Friday, March 04, 2011

THE LEIB-MCCAIN DUPES

DOUG AND LAURIE MAR 4,11 6-9PM EST ABOUT THE ISSUES IN THE WORLD
http://www.usaradio.com/listen_live_usa2.php
http://therothshow.com/show-archives/march-2011/

LAURIE ROTHS SITE
http://therothshow.com/
DOUG HAGMANNS SITES
http://homelandsecurityus.com/
https://hagmann-pi.com/Home.html
http://theneinblog.blogspot.com/
CANADA FREE PRESS-JUDI MCLEOD
http://www.canadafreepress.com/

ALAN GREENSPAN ON CNBC
http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1828815428&play=1
http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1828819830&play=1
http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1828819886&play=1
http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1828846161&play=1
http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1828828276&play=1
http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1828868683&play=1
RON PAUL ON TAXES
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5m1J32wABiI&feature=player_embedded
HIGH OIL TO KILL THE ECONOMY
http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1828995682&play=1

Obama’s two most useful idiots By Judi McLeod Friday, March 4, 2011 CANADA FREE PRESS

Proof positive that Republicans who cross the bi-partisan aisle too many times come back as Democrat dupes: Senator John McCain and Independent Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman.In their newfound state of `civility’ the senators are flying not Old Glory but are white flagging orchestrated democracy movements in the Middle East.
According to McCain, all praise for the revolution goes to the social network sites and Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg is the most popular man in the Middle East. (FoxNews, March 3, 2011).

President Barack Obama whose group Organizing America helped hand Egypt over to the Muslim Brotherhood feels the same way about Google, Mr. McCain.Fresh home from a trip to the middle east, McCain and Lieberman sang the praises of the social networks on recent developments in Tunisia, Egypt, Bahrain and Libya at the Brookings Institute.This social networking cannot be underestimated in how all of these events, really the driving force in how all of this transformed and took place, crowed McCain.Lieberman called the changes, Even more consequential than the collapse of the Soviet Union and suggested, It’s in our strategic interest at this moment to help history move in the right direction.Incredibly by further emphasizing the role technology has been playing in world revolution, McCain relayed a story from a young man he met with in Egypt, who held up his blackberry and said, I can get 200,000 people in the square in two hours. And it’s Egypt the two senators advised the Obama administration to keep an eye on.Young men with Blackberrys can also get dozens of young people into Chicago department stores for a flash mob collective shoplifting.And who knows if they’re not already using technology to bring illegals over the Arizona border? And how’s this for John Maverick McCain wisdom: Egypt is the heart and soul of the Arab world. What happens in Egypt will be vital to what happens in the rest of the region.

Some not on the government payroll knew that all along.That Google-trained digital activists have already been lauded seemed to have gone over McCain, who warned against the appearance of outside interference in Cairo. He insisted that the best move for the U.S. to make was to help with job creation: I hope the high tech community and friends of ours like John Chambers and Bill Gates and all of these people would come out and say, Ok we’re gonna invest in Egypt, we’re gonna help people create jobs and opportunity.Left unsaid: Americans struggling in the recession who are not out fomenting for revolution in foreign countries can find their own jobs.Lieberman and McCain, are both advocates for a no-fly zone for Libya.
Lieberman feels that the Obama administration was a little slow in handling these events to date. Make that nine days slow, Joe.But McCain as an Obama booster could rival Nancy Pelosi. This administration came into power with an anti-Bush agenda, whether that was the right thing to do or not. I think history will judge. But I also think that this administration has come a long way, especially in this last year and I give them credit for that. And so I certainly like what Secretary Clinton has been saying. I certainly appreciate many of the things the administration has been saying.How can Obama lose with useful idiots like McCain and Lieberman in tow?

FALSE TEACHERS,PROPHETS,DECIEVERS

MATTHEW 24:4-5,11,24-25
4 And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you.
5 For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.
11 And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many.
24 For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.
25 Behold, I have told you before.

1 TIMOTHY 4:1-2
1 Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils;
2 Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron;

MARK 13:22-23
22 For false Christs and false prophets shall rise, and shall shew signs and wonders, to seduce, if it were possible, even the elect.
23 But take ye heed: behold, I have foretold you all things.

2 TIMOTHY 3:13
13 But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived.

DEUTORONOMY 18:10-12
10 There shall not be found among you any one that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, or that useth divination, or an observer of times, or an enchanter, or a witch,
11 Or a charmer, or a consulter with familiar spirits, or a wizard, or a necromancer.
12 For all that do these things are an abomination unto the LORD: and because of these abominations the LORD thy God doth drive them out from before thee.

JUDE 10-13
10 But these speak evil of those things which they know not: but what they know naturally, as brute beasts, in those things they corrupt themselves.
11 Woe unto them! for they have gone in the way of Cain, and ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward, and perished in the gainsaying of Core.
12 These are spots in your feasts of charity, when they feast with you, feeding themselves without fear: clouds they are without water, carried about of winds; trees whose fruit withereth, without fruit, twice dead, plucked up by the roots;
13 Raging waves of the sea, foaming out their own shame; wandering stars, to whom is reserved the blackness of darkness for ever.

MATTHEW 10:32-33
32 Whosoever therefore shall confess me before men, him will I confess also before my Father which is in heaven.
33 But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven.

THIS WESBORO HATE GROUP AND HAROLD CAMPING WITH HIS FALSE RAPTURE DATE OF MAY 21,11 ARE FALSE CHRISTIANS.

Supremes – How much more are you going to protect in the name of speech?
Posted on March 3, 2011 by Laurie Roth


This week we saw the horror decision by the Supreme Court, voting 8-1 for the notorious Westboro Baptist Church. They are the church who has felt like it was God’s calling for them to go around the country and crash funerals of grieving families trying to bury their dead….you know, those who have died in our military defending our nation. How could we forget Westboro’s freedom of speech concerns over our souls when they protested at the funeral of Matthew Snyder, a brave Marine killed in Iraq.Interestingly Matthew wasn’t gay nor connected in anyway with Westboro yet they viciously picketed at his funeral so much so that his Father Albert Snyder sued Fred Phelps of the church to try and stop their picketing at military funerals around the country. I’ll never forget when they showed up in the Northwest to picket a funeral of one of our fallen war heroes, not an hour from my house. I thought I would lose my mind then.You may recall that Matthew’s Father, Albert Snyder was awarded $11 million in damages but later the award was cut in half, then the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals threw the whole award out.

What does the Supreme Court have to say for itself?

They acknowledge in their ruling that the views of Westboro Baptist Church are hateful and inexplicable. However, they strongly feel that if they ruled differently it would slow down if not stop people speaking out on controversial issues. They even talked of this also creating liability for news media and the coverage of events and commentaries.Most of us cherish free speech and see the importance of protecting that right. However, our framers never meant for that Freedom of speech to be void of total decency, responsibility and screamed out in whatever setting you chose.Try yelling Fire in a crowded theatre and see what happens. What is the problem? I can yell Fire elsewhere and say whatever I want to. It is the people’s choice if they get up, cause a disturbance and run. I didn’t make them. Yet, this is not allowed due to creating a panicked mob reaction and danger for all. Nor should it be allowed.So, we can’t say anything, where ever we want if it causes potential danger to others. What if it causes emotional trauma and damage to the family of a fallen soldier to display signs such as God hates you Destruction is Imminent Fags are Beasts at a funeral for their son or daughter? Why is the potential of several emotional trauma, insult and violation any less painful than creating potential physical damage in a theatre? I believe it is ALL pain and ALL wrong.Our founding fathers never thought in their wildest dreams that our 1st Amendment rights for free speech would be contorted to allow a group calling themselves a church to exercise their freedom and evil displays anywhere they wanted, especially at someone’s funeral. What about the rights of the family to grieve and honor their dead?

Westboro has the perfect right to believe what they want and they believe God is punishing our nation for having Gays by killing soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan. They are known to demonstrate all over the country, sometimes sharing their anti-Semitic and anti-gay message several times a week.I was listening to one of their members on the news this morning saying how loving they really are because they are trying to yell out the truth to keep us all out of hell. They wouldn’t picket at so many funerals if they didn’t love us. We apparently are all going to hell if we want to do anything but judge and or hate gays. You see, God hates gays. Westboro’s hatred isn’t satisfied with gays. They also hate Jews and Israel. A few other picket signs I’m looking at say The Jews killed Jesus Some Jews will repent God hates Israel Mourn for your sins. Naturally they have to go to Jewish institutions and places of worship to practice their 1st amendment rights there.Of course we don’t want a slippery slope away from freedom of speech. I’m aware people say things I don’t believe or like but they still have the right to say them. That is true, accept I and most of us believe those extreme speech expressions don’t have the right to be shared everywhere they want.

Here is part of my yes and no, do or die list.

It is never acceptable, appropriate or part of freedom of speech in America to allow the Nazi party, KKK or neo Nazis to march in the streets or picket in public in America. They all have a history, not only of hate but violence and murder. We have seen what giving them power, speech and a bigger voice leads to….millions of murders. No thank you. They can keep their opinions in the living room of a house somewhere and out of the public square.Westboro Baptist Church, thinks we are all going to hell, especially if we support or love gays. I would go to hell accept I can’t get through the door and find a place to stand. There are too many of them in the way.Regardless of what anyone thinks of gays or gay behavior, as a conservative, Christian who does not believe in Gay Marriage, I will let my opinion be heard.The truth about what God says in the Bible is clear, spoken out and simple. God loves all people including gays. He identifies many sins that separate us from God, various attitudes of Judgment, hate, jealousy, gossip, rage and sexual acting out, outside of marriage, gay and straight. God lovingly calls us all back to him and offers healing to us all. Even those invested in Judgment and hatred like members of Westboro Baptist Church.I believe the Supreme Court aired in their judgment, allowing freedom of such hostile and insulting speech to be shared anywhere, violating the rights of the fallen heroes families. They could display their pickets all kinds of places. Why a funeral? That should have never been allowed.Let Freedom of speech reign BUT in appropriate locations and times.

The Non issue of Obama’s eligibility IS one of the BIG issues in 2012
Posted on March 2, 2011 by LAURIE ROTH


The assaults, name calling and slander continues against those who dare to question and make comments about Obama’s eligibility and constitutional status to be President. We are distractions and we are racist, conspiratorial birthers.Let us look at some of the messiah level conservatives and what they have to say about this. First on our list of on high opinions is Karl Rove, a Fox News contributor and the former Senior Adviser and Deputy Chief of Staff under George W. Bush. I have respected and supported much of what he has said over the years, but he loses my respect and support on this issue. He said on Bill O’Reilly recently that the Republican Party has to focus on real issues, not non issues. The party should ignore the birther movement. Rove compared the birthers to the John Birch Society, a far-right group started in the 1950s. He compared the 9/11 deniers with the birthers, those who want Obama to prove his eligibility.Rove made these comments to an agreeing Bill O’Reilly who also has marginalized and insulted ‘birthers’ for the last two years (translation: A birther is anyone who looks at the sea of growing evidence that Obama was not born in Hawaii and wants him to come clean and show his long form birth certificate).Karl Rove was advising the GOP not to waste time on this non issue and certainly not give anyone who believes that way any profile or stature in the party. Worshiping and sold out Bill O’Reilly agreed.

Other Conservative Big Dogs who know better

Glenn Beck has put down and minimized the eligibility issue all along. He has done this while talking passionately about our constitution, founding fathers, waging war against George Soros and more. Recently on the Peter Boyle show he was asked about eligibility. I was just interviewed myself on the Peter Boyle show and he rocks. Glenn is reported to have said the following: Where he was born? I don’t know?……then later He cares about the U.S. Constitution.He went on…..Our rights are being violated right now and I want to concentrate on that.OK Glenn, ignore the rights violating elephants stampeding through the room! So far we are wasting time, represent a non issue according to Karl Rove and Glenn thinks we should be focusing on our rights being violated, not the eligibility issue.

Who else has conservative wisdom to ad to this list?

Even the amazing Sarah Palin has strangely minimized this issue. She has stated on her Facebook postings: …….….at no point, not during the campaign, and not during recent interviews – have I asked the president to produce his birth certificate or suggested that he was not born in the United States.Why Sarah did you not ever suggest Obama come clean with this and show his birth certificate? You act as if that is a great thing that you didn’t ask Obama to show he was born in the US. I think it is a shame and missing the mark that you didn’t. Do you not think it odd that John McCain was asked to show his birth certificate to the media and left…he did. Obama has been asked, sued and begged to show his long form birth certificate and he has answered by spending over 2 million dollars hiding every record he has, while calling us names. According to a recent poll over 51% of Americans don’t believe he was born in the U.S. It is RATHER a big question mark.Regardless of all the suspicious behavior by Obama, fingers and signed affidavits pointing to him being born in Kenya www.obamacrimes.com, and even a former election official, Tim Adams of Hawaii signing an affidavit in 2008 saying Obama was not born in Hawaii, Rove, Beck, O’Reilly, Palin continue to ignore and betray this issue. Isn’t it most interesting that they all appear on Fox regularly and they either have their own shows or are regular guests? One thing is for sure. They refuse to honestly deal with this glaring issue of national concern and danger. Can you say, threats, intimidation, bribes and pay offs??? I think someone controlling and/or running Fox got to them and they are scared.

How is it that even with Dr. Jerry Corsi, the Governor of Hawaii, Neil Abercrombie, and former election official Tim Adams saying the birth certificate is not there, that the real story continues to be buried in most of radio and TV in America??? OBAMA LIED ABOUT WHERE HE WAS BORN. That is the real story. People don’t lie and spend money to hide info unless they have something to hide. This isn’t fringe and a waste of GOP time. This has been and is a national emergency and if I was running for President I WOULD SURE ADDRESS IT IN MY CAMPAIGN AND IN ANY MEDIA DEBATE OR EVENT. www.thepeoplespresident.me

DOCTOR DOCTORIAN FROM ANGEL OF GOD
then the angel said, Financial crisis will come to Asia. I will shake the world.

JAMES 5:1-3
1 Go to now, ye rich men, weep and howl for your miseries that shall come upon you.
2 Your riches are corrupted, and your garments are motheaten.
3 Your gold and silver is cankered; and the rust of them shall be a witness against you, and shall eat your flesh as it were fire. Ye have heaped treasure together for the last days.

REVELATION 18:10,17,19
10 Standing afar off for the fear of her torment, saying, Alas, alas that great city Babylon, that mighty city! for in one hour is thy judgment come.
17 For in one hour so great riches is come to nought. And every shipmaster, and all the company in ships, and sailors, and as many as trade by sea, stood afar off,
19 And they cast dust on their heads, and cried, weeping and wailing, saying, Alas, alas that great city, wherein were made rich all that had ships in the sea by reason of her costliness! for in one hour is she made desolate.

EZEKIEL 7:19
19 They shall cast their silver in the streets, and their gold shall be removed: their silver and their gold shall not be able to deliver them in the day of the wrath of the LORD: they shall not satisfy their souls, neither fill their bowels: because it is the stumblingblock of their iniquity.

REVELATION 13:16-18
16 And he(FALSE POPE) causeth all,(WORLD SOCIALISM) both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:(CHIP IMPLANT)
17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.(6-6-6) A NUMBER SYSTEM

WORLD MARKET RESULTS
http://money.cnn.com/data/world_markets/
CNBC VIDEOS
http://www.cnbc.com/id/15839263/?tabid=15839796&tabheader=false

HALF HOUR DOW RESULTS FRI MAR 04,2011

09:30 AM +2.43
10:00 AM -7.04
10:30 AM -63.38
11:00 AM -48.89
11:30 AM -66.60
12:00 PM -95.81
12:30 PM -164.91
01:00 PM -159.35
01:30 PM -159.69
02:00 PM -158.86
02:30 PM -152.95
03:00 PM -150.42
03:30 PM -163.22
04:00 PM -88.32 12,169.88

S&P 500 1321.15 -9.82

NASDAQ 2784.67 -14.07

GOLD 1,429.10 +12.70

OIL 104.63 +2.72

TSE 300 14,252.80 +38.00

CDNX 2439.29.01

S&P/TSX/60 819.25 +1.40

MORNING,NEWS,STATS

YEAR TO DATE PERFORMANCE
Dow -2 points at 4 minutes of trading today.
Dow -95 points at low today.
Dow +8 points at high today so far.
GOLD opens at $1,426.70.OIL opens at $103.08 today.

AFTERNOON,NEWS,STATS
Dow -178 points at low today so far.
Dow +8 points at high today so far.

WRAPUP,NEWS,STATS
Dow -178 points at low today.
Dow +8 points at high today.

GOLD ALLTIME HIGH $1,439.20 (NOT AT CLOSE)

WELL I GOTTA GIVE ALEX JONES CREDIT.THERE WAS A CALLER NAMED SCOTT ON ALEX JONES WHO SAID THE JEWS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL THE ILLS IN THE WORLD.AND THAT THE JEWS SHOULD ALL BE KILLED AGAIN.THIS SCOTT IS AN IDIOT-WORLD BELIEVER-DECIEVED NUTCASE.BUT ALEX JONES REPLIED THAT HIS WIFE IS JEWISH AND IF YOU WANT TO KILL ALL THE JEWS.YOU GOTTA GO THREW ME FIRST.I GIVE JONES CREDIT FOR STICKING UP FOR ALL THE ISRAELI-JEWS.THIS IDIOT SCOTT FULFILLS PROPHECY THAT SAYS ALL THE WORLD WILL HATE ISRAEL IN THE LAST DAYS.THATS WHY US CHRISTIANS HAVE TO PRAY FOR AND STICK UP FOR ISRAELIS TO STOP THESE HATE MONGERS OF ISRAEL-JEWS-AND GOD(KING JESUS)HATERS.

THE HATER IS ON AT 12:30PM EST-1ST HALF HOUR-AND JONES 15 MIN REPLY
http://rss.nfowars.net/20110304_Fri_Alex.mp3

FAMINE

REVELATION 6:5-6
5 And when he had opened the third seal, I heard the third beast say, Come and see. And I beheld, and lo a black horse; and he that sat on him had a pair of balances in his hand.
6 And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and see thou hurt not the oil and the wine.(A DAYS WAGES FOR A LOAF OF BREAD)

FAMINE

MATTHEW 24:7-8
7 For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places.
8 All these are the beginning of sorrows.

MARK 13:8
8 For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be earthquakes in divers places, and there shall be famines and troubles: these are the beginnings of sorrows.

LUKE 21:11
11 And great earthquakes shall be in divers places, and famines, and pestilences; and fearful sights and great signs shall there be from heaven.

Is Your Wallet Screaming Inflation? By James Sharp Thursday, March 3, 2011 CFP

I would like to start off by stressing the fact that I am NOT an economist. I am a working Joe that gets up and goes to work every day – as I have for thirty-five years – in order to pay my bills and feed my family. I do not profess to be an expert. However, I do know what my wallet is telling me – and it isn’t telling me anything good.I need not mention what we are seeing at the gas pump these days. The price of a gallon of gasoline has skyrocketed (in my home state of Florida) from just over $1.50 per gallon at the end of the Bush administration to close to $3.50 for that same gallon today.Anybody that believes that inflation is really 1.63 percent (as told to us by the federal government’s Bureau of Labor Statistics in its Consumer Price Index summary) is not living in the real world. If you shop for groceries, gasoline, insurance, or basically, ANYTHING (computers and other electronic goods notwithstanding) on a regular basis, you have seen a steady rise in prices for a number of years.There is a web site that offers an inflation calculator. This is very intriguing and allows one to determine the rate of inflation between any two dates from 1914 to the present. You can then enter that inflation rate and a dollar amount (such as the cost of goods or services) and determine what the inflated cost is. According to the information on this site, the inflation rate from January 2000 to today is 30.46 percent. This means that something that cost one dollar in 2000 costs $1.30 today.

I like to think of prices in terms of my personal price index. I do most of the grocery shopping in my family and I am keenly aware of the prices that I pay for the goods that I purchase regularly. Take, for instance, a popular national brand of orange juice that I was able to buy on sale (back in 2000) in half gallon cartons for three for $5.00. That same container of orange juice today will cost you $2.99 when you can find it on sale. But wait – the vendor recently reduced the package size from a half-gallon to 59 fluid ounces. This increase in price PLUS the decrease in package size yields a net increase in the per-ounce price from 2.61 cents to 5.07 cents, or 94 percent. And this has taken place since 2000.Granted, many factors can enter into the price of orange juice including freezes in Florida. But this is a steady long-term increase – not a seasonal trend. And how many other products can you name which have seen similar increases in price along with a decrease in package size? Ice cream and coffee are two that immediately come to mind. Or have you purchased a bag of sugar lately? A four pound bag that used to be five? If not, you are in for a shock.

My 82-year-old mother told me just the other day that the yogurt that she has been purchasing for quite some time for $2.49 just increased in price to $2.79. This sounds like a twelve percent increase to me - in one fell swoop; not over an extended period of time.We know that the Federal Reserve has been, for the past several months (and will continue doing through the third quarter of this year), increasing the money supply by a process euphemistically known as quantitative easing. The irony here is that they are not making it easier on the working people. Increasing the supply of money is the only real cause of inflation and this is precisely what the Fed is doing. The price of oil (as with the price of everything) is controlled by the laws of supply and demand. But with the Fed seemingly trying to destroy the dollar, investors are turning to commodities such as gold, silver, sugar, and OIL. Not only has oil seen a large run-up in price lately, but silver (from which, once upon a time, our coins were minted) has increased over twenty percent in the past month alone.I believe that we are seeing people eager to spend their dollars while there is still at least some value left to them, albeit not much. Hence the demand, and increasing prices, for the aforementioned commodities. It is a vicious cycle. The more the Fed devalues the dollar through forced inflation, the more investors try to unload their dollars by purchasing tangible assets with real value.

We have all heard stories about Germany in the 1920’s and the inflation that that country experienced. Stories abound of people using wheelbarrows full of money to purchase loaves of bread. Such stories may seem absurd to a majority of Americans today. But think about it in the context of such inflation taking place over a period of many years. This is precisely what we have seen in this country. The dollar has lost over 95 percent of its value since 1900. This means that, what once sold for less than five cents now costs a dollar – two 50-cent rolls of pennies – or more. A forty cent loaf of bread of a few decades ago now costs upwards of three dollars. Hence it is not difficult to spend a wheelbarrow full of pennies on a single trip to the grocery store.In my opinion, if it looks like a duck, waddles like a duck, and quacks like a duck – it’s a duck. Well, if it looks like inflation and feels like inflation, it IS inflation, regardless of what the government tries to tell us.Fed chairman Ben Bernanke is whispering,Don’t worry.But my wallet is screaming, Inflation!

Has America’s Playing Nuclear Patty-Cake With Egypt Been A Bad Idea?
by Sean Osborne NEIN


27 February 2011: It was just too hard to resist making the title of this report a parody of the Geico rhetorical question advertising campaign featuring actor Mike McGlone. So tell me, has America’s playing nuclear patty-cake with Egypt been a bad idea? After reading this article you will know why it was a very bad idea.Now that the restraining influence of President Hosni Mubarak is gone, it would appear to be a very bad idea. And the strong support former President Mubarak’s government had previously received from most of the key nations involved in the Middle East for the past 30 years, primarily Israel and the United States, will now come into clearer into focus and scrutiny. You see, Hosni Mubarak was the key figure in keeping a previously clandestine Egyptian nuclear weapons program under tight controls; a nuclear weapons program manifest in the Argentina-built 22-megawatt reactor located in Egypt’s Nile Delta town of Inshas.It would seem that friendly regimes, long-standing allies, can have a clandestine nuclear weapons program because they’ve shown themselves capable of not behaving badly as in the case of the world’s largest supporter on international Islamic terrorism, the Islamic Republic of Iran.

In just a couple of days new information is going to be in published in the media which details certain facts about the Egyptian nuclear weapons program which is now, thanks to the amatuerish and extremely ill-advised pressure from Obama and his friends in throwing Hosni Mubarak under the bus, clearly within the grasp of the Islamo-Nazi fundamentalists of Egypt’s al-Ikhwan al-Muslimun (Muslim Brotherhood).
The United States Intelligence Community (USIC) has just assessed, based upon direct knowledge of the Egyptian nuclear progam since the mid-1980s, that a nuclear weapons capability is well within the grasp of either the Egyptain armed forces or the Ikhwan in their ongoing power struggle in Egypt. The Ikhwan clearly have the upper-hand and the organizational edge in the struggle, and may well represent the coming power of a cruel master, and a fierce king will rule over them declared by the Lord Almighty in Isaiah 19:4. Of course, the Ikhwan covertly exist within the Egyptian armed forces, so the ultimate Egyptian power-broker could well be a combination of the two.The USIC has revealed that Egypt has quietly acquired nuclear weapons technology and material from China, North Korea and Pakistan, in addition to biological and chemical weapons capabilities, and Hosni Mubarak was the key factor in ensuring that an Egyptian nuclear breakout would not occur. Otherwise the United States would have been all over Egypt as we have been for over a decade regarding the Iranian nuclear weapons program. The key controlling factor of Hosni Mubarak no longer exists. However, even during his tenure between 1990 and 2003 Egypt is known to have conducted 16 secret nuclear experiments under the command of Brigadier General Ahmed Nashet. In this same period Egypt acquired a Russian-made cyclotron for advanced uranium enrichment, and the Argentines designed the Inshas nuclear reactor to produce weapons-grade plutonium.The bottom-line USIC assessments is that Egypt now has the resources to complete the production of nuclear warheads and a missile-borne delivery system of at least 1,000 kilometers (621 miles). How convenient! The distance between Cairo and Tel Aviv is less than half of that, and Cairo to Dimona is a mere stones throw. Worse, there’s a common border between Egyptian Sinai and the Israeli Negev were smuggling is rampant.

ISRAELS INHERITED LAND IN THE FUTURE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ytWmPqY8TE0&feature=player_embedded

DEUTERONOMY 7:7-8
7 The LORD did not set his love upon you, nor choose you, because ye were more in number than any people;(ISRAEL) for ye were the fewest of all people:
8 But because the LORD loved you,(ISRAEL) and because he would keep the oath which he had sworn unto your fathers, hath the LORD brought you out with a mighty hand, and redeemed you out of the house of bondmen, from the hand of Pharaoh king of Egypt.

ZECHARIAH 2:8
8 For thus saith the LORD of hosts; After the glory hath he sent me unto the nations which spoiled you: for he that toucheth you toucheth the apple of his eye.

JEREMIAH 3:14
14 Turn, O backsliding children, saith the LORD; for I am married unto you:(ISRAEL) and I will take you one of a city, and two of a family, and I will bring you to Zion:

ISAIAH 42:1
1 Behold my servant, whom I uphold; mine elect,(ISRAEL) in whom my soul delighteth; I have put my spirit upon him: he shall bring forth judgment to the Gentiles.

ISAIAH 45:4
4 For Jacob my servant’s sake, and Israel mine elect, I have even called thee by thy name: I have surnamed thee, though thou hast not known me.

ISAIAH 65:9,22
9 And I will bring forth a seed out of Jacob, and out of Judah an inheritor of my mountains: and mine elect (ISRAEL) shall inherit it, and my servants shall dwell there.
22 They shall not build, and another inhabit; they shall not plant, and another eat: for as the days of a tree are the days of my people, and mine elect (ISRAEL) shall long enjoy the work of their hands.

ISAIAH 56:5
5 Even unto them (ISRAELIS) will I give in mine house and within my walls a place and a name better than of sons and of daughters: I will give them an everlasting name,(ISRAEL) that shall not be cut off.

And here are the bounderies of the land that Israel will inherit either through war or peace or God in the future. God says its Israels land and only Israels land. They will have every inch God promised them of this land in the future.
Egypt east of the Nile River, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, The southern part of Turkey and the Western Half of Iraq west of the Euphrates. Gen 13:14-15, Psm 105:9,11, Gen 15:18, Exe 23:31, Num 34:1-12, Josh 1:4.ALL THIS LAND ISRAEL WILL DEFINATELY OWN IN THE FUTURE, ITS ISRAELS NOT ISHMAELS LAND.

12 TRIBES INHERIT LAND IN THE FUTURE

The Peace of Israel By Alan Caruba Friday, March 4, 2011 CFP

There is one nation in the Middle East that is not roiling in anarchy, rioting, and internal warfare. It does so without oppressing its citizens. It encourages and protects the practice of all religions. That nation is Israel.The other Middle Eastern and North African nations, all predominantly Islamic, have discovered that Islam, despite its grip on the minds and souls of Muslims, does not preclude the universal human desire for freedom, for hope of a better life.It seems that no one lacks for a reason to hate Jews, but if one steps back from the shouting and the insane claims that Jews and Zionism are responsible for everything and control everything, Israel seems to have made multiculturalism actually work.Israel, whose official languages are Hebrew and Arabic, is home to more than seven million people, 76% if whom are Jewish and 24% are mostly Muslim, but include Christians, Bahai, and probably every other faith known to God and man.

The latest news, according to a report in the March 4th Wall Street Journal, is that Israel is weighing a new plan for a provisional Palestinian state, an offer of temporary borders within which the Palestinians could establish a nation of their own.The problem, of course, is that the Palestinians have rejected this obvious solution for more than sixty years and are, themselves, divided between the Palestinian Authority and the radical Hamas that only wants to utterly destroy Israel and its Jewish citizens.The French have France, the Greeks have Greece, the Turks have Turkey and all manner of self-identifying groups have their own nations, but for many worldwide the Jews are not supposed to have their own nation or to live in the land in which their ancestors have lived for 3,500 years ago.When Muhammad began to piece together Islam, naming himself as a new prophet, he instructed the first Muslims to face Jerusalem when they prayed. After Arabian tribes of Jews refused to convert, he slaughtered their men, sold their women and children into slavery, and ordered Muslims to face Mecca instead.The Jews, however, have some good news to celebrate because on March 3rd there was a report of Pope Benedict XVI’s new book, Jesus of Nazareth—Part II” in which he asserts a sweeping exoneration of the Jewish people for the death of Jesus Christ. Given Jesus’ paternity, faith, and apostles, all Jewish, that is surely welcome news.In 1965, the Second Vatican Council document, Nostra Aetate, initially affirmed that Jesus’ death could not be blamed on the Jews as a whole at that time or today. Pope Benedict’s reaffirmation of that Catholic truth should be bigger news.

In a world in which more than a billion Muslims are eager to establish a universal caliphate, mostly by the use of terror on the Earth’s other five billion inhabitants, the Pope’s book is a candle of sanity in the darkness.Pope Benedict, forced to join the Hitler Youth, witness to the Holocaust, has made improving the Church’s relations with Jews a priority of his pontificate. He has visited the Auschwitz Nazi death camp in Poland and Israel’s Yad Vashem Holocaust memorial where he prayed for the souls of those killed for the crime of being Jewish.In contrast, Islam makes death the punishment for the crime of converting to any other faith. That is surely a measure of how thoroughly evil it is. In Pakistan a Christian government minister was murdered this week. In Germany, a Muslim convert killed U.S. service members, and every day mullahs tell Muslims that suicide/homicide killing is a holy act. In America, the current regime refuses to use words like terrorism or jihad.It takes clarity and courage for non-Muslims to identify the threat to their faith and their lives. Benedict’s predecessor, Pope John Paul, was instrumental in shining a light on a comparable threat, Communism, aiding in the downfall of the Berlin Wall and the Soviet Union. An earlier Pope, Pius XII, used his powers to resist the rise and reign of Nazism.It is a good thing to be a Catholic. It is a good thing to be a Christian. It is a good thing to be a Hindu or a Buddhist. It is a good thing to be a Jew.The same cannot be said of those who embrace terror, murder, and death as their path to paradise. Alan Caruba, 2011

Computer Expert: US Was Behind Stuxnet Virus
Paul Joseph Watson Infowars.com March 4, 2011

http://www.infowars.com/computer-expert-us-was-behind-stuxnet-virus/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYB-yxxsbig&feature=player_embedded (VIDEO)

A computer expert at the influential TED Conference in California has confirmed what the New York Times already admitted in January – that the same governments calling for draconian cybersecurity powers in order to protect against cyber warfare were themselves the culprits behind an act of cyber warfare that could have triggered a new Chernobyl disaster in launching the Stuxnet worm attack against Iran.Ralph Langner, dubbed by his peers as one of the best technical minds working in the field of industrial control system security, said that the Stuxnet virus, which was used to attack Iranian computer systems that controlled water supplies, oil rigs, power plants and other critical infrastructure at the Bushehr nuclear reactor plant, was created by the United States with assistance from Israel.My opinion is that the Mossad is involved, Langner said while discussing his in-depth Stuxnet analysis at a prestigious TED conference in the Southern California city of Long Beach, reports AFP.But, the leading source is not Israel… There is only one leading source, and that is the United States, explained Langner.Langner’s conclusion only confirms what the New York Times already admitted in January, that the worm was created by the US and Israel as a weapon with which to sabotage Iran’s nuclear program.The fact that the effectiveness of the Stuxnet worm was tested at Israel’s Dimona nuclear facility strongly indicates that the virus was designed as an American-Israeli project to sabotage the Iranian program, the Times reported on January 15.

At the height of the Stuxnet attack last year, many cybersecurity advocates were citing the virus as a justification for giving President Obama a kill switch to shut down the Internet, despite the fact that the worm could only have infected computer systems by being inserted physically via a USB flash drive.The fact that the virus was created by the United States and Israel renders obsolete the entire cybersecurity agenda. Here we have the very culprits behind acts of cyber warfare telling us that we need to give them more power to counter the threat of cyber warfare.But this goes further than the Iranian nuclear program or cybersecurity. After it became apparent that the US and Israel were behind he virus, Russian officials called on NATO to launch a full investigation into Stuxnet, warning that the attack had caused centrifuges at the Bushehr to spin out of control, which could have triggered a new Chernobyl disaster.Langner said the Stuxnet code was designed to trick human operators by showing them recorded readings indicating machinery is running normally while behind the scenes they are heading for destruction.It’s definitely hard-core sabotage, Langner said of Stuxnet. It’s like in the movies where during a heist the security camera is running pre-recorded video showing nothing is wrong.Back in September 2010, we wrote several articles in which we identified Israel and the United States….as the prime suspects behind the Stuxnet worm attack, following the revelation that the virus was created by experts working for a country or a well-funded private group.At the time, debunkers labeled the claim that the US and Israel had launched the worm attack as a ridiculous conspiracy theory.

- In an article entitled Debunking the Bunk of Stuxnet, the popular About.com website claimed that none of the evidence had any direct connection to Israel being behind the attack.
- The Economist reported that there was no specific evidence Stuxnet was an Israeli cyber-missile aimed at Iran.
- In an October 5 piece entitled Stuxnet: Fact vs. theory, CNet’s Elinor Mills wrote that there was no hard evidence behind the claim that, The malware was distributed by Israel or the United States in an attempt to interfere with Iran’s nuclear program.
- A Reddit piece submitted by conspiracy debunker entitled, I would just to take this opportunity to debunk the conspiracy theory that Stuxnet was made by Israeli hackers,blamed low educated Iranians from poor backgrounds for the theory that Israel was behind the attack.
- The Judeosphere blog labeled the charge convoluted mental gymnastics.
- A Jewish Chronicle article written by Miriam Shaviv labeled the claim a ridiculous conspiracy theory.

That ridiculous conspiracy theory was a very real fact, and one that could have caused an environmental catastrophe that would have plagued the planet for decades to come.If we allow cybersecurity legislation to pass, we will be empowering the very cyber terrorists, the US military-industrial complex, who launched the most devastating and potentially dangerous cyber attack to date, handing them carte blanche to exploit more acts of cyber warfare to exalt themselves as the saviors when they are the very culprits behind the attacks.Ridiculous conspiracy theory: The Alex Jones Show from September 27, 2010, in which Israel and the United States were identified as being behind the Stuxnet attack.

Unions could block all routes into Brussels to shut down EU summit
LEIGH PHILLIPS Today MAR 4,11 @ 17:50 CET


EUOBSERVER / BRUSSELS - As anger mounts on the left and amongst unions at European economic governance plans, Belgian workers have announced they will attempt to blockade all access to Brussels and paralyse the European capital in an attempt to shut down the European summit of 24 March. France's powerful CGT union is considering joining them.The General Workers Federation of Belgium (FGTB) has said it intends to mount barricades on the motorways coming into the city, close the train stations, bring the metro and trams to a halt and even shut down Brussels airport.We need to strike a blow,, said Nico Cue, secretary general of the metalworkers' section of the union, reported La Libre Belgique on Thursday. The Sarkozy-Merkel duo is trying to impose a competitiveness pact that could undermine automatic indexing of salaries and threaten the retirement age of 65. This subject will be found on the menu at the EU summit on 24 and 25 March to be held in Brussels, he continued.He said he did not want the union action to be a normal Brussels march through the city ending with everyone heading home with little achieved: While this could be a routine demonstration, starting from the Gare du Nord [the city's north train station] to Gare du Midi [its south train station], we believe that it takes some other action, more determined.Other unions are currently considering the proposal, including the country's Christian trade union, the CSC, which has also approached the European Trade Union Congress to organise a large-scale action the same day.France's powerful CGT union is also looking into backing the idea. The ETUC will take a decision on the matter on Tuesday.

Several sectors have already said yes, Mr Cue added.We'll see. It is democracy that will decide.A source close to discussions told EUobserver: The idea is that leaders can't get in or out of the city. If the airport is shut down, if there's no fuel for the planes, if no air traffic controllers are working, if the Eurostar is down, they can't meet. We can stop them before they can come.He explained why the unions were ready to take such radical action: Even if we have a march of 100,000 people from all across Europe, they won't listen. It won't change much. They couldn't care less. We need to do something that will make them pay attention. We really need to get serious this time.Discussions at the EU level of a European economic governance and competitiveness pact initially proposed by Merkel and Sarkozy and now being moved forward by EU Council President Herman Van Rompuy and European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso and focus heavily on wage restraint, raising retirement ages and restricting public spending.According to the leak of a recent draft currently on the table, the pact would also monitor public and private sector wages across the bloc, force a decentralisation of collective bargaining, and end the closed shop (where to be hired, one must be a member of a union) and reform systems of the indexation of wages to inflation where such schemes exist.On Wednesday, the European Public Service Union, representing public-sector workers, called on the EU to hold referendums on economic governance plans.

MEPs vote themselves extra €1,500 allowance a month
ANDREW WILLIS Today MAR 4,11 @ 09:26 CET


EUOBSERVER / BRUSSELS - MEPs have elected to boost their monthly allowance for staff and office expenses by €1,500, mirroring a similar move last year despite a widespread austerity drive in EU member states.The decision by members of the European Parliament's budgetary committee on Thursday (3 March) will see the legislature's overall budget increase by almost €13.25 million in 2011.MEPs from parliament's Socialist and centre-right European Peoples Party groups supported the proposed raise, while other groups said the decision was unjustified.German Green MEP Helga Trupel said the move showed EU lawmakers were clearly out of touch with fiscal realities ...[and] sent completely the wrong signal to EU citizens. Portuguese far-left MEP Miguel Portas called the decision misconceived.Meanwhile, supporters say the extra allowance would enable the hiring of additional staff to tackle the growing workload under the EU's new Lisbon Treaty, in place since 1 December 2009.I cannot do the political or control work I have to do if I don't have more staff, said German centre-right MEP Ingeborg Grassle. Euro deputies are paid €7,956.87 per month before tax, and an additional €300 for the days they officially sign in to work in Brussels or Strasbourg.They also receive a monthly allowance of €19,709 for staff and other office expenses, with Thursday's decision set to increase this figure.The move is unlikely to be welcomed in several corners of Europe as EU governments embark on a wave of spending cuts and tax increases.

Leaders from Britain, France and Germany late last year called for limits to be placed on future EU spending, while a commission and parliament request for a six percent increase to the EU's 2011 budget was eventually cut in half by member states.In a sign that some in the EU institutions were beginning to take note, an internal memo written by commission secretary-general Catherine Day last month called on the EU body to change its culture of entitlement and bureaucratic focus and to embark on a new efficiency drive.

MEPs take note of attacks on EU press freedom
ANDREW WILLIS 03.03.2011 @ 17:43 CET


EUOBSERVER / BRUSSELS – European governments are using wiretaps, the threat of large fines and the prospect of psychiatric testing to intimidate journalists and muzzle the region's free press, according to stakeholders and experts in the field. A shortage of funds and an over-concentration of media ownership are also key problems facing the sector, participants at a conference organised by the European Parliament's Socialist group said on Thursday (3 March).Traditionally seen as a 'fourth estate' charged with monitoring the holders of power, Europe's media freedom has recently come under greater scrutiny after Hungary's centre-right government introduced a widely–criticised media law on 1 January 2011.But other EU countries including Romania, Italy, Bulgaria and France have also witnessed rising tensions.Romanian broadcast laws have been subject to six amendments over the past year, with up to 40 percent of broadcast time now reserved for the national news agency, said Ioana Avadani, executive director of the Centre of Independent Journalism, a Bucharest-based NGO.The country's parliament is currently debating the idea of imposing annual psychiatric controls on journalists, while the government recently changed a public procurement law related to media contracts.

Basically the government can give public money to whoever it wants, Ms Avadani said, reserving her strongest criticism for the government's plan for a national defence strategy under which media groups would be listed as a vulnerability to the state.
In France, the recent scandal linking L'Oreal billionaire-heiress Liliane Bettencourt with Eric Woerth, the former treasurer of President Nicolas Sarkozy's UMP party, has added to tensions.The centre-left Le Monde newspaper subsequently accused the French presidency of ordering counter-intelligence agents to identify the source who leaked information to the newspaper.Added to this, the fall in readership and recent wave of newspaper/television takeovers has threatened the independence of some of the country's most established news outlets, said Jean-Marie Charon, a sociologist with CNRS, a French government-funded research body.Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi's fusion of political and media power has been a bone of contention for many years.But the embattled premier could opt to further increase the size of his media empire from 1 April when a law restricting media concentration is set to expire, warned Roberto Natale, President of the Federazione Nazionale Stampa Italiana.As prime minister, only he can decide on whether to extend the law or not, said Mr Natale.In Bulgaria, the centre-right government is also planning to introduce new media laws.

These, together with widespread wiretapping of journalists and a failure to properly investigate a recent bomb explosion at the Sofia-based headquarters of the Galeria magazine were reminiscent of the country's past totalitarian regime said Borislav Tsekov, director of the Institute of Modern Politics in Bulgaria.The European Commission's role in supporting Europe's free press has also come under greater scrutiny following Hungary's controversial new media law, but critics say a series of amendments demanded by the commission are essentially cosmetic in nature, with the homogeneous nature of Hungary's powerful new media authority left intact.As a result, other EU states and aspiring members may also be tempted to engage in media restrictions said Gabor Horvath, deputy editor-in-chief of Hungary's Nepszabadsag newspaper.Different EU initiatives have also faced criticism, with a European Parliament plan to allocate €1.5 million to investigative journalism research grants in 2010 and 2011 eventually withdrawn due to fears over editorial independence. While several speakers at Thursday's event called for the introduction of new EU legislation to secure Europe's media freedom and potentially provide financial support, the general secretary of the International Federation of Journalists said policymakers should concentrate on implementing legal provisions already in place, including the EU's Charter of Fundamental Rights.Creating new legislation is such a long-winded debate. We've been discussing it for 15 years ... we need to focus on practical structures,said Aidan White.

Thousands march in India against EU trade deal
ANDREW WILLIS 03.03.2011 @ 09:25 CET


EUOBSERVER / BRUSSELS - Thousands of HIV-positive protesters took to the streets in downtown New Delhi on Wednesday (2 March), concerned that an imminent EU-India free trade agreement (FTA) will end the production of affordable life-prolonging drugs.
The rally of more than 2,000 demonstrators from India and other Asian countries coincided with the re-start of sensitive trade negotiations in Brussels, with officials suggesting an end to the 2007-initiated talks is in sight.But opponents of the deal say an EU request for a data exclusivity clause will drive the price of generic drugs made in India above an affordable level for people in poorer countries.More than 80 percent of the AIDS drugs our medical practitioners use to treat 175,000 people in developing countries are affordable generics from India, said Paul Cawthorne, a spokesman for Paris-based humanitarian group Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF).Beyond AIDS, we rely on producers in India for drugs to treat other illnesses, such as tuberculosis and malaria. We cannot afford to let our patients lifeline be cut, Mr Cawthorne added, reports AFP.Medicines have proved a sticking point in the ongoing discussions, with the EU keen to secure India's commitment to a strong intellectual property rights regime with respect to drugs.European drug manufacturers complain that many of their patented products are frequently undercut by generics produced in India. EU customs officials have seized a number of containments bound for the 27-member state market over the past few years.

Until recently, Indian regulations allowed pharmaceutical companies to patent only drug-making processes and not the final products. Pressure from the World Trade Organisation has resulted in a tightening of those rules, but not as much as the EU would like.Critics of the FTA say Europe's demand for data exclusivity would mean that clinical trial data filed by one company could not be relied upon by other companies. As a result, the need for each firm to produce its own clinical trial tests would dramatically increase the price of medicines, they complain.The United Nations is among those who also fear data exclusivity provisions could act like a patent and block more affordable generic medicines from the market.It would be a colossal mistake to introduce data exclusivity in India, when millions of people across the globe depend on the country as the pharmacy of the developing world, said Anand Grover, the UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Health.The EU is India's largest trading partner. Bilateral trade in goods and services between the two sides in 2009 was worth just under €69 billion, according to European Commission figures.

Another sensitive issue in the talks relates to the automobile sector, one of the subjects being discussed by commission and Indian negotiators this week. Here Europe is pushing for a reduction in Indian import tariffs on European cars, currently around 110 percent. Indian car manufacturers are against the move.We are aware of the position of the Indian car industry with respect to the negotiations, EU trade spokesman John Clancy told the Business Standard newspaper this week. But it is clear that in order for the EU to support this agreement, access to India's car market must be improved significantly.A compromise deal could revolve around the abolition of tariffs on high-end, luxury cars, while small models retain a degree of protection.

ALLTIME