ROMAN DICTATOR-JEWISH FALSE PROPHET

KING JESUS IS COMING FOR US ANY TIME NOW. THE RAPTURE. BE PREPARED TO GO.
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/02/stock-results-feb-112013.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/02/could-marc-ouellet-be-pope.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/02/that-meteorite-hit-was-nothing-wait.html  
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/02/pope-may-change-conclave-rules.html 
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/02/vatican-news-with-6-days-from-popes.html 

HAL LINSEYS SHOW FEB 8,2013
http://www.hallindsey.com/

THE VATICAN WEB
http://www.vatican.va/

THE ENVIROMENTAL MOVEMENT AND CHRISTIANITY
http://www.oneplace.com/ministries/understanding-the-times/player/green-christianity-neo-marxism-in-the-church-326019.html

ON HALS FEB 8,2013  BROADCAST.HE SAID THE ANTICHRIST OR WORLD DICTATOR COMES FROM REVIVED ROME.BUT HE SAID THE FALSE PROPHET WILL BE JEWISH,WHICH I NEVER EVER HEARD BEFORE.I THINK THE WORLD LEADER WILL BE A EUROPEAN JEW.BUT IT WOULD MAKE SENSE THAT THE FALSE PROPHET WOULD ALSO BE JEWISH.AS THE TWO WILL BE WORKING TOGETHER CLOSELY DURING THE 7 YEAR TRIBULATION PERIOD.

REVELATION 13:1-2
1 And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast (WORLD DICTATOR) rise up out of the sea,(OF POLITICS) having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.
2 And the beast (WORLD DICTATOR) which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.

REVELATION 17:15
15 And he saith unto me, The waters which thou sawest, where the whore sitteth, are peoples, and multitudes, and nations, and tongues.

ISAIAH 57:20
20 But the wicked are like the troubled sea, when it cannot rest, whose waters cast up mire and dirt.

HAL SAID THE WORLD DICTATOR WOULD COME FROM ROME WHICH THE BIBLE CLEARLY TELLS US.

DANIEL 9:26 (COMES FROM ROME) (EU)
26 And after threescore (60) and two (2) weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince (ROMANS) that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary;(THE ROMANS DESTROYED THE 2ND TEMPLE IN AD70) and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.(SO YES WE KNOW THE WORLD DICTATOR WILL BE FROM REVIVED ROME,A ROMAN LEADER).

THEN HAL SAID BUT THE FALSE PROPHET COMES FROM THE EARTH.WHICH MEANS HE WILL BE JEWISH.

REVELATION 13:11
11 And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth;(FROM ISRAEL) and he had two horns like a lamb,(JESUS IS THE LAMB OF GOD) and he spake as a dragon.(INSPIRED BY SATAN,HE SPEAKS THE OCCULT)(THIS FALSE POPE IS JEWISH AND A CHRISTIAN DEFECTOR BY HAL)

REVELATION 20:2
2 And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years,

OK SO THERES THE PROOF BY THE BIBLE WERE THE WORLD DICTATOR AND THE FALSE PROPHET COMES FROM.

Papal Conclave How Popes Are Chosen—Exerpted from Catholic Update, “The Future of the Papacy”

When the pope dies, the cardinals are summoned to Rome by the dean of the college of cardinals for the conclave that will elect the new pope.The word conclave (Latin, cum + clavis, literally, "locked with the key") designates the place in a locked section of the Vatican where the cardinals remain until a new pope is elected. It is also used to designate the actual gathering of the cardinals.

Before the conclave: The cardinals may discuss the upcoming election with one another. The conclave begins 15 to 20 days after the pope's death.

The actual conclave: After the celebration of Mass, the cardinal dean presides over the preliminary sessions, where procedures regulated by canon law are clarified. Then all others are dismissed and the cardinals are sealed in the Sistine Chapel where the voting takes place, every morning and afternoon.

Until recently a two-thirds majority plus one was required for election. After his election Pope John Paul II changed this. Now if there is no conclusive vote after 30 ballots, an absolute majority suffices. [This means that if a candidate gets a majority on the first or second ballot, his supporters need only wait till 30 ballots have been cast. He will then be elected on the 31^st ballot.]

For each ballot, the cardinals are given rectangular cards with Eligo in summum pontificem ("I elect as supreme pontiff") printed at the top. Each cardinal prints the name of his choice. One by one in order of seniority they approach the altar where there is a chalice with a paten on top. They place the ballot (folded down the middle) on the paten, then drop it into the cup.After each voting the ballots are burned. Special chemicals are added to make the smoke white or black. To people eagerly waiting outside, black smoke signifies an inconclusive vote. White smoke announces that a pope has been elected.The cardinals may elect whomever they wish, as long as the person is a baptized male. There have been occasions in the past when laymen were elected. After their election they had to be ordained priest and bishop. The one elected is asked if he accepts. The moment he accepts he is pope and, if he is a bishop, he is Bishop of Rome. If he is not a bishop he is immediately ordained by the dean of the college. The cardinals individually pledge their support to the new pope. The cardinal dean asks the pope what name he chooses. Then the oldest member of the college announces the choice to the city of Rome and to the world.

01/15/2013 

Koch: “The Jews are our brothers; the Pope does not go back on his word”

Cardinal Koch

The Italian Religious Information Service “SIR” interviews the President of the Vatican Commission for Religious Relations with Jews

vatican insider staff rome “The Catholic Church will not go back on the “Nostra Aetate” declaration because it cannot call the Council into question; this is unthinkable. And the Holy Father cannot go turn his back on  his magisterium,” Cardinal Kurt Koch, President of the Vatican Commission for Religious Relations with Jews said in a statement to Italian Religious Information Service SIR. The statement was made ahead of the Day for Jewish-Christian dialogue which will be celebrated in Italy on 17 January. The Swiss cardinal responded openly to the “concerns” triggered by the dialogue process between the Holy See and the Lefebvrians of the Society of St. Pius X.

“Jews – the cardinal said – are our elder brothers: Christians and Jews are inseparable, especially in Benedict XVI’s vision of the unity between the Two Testaments. This is the clear vision also in light of the Second Vatican Council Declaration “Nostra Aetate”. The Catholic Church is in no doubt about the value this declaration still has today. The only group that does not accept it are the Lefebvrians. As such, they do not accept ecumenical dialogue, relations with Jews or religious freedom. But these are central to the Holy Father’s teaching and if a group does not accept the Council and does not accept a magisterium, they need to ask themselves how they see themselves as Catholic. This is the fundamental problem.”

The cardinal went on to recall what Fr. Lombardi had said regarding some remarks made by the head of the Society of St. Pius X, Bishop Fellay. “Any form of anti-Semitism is contrary to Christianity and the Catholic Church must do all that is in its power to stop this.”
http://www.examiner.com/article/cardinal-koch-comes-up-supporting-jews-vatican-ii-and-nostra-aetate
 

Challenging the Vatican: Progressive Catholics say reform must begin with church governance-THESTAR.COM

Progressive Catholics say the real challenge is the church’s culture of top-down monarchy North Americans have a culture of democracy.

FILIPPO MONTEFORTE / AFP/GETTY IMAGES

Lightning hits St. Peter's dome on Monday, after Pope Benedict stunned the world.

By: Leslie Scrivener Feature reporter, Published on Fri Feb 15 2013

To progressive Canadian Catholics, reform of their church ultimately means ordination of women, married priests and freedom of birth control.None of these will be on the table when their next pope is chosen next month.In a church that has become so deeply conservative, hope of revisiting such fundamental aspects of Catholic dogma and practice is impossible.Reformers’ objectives are instead more subtle and less publicly controversial. More realistic, they say — if still deeply challenging to today’s church.They want a pope who is a listener, as well as a leader. They want a church that is more collegial — less a monarchy, more a democracy.“Any of these questions — expanding roles for women, ordaining married men — for these things to change, the style of the church’s governance has to change,” says Catherine Clifford, professor and vice-dean in the faculty of theology at Saint Paul University in Ottawa.“We have to create spaces for dialogue. We don’t have to look upon people as being disloyal Catholics for raising these questions.”

Pope Benedict XVI announced Monday he was stepping down after nearly eight years as Supreme Pontiff and leader of the world’s 1.2 billion Catholics.Clifford hopes that when the cardinals gather in their secret conclave, expected in mid-March, they will elect a pope with a different style of leadership: “One far more consultative, with more space for the voices and experiences of Catholics from different regions of the world . . .“Not everything can be decided at the centre.”That concern has become more critical as the population of Catholics has more than doubled in the last five decades and the church has become more global. The Southern Hemisphere is home to two-thirds of the world’s Catholics. By 2050, it’s expected that 75 per cent of Catholics will live there.No longer centred in Europe, it’s a different church from the early 1950s, when an archbishop named Angelo Roncalli — who would become the much loved Pope John XXIII — was reading a book on reform of the church. “Reform of the church; is such a thing possible?” he mused to a visitor even then.In the Second Vatican Council, which John XXIII called in 1962, the values of consultation and collegiality were at the heart of his appeal for renewal of the church in the modern world. For some Catholics, the changes brought fresh thinking and vitality, though the speed of change has been slow and even 50 years on, there is still much to be done. For others, the old ways were better. Discord and power struggles ensued.Now, says Clifford, the church is in a new social and historical context and demands new questions: “Is the present form of the priesthood adequate? Are we receiving all the gifts women and lay people have to bring to the service of the church? Is there a space to think about human sexuality in a different way? What is the relationship between Christianity and other religions? “But trying to think about them in new ways is often greeted with suspicion. These questions are not just raised by radical theologians but also by bishops who are responsible pastors. These questions are being raised by very faithful Catholics.”Even in his last public homily on Ash Wednesday, Benedict did not appear to see faithfulness in those seeking “new ways.” He seemed to view their aspirations as ruptures. He decried “sins against the unity of the Church, of the divisions in the body of the Church.” He made a plea for those indifferent or distanced from the faith to overcome “individualism and rivalry.”Despite this language from the outgoing Benedict, Mary Ellen Chown, of the Catholic Network for Women’s Equality, says his departure offers a genuine chance to renew the church. “There’s always room for hope,” she says.“If the new leader takes a pastoral tone as John XXIII did, that we, with the bishops and the Pope, form the people of God, if you walk with people and are close, I think reform comes. The focus is relational, not institutional. But that’s hard to do at the higher levels.”It was under Benedict that the Vatican announced that attempted ordination of women was a grave crime. “To me that was the desperate power grab of a male hierarchy afraid of the possibility for change,” Chown says.In a statement sent this week, the women’s network catalogued some of the low points of Benedict’s tenure as they affected women in the church. “Under Pope Benedict’s leadership we have witnessed the criminalization of those who support women’s ordination, an about-face on the use of inclusive language in the English mass, the bullying of nuns in the United States and the arbitrary removal of the woman who directed the largest Catholic aid organization in the world.”The change in the language in the New Roman Missal was a return to the old ways, she says. One new prayer uses the phrase “us men.”“That wouldn’t include me,” notes Chown.The women’s network sent a letter in January to Canadian bishops expressing its dismay with the language changes, and included a petition of 400 names. The Missal’s language, meant to be more courtly and reverential, also reflected a “theological shift” emphasizing sinfulness and unworthiness before a “monarchical God,” the petition said.These critiques, Chown notes, do not come from men-hating, Pope-bashing women. “They are deeply rooted in the Gospel and they are the reason I stay Catholic.”Last year the Vatican censured the Leadership Conference of Women Religious, a group that represents about 80 per cent of U.S. Catholic nuns, charging the group with following a “radical feminist” agenda and daring to disagree with or challenge bishops. It assigned a panel of bishops to review and overhaul the organization.“The way in which the Vatican and female religious orders have engaged each other in the last five years damaged the perspective of the church as a church that serves the poor, which has been one of the primary works of women religious in the U.S.,” says Mark McGowan, a professor at the University of Toronto. “We always have to remember that that these are the women who stayed, after the exodus of many from religious orders after Vatican II.”But without the censure, American nuns wouldn’t have had the high-profile “Nuns on the Bus” tour, which travelled through some U.S. states last summer to condemn Republican budget proposals they said favoured rich Americans over poor.

The censure was painful, admits Sister Simone Campbell, head of Network, a U.S. social justice lobby group. But American Catholics were also animated.“I believe the Holy Spirit is alive and well making mischief,” says Campbell. “We found so many people hungry for a faith that is more about inclusion and lifting the needs of those at the margins of society. So many people told me they used to be Catholic and this is restoring their faith.”With that as a backdrop, Campbell hopes when the cardinals elect a new leader, they choose someone “who can really be a shepherd, who can care for the flock, not be a rigid, militarist type.”

She says, looking back on the last three decades of papal leadership, that Pope John Paul II came out of a culture that “feared the West” while Pope Benedict was an academic, with brief experience as a pastor.

“What I’ve been realizing is the real challenge is the culture of the monarchy. The European model of church is clashing with our culture of democracy in North America.”McGowan, a religious historian and co-coordinator of the University of Toronto's Book and Media Studies program, says cardinals next month will be looking for, among other things, stability and obedience.Such a candidate may not be hard to find. Benedict appointed 67 of the 117 cardinals who are younger than 80 and eligible to vote.“During his time in office he has ordained so many conservative cardinals that amongst them there is hardly a single person to be found who could lead the church out of its multifaceted crisis,” theologian Hans Kung told the Guardian.

In an October interview with the newspaper, Kung said the only way to reform the church is from the bottom up. Priests and others in responsible positions need to stop being “so subservient” and organize themselves to stand up and “say there are certain things that they simply will not put up with any more.”The new pope will also have to face the crisis of sexual abuse of children by priests. Critics say Benedict failed to repair or truly help victims despite his frequent apologies. It’s been a catastrophe in many parts of the world, but still the culture of secrecy remains intact, they say.“Benedict’s words rang hollow. He spoke as a shocked bystander, as if he had just stumbled upon the abuse crisis,” Anne Barrett Doyle, co-director of Bishop Accountability, a U.S. organization that documents sexual abuse by priests, wrote in a statement this week. “But more than anyone in the Vatican, he knew about the damage done to innocent children.”The flight of Catholics from the European and North American church should also be a focus for the new pope, McGowan says. Some 180,000 German Catholics have abandoned the church, leaving it with about the same numbers it had in 1945. Religious participation in Ireland is about 50 per cent compared to 90 per cent in the 1970s, he adds.In Quebec, only 10 per cent of Catholics are part of church life. Church buildings are being sold by the score. “This is a problem in Quebec, once the most Catholic of Catholic societies in the world, that is not going away.”More also needs to be done to promote lay people into responsible positions, says Rev. Jacques Monet, historian to the Jesuit Archive in Canada. “A lot has been done, but not nearly enough.”If lay people rose to positions of influence, it’s not impossible that in the future lay cardinals could be among those who elect the pope, he muses. It’s not a new practice; it was done until about the 19th century. “Then you would have the values (of) lay people whose experience of Christianity is different than the clerical.”Similarly, the day-to-day governance of the Vatican — itself beset by financial scandals — needs to reflect more the global makeup of today’s church, says Monet. Since Rome is the base, most Vatican bureaucrats are Italian, predictable in their adherence to established ways. “But if you change and have many cultures and languages, you will have different proposals and points of view.”

Related: Can Quebec Cardinal Marc Ouellet save the Catholic Church??
http://www.thestar.com/news/insight/2013/02/15/challenging_the_vatican_progressive_catholics_say_reform_must_begin_with_church_governance.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/02/no-asteroid-hit-today-in-future-though.html