatience with Afghanistan President Hamid Karzai's refusal to sign the agreement that would keep several thousand American troops in the country after combat operations conclude this year.In a phone call with Karzai on Tuesday to discuss upcoming elections for a new Afghan leader, Obama made clear that time was running out to properly plan for keeping any U.S. forces in the country beyond 2014, the White House said.Meanwhile, a senior Pakistani official warned that pulling out U.S. troops could have dire consequences, leading to a civil war in Afghanistan.
Obama calling
"President Obama has asked the Pentagon to ensure that it has adequate plans in place to accomplish an orderly withdrawal by the end of the year should the United States not keep any troops in Afghanistan after 2014," said the White House statement.Abdullah Abdullah on Afghan future.Soldiers return to new and familiar faces.Hagel: Cuts reflect 'repositioning'It also noted that a deal remained possible with a new Afghan leader, even if Karzai fails to sign the Bilateral Security Agreement before the April election chooses his successor.
History not repeating itself in Afghanistan
"Should we have a BSA and a willing and committed partner in the Afghan government, a limited post-2014 mission focused on training, advising, and assisting Afghan forces and going after the remnants of core al Qaeda could be in the interests of the United States and Afghanistan," the White House said. "Therefore, we will leave open the possibility of concluding a BSA with Afghanistan later this year."In his separate statement, Hagel said he strongly supported the order by Obama to "ensure adequate plans are in place to accomplish an orderly withdrawal by the end of the year should the United States not keep any troops in Afghanistan after 2014."Speaking at Joint Base Langley-Eustis in Virginia Tuesday afternoon, Hagel said the situation in Afghanistan will likely be a top item on the agenda at a NATO ministerial conference in Brussels this week.
Obama, he said, has been very clear that the possibility of U.S. troops staying in Afghanistan depends "on whether we have a bilateral security agreement signed by the Afghani government, to assure our rights of our troops and other important elements that are required any time America has troops in another country."
Pakistani official: Don't do it
A senior Pakistani government official told CNN that a full withdrawal of U.S. troops should not be considered, declaring that "the zero option means civil war in Afghanistan."Speaking on condition of not being identified, the Pakistani official predicted that 30% of Afghan forces would desert if U.S. forces leave the country.For the Pentagon, Obama's order means preparing for all contingencies."For the first time, the commander in chief has told us to begin planning for a complete withdrawal" from Afghanistan, a senior U.S. official told CNN.While the option to keep troops there remains, the situation has reached a point where the Pentagon has to begin planning for all possibilities, the official added.More than 33,000 U.S. troops remain in Afghanistan as the Obama administration winds down the almost 13-year war that began shortly after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.The security agreement negotiated between Afghanistan and the United States would cover a continuing mission after 2014 focused on training Afghan forces and counterterrorism.Pentagon: If freed Afghan prisoners return to fight, they're 'legitimate targets'
Afghan presidential contender says he'll sign if elected
While Karzai has balked at signing, a leading contender to succeed him told CNN's Christiane Amanpour this month that the agreement should proceed.Presidential candidate Abdullah Abdullah said he would sign the deal to keep international forces in Afghanistan, and aid dollars flowing, if elected in April.Abdullah said Afghanistan will need the financial and military support of the international community "for years to come."White House spokesman Jay Carney told reporters Tuesday that that longer it takes for security agreement to get signed, the more difficult it will be to properly plan and carry out a U.S. mission after 2014.Continued delay would result in a smaller and less ambitious mission, Carney said. Asked what happens if no agreement gets signed, he said: "We cannot and will not have U.S. troops on the ground" without a signed deal.Karzai's not-so-crazy end gameLeading contender for Afghanistan president vows to sign troop agreement if elected.CNN's Jim Sciutto contributed to this report.
HERES THE REAL REASON OBAMA IS WITHDRAWING THE TROOPS FROM AFGHANISTAN.I'M NOT STUPID.ITS NOT BECAUSE OF SOME SECURITY DEAL.
Karzai rejects U.S. warnings over freed Afghan detainees
By Humeyra Pamuk and Hamid Shalizi-ANKARA/KABUL Thu Feb 13, 2014 3:53pm EST
(Reuters) - Afghan President Hamid Karzai on Thursday rejected criticism of his government's release of 65 detainees viewed by Washington as dangerous militants, further fanning tensions with the United States as the international mission in Afghanistan winds down.Afghan officials described the release as justice for its own citizens who had faced unfounded U.S. accusations. But the United States expressed deep concern over the decision and NATO, which runs the 12-year-old foreign military operation supporting the Karzai government, denounced it as "a major step backward"."If Afghan judicial authorities decide to release a prisoner, it is of no concern to the U.S.," Karzai told a news conference in the Turkish capital Ankara after talks with Turkey's president and Pakistan's prime minister."I hope the U.S. will stop harassing Afghanistan's procedures and judicial authority. I hope the United States will now begin to respect Afghan sovereignty," said Karzai, who after more than a decade in power is to step down after April elections.Karzai's government has long complained that foreign forces have locked up Afghans on dubious grounds, with no proper judicial process.In an unusually strong statement, the U.S. military force in Kabul said some of the released detainees had killed both Afghans and foreign soldiers and now posed a fresh threat."U.S. and Afghan forces risked their lives to ensure the safety of the Afghan people. We call upon the (Kabul government) to consider the potentially lethal effects of today's releases," it said, adding that the released detainees may resume their "criminal behavior".U.S. State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf called on Kabul to ensure that released detainees do not carry out any acts of violence "and to immediately bring to justice any who would.""Afghanistan is a sovereign country, (Karzai) is right about that. They can make their own decisions," Harf said."We have been very clear, however, that we have a legitimate force protection concern for the lives of coalition forces, of Afghan security forces and Afghan civilians because these men have been released."In the U.S. Congress, the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, Representative Howard "Buck" McKeon, said he was "appalled" by Kabul's decision. Republican Senator Lindsey Graham has said he would introduce a resolution condemning Karzai's actions and would seek to cut off some U.S. development aid in response.Video provided to Reuters by the Afghan Defence Ministry showed the prisoners, with jackets or blankets over their traditional Afghan garb, shaking hands with Afghan military officials as they left the prison.Abdul Shakor Dadras, head of the Afghan board charged with reviewing the prisoners' cases, said their detention had been unjustified from the outset, despite the U.S. claims."I believe the release of these 65 people will benefit the Afghan nation and it will benefit the American nation and American government," Dadras told Reuters Television.In Brussels, NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen echoed the U.S. criticism of the release of the detainees."This decision, which appears to have been made based on political calculations and without regard for due process before the Afghan courts, is a major step backwards for the rule of law in Afghanistan, and poses serious security concerns," he said.
'SONS OF THEIR COUNTRY'
The prisoners were part of a much larger group of detainees transferred to Afghan authority last year as one milestone in the U.S. and NATO transition out of Afghanistan. A coalition of foreign forces has been battling the Taliban since the Islamist group was ousted in 2001.More than 500 of those prisoners have already been released, a U.S. military official said on condition of anonymity, while others were recommended for prosecution in Afghan courts.The 65 freed on Thursday were part of a group of 88 whose proposed release had prompted U.S. objections. The fate of the remaining 23 prisoners in the group is still being examined by the Afghan government, the official said.An unnamed prisoner, speaking in the footage provided by the Afghan Defence Ministry, said those detained at Bagram prison were "sons of their country, whose ancestors fought against Russia," referring to what many Afghans see as the Afghan Mujahideen's honorable fight against the Soviet occupation in the 1980s.While U.S. officials have said U.S. forces would try to kill or capture the men if they took up arms against them, it remains unclear whether U.S. or coalition forces would try to apprehend or target them pre-emptively.The detainees have become one more issue fuelling tension in U.S.-Afghan ties ahead of the April presidential poll and the planned pullout of most foreign troops by the end of the year.The Obama administration has been pressing Karzai for months to sign a bilateral security agreement with Washington that would allow some U.S. troops to stay beyond that deadline.It was unclear what effect the release would have on U.S. deliberations about what a possible post-2014 troop presence could look like or on its view of the stalled security pact.The U.S. military official said the United States had provided Afghan officials with "hundreds of pages" of what he described as evidence or leads against the prisoners.Some of the detainees, he said, had been linked by biometric data to the production or placement of improvised explosive devices, sometimes through fingerprints left on adhesive tape used to assemble homemade bombs.(Additional reporting by Adrian Croft in Brussels and Lesley Wroughton, Patricia Zengerle and Phil Stewart in Washington; Writing by Missy Ryan in Kabul; Editing by Paul Tait, Gareth Jones and Mohammad Zargham)
I HAD TO PUT THIS STORY BACK UP BECAUSE THE EX UKRAINE LEADER WHO SKIPPED TO RUSSIA NOW IS SAYING THE SAME THING I'M SAYING HERE.THAT THE WEST CREATES THESE ARAB SPRINGS TO OVER THROW DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENTS TO BRING IN RADICAL MUSLIM LOVING SHARIA LAW CULT DICTATORS TO CONTROL THE WORLD.
THE FRUIT OF OBAMA
WELL NOW I SEE IN THE NEWS THAT AMERICA WANTS TO TAKE ALL ITS TROOPS OUT OF AFGHANISTAN.WHY COULD THIS BE.MAYBE BECAUSE OBAMA NEVER GOT HIS OWN WAY OF NOT ALLOWING THE 65 FREED PRISONERS IN AFGHANISTAN BY KARZAI.NOT TO BE DONE.BUT OBAMA COULD SURE QUICKLY FORCE ISRAEL TO FREE 78 ARAB MURDERERS FROM THEIR PRISONS IN THE NAME OF A SO CALLED PEACE PROCESS.BUT WHEN AFGHAN MURDERERS ARE SET FREE THAT MURDERERD AMERICAN SOLDIERS.OBAMA WAS CRYING FOWL AND NOW TAKING THEIR TROOPS OUT OF AFGHANISTAN.
THE WAY OBAMA WORKS.IS WE CAN EXPECT AFTER THE AMERICANS TAKE THEIR TROOPS OUT.THAT THERE WILL JUST SUDDENLY BE AN ARAB SPRING IN AFGHANISTAN.SURPRISE-SURPRISE.OBAMAS REVENGE WILL THEN BE TO OVER THROW KARZAI IN THE NAME OF DEMOCROCY FOR THE PEOPLE OF AFGHANISTAN.JUST WAIT AND SEE.AND IF NOT-IT WILL BE BECAUSE I AM TIPPING USE OFF TO OBAMAS TRUE FRUIT HERE.I'M STARTING TO BE ABLE TO READ THIS FRAUD-MUSLIM SYMPATHIZER IN OFFICE OBAMA FOR WHAT HE TRUELY IS.....A DICTATOR CONTROL FREAK.WHO IF YOU GO AGAINST-YOUR COUNTRY ENDS UP WITH AN ARAB SPRING AND THEIR GOVERNMENT OVERTHROWN.AND MUSLIM LEADERS INCERTED INSTEAD OF DEMOCRATIC LEADERS.
No bluff: U.S. planning possible withdrawal of all troops from Afghanistan
By Barbara Starr and Tom Cohen, CNN-updated 8:57 PM EST, Tue February 25, 2014
-President Obama calls Afghan leader to discuss security agreement
-Obama orders planning for bringing home all U.S. troops at the end of 2014
-Afghan President Karzai refuses to sign a deal to keep some troops there
-The White House says an agreement could happen after Karzai leaves office in April
Washington (CNN) -- We're not bluffing, the Obama administration told Afghanistan on Tuesday in announcing for the first time it has started planning for the possible withdrawal of all U.S. troops by the end of the year if no security agreement is signed.Statements by the White House and Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel showed President Barack Obama's impatience with Afghanistan President Hamid Karzai's refusal to sign the agreement that would keep several thousand American troops in the country after combat operations conclude this year.In a phone call with Karzai on Tuesday to discuss upcoming elections for a new Afghan leader, Obama made clear that time was running out to properly plan for keeping any U.S. forces in the country beyond 2014, the White House said.Meanwhile, a senior Pakistani official warned that pulling out U.S. troops could have dire consequences, leading to a civil war in Afghanistan.
Obama calling
"President Obama has asked the Pentagon to ensure that it has adequate plans in place to accomplish an orderly withdrawal by the end of the year should the United States not keep any troops in Afghanistan after 2014," said the White House statement.Abdullah Abdullah on Afghan future.Soldiers return to new and familiar faces.Hagel: Cuts reflect 'repositioning'It also noted that a deal remained possible with a new Afghan leader, even if Karzai fails to sign the Bilateral Security Agreement before the April election chooses his successor.
History not repeating itself in Afghanistan
"Should we have a BSA and a willing and committed partner in the Afghan government, a limited post-2014 mission focused on training, advising, and assisting Afghan forces and going after the remnants of core al Qaeda could be in the interests of the United States and Afghanistan," the White House said. "Therefore, we will leave open the possibility of concluding a BSA with Afghanistan later this year."In his separate statement, Hagel said he strongly supported the order by Obama to "ensure adequate plans are in place to accomplish an orderly withdrawal by the end of the year should the United States not keep any troops in Afghanistan after 2014."Speaking at Joint Base Langley-Eustis in Virginia Tuesday afternoon, Hagel said the situation in Afghanistan will likely be a top item on the agenda at a NATO ministerial conference in Brussels this week.
Obama, he said, has been very clear that the possibility of U.S. troops staying in Afghanistan depends "on whether we have a bilateral security agreement signed by the Afghani government, to assure our rights of our troops and other important elements that are required any time America has troops in another country."
Pakistani official: Don't do it
A senior Pakistani government official told CNN that a full withdrawal of U.S. troops should not be considered, declaring that "the zero option means civil war in Afghanistan."Speaking on condition of not being identified, the Pakistani official predicted that 30% of Afghan forces would desert if U.S. forces leave the country.For the Pentagon, Obama's order means preparing for all contingencies."For the first time, the commander in chief has told us to begin planning for a complete withdrawal" from Afghanistan, a senior U.S. official told CNN.While the option to keep troops there remains, the situation has reached a point where the Pentagon has to begin planning for all possibilities, the official added.More than 33,000 U.S. troops remain in Afghanistan as the Obama administration winds down the almost 13-year war that began shortly after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.The security agreement negotiated between Afghanistan and the United States would cover a continuing mission after 2014 focused on training Afghan forces and counterterrorism.Pentagon: If freed Afghan prisoners return to fight, they're 'legitimate targets'
Afghan presidential contender says he'll sign if elected
While Karzai has balked at signing, a leading contender to succeed him told CNN's Christiane Amanpour this month that the agreement should proceed.Presidential candidate Abdullah Abdullah said he would sign the deal to keep international forces in Afghanistan, and aid dollars flowing, if elected in April.Abdullah said Afghanistan will need the financial and military support of the international community "for years to come."White House spokesman Jay Carney told reporters Tuesday that that longer it takes for security agreement to get signed, the more difficult it will be to properly plan and carry out a U.S. mission after 2014.Continued delay would result in a smaller and less ambitious mission, Carney said. Asked what happens if no agreement gets signed, he said: "We cannot and will not have U.S. troops on the ground" without a signed deal.Karzai's not-so-crazy end gameLeading contender for Afghanistan president vows to sign troop agreement if elected.CNN's Jim Sciutto contributed to this report.
HERES THE REAL REASON OBAMA IS WITHDRAWING THE TROOPS FROM AFGHANISTAN.I'M NOT STUPID.ITS NOT BECAUSE OF SOME SECURITY DEAL.
Karzai rejects U.S. warnings over freed Afghan detainees
By Humeyra Pamuk and Hamid Shalizi-ANKARA/KABUL Thu Feb 13, 2014 3:53pm EST
(Reuters) - Afghan President Hamid Karzai on Thursday rejected criticism of his government's release of 65 detainees viewed by Washington as dangerous militants, further fanning tensions with the United States as the international mission in Afghanistan winds down.Afghan officials described the release as justice for its own citizens who had faced unfounded U.S. accusations. But the United States expressed deep concern over the decision and NATO, which runs the 12-year-old foreign military operation supporting the Karzai government, denounced it as "a major step backward"."If Afghan judicial authorities decide to release a prisoner, it is of no concern to the U.S.," Karzai told a news conference in the Turkish capital Ankara after talks with Turkey's president and Pakistan's prime minister."I hope the U.S. will stop harassing Afghanistan's procedures and judicial authority. I hope the United States will now begin to respect Afghan sovereignty," said Karzai, who after more than a decade in power is to step down after April elections.Karzai's government has long complained that foreign forces have locked up Afghans on dubious grounds, with no proper judicial process.In an unusually strong statement, the U.S. military force in Kabul said some of the released detainees had killed both Afghans and foreign soldiers and now posed a fresh threat."U.S. and Afghan forces risked their lives to ensure the safety of the Afghan people. We call upon the (Kabul government) to consider the potentially lethal effects of today's releases," it said, adding that the released detainees may resume their "criminal behavior".U.S. State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf called on Kabul to ensure that released detainees do not carry out any acts of violence "and to immediately bring to justice any who would.""Afghanistan is a sovereign country, (Karzai) is right about that. They can make their own decisions," Harf said."We have been very clear, however, that we have a legitimate force protection concern for the lives of coalition forces, of Afghan security forces and Afghan civilians because these men have been released."In the U.S. Congress, the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, Representative Howard "Buck" McKeon, said he was "appalled" by Kabul's decision. Republican Senator Lindsey Graham has said he would introduce a resolution condemning Karzai's actions and would seek to cut off some U.S. development aid in response.Video provided to Reuters by the Afghan Defence Ministry showed the prisoners, with jackets or blankets over their traditional Afghan garb, shaking hands with Afghan military officials as they left the prison.Abdul Shakor Dadras, head of the Afghan board charged with reviewing the prisoners' cases, said their detention had been unjustified from the outset, despite the U.S. claims."I believe the release of these 65 people will benefit the Afghan nation and it will benefit the American nation and American government," Dadras told Reuters Television.In Brussels, NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen echoed the U.S. criticism of the release of the detainees."This decision, which appears to have been made based on political calculations and without regard for due process before the Afghan courts, is a major step backwards for the rule of law in Afghanistan, and poses serious security concerns," he said.
'SONS OF THEIR COUNTRY'
The prisoners were part of a much larger group of detainees transferred to Afghan authority last year as one milestone in the U.S. and NATO transition out of Afghanistan. A coalition of foreign forces has been battling the Taliban since the Islamist group was ousted in 2001.More than 500 of those prisoners have already been released, a U.S. military official said on condition of anonymity, while others were recommended for prosecution in Afghan courts.The 65 freed on Thursday were part of a group of 88 whose proposed release had prompted U.S. objections. The fate of the remaining 23 prisoners in the group is still being examined by the Afghan government, the official said.An unnamed prisoner, speaking in the footage provided by the Afghan Defence Ministry, said those detained at Bagram prison were "sons of their country, whose ancestors fought against Russia," referring to what many Afghans see as the Afghan Mujahideen's honorable fight against the Soviet occupation in the 1980s.While U.S. officials have said U.S. forces would try to kill or capture the men if they took up arms against them, it remains unclear whether U.S. or coalition forces would try to apprehend or target them pre-emptively.The detainees have become one more issue fuelling tension in U.S.-Afghan ties ahead of the April presidential poll and the planned pullout of most foreign troops by the end of the year.The Obama administration has been pressing Karzai for months to sign a bilateral security agreement with Washington that would allow some U.S. troops to stay beyond that deadline.It was unclear what effect the release would have on U.S. deliberations about what a possible post-2014 troop presence could look like or on its view of the stalled security pact.The U.S. military official said the United States had provided Afghan officials with "hundreds of pages" of what he described as evidence or leads against the prisoners.Some of the detainees, he said, had been linked by biometric data to the production or placement of improvised explosive devices, sometimes through fingerprints left on adhesive tape used to assemble homemade bombs.(Additional reporting by Adrian Croft in Brussels and Lesley Wroughton, Patricia Zengerle and Phil Stewart in Washington; Writing by Missy Ryan in Kabul; Editing by Paul Tait, Gareth Jones and Mohammad Zargham)
