THE LEIB-MCCAIN DUPES

DOUG AND LAURIE MAR 4,11 6-9PM EST ABOUT THE ISSUES IN THE WORLD
http://www.usaradio.com/listen_live_usa2.php
http://therothshow.com/show-archives/march-2011/

LAURIE ROTHS SITE
http://therothshow.com/
DOUG HAGMANNS SITES
http://homelandsecurityus.com/
https://hagmann-pi.com/Home.html
http://theneinblog.blogspot.com/
CANADA FREE PRESS-JUDI MCLEOD
http://www.canadafreepress.com/

ALAN GREENSPAN ON CNBC
http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1828815428&play=1
http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1828819830&play=1
http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1828819886&play=1
http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1828846161&play=1
http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1828828276&play=1
http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1828868683&play=1
RON PAUL ON TAXES
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5m1J32wABiI&feature=player_embedded
HIGH OIL TO KILL THE ECONOMY
http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1828995682&play=1

Obama’s two most useful idiots By Judi McLeod Friday, March 4, 2011 CANADA FREE PRESS

Proof positive that Republicans who cross the bi-partisan aisle too many times come back as Democrat dupes: Senator John McCain and Independent Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman.In their newfound state of `civility’ the senators are flying not Old Glory but are white flagging orchestrated democracy movements in the Middle East.
According to McCain, all praise for the revolution goes to the social network sites and Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg is the most popular man in the Middle East. (FoxNews, March 3, 2011).

President Barack Obama whose group Organizing America helped hand Egypt over to the Muslim Brotherhood feels the same way about Google, Mr. McCain.Fresh home from a trip to the middle east, McCain and Lieberman sang the praises of the social networks on recent developments in Tunisia, Egypt, Bahrain and Libya at the Brookings Institute.This social networking cannot be underestimated in how all of these events, really the driving force in how all of this transformed and took place, crowed McCain.Lieberman called the changes, Even more consequential than the collapse of the Soviet Union and suggested, It’s in our strategic interest at this moment to help history move in the right direction.Incredibly by further emphasizing the role technology has been playing in world revolution, McCain relayed a story from a young man he met with in Egypt, who held up his blackberry and said, I can get 200,000 people in the square in two hours. And it’s Egypt the two senators advised the Obama administration to keep an eye on.Young men with Blackberrys can also get dozens of young people into Chicago department stores for a flash mob collective shoplifting.And who knows if they’re not already using technology to bring illegals over the Arizona border? And how’s this for John Maverick McCain wisdom: Egypt is the heart and soul of the Arab world. What happens in Egypt will be vital to what happens in the rest of the region.

Some not on the government payroll knew that all along.That Google-trained digital activists have already been lauded seemed to have gone over McCain, who warned against the appearance of outside interference in Cairo. He insisted that the best move for the U.S. to make was to help with job creation: I hope the high tech community and friends of ours like John Chambers and Bill Gates and all of these people would come out and say, Ok we’re gonna invest in Egypt, we’re gonna help people create jobs and opportunity.Left unsaid: Americans struggling in the recession who are not out fomenting for revolution in foreign countries can find their own jobs.Lieberman and McCain, are both advocates for a no-fly zone for Libya.
Lieberman feels that the Obama administration was a little slow in handling these events to date. Make that nine days slow, Joe.But McCain as an Obama booster could rival Nancy Pelosi. This administration came into power with an anti-Bush agenda, whether that was the right thing to do or not. I think history will judge. But I also think that this administration has come a long way, especially in this last year and I give them credit for that. And so I certainly like what Secretary Clinton has been saying. I certainly appreciate many of the things the administration has been saying.How can Obama lose with useful idiots like McCain and Lieberman in tow?

FALSE TEACHERS,PROPHETS,DECIEVERS

MATTHEW 24:4-5,11,24-25
4 And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you.
5 For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.
11 And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many.
24 For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.
25 Behold, I have told you before.

1 TIMOTHY 4:1-2
1 Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils;
2 Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron;

MARK 13:22-23
22 For false Christs and false prophets shall rise, and shall shew signs and wonders, to seduce, if it were possible, even the elect.
23 But take ye heed: behold, I have foretold you all things.

2 TIMOTHY 3:13
13 But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived.

DEUTORONOMY 18:10-12
10 There shall not be found among you any one that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, or that useth divination, or an observer of times, or an enchanter, or a witch,
11 Or a charmer, or a consulter with familiar spirits, or a wizard, or a necromancer.
12 For all that do these things are an abomination unto the LORD: and because of these abominations the LORD thy God doth drive them out from before thee.

JUDE 10-13
10 But these speak evil of those things which they know not: but what they know naturally, as brute beasts, in those things they corrupt themselves.
11 Woe unto them! for they have gone in the way of Cain, and ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward, and perished in the gainsaying of Core.
12 These are spots in your feasts of charity, when they feast with you, feeding themselves without fear: clouds they are without water, carried about of winds; trees whose fruit withereth, without fruit, twice dead, plucked up by the roots;
13 Raging waves of the sea, foaming out their own shame; wandering stars, to whom is reserved the blackness of darkness for ever.

MATTHEW 10:32-33
32 Whosoever therefore shall confess me before men, him will I confess also before my Father which is in heaven.
33 But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven.

THIS WESBORO HATE GROUP AND HAROLD CAMPING WITH HIS FALSE RAPTURE DATE OF MAY 21,11 ARE FALSE CHRISTIANS.

Supremes – How much more are you going to protect in the name of speech?
Posted on March 3, 2011 by Laurie Roth

This week we saw the horror decision by the Supreme Court, voting 8-1 for the notorious Westboro Baptist Church. They are the church who has felt like it was God’s calling for them to go around the country and crash funerals of grieving families trying to bury their dead….you know, those who have died in our military defending our nation. How could we forget Westboro’s freedom of speech concerns over our souls when they protested at the funeral of Matthew Snyder, a brave Marine killed in Iraq.Interestingly Matthew wasn’t gay nor connected in anyway with Westboro yet they viciously picketed at his funeral so much so that his Father Albert Snyder sued Fred Phelps of the church to try and stop their picketing at military funerals around the country. I’ll never forget when they showed up in the Northwest to picket a funeral of one of our fallen war heroes, not an hour from my house. I thought I would lose my mind then.You may recall that Matthew’s Father, Albert Snyder was awarded $11 million in damages but later the award was cut in half, then the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals threw the whole award out.

What does the Supreme Court have to say for itself?

They acknowledge in their ruling that the views of Westboro Baptist Church are hateful and inexplicable. However, they strongly feel that if they ruled differently it would slow down if not stop people speaking out on controversial issues. They even talked of this also creating liability for news media and the coverage of events and commentaries.Most of us cherish free speech and see the importance of protecting that right. However, our framers never meant for that Freedom of speech to be void of total decency, responsibility and screamed out in whatever setting you chose.Try yelling Fire in a crowded theatre and see what happens. What is the problem? I can yell Fire elsewhere and say whatever I want to. It is the people’s choice if they get up, cause a disturbance and run. I didn’t make them. Yet, this is not allowed due to creating a panicked mob reaction and danger for all. Nor should it be allowed.So, we can’t say anything, where ever we want if it causes potential danger to others. What if it causes emotional trauma and damage to the family of a fallen soldier to display signs such as God hates you Destruction is Imminent Fags are Beasts at a funeral for their son or daughter? Why is the potential of several emotional trauma, insult and violation any less painful than creating potential physical damage in a theatre? I believe it is ALL pain and ALL wrong.Our founding fathers never thought in their wildest dreams that our 1st Amendment rights for free speech would be contorted to allow a group calling themselves a church to exercise their freedom and evil displays anywhere they wanted, especially at someone’s funeral. What about the rights of the family to grieve and honor their dead?

Westboro has the perfect right to believe what they want and they believe God is punishing our nation for having Gays by killing soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan. They are known to demonstrate all over the country, sometimes sharing their anti-Semitic and anti-gay message several times a week.I was listening to one of their members on the news this morning saying how loving they really are because they are trying to yell out the truth to keep us all out of hell. They wouldn’t picket at so many funerals if they didn’t love us. We apparently are all going to hell if we want to do anything but judge and or hate gays. You see, God hates gays. Westboro’s hatred isn’t satisfied with gays. They also hate Jews and Israel. A few other picket signs I’m looking at say The Jews killed Jesus Some Jews will repent God hates Israel Mourn for your sins. Naturally they have to go to Jewish institutions and places of worship to practice their 1st amendment rights there.Of course we don’t want a slippery slope away from freedom of speech. I’m aware people say things I don’t believe or like but they still have the right to say them. That is true, accept I and most of us believe those extreme speech expressions don’t have the right to be shared everywhere they want.

Here is part of my yes and no, do or die list.

It is never acceptable, appropriate or part of freedom of speech in America to allow the Nazi party, KKK or neo Nazis to march in the streets or picket in public in America. They all have a history, not only of hate but violence and murder. We have seen what giving them power, speech and a bigger voice leads to….millions of murders. No thank you. They can keep their opinions in the living room of a house somewhere and out of the public square.Westboro Baptist Church, thinks we are all going to hell, especially if we support or love gays. I would go to hell accept I can’t get through the door and find a place to stand. There are too many of them in the way.Regardless of what anyone thinks of gays or gay behavior, as a conservative, Christian who does not believe in Gay Marriage, I will let my opinion be heard.The truth about what God says in the Bible is clear, spoken out and simple. God loves all people including gays. He identifies many sins that separate us from God, various attitudes of Judgment, hate, jealousy, gossip, rage and sexual acting out, outside of marriage, gay and straight. God lovingly calls us all back to him and offers healing to us all. Even those invested in Judgment and hatred like members of Westboro Baptist Church.I believe the Supreme Court aired in their judgment, allowing freedom of such hostile and insulting speech to be shared anywhere, violating the rights of the fallen heroes families. They could display their pickets all kinds of places. Why a funeral? That should have never been allowed.Let Freedom of speech reign BUT in appropriate locations and times.

The Non issue of Obama’s eligibility IS one of the BIG issues in 2012
Posted on March 2, 2011 by LAURIE ROTH

The assaults, name calling and slander continues against those who dare to question and make comments about Obama’s eligibility and constitutional status to be President. We are distractions and we are racist, conspiratorial birthers.Let us look at some of the messiah level conservatives and what they have to say about this. First on our list of on high opinions is Karl Rove, a Fox News contributor and the former Senior Adviser and Deputy Chief of Staff under George W. Bush. I have respected and supported much of what he has said over the years, but he loses my respect and support on this issue. He said on Bill O’Reilly recently that the Republican Party has to focus on real issues, not non issues. The party should ignore the birther movement. Rove compared the birthers to the John Birch Society, a far-right group started in the 1950s. He compared the 9/11 deniers with the birthers, those who want Obama to prove his eligibility.Rove made these comments to an agreeing Bill O’Reilly who also has marginalized and insulted ‘birthers’ for the last two years (translation: A birther is anyone who looks at the sea of growing evidence that Obama was not born in Hawaii and wants him to come clean and show his long form birth certificate).Karl Rove was advising the GOP not to waste time on this non issue and certainly not give anyone who believes that way any profile or stature in the party. Worshiping and sold out Bill O’Reilly agreed.

Other Conservative Big Dogs who know better

Glenn Beck has put down and minimized the eligibility issue all along. He has done this while talking passionately about our constitution, founding fathers, waging war against George Soros and more. Recently on the Peter Boyle show he was asked about eligibility. I was just interviewed myself on the Peter Boyle show and he rocks. Glenn is reported to have said the following: Where he was born? I don’t know?……then later He cares about the U.S. Constitution.He went on…..Our rights are being violated right now and I want to concentrate on that.OK Glenn, ignore the rights violating elephants stampeding through the room! So far we are wasting time, represent a non issue according to Karl Rove and Glenn thinks we should be focusing on our rights being violated, not the eligibility issue.

Who else has conservative wisdom to ad to this list?

Even the amazing Sarah Palin has strangely minimized this issue. She has stated on her Facebook postings: …….….at no point, not during the campaign, and not during recent interviews – have I asked the president to produce his birth certificate or suggested that he was not born in the United States.Why Sarah did you not ever suggest Obama come clean with this and show his birth certificate? You act as if that is a great thing that you didn’t ask Obama to show he was born in the US. I think it is a shame and missing the mark that you didn’t. Do you not think it odd that John McCain was asked to show his birth certificate to the media and left…he did. Obama has been asked, sued and begged to show his long form birth certificate and he has answered by spending over 2 million dollars hiding every record he has, while calling us names. According to a recent poll over 51% of Americans don’t believe he was born in the U.S. It is RATHER a big question mark.Regardless of all the suspicious behavior by Obama, fingers and signed affidavits pointing to him being born in Kenya www.obamacrimes.com, and even a former election official, Tim Adams of Hawaii signing an affidavit in 2008 saying Obama was not born in Hawaii, Rove, Beck, O’Reilly, Palin continue to ignore and betray this issue. Isn’t it most interesting that they all appear on Fox regularly and they either have their own shows or are regular guests? One thing is for sure. They refuse to honestly deal with this glaring issue of national concern and danger. Can you say, threats, intimidation, bribes and pay offs??? I think someone controlling and/or running Fox got to them and they are scared.

How is it that even with Dr. Jerry Corsi, the Governor of Hawaii, Neil Abercrombie, and former election official Tim Adams saying the birth certificate is not there, that the real story continues to be buried in most of radio and TV in America??? OBAMA LIED ABOUT WHERE HE WAS BORN. That is the real story. People don’t lie and spend money to hide info unless they have something to hide. This isn’t fringe and a waste of GOP time. This has been and is a national emergency and if I was running for President I WOULD SURE ADDRESS IT IN MY CAMPAIGN AND IN ANY MEDIA DEBATE OR EVENT. www.thepeoplespresident.me

DOCTOR DOCTORIAN FROM ANGEL OF GOD
then the angel said, Financial crisis will come to Asia. I will shake the world.

JAMES 5:1-3
1 Go to now, ye rich men, weep and howl for your miseries that shall come upon you.
2 Your riches are corrupted, and your garments are motheaten.
3 Your gold and silver is cankered; and the rust of them shall be a witness against you, and shall eat your flesh as it were fire. Ye have heaped treasure together for the last days.

REVELATION 18:10,17,19
10 Standing afar off for the fear of her torment, saying, Alas, alas that great city Babylon, that mighty city! for in one hour is thy judgment come.
17 For in one hour so great riches is come to nought. And every shipmaster, and all the company in ships, and sailors, and as many as trade by sea, stood afar off,
19 And they cast dust on their heads, and cried, weeping and wailing, saying, Alas, alas that great city, wherein were made rich all that had ships in the sea by reason of her costliness! for in one hour is she made desolate.

EZEKIEL 7:19
19 They shall cast their silver in the streets, and their gold shall be removed: their silver and their gold shall not be able to deliver them in the day of the wrath of the LORD: they shall not satisfy their souls, neither fill their bowels: because it is the stumblingblock of their iniquity.

REVELATION 13:16-18
16 And he(FALSE POPE) causeth all,(WORLD SOCIALISM) both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:(CHIP IMPLANT)
17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.(6-6-6) A NUMBER SYSTEM

WORLD MARKET RESULTS
http://money.cnn.com/data/world_markets/
CNBC VIDEOS
http://www.cnbc.com/id/15839263/?tabid=15839796&tabheader=false

HALF HOUR DOW RESULTS FRI MAR 04,2011

09:30 AM +2.43
10:00 AM -7.04
10:30 AM -63.38
11:00 AM -48.89
11:30 AM -66.60
12:00 PM -95.81
12:30 PM -164.91
01:00 PM -159.35
01:30 PM -159.69
02:00 PM -158.86
02:30 PM -152.95
03:00 PM -150.42
03:30 PM -163.22
04:00 PM -88.32 12,169.88

S&P 500 1321.15 -9.82

NASDAQ 2784.67 -14.07

GOLD 1,429.10 +12.70

OIL 104.63 +2.72

TSE 300 14,252.80 +38.00

CDNX 2439.29.01

S&P/TSX/60 819.25 +1.40

MORNING,NEWS,STATS

YEAR TO DATE PERFORMANCE
Dow -2 points at 4 minutes of trading today.
Dow -95 points at low today.
Dow +8 points at high today so far.
GOLD opens at $1,426.70.OIL opens at $103.08 today.

AFTERNOON,NEWS,STATS
Dow -178 points at low today so far.
Dow +8 points at high today so far.

WRAPUP,NEWS,STATS
Dow -178 points at low today.
Dow +8 points at high today.

GOLD ALLTIME HIGH $1,439.20 (NOT AT CLOSE)

WELL I GOTTA GIVE ALEX JONES CREDIT.THERE WAS A CALLER NAMED SCOTT ON ALEX JONES WHO SAID THE JEWS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL THE ILLS IN THE WORLD.AND THAT THE JEWS SHOULD ALL BE KILLED AGAIN.THIS SCOTT IS AN IDIOT-WORLD BELIEVER-DECIEVED NUTCASE.BUT ALEX JONES REPLIED THAT HIS WIFE IS JEWISH AND IF YOU WANT TO KILL ALL THE JEWS.YOU GOTTA GO THREW ME FIRST.I GIVE JONES CREDIT FOR STICKING UP FOR ALL THE ISRAELI-JEWS.THIS IDIOT SCOTT FULFILLS PROPHECY THAT SAYS ALL THE WORLD WILL HATE ISRAEL IN THE LAST DAYS.THATS WHY US CHRISTIANS HAVE TO PRAY FOR AND STICK UP FOR ISRAELIS TO STOP THESE HATE MONGERS OF ISRAEL-JEWS-AND GOD(KING JESUS)HATERS.

THE HATER IS ON AT 12:30PM EST-1ST HALF HOUR-AND JONES 15 MIN REPLY
http://rss.nfowars.net/20110304_Fri_Alex.mp3

FAMINE

REVELATION 6:5-6
5 And when he had opened the third seal, I heard the third beast say, Come and see. And I beheld, and lo a black horse; and he that sat on him had a pair of balances in his hand.
6 And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and see thou hurt not the oil and the wine.(A DAYS WAGES FOR A LOAF OF BREAD)

FAMINE

MATTHEW 24:7-8
7 For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places.
8 All these are the beginning of sorrows.

MARK 13:8
8 For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be earthquakes in divers places, and there shall be famines and troubles: these are the beginnings of sorrows.

LUKE 21:11
11 And great earthquakes shall be in divers places, and famines, and pestilences; and fearful sights and great signs shall there be from heaven.

Is Your Wallet Screaming Inflation? By James Sharp Thursday, March 3, 2011 CFP

I would like to start off by stressing the fact that I am NOT an economist. I am a working Joe that gets up and goes to work every day – as I have for thirty-five years – in order to pay my bills and feed my family. I do not profess to be an expert. However, I do know what my wallet is telling me – and it isn’t telling me anything good.I need not mention what we are seeing at the gas pump these days. The price of a gallon of gasoline has skyrocketed (in my home state of Florida) from just over $1.50 per gallon at the end of the Bush administration to close to $3.50 for that same gallon today.Anybody that believes that inflation is really 1.63 percent (as told to us by the federal government’s Bureau of Labor Statistics in its Consumer Price Index summary) is not living in the real world. If you shop for groceries, gasoline, insurance, or basically, ANYTHING (computers and other electronic goods notwithstanding) on a regular basis, you have seen a steady rise in prices for a number of years.There is a web site that offers an inflation calculator. This is very intriguing and allows one to determine the rate of inflation between any two dates from 1914 to the present. You can then enter that inflation rate and a dollar amount (such as the cost of goods or services) and determine what the inflated cost is. According to the information on this site, the inflation rate from January 2000 to today is 30.46 percent. This means that something that cost one dollar in 2000 costs $1.30 today.

I like to think of prices in terms of my personal price index. I do most of the grocery shopping in my family and I am keenly aware of the prices that I pay for the goods that I purchase regularly. Take, for instance, a popular national brand of orange juice that I was able to buy on sale (back in 2000) in half gallon cartons for three for $5.00. That same container of orange juice today will cost you $2.99 when you can find it on sale. But wait – the vendor recently reduced the package size from a half-gallon to 59 fluid ounces. This increase in price PLUS the decrease in package size yields a net increase in the per-ounce price from 2.61 cents to 5.07 cents, or 94 percent. And this has taken place since 2000.Granted, many factors can enter into the price of orange juice including freezes in Florida. But this is a steady long-term increase – not a seasonal trend. And how many other products can you name which have seen similar increases in price along with a decrease in package size? Ice cream and coffee are two that immediately come to mind. Or have you purchased a bag of sugar lately? A four pound bag that used to be five? If not, you are in for a shock.

My 82-year-old mother told me just the other day that the yogurt that she has been purchasing for quite some time for $2.49 just increased in price to $2.79. This sounds like a twelve percent increase to me - in one fell swoop; not over an extended period of time.We know that the Federal Reserve has been, for the past several months (and will continue doing through the third quarter of this year), increasing the money supply by a process euphemistically known as quantitative easing. The irony here is that they are not making it easier on the working people. Increasing the supply of money is the only real cause of inflation and this is precisely what the Fed is doing. The price of oil (as with the price of everything) is controlled by the laws of supply and demand. But with the Fed seemingly trying to destroy the dollar, investors are turning to commodities such as gold, silver, sugar, and OIL. Not only has oil seen a large run-up in price lately, but silver (from which, once upon a time, our coins were minted) has increased over twenty percent in the past month alone.I believe that we are seeing people eager to spend their dollars while there is still at least some value left to them, albeit not much. Hence the demand, and increasing prices, for the aforementioned commodities. It is a vicious cycle. The more the Fed devalues the dollar through forced inflation, the more investors try to unload their dollars by purchasing tangible assets with real value.

We have all heard stories about Germany in the 1920’s and the inflation that that country experienced. Stories abound of people using wheelbarrows full of money to purchase loaves of bread. Such stories may seem absurd to a majority of Americans today. But think about it in the context of such inflation taking place over a period of many years. This is precisely what we have seen in this country. The dollar has lost over 95 percent of its value since 1900. This means that, what once sold for less than five cents now costs a dollar – two 50-cent rolls of pennies – or more. A forty cent loaf of bread of a few decades ago now costs upwards of three dollars. Hence it is not difficult to spend a wheelbarrow full of pennies on a single trip to the grocery store.In my opinion, if it looks like a duck, waddles like a duck, and quacks like a duck – it’s a duck. Well, if it looks like inflation and feels like inflation, it IS inflation, regardless of what the government tries to tell us.Fed chairman Ben Bernanke is whispering,Don’t worry.But my wallet is screaming, Inflation!

Has America’s Playing Nuclear Patty-Cake With Egypt Been A Bad Idea?
by Sean Osborne NEIN

27 February 2011: It was just too hard to resist making the title of this report a parody of the Geico rhetorical question advertising campaign featuring actor Mike McGlone. So tell me, has America’s playing nuclear patty-cake with Egypt been a bad idea? After reading this article you will know why it was a very bad idea.Now that the restraining influence of President Hosni Mubarak is gone, it would appear to be a very bad idea. And the strong support former President Mubarak’s government had previously received from most of the key nations involved in the Middle East for the past 30 years, primarily Israel and the United States, will now come into clearer into focus and scrutiny. You see, Hosni Mubarak was the key figure in keeping a previously clandestine Egyptian nuclear weapons program under tight controls; a nuclear weapons program manifest in the Argentina-built 22-megawatt reactor located in Egypt’s Nile Delta town of Inshas.It would seem that friendly regimes, long-standing allies, can have a clandestine nuclear weapons program because they’ve shown themselves capable of not behaving badly as in the case of the world’s largest supporter on international Islamic terrorism, the Islamic Republic of Iran.

In just a couple of days new information is going to be in published in the media which details certain facts about the Egyptian nuclear weapons program which is now, thanks to the amatuerish and extremely ill-advised pressure from Obama and his friends in throwing Hosni Mubarak under the bus, clearly within the grasp of the Islamo-Nazi fundamentalists of Egypt’s al-Ikhwan al-Muslimun (Muslim Brotherhood).
The United States Intelligence Community (USIC) has just assessed, based upon direct knowledge of the Egyptian nuclear progam since the mid-1980s, that a nuclear weapons capability is well within the grasp of either the Egyptain armed forces or the Ikhwan in their ongoing power struggle in Egypt. The Ikhwan clearly have the upper-hand and the organizational edge in the struggle, and may well represent the coming power of a cruel master, and a fierce king will rule over them declared by the Lord Almighty in Isaiah 19:4. Of course, the Ikhwan covertly exist within the Egyptian armed forces, so the ultimate Egyptian power-broker could well be a combination of the two.The USIC has revealed that Egypt has quietly acquired nuclear weapons technology and material from China, North Korea and Pakistan, in addition to biological and chemical weapons capabilities, and Hosni Mubarak was the key factor in ensuring that an Egyptian nuclear breakout would not occur. Otherwise the United States would have been all over Egypt as we have been for over a decade regarding the Iranian nuclear weapons program. The key controlling factor of Hosni Mubarak no longer exists. However, even during his tenure between 1990 and 2003 Egypt is known to have conducted 16 secret nuclear experiments under the command of Brigadier General Ahmed Nashet. In this same period Egypt acquired a Russian-made cyclotron for advanced uranium enrichment, and the Argentines designed the Inshas nuclear reactor to produce weapons-grade plutonium.The bottom-line USIC assessments is that Egypt now has the resources to complete the production of nuclear warheads and a missile-borne delivery system of at least 1,000 kilometers (621 miles). How convenient! The distance between Cairo and Tel Aviv is less than half of that, and Cairo to Dimona is a mere stones throw. Worse, there’s a common border between Egyptian Sinai and the Israeli Negev were smuggling is rampant.

ISRAELS INHERITED LAND IN THE FUTURE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ytWmPqY8TE0&feature=player_embedded

DEUTERONOMY 7:7-8
7 The LORD did not set his love upon you, nor choose you, because ye were more in number than any people;(ISRAEL) for ye were the fewest of all people:
8 But because the LORD loved you,(ISRAEL) and because he would keep the oath which he had sworn unto your fathers, hath the LORD brought you out with a mighty hand, and redeemed you out of the house of bondmen, from the hand of Pharaoh king of Egypt.

ZECHARIAH 2:8
8 For thus saith the LORD of hosts; After the glory hath he sent me unto the nations which spoiled you: for he that toucheth you toucheth the apple of his eye.

JEREMIAH 3:14
14 Turn, O backsliding children, saith the LORD; for I am married unto you:(ISRAEL) and I will take you one of a city, and two of a family, and I will bring you to Zion:

ISAIAH 42:1
1 Behold my servant, whom I uphold; mine elect,(ISRAEL) in whom my soul delighteth; I have put my spirit upon him: he shall bring forth judgment to the Gentiles.

ISAIAH 45:4
4 For Jacob my servant’s sake, and Israel mine elect, I have even called thee by thy name: I have surnamed thee, though thou hast not known me.

ISAIAH 65:9,22
9 And I will bring forth a seed out of Jacob, and out of Judah an inheritor of my mountains: and mine elect (ISRAEL) shall inherit it, and my servants shall dwell there.
22 They shall not build, and another inhabit; they shall not plant, and another eat: for as the days of a tree are the days of my people, and mine elect (ISRAEL) shall long enjoy the work of their hands.

ISAIAH 56:5
5 Even unto them (ISRAELIS) will I give in mine house and within my walls a place and a name better than of sons and of daughters: I will give them an everlasting name,(ISRAEL) that shall not be cut off.

And here are the bounderies of the land that Israel will inherit either through war or peace or God in the future. God says its Israels land and only Israels land. They will have every inch God promised them of this land in the future.
Egypt east of the Nile River, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, The southern part of Turkey and the Western Half of Iraq west of the Euphrates. Gen 13:14-15, Psm 105:9,11, Gen 15:18, Exe 23:31, Num 34:1-12, Josh 1:4.ALL THIS LAND ISRAEL WILL DEFINATELY OWN IN THE FUTURE, ITS ISRAELS NOT ISHMAELS LAND.

12 TRIBES INHERIT LAND IN THE FUTURE

The Peace of Israel By Alan Caruba Friday, March 4, 2011 CFP

There is one nation in the Middle East that is not roiling in anarchy, rioting, and internal warfare. It does so without oppressing its citizens. It encourages and protects the practice of all religions. That nation is Israel.The other Middle Eastern and North African nations, all predominantly Islamic, have discovered that Islam, despite its grip on the minds and souls of Muslims, does not preclude the universal human desire for freedom, for hope of a better life.It seems that no one lacks for a reason to hate Jews, but if one steps back from the shouting and the insane claims that Jews and Zionism are responsible for everything and control everything, Israel seems to have made multiculturalism actually work.Israel, whose official languages are Hebrew and Arabic, is home to more than seven million people, 76% if whom are Jewish and 24% are mostly Muslim, but include Christians, Bahai, and probably every other faith known to God and man.

The latest news, according to a report in the March 4th Wall Street Journal, is that Israel is weighing a new plan for a provisional Palestinian state, an offer of temporary borders within which the Palestinians could establish a nation of their own.The problem, of course, is that the Palestinians have rejected this obvious solution for more than sixty years and are, themselves, divided between the Palestinian Authority and the radical Hamas that only wants to utterly destroy Israel and its Jewish citizens.The French have France, the Greeks have Greece, the Turks have Turkey and all manner of self-identifying groups have their own nations, but for many worldwide the Jews are not supposed to have their own nation or to live in the land in which their ancestors have lived for 3,500 years ago.When Muhammad began to piece together Islam, naming himself as a new prophet, he instructed the first Muslims to face Jerusalem when they prayed. After Arabian tribes of Jews refused to convert, he slaughtered their men, sold their women and children into slavery, and ordered Muslims to face Mecca instead.The Jews, however, have some good news to celebrate because on March 3rd there was a report of Pope Benedict XVI’s new book, Jesus of Nazareth—Part II” in which he asserts a sweeping exoneration of the Jewish people for the death of Jesus Christ. Given Jesus’ paternity, faith, and apostles, all Jewish, that is surely welcome news.In 1965, the Second Vatican Council document, Nostra Aetate, initially affirmed that Jesus’ death could not be blamed on the Jews as a whole at that time or today. Pope Benedict’s reaffirmation of that Catholic truth should be bigger news.

In a world in which more than a billion Muslims are eager to establish a universal caliphate, mostly by the use of terror on the Earth’s other five billion inhabitants, the Pope’s book is a candle of sanity in the darkness.Pope Benedict, forced to join the Hitler Youth, witness to the Holocaust, has made improving the Church’s relations with Jews a priority of his pontificate. He has visited the Auschwitz Nazi death camp in Poland and Israel’s Yad Vashem Holocaust memorial where he prayed for the souls of those killed for the crime of being Jewish.In contrast, Islam makes death the punishment for the crime of converting to any other faith. That is surely a measure of how thoroughly evil it is. In Pakistan a Christian government minister was murdered this week. In Germany, a Muslim convert killed U.S. service members, and every day mullahs tell Muslims that suicide/homicide killing is a holy act. In America, the current regime refuses to use words like terrorism or jihad.It takes clarity and courage for non-Muslims to identify the threat to their faith and their lives. Benedict’s predecessor, Pope John Paul, was instrumental in shining a light on a comparable threat, Communism, aiding in the downfall of the Berlin Wall and the Soviet Union. An earlier Pope, Pius XII, used his powers to resist the rise and reign of Nazism.It is a good thing to be a Catholic. It is a good thing to be a Christian. It is a good thing to be a Hindu or a Buddhist. It is a good thing to be a Jew.The same cannot be said of those who embrace terror, murder, and death as their path to paradise. Alan Caruba, 2011

Computer Expert: US Was Behind Stuxnet Virus
Paul Joseph Watson Infowars.com March 4, 2011
http://www.infowars.com/computer-expert-us-was-behind-stuxnet-virus/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYB-yxxsbig&feature=player_embedded (VIDEO)

A computer expert at the influential TED Conference in California has confirmed what the New York Times already admitted in January – that the same governments calling for draconian cybersecurity powers in order to protect against cyber warfare were themselves the culprits behind an act of cyber warfare that could have triggered a new Chernobyl disaster in launching the Stuxnet worm attack against Iran.Ralph Langner, dubbed by his peers as one of the best technical minds working in the field of industrial control system security, said that the Stuxnet virus, which was used to attack Iranian computer systems that controlled water supplies, oil rigs, power plants and other critical infrastructure at the Bushehr nuclear reactor plant, was created by the United States with assistance from Israel.My opinion is that the Mossad is involved, Langner said while discussing his in-depth Stuxnet analysis at a prestigious TED conference in the Southern California city of Long Beach, reports AFP.But, the leading source is not Israel… There is only one leading source, and that is the United States, explained Langner.Langner’s conclusion only confirms what the New York Times already admitted in January, that the worm was created by the US and Israel as a weapon with which to sabotage Iran’s nuclear program.The fact that the effectiveness of the Stuxnet worm was tested at Israel’s Dimona nuclear facility strongly indicates that the virus was designed as an American-Israeli project to sabotage the Iranian program, the Times reported on January 15.

At the height of the Stuxnet attack last year, many cybersecurity advocates were citing the virus as a justification for giving President Obama a kill switch to shut down the Internet, despite the fact that the worm could only have infected computer systems by being inserted physically via a USB flash drive.The fact that the virus was created by the United States and Israel renders obsolete the entire cybersecurity agenda. Here we have the very culprits behind acts of cyber warfare telling us that we need to give them more power to counter the threat of cyber warfare.But this goes further than the Iranian nuclear program or cybersecurity. After it became apparent that the US and Israel were behind he virus, Russian officials called on NATO to launch a full investigation into Stuxnet, warning that the attack had caused centrifuges at the Bushehr to spin out of control, which could have triggered a new Chernobyl disaster.Langner said the Stuxnet code was designed to trick human operators by showing them recorded readings indicating machinery is running normally while behind the scenes they are heading for destruction.It’s definitely hard-core sabotage, Langner said of Stuxnet. It’s like in the movies where during a heist the security camera is running pre-recorded video showing nothing is wrong.Back in September 2010, we wrote several articles in which we identified Israel and the United States….as the prime suspects behind the Stuxnet worm attack, following the revelation that the virus was created by experts working for a country or a well-funded private group.At the time, debunkers labeled the claim that the US and Israel had launched the worm attack as a ridiculous conspiracy theory.

- In an article entitled Debunking the Bunk of Stuxnet, the popular About.com website claimed that none of the evidence had any direct connection to Israel being behind the attack.
- The Economist reported that there was no specific evidence Stuxnet was an Israeli cyber-missile aimed at Iran.
- In an October 5 piece entitled Stuxnet: Fact vs. theory, CNet’s Elinor Mills wrote that there was no hard evidence behind the claim that, The malware was distributed by Israel or the United States in an attempt to interfere with Iran’s nuclear program.
- A Reddit piece submitted by conspiracy debunker entitled, I would just to take this opportunity to debunk the conspiracy theory that Stuxnet was made by Israeli hackers,blamed low educated Iranians from poor backgrounds for the theory that Israel was behind the attack.
- The Judeosphere blog labeled the charge convoluted mental gymnastics.
- A Jewish Chronicle article written by Miriam Shaviv labeled the claim a ridiculous conspiracy theory.

That ridiculous conspiracy theory was a very real fact, and one that could have caused an environmental catastrophe that would have plagued the planet for decades to come.If we allow cybersecurity legislation to pass, we will be empowering the very cyber terrorists, the US military-industrial complex, who launched the most devastating and potentially dangerous cyber attack to date, handing them carte blanche to exploit more acts of cyber warfare to exalt themselves as the saviors when they are the very culprits behind the attacks.Ridiculous conspiracy theory: The Alex Jones Show from September 27, 2010, in which Israel and the United States were identified as being behind the Stuxnet attack.

Unions could block all routes into Brussels to shut down EU summit
LEIGH PHILLIPS Today MAR 4,11 @ 17:50 CET

EUOBSERVER / BRUSSELS - As anger mounts on the left and amongst unions at European economic governance plans, Belgian workers have announced they will attempt to blockade all access to Brussels and paralyse the European capital in an attempt to shut down the European summit of 24 March. France's powerful CGT union is considering joining them.The General Workers Federation of Belgium (FGTB) has said it intends to mount barricades on the motorways coming into the city, close the train stations, bring the metro and trams to a halt and even shut down Brussels airport.We need to strike a blow,, said Nico Cue, secretary general of the metalworkers' section of the union, reported La Libre Belgique on Thursday. The Sarkozy-Merkel duo is trying to impose a competitiveness pact that could undermine automatic indexing of salaries and threaten the retirement age of 65. This subject will be found on the menu at the EU summit on 24 and 25 March to be held in Brussels, he continued.He said he did not want the union action to be a normal Brussels march through the city ending with everyone heading home with little achieved: While this could be a routine demonstration, starting from the Gare du Nord [the city's north train station] to Gare du Midi [its south train station], we believe that it takes some other action, more determined.Other unions are currently considering the proposal, including the country's Christian trade union, the CSC, which has also approached the European Trade Union Congress to organise a large-scale action the same day.France's powerful CGT union is also looking into backing the idea. The ETUC will take a decision on the matter on Tuesday.

Several sectors have already said yes, Mr Cue added.We'll see. It is democracy that will decide.A source close to discussions told EUobserver: The idea is that leaders can't get in or out of the city. If the airport is shut down, if there's no fuel for the planes, if no air traffic controllers are working, if the Eurostar is down, they can't meet. We can stop them before they can come.He explained why the unions were ready to take such radical action: Even if we have a march of 100,000 people from all across Europe, they won't listen. It won't change much. They couldn't care less. We need to do something that will make them pay attention. We really need to get serious this time.Discussions at the EU level of a European economic governance and competitiveness pact initially proposed by Merkel and Sarkozy and now being moved forward by EU Council President Herman Van Rompuy and European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso and focus heavily on wage restraint, raising retirement ages and restricting public spending.According to the leak of a recent draft currently on the table, the pact would also monitor public and private sector wages across the bloc, force a decentralisation of collective bargaining, and end the closed shop (where to be hired, one must be a member of a union) and reform systems of the indexation of wages to inflation where such schemes exist.On Wednesday, the European Public Service Union, representing public-sector workers, called on the EU to hold referendums on economic governance plans.

MEPs vote themselves extra €1,500 allowance a month
ANDREW WILLIS Today MAR 4,11 @ 09:26 CET

EUOBSERVER / BRUSSELS - MEPs have elected to boost their monthly allowance for staff and office expenses by €1,500, mirroring a similar move last year despite a widespread austerity drive in EU member states.The decision by members of the European Parliament's budgetary committee on Thursday (3 March) will see the legislature's overall budget increase by almost €13.25 million in 2011.MEPs from parliament's Socialist and centre-right European Peoples Party groups supported the proposed raise, while other groups said the decision was unjustified.German Green MEP Helga Trupel said the move showed EU lawmakers were clearly out of touch with fiscal realities ...[and] sent completely the wrong signal to EU citizens. Portuguese far-left MEP Miguel Portas called the decision misconceived.Meanwhile, supporters say the extra allowance would enable the hiring of additional staff to tackle the growing workload under the EU's new Lisbon Treaty, in place since 1 December 2009.I cannot do the political or control work I have to do if I don't have more staff, said German centre-right MEP Ingeborg Grassle. Euro deputies are paid €7,956.87 per month before tax, and an additional €300 for the days they officially sign in to work in Brussels or Strasbourg.They also receive a monthly allowance of €19,709 for staff and other office expenses, with Thursday's decision set to increase this figure.The move is unlikely to be welcomed in several corners of Europe as EU governments embark on a wave of spending cuts and tax increases.

Leaders from Britain, France and Germany late last year called for limits to be placed on future EU spending, while a commission and parliament request for a six percent increase to the EU's 2011 budget was eventually cut in half by member states.In a sign that some in the EU institutions were beginning to take note, an internal memo written by commission secretary-general Catherine Day last month called on the EU body to change its culture of entitlement and bureaucratic focus and to embark on a new efficiency drive.

MEPs take note of attacks on EU press freedom
ANDREW WILLIS 03.03.2011 @ 17:43 CET

EUOBSERVER / BRUSSELS – European governments are using wiretaps, the threat of large fines and the prospect of psychiatric testing to intimidate journalists and muzzle the region's free press, according to stakeholders and experts in the field. A shortage of funds and an over-concentration of media ownership are also key problems facing the sector, participants at a conference organised by the European Parliament's Socialist group said on Thursday (3 March).Traditionally seen as a 'fourth estate' charged with monitoring the holders of power, Europe's media freedom has recently come under greater scrutiny after Hungary's centre-right government introduced a widely–criticised media law on 1 January 2011.But other EU countries including Romania, Italy, Bulgaria and France have also witnessed rising tensions.Romanian broadcast laws have been subject to six amendments over the past year, with up to 40 percent of broadcast time now reserved for the national news agency, said Ioana Avadani, executive director of the Centre of Independent Journalism, a Bucharest-based NGO.The country's parliament is currently debating the idea of imposing annual psychiatric controls on journalists, while the government recently changed a public procurement law related to media contracts.

Basically the government can give public money to whoever it wants, Ms Avadani said, reserving her strongest criticism for the government's plan for a national defence strategy under which media groups would be listed as a vulnerability to the state.
In France, the recent scandal linking L'Oreal billionaire-heiress Liliane Bettencourt with Eric Woerth, the former treasurer of President Nicolas Sarkozy's UMP party, has added to tensions.The centre-left Le Monde newspaper subsequently accused the French presidency of ordering counter-intelligence agents to identify the source who leaked information to the newspaper.Added to this, the fall in readership and recent wave of newspaper/television takeovers has threatened the independence of some of the country's most established news outlets, said Jean-Marie Charon, a sociologist with CNRS, a French government-funded research body.Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi's fusion of political and media power has been a bone of contention for many years.But the embattled premier could opt to further increase the size of his media empire from 1 April when a law restricting media concentration is set to expire, warned Roberto Natale, President of the Federazione Nazionale Stampa Italiana.As prime minister, only he can decide on whether to extend the law or not, said Mr Natale.In Bulgaria, the centre-right government is also planning to introduce new media laws.

These, together with widespread wiretapping of journalists and a failure to properly investigate a recent bomb explosion at the Sofia-based headquarters of the Galeria magazine were reminiscent of the country's past totalitarian regime said Borislav Tsekov, director of the Institute of Modern Politics in Bulgaria.The European Commission's role in supporting Europe's free press has also come under greater scrutiny following Hungary's controversial new media law, but critics say a series of amendments demanded by the commission are essentially cosmetic in nature, with the homogeneous nature of Hungary's powerful new media authority left intact.As a result, other EU states and aspiring members may also be tempted to engage in media restrictions said Gabor Horvath, deputy editor-in-chief of Hungary's Nepszabadsag newspaper.Different EU initiatives have also faced criticism, with a European Parliament plan to allocate €1.5 million to investigative journalism research grants in 2010 and 2011 eventually withdrawn due to fears over editorial independence. While several speakers at Thursday's event called for the introduction of new EU legislation to secure Europe's media freedom and potentially provide financial support, the general secretary of the International Federation of Journalists said policymakers should concentrate on implementing legal provisions already in place, including the EU's Charter of Fundamental Rights.Creating new legislation is such a long-winded debate. We've been discussing it for 15 years ... we need to focus on practical structures,said Aidan White.

Thousands march in India against EU trade deal
ANDREW WILLIS 03.03.2011 @ 09:25 CET

EUOBSERVER / BRUSSELS - Thousands of HIV-positive protesters took to the streets in downtown New Delhi on Wednesday (2 March), concerned that an imminent EU-India free trade agreement (FTA) will end the production of affordable life-prolonging drugs.
The rally of more than 2,000 demonstrators from India and other Asian countries coincided with the re-start of sensitive trade negotiations in Brussels, with officials suggesting an end to the 2007-initiated talks is in sight.But opponents of the deal say an EU request for a data exclusivity clause will drive the price of generic drugs made in India above an affordable level for people in poorer countries.More than 80 percent of the AIDS drugs our medical practitioners use to treat 175,000 people in developing countries are affordable generics from India, said Paul Cawthorne, a spokesman for Paris-based humanitarian group Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF).Beyond AIDS, we rely on producers in India for drugs to treat other illnesses, such as tuberculosis and malaria. We cannot afford to let our patients lifeline be cut, Mr Cawthorne added, reports AFP.Medicines have proved a sticking point in the ongoing discussions, with the EU keen to secure India's commitment to a strong intellectual property rights regime with respect to drugs.European drug manufacturers complain that many of their patented products are frequently undercut by generics produced in India. EU customs officials have seized a number of containments bound for the 27-member state market over the past few years.

Until recently, Indian regulations allowed pharmaceutical companies to patent only drug-making processes and not the final products. Pressure from the World Trade Organisation has resulted in a tightening of those rules, but not as much as the EU would like.Critics of the FTA say Europe's demand for data exclusivity would mean that clinical trial data filed by one company could not be relied upon by other companies. As a result, the need for each firm to produce its own clinical trial tests would dramatically increase the price of medicines, they complain.The United Nations is among those who also fear data exclusivity provisions could act like a patent and block more affordable generic medicines from the market.It would be a colossal mistake to introduce data exclusivity in India, when millions of people across the globe depend on the country as the pharmacy of the developing world, said Anand Grover, the UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Health.The EU is India's largest trading partner. Bilateral trade in goods and services between the two sides in 2009 was worth just under €69 billion, according to European Commission figures.

Another sensitive issue in the talks relates to the automobile sector, one of the subjects being discussed by commission and Indian negotiators this week. Here Europe is pushing for a reduction in Indian import tariffs on European cars, currently around 110 percent. Indian car manufacturers are against the move.We are aware of the position of the Indian car industry with respect to the negotiations, EU trade spokesman John Clancy told the Business Standard newspaper this week. But it is clear that in order for the EU to support this agreement, access to India's car market must be improved significantly.A compromise deal could revolve around the abolition of tariffs on high-end, luxury cars, while small models retain a degree of protection.

NORTH AMERICAN UNION-1 OF THE 10 WORLD TRADE BLOCS

DANIEL 7:23-24
23 Thus he said, The fourth beast(THE EU,REVIVED ROME) shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth,(7TH WORLD EMPIRE) which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces.(TRADE BLOCKS)
24 And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise:(10 NATIONS) and another shall rise after them;(#11 SPAIN) and he shall be diverse from the first, and he shall subdue three kings.(BE HEAD OF 3 KINGS OR NATIONS).

END GAME GLOBAL ENSLAVEMENT MOVIE EXPLAINS THE NORTH AMERICAN UNION
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1070329053600562261#
JEROME CORSI ON THE AMERO
http://ianschwartz.com/2007/10/11/video-corsi-talks-about-the-amero/
http://israndjer.blogspot.com/2007/05/european-unification-equals-war.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.com/2006/08/open-letter-to-world-rabbi.html
A EUROPE OF TRADE BLOCS
http://israndjer.blogspot.com/2008/04/is-lake-of-fire-black-holes.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.com/2008/07/eu-video-lisbon-treaty.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.com/2006/04/one-eu-one-world-power.html
NORTH AMERICAN UNION STORIES
http://israndjer.blogspot.com/2008/04/spp-summit-in-new-orleans.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.com/2007/08/north-american-union-meeting-text.html
http://www.nascocorridor.com/
http://israndjer.blogspot.com/2006/06/north-american-union-country.html
http://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/nafta-alena/index.aspx
WW3 WHAT WILL BE HAPPENING ON EARTH WITH NUKES FLYIN
http://israndjer.blogspot.com/2005/11/questions-ww3-whats-coming.html

THE CLUB OF ROME FOUNDER AURELIO PECCEI WANTS THE WORLD IN 10 REGIONAL TRADING BLOCKS

HERES WHAT THE WORLD WOULD LOOK LIKE (SINCE THERE WILL BE WORLD GOVERNMENT IN THE FUTURE)

01 CANADA, U.S.A, MEXICO
02 EUROPEAN UNION,WESTERN EUROPE
03 JAPAN
04 AUSTRALIA,NEW ZEALAND, S AFRICA, ISRAEL AND PACIFIC ISLANDS
05 EASTERN EUROPE
06 SOUTHERN, CENTRAL AND LATIN AMERICAS
07 NORTH AFRICA, AND MIDEAST (MOSLEMS)
08 CENTRAL AFRICA
09 SOUTH AND SOUTHEAST ASIA
10 CENTRAL ASIA

THE CLUB OF ROME WANTS A WORLD CHARISMATIC DICTATOR (EITHER RELIGIOUS, POLITICAL OR SCIENTIFICAL) TO HEAD THIS WORLD GOVERNMENT. REV 13:3,7-8, DAN 7:23-24

WORLD POWERS IN THE END TIME

NORTH - RUSSIA EZEK 38:1-2, 39:1-2
SOUTH - EGYPT DAN 11:42
EAST - CHINA DAN 11:44,REV 16:12
WEST - EUROPEAN UNION DAN 7:23-24 (NOT THE U.S.A)

The Tonka Report Real News In A Changing World-US And Canada Agree To Swap Troops February 24, 2011: Ottawa Citizen / Canada.com

This is treason by our governments! - SJH

Canada and the U.S. have signed an agreement that paves the way for the militaries from either nation to send troops across each other’s borders during an emergency, but some are questioning why the Harper government has kept silent on the deal.
Neither the Canadian government nor the Canadian Forces announced the new agreement, which was signed Feb. 14 in Texas.The U.S. military’s Northern Command, however, publicized the agreement with a statement outlining how its top officer, Gen. Gene Renuart, and Canadian Lt.-Gen. Marc Dumais, head of Canada Command, signed the plan, which allows the military from one nation to support the armed forces of the other nation during a civil emergency.The new agreement has been greeted with suspicion by the left wing in Canada and the right wing in the U.S. The left-leaning Council of Canadians, which is campaigning against what it calls the increasing integration of the U.S. and Canadian militaries, is raising concerns about the deal.It’s kind of a trend when it comes to issues of Canada-U.S. relations and contentious issues like military integration. We see that this government is reluctant to disclose information to Canadians that is readily available on American and Mexican websites, said Stuart Trew, a researcher with the Council of Canadians.Trew said there is potential for the agreement to militarize civilian responses to emergency incidents. He noted that work is also underway for the two nations to put in place a joint plan to protect common infrastructure such as roadways and oil pipelines. Are we going to see (U.S.) troops on our soil for minor potential threats to a pipeline or a road? he asked.Trew also noted the U.S. military does not allow its soldiers to operate under foreign command so there are questions about who controls American forces if they are requested for service in Canada. We don’t know the answers because the government doesn’t want to even announce the plan, he said.

But Canada Command spokesman Commander David Scanlon said it will be up to civilian authorities in both countries on whether military assistance is requested or even used.He said the agreement is benign and simply sets the stage for military-to-military co-operation if the governments approve. But there’s no agreement to allow troops to come in, he said. It facilitates planning and co-ordination between the two militaries. The allow piece is entirely up to the two governments.If U.S. forces were to come into Canada they would be under tactical control of the Canadian Forces but still under the command of the U.S. military, Scanlon added.News of the deal, and the allegation it was kept secret in Canada, is already making the rounds on left-wing blogs and Internet sites as an example of the dangers of the growing integration between the two militaries.On right-wing blogs in the U.S. it is being used as evidence of a plan for a North American union where foreign troops, not bound by U.S. laws, could be used by the American federal government to override local authorities. Co-operative militaries on Home Soil! notes one website. The next time your town has a national emergency, don’t be surprised if Canadian soldiers respond. And remember — Canadian military aren’t bound by posse comitatus.Posse comitatus is a U.S. law that prohibits the use of federal troops from conducting law enforcement duties on domestic soil unless approved by Congress.Scanlon said there was no intent to keep the agreement secret on the Canadian side of the border. He noted it will be reported on in the Canadian Forces newspaper next week and that publication will be put on the Internet. Scanlon said the actual agreement hasn’t been released to the public as that requires approval from both nations. That decision has not yet been taken, he added.Canadian And U.S. Marines Conduct Room Clearing Training.The Tonka Report Editor’s Note: This is being done because foreign troops will have no problem firing on civilians from another country. This has been done throughout history… - SJH

Link to original article below…
http://www.canada.com/topics/news/story.html?id=403d90d6-7a61-41ac-8cef-902a1d14879d&k=14984

THE BEGGING OF THE NORTH AMERICAN UNION STARTED WITH NAFTA THEN REALLY HEATED UP AND INTO A CANADA,MEXICO,USA NORTH AMERICAAN UNION TRADE BLOC IN 2005.

Baylor Hosts President Bush, Mexican President Fox And Canadian Prime Minister Martin For Historic Meeting March 23, 2005 by Lori Scott Fogleman

Video of the March 23 news conference in Baylor's Barfield Drawing Room with President Bush, President Fox and Prime Minister Martin is available via streaming video at BaylorTV.com. Baylor University welcomed President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin on March 23 for meetings the leaders said provide a framework for the next generation of trilateral relations between the North American countries. The meeting was followed by a working lunch at President Bush's ranch in Crawford, less than 25 minutes away from the Baylor campus.The leaders of the United States, Mexico and Canada arrived by motorcade at Baylor's Armstrong Browning Library, the location for the meetings on the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America.

Renowned Library Provides Meeting Site

Baylor President Robert B. Sloan Jr. greeted President Bush and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice at Armstrong Browning, the library world-renowned for its collection of book and mansucript holdings related to Victorian poets, Robert and Elizabeth Barrett Browning. The stately library was chosen by White House staff as the site of the meetings because of its impressive features, such as its bronze doors, stained glass windows, paneled walls, polished floors and antique furniture that reflect the lives and works of the two poets.Sloan said he spent about 20 minutes discussing various issues with the President and Secretary Rice, during which President Bush expressed great appreciation for Baylor University.By Mr. Bush's request, Sloan also welcomed the arrival of both President Fox and Prime Minister Martin. Other members of President Bush's cabinet that attended the meetings included Chief of Staff Andrew H. Card Jr., Secretary of Commerce Carlos M. Gutierrez, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff, National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley, and Assistant to the President and Deputy Chief of Staff Joseph Hagin. It is an honor for Baylor University to host the leaders of the United States, Canada and Mexico, Sloan said. Here at Baylor, we want to teach our students to serve. Baylor today had the opportunity to serve on behalf of our country and the world, and it is a tremendous privilege for Baylor to host this trilateral meeting.Mr. Bush remembered very favorably, Sloan said, the President's Economic Forum, which was hosted by Baylor in August 2002, as well as the visit of Russian President Vladimir Putin, who was a guest at the President's ranch in Crawford in November 2001. For both events, Baylor hosted an array of special guests, including cabinet members, White House and State Department staff, Fortune 500 company CEOs and hundreds of journalists from all over the world, who filed their stories from a media center set up in the McLane Student Life Center.

Table A Work of Art

President Bush, President Fox and Prime Minister Martin held their high-level talks in Armstrong Browning's John Leddy-Jones Research Hall, an exquisite reading room for Browning scholars and students. However, the presidential meeting added an additional work of art to the room - a custom-built, 18-foot round table, with 18 chairs for the leaders, their cabinet members and ministers, and other staff. We searched all over the United States for a table, but when we couldn't find one to the president's specifications, we contacted a Waco company, C.M. Trautschold Millwork Co., who also did the cabinet work in Baylor Law School and the woodwork in the Baylor Sciences Building,said Rick Creel, associate vice president for operations and facilities at Baylor. Creel said Trautschold built the 19-piece, solid wood, stained table in 48 hours, with its center embossed with the meeting's logo design. Baylor carpenters also fashioned a plaque for the table that read, "For the exclusive use of the trilateral meeting.After the meeting, the table will be taken apart, crated and stored.But hopefully it will be on display someday here at Baylor,Creel said.

News Conference

The leaders also held a meeting on the other side of Armstrong Browning, in the library's Treasure Room, a dignified, dark-paneled room that displays some of the library's extraordinary collections of Browning items. At the conclusion of the meetings, President Bush, President Fox and Prime Minister Martin departed the library by motorcade and drove through the Baylor campus to the Bill Daniel Student Center for a news conference in Barfield Drawing Room.The elegant room was transformed into a working media center, with platforms and seating areas arranged to accommodate more than 120 television and print journalists and photographers, as well as several dignitaries from each country. White House staff members also spent the week searching for the right look for the staging and news conference background. In the end, designers covered the room's stylish archways with a mosaic of each country's flags that created a stained glass effect behind each leader. Baylor's been fantastic, said Scott Sforza, deputy assistant to the president/deputy director of communications. I have never worked with better people in my life.Once the news conference began, President Bush, President Fox and Prime Minister Martin appeared under a canopy of Mexican, American and Canadian flags, with Mr. Bush beginning with news conference with some gracious words for Baylor. (Click here for a transcript of today's news conference.).It's my honor to welcome two friends to Baylor University, the President said.First, I want to thank the Baylor University family for providing these facilities for us. Your hospitality is awesome.I want to also extend...my gratitude for this wonderful reception, for this wonderful facility here at Baylor University, and of course, my gratitude to the authorities here in Waco, the venue of this important event,said President Fox. It's a real pleasure to be here in Texas and to stand with President Bush and President Fox as representatives of a strong North America, Prime Minister Martin said.We represent three sovereign nations that have formed one of the most successful partnerships in the world.

The leaders then announced the establishment of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America and took questions from the media on the new accord, as well as the Terri Schiavo case in Florida and Secretary of State Rice's recent visit to Asia. President Bush, President Fox and Prime Minister Martin then exited the student center and traveled to Mr. Bush's Crawford ranch for a working lunch.

Baylor Student Body President Jeff Leach attended the news conference, although the high level of security surrounding the talks did not allow for much participation for Baylor faculty and students.To have our campus as the site for this meeting is both a blessing and a privilege, Leach said. Our students realize that colleges all over the country don't often have an opportunity to see the presidential motorcade, much less to hold a news conference with three world leaders in our Student Union Building.Just by holding this trilateral meeting on the Baylor campus has provided great energy for any discussions on current political affairs, said President Sloan. It has provided a tremendous academic experience simply by having President Bush, President Fox and Prime Minister Martin at Baylor.Sloan's comments were echoed by Dr. Joseph McKinney, professor of economics and The Ben H. Williams Professor of International Economics, and Dr. Victor Hinojosa, assistant professor of political science. Both faculty members attended the news conference as resources for reporters on the North American Free Trade Agreement and U.S./Mexico relations. Having three heads of state on campus provides a lot to talk about in class,said Hinojosa, who teaches Government and Politics of Mexico (PSC 4304), a survey of Mexican politics in the 20th century. Hinojosa's fluency in Spanish also provided the Baylor alum with several interview opportunities with members of the Mexican media, as well as American journalists.

Baylor Staff Steps Up

An event of this magnitude doesn't just happen overnight. Baylor staff members began meeting with the White House, the Secret Service and delegations from Mexico and Canada only a week ago to prepare for the trilateral meeting.More than 25 members of Baylor's facilities services staff, under manager Don Bagby, were responsible for taking care of a variety of needs, from providing electrical power and building staging to erecting security tents and moving furniture.We installed three generators and ran one-and-a-half miles of power cable, Bagby said. We built the staging for the media and the stage for leaders, and we even provided services like interior design, with Lois Ferguson getting holding rooms ready for the leaders and their delegations.Bob Hartland's staff in Internet networks and services installed 110 phone lines, 80 hard network lines and some wireless access for White House staff, each country's delegation and accompanying media in three separate venues - Armstrong Browning Library, Bill Daniel Student Center and Roxy Grove Hall.That was a real challenge, but I have some terrific people, such as Stacey Benningfield, (director of telecommunications operations) and his staff, Scott Day (manager of network services) and his group, and Bill Lechner (coordinator of network special projects) and his staff.The first floor of the student center was quickly turned into a media hub, with the CUB area a filing center for Mexico's press, the BEAR Food Court a temporary editing suite and studio for CNN, and the DEN student lounge a filing center for Canadian press.I am extraordinarily proud of the staff in operations and facilities, who dedicated many overtime hours away from their families and even from their spring break to make this meeting a success, Rick Creel said. Don Bagby, Chris Krause and their teams really stepped up and were instrumental in answering every request of the White House and the Secret Service. One agent said that they had not had this level of cooperation with another other venue, and they were very pleased.

Secret Banff Meeting of CEOs and the Defense Establishment : Militarization and the Deconstruction of North America by Michel Chossudovsky Global Research, September 19, 2006

Cabinet ministers, top military brass together with North America's top corporate executives mingle in the plush surroundings of the Fairmont Banff Springs Hotel. This secret venue on Continental Prosperity in the New Security Environment focused on Deep Integration, which largely consists in flushing national sovereignty in favor of Fortress North America. According to the draft program (see below), Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld traveled to Banff, Alberta to deliver the keynote address on military to military cooperation. Canada's Minister of Public Security Stockwell Day focused his address on issues of North American public security.Top brass from the US and Canada were in attendance. Canada's Minister of Defense Gordon O'Connor was present together with Chief of Defense Staff, General Rick Hellier.There was, however, no confirmation that Canada's Prime Minister Stephen Harper attended the meetings.On the US side, several of Rumsfeld's top policy advisers were present alongside a handful of researchers and consultants.The commander of US NorthCom Admiral Tim Keating was also in attendance with several of his senior staff members. Keating is also Commander of NORAD, which is slated to be merged with US NorthCom.

Deep Integration

Deep Integration was first enunciated by The Independent Task Force for North America, led on the Canadian side by former Liberal deputy prime minister, John Manley together with Tom Aquino, president of the Canadian Council of Chief Executives. The task force led by US, Canadian and Mexican officials was sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).D’Aquino and his partners in a corporate task force, former deputy prime minister John Manley and former finance minister Michael Wilson, tell us that by integrating ever more into the U.S. we will somehow guarantee our prosperity, creating fortress North America to compete with China, Europe, and other competitors.(Murray Dobbin, April 2005)In 2005, Manley’s task force released its Trinational Call for a North American Economic and Security Community by 2010.Both Aquino and Manley are participants in the Banff venue, which essentially constitutes a follow-up to the CFR sponsored initiative. Another central theme of the Banff conference is the integration of military command structures, which could eventually lead to the scrapping of NORAD and the integration of Canada into US Northern Command.(Chossudovsky, November 2004)The Banff venue was co-chaired by George Shultz, a staunch Republican, former Secretary of State to President Ronald Reagan who later became president and director of Bechtel corporation.

George Shultz

Top execs from the military-industrial complex and the oil companies were present including Lockheed Martin, Chevron, Mexico's PEMEX and Suncor Energy.Top officials and policy analysts from the military's research labs and thinks tanks including Livermore were invited to integrate several of the specialized panels.The meetings focused on the interrelationship between North American defense systems, militarization, national security, borders, immigration, military production and the control over North America's energy reserves.The venue had more to do with profit driven militarization than continental prosperity.No journalists, no press releases, no commentary which might inform public opinion, a total media blackout: The program of this venue, which was a carefully guarded State secret was first revealed by Canadian author and politician Mel Hurtig on an internet posting :Thought you would like to see this. They're at it again. The sellouts, the usual suspects.September 12th to 14th, at the Banff Springs Hotel, a conference on North American Integration.

Among the long list of those who will be there are Perrin Beatty, Peter Lougheed, Thomas d'Aquino, Stockwell Day, Wendy Dobson, Roger Gibbins, John Manley, Anne McLellan, Gordon O'Connor, James Schlesinger, Donald Rumsfeld, George Shultz and a long list of others.Among the topics: A Vision for North America, A North American Energy Strategy, Demographic and Social Dimensions of North American Integration, Opportunities for Security Cooperation.Many prominent high level U.S. government people will be there.Lots of military. Lots of Deputy Ministers.Lock up your valuables. Hide your children.Mel Hurtig

Erratum: a previous version of this text indicated the presence of Five Star Generals at the meeting. This statement was incorrect. Admiral T. Keating and General Rick Hillier are not Five Star Generals.

ANNEX

The list of participants and the draft program dated respectively August 31st and September 1st, were sent out on email lists. [we were not able to verify the accuracy of this draft program and whether all the confirmed participants attended the venue]NORTH AMERICAN FORUM CONFIRMED PARTICIPANTS (Internal Document, Not for Public Release)Report dated August 31, 2006-Forum Co-Chairs: Dr. Pedro Aspe
Hon. Peter Lougheed -Hon. George Shultz

Canadian Participants

Col. Peter Atkinson Special Advisor to Chief of Defence, Staff
Hon. Perrin Beatty Canadian Manufacturers & Exporters
Mr. Peter M. Boehm Assistant Deputy Minister, North America Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada
Mr. Thomas d’Aquino, Canadian Council of Chief Executives
Hon. Stockwell Day, Minister of Public Safety, Government of Canada
Dr. Wendy Dobson The Institute for International Business
Mr. N. Murray Edwards Edco Financial Holdings Ltd.
Mr. Ward Elcock, Deputy Minister of National Defence
Mr. Bill Elliott Associate Deputy Minister, Public Safety
Dr. John English The Cdn Centre for International Governance Innovation
Mr. Brian Felesky Felesky Flynn LLP
Mr. Richard L. George, Suncor Energy Inc.
Dr. Roger Gibbins Canada West Foundation
Rear Adm Roger Girouard, Commander Joint Task Force Pacific, Cdn Forces
Major Gen Daniel Gosselin, Director General, International Security Policy
Mr. James K. Gray Canada West Foundation Mr. Fred Green Canadian Pacific Railway
Mr. V. Peter Harder Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs
Mr. Paul J. Hill Harvard Developments Inc.
General Rick Hillier Chief of the Defence Staff
Mr. Pierre Marc Johnston Heenan Blaikie
Mr. James Kinnear Pengrowth Corporation
Mr. Harold N. Kvisle TransCanada Corporation
Hon. John P. Manley, McCarthy, Tetrault LLP
Mr. Ron Mannix, Coril Holdings Ltd.
Mr. Ron Mathison, Matco Investments
Hon. Anne McLellan, Senior Counsel, Bennett Jones
Hon. Greg Melchin, Minister of Energy, Government of Alberta
Ms.Sharon Murphy, Chevron Canada
Ms. Sheila O’Brien, President, Corporate Director, Belvedere Investments
Hon. Gordon O’Connor, Minister of Defense, Government of Canada
Mr. Berel Roda,l International Center on Nonviolent Conflict
Mr. Gordon Smith, Chairman, The International Development Research Centre

Timeline Of The Progress Toward A North American Union
Posted on Wednesday, August 30 at 16:39 2006 by sthompson
http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article/163939368-timeline-of-the-progress-toward-a-north-american-union

Timeline of the Progress Toward a North American Union
Canadian, U.S., and Mexican elites, including CEOS and politicians, have a plan to create common North American policies and further integrate our economies. This plan goes by various names and euphemisms, such as deep integration, NAFTA-plus,harmonization, the Big Idea, the Grand Bargain, and the North American Security and Prosperity Initiative. Regardless of which name your prefer, the end goal of all of these plans is to create a new political and economic entity named the North American Union (NAU) that would supercede the existing countries. Theoretically, it would be similar to and competetive with the European Union (EU). The individual currencies of each country would be replaced by a common currency called the Amero and everything from environmental regulations to security would be brought in line with a common standard.Vive le Canada.ca offers the following timeline as a resource to educate the general public about the progress of the three countries toward a new North American Union (NAU).

Vive le Canada.ca opposes the creation of the North American Union (NAU) because we believe it will mean the loss of Canadian sovereignty and democracy and hand over more power to giant, unelected corporations. We also believe that unlike the EU, the countries joining the NAU are not roughly equal in size and power and that this means the U.S. will most certainly be setting policy for all three countries. Considering the unpopularity of the Bush administration and its policies in the U.S., Canada, and around the world we believe that erasing the borders between our countries and adopting U.S. policies at this time is a bad idea and will create economic, political and military insecurity in this country. We hope that raising awareness about the plan to create a North American Union (NAU) will create opposition and encourage debate in all three countries, but especially in Canada.

Note: This timeline is a work in progress and will also be updated as events progress. If you notice a correction that needs to be made or an event that should be included, please email susan.thompson@vivelecanada.ca

Timeline

-November 13, 1979: While officially declaring his candidacy for U.S. President, Ronald Reagan proposes a North American Agreement which will produce a North American continent in which the goods and people of the three countries will cross boundaries more freely.
-January 1981: U.S. President Ronald Reagan proposes a North American common market.
-September 4, 1984: Conservative Brian Mulroney is elected Prime Minister of Canada after opposing free trade during the campaign.
-September 25, 1984: Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney meets President Reagan in Washington and promises closer relations with the US.
-October 9, 1984: The US Congress adopts the Trade and Tariff Act, an omnibus trade act that notably extends the powers of the president to concede trade benefits and enter into bilateral free trade agreements. The Act would be passed on October 30, 1984.
-1985: A Canadian Royal Commission on the economy chaired by former Liberal Minister of Finance Donald S. Macdonald issues a report to the Government of Canada recommending free trade with the United States.
-St. Patrick's Day, 1985: Prime Minister Brian Mulroney and President Ronald Reagan sing When Irish Eyes Are Smiling together to cap off the Shamrock Summit, a 24-hour meeting in Quebec City that opened the door to future free trade talks between the countries. Commentator Eric Kierans observed that The general impression you get, is that our prime minister invited his boss home for dinner. Canadian historian Jack Granatstein said that this public display of sucking up to Reagan may have been the single most demeaning moment in the entire political history of Canada's relations with the United States.
-September 26, 1985: Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney announces that Canada will try to reach a free trade agreement with the US.
-December 10, 1985: U.S. President Reagan officially informs Congress about his intention to negotiate a free trade agreement with Canada under the authority of trade promotion. Referred to as fast track, trade promotion authority is an accelerated legislative procedure which obliges the House of Representatives and the Senate to decide within 90 days whether or not to establish a trade trade unit. No amendments are permitted.
-May 1986: Canadian and American negotiators begin to work out a free trade deal. The Canadian team is led by former deputy Minister of Finance Simon Reisman and the American side by Peter O. Murphy, the former deputy United States trade representative in Geneva.
-October 3, 1987: The 20-chapter Canada–United States Free Trade Agreement (CUSFTA or FTA) is finalized.
-November 6, 1987: Signing of a framework agreement between the US and Mexico.
-January 2, 1988: Prime Minister Mulroney and President Reagan sign the FTA.
-January 1, 1989: The Canada US Free Trade Agreement (CUSFTA or FTA) goes into effect.
-June 10, 1990: Presidents Bush (U.S.) and Salinas (Mexico) announce that they will begin discussions aimed at liberalizing trade between their countries.
-August 21, 1990: Mexican President Salinas officially proposes to the US president the negotiation of a free trade agreement between Mexico and the US.
-February 5, 1991: Negotiations between the US and Mexico aimed at liberalizing trade between the two countries officially become trilateral at the request of the Canadian government under Brian Mulroney.
-April 7 to 10, 1991: Cooperation agreements are signed between Mexico and Canada covering taxation, cultural production and exports.
-May 24, 1991: The American Senate endorses the extension of fast track authority in order to facilitate the negotiation of free trade with Mexico.
-June 12, 1991: Start of trade negotiations between Canada, the US and Mexico.
-April 4, 1992 Signing in Mexico by Canada and Mexico of a protocol agreement on cooperation projects regarding labour.
-August 12, 1992: Signing of an agreement in principle on NAFTA.
-September 17, 1992: Creation of a trilateral commission responsible for examining cooperation in the area of the environment.
-October 7, 1992: Official signing of NAFTA by Michael Wilson of Canada (minister), American ambassador Carla Hills and Mexican secretary Jaime Serra Puche, in San Antonio (Texas).
-December 17, 1992: Official signing of NAFTA by Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney, US president George Bush, and Mexican president Carlos Salinas de Gortari, subject to its final approval by the federal Parliaments of the three countries.
-March 17 and 18, 1993: Start of tripartite discussions in Washington aimed at reaching subsidiary agreements covering labor and the environment.
-September 14, 1993: Official signing of parallel agreements covering labor and the environment in the capitals of the three countries.
-1993: The Liberal Party under Jean Chretien promises to renegotiate NAFTA in its campaign platform, titled Creating Opportunity: the Liberal Plan for Canada and also known as The Red Book.
-December 1993: Newly elected Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chretien signs NAFTA without changes, breaking his promise to renegotiate NAFTA. U.S. President Bill Clinton signs NAFTA for the U.S.
-January 1, 1994: NAFTA and the two agreements on labour and the environment go into effect, replacing CUSFTA.
-November 16, 1994: Canada and Mexico sign a cooperation agreement regarding the peaceful use of nuclear energy.
-December 1994: The Summit of the Americas is held in Miami. The three signatories of NAFTA officially invite Chile to become a contractual party of the agreement. The Free Trade Area of the Americas or FTAA is initiated. According to the offical FTAA website, the Heads of State and Government of the 34 democracies in the region agreed to construct a Free Trade Area of the Americas, or FTAA, in which barriers to trade and investment will be progressively eliminated. They agreed to complete negotiations towards this agreement by the year 2005 and to achieve substantial progress toward building the FTAA by 2000. See: FTAA
-December 22, 1994: Mexican monetary authorities decide to let the Peso float. The US and Canada open a US$6 billion line of credit for Mexico.
-January 3, 1995: Mexican president Ernesto Zedillo presents an emergency plan.
-January 1995: President Clinton announces an aid plan for Mexico.
-February 9, 1995: Mickey Kantor, the US Foreign Trade representative, announces Washington’s intention to include the provisions of NAFTA regarding labor and the environment in negotiations with Chile.
-February 21, 1995: Signing in Washington of an agreement regarding the financial assistance given to Mexico. Mexico in turn promises to pay Mexican oil export revenue as a guarantee into an account at the Federal Reserve in New York.
-February 28, 1995: Mexico announces the increase of its customs duties on a number of imports from countries with which it does not have a free trade agreement.
-March 9, 1995: President Zedillo presents austerity measures. The plan envisages a 50% increase in value added taxes, a 10% reduction of government expenditure, a 35% increase in gas prices, a 20% increase in electricity prices and a 100% increase in transportation prices. The minimum wage is increased by 10%. The private sector can benefit from government assistance. The inter-bank rate that is reduced to 74% will be increased to 109% on March 15.
-March 29, 1995: Statistical data on US foreign trade confirms the sharp increase in Mexican exports to the US.
-April 10, 1995: The US dollar reaches its lowest level in history on the international market. It depreciated by 50% relative to the Japanese yen in only four years.
-June 7, 1995: First meeting of the ministers of Foreign Trade of Canada (Roy MacLaren), the US (Mickey Kantor), Mexico (Herminio Blanco) and Chile (Eduardo Aninat) to start negotiations.
-December 29, 1995: Chile and Canada commit to negotiate a bilateral free trade agreement.
-June 3, 1996: Chile and Canada start negotiating the reciprocal opening of markets in Santiago.
-November 18, 1996: Signing in Ottawa of the Canada-Chile free trade agreement by Jean Chrétien, Prime Minister of Canada and Eduardo Frei, President of Chile. The agreement frees 80% of trade between the two countries. It is the first free trade agreement signed between Chile and a member of the G 7.
-July 4, 1997: The Canada-Chile free trade agreement comes into effect.
-1997: The US presidency proposes applying NAFTA parity to Caribbean countries.
-April 17, 1998: Signing in Santiago, Chile of the free trade agreement between Chile and Mexico by President Ernesto Zedillo Ponce de León of Mexico, and President Eduardo Frei of Chile.
-August 1, 1999: The Chile-Mexico free trade agreement comes into effect.
-September, 1999: The Canadian right-wing think tank the Fraser Institute publishes a paper by Herbert G. Grubel titled The Case for the Amero: The Economics and Politics of a North American Monetary Union. In the paper Grubel argues that a common currency is not inevitable but it is desirable. See: The Case for the Amero
-July 2, 2000: Vicente Fox Quesada of the National Action Party (PAN), is elected president of Mexico, thus ending the reign of the Revolutionary Institutional Party (RIP) that had held power for 71 years. Mr. Fox is sworn in on 1 December 2000.
-July 4, 2000: Mexican president Vicente Fox proposes a 20 to 30 year timeline for the creation of a common North American market. President Fox’s 20/20 vision as it is commonly called, includes the following: a customs union, a common external tariff, greater coordination of policies, common monetary policies, free flow of labor, and fiscal transfers for the development of poor Mexican regions. With the model of the European Fund in mind, President Fox suggests that US$10 to 30 billion be invested in NAFTA to support underdeveloped regions. The fund could be administered by an international financial institution such as the Inter-American Development Bank.
-November 27, 2000: Trade negotiations resume between the US and Chile for Chile’s possible entry into NAFTA.
-2001: Robert Pastor's 2001 book Toward a North American Community is published. The book calls for the creation of a North American Union (NAU).
-April 2001: Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chretien and US President George W. Bush sign the Declaration of Quebec City at the third Summit of the Americas: This is a commitment to hemispheric integration. See: Declaration of Quebec City
-September 11, 2001: A series of coordinated suicide terrorist attacks upon the United States, predominantly targeting civilians, are carried out on Tuesday, September 11, 2001. Two planes (United Airlines Flight 175 and American Airlines Flight 11) crashed into the World Trade Center in New York City, one plane into each tower (One and Two). Both towers collapsed within two hours. The pilot of the third team crashed a plane into the Pentagon in Arlington County, Virginia. Passengers and members of the flight crew on the fourth aircraft attempted to retake control of their plane from the hijackers; that plane crashed into a field near the town of Shanksville in rural Somerset County, Pennsylvania. Excluding the 19 hijackers, a confirmed 2,973 people died and another 24 remain listed as missing as a result of these attacks. In response, the Bush administration launches the war on terror and becomes very concerned with security.
-December 2001: New U.S. Ambassador to Canada Paul Cellucci publicly advocates NAFTA-plus. See: The Emergence of a North American Community?
-December 2001: U.S. Governor Tom Ridge and Canadian Deputy Prime Minister John Manley sign the Smart Border Declaration and Associated 30-Point Action Plan to Enhance the Security of Our Shared Border While Facilitating the Legitimate Flow of People and Goods. The Action Plan has four pillars: the secure flow of people, the secure flow of goods, secure infrastructure, and information. It includes shared customs data, a safe third-country agreement, harmonized commercial processing, etc.
-April 2002: The Canadian right-wing think tank the C.D. Howe Institute publishes the first paper in the Border Papers series, which they have described as a project on Canada's choices regarding North American integration. The Border Papers were published with the financial backing of the Donner Canadian Foundation. Generally the border papers advocate deep integration between Canada and the U.S., and the first border paper Shaping the Future of the North American Economic Space: A Framework for Action by Wendy Dobson popularized the term the Big Idea as one euphemism for deep integration. To read the border papers, you can visit the C.D. Howe Institute website at www.cdhowe.org. Use the publication search form (1996 to current, PDF) and choose border papers from the Serie contains drop down menu.
-September 9, 2002: President Bush and Prime Minister Chrétien meet to discuss progress on the Smart Border Action Plan and ask that they be updated regularly on the work being done to harmonize our common border.
-December 5, 2002: The text of the Safe Third Country Agreement is signed by officials of Canada and the United States as part of the Smart Border Action Plan. See the final text here: Final Text of the Safe Third Country Agreement Refugee support groups on both sides of the Canadian-U.S. border criticize the new agreement dealing with refugees for stipulating that refugees must seek asylum in whichever of the two countries they reach first. Critics say that preventing individuals who first set foot in the U.S. from making a claim in Canada will increase cases of human smuggling, and that other refugees will be forced to live without any kind of legal status in the U.S. See for example: 10 Reasons Why Safe Third Country is a Bad Deal
-September 11, 2002: The National Post publishes an article by Alan Gotlieb, the chairman of the Donner Canadian Foundation and Canada's ambassador to the United States from 1981 to 1989, titled Why not a grand bargain with the U.S.? In the article, Gotlieb asks Rather than eschewing further integration with the United States, shouldn't we be building on NAFTA to create new rules, new tribunals, new institutions to secure our trade? Wouldn't this legal integration be superior to ad hoc responses and largely ineffective lobbying to prevent harm from Congressional protectionist sorties? Wouldn't our economic security be enhanced by establishing a single North American competitive market without anti-dumping and countervail rules? Are there not elements of a grand bargain to be struck, combining North American economic, defence and security arrangements within a common perimeter? See: Why not a grand bargain with the U.S.?
-December 6, 2002: The White House issues an update on the progress of the Smart Border Action Plan. See: U.S. Canada Smart Border 30 Point Action Plan Update
-December, 2002: US Secretary Colin Powell signs an agreement between the United States and Canada to establish a new bi-national planning group at the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) headquarters in Colorado Springs. The new bi-national planning group is expected to release a report recommending how the militaries of U.S. and Canada can work together more effectively to counter land-based and maritime threats. See: U.S. and Canada Sign Bi-National Agreement on Military Planning
-January 2003: The Canadian Council of Chief Executives headed by Tom D'Aquino (also a member of the trinational Task Force on the Future of North America) launches the North American Security and Prosperity Initiative (NASPI) in January 2003 in response to an alleged need for a comprehensive North American strategy integrating economic and security issues. NASPI has five main elements, which include: Reinventing borders, Maximizing regulatory efficiencies, Negotiation of a comprehensive resource security pact, Reinvigorating the North American defence alliance, and Creating a new institutional framework.
-January 2004: NAFTA celebrates its tenth anniversary with controversy, as it is both praised and criticized.
-January/February 2004: The Council on Foreign Relations publishes Robert Pastor's paper North America's Second Decade, which advocates further North American integration. Read it at: North America's Second Decade
-April 2004: The Canadian Council of Chief Exectuives (CCCE) publishes a major discussion paper titled New Frontiers: Building a 21st Century Canada-United States Partnership in North America. Some of the paper’s 15 recommendations expand on the NASPI framework in areas such as tariff harmonization, rules of origin, trade remedies, energy strategy, core defence priorities and the need to strengthen Canada-United States institutions, including the North American Aerospace Defence Command (NORAD). Other recommendations focus on the process for developing and executing a comprehensive strategy, including the need for greater coordination across government departments, between federal and provincial governments and between the public and private sectors.
-October 2004: The Canada-Mexico Partnership (CMP) is launched during the visit of President Vicente Fox to Ottawa. See: Canada-Mexico Partnership (CMP)
-November 1, 2004: The Independent Task Force on the Future of North America is formed. The task force is a trilateral task force charged with developing a roadmap to promote North American security and advance the well-being of citizens of all three countries. The task force is chaired by former Liberal Deputy Prime Minister John Manley. It is sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) in association with the Canadian Council of Chief Executives (CCCE) and the Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos Internacionales.
-December 29, 2004: The Safe Third Country Agreement comes into force. See: Safe Third Country Agreement Comes Into Force Today
-March 2005: The Independent Task Force on the Future of North America releases Creating a North American Community - Chairmen’s Statement. Three former high-ranking government officials from Canada, Mexico, and the United States call for a North American economic and security community by 2010 to address shared security threats, challenges to competitiveness, and interest in broad-based development across the three countries. See: Creating a North American Community Chairmen’s Statement
-March 23, 2005: The leaders of Canada, the United States and Mexico sign the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) of North America at the trilateral summit in Waco, Texas. Canada is signed on by Prime Minister Paul Martin. See: www.spp.gov.
-March 24, 2005: The 40 Point Smart Regulation Plan is launched as part of the SPP agreement. It is a far-reaching plan to introduce huge changes to Canada's regulatory system in order to eliminate some regulations and harmonize other regulations with the U.S. Reg Alcock, President of the Treasury Board and Minister responsible for the Canadian Wheat Board, launches the Government of Canada's implementation plan for Smart Regulation at a Newsmaker Breakfast at the National Press Club. For the original plan and updates see: Smart Regulation: Report on Actions and Plans
-March 2005: Agreement to build the Texas NAFTA Superhighway: A Comprehensive Development Agreement [is] signed by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) to build the TTC-35 High Priority Corridor parallel to Interstate 35. The contracting party involved a limited partnership formed between Cintra Concesiones de Infraestructuras de Transporte, S.A., a publically listed company headquartered in Spain, owned by the Madrid-based Groupo Ferrovial, and a San Antonio-based construction company, Zachry Construction Corp. Texas Segment of NAFTA Super Highway Nears Construction, Jerome R. Corsi, June 2006, www.Humaneventsonline.com The proposed NAFTA superhighway will be a 10 lane super highway four football fields wide that will travel through the heart of the U.S. along Interstate 35, from the Mexican border at Laredo, Tex., to the Canadian border north of Duluth. Minn. The Trans-Texas Corridor or TTC will be the first leg of the NAFTA superhighway.
-April 2005: U.S. Senate Bill 853 is introduced by Senator Richard G. Lugar (IN) and six cosponsors.The North American Security Cooperative Act (NASCA) is touted as a bill to protect the American public from terrorists by creating the North American Union. The North American Union consists of three countries, U.S., Canada, and Mexico, with open borders, something that is proposed to be in effect by 2010. Thus, it would ensure the fulfillment of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America. NASCA Rips America, April 2005, www.Freemarketnews.com
-May 2005: The Council on Foreign Relations Press publishes the report of the Independent Task Force on the Future of North America, titled Building a North American Community (task force report 53). See: Building a North American Community
-June 2005: A follow-up SPP meeting is held in Ottawa, Canada.
-June 2005: A U.S. Senate Republican Policy Committee policy paper is released: The CFR did not mention the Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA), but it is obvious that it is part of the scheme. This was made clear by the Senate Republican Policy Committee policy paper released in June 2005. It argued that Congress should pass CAFTA … The Senate Republican policy paper argued that CAFTA will promote democratic governance. But there is nothing democratic about CAFTA’s many pages of grants of vague authority to foreign tribunals on which foreign judges can force us to change our domestic laws to be no more burdensome than necessary on foreign trade. CFR's Plan to Integrate the U.S., Mexico and Canada, July 2005, www.Eagleforum.org
-July 2005: The Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) passes in the U.S. the House of Representatives by a 217-215 vote.
-January 2006: Conservative Stephen Harper is elected Prime Minister of Canada with a minority government.
-March 31, 2006: At the Summit of the Americas in Cancun, Canada (under new Prime Minister Stephen Harper) along with the U.S. and Mexico release the Leaders' Joint Statement. The statement presents six action points to insure that the North American Union be in place by 2007. These action points include: 1) Establishment of a Trilateral Regulatory Cooperative Framework 2) Establishment of the North American Competitiveness Council (NACC) 3) Provision for North American Emergency Management 4) Provision for Avian and Human Pandemic Influenza Management 5) Development of North American Energy Security 6) Assure Smart, Secure Borders North American Borders Read the full statement at: Leaders' Joint Statement
-April 2006: A draft environmental impact statement on the proposed first leg of the NAFT superhighway, the Trans-Texas Corridor or TTC, is completed.
-June 2006: Tom Tancredo, R-Colorado. demands superstate accounting from the Bush administration: Responding to a Worldnetdaily.com report, Tom Tancredo is demanding the Bush administration fully disclose the activities of an office implementing a trilateral agreement with Mexico and Canada that apparently could lead to a North American union, despite having no authorization from Congress. Tancredo Confronts Super-State Effort, June 2006, www.Worldnetdaily.com
-July 2006:
Public hearings on the proposed NAFTA superhighway begin in the U.S.
-COMING IN 2007: Construction is set to begin on the NAFTA superhighway.
-COMING IN 2007: Another trilateral meeting, to be held in Canada. The six actions towards creating a North American Union (NAU) as set out in the Cancun Leaders' Statement will have been taken in part or in full. re regulations, according to the statement: We affirm our commitment to strengthen regulatory cooperation in [food safety] and other key sectors and to have our central regulatory agencies complete a trilateral regulatory cooperation framework by 2007.
Main Sources:
Vive le Canada.ca, FAQ, Sovereignty vs Deep Integration
North American Forum on Integration, NAFTA Timeline
Free Market News Network Corp, N. AM. UNION TIMELINE
Wikipedia, various entries, Wikipedia.org [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on September 1, 2006]

Note: Timeline of the Progres... susan.thompson@viveleca... FTAA The Case for the Amero Declaration of Quebec ... The Emergence of a Nort... www.cdhowe.org Final Text of the Safe ... 10 Reasons Why Safe Thi... Why not a grand bargain... U.S. Canada Smart Borde... U.S. and Canada Sign Bi... North America's Second ... Canada-Mexico Partnersh... Safe Third Country Agre... Creating a North Americ... www.spp.gov Smart Regulation: Repor... Building a North Americ... Leaders' Joint Statement Sovereignty vs Deep Int... NAFTA Timeline N. AM. UNION TIMELINE Wikipedia.org
Contributed By sthompson