SYRIA AND THE WAR POWERS ACT

KING JESUS IS COMING FOR US ANY TIME NOW. THE RAPTURE. BE PREPARED TO GO.

ISAIAH 17:1
1 The burden of Damascus. Behold, Damascus is taken away from being a city, and it shall be a ruinous heap.

AMOS 1:5
5  I will break also the bar of Damascus, and cut off the inhabitant from the plain of Aven, and him that holdeth the sceptre from the house of Eden:(IRAQ) and the people of Syria shall go into captivity unto Kir,(JORDAN) saith the LORD.

JEREMEIAH 49:23-27
23  Concerning Damascus.(SYRIA) Hamath is confounded, and Arpad: for they have heard evil tidings: they are fainthearted; there is sorrow on the sea;(WAR SHIPS WITH NUKES COMING ON SYRIA) it cannot be quiet.
24  Damascus is waxed feeble, and turneth herself to flee, and fear hath seized on her: anguish and sorrows have taken her, as a woman in travail.
25  How is the city of praise not left, the city of my joy!
26  Therefore her young men shall fall in her streets, and all the men of war shall be cut off in that day, saith the LORD of hosts.
27  And I will kindle a fire (NUKES OR BOMBS) in the wall of Damascus, and it shall consume the palaces of Benhadad.(ASSADS PALACES POSSIBLY IN DAMASCUS)

COUNTRIES WITH ISRAEL (THE WEST)(SAUDIA ARABIA WITH WEST)

EZEKIEL 38:10-19
10 Thus saith the Lord GOD; It shall also come to pass, that at the same time shall things come into thy mind, and thou shalt think an evil thought:
11 And thou shalt say,(RUSSIA,ARAB,MUSLIMS) I will go up to the land of unwalled villages; I will go to them that are at rest, that dwell safely, all of them dwelling without walls, and having neither bars nor gates,
12 To take a spoil, and to take a prey; to turn thine hand upon the desolate places that are now inhabited, and upon the people that are gathered out of the nations, which have gotten cattle and goods, that dwell in the midst of the land.
13 Sheba, and Dedan,(SAUDIA ARABIA) and the merchants of Tarshish,(ENGLAND) with all the young lions thereof,(USA,CANADA,AUSTRALIA,NEW ZEALAND,EU,ENGLAND,ENGLISH SPEAKING shall say unto thee, Art thou come to take a spoil? hast thou gathered thy company to take a prey? to carry away silver and gold, to take away cattle and goods, to take a great spoil?
14 Therefore, son of man, prophesy and say unto Gog, Thus saith the Lord GOD; In that day when my people of Israel dwelleth safely, shalt thou not know it?
15 And thou shalt come from thy place out of the north parts, thou, and many people with thee, all of them riding upon horses, a great company, and a mighty army:
16 And thou shalt come up against my people of Israel, as a cloud to cover the land; it shall be in the latter days, and I will bring thee against my land, that the heathen may know me, when I shall be sanctified in thee, O Gog, before their eyes.
17 Thus saith the Lord GOD; Art thou he of whom I have spoken in old time by my servants the prophets of Israel, which prophesied in those days many years that I would bring thee against them?
18 And it shall come to pass at the same time when Gog shall come against the land of Israel, saith the Lord GOD, that my fury shall come up in my face.
19 For in my jealousy and in the fire of my wrath have I spoken, Surely in that day there shall be a great shaking in the land of Israel;

(COUNTRIES AGAINST THE WEST)(NOTICE GERMANY-TURKEY IN THE AGAINST)

EZEKIEL 38:1-7
1 And the word of the LORD came unto me, saying,
2 Son of man, set thy face against Gog,(RULER) the land of Magog,(RUSSIA) the chief prince of Meshech(MOSCOW)and Tubal,(TOBOLSK) and prophesy against him,
3 And say, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I am against thee, O Gog,(LEADER OF RUSSIA) the chief prince of Meshech(MOSCOW) and Tubal:TOBOLSK)
4 And I will turn thee back, and put hooks into thy jaws,(GOD FORCES THE RUSSIA-MUSLIMS TO MARCH) and I will bring thee forth, and all thine army, horses and horsemen, all of them clothed with all sorts of armour, even a great company with bucklers and shields, all of them handling swords:
5 Persia,(IRAN,IRAQ) Ethiopia, and Libya with them; all of them with shield and helmet:
6 Gomer,(GERMANY) and all his bands; the house of Togarmah (TURKEY) of the north quarters, and all his bands:(SUDAN,AFRICA) and many people with thee.
7 Be thou prepared, and prepare for thyself, thou, and all thy company that are assembled unto thee, and be thou a guard unto them. 

AT THE HEARINGS TODAY SEPT 4,13.I HEARD THERES 34 NATIONS AND ORGANISAZTIONS THAT ARE WITH AMERICA ON THIS SYRIA WAR BOMBING. KERRY JUST GAVE THE BIG NAMES. TURKEY, BRITTAIN,FRANCE,CANADA WITH AIDE,THE ARAB LEAGUE,SAUDI ARABIA,THE ARAB EMERITES.WE AMERICA ARE JOING THE 134 NATIONS THAT ARE AGAINST CHEMICAL WEAPONS THEY SIGNED. ITS A WORLD MATTER-NOT JUST AN AMERICAN MATTER.SAYS KERRY.OBAMA SAID MY CREDABILITY IS NOT SHOT.I DID NOT SET A RED LINE-THE WORLD DID.TED POE SAID WE BETTER HAVE SOMETHING IN THIS BILL THAT COMES TO CONGRESS THAT SAYS THAT IF IRAN GETS TO A CERTAIN POINT WITH ITS NUCLEAR WEAPONS PROGRAM.THEY GET THE SAME PUNISHMENT THAT SYRIAS ASSAD WILL BE GETTING SHORTLY.

R-TOM COTTON WANTS A REGIME CHANGE IN SYRIA AND WILL GO WITH THE ASSAD MISSLING THIS TIME.MR GEORGE HOLDING ASKES IS RUSSIA STILL A SUPER POWER.THE ANSWER FROM THE GENERAL-RUSSIA RUSSIA STILL HAS ELEMENTS THAT QUALIFY THEM AS A SUPER POWER.THEY STILL HAVE A INCEDIBLE STATEGIC ARSENAL.BUT A TRUE SUPERPOWER IS MILITARY-AND ECONOMICAL AND DIPLOMATICAL.BUT CONVENTIONALLY I WOULD NOT PUT RUSSIA IN THAT CLASS.MR HOLDING-SYRIA AND RUSSIA ARE ALLIES.IF RUSSIA DECIDED TO STRIKE US IN THAT THEATRE.WHAT ARE THE TOP 3 OPTIONS THAT THEY WOULD HAVE TO STRIKE US IN RETATIATION FOR US STRIKING SYRIA-THERE CLOSEST ALLY.GENERAL.IT WOULD NOT BE HELPFUL IN THIS SETTING (TO TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT RUSSIA.AND LET THE AMERICAN CITIZENS KNOW THE TRUTH.)IN THAT KIND OF HYPOTHETICAL.BUT I HAVE VIEWS I CAN TELL YOU IN A CLASSIFIED ENVIROMENT.MR HOLDING-SO WE CAN SAY THAT RUSSIA WOULD HAVE OPTIONS TO STRIKE US,DO WE NOT.IN RETALIATION FOR US STRIKING SYRIA.GENERAL-RUSSIA HAS CAPABILITIES THAT RANGE FROM CYBER ALL THE WAY UP TO NUCLEAR WEAPONS.(WHICH MEANS YES THEY COULD CYBER-EMP -THEN NUKE US.).BUT AGAIN IT WOULD NOT BE HELPFUL IN THIS SETTING TO TALK ABOUT THAT.

JEREMIAH 51:29-32 (CYBER ATTACK 1ST)
29  And the land shall tremble and sorrow: for every purpose of the LORD shall be performed against Babylon,(AMERICA-NEW YORK) to make the land of Babylon (AMERICA) a desolation without an inhabitant.
30  The mighty men of Babylon (AMERICA) have forborn to fight, they have remained in their holds: their might hath failed; they became as women: they have burned her dwellingplaces; her bars are broken.
31  One post shall run to meet another, and one messenger to meet another, to shew the king of Babylon (NEW YORK) that his city is taken at one end,
32  And that the passages are stopped,(THE WAR COMPUTERS HACKED OR EMP'D) and the reeds they have burned with fire, and the men of war are affrighted.(DON'T KNOW WHAT TO DO)

COMPLETE SILENCE AFTER AN EMP GOES OFF
REVELATION 8:1
1 And when he had opened the seventh seal, there was silence in heaven about the space of half an hour.

JEREMIAH 50:3,24 RUSSIA SNEAK NUKE ATTACK ON AMERICA)
3 For out of the north (RUSSIA) there cometh up a nation against her, which shall make her land desolate, and none shall dwell therein: they shall remove, they shall depart, both man and beast.
24 I have laid a snare for thee, and thou art also taken, O Babylon,(AMERICA) and thou wast not aware: thou art found, and also caught, because thou hast striven against the LORD. (RUSSIA A SNEAK CYBER,EMP ATTACK,THEN NUKE ATTACK ON AMERICA)

THE SENATE COMMITEE HAS PASSED THE BILL TO ATTACK SYRIA.AND IT GOES TO THE SENATE NEXT WEEK
 
ONE OF THE LAW MAKERS SAID AT LEAST 25% UP TO 50% OF THE SO CALLED OPPOSITION OR AMERICAS FIGHTERS ARE AL-QUEDA,HEZZBOLLAH AND BROTHERHOOD MEMBERS.SO THAT MEANDS 50% OF THE OPPOSITION ARE ISRAE-WEST HATERS AND AMERICA IS GIVING THEM TONS OF CASH AND WEAPONS TO FIGHT ASSAD.THIS DOES NOT MAKE SENSE TO ME.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V1zkSwihbPg

Rumsfeld: Either oust Assad or stay out of Syria

THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
September 03, 2013 - 9:22 pm EDT

GRAND RAPIDS, Michigan — President Barack Obama should either oust Syrian President Bashar Assad or not bother getting involved in the civil war-torn Middle Eastern nation, former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld told a Michigan audience Tuesday.Rumsfeld spoke in response to a question during a speech at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Museum in Grand Rapids.The 81-year-old served as defense secretary under Ford and President George W. Bush."You either ought to change the regime or you ought to do nothing," Rumsfeld said. "Why would you go in and fire a shot across the bow? All it does is make a splash."What have you achieved? What you've probably achieved is the embarrassment of the United States for being feckless and ineffective. The last thing we ought to be sending out is a signal that there is a red line (about chemical weapons use) and we fired a shot across the bow. ... If you decide that it's in our national interest to do anything, it's to change the regime."Rumsfeld said that if the U.S. defers action until the United Nations gives the green light, it means the U.S. "won't do anything" unless Russian President Vladimir Putin agrees.
"The Chinese and the Russians are supporting the use of chemical weapons" with their opposition to intervention, he said.Rumsfeld dismissed the idea that Obama was obligated to go to Congress before attacking Syria."The debate about whether the president has the authority to use force is silly," he said. "When was the last time war was declared? It was World War II. You can't have 535 members of Congress making decisions that a commander in chief needs to make. You just can't do it. It doesn't work."Earlier, Rumsfeld told MLive.com (http://bit.ly/14h6GyV ) that Obama lost a lot of credibility through indecisiveness in responding to the killing last year of America's Libyan ambassador.A militant attack Sept. 11, 2012, on a diplomatic outpost in Benghazi, Libya, killed U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.
"You can't be persuasive unless you're believable," Rumsfeld said. "To the extent that a leader says things that in a week or two or three turn out to not be the case — if a leader does that they lose credibility.
"It seems to me that what the people in the White House need to do is recognize that they've lost a good deal of credibility and that's harmful. What they need to do is get people in the room to find out what ground truth is and make sure they're standing on a piece of concrete and not mush."

Fox Analyst's Position On War Powers Act Depends On How He Can Attack Obama

Blog ››› September 3, 2013 11:09 AM EDT ››› MATT GERTZ

Fox News senior judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano is criticizing President Obama for seeking congressional authorization for a military strike on Syria after previously criticizing Obama for not seeking congressional authorization for a military strike on Libya.Obama said he would seek Congressional authorization for a military strike on Syria during a September 1 speech. He stated that he believed the nation's power is rooted "in our example as a government of the people, by the people, and for the people," adding: "[W]hile I believe I have the authority to carry out this military action without specific congressional authorization, I know that the country will be stronger if we take this course, and our actions will be even more effective. We should have this debate, because the issues are too big for business as usual."Napolitano criticized Obama for seeking legislative approval of military action in Syria during a September 3 appearance on Fox & Friends, calling his actions "mystifying legally why the president is asking Congress for authority to do something that it has already given him authority to do," citing the executive power granted under the War Powers Act to use U.S. forces in some circumstances for 90 days without congressional authorization. Napolitano and co-host Steve Doocy agreed this indicated Obama was treating Syria as a political issue.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3rhjKdhDrk
While Napolitano is now criticizing Obama's effort to seek congressional authorization for a military strike, he previously criticized Obama for preparing a military strike without that authorization. In March 2011, when President Obama was considering military action against Libya without seeking congressional authorization, Napolitano warned that Obama could use "a terrible law called the War Powers Act," asking Sen. Mike Lee whether Obama was "planning to do something like that, whether the American people or the Congress wants it or not? Even though the Constitution says only Congress shall declare war?"
From the March 7, 2011, edition of Fox News' Glenn Beck:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kMG8XNqRlU0#t=449

NAPOLITANO: Senator Lee, it's interesting that Senator Paul said that he's reluctant to vote. You know as well as I that under a terrible law called the War Powers Act, the president can commit to us a land war, or an air war, whatever he wants to do, for 90 days and then renew it for another 90 days and there's nothing the Congress can do about it.
Is he planning to do something like that, whether the American people, whether the Congress wants it or not? Even though the Constitution says only Congress shall declare war?

WAR POWERS ACT-http://www.loc.gov/law/help/war-powers.php

Overview

This guide is intended to serve as an introduction to research on the War Powers Resolution, Public Law 93-148, 87 Stat. 555, passed over President Nixon's veto on November 7, 1973. The War Powers Resolution is sometimes referred to as the War Powers Act, its title in the version passed by the Senate. This Joint Resolution is codified in the United States Code ("USC") in Title 50, Chapter 33, Sections 1541-48.The term "Resolution" can be misleading; this law originated as a Joint Resolution and was passed by both Houses of Congress pursuant to the Legislative Process, and has the same legal effect as a Bill which has passed and become a law. For more information on Bills and Joint Resolutions see this explanation of Congressional Forms of Action.The Constitution of the United States divides the war powers of the federal government between the Executive and Legislative branches: the President is the Commander in Chief of the armed forces (Article II, section 2), while Congress has the power to make declarations of war, and to raise and support the armed forces (Article I, section 8). Over time, questions arose as to the extent of the President's authority to deploy U.S. armed forces into hostile situations abroad without a declaration of war or some other form of Congressional approval. Congress passed the War Powers Resolution in the aftermath of the Vietnam War to address these concerns and provide a set of procedures for both the President and Congress to follow in situations where the introduction of U.S. forces abroad could lead to their involvement in armed conflict.Conceptually, the War Powers Resolution can be broken down into several distinct parts. The first part states the policy behind the law, namely to "insure that the collective judgment of both the Congress and the President will apply to the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities," and that the President's powers as Commander in Chief are exercised only pursuant to a declaration of war, specific statutory authorization from Congress, or a national emergency created by an attack upon the United States (50 USC Sec. 1541).

The second part requires the President to consult with Congress before introducing U.S. armed forces into hostilities or situations where hostilities are imminent, and to continue such consultations as long as U.S. armed forces remain in such situations (50 USC Sec. 1542). The third part sets forth reporting requirements that the President must comply with any time he introduces U.S. armed forces into existing or imminent hostilities (50 USC Sec. 1543); section 1543(a)(1) is particularly significant because it can trigger a 60 day time limit on the use of U.S. forces under section 1544(b).

The fourth part of the law concerns Congressional actions and procedures. Of particular interest is Section 1544(b), which requires that U.S. forces be withdrawn from hostilities within 60 days of the time a report is submitted or is required to be submitted under Section 1543(a)(1), unless Congress acts to approve continued military action, or is physically unable to meet as a result of an armed attack upon the United States. Section 1544(c) requires the President to remove U.S. armed forces that are engaged in hostilities "without a declaration of war or specific statutory authorization" at any time if Congress so directs by a Concurrent Resolution (50 USC 1544). Concurrent Resolutions are not laws and are not presented to the President for signature or veto; as a result the procedure contemplated under Section 1544(c) is known as a "legislative veto" and is constitutionally questionable in light of the decision of the United States Supreme Court in INS v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919 (1983). Further sections set forth expedited Congressional procedures for considering proposed legislation to authorize the use of U.S. armed forces, as well as similar procedures regarding proposed legislation to withdraw U.S. forces under Section 1544(c) (50 U.S. 1545-46a).The fifth part of the law sets forth certain definitions and rules to be used when interpreting the War Powers Resolution (50 USC 1547). Finally, the sixth part is a "separability provision" and states that if any part of the law is held (by a court) to be invalid, on its face or as applied to a particular situation, the rest of the law shall not be considered invalid, nor shall its applicability to other situations be affected (50 USC 1548).U.S. Presidents have consistently taken the position that the War Powers Resolution is an unconstitutional infringement upon the power of the executive branch. As a result, the Resolution has been the subject of controversy since its enactment, and is a recurring issue due to the ongoing worldwide commitment of U.S. armed forces. Presidents have submitted a total of over 120 reports to Congress pursuant to the Resolution. Some examples of the Resolution's effect on the deployment of U.S. armed forces include:1975: President Ford submitted a report to Congress as a result of his order to the U.S. armed forces to retake the Mayaguez, a U.S. merchant vessel which had been seized by Cambodia. This report is the only report to have cited Section 4(a)(1) (50 USC Sec. 1543(a)(1)) of the Resolution, triggering the 60-day time limit; however the operation was completed before 60 days had expired.

1981: President Reagan deployed a number of U.S. military advisors to El Salvador but submitted no report to Congress. Members of Congress filed a federal lawsuit in an attempt to force compliance with the Resolution, but the U.S. District Court hearing the suit declined to become involved in what the judge saw as a political question, namely whether U.S. forces were indeed involved in hostilities.

1982-83: President Reagan sent a force of Marines to Lebanon to participate in peacekeeping efforts in that country; while he did submit three reports to Congress under the Resolution, he did not cite Section 4(a)(1), and thus did not trigger the 60 day time limit. Over time the Marines came under increasing enemy fire and there were calls for withdrawal of U.S. forces. Congress, as part of a compromise with the President, passed Public Law 98-119 in October 1983 authorizing U.S. troops to remain in Lebanon for 18 months. This resolution was signed by the President, and was the first time a President had signed legislation invoking the War Powers Resolution.

1990-91: President George H.W. Bush sent several reports to Congress regarding the buildup of forces in Operation Desert Shield. President Bush took the position that he did not need "authority" from Congress to carry out the United Nations resolutions which authorized member states to use "all necessary means" to eject Iraq from Kuwait; however he did ask for Congressional "support" of U.S. operations in the Persian Gulf. Congress passed, and the President signed, Public Law 102-1 authorizing the President to use force against Iraq if the President reported that diplomatic efforts had failed. President Bush did so report, and initiated Operation Desert Storm.

1993-99: President Clinton utilized United States armed forces in various operations, such as air strikes and the deployment of peacekeeping forces, in the former Yugoslavia, especially Bosnia and Kosovo. These operations were pursuant to United Nations Security Council resolutions and were conducted in conjunction with other member states of NATO. During this time the President made a number of reports to Congress "consistent with the War Powers Resolution" regarding the use of U.S. forces, but never cited Section 4(a)(1), and thus did not trigger the 60 day time limit. Opinion in Congress was divided and many legislative measures regarding the use of these forces were defeated without becoming law. Frustrated that Congress was unable to pass legislation challenging the President's actions, Representative Tom Campbell and other Members of the House filed suit in the Federal District Court for the District of Columbia against the President, charging that he had violated the War Powers Resolution, especially since 60 days had elapsed since the start of military operations in Kosovo. The President noted that he considered the War Powers Resolution constitutionally defective. The court ruled in favor of the President, holding that the Members lacked legal standing to bring the suit; this decision was affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. See Campbell v. Clinton, 203 F.3d 19 (D.C. Cir. 2000). The U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal from this decision, in effect letting it stand.

2001: In the wake of the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, Congress passed Public Law 107-40 (PDF), authorizing President George W. Bush to "use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons." For the first time, "organizations and persons" are specified in a Congressional authorization to use force pursuant to the War Powers Resolution, rather than just nations.

2002: Congress authorized President George W. Bush to use force against Iraq, pursuant to the War Powers Resolution, in Public Law 107-243 (PDF).

Constitutional Provisions

1. Constitution of the United States, Article I, Section 8: Gives Congress the power to declare war and raise and support the armed forces. Available online.

2. Constitution, Article II, Section 2: President as Commander in Chief. Available online

Back to Top
Legislation

1. The War Powers Resolution, Pub. L. No. 93-148, 87 Stat. 555 (November 7, 1973). Available online. It is codified in Title 50, Chapter 33, Sections 1541-48 of the United States Code. Available online.

2. Authorization for use of Military Force, Pub. L. No. 107-40, 115 Stat. 224 (September 18, 2001). Available online (PDF).

3. Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-243, 116 Stat. 1498 (October 16, 2002). Available online (PDF).

Judicial Decisions

1. INS v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919 (1983). Available online.

2. Campbell v. Clinton, 203 F.3d 19 (D.C. Cir. 2000). Available online.

RECENT OTHER SYRIAN NEWS
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/america-might-bomb-syria-quick-but-will.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/syria-threatens-surprises-for-western.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/500-syrian-scud-missles-aimed-at-israel.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/hackers-try-to-wipe-israel-off-map.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/iran-zionists-israel-will-burn-i-say-u.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/arab-muslim-countries-scared-if-syria.html 
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/me-and-stockwell-day-fell-virtually.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/france-on-board-with-usa-on-syria.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/update-on-syria-happenings.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/will-obama-attack-today-in-syria-or.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/obama-to-get-vote-from-congress-before.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/09/syria-brags-obamas-done-before-he-got.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/09/standstill-in-america-about-syria-till.html 
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/09/mccain-graham-want-tough-attack-on-assad.html 
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/09/60-to-90-day-timeline-for-obama-to-take.html 

ROSH-HASHANA DAY 1 AND 2 HAPPENINGS-HAPPY NEW YEAR ISRAEL

KING JESUS IS COMING FOR US ANY TIME NOW. THE RAPTURE. BE PREPARED TO GO.

LAND FOR PEACE (THE FUTURE 7 YEARS OF HELL ON EARTH)

JOEL 3:2
2 I will also gather all nations, and will bring them down into the valley of Jehoshaphat, and will plead with them there for my people(ISRAEL) and for my heritage Israel, whom they have scattered among the nations, and parted my land.(UPROOTED ISRAELIS AND DIVIDED JERUSALEM)(THIS BRINGS ON WW3 BECAUSE JERUSALEM IS DIVIDED,WARNING TO ARABS-MUSLIMS AND THE WORLD).

THE WEEK OF DANIEL 9:27 WE KNOW ITS 7 YRS

Heres the scripture 1 week = 7 yrs Genesis 29:27-29
27 Fulfil her week, and we will give thee this also for the service which thou shalt serve with me yet seven other years.
28 And Jacob did so, and fulfilled her week: and he gave him Rachel his daughter to wife also.
29 And Laban gave to Rachel his daughter Bilhah his handmaid to be her maid.

DANIEL 11:21-23
21 And in his estate shall stand up a vile person, to whom they shall not give the honour of the kingdom: but he shall come in peaceably, and obtain the kingdom by flatteries.
23 And after the league made with him he shall work deceitfully: for he shall come up, and shall become strong with a small people.
24 He shall enter peaceably even upon the fattest places of the province; and he shall do that which his fathers have not done, nor his fathers' fathers; he shall scatter among them the prey, and spoil, and riches: yea, and he shall forecast his devices against the strong holds, even for a time.

DANIEL 9:26-27
26 And after threescore and two weeks(62X7=434 YEARS+7X7=49 YEARS=TOTAL OF 69 WEEKS OR 483 YRS) shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary;(ROMAN LEADERS DESTROYED THE 2ND TEMPLE) and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.(THERE HAS TO BE 70 WEEKS OR 490 YRS TO FUFILL THE VISION AND PROPHECY OF DAN 9:24).(THE NEXT VERSE IS THAT 7 YR WEEK OR (70TH FINAL WEEK).
27 And he ( THE ROMAN,EU PRESIDENT) shall confirm the covenant (PEACE TREATY) with many for one week:(1X7=7 YEARS) and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease,(3 1/2 yrs in TEMPLE ANIMAL SACRIFICES STOPPED) and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

JEREMIAH 6:14
14 They have healed also the hurt of the daughter of my people slightly, saying, Peace, peace; when there is no peace.

JEREMIAH 8:11
11 For they have healed the hurt of the daughter of my people slightly, saying, Peace, peace; when there is no peace.

1 THESSALONIANS 5:3
3 For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape.

ISAIAH 33:8
8  The highways lie waste, the wayfaring man ceaseth: he hath broken the covenant,(7 YR TREATY) he hath despised the cities, he regardeth no man.(THE WORLD LEADER-WAR MONGER CALLS HIMSELF GOD)

ISAIAH 28:14-19 (THIS IS THE 7 YR TREATY COVENANT OF DANIEL 9:27)
14 Wherefore hear the word of the LORD, ye scornful men, that rule this people which is in Jerusalem.
15 Because ye have said, We have made a covenant with death, and with hell are we at agreement; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, it shall not come unto us: for we have made lies our refuge, and under falsehood have we hid ourselves:
16 Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD, Behold, I lay in Zion for a foundation a stone, a tried stone, a precious corner stone, a sure foundation: he that believeth shall not make haste.
17 Judgment also will I lay to the line, and righteousness to the plummet: and the hail shall sweep away the refuge of lies, and the waters shall overflow the hiding place.
18 And your covenant with death shall be disannulled, and your agreement with hell shall not stand; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, then ye shall be trodden down by it.
19 From the time that it goeth forth it shall take you: for morning by morning shall it pass over, by day and by night: and it shall be a vexation only to understand the report.

ITS ON DAY 1 OF ROSH-HASHAN WHENEVER.THAT I BELIEVE THE 7 YEAR FINAL PEACE TREATY WILL BE SIGNED.

Reading for First Day Rosh Hashanah

The Birth of Isaac

Exactly a year after the three angels visited Abraham and Sarah and delivered G-d's promise that a son shall be born to them (as related in Genesis 18), G-d remembered Sarah as He had said, and G-d did to Sarah as He had spoken.Sarah conceived, and bore Abraham a son in his old age, at the set time of which G-d had spoken to him.The boy is named Yitzchak ("will laugh"), because, as Sarah declared, "G-d has made laughter for me, so that all that hear will laugh with me."Abraham circumcised his son Isaac being eight days old, as G-d had commanded him. Abraham was a hundred years old, when his son Isaac was born to him.The Torah then tells of a great feast that Abraham made "on the day that Isaac was weaned."

The Banishment of Hagar and Ishmael

Abraham already had a son, Ishmael, born 14 years earlier to Hagar, the Egyptian maid whom Sarah urged him to marry in her barren years. As had been predicted, Ishmael grows to become "a wild man, his hand against every man, and every man's hand against him." Sarah, fearing Ishmael's negative influence upon her son, urges Abraham to "Banish this maidservant and her son: for the son of this maidservant shall not be heir with my son, with Isaac."Abraham is reluctant to do so until G-d intervenes, telling him: "In all that Sarah says to you, hearken to her voice; for in Isaac shall thy seed be called."Abraham rose up early in the morning, and took bread, and a bottle of water, and gave it to Hagar, putting it on her shoulder, and the child, and sent her away: and she departed, and wandered in the wilderness of Be'er-Sheva.Their water, however, runs out quickly in the desert heat, and soon Ishmael is faint with heat and thirst; Hagar cast the child under one of the shrubs. And she went off...the distance of a bowshot; for she said, "Let me not see the death of the child." And she sat over against him, and lifted up her voice, and wept.And G-d heard the voice of the lad; and the angel of G-d called to Hagar out of heaven, and said to her "What ails you, Hagar? Fear not, for G-d has heard the voice of the lad where he is..."And G-d opened her eyes, and she saw a well of water; and she went, and filled the bottle with water, and gave the lad drink.And G-d was with the lad; and he grew, and dwelt in the wilderness, and became an archer. And he dwelt in the wilderness of Paran: and his mother took him a wife out of the land of Egypt.

The Covenant with Avimelech

Avimelech the king of the Philistines, who had earlier driven Abraham from his country, now comes seeking a covenant of peace with the Hebrew. "G-d is with you in all that you do," says the king, "let us swear to each other that neither of us will show hostility to the other or the other's offspring."Abraham agrees, and gives Avimelech seven sheep as a testimony to the resolution of a past controversy between them over a well that Abraham had dug. The place is thus named Be'er Sheva ("Well of the Oath" and "Well of the Seven").
Abraham establishes an eshel (wayside inn) at Be'er Sheva, where he "called the name of G-d, G-d of the world."

Reading for Second Day of Rosh Hashanah

The Binding of Isaac

And it came to pass after these things, that G-d did test Abraham. And He said to him: "Abraham!"And he said: "Here I am!"And He said: "Please, take your son, your only son, the one whom you love, Isaac; and get thee into the land of Moriah; and offer him there for a burnt offering upon one of the mountains which I will tell thee of."And Abraham rose up early in the morning, and saddled his donkey, and took two of his young men with him, and Isaac his son, and broke up the wood for the burnt offering, and rose up, and went to the place of which G-d had told him.Then on the third day Abraham lifted up his eyes, and saw the place afar off. And Abraham said to his young men: "Stay here with the ass; and I and the lad will go yonder and worship, and come again to you."And Abraham took the wood of the burnt offering, and laid it upon Isaac his son; and he took the fire in his hand, and the knife; and they went both of them together.And Isaac spoke to Abraham his father, and said, "My father!" and he said, "Here I am, my son."And he said: "Behold the fire and the wood: but where is the lamb for a burnt offering?"And Abraham said: "G-d will provide himself a lamb for a burnt offering, my son." And they went both of them together.And they came to the place which G-d had told him of; and Abraham built an altar there, and laid the wood in order, and bound Isaac his son, and laid him on the altar upon the wood.And Abraham stretched out his hand, and took the knife to slay his son.And an angel of G-d called to him out of heaven, and said: "Abraham! Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am!"And he said: "Lay not your hand upon the lad, neither do anything to him: for now I know that you do fear G-d, seeing that you have not withheld your son, your only son, from Me."And Abraham lifted up his eyes, and looked; and behold, behind him a ram caught in the thicket by his horns: and Abraham went and took the ram, and offered him up for a burnt offering in place of his son.And Abraham called the name of that place Adonai-Yireh ("G-d will be revealed"); as it is said to this day: "On the mount G-d will appear."The reading concludes with report of a granddaughter born to Abraham's brother, Nachor, named Rebecca (destined to become Isaac's wife).

ISRAELI COMMENTARY ON THE SCRIPTURES OF ROSH-HASHANA

G-d remembered Sarah (Genesis 21:1)
"Remembrance" is one of the three primary themes of Rosh Hashanah (the other two being "Kingship" and "Shofarot"). For it is the day on which "the remembrance of all of existence comes before You." In the words of the U'nesaneh Tokef prayer:"On this day... You will remember all that was forgotten. You will open the Book of Memory--it will read itself, and everyone's signature is in it... and all mankind will pass before You like sheep. Like a shepherd inspecting his flock, making his sheep pass under his staff, so shall You run by, count, calculate, and consider the soul of all the living; You will apportion the fixed needs of all Your creatures, and inscribe their verdict."On Rosh Hashanah it will be inscribed, and on Yom Kippur it will be sealed: How many shall pass on, and how many shall be born; who will live and who will die; who will die at his predestined time and who before his time; who by water and who by fire, who by sword, who by beast, who by famine, who by thirst, who by storm, who by plague, who by strangulation, and who by stoning; who will rest and who will wander, who will live in harmony and who will be harried; who will enjoy tranquility and who will suffer; who will be impoverished and who will be enriched; who will be degraded and who will be exalted..."

---

And Sarah said: G-d has made laughter for me, so that all that hear will laugh (yitz'chak) with me (21:6)
The concept of Rosh Hashanah as the day of G-d's "coronation" as king of the universe explains a most puzzling paradox in the nature of the day. On the one hand, Rosh Hashanah is when we stand before the Supreme King and tremulously accept the "yoke of His sovereignty." On the other hand, it is a festival (yom tov), celebrated amidst much feasting and rejoicing--a day on which we are enjoined to "Eat sumptuous foods and drink sweet beverages, and send portions to those for whom nothing is prepared, for the day is holy to our L-rd; do not be distressed, for the joy of the L-rd is your strength" (Nehemiah 8:10).But such is the nature of a coronation: it is an event that combines trepidation and joy, awe and celebration. For true kingship, as opposed to mere rulership, derives from the willful submission of a people to their sovereign. So the coronation of a king includes a display of reverence and awe on the part of the people, conveying their submission to the king; as well as the joy that affirms that their submission is willful and desirous.

(From the Chassidic Masters)

---

In all that Sarah says to you, hearken to her voice (21:12)

This teaches us that Sarah was superior to Abraham in prophecy.

(Rashi)

---

And G-d heard the voice of the lad (21:17)

This teaches us that a person's prayer for himself is preferable to others praying for him, and is sooner to be accepted. (For though the verse speaks of Hagar's weeping, it tells us that it was Ishmael's cry which G-d heard).

(Midrash Rabbah; Rashi)

---

For G-d has heard the voice of the lad where he is (21:17)

The ministering angels hastened to indict him, exclaiming: "Sovereign of the Universe! Would You bring up a well for one who will one day slay Your children with thirst?" "What is he now?" asked G-d. "Righteous," said the angels. Said G-d: "I judge man only as he is at the moment."

(Midrash Rabbah; Rashi)

---

And his mother took him a wife out of the land of Egypt (21:21)

Said Rabbi Yitzchak: Throw a stick into the air, and it will fall back to its place of origin (the ground). It is written, "And she had a handmaid, an Egyptian, whose name was Hagar" (Genesis 16:1); therefore, "his mother took him a wife out of the land of Egypt."

(Midrash Rabbah)

---

Abraham established an eshel at Beer Sheva; there he called the name of G-d, G-d of the world (21:33)
When Abraham's guests wished to bless him for his generosity, he would say to them: "Has the food you have eaten been provided by myself? You should thank, praise and bless He who spoke the world into being!"If they refused Abraham would demand payment for the food they had eaten. "How much do I owe you?" they would ask. "A jug of wine is one furlin," Abraham would say; "a pound of meat, one furlin; a loaf of bread, one furlin." When the guest would protest these exorbitant prices, Abraham would counter: "Who supplies you with wine in the middle of the desert? Who supplies you with meat in the desert? Who supplies you with bread in the desert?" When the guest would realize the predicament he was in he would relent and proclaim: "Blessed be the G-d of the world, from whose providence we have eaten."

(Midrash Rabbah; Tosofot Shantz on Sotah 10)

What value, we might ask, was there in such an unwilling proclamation, extracted under duress? Was this not a mere mouthing of words, devoid of any conviction as to the truth of the One G-d or any desire to thank Him for His providence? But Abraham had a vision of humanity which convinced him that every positive deed, word or thought does have value, no matter how "superficial" or "hypocritical" it might seem to a less discerning eye. When Abraham looked at his guests, he did not see pagans and idolaters; he saw creatures of G-d, men and women who had been created in the Divine image and possessed a potential, inherent to the very essence of their being, to recognize their Creator and serve His will.Most often, a kind word and a helping hand will bring to light this inner potential. At times, however, a soul might be so encrusted by negative influences and a corrupted character that a certain degree of "pressure" must be applied to quell its resistance to a G-dly deed. (Of course, any use of such "pressure" must conform to the dictates of G-d's Torah, whose "ways are ways of pleasantness, and all its pathways are peace"--as in the case of Abraham's fully legitimate demand for payment.)
Abraham understood that no human acknowledgment of G-d can ever be "hypocritical." On the contrary: a denial of G-d is the ultimate hypocrisy, for it is at variance with the person's quintessential being. When a creature of G-d proclaims "Blessed be the G-d of the world from whose providence we have eaten," nothing can be more consistent with his or her innermost self.

(From the teachings of the Lubavitcher Rebbe)

---

And it came to pass after these things, that G-d did test Abraham (22:1)

Said Rabbi Jonathan: A potter does not examine defective vessels, because he cannot give them a single blow without breaking them. What then does he examine? Only the sound vessels, for he will not break them even with many blows. Similarly, the Holy One, blessed be He, tests not the wicked but the righteous.

(Midrash Rabbah)

Isaac and Ishmael were engaged in a controversy. Said Ishmael to Isaac: "I am more beloved to G-d than you, since I was circumcised at the age of thirteen, but you were circumcised as a baby and could not refuse." Isaac retorted: "All that you gave up to G-d was three drops of blood. But lo, I am now thirty-seven years old, yet if G-d desired of me that I be slaughtered, I would not refuse. Said the Holy One, blessed be He: "This is the moment!"

(Midrash Rabbah)

Jewishness is not a matter of historical conscious, outlook, ethics, or even behavior; it is a state of being. This is the deeper significance of the debate between Ishmael and Isaac. When the Jew is circumcised on the eighth day of life, he is completely unaware of the significance of what has occurred. But this "non-experience" is precisely what circumcision means. With circumcision the Jew says: I define my relationship with G-d not by what I think, feel or do, but by the fact of my Jewishness--a fact which equally applies to an infant of eight days and a sage of eighty years.

(From the teachings of the Lubavitcher Rebbe)

---

And he saddled his donkey (22:3)

This is the very same donkey which Moses Rode to Egypt (cf. Exodus 4:20); and this is the very same donkey upon which the Messiah will arrive (cf. Zechariah 9:9).

(Pirkei d'Rabbi Eliezer, ch. 25)

---

And he bound Isaac his son (22:9)

Can one bind a man thirty-seven years old without his consent?
But when Abraham made to sacrifice his son Isaac, Isaac said to him: Father, I am a young man and am afraid that my body may tremble through fear of the knife and I will grieve you, whereby the slaughter may be rendered unfit and this will not count as a real sacrifice; therefore bind me very firmly."

(Midrash Rabbah)

---

And Abraham called the name of that place Adonai-Yireh (22:14)
Shem (the son of Noah) called it Salem, as it is written "And Melchizedek king of Salem" (Genesis 14: 18). Said the Holy One, blessed be He: If I call it Yireh as did Abraham, then Shem, a righteous man, will resent it; while if I call it Salem as did Shem, Abraham, the righteous man, will resent it. Hence I will call it Jerusalem, including both names, Yireh Salem.-(Midrash Rabbah)

GIANT EARTHQUAKES AROUND THE WORLD AT THE SAME TIME THE BIBLE SAYS

KING JESUS IS COMING FOR US ANY TIME NOW. THE RAPTURE. BE PREPARED TO GO.

DEAD ANIMALS

HOSEA 4:1-3
1 Hear the word of the LORD, ye children of Israel: for the LORD hath a controversy with the inhabitants of the land,(EARTH) because there is no truth, nor mercy, nor knowledge of God in the land.
2  By swearing, and lying, and killing, and stealing, and committing adultery, they break out, and blood toucheth blood.
3  Therefore shall the land mourn, and every one that dwelleth therein shall languish, with the beasts of the field, and with the fowls of heaven; yea, the fishes of the sea also shall be taken away.

ZEPHANIAH 1:2-3
2  I will utterly consume all things from off the land, saith the LORD.
3  I will consume man and beast; I will consume the fowls of the heaven, and the fishes of the sea, and the stumblingblocks with the wicked; and I will cut off man from off the land, saith the LORD.

66,000 DEAD FISH BLOCK CHINA RIVER PICTURES
http://photos.mercurynews.com/2013/09/03/photos-over-66000-pounds-of-dead-fish-block-the-fuhe-river-in-china/

EARTHQUAKES

ISAIAH 42:15
15  I will make waste mountains and hills, and dry up all their herbs; and I will make the rivers islands, and I will dry up the pools.

MATTHEW 24:7-8
7 For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places.
8 All these are the beginning of sorrows.

MARK 13:8
8 For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom:(ETHNIC GROUP AGAINST ETHNIC GROUP) and there shall be earthquakes in divers places, and there shall be famines and troubles: these are the beginnings of sorrows.

LUKE 21:11
11 And great earthquakes shall be in divers places,(DIFFERNT PLACES AT THE SAME TIME) and famines, and pestilences; and fearful sights and great signs shall there be from heaven.

1 Day, Magnitude 2.5+ Worldwide

41 earthquakes - DownloadUpdated: 2013-09-04 09:26:30 UTC-04:00Showing event times using Local System Time (UTC-04:00)

1. 4.8 35km SW of Brooklyn, New Zealand 2013-09-04 08:04:10 UTC-04:00 20.3 km
2. 4.2 76km SE of Akutan, Alaska 2013-09-04 07:14:18 UTC-04:00 36.5 km
3. 4.9 83km SE of Akutan, Alaska 2013-09-04 06:41:40 UTC-04:00 10.3 km
4. 5.0 78km SSW of Unalaska, Alaska 2013-09-04 06:04:06 UTC-04:00 10.7 km
5. 2.6 37km SSW of Ferndale, California 2013-09-04 05:32:23 UTC-04:00 19.1 km
6. 5.1 98km SSW of Atka, Alaska 2013-09-04 05:16:28 UTC-04:00 24.3 km
7. 4.8 11km SE of Sarimatondang, Indonesia 2013-09-04 05:11:57 UTC-04:00 163.9 km
8. 4.7 89km SSW of Atka, Alaska 2013-09-04 04:16:53 UTC-04:00 28.6 km
9. 4.3 65km SW of Atka, Alaska 2013-09-04 03:42:26 UTC-04:00 50.8 km
10. 5.2 80km SSW of Atka, Alaska 2013-09-04 02:54:16 UTC-04:00 41.6 km
11. 6.2 88km SW of Atka, Alaska 2013-09-04 02:27:05 UTC-04:00 32.8 km
12. 5.9 87km SSW of Atka, Alaska 2013-09-04 02:16:50 UTC-04:00 25.2 km
13. 4.7 71km ENE of Ndoi Island, Fiji 2013-09-04 01:47:10 UTC-04:00 469.6 km
14. 4.3 58km WSW of Jiquilillo, Nicaragua 2013-09-04 01:37:52 UTC-04:00 31.7 km
15. 5.2 80km SW of Atka, Alaska 2013-09-04 01:15:56 UTC-04:00 44.8 km
16. 2.5 47km NNW of Searles Valley, California 2013-09-04 00:53:22 UTC-04:00 0.1 km
17. 2.5 48km NNW of Searles Valley, California 2013-09-04 00:53:18 UTC-04:00 5.8 km
18. 5.5 78km SSW of Atka, Alaska 2013-09-04 00:16:31 UTC-04:00 34.6 km
19. 3.3 6km NW of Borrego Springs, California 2013-09-04 00:04:54 UTC-04:00 13.3 km
20. 3.0 45km SSW of Anchor Point, Alaska 2013-09-03 22:35:51 UTC-04:00 13.7 km
21. 6.5 77km SSW of Atka, Alaska 2013-09-03 22:32:33 UTC-04:00 39.9 km
22. 4.5 52km S of Tanaga Volcano, Alaska 2013-09-03 20:43:17 UTC-04:00 49.1 km
23. 3.4 41km ESE of Sterling, Alaska 2013-09-03 20:26:33 UTC-04:00 0.0 km
24. 5.9 163km SW of Bella Bella, Canada 2013-09-03 20:23:12 UTC-04:00 9.9 km
25. 6.5 Izu Islands, Japan region 2013-09-03 20:18:24 UTC-04:00 407.0 km
26. 5.3 38km E of Sarangani, Philippines 2013-09-03 19:46:55 UTC-04:00 137.4 km
27. 3.4 80km E of Old Iliamna, Alaska 2013-09-03 19:40:42 UTC-04:00 135.6 km
28. 4.6 260km S of Sidorukun, Indonesia 2013-09-03 19:28:25 UTC-04:00 10.2 km
29. 4.2 179km WSW of Bella Bella, Canada 2013-09-03 19:07:08 UTC-04:00 10.0 km
30. 5.0 188km SW of Bella Bella, Canada 2013-09-03 18:29:32 UTC-04:00 9.8 km
31. 4.3 30km WNW of Putian, China 2013-09-03 18:23:27 UTC-04:00 15.4 km
32. 4.8 183km SW of Bella Bella, Canada 2013-09-03 17:25:18 UTC-04:00 10.2 km
33. 4.6 181km SW of Bella Bella, Canada 2013-09-03 17:05:58 UTC-04:00 10.5 km
34. 6.0 191km WSW of Bella Bella, Canada 2013-09-03 16:19:06 UTC-04:00 1.0 km
35. 4.4 33km S of Npongge, Indonesia 2013-09-03 15:10:22 UTC-04:00 116.0 km
36. 4.8 237km W of Hihifo, Tonga 2013-09-03 15:01:12 UTC-04:00 327.2 km
37. 2.9 41km N of Culebra, Puerto Rico 2013-09-03 14:51:43 UTC-04:00 65.0 km
38. 4.4 132km SSE of Putre, Chile 2013-09-03 13:48:10 UTC-04:00 129.1 km
39. 4.6 138km SSW of Bambanglipuro, Indonesia 2013-09-03 13:06:43 UTC-04:00 41.1 km
40. 4.9 Ascension Island region 2013-09-03 10:41:52 UTC-04:00 10.0 km
41. 4.8 12km ENE of Benzilan, China 2013-09-03 10:32:39 UTC-04:00 31.2 km

60 TO 90 DAY TIMELINE FOR OBAMA TO TAKE OUT SYRIA AND SCOLD HIS REGIME

KING JESUS IS COMING FOR US ANY TIME NOW. THE RAPTURE. BE PREPARED TO GO.

Netanyahu on Israel: 'We've Defied the Laws of History'

As Prime Minister Netanyahu wishes Jews all over the world a healthy new year, he reviews why Israel "remains an oasis" in the Middle East.-By Kochava Rozenbaum-First Publish: 9/4/2013, 10:10 AM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ay42HCyifh0 

As the eve of Rosh Hashanah approaches, Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu wishes Jewish communities throughout the world security, prosperity and most of all peace.Netanyahu reflects upon the all of the achievements of the past year: the launching of the Amos 4 communication satellite, sustainable economic growth, receiving gold medals at the computer and science Olympics, and top tier students in the field of science."I am proud to serve as Prime Minister of Israel," Netanyahu said with a smile."We remain an oasis of democracy, of stability, of tolerance, and liberty," he said, comparing Israel to the turbulent countries in the Middle East.One major point that Netanyahu emphasized was that "Iran's nuclear program must be stopped" since it poses as a major threat to the region of Israel and the peace of the world. However, Netanyahu calmed the fears of any potential threat to Israel when he spoke to his cabinet on Sunday saying, "our enemies have very good reasons not to try our strength, not to test our power," he said. "They know why."
Netanyahu concluded to say how the State of Israel has "defied the laws of history against some tremendous odds" and that now, Israel is such a thriving, bustling, modern, advanced country.

OBAMA SAYS HIS CREDIBILITY IS NOT ON THE LINE.HE SAYS CONGRESSES AND THE SENATES REPUTATION ARE ON THE LINES.YUP OBAMA BLAMING THE AMERICA CITIZENS FOR THIS WAR AGAINST SYRIA.OBAMA WOULD NEVER START A WAR UNDER THE GUISE OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS.THEN NOT TAKE THE BLAME FOR IT.BUT THEN FOR THE LAST 5 YEARS OBAMA HAS BLAMED EVERYBODY ELSE FOR HIS DECISIONS HE MADE.THAT JUST CRIPPLE AMERICAS ECONOMY AND CONTROL ALL AMERICANS CITIZENS THREW DICTATORSHIP DECISIONS BY OBBBBAMA YOUR LOVING AMERICAN-MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD - ARAB-MUSLIM SYMPOTHIZER THAT WORSHIPS EVERY DICTATOR THAT COMES TO THE WHITEHOUSE.AND THATS JUST OBAMAS GOOD TRAITS THE HEAD IN THE SANDERS THINK. 

Senate Committee May Vote Wednesday on Syria Strike

Senators reportedly reach an agreement on a resolution for military force in Syria. Vote expected Wednesday.-By Elad Benari-First Publish: 9/4/2013, 3:45 AM-Israelnationalnews

Kerry and Hagel before meeting with Senate Foreign Relations Committee-Reuters

Democratic Senator Robert Menendez, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said on Tuesday evening he hoped a resolution on the use of U.S. military force in Syria would be ready by the end the day.

Speaking after a three-and-a-half hour hearing on Syria, Menendez said it was likely the panel could vote on the resolution on Wednesday.Menendez said the text would be crafted in a way that would ensure the intervention is not an open-ended engagement and that “specifically not with boots on the ground, American troops on the ground."Congressional aides told the Associated Press that Menendez and Sen. Bob Corker, the panel's top Republican, have reached an agreement on the resolution.The resolution would limit the duration of any U.S. military action in response to the Syrian government's suspected use of chemical weapons on its people. It also would specifically bar U.S. ground troops from Syria, the aides told the news agency.Among other provisions, the draft, according to the Reuters news agency, sets a 60-day limit on military action in Syria, with a possibility for a single 30-day extension subject to conditions.During Tuesday’s hearing, top officials in the Obama administration - Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, Secretary of State John Kerry and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Martin Dempsey - tried to secure support for the president’s proposal to strike in Syria.Dempsey told the committee members that he had not been asked to change the momentum in the Syrian conflict, but instead develop options to degrade Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad's military capabilities."I have never been told to change the momentum. I have been told to degrade capability," he stressed.The top U.S. military officer also said that Russia may hike its military assistance to Syria should the United States strike, but said that was not a reason in his view to hesitate to act."There is some indication that they (the Russians) have assured the regime that if we destroy something, they can replace it," said Dempsey.Hagel warned at the hearing that failure to take action over Syria's use of chemical weapons would damage the credibility of America's pledge to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon."A refusal to act would undermine the credibility of America's other security commitments - including the president's commitment to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon," he said, adding, "The word of the United States must mean something.”"There are always risks in taking action, but there are also risks with inaction. The Assad regime, under increasing pressure by the Syrian opposition, could feel empowered to carry out even more devastating chemical weapons attacks. Chemical weapons make no distinction between combatants and innocent civilians, and inflict the worst kind of indiscriminate suffering, as we have recently seen,” said Hagel.Kerry clarified that President Barack Obama was neither proposing nor leaving the door open to putting troops on the ground in Syria.He added that failing to strike Syria in response to a chemical weapons attack would open a "Pandora's box" of "dangerous consequences," leaving U.S. allies questioning the worth of America's word and U.S. enemies itching to test America's resolve.

On Sunday, Kerry said that the administration had new evidence that sarin gas was used in the chemical attack."We know that the regime ordered this attack," he said. "We know they prepared for it. We know where the rockets came from. We know where they landed. We know the damage that was done afterwards."Intelligence reports by other countries, such as France and Germany, have also determined that the Assad regime was behind the chemical attack on August 21. Germany has ruled out taking part in a strike in Syria, but French President Francois Hollande has expressed support.Earlier Tuesday, the Obama administration won support for a strike on Syria from top congressional leaders, including House Speaker John Boehner.Boehner, emerging from a White House meeting, said the chemical weapons attack last month "has to be responded to.”Minutes later, House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi told reporters that she, too, feels Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad has "crossed a line."House Republican Leader Eric Cantor said definitively that he plans to vote in favor of giving Obama authorization to use military force.

ISAIAH 17:1
1 The burden of Damascus. Behold, Damascus is taken away from being a city, and it shall be a ruinous heap.


AMOS 1:5
5  I will break also the bar of Damascus, and cut off the inhabitant from the plain of Aven, and him that holdeth the sceptre from the house of Eden:(IRAQ) and the people of Syria shall go into captivity unto Kir,(JORDAN) saith the LORD.

JEREMEIAH 49:23-27
23  Concerning Damascus.(SYRIA) Hamath is confounded, and Arpad: for they have heard evil tidings: they are fainthearted; there is sorrow on the sea;(WAR SHIPS WITH NUKES COMING ON SYRIA) it cannot be quiet.
24  Damascus is waxed feeble, and turneth herself to flee, and fear hath seized on her: anguish and sorrows have taken her, as a woman in travail.
25  How is the city of praise not left, the city of my joy!
26  Therefore her young men shall fall in her streets, and all the men of war shall be cut off in that day, saith the LORD of hosts.
27  And I will kindle a fire (NUKES OR BOMBS) in the wall of Damascus, and it shall consume the palaces of Benhadad.(ASSADS PALACES POSSIBLY IN DAMASCUS)

COUNTRIES WITH ISRAEL (THE WEST)(SAUDIA ARABIA WITH WEST)

EZEKIEL 38:10-19
10 Thus saith the Lord GOD; It shall also come to pass, that at the same time shall things come into thy mind, and thou shalt think an evil thought:
11 And thou shalt say,(RUSSIA,ARAB,MUSLIMS) I will go up to the land of unwalled villages; I will go to them that are at rest, that dwell safely, all of them dwelling without walls, and having neither bars nor gates,
12 To take a spoil, and to take a prey; to turn thine hand upon the desolate places that are now inhabited, and upon the people that are gathered out of the nations, which have gotten cattle and goods, that dwell in the midst of the land.
13 Sheba, and Dedan,(SAUDIA ARABIA) and the merchants of Tarshish,(ENGLAND) with all the young lions thereof,(USA,CANADA,AUSTRALIA,NEW ZEALAND,EU,ENGLAND,ENGLISH SPEAKING shall say unto thee, Art thou come to take a spoil? hast thou gathered thy company to take a prey? to carry away silver and gold, to take away cattle and goods, to take a great spoil?
14 Therefore, son of man, prophesy and say unto Gog, Thus saith the Lord GOD; In that day when my people of Israel dwelleth safely, shalt thou not know it?
15 And thou shalt come from thy place out of the north parts, thou, and many people with thee, all of them riding upon horses, a great company, and a mighty army:
16 And thou shalt come up against my people of Israel, as a cloud to cover the land; it shall be in the latter days, and I will bring thee against my land, that the heathen may know me, when I shall be sanctified in thee, O Gog, before their eyes.
17 Thus saith the Lord GOD; Art thou he of whom I have spoken in old time by my servants the prophets of Israel, which prophesied in those days many years that I would bring thee against them?
18 And it shall come to pass at the same time when Gog shall come against the land of Israel, saith the Lord GOD, that my fury shall come up in my face.
19 For in my jealousy and in the fire of my wrath have I spoken, Surely in that day there shall be a great shaking in the land of Israel;

(COUNTRIES AGAINST THE WEST)(NOTICE GERMANY-TURKEY IN THE AGAINST)

EZEKIEL 38:1-7
1 And the word of the LORD came unto me, saying,
2 Son of man, set thy face against Gog,(RULER) the land of Magog,(RUSSIA) the chief prince of Meshech(MOSCOW)and Tubal,(TOBOLSK) and prophesy against him,
3 And say, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I am against thee, O Gog,(LEADER OF RUSSIA) the chief prince of Meshech(MOSCOW) and Tubal:TOBOLSK)
4 And I will turn thee back, and put hooks into thy jaws,(GOD FORCES THE RUSSIA-MUSLIMS TO MARCH) and I will bring thee forth, and all thine army, horses and horsemen, all of them clothed with all sorts of armour, even a great company with bucklers and shields, all of them handling swords:
5 Persia,(IRAN,IRAQ) Ethiopia, and Libya with them; all of them with shield and helmet:
6 Gomer,(GERMANY) and all his bands; the house of Togarmah (TURKEY) of the north quarters, and all his bands:(SUDAN,AFRICA) and many people with thee.
7 Be thou prepared, and prepare for thyself, thou, and all thy company that are assembled unto thee, and be thou a guard unto them. 

TAMAR YONAH ON OBAMA AND WAR REDERIC WITH SYRIA
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Radio/News.aspx/4878#.UiWyqn8wneE  

NOW WE FIND OUT THAT THIS ATTACK BY OBAMA CAN GO FROM 2 OR 3 DAYS TO 2 MONTH WITH A 30 DAY EXTENTION.HMMM - I SMELL A LONG WAR COMING AGAIN.

Senate resolution sets deadline, bars ground forces in Syria

Kerry tells congressional committee that Netanyahu can deal with an attack on Israel; Dempsey says Russia may boost aid to Assad if US strikes

By Times of Israel staff and AP September 4, 2013, 4:05 am 0-The Times of Israel

WASHINGTON — The Senate resolution authorizing President Barack Obama to use military force against Syria would bar American ground troops for combat operations and set a deadline for any action.The Associated Press obtained a copy of the draft resolution that the Foreign Relations Committee will vote on Wednesday.The measure would set a time limit of 60 days and says the president can extend that for 30 days more unless Congress has a vote of disapproval.Democratic Sen. Bob Menendez, chairman of the committee, and Sen. Bob Corker, the top Republican, agreed on the measure late Tuesday.At a committee hearing earlier in the day, Secretary of State John Kerry, Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Martin Dempsey provided extensive testimony on the Obama administrations plans and intentions regarding a strike against the Bashar Assad regime.Kerry had signaled earlier that the troop restriction was acceptable to the administration. “There’s no problem in our having the language that has zero capacity for American troops on the ground,” he said.“President Obama is not asking America to go to war,” Kerry said in a strongly worded opening statement. He added, “This is not the time for armchair isolationism. This is not the time to be spectators to slaughter.”Obama said on Tuesday that he was open to revisions in the relatively broad request the White House made over the weekend. He expressed confidence Congress would respond to his call for support and said Assad’s action “poses a serious national security threat to the United States and to the region.”The administration says 1,429 died from the attack on Aug. 21 in a Damascus suburb. Casualty estimates by other groups are far lower, and Assad’s government blames the episode on rebels who have been seeking to overthrow his government in a civil war that began over two years ago. A United Nations inspection team is awaiting lab results on tissue and soil samples it collected while in the country before completing a closely watched report.Kerry said at the hearing that he spoke Tuesday with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who assured the top US diplomat that he was certain Israel could deal with any misguided attack from the Assad regime.Dempsey told senators at the hearing that Russia may boost its military assistance to Syria if the US were to attack.“There is some indication that they [the Russians] have assured the regime that if we destroy something, they can replace it,” Dempsey said.

Meanwhile, a few hundred miles away, United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon urged caution. He said any punitive action against Syria could unleash more turmoil and bloodshed, and he advised that such strikes would be legal only in self-defense under the UN Charter or if approved by the organization’s Security Council. Russia and China have repeatedly used their veto power in the council to block action against Assad.In the Middle East, Israel and the US conducted a joint missile test over the Mediterranean in a display of military might in the region.Obama set the fast-paced events in motion on Saturday, when he unexpectedly stepped back from ordering a military strike under his own authority and announced he would seek congressional approval.Recent presidents have all claimed the authority to undertake limited military action without congressional backing. Some have followed up with such action.Obama said he, too, believes he has that authority, and House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi said during the day that even Congress’ refusal to authorize the president wouldn’t negate the power of the commander in chief.Still, the president also has stated that the United States will be stronger if lawmakers grant their support. But neither Obama nor his aides has been willing to state what options would be left to him should Congress reject his call. 

Jewish organizations in US support Syria strike

‘Barbarism on a mass scale must not be given a free pass,’ says AIPAC; ADL cites ‘moral and national security grounds’ for attack

By JTA and Times of Israel staff September 4, 2013, 12:45 am 4-The Times of Israel

An array of Jewish organizations is set to endorse US President Barack Obama’s call for military strikes against Syria, although the degree of support is not yet clear.Several organizations — including the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, the Zionist Organization of America, Americans for Peace Now and the Anti-Defamation League — will participate in a conference call on Syria with administration officials on Tuesday afternoon. The call is being organized by the Presidents Conference.“AIPAC urges Congress to grant the President the authority he has requested to protect America’s national security interests and dissuade the Syrian regime’s further use of unconventional weapons,” the pro-Israel lobby said in a statement before the call. “The civilized world cannot tolerate the use of these barbaric weapons, particularly against an innocent civilian population including hundreds of children.”“Simply put, barbarism on a mass scale must not be given a free pass,” it said, referring to a suspected chemical weapons attack last month by Syrian President Bashar Assad’s government. The attack near Damascus killed an estimated 1,400 people, including 400 children.

According to the statement, “This is a critical moment when America must also send a forceful message of resolve to Iran and Hezbollah — both of whom have provided direct and extensive military support to Assad. The Syrian regime and its Iranian ally have repeatedly demonstrated that they will not respect civilized norms. That is why America must act, and why we must prevent further proliferation of unconventional weapons in this region.”Following the call, the Presidents Conference will convene its own conference call to shape a statement, Malcolm Hoenlein, the foreign policy umbrella body’s executive vice president, said. Hoenlein also confirmed that the statement would support Obama’s call to action, but he could not say to what extent.Others predicted wholehearted endorsement.“I would predict that the overwhelming majority of the American Jewish community will support the president’s decision on moral grounds and national security grounds,” Abraham Foxman, the ADL’s national director, told JTA.“It’s hard to imagine there’s a rabbi alive who has a High Holiday service who is not going to talk about Syria,” said one Jewish official who often brokers relations between the White House and the Jewish community.Until Obama declared over the weekend that he was ready to strike, however, Jewish groups had been reluctant to weigh in on American intervention, in part because of the hangover from unwarranted attacks in the last decade blaming Jewish lobbying for the Iraq War. Foxman said such hesitations were obviated by Obama’s explicit call for a strike.

“The president has made his decision and we’re not ahead of it,” Foxman said. “He’s not doing this for Israel. This may have serious ramifications for Israel which are negative.”Obama on Tuesday met with top congressional officials and called on them to support limited strikes on Syria to degrade its chemical weapons capability.“This is a limited, proportional step that will send a clear message not only to the Assad regime, but also to other countries that may be interested in testing some of these international norms, that there are consequences,” Obama said before the meeting.As he has done repeatedly since first indicating his intention to strike Syria, Obama cited the potential threat to Israel, among other American allies, as one of his concerns.“This norm against using chemical weapons that 98 percent of the world agrees to is there for a reason,” he said. “Because we recognize that there are certain weapons that when used cannot only end up resulting in grotesque deaths, but also can end up being transmitted to non-state actors; can pose a risk to allies and friends of ours like Israel, like Jordan, like Turkey; and unless we hold them into account, also sends a message that international norms around issues like nuclear proliferation don’t mean much.”

Ban: Any Syria strike must get Security Council OK

Secretary general says attack on sovereign nation may only be initiated as act of self-defense

By Peter James Spielmann September 3, 2013, 10:59 pm 2-The Times Of Israel

UNITED NATIONS (AP) — UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon on Tuesday warned that any “punitive” action taken against Syria for an alleged chemical weapons attack last month would be illegal without Security Council approval or a sound case for self-defense.The US and France have blamed Syrian President Bashar Assad’s regime for the alleged Aug. 21 attack and are considering military action in response. Such a strike would almost certainly occur without the approval of the Security Council, where Russia and China have consistently used their veto power to block action against Assad’s regime. The Obama administration argues that a chemical weapons attack cannot go unpunished because of the council’s inaction.“As I have repeatedly said, the Security Council has primary responsibility for international peace and security,” Ban said at a news conference. “The use of force is lawful only when in exercise of self-defense in accordance with article 51 of the United Nations Charter and or when the Security Council approves such action.He also warned that a military strike against Syria could unleash more turmoil and bloodshed in a crisis that has already killed more than 100,000 people.“I take note of the argument for action to prevent a future use of chemical weapons. At the same time, we must consider the impact of any punitive measure on efforts to prevent further bloodshed and facilitate the political resolution of the conflict,” Ban said.President Barack Obama received key support from leaders in Congress on Tuesday for a potential strike.Ban did not blame any party for the alleged attack on a Damascus suburb, saying that “If confirmed, any use of chemical weapons by anyone under any circumstances will be a serious violation of international law and an outrageous war crime.”“Whatever the source, this latest allegation should be as wakeup call for the international community,” Ban said.He stressed that an ongoing investigation by UN chemical weapons experts “is uniquely placed to independently establish the facts in an objective and impartial manner.”The US government has said it has “high confidence” that there was a gas attack and it was launched by the Syrian government. US officials have also questioned the ability of the UN team to properly investigate, saying the inspectors faced too many delays getting on the ground and only have a mandate to determine whether chemical weapons were used in the attack — not who was responsible.

Ban said biological samples collected by the inspectors will arrive in European labs for testing by Wednesday.

Syria said to be hiding troops and moving weapons

Damascus braces for US strike, threatens widespread regional war

By RYAN LUCAS September 3, 2013, 10:22 pm 0-The Times of Israel

BEIRUT (AP) — As the Obama administration tries to prod Congress into backing armed action against Syria, the regime in Damascus is hiding military hardware and shifting troops out of bases into civilian areas.

Politically, President Bashar Assad has gone on the offensive, warning in a rare interview with Western media that any military action against Syria could spark a regional war.If the US undertakes missile strikes, Assad’s reaction could have a major effect on the trajectory of Syria’s civil war. Neighboring countries could get dragged into a wider conflict, or it could be back to business as usual for a crisis that has claimed the lives of more than 100,000 people over 2½ years.The main Western-backed opposition group says that during the buildup last week to what seemed like an imminent US attack, the army moved troops as well as rocket launchers, artillery and other heavy weapons into residential neighborhoods in cities nationwide. Three Damascus residents, speaking on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisals, confirmed such movements.

One man said two members of the elite Republican Guards broke into an empty house he owns and showed him an official document stating they were authorized to do so because Syria is at war. A woman in another area said soldiers moved into a school next to her house.A US official confirmed there are indications that the Syrian regime is taking steps to move some of its military equipment and bolster protection for defense facilities.The official, who was not authorized to discuss intelligence matters and spoke on condition of anonymity, said that at this point, the US has the information it needs to maintain a good handle on what the regime is doing to prepare.The trend inside Syria is likely to continue in the coming days now that the regime has won a reprieve with President Barack Obama’s decision to seek congressional approval for military action.“The Syrian regime knows there are 30-40 potential targets for US airstrikes, and they have had ample time to prepare,” said Hisham Jaber, a retired Lebanese army general and director of the Middle East Center for Studies and Political Research in Beirut. “Half of them, if not more, have been evacuated, moved or camouflaged. This is the natural thing to do.”Obama said last week that he believes the US should strike Syria for what the administration says was a deadly chemical weapons attack by Assad’s forces on rebel-held suburbs of Damascus. The administration has stressed, however, that any operation would be limited and not aimed at tipping the balance of power in Syria’s civil war.In an interview published Monday with the French newspaper Le Figaro, Assad refused to say how Syria would respond to Western strikes, but warned that “the risk of a regional war exists.”The regime has a range of options if the US does bomb. It could retaliate with rockets against US allies in the region. It could unleash allies like Hezbollah against Western targets abroad. Or it could do nothing — and score propaganda points by portraying itself as victim of US aggression.The regime’s choice, analysts say, will probably depend on the magnitude of the American military action: The bigger and more sustained the strikes, the more likely the government in Damascus will feel compelled to respond.If Washington follows through with calibrated strikes, analysts say, Assad may reach for a political card, not a military one.“His first option is propaganda value,” said Salman Shaikh, director of the Brookings Doha Center. Assad could try to foster the notion “that the West is again attacking a Middle Eastern state, an Arab state, without the right international legitimacy. And he can bolster that dynamic, that narrative, by showing that it’s had a cost on innocent civilians.”One way to achieve that would be to show the world images of civilians purportedly killed by American strikes.“If he’s able to score points from this, he will feel that he’s actually won without actually engaging in a military response,” Shaikh said.

Assad charted a similar course after Israeli airstrikes in May that targeted advanced weapons destined for Lebanon’s Shiite militant group Hezbollah. His regime portrayed the attacks as proof of the rebels’ collusion with Israel, denounced the strikes as a violation of Syrian sovereignty and dispatched an obscure militant group to threaten retaliation.In terms of military responses, Assad could launch rockets at US allies Turkey, Jordan or Israel. But that could touch off a prolonged military engagement with an outside power at a time when the regime is already in a bloody fight for its survival.An attack against NATO-member Turkey could trigger a response from the entire military alliance, while Jordan hosts about a dozen US F-16 jets, a Patriot missile battery and around 1,000 American troops.As for Israel, the Assad regime could launch rockets at the Jewish state, or turn to Hezbollah to do so. The militant group, which fought Israel to a standstill in a 34-day war in 2006, is believed to have a well-stocked arsenal of missiles capable of hitting the country’s major cities.But analysts say Syria is unlikely to pursue such a course unless the US strikes pose an immediate threat to Assad’s grip on power.Hezbollah would have a lot to lose. The group is already facing flak at home for fighting alongside Syrian government troops against the rebels. A full-on confrontation with Israel on behalf of Syria would probably be a tough sell to its Shiite constituents at home, let alone the broader Lebanese public.“I can’t see a situation whereby they would accept an order from Assad to, say, attack Israel or attack some domestic enemies. I think that would be too damaging for their position,” said Chris Phillips, a Syria specialist at Queen Mary University in London.Israeli defense officials also say the odds of retaliation by Syria or Hezbollah are very low. Still, Israel has deployed Iron Dome anti-missile batteries in the Tel Aviv area and toward its northern frontier with Syria.Between these two extremes lies a middle path for Assad, which would involve an attack such as a car bombing carried out by a sympathetic militant group.“Something to indicate to the outside world that it’s dangerous to mess with the Assad regime, that they have levers that can cause damage elsewhere, while also plausibly denying that they’ve had direct impact,” Phillips said.As an example, Phillips pointed to a double car bombing earlier this year in Turkey that killed more than 50 people. Turkey blames Syria, while Syria denies any role.

Ariel Sharon undergoes surgical procedure

Former PM, in a coma since 2006, is returned to rehabilitation department at Sheba Medical Center

By Yoel Goldman September 4, 2013, 2:06 am 0-The Times of ISRAEL

Former prime minister Ariel Sharon, who has been in a vegetative state since 2006, underwent a scheduled surgical procedure Tuesday at the Sheba Medical Center in Ramat Gan.The operation reinstalled a feeding tube in Sharon’s digestive system. It proceeded without incident and the former prime minister was returned to the hospital’s Department of Respiratory Care and Rehabilitation, where he has been treated in recent years.Sharon, 85, was prime minister from 2001 until suffering a second stroke that left him comatose in 2006. In 2005, he initiated and carried out the disengagement from the Gaza Strip, ordering the removal of all Israelis from the area.

RECENT OTHER SYRIAN NEWS
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/america-might-bomb-syria-quick-but-will.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/syria-threatens-surprises-for-western.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/500-syrian-scud-missles-aimed-at-israel.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/hackers-try-to-wipe-israel-off-map.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/iran-zionists-israel-will-burn-i-say-u.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/arab-muslim-countries-scared-if-syria.html 
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/me-and-stockwell-day-fell-virtually.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/france-on-board-with-usa-on-syria.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/update-on-syria-happenings.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/will-obama-attack-today-in-syria-or.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/obama-to-get-vote-from-congress-before.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/09/syria-brags-obamas-done-before-he-got.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/09/standstill-in-america-about-syria-till.html 
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/09/mccain-graham-want-tough-attack-on-assad.html 

FIRE DESTROYS ANOTHER LONG TIME BUSINESS IN KITCHENER THIS TIME

KING JESUS IS COMING FOR US ANY TIME NOW. THE RAPTURE. BE PREPARED TO GO.

ROBS SPORTS BAR FIRE IN WALKERTON ONTARIO
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/major-blaze-at-robs-sports-bar-in.html

ROBS SPORTS BAR PICTURES
 

ROBS ON FIRE PICTURE BLACKBURNNEWS.COM





PICTURE OF ROBS CTVNEWS.CA
RUBBLE FROM ROBS FIRE PICTURE WWW.THEPOST.ON.CA

ON SUNDAY AUGUST 25,13 ROBS SPORTS BAR A LONG TIME BUSINESS WORTH OVER A HALF OF A MILLION DOLLARS BURNT TO THE GROUND.NOW ONE WEEK LATER ON SUNDAY AUGUST 31,13-ACTUALLY EARLY MONDAY AROUND 2AM ST JACOBS FARMERS MARKET COMES TO A OVER A 2 MILLION DOLLAR BURNING DEMISE.2 SUNDAYS.2 MAJOR BUSINESSES WERE BURNT TO THE GROUND.45 MINUTE DRIVE APART FROM EACH OTHER.AND MAJOR LONG TIME BUSINESSES BOTH OF THEM.AND THE GUTTED PLACE AT ST JABOCS DEALT WITH THE FOOD EATING SECTION.AND THE ROBS FIRE WAS SUSPECTED OF STARTING IN THE FOOD PREPARING AREA.2 INTERESTING CONNECTIONS TO BOTH FIRES.AT ROBS SPORTS BAR.SOMEONE EVEN LEFT A BOKAY OF FLOWERS BY THE FENCE.IN RECOGNITION OF HOW THEY WILL MISS ROBS SPORTS BAR.I WAS NEVER AT THE FARMERS MARKET IN KITCHENER EVER MYSELF.BUT FROM 1980 TILL 1994 I LIVED IN KITCHENER AND LOVED IT.I WORKED AT THE SMOKE SHOP FOR 5 YEARS ON KING IN KITCHENER AT THE OLD WALPER HOTEL.THEN FOR ANOTHER YEAR AFTER THAT I WAS A FLOATER AT LITTLE SHORT STOP STORES UNTIL I GOT ROBBED AT THE SHORT STOP ON KING BY THE SALVATION ARMY AND DECIDED TO GET OUT OF THE BUSINESS IN 1992.AND THEN 2 YEARS LATER I DECIDED TO MOVE BACK TO DURHAM ONTARIO.

ST JACOBS MARKET BEFORE FIRE
http://www.stjacobs.com/farmers-market

LOOK: St Jacobs Farmer's Market vows to spring back after fire

Posted By: Newstalk 1010 · 9/2/2013 2:41:00 PM

The community of St. Jacobs has been overwhelmed by the outpouring of support it has received since losing the village's popular farmer's market.Fire crews were called early Monday morning to a major blaze at the two-storey, 24,000 sq ft building that houses around 60 vendors.Woolwich Township Deputy Fire Chief Dale Martin says the fire gutted the complex's main building. But the market's outdoor section could be open by Thursday.The building is a total loss, only charred bits of the frame remaining.The building's wooden construction, fabrics and other materials sold by vendors, fuelled the blaze, which took 40 firefighters three hours to put out.The market had a new fire alarm system but wasn't equipped with sprinklers.No one was hurt in the fire, and the winds kept it away from a nearby livestock area. It isn't clear what sparked the blaze, though local police and the Ontario Fire Marshal are investigating.Martin expects the damage will total around $2-million.Woolwich Township Mayor Todd Cowan says the municipality will do what it can to get the market open again."This is a devastating loss for St. Jacobs, the Township of Woolwich, the region and the agricultural community", Cowan said in a statement.The president of the company that owns the market says the community is in shock. "It's overwhelming," Marcus Shantz, tells Newstalk 1010. "It's really humbling and it puts it in perspective because it's not just our building but something the whole community has taken ownership of."The market posted this statement on its facebook page:
We lost the main food building at the Market to a fire early Labour Day morning. Thanks to all the firefighters who came out to help us. They did a great job in making sure the fire didn’t spread to other buildings on the property. We are very grateful that no one was hurt.Our hearts go out to all of the great vendors in that building. Many of them were there since the building opened back in the late 1980’s. There is a long road ahead, but we will build a new home for your businesses.
We have a huge outdoor market, and another indoor food and flea market building, and our hope is to keep it open this week. At this very early stage, we can’t give a definite answer on that, but please stay tuned for further updates.A big THANK YOU to everyone who has reached out to us this morning. We have always said that the market is not the buildings. It’s the people – the vendors, customers, the whole community. We’re very humbled by the sense of ownership and pride that so many people have for this market. We will bring it back!

Premier Kathleen took to Twitter to thank firefighters who battled the blaze and express her regrets at the loss of the market."The destruction of the St. Jacobs Farmers' Market is a terrible loss to the Waterloo region. St. Jacobs played such an important role in the community and contributed greatly to the local economy."(with files from the Canadian Press & Justine Lewkowicz)
http://www.newstalk1010.com/News/localnews/blogentry.aspx?BlogEntryID=10583795

ST JACOBS BEFORE FIRE-FARMERS MARKET PICYURE FROM THEIR SITE

 
ST JACOBS FARMERS MARKET ON FIRE PICTURE 570NEWS

 
TOR CTVNEWS.CA PICTURE OF FARMERS MARKET FIRE

 
RUBBLE AFTER FARMERS MARKET FIRE - PICTURE CBC.CA
PICTURE CA.NEWS YAHOO.COM OF FIRE RUBBLE 

PICTURES
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/kitchener-waterloo/story/2013/09/02/stjacobs-market-open.html