KING JESUS IS COMING FOR US ANY TIME NOW. THE RAPTURE. BE PREPARED TO GO.
ON CNN OBAMAS MOUTH PIECE FOR PROPAGANDA NOW THEY ARE COMPLAINING ABOUT RUBIO TAKING A DRINK OF WATER WHILE TALKING.MEAN WHILE WHAT DID OBAMA SAY DURING HIS PRETEND SPEECH.WELL HE WANTS TO STEAL YOUR GUNS.HE DONE A DICTATOR EXECUTIVE ORDER TO CONTROL AND WATCH EVERYBODY ON THE INTERNET.HE NEVER SAID NOTHING ABOUT GIVING AMERICANS JOBS.THAT MIGHT TAKE SOME WORK.AND A DICTATOR LIKE FRAUD MUSLIM,85% ARAB OBAMA,WANTS TO BE ON TV SHOWS AND ACT LIKE A HERO BISCUIT INSTEAD.THE WHITE HOUSE IS JUST A SIDE JOB FOR OBAMA.HIS REAL JOB IS ACTING IMPORTANT ON TALK SHOWS.GIVING MUSLIM COUNTRIES BILLIONS OF DOLLARS SO THEY CAN MAKE MISSLES AND NUKES TO TRY TO KILL OFF ISRAEL.AND OBAMAS BEST AND FAVORITE JOB IS TO READ TELEPROMTERS.SAY THE WORDS,BUT DO NOTHING ABOUT THEM UNLESS IT DEALS WITH THAT CAMEL JOCKEY SEX FOR MURDER CULT OF SHARIA LAW ISLAM.THEN HE TAKES ACTION QUICK.AND DEFENDS ISLAM AND PUTS DOWN CHRISTIANITY.SO CNN WHY COMPLAIN ABOUT A PERSON WHO HAS A DRINK OF WATER FOR A SECOND - WHEN YOUR PUPPET LEADER OBAMA CONTROLS ALL USE SAY.AND USE REFUSE TO SAY ONE THING BAD ABOUT YOUR MONEY FEEDER OBAMA.I GUESS ITS JUST ANOTHER DAY AT THE OFFICE FOR CNN AND THEIR PROPAGANDA FEEDER OBAMA FROM THE WHITEHOUSE.
THE BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS IS THE CENTRAL BANK OF THE WORLD THAT LENDS ONLY TO CENTRAL BANKERS AROUND THE GLOBE.THE IMF LENDS TO THE COUNTRIES BANKS OF THE WORLD.BETWEEN THIS BANK AND THE IMF I BELIEVE WILL BE THE BANKS OF THE WORLD.THE IMF THE WORLD BANK AND THE POLICEMAN OF THE IMF THE BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS WHERE WE PAY OUT CAP & TRADE,CLIMATE,ENERGY SCAM TAXES TOO TO PAY FOR THE WORLD GOVERNMENT.THE GLOBAL CURRENCY WILL BE THE SDRS OR SPECIAL DRAWING RIGHTS UNTILL THE EU INVENTS THE WORLD MICROCHIP IMPLANT SYSTEM THEN THE EU WILL MAKE ALL TAKE THE IMPLANT OR BE MURDERED.FORCE THE WORLD INTO FULLOUT INFLATION,SKYROCKETING FOOD PRICES AND A 50CENT DOLLAR.
AND THE OTHER ISSUE WE MUST KEEP ON THE TABLE AND IN PEOPLES MEMORY IS THAT BARRY SOETORO IS REALLY BARACK OBAMAS REAL NAME AND HE WAS BORN IN KENYA NOT AMERICA.BARRY SOETORO AKA BARACK OBAMA IS NOT ELLIGABLE TO BE THE PRESIDENT OF THE USA GOVERNMENT.EVERYTHING HE SIGNS IN BARACK OBAMA IS ILLEGEL,BECAUCE HIS REAL NAME IS BARRY SOETORO.AMERICAS CONSTITUTION WILL BE IN SHAMBLES ONCE THIS SCAM IS FINALLY REVEALED TO THE WORLD.
BY THE TIMELINE IN OBAMAS OWN BOOKS-OBAMA WENT TO PAKISTAN ON HIS INDONESIAN PASSPORT.ANOTHER ISSUE OUT OF 400 PEOPLE AT COLUMBIA THAT GRADUATED THE YEAR OBAMA OR BARRY SOETORO DID,NO ONE COMES FORWARD TO SAY THEY KNEW HIM.HOW COME AT HAWAII HOSPITAL WERE OBAMA CLAIMS HE WAS BORN,NO NURSES OR ANYBODY CAME FORWARD TO SAY THEY WITNESSED OR TOOK PART IN THE BIRTH.THIS BARRY SOETORO OR AKA BARACK OBAMAS LIFE IS A COMPLETE FRAUD.AND AMERICA IS CONNED TO BELIEVE THE LIE.WHY WOULD SOETORO AKA OBAMA SPEND 2 MILLION DOLLARS TO STOP ALL THESE LAWSUITS IF THERES NO COVERUP.HE WOULD JUST SHOW THE PROOF OF EACH EVENT-PLACE OF BIRTH,CERTIFICATE AND REAL NAME BARRY SOETORO INDONESIAN PASSPORT.
The proof is everywhere from statements and affidavits from Government parliament sources and Obama’s own Grandmother who says she saw him born in a hospital in Mombassa Kenya. The former ambassador to Kenya says Obama was born in Mombassa Kenya, so do others.
OBAMA WANTS TO TAX ITS CITIZENS INTO OBLIVIAN.WITH CARBON TAXES.
Carbon Tax bill coming Thursday to Senate
wattupwiththat ^ | February 12,2013 | AnthonyWatts
Posted on Wednesday, February 13, 2013 5:59:03 PM by lbryce
Senators Bernie Sanders and Barbara Boxer will outline the legislation on Thursday morning. They are even going to let that wacky 350.org activist Bill McKibben speak. Sheesh.Billed as “major” and “comprehensive” legislation, it will have a carbon tax. Here is the statement from Sanders’ office (bold mine):
Sanders, Boxer to Introduce Major Climate Change Legislation
February 12, 2013
WASHINGTON, Feb 12 – Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) will hold a news conference on Thursday, Feb. 14 to announce comprehensive legislation on climate change. Boxer is Chairman of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works. Sanders serves on the environment committee and also is a member of the Senate energy committee.Under the legislation, a fee on carbon pollution emissions would fund historic investments in energy efficiency and sustainable energy technologies such as wind, solar, geothermal and biomass. The proposal also would provide rebates to consumers to offset any efforts by oil, coal or gas companies to raise prices.Environment and consumer leaders set to participate include Bill McKibben, founder of 350.org; Mike Brune, executive director of Sierra Club; Tara McGuiness, executive director of the Center for American Progress Action Fund; Tyson Slocum, Public Citizen’s energy director; and David Bradley, National Community Action Foundation executive director.
Who:Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.),Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.),Bill McKibben, 350.org founder,Mike Brune, Sierra Club executive director,Tara McGuiness, CAP Action Fund executive director,Tyson Slocum, Public Citizen’s Energy Program director David Bradley, National Community Action Foundation executive directorWhat: News conference on climate change legislation-When: 11 a.m., Thursday, Feb. 14-Where: SD-406, Senate Environment and Public Works Committee hearing room
Donald Marron, Contributor
Two great tastes often taste great together. Chocolate and peanut
butter. Oreos and milk. Popcorn and butter. Could the same be true of
carbon taxes and corporate tax reform? Done right, each could be
flavorful. But would they be even tastier together? My Tax Policy Center colleague Eric Toder and I explore that question in a new paper.
We find that using a carbon tax to help pay for corporate tax reform
has several attractions and one big drawback. A well-designed tax swap
could combat climate change, make our corporate tax system more
competitive, and reduce long-term deficits, but it would be quite
regressive, increasing tax burdens on most Americans while cutting them
on those with the highest incomes.Let’s start with the good news. Putting a price on carbon dioxide and
other greenhouse gases would be an efficient way to reduce future
emissions, encourage greener technologies, and reduce future risks of
climate change. A carbon tax would make real the adage that you should
tax things that you don’t want–like pollution–rather than things you do.A carbon tax could also raise substantial revenue. One common
proposal, a $20 per ton tax rising at 5.6 percent annually, would raise
north of $1 trillion over ten years. That money could help reduce future
deficits, pay for offsetting tax cuts, or a combination of both.Which brings us to corporate reform. Just about everyone wants to cut
America’s corporate tax rate, now the highest in the developed world.
President Obama wants to lower the federal rate from 35 percent to 28
percent. Many Republicans, including House Ways and Means Chairman Dave
Camp, hope to get down to 25 percent or even lower. But they are all
having a hard time finding a way to pay for such rate cuts. It’s easy to
talk about closing “loopholes” and “special interest” tax breaks in the
abstract, but in practice it’s difficult to cut back enough to make
such large rate cuts.Enter the carbon tax. A reasonable levy could easily pay for cutting
the corporate tax rate to 28 percent or even lower. In fact, such rate
cuts would require only a fraction of carbon revenues if lawmakers also
identify some significant tax breaks to go after. The remaining carbon
revenues could then finance deficit reduction or other policies.Cutting the corporate tax rate would boost the U.S. economy, reduce
many distortions in our existing code, and weaken multinationals’
incentives to play accounting games to avoid U.S. taxes. The resulting
economic gains might even be enough to offset the economic costs of the
carbon tax. That’s a tasty recipe.Except for one missing ingredient: fairness. Like other consumption
taxes, a carbon tax would fall disproportionately on low-income
families. Cutting corporate income taxes, on the other hand, would
disproportionately benefit those with higher incomes. A
carbon-for-corporate tax swap would thus be quite regressive.Eric and I used TPC’s tax model to measure this regressivity for a
stylized carbon tax that would raise revenues equal to 1 percent of
American’s pre-tax income. As illustrated by the light blue bars in the
chart below, that carbon tax would boost taxes by more than 1 percent of
pre-tax income for households in the bottom four income quintiles—1.8
percent, for example, in the lowest fifth of the income distribution.
The increase would be smaller at higher incomes. Folks with the highest
incomes would bear a significantly lower relative burden—just 0.75
percent of their pre-tax income, for the top 20 percent of households.
Pairing a carbon tax with an offsetting cut in corporate taxes would make things more regressive (dark blue bars). Lower corporate rates would benefit taxpayers at all income levels, workers and investors alike. But the biggest savings would go to high-income households. Cutting corporate taxes offsets less than a third of carbon tax burden for households in the first three income quintiles, but more than offsets the carbon tax burden in the highest-income group. The net effect would be a tax cut for high-income taxpayers, and tax increases for everyone else.That regressivity is a serious concern. A carbon-for-corporate tax swap may be a recipe for environmental and economic improvement, but it isn’t a complete one. As Eric and I discuss in the paper, lawmakers should therefore consider other policy ingredients—per capita credits, for example—that could help protect low-income households and potentially make a carbon-for-corporate tax swap a more balanced policy option.
ON CNN OBAMAS MOUTH PIECE FOR PROPAGANDA NOW THEY ARE COMPLAINING ABOUT RUBIO TAKING A DRINK OF WATER WHILE TALKING.MEAN WHILE WHAT DID OBAMA SAY DURING HIS PRETEND SPEECH.WELL HE WANTS TO STEAL YOUR GUNS.HE DONE A DICTATOR EXECUTIVE ORDER TO CONTROL AND WATCH EVERYBODY ON THE INTERNET.HE NEVER SAID NOTHING ABOUT GIVING AMERICANS JOBS.THAT MIGHT TAKE SOME WORK.AND A DICTATOR LIKE FRAUD MUSLIM,85% ARAB OBAMA,WANTS TO BE ON TV SHOWS AND ACT LIKE A HERO BISCUIT INSTEAD.THE WHITE HOUSE IS JUST A SIDE JOB FOR OBAMA.HIS REAL JOB IS ACTING IMPORTANT ON TALK SHOWS.GIVING MUSLIM COUNTRIES BILLIONS OF DOLLARS SO THEY CAN MAKE MISSLES AND NUKES TO TRY TO KILL OFF ISRAEL.AND OBAMAS BEST AND FAVORITE JOB IS TO READ TELEPROMTERS.SAY THE WORDS,BUT DO NOTHING ABOUT THEM UNLESS IT DEALS WITH THAT CAMEL JOCKEY SEX FOR MURDER CULT OF SHARIA LAW ISLAM.THEN HE TAKES ACTION QUICK.AND DEFENDS ISLAM AND PUTS DOWN CHRISTIANITY.SO CNN WHY COMPLAIN ABOUT A PERSON WHO HAS A DRINK OF WATER FOR A SECOND - WHEN YOUR PUPPET LEADER OBAMA CONTROLS ALL USE SAY.AND USE REFUSE TO SAY ONE THING BAD ABOUT YOUR MONEY FEEDER OBAMA.I GUESS ITS JUST ANOTHER DAY AT THE OFFICE FOR CNN AND THEIR PROPAGANDA FEEDER OBAMA FROM THE WHITEHOUSE.
THE BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS IS THE CENTRAL BANK OF THE WORLD THAT LENDS ONLY TO CENTRAL BANKERS AROUND THE GLOBE.THE IMF LENDS TO THE COUNTRIES BANKS OF THE WORLD.BETWEEN THIS BANK AND THE IMF I BELIEVE WILL BE THE BANKS OF THE WORLD.THE IMF THE WORLD BANK AND THE POLICEMAN OF THE IMF THE BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS WHERE WE PAY OUT CAP & TRADE,CLIMATE,ENERGY SCAM TAXES TOO TO PAY FOR THE WORLD GOVERNMENT.THE GLOBAL CURRENCY WILL BE THE SDRS OR SPECIAL DRAWING RIGHTS UNTILL THE EU INVENTS THE WORLD MICROCHIP IMPLANT SYSTEM THEN THE EU WILL MAKE ALL TAKE THE IMPLANT OR BE MURDERED.FORCE THE WORLD INTO FULLOUT INFLATION,SKYROCKETING FOOD PRICES AND A 50CENT DOLLAR.
AND THE OTHER ISSUE WE MUST KEEP ON THE TABLE AND IN PEOPLES MEMORY IS THAT BARRY SOETORO IS REALLY BARACK OBAMAS REAL NAME AND HE WAS BORN IN KENYA NOT AMERICA.BARRY SOETORO AKA BARACK OBAMA IS NOT ELLIGABLE TO BE THE PRESIDENT OF THE USA GOVERNMENT.EVERYTHING HE SIGNS IN BARACK OBAMA IS ILLEGEL,BECAUCE HIS REAL NAME IS BARRY SOETORO.AMERICAS CONSTITUTION WILL BE IN SHAMBLES ONCE THIS SCAM IS FINALLY REVEALED TO THE WORLD.
BY THE TIMELINE IN OBAMAS OWN BOOKS-OBAMA WENT TO PAKISTAN ON HIS INDONESIAN PASSPORT.ANOTHER ISSUE OUT OF 400 PEOPLE AT COLUMBIA THAT GRADUATED THE YEAR OBAMA OR BARRY SOETORO DID,NO ONE COMES FORWARD TO SAY THEY KNEW HIM.HOW COME AT HAWAII HOSPITAL WERE OBAMA CLAIMS HE WAS BORN,NO NURSES OR ANYBODY CAME FORWARD TO SAY THEY WITNESSED OR TOOK PART IN THE BIRTH.THIS BARRY SOETORO OR AKA BARACK OBAMAS LIFE IS A COMPLETE FRAUD.AND AMERICA IS CONNED TO BELIEVE THE LIE.WHY WOULD SOETORO AKA OBAMA SPEND 2 MILLION DOLLARS TO STOP ALL THESE LAWSUITS IF THERES NO COVERUP.HE WOULD JUST SHOW THE PROOF OF EACH EVENT-PLACE OF BIRTH,CERTIFICATE AND REAL NAME BARRY SOETORO INDONESIAN PASSPORT.
The proof is everywhere from statements and affidavits from Government parliament sources and Obama’s own Grandmother who says she saw him born in a hospital in Mombassa Kenya. The former ambassador to Kenya says Obama was born in Mombassa Kenya, so do others.
OBAMA WANTS TO TAX ITS CITIZENS INTO OBLIVIAN.WITH CARBON TAXES.
Carbon Tax bill coming Thursday to Senate
wattupwiththat ^ | February 12,2013 | AnthonyWatts
Posted on Wednesday, February 13, 2013 5:59:03 PM by lbryce
Senators Bernie Sanders and Barbara Boxer will outline the legislation on Thursday morning. They are even going to let that wacky 350.org activist Bill McKibben speak. Sheesh.Billed as “major” and “comprehensive” legislation, it will have a carbon tax. Here is the statement from Sanders’ office (bold mine):
Sanders, Boxer to Introduce Major Climate Change Legislation
February 12, 2013
WASHINGTON, Feb 12 – Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) will hold a news conference on Thursday, Feb. 14 to announce comprehensive legislation on climate change. Boxer is Chairman of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works. Sanders serves on the environment committee and also is a member of the Senate energy committee.Under the legislation, a fee on carbon pollution emissions would fund historic investments in energy efficiency and sustainable energy technologies such as wind, solar, geothermal and biomass. The proposal also would provide rebates to consumers to offset any efforts by oil, coal or gas companies to raise prices.Environment and consumer leaders set to participate include Bill McKibben, founder of 350.org; Mike Brune, executive director of Sierra Club; Tara McGuiness, executive director of the Center for American Progress Action Fund; Tyson Slocum, Public Citizen’s energy director; and David Bradley, National Community Action Foundation executive director.
Who:Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.),Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.),Bill McKibben, 350.org founder,Mike Brune, Sierra Club executive director,Tara McGuiness, CAP Action Fund executive director,Tyson Slocum, Public Citizen’s Energy Program director David Bradley, National Community Action Foundation executive directorWhat: News conference on climate change legislation-When: 11 a.m., Thursday, Feb. 14-Where: SD-406, Senate Environment and Public Works Committee hearing room
Could A Carbon Tax Be The Key To Achieving Corporate Tax Reform?
Donald Marron, Contributor
Comment Now
Follow Comments
Tax (Photo credit: 401(K) 2013)
Pairing a carbon tax with an offsetting cut in corporate taxes would make things more regressive (dark blue bars). Lower corporate rates would benefit taxpayers at all income levels, workers and investors alike. But the biggest savings would go to high-income households. Cutting corporate taxes offsets less than a third of carbon tax burden for households in the first three income quintiles, but more than offsets the carbon tax burden in the highest-income group. The net effect would be a tax cut for high-income taxpayers, and tax increases for everyone else.That regressivity is a serious concern. A carbon-for-corporate tax swap may be a recipe for environmental and economic improvement, but it isn’t a complete one. As Eric and I discuss in the paper, lawmakers should therefore consider other policy ingredients—per capita credits, for example—that could help protect low-income households and potentially make a carbon-for-corporate tax swap a more balanced policy option.
