OBAMA REVEALS BIRTH CIRTIFICATE-ARE THE QUESTIONS ANSWERED

ENDGAME GLOBAL ENSLAVEMENT
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1070329053600562261
BOHEMIAN GROVE NWO OCCULTISTS
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-82095917705734983
WITCHCRAFT IN THE WHITE HOUSE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AmaiX86sUoc&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IF2eILED00s&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZARWvlz_yKI&feature=channel_page
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sbh7KrUwawI&feature=channel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IG0tmvCozU&feature=channel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NgP-SyrooKI&feature=channel
OBAMA SCAM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9V1nmn2zRMc&feature=player_embedded
PHIL BERG - OBAMA CRIMES
http://obamacrimes.com/
PROTECT OUR LIBERTY
http://protectourliberty.org/
MARIO APUZZO
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/
LAURIE ROTH SHOW
http://therothshow.com/
DOUG HAGMANN
http://homelandsecurityus.com/
CANADA FREE PRESS-JUDI MCLEOD
http://www.canadafreepress.com/

OBAMA ELIGIBILTY MARCH VIDEO
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTbUPs8b7bY&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=csM_VjVrgws&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Qe2BH9DFsc&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OU62aC0CrO0&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HgtmQGUg62c&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYlF17_twVI&feature=player_embedded

OBAMAS BIRTH ISSUE-NATURAL BORN
http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaNaturalBorn.htm
PHIL BERG IS ON JONES TODAY
http://rss.nfowars.net/20110427_Wed_Alex.mp3
OBAMA ABOUT THE CERTIFICATE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnYJI4QTpXs&feature=player_embedded
TRUMP ABOUT THE CERTIFICATE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aszpJ1Iuroo&feature=player_embedded
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/04/27/trump_to_obama_now_release_your_college_records.html

AND THE OTHER ISSUE WE MUST KEEP ON THE TABLE AND IN PEOPLES MEMORY IS THAT BARRY SOETORO IS REALLY BARACK OBAMAS REAL NAME AND HE WAS BORN IN KENYA NOT AMERICA.BARRY SOETORO AKA BARACK OBAMA IS NOT ELLIGABLE TO BE THE PRESIDENT OF THE USA GOVERNMENT.EVERYTHING HE SIGNS IN BARACK OBAMA IS ILLEGEL,BECAUCE HIS REAL NAME IS BARRY SOETORO.AMERICAS CONSTITUTION WILL BE IN SHAMBLES ONCE THIS SCAM IS FINALLY REVEALED TO THE WORLD.

BY THE TIMELINE IN OBAMAS OWN BOOKS-OBAMA WENT TO PAKISTAN ON HIS INDONESIAN PASSPORT.ANOTHER ISSUE OUT OF 400 PEOPLE AT COLUMBIA THAT GRADUATED THE YEAR OBAMA OR BARRY SOETORO DID,NO ONE COMES FORWARD TO SAY THEY KNEW HIM.HOW COME AT HAWAII HOSPITAL WERE OBAMA CLAIMS HE WAS BORN,NO NURSES OR ANYBODY CAME FORWARD TO SAY THEY WITNESSED OR TOOK PART IN THE BIRTH.THIS BARRY SOETORO OR AKA BARACK OBAMAS LIFE IS A COMPLETE FRAUD.AND AMERICA IS CONNED TO BELIEVE THE LIE.WHY WOULD SOETORO AKA OBAMA SPEND 2 MILLION DOLLARS TO STOP ALL THESE LAWSUITS IF THERES NO COVERUP.HE WOULD JUST SHOW THE PROOF OF EACH EVENT-PLACE OF BIRTH,CERTIFICATE AND REAL NAME BARRY SOETORO INDONESIAN PASSPORT.

The proof is everywhere from statements and affidavits from Government parliament sources and Obama’s own Grandmother who says she saw him born in a hospital in Mombassa Kenya. The former ambassador to Kenya says Obama was born in Mombassa Kenya, so do others.

FROM THE WHITE HOUSE OBAMA REVEALS HIS BIRTH CIRTIFICATE.HE NEVER MENTIONED ONE THING ABOUT HIS LIFE IN HIS FEW MINUTE BABBLING,BUMBLING.HE MENTIONED ITS A DISTRACTION FROM THE ECONOMY.

WELL HES RIGHT ABOUT THAT.TODAY HELICOPTER BEN BERNANKE ANSWERS FED QUESTIONS AT 2:15PM.OBAMA IS TRYING TO GET MEDIA ATTENTION WITH THE BIRTH CIRTIFICATE TO DISTRACT THEM FROM THE MAIN ISSUE OF THE FED SCAMMING THE WORLD.WE WILL SEE IF THIS IS OBAMAS TRUE BIRTH CIRTIFICATE OR NOT.OR JUST ANOTHER OF HIS FRAUDS.HE NEVER MENTIONED HE WAS A CIA AGENT EITHER.THERES STILL LOTS OF QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED ON THIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE ISSUE.SUCH AS WHY A NANNY OF OBAMAS OR HIS FAMILIES WAS A TRANSEXUAL-REPORTS HAVE IT.OR WHY OBAMA NEVER MENTIONED TODAY HIS REAL NAME IS BARRY SOETORO.

I WAS WATCHING FOX AT THE TIME OF THE BABBLING.AND FOX PEOPLE WERE MOCKING BIRTHERS AND ESPECIALLY THAT COMBES.I MAY ASK WHY WOULD FOX HAVE A GODLESS LEFT ON ABOUT THE BIRTH CIRTIFICATE ISSUE WHEN THEY CLAIM THERE CONSERVATIVE AND YET PUT DOWN TRUMP A REPUBLICAN FOR BRINGING UP THE ISSUE AND FORCING THE WHITEHOUSE TO REVEAL IT.WHY DID OBAMA PAY AT LEAST $1.5 MILLION DOLLARS TO COVERUP HIS BIRTH CIRTIFICATE UNTIL A DAY WHEN THE FED IS ON ABOUT QUESTIONS ON THE ECONOMY.INTERESTING QUESTIONS STILL REMAIN.

IN FACT OBAMA NEVER MENTIONED NOTHING IN HIS BABBLE ABOUT HIS LIFE ONLY SAID THE FULL BIRTH CIRTIFICATE IS ON LINE.NO EXPLANATIONS-LIKE OBAMA DOES IT HIS WAY.AND NO OTHERS.THIS WILL JUST BE THE BEGININGS OF OBAMAS SKELETONS IN THE CLAUSET ABOUT HIS LIFE,I PREDICT.NOW THAT HE MADE IT PUBLIC.BUT OF COURSE THE GODLESS MEDIA WILL TRY TO SHUT UP PEOPLE WITH THE REST OF THE QUESTIONS,AS USUAL.BUT TODAY IS DISTRACTION FROM BERNANKE DAY BY OBAMA.WHY WOULD OBAMA WAIT 2 YRS TO REVEAL THE BIRTH CIRTIFICATE WHEN THE FED WILL COME UNDER BIG QUESTIONS,IS MY QUESTION.

Will Release Of Obama's Purported Birth Certificate Give Rise To New Certer Movement?

This morning’s White House release of President Barack Obama’s long form birth certificate will, of course, do little to derail the birther movement, which will now analyze the document with the kind of verve previously directed toward those Texas Air National Guard memos faxed to CBS from that Kinko’s in Abilene.

So here’s a few nutty points about the birth certificate sure to be seized upon by the nonbelievers:

• If the original document was in a bound volume (as reflected by the curvature of the left hand side of the certificate), how can the green patterned background of the document's safety paper be so seamless?

• Why, if Obama was born on August 4, 1961, was the “Date Accepted by Local Reg.” four days later on August 8, 1961?

• What is the significance of the smudges in the box containing the name of the reported attendant?

• David A. Sinclair, the M.D. who purportedly signed the document, died nearly eight years ago at age 81. So he is conveniently unavailable to answer questions about Obama’s reported birth.

• In the This Birth box there are two mysterious Xs above Twin and Triplet.Is there a sibling or two unaccounted for?

• What is the significance of the mysterious numbers, seen vertically, on the document’s right side?

• Finally, the Signature of Local Registrar in box 21 may be a desperate attempt at establishing the document’s Hawaiian authenticity. Note to forgers: It is spelled Ukulele.

The White House Blog President Obama's Long Form Birth Certificate
Posted by Dan Pfeiffer on April 27, 2011 at 08:57 AM EDT

In 2008, in response to media inquiries, the President’s campaign requested his birth certificate from the state of Hawaii. The state sent the campaign the President’s birth certificate, the same legal documentation provided to all Hawaiians as proof of birth in state, and the campaign immediately posted it on the internet. That birth certificate can be seen here (PDF).When any citizen born in Hawaii requests their birth certificate, they receive exactly what the President received. In fact, the document posted on the campaign website is what Hawaiians use to get a driver’s license from the state and the document recognized by the Federal Government and the courts for all legal purposes. That’s because it is the birth certificate. This is not and should not be an open question.The President believed the distraction over his birth certificate wasn’t good for the country. It may have been good politics and good TV, but it was bad for the American people and distracting from the many challenges we face as a country. Therefore, the President directed his counsel to review the legal authority for seeking access to the long form certificate and to request on that basis that the Hawaii State Department of Health make an exception to release a copy of his long form birth certificate. They granted that exception in part because of the tremendous volume of requests they had been getting. President Barack Obama's long form birth certificate can be seen here (PDF):
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf

Birth certificate-long-formCorrespondence with the Hawaii State Department of Health can be seen here (PDF).At a time of great consequence for this country – when we should be debating how we win the future, reduce our deficit, deal with high gas prices, and bring stability to the Middle East, Washington, DC, was once again distracted by a fake issue. The President’s hope is that with this step, we can move on to debating the bigger issues that matter to the American people and the future of the country.Dan Pfeiffer is White House Communications Director
http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/04/27/president-obamas-long-form-birth-certificate
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf

Obama Birth Certificate Raises As Many Questions As It Answers
Paul Joseph Watson Infowars.com April 27, 2011

Despite some political commentators insisting that the White House release of what it claims to be Barack Obama’s long form birth certificate represents the end of the crazy birther fringe movement, those who most fiercely pushed doubts surrounding the president’s eligibility are not convinced.While presumptive Republican candidate Donald Trump welcomed the release of the document, he was quick to cast suspicion as to why it took so long and if the certificate was even genuine.Trump said it was amazing that the document surfaced all of a sudden after he had begun asking questions about the controversy, adding that the certificate should be analyzed to determine its authenticity.Indeed, the Smoking Gun website has already compiled a list of inconsistencies found in the document, including asking, If the original document was in a bound volume (as reflected by the curvature of the left hand side of the certificate), how can the green patterned background of the document’s safety paper be so seamless? Meanwhile, World Net Daily editor Joseph Farah, who has been at the forefront of the birther movement, heavily promoting Jerome Corsi’s investigations into the matter along with his new book, Where’s The Birth Certificate?, reacted to the news by saying the birth certificate raises as many questions as it answers.

At the center of the storm is the argument about whether the fact that Obama’s father was born in Kenya, which is confirmed on the document released by the White House today, makes Obama ineligible to become president because he is not a natural born citizen of the United States.Some of the cases challenging Obama have explained that he was a dual citizen through his father at his birth, and they contend the framers of the Constitution excluded dual citizens from qualifying as natural born citizens,” reports WND, meaning that the document released by the White House today could even lead to proving Obama’s ineligibility.The news media and the political establishment were quick to rush to judgment regarding Obama’s eligibility in 2008, without any basis. It would be a big mistake for everyone to jump to a conclusion now based on the release of this document, which raises as many questions as it answers, Farah said today.Some political commentators have hastily insisted that the release of the document means, The birther movement is now dead as a political force,a rush to judgment given the fact that the White House’s direct involvement now means the entire controversy will only continue to generate attention.Since the American people have been habitually lied to about everything under the sun, with trust in government at an all time low, a PDF file put out directly by the Obama administration itself isn’t going to make the furore die down at all, and will only lead to claims that the document is a carefully crafted fake.

OBAMA WAS ADOPTED THAT WHY HES AN ILLEGEL ALIEN AND CAN NOT BE PRESIDENT OF THE USA AS PHIL BERG SAYS.AT 1:00PM TILL 1:05PM WHILE I WAS PUTTING THIS NATURAL BORN STORY ON MY COMPUTER.MY COMPUER WENT COMPLETELY NUTS LIKE IT ALWAYS DOES WHEN THEY TRY TO STOP ME FROM TRUTH GETTING OUT.SO THIS TELLS ME THE ADOPTION ISSUE ABOUT OBAMA WHO IS ILLEGEL IS THE MAIN ISSUE OBAMA DOES NOT WANT REVEALED FOR THE FRAUD HE IS.

Defining Natural-Born Citizen
By P.A. Madison on November 18, 2008-The common law of England is not the common law of these States.—George Mason

What might the phrase natural-born citizen of the United States imply under the U.S. Constitution? The phrase has always been obscure due to the lack of any single authoritative source to confer in order to understand the condition of citizenship the phrase recognizes. Learning what the phrase might have meant following the Declaration of Independence, and the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment, requires detective work. As with all detective work, eliminating the usual suspects from the beginning goes a long way in quickly solving a case.

What Natural-Born Citizen Could Not Mean

Could a natural-born citizen simply mean citizenship due to place of birth?

Unlikely in the strict sense because we know one can be native born and yet not a native born citizen of this country. There were even disputes whether anyone born within the District of Columbia or in the territories were born citizens of the United States (they were generally referred to as inhabitants instead.) National Government could make no territorial allegiance demands within the several States because as Madison explained it, the powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State.Jurisdiction over citizenship via birth within the several States was part of the ordinary course of affairs of the States that only local laws could affect. Early acts of Naturalization recognized the individual State Legislatures as the only authority who could make anyone a citizen of a State. Framer James Wilson said, a citizen of the United States is he, who is a citizen of at least some one state in the Union.These citizens of each State were united together through Article IV, Sec. II of the U.S. Constitution, and thus, no act of Congress was required to make citizens of the individual States citizens of the United States.

Prior to the Revolutionary War place of birth within the dominions of the crown was the principle criterion for establishing perpetual allegiance and citizenship. After independence perpetual allegiance was abandoned for expatriation and, as Madison stated, citizenship was strictly left to the individual States to define.

Could a natural-born citizen perhaps be synonymous with the British term natural-born subject?

It is very doubtful the framers adopted the doctrine found under the old English doctrine of natural-born subject.The British doctrine allowed for double allegiances, something the founders considered improper and dangerous. The American naturalization process required all males to twice renounce all allegiances with other governments and pledge their allegiance to this one before finally becoming a citizen. House Report No. 784, dated June 22, 1874, stated, The United States have not recognized a ‘double allegiance.’ By our law a citizen is bound to be ‘true and faithful’ alone to our government.It wouldn’t be practical for the United States to claim a child as a citizen when the child’s natural country of origin equally claims him/her because doing so would leave the child with competing legal obligations.
Under the old English common law doctrine of natural-born subject, birth itself was an act of naturalization that required no prior consent or demanded allegiance to the nation in advance. Furthermore, birth was viewed as enjoining a perpetual allegiance upon all that could never be severed or altered by any change of time or act of anyone. England’s perpetual allegiance due from birth was extremely unpopular in this country; often referred to as absurd barbarism, or simply perpetual nonsense. America went to war with England over the doctrine behind natural-born subject in June of 1812.

Because Britain considered all who were born within the dominions of the crown to be its natural-born subjects even after becoming naturalized citizens of the United States, led to British vessels blockading American ports. Under the British blockade, every American ship entering or leaving was boarded by soldiers in search of British born subjects. At least 6,000 American citizens who were found to be British natural-born subjects were pressed into military service on behalf of the British Empire, and thus, the reason we went to war.

Fourteenth Amendment

Whatever might had been the correct understanding of natural-born citizen prior to 1866, the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment certainly changes the view because for the first time we have a written national rule declaring who are citizens through birth or naturalization. Who may be born citizens is conditional upon being born subject to the jurisdiction of the United States - a condition not required under the common law. The legislative definition of subject to the jurisdiction thereof was defined as Not owing allegiance to anybody else, which is vastly different from local jurisdiction due to physical location alone.This national rule prevents us from interpreting natural-born citizen under common law rules because it eliminates the possibility of a child being born with more than one claim for allegiance.The primary author of the citizenship clause, Sen. Jacob M. Howard, said the “word jurisdiction, as here employed, ought to be construed so as to imply a full and complete jurisdiction on the part of the United States, coextensive in all respects with the constitutional power of the United States, whether exercised by Congress, by the executive, or by the judicial department; that is to say, the same jurisdiction in extent and quality as applies to every citizen of the United States now.United States Attorney General, George Williams, whom was a U.S. Senator aligned with Radical Republicans during the drafting of the Fourteenth Amendment in 1866, ruled in 1873 the word jurisdiction under the Fourteenth Amendment must be understood to mean absolute and complete jurisdiction, such as the United States had over its citizens before the adoption of this amendment.He added,Political and military rights and duties do not pertain to anyone else.

Essentially then, subject to the jurisdiction thereof means the same jurisdiction the United States exercises over its own citizens, i.e., only citizens of the United States come within its operation since citizens of the United States do not owe allegiance to some other nation at the same time they do the United States. This makes arguing the physical presence of being subject to laws silly because being subject to another countries laws while visiting makes no change to an aliens allegiance to their native country.

Natural-Born Citizen Defined

One universal point most all early publicists agreed on was natural-born citizen must mean one who is a citizen by no act of law. If a person owes their citizenship to some act of law (naturalization for example), they cannot be considered a natural-born citizen. This leads us to defining natural-born citizen under the laws of nature - laws the founders recognized and embraced.Under the laws of nature, every child born requires no act of law to establish the fact the child inherits through nature his/her father’s citizenship as well as his name (or even his property) through birth. This law of nature is also recognized by law of nations. Sen. Howard said the citizenship clause under the Fourteenth Amendment was by virtue of natural law and national law.The advantages of Natural Law is competing allegiances between nations are not claimed, or at least with those nations whose custom is to not make citizens of other countries citizens without their consent. Any alternations or conflicts due to a child’s natural citizenship are strictly a creature of local municipal law. In the year 1866, the United States for the first time adopted a local municipal law under Sec. 1992 of U.S. Revised Statutes that read: All persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are declared to be citizens of the United States.Rep. John A. Bingham commenting on Section 1992 said it means every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen. (Cong. Globe, 39th, 1st Sess., 1291 (1866))

Bingham had asserted the same thing in 1862 as well:

Does the gentleman mean that any person, born within the limits of the Republic, and who has offended against no law, can rightfully be exiled from any State or from any rood of the Republic? Does the gentleman undertake to say that here, in the face of the provision in the Constitution, that persons born within the limits of the Republic, of parents who are not the subjects of any other sovereignty, are native-born citizens, whether they be black or white? There is not a textbook referred to in any court which does not recognise the principle that I assert. (Cong. Globe, 37th, 2nd Sess., 407 (1862))Bingham subscribed to the same view as most everyone in Congress at the time that in order to be born a citizen of the United States one must be born within the allegiance of the Nation. Bingham had explained years earlier that to be born within the allegiance of the United States the parents, or more precisely, the father, must not owe allegiance to some other foreign sovereignty (remember the U.S. abandoned England’s natural allegiance doctrine). This of course, explains why emphasis of not owing allegiance to anyone else was the effect of being subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.It should be noted this allegiance due under England’s common law and American law are of two different species. Under the common law one owed a personal allegiance to the King as an individual upon birth. Under the American system there was no individual ruler to owe a personal allegiance to.The constitutional requirement for the President of the United States to be a natural-born citizen had one purpose according to St. George Tucker: That provision in the constitution which requires that the president shall be a native-born citizen (unless he were a citizen of the United States when the constitution was adopted,) is a happy means of security against foreign influence, which, wherever it is capable of being exerted, is to he dreaded more than the plague. The admission of foreigners into our councils, consequently, cannot be too much guarded against; their total exclusion from a station to which foreign nations have been accustomed to, attach ideas of sovereign power, sacredness of character, and hereditary right, is a measure of the most consummate policy and wisdom. …The title of king, prince, emperor, or czar, without the smallest addition to his powers, would have rendered him a member of the fraternity of crowned heads: their common cause has more than once threatened the desolation of Europe. To have added a member to this sacred family in America, would have invited and perpetuated among us all the evils of Pandora’s Box. Charles Pinckney in 1800 said the presidential eligibility clause was designed to insure … attachment to the country. President Washington warned a passionate attachment of one nation for another, produces a variety of evils, and goes on to say:

Sympathy for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest, in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter, without adequate inducement or justification. It leads also to concessions to the favorite nation, of privileges denied to others, which is apt doubly to injure the nation making the concessions; by unnecessarily parting with what ought to have been retained; and by exciting jealousy, ill- will, and a disposition to retaliate, in the parties from whom equal privileges are withheld.
And it gives to ambitious, corrupted, or deluded citizens, (who devote themselves to the favorite nation,) facility to betray or sacrifice the interests of their own country, without odium, sometimes even with popularity; gilding, with the appearance of a virtuous sense of obligation, a commendable deference for public opinion, or a laudable zeal for public good, the base or foolish compliances of ambition, corruption, or infatuation.What better way to insure attachment to the country then to require the President to have inherited his American citizenship through his American father and not through a foreign father. Any child can be born anywhere in the country and removed by their father to be raised in his native country. The risks would be for the child to return in later life to reside in this country bringing with him foreign influences and intrigues, and thus, making such a citizen indistinguishable from a naturalized citizen.

Conclusion

Extending citizenship to non-citizens through birth based solely upon locality is nothing more than mere municipal law that has no extra-territorial effect as proven from the English practice of it. On the other hand, citizenship by descent through the father is natural law and is recognized by all nations (what nation doesn’t recognize citizenship of children born wherever to their own citizens?). Thus, a natural-born citizen is one whose citizenship is recognized by law of nations rather than mere local recognition.Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, James F. Wilson of Iowa, confirmed this in 1866: We must depend on the general law relating to subjects and citizens recognized by all nations for a definition, and that must lead us to the conclusion that every person born in the United States is a natural-born citizen of such States, except that of children born on our soil to temporary sojourners or representatives of foreign Governments.When a child inherits the citizenship of their father they become a natural-born citizen of the nation their father belongs regardless of where they might be born. It should be pointed out that citizenship through descent of the father was recognized by U.S. Naturalization law whereby children became citizens themselves as soon as their father had become a naturalized citizen.In a nation that has abandoned the English tradition of perpetual allegiance to the King upon birth for the principal of expatriation, the requirement of preexisting allegiance of the father can be the only method for a child to be born into the allegiance of the nation, and thus, a natural-born citizen.