THE DEEM-SLAUGHTER AMERICA DICTATORSHIP RAM-JET

THE DICTATORSHIP-SOCIALIST-COMMUNIST-CONSTITUTION SHREADING BILL HAS PASSED LIKE PREDICTED.

SENATE HEALTH CARE VOTE(OBAMA SIGNS INTO LAW TONIGHT)
AT 10:37PM YES 184 NO 160 WITH 8 MINUTES LEFT IN VOTING.
AT 10:45PM YES 219 NO 212 DICTATORHIP OF LIES IS OFFICIAL.

MOTION TO RECOMIT VOTE(NO RECOMITTING TO BILL)
YES 199 NO 232

HR 4872 RECONCILIATION BILL VOTE(GOES TO SENATE NEXT)
YES 220 NO 211

A REPUBLICAN SAID THERE WILL HAVE TO BE A NATIONAL SALES TAX TO TO COVER THIS BILL.NOW WE KNOW WHY SOETORO-OBAMA WILL RAM THROUGH NEXT THE CAP & TRADE TAX ON EVERYTHING BILL.THIS IS A GLOBAL TAX.

THIS IS NOTHING BUT AN INSURANCE BAILOUT AND BIG PHARMACY PROFITS.

UPDATE ON SIGNING OF BILL.
BIDEN JUST BEFORE THE OFFICIAL SIGNING OF THE SOETORO DICTATORSHIP-COMMUNIST-SOCIALIST-DIDTRIBUTION OF WEALTH HEALTH CARE BILL WAS TRYING TO MAKE SOETORO LOOK LIKE THE COMING MESSIAH THAT JUST SAVED AMERICA FROM ITSELF.THE OFFICIAL SIGNING WAS AT 11:55 AM MARCH 23,10 BY SOETORO AND THE GODLESS DEMOCRATES,NOT ONE REPUBLICAN WAS AT THE SIGNING.

SOETORO WAS BRAGING WITH HIS HEAD IN THE CLOUDS ABOUT THIS HISTORIC DICTATORSHIP HEALTH CARE BILL JUST BEFORE SIGNING IT.HE MUST BE THINKING NOW OF HITLERS TRIUMPHS BEFORE THE 7 MILLION ISRAELS WERE GASSED.HE CAN HARDLY WAIT TO START GASSING AMERICANS IN THIS HEALTH CARE DICTATORSHIP-SOCIALIST-COMMUNIST BILL NOW THAT HE(SOETORO-OBAMA-ILLEGEL IMIGRANT MUSLIM FOM KENYA ON AN INDONESIAN PASSPORT)HAS SIGNED INTO LAW TUESDAY MARCH 23,2010.

Congress clears historic health care bill By DAVID ESPO, AP Special Correspondent - 10:50 PM SUNDAY MAR 21,2010.

WASHINGTON – Summoned to success by President Barack Obama, the Democratic-controlled Congress approved historic legislation Sunday night extending health care to tens of millions of uninsured Americans and cracking down on insurance company abuses, a climactic chapter in the century-long quest for near universal coverage.

Widely viewed as dead two months ago, the Senate-passed bill cleared the House on a 219-212 vote, with Republicans unanimous in opposition.Congressional officials said they expected Obama to sign the bill as early as Tuesday.A second measure — making changes in the first — was lined up for passage later in the evening. It would then go to the Senate, where Democratic leaders said they had the votes to pass it.Crowds of protesters outside the Capitol shouted just vote no in a futile attempt to stop the inevitable taking place inside a House packed with lawmakers and ringed with spectators in the galleries above.Across hours of debate, House Democrats predicted the major bill, costing $940 billion over a decade, would rank with other great social legislation of recent decades.We will be joining those who established Social Security, Medicare and now, tonight, health care for all Americans, said Speaker Nancy Pelosi, partner to Obama and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., in the grueling campaign to pass the legislation.This is the civil rights act of the 21st century, added Rep. Jim Clyburn of South Carolina, the top-ranking black member of the House.

Republicans readily agreed the bill would affect everyone in America, but warned repeatedly of the burden imposed by more than $900 billion in tax increases and Medicare cuts combined.We have failed to listen to America, said Rep. John Boehner of Ohio, leader of a party that has vowed to carry the fight into the fall's midterm elections for control of Congress.The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said the legislation would extend coverage to 32 million Americans who lack it, ban insurers from denying coverage on the basis of pre-existing medical conditions and cut deficits by an estimated $138 billion over a decade. If realized, the expansion of coverage would include 95 percent of all eligible individuals under age 65.Far beyond the political ramifications — a concern the president repeatedly insisted he paid no mind — were the sweeping changes the bill held in store for millions of individuals, the insurance companies that would come under tougher control and the health care providers, many of whom would face higher taxes.For the first time, most Americans would be required to purchase insurance, and face penalties if they refused. Much of the money in the bill would be devoted to subsidies to help families at incomes of up to $88,000 a year pay their premiums.The measure would also usher in a significant expansion of Medicaid, the federal-state health care program for the poor. Coverage would be required for incomes up to 133 percent of the federal poverty level, $29,327 a year for a family of four. Childless adults would be covered for the first time, starting in 2014.The insurance industry, which spent millions on advertising trying to block the bill, would come under new federal regulation. They would be forbidden from placing lifetime dollar limits on policies, from denying coverage to children because of pre-existing conditions and from canceling policies when a policyholder becomes ill.

Parents would be able to keep children up to age 26 on their family insurance plans, three years longer than is now the case.A new high-risk pool would offer coverage to uninsured people with medical problems until 2014, when the coverage expansion would go into high gear.The final obstacle to passage was cleared a few hours before the vote, when Obama and Democratic leaders reached a compromise with anti-abortion lawmakers whose rebellion had left the outcome in doubt. The president issued an executive order pledging that no federal funds would be used for elective abortion, satisfying Rep. Bart Stupak of Michigan and a handful of like-minded lawmakers. A spokesman for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops expressed skepticism that the presidential order would satisfy the church's objections. For the president, the events capped an 18-day stretch in which he traveled to four states and lobbied more than 60 wavering lawmakers in person or by phone to secure passage of his signature domestic issue. According to some who met with him, he warned that the bill's demise could cripple his still-young presidency. After more than a year of political combat, Democrats piled superlative upon superlative across several hours of House debate. Rep. Louise Slaughter of New York read a message President Franklin Roosevelt sent Congress in 1939 urging lawmakers to address the needs of those without health care, and said Democrat Harry Truman and Republican Richard Nixon had also sought to broaden insurance coverage. Republicans attacked the bill without let-up, warning it would harm the economy while mandating a government takeover of the health care system.

The American people know you can't reduce health care costs by spending $1 trillion or raising taxes by more than one-half trillion dollars. The American people know that you cannot cut Medicare by over one-half trillion dollars without hurting seniors, said Rep. Dave Camp, R-Mich. And, the American people know that you can't create an entirely new government entitlement program without exploding spending and the deficit.Obama has said often that presidents of both parties have tried without success to achieve national health insurance, beginning with Theodore Roosevelt early in the 20th century. The 44th president's quest to succeed where others have failed seemed at a dead end two months ago, when Republicans won a special election for a Massachusetts Senate seat, and with it, the votes to prevent a final vote. But the White House, Pelosi and Reid soon came up with a rescue plan that required the House to approve the Senate-passed measure despite opposition to many of its provisions, then have both houses pass a fix-it measure incorporating numerous changes. To pay for the changes, the legislation includes more than $400 billion in higher taxes over a decade, roughly half of it from a new Medicare payroll tax on individuals with incomes over $200,000 and couples over $250,000. A new excise tax on high-cost insurance policies was significantly scaled back in deference to complaints from organized labor. In addition, the bills cut more than $500 billion from planned payments to hospitals, nursing homes, hospices and other providers that treat Medicare patients. An estimated $200 billion would reduce planned subsidies to insurance companies that offer a private alternative to traditional Medicare. The insurance industry warned that seniors would face sharply higher premiums as a result, and the Congressional Budget Office said many would return to traditional Medicare as a result. The subsidies are higher than those for seniors on traditional Medicare, a difference that critics complain is wasteful, but insurance industry officials argue goes into expanded benefits. Associated Press writers Jim Kuhnhenn and Erica Werner contributed to this report.

MEDIA SOURCES TO PHONE ABOUT HEALTHCARE-DICTATORSHIP BILL IN YOUR AREA
http://www.congress.org/congressorg/dbq/media
BASICPROJECTS.ORG
http://basicsproject.org/resources.htm
http://basicsproject.org/

LISTEN TO HOUR 1 WITH FRANK SAVATO ON LAURIE ROTH MAR 17,2010
http://therothshow.com/show-archives/march-2010/
GREAT SHOW MARCH 16,10 HOUR 2 ALSO
http://therothshow.com/show-archives/march-2010/
LISTEN TO MAR 19,10 DOUG HAGMANN-DR ROCK
http://therothshow.com/show-archives/march-2010/

WED MAR 17,2010-OVER 30 ATTORNEY GENERALS AND MARK LEVIN WILL HAVE LAWSUITS AGAINST THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION AND THE DEMOCRATES IF THIS SLAUGHTER AMENDMENT PUTS THROUGH THE HEALTHCARE BILL WITHOUT A VOTE AND SENT TO OBAMA TO SIGN IT AND MAKE IT LAW.

PELIOSI THE DICTATOR OF THE GODLESS DEMOCRATS,AT LEAST SHES A LEGEL AMERICAN UNLIKE HER LEADER BARRY SOETORO AKA BARACK OBAMA.PELOSI AND THE ADMINISTRATION ARE SO DESPERATE TO GET THIS HEALTHCARE BILL RAMMED THROUGH THAT THEY WANT THIS HEALTHCARE BILL PASSED WITHOUT A VOTE BY USING THE SLAUGHTER BILL TO BYPASS THE HOUSE AND SAY THIS BILL IS OFFICIAL,SEND IT TO OBAMA FOR A SIGNATURE AND MADE A LAW BY SUNDAY BEFORE OBAMA GOES TO INDONESIA(PROBABLY TO UPDATE HIS MUSLIM PASSPORT)SO HE CAN TRAVEL TO ASIA.

AMERICA YOU GOT 3 DAYS TO TRY TO STOP THIS GODLESS ADMINISTRATION BY PHONING YOUR LOCAL LEADER TO TELL THEM TO STOP THIS HEALTHCARE BILL AND VOTE NO TO IT.

BUT DO NOT JUST PHONE YOUR LOCAL LEADER,PHONE THE WHITE HOUSE AND ALSO PHONE YOUR LOCAL MEDIA SO THEY GET INVOLVED AND KNOW THAT THE PEOPLE IN YOUR TOWN ARE AGAINST THIS GODLESS HEALTHCARE DICTATORSHIP BILL BY THE DEMOCRATES AND OBAMA.

I HAVE THE LINK IN THE TITLE WERE YOU CAN HIT ON YOUR AREA AND CAN GET THE PHONE NUMBERS ETC OF ALL THE MEDIA SO YOU CAN PHONE THEM SO THE MEDIA WILL PAY ATTENTION TO THIS AND START DOING STORIES BY FLOODING THE AIRWAVES THAT AMERICAS CONSTITUTION WILL NOT BE DRIVEN IN THE GROUND BY GODLESS OBAMA JUST TO RAM THROUGH THE HEALTHCARE BILL.IF THE MEDIA AROUND AMERICA GET ON THIS AND ALL THE PEOPLE IN EACH COUNTY ARE SAYING NO TO THIS BILL,OBAMA AND THE DEMOCRATES WILL KNOW THEIR DAYS ARE NUMBERED AT THE NOVEMBER ELECTIONS BY PUTTING THROUGH THIS SOCIALIST - DISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH DICTATORSHIP BILL.

MEDIA INFO HERE ALSO LINK
http://www.congress.org/congressorg/dbq/media

THU MAR 18,2010-1 PM-WATCH FOR EVERY BRIBERY AND CURRUPTION IN THE BOOK THE DEMOCRATES AND SOETORO-OBAMA ADMINISTRATION TO THROW OUT THERE TO GET THIS DICTATORSHIP BILL PASSED SUNDAY.I ALSO THINK ,CANCELLING OF THE ASA TRIP WAS A SCARE TACTIC OR FALSE FLAG ATTACK OR A FEAR TACTIC TO FORCE THE GODLESS DEMOCRATES TO ACT TO PASS THE GODLESS HEALTHCARE BILL.SOETORO-OBAMA THOUGHT BY CANCELLING IT THE FIRST TIME IT WOULD PRESSURE THE DEAL TO GO THROUGH AND SINCE HIS SCAM NEVER WORKED HE HAS TO CANCEL THE TRIP TILL JUNE THIS 2ND TIME TO TRY SOME MORE FALSE FLAG ATTACKS TO GET THIS BILL RAMMED THROUGH FAST TO SAVE HIS AND THE DEMOCRATES SKIN.

KEEP CALLING THE MEDIA AND YOUR LOCAL OFFICIALS TO CANCEL THIS SOCIALIST-DISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH GODLESS BILL.AMERICA YOU CAN DO IT CALL ON GOD-KING JESUS TO HELP STOP THIS MUSLIM-COMMUNIST FROM HIS GODLESS DICTATORHIP.

MAR 19,2010 10AM ON THIS PRO ABORTION,OLD PEOPLE KILLER HEALTHCARE BILL TODAY THE NEWS ARE REPORTING THAT PELOSO IS 2 VOTES SHY OF PASSING THIS BILL.EVEN THE 72 HOUR TIMELINE IS A FALSE FLAG ATTACK TO PRESSURE THE GODLESS TO PASS THIS GODLESS BILL.ONE OF THE 10 COMMANDMENTS ARE YOU SHALL NOT KILL,MURDER.THATS GODS CREATED BABBIES THAT WILL BE MURDERERED IN THIS HEALTHCARE BILL AND WILL ALSO KILL OUR PARENTS BECAUSE OF LACK OF HEALTHCARE IN THIS DICTATORSHIP-COMMUNIST BILL.

ITS 11:33AM MAR 19,10-OBAMA IS IN FAIRFAX VIRGINIA CLAIMING TO BE THE MESSIAH THAT SAVED THE EARTH FROM ECONOMIC COLLAPSE,AND FROM EVERY OTHER DISASTER THAT HAS OCCURED IN THE LAST YEAR.NOW SOETORO-OBAMA IS CLAIMING HES THE SAVIOUR THAT WILL BRING IN AMERICAN HEALTHCARE.HE SAYS HES GOING AGAINST THE INSURANCE COMPANIES MEANWHILE HE HAS STOCKS IN THE PHARMACY-DRUG STORES,SO THIS TELLS ME PHARMACIES WILL GET BIG PAYOFFS AND PAYOUTS FROM THIS HEALTHCARE BILL.JUST THINK THE PILLS AND STUFF THE SOETORO-OBAMA ADMINISTRATION WILL MAKE A KILLNG OFF WITH EVERY AMERICAN UNDER HIS COMMUNIST-SOCIAL DICTATORSHIP HEALTHCARE PLAN.

12:20PM FRI MAR 19,10 ONE MORE DEMOCRAT HAS GIVIN IN TO BRIBES AND CURRUPTION AND NOW THE GODLESS DICTATORSHIP ONLY NEEDS ONE MORE GODLESS TO TURN OVER AND FLIP/FOP TO DESTROY AMERICA FOREVER.THE PELOSI DEMON POSSESSION JUST NEEDS 1 MORE VOTE TILL BIG PHARMA AND SOETORO-OBAMA CONTROL EVERY ASPECT OF EVERY AMERICANS LIVES.215 VOTES THIS DEMON PELOSI HAS NOW.

NOW MY COMPUTERS ACTING UP.IT SEEMS AS SOON AS I MENTION BIG PHARMA,MY COMPUTER GOES NUTS....INTERESTING,I THNK I HIT A NERVE.AT CANADA FREE PRESS I HAVE A HARD TIME GETTING THE STORY: MAKE WAY FOR THE HEALTHCARE MESSIAH.THEY WON'T LET ME GET IT.THIS MEANS ALL READ AT CANADA FREE PRESS- http://www.canadafreepress.com/

I JUST FOUND OUT SOMETHING INTERESTING AT 5:45PM MAR 19,2010.IN CALIFORNIA VALLEY WERE THERE IS 2 DEMOCRATES THAT HAVE NOT VOTED NO TO THE HEALTH CARE BILL YET-THEY JUST SUDDENLY 2 DAYS AGO WERE AWARDED 25% WATER TO BE GIVIN TO THIER AREAS IN THE CALIFORNIA VALLEY THAT WERE FOR ENDANGERED SPECIES AREAS WERE 5% WATER WAS ONLY GIVIN THEM BEFORE 2 DAYS AGO.MAN THAT SOETORO - PELOSI DEMOCRATES ARE TRYING EVERYTHING IN THE BOOKS TO BRIBE AND CORRUPT THESE CALIFORNIA LEADERS TO GET THAT VOTE TO PUT AMERICA INTO ITS SOCIALIST-COMMUNIST DICTATORSHIP.

I WONDER IF SOETORO-OBAMA ADMINISTRATION WANT A REVOLT SO BAD SO THEY CAN BRING IN MARTIAL LAW AGAINST ALL AMERICANS AND DETAIN THEM ALL IN GITMO INSTEAD OF THE MURDERER MULIMS CURRENTLY IN GITMO.SINCE SOETORO-OBAMA HATES AMERICA SO MUCH.THE DICTATORSHIP DRAMA CONTINUES TILL SUNDAY COMES.AND ITS ONLY FRIDAY NIGHT AT 8PM.

WELL THAT SOCIALIST-DICTATOR,LONG LEGGED MACK DADDY LIER IS AT IT AGAIN TODAY ON THE FIRST DAY OF SPRING 4PM ON MARCH 20,2010.THE LIES ARE FLOWING FROM CAPITAL HILL MORE THEN MY TOILET IS RUNNING.SOETORO-OBAMAS MOUTH JUST KEEPS ON GOING NEVER ENDING LIES,SEDUCTION AND DECEPTION.IF HE WERE A TRUE LEADER HE WOULD SHOW HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE TO PROVE HES NOT A MUSLIM FROM KENYA ON AN INDONESIAN PASSPORT.INSTEAD ALL HE DOES IS LIE...LIE...LIE.

I LIKE WHAT REV JESSE LEE PETERSON SAID LAST NIGHT:THE NAME OF THE WHITE HOUSE SHOULD BE BIG MOMMAS HOUSE(MICHELE SOETORO-OBAMA HE WAS HINTING AT).AND OF COURSE THERE WAS A GODLESS DEMOCRAT CLAIMING RACISM WITH THAT REMARK WHILE ALAN STOCK WAS LAUGHING HIS HEAD OFF FROM THE INSTANTANIAS COMMENT BY JESSE.AND ONE MORE THING I LIKE WHAT JESSE SAID:WE ARE FIGHTING AGAINST EVIL WITH THIS SOETORO-OBAMA ADMINISTRATION.YES WE ARE FIGHTING THE EVILS OF SATAN TO DESTROY AMERICA AND BRING ABOUT THE DICTATORSHIP AS PREDICTED IN GODS WORD-THE BIBLE.PROOF GODS(KING JESUS')WORDS ARE COMMING TO PASS AS SOETORO-OBAMA DEFINATELY IS A FORUNNER OF THE FUTURE EU WORLD DICTATOR.IF SOETORO IS THIS MUCH OF A DECIEVER-LIER,JUST THINK HOW SMOOTH THE LYING WORLD DICTATOR WILL BE.

LISTEN TO MAR 19,10 DOUG HAGMANN-DR ROCK
http://therothshow.com/show-archives/march-2010/
AS OF MARCH 20,10 5PM REPORTS HAVE IT AT 218 FOR THE HEALTH CARE DICTATORSHIP AND 213 AGAINST.BUT ITS CHANGING BY THE MINUTE.SO THE FATTER THE CORRUPT INCENTIVES THE BIGGER THE YES VOTES GET.

LISTEN TO THE SHOW HERE INFOWARS.COM
http://www.infowars.com/
OBAMA DECEPTION
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAaQNACwaLw
FALL OF THE REPUBLIC MOVIE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8LPNRI_6T8&feature=player_embedded
ENDGAME GLOBAL ENSLAVEMENT
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1070329053600562261
BOHEMIAN GROVE NWO OCCULTISTS
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-82095917705734983
WITCHCRAFT IN THE WHITE HOUSE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AmaiX86sUoc&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IF2eILED00s&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZARWvlz_yKI&feature=channel_page
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sbh7KrUwawI&feature=channel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IG0tmvCozU&feature=channel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NgP-SyrooKI&feature=channel
OBAMA SCAM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9V1nmn2zRMc&feature=player_embedded
PHIL BERG - OBAMA CRIMES
http://obamacrimes.com/
LAURIE ROTH SHOW
http://therothshow.com/
DOUG HAGMANN
http://homelandsecurityus.com/
CANADA FREE PRESS-JUDI MCLEOD
http://www.canadafreepress.com/

AND THE OTHER ISSUE WE MUST KEEP ON THE TABLE AND IN PEOPLES MEMORY IS THAT BARRY SOETORO IS REALLY BARACK OBAMAS REAL NAME AND HE WAS BORN IN KENYA NOT AMERICA.BARRY SOETORO AKA BARACK OBAMA IS NOT ELLIGABLE TO BE THE PRESIDENT OF THE USA GOVERNMENT.EVERYTHING HE SIGNS IN BARACK OBAMA IS ILLEGEL,BECAUCE HIS REAL NAME IS BARRY SOETORO.AMERICAS CONSTITUTION WILL BE IN SHAMBLES ONCE THIS SCAM IS FINALLY REVEALED TO THE WORLD.

BY THE TIMELINE IN OBAMAS OWN BOOKS-OBAMA WENT TO PAKISTAN ON HIS INDONESIAN PASSPORT.ANOTHER ISSUE OUT OF 400 PEOPLE AT COLUMBIA THAT GRADUATED THE YEAR OBAMA OR BARRY SOETORO DID,NO ONE COMES FORWARD TO SAY THEY KNEW HIM.HOW COME AT HAWAII HOSPITAL WERE OBAMA CLAIMS HE WAS BORN,NO NURSES OR ANYBODY CAME FORWARD TO SAY THEY WITNESSED OR TOOK PART IN THE BIRTH.THIS BARRY SOETORO OR AKA BARACK OBAMAS LIFE IS A COMPLETE FRAUD.AND AMERICA IS CONNED TO BELIEVE THE LIE.WHY WOULD SOETORO AKA OBAMA SPEND 2 MILLION DOLLARS TO STOP ALL THESE LAWSUITS IF THERES NO COVERUP.HE WOULD JUST SHOW THE PROOF OF EACH EVENT-PLACE OF BIRTH,CERTIFICATE AND REAL NAME BARRY SOETORO INDONESIAN PASSPORT.

OBAMA SEPT 2009 HEALTH CARE SPEECH
http://www.squidoo.com/obamahealthcarespeech
VIDEO OF LIER SOTETORO AT VIRGINIA FRIDAY
http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/03/19/i-still-believe-we-can-do-whats-right
HR4872 TEXT BILL-HEALTHCARE-EDUCATION BILL
http://docs.house.gov/rules/hr4872/111_hr4872_amndsub.pdf
YESTERDAY OBAMA CHEERON VIDEO-MAKE TRUE ON THAT PROMISE
http://www.whitehouse.gov/photos-and-video/video/it-time-pass-health-care-reform
CSPAN
http://www.c-span.org/Topics/Health-Care-Insurance-Reform-Legislation-Town-Hall.aspx
TEXTS
http://www.rules.house.gov/bills_details.aspx?NewsID=4606

ITS 2:15PM SUNDAY MAR 21,10 THE FIRST OF 3 DEBATES AND VOTES IS UNDER WAY TO SEE IF THE GODLESS HEALTH CARE BILL PASSES TODAY.

ITS 3:15PM MAR 21,10 AND WE HAVE DEMOCRATES ON THE TV STATIONS COMPLAINING THE PEACEFUL PROTESTERS ARE THREATENING THEM AND CALLING THEM RACIST NAMES.THESE GODLESS DEMOCRAT IDIOTS ARE EVEN TRYING TO USE THE PROTESTERS AS FALSE FLAG DESTRACTIONS WHILE THEY RAM-JET THIS GODLESS HEALTH CARE BILL DOWN THE THROATS OF SHEEPLE AMERICANS DECIEVED BY THEIR SEDUCTIVE LIES AND HYPOCRITICAL ACTIONS.

ITS 4:05PM STUPAK HAS JUST CAME ON THE AIR TO SAY THAT THEY HAVE STRUCK A DEAL WITH SOETORO THAT NO ABORTIONS WILL BE PAID FOR IN THE BILL.SOETORO WILL SIGN THE ABORTION FREE BILL INTO LAW AFTER HE SIGNS THE HEALTH CARE BILL INTO LAW WHENEVER THE VOTE IS DONE.SOETORO,OBAMA BETTER NOT LIE ABOUT THIS OR HE AND THE DEMOCRATES WILL DEFINETALY BE UP A CREEK WITHOUT A PADDLE.THEY PROBABLY HAVE A BACKUP BILL HE WILL SIGN TO PUT THE ABORTION BACK IN THE HEALTH CARE BILL,IT WOULD NOT SURPRISE ME ONE BIT.BUT AS OF NOW STUPAK AND COMPANY WILL VOTE YES ON THE HEALTH CARE BILL AND IT WILL PASS FOR SURE NOW,THE AMERICAN SOCIALIST-MARXIST-DICTATORSHIP WILL OFFICIAL BE STARTING AFTER TONIGHT WHEN SOETORO-OBAMA SIGNS IT INTO LAW.

THE DICTATORSHIP-SOCIALIST-COMMUNIST-CONSTITUTION SHREADING BILL HAS PASSED LIKE PREDICTED.

SENATE HEALTH CARE VOTE(OBAMA SIGNS INTO LAW TONIGHT)
AT 10:37PM YES 184 NO 160 WITH 8 MINUTES LEFT IN VOTING.
AT 10:45PM YES 219 NO 212 DICTATORHIP OF LIES IS OFFICIAL.

MOTION TO RECOMIT VOTE(NO RECOMITTING TO BILL)
YES 199 NO 232

HR 4872 RECONCILIATION BILL VOTE(GOES TO SENATE NEXT)
YES 220 NO 211

A REPUBLICAN SAID THERE WILL HAVE TO BE A NATIONAL SALES TAX TO TO COVER THIS BILL.NOW WE KNOW WHY SOETORO-OBAMA WILL RAM THROUGH NEXT THE CAP & TRADE TAX ON EVERYTHING BILL.THIS IS A GLOBAL TAX.

AFTER 3 OR 4 HOURS I CAN FINALLY GET THE MESSIAH STORY FROM CANADA FREE PRESS.

Obama and his Obamacare Make Way for the Healthcare Messiah
By Judi McLeod Friday, March 19, 2010

It would never be gratifying enough for him to push America over the cliff on March 21, 2010, just one week before Palm Sunday. In unloading his HealthCare on the American population just before Palm Sunday, President Barack Obama is trying to write himself into real time as The Messiah.A no-vote, deemed-into-reality Health Bill was bad enough before Obama borrowed the most meaningful symbolism of the Judeo Christian world. The arrogance of using the symbolism of Palm Sunday as his HealthCare showcase speaks volumes about Barry Soetero’s massive insecurity, an insecurity his just-as-insecure wife and self-centered boss woman Valerie Jarrett can’t keep propped up to healthier levels.On Obama Has An Ego Day, other than the courage and the decency to do the right thing, all he’s missing is the donkey, though at least figuratively speaking, either Pelosi or Reid could easily fill in as the #####.

Supplanting himself as The Messiah and making his Triumphant Entry into Jerusalem is more than 2,000 years too late.In Christianity, Palm Sunday is the first day of Holy Week and the Sunday before Easter, commemorating Jesus’ triumphal entry into Jerusalem.No one, not even Vice President Joe Biden can possibly miss the symbolism of the debut of ObamaCare one week before Palm Sunday....In the late Middle Ages, this was one of the most vivid festivals of the year.(Answers.com). Before Mass, the priests blessed palms (twigs of sallow, box or yew, which the congregation carried in procession and later into the house. During Mass, people made crosses, either from their palms or from sticks and string they had brought to the church; these too were blessed and later taken home to ward off evil.(Duffy, 1992:23-7).

Palm Sunday had meaning, too, in the secular world. Echoes remained in the secular folk custom of going-a-palming; common from the 18th century until the mid-19th century. Groups of young people went into the woods to collect the catkin-bearing hazel and sallow to decorate their homes and bring luck for the year, and to wear in their buttonholes. In some places, those gathering palms then headed for a prominent hill, to dance and hold sports, eat figs and cakes, and drink sugared water, and was held to encourage drunkenness, brawling and immorality; This caused annoyance to landowners whose hedges and woods were invaded. It was discouraged by the later Victorian gentry.For all of those who feel the pain of the Traveling Obama Show, it is not the end but only the beginning.Barry Soetoro may have been able to recreate his entire image in a self serving book, but history is there to prove that no one has ever been able to successfully rewrite the Script.In a world where truth is getting to be as rare as political altruism, the change of We the People will follow ObamaCare. After Healthcare passage, Obama will awaken in time for Holy Week as the same old Barry-cum Barack.And on the Easter Sunday, millions of people will be saying, from the sincerity of their very souls: Christ is risen and hearing back He has risen indeed.After Easter, those same millions will be finding the ways to repeal ObamaCare. For the real battle will have just begun.

OBAMAS OWN COUSIN IS AGAINST THE HEALTHCARE BILL DR MILTON WOLF.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3qylfSfeuQ&feature=player_embedded

Dr. Milton Wolf-Barack Obama’s Cousin Speaks Against Obamacare
By Dr. Milton R. Wolf mar 17,10

Primum nil nocere.First, do no harm. This guiding principle is a bedrock of medical care. Sadly, those politicians who would rewrite our health care laws do not live in the same universe as do the doctors and health care professionals who must practice it.Imagine if, like physicians, politicians were personally held to the incredibly high level of scrutiny that includes civil and financial liability for any unintended consequence of their decisions. Imagine if they were forced to spend tens of thousands of dollars each year on malpractice insurance and still faced the threat of multimillion-dollar lawsuits with every single decision they made. If so, a government takeover of health care would be the furthest thing from their minds.

Obamacare proponents would have us believe that we will add 30 million patients to the system without adding providers, we will see no decline in the quality of care for the millions of Americans currently happy with the system, and -if you act now!- we will save money in the process. But why stop there? Why not promise it will no longer rain on weekends and every day will be a great hair day? America has the finest health care delivery system in the world. Let’s not forget that and put it at risk in the name of reform. Desperate souls across the globe flock to our shores and cross our borders every day to seek our care. Why? Our system provides cures while the government-run systems from which they flee do not. Compare Europe’s common cancer mortality rates to America’s: breast cancer – 52 percent higher in Germany and 88 percent higher in the United Kingdom; prostate cancer – a staggering 604 percent higher in the United Kingdom and 457 percent higher in Norway; colon cancer –40 percent higher in the United Kingdom.

Look closer at the United Kingdom. Britain’s higher cancer mortality rate results in 25,000 more cancer deaths per year compared to a similar population size in the United States. But because the U.S. population is roughly five times larger than the United Kingdom’s, that would translate into 125,000 unnecessary American cancer deaths every year. This is more than all the mothers and fathers, aunts and uncles, cousins and children in Topeka, Kan. And keep in mind, these numbers are for cancer alone. America also has better survival rates for other major killers, such as heart attacks and strokes. Whatever we do, let us not surrender the great gains we have made. First, do no harm. Lives are at stake.

Obamacare: Fixing price at any cost

The justification for Obamacare has been to control costs, but the problem is there is little in Obamacare that will do that. Instead, there are provisions that will ration care and artificially set price. This is a confusion of costs and price.

As one example, consider the implications of Obamacare’s financial penalty aimed at your doctor if he seeks the expert care he has determined you need. If your doctor is in the top 10 percent of primary care physicians who refer patients to specialists most frequently – no matter how valid the reasons – he will face a 5 percent penalty on all their Medicare reimbursements for the entire year. This scheme is specifically designed to deny you the chance to see a specialist. Each year, the insidious nature of that arbitrary 10 percent rule will make things even worse as 100 percent of doctors try to stay off that list. Many doctors will try to avoid the sickest patients, and others will simply refuse to accept Medicare. Already, 42 percent of doctors have chosen that route, and it will get worse. Your mother’s shiny government-issued Medicare health card is meaningless without doctors who will accept it.Obamacare will further diminish access to health care by lowering reimbursements for medical care without regard to the costs of that care. Price controls have failed spectacularly wherever they’ve been tried. They have turned neighborhoods into slums and have caused supply chains to dry up when producers can no longer profit from providing their goods. Remember the Carter-era gas lines? Medical care is not immune from this economic reality. We cannot hope that our best and brightest will pursue a career in medicine, setting aside years of their lives – for me, 13 years of school and training – to enter a field that might not even pay for the student loans it took to get there.

Giving power back to people

I believe there is a better way. The problems in the American health care system are not caused by a shortage of government intrusion. They will not be solved by more government intrusion. In fact, our current problems were precisely, though unintentionally, created by government.World War II-era wage-control measures – a form of price controls – ushered in a perverted system in which we turn to our employers for insurance and the government penalizes us if we choose to purchase insurance for ourselves. You are not given the opportunity to be a wise consumer of health care and compare prices as well as quality in any meaningful way. Worse still, your insurance company is not answerable to you because you are not its customer. It is answerable to your employer, whose interests differ from your own.

Insurance companies have been vilified for following the perverse rules that government has created for them. But it gets worse. The government, always knowing best, deploys insurance commissioners across the land to dictate what the insurance companies must provide, whether you want it or not, and each time, your premiums increase. Obamacare will make all of this worse, not better.One of America’s founding principles is our trust in the people and their economic freedom to rule their own lives. We should decouple health insurance from employers and empower patients to be consumers once again. Allow them to determine the insurance plan that best meets their families’ needs and which company will provide it. This will unleash a wave of competition that will drive costs down in a way that price controls never have. Eliminate the artificial state boundary rules that protect insurance companies from true competition and watch as voters demand that their state insurance commissioners get the heck out of the way. Innovative companies will drive down costs similar to how Geico and Progressive have worked for automobile insurance. And it won’t cost taxpayers a trillion dollars in the process.

This free-market approach has worked for everything from high-definition TVs to breakfast cereals, but will it work for medicine? It already is. Take Lasik eye surgery, for example. Because patients are allowed to be informed consumers and can shop anywhere, doctors work hard for their business. Services, availability and expertise have all increased, and costs have decreased. Should consumers demand it, insurance companies – now answerable to you rather than your employer – would cover it.

Between Barack and a hard place

I have personally trained and practiced in both the government-run and free-market segments of American medicine. The difference is vast. Patients see this for themselves, and this may be why, according to a recent CNN poll, they oppose Obamacare nearly 3 to 1. I am with them. It is difficult for me to speak publicly against the president on his central issue, but too much is at stake.I wish my cousin Barack the greatest of success in office. But I feel duty-bound to rise in opposition to Obamacare. I must take a stand for my patients, my profession and, ultimately, my country. The problems caused by government will not be solved by growing government. Now that this new era of big-government takeovers has spread to our health care system, it’s not just our freedoms or our wallets that are at stake. It’s our lives.

Dr. Milton R. Wolf is a radiologist in Kansas. He is Barack Obama’s second cousin once removed. President Obama’s great-great grandfather, Thomas Creekmore McCurry, is Dr. Wolf’s great-grandfather. Dr. Wolf’s mother, Anna Margaret McCurry, was five years older than Mr. Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham. The two were childhood friends until the Dunhams moved from Kansas to Seattle in 1955.Washington Times.com

WHAT THIS HEALTHCARE BILL DOES? - DICTATORSHIP!!!!

-THE IRS CAN TAKE YOUR TAX REFUND TO FORCE YOU INTO THE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM.

-WILL PAY FOR ABORTIONS.

-CAN STOP OLD FOLKS FROM GETTING PROPER HEALTHCARE.

-DOCTORS WILL QUIT BIGTIME.

-YOU WILL BE TRACKED AND TRACED IN EVERY AREA OF YOUR LIVES.

-PHARMACY WILL GET GIGANTIC PROFITS.


FORGET ABOUT DICTATORSHIP GET BACK TO TRUE LIBERTY.THE 10COMMANDMENTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

EXODUS 20:1-20
1 And God spake all these words, saying,
2 I am the LORD thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.
3 Thou shalt have no other gods before me.
4 Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth:
5 Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;
6 And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.
7 Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.
8 Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy.
9 Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work:
10 But the seventh day is the sabbath of the LORD thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates:
11 For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.
12 Honour thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee.
13 Thou shalt not kill.
14 Thou shalt not commit adultery.
15 Thou shalt not steal.
16 Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.
17 Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour's.
18 And all the people saw the thunderings, and the lightnings, and the noise of the trumpet, and the mountain smoking: and when the people saw it, they removed, and stood afar off.
19 And they said unto Moses, Speak thou with us, and we will hear: but let not God speak with us, lest we die.
20 And Moses said unto the people, Fear not: for God is come to prove you, and that his fear may be before your faces, that ye sin not.

House Democrats looking at Slaughter Solution to pass Obamacare without a vote on Senate bill UPDATED! By: Mark Tapscott Editorial Page Editor
03/10/10 4:17 PM EST

Rep. Louise Slaughter, D-N.Y. (AP photo) Would House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her fellow House Democratic leaders try to cram the Senate version of Obamacare through the House without actually having a recorded vote on the bill? Not only is the answer yes, they would, they have figured out a way to do it, according to National Journal's Congress Daily:House Rules Chairwoman Louise Slaughter is prepping to help usher the healthcare overhaul through the House and potentially avoid a direct vote on the Senate overhaul bill, the chairwoman said Tuesday.Slaughter is weighing preparing a rule that would consider the Senate bill passed once the House approves a corrections bill that would make changes to the Senate version.

Slaughter has not taken the plan to Speaker Pelosi as Democrats await CBO scores on the corrections bill. Once the CBO gives us the score, we'll spring right on it, she said.Each bill that comes before the House for a vote on final passage must be given a rule that determines things like whether the minority would be able to offer amendments to it from the floor.In the Slaughter Solution, the rule would declare that the House deems the Senate version of Obamacare to have been passed by the House. House members would still have to vote on whether to accept the rule, but they would then be able to say they only voted for a rule, not for the bill itself.

Would that rationale fly with the public? Is it logical? Of course not. But remember, these folks have persuaded themselves that a majority of the American people really want Obamacare. A blog post on House Minority Leader John Boehner's blog described the approach as a twisted scheme.How much fun will it be for Democrats representing congressional districts carried by John McCain in 2008 to be constantly reminded about the Cornhusker Kickback, the Louisiana Purchase, the Slaughter Solution, the death panels, $500 billion in cuts to Medicare, individual mandates, etc.

(MY ADD SOCIALISTIC-DISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH UNDER GOVERNMENT DICTATORSHIP).

Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/House-Democrats-looking-at-Slaughter-Solution-to-pass-Obamacare-without-a-vote-on-Senate-bill-87267402.html#ixzz0iTvKq4UI

Landmark Legal Foundation readies constitutional suit if Obamacare passes with Slaughter Solution By: Mark Tapscott Editorial Page Editor
03/17/10 5:58 PM EDT

Landmark Legal Foundation president and Talk Radio powerhouse Mark Levin promised today that his foundation will file suit in federal court challenging the constitutionality of Obamacare if it is approved in the House using the Slaughter Solution.Landmark has already prepared a lawsuit that will be filed in federal court the moment the House acts. Such a brazen violation of the core functions of Congress simply cannot be ignored. Article I, Section 7 of the Constitution is clear respecting the manner in which a bill becomes law. Members are required to vote on this bill, not claim they did when they didn’t. The Speaker of the House and her lieutenants are temporary custodians of congressional authority. They are not empowered to do permanent violence to our Constitution, Levin said.

A draft of the suit initial filing can be read here.

Even if Landmark never does another good thing for the Republic, what it has been doing for more than a decade to expose the facts about the partisan political partnership between the National Education Association and the Democratic Party makes it an invaluable asset. You can check that out here. Landmark also has done superb work in exposing how federal bureaucrats at the EPA have funneled billions of tax dollars to radical environmental groups that lobby on behalf of more regulatory power, bigger budgets and expanded staffing for ... EPA. Check that out here.Levin may be best known for his New York Times best-seller, Liberty and Tyranny: A conservative manifesto.I knew something remarkable was bubbling out there among the American people last year when Levin's book zoomed to the top of the best-seller's list and people lined up for blocks in places like Fairfax County, Va., to buy signed copies of the book and to meet him.

Remember this video?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGk5yvYReHs&feature=player_embedded

When I saw that line, I knew the Middle American Revolt of 2009 was underway.

Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/Landmark-Legal-Foundation-readies-constitutional-suit-if-Obamacare-passes-with-Slaughter-Solution-88261347.html#ixzz0iTtjsjW6

Health care reform means more power for the IRS
By: Byron York Chief Political Correspondent September 2, 2009

A sign identifies the Internal Revenue Service building on Constitution Avenue NW in Washington, D.C., Jan (Bloomberg: Dennis Brack) (Bloomberg)There's been a lot of discussion about the new and powerful federal agencies that would be created by the passage of a national health care bill. The Health Choices Administration, the Health Benefits Advisory Committee, the Health Insurance Exchange — there are dozens in all.But if the plan envisioned by President Barack Obama and Congressional Democrats is enacted, the primary federal bureaucracy responsible for implementing and enforcing national health care will be an old and familiar one: the Internal Revenue Service. Under the Democrats' health care proposals, the already powerful — and already feared — IRS would wield even more power and extend its reach even farther into the lives of ordinary Americans, and the presidentially-appointed head of the new health care bureaucracy would have access to confidential IRS information about millions of individual taxpayers.In short, health care reform, as currently envisioned by Democratic leaders, would be built on the foundation of an expanded and more intrusive IRS.

Under the various proposals now on the table, the IRS would become the main agency for determining who has an acceptable health insurance plan; for finding and punishing those who don't have such a plan; for subsidizing individual health insurance costs through the issuance of a tax credits; and for enforcing the rules on those who attempt to opt out, abuse, or game the system. A substantial portion of H.R. 3200, the House health care bill, is devoted to amending the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 in order to give the IRS the authority to perform these new duties.The Democrats' plan would require all Americans to have acceptable insurance coverage (the legislation includes long and complex definitions of acceptable) and would designate the IRS as the agency charged with enforcing that requirement. On your yearly 1040 tax return, you would be required to attest that you have acceptable coverage. Of course, you might be lying, or simply confused about whether or not you are covered, so the IRS would need a way to check your claim for accuracy. Under current plans, insurers would be required to submit to the IRS something like the 1099 form in which taxpayers report outside income. The IRS would then check the information it receives from the insurers against what you have submitted on your tax form.If it all matches up, you're fine. If it doesn't, you will hear from the IRS. And if you don't have acceptable coverage, you will be subject to substantial fines — fines that will be administered by the IRS.Under some versions of health reform now circulating on Capitol Hill, the IRS would also be intimately involved in how you pay for insurance. Everyone would be required to buy coverage. The millions of Americans who can't afford it would receive a subsidy to pay for it. Under the version of the plan currently under negotiation in the Senate Finance Committee, that subsidy would come through the IRS in the form of a refundable tax credit. Under the House plan, the subsidy would come directly from the Health Choices Administration.

In either scenario, the IRS would be the key to making the system work. Before you could receive any subsidy, whether through the IRS or not, the Health Choices Administration would have to determine whether you are eligible for it. To do so, the bills under consideration would give the Health Choices Commissioner the authority to demand sensitive, confidential information from the IRS about individual taxpayers. The IRS would have to provide it.Under current law, it is a felony for a government official to release taxpayer information in all but the most limited of circumstances. One such exception is for law enforcement; the IRS is allowed to give taxpayer information to prosecutors in criminal cases. The information can also, in some instances, be released to the Social Security Administration and the Veterans' Administration for the determination of benefits. The health care bills would change the Internal Revenue Code to permit the IRS to give similar information to the vast, new health care bureaucracy. That means the personal tax information of millions of Americans would enter the system whether they want it to or not. There's a mandate to buy insurance, says one Republican House aide. You have to buy it. You have millions of people who can't buy it without a subsidy, so they will have no choice but to accept the subsidy in order to buy insurance, and then the Health Choices Commissioner will have access to their tax records.How many hands would this information go through? asks a GOP source in the Senate.What are the quality controls? This increases the risk of misusing this information.

Some versions of the bill even permit the release of confidential taxpayer information for decidedly less pressing reasons. In H.R. 3200, the IRS would be required to provide taxpayer information to the Social Security Administration for the purpose of helping Social Security officials find qualifying seniors who can then be encouraged to enroll in the prescription drug program. There is no precedent for using taxpayer information for the purpose of identifying people to go out and advertise to them, says the House expert.So far, there has been little substantive public debate about the integral role of the IRS in nearly every aspect of the various national health care proposals. But people who are closely involved with the process are deeply concerned about what they view as a massive, and in some senses unprecedented, expansion of the Internal Revenue Service.First, they wonder whether the IRS can handle the new demands.There is a sense at the IRS that their purpose is to collect revenue and not to implement all sorts of other programs,says a second Senate GOP aide. Also, the IRS isn't necessarily great at doing what it does already. How is it going to determine whether 300 million people have health insurance? Second, they are concerned about anticipated abuse of the system.You're going to have lots of fraud, says the House source.People claiming lots of affordability credits or refundable tax credits. The IRS is not going to have the resources and expertise to police this stuff.Finally, there is a third concern, more fundamental than questions of whether the IRS can handle the job: Should the IRS be involved in health care enforcement in the first place? As seen in the town halls across the country in August, many Americans are concerned about the coercive nature of the proposed national health care system. Handing the IRS the power to monitor every American's place in the system worries them even more.

Backers of the Democratic bills are betting that the handouts involved — giving people money to buy health insurance — will outweigh concerns about privacy and coercive government. Perhaps. But before Congress makes any decision on national health care, voters should know just what it will involve.

Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/Health-care-reform-means-more-power-for-the-IRS-56781377.html#ixzz0ie0ZN1Ir

Q&A: Abortion & the health care bill MAR 17,10

Pro-life groups are busy urging their constituents to call the House of Representatives and urge a no vote on the Senate health care bill. Following are some common questions, along with answers, about the bill's abortion provisions:

-- Why are most pro-lifers opposed to the Senate health care bill?

Pro-lifers argue that the health care bill 1) changes longstanding policy on coverage of abortion in federally subsidized insurance plans, 2) would lead to a drastic expansion of abortion coverage and 3) could result in federal tax dollars being directly used for abortions.

-- What is the current federal policy on abortion coverage within federally subsidized insurance plans?

Current law prohibits the federal government from funding insurance plans covering elective abortions. The Medicaid program for lower income people is prohibited from covering elective abortions, as are insurance plans for federal employees. Congress' own insurance plans, for instance, cannot by law cover elective abortions.

-- How would the Senate health care bill change current policy?

The Senate bill allows federal subsidies -- that is, federal assistance for lower income people -- to be used to purchase health insurance plans that cover elective abortions. Enrollees would have to make two payments: one for abortion coverage and one for the rest of the premium, and the company would be required to segregate the funds. Sen. Barbara Boxer, D.-Calif., a strong supporter of the bill and of abortion rights, calls it an accounting procedure. The bill requires insurance exchanges in each state to offer at least one insurance plan that covers abortion and one insurance plan that does not, although states would be allowed to opt out and not offer the abortion plan.

-- How would this lead to an expansion of abortion coverage?

Because more women would have abortion coverage as part of their insurance plans, the procedure would become far more accessible and affordable. In other words, women who for various reasons (for instance, financial) currently don't have abortion coverage will have it if the Senate bill becomes law. Planned Parenthood, the nation's largest abortion provider, said the bill would significantly increase access to reproductive health care.

-- But doesn't the writing of separate checks prevent federal dollars from going toward funding elective abortions?

Pro-lifers have several objections to this section of the bill. First, anyone in an insurance plan that covers abortion -- even men and elderly women -- must write a separate check for abortion coverage, making them direct contributors to elective abortions. This becomes even more significant if a person's employer offers only this one plan. Second, the federal government would be mandating abortion coverage by requiring not only that at least one plan cover abortion, but that people write a check specifically for it. The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops argues, Saying that this payment is not a tax dollar is no help if it is required by the government.Third, the bill includes a loophole (on page 123) stating that separate checks would not be required and that direct federal subsidies would be allowed for elective abortions if the Hyde Amendment -- which prevents Medicaid from covering elective abortions -- is ever reversed. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi opposes the Hyde Amendment.

-- So, does the Hyde Amendment apply to the Senate bill?

No, although the explanation is somewhat complicated. The Hyde Amendment -- which must be renewed annually -- applies only to Medicaid and a handful of other Health and Human Services Department funding streams and prevents abortion coverage except in the cases of rape, incest and to save the mother's life. The health care bill references the Hyde Amendment only as a way to ensure that federal policy is standard across the board. If the Hyde Amendment is overturned and Medicaid is allowed to cover elective abortions, then federal subsidies for insurance plans would be allowed to cover them as well. In reporting about the issue March 5, the Associated Press said, The Democratic bills created a new stream of federal money to help working households afford health insurance premiums. And those funds were not subject to the Hyde restrictions.

-- Do pro-lifers have any other concerns about the bills?

Yes, especially as it relates to the bill's $7 billion in funding of the nation's 1,200-plus community health centers. There is nothing in the bill, the National Right to Life argues, to prevent the centers from using tax dollars to pay directly for elective abortions. (The bill's limited abortion funding restrictions apply only to the issue of federal subsidies for enrollee insurance plans, the organization says.) The Senate bill also lacks language protecting health care workers who refuse to participate in providing abortions. National Right to Life calls the entire bill the most pro-abortion single piece of legislation that has ever come to the House floor for a vote, since Roe v. Wade.The Southern Baptist Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission says health care must honor all human life, from conception to natural death.Contact: Michael Foust Source: BP Publish Date: March 17, 2010

Health Care IT Legislation Must Overcome Privacy Concerns-With the number of days remaining in the congressional session dwindling, supporters are urging faster action. They tout health IT as a way to improve care and reduce costs.

Health Care IT Legislation Must Overcome Privacy Concerns
Advocates for establishing a national health care information technology network had hoped to attend a Rose Garden bill signing this summer.Instead, legislation that would promote electronic medical records and other uses of IT at hospitals and doctor’s offices must overcome privacy concerns raised by members of Congress and interest groups.In the House, ideas from a number of health IT bills have been melded into discussion draft legislation in the Energy and Commerce Committee. In the Senate, a bill has been approved by the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee but is being amended in further negotiations.Although it could speed up at any moment, final health IT legislation is some distance from the finish line. With the number of days remaining in the congressional session dwindling, supporters are urging faster action. They tout health IT as a way to improve care and reduce costs.

America can’t afford coverage for all, if we don’t have health IT,said former Rep. Nancy Johnson, R-Connecticut, who is co-chair of the Health IT Now Coalition.We must push the ball over the line this session or we will pay dearly.The Senate bill and the draft House measure would make permanent the Office of the National Coordinator of Health Information Technology within the Department of Health and Human Services.

Originally created by a presidential executive order, the office would guide the development and adoption of health IT. In the Senate bill, a public-private partnership would make recommendations to HHS on interoperability and voluntary standards. The House bill would establish federal advisory committees.Both bills include funding mechanisms to help health care providers purchase health IT. The House bill contains stronger privacy protections, although the Senate bill was modified in early June to bolster its privacy provisions. Under the House bill, a patient would have the right to know when his or her medical information has been compromised. Businesses that work with health care providers would be penalized for improper use of records. A House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing in early June focused exclusively on privacy, with watchdogs calling for patient control of their medical history.While legislative details are negotiated, corporate officials and experts assert that it is essential to move beyond handwritten medical records and enhance communication between patients, providers and insurers.Health IT would make health data more transparent and improve standards of care and disease management, according to Felicia Fields, group vice president for human resource and corporate services at Ford Motor Co.It allows us to be more patient-centric than organization-centric in how we provide care, Fields said in an interview after an early-June Senate Finance Committee hearing on health care reform.

Although witnesses acknowledged that IT is not a panacea for what ails U.S. health care, they argued that it is an important part of the prescription.It’s hard for me to imagine how we make significant progress if we don’t introduce computers into the delivery of health care, said Elizabeth McGlynn, a health expert at Rand, a research organization.—Mark Schoeff Jr.

Suicide is bad for your health. Do the Democrats think the Health bill nonsense is good for them? MAR 18,10

Here we go again. Forget American Idol and the fancy new TV shows. The actions of congress and Pelosi are beyond just horrifying and unconstitutional they are simply entertaining in their absurdity!Let’s see….where do we begin today….Rep. Stephen Lynch has warned that a move to pass health care reform without a real vote by congress would be disingenuous and harm the credibility of Congress. I have news for Rep. Lynch. Forget the danger of losing credibility. Congress is already looking up to the swirling toilet water. The American people are in the process of flushing the brown stuff right down the toilet to the globally warmed sewage treatment plant! This latest stunt pretty well sealed the progressive liberal’s fate in my view.Start pealing off the toilet paper you yes vote people in congress on any side of the line who want to hide behind a deem parliamentary trick. To dare to even think of deeming something this important, affecting 1/6th of our economy, introducing forced health insurance, socialism and massive controls on the American people WITHOUT A REAL VOTE, is treasonous in my view. This is too important. This is too expensive. The scheme to DEEM it into place is vividly unconstitutional. It is a total legal violation and will cause unprecedented revolt and law suits.

Gee, lets just deem that we went to work today instead of going. Lets just deem that we sent in our tax return instead of paying to the IRS. Lets just deem that we are faithful to our spouse instead of actually being so. Did I talk with you about toilet water and brown things yet??? The suit patrol is lining up the wagons already. Mark Levin, President of Landmark Legal Foundation has promised to file suit if congress passes a Health-Care bill without actually voting on it. Yeah Mark. Work it!….you fellow radio patriot! The states are also lining up for the coming, legal blood bath if Pelosi and congress want to play this way. Idaho is the first to sign a law. Their Governor signed a measure to require the state attorney general to sue the federal government if Idaho is forced to buy health insurance. So far 37 other states are planning the same response.As I said before, the brown stuff is swirling and I’ll be darned but it looks like the careers of the ‘Yes vote representatives’ stuck to chunks of the brown stuff.Many of our courts might be asleep. Our congress might be asleep, BUT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE NOT ASLEEP AT ALL.

Tea party groups, are rallying behind classic and real conservatives all across the country. Check out www.teaparty.org

Faxes are flying out to congress. Get involved at: www.faxdc.com

For an entire list of national and your local media contacts go to http://basicsproject.org/resources.htm Now you can’t say that you don’t have the time or know how to find your national and local media people.As many of you know, the telephone lines to DC and congress are swamped. It is nothing but a sea of busy signals. That is fabulous pressure and we need to continue but, more directed and fruitful pressure is also needed. Frank Salvato, editor of www.newmediajournal.us said just yesterday on my radio show that we must swamp calls to our local media in our cities as well. We must have thousands of calls going to them saying the following: We are 100% against this congress deeming a national health care bill into existence without a vote. It is totally unconstitutional and we are most angry at the thought of it. Whoever votes for this bill or for a deem tactic will be voted out of office in the midterms.We must keep the pressure up on this runaway congress by continuing on with our attempted calls, emails and faxes, BUT, also slam our media in our various cities and states with so many calls that they will have to cover it.Media people wake up before you too are swirling down the toilet with brown stuff and politicians!