JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.GET SAVED NOW- CALL ON JESUS TODAY.THE ONLY SAVIOR OF THE WHOLE EARTH - NO OTHER. 1 COR 15:23-JESUS THE FIRST FRUITS-CHRISTIANS RAPTURED TO JESUS-FIRST FRUITS OF THE SPIRIT-23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.ROMANS 8:23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.(THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE)
SOUTH AFRICAN CONTRACT FROM PHIZER. THE VACCINE HAS NOT BEEN TESTED.THE WORLD WAS A BUNCH OF SHEEP TO SLAUGHTER.
DISEASES-ANIMAL TO HUMAN
REVELATION 6:7-8 (500 MILLION DEAD EACH FROM THE 4 JUDGEMENTS)(2 BILLION TOT DEAD HERE)
7 And when he had opened the fourth seal, I heard the voice of the fourth beast say, Come and see.
8
And I looked, and behold a pale horse:(CHLORES GREEN) and his name that
sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given
unto them over the fourth part of the earth,(2 billion) of (8 billion)
to kill with sword,(WEAPONS)(500 million) and with hunger,(FAMINE)(500
million) and with death,(INCURABLE DISEASES)(500 million) and with the
beasts of the earth.(ANIMAL TO HUMAN DISEASE)(500 million).
SOAFRICA PFIZER CONTRACT-VACCINE UNTESTED
https://rumble.com/v3j43pc-south-africa-forced-to-reveal-pfizer-covid-contract-they-knew-shots-could-c.html
Yet
recent online posts claim, as if it were breaking news, that a Pfizer
executive “admits” the vaccine was never tested for whether it prevented
transmission. Social media posts claim the supposed “shocking
admission” was “criminal” and “indisputable proof of the fact that our
governments lied to us.”The posts cite remarks by Pfizer’s president of
international developed markets, Janine Small, while testifying on
behalf of Bourla before the European Parliament’s COVID-19 committee on
Oct. 10. During the session, a conservative Dutch member of the
Parliament, Rob Roos, asked Small if Pfizer had tested the vaccine for
transmission prevention before the vaccine entered the market. Small
said: “No. We had to really move at the speed of science to really
understand what is taking place in the market”
SO THAT TERESA TAM AND ALL THE CANADIAN SCAMMERS AT THE HEALTH CENTERS. NEW THAT THE WORLD DRUG DEALERS PFIZER, MODERNA AND THE REST OF THE DRUG DEALER PHARACIES THAT THE VACCINES WERE NEVER TESTED. SINCE IT SAID RIGHT IN THE WORLDS DRUG DEALERS CONTRACTS. USE AT YOUR RISK.
Secret vaccine
contracts in South Africa authorized high prices and huge advance
payments-Geoffrey York-Africa Bureau Chief-Johannesburg-Published
September 5, 2023
Secret vaccine contracts, disclosed after a
court battle, show that global vaccine manufacturers charged high prices
and insisted on hefty advance payments from the South African
government at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic.The contracts are
believed to be the first COVID-19 vaccine contracts in any country to be
legally disclosed without redactions. They provide a glimpse into the
exhaustive conditions that were imposed by the vaccine suppliers at a
time when thousands of people were dying and developing countries were
desperate for doses.The contracts, released on Tuesday, show that South
Africa was liable for at least US$734-million in payments under four
vaccine deals in 2021, including advance payments of almost
US$95-million, without any guarantee that the doses would be delivered
on time.The contracts imposed a series of secrecy and indemnification
clauses to shield the companies from scrutiny and legal liability, while
other clauses allowed them to take control of any export of the
supplied vaccines. They were also exempted from the obligation to give
full refunds if their deliveries were delayed or cancelled.Health
activists fought for months in the South African courts to obtain the
contracts. When a court ordered their release last month, the South
African government decided not to appeal the ruling and began releasing
the contracts to the activists.An international coalition of health
groups, including the Health Law Institute at Dalhousie University in
Halifax, said the contracts showed a pattern of bullying, profiteering
and unethical behaviour by the vaccine makers.“The contracts reveal the
phenomenal power that pharmaceutical companies wielded in negotiations,”
said Fatima Hassan, a human-rights lawyer who heads the Health Justice
Initiative, which led the court battle to obtain the contracts.“In our
scramble for desperately needed vaccines, South Africa was forced to
hand over unimaginable sums of money for overpriced vaccine doses,” she
said. “Put simply, pharmaceutical companies held us to ransom. And we
must ask: Did they do it to other countries, too?”The contracts showed
that Pfizer charged South Africa a price of US$10 a dose for 30 million
doses, and South Africa was required to pay US$40-million in advance, of
which only half was refundable. The price per dose was 32 per cent
higher than the US$6.75 “cost price” that Pfizer reportedly charged to
the African Union. (The Globe and Mail has asked Pfizer to respond to
this, but the company did not respond by Tuesday evening.) Another
supplier, the Serum Institute of India, charged South Africa a price of
US$5.35 a dose, according to the contracts. This was more than double
the price that it charged to the European Union, and it required payment
in advance.A third supplier, Johnson & Johnson, charged a price of
US$10 a dose in South Africa, according to the contracts, and it
required a non-refundable advance payment of US$27.5-million. The health
groups said that this price was 15 per cent more than the company
charged the European Union, and about 25 per cent more than the
estimated not-for-profit price.The contract also prohibited South Africa
from imposing any export restrictions on Johnson & Johnson’s
vaccines, even on doses that were filled and finished in South Africa.
This allowed the company to export some of the South African doses to
Europe without penalty at the height of the pandemic.In response to
questions from The Globe on Tuesday, Johnson & Johnson said it had
ultimately charged a final price of US$7.50 to South Africa, despite the
higher price cited in the contract.It said it had also transferred its
technology to a South African company, Aspen Pharmacare, to allow it to
sell its own version of the vaccine, while also providing 500,000 doses
to South African health care workers under a clinical study. “We remain
deeply committed to helping address the health needs of people in South
Africa,” it said.The fourth contract was with Gavi, the Vaccine
Alliance, for doses under the non-profit COVAX program. The contract
gave South Africa no guaranteed number of doses and no delivery date,
and the country was liable to pay for all doses ordered, regardless of
delivery. In response to questions from The Globe, Gavi said it had
provided financial incentives to manufacturers to ensure their readiness
to produce, and so the payments from countries such as South Africa
could not contractually be waived.Matthew Herder, director of the Health
Law Institute at Dalhousie University, said the pricing information in
the contracts was “extremely” worrisome.“It is absolutely clear from
these four contracts that South Africa was bullied in terms of sweeping
indemnification and confidentiality obligations, complete waiver of
sovereign immunity, no guarantee of delivery, requirement of a vaccine
compensation program before any doses supplied, no scope for local
manufacturing, and zero flexibility to share doses,” Prof. Herder told
The Globe.The release of the vaccine contracts is a major victory for
transparency, with global implications, he said.The health activists
spent four days poring over the vaccine contracts after obtaining them
last week under the terms of the court order. Their conclusion was
“utter disbelief that this is the power of these companies,” Ms. Hassan
told an online media briefing.The contracts forced South Africa to sign
away its sovereign rights, she said.Nick Dearden, director of
British-based group Global Justice Now, said the South African court
decision is “phenomenally important” and will spur his group to fight
harder for access to British vaccine contracts, which have been heavily
redacted.“When secrecy is allowed to rule, big pharma gains tremendous
power, and they use that power to undermine global equity and public
interest,” he told the media briefing.
