JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.GET SAVED NOW- CALL ON JESUS TODAY.THE ONLY SAVIOR OF THE WHOLE EARTH - NO OTHER. 1 COR 15:23-JESUS THE FIRST FRUITS-CHRISTIANS RAPTURED TO JESUS-FIRST FRUITS OF THE SPIRIT-23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.ROMANS 8:23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.(THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE)
WAR WITH IRAN - DAY 259 FRI NOVEMBER 13,26 - CAN IRAN STILL MAKE ATOMIC BOMBS.
THE NEXT US-ISRAEL HIT ON IRAN SHOULD BE VERSE 37. ALL OFFENSIVE NUKE SITES MISSLES,DRONES,AND OF COURSE KHEMENI AND THE IRGC GUARDS.THEN AFTER IRANS REGIME CHANGE. MUSLIMS COME TO JESUS BY THE MILLIONS.
JEREMEIAH 49:32-39 (IN IRAN AT THE BUSHEHR OR ARAK NUKE SITES AND ALL OFENSIVE WEAPONS DESTROYED IN IRAN)
Jeremiah 49:32-39
32 Their camels shall be a booty, and the multitude of their cattle a spoil: and I will scatter to all winds those who have the corners [of their hair] cut off; and I will bring their calamity from every side of them, says Yahweh.
33 Hazor shall be a dwelling-place of jackals, a desolation forever: no man shall dwell there, neither shall any son of man sojourn therein.(Location & Size: It was strategically located along the Via Maris (Way of the Sea), a major trade route connecting Egypt with Syria and Mesopotamia.)
34 The word of Yahweh that came to Jeremiah the prophet concerning Elam,(IRAN) in the beginning of the reign of Zedekiah king of Judah, saying,
35 Thus says Yahweh of Hosts: Behold, I will break the bow of Elam,(IRANS OFFENSIVE WEAPONS) the chief of their might.(MISSLES AND NUKE SITES)
36 On Elam (IRAN) will I bring the four winds from the four quarters of the sky, and will scatter them toward all those winds; and there shall be no nation where the outcasts of Elam shall not come.(SINCE 1979 IRANIANS HAVE GOTTIN OUT OF IRAN BECAUSE OF KHEMENI AND HIS APOCOPOLIPTIC DEATH CULT BELIEF-BLACK HATER 12ERS)
37 I will cause Elam (IRAN) to be dismayed before their enemies, and before those who seek their life;(ISRAEL THE LITTLE SATAN AND THE U.S THE BIG SATAN) and I will bring evil on them, (MISSLES) even my fierce anger,(FIRE) says Yahweh; and I will send the sword after them,(IRANS OFFENSIVE WEAPONS) until I have consumed them; (DESTROYED THEM ALL NUKE SITES,MISSLES ETC)
38 and I will set my throne in Elam,(IRAN WILL BECOME A CHRISTIAN NATION) and will destroy from there king (KHEMENI CLAN) and princes, says Yahweh.(IRANIAN ARMY GUARDS)
39 But it shall happen in the latter days, that I will bring back the captivity of Elam,(IRAN) says Yahweh.(WERE IN THE LATTER DAYS NOW)
WHEN ARE THE 500 MILLION MIGRATING BIRDS IN ISRAEL IN THE SPRING TIME.(GET READY ISLAM TO BE BIRD SEED FOR THESE BIRDS)
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/m0bXU5Xqc5M
The 500 million migratory birds in Israel during the spring arrive from Africa and head toward Europe and Asia, with the peak migration occurring in March and April. While migration starts in late February, the most intense movements, particularly of birds of prey, storks, and pelicans, occur during the third week of March and continue into April.
Key Details on the Spring Migration
Peak Period: Mid-March through April.
Main Migration Route: The birds use the Great Rift Valley, which includes the Hula Valley and Eilat, acting as a "bottleneck" where millions of birds fly through the narrow land bridge.
Best Spots: The Hula Lake Park (Northern Israel) and the Eilat Birding Center (Southern Israel) are primary locations for observing the migration.
Key Species: Hundreds of thousands of white storks, along with black kites, raptors, and pelicans, pass through over these months.
uration: The spring migration runs from late February and continues into June, though the heaviest traffic is in March/April.
The 500 million migratory birds fly over Israel in the fall between late August and mid-December. The peak migration period for the autumn, when the highest volume of bird traffic occurs, is typically October and November.
Key Fall Migration Details
Location: The Hula Valley (Agamon Hula Park) in northern Israel is the premier spot to witness this phenomenon.
Timing: Migration starts as early as late June with some waders, but intensifies from mid-August through November.
Peak Festival: The "Annual Hula Valley Bird Festival" is usually held in November to align with the peak migration traffic.
Key Species: Many birds of prey (raptors), including honey buzzards and steppe eagles, cross during this time, along with massive flocks of storks and cranes.
While roughly 500 million birds pass through in the autumn on their way to Africa, the same number crosses again in the spring (mid-February to May) on their way back to Europe and Asia.
JEREMEIAH 49:23-27
23 Concerning Damascus.(SYRIA) Hamath is confounded, and Arpad: for they have heard evil tidings: they are fainthearted; there is sorrow on the sea;(WAR SHIPS WITH NUKES COMING ON SYRIA) it cannot be quiet.
24 Damascus is waxed feeble, and turneth herself to flee, and fear hath seized on her: anguish and sorrows have taken her, as a woman in travail.
25 How is the city of praise not left, the city of my joy!
26 Therefore her young men shall fall in her streets, and all the men of war shall be cut off in that day, saith the LORD of hosts.
27 And I will kindle a fire (NUKES OR BOMBS) in the wall of Damascus, and it shall consume the palaces of Benhadad.(ASSADS PALACES POSSIBLY IN DAMASCUS)
TED POSTOL-IRANS DANGEROUS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zz6gGA63Kcw
Iran can make at least 11 nuclear bombs within weeks’: MIT prof warns ahead of US-Tehran talks in Islamabad-MIT professor Theodore Postol claims Iran already has enough material for 10 to 11 nuclear weapons and warns any nuclear escalation could trigger mass destruction across the region.Kamna Arora | New Delhi | April 11, 2026 1:32 pm
The Bushehr nuclear power plant in Iran. File photo: Reuters via ANI-MIT professor Theodore Postol, a longtime national security expert who has also advised the Pentagon, has issued a stark warning on Iran’s nuclear capability, claiming Tehran already has enough material for 10 to 11 nuclear weapons and could assemble them in a matter of weeks if it chose to do so.Speaking in an interview on Glenn Diesen’s YouTube channel, Postol said the bigger danger is not just what Iran may already possess, but how badly its capabilities may have been underestimated. He argued that Iran’s missile, drone and nuclear potential has not been fully understood by the United States and Israel, and warned that any Israeli nuclear strike on Iran could trigger a catastrophic response.Postol’s most striking assertion came early in the discussion, when he said Iran already has the material needed to move quickly towards a bomb. “They can make 11 atomic bombs with this material,” he said, referring to Iran’s stockpile of 60 per cent enriched uranium hexafluoride. He also said Iran was “already a nuclear threshold state”.He argued that Iran does not need a vast visible facility to complete the final steps. According to Postol, the process of enriching uranium further, converting it into metal and assembling a working device could be done in relatively small underground spaces. He said such a weapon would not necessarily need testing before use.“I do not need to test this weapon. This weapon never needs to be tested before I use it,” Postol said, while drawing a comparison with the Hiroshima bomb, which he noted was used without a prior full test of that specific design.What Theodore Postol said about Iran’s nuclear material-Postol said Iran already has the ingredients to move from threshold capability to an actual weapon in a short period if it decides to do so. “Yes, they do,” he said when asked if Iran likely had the nuclear material to build at least 10 weapons.He went further, arguing that Tehran may not even need to openly develop a formal nuclear deterrent at this stage. “They don’t even need to develop a nuclear deterrent. All they have these materials,” he said.Postol claimed Iran’s existing stockpile of 60 per cent enriched uranium hexafluoride was enough to produce several bombs once enriched further and converted into metal. He said Iran had 408 kilograms of the material, adding that “they have 11, if you do a more careful arithmetic”.He also said the equipment required for the final stages could fit inside tunnels and other concealed locations. “A few hundreds of square meters of floor space is all you need,” he said, arguing that such work would not require a major above-ground facility.Why Postol says Iran could move quickly-According to Postol, one centrifuge cascade could take four or five weeks to enrich enough material to 90 per cent, but the timeline could shrink if Iran had multiple cascades operating at once. “If I have two or three of these cascades, I could do it in a few weeks,” he said.He added that the West no longer has full visibility into Iran’s centrifuge construction after the earlier agreement limiting Iran’s nuclear activity broke down. Postol blamed both Donald Trump and Joe Biden for that outcome, saying Washington lost the ability to monitor crucial parts of Iran’s programme after the deal was not restored.In one of his sharpest political comments, Postol said, “Biden deserves a large amount of the negative credit for this disaster having occurred. It’s not simply Trump.”He also took aim at the wider US national security establishment, saying policymakers had mishandled the issue and failed to grasp the consequences of losing oversight of Iran’s enrichment capability.Warning over Israeli action and possible retaliation-The MIT expert also devoted a large part of the discussion to what he said could happen if Israel ever used nuclear weapons against Iran. His argument was that even if Iran has not yet assembled completed nuclear bombs, it could still respond after an attack because it already has the material, the know-how and, in his view, likely hidden equipment.“An Israeli nuclear attack on Iran can be retaliated against,” Postol said. “The Iranians will be able to do it even if they have not yet built nuclear weapons.”He said that the delay would make little difference in strategic terms. “Getting destroyed two or three weeks later is no different in the end from an immediate response,” he said.Postol’s description of such a scenario was grim and detailed. He argued that even lower-yield nuclear weapons could unleash urban firestorms, devastating blast damage, lethal radiation exposure and radioactive rain, producing casualties on a massive scale in cities like Tel Aviv.“Don’t do it. Don’t use nuclear weapons against Iran because there will be death and destruction on the scale of millions of people on all sides,” he said.Postol says the war has already been strategically lost-Towards the end of the interview, Postol argued that from the point of view of Israel and the United States, the war had already been lost in strategic terms. “I think the war from the point of view of the Israelis and the Americans has already been lost,” he said.He said Israel could still survive as a state, but only if it abandoned what he portrayed as a reckless approach and moved towards a more credible diplomatic posture with Iran. He argued that Israel needed to accept Iran’s right to exist and stop operating through deception and surprise attacks. Postol also claimed public sentiment in the United States had shifted sharply. He said many Americans, including American Jews, were no longer willing to be drawn into another war on Israel’s behalf and suggested Israel could not assume the same level of support in future that it had once enjoyed.“The economy of Israel is a shambles,” he said, adding that Americans were increasingly “fed up with Israel”.The interview, taken as a whole, offered one of Postol’s bluntest warnings yet. His central message was clear: Iran, in his assessment, may already be far closer to usable nuclear capability than many governments are willing to admit, and any move towards nuclear escalation in the region could end in mass destruction.
Prof. Ted Postol: Why Bombs Can't Stop Iran's Nuclear Program
See Full Interview: https://www.youtube.com/live/qSmvkuSjGOY?si=Y1sTZy3671h99PYH Follow me:
Substack: https://substack.com/@dialogueworks?utm_campaign=profile&utm_medium=profile-page
X (Twitter): https://x.com/Dialogue_NRA Patreon: https://patreon.com/Dialogueworks?
utm_medium=unknown&utm_source=join_link&utm_campaign=creatorshare_creator&utm_content=copyLin #Nima
What's depicted in slide 11 is the red square. The red square shows you that 25 kilograms of 90% enriched uranium is equivalent to, on the left side, 3,165 kilograms of natural uranium.So that's just showing you the amount. And then each subsequent stage of enrichment is removing the uranium-238 from around it, concentrating it to eventually a nuclear weapon. And as I explained earlier in the next slide, this process is an accelerating process. So just go to the next slide, Nima.There you go. So the way you can think of this is if you have sugar in water, the concentration process is similar to boiling the water. And the separative work is, at a very conceptual level, the amount of time you're boiling at a given rate it takes to remove, let's say, 10% of the uranium-238— in this case, the water.And as we look further and further to the right, if we look at the next-to-last column on the right,where we have 50% enriched sugar and water, we see that the last step brings us to pure sugar.And the graph below shows us what the concentration curve as a function of boiling steps looks like.So if we go to the next slide, this is what the enrichment process shows in separative work units. If we look at the red curve — I forgot to label the red — the red curve is a curve where the centrifuge cascade produces depleted uranium to 0.2%. So it starts with 0.711% uranium-235, and the depleted uranium is 0.02%.The blue curve shows that if the depleted uranium is at a much lower level, it's a much less efficient process in terms of using uranium, where you have 0.04% of the depleted uranium. So you're throwing away much more uranium-235. But let's look at the red side. What the red side shows, if you look at the left vertical axis, if you go to the top of the axis, that's 0.9 concentration — that's weapons-grade uranium. If you look at where the red curve goes as far to the right as possible,that's about 5,500 separative work units. So starting out with about 3,165 kilograms of natural
uranium, I need about 5,500 separative work units to get to a nuclear weapon. But I can take this curve and reconstruct it.So the same curve — let me show you slide 14. And what this is, is the same curve, but what I've done is ask, how much separative work do I need for a given level of concentration to produce weapons-grade plutonium? So let's go to the next slide. I'll give you an example to show you what is going on here. All right, so let's look at the leftmost vertical green line. If I have 40% enriched uranium hexafluoride, I will need about 240 separative work units in order to get to 90% enriched. That's what it's telling me, in order to get to weapons-grade plutonium. So it takes me 2.8 weeks if I have one of these cascades, these double cascades. That's pretty good. If I have 60% enriched, it only takes me 1.4 weeks.So if I blend it down, you know, like the offer, well, it gives you a little bit of extra time, but not a lot. But what it's an indication of—the way to take this—is an indication of the fact that the Iranians have a tremendous capacity to do enrichment. And you're going to need to accept that capacity and negotiate with them because they have an incentive. They have a security incentive to not proceed and build nuclear weapons. So you have to recognize their incentive to not proceed and build nuclear weapons and negotiate something where you can now have inspections of what is going on,because right now there are no inspections. You don't know how many cascades and centrifuges they have. You don't know how many they're building because they threw us out from monitoring. The JCPOA required that we be able to monitor their construction of centrifuge cascades. We don't know what they're doing now. We have no idea how many they're building. In the end, we probably won't know how many they built, even if we renegotiate. But that's not an argument to not get into a treaty arrangement with them, because without that treaty arrangement, this country is going to have—and if they decide to move—they're going to have 20 or more nuclear weapons in four or five years.And they're going to have a dozen or more nuclear weapons within less than a year if they decide to do it.So this is crazy not to get them to agree to something that they basically want to do because they don't want to create a problem for themselves with their near neighbors. So the argument I'm basically trying to make, which I think is solid—if people have an alternative argument, I'm interested, let me know. But I'm not interested in saying, oh, let's bomb them into the Stone Age.It's not going to work. It's not going to happen. So it's unrealistic, it's brutal, it's immoral, and it's just not going to happen. So instead of beating one's chest and saying silly things, it's important to think this through and look at the realities of the situation. It's really extremely important to do that.So... and I can show you one more slide just so people know it exists.Slide 17. This is just a summary of estimates of Iran's rate at which they can build nuclear weapons given the centrifuge capacity and the total number they can build. The rate could be very high, but of course, if they don't have all the material available. So, for example, if we look at the leftmost column in the first table, the bottom leftmost column, the enrichment level going from 60% enriched uranium-235 to bombs per year with these cascades, you can do 35.6, 35.8 bombs per year. That's on the leftmost column. But you don't have all that. You don't have so much 60% enriched uranium hexafluoride; you have only 440 kilograms of it, as is shown in the middle column in the bottom, in the bottom table, bottom of the middle column.So if you have that capacity, then in the rightmost column, you could build roughly 11 or 12 nuclear weapons. So between the 20% and 60% enriched, you should be able to build 12 or 13 nuclear weapons, and add another 11 or 12 nuclear weapons over a period of, you know, four or five years.And anyone who thinks that this thing could not go on for four or five years is really not thinking it through. And the Iranians can stand us off, and they will if they have to. So this is a lesson in reality,is my argument. If there's another solution and it's realistic, someone needs to come up with one.Otherwise, we should stop playing with fire, because I won't suggest that I understand Iran's internal politics at all. I mean, everybody I've talked to who has a modicum of understanding of Iran talks about it as an extraordinarily complex, nuanced political environment. There's a wide, wide range of views among the political elite. And sooner or later, you could have a set of situations where those who want to go ahead and build nuclear weapons prevail. And that will be a bad thing for Iran, but it will also be a bad thing for everyone else. And it's time to give those people who are arguing for a common-sense solution — those Iranians in the political leadership who say, look, this is a sensible way for our country as well as for everyone else — like a guy like Mohammad Zarif explained to this friend of mine. There are people like him in Iran, and they're under attack.And the more that the irrational people in the United States and Israel prevail and continue hammering Iran, the more likely it will eventually become a point where, in the political leadership,those who want to proceed with building nuclear weapons will prevail. And that will be bad for Iran,and it'll be bad for everyone else. The political dynamics are clear. You don't need 10 years of college to understand this. You just need to think. And there's very little thinking. And I might add,it's also a problem with the American arms control community, because these guys don't think at all.I mean, you know, every time you come up with an argument — arms control, arms control — you know, they're just on automatic control.
There's no analysis at all, which is why I got so upset at the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists,because these guys are, you know, they don't care. You know, they want to tell you they're experts and just write articles and, you know, what you should believe because they believe it. Because they live in their little bubble. They just talk to each other. But analysis really matters. And I'm trying to make that point with these talks with your audience. It doesn't mean the analysis leads the way to a simple solution. This may be a very undesirable solution for many people. But it's the only solution that I can see where we end up with a safer world. When I say "we," I mean the Iranians and everybody else.And if we don't start thinking about what the real situation is and how to address this diplomatically, we are going to be in a boatload of trouble in the next few years. And we're already in a boatload of trouble because we are drifting inexorably toward a gigantic economic disaster. In the United States,we're in deep, deep, deep trouble. We're a tremendously rich country, but unfortunately, we have a very unfavorable distribution of wealth. Sixty percent of Americans live paycheck to paycheck. When their gas goes up, when the cost of a gallon of gas goes up by a dollar a gallon, most Americans cannot just avoid spending the money. We are a country that's spread out. Our cities are built — they're low density. People have to drive around. It's not a choice.I can take public transportation because I'm fortunate enough to be well-to-do enough to live in a downtown area. I have a car with almost no mileage on it. It's 10 years old. I walk everywhere. I walk to the grocery store. Most people can't do that. They don't have a choice. And when you're living from paycheck to paycheck and all of a sudden a significant part of your income disappears because you have to buy gas to go to work, you don't have money for food. And the food is going up in price, not only because the transportation costs are higher, but that's only the tip of the iceberg, because the farm — you know, my wife has a farm in the family — and we're now in the process of talking to people, to a friend who rents land on the farm.We're trying to understand what the price of fertilizer is going to be. And, you know, because the growing season is beginning, how much money is it going to cost to pump water onto the land? Because you need diesel fuel to pump the water. You know, this is going to result in increased costs for food and increased costs. So for the United States, which is a rich and privileged country, it's going to be a disaster. And the pressure on Donald Trump is going to increase dramatically,tremendously more than it already is. And God knows what this lunatic and his incompetent staff are going to be up to in the next few months before the major congressional elections coming up. So the United States is going to see a lot of political turmoil.More importantly, you have countries all over the world that are having trouble feeding their populations. There's going to be famine in these places. This is what we're looking at. And this is going to be happening, right? If we stopped right now, it's going to happen at some level. We have lost 13 million barrels a day of oil production already just from, you know, damage to existing facilities. This cannot go on forever. And people need to start thinking about how diplomacy can be used to stop this insanity. But, you know, I'll be accused of being on the wrong side, but I don't see how the Iranians can do anything differently from what they're doing if the West doesn't start seriously negotiating with them. Their incentive is to negotiate.They have every reason to negotiate, but they need sanction relief, and they need to be able to carry on an enrichment program with the appropriate safeguards under the International Atomic Energy Agency so they can go about their business, which they are determined to do. It's not for us to decide whether or not they have the right to enrich. They have the right to enrich. That was decided when the Non-Proliferation Treaty was negotiated. You can't say you don't have the right to enrich and everybody else does. That doesn't work—not if you're a country that aspires to have your own enrichment program. We can debate whether they need it or not and all this other stuff, but that's another discussion. And so I think diplomacy is really needed here.#Guest Yeah. I think many good points were made during this talk, and I hope that we can reach some sort of sanity with what's going on in the Middle East. Everything is somehow getting more complicated.You know, I remember you talked about Michael McFaul. Just five days ago, he tweeted that Ukraine is winning. Just compare that with Ambassador Chas Freeman. It's hard to believe.#Nima It's hard to believe. It's hard to believe. Well, I think I described this at one point. I don't know if I described it to you, but I had this—you know, I’ve known him for many years. So I was at Stanford,and I had this discussion with him after a seminar. And I asked him, I actually asked him in this discussion, I said, what do you think you're going to accomplish? And he said, what do you want to accomplish? And he says, this is a real discussion, I mean—and he says, I want to get rid of Putin.And I said to him, how are you going to do it? He says, I don't know. I said, you want to get rid of him, you don't know. What kind of policy is that? Well, it's not a policy. I'm not arguing a policy. I said, well, you just made a policy statement. You think it's important to get rid of Putin. Who's going to replace him? Have you thought about that? This is, you know, here is a guy—it's hard to believe. This is what happens when you have people who live in a bubble. This is a man, this is an example of a person who lives in a bubble. I had an earlier discussion with him, quite a lot earlier, where he was promoting—he was the lead person during the, you may recall, the Russian reset in 2009. The United States was going to reset the relationship with Russia and have good relations.So the story you'll get from McFaul is, well, the Russians didn't follow through. That's what he'll tell you. Well, the real story is not what he claims. What the real story is, is he, along with Hillary Clinton, surprised the Russians with a proposal to put missile defense systems in Romania and Poland. Those missile defense systems were Aegis systems, which are capable of launching cruise missiles into Russia. The Russians looked at this and said, you know, this missile defense has no capability. In fact, I had to explain that to McFaul. He didn't know that this missile defense had no capability.He was working on getting these things deployed, but he had no knowledge of what the capabilities were. I had to explain to him, you know, the radars are not powerful enough to see and guide interceptors. The interceptors are not fast enough to get the targets. This is a joke. This is a technical joke. What the system can do, though, is launch cruise missiles into Russia. Now, what do you think, Mike? The Russians are going to think what I think. I think this is to threaten the Russians. I'm not a Russian. I'm an American. I'm just technically informed, unlike you. I think this is a threat against Russia.Now, why do you think the Russians react against it? Why do you think this deal failed? It has to do with you, your ignorance, your complete lack of regard for understanding what you're doing, your disinterest in understanding your policies. You are in a position to ask the right questions. You didn't.So this guy is a bubble. He lives in a bubble. And he's an example. He's another example of the bubble I talked to you about earlier, who sits, called a meeting with me, a Zoom meeting, and she sits there, "Well, I don't know what you're talking about. What are you talking about?" Well, you called the meeting. I sent you materials. You didn't read them. "Well, I was busy." You were busy,huh? Don't you think I'm busy? She had a technical person on the Science and Security Board, this woman. He couldn't show up. He was too busy too. But I had an exchange with him in emails, and at one point, he said something to me in the emails. I have these emails, incidentally. I was thinking of giving a talk on it. He actually says to me something that caused me to write back to him and say,"Are you insulting me? Are you insulting me? Do you think I have no scientific capabilities? You know, this is insulting, what you're saying." So he writes back to me, this guy writes back to me,"Oh, Dr. Postol, I'm not insulting you. I understand that you know much more about these things than I do."But he didn't take the trouble to show up at the meeting to talk about this. So it's in writing, you know. You know much more about this than I do. So I wrote him back and I said, why are you on the Science and Security Board of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists if you don't know anything about this and you're not interested in learning? What's your job? Why are you there? To say, I'm a good guy. I'm for arms control, arms control, arms control. I'm a good man. I'm against instability.That's the community you're dealing with. That's the people on the right side. That's the people on the right side. So you can understand why I'm fed up with these people. And I am fed up. I'm totally fed up.
