JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.GET SAVED NOW- CALL ON JESUS TODAY.THE ONLY SAVIOR OF THE WHOLE EARTH - NO OTHER. 1 COR 15:23-JESUS THE FIRST FRUITS-CHRISTIANS RAPTURED TO JESUS-FIRST FRUITS OF THE SPIRIT-23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.ROMANS 8:23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.(THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE)
HITLARY (2ND) CLINTON GATE.SHUT IT DOWN.
FIRES AND EXPLOSIONS
REVELATION 8:7
7
The first angel sounded, and there followed hail and fire mingled with
blood, and they were cast upon the earth: and the third part of trees
was burnt up, and all green grass was burnt up.
JAMES 1:11
11
For the sun is no sooner risen with a burning heat, but it withereth the
grass, and the flower thereof falleth, and the grace of the fashion of
it perisheth: so also shall the rich man fade away in his ways.
The
Hebrew noun accurately translated “oven” refers to a “baking oven” as
distinct from a kiln or smelting furnace—both of which burn much hotter.
(The Hebrew nouns for “kiln” or for “smelting furnace” are more likely
to appear in contexts of God's wrath or judgment.)
21 They have
roused me to jealousy with a non-god, they have exasperated me with
their idols. In my turn I shall rouse them to jealousy with a
non-people, I shall exasperate them with a stupid nation.
22 Yes, a
fire has blazed from my anger, it will burn right down to the depths of
Sheol; it will devour the earth and all its produce, it will set fire to
the footings of the mountains.
23 I shall hurl disasters on them, on them I shall use up all my arrows.
Ephesians 2:2
2
Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world,
according to the prince of the power of the air,(LIBERAL GODLESS AIR
WAVES) the spirit that now worketh in the children of
disobedience:(GODLESS)
2 Peter 3:6-7 Amplified Bible (AMP) (HOT SUN, NUKES ETC)
6 By these waters also the world of that time was deluged and destroyed.
7
By the same word the present heavens and earth are reserved for fire,
being kept for the day of judgment and destruction of the ungodly.
Daniel
chapter 10 provides us with a particularly fascinating incident from
the life of the prophet Daniel. The incident has to do with answers to
prayer and why those answers sometimes get delayed. In Daniel’s case,
his answer was delayed for three full weeks.
12 Then said he unto me,
Fear not, Daniel: for from the first day (3 WEEKS EARLIER) that thou
didst set thine heart to understand, and to chasten thyself before thy
God, thy words were heard, and I am come for thy words.(THIS SEEMS TO ME
TO BE MICHAEL THE ARCH ANGEL ISRAELS WAR ANGEL OF PROTECTION.) THAT
CAME TO DANIEL.
13 But the prince (TERRITORIAL DEMON OVER IRAN) of
the kingdom of Persia withstood me one and twenty days:(3 WEEKS) but,
lo, Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me; and I remained
there with the kings of Persia.
14 Now I am come to make thee
understand what shall befall thy people in the latter days: for yet the
vision is for many days.(THE POINT HERE IS THAT SAME TERRITORIAL DEMON
THAT STOPPED DANIELS PRAYER FROM BEING ANSWERED FOR 3 WEEKS-IS STILL
OVER IRANS TERRITORY THAT LEADS THE LEADERS OF IRAN). THATS WHY IRAN
WILL NEVER STOP MAKING NUKES TILL ISRAEL IS OFF THE FACE OF THE EARTH.
WITH THIS TERRITORIAL DEMON CONTROLLING THE MINDS OF KHAMENEI AND THE
LEADERS IN IRAN.
SOME OF
THE DEMOCRAT STOOGES ARE NOW COMING OUT AS WHISTLE BLOWERS AGAINST THE
RUSSIA HOAX.THE TRUTH IS FINALLY BEING REVEALED BY JESUS OUR GOD WHO
KNOWS EVERY SECRET ON EARTH ANYBODY EVER KEPT..
‘Shut
it down’: Bombshell FBI timeline exposes political interference in
Clinton corruption probe-Kid gloves vs. brass knuckles:
Newly-declassified timeline shows how the investigation of the Clinton
Foundation was hamstrung by FBI and DOJ while baseless Russia collusion
marched foward in both agencies against Donald Trump.By John Solomon and
Jerry Dunleavy-Published: August 13, 2025 8:40pm
FBI Director
Kash Patel has uncovered a bombshell memo written in 2017 chronicling
the extensive political obstruction that career agents in three cities
faced from their own bosses and the Obama Justice Department during the
2016 election as they probed whether Hillary Clinton engaged in a
pay-to-play corruption scheme involving her family foundation."Shut it
down!" then-Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates is quoted as demanding
in the detailed timeline of political impediments that agents in New
York City, Little Rock, Ark., and Washington D.C. reported. The agents
tried to get the help of federal prosecutors to determine whether or
what crimes occurred while Hillary Clinton served as Secretary of State,
most notably, because at that time, her family foundation solicited
hundreds of millions of dollars from foreign and U.S. interests with
business before her department.The timeline — written by a DOJ lawyer
assigned to the FBI under former bureau Director James Comey — was
recently secured by top aides to Patel along with several corroborating
internal emails and was obtained by Just the News. Together, they make
clear that both the DOJ and former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe
placed significant impediments in front of agents who believed they had
evidence to justify a public integrity criminal case.The declassified
timeline revealed that as early as February 2016, the Justice Department
“indicated they would not be supportive of an FBI investigation.” The
timeline also shows that, in mid-February 2016, McCabe ordered that “no
overt investigative steps” were allowed to be taken in the Clinton
Foundation investigation “without his approval” — a command he allegedly
repeated numerous times over the coming months.You can read the
timeline here:Declassified Timeline on Clinton Foundation
Investigation-The roadblocks just kept coming, the timeline shows, to
the great frustration of the agents and the U.S. attorney's office in
Little Rock, which had moved to a fully predicated criminal
investigation.Patel's discovery of the memo and related emails comes at a
sensitive time as Attorney General Pam Bondi has approved the use of a
strike force and a grand jury to investigate whether law enforcement and
intelligence abuses over the last decade amounted to a criminal
conspiracy to protect Democrats like Clinton and Joe Biden while
inflicting harm on Trump and his followers.Officials told Just the News
that DOJ also has secure potential cooperation from current and former
prosecutors and agents who were willing to assist any investigation in
possible obstruction of the Clinton probes."Shut it down!" No
explanation given-The timeline detailed how Yates ordered one of the
federal prosecutors to “shut it down” likely in the March 2016
timeframe. Federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York
(SDNY) and Eastern District of New York (EDNY) purportedly said in
August 2016 that they “would not support the investigation” into the
Clinton Foundation, according to the timeline, and that “no explanation
was given.”Once the investigation had essentially been delayed for a
year and dragged past the November 2016 election, the timeline shows
that DOJ officials under Trump then began to raise their “concerns
regarding the statute of limitations” around the investigation, with one
still unnamed official saying that they “wanted to close this chapter
and move forward.”Yates did not immediately respond to a request sent to
her via her law firm email, and McCabe did not immediately respond to a
request for comment sent to him through George Mason University. The
Clinton Foundation did not immediately respond to a request for comment
sent through its website.McCabe was the Assistant Director in Charge of
the FBI’s Washington Field Office, but he soon ascended to Deputy
Director of the FBI under Comey, where the Justice Department inspector
general said he “had an active role in the supervision of the Midyear
[Clinton emails] investigation, and oversight of the Clinton Foundation
investigation, until he recused himself from these investigations on
November 1, 2016” — just days before the election. By that time, most
political fallout against Hillary Clinton from the FBI's probes had been
neutralized. Inspector General Horowitz noted that his investigation
“found that McCabe did not fully comply with this recusal in a few
instances related to the Clinton Foundation investigation.”No matter
where agents turned to get support to investigate Clinton's alleged
corruption, they were thwarted, the memo located by Patel reveals.The
timeline stated that, in July or August 2015, an FBI supervisory special
agent at the Washington Field Office “had a brief discussion” with a
member of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia
“regarding the Clinton Foundation allegations” which had been focused on
by the book Clinton Cash by Peter Schweizer. At the time, an
investigator whose name remains redacted “was in the process of
attempting to predicate an investigation based on the allegations.”An
unnamed investigator “may have had one or two brief discussions” in the
fall of 2015 with an assistant U.S. attorney in the nation’s capital and
with a member of DOJ’s Public Integrity Section, according to the
timeline, where the Clinton Foundation was “likely ancillary” and “with
the intention of informing” the redacted DOJ officials that an
investigator “was continuing to study the matter to possibly predicate
an investigation.”The preliminary investigation begins-A meeting between
multiple FBI agents and DOJ officials whose names are redacted,
including staff from the Criminal Investigative Division and the Office
of General Counsel, was held “to discuss the opening of the Clinton
Foundation investigation.” An unnamed official whose identity was
redacted “authorized all three field offices to open investigations but
to not take any investigative steps until the matter was discussed with
DOJ.” The FBI’s Criminal Investigative Division “advised the
search/access parameters for their investigation were limited in scope”
and that the Criminal Investigative Division “would not be able to
share” certain redacted information “with the CF investigative team.”The
timeline stated that the FBI’s New York field office “initiated a
Preliminary Investigation” on January 22, the Little Rock field office
“initiated a Full Field Investigation” on January 27, and the Washington
field office “initiated a Preliminary Investigation" on January 29,
2016.The Durham report previously said the FBI’s Little Rock
investigation was launched in part due to an intelligence product and
corroborating financial reporting that a particular commercial "industry
likely engaged a federal public official in a flow of benefits scheme,
namely, large monetary contributions were made to a non-profit, under
both direct and indirect control of the federal public official, in
exchange for favorable government action and/or influence."The special
counsel said the FBI investigation in the nation’s capital was opened
“as a preliminary investigation, because the Case Agent wanted to
determine if he could develop additional information to corroborate the
allegations in a recently-published book, Clinton Cash by Peter
Schweizer, before seeking to convert the matter to a full
investigation.”Offers of contributions to Clinton Foundation for
preferential treatment-Durham also said the FBI’s Little Rock and New
York investigations “included predication based on source reporting that
identified foreign governments that had made, or offered to make,
contributions to the Foundation in exchange for favorable or
preferential treatment from Clinton.”Despite that evidence, the FBI
timeline stated that DOJ “indicated they would not be supportive of an
FBI investigation” on February 1, 2016.The timeline said that personnel
from the FBI’s Little Rock office raised concerns that a redacted
official “may not want to be a party to the briefing because of
conflicts of interest” during an early February 2016 meeting. A redacted
Little Rock official “expressed these concerns due to the possibility
that” another redacted official “was believed to be a supporter of the
Democratic Party and possibly the Clintons.”There was a meeting between
officials from the New York and Washington field offices, and possibly
the Little Rock field office, on February 17, 2016 according to the
timeline. McCabe “led the meeting” and “was advised” by the New York
field office about a confidential human source (CHS) “who possibly had
information on the matter.” During this meeting, McCabe “directed that
no overt investigative steps were to be taken on the CF investigation
without his approval.”McCabe demands pre-approval of any investigation
into Clintons-The timeline stated that the FBI’s Criminal Investigative
Division reiterated that “all overt investigative steps related to the
CF investigation” would “require” McCabe’s approval, “with the exception
of speaking to open CHSs” during a February 22, 2016 meeting. The
inquiry was further hobbled during the meeting when the FBI offices were
“directed not to open or recruit any new CHSs, and no additional overt
investigative steps were authorized.”The Durham report previously said
that, in late February 2016, a “meeting was convened at FBI Headquarters
to discuss the Foundation investigations” — and McCabe initially
ordered the closure of all the investigations before backtracking
slightly to hamper the investigations by requiring his personal approval
for any significant investigative actions.The Durham report said
“McCabe initially directed the field offices to close their cases, but
following objections, agreed to reconsider the final disposition of the
cases.”Paul Abbate, then the assistant director in charge of the
Washington Field Office, described McCabe as "negative," "annoyed," and
"angry" about the Clinton Foundation cases, with McCabe saying that
"they [the DOJ] say there's nothing here" and with McCabe asking "why
are we even doing this?"Durham said that, at the end of the meeting,
Services Branch Executive Assistant Director Randall Coleman “directed
that for any overt investigative steps to be taken, the Deputy
Director's [McCabe’s] approval would be required.”The declassified
timeline showed that the FBI’s Little Rock office “sent an email” to the
Criminal Investigative Division “requesting concurrence” to “obtain
supporting documents” for the investigation on March 1, 2016, but the
Little Rock investigators “never received permission to seek the
documents.” The timeline also said that, possibly in March 2016, the
U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Arkansas informed the
FBI’s Little Rock investigators that Yates “ordered” the federal
prosecutors to “shut it down.”Lynch and Comey looked for ways to end the
Clinton emails investigation-Obama Attorney General Loretta Lynch met
with former President Bill Clinton on Lynch’s plane on the tarmac of a
Phoenix airport on June 27, 2016. Lynch and Bill Clinton both claimed to
the DOJ watchdog that they did not discuss the Midyear Exam
investigation or any other DOJ investigations during their lengthy and
private conversation.Lynch later admitted to the DOJ inspector general
that the meeting “went on and on” and “that it was just too long a
conversation to have had.” After the meeting, the DOJ’s ethics office
concluded that Lynch did not have to recuse herself and Lynch decided
not to voluntarily recuse herself either. Lynch claimed to Horowitz that
stepping aside would have created a “misimpression” that she and Bill
Clinton “had discussed inappropriate topics, or that her role in the
Midyear investigation somehow was greater than it was.”The Obama
attorney general told a reporter at the start of July 2016 that she
”fully expect[ed]” to accept the recommendation of the career FBI agents
and DOJ prosecutors who conducted the Clinton emails investigation, and
said that “I’ll be briefed on [the findings] and I will be accepting
their recommendations.”Comey clears Hillary, sets sights on Trump-Comey
cleared Hillary Clinton of criminal wrongdoing for transmitting
classified information on an insecure and private email server in a
speech on July 5, 2016 — just weeks before greenlighting the Crossfire
Hurricane investigation in late July 2016. Comey claimed of the Clinton
case at the time that Clinton’s email practices were “extremely
careless” and that “although there is evidence of potential violations
of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our
judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case.”Comey
listed Clinton’s numerous missteps, including the fact that 110 emails
in 52 email chains contained classified information at the time they
were sent or received by Clinton, but he recommended against charging
her with any crimes.Disgraced fired FBI special agent Peter Strzok later
testified to Congress in 2018 that the FBI "did not have access" to
Clinton Foundation emails that were on Clinton's private server because
of a consent agreement "negotiated between the Department of Justice
attorneys and counsel for Clinton."Horowitz’s 2018 report concluded
Comey’s actions seemingly exonerating Clinton were “extraordinary and
insubordinate” when he announced Clinton wouldn’t be charged. “We
concluded that Comey’s unilateral announcement was inconsistent with
Department policy and violated long-standing Department practice and
protocol by, among other things, criticizing Clinton’s uncharged
conduct,” the DOJ inspector general concluded. "We also found that Comey
usurped the authority of the Attorney General, and inadequately and
incompletely described the legal position of Department prosecutors.”The
timeline said the FBI field offices in Little Rock and the nation’s
capital were “directed to close their investigations” while the New York
office “was advised no overt investigative action was to take place”
unless McCabe authorized it.Strzok had exchanged a host of anti-Trump
texts in 2016 with now-former FBI lawyer Lisa Page, with whom he was
having an affair. Horowitz wrote, “We did not have confidence that
Strzok’s decision to prioritize the Russia investigation over following
up on the Midyear-related investigative lead discovered on the Weiner
laptop was free from bias.”Strzok wrote in his 2020 book "Compromised"
that “of course” he prioritized the Trump-Russia investigation over the
Clinton emails investigation because “there was simply no equivalence
between Midyear and Crossfire.”Horowitz’s report in 2018 detailed
multiple instances in which McCabe “lacked candor” with Comey, FBI
investigators, and inspector general investigators, including while
under oath, about his authorization to then leak sensitive information
to The Wall Street Journal in late October 2016 that revealed the
existence of the FBI investigation into the Clinton Foundation (while
not revealing how McCabe had put the inquiry in leg-irons for nearly a
year).The Horowitz report concluded “the evidence is substantial” that
McCabe misled investigators “knowingly and intentionally” about leaking
to the media. Comey said he did not permit McCabe to tell the media, and
Horowitz wrote that McCabe’s actions were “designed to advance his
personal interests at the expense of Department leadership” and
“violated the FBI’s and the Department’s media policy and constituted
misconduct.”The timeline said that in a conference call on October 25,
2016, McCabe was also “reminded that EDNY had previously stated not
interested in pursuing CF matter, but then changed to no legal process…
until after the election.”McCabe talked to a redacted official about the
Journal article which had included details about the Clinton Foundation
inquiry and about his “concern over leaks and need to advise folks of
media policy” during an October 30, 2016, meeting, according to the
timeline. McCabe, as he well knew, had been the source of the Clinton
Foundation leak.It was only the next day — November 1, 2016 — that
McCabe “sent an email recusing himself from the Clinton Foundation
Investigation,” according to the timeline. McCabe had successfully
slow-walked the inquiry all the way up to just prior to Election Day
2016."DOJ told them to stand down"DOJ personnel allegedly “indicated” on
August 2, 2017, that U.S. attorneys “have the autonomy and discretion
to pursue any investigation deemed appropriate” and that the U.S.
Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Arkansas “does not require
DOJ concurrence to move forward,” according to the timeline.The
timeline stated that an official said on August 11, 2017 that “they
continue to fully support” the Little Rock field office on the matter
and “reiterated it was ‘the right thing to do’ since the allegations
were like any other PC case that would be worked, albeit this matter was
more sensitive than others.” Nonetheless, an official whose name is
redacted said that they were “going to wait until DOJ gave them
concurrence to proceed” because “DOJ had told them to stand down last
year.”The final entry in the timeline comes on August 23, 2017. That
day, the Criminal Investigative Division received a phone call from a
redacted investigator “who requested follow-up information concerning”
the “19 CF bank accounts” which had been obtained by the FBI’s Los
Angeles field office “during a separate Campaign Finance Fraud
investigation.”Investigation into Clinton Foundation snuffed out soon
after.Memos penned by McCabe and declassified earlier this year show how
McCabe kept the Trump-Russia investigation alive and then escalated it
after Comey’s removal by Trump in 2017. The memos show McCabe
facilitated the FBI’s targeting of Lt. Gen. Mike Flynn, met with Vice
President Mike Pence and other White House officials about the Flynn
allegations, refused to publicly shoot down false media stories on
collusion, opened a baseless collusion investigation into Trump himself
after Comey was fired, ratcheted up the Trump-Russia investigation as
the acting FBI director, helped successfully push for a special counsel
to take the reins, and more.Then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions fired
McCabe in 2018 just before he was set to retire.“Andrew McCabe FIRED, a
great day for the hard working men and women of the FBI — A great day
for Democracy,” Trump tweeted just after midnight after McCabe’s 2018
firing. “Sanctimonious James Comey was his boss and made McCabe look
like a choirboy. He knew all about the lies and corruption going on at
the highest levels of the FBI!”Kid gloves vs. brass knuckles-The
differences in how the Justice Department and FBI handled cases related
to Clinton and Trump were stark — publicly exonerating Clinton for her
mishandling of classified information when using a private email server
as secretary of state and not even allowing the Clinton Foundation
investigation to get off the ground, while launching a sprawling and
baseless Russia collusion inquiry into the Trump campaign and the
candidate (and then the president) himself.Special Counsel John Durham
later pointed out that “the immediate opening of Crossfire Hurricane as a
full investigation contrasts with the care taken in connection with the
investigation of the Clinton Foundation and other matters.”
Top
DOJ lawyer warns feds could face criminal civil rights charges for
weaponization-Local police for years have been charged under civil
rights laws for abuses of authority. Now, DOJ is taking a closer look at
applying those laws to federal agents in cases of political
weaponization.By John Solomon-Published: August 10, 2025 11:07pm
A
top Justice Department lawyer is warning that federal agents and
intelligence officers who weaponized their government powers for
political purposes could face criminal charges under civil rights laws
created to fight injustices during the Jim Crow era more than a
half-century ago.Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet
Dhillon cautioned in an interview with Just the News that she could not
discuss any specific investigations or potential suspect.But she said
recent reports that one or more grand juries were probing the
weaponization of government powers against President Trump and his
associates or followers might have given good reason for current and
former FBI and CIA officials to hire lawyers.“This, again, goes back to
those Reconstruction Era statutes that sought to remedy the vestiges of
racism, and we had some terrible incidents in our country's history of
law enforcement officials conspiring to deprive African Americans of
their civil rights,“ she said in a wide-ranging interview with the "Just
the News, No Noise" television show. “And that is where some of these
laws stem from."Dhillon: Government officials wrongly think they are
immune from civil rights laws“But they're broader than that, and so it
can be a crime for government officials, either together or in
conspiring with non-government officials, to violate people's civil
rights,” she explained. “That's also a civil violation. I've actually
sued over that in California for pro-life activists. And you know, we
have long-standing cases involving these issues, and so I think, you
know, government officials may think, because nobody ever bothers to
enforce these statutes, that they're immune, and they can do whatever
they want."“Not so, and I think that's why you're seeing some people
tongue-in-cheek saying that in DC, every lawyer is being retained …. as
these investigations have begun to hit the newswires,” she
added.Dhillon's comments come as FBI Director Kash Patel has opened at
least one criminal conspiracy case looking at whether DOJ, FBI, and
intelligence community officers were engaged in a long-running
conspiracy to violate the rights of Donald Trump and his followers from
the Russiagate scandal to the raid on Mar-a-Lago.In addition, CIA
Director John Ratcliffe and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi
Gabbard have referred current and former officials to the Justice
Department for possible prosecution for alleged abuses.Last week, the
Justice Department issued subpoenas to New York Attorney General Leticia
James seeking any evidence of whether she sought to violate the civil
rights of President Trump when she filed a civil lawsuit against his
company for alleged fraud.Section 241 of Title 18 of the U.S. Code makes
it "unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to injure, oppress,
threaten, or intimidate any person of any state, territory or district
in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to
him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the United States."Such
conspiracy statutes are derived from the Civil Rights Acts of 1960 and
1964, which were enacted to protect black citizens from police abuses in
the South and from prohibitions in public places. Those laws were
complemented by a series of voting rights laws as well.Recent
implementation of the civil rights laws-The laws were seldom
successfully used against police officers during the 1960's, but have
been more commonly used against police misconduct over the last three
decades, starting most notably with the infamous 1993 Rodney King case
where four LAPD officers involved were captured on videotape beating
King.The four were initially acquitted on state charges in May of that
year, which led to five days of rioting. Fifty-three people (including
28 African-Americans, 19 Hispanics, 14 whites, and 2 Asians) were
killed: the greatest death toll in any American civil disturbance since
the 1863 Draft Riots in New York City. Looting and fires had inflicted
more than one billion dollars in property damage. The four officers were
retried under federal civil rights laws in February 1993, with two of
them being acquitted, and the remaining two found guilty and sentenced
to two and a half years in prison. In a civil lawsuit, King won a $3.8
million verdict from the City of Los Angeles.More recently, former
Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin was convicted of violating
George Floyd's civil rights in 2020 by kneeling on his neck and
suffocating Floyd. The Justice Department said in a press release that
Chauvin pleaded guilty to willfully depriving Mr. Floyd of his
constitutional right to be free from the use of unreasonable force by a
police officer, resulting in Mr. Floyd’s bodily injury and death. In the
plea documents, Chauvin agreed that the sentencing for this crime
should be based on the sentence for second-degree murder because he
acted willfully and in callous and wanton disregard of the consequences
on Floyd’s life. He was sentenced to a term in prison of more than 20
years.Elsewhere, a law enforcement officer was tried and convicted on
similar charges related to violating the civil rights of Breonna Taylor
in Kentucky during the execution of a search warrant in March 2020 that,
according to the Justice Department, led to the death of Taylor in her
home.Although his shots did not strike Taylor, the use of deadly force
was unjustified. Taylor was killed during the botched raid when police
rammed the door open and Taylor’s boyfriend, believing that intruders
were breaking in, fired his handgun one time at officers, two of whom
fired back, hitting and killing Taylor.A federal judge dismissed the
felony charges against the other police officers in August of last year,
although the other officers are still facing ongoing criminal
litigation, according to a local TV station.
