JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.GET SAVED NOW- CALL ON JESUS TODAY.THE ONLY SAVIOR OF THE WHOLE EARTH - NO OTHER.
1 COR 15:23-JESUS THE FIRST FRUITS-CHRISTIANS RAPTURED TO JESUS-FIRST FRUITS OF THE SPIRIT-23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.ROMANS 8:23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.(THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE)
LUKE 21:28-29
28 And when these things begin to come to pass,(ALL THE PROPHECY SIGNS FROM THE BIBLE) then look up, and lift up your heads; for your redemption (RAPTURE) draweth nigh.
29 And he spake to them a parable; Behold the fig tree,(ISRAEL) and all the trees;(ALL INDEPENDENT COUNTRIES)
30 When they now shoot forth, ye see and know of your own selves that summer is now nigh at hand.(ISRAEL LITERALLY BECAME AND INDEPENDENT COUNTRY JUST BEFORE SUMMER IN MAY 14,1948.)
JOEL 2:3,30
3 A fire devoureth (ATOMIC BOMB) before them;(RUSSIAN-ARAB-MUSLIM ARMIES AGAINST ISRAEL) and behind them a flame burneth: the land is as the garden of Eden before them, and behind them a desolate wilderness; yea, and nothing shall escape them.
30 And I will shew wonders in the heavens and in the earth, blood, and fire, and pillars of smoke.(ATOMIC BOMB AFFECT)
ZECHARIAH 14:12-13
12 And this shall be the plague wherewith the LORD will smite all the people that have fought against Jerusalem; Their flesh shall consume away while they stand upon their feet,(DISOLVED FROM ATOMIC BOMB) and their eyes shall consume away in their holes,(DISOLVED FROM ATOMIC BOMB) and their tongue shall consume away in their mouth.(DISOLVED FROM ATOMIC BOMB)(BECAUSE NUKES HAVE BEEN USED ON ISRAELS ENEMIES)(GOD PROTECTS ISRAEL AND ALWAYS WILL)
13 And it shall come to pass in that day, that a great tumult from the LORD shall be among them; and they shall lay hold every one on the hand of his neighbour, and his hand shall rise up against the hand of his neighbour.(1/2-3 BILLION DIE IN WW3)(THIS IS AN ATOMIC BOMB EFFECT)
EZEKIEL 20:47
47 And say to the forest of the south, Hear the word of the LORD; Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I will kindle a fire in thee, and it shall devour every green tree in thee, and every dry tree: the flaming flame shall not be quenched, and all faces from the south to the north shall be burned therein.
ZEPHANIAH 1:18
18 Neither their silver nor their gold shall be able to deliver them in the day of the LORD'S wrath; but the whole land shall be devoured by the fire of his jealousy: for he shall make even a speedy riddance of all them that dwell in the land.
MALACHI 4:1
1 For, behold, the day cometh, that shall burn as an oven;(FROM ATOMIC BOMBS) and all the proud, yea, and all that do wickedly, shall be stubble: and the day that cometh shall burn them up, saith the LORD of hosts, that it shall leave them neither root nor branch.
And here are the bounderies of the land that Israel will inherit either through war or peace or God in the future. God says its Israels land and only Israels land. They will have every inch God promised them of this land in the future.
Egypt east of the Nile River, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, The southern part of Turkey and the Western Half of Iraq west of the Euphrates. Gen 13:14-15, Psm 105:9,11, Gen 15:18, Exe 23:31, Num 34:1-12, Josh 1:4.ALL THIS LAND ISRAEL WILL DEFINATELY OWN IN THE FUTURE, ITS ISRAELS NOT ISHMAELS LAND.
12 TRIBES INHERIT LAND IN THE FUTURE
Iran MP sued for ‘no donkeys, no women in parliament’ rant-Nader Ghazipour offers apology, insists his comments don’t apply every woman, especially not female lawmakers-By AFP March 10, 2016, 9:01 pm-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL
TEHRAN, Iran — Iranian women deputies are suing a conservative male colleague, Nader Ghazipour, after he declared in a video that parliament was no place for “donkeys and women.”Ghazipour’s comments during an election campaign meeting last month have gone viral on social media.“Parliament is not a place for foxes, donkeys and women,” he proclaims before a cheering crowd in the video ahead of the February 26 polls.If you elect women, “they [men colleagues] might do things to them and disgrace you,” he said.Ghazipour was elected in Orumiyeh, a Turkish-speaking province near the border with Turkey.Women MPs — along with a number of men — have filed complaints with Iran’s prosecutor general, parliament’s supervision committee and house speaker Ali Larijani, a leading woman deputy, Fatemeh Rahbar, told state news agency IRNA.“There has been an accusation against women, and Mr Ghazipour must be held responsible,” she said.Ghazipour had sent an apology through mediators, but the plaintiffs “won’t withdraw their lawsuit,” Rahbar said.“His words have gone public through the media and gone viral inside and outside Iran. He should come out” and explain himself.Ghazipour’s comments were “an insult not only to women but to the entire parliament,” Rahbar, herself a member of the conservative camp in Iranian politics, told the reformist daily Shargh.Faced with the threat of lawsuits, Ghazipour has said he was not referring to women in the Islamic republic’s parliament or to female candidates in his own constituency.“I didn’t mean all women. There were two ladies running from our city in this election. You can ask them my opinion of women,” he told the KhabarOnline website.“If elections were held again right now, I would win twice as many votes,” Ghazipour said on a defiant note.According to media reports, unknown assailants beat up the journalist who posted the video, Hamed Atayi, on the street last week in front of his wife and child.
Obama sees Netanyahu as most disappointing of all Mideast leaders — report-The Atlantic: Israeli PM is ‘in his own category’ when it comes to those who frustrate US president; article cites ‘condescending’ lecture by PM, asserts that Obama sees Netanyahu as ‘too fearful and politically paralyzed’ to secure two-state solution-By Times of Israel staff March 10, 2016, 4:39 pm
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu “is in his own category” when it comes to the Middle East leaders who have most deeply disappointed President Barack Obama, according to a major overview of the Obama presidency, featuring numerous interviews with the president, published online Thursday by The Atlantic.In the piece, headlined “The Obama Doctrine,” writer Jeffrey Goldberg goes to great lengths to trace the president’s growing disillusionment, over the course of his presidency, with the possibility of changing the region for the better. “Some of his deepest disappointments concern Middle Eastern leaders themselves,” Goldberg writes. Of these, “Benjamin Netanyahu is in his own category.”According to Goldberg, “Obama has long believed that Netanyahu could bring about a two-state solution that would protect Israel’s status as a Jewish-majority democracy, but is too fearful and politically paralyzed to do so.”To illustrate Obama’s impatience with Netanyahu, one of several Middle Eastern leaders said to have questioned the president’s understanding of the region, Goldberg relates an incident during an undated Obama-Netanyahu meeting, at which the Israeli prime minister “launched into something of a lecture about the dangers of the brutal region in which he lives.”Obama, relates Goldberg, “felt that Netanyahu was behaving in a condescending fashion, and was also avoiding the subject at hand: peace negotiations. Finally, the president interrupted the prime minister: ‘Bibi, you have to understand something,’ he said. ‘I’m the African American son of a single mother, and I live here, in this house. I live in the White House. I managed to get elected president of the United States. You think I don’t understand what you’re talking about, but I do.'”The piece does not single out Netanyahu as the only regional leader to “frustrate him immensely.” Obama now thinks of Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, who he had hoped could bridge the East-West divide, as “a failure and an authoritarian, one who refuses to use his enormous army to bring stability to Syria,” Goldberg writes.He also says Obama two years ago took Jordan’s King Abdullah II aside at an international summit because he was unhappy that the monarch was badmouthing him. “Obama said he had heard that Abdullah had complained to friends in the U.S. Congress about his leadership, and told the king that if he had complaints, he should raise them directly. The king denied that he had spoken ill of him.”“In recent days,” Goldberg continues, “the president has taken to joking privately, ‘All I need in the Middle East is a few smart autocrats.’ Obama has always had a fondness for pragmatic, emotionally contained technocrats, telling aides, ‘If only everyone could be like the Scandinavians, this would all be easy.'”According to Goldberg, Obama now acknowledges that a goal of his Cairo speech in 2009, early in his presidency, in which he sought to persuade Muslims to look honestly at the sources of their unhappiness and stop blaming Israel for all their problems, has proved unsuccessful.He quotes Obama as follows: “My argument was this: Let’s all stop pretending that the cause of the Middle East’s problems is Israel… We want to work to help achieve statehood and dignity for the Palestinians, but I was hoping that my speech could trigger a discussion, could create space for Muslims to address the real problems they are confronting — problems of governance, and the fact that some currents of Islam have not gone through a reformation that would help people adapt their religious doctrines to modernity. My thought was, I would communicate that the U.S. is not standing in the way of this progress, that we would help, in whatever way possible, to advance the goals of a practical, successful Arab agenda that provided a better life for ordinary people.”What unfolded over the following three years, Goldberg goes on, “as the Arab Spring gave up its early promise, and brutality and dysfunction overwhelmed the Middle East,” left Obama bleak. “The unraveling of the Arab Spring darkened the president’s view of what the U.S. could achieve in the Middle East, and made him realize how much the chaos there was distracting from other priorities,” Goldberg writes.More recently, says Goldberg, the rise of the Islamic State terror group has “deepened Obama’s conviction that the Middle East could not be fixed — not on his watch, and not for a generation to come.”In the piece, Goldberg quotes Obama castigating Islamic State in the most bitter tones, as “the distillation of every worst impulse.” Says Obama: “The notion that we are a small group that defines ourselves primarily by the degree to which we can kill others who are not like us, and attempting to impose a rigid orthodoxy that produces nothing, that celebrates nothing, that really is contrary to every bit of human progress— it indicates the degree to which that kind of mentality can still take root and gain adherents in the 21st century.”Obama is also quoted praising Israelis’ ability to withstand a relentless climate of terrorism. Writes Goldberg of the US president: “Several years ago, he expressed to me his admiration for Israelis’ ‘resilience’ in the face of constant terrorism, and it is clear that he would like to see resilience replace panic in American society.”Relating to last July’s nuclear agreement with Iran, on which he and Netanyahu disagreed so profoundly and so publicly, Obama told Goldberg as recently as January that he wasn’t bluffing when he said in 2012 that he would have attacked Iran to prevent it from getting a nuclear weapon. “I actually would have,” Goldberg quotes Obama saying, in reference to a strike on the Iranian nuclear facilities, “If I saw them break out… This was in the category of an American interest.”Where he and Netanyahu differed, Goldberg elaborates, is that “Netanyahu wanted Obama to prevent Iran from being capable of building a bomb, not merely from possessing a bomb.”Much of the article relates to Obama’s decision not to strike at Syria after President Bashar Assad used chemical weapons against his own people in the summer of 2013 — a landmark volte face in his presidency. Goldberg reveals, however, that Secretary of State John Kerry has continued to press Obama “to violate Syria’s sovereignty” and “launch missiles at specific regime targets, under cover of night, to ‘send a message’ to the regime.” The president has insistently refused these requests, Goldberg writes, “and seems to have grown impatient” with Kerry’s lobbying. “Recently, when Kerry handed Obama a written outline of new steps to bring more pressure to bear on Assad, Obama said, ‘Oh, another proposal?'”Goldberg concludes the piece by arguing that Obama “has placed some huge bets” in foreign policy — notably where the Iran deal is concerned. When Goldberg told him last May that he was “nervous” about the deal, Obama replied: “Look, 20 years from now, I’m still going to be around, God willing. If Iran has a nuclear weapon, it’s my name on this… I think it’s fair to say that in addition to our profound national-security interests, I have a personal interest in locking this down.”For supporters of the president, Goldberg sums up, “his strategy makes eminent sense: Double down in those parts of the world where success is plausible, and limit America’s exposure to the rest. His critics believe, however, that problems like those presented by the Middle East don’t solve themselves — that, without American intervention, they metastasize.”
Poll: Most Arab Israelis back MKs’ meeting with terrorists’ families-Channel 2 survey of 350 people finds most respondents disagree with Joint List lawmakers’ condemnation of Gulf states for blacklisting Hezbollah-By Adiv Sterman and Stuart Winer March 10, 2016, 10:52 pm-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL
A majority of Arab Israelis feel Joint (Arab) List MKs did not make a mistake by visiting the bereaved families of Palestinian terrorists killed while carrying out attacks on Israelis, but said the faction’s lawmakers who condemned Gulf states for declaring Hezbollah a terror group were wrong to do so, according to a Channel 2 television poll published Thursday.The survey conducted by the Midgam Institute found that 65 percent of respondents agreed with a decision by MKs from the Balad party, one of four parties that comprise the Joint List Knesset faction, to meet with family members of Palestinian terrorists whose bodies were held by Israeli authorities. Just 17% agreed that the move was a mistake.The poll was conducted among 350 Arab Israelis, with a margin of error of 5.2%.At the time the lawmakers maintained they were simply helping the families recover the attackers’ bodies for burial, but a video of the three MKs ostensibly observing a moment of silence sparked widespread Israeli outrage, and prompted the coalition to draft a controversial bill to allow a three-quarters majority of lawmakers to suspend their colleagues for “unseemly behavior.”The Channel 2 poll also found that 56% of respondents disagreed with two Joint List parties — Hadash and Balad — for condemning the Gulf Arab states, while just under one fifth (19%) said they approved of the move. The remaining quarter said they either don’t know if the condemnation was justified or declined to answer.When it comes to the performance of Arab lawmakers, 35% of respondents said the Joint List MKs only slightly represent them, while another 21% said the Arab lawmakers do not represent them at all.Thirty percent said they feel well-represented by the majority-Arab faction that was formed by the union of Hadash, the United Arab List, Balad, and Ta’al before the 2015 elections. An additional 10% said they feel extremely well-represented.Earlier this week, Hadash and Balad published condemnations of Sunni Arab states that days earlier blacklisted the Lebanese-based Hezbollah organization. Both parties argued that the move serves Israel.Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hit out at the MKs in the Knesset after their condemnation. “Will you continue to condemn them when Hezbollah shoots missiles at your villages? Have you gone mad?” he asked, before apologizing for his turn of phrase.Hezbollah is openly committed to destroying Israel, and has an estimated 100,000-plus rockets and missiles aimed at the Jewish state.The blacklisting of Hezbollah, announced last Wednesday by the six-member Gulf Cooperation Council, came amid the continued deterioration of relations between Hezbollah’s Shiite backer Iran and Sunni-dominated powerhouse Saudi Arabia. Gulf monarchies had already sanctioned Hezbollah in 2013 in reprisal for its armed intervention in Syria in support of embattled President Bashar Assad.Times of Israel staff contributed to this report.
Ex-Mubarak minister named new Arab League chief-A former ambassador to the United Nations, Ahmed Aboul Gheit is seen by some as hope for turbulent Middle East-By AP and AFP March 10, 2016, 10:00 pm-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL
CAIRO — Veteran Egyptian diplomat Ahmed Aboul Gheit was named Thursday as the new secretary general of the Cairo-based Arab League, the 22-member bloc announced in a statement.Aboul Gheit, a former ambassador to the United Nations and Egypt’s last foreign minister under ousted president Hosni Mubarak, won the backing of League members despite a last-minute objection from Qatar.He was the only nominee for the post. It is a long-held protocol that Egypt as host of the Arab League traditionally nominates the league chief.The vote comes at a critical time for the region, with Syria marking the fifth anniversary of the start of its devastating civil war, regional proxy wars between Saudi Arabia and Iran on full display, and the battle against the Islamic State raging in several Arab countries.Divisions have weakened the Arab League since the 2011 uprisings that toppled three longtime autocratic rulers but also sparked three civil wars.But despite its waning influence, a strong leadership might help shore up Saudi-led Sunni front against Iran at a time of ongoing military involvement by the Saudis and other Gulf Arab countries in Yemen and Syria.Past league chairmen have included pan-Arab nationalists such as Amr Moussa and the outgoing head, Nabil Elaraby. Aboul Gheit appears to mark a shift as he is known to be a pragmatic diplomat with strong enmity for political Islam factions like the Muslim Brotherhood, the parent organization of Hamas, which rules the Gaza Strip.Aboul Gheit was replaced as foreign minister after Mubarak’s removal and kept a low profile while many of the former president’s loyalists were sent to courts for trials in corruption-linked cases.
US warns citizens in Israel to be on high alert after string of attacks-Citing uptick in stabbing and shootings, diplomatic mission urges Americans to ‘maintain high degree of personal awareness’-By JTA March 10, 2016, 9:36 pm-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL
The US diplomatic missions in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem has warned American citizens in Israel to maintain heightened awareness, following a week of bloody shooting and stabbing terror attacks.“During the last few months, and in particular over the past several days, there have been a number of attacks in Israel, Jerusalem, and the West Bank that have resulted in injury and death to multiple individuals, including to US citizens,” a security message sent to American citizens in Israel on Wednesday evening read.“Given these recent events and the continuing dynamic security environment in these areas, the US Embassy in Tel Aviv and the US Consulate General in Jerusalem remind US citizens of the need to maintain a high degree of personal situational awareness and to monitor local media for information about breaking events.”The warning came a day after Taylor Force, a graduate student at Vanderbilt University on a school trip to Israel, was killed in a stabbing attack that wounded as many as 10 people at and near Tel Aviv’s Jaffa Port. Earlier the same day, terror attacks in Jerusalem and the central Israel town of Petah Tikva left an ultra-Orthodox man and two Border Police officers seriously injured.The message said, “In view of the current security environment and the possibility of future attacks,” US government employees are prohibited from visiting Jerusalem’s Old City unless “specifically approved for mission critical travel.”The prohibition is in place until March 16 and could be extended, the message said.The message also reminded US citizens “to exercise heightened caution in areas around the Damascus, Lion’s and Herod’s gates to the Old City, as these locations have been the scene of past attacks.”Times of Israel staff contributed to this report
Virginia General Assembly passes anti-BDS resolution-Resolution states boycott is damaging to causes of peace, calls for two-state solution through constructive dialogue-By JTA March 10, 2016, 9:18 pm-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL
The Virginia House of Delegates on Wednesday overwhelmingly passed a resolution condemning the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement against Israel.The resolution passed by a vote of 85-5, with nine abstentions, one day after the state Senate passed the same resolution in a voice vote.It calls for a two-state solution and states that “the members of the General Assembly reaffirm their support for the State of Israel and oppose all attempts to economically and politically isolate Israel within the international arena, including promotion of economic, cultural, and academic boycotts, and all efforts to assault the legitimacy of the State of Israel as the sovereign homeland of the Jewish people.”In condemning the BDS movement and its activities in Virginia, the resolution says the movement’s agenda “is inherently antithetical and deeply damaging to the causes of peace, justice, equality, democracy, and human rights for all peoples in the Middle East.”Virginia’s organized Jewish community in a statement thanked the state’s General Assembly for passing the resolution.“By promoting boycotts rather than constructive dialogue, BDS prevents negotiation and progress,” the statement said. “The statewide organized Jewish community appreciates the General Assembly’s continuing support of the State of Israel and thanks our legislators for rejecting BDS and standing up for reconciliation, hope, and a peaceful future in the Middle East.”
Copenhagen gunman ‘joked after attacks’ with alleged accomplices-Court proceedings reveal attacker had help from several sources; Danish intelligence agency criticized for failing to act on prior information-By Soren Billing March 10, 2016, 10:15 pm-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL
AFP — A Danish court watched dramatic footage Thursday showing the gunman behind a double shooting in Copenhagen joking in a cafe with his alleged accomplices and pretending to pull a trigger after the attacks that left two people dead.The court was also shown a grisly video of the gunman, 22-year-old Danish-born Palestinian Omar El-Hussein, shooting a security guard at a synagogue in one of the two attacks in February last year.The footage was part of the prosecution’s evidence at the opening of the trial of four men accused of helping El-Hussein after the shootings.The Copenhagen courthouse was guarded by about a dozen heavily armed police, with Europe still on high alert over fears of jihadist violence following bloody attacks in Paris in 2015.Prosecutor Bo Bjerregaard accused the four defendants of trying to “destabilize or destroy Denmark’s basic political, constitutional, economic or societal structures.”Defense lawyers said their clients were innocent of the terror charges against them.El-Hussein opened fire on February 14, 2015 outside a cultural center where the speakers included Swedish artist Lars Vilks, a target of Islamic extremists since he portrayed the Prophet Muhammad as a dog in 2007.Filmmaker Finn Norgaard, 55, died and four police officers were injured.Later that night, El-Hussein fired six shots outside the city’s main synagogue, killing security guard Dan Uzan, 37, and injuring two more policemen.The assailant was shot dead by police hours later.Bjerregaard said the four men had to have been aware of the intentions of the gunman, whom some had known since childhood.The court named the four as Liban Ahmed Saleban Elmi, 20, Ibrahim Khalil Abbas, 23, Bhostan Khan Hussein, 26 and Mahmoud Rabea, 31, after lifting a ban on their identities.The prosecution says they committed a “terror offence” by providing El-Hussein with support in the form of ammunition, a hoodie and a bag used in the second attack, and by paying for his time in an Internet cafe where he located the synagogue.Abbas and Elmi are also charged with helping him dispose of the weapon used at the cultural center.The footage of Uzan’s killing was shown only to the judges at the request of his family.But the full court viewed the images of El-Hussein, Elmi and Abbas in the cafe after the synagogue shooting.They are seen talking jokingly, and El-Hussein appears to act out pulling the trigger of a weapon.The prosecution also showed the court the two guns found on El-Hussein’s body after he was killed, and three bullets he was allegedly given from a box of ammunition found at Rabea’s home.If found guilty, the four risk life imprisonment, which in Denmark means they would be entitled to a pardon hearing after 12 years.They did not testify in court Thursday, but when Bjerregaard cited Denmark’s terrorism law, which refers to “he who intends to scare a population,” Rabea interrupted, shouting “I did not want to scare any people.”To secure a conviction, the prosecution has to prove “intent,” meaning they knew about his plans to commit an act of terror.The trial is expected to run for up to 30 court days through September.Elmi’s lawyer told AFP that while her client had been friends with El-Hussein since childhood, he knew nothing of his plans.“He doesn’t deny” meeting up with the gunman on the afternoon of the attacks, “but he denies he knew anything about terror and he didn’t participate in anything concerning terror,” Mette Grith Stage said.Released from prison just two weeks before the attacks after serving time for a stabbing, El-Hussein was known for his violent temper and for having ties to a criminal gang.The prosecution said he pledged allegiance to Islamic State group leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi on Facebook on the day of the shootings, but investigators believe he was not part of a jihadist network.Danish intelligence agency PET has however been criticized for failing to act on information from prison services that he was at risk of radicalization.Little is known about the four suspects, although media reports say they all have criminal records for offences ranging from break-ins to possession of automatic weapons.
28 And when these things begin to come to pass,(ALL THE PROPHECY SIGNS FROM THE BIBLE) then look up, and lift up your heads; for your redemption (RAPTURE) draweth nigh.
29 And he spake to them a parable; Behold the fig tree,(ISRAEL) and all the trees;(ALL INDEPENDENT COUNTRIES)
30 When they now shoot forth, ye see and know of your own selves that summer is now nigh at hand.(ISRAEL LITERALLY BECAME AND INDEPENDENT COUNTRY JUST BEFORE SUMMER IN MAY 14,1948.)
JOEL 2:3,30
3 A fire devoureth (ATOMIC BOMB) before them;(RUSSIAN-ARAB-MUSLIM ARMIES AGAINST ISRAEL) and behind them a flame burneth: the land is as the garden of Eden before them, and behind them a desolate wilderness; yea, and nothing shall escape them.
30 And I will shew wonders in the heavens and in the earth, blood, and fire, and pillars of smoke.(ATOMIC BOMB AFFECT)
ZECHARIAH 14:12-13
12 And this shall be the plague wherewith the LORD will smite all the people that have fought against Jerusalem; Their flesh shall consume away while they stand upon their feet,(DISOLVED FROM ATOMIC BOMB) and their eyes shall consume away in their holes,(DISOLVED FROM ATOMIC BOMB) and their tongue shall consume away in their mouth.(DISOLVED FROM ATOMIC BOMB)(BECAUSE NUKES HAVE BEEN USED ON ISRAELS ENEMIES)(GOD PROTECTS ISRAEL AND ALWAYS WILL)
13 And it shall come to pass in that day, that a great tumult from the LORD shall be among them; and they shall lay hold every one on the hand of his neighbour, and his hand shall rise up against the hand of his neighbour.(1/2-3 BILLION DIE IN WW3)(THIS IS AN ATOMIC BOMB EFFECT)
EZEKIEL 20:47
47 And say to the forest of the south, Hear the word of the LORD; Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I will kindle a fire in thee, and it shall devour every green tree in thee, and every dry tree: the flaming flame shall not be quenched, and all faces from the south to the north shall be burned therein.
ZEPHANIAH 1:18
18 Neither their silver nor their gold shall be able to deliver them in the day of the LORD'S wrath; but the whole land shall be devoured by the fire of his jealousy: for he shall make even a speedy riddance of all them that dwell in the land.
MALACHI 4:1
1 For, behold, the day cometh, that shall burn as an oven;(FROM ATOMIC BOMBS) and all the proud, yea, and all that do wickedly, shall be stubble: and the day that cometh shall burn them up, saith the LORD of hosts, that it shall leave them neither root nor branch.
And here are the bounderies of the land that Israel will inherit either through war or peace or God in the future. God says its Israels land and only Israels land. They will have every inch God promised them of this land in the future.
Egypt east of the Nile River, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, The southern part of Turkey and the Western Half of Iraq west of the Euphrates. Gen 13:14-15, Psm 105:9,11, Gen 15:18, Exe 23:31, Num 34:1-12, Josh 1:4.ALL THIS LAND ISRAEL WILL DEFINATELY OWN IN THE FUTURE, ITS ISRAELS NOT ISHMAELS LAND.
12 TRIBES INHERIT LAND IN THE FUTURE
Iran MP sued for ‘no donkeys, no women in parliament’ rant-Nader Ghazipour offers apology, insists his comments don’t apply every woman, especially not female lawmakers-By AFP March 10, 2016, 9:01 pm-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL
TEHRAN, Iran — Iranian women deputies are suing a conservative male colleague, Nader Ghazipour, after he declared in a video that parliament was no place for “donkeys and women.”Ghazipour’s comments during an election campaign meeting last month have gone viral on social media.“Parliament is not a place for foxes, donkeys and women,” he proclaims before a cheering crowd in the video ahead of the February 26 polls.If you elect women, “they [men colleagues] might do things to them and disgrace you,” he said.Ghazipour was elected in Orumiyeh, a Turkish-speaking province near the border with Turkey.Women MPs — along with a number of men — have filed complaints with Iran’s prosecutor general, parliament’s supervision committee and house speaker Ali Larijani, a leading woman deputy, Fatemeh Rahbar, told state news agency IRNA.“There has been an accusation against women, and Mr Ghazipour must be held responsible,” she said.Ghazipour had sent an apology through mediators, but the plaintiffs “won’t withdraw their lawsuit,” Rahbar said.“His words have gone public through the media and gone viral inside and outside Iran. He should come out” and explain himself.Ghazipour’s comments were “an insult not only to women but to the entire parliament,” Rahbar, herself a member of the conservative camp in Iranian politics, told the reformist daily Shargh.Faced with the threat of lawsuits, Ghazipour has said he was not referring to women in the Islamic republic’s parliament or to female candidates in his own constituency.“I didn’t mean all women. There were two ladies running from our city in this election. You can ask them my opinion of women,” he told the KhabarOnline website.“If elections were held again right now, I would win twice as many votes,” Ghazipour said on a defiant note.According to media reports, unknown assailants beat up the journalist who posted the video, Hamed Atayi, on the street last week in front of his wife and child.
Obama sees Netanyahu as most disappointing of all Mideast leaders — report-The Atlantic: Israeli PM is ‘in his own category’ when it comes to those who frustrate US president; article cites ‘condescending’ lecture by PM, asserts that Obama sees Netanyahu as ‘too fearful and politically paralyzed’ to secure two-state solution-By Times of Israel staff March 10, 2016, 4:39 pm
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu “is in his own category” when it comes to the Middle East leaders who have most deeply disappointed President Barack Obama, according to a major overview of the Obama presidency, featuring numerous interviews with the president, published online Thursday by The Atlantic.In the piece, headlined “The Obama Doctrine,” writer Jeffrey Goldberg goes to great lengths to trace the president’s growing disillusionment, over the course of his presidency, with the possibility of changing the region for the better. “Some of his deepest disappointments concern Middle Eastern leaders themselves,” Goldberg writes. Of these, “Benjamin Netanyahu is in his own category.”According to Goldberg, “Obama has long believed that Netanyahu could bring about a two-state solution that would protect Israel’s status as a Jewish-majority democracy, but is too fearful and politically paralyzed to do so.”To illustrate Obama’s impatience with Netanyahu, one of several Middle Eastern leaders said to have questioned the president’s understanding of the region, Goldberg relates an incident during an undated Obama-Netanyahu meeting, at which the Israeli prime minister “launched into something of a lecture about the dangers of the brutal region in which he lives.”Obama, relates Goldberg, “felt that Netanyahu was behaving in a condescending fashion, and was also avoiding the subject at hand: peace negotiations. Finally, the president interrupted the prime minister: ‘Bibi, you have to understand something,’ he said. ‘I’m the African American son of a single mother, and I live here, in this house. I live in the White House. I managed to get elected president of the United States. You think I don’t understand what you’re talking about, but I do.'”The piece does not single out Netanyahu as the only regional leader to “frustrate him immensely.” Obama now thinks of Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, who he had hoped could bridge the East-West divide, as “a failure and an authoritarian, one who refuses to use his enormous army to bring stability to Syria,” Goldberg writes.He also says Obama two years ago took Jordan’s King Abdullah II aside at an international summit because he was unhappy that the monarch was badmouthing him. “Obama said he had heard that Abdullah had complained to friends in the U.S. Congress about his leadership, and told the king that if he had complaints, he should raise them directly. The king denied that he had spoken ill of him.”“In recent days,” Goldberg continues, “the president has taken to joking privately, ‘All I need in the Middle East is a few smart autocrats.’ Obama has always had a fondness for pragmatic, emotionally contained technocrats, telling aides, ‘If only everyone could be like the Scandinavians, this would all be easy.'”According to Goldberg, Obama now acknowledges that a goal of his Cairo speech in 2009, early in his presidency, in which he sought to persuade Muslims to look honestly at the sources of their unhappiness and stop blaming Israel for all their problems, has proved unsuccessful.He quotes Obama as follows: “My argument was this: Let’s all stop pretending that the cause of the Middle East’s problems is Israel… We want to work to help achieve statehood and dignity for the Palestinians, but I was hoping that my speech could trigger a discussion, could create space for Muslims to address the real problems they are confronting — problems of governance, and the fact that some currents of Islam have not gone through a reformation that would help people adapt their religious doctrines to modernity. My thought was, I would communicate that the U.S. is not standing in the way of this progress, that we would help, in whatever way possible, to advance the goals of a practical, successful Arab agenda that provided a better life for ordinary people.”What unfolded over the following three years, Goldberg goes on, “as the Arab Spring gave up its early promise, and brutality and dysfunction overwhelmed the Middle East,” left Obama bleak. “The unraveling of the Arab Spring darkened the president’s view of what the U.S. could achieve in the Middle East, and made him realize how much the chaos there was distracting from other priorities,” Goldberg writes.More recently, says Goldberg, the rise of the Islamic State terror group has “deepened Obama’s conviction that the Middle East could not be fixed — not on his watch, and not for a generation to come.”In the piece, Goldberg quotes Obama castigating Islamic State in the most bitter tones, as “the distillation of every worst impulse.” Says Obama: “The notion that we are a small group that defines ourselves primarily by the degree to which we can kill others who are not like us, and attempting to impose a rigid orthodoxy that produces nothing, that celebrates nothing, that really is contrary to every bit of human progress— it indicates the degree to which that kind of mentality can still take root and gain adherents in the 21st century.”Obama is also quoted praising Israelis’ ability to withstand a relentless climate of terrorism. Writes Goldberg of the US president: “Several years ago, he expressed to me his admiration for Israelis’ ‘resilience’ in the face of constant terrorism, and it is clear that he would like to see resilience replace panic in American society.”Relating to last July’s nuclear agreement with Iran, on which he and Netanyahu disagreed so profoundly and so publicly, Obama told Goldberg as recently as January that he wasn’t bluffing when he said in 2012 that he would have attacked Iran to prevent it from getting a nuclear weapon. “I actually would have,” Goldberg quotes Obama saying, in reference to a strike on the Iranian nuclear facilities, “If I saw them break out… This was in the category of an American interest.”Where he and Netanyahu differed, Goldberg elaborates, is that “Netanyahu wanted Obama to prevent Iran from being capable of building a bomb, not merely from possessing a bomb.”Much of the article relates to Obama’s decision not to strike at Syria after President Bashar Assad used chemical weapons against his own people in the summer of 2013 — a landmark volte face in his presidency. Goldberg reveals, however, that Secretary of State John Kerry has continued to press Obama “to violate Syria’s sovereignty” and “launch missiles at specific regime targets, under cover of night, to ‘send a message’ to the regime.” The president has insistently refused these requests, Goldberg writes, “and seems to have grown impatient” with Kerry’s lobbying. “Recently, when Kerry handed Obama a written outline of new steps to bring more pressure to bear on Assad, Obama said, ‘Oh, another proposal?'”Goldberg concludes the piece by arguing that Obama “has placed some huge bets” in foreign policy — notably where the Iran deal is concerned. When Goldberg told him last May that he was “nervous” about the deal, Obama replied: “Look, 20 years from now, I’m still going to be around, God willing. If Iran has a nuclear weapon, it’s my name on this… I think it’s fair to say that in addition to our profound national-security interests, I have a personal interest in locking this down.”For supporters of the president, Goldberg sums up, “his strategy makes eminent sense: Double down in those parts of the world where success is plausible, and limit America’s exposure to the rest. His critics believe, however, that problems like those presented by the Middle East don’t solve themselves — that, without American intervention, they metastasize.”
Poll: Most Arab Israelis back MKs’ meeting with terrorists’ families-Channel 2 survey of 350 people finds most respondents disagree with Joint List lawmakers’ condemnation of Gulf states for blacklisting Hezbollah-By Adiv Sterman and Stuart Winer March 10, 2016, 10:52 pm-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL
A majority of Arab Israelis feel Joint (Arab) List MKs did not make a mistake by visiting the bereaved families of Palestinian terrorists killed while carrying out attacks on Israelis, but said the faction’s lawmakers who condemned Gulf states for declaring Hezbollah a terror group were wrong to do so, according to a Channel 2 television poll published Thursday.The survey conducted by the Midgam Institute found that 65 percent of respondents agreed with a decision by MKs from the Balad party, one of four parties that comprise the Joint List Knesset faction, to meet with family members of Palestinian terrorists whose bodies were held by Israeli authorities. Just 17% agreed that the move was a mistake.The poll was conducted among 350 Arab Israelis, with a margin of error of 5.2%.At the time the lawmakers maintained they were simply helping the families recover the attackers’ bodies for burial, but a video of the three MKs ostensibly observing a moment of silence sparked widespread Israeli outrage, and prompted the coalition to draft a controversial bill to allow a three-quarters majority of lawmakers to suspend their colleagues for “unseemly behavior.”The Channel 2 poll also found that 56% of respondents disagreed with two Joint List parties — Hadash and Balad — for condemning the Gulf Arab states, while just under one fifth (19%) said they approved of the move. The remaining quarter said they either don’t know if the condemnation was justified or declined to answer.When it comes to the performance of Arab lawmakers, 35% of respondents said the Joint List MKs only slightly represent them, while another 21% said the Arab lawmakers do not represent them at all.Thirty percent said they feel well-represented by the majority-Arab faction that was formed by the union of Hadash, the United Arab List, Balad, and Ta’al before the 2015 elections. An additional 10% said they feel extremely well-represented.Earlier this week, Hadash and Balad published condemnations of Sunni Arab states that days earlier blacklisted the Lebanese-based Hezbollah organization. Both parties argued that the move serves Israel.Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hit out at the MKs in the Knesset after their condemnation. “Will you continue to condemn them when Hezbollah shoots missiles at your villages? Have you gone mad?” he asked, before apologizing for his turn of phrase.Hezbollah is openly committed to destroying Israel, and has an estimated 100,000-plus rockets and missiles aimed at the Jewish state.The blacklisting of Hezbollah, announced last Wednesday by the six-member Gulf Cooperation Council, came amid the continued deterioration of relations between Hezbollah’s Shiite backer Iran and Sunni-dominated powerhouse Saudi Arabia. Gulf monarchies had already sanctioned Hezbollah in 2013 in reprisal for its armed intervention in Syria in support of embattled President Bashar Assad.Times of Israel staff contributed to this report.
Ex-Mubarak minister named new Arab League chief-A former ambassador to the United Nations, Ahmed Aboul Gheit is seen by some as hope for turbulent Middle East-By AP and AFP March 10, 2016, 10:00 pm-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL
CAIRO — Veteran Egyptian diplomat Ahmed Aboul Gheit was named Thursday as the new secretary general of the Cairo-based Arab League, the 22-member bloc announced in a statement.Aboul Gheit, a former ambassador to the United Nations and Egypt’s last foreign minister under ousted president Hosni Mubarak, won the backing of League members despite a last-minute objection from Qatar.He was the only nominee for the post. It is a long-held protocol that Egypt as host of the Arab League traditionally nominates the league chief.The vote comes at a critical time for the region, with Syria marking the fifth anniversary of the start of its devastating civil war, regional proxy wars between Saudi Arabia and Iran on full display, and the battle against the Islamic State raging in several Arab countries.Divisions have weakened the Arab League since the 2011 uprisings that toppled three longtime autocratic rulers but also sparked three civil wars.But despite its waning influence, a strong leadership might help shore up Saudi-led Sunni front against Iran at a time of ongoing military involvement by the Saudis and other Gulf Arab countries in Yemen and Syria.Past league chairmen have included pan-Arab nationalists such as Amr Moussa and the outgoing head, Nabil Elaraby. Aboul Gheit appears to mark a shift as he is known to be a pragmatic diplomat with strong enmity for political Islam factions like the Muslim Brotherhood, the parent organization of Hamas, which rules the Gaza Strip.Aboul Gheit was replaced as foreign minister after Mubarak’s removal and kept a low profile while many of the former president’s loyalists were sent to courts for trials in corruption-linked cases.
US warns citizens in Israel to be on high alert after string of attacks-Citing uptick in stabbing and shootings, diplomatic mission urges Americans to ‘maintain high degree of personal awareness’-By JTA March 10, 2016, 9:36 pm-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL
The US diplomatic missions in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem has warned American citizens in Israel to maintain heightened awareness, following a week of bloody shooting and stabbing terror attacks.“During the last few months, and in particular over the past several days, there have been a number of attacks in Israel, Jerusalem, and the West Bank that have resulted in injury and death to multiple individuals, including to US citizens,” a security message sent to American citizens in Israel on Wednesday evening read.“Given these recent events and the continuing dynamic security environment in these areas, the US Embassy in Tel Aviv and the US Consulate General in Jerusalem remind US citizens of the need to maintain a high degree of personal situational awareness and to monitor local media for information about breaking events.”The warning came a day after Taylor Force, a graduate student at Vanderbilt University on a school trip to Israel, was killed in a stabbing attack that wounded as many as 10 people at and near Tel Aviv’s Jaffa Port. Earlier the same day, terror attacks in Jerusalem and the central Israel town of Petah Tikva left an ultra-Orthodox man and two Border Police officers seriously injured.The message said, “In view of the current security environment and the possibility of future attacks,” US government employees are prohibited from visiting Jerusalem’s Old City unless “specifically approved for mission critical travel.”The prohibition is in place until March 16 and could be extended, the message said.The message also reminded US citizens “to exercise heightened caution in areas around the Damascus, Lion’s and Herod’s gates to the Old City, as these locations have been the scene of past attacks.”Times of Israel staff contributed to this report
Virginia General Assembly passes anti-BDS resolution-Resolution states boycott is damaging to causes of peace, calls for two-state solution through constructive dialogue-By JTA March 10, 2016, 9:18 pm-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL
The Virginia House of Delegates on Wednesday overwhelmingly passed a resolution condemning the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement against Israel.The resolution passed by a vote of 85-5, with nine abstentions, one day after the state Senate passed the same resolution in a voice vote.It calls for a two-state solution and states that “the members of the General Assembly reaffirm their support for the State of Israel and oppose all attempts to economically and politically isolate Israel within the international arena, including promotion of economic, cultural, and academic boycotts, and all efforts to assault the legitimacy of the State of Israel as the sovereign homeland of the Jewish people.”In condemning the BDS movement and its activities in Virginia, the resolution says the movement’s agenda “is inherently antithetical and deeply damaging to the causes of peace, justice, equality, democracy, and human rights for all peoples in the Middle East.”Virginia’s organized Jewish community in a statement thanked the state’s General Assembly for passing the resolution.“By promoting boycotts rather than constructive dialogue, BDS prevents negotiation and progress,” the statement said. “The statewide organized Jewish community appreciates the General Assembly’s continuing support of the State of Israel and thanks our legislators for rejecting BDS and standing up for reconciliation, hope, and a peaceful future in the Middle East.”
Copenhagen gunman ‘joked after attacks’ with alleged accomplices-Court proceedings reveal attacker had help from several sources; Danish intelligence agency criticized for failing to act on prior information-By Soren Billing March 10, 2016, 10:15 pm-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL
AFP — A Danish court watched dramatic footage Thursday showing the gunman behind a double shooting in Copenhagen joking in a cafe with his alleged accomplices and pretending to pull a trigger after the attacks that left two people dead.The court was also shown a grisly video of the gunman, 22-year-old Danish-born Palestinian Omar El-Hussein, shooting a security guard at a synagogue in one of the two attacks in February last year.The footage was part of the prosecution’s evidence at the opening of the trial of four men accused of helping El-Hussein after the shootings.The Copenhagen courthouse was guarded by about a dozen heavily armed police, with Europe still on high alert over fears of jihadist violence following bloody attacks in Paris in 2015.Prosecutor Bo Bjerregaard accused the four defendants of trying to “destabilize or destroy Denmark’s basic political, constitutional, economic or societal structures.”Defense lawyers said their clients were innocent of the terror charges against them.El-Hussein opened fire on February 14, 2015 outside a cultural center where the speakers included Swedish artist Lars Vilks, a target of Islamic extremists since he portrayed the Prophet Muhammad as a dog in 2007.Filmmaker Finn Norgaard, 55, died and four police officers were injured.Later that night, El-Hussein fired six shots outside the city’s main synagogue, killing security guard Dan Uzan, 37, and injuring two more policemen.The assailant was shot dead by police hours later.Bjerregaard said the four men had to have been aware of the intentions of the gunman, whom some had known since childhood.The court named the four as Liban Ahmed Saleban Elmi, 20, Ibrahim Khalil Abbas, 23, Bhostan Khan Hussein, 26 and Mahmoud Rabea, 31, after lifting a ban on their identities.The prosecution says they committed a “terror offence” by providing El-Hussein with support in the form of ammunition, a hoodie and a bag used in the second attack, and by paying for his time in an Internet cafe where he located the synagogue.Abbas and Elmi are also charged with helping him dispose of the weapon used at the cultural center.The footage of Uzan’s killing was shown only to the judges at the request of his family.But the full court viewed the images of El-Hussein, Elmi and Abbas in the cafe after the synagogue shooting.They are seen talking jokingly, and El-Hussein appears to act out pulling the trigger of a weapon.The prosecution also showed the court the two guns found on El-Hussein’s body after he was killed, and three bullets he was allegedly given from a box of ammunition found at Rabea’s home.If found guilty, the four risk life imprisonment, which in Denmark means they would be entitled to a pardon hearing after 12 years.They did not testify in court Thursday, but when Bjerregaard cited Denmark’s terrorism law, which refers to “he who intends to scare a population,” Rabea interrupted, shouting “I did not want to scare any people.”To secure a conviction, the prosecution has to prove “intent,” meaning they knew about his plans to commit an act of terror.The trial is expected to run for up to 30 court days through September.Elmi’s lawyer told AFP that while her client had been friends with El-Hussein since childhood, he knew nothing of his plans.“He doesn’t deny” meeting up with the gunman on the afternoon of the attacks, “but he denies he knew anything about terror and he didn’t participate in anything concerning terror,” Mette Grith Stage said.Released from prison just two weeks before the attacks after serving time for a stabbing, El-Hussein was known for his violent temper and for having ties to a criminal gang.The prosecution said he pledged allegiance to Islamic State group leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi on Facebook on the day of the shootings, but investigators believe he was not part of a jihadist network.Danish intelligence agency PET has however been criticized for failing to act on information from prison services that he was at risk of radicalization.Little is known about the four suspects, although media reports say they all have criminal records for offences ranging from break-ins to possession of automatic weapons.
