JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.GET SAVED NOW- CALL ON JESUS TODAY.THE ONLY SAVIOR OF THE WHOLE EARTH - NO OTHER
REVELATION 6:9-11
9 And when he had opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of them that were slain(BEHEADED) for the word of God, and for the testimony which they held:
10 And they cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?
11 And white robes were given unto every one of them; and it was said unto them, that they should rest yet for a little season, until their fellowservants also and their brethren, that should be killed as they were, should be fulfilled.
REVELATION 20:4
4 And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands;(WILLINGLY-THEY CHOSE THE IMPLANT) and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.
GENESIS 16:11-12
11 And the angel of the LORD said unto her,(HAGAR) Behold, thou art with child, and shalt bear a son, and shalt call his name Ishmael;(FATHER OF THE ARAB/MUSLIMS) because the LORD hath heard thy affliction.
12 And he (ISHMAEL) will be a wild man;(ISLAM IS A FAKE AND DANGEROUS SEX FOR MURDER CULT) his hand will be against every man,(ISLAM HATES EVERYONE) and every man's hand against him;(PROTECTING THEMSELVES FROM BEING BEHEADED) and he (ISHMAEL ARAB/MUSLIM) shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren.(LITERAL-THE ARABS LIVE WITH THEIR BRETHERN JEWS)
ISAIAH 14:12-14
12 How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer,(SATAN) son of the morning!(HEBREW-CRECENT MOON-ISLAM) how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!
13 For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north:
14 I (SATAN HAS EYE TROUBLES) will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.(AND 1/3RD OF THE ANGELS OF HEAVEN FELL WITH SATAN AND BECAME DEMONS)
JOHN 16:2
2 They shall put you out of the synagogues: yea, the time cometh, that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service.(ISLAM MURDERS IN THE NAME OF MOON GOD ALLAH OF ISLAM)
FROM THE CULT QARAN ON BEHEADING
SURAH 8:12
Therefore strike off their (CHRISTIANS-JEWS) heads and strike off every fingertip of them. ... the Quran orders Muslims to go and chop people's heads off along with their finger tips.
British 'jihadist' mum threatens to behead Christians: reports-AFP-SEPT 1,14-YAHOONEWS
London (AFP) - A middle-aged British mother-of-two and former rock band member has joined jihadists in Syria and wants to behead Christians with a "blunt knife", British media reported.The reports identified the woman as Sally Jones, 45, from Kent in southeast England, and said she now goes by the name Sakinah Hussain, or Umm Hussain al-Britani.Security experts estimate that hundreds of Britons have gone to the Middle East to join the Islamic State (IS) militant group, the most brutal to emerge out of Syria's bloody civil war and the most successful.The well-funded group controls large swathes of Syria and Iraq and has proved adept at using social media to boost its profile, attract recruits and terrify enemies with images of mass executions and battlefield victories.Last week another female British jihadist reportedly in Syria, known as Khadijah Dare, purportedly tweeted that she wanted to be the first woman to kill a British or US "terrorist". The Daily Mail and the Sunday Times alleged that Jones, a convert to Islam, travelled to Syria after an online romance with convicted 20-year-old computer hacker Junaid Hussain, and is now based in the IS stronghold of Raqa.The Sunday Times said she had tweeted last week saying: "You Christians all need beheading with a nice blunt knife and stuck on the railing at raqqa... Come here I'll do it for you!"Jones' Twitter account was still active on Monday, but could not be independently verified and the post quoted by the newspaper was not on her timeline.The alleged threat is likely to be taken seriously by British security agencies after an IS video posted online last month showed a man with a British accent appearing to behead US freelance journalist James Foley.The brazen execution heaped pressure on Prime Minister David Cameron to toughen anti-jihadist security measures, and Britain has since raised its terror alert level to "severe", citing the threat from returning jihadists.Jones' twitter account banner page features a photo of man who appears to be Junaid Hussain, and another tweet says she and her "husband" -- presumably Junaid -- had been stuck in Syria's northwestern city of Idlib for seven months before joining the "khilafa".The "khilafa" is the Arabic word for caliphate, a sovereign, religiously led state IS have declared in lands they control. Cameron is expected to outline tougher measures against jihadist suspects later on Monday.
DAVID CAMERONS PLAN ON SWEEPING ANTI-TERROR LAWS-VIDEO
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHw7M_WhPgA
CAMERON WANTS TO CRACK DOWN ON HATE SPEECH.THIS WILL BE AGAINST CHRISTIANS.WE KNOW THAT.CAMERON SAYS HE WANTS TO CRACK DOWN ON ALL EXTREMISM.AND WHOS AN EXTREMIST.WE CHRISTIANS WILL BE CALLED EXTREMISTS FOR COMING OUT AGAINST ABORTION-HOMOSEXUALITY-ISLAM.AND FOR SAYING JESUS IS THE ONLY WAY TO SALVATION NO-OTHER.AND YOU CAN BET THE REST OF THE WEST WILL DO WHAT CAMERON WANTS-AND WILL IMPLIMENT THE SAME BILL.
RADICAL MUSLIM ANJEM CHOUDARY ON HANNITY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3jtdK4yKrvY
RADICAL MUSLIM ANJEM CHOUDARY ON STELTER
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Fcl8VdFbWM
MUSLIM ON THE MARCH-HANNITY-FULL
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrilgYRauZY
BRIGITTE GABRIEL ON ISLAMIC INFILTRATION
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFO1AtjoUoo
Published on Sep 1, 2014-WATCH: UK PM David Cameron announces new anti-terror laws
(BBC) David Cameron outlines new anti-terror measures to MPs
The police are to be given new powers to seize the passports of terrorist suspects and stop British jihadists from returning to the UK, David Cameron has said.It was "abhorrent" British citizens had "declared their allegiance" to groups like Islamic State, he told MPs.He said the UK was looking at "specific and discretionary" powers to bar suspects from returning the UK.Powers to monitor suspects in the UK will also be strengthened.The statement to MPs comes after the UK's terror threat level was raised to "severe" from "substantial" on Friday.Some Tories have urged new powers to seize passports from returning fighters but Lib Dems have urged caution.In a Commons statement and question and answer session which could last two hours, the prime minister is talking about developments in the Middle East and their implications for British security amid concerns about the risk of Britons who have travelled to fight with Islamic State (IS) in Iraq or Syria carrying out an attack on UK soil upon their return.Mr Cameron, addressing MPs on their first day back since July, is also covering the situation in Ukraine, and the weekend's EU summit.No 10 has sought to play down reports of a rift with the Liberal Democrats over the measures after the prime minister and his Lib Dem deputy Nick Clegg were locked in talks over the weekend.It has been reported that new laws are being considered to seize passports and impose temporary bans on fighters travelling home from foreign conflicts.Under the proposals, UK nationals suspected of being involved in terror acts would be allowed to keep their British citizenship, but they would be prevented from re-entering the UK for a period of time.However, the Liberal Democrats have questioned the legality of such measures, warning that rendering citizens stateless was regarded as illegal in international law.The Lib Dems have said they will only agree to policies that are made calmly, on the basis of evidence and maintain the liberty of British citizens.The Prime Minister is addressing the House of Commons at 3.30pm this afternoon, following a weekend of negotiations over controversial plans to extend anti-terrorism powers.British Prime Minister David Cameron addresses MPs this afternoon to unveil a raft of new anti-terrorism laws to help tackle British jihadists.The move follows the decision to raise the UK threat level to “severe” — its second highest — meaning that a terrorist attack is “highly likely”.Among the legislation announced are measures stopping British fanatics from travelling to or returning from the war zones by making it easier to seize their passports.The Prime Minister also tightens controls that can be put on the movement and activities of terror suspects within the UK.
DAVID CAMERON, PRIME MINISTER OF U.K.: -- and on the measures we're taking to defeat extremism and to keep our country safe.
ON EU TOP LEADERS
First on the council, we agreed that Poland's Prime Minister Donald Tusk should serve as the next council president. And Italian Foreign Minister Frederico Mogherini should become the next high representative for foreign and security policy. Donald Tusk made clear in his acceptance speech that he places a high priority on addressing Britain's concerns over the E.U. and I look forward to working with him in his new role.Mr. Speaker, the council spent most of its time focusing on the big international issues that have concerned us all this summer -- the situations in Ukraine, Gaza and the growing threat of ISIL in Iraq and Syria. And I want to discuss each.The presence of Russian soldiers on Ukrainian soil is completely unjustified and unacceptable. I met with President Poroshenko before the counsel on Saturday and with our support, he's invited to address the council. The real cause of this conflict is Russia's refusal to recognize Ukraine's independence and sovereignty. Decisions on Ukraine's political and economic relationships should be for the people of Ukraine, no one else.But Russia appears to be trying to force Ukraine to abandon its democratic choices at the barrel of a gun. In the last two weeks we've seen a dramatic stepping up of Russian military support to the separatists in eastern Ukraine, including Russian troops fighting on the ground.Mr. Speaker, we know from European history the grave danger of a nation state being threatened and undermined in this way. So the European Council agreed that the economic cost it has already imposed on Russia must be stepped up if Moscow persists with these indefensible actions. The council was clear that new sanctions measures will be drawn up within a week.And Mr. Speaker I don't accept the suggestion that sanctions are not having an impact. Capital has flown out of Russia. Banks are short of finance and the Russian stock market and ruble have fallen significantly. Mr. Speaker, we have to show real resilience and resolve. Russia needs to understand that if it continues on their current path that its relationship with the rest of the world will be radically different in the future.
ON ISRAEL-ARABS-GAZA
Turning to Israel and Gaza, we have all been deeply saddened by the violence we've seen and the dreadful civilian suffering it's caused particularly to innocent children. The government has worked hard with our international partners to help bring about a sustainable cease-fire and we warmly welcome the agreement reached in Cairo.Mr. Speaker, the loss of life this summer has been truly appalling and the number of civilian casualties completely unacceptable. The life of a Palestinian child is worth the same as a child in any one of our nations. But support for a lasting settlement that includes a Palestinian State does not mean we should ever support the terrorist tactics of Hamas who've rained down rockets on Israel and continue to refuse to accept cease-fires.We will continue to support Israel and Israel's right to defend itself, but that does not mean we support every decision the Israeli government takes. Most recently, the appropriation of nearly a thousand acres of land in the West Bank near Bethlehem is utterly deplorable. Settlements are illegal under international law. They will do nothing to create the kind of peace process we all want to see. And we urge the Israeli government to reverse this decision.Mr. Speaker, while I understand the many strong emotions around this tragic conflict, I am though deeply concerned by growing reports of anti-Semitism on our own streets here in Britain. Let me be clear we must not tolerate this in our country. There can never be any excuse for anti-Semitism and no disagreements on politics or policy should ever be allowed to justify racism, prejudice or extremism in any form.
ON TERRORISM
Turning to the terrorist threat we face here in the U.K., we have all been shocked and sickened the barbarism we've witnessed in Iraq this summer. The widespread slaughter of Muslims by fellow Muslims, the vicious persecution of religious such as Christian and Yazidis, the enslavement and raping of women and, of course, the beheading of the American journalist James Foley with the voice of what seems to have been a British terrorist recorded on that video.The European Council's conclusions could not be clearer and I quote, "The European Council believes the creation of Islamic caliphate in Iraq and Syria and the Islamist extremism and export of terrorism on which it is based is a direct threat to every European country.On Friday, the Independent Joint Terrorism Analyst Center increased the threat level in the United Kingdom from substantial to severe. We now believe that at least 500 people have traveled from Britain to fight in the region. This is in addition to 700 from France, 400 from Germany, and hundreds more from countries including America, Canada, Austria, Denmark, Spain, Sweden, Belgium, The Netherlands and Australia.The council agreed to coordinate action in cracking down on those traveling to fight in Syria and Iraq and making sure that all European countries are taking necessary steps to tackle this problem of radicalization. We should be clear about the root cause of this threat -- a poisonous ideology of Islamist extremism which believes in using the most brutal forms of terrorism to force people to accept a warped world view and to live in a medieval state. We should be clear that this has nothing to do with Islam which is a religion peacefully observed and devoutly observed by over a billion people and one that inspires countless acts of kindness every day there is.To confront the threat of Islamist extremism, we need a tough, intelligent, patient and comprehensive approach to defeat the terrorist threat at its source. We must use all the resources at our disposal, our aid, our diplomacy and our military. We need a firm security response with a military action to go after terrorists, international cooperation on intelligence, with uncompromising action against terrorists at home.Britain is already providing equipment directly to Kurdish forces. We support U.S. military airstrikes against ISIL in Iraq. And we've secured a United Nations' Security Council resolution to disrupt the flows of finance to ISIL to sanction those who are seeking to recruit to ISIL and to encourage countries to do all they can to prevent foreign fighters joining the extremist cause.But alongside a tough security response, there must also be the right political response. We know that terrorist organizations thrive where there is political instability and weak or dysfunctional institutions, so we must support the building blocks of free and open societies. In Syria it must mean a political transition and an end to Assad's brutality which has allowed ISIL to flourish. In Iraq that must begin with a new and genuinely inclusive government capable of uniting all Iraqis -- Sunni, Shia, Kurd, Christian and others against the shared thread.The NATO Summit in Wales this week will provide an opportunity for us to review the effectiveness of the international response so far and discuss what more we should do to help the region overcome the ISIL threat.Britain will continue to consider what further role is in our national interest including any further diplomatic, humanitarian, or indeed military measures we might take.
ON NEW LAWS TO FIGHT ALL TERRORISM-EXTREMISM
Mr. Speaker, let me turn to how we address the terrorist threat at home. We have already taken a wide range of measures, including stopping suspects from traveling to the region by seizing passports, barring foreign nationals from reentering the United Kingdom, legislating so that we can prosecute people for all terrorist activity even where that activity takes place overseas and bringing forward emergency legislation, for instance, to safeguard our use of communications data.We've also stepped up our operational response with a five-fold increase in Syria-related arrests, the removal of 28,000 pieces of extremist material from the Internet this year alone including 46 ISIL-related videos.But I've said all along there should not be a knee-jerk reaction or the introduction of sweeping, new, blanket powers that would ultimately be ineffective. That is not what those who work so hard to keep us safe actually want. They want a targeted approach that reflects a forensic focus on the threat we face and that protects their operation, independence, and decision making. To achieve this, there are two key areas where we now need to strengthen our powers to fill specific gaps in our armory. These are around preventing suspects from traveling and dealing decisively with those already here who pose a risk. And I want to just mention them both briefly.First -- stopping people from traveling in the first speaker. Mr. Speaker, passports are not an automatic right. The home secretary already has the discretion to issue, revoke and refuse passports under the royal prerogative if there's reason to believe that people are planning to take part in terrorist-related activity. But when police suspect a traveler at the border, they are not currently able apply for the prerogative and so only have limited stop and search powers.So we will introduce specific and targeted legislation to fill this gap by providing the police with the temporary power seize a passport at the border during which time they'll be able to investigate the individual concerned. This power will include prerogative safeguards and of course, oversight arrangements.Mr. Speaker, the House should also be aware that our current prerogative powers are being challenged in the courts. And I want to be clear, if there is any judgment that threatens the operation of our existing powers we will introduce primary legislation immediately so that parliament, not the courts can determine whether it is right that we have this power. And I can announce today that we'll now start preparing the legislation and consult parliament on the draft clauses.Now as well as stopping people going, we must also keep out foreign fighters who would pose a threat to the U.K. We do already have important powers to block return. We can deprive dual nationals of their citizenship to stop them returning. We can bar foreign nationals on the basis of the threat they pose and we legislated in the immigration act to allow stronger powers to strip citizenship from naturalized Britons. But of course, these powers do not apply to those who are solely British nationals who could be rendered stateless if deprived of citizenship.Now, some have said we should deal with this gap by criminalizing travel to certain individual countries or fundamentally changing our criminal burden of proof. The government is clear that it will be wrong to deal with this gap by fundamentally changing core principles of our criminal justice system. But it is abhorrent that people who declare their allegiance elsewhere are able to return to the United Kingdom and pose a threat to our national security.We're clear in principle that what we need is a targeted discretionary power to allow us to exclude British nationals from the U.K. And we'll work up proposals on this basis with our agencies in line with our international obligations and discuss the details on a cross-party basis.Mr. Speaker, we're also putting our longstanding arrangements on aviation security around the world on a statutory footing. Airlines will have to comply with our no fly list arrangements, give us information on passenger lists and comply with our security screening requirements. If they do not do this, their flights will not be able to land in Britain.Second, we need stronger powers to manage the risk posed by suspected extremists already here in the United Kingdom. The Home Secretary can already impose terrorism prevention and investigations measures on security grants including overnight residence requirements and Internet restrictions. But the intelligence agencies and the police believe they need stronger powers to impose further restrictions and an independent review of counterterrorism legislation David Anderson agrees.So we will introduce new powers to add to our existing terrorism prevention and investigation measures including stronger locational constraints on suspects under (inaudible) either through enhanced use of exclusion zones or through relocation powers.
Mr. Speaker, dealing with this terrorist threat is not just about new powers. It is also about how we combat extremism in all its forms. That is why we have a new approach to tackling radicalization, focusing on all types of extremism not just violent extremism. This has included stopping the funding of organizations that promote extremism, banning hate preachers and ensuring every part of government from schools and universities to prisons are all focused on beating this scourge of extremism.As part of this we're now putting our deradicalization program called Chanel (ph) on a statutory footing. Anyone subject to our strengthened terrorism prevention investigation measures will be required to engage with the preventive program.Mr. Speaker, we are proud to be an open, free and tolerant nation, but that tolerance must never be confused with a passive acceptance of cultures, living separate lives, or people behaving in ways that run completely counter to our values. Adhering to British values is not option or a choice. It is a duty for all of those who live in these islands. So we will stand up for our values, we will in the end defeat this extremism and we will secure our way of life for generations to come. And I commend this statement to the House.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1409/01/cnr.04.html
Speech-Threat level from international terrorism raised: PM press statement-From:Prime Minister's Office, 10 Downing Street and The Rt Hon David Cameron MP Delivered on: 29 August 2014 (Transcript of the speech, exactly as it was delivered)
David Cameron gave a press statement about the threat level in the United Kingdom increasing from ‘substantial’ to ‘severe’.The Rt Hon David Cameron MP
Good afternoon. Earlier today the Home Secretary confirmed that the Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre has increased the threat level in the United Kingdom from ‘substantial’ to ‘severe’. This is the first time in 3 years that the threat to our country has been at this level.My first priority as Prime Minister is to make sure we do everything possible to keep our people safe. Today I want to set out the scale and nature of the threat we face and the comprehensive approach that we are taking to combat it. We’ve all been shocked and sickened by the barbaric murder of American journalist James Foley and by the voice of what increasingly seems to have been a British terrorist recorded on that video.It was clear evidence – not that any more was needed – that this is not some foreign conflict thousands of miles from home that we can hope to ignore. The ambition to create an extremist caliphate in the heart of Iraq and Syria is a threat to our own security here in the UK. And that is in addition to the many other al Qaeda inspired terrorist groups that exist in that region.The first ISIL inspired terrorist acts on the continent of Europe have already taken place. We now believe that at least 500 people have travelled from Britain to fight in Syria, and potentially Iraq. Let’s be clear about the source of the threat that we face. The terrorist threat was not created by the Iraq war 10 years ago. It existed even before the horrific attacks on 9/11, themselves some time before the Iraq war. This threat cannot be solved simply by dealing with the perceived grievances over Western foreign policy. Nor can it be dealt with by addressing poverty, dictatorship or instability in the region, as important as these things are.The root cause of this threat to our security is quite clear. It is a poisonous ideology of Islamist extremism that is condemned by all faiths and by all faith leaders. It believes in using the most brutal forms of terrorism to force people to accept a warped world view and to live in an almost medieval state. A state in which its own citizens would suffer unimaginable brutality, including barbaric beheadings of those who refuse to convert to their warped version of Islam; the enslavement and raping of women; and the widespread slaughter of Muslims by fellow Muslims. And, of course, the exporting of terrorism abroad.
So this is about a battle between Islam on the one hand and extremists who want to abuse Islam on the other. It is absolutely vital that we make this distinction between religion and political ideology. Islam is a religion observed peacefully and devoutly by over 1 billion people. It is a source of spiritual guidance which daily inspires millions to countless acts of kindness.Islamist extremism is a poisonous political ideology supported by a minority. These extremists often funded by fanatics living comfortably far away from the battlefields pervert the Islamic faith as a way of justifying their warped and barbaric ideology.Now this is not a new problem: we have seen this extremism before here in our own country. We saw it with the sickening murder of Lee Rigby and we saw it too with the home grown 7/7 bombers who blew up tube trains and buses. The links between what happens overseas and what happens here has also always been there. Many of those who sought to do us harm in the past have been foreign nationals living in Britain or even British citizens who have returned from terrorist training camps in Pakistan or elsewhere around the world.But what we’re facing in Iraq now with ISIL is a greater and deeper threat to our security than we have known before. In Afghanistan, the Taliban were prepared to play host to al Qaeda, a terrorist organisation. With ISIL, we are facing a terrorist organisation not being hosted in a country but actually seeking to establish and then violently expand its own terrorist state. And with designs on expanding to Jordan and Lebanon, right up to the Turkish border, we could be facing a terrorist state on the shores of the Mediterranean and bordering a NATO member.Now, we cannot appease this ideology. We have to confront it at home and abroad. To do this we need a tough, intelligent, patient and comprehensive approach to defeat the terrorist threat at its source. Tough, in that we need a firm security response whether that is action to go after the terrorists, international cooperation on intelligence and counter terrorism or uncompromising measures against terrorists here at home.But it also must be an intelligent, political response. We must use all resources we have at our disposal – aid, diplomacy, political influence, and our military. Learning the lessons from the past doesn’t mean that there isn’t a place for our military; the military were vital in driving Al Qaeda from Afghanistan, and we support the US air strikes against ISIL in Iraq. The key point is that military force is just one element of what we can do. And we need a much wider approach, working with neighbours in the region, and addressing not just security but politics too.We know that terrorist organisations thrive where there is political instability and weak or dysfunctional political institutions. So we must support the building blocks of democracy, the rule of law, the independence of the judiciary, the rights of minorities, free media, free association, a proper place in society for the army, and we must show perseverance. Not just because these building blocks take time to put in place, but because we are in the middle of a generational struggle against a poisonous and extremist ideology that I believe we’ll be fighting for years and probably decades.We will always take whatever action is necessary to keep the British people safe here at home. Britain has some of the finest and most effective security and intelligence services anywhere in the world. We will always act with urgency where needed, as we did with the emergency data retention legislation which is already yielding results. And we’ve already taken a whole range of measures to keep our people safe. We are stopping suspects from travelling by seizing passports. We’re barring foreign nationals from re entering the UK. We’re depriving people of citizenship and we are legislating so we can prosecute people for all terrorist activity, even where that activity takes place overseas.We’ve also stepped up our operational response. Since last year we’ve seen a fivefold increase in Syria related arrests. We’ve seen port stops and cash seizures grow by over 50%. We’ve taken down 28,000 pieces of extremist material off the internet this year alone, including 46 ISIL related videos. We made clear that those who carry ISIL flags or seek to recruit to ISIL will be arrested and the material seized. And we’ve seen a 58% increase in referrals to our de radicalisation programme, called the Channel Project.Now people are rightly concerned about so called foreign fighters who travel from Britain to Syria and Iraq, taken part in terrorist acts and now come back to threaten our security here at home. And the scale of this threat is growing. I said very clearly last week that there will be no knee jerk reactions. We will respond calmly and with purpose. And we’ll do so driven by the evidence and the importance of maintaining the liberty that is the hallmark of the society that we defend. But we have to listen carefully to the security and intelligence officers who do so much every day to keep us safe.I chaired a meeting a week ago with our intelligence and security services and we agreed that the answer to this threat was not to dream up some sweeping new power that would be ineffective in practice. But it is becoming clear that there are some gaps in our armoury, and we need to strengthen them. We need to do more to stop people travelling, to stop those who do go from returning, and to deal decisively with those who are already here. I’ll be making a statement in the House of Commons on Monday. This will include further steps to stop people travelling with new legislation that will make it easier to take people’s passports away.Now, as well as being tough, patient and intelligent, we also need to take a comprehensive approach. Dealing with this threat is not just about new powers. It is about how we combat extremism in all its forms. We need to tackle that ideology of Islamist extremism head on at root before it takes the form of violence and terror. That means challenging the thinking of extremist ideologues, identifying the groups in this country that push an extremist agenda, and countering them by empowering the overwhelming majority who believe in British values of democracy, the rule of law and respect for minorities.That is why as Prime Minister I have driven a new approach to tackling radicalisation and counter extremism in Britain, focusing on all types of extremism, not just violent extremism. I set this out in my Munich speech in 2011 and I’ve driven this forward through my extremism task force. This has included stopping the funding of organisations that promote extremism, banning hate preachers and ensuring that every part of government and the state from schools and universities to prisons are all focused on beating the scourge of extremism. And this task force will continue to meet regularly.Britain is an open, tolerant and free nation. We are a country that backs people in every community, who want to work hard, make a contribution and build a life for themselves and their families. But we cannot stand by and allow our openness to be confused with a tolerance of extremism, or one that encourages different cultures to live separate lives and allows people to behave in ways that run completely counter to our values. Adhering to British values is not an option or a choice; it is a duty for those who live in these islands. And in the end it is only by standing up for these values that will defeat the extremism, protect our way of life and keep all our people safe.Thank you.
REVELATION 6:9-11
9 And when he had opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of them that were slain(BEHEADED) for the word of God, and for the testimony which they held:
10 And they cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?
11 And white robes were given unto every one of them; and it was said unto them, that they should rest yet for a little season, until their fellowservants also and their brethren, that should be killed as they were, should be fulfilled.
REVELATION 20:4
4 And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands;(WILLINGLY-THEY CHOSE THE IMPLANT) and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.
GENESIS 16:11-12
11 And the angel of the LORD said unto her,(HAGAR) Behold, thou art with child, and shalt bear a son, and shalt call his name Ishmael;(FATHER OF THE ARAB/MUSLIMS) because the LORD hath heard thy affliction.
12 And he (ISHMAEL) will be a wild man;(ISLAM IS A FAKE AND DANGEROUS SEX FOR MURDER CULT) his hand will be against every man,(ISLAM HATES EVERYONE) and every man's hand against him;(PROTECTING THEMSELVES FROM BEING BEHEADED) and he (ISHMAEL ARAB/MUSLIM) shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren.(LITERAL-THE ARABS LIVE WITH THEIR BRETHERN JEWS)
ISAIAH 14:12-14
12 How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer,(SATAN) son of the morning!(HEBREW-CRECENT MOON-ISLAM) how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!
13 For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north:
14 I (SATAN HAS EYE TROUBLES) will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.(AND 1/3RD OF THE ANGELS OF HEAVEN FELL WITH SATAN AND BECAME DEMONS)
JOHN 16:2
2 They shall put you out of the synagogues: yea, the time cometh, that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service.(ISLAM MURDERS IN THE NAME OF MOON GOD ALLAH OF ISLAM)
FROM THE CULT QARAN ON BEHEADING
SURAH 8:12
Therefore strike off their (CHRISTIANS-JEWS) heads and strike off every fingertip of them. ... the Quran orders Muslims to go and chop people's heads off along with their finger tips.
British 'jihadist' mum threatens to behead Christians: reports-AFP-SEPT 1,14-YAHOONEWS
London (AFP) - A middle-aged British mother-of-two and former rock band member has joined jihadists in Syria and wants to behead Christians with a "blunt knife", British media reported.The reports identified the woman as Sally Jones, 45, from Kent in southeast England, and said she now goes by the name Sakinah Hussain, or Umm Hussain al-Britani.Security experts estimate that hundreds of Britons have gone to the Middle East to join the Islamic State (IS) militant group, the most brutal to emerge out of Syria's bloody civil war and the most successful.The well-funded group controls large swathes of Syria and Iraq and has proved adept at using social media to boost its profile, attract recruits and terrify enemies with images of mass executions and battlefield victories.Last week another female British jihadist reportedly in Syria, known as Khadijah Dare, purportedly tweeted that she wanted to be the first woman to kill a British or US "terrorist". The Daily Mail and the Sunday Times alleged that Jones, a convert to Islam, travelled to Syria after an online romance with convicted 20-year-old computer hacker Junaid Hussain, and is now based in the IS stronghold of Raqa.The Sunday Times said she had tweeted last week saying: "You Christians all need beheading with a nice blunt knife and stuck on the railing at raqqa... Come here I'll do it for you!"Jones' Twitter account was still active on Monday, but could not be independently verified and the post quoted by the newspaper was not on her timeline.The alleged threat is likely to be taken seriously by British security agencies after an IS video posted online last month showed a man with a British accent appearing to behead US freelance journalist James Foley.The brazen execution heaped pressure on Prime Minister David Cameron to toughen anti-jihadist security measures, and Britain has since raised its terror alert level to "severe", citing the threat from returning jihadists.Jones' twitter account banner page features a photo of man who appears to be Junaid Hussain, and another tweet says she and her "husband" -- presumably Junaid -- had been stuck in Syria's northwestern city of Idlib for seven months before joining the "khilafa".The "khilafa" is the Arabic word for caliphate, a sovereign, religiously led state IS have declared in lands they control. Cameron is expected to outline tougher measures against jihadist suspects later on Monday.
DAVID CAMERONS PLAN ON SWEEPING ANTI-TERROR LAWS-VIDEO
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHw7M_WhPgA
CAMERON WANTS TO CRACK DOWN ON HATE SPEECH.THIS WILL BE AGAINST CHRISTIANS.WE KNOW THAT.CAMERON SAYS HE WANTS TO CRACK DOWN ON ALL EXTREMISM.AND WHOS AN EXTREMIST.WE CHRISTIANS WILL BE CALLED EXTREMISTS FOR COMING OUT AGAINST ABORTION-HOMOSEXUALITY-ISLAM.AND FOR SAYING JESUS IS THE ONLY WAY TO SALVATION NO-OTHER.AND YOU CAN BET THE REST OF THE WEST WILL DO WHAT CAMERON WANTS-AND WILL IMPLIMENT THE SAME BILL.
RADICAL MUSLIM ANJEM CHOUDARY ON HANNITY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3jtdK4yKrvY
RADICAL MUSLIM ANJEM CHOUDARY ON STELTER
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Fcl8VdFbWM
MUSLIM ON THE MARCH-HANNITY-FULL
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrilgYRauZY
BRIGITTE GABRIEL ON ISLAMIC INFILTRATION
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFO1AtjoUoo
Published on Sep 1, 2014-WATCH: UK PM David Cameron announces new anti-terror laws
(BBC) David Cameron outlines new anti-terror measures to MPs
The police are to be given new powers to seize the passports of terrorist suspects and stop British jihadists from returning to the UK, David Cameron has said.It was "abhorrent" British citizens had "declared their allegiance" to groups like Islamic State, he told MPs.He said the UK was looking at "specific and discretionary" powers to bar suspects from returning the UK.Powers to monitor suspects in the UK will also be strengthened.The statement to MPs comes after the UK's terror threat level was raised to "severe" from "substantial" on Friday.Some Tories have urged new powers to seize passports from returning fighters but Lib Dems have urged caution.In a Commons statement and question and answer session which could last two hours, the prime minister is talking about developments in the Middle East and their implications for British security amid concerns about the risk of Britons who have travelled to fight with Islamic State (IS) in Iraq or Syria carrying out an attack on UK soil upon their return.Mr Cameron, addressing MPs on their first day back since July, is also covering the situation in Ukraine, and the weekend's EU summit.No 10 has sought to play down reports of a rift with the Liberal Democrats over the measures after the prime minister and his Lib Dem deputy Nick Clegg were locked in talks over the weekend.It has been reported that new laws are being considered to seize passports and impose temporary bans on fighters travelling home from foreign conflicts.Under the proposals, UK nationals suspected of being involved in terror acts would be allowed to keep their British citizenship, but they would be prevented from re-entering the UK for a period of time.However, the Liberal Democrats have questioned the legality of such measures, warning that rendering citizens stateless was regarded as illegal in international law.The Lib Dems have said they will only agree to policies that are made calmly, on the basis of evidence and maintain the liberty of British citizens.The Prime Minister is addressing the House of Commons at 3.30pm this afternoon, following a weekend of negotiations over controversial plans to extend anti-terrorism powers.British Prime Minister David Cameron addresses MPs this afternoon to unveil a raft of new anti-terrorism laws to help tackle British jihadists.The move follows the decision to raise the UK threat level to “severe” — its second highest — meaning that a terrorist attack is “highly likely”.Among the legislation announced are measures stopping British fanatics from travelling to or returning from the war zones by making it easier to seize their passports.The Prime Minister also tightens controls that can be put on the movement and activities of terror suspects within the UK.
DAVID CAMERON, PRIME MINISTER OF U.K.: -- and on the measures we're taking to defeat extremism and to keep our country safe.
ON EU TOP LEADERS
First on the council, we agreed that Poland's Prime Minister Donald Tusk should serve as the next council president. And Italian Foreign Minister Frederico Mogherini should become the next high representative for foreign and security policy. Donald Tusk made clear in his acceptance speech that he places a high priority on addressing Britain's concerns over the E.U. and I look forward to working with him in his new role.Mr. Speaker, the council spent most of its time focusing on the big international issues that have concerned us all this summer -- the situations in Ukraine, Gaza and the growing threat of ISIL in Iraq and Syria. And I want to discuss each.The presence of Russian soldiers on Ukrainian soil is completely unjustified and unacceptable. I met with President Poroshenko before the counsel on Saturday and with our support, he's invited to address the council. The real cause of this conflict is Russia's refusal to recognize Ukraine's independence and sovereignty. Decisions on Ukraine's political and economic relationships should be for the people of Ukraine, no one else.But Russia appears to be trying to force Ukraine to abandon its democratic choices at the barrel of a gun. In the last two weeks we've seen a dramatic stepping up of Russian military support to the separatists in eastern Ukraine, including Russian troops fighting on the ground.Mr. Speaker, we know from European history the grave danger of a nation state being threatened and undermined in this way. So the European Council agreed that the economic cost it has already imposed on Russia must be stepped up if Moscow persists with these indefensible actions. The council was clear that new sanctions measures will be drawn up within a week.And Mr. Speaker I don't accept the suggestion that sanctions are not having an impact. Capital has flown out of Russia. Banks are short of finance and the Russian stock market and ruble have fallen significantly. Mr. Speaker, we have to show real resilience and resolve. Russia needs to understand that if it continues on their current path that its relationship with the rest of the world will be radically different in the future.
ON ISRAEL-ARABS-GAZA
Turning to Israel and Gaza, we have all been deeply saddened by the violence we've seen and the dreadful civilian suffering it's caused particularly to innocent children. The government has worked hard with our international partners to help bring about a sustainable cease-fire and we warmly welcome the agreement reached in Cairo.Mr. Speaker, the loss of life this summer has been truly appalling and the number of civilian casualties completely unacceptable. The life of a Palestinian child is worth the same as a child in any one of our nations. But support for a lasting settlement that includes a Palestinian State does not mean we should ever support the terrorist tactics of Hamas who've rained down rockets on Israel and continue to refuse to accept cease-fires.We will continue to support Israel and Israel's right to defend itself, but that does not mean we support every decision the Israeli government takes. Most recently, the appropriation of nearly a thousand acres of land in the West Bank near Bethlehem is utterly deplorable. Settlements are illegal under international law. They will do nothing to create the kind of peace process we all want to see. And we urge the Israeli government to reverse this decision.Mr. Speaker, while I understand the many strong emotions around this tragic conflict, I am though deeply concerned by growing reports of anti-Semitism on our own streets here in Britain. Let me be clear we must not tolerate this in our country. There can never be any excuse for anti-Semitism and no disagreements on politics or policy should ever be allowed to justify racism, prejudice or extremism in any form.
ON TERRORISM
Turning to the terrorist threat we face here in the U.K., we have all been shocked and sickened the barbarism we've witnessed in Iraq this summer. The widespread slaughter of Muslims by fellow Muslims, the vicious persecution of religious such as Christian and Yazidis, the enslavement and raping of women and, of course, the beheading of the American journalist James Foley with the voice of what seems to have been a British terrorist recorded on that video.The European Council's conclusions could not be clearer and I quote, "The European Council believes the creation of Islamic caliphate in Iraq and Syria and the Islamist extremism and export of terrorism on which it is based is a direct threat to every European country.On Friday, the Independent Joint Terrorism Analyst Center increased the threat level in the United Kingdom from substantial to severe. We now believe that at least 500 people have traveled from Britain to fight in the region. This is in addition to 700 from France, 400 from Germany, and hundreds more from countries including America, Canada, Austria, Denmark, Spain, Sweden, Belgium, The Netherlands and Australia.The council agreed to coordinate action in cracking down on those traveling to fight in Syria and Iraq and making sure that all European countries are taking necessary steps to tackle this problem of radicalization. We should be clear about the root cause of this threat -- a poisonous ideology of Islamist extremism which believes in using the most brutal forms of terrorism to force people to accept a warped world view and to live in a medieval state. We should be clear that this has nothing to do with Islam which is a religion peacefully observed and devoutly observed by over a billion people and one that inspires countless acts of kindness every day there is.To confront the threat of Islamist extremism, we need a tough, intelligent, patient and comprehensive approach to defeat the terrorist threat at its source. We must use all the resources at our disposal, our aid, our diplomacy and our military. We need a firm security response with a military action to go after terrorists, international cooperation on intelligence, with uncompromising action against terrorists at home.Britain is already providing equipment directly to Kurdish forces. We support U.S. military airstrikes against ISIL in Iraq. And we've secured a United Nations' Security Council resolution to disrupt the flows of finance to ISIL to sanction those who are seeking to recruit to ISIL and to encourage countries to do all they can to prevent foreign fighters joining the extremist cause.But alongside a tough security response, there must also be the right political response. We know that terrorist organizations thrive where there is political instability and weak or dysfunctional institutions, so we must support the building blocks of free and open societies. In Syria it must mean a political transition and an end to Assad's brutality which has allowed ISIL to flourish. In Iraq that must begin with a new and genuinely inclusive government capable of uniting all Iraqis -- Sunni, Shia, Kurd, Christian and others against the shared thread.The NATO Summit in Wales this week will provide an opportunity for us to review the effectiveness of the international response so far and discuss what more we should do to help the region overcome the ISIL threat.Britain will continue to consider what further role is in our national interest including any further diplomatic, humanitarian, or indeed military measures we might take.
ON NEW LAWS TO FIGHT ALL TERRORISM-EXTREMISM
Mr. Speaker, let me turn to how we address the terrorist threat at home. We have already taken a wide range of measures, including stopping suspects from traveling to the region by seizing passports, barring foreign nationals from reentering the United Kingdom, legislating so that we can prosecute people for all terrorist activity even where that activity takes place overseas and bringing forward emergency legislation, for instance, to safeguard our use of communications data.We've also stepped up our operational response with a five-fold increase in Syria-related arrests, the removal of 28,000 pieces of extremist material from the Internet this year alone including 46 ISIL-related videos.But I've said all along there should not be a knee-jerk reaction or the introduction of sweeping, new, blanket powers that would ultimately be ineffective. That is not what those who work so hard to keep us safe actually want. They want a targeted approach that reflects a forensic focus on the threat we face and that protects their operation, independence, and decision making. To achieve this, there are two key areas where we now need to strengthen our powers to fill specific gaps in our armory. These are around preventing suspects from traveling and dealing decisively with those already here who pose a risk. And I want to just mention them both briefly.First -- stopping people from traveling in the first speaker. Mr. Speaker, passports are not an automatic right. The home secretary already has the discretion to issue, revoke and refuse passports under the royal prerogative if there's reason to believe that people are planning to take part in terrorist-related activity. But when police suspect a traveler at the border, they are not currently able apply for the prerogative and so only have limited stop and search powers.So we will introduce specific and targeted legislation to fill this gap by providing the police with the temporary power seize a passport at the border during which time they'll be able to investigate the individual concerned. This power will include prerogative safeguards and of course, oversight arrangements.Mr. Speaker, the House should also be aware that our current prerogative powers are being challenged in the courts. And I want to be clear, if there is any judgment that threatens the operation of our existing powers we will introduce primary legislation immediately so that parliament, not the courts can determine whether it is right that we have this power. And I can announce today that we'll now start preparing the legislation and consult parliament on the draft clauses.Now as well as stopping people going, we must also keep out foreign fighters who would pose a threat to the U.K. We do already have important powers to block return. We can deprive dual nationals of their citizenship to stop them returning. We can bar foreign nationals on the basis of the threat they pose and we legislated in the immigration act to allow stronger powers to strip citizenship from naturalized Britons. But of course, these powers do not apply to those who are solely British nationals who could be rendered stateless if deprived of citizenship.Now, some have said we should deal with this gap by criminalizing travel to certain individual countries or fundamentally changing our criminal burden of proof. The government is clear that it will be wrong to deal with this gap by fundamentally changing core principles of our criminal justice system. But it is abhorrent that people who declare their allegiance elsewhere are able to return to the United Kingdom and pose a threat to our national security.We're clear in principle that what we need is a targeted discretionary power to allow us to exclude British nationals from the U.K. And we'll work up proposals on this basis with our agencies in line with our international obligations and discuss the details on a cross-party basis.Mr. Speaker, we're also putting our longstanding arrangements on aviation security around the world on a statutory footing. Airlines will have to comply with our no fly list arrangements, give us information on passenger lists and comply with our security screening requirements. If they do not do this, their flights will not be able to land in Britain.Second, we need stronger powers to manage the risk posed by suspected extremists already here in the United Kingdom. The Home Secretary can already impose terrorism prevention and investigations measures on security grants including overnight residence requirements and Internet restrictions. But the intelligence agencies and the police believe they need stronger powers to impose further restrictions and an independent review of counterterrorism legislation David Anderson agrees.So we will introduce new powers to add to our existing terrorism prevention and investigation measures including stronger locational constraints on suspects under (inaudible) either through enhanced use of exclusion zones or through relocation powers.
Mr. Speaker, dealing with this terrorist threat is not just about new powers. It is also about how we combat extremism in all its forms. That is why we have a new approach to tackling radicalization, focusing on all types of extremism not just violent extremism. This has included stopping the funding of organizations that promote extremism, banning hate preachers and ensuring every part of government from schools and universities to prisons are all focused on beating this scourge of extremism.As part of this we're now putting our deradicalization program called Chanel (ph) on a statutory footing. Anyone subject to our strengthened terrorism prevention investigation measures will be required to engage with the preventive program.Mr. Speaker, we are proud to be an open, free and tolerant nation, but that tolerance must never be confused with a passive acceptance of cultures, living separate lives, or people behaving in ways that run completely counter to our values. Adhering to British values is not option or a choice. It is a duty for all of those who live in these islands. So we will stand up for our values, we will in the end defeat this extremism and we will secure our way of life for generations to come. And I commend this statement to the House.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1409/01/cnr.04.html
Speech-Threat level from international terrorism raised: PM press statement-From:Prime Minister's Office, 10 Downing Street and The Rt Hon David Cameron MP Delivered on: 29 August 2014 (Transcript of the speech, exactly as it was delivered)
David Cameron gave a press statement about the threat level in the United Kingdom increasing from ‘substantial’ to ‘severe’.The Rt Hon David Cameron MP
Good afternoon. Earlier today the Home Secretary confirmed that the Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre has increased the threat level in the United Kingdom from ‘substantial’ to ‘severe’. This is the first time in 3 years that the threat to our country has been at this level.My first priority as Prime Minister is to make sure we do everything possible to keep our people safe. Today I want to set out the scale and nature of the threat we face and the comprehensive approach that we are taking to combat it. We’ve all been shocked and sickened by the barbaric murder of American journalist James Foley and by the voice of what increasingly seems to have been a British terrorist recorded on that video.It was clear evidence – not that any more was needed – that this is not some foreign conflict thousands of miles from home that we can hope to ignore. The ambition to create an extremist caliphate in the heart of Iraq and Syria is a threat to our own security here in the UK. And that is in addition to the many other al Qaeda inspired terrorist groups that exist in that region.The first ISIL inspired terrorist acts on the continent of Europe have already taken place. We now believe that at least 500 people have travelled from Britain to fight in Syria, and potentially Iraq. Let’s be clear about the source of the threat that we face. The terrorist threat was not created by the Iraq war 10 years ago. It existed even before the horrific attacks on 9/11, themselves some time before the Iraq war. This threat cannot be solved simply by dealing with the perceived grievances over Western foreign policy. Nor can it be dealt with by addressing poverty, dictatorship or instability in the region, as important as these things are.The root cause of this threat to our security is quite clear. It is a poisonous ideology of Islamist extremism that is condemned by all faiths and by all faith leaders. It believes in using the most brutal forms of terrorism to force people to accept a warped world view and to live in an almost medieval state. A state in which its own citizens would suffer unimaginable brutality, including barbaric beheadings of those who refuse to convert to their warped version of Islam; the enslavement and raping of women; and the widespread slaughter of Muslims by fellow Muslims. And, of course, the exporting of terrorism abroad.
So this is about a battle between Islam on the one hand and extremists who want to abuse Islam on the other. It is absolutely vital that we make this distinction between religion and political ideology. Islam is a religion observed peacefully and devoutly by over 1 billion people. It is a source of spiritual guidance which daily inspires millions to countless acts of kindness.Islamist extremism is a poisonous political ideology supported by a minority. These extremists often funded by fanatics living comfortably far away from the battlefields pervert the Islamic faith as a way of justifying their warped and barbaric ideology.Now this is not a new problem: we have seen this extremism before here in our own country. We saw it with the sickening murder of Lee Rigby and we saw it too with the home grown 7/7 bombers who blew up tube trains and buses. The links between what happens overseas and what happens here has also always been there. Many of those who sought to do us harm in the past have been foreign nationals living in Britain or even British citizens who have returned from terrorist training camps in Pakistan or elsewhere around the world.But what we’re facing in Iraq now with ISIL is a greater and deeper threat to our security than we have known before. In Afghanistan, the Taliban were prepared to play host to al Qaeda, a terrorist organisation. With ISIL, we are facing a terrorist organisation not being hosted in a country but actually seeking to establish and then violently expand its own terrorist state. And with designs on expanding to Jordan and Lebanon, right up to the Turkish border, we could be facing a terrorist state on the shores of the Mediterranean and bordering a NATO member.Now, we cannot appease this ideology. We have to confront it at home and abroad. To do this we need a tough, intelligent, patient and comprehensive approach to defeat the terrorist threat at its source. Tough, in that we need a firm security response whether that is action to go after the terrorists, international cooperation on intelligence and counter terrorism or uncompromising measures against terrorists here at home.But it also must be an intelligent, political response. We must use all resources we have at our disposal – aid, diplomacy, political influence, and our military. Learning the lessons from the past doesn’t mean that there isn’t a place for our military; the military were vital in driving Al Qaeda from Afghanistan, and we support the US air strikes against ISIL in Iraq. The key point is that military force is just one element of what we can do. And we need a much wider approach, working with neighbours in the region, and addressing not just security but politics too.We know that terrorist organisations thrive where there is political instability and weak or dysfunctional political institutions. So we must support the building blocks of democracy, the rule of law, the independence of the judiciary, the rights of minorities, free media, free association, a proper place in society for the army, and we must show perseverance. Not just because these building blocks take time to put in place, but because we are in the middle of a generational struggle against a poisonous and extremist ideology that I believe we’ll be fighting for years and probably decades.We will always take whatever action is necessary to keep the British people safe here at home. Britain has some of the finest and most effective security and intelligence services anywhere in the world. We will always act with urgency where needed, as we did with the emergency data retention legislation which is already yielding results. And we’ve already taken a whole range of measures to keep our people safe. We are stopping suspects from travelling by seizing passports. We’re barring foreign nationals from re entering the UK. We’re depriving people of citizenship and we are legislating so we can prosecute people for all terrorist activity, even where that activity takes place overseas.We’ve also stepped up our operational response. Since last year we’ve seen a fivefold increase in Syria related arrests. We’ve seen port stops and cash seizures grow by over 50%. We’ve taken down 28,000 pieces of extremist material off the internet this year alone, including 46 ISIL related videos. We made clear that those who carry ISIL flags or seek to recruit to ISIL will be arrested and the material seized. And we’ve seen a 58% increase in referrals to our de radicalisation programme, called the Channel Project.Now people are rightly concerned about so called foreign fighters who travel from Britain to Syria and Iraq, taken part in terrorist acts and now come back to threaten our security here at home. And the scale of this threat is growing. I said very clearly last week that there will be no knee jerk reactions. We will respond calmly and with purpose. And we’ll do so driven by the evidence and the importance of maintaining the liberty that is the hallmark of the society that we defend. But we have to listen carefully to the security and intelligence officers who do so much every day to keep us safe.I chaired a meeting a week ago with our intelligence and security services and we agreed that the answer to this threat was not to dream up some sweeping new power that would be ineffective in practice. But it is becoming clear that there are some gaps in our armoury, and we need to strengthen them. We need to do more to stop people travelling, to stop those who do go from returning, and to deal decisively with those who are already here. I’ll be making a statement in the House of Commons on Monday. This will include further steps to stop people travelling with new legislation that will make it easier to take people’s passports away.Now, as well as being tough, patient and intelligent, we also need to take a comprehensive approach. Dealing with this threat is not just about new powers. It is about how we combat extremism in all its forms. We need to tackle that ideology of Islamist extremism head on at root before it takes the form of violence and terror. That means challenging the thinking of extremist ideologues, identifying the groups in this country that push an extremist agenda, and countering them by empowering the overwhelming majority who believe in British values of democracy, the rule of law and respect for minorities.That is why as Prime Minister I have driven a new approach to tackling radicalisation and counter extremism in Britain, focusing on all types of extremism, not just violent extremism. I set this out in my Munich speech in 2011 and I’ve driven this forward through my extremism task force. This has included stopping the funding of organisations that promote extremism, banning hate preachers and ensuring that every part of government and the state from schools and universities to prisons are all focused on beating the scourge of extremism. And this task force will continue to meet regularly.Britain is an open, tolerant and free nation. We are a country that backs people in every community, who want to work hard, make a contribution and build a life for themselves and their families. But we cannot stand by and allow our openness to be confused with a tolerance of extremism, or one that encourages different cultures to live separate lives and allows people to behave in ways that run completely counter to our values. Adhering to British values is not an option or a choice; it is a duty for those who live in these islands. And in the end it is only by standing up for these values that will defeat the extremism, protect our way of life and keep all our people safe.Thank you.
