Tuesday, January 07, 2014

IRAN-SYRA-IRAQ-PEACE PROCESS NEWS-WHAT IS UP I MUST ASK MYSELF

KING JESUS IS COMING FOR US ANY TIME NOW. THE RAPTURE. BE PREPARED TO GO.

DANIEL 9:26-27
26 And after threescore and two weeks(62X7=434 YEARS+7X7=49 YEARS=TOTAL OF 69 WEEKS OR 483 YRS) shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary;(ROMAN LEADERS DESTROYED THE 2ND TEMPLE) and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.(THERE HAS TO BE 70 WEEKS OR 490 YRS TO FUFILL THE VISION AND PROPHECY OF DAN 9:24).(THE NEXT VERSE IS THAT 7 YR WEEK OR (70TH FINAL WEEK).
27 And he ( THE ROMAN,EU PRESIDENT) shall confirm the covenant (PEACE TREATY) with many for one week:(1X7=7 YEARS) and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease,(3 1/2 yrs in TEMPLE ANIMAL SACRIFICES STOPPED) and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

JEREMIAH 6:14
14 They have healed also the hurt of the daughter of my people slightly, saying, Peace, peace; when there is no peace.

JEREMIAH 8:11
11 For they have healed the hurt of the daughter of my people slightly, saying, Peace, peace; when there is no peace.

1 THESSALONIANS 5:3
3 For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape.

ISAIAH 33:8
8  The highways lie waste, the wayfaring man ceaseth: he hath broken the covenant,(7 YR TREATY) he hath despised the cities, he regardeth no man.(THE WORLD LEADER-WAR MONGER CALLS HIMSELF GOD)

JERUSALEM DIVIDED

GENESIS 25:20-26
20  And Isaac was forty years old (A BIBLE GENERATION NUMBER=1967 + 40=2007+) when he took Rebekah to wife, the daughter of Bethuel the Syrian of Padanaram, the sister to Laban the Syrian.
21  And Isaac intreated the LORD for his wife, because she was barren: and the LORD was intreated of him, and Rebekah his wife conceived.
22  And the children (2 NATIONS IN HER-ISRAEL-ARABS) struggled together within her; and she said, If it be so, why am I thus? And she went to enquire of the LORD.
23  And the LORD said unto her, Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels;(ISRAEL AND THE ARABS) and the one people shall be stronger than the other people;(ISRAEL STRONGER THAN ARABS) and the elder shall serve the younger.(LITERALLY ISRAEL THE YOUNGER RULES (ISSAC)(JACOB-LATER NAME CHANGED TO ISRAEL) OVER THE OLDER ARABS (ISHMAEL)(ESAU)
24  And when her days to be delivered were fulfilled, behold, there were twins in her womb.
25  And the first came out red, all over like an hairy garment; and they called his name Esau.(THE OLDER AN ARAB)
26  And after that came his brother out, and his hand took hold on Esau's heel; and his name was called Jacob:(THE YOUNGER-ISRAELI) and Isaac was threescore (60) years old when she bare them.(1967 + 60=2027)(COULD BE THE LAST GENERATION WHEN JERUSALEM IS DIVIDED AMOUNG THE 2 TWINS)(THE 2 TWINS WANT JERUSALEM-THE DIVISION OF JERUSALEM TODAY)(AND WHOS IN CONTROL OF JERUSALEM TODAY-THE YOUNGER ISSAC-JACOB-ISRAEL)(AND WHO WANTS JERUSALEM DIVIDED-THE OLDER,ESAU-ISHMAEL (THE ARABS)

ISAIAH 28:14-19 (THIS IS THE 7 YR TREATY COVENANT OF DANIEL 9:27)
14 Wherefore hear the word of the LORD, ye scornful men, that rule this people which is in Jerusalem.
15 Because ye have said, We have made a covenant with death, and with hell are we at agreement; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, it shall not come unto us: for we have made lies our refuge, and under falsehood have we hid ourselves:
16 Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD, Behold, I lay in Zion for a foundation a stone, a tried stone, a precious corner stone, a sure foundation: he that believeth shall not make haste.
17 Judgment also will I lay to the line, and righteousness to the plummet: and the hail shall sweep away the refuge of lies, and the waters shall overflow the hiding place.
18 And your covenant with death shall be disannulled, and your agreement with hell shall not stand; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, then ye shall be trodden down by it.
19 From the time that it goeth forth it shall take you: for morning by morning shall it pass over, by day and by night: and it shall be a vexation only to understand the report.

Netanyahu: No Kerry framework deal yet, and it won’t be binding anyway

Hours after US secretary departs, PM warns of the dangers of dismantling settlements; Kerry may return as soon as next week

January 6, 2014, 10:22 pm 3
US Secretary of State John Kerry, who left Israel on Monday after a long weekend of shuttle diplomacy, is set to return as early as next week in his relentless bid to broker a “framework” agreement for Israel-Palestinian peace.Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told his Likud Knesset faction Monday that “there is no American framework document yet,” and that even if it could be agreed, it would not be binding on the sides, Channel 2 reported. He also assured the Likud MKs that he had not given in to American pressure for more flexible positions regarding the fate of Jerusalem and the Jordan Valley, and said he was only too aware of the consequences of dismantling settlements in the absence of a viable peace accord, the report said.Referring to Israel’s dismantling of its settlements in Gaza and unilateral withdrawal from the Strip in 2005 — which was followed by a Hamas takeover, rocket fire into Israel and two small wars — Netanyahu reportedly told his colleagues, “We saw what happened when we closed our eyes and dismantled settlements. In the best case we get peace; in the worst, we get Afghanistan.”The report said Netanyahu did not rule out dismantling settlements at any price. Another report on Channel 10 said the prime minister had told the Likud meeting he did not intend to dismantle settlements, but did not indicate whether Netanyahu was referring to the short term or further down the line.Kerry has paid 10 trips to the region this year, initially expressing confidence that a permanent peace accord, providing for a Palestinian state alongside Israel, could be wrapped up by the end of April. More recently, though, evidently realizing that this was a tall order, he has been pushing the less ambitious “framework” idea.Netanyahu on Monday, however, reportedly told the Likud that even the framework plan, which Kerry has not yet been able to finalize, would not be binding to the two sides. The prime minister also said there would be elements in the non-binding paper that he and his party colleagues wouldn’t like, and elements that the Palestinians wouldn’t like.The two sides are believed to be at odds over almost every aspect of the core issues involved in a two-state accord. Kerry has been reportedly pushing Netanyahu to agree to at least keep talking on the basis of a Palestinian state to be established along the pre-1967 lines, with land-swap adjustments, and urging Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas to recognize Israel as a Jewish state.Beyond these points, the two sides are said to disagree over security arrangements, border demarcations, the fate of Jerusalem and Palestinian refugee demands under a permanent deal. There have also been disputes over who will be released in a final phase of prisoner releases by Israel of terror convicts in the coming months. And it is unclear whether the Palestinians are prepared to extend the current talks beyond their scheduled expiry date in late April.
The pan-Arab daily Al-Quds Al-Arabi on Monday quoted Palestinian sources as saying that Abbas was inclining to accept a Kerry proposal for an Israeli-Palestinian-international force to secure the eastern border between the West Bank and Jordan even after Palestinian statehood, where previously Abbas had ruled out any Israeli presence. But the claim was unconfirmed, and it is entirely unclear whether it would be palatable to Netanyahu.A Maariv report Monday said Netanyahu had rejected a Kerry proposal for a limited number of Palestinian refugees to enter Israel. The paper also claimed Netanyahu was ready to freeze settlement expansion in order to keep the talks going to the end of the year. Netanyahu is expected to announce 1,400 new building starts over the Green Line in the near future, and the government on Sunday agreed another stage of the approval process for more than 100 homes in the Ofra and Karnei Shomron settlements.
If Kerry failed to close the gaps between Israel and the Palestinians, he did say he had won backing during this visit from Jordan and Saudi Arabia after lightning visits to both countries on Sunday. Netanyahu’s predecessor, Ehud Olmert, on Monday asserted that a full peace deal could be done now, and derided any prime minister who didn’t seize the opportunity as an “idiot.”Netanyahu’s Finance Minister Yair Lapid, from the centrist Yesh Atid, also said Monday there was “a real opportunity” for an accommodation with the Palestinians, “and it’s closer than appearances would indicate.”Before leaving on Monday, Kerry met with Tony Blair, who serves as special envoy for the Quartet of Regional Peacemakers comprising the United Nations, European Union, United States, and Russia. The top US diplomat also convened with the leader of the Israeli opposition, Labor MK Isaac Herzog.Herzog said he assured Kerry that the majority of the Knesset, including the opposition, supports reaching a diplomatic solution but that ensuring security and the rejection of the Palestinian right of return were central issues. ”I stressed that we see the utmost importance in the security arrangements that will ensure Israel’s ability to protect her citizens and the prevention of the right of return of Palestinian refugees to Israeli territory,” Herzog said.One State Department official, quoted by AFP, told reporters on Kerry’s plane home Monday, “There’s a lot of work that needs to happen, a lot of tough decisions that need to be made. At some point there will a document with the ideas from both parties, but we’re not going to make a prediction of when that will be.”

US-Brokered Deal 'Just the First Stage' in Israel's Demise

Senior member of Mahmoud Abbas' party reiterates his organization's stance: destroy Israel 'in stages'.
By Ari Soffer-First Publish: 1/6/2014, 6:26 PM-Israelnationalnews

Fatah Central Committee member Abbas Zaki
Fatah Central Committee member Abbas Zaki-YouTube/Palestinian Media Watch
As US-brokered talks between Israel and the Palestinian Authority (PA) continue, amid pressure for further territorial concessions by Israel, a senior Palestinian Authority official has told Syrian TV that any agreement will simply be the "first stage" in eradicating Israel altogether.Abbas Zaki posted a clip of the interview - which was promptly translated and circulated by Palestinian Media Watch (PMW) - onto his Facebook page.In response to concern expressed by the interviewer that any US-imposed deal would be "deficient", insofar as it would "only" require Israel to cede Judea and Samaria, a smiling Zaki urges calm."You can relax. We find ourselves united for the first time. Even the most extreme among us, Hamas, or the fighting forces, want a state within the '67 borders [sic]. Afterward, we [will] have something to say, because the inspiring idea cannot be achieved all at once. [Rather] in stages," he responded.Zaki is a senior member of the central committee of Fatah - the Arab nationalist party which dominates the PA, and is headed by PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas.The strategy to eradicate the Jewish state "in stages" via a combination of terrorism and diplomacy, as opposed to in a single military conquest, has been voiced by many PA officials in the past, who note that Israel cannot be destroyed in one fell swoop. Palestinian Media Watch has exposed a string of such statements by senior officials in the past, casting serious doubt over the viability of the Obama administration's recent attempt to impose a solution to the conflict.Earlier this year, in a speech attended by Mahmoud Abbas, the PA's Religious Affairs Minister explained that any treaties with Israel should be viewed as another "Treaty of Hudaybiyyah" - a reference to a "temporary" deal signed by Islam's founder Muhammed, which was promptly broken as soon as the Muslim armies were strong enough to achieve victory.In another interview in 2011, Zaki was even more explicit:"While the agreement is on the borders of June 4, the President [Mahmoud Abbas] understands, we understand, and everyone knows that it is impossible to realize the inspiring idea, or the great goal in one stroke," he explained to Al Jazeera.
However, he continued, an agreement which would see the destruction and ethnic-cleansing of Jewish communities in Judea and Samaria would itself prove strategically fatal for the Jewish state in the long-run.
"If Israel withdraws from Jerusalem, if Israel uproots the settlements, 650,000 settlers, if Israel removes the (security) fence - what will be with Israel? Israel will come to an end."If I say that I want to remove it from existence, this will be great, great, [but] it is hard. This is not a [stated] policy. You can't say it to the world. You can say it to yourself."
VIDEOS IN STORY

Netanyahu may suffer if he signs peace deal, settler spokeman says

David Wilder draws parallel between the tragic ends of PMs who surrendered land; comments come with Sharon at death’s door

January 6, 2014, 11:59 pm 0-The times of israel


David Wilder, the spokesman for Hebron’s Jewish community, has written an article published by various right-wing Jewish outlets arguing that Ariel Sharon, Yitzhak Rabin and Menachem Begin all met unhappy ends because they surrendered land. And he warns Netanyahu that he is liable to suffer a similar fate if he gives up land to the Palestinians.In the article — which was published by The Jewish Press, a Brooklyn-based Orthodox weekly, and on the pro-settler Israeli website Arutz Sheva — Wilder writes: “What then is the punishment of people who remove cities from Israel, abandoning the land, expelling the people, endangering the population? What happened to them, what was their fate:“Begin, the hero of the Jewish underground, the leader who destroyed the Iraqi nuclear threat, secluded himself for years following his resignation as prime minister, unseen until his dying day. Rabin was assassinated. Olmert, one of the primary initiators of the Gush Katif catastrophe, has undergone numerous trials on charges of corruption, facing disgrace. Katsav, who as president refused to oppose the Gush Katif expulsion, imprisoned following conviction for rape, from the president’s mansion to a jail cell. Ariel Sharon, suffering the worst kind of hell, neither here nor there, not dead, not alive, for the past eight years. Some 8,600 people were expelled from the Gush, a year for every thousand people. And one can only imagine what he will face when trying to enter the Pearly Gates of heaven.”Wilder goes on to malign US Secretary of State John Kerry (“the word ‘Kerry’ in Hebrew has a distinct meaning: impurity”) before concluding:“I can only say: Bibi, beware. Don’t fall into the potholes left to you by Sharon. And to the others, who can join him, or leave him, can support him or bring him down, your fate is too hanging in the balance. Purify yourselves from the contamination of Kerry. Before Sharon’s miserable fate will almost look good to you.”This is not the first time that a critic has connected Sharon’s illness to his decision to withdraw from Gaza. In 2006, American televangelist Pat Robertson suggested that Sharon’s stroke was divine punishment, a comment for which he later apologized.
Follow us: @timesofisrael on Twitter | timesofisrael on Facebook

Olmert: PM would have to be an ‘idiot’ to pass up peace

Ex-premier in derisive attack on Netanyahu, also slams Liberman’s population exchange idea; says Assad could have avoided rebellion if he’d signed deal

January 6, 2014, 6:10 pm 38-The Times of Israel
Former prime minister Ehud Olmert took an unusually blatant and derisive potshot Monday at Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, indicating that his successor was an idiot for not doing more to reach a peace agreement with the Palestinians when such a deal could be done right now.Olmert also criticized Foreign Minister Avigdor Liberman for opposing any deal that does not take into consideration the Yisrael Beytenu chairman’s controversial proposal to exchange major Arab population centers for settlements in the West Bank.Speaking about “Media Challenges of Prime Ministers in Times of War and Terror” at a conference in Jerusalem’s Hebrew University, Olmert said it was nearly impossible for an Israeli prime minister to get positive headlines during wartime. On the other hand, any leader who signs peace agreements can be sure of positive press, he said.“Even an idiot prime minister would be portrayed in a positive light [if he signed a peace deal]. But an idiot prime minister doesn’t make peace, and a prime minister who makes peace is no idiot,” Olmert said to raucous laughter in the room, as the capacity crowd in the hall understood his comment to be a snipe at Netanyahu. (He used the derisive Hebrew word tembel for idiot.) “And I’m really saying this in the most general terms,” Olmert continued, laughing, “and not at all personally.”The former prime minister later said that he did not mean to wage a campaign against his successor, but added that peace was possible and that no stone should be left unturned in the attempt to reach an agreement.“There is nothing more important, there’s nothing that will change our lives so substantially, nothing that could negatively impact our lives, more than the existence or absence of a peace agreement between us and Palestinians as soon as possible,” Olmert said. An agreement depends on both the Israeli and the Palestinian leaderships, he added, but if a deal is struck, “the benefit for the State of Israel will be greater than any other issue that we can achieve, and in all other areas combined, any time in the near future.”In 2008, Olmert offered the Palestinians a state.He also negotiated for a peace agreement with Syrian President Bashar Assad. “He understands today that he missed the opportunity of his life, when he didn’t jump at the opportunity that I had presented him. And I presented him an exceptional opportunity,” Olmert said of Assad on Monday. “He made a dramatic mistake, because he might have spared himself the entire rebellion and everything that has happened in Syria since then.”Olmert declined to comment on the current negotiations led by US Secretary of State John Kerry. He merely said that it was “possible to reach peace now, a peace that will secure Israeli’s security, its Jewishness, its Zionism, the security of its residents, its democratic nature, and also establish a Palestinian state that will be the national homeland of the Palestinian people. It’s possible to do that. You just need to reach decisions — that’s the task of leaders.”He also condemned the speech delivered by the foreign minister Sunday, during which Liberman vowed to veto any peace agreement with the Palestinians that lacked the exchange of the “triangle” area southeast of Haifa and Wadi Ara — both areas mostly populated by Israeli Arabs — for West Bank areas populated primarily by Jews, commonly known as “settlement blocs.”“Mr. Liberman understands well that there is no chance to ever make peace on the basis of his positions, to exclude the ‘triangle’ and Wadi Ara from the boundaries of the State of Israel,” Olmert said. “I believe the vast majority of Israel’s non-Jewish citizens — mostly Muslim Arabs — are loyal citizens and we need to approach them with understanding, responsibility and full equality.”Last month, Olmert made headlines when he launched an acerbic attack on Netanyahu, for his “utterly misguided” policy of publicly confronting the United States over its Iran policy. Olmert said the current prime minister was causing an unprecedented and acutely dangerous rift in bilateral diplomatic relations by “going into battle against our best ally and whipping up Congress” against the US administration.

ISAIAH 17:1,11-14
1 The burden of Damascus. Behold, Damascus is taken away from being a city, and it shall be a ruinous heap.
11  In the day shalt thou make thy plant to grow, and in the morning shalt thou make thy seed to flourish: but the harvest shall be a heap in the day of grief and of desperate sorrow.
12  Woe to the multitude of many people, which make a noise like the noise of the seas; and to the rushing of nations,(USELESS U.N) that make a rushing like the rushing of mighty waters!
13  The nations shall rush like the rushing of many waters: but God shall rebuke them, and they shall flee far off, and shall be chased as the chaff of the mountains before the wind, and like a rolling thing before the whirlwind.
14  And behold at evening tide trouble; and before the morning he is not.(ASSAD KILLED IN OVERNIGHT RAID) This is the portion of them that spoil us,(ISRAEL) and the lot of them that rob us.


AMOS 1:5
5  I will break also the bar of Damascus, and cut off the inhabitant from the plain of Aven, and him that holdeth the sceptre from the house of Eden:(IRAQ) and the people of Syria shall go into captivity unto Kir,(JORDAN) saith the LORD.

JEREMEIAH 49:23-27
23  Concerning Damascus.(SYRIA) Hamath is confounded, and Arpad: for they have heard evil tidings: they are fainthearted; there is sorrow on the sea;(WAR SHIPS WITH NUKES COMING ON SYRIA) it cannot be quiet.
24  Damascus is waxed feeble, and turneth herself to flee, and fear hath seized on her: anguish and sorrows have taken her, as a woman in travail.
25  How is the city of praise not left, the city of my joy!
26  Therefore her young men shall fall in her streets, and all the men of war shall be cut off in that day, saith the LORD of hosts.
27  And I will kindle a fire (NUKES OR BOMBS) in the wall of Damascus, and it shall consume the palaces of Benhadad.(ASSADS PALACES POSSIBLY IN DAMASCUS)

PSALMS 83:3-7
3 They (ARABS,MUSLIMS) have taken crafty counsel against thy people,(ISRAEL) and consulted against thy hidden ones.
4 They have said, Come, and let us cut them off from being a nation; that the name of Israel may be no more in remembrance.
5 For they (MUSLIMS) have consulted together with one consent: they are confederate against thee:(TREATIES)
6 The tabernacles of Edom,(JORDAN) and the Ishmaelites;(ARABS) of Moab, PALESTINIANS,JORDAN) and the Hagarenes;(EGYPT)
7 Gebal,(HEZZBALLOH,LEBANON) and Ammon,(JORDAN) and Amalek;(SYRIA,ARABS,SINAI) the Philistines (PALESTINIANS) with the inhabitants of Tyre;(LEBANON)

Syria’s ‘war within a war’ amps up ahead of peace conference

Islamist brigades and more moderate rebels battle al-Qaeda-linked fighters across four northern provinces

January 7, 2014, 12:37 am 0-The times of Israel
BEIRUT (AP) — Syrian rebels surrounded a compound held by al-Qaeda-linked fighters and freed at least 50 people from a nearby prison Monday as clashes between rival factions in the country’s northern provinces spread to the largest city controlled by the opposition.The rebel-on-rebel fighting in Raqqa — a stronghold of the al-Qaeda-linked group known as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant — reflects a widening war within a war in Syria, this one against radical extremists. It also adds yet another layer of complexity to the broader Syrian conflict less than three weeks ahead of a planned international peace conference to try to broker a political solution to the civil war.Support from the US and its Western allies for the rebels has faded in the past year as al-Qaeda-affiliated groups have risen to become one of the most dominant forces among the patchwork of opposition fighting factions.There was no indication that the move by a mix of more moderate rebels and powerful ultraconservative Islamist brigades against the al-Qaeda fighters was a reaction to Western pressure to move against the extremist group. Rather, the violence has been largely limited to communities where tensions between the factions were already simmering.The number of towns, villages and neighborhoods where clashes were taking place spread across four provinces, providing an indication of the extent of resentment of the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant.Since spring 2013, the group has muscled its way into rebel-held territory across northern Syria, crushing resistance from other factions, seizing their weapons and detaining their fighters. It has kidnapped journalists and abducted activists who are critical of its efforts to impose a strict interpretation of Islam.For months, sporadic clashes between its fighters and other rebel brigades have left scores dead and hampered the broader movement to topple Syrian President Bashar Assad.But the latest fighting, which broke out Friday in the northern provinces of Aleppo and Idlib after residents there accused the al-Qaeda-linked group of killing a popular doctor, is the most serious since the uprising began in March 2011.The fighting has since spread to the central province of Hama as well as the northeastern province of Raqqa, and killed an estimated 100 fighters on both sides, according to the Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights activist group.The fighting in the city of Raqqa — the provincial capital — began before dawn Monday, when a coalition of Islamic brigades attacked fighters from the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant, said Observatory director Rami Abdurrahman. Another activist group, the Local Coordinating Committees, also reported the Raqqa clashes, saying they were focused around a post office.The Observatory said rebels surrounded the group’s main compound in Raqqa and freed at least 50 detainees from a prison. Abdurrahman said they included fighters and activists imprisoned for criticizing the group.“Many of them were from various rebel groups,” Abdurrahman said. “Some of them had been held a few weeks, some of them a few months.”The Observatory also said the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant retreated from the town of Tal Abyad along the Turkish border after heavy fighting there. Clashes continued in parts of Aleppo province, including the neighborhoods of Masaken Hanano and Shaar in the city of Aleppo.Raqqa was the first provincial capital to fall entirely into the hands of rebels, and the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant slowly squeezed many other groups out of the city last year. An Italian Jesuit priest, the Rev. Paolo Dall’Oglio, disappeared in July after traveling to meet al-Qaeda militants in Raqqa. Since then, rumors have swirled that foreign aid workers, reporters and Syrian activists have been held in Raqqa’s detention centers.Abdurrahman estimated that more than 1,000 people are being held in Raqqa province. He said the fate of the priest and foreign journalists was unknown.Activists said another al-Qaeda-linked rebel group, the Nusra Front, was taking part in the fighting in Raqqa against the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant. However, Abdurrahman said many of the Nusra Front fighters in Raqqa had joined the group from other rebel outfits that had collapsed in the face of the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant.One of the more moderate rebel groups involved in the fighting elsewhere against the al-Qaeda-linked insurgents, the Syrian Revolutionary Front, appeared reluctant to give up the offensive.The group, a recently formed coalition of rebel brigades aligned with the exiled Syrian opposition, demanded in a statement Monday that the al-Qaeda-linked fighters desert and join their ranks. They also blamed the group for killing at least 400 of their fighters and imprisoning 2,000.“Were it not for these actions, the Front would not have raised its weapons,” the statement said.Rebels appear to have taken several of the group’s compounds in Aleppo province, and its fighters handed over strongholds in the town of Tal Rafat to the Nusra Front to avoid clashes, the Observatory reported.At the United Nations, Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon was sending out 20 invitations to the so-called Geneva peace conference, which is to open Jan. 22 in Switzerland. Iran, a close Assad ally that has supplied his government with weapons, funds and military advisers, was not among the nations invited, UN spokesman Farhan Haq said.
The US and Russia have not yet agreed on Iran’s role in the talks, but Haq says the UN hopes that can be resolved at a Jan. 13 meeting between US Secretary of State John Kerry and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. 

A Look at the Massive Ship That Will Destroy Syria's Chemical Weapons


ABC News
A Look at the Massive Ship That Will Destroy Syria's Chemical Weapons (ABC News)
To neutralize the most dangerous chemicals stockpiled by Syria in a weapons program that brought global attention to a violent civil war, the international community will rely on a massive ship currently docked in Portsmouth, Va.: the MV (motor vessel) Cape Ray, a transport and humanitarian-response vessel owned by the U.S. Maritime Administration.The plan, announced in November by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) and agreed to by Syria, calls for President Bashar al-Assad's regime to move Syria's most dangerous chemical-weapons components - already mixed mustard gas in liquid form, and a precursor to sarin gas - to the port of Latakia and out of the country, onto Norwegian and Danish ships. That process is behind schedule due to fighting in Syria.Italy has offered to host the transfer of chemical components to the Cape Ray at one of its ports, but the details have not been worked out. The OPCW has set a goal of March 31 for the destruction of these chemicals, and June 30 for all of Syria's chemicals.The Cape Ray is part of a reserve fleet that helps surge military equipment into war zones when needed. The Cape Ray has deployed tanks, humvees, helicopters, and other vehicles to Iraq multiple times. It conducts humanitarian response to natural disasters and has responded to Haiti's earthquake, and hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Sandy.It is about 650 feet long, has five decks, and will carry 35 sailors to operate the ship, plus 64 technical crew involved with the chemical destruction (a "handful" of whom will actually handle the chemicals and operate the machinery to destroy them, according to the top engineer), and an unknown number of U.S. military personnel.It's currently being outfitted with two Field-Deployable Hydrolysis Systems (FDHS), which the Pentagon began procuring in February 2013, knowing it might need a way to destroy Syrian chemical-weapons components in the field. It did not expect to do so at sea, and the equipment had to be tested for vibrations, the sloshing of liquids, and other potential problems."Putting these systems on a ship wasn't the first thing that came to mind," Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisitions, Technology, and Logistics Frank Kendall said.The two units are 20 feet by eight feet by eight feet - the size of a standard shipping container - and are being housed in the ship's main deck in a divided white tent about 60 feet by 36 feet. They cost $5 million apiece and were paid for through Department of Defense threat-reduction contingency funds, after Congress was notified.The technology has been around - the U.S. has destroyed its own chemical weapons using a similar process for decades - but it has never been built in such a small, transportable unit, and chemical weapons have never before been destroyed at sea, to the knowledge of Rob Malone, an environmental engineer with Department of Defense and a top engineer on this project."This is not new technology. This is not a high-risk thing that we are doing," Kendall said.
Workers handling the chemicals will wear fully enclosed hazmat suits with oxygen supplied through a mask - described as "scuba suits" by Malone.Seven hundred metric tons of Syria's most dangerous chemical-weapons components will be loaded onto the Cape Ray and destroyed over a 90-day mission, with the two FDHS units running continuously. Syria's chemicals will be stored on decks above and below the main deck where they're being destroyed.The result of this destruction will be 1.5 million gallons of hazardous waste, which a top engineer likened to Drano, that will not be usable for chemical-weapons production, but nonetheless will need to be disposed of at a waste facility of some kind. (Details of disposal have not been worked out yet.)If a spill were to occur, it would be contained to the ship's main deck, Malone said. The tents will be ventilated through carbon before exhaust is released from the ship, and those filters would, according to Malone, neutralize any chemical vapors in the event of a spill.The Cape Ray is docked at a private shipyard in Portsmouth, alongside two other Maritime Administration vessels, and is expected to deploy within the next two weeks, Kendall said. The ship's captain, Rick Jordan, said he has not yet received orders for departure, where the chemicals will be transferred aboard, or where at sea they're to be destroyed.

'Nuclear Bomb Necessary to Put Down Israel'

Iranian cleric and lawmaker reveals that Iran 'needs' a nuclear weapon to 'wipe Israel off the map'; also reveals US 'need' for Iran deal.-By Tova Dvorin-First Publish: 1/7/2014, 1:13 AM-Israelnationalnews

Nuclear talks in Geneva
Nuclear talks in Geneva-Reuters
Iranian lawmaker, cleric, and Majilis (council) member Mohammed Nabavian declared Monday that Iran does need a nuclear bomb - to destroy Israel. Iran would be able to build a nuclear bomb in “two weeks” if it gets “access to 270 kilograms of 20 percent [enriched uranium], 10 tons of 5 percent, and 20 thousand centrifuges,” Nabavian stated, according to Iranian media reports. “We are not looking for a nuclear bomb, but having a nuclear bomb is necessary to put down Israel." Regarding Iran's resumed diplomatic relations with the US, Nabavian stated, "If Obama asked for a meeting five times before the visit to New York and several times during the visit, it's because over these eight years measures were taken [by Iran] and, as a result, the United States [now] needs Iran.""In Syria, the U.S. did not manage to attack and was humiliated. In practice, Obama was humiliated because he did not stand up to Iran, and hence it is necessary to meet with Iran's president to show that he is a strong man and tell the world: I brought Iran to the negotiating table after 30 years."According to MEMRI, Nabavian made the remarks in a speech that he delivered at a political activists' conference in Mashhad (northeastern Iran).Nabavian also claimed that Iran agreed to a deal only to escape the sanctions imposed on its booming oil trade."Forty-nine percent of our budget depends on oil [revenue]. This is a very high figure. This means that half our budget comes from oil money. In [March 2012-March 2013,] we had to sell 2,700,000 barrels of oil daily to supply the budget. Now take into account banking sanctions [even] more severe than the oil sanctions," he mused.  "Since June 2012 all the world's banks have been barred to us and we don't have permission to exchange even a dollar. Think of it, even if we sold 2,700,000 barrels of oil [a day], how could we have conducted the financial transactions?"
Once an agreement was reached, business eased, according to Nabavian. "Finally, Putin sent the governor of his central bank directly [to Tehran] to secure alleviations in the field of money transfers and barter trade. Likewise, China transferred to our account 10 billion toman from the blocked funds."The deal is set to take affect on January 20, according to recent reports. The interim deal requires that Iran freeze or curb its nuclear activities for six months in exchange for some sanctions relief. In the meantime, Iran and Western powers will try to reach a comprehensive agreement.Nabavian's remarks, oddly, echo statements made by Intelligence Minister Yuval Steinitz in December, who dismissed reports that the sanctions had little effect on Iran and lamented the deal for allowing nuclear building to escalate. "According to calculations the government made a few months ago, during a special Knesset meeting, the sanctions imposed on Iran cost it over 100 billion dollars," Steinitz stated. "This is a vast sum, considering that Iran's GNP is 450 billion dollars per year." Steinitz stated that the sanctions had been one of the State of Israel's greatest successes. "If we would have continued sanctions [on Iran], we would have seen the Iranian economy collapse in a year or two," he said.

US issues rare order to stop transfer of goods to Iran

Commerce Dept. uses anti-terrorism laws in attempt to prevent a Turkish company from exporting two Boeing airplane engines

January 7, 2014, 2:19 am 0-The times of israel
ISTANBUL (AP) — The United States Commerce Department has issued an emergency order using US anti-terrorism export control laws against a Turkish company in an attempt to stop it from exporting two Boeing airplane engines to Iran.Commerce Department officials say that such orders are used rarely to prevent the imminent export of restricted US items to certain countries, including Iran.The order posted online was issued Friday because US officials believed that an Iranian cargo company was set to pick up the secondhand engines Tuesday. The order also targeted the Iranian company, Pouya Airline.H. Engin Borluca , the director of the Turkish company, 3K Aviation & Logistics, said in a telephone interview with The Associated Press on Monday that he was unaware that US restrictions applied to transactions outside of the US and that the company is trying to resolve the matter. He said that his company is seeking to return the engines to the sender.The US Commerce Department order, signed by Assistant Secretary David Mills, imposes strict restrictions on the business of 3K, Pouya and a third company, US-based Adaero International Trade that the document says shipped the engines to Turkey. The order would restrict the companies for 180 days from trade or shipping of any items on US export control lists. It also would prevent other companies, including banks, from financing or supporting restricted trade by the companies. Violations of the order also could subject the companies to criminal prosecution in the United States.Borluca said his company was acting as a logistics and customs clearing company and was not involved in the sale of the engines. He said the order could have drastic consequences for his business.Representatives at Adaero International Trade and Pouya Airline could not immediately be reached for comment.

Escalating Iraq violence not a result of U.S. force withdrawal, says White House


Olivier Knox, Yahoo News
The White House pushed back hard on Monday against allegations that the U.S. troop withdrawal from Iraq is partly to blame for a surge in deadly sectarian violence there.“I've heard members of Congress suggest this, but if members were suggesting that there should be American troops fighting and dying in Fallujah today, they should say so,” spokesman Jay Carney told reporters. “The president doesn't believe that.”
Al-Qaida-linked extremists have escalated attacks in Iraq and captured two cities in Anbar province, Ramadi and Fallujah, sites of some of the bloodiest battles U.S. troops waged in the aftermath of the March 2003 invasion to topple Saddam Hussein.Over the weekend, Republican Senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham blamed Obama’s decision to withdraw all U.S. forces from Iraq in 2011 for making that possible.“While many Iraqis are responsible for this strategic disaster, the Administration cannot escape its share of the blame,” they said in a joint statement. “Many of us predicted that the vacuum would be filled by America's enemies and would emerge as a threat to U.S. national security interests. Sadly, that reality is now clearer than ever.”Obama hoped to leave a residual force of some 10,000 American troops in Iraq, but withdrew all U.S. forces after Iraq’s government refused to grant them immunity from local prosecution.
“There was sectarian conflict, violent sectarian conflict in Iraq when there were 150,000 U.S. troops on the ground there,” Carney said. “So the idea that this would not be happening if there were 10,000 troops in Iraq I think bears scrutiny.”Still, the spokesman said, Obama wants to leave a residual force in Afghanistan after most troops leave by the end of 2014, in order to train Afghan security forces and carry out counterterrorism operations.But Afghan President Hamid Karzai’s refusal to sign a bilateral security agreement (BSA) that would allow that has put that goal in jeopardy.“As each day passes, it becomes harder to plan with our NATO allies for a post-2014 mission because we can't do that without a BSA that's signed after it's been negotiated,” Carney said.At least 7,818 civilians and 1,050 members of security forces were killed in violent attacks across Iraq in 2013, according to U.N. figures. More than 759 people were killed in December. The toll is the highest in five years, but still far below 2006 and 2007 sectarian conflicts.

Pipe bomb explodes at Rachel’s Tomb parking lot

One person lightly injured in blast; security forces search for perpetrator

January 7, 2014, 1:33 am 0
An unknown assailant lobbed a small pipe bomb into the Rachel’s Tomb complex near Bethlehem on Monday night, causing an explosion.One person was lightly injured and treated on the spot, according to Israel Radio. The blast reportedly occurred in the parking lot.IDF units were out searching the area for the perpetrator.Earlier Monday, a Palestinian attacker hurled a grenade at an IDF base near Bethlehem.
No one was hurt and no damage was caused in the attack, which came hours after US Secretary of State John Kerry wrapped up his 10th visit to the region.Sporadic attacks throughout the West Bank have become almost commonplace in recent months, as US-led peace efforts intensify, leading to widespread fears among Israelis that a Third Intifada may be imminent.Follow us: @timesofisrael on Twitter | timesofisrael on Facebook

Monday, January 06, 2014

POPE VISITS ISRAEL MAY 24-26,14-FATAH CLARITY ON JERUSALEM OUR HOLY CITY

KING JESUS IS COMING FOR US ANY TIME NOW. THE RAPTURE. BE PREPARED TO GO.


Former PM’s heartbeat and blood pressure ‘good,’ hospital director says, but 85-year-old still in ‘immediate danger’

January 5, 2014, 11:57 am 2
Former prime minister Ariel Sharon’s condition has been stable for the last 12 hours, and his heartbeat and blood pressure are “good,” Sheba Medical Center director Zeev Rotstein said Sunday morning.“We knew he had a good heart, and now we know he has a strong heart,” Rotstein said, but added that Sharon’s life was still in “immediate danger” and there was no cause for optimism.Sharon is “a true lion” who “continues to fight for his life,” the hospital director added.His family remained at his bedside, the hospital said, and former soldiers who fought alongside him were among the well-wishers who visited him during the day.
Last Wednesday, hospital personnel put out a laconic statement saying the comatose former leader’s condition had taken a turn for the worse.His family was at his bedside on Thursday afternoon, and his condition has since been defined as critical, with indications that he has at most a few days to live. Rotstein said Sunday that his family members were still at his side and the doctors were “treating him with all their might.”In his previous statement to the press on Friday, Rotstein said the former PM was in critical condition and deteriorating, and continues suffering from continuous organ failure that may lead to critical damage to many bodily systems.Doctors said Sharon, 85, who has been in a vegetative state since 2006, was suffering from renal failure that could lead to multiple organ system failure and death. Sharon has been hospitalized at Sheba for seven years.The hospital director said last week that while Sharon’s condition had “seen ups and downs” in the past two-and-a-half months, his life was now in danger.“The danger [to Sharon's life] exists, [but] as we know, Arik [Sharon] is a powerful man and has survived difficult situations during his time in our hospital,” he continued. ”I’m no prophet, but the feeling among the doctors treating him and the family by his side… is that he has taken a turn for the worse.”Rotstein added that Sharon wasn’t receiving dialysis treatment for his kidney collapse, as it was not recommended for a patient with multiple organ failure. He said the ex-prime minister had received antibiotic treatment in recent weeks for infections that caused his condition to deteriorate.“He is receiving all the treatments that a patient in his condition should receive,” he said.In September, doctors reinstalled a feeding tube in Sharon’s digestive system. The procedure was completed without incident, and the former prime minister was returned to the hospital’s Department of Respiratory Care and Rehabilitation, where he has been in treatment in recent years.Sharon is one of Israel’s most iconic and controversial figures. As one of Israel’s most famous generals, Sharon was known for bold tactics and an occasional refusal to obey orders. As a politician he became known as “The Bulldozer,” a man contemptuous of his critics while also capable of getting things done.As defense minister, he led Israel’s 1982 invasion of Lebanon, and was forced to resign the post after a commission of inquiry found him responsible for failing to prevent the massacre by Christian Phalangists of Palestinian refugees in Beirut’s Sabra and Shatila camps.A prominent hard-line voice over the decades, he was elected prime minister in 2001.In mid-2005, he directed a unilateral withdrawal of Israeli troops and settlers from the Gaza Strip, ending a 38-year military control of the territory. It was a shocking turnaround for a man who had been a leading player in building Jewish settlements in captured territories.He bolted the Likud party soon after and established the centrist Kadima party, where he was joined by Ehud Olmert and Tzipi Livni. He appeared on his way to an easy reelection when he suffered a severe stroke in January 2006. His deputy, Olmert, took over and was elected prime minister a few months later.Sharon had a first, small stroke in December 2005 and was put on blood thinners before experiencing a severe brain hemorrhage on January 4, 2006. After spending months in the Jerusalem hospital where he was initially treated, Sharon was transferred to the long-term care facility at Tel Hashomer Hospital. He was taken home briefly at one point, but was returned to the hospital, where he has been since.AP contributed to this report.

RELATED STORIES
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2014/01/ariel-sharon-still-in-grave-condition.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2014/01/pope-to-strengthen-interreligious.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/10/3-of-israels-200-400-nuke-arsenal.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/12/2014-plus-what-to-watch-for-by-bible.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/12/2014-15-blood-moons-israeli-wars-to.html
RABBI KADURI NEWS
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/89850#.UsW-1fswneE
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/97471#.UsXAbfswneE
http://rabbikaduri.blogspot.ca/

ZECHARIAH 12:1-5 King James Bible
1 The burden of the word of the LORD for Israel, saith the LORD, which stretcheth forth the heavens, and layeth the foundation of the earth, and formeth the spirit of man within him.
2 Behold, I will make Jerusalem a cup of trembling unto all the people round about, when they shall be in the siege both against Judah and against Jerusalem.
3 And in that day will I make Jerusalem a burdensome stone for all people: all that burden themselves with it shall be cut in pieces, though all the people of the earth be gathered together against it.
4 In that day, saith the LORD, I will smite every horse with astonishment, and his rider with madness: and I will open mine eyes upon the house of Judah, and will smite every horse of the people with blindness.
5 And the governors of Judah shall say in their heart, The inhabitants of Jerusalem shall be my strength in the LORD of hosts their God.

ISAIAH 31:5
5 As birds flying,(PLANES) so will the LORD of hosts defend Jerusalem;(WITH PLANES) defending also he will deliver it; and passing over he will preserve it.(NUKE OR BOMB ISRAELS ENEMIES)

JOEL 3:2
2 I will also gather all nations, and will bring them down into the valley of Jehoshaphat, and will plead with them there for my people and for my heritage Israel, whom they have scattered among the nations, and parted my land.(WW3 STARTS BECAUSE JERUSALEM IS DIVIDED AND ISRAELIS UPROOTED FROM THEIR GOD GIVIN LAND)

ZECHARIAH 14:12-13
12 And this shall be the plague wherewith the LORD will smite all the people that have fought against Jerusalem; Their flesh shall consume away while they stand upon their feet, and their eyes shall consume away in their holes, and their tongue shall consume away in their mouth.
13 And it shall come to pass in that day, that a great tumult from the LORD shall be among them; and they shall lay hold every one on the hand of his neighbour, and his hand shall rise up against the hand of his neighbour.(1/2-3 BILLION DIE IN WW3)

PSALMS 137:5-6
5  If I forget thee, O Jerusalem, let my right hand forget her cunning.
6  If I do not remember thee, let my tongue cleave to the roof of my mouth; if I prefer not Jerusalem above my chief joy.

ZECHARIAH 14:1-4 King James Bible
1 Behold, the day of the LORD cometh, and thy spoil shall be divided in the midst of thee.
2 For I will gather all nations against Jerusalem to battle; and the city shall be taken, and the houses rifled, and the women ravished;(RAPED) and half of the city shall go forth into captivity, and the residue of the people shall not be cut off from the city.
3 Then shall the LORD go forth, and fight against those nations, as when he fought in the day of battle.
4 And his feet shall stand in that day upon the mount of Olives, which is before Jerusalem on the east, and the mount of Olives shall cleave in the midst thereof toward the east and toward the west, and there shall be a very great valley; and half of the mountain shall remove toward the north, and half of it toward the south.

LUKE 1:31-32
32  He (JESUS) shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the Highest: and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David:(IN JERUSALEM)
33  And he shall reign over the house of Jacob (ISRAEL) for ever; and of his kingdom there shall be no end.(THATS RULING FOREVER FROM JERUSALEM JESUS DOES)

ISAIAH 9:6-7
6 For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given:(JESUS 1ST COMING) and the government shall be upon his shoulder:(JESUS 2ND COMING AS RULING KING FROM JERUSALEM FOREVER AT THE END OF THE 7 YEAR TRIBULATION) and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.
7 Of the increase of his (JESUS) government and peace there shall be no end, upon the throne of David,( IN JERUSALEM) and upon his kingdom, to order it, and to establish it with judgment and with justice from henceforth even for ever. The zeal of the LORD of hosts will perform this.

JERUSALEM DIVIDED

GENESIS 25:20-26
20  And Isaac was forty years old (A BIBLE GENERATION NUMBER=1967 + 40=2007+) when he took Rebekah to wife, the daughter of Bethuel the Syrian of Padanaram, the sister to Laban the Syrian.
21  And Isaac intreated the LORD for his wife, because she was barren: and the LORD was intreated of him, and Rebekah his wife conceived.
22  And the children (2 NATIONS IN HER-ISRAEL-ARABS) struggled together within her; and she said, If it be so, why am I thus? And she went to enquire of the LORD.
23  And the LORD said unto her, Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels;(ISRAEL AND THE ARABS) and the one people shall be stronger than the other people;(ISRAEL STRONGER THAN ARABS) and the elder shall serve the younger.(LITERALLY ISRAEL THE YOUNGER RULES (ISSAC)(JACOB-LATER NAME CHANGED TO ISRAEL) OVER THE OLDER ARABS (ISHMAEL)(ESAU)
24  And when her days to be delivered were fulfilled, behold, there were twins in her womb.
25  And the first came out red, all over like an hairy garment; and they called his name Esau.(THE OLDER AN ARAB)
26  And after that came his brother out, and his hand took hold on Esau's heel; and his name was called Jacob:(THE YOUNGER-ISRAELI) and Isaac was threescore (60) years old when she bare them.(1967 + 60=2027)(COULD BE THE LAST GENERATION WHEN JERUSALEM IS DIVIDED AMOUNG THE 2 TWINS)(THE 2 TWINS WANT JERUSALEM-THE DIVISION OF JERUSALEM TODAY)(AND WHOS IN CONTROL OF JERUSALEM TODAY-THE YOUNGER ISSAC-JACOB-ISRAEL)(AND WHO WANTS JERUSALEM DIVIDED-THE OLDER,ESAU-ISHMAEL (THE ARABS)


Fatah official: We demand clarity on Jerusalem

Azzam Al-Ahmad says proposals regarding ‘greater Jerusalem’ and refugees leave the US secretary ‘in a vicious circle’


January 5, 2014, 1:37 pm 11-The Times of Israel
US Secretary of State John Kerry has proposed designating “greater Jerusalem” as the capital of both Israel and the Palestinian state, a Fatah official reported on Sunday, claiming that Kerry is stuck in “a vicious circle” and will likely achieve no progress in his current visit to the region.Azzam Al-Ahmad, a member of Fatah’s Central Committee and its representative to talks with Hamas, told the Jordanian daily Al-Ghad that Kerry was “elusive” when speaking of the exclusion of East Jerusalem from the rest of the West Bank.“An ambiguous term such as ‘greater Jerusalem’ in [Kerry's] proposal could reach the Dead Sea, and could [equally] not include [the Palestinian village of] Abu Dis,” Al-Ahmad told the Jordanian daily. ”This [ambiguity] destroys all American efforts to reach a peace agreement.”Palestinian sources have reported “extremely difficult” talks with Kerry over the weekend. According to a report by Agence France Presse, Kerry has exerted immense pressure on PA President Mahmoud Abbas to accept Israel as a Jewish state as part of a framework agreement, a demand Abbas continues to adamantly oppose.The Palestinian source quoted Kerry as saying that the demand to recognize Israel as a Jewish state is not only an Israeli demand, but one shared by the American administration as well.But Al-Ahmad said that Kerry’s ambiguity on Jerusalem and the settlements leave little chance for the Palestinian side to accept his offers.“Kerry is stuck in a vicious circle. If he continues to propose what he has [so far], he will achieve nothing,” Al-Ahmad said.
Kerry, for his part, acknowledged the difficulties experienced by both sides, but insisted that progress has been achieved.“Mistrust obviously exists at a very high level. So we have to work through that and around that and over that,” he said. The secretary of state was traveling to Jordan and Saudi Arabia on Sunday before returning to Israel Sunday evening to continue talks.With regards to the Jordan Valley, Al-Ahmad said the Palestinians rejected any Israeli presence under a final status agreement, but agreed to international forces patrolling the border, including, for example, a joint Jordanian-American contingent. He added that former Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert had already agreed to forgo the Israeli military presence in the Jordan Valley during talks with Abbas. (Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu insists on an ongoing IDF presence to secure the eastern border.)Palestinian officials continued to voice their opposition to provisional or framework agreements as an alternative to the original nine-month timetable agreed upon with the US, which ends in April.On Saturday, chief Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat said that Kerry was not engaged in working on a “transitional agreement” but rather was discussing “all core issues.”Al-Ahmad articulated the Palestinian position differently.“The framework agreement is being used to blackmail the Palestinians and reshuffle the cards, or lengthen the negotiation period beyond nine months,” he said.

IS IT A ACCIDENT THAT AMERICA IS FREEZING COLD AND STORMS.WHEN AMERICA IS REALLY PRESSURING ISRAEL TO GIVE UP GODS LAND ISRAEL AND GODS HOLY CITY JERUSALEM.WHEN WILL THESE POLITICIANS EVER LEARN-YOU TOUCH ISRAEL OR JERUSALEM-YOU TOUCH GOD HIMSELF.AND YOU WANNA DIVIDE JERUSALEM.YOUR COUNTRY WILL BE DIVIDED WITH QUAKES.AND YOU WANNA FORCE ISRAELIS OFF THEIR GOD GIVIN LAND.YOU GET TORNADOES-TSUNAMIS-HURRICANES THAT FORCE YOUR COUNTRIES CITIZENS OFF THEIR LAND.AND IF YOU STILL INSIST ON DIVIDING JERUSALEM.THEN GOD WILL SEND RUSSIA AGAINST YOU TO NUKE YOUR WORSHIP CITY OF NEW YORK.THEN MAYBE THE POLITICIANS IN AMERICA WILL TAKE THE HINT.YOU TOUCH ISRAEL OR JERUSALEM.YOU GET TOUCHED BY GOD BY JUDGEMENTS.AMERICA ITS TIME TO GET OUTTA THE PEACE PROCESS.AND LET ISRAEL BUILD WERE IT WANTS.PRAY ON THE MOUNT 24 HOURS A DAY-7 DAYS A WEEK.AND LET ISRAEL REBUILD THEIR 3RD TEMPLE.SO THEY CAN HAVE SACRIFICES IMPLIMENTED TO WORSHUP THEIR ONE GOD KING JESUS THEIR JEWISH MESSIAH.


Kerry heads for home empty-handed but undeterred

US secretary of state bags key support from Jordan and Saudi Arabia after four days of regional meetings

January 6, 2014, 2:06 pm
US Secretary of State John Kerry left the Middle East on Monday without the framework agreement that he has been promoting as an interim solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, but buoyed by the knowledge that he obtained Saudi backing for his peace push.Earlier in the day Kerry met with Tony Blair, who serves as special envoy for the Quartet of Regional Peacemakers comprising the United Nations, European Union, United States, and Russia, AFP reported. The top US diplomat also convened with the leader of the Israeli opposition, Labor MK Isaac Herzog.Herzog said he assured Kerry that the majority of the Knesset, including the opposition, supports reaching a diplomatic solution but that ensuring security and the rejection of the Palestinian right of return are central issues.“I stressed that we see the utmost importance in the security arrangements that will ensure Israel’s ability to protect her citizens and the prevention of the right of return of Palestinian refugees to Israeli territory,” Herzog said.Kerry spent Sunday jetting around the Middle East and attempting to shore up support for a US framework plan for Israeli-Palestinian peace, calling the endeavor a challenge that could still fall apart.Kerry, meeting in Saudi Arabia with King Abdullah, said Riyadh would back American efforts to reach a deal between the sides.“I am grateful that the Arab League as a whole and Saudi Arabia individually will be significantly involved in helping build support for this effort,” Kerry said at the Riyadh airport prior to his departure. “Today his majesty was not just encouraging, but supported our efforts in the hopes that we can be successful in the days ahead.”Kerry said after his meeting with the Saudi leader that Abdullah’s 2002 initiative “has been part of the framework that we’ve been piecing together — both in inspiration and substance.”The Saudi leader developed an initiative in 2002 in which the Arab world offered comprehensive peace with Israel in exchange for a full pullout from all territories it captured in the 1967 Mideast war.The initiative, revolutionary when it was introduced, has been endorsed by the Arab League and, technically, remains in effect.“Saudi Arabia’s initiative holds out the prospect that if the parties could arrive at a peaceful resolution, you could instantaneously have peace between the 22 Arab nations and 35 Muslim nations, all of whom have said they will recognize Israel if peace is achieved,” Kerry said.“Imagine how that changes the dynamics of travel, of business, of education, of opportunity in this region, of stability. Imagine what peace could mean for trade and tourism, what it could mean for developing technology and talent, for job opportunities for the younger generation, for generations in all of these countries,” Kerry said.Earlier on Sunday, Kerry flew to Amman, Jordan, and held more than an hour of talks with King Abdullah II and Foreign Minister Nasser Judeh. In addition to discussing the Israeli-Palestinian peace talks, Kerry reportedly raised other regional issues, including the civil war in Syria, increasing unrest in Iraq, and the Iranian nuclear program.In a press conference held in Jerusalem on Sunday morning, Kerry called his trip “a productive couple of days with very, very intensive talks.” He also said that both Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had made “important… and courageous decisions, difficult decisions,” but declined comment on the content of those decisions.
Speaking in Jerusalem on Sunday, Kerry likened the bid, to reach a historic deal between Israel and the Palestinians, to an enigma.“In the end, all of these core issues fit together like a mosaic, like a puzzle and you can’t separate out one piece or another,” he said, adding that “the last pieces may decide to fall into place, or may fall on the floor, and leave the puzzle unfinished.”Kerry met several times over the long weekend with Netanyahu and Abbas, seeking to finalize a framework deal covering all the core elements of a potential peace treaty, and is set to return later in the month to continue the effort. He is reportedly urging Netanyahu to continue talks on the basis of the pre-1967 lines with adjustments, and urging Abbas to recognize Israel as a “Jewish state.”Beyond these points, too, the two sides are said to be at odds over most aspects of a permanent accord, notably including security arrangements, border demarcations, the fate of Jerusalem and Palestinian refugee demands. There have also been disputes over who will be released in a final phase of prisoner releases by Israel of terror convicts. And it is unclear whether the Palestinians are prepared to extend the current talks beyond their scheduled expiry date in late April.As of yet, no confirmed concrete details of the framework agreement proposed by the US have come to light.



Kerry gains Arab backing for framework peace plan

US secretary of state returning to Jerusalem with key support in pocket after meetings in Amman and Riyadh

January 5, 2014, 8:22 pm 13-The times of Israel
US Secretary of State John Kerry spent Sunday jetting around the Middle East and attempting to shore up support for a US framework plan for Israeli-Palestinian peace, calling the endeavor a challenge that could still fall apart.Kerry, meeting in Saudi Arabia with King Abdullah, said Riyadh would back American efforts to reach a deal between the sides.“I am grateful that the Arab League as a whole and Saudi Arabia individually will be significantly involved in helping build support for this effort,” Kerry said at the Riyadh airport prior to his departure. “Today his majesty was not just encouraging, but supported our efforts in the hopes that we can be successful in the days ahead.”Kerry said after his meeting with the Saudi leader that Abdullah’s 2002 initiative “has been part of the framework that we’ve been piecing together — both in inspiration and substance.”The Saudi leader developed an initiative in 2002 in which the Arab world offered comprehensive peace with Israel in exchange for a full pullout from all territories it captured in the 1967 Mideast war.The initiative, revolutionary when it was introduced, has been endorsed by the Arab League and, technically, remains in effect.“Saudi Arabia’s initiative holds out the prospect that if the parties could arrive at a peaceful resolution, you could instantaneously have peace between the 22 Arab nations and 35 Muslim nations, all of whom have said they will recognize Israel if peace is achieved,” Kerry said.
“Imagine how that changes the dynamics of travel, of business, of education, of opportunity in this region, of stability. Imagine what peace could mean for trade and tourism, what it could mean for developing technology and talent, for job opportunities for the younger generation, for generations in all of these countries,” Kerry said.Earlier on Sunday, Kerry flew to Amman, Jordan, and held more than an hour of talks with Jordan’s King Abdullah II and Foreign Minister Nasser Judeh. In addition to discussing the Israeli-Palestinian peace talks, Kerry reportedly raised other regional issues, including the civil war in Syria, increasing unrest in Iraq, and the Iranian nuclear program.In a press conference held in Jerusalem on Sunday morning, Kerry called his trip “a productive couple of days with very, very intensive talks.” He also said that both Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had made “important… and courageous decisions, difficult decisions,” but declined comment on the content of those decisions.Speaking before taking off from Jerusalem, Kerry likened the bid, to reach a historic deal between Israel and the Palestinians, to an enigma.“In the end, all of these core issues fit together like a mosaic, like a
puzzle and you can’t separate out one piece or another,” he said, adding that “the last pieces may decide to fall into place, or may fall on the floor, and leave the puzzle unfinished.”As of yet, no confirmed concrete details of the framework agreement proposed by the US have come to light.Kerry will return to Israel Sunday night and is expected to stay for a few days before returning to Washington.




Kerry praises ‘intensive’ talks, to return Sunday night

US secretary of state en route to Jordan and Saudia Arabia to brief regional leaders on Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations

January 5, 2014, 8:30 am 1-The Times of Israel
After three days of lengthy meetings with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Jerusalem and Ramallah, US Secretary of State John Kerry will travel to Jordan and Saudi Arabia on Sunday to discuss his efforts to reach Israeli-Palestinian peace, as well as other regional issues.Kerry said he would return to Jerusalem Sunday evening, and may stay for several days before flying back to Washington later in the week, he told reporters in Jerusalem on Sunday morning.
“This has been a productive couple of days with very, very intensive talks,” he said.Addressing skepticism on both sides about the probability for reaching a final agreement, he added, “These issues are not easy. If it was easy it would have been resolved a long time ago. These are complicated issues that involve…the survival of peoples. This conflict has gone on too long, so positions have hardened. Mistrust obviously exists at a very high level. So we have to work through that and around that and over that.”He urged leaders to avoid the spate of criticism each side has leveled at the other in recent weeks, with Netanyahu accusing the Palestinian leadership of anti-Jewish incitement, and Palestinians threatening repeatedly to walk away from the talks over settlement construction.“Now is not the time to get trapped in the sort of up-and-down of the day-to-day challenges,” Kerry said. “This does not lend itself to a daily tick-tock. We don’t have the luxury of dwelling on the obstacles that we all know could distract us from our goal. What we need to do is lift our sights and look ahead and keep in mind the vision of what can come and if we can move forward.“I know there are those out there on both sides who question whether peace is possible. I know there is a high level of cynicism, reservations about the possibilities. But it is clear to me that we can work to bridge the remaining gaps that do exist,” he insisted.Kerry said both Abbas and Netanyahu “have already made important… and courageous decisions, difficult decisions” in the negotiations.“The path is becoming clearer,” he added, “the puzzle is becoming more defined, and it is becoming much more apparent to everybody what the remaining tough choices are, and what the options are with respect to those choices. But it takes time to work through these things.A US official told Haaretz over the weekend that one of the main obstacles holding up the framework deal is each side’s demand that their reservations over the framework appear as a separate appendix in the final text, rather than as part of the main text which details the areas of common ground in the talks.“It is essential that if there are reservations, they will be part of the framework, not a separate part. Otherwise, it would damage the agreement. For example, if the framework includes a clause stating that the negotiations will be based on the 1967 borders, we cannot agree to a reservation stating that one of the sides opposes this,” the official said.Any agreed framework would not be a signed document, but would address all core issues, including the borders between Israel and a future Palestine, security, Palestinian refugees, and conflicting claims to Jerusalem, the official said. The official also said if the parties agreed on a framework for negotiating a final peace deal, it might not be made public to avoid exposing the leaders to political pressures at home.But those pressures are already ramping up.Jewish Home Knesset faction chair MK Ayelet Shaked said Sunday morning that her party would not remain in the coalition if the government adopts a framework agreement “based on the ’67 lines.”“A government that accepts the ’67 lines is a government of national suicide,” she said.Kerry reiterated long-standing Obama administration commitments to Israel’s security and Palestinian independence.“The security of Israel is always paramount in my mind, in our mind. For 29 years, I had the privilege of serving in the United States Senate, and I’m proud to say I had a 100% voting record with respect to those issues concerning Israel. And I don’t intend to change that now. Israel’s security is critical and the United States’ relationship is ironclad.”But, he added, “so is our concern for the people of Palestine, for the Palestinians and their future. And I can guarantee all parties that President [Barack] Obama and I are committed to putting forward ideas that are fair, that are balanced and that improve the security of all of the people of this region.”He declined to give details about what difficult decisions the leaders had made, saying, “We are not going to negotiate this in public. But I can tell everybody all of the core issues are on the table.”Kerry’s talks on Sunday with Jordan’s King Abdullah II and Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah are likely to also touch on the civil war in Syria, rising violence in Iraq, and Iran’s nuclear program. Kerry is reportedly to meet next week with Arab League representatives and discuss the Israeli-Palestinian peace process and other regional issues.Times of Israel staff and AP contributed to this report.


Migrants march on embassies in second day of protests

Asylum seekers call on US, UN, EU and other diplomatic offices to pressure Israel to soften refugee policies

January 6, 2014, 9:10 am Updated: January 6, 2014, 12:57 pm 14-The times of Israel
 day after the UN’s refugee agency backed their claims, thousands of African asylum seekers rallied Monday morning at a handful of foreign embassies in Israel, stepping up a two-day-old protest against Israeli policies.
The migrants, who are also taking part in a three-day strike, are angry at the government’s incarceration rules, which have seen tens of thousands of them held for long periods in prison facilities in the Negev, and long delays in processing their refugee applications.“We don’t want to live here for the rest of our lives. We want basic rights until we can return,” Dawit, an Eritrean who is one of the leaders of the protest, told Channel 2 on Monday morning.“I love my country, the land I grew up in. My family is in Eritrea. But I can’t live there now,” he said, citing his home country’s political turmoil and repression, including a policy of forced lifelong military service. “Until I can, I only want Israel to treat me like a human being.”The migrants, mainly from Sudan and Eritrea, demonstrated Monday morning in front of embassies and diplomatic offices of the United States, European Union, France, Canada, Sweden, Britain, Germany, Italy, the African Union and the UN High Commissioner for Refugees. The main demonstration took place in front of the American embassy on Tel Aviv’s Hayarkon Street, where thousands of migrants had gathered by mid-morning.According to spokespeople for the demonstrators, they had delivered a letter to US ambassador Dan Shapiro asking him to use his influence on the Israeli government to bring about the cancellation of the law allowing their incarceration in the Negev.Israel’s regulations on employing or providing aid to African migrants can be confusing. The migrants are generally forbidden from working until they are registered as asylum seekers, but getting that far in the process can be onerous, critics say.Tel Aviv’s Mayor Ron Huldai urged the government to face up to the problem, and to allow the migrants to work. He warned that the friction in his city would lead to violence if the asylum-seekers’ complaints were not dealt with properly. The government is “not merely ignoring them, it’s branding them criminals,” the mayor protested in an Army Radio interview.
Israel’s government says most of the 50-60,000 migrants are not refugees but rather economic migrants, and that they will not be allowed to stay in Israel.“A small minority of these people are really refugees,” Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister’s Office Ofir Akunis (Likud) insisted on Monday afternoon.“Other countries, including those they’re turning to, America and European countries, don’t recognize them as refugees either,” he insisted in a Channel 2 interview.Some 3,000 people marched from Levinsky Park in South Tel Aviv toward the center of city on Monday morning, before dispersing to the embassies. Orit Marom, an activist in Assaf, the Aid Organization for Refugees, said thousands had been expected at the protests.The protesters called on the world “to help us in the face of Israel’s harsh policies against us,” according to a statement released by the protesters.“We will call on the international community to support our struggle against Israel’s violations of basic human rights,” the statement added.On Sunday, an estimated 30,000 migrants participated in a march that began in Tel Aviv’s Levinsky Park and ended with a demonstration in Rabin Square at which the crowd chanted “No more prison, no more deportation. We are refugees, we need asylum.”“We know the situation isn’t ideal in any country,” the protesters wrote in a statement announcing Monday’s protests. “It’s clear to us that all nations have difficulty absorbing masses of people, survivors of genocide and war, but with that, the nations of the world must honor international conventions and respect human rights.”In Israel, they added, “we don’t get a proper examination of our asylum requests or recognition of our basic rights that will allow us to live in dignity. Instead, the Israeli government sees us as a threat that must be removed quickly. It arrests us in the streets as though we are criminals, incarcerates us for indefinite periods, leaves us on the fringes of society without access to basic rights, and continues to incite against us repeatedly.”
Interior Minister Gideon Saar responded to the ongoing protest on Monday, repeating the government’s position that most of the migrants were not refugees.“They are demanding collective recognition as refugees in order to plant roots in Israel,” he told Army Radio. The state was checking their requests on a case-by-case basis, he added, and its work was “showing results. We’re seeing a sharp rise in the number of infiltrators who are leaving Israel. They understand that the government is serious, that we are serious.”
Most of the asylum seekers, he concluded, “are labor migrants, and the state of Israel is not their home.”
But the protests were being heard internationally this week. The UN’s refugee agency called on Sunday for Israel to reform its policies toward African asylum seekers, saying the involuntary detentions and rules treat them as criminals.In a statement, the UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency, criticized the conditions at the Holot detention center in the Negev and appealed to policy makers to consider alternative measures to deal with the asylum seekers.The statement said Israel’s policies were sowing fear, and Jerusalem should stop defining the refugees as ‘asylum seekers’ and grant them protection.In their statement Monday, the protesters called for “the direct involvement [of UNHCR] in examining asylum requests,” and for “the nations of the world [to] verify that the government of Israel respects its international commitment, to tell [Israel] that it is possible to [behave] otherwise, that it is only right to treat refugees as human beings, that international laws establish the standards for dealing with refugees. Don’t allow the government of Israel to repeatedly violate our basic human rights, its own commitment under international law, and basic standards of human decency.”
Marissa Newman contributed to this report. 

Hateful anti-Israel education shows PA’s true colors, minister charges

Palestinians accused of preaching anti-Semitism, including ‘elements of admiration for Hitler’; PM says true peace requires ending incitement


January 5, 2014, 4:32 pm 0-The times of Israel
Israel’s government accused the Palestinian Authority Sunday of educating children to seek the destruction of Israel and look to Adolf Hitler as a role model.At the same time Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu connected Palestinian refusal to recognize Israel as a Jewish state to what he said was continuing Palestinian incitement.“True peace cannot exist without stopping the incitement against Israel, and educating for peace,” Netanyahu said in a statement. “The refusal of the Palestinians to recognize Israel as the state of the Jewish people and declare the end of national demands – this is the root of the conflict.”Strategic Affairs Minister Yuval Steinitz pointed to a number of cases of anti-Israel statements as proof that Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas was not trying to make peace.“As it talks of peace in the United Nations, and in the international forums, it teaches for the destruction of the State of Israel and the expulsion or destruction of the Jewish people,” Steinitz told Israel Radio. “It is an entire system of hatred and one that shows elements of admiration of Adolf Hitler as someone who knew how to deal with the Jewish people.”Steinitz, whose ministry publishes an “incitement index” meant to track Palestinian statements against Israel, presented new findings on the subject to the cabinet Sunday.Steinitz’s presentation focused on denials of Israel’s right to exist; emphasis on Israel’s inevitable disappearance; depiction of Jews as subhuman; and statements that all forms of resistance — including terror — are legitimate.Among presented findings were posts on Abbas’s Presidential Guards’ Facebook page that showed maps of Israel labeled as Palestine.Another post used as evidence, taken from the official Fatah Facebook page and the website of its military wing from November 2013, threatens to kidnap soldiers and fire rockets at Israel.“We are talking about very serious things and it is about time that we stopped burying our heads in the sand,” Steinitz said.During the cabinet meeting, Netanyahu backed up Steinitz’s assertions.“To my regret, this incitement is continuing,” Netanyahu said. “Opposition to recognizing the Jewish state and our right to be here is continuing. We are not foreigners in Jerusalem, Beit El or Hebron. I reiterate that in my view, this is the root of both the conflict and the incitement: the nonrecognition of this basic fact.”Speaking at the same cabinet meeting, Justice Minister Tzipi Livni, who also serves as Israel’s chief peace negotiator, emphasized that the high levels of incitement must not be used as a pretext to terminate the peace process with the Palestinian leadership. Instead, the justice minister said, Israel must work toward reaching an agreement in order to ensure it stays both a Jewish and a democratic state.The incitement against Israel taking place within Palestinian society, and especially within the Palestinian education system, may result in extreme consequences and should serve as an incentive for the Jewish state to advance a two-state solution in order to separate from the Palestinian people, Livni said.
Opposition leader Isaac Herzog (Labor) told Israel Radio on Sunday that while he doesn’t take the incitement lightly, he rejects the notion that the hateful speech reflects the Palestinian Authority’s point of view.Herzog called on the prime minister to make historic decisions and noted that he wouldn’t be surprised if a final agreement sees Palestinian government buildings located in East Jerusalem neighborhoods.
Some Israeli leaders have long pointed to Palestinian incitement, in education and the media, as evidence that there is no peace partner.Last week Netanyahu, recalling Palestinian celebrations over a prisoner release earlier in the week, told Kerry he was skeptical over Ramallah’s commitment to peace.“I know that you are committed to peace; I know that I am committed to peace; but, unfortunately, given the actions and words of Palestinian leaders, there’s growing doubt in Israel that the Palestinians are committed to peace,” Netanyahu said during a joint press conference on Thursday.On Monday, Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon  said terror attacks were rooted in Palestinian indoctrination and Abbas was not actually seeking peace.“They are only trying to get what they can and then they will continue,” he said, charging that the biggest problem preventing reconciliation is the continued education supporting anti-Israel terrorism within Palestinian society.“It all begins with education,” Ya’alon said.

Catalonia urges EU leaders to endorse 'legal' referendum

03.01.14 @ 09:29-EUOBSERVER
By Benjamin Fox
BRUSSELS - Catalonia's President, Artur Mas, has written to EU leaders and world powers seeking their support for a vote on independence from Spain.The appeal comes amid strong resistance to his plan to hold a referendum in November.Spain's governing centre-right Partido Popular and the opposition PSOE have both said it would breach the Spanish constitution.When Mas told media last month that separatist parties had agreed on the referendum questions and on its "consultative" rather than legally binding nature, the Spanish justice minister, Alberto Ruiz-Gallardon, said: "The poll will not be held."In an interview published on Wednesday (1 January), Spain's economy minister, Luis de Guindos, added: "There is no national investor who considers that there may be a secessionist process in Catalonia at this time."But for his part, Mas believes he has both the mandate and the legal means to secure a vote.Separatist parties dominated snap elections in Catalonia in November, with politicians who favour the region's “right to decide” taking some two thirds of the 135 seats in the Catalan parliament."Contrary to some reports, there are a number of legal and constitutional options which allow this referendum to take place in Catalonia," Mas said in a letter to German Chancellor Angela Merkel, which was sent in December, but made public on Thursday."I am confident I can rely on you to encourage the peaceful, democratic, transparent, and European process to which I and a vast majority of the Catalan people are fully committed," he added.He also said that Catalonia - which accounts for more than 20 percent of Spain's GDP - is wealthy enough to be a net contributor to the EU budget.He sent similar notes to the EU's 26 other capitals and to 45 leaders of non-EU states.The Catalan referendum, if it happens, is to take place less than two months after Scottish voters say whether they want to leave the UK.As with Scotland, it is unclear whether an independent Catalonia would be required to re-apply for EU membership.If it does, it might make Catalans more reluctant to pursue independence.Currently, opinion polls indicate that around 55 percent of Catalans want to leave Spain.
EU leaders have so far remained silent on whether they would endorse the move.But Mas did not send letters to the EU institutions, which have already taken sides.In responses to parliamentary questions by MEPs, the European Commission has said Catalonia would have to leave the EU before trying to get back in.



Pope Francis confirms May visit to Israel, West Bank, Jordan

Catholic leader announces itinerary, including stops in Jerusalem, Bethlehem and Amman

January 5, 2014, 3:58 pm 1
Pope Francis on Sunday announced long-awaited plans to travel to Israel, the West Bank and Jordan in the spring.The visit, scheduled for May 24-26, will be his first trip to the Holy Land since taking office, though he has visited before, and the only foreign trip announced so far for 2014.Addressing a Vatican crowd gathered in the rain for his weekly Sunday blessing, Francis said he would be visiting Bethlehem and Jerusalem. He would also travel to Amman.Francis’s trip will commemorate the 50th anniversary of the historic meeting between Pope Paul VI and Orthodox Christian spiritual leader Ecumenical Patriarch Atengora, in Jerusalem. Current patriarch Bartholomew I will join Pope Francis in Jerusalem in late May, where they will celebrate Mass together at the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, where most Christians believe Jesus was crucified and buried.In Jerusalem, Israeli Foreign Ministry Yigal Palmor said Israel was excited by the visit. “He’s very welcome in Israel and will be greeted as warmly as his predecessors were,” he said.On Sunday, the Palestinian news agency Wafa said President Mahmoud Abbas welcomed the visit and said he hoped it would “contribute to alleviate the suffering of the Palestinian people who aspire for freedom, justice and independence.”Jordan’s Royal Palace said the Amman leg of Francis’ visit — on May 24 — would mark a “significant milestone for brotherhood and forgiveness between Muslims and Christians and consolidates the message of peace.”Despite the geopolitical backdrop of the trip, the Catholic Church in the Holy Land insisted that the visit was aimed “mainly at spreading and promoting love, cooperation and peace among all inhabitants of the region.”The trip will mark the new pope’s second visit to the Holy Land. He arrived in Israel in 1973, just as the Yom Kippur War broke out. As The Times of Israel revealed in April, the young Jorge Mario Bergoglio spent six days confined by the conflict to his Jerusalem hotel, where he studied the Letters of Saint Paul to the Corinthians.President Shimon Peres first invited Francis to Israel immediately after his election as pope, calling on him to visit as a spiritual — not a political — leader. “The sooner you visit, the better; in these days, a new opportunity is being created for peace and your arrival could contribute significantly to increasing the trust and belief in peace,” Peres told the pope at the time.Last October, Knesset Speaker Yuli Edelstein (Likud) met Pope Francis in the Vatican and invited him to visit Israel and the Knesset.Francis reportedly replied emphatically to Edelstein, “I’ll come! I’ll come!”Both of the pontiff’s immediate predecessors visited Israel — Benedict XVI in 2009 and John Paul II in 2000.

01/ 5/2014 VATICAN INSIDER

Pope Francis will make "a pilgrimage to the Holy Land” next May

Rss Feed Twitter Facebook Print
[Translate to English:] Gerusalemme
Jerusalem

Pope Francis said the main purpose of this “pilgrimage of prayer” is to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the historic meeting between Pope Paul VI and the Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople, Athenagoras.

Gerard O’Connell Rome  
Pope Francis will “make a pilgrimage to the Holy Land” from 24-26 May, and visit Amman, Bethlehem and Jerusalem. He made the announcement on January 5, after greeting and praying with tens of thousands of pilgrims gathered in St Peter’s Square at midday on this rainy Sunday.“In the climate of joy, typical of this Christmas season,  I wish to announce that from 24 to 26 May next, I will make a pilgrimage to the Holy Land, God willing!”, he stated. The crowd applauded enthusiastically.He explained that “the main purpose” of this “pilgrimage of prayer” is “to commemorate the historic meeting between Pope Paul VI and Patriarch Athenagoras, which took place on 5 January, exactly 50 years ago today.”Last March, Patriarch Bartholomew attended the Pope’s inauguration and then invited Francis to join him in celebrating that 50th anniversary of the first encounter between a Pope and the Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople since 1054. Francis agreed, and now will make a three-day visit to the Holy Land, just as Paul VI did in 1964. It will be his second journey outside Italy as Pope.He said he will visit Amman, Bethlehem and Jerusalem. Then, seeking to underline the profoundly religious nature of this journey – which, significantly, he called “a pilgrimage of prayer” - Pope Francis announced that an “ecumenical encounter” would be held at the Basilica of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem together with representatives of all the Christian Churches of Jerusalem and the Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople, Bartholomew 1. The basilica is built over the site that Christians down the centuries have recognizes as the place of the death and resurrection of Jesus, but in that revered place too one can see clearly the divisions in the Christian family. Hence, the ecumenical encounter that will be celebrated there during the Pope’s visit is an important sign of hope that such sad divisions can be overcome.Speaking from the study window of the papal apartment (which he does not use), the Jesuit Pope did not give any other details of his program for this pilgrimage, but Church sources say they expect him to pray at the site of the Baptism of Jesus by John the Baptist in Jordan, and to celebrate Mass in Bethlehem where Jesus was born.Pope Francis concluded his announcement by asking everyone to pray for this pilgrimage. “As of now I ask you to pray for this pilgrimage”, he said. He also asked all present to pray for him and his ministry as Successor of Peter. 

01/ 3/2014 VATICAN INSIDER

Israel/Vatican: 20 years of diplomatic relations

Rss Feed Twitter Facebook Print
2014 will see another milestone in Vatican-Israel relations
2014 will see another milestone in Vatican-Israel relations

Diplomacy and interreligious dialogue continue striding onwards despite occasional hurdles

By Lisa Palmieri-Billig

December 30th marked the 20th anniversary of the signing of the Fundamental Agreement which initiated diplomatic relations between Israel and the Holy See. A sentence in the Preamble reflects the extraordinary nature of the two decades of diplomacy between the City-State representing over a billion Catholics in the world and the State representing nearly 6 million Jews: “Aware of the unique nature of the relationship between the Catholic Church and the Jewish people, and of the historic process of reconciliation and growth in mutual understanding and friendship between Catholics and Jews….
 
The precepts of “Nostra Aetate”,  the 1965 Vatican II document that ushered in a new era of dialogue and respect, ending nearly two millennia of erroneous interpretations of the New Testament that repeatedly led to contempt and tragic persecutions of Jews, penetrates not only the Catholic-Jewish dialogue but has also created a special atmosphere between diplomats of the two States.2014 will see another milestone in Vatican-Israel relations: the visit of Pope Francis to the Holy Land planned for May. Israel’s Ambassador to the Holy See Zion Evrony states confidently that “Pope Francis is a friend of the Jewish People, and I am sure that his visit in Israel will further strengthen the relations between Israel and the Holy See.” 
   Today’s relations between the State of Israel and the Holy See are based on mutual respect and dialogue” he says, “and although disagreements and challenges remain, we have made significant progress over the past three decades. This will be an important year for a number of reasons:  the 20th anniversary of diplomatic relations, the expected visit of Pope Francis in Israel and the possibility of concluding and signing the Economic, Financial Agreement.”Optimism prevails on the official, diplomatic level, and the flow of cultural/educational exchange helps create new generations free of prejudice.   Yet, occasionally, ancient wounds, misinterpretations and stereotypes still re-emerge.A recent example is the upset created by the journalist-priest, Filippo Di Giacomo in an article published by ”Il Venerdi” of “La Repubblica December 27.   He accuses Israel’s political class of “near-sighted vision and petty calculations”, inferring however, that the Israeli people are much more open to good relations with Christians than their political leaders. He also accuses “a group of Italian Jews” for placing a text (now modified) critical of Pius XII beneath his photo at Yad Vashem, finding that this hardly reflects the true “Israeli” viewpoint.Moreover, “Israeli Foreign Ministry officials” he says, made “coarse and false accusations against Benedict XVIth a few days after his election”.  But this time, when Pope Bergoglio comes, things will be different, Di Giacomo holds, because these officials will be restrained by the large community of Israelis of Argentinian origin who support him…Immediate reactions came from the online daily of the Union of Italian Jewish Communities ( UCEI)  ”Pagine Ebraiche”, with an animated ongoing discussion spurred by comments from the Chief Rabbi of Rome, Riccardo Di Segni, and a former Israeli ambassador to the EU, Sergio Minerbi.Referring to Pius XII, Rabbi Di Segni said “Italian Jews know how to distinguish between the clergy that helped them, and the actions of Pius XII.  The official silence of the Pope while Jews were being deported by the Nazi-Fascists is still an open wound for Italian Jewry.”Ambassador Minerbi said that the “poisonous” comments of Di Giacomo “should surprise no one….they are based on a basic incomprehension between the two States, since in fact the Vatican has never approved the existence of Israel”.He points out discrepancies in the relationship that carry over even into the speeches of Pope Francis.  Minerbi recalls a Meditation on the Acts of the Apostles (13, 44-52) delivered by Francis at the Domus Sanctae Marthae Chapel on Saturday, April 27. Quoting the homily from memory, the former ambassador says Francis called for Catholics to become “an open community  and not a  closed community like that of the Jews who, when the soldiers came and said, ‘We have seen him with our eyes, he has arisen’, they replied, take this money and get out of here.  Because they wanted to solve all problems with money.  This clearly anti-Semitic sermon (even if it is taken from the Gospels) did not call forth any Jewish reaction out of respect for the Pontiff” he concludes.It is dutiful to note however, that in his introduction to this sermon (published by the Osservatorio Romano on April 28), Pope Bergoglio  specified that he (and the Acts) defined the community as “ ‘the closed-minded Jews’, because not all Jews were such”.   In other words, there was no intention to generalize to include all Jews of that time.Regarding this discussion, Marco Morselli, President of the Rome Jewish-Christian Friendship Association,  issued a declaration to “Vatican Insider” as well as to “Pagine Ebraiche.”“It must be said first of all”, he commented, “that this Pope, who is particularly loved and respected by Jews all over the world and especially by those of his native Argentina -- who co-authored with Rabbi Abraham Skorka a dialogue-turned-book on the key issues of our time -- can certainly not be accused of anti-Semitism or anti-Judaism. Commenting on the passage from the Acts of the Apostles the Pope was clearly referring to the present time and to open and closed communities in Christianity.” “However, unfortunately”  Prof. Morselli continued, “every time one reads passages that emphasize the contrast between ‘the Jews’ and the early Christians (who, also being Jews, are considered as ‘the good Jews’), one faces the danger of reinforcing a negative image of the entire Jewish people of yesterday and today.”Morselli  then refers to an editorial by Eugenio Scalfari also published by “La Repubblica” on December 29. “Reasoning in terms of the purest Marcionism, he contrasts the Jewish or ‘Mosaic’ God to the ‘Christian’ God, stating furthermore that Mosaic law does not include any rights or freedoms, only servitude.”Rabbi Di Segni too expressed dismay over this editorial which, he says, serves “the old, banal Marcionist anti-Judaism  in a secular wrapping. Marcion was the heretic who contrasted the God of Revenge of the ‘Old’ Testament with the God of Love of the New.”“Years ago”, continued Di Segni, “when ‘La Repubblica’  published a front-page headline entitled ‘The Revenge of Israel’ , we were not wrong in seeing in this the signs of theological prejudice that went far beyond political criticism.”Marco Morselli  stresses the ever-present need to further disseminate ‘Nostra Aetate’ and all subsequent documents promulgated by the Pontifical Commission for Religious Relations with Jews.“They provide a mandatory guide for Jewish-Christian dialogue:  reading and interpreting the Christian Sacred Texts in their historical context, so as to avoid repeating negative stereotypes that can otherwise so easily filter out of the New Testament” he says.“When elements of the past resurface and misunderstandings arise… they can become an incentive to work even harder to repair the damage caused by a lingering ‘Supersessionist,  or Replacement Theology’ and ‘the teaching of contempt’ (as Jules Isaac  termed the volume he presented to John XXIII in their historic encounter in 1960.)”Morselli criticizes the role played by the various media representatives in the ongoing controversy. “While don Filippo Di Giacomo’s opinions are very questionable” he says, “it does not appear he is expressing the Holy See’s official position or even the Pope’s personal thoughts.  One therefore wonders what was the point of asking the Chief rabbi of Rome and Ambassador Minerbi – described as one of the greatest experts in Israeli-Vatican relations – for their opinions.  Is there not a risk of giving formal importance to words that do not have it, with the possible result of reigniting controversy over complex and sensitive issues?”“Does Don Di Giacomo believe that accusing Israel of ‘short-sighted visions and petty calculations’ against the Vatican is the best way to prepare for Pope Francis’ pilgrimage to Israel?”Fortunately, however, it seems that the higher echelons of diplomacy and religious authority on both shores of the Mediterranean are not tuned in to these problematic rumblings of discontent.

01/ 4/2014 VATICAN INSIDER

Pope abolishes honorary title of monsignor for diocesan priests under the age of 65

Rss Feed Twitter Facebook Print
Vatican City
Vatican City

Seeking to eliminate careerism in the Catholic clergy, Pope Francis has abolished the conferral of the title of ‘monsignor’ on secular or diocesan priests under the age of 65

gerard o'connell rome In a new move aimed at reforming the clergy and eliminating careerism in the Catholic Church, Pope Francis has abolished the conferral of the Pontifical Honor of ‘Monsignor’ on secular priests under the age of 65.Henceforth, the only Pontifical Honor that will be conferred on ‘secular priests’  will be that of ‘Chaplain to His Holiness’ and this will be conferred only on ‘worthy priests’ who are over 65 years of age. (‘Secular priests’ are priests in a diocese, who are not monks or members of religious institutes or orders).The Vatican’s Secretariat of State has communicated this news to Apostolic Nuncios around the world, and has asked them to inform all bishops in their respective countries of the decision in this regard taken by Pope Francis. Thus, for example, on January 2, the Apostolic Nuncio to Great Britain, Archbishop Antonio Mennini, wrote to all the bishops in Great Britain to inform them of the Pope’s decision.  He confirmed that “the privileges in this regard” that have already been granted by the Roman Pontiff to “physical or juridical persons” remain in force.  This would suggest that the papal decree is not retroactive, those who are already monsignors will not lose their title.The decision does not come as a surprise to those who know Pope Francis.  A humble man, he has always been averse to ecclesiastical titles, and when he was bishop and later cardinal in Argentina he always asked people to call him ‘Father’,  instead of ‘My Lord’, ‘Your Grace’ or ‘Your Eminence’; he is convinced that the name ‘Father’ best reflects  the mission that has been entrusted to a priest, bishop or cardinal.  Indeed, during his tenure as archbishop of Buenos Aires (1998-2013), he never asked the Holy See to confer the title of ‘monsignor’ on any priest in the archdiocese.In taking this decision, Pope Francis is building on the reform in this area of ecclesiastical titles that was introduced by Paul VI in 1968, in the wake of the Second Vatican Council. Before Paul VI’s reform there were 14 grades of ‘monsignor’, he reduced them to the three ranks that exist today: Apostolic Protonotary, Honorary Prelate of His Holiness, Chaplain of His Holiness.   The original titles dated back to the pontificate of Pope Urban VIII (1623-1644).These three honors are granted by the Pope, usually on the proposal of the local bishop, to Catholic priests who have rendered particularly valuable service to the Church.  The priests are given these Pontifical Honors may be addressed as ‘Monsignor’ and has certain privileges, such as those regarding ecclesiastical dress and vestments.Many bishops have tended to use the honor as a way of rewarding priests who are particularly loyal to them, or to promote priests who have showed particular initiative, but not infrequently priests in their dioceses have read it in a different light. Just before Christmas, a senior Vatican prelate told me that Pope Francis had recently refused the request of one bishop who had asked him to confer the title of ‘Monsignor’ on no less than 12 priests in his diocese.  Another source told me that in some countries the Pontifical Honor is conferred in a ceremony that, sometimes, is far from the style of Church that Francis desires.The Pope’s decision does not make any changes regarding the conferral of Pontifical Honors for Religious and Lay people, the Vatican Secretariat of State stated in its communication to the nuncios.  It said the same conditions apply as previously for such honors, as does the mode for requesting them.

ALLTIME