Friday, January 27, 2023

MY MOHAWK RACEWAY PREDICTIONS 2023 RD 015 FRI JAN 27, 2023

    MOHAWK STANDARDBREAD HARNESS RACEWAY 2023 - RESULTS AS OF FRI JAN-27, 2023 - DAY-015

MOHAWK PICKS
01-5-8-1-2 W-2.70, P-2.10, S-2.70, SEX-4.00, STRI-4.10 - 15.60
02-9-3-6-0 MTRI-12.65 - 28.25
03-2-6-1-3 W-3.20 - 31.45
04-2-5-1-3 4TH WBP (4-1)
05-9-7-1-10 4TH WBP (1-1)
06-1-3-2-4 W-2.40 - 33.85
07-6-8-9-4 4TH WBP (7-1)
08-4-1-2-5 4TH WBP (7-1)
09-3-2-6-5 4TH WBP (8-1), MSUP-86.00 - 119.85
10-9-3-5-0 W-3.40 - 123.25
11-9-7-2-8-0 W-4.80, DD-9.10 - 137.15
MOHAWKS TONIGHTS TOTAL $137.15 OVERALL TOTAL $3,476.55

STANS PICKS
01-8-5-2-1-3 4TH WBP (15-1), MEX-4.00 - 4.00
02-3-9-5-2-6 P-3.70 - 7.70
03-6-7-2-1-3 4TH WBP (9-1)
04-3-2-4-9-10 W-10.40, 4TH WBP (26-1) - 18.10
05-7-10-1-5-6 4TH (36-1)
06-1-3-2-6-8 W-2.40, 4TH WBP (12-1) - 20.50
07-4-7-2-1-8 S-6.10 - 26.60
08-8-5-6-1-2 4TH WBP (3-1)
09-2-3-5-6-1 W-10.20, S-NSB, 4TH WBP (7.2), MSUP-86.00 - 122.80
10-4-3-2-9-6 4TH WBP (3.5)
11-9-5-1-8-7 W-4.80, S-7.50 - 135.10
HI-5 MONEY BEFORE TONIGHT = $200,575.59
STANS TONIGHTS TOTAL $135.10 OVERALL TOTAL $6,452.35     

ACTUAL RACE RESULTS
01-5 (1.5)-8 (2-1)-1 (15-1)-6 (43-1)
02-6 (6.5)-9 (7.2)-3 (2-1)-7 (32-1) (1-SCR)
03-2 (3.5)-1 (9-1)-5 (12-1)-6 (2-1)
04-3 (4-1)-9 (26-1)-6 (12-1)-1 (7-1)
05-10 (1-1)-9 (9.2)-8 (34-1)-5 (36-1)
06-1 (1.5)-7 (12-1)-6 (12-1)-2 (12-1)
07-8 (9.5)-4 (7-1)-2 (25-1)-9 (8-1)
08-1 (3-1)-6 (9-1)-5 (7-1)-2 (4-1)
09-2 (4-1)-6 (7.2)-5 (8-1)-3 (1.2) (NO SHOW BETTING)
10-9 (3.5)-6 (29-1)-3 (3-1)-1 (65-1) (8-SCR)
11-9 (7.5)-2 (2-1)-1 (45-1)-3 (34-1)-5 (5-1) (10-SCR)

MOHAWK PREDICTIONS)-RECORD 2023

01-044-BIG-$10.20 (JAN 06-11TH) (4-1), $08.60 (JAN 21-11TH) (3-1), $08.40 (JAN 26-10TH) (3-1),   
02-026-BIG-$08.20 (JAN 14-6TH) (10-1), $06.80 (JAN 26-10TH) (7-1), $06.60 (JAN 02-10TH) (5-1),
03-034-BIG-$08.20 (JAN 21-8TH) (19-1), $07.50 (JAN 27-11TH) (45-1), $05.30 (JAN 20-6TH) (7-1),
04-018-BIG-24-1 (JAN 19-1ST), 20-1 (JAN 16-3RD), 16-1 (JAN 13-2ND), 13-1 (JAN 02-7TH),
04-055-W B P-BIG-19-1 (JAN 06-4TH), 16-1 (JAN 21-4TH), 13-1 (JAN 05-3RD), 12-1 (JAN 09-2ND),
S EX-017-BIG-$43.60 (JAN 26-10TH)
M EX-011-BIG-$43.70 (JAN 05-10TH)
S TRI-008-BIG-$59.75 (JAN 20-3RD)
M TRI-009-BIG-$45.95 (JAN 09-11TH)
S SUP-001-BIG-$24.00 (JAN 13-2ND)
M SUP-008-BIG-$480.15 (JAN 20-7TH)
DD-1,2-01-BIG-$19.10 (JAN 06-1ST)
DD-2,3-00-BIG-$
DD-3,4-00-BIG-$
DD-4,5-00-BIG-$
DD-5,6-02-BIG-$12.80 (JAN 05-6TH)
DD-6,7-02-BIG-$09.10 (JAN 07-7TH)
DD-7,8-02-BIG-$13.30 (JAN 07-8TH)
DD-8,9-01-BIG-$19.60 (JAN 21-9TH)
DD-9,10-01-BIG-$08.70 (JAN 16-10TH)
DD-10,11-01-BIG-$09.10 (JAN 27-11TH)
DD-11,12-01-BIG-$63.90 (JAN 21-12TH)
DD-12,13-00-BIG-$
P3 (1-3)-00-BIG-$
P3 (2-4)-00-BIG-$
P3 (3-5)-00-BIG-$
P3 (4-6)-00-BIG-$
P3 (5-7)-01-BIG-$11.95 (JAN 07-7TH)
P3 (6-8)-01-BIG-$11.65 (JAN 07-8TH)
P3 (7-9)-01-BIG-$15.80 (JAN 21-9TH)
P3 (8-10)-00-BIG-$
P3 (9-11)-00-BIG-$
P3 (10-12)-00-BIG-$
P3 (11-13)-00-BIG-$
P4 (4-7)-00-BIG-$
P4 (7-10)-00-BIG-$
P5 (1-5)-00-BIG-$
P5 (6-10)-00-BIG-$
10TH -P5 (HF)-S-00-BIG-$
10TH -P5 (HF)-M-00-BIG-$
11TH -P5 (HF)-S-00-BIG-$
11TH -P5 (HF)-M-01-BIG-$124.00 (JAN 20-11TH)
12TH -P5 (HF)-S-00-BIG-$
12TH -P5 (HF)-M-00-BIG-$
13TH -P5 (HF)-S-00-BIG-$
13TH -P5 (HF)-M-00-BIG-$
5-1+ LONG-(02)-55
5-1+ LONG TOT-(15)-177-31.1%
LONGEST LONG-
LONGS THIS NIGHT T3-0
4TH PLACE PICKED CORRECT-0
4TH PLACE WRONG BUT PICKED 5-1+ ONLY-0
PICK 4 PLACINGS-29-44
OA PICK 4 PLAC TOT-369-568-65.0%
TOTAL RACES-(11)-142
TOP 4 PICKS EACH RACE-01-03,02-03,03-03,04-02,05-02,06-02,07-03,08-03,09-04,10-02,11-02,12-00,13-00=29-44-OATOT-369-568-65.0%


(STANS PREDICTIONS)-RECORD AT MOHAWK 2023

01-038-BIG-$34.30 (JAN 02-10TH) (16-1), $20.60 (JAN 14-8TH) (9-1), $12.00 (JAN 05-9TH) (5-1),
02-021-BIG-$8.60 (JAN 23-8TH) (9-1), $07.30 (JAN 16-3RD) (9-1), $06.10 (JAN 02-2ND) (10-1),
03-019-BIG-$06.50 (JAN 05-7TH) (9-1), $06.00 (JAN 14-11TH) (9-1), $05.10 (JAN 20-1ST) (9-1),
04-017-BIG-50-1 (JAN 05-1ST), 36-1 (JAN 27-5TH), 28-1 (JAN 21-4TH), 28-1 (JAN 16-4TH),
04-058-W B P-BIG-42-1 (JAN 26-10TH), 38-1 (JAN 21-8TH), 35-1 (JAN 02-6TH), 26-1 (JAN 27-4TH),
S EX-010-BIG-$51.40 (JAN 23-08TH)
M EX-007-BIG-$42.20 (JAN 23-1ST)
S TRI-001-BIG-$14.00 (JAN 09-9TH)
M TRI-005-BIG-$72.30 (JAN 14-6TH)
S SUP-001-BIG-$40.00 (JAN 09-9TH)
M SUP-007-BIG-$2,709.00 (JAN 20-6TH)
DD-1,2-01-BIG-$12.30 (JAN 21-2ND)
DD-2,3-00-BIG-$
DD-3,4-00-BIG-$
DD-4,5-01-BIG-$13.90 (JAN 20-5TH)
DD-5,6-00-BIG-$
DD-6,7-01-BIG-$24.30 (JAN 23-7TH)
DD-7,8-03-BIG-$42.90 (JAN 26-8TH)
DD-8,9-02-BIG-$91.60 (JAN 14-9TH)
DD-9,10-01-BIG-$82.90 (JAN 05-10TH)
DD-10,11-00-BIG-$
DD-11,12-00-BIG-$
DD-12,13-00-BIG-$
P3 (1-3)-00-BIG-$
P3 (2-4)-00-BIG-$
P3 (3-5)-00-BIG-$
P3 (4-6)-00-BIG-$
P3 (5-7)-00-BIG-$
P3 (6-8)-01-BIG-$38.50 (JAN 23-8TH)
P3 (7-9)-01-BIG-$15.80 (JAN 21-9TH)
P3 (8-10)-00-BIG-$
P3 (9-11)-00-BIG-$
P3 (10-12)-00-BIG-$
P3 (11-13)-00-BIG-$
P4 (4-7)-00-BIG-$
P4 (7-10)-00-BIG-$
P5 (1-5)-00-BIG-$
P5 (6-10)-00-BIG-$
10TH -P5 (HF)-S-00-BIG-$
10TH -P5 (HF)-M-00-BIG-$
11TH -P5 (HF)-S-00-BIG-$
11TH -P5 (HF)-M-02-BIG-$1,151.25 (JAN 14-11TH)
12TH -P5 (HF)-S-00-BIG-$
12TH -P5 (HF)-M-00-BIG-$
13TH -P5 (HF)-S-00-BIG-$
13TH -P5 (HF)-M-00-BIG-$
5-1+ LONG-(04)-51
5-1+ LONG TOT-(15)-177-28.8%
LONGEST LONG-75-1 (JAN 21-3RD),
LONGS THIS NIGHT T3-75-1 (JAN 21-3RD),
4TH PLACE PICKED CORRECT-0
4TH PLACE WRONG BUT PICKED 5-1+ ONLY-0
PICK 4 PLACINGS-28-44
OA PICK 4 PLAC TOT-334-568-58.8%
TOTAL RACES-(11)-142
TOP 4 PICKS EACH RACE-01-03,02-02,03-03,04-02,05-02,06-03,07-02,08-03,09-04,10-02,11-02,12-00,13-00=28-44-OATOT-334-568-58.8%

Thursday, January 26, 2023

MY MOHAWK RACEWAY PREDICTIONS 2023 RD 014 THU JAN 26, 2023

    MOHAWK STANDARDBREAD HARNESS RACEWAY 2023 - RESULTS AS OF THU JAN-26, 2023 - DAY-014

MOHAWK PICKS
01-2-4-6-5
02-6-5-2-4 4TH WBP (8.5)
03-5-1-8-4
04-8-4-5-7 S-3.40, 4TH WBP (2-1) - 3.40
05-4-6-1-5 S-3.40 - 6.80
06-4-2-7-5 S-3.80, 4TH (6-1) - 10.60
07-4-2-7-10 S-4.90 - 15.50
08-7-1-2-10 W-5.40 - 20.90
09-8-3-4-6 4TH WBP (4.5)
10-1-2-7-8 W-8.40, P-6.80, 4TH (11-1), SEX-43.60 - 79.70
11-3-2-6-10-5
MOHAWKS TONIGHTS TOTAL $79.70 OVERALL TOTAL $3,339.40

STANS PICKS
01-4-2-7-9-6
02-6-2-4-1-5 P-3.80, S-2.40 - 6.20
03-5-4-7-1-8
04-4-5-7-3-2
05-4-9-5-2-8 4TH WBP (6-1)
06-4-2-1-7-5 4TH WBP (9-1)
07-2-9-10-3-4 W-7.50 -  13.70
08-7-1-2-4-10 W-5.40, DD-42.90 - 62.00
09-5-2-8-1-6
10-1-4-7-3-5 W-8.40, 4TH WBP (42-1) - 70.40
11-9-7-1-2-6
HI-5 MONEY BEFORE TONIGHT = $187,610.16
STANS TONIGHTS TOTAL $70.40 OVERALL TOTAL $6,317.25

ACTUAL RACE RESULTS
01-7 (27-1)-6 (9.2)-2 (7.2)-4 (1-1)
02-5 (7-1)-2 (3-1)-4 (8.5)-3 (50-1)
03-7 (7.5)-8 (5-1)-6 (20-1)-5 (7.2) (3-SCR)
04-6 (3-1)-7 (2-1)-5 (4-1)-2 (34-1)
05-6 (3.5)-2 (6-1)-1 (13-1)-4 (3-1)
06-2 (2.5)-1 (9-1)-7 (9-1)-5 (6-1)
07-2 (5.2)-5 (3-1)-7 (7-1)-1 (16-1) (6-SCR)
08-7 (8.5)-9 (38-1)-5 (48-1)-8 (75-1)
09-4 (14-1)-5 (9.2)-6 (4.5)-7 (19-1)
10-1 (3-1)-2 (7-1)-3 (42-1)-8 (11-1) (10-SCR)
11-7 (4-1)-6 (9.5)-5 (12-1)-4 (23-1)-1 (7-1) (8-SCR)

MOHAWK PREDICTIONS)-RECORD 2023

01-039-BIG-$10.20 (JAN 06-11TH) (4-1), $08.60 (JAN 21-11TH) (3-1), $08.40 (JAN 26-10TH) (3-1),   
02-025-BIG-$08.20 (JAN 14-6TH) (10-1), $06.80 (JAN 26-10TH) (7-1), $06.60 (JAN 02-10TH) (5-1),
03-033-BIG-$08.20 (JAN 21-8TH) (19-1), $05.30 (JAN 20-6TH) (7-1), $05.10 (JAN 02-2ND) (7-1),
04-018-BIG-24-1 (JAN 19-1ST), 20-1 (JAN 16-3RD), 16-1 (JAN 13-2ND), 13-1 (JAN 02-7TH),
04-050-W B P-BIG-19-1 (JAN 06-4TH), 16-1 (JAN 21-4TH), 13-1 (JAN 05-3RD), 12-1 (JAN 09-2ND),
S EX-016-BIG-$43.60 (JAN 26-10TH)
M EX-011-BIG-$43.70 (JAN 05-10TH)
S TRI-007-BIG-$59.75 (JAN 20-3RD)
M TRI-008-BIG-$45.95 (JAN 09-11TH)
S SUP-001-BIG-$24.00 (JAN 13-2ND)
M SUP-007-BIG-$480.15 (JAN 20-7TH)
DD-1,2-01-BIG-$19.10 (JAN 06-1ST)
DD-2,3-00-BIG-$
DD-3,4-00-BIG-$
DD-4,5-00-BIG-$
DD-5,6-02-BIG-$12.80 (JAN 05-6TH)
DD-6,7-02-BIG-$09.10 (JAN 07-7TH)
DD-7,8-02-BIG-$13.30 (JAN 07-8TH)
DD-8,9-01-BIG-$19.60 (JAN 21-9TH)
DD-9,10-01-BIG-$08.70 (JAN 16-10TH)
DD-10,11-00-BIG-$
DD-11,12-01-BIG-$63.90 (JAN 21-12TH)
DD-12,13-00-BIG-$
P3 (1-3)-00-BIG-$
P3 (2-4)-00-BIG-$
P3 (3-5)-00-BIG-$
P3 (4-6)-00-BIG-$
P3 (5-7)-01-BIG-$11.95 (JAN 07-7TH)
P3 (6-8)-01-BIG-$11.65 (JAN 07-8TH)
P3 (7-9)-01-BIG-$15.80 (JAN 21-9TH)
P3 (8-10)-00-BIG-$
P3 (9-11)-00-BIG-$
P3 (10-12)-00-BIG-$
P3 (11-13)-00-BIG-$
P4 (4-7)-00-BIG-$
P4 (7-10)-00-BIG-$
P5 (1-5)-00-BIG-$
P5 (6-10)-00-BIG-$
10TH -P5 (HF)-S-00-BIG-$
10TH -P5 (HF)-M-00-BIG-$
11TH -P5 (HF)-S-00-BIG-$
11TH -P5 (HF)-M-01-BIG-$124.00 (JAN 20-11TH)
12TH -P5 (HF)-S-00-BIG-$
12TH -P5 (HF)-M-00-BIG-$
13TH -P5 (HF)-S-00-BIG-$
13TH -P5 (HF)-M-00-BIG-$
5-1+ LONG-(06)-53
5-1+ LONG TOT-(15)-162-32.7%
LONGEST LONG-
LONGS THIS NIGHT T3-0
4TH PLACE PICKED CORRECT-0
4TH PLACE WRONG BUT PICKED 5-1+ ONLY-0
PICK 4 PLACINGS-28-44
OA PICK 4 PLAC TOT-315-524-65.6%
TOTAL RACES-(11)-131
TOP 4 PICKS EACH RACE-01-03,02-03,03-02,04-02,05-03,06-03,07-02,08-01,09-02,10-03,11-01,12-00,13-00=25-44-OATOT-340-524-64.9%


(STANS PREDICTIONS)-RECORD AT MOHAWK 2023

01-034-BIG-$34.30 (JAN 02-10TH) (16-1), $20.60 (JAN 14-8TH) (9-1), $12.00 (JAN 05-9TH) (5-1),
02-020-BIG-$8.60 (JAN 23-8TH) (9-1), $07.30 (JAN 16-3RD) (9-1), $06.10 (JAN 02-2ND) (10-1),
03-016-BIG-$06.50 (JAN 05-7TH) (9-1), $06.00 (JAN 14-11TH) (9-1), $05.10 (JAN 20-1ST) (9-1),
04-016-BIG-50-1 (JAN 05-1ST), 28-1 (JAN 21-4TH), 28-1 (JAN 16-4TH), 26-1 (JAN 06-4TH),
04-051-W B P-BIG-42-1 (JAN 26-10TH), 38-1 (JAN 21-8TH), 35-1 (JAN 02-6TH), 22-1 (JAN 19-1ST),
S EX-009-BIG-$51.40 (JAN 23-08TH)
M EX-007-BIG-$42.20 (JAN 23-1ST)
S TRI-001-BIG-$14.00 (JAN 09-9TH)
M TRI-005-BIG-$72.30 (JAN 14-6TH)
S SUP-001-BIG-$40.00 (JAN 09-9TH)
M SUP-006-BIG-$2,709.00 (JAN 20-6TH)
DD-1,2-01-BIG-$12.30 (JAN 21-2ND)
DD-2,3-00-BIG-$
DD-3,4-00-BIG-$
DD-4,5-01-BIG-$13.90 (JAN 20-5TH)
DD-5,6-00-BIG-$
DD-6,7-01-BIG-$24.30 (JAN 23-7TH)
DD-7,8-03-BIG-$42.90 (JAN 26-8TH)
DD-8,9-02-BIG-$91.60 (JAN 14-9TH)
DD-9,10-01-BIG-$82.90 (JAN 05-10TH)
DD-10,11-00-BIG-$
DD-11,12-00-BIG-$
DD-12,13-00-BIG-$
P3 (1-3)-00-BIG-$
P3 (2-4)-00-BIG-$
P3 (3-5)-00-BIG-$
P3 (4-6)-00-BIG-$
P3 (5-7)-00-BIG-$
P3 (6-8)-01-BIG-$38.50 (JAN 23-8TH)
P3 (7-9)-01-BIG-$15.80 (JAN 21-9TH)
P3 (8-10)-00-BIG-$
P3 (9-11)-00-BIG-$
P3 (10-12)-00-BIG-$
P3 (11-13)-00-BIG-$
P4 (4-7)-00-BIG-$
P4 (7-10)-00-BIG-$
P5 (1-5)-00-BIG-$
P5 (6-10)-00-BIG-$
10TH -P5 (HF)-S-00-BIG-$
10TH -P5 (HF)-M-00-BIG-$
11TH -P5 (HF)-S-00-BIG-$
11TH -P5 (HF)-M-02-BIG-$1,151.25 (JAN 14-11TH)
12TH -P5 (HF)-S-00-BIG-$
12TH -P5 (HF)-M-00-BIG-$
13TH -P5 (HF)-S-00-BIG-$
13TH -P5 (HF)-M-00-BIG-$
5-1+ LONG-(02)-46
5-1+ LONG TOT-(15)-162-28.4%
LONGEST LONG-75-1 (JAN 21-3RD),
LONGS THIS NIGHT T3-75-1 (JAN 21-3RD),
4TH PLACE PICKED CORRECT-0
4TH PLACE WRONG BUT PICKED 5-1+ ONLY-0
PICK 4 PLACINGS-20-44
OA PICK 4 PLAC TOT-306-524-58.4%
TOTAL RACES-(11)-131
TOP 4 PICKS EACH RACE-01-03,02-02,03-02,04-02,05-02,06-03,07-01,08-01,09-01,10-02,11-01,12-00,13-00=20-44-OATOT-306-524-58.4%

Wednesday, January 25, 2023

HUMAN MICROCHIPPING TAKES CENTER STAGE.

JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.GET SAVED NOW- CALL ON JESUS TODAY.THE ONLY SAVIOR OF THE WHOLE EARTH - NO OTHER. 1 COR 15:23-JESUS THE FIRST FRUITS-CHRISTIANS RAPTURED TO JESUS-FIRST FRUITS OF THE SPIRIT-23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.ROMANS 8:23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.(THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE)

HUMAN MICROCHIPPING TAKES CENTER STAGE.

City of Mississauga Thrilled with $200 Million Investment to Expand Resilience Biotechnologies Inc.’s Vaccine Manufacturing in Mississauga-Business and innovation | May 19, 2021

Yesterday, the Government of Canada announced a $200 million investment in Resilience Biotechnologies Inc., a Mississauga-based biomanufacturing facility, to help expand made-in-Canada vaccine solutions. With this investment, the Mississauga facility is expected to manufacture approximately 112 to 640 million doses of mRNA (messenger ribonucleic acid) vaccines per year.“Investing in vaccine manufacturing is more important now than ever and I’m thankful that the federal government chose to invest in a Mississauga-based facility,” says Mayor Bonnie Crombie. “This investment is evidence that Mississauga is a leading national science hub that supports business development and growth. Through our relationships with biomanufacturing companies, like Resilience Biotechnologies Inc., we can continue to support growth and expansion in this sector.”As part of this investment, Resilience Biotechnologies Inc. will expand their existing facility by adding 35,000 sq. ft. of space to create more capacity to manufacture vaccines and other biologics. This investment supports a larger, $400 million project that aims to develop Canada’s emergency preparedness for future pandemics.“We are proud that Mississauga’s life sciences sector is making great contributions to Canada’s biomanufacturing capabilities that will support our national life sciences priorities for decades to come,” said Harold Dremin, Acting Director, Economic Development Office. “It’s exciting to know that a Mississauga-based company is the first in Canada to have both the capacity and capability to use leading-edge mRNA technologies to produce vaccines, and has the potential to develop future therapeutics for other diseases and chronic illnesses.”Mississauga has the second-largest life sciences sector in Canada by employment, with more than 470 companies employing more than 25,000 people.

BACKGROUND

About Resilience Biotechnologies Inc.
Resilience Biotechnologies Inc. is located in Mississauga. It specializes in the development and manufacturing of clinical and commercial drugs, like vaccines. With this investment, Resilience Biotechnologies Inc. hopes to create and maintain 500 full-time jobs in Canada and create 50 co-op positions.

About Life Sciences in Mississauga
Mississauga is a connected ecosystem that cultivates and nurtures commercialization of life sciences innovations: a proven destination where diverse companies and exceptional talent grow, succeed and prosper. To learn more about advancements in Mississauga’s life sciences sector, visit thefutureisunlimited.ca/industries/life-sciences/.

Media Contact:City of Mississauga Media Relations-media@mississauga.ca-905-615-3200, ext. 5232-TTY: 905-896-5151

MARK OF THE BEAST (engraved microchip in your hand or forehead)

REVELATION 13:16-18
16 And he(FALSE POPE) causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:(CHIP IMPLANT)
17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.(6-6-6) A NUMBER SYSTEM

REVELATION 16:1-2
1 And I heard a great voice out of the temple saying to the seven angels, Go your ways, and pour out the vials of the wrath of God upon the earth.
2 And the first went, and poured out his vial upon the earth; and there fell a noisome and grievous sore upon the men which had the mark of the beast, and upon them which worshipped his image.

I KNOW THIS MARK WILL BE A MICROCHIP IMPLANT UNDER THE SKIN. LETS LOOK UP WHAT THE WORD MARK SAYS IN REVELATION 13:16-18, 14:9,11, 15:2, 16:2, 19:20, 20:4-ALL THESE VERSES FROM THE BOOK OF REVELATION SPEAK OF THIS DICTATORS MARK. NOW LETS SEE WHAT IT MEANS FROM STRONGS EXAUSTIVE CONCORDANCE OF THE BIBLE. UNDER MARK PAGE 684.MARK UNDER MARK. THE OLD TESTAMENT IS UNDER HEBREW AND THE NEW TESTAMENT IS UNDER GREEK. SO WHEN WE LOOK UNDER REVELATION 13:16-17 WE SEE IT IS UNDER GREEK, SO WE GO TO GREEK IN THE BACK SECTION AND GO TO 5480 TO SEE WHAT IT SAYS THIS MARK WOULD BE. SO LETS GET TO IT.MARK IN STRONGS GREEK 5480 XAPAYUA CHARAGMA, KHAR-AG-MAH: FROM THE SAME AS 5482: A SCRATCH OR ETCHING, I.E STAMP (AS A BADGE OF SERVITUDE), OR SCULPTURED FIGURE-(STATUE):-GRAVEN, MARK FROM 5482 XAPAE CHARAX, KHAR-AX; FROM XAPAOOW CHARASSO (TO SHARPEN TO A POINT; AKIN TO 1125 THROUGH THE IDEA OF SCRATCHING); A STAKE, I.E (BYIMPL.) A PALISADE OR RAMPART (MILITARY MOUND FOR CIRCUMVALLATION IN A SIEGE): - TRENCH FROM 1125 YPAPOE GRAPHO, GRAF-0; A PRIM. VERB; TO "GRAVE", ESPEC. TO WRITE; FIG. TO DESCRIBE:-DESCRIBE, WRITE (-ING, -TEN).

THE MICROCHIP IMPLANT IN YOUR RIGHT HAND OR FOREHEAD.


LEVETICUS 19.28
Ye shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor print any marks upon you: I am the LORD.

Human microchip implants take center stage-by Zhanna L. Malekos Smith, Opinion Contributor - 01/23/23 7:30 AM ET

The novelty of replacing one’s “home key” with a microchip implant is gaining worldwide interest, but there’s another more compelling story under the surface. Why is this technology — an integrated circuit the size of a grain of rice — reviled by some and celebrated by self-proclaimed human cyborgs? Arguably, William Shakespeare’s “Hamlet” offers the most elegant explanation: “Nothing is neither good nor bad, but thinking makes it so.” However, it would be prudent to tell Prince Hamlet that not all microchip implants are designed alike, and understanding the technological design enables one to better evaluate the competing viewpoints. Today, more than 50,000 people have elected to have a subdermal chip surgically inserted between the thumb and index finger, serve as their new swipe key, or credit card. In Germany, for example, more than 2,000 Germans have opted to receive these implants; one man even used it to store a link to his last will and testament. As chip storage capacity increases, perhaps users could even link to the complete works of Shakespeare.Chip implants are just one of the many types of emerging technologies in the Internet of Things (IoT) — an expanding digital cosmos of wirelessly connected internet-enabled devices. Some technologists are worried, however, that hackers targeting IoT vulnerabilities in sensors and network architecture also may try to hack chip implants. Radio-frequency identification (RFID) chips are identifying transponders that typically carry a unique identification number and can be tagged with user data such as health records, social media profiles, and financial information.RFID chips are passive transponders, which means the digital reader must be positioned a few inches away from the user’s microchipped hand to communicate. In contrast, near field communication (NFC) chips use electromagnetic radio fields to wirelessly communicate to digital readers in close proximity, much like smartphones and contactless credit cards. A benefit of NFC over RFID is international use, reasons Biohax: “With the power of existing infrastructure and the wide variety of services and products already supporting the NFC standard globally, one huge benefit of ours is that we overlap virtually any private or public sector already using NFC or mobile tech.”According to a 2021 United Kingdom-based consumer survey by Propeller Insights on digital payment trends in Europe, 51 percent of the approximately 2,000 respondents said they would consider getting a chip implant to pay for services. This technology is especially popular in Sweden as a substitute for paying with cash. “Only 1 in 4 people living in Sweden use cash at least once a week,” writes NPR. More than 4,000 Swedes have replaced keycards for chip implants to use for gym access, e-tickets on railway travel, and to store emergency contact information.The technology also may offer increased mobility for people with physically limiting health conditions, such as rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, and motor neurone disease, according to BioTeq, a UK-based tech firm. For example, “a wheelchair-mobile person can approach a door and the reader will unlock the door, avoiding the need for keys that the person may not be able to use for themselves.” BioTeq is also exploring providing microchip services for those who are visually impaired to create “trigger audible or touch-sensory signals” in the home. Despite these benefits, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists avers that the main challenges to chip implants are security, safety and privacy.A general security concern with NFC technology is that it could allow third parties to eavesdrop on device communication, corrupt data, or wage interception attacks, warns NFC.org.  Interception attacks are when someone intercepts the data transmitted between two NFC devices and then alters the data as it’s being relayed. Like any device, these personal chips have security vulnerabilities and potentially could be hacked, even if embedded underneath the skin.With regard to health safety concerns, a 2020 study with the American Society for Surgery of the Hand indicated that RFID chip implants may carry potential health risks such as adverse tissue reaction and incompatibility with some magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technology. Several social scientists also are apprehensive about the risks to privacy and human rights if the body becomes a type of “human barcode.” According to microbiologist Ben Libberton at Stockholm’s Karolinska Institute, chip implants can reveal sensitive personal information about your health and even “data about your whereabouts, how often you’re working, how long you’re working, if you’re taking toilet breaks and things like that.” Interestingly, the first person to implant a microchip in himself was professor Kevin Warwick of Reading University in 1998; he wanted to determine whether his computer could wirelessly track his movements at work.To date, at least 10 state legislatures in the United States have passed statutes to ban employers from requiring employees to receive human microchip implants. The most recent state was Indiana, which prohibited employers from requiring employees to be chipped as a condition of employment and discriminating against job applicants who refuse the implant. Nevada’s legislation is the most restrictive — although not a total ban, as proposed in 2017, Nevada Assembly Bill 226 prohibits an officer or employee of Nevada from “establishing a program that authorizes a person to voluntarily elect to undergo the implantation of such a microchip or permanent identification marker.”As the impact and influence of chip implants increases in the United States, it will raise complex questions for state legislatures and courts to consider, such as third-party liability for cybersecurity, data ownership rights, and Americans’ rights under the Fourth Amendment and the protection of sensitive digital data under the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Carpenter v. United States.Microchips offer alluring benefits of convenience and mobility, but they carry potential cybersecurity, privacy and health risks. The onus cannot be on the law alone, however, to protect consumers. Instead, it is a shared responsibility among consumers to understand their data rights as part of digital literacy, and among technologists to promote cybersecurity-informed engineering at each phase of product development. Further, lawmakers must be mindful of the delicate balance between protecting the flame of technological innovation and advancement, while guarding against misapplication and abuse. As technology historian Melvin Kranzberg noted, “Technology is neither good nor bad, nor is it neutral.”Zhanna L. Malekos Smith is a nonresident adjunct fellow with the Strategic Technologies Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) in Washington and an assistant professor in the Department of Systems Engineering at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, where she also is a Cyber Law and Policy Fellow with the Army Cyber Institute and affiliate faculty with the Modern War Institute. The opinions expressed here are solely those of the author and not those of CSIS, the U.S. government or Department of Defense.

Storing medical information below the skin’s surface-Specialized invisible dye, delivered along with a vaccine, could enable “on-patient” storage of vaccination history to save lives in regions where paper or digital records aren’t available.Anne Trafton | MIT News Office-December 18, 2019

A key challenge for vaccination campaigns in some developing regions is that there is little infrastructure for storing medical records, so there’s often no easy way to determine who needs a particular vaccine or booster shot. MIT engineers have developed a way to store information about a patient’s vaccine history under the skin, using an invisible quantum dot dye that is delivered, along with a vaccine, by a microneedle patch.Editor’s note: This article has been updated to clarify that this research was developed to help avoid preventable deaths in parts of the world where paper or digital systems for storing patients’ vaccination records aren’t available. Many vaccines require multiple doses spaced out at certain intervals; without accurate records, people may not receive all of the necessary doses. The method is still in an experimental stage and is not being used for any current vaccinations, including Covid-19 vaccines.Every year, a lack of vaccination leads to about 1.5 million preventable deaths, primarily in developing nations. One factor that makes vaccination campaigns in those nations more difficult is that there is little infrastructure for storing medical records, so there’s often no easy way to determine who needs a particular vaccine.MIT researchers have now developed a novel way to record a patient’s vaccination history: storing the data in a pattern of dye, invisible to the naked eye, that is delivered under the skin at the same time as the vaccine.“In areas where paper vaccination cards are often lost or do not exist at all, and electronic databases are unheard of, this technology could enable the rapid and anonymous detection of patient vaccination history to ensure that every child is vaccinated,” says Kevin McHugh, a former MIT postdoc who is now an assistant professor of bioengineering at Rice University.The researchers showed that their new dye, which consists of nanocrystals called quantum dots, can remain for at least five years under the skin, where it emits near-infrared light that can be detected by a specially equipped smartphone.McHugh and former visiting scientist Lihong Jing are the lead authors of the study, which appears today in Science Translational Medicine. Ana Jaklenec, a research scientist at MIT’s Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, and Robert Langer, the David H. Koch Institute Professor at MIT, are the senior authors of the paper.An invisible record-Several years ago, the MIT team set out to devise a method for recording vaccination information in a way that doesn’t require a centralized database or other infrastructure. Many vaccines, such as the vaccine for measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR), require multiple doses spaced out at certain intervals; without accurate records, children may not receive all of the necessary doses.“In order to be protected against most pathogens, one needs multiple vaccinations,” Jaklenec says. “In some areas in the developing world, it can be very challenging to do this, as there is a lack of data about who has been vaccinated and whether they need additional shots or not.”To create an “on-patient,” decentralized medical record, the researchers developed a new type of copper-based quantum dots, which emit light in the near-infrared spectrum. The dots are only about 4 nanometers in diameter, but they are encapsulated in biocompatible microparticles that form spheres about 20 microns in diameter. This encapsulation allows the dye to remain in place, under the skin, after being injected.The researchers designed their dye to be delivered by a microneedle patch rather than a traditional syringe and needle. Such patches are now being developed to deliver vaccines for measles, rubella, and other diseases, and the researchers showed that their dye could be easily incorporated into these patches.The microneedles used in this study are made from a mixture of dissolvable sugar and a polymer called PVA, as well as the quantum-dot dye and the vaccine. When the patch is applied to the skin, the microneedles, which are 1.5 millimeters long, partially dissolve, releasing their payload within about two minutes.By selectively loading microparticles into microneedles, the patches deliver a pattern in the skin that is invisible to the naked eye but can be scanned with a smartphone that has the infrared filter removed. The patch can be customized to imprint different patterns that correspond to the type of vaccine delivered.“It’s possible someday that this ‘invisible’ approach could create new possibilities for data storage, biosensing, and vaccine applications that could improve how medical care is provided, particularly in the developing world,” Langer says.Effective immunization-Tests using human cadaver skin showed that the quantum-dot patterns could be detected by smartphone cameras after up to five years of simulated sun exposure.The researchers also tested this vaccination strategy in rats, using microneedle patches that delivered the quantum dots along with a polio vaccine. They found that those rats generated an immune response similar to the response of rats that received a traditional injected polio vaccine.“This study confirmed that incorporating the vaccine with the dye in the microneedle patches did not affect the efficacy of the vaccine or our ability to detect the dye,” Jaklenec says.The researchers now plan to survey health care workers in developing nations in Africa to get input on the best way to implement this type of vaccination record keeping. They are also working on expanding the amount of data that can be encoded in a single pattern, allowing them to include information such as the date of vaccine administration and the lot number of the vaccine batch.The researchers believe the quantum dots are safe to use in this way because they are encapsulated in a biocompatible polymer, but they plan to do further safety studies before testing them in patients.
“Storage, access, and control of medical records is an important topic with many possible approaches,” says Mark Prausnitz, chair of chemical and biomolecular engineering at Georgia Tech, who was not involved in the research. “This study presents a novel approach where the medical record is stored and controlled by the patient within the patient’s skin in a minimally invasive and elegant way.”The research was funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Koch Institute Support (core) Grant from the National Cancer Institute. Other authors of the paper include Sean Severt, Mache Cruz, Morteza Sarmadi, Hapuarachchige Surangi Jayawardena, Collin Perkinson, Fridrik Larusson, Sviatlana Rose, Stephanie Tomasic, Tyler Graf, Stephany Tzeng, James Sugarman, Daniel Vlasic, Matthew Peters, Nels Peterson, Lowell Wood, Wen Tang, Jihyeon Yeom, Joe Collins, Philip Welkhoff, Ari Karchin, Megan Tse, Mingyuan Gao, and Moungi Bawendi.

How ‘killer robots’ can help us learn from mistakes made in AI policies-by Michael Depp, Opinion Contributor - 01/25/23 7:30 AM ET

San Francisco Police Chief Bill Scott answers questions during a news conference on May 21, 2019, regarding allowing police to use potentially lethal, remote-controlled robots in emergency situations. Civil rights advocates are critical of the militarization of police.The use of lethal robots for law enforcement has turned from a science fiction concept to news snippets, thanks to recent high-profile debates in San Francisco and Oakland, Calif., as well as their actual use in Dallas. The San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted 8-3 to grant police the ability to use ground-based robots for lethal force when “when risk of loss of life to members of the public or officers is imminent and officers cannot subdue the threat after using alternative force options or other de-escalation tactics.” Following immediate public outcry, the board reversed course a week later and unanimously voted to ban the lethal use of robots. Oakland underwent a less public but similar process, and in January the Dallas Police Department used a robot to end a standoff. All of these events illustrate major pitfalls with the way that police currently use or plan to use lethal robots. Processes are rushed or nonexistent, conducted haphazardly, do not involve the public or civil society, and fail to create adequate oversight. These problems must be fixed in future processes that authorize artificial intelligence (AI) use in order to avoid controversy, collateral damage and even international destabilization.The chief sin that a process can commit is to move too quickly. Decisions about how to use AI systems require careful deliberation and informed discussion, especially with something as high-stakes as the use of lethal force. A counter example here is the Department of Defense (DOD) Directive 3000.09, which covers the development and deployment of lethal autonomous systems. Because it lacks clarity for new technology and terminology, this decade-old policy is in the process of a lengthy, but deliberate, update. For San Francisco and Oakland, the impetus for speed was California’s requiring an audit of military equipment, but San Francisco’s debate was too far along to get started and Oakland’s was done in an entirely impromptu fashion.This was reinforced by the fact that the police in both cities already had robots (albeit, not armed in San Francisco) in their inventories; if the use of robots was not approved, they argued, the equipment would have to be divested, creating an “authorize it or lose it” mentality. Procurement should be covered by the policy on autonomous systems, not an afterthought to avoid loss. In a functional process, procurement should follow authorization, not vice versa.Simply slowing down and avoiding sunk costs alone is not enough, however; the process itself must be improved. In the case of San Francisco, debate involved only the board of supervisors and the police department (who had a hand in drafting the authorization under discussion). Oakland’s process started as the council discussed robots alongside staples of police equipment such as stun grenades. When considering the deployment of AI, it is important to solicit the viewpoint of civil society representatives, whose expertise on technology policy, law, human rights and artificial intelligence generally, could prove invaluable to producing nuanced policies. Additionally, and especially for law enforcement issues, the public needs to have more involvement in these processes; otherwise, the public will be forced to turn to protests to make its voice heard. In contrast, consider the robust public discussion among citizens, civil society, and companies over law enforcement use of facial recognition software or California’s Bot Bill. The ideal process fosters such discussion.Finally, it is critical to consider oversight mechanisms at the start. San Francisco neatly sidestepped this with a nebulous mandate. All four of the requirements to use force that the board approved require additional guidance. Without specific definitions for “risk of loss of life,” “imminent,” “alternative force options” and “de-escalation tactics,” and no other figures of authority there to challenge a police interpretation of them, these are largely toothless stipulations. But San Francisco did more than Oakland, which did not outline even cursory oversight mechanisms for the police and relied solely on the standard police authorization to use lethal force. These cases indicate that there should be a separate body to carry out oversight, with clear guidelines about when and how to deploy autonomous systems.With the media in decline, will a memorial to fallen journalists help restore trust? How to pay all of the Treasury’s bills without raising the debt limit-As AI systems continue to improve, debates are required about how and where government bodies deploy them. Each organization should have its own processes: the Department of Defense will have stakeholders and systems different from local law enforcement. But some practices should be constant. Processes need to be deliberate and not rushed; appealing to the sunk cost fallacy should be avoided; other stakeholders need to be consulted early and often; and oversight needs to be built in from the beginning. Without taking these steps, it will continue to be difficult to build trust with the public and the international community that AI can be deployed responsibly. While recent events may have sparked a public outcry over the dangers of “killer robots,” we should not lose sight of the danger that poor processes create when deploying AI systems.Michael Depp is a research associate at the Center for a New American Security, where he focuses on artificial intelligence safety and stability. Follow him on Twitter @michaeljaydepp.

Senate GOP pours cold water on idea of impeaching Biden-by Alexander Bolton - 01/25/23 6:00 AM ET

Senate Republicans are pouring cold water on the idea that President Biden’s classified documents controversy rises to the level of an impeachable offense, heading off House conservatives looking for revenge after former President Trump’s two trials.Even before Tuesday’s revelation that about a dozen classified documents had been found at former Vice President Mike Pence’s Indiana home, GOP senators were cool to the idea of impeachment. “I don’t think you want to get into where it’s a tit for tat, every two years or four years you’re dealing with impeachment proceedings in the House and Senate,” Senate Republican Whip John Thune (S.D.) told The Hill. “There has to be a really good reason, obviously, the constitutional reasons and grounds for that. So we’ll see where it goes.” Asked whether Biden’s possession of classified documents has the potential to rise to the level of an impeachable offense, Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), an adviser to the Senate GOP leadership team, gave a simple answer: “No.” Many Republicans thought the Democrats’ first impeachment of Trump over delaying military aide to Ukraine was a partisan overreach. But that means they are also wary of doing the same thing now that their party has the House majority.It’s just one of several tension points emerging between Republicans in the two chambers.  Senate Republicans have mostly ignored chatter in the House about impeaching Biden’s secretary of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, or wiping out the tax code and replacing it with a 23 percent to 30 percent national sales tax. Some Republicans think talk of impeaching Biden will grow in the House, even though GOP senators warn that it’s a bad idea. House Republicans introduced more than a dozen impeachment resolutions against Biden in the last Congress, and the GOP-controlled House Judiciary Committee has already initiated an investigation of Biden’s handling of classified documents, which could lay the ground for future impeachment proceedings.  Trump has also come under criticism for a separate classified documents controversy, but House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) in an interview with Fox Business argued that Biden’s handling of classified documents was more egregious because the former Republican president at least secured the classified information he held with padlocks.“That’s much different than what we’re finding now with President Biden, and I think it is severely going to cause him a great deal of trouble in the future as we get more of the truth,” McCarthy told Fox host Larry Kudlow. A few Senate Republicans entertain the idea that the classified documents found at Biden’s Delaware home and former Washington, D.C., office would lead to a Senate impeachment trial. “This actually might be an impeachable offense. If there’s a high crime and misdemeanor standard, which there is, this is the closest thing to one in recent years,” said Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.). “If the special counsel comes up with anything, realizing [Biden’s] a sitting president, I suppose they could draft up what would become articles of impeachment, depending on what they find.” Cramer said “I personally hate impeachments” but thinks the standard has changed since House Democrats impeached Trump in 2019 after he held up aid to Ukraine to use as leverage to get Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate Biden’s family’s business dealings in the country.  Only one Republican senator, Mitt Romney (Utah), voted to convict on an article of impeachment during Trump’s 2020 Senate trial.Cramer said “Democrats created an impeachment cycle and we may be in that cycle,” calling Trump’s first impeachment “far-fetched and silly.”  He said House Republicans now need to decide whether they want to keep the impeachment bar as low as they believe Democrats set it in 2019 or whether to elevate it to cover only the most serious crimes.The documents found at Pence’s home would further muddy any attempt to argue that Biden’s possession of classified documents meets the standard of high crimes and misdemeanors. Romney on Tuesday said it will be hard for House Republicans to credibly push an article of impeachment against Biden for keeping classified documents at his Delaware home after Pence admitted the same transgression. “I can’t imagine that’s where it’s going to head with so many people in the same arena,” he said.Some key Senate Republicans, such as Senate Intelligence Committee Vice Chairman Marco Rubio (Fla.), are already on record downplaying Trump’s possession of classified documents at his Florida home as a “storage” issue.  Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) on Tuesday dismissed a question about whether Biden’s possession of classified documents could rise to the level of an impeachable offense. “I don’t have an answer to that hypothetical. I do think that the Justice Department seems to be willing to treat everybody the same and to try to retrieve the documents, and obviously it’s not a great idea to take classified documents away from the archives. We’ll see how they continue to handle it,” he said.   Republican senators say it should be up to Robert Hur, the special counsel appointed by Attorney General Merrick Garland, to decide whether Biden should be charged with a crime, not House Republicans, who filed more than a dozen articles of impeachment against Biden in the last Congress.  “It could be a criminal offense,” Cornyn said. “That’s what the special counsel is for. Mishandling classified materials is very serious.”Garland appointed special counsel Jack Smith in November to oversee the Justice Department’s investigation of Trump’s handling of classified documents and whether he unlawfully interfered with the 2021 transfer of presidential power.  Cornyn, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, blasted some Democrats for “hypocrisy” by trying to minimize Biden’s culpability after hammering Trump for months after the FBI searched Mar-a-Lago in August to retrieve classified documents.  “The thing that’s made this such a story is the hypocrisy, [Democrats] attacking Trump,” he said. “Nobody should take classified materials outside of a secure facility, period.”   Sen. Mike Braun (R-Ind.) said fellow Republicans should “be careful” about “knee-jerking to impeachment.”“I think the country will fatigue of that,” he said, pointing out that recent impeachment proceedings against former Presidents Clinton and Trump “have not ended up with any real result.”  “If you start doing it on everything, I think it would be bad politically and for the mechanics of government working,” he said.Democrats picked up five House seats in the 1998 midterm elections as the Republican majority was in the midst of gearing up to impeach Clinton, marking a rare instance when the president’s party picked up House seats in the middle of a second term.Republicans picked up 14 House seats in the 2020 election after Democrats impeached Trump at the end of 2019.

Tuesday, January 24, 2023

LETS GET ALL FACE DIAPERS OFF ALL CANADIANS.NOT JUST SOME.

JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.GET SAVED NOW- CALL ON JESUS TODAY.THE ONLY SAVIOR OF THE WHOLE EARTH - NO OTHER. 1 COR 15:23-JESUS THE FIRST FRUITS-CHRISTIANS RAPTURED TO JESUS-FIRST FRUITS OF THE SPIRIT-23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.ROMANS 8:23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.(THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE)

 LETS GET ALL FACE DIAPERS OFF ALL CANADIANS.

REVERA OWNER THOMAS G WELLNER ON AGING
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_ftW9xbTZE
FAUCI FUNDED WUHAN LAB
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nFoAczoHbV0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__Czlg1xLJA
ALL TRUTHS BUT SHE BELIEVES THERE LIES
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WB6yucemJ-o

SINCE TOM WELLNER THE OWNER AND CEO OF REVERA WORKED WITH PHARMACY LABS AND COMPANIES. HE SHOULD NOT BE DEMANDING THE WORKERS AT REVERA HOMES WEAR THE FACE DIAPERS OR MASKS. NO AIR CAN GET IN AND YOUR TEETH CAN END UP ROTING. I PHONED REVERA THIS MOURNING ASKING THEM WHY DO ALL THE WORKERS HAVE TO WEAR MASKS. REVERA GAVE THE MESSAGE TO MY BOSS HERE. AND WE TALKED FOR A MINUTE ABOUT IT. SHE TOLD ME ITS THE GOVERNMENT THATS MAKING THE MASKS MANDATORY AT REVERA. THEN I PHONED FORDS OFFICE AND TOLD THE RECEPTIONIST. I WANT THESE MASKS OFF WORKERS AT REVERA AND ALL THE OLD AGE HOMES. LIKE THE BABY MURDERERS AND ABORTION-ITS MY BODY-MY CHOICE. I WANT IT SO WORKERS HAVE A CHOICE TO WEAR THE MASKS OR NOT. NOT GETTING FIRED OR FORCED TO WEAR THE FACE DIAPERS. SHE SAID I WILL TELL FORD. AND THAT WAS IT. IF ANYBODY ELSE WANTS TO REBELL AGAINST THE FORCED MASK WEARING PHONE DOUG FORDS OFFICE AT 416-325-1941. LETS GET THESE DIAPERS OF ALL OUR FACES. NOT JUST SOME CANADIANS.

Last updated: 1 January 2023 at 11:00am EST-Thomas Wellner Net Worth-President and Chief Executive Officer @ Revera Inc.
Location-Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Work
President and Chief Executive Officer @ Revera Inc.
Co-Chief Executive Officer @ Lifelabs Medical Laboratory Services (FUNDED BY THE CANADIAN OR ONTARIO GOVERNMENT)
President and Chief Executive Officer @ CML Healthcare
President - Well Cap @ Wellcap Advisors
President and Chief Executive Officer @ Therapure Biopharma
President and General Manager, Lilly Germany @ Eli Lilly and Company
Executive Director Marketing and Sales, European Operations @ Eli Lilly and Company
Director Marketing @ Eli Lilly Canada
Education
University of Toronto - Rotman School of Management
2014 - 2015-
Harvard University
(Business Administration, Business Administration and Management, Management, Education)
 2005 - 2005
Queen's University
Bachelor of Science - 1983 - 1987
Skills
Biotechnology
Lifesciences
Biopharmaceuticals
Strategy
Pharmaceutical Industry
Healthcare
Business Development
Business Strategy
Entrepreneurship
Marketing Strategy

Thomas Wellner biography
Thomas G. Wellner serves as Independent Director of the Company. He currently serves as President and Chief Executive Officer of Revera Inc. (“Revera”), a leading investor, operator and developer in the senior living sector. Mr. Wellner joined Revera in 2014, and since that time has led the organization through transformational change, developing the company’s strategic direction to grow, innovate and lead in the sector. He has worked with a number of strategic partners in Canada, the U.S. and the U.K. to grow Revera’s international portfolio to more than 500 properties and 56,000 suites. Mr. Wellner has extensive global experience in biotech, pharmaceuticals and health care services, previously leading a number of organizations including LifeLabs Inc., CML Healthcare Inc. and Therapure Biopharma Inc.. Mr. Wellner currently serves on the board of directors of a number of private companies, including Revera and FreshBooks. Mr. Wellner began his career at Eli Lilly & Company where he held a variety of global operational and leadership roles. Mr. Wellner holds an Honours Bachelor of Science degree in Life Sciences from Queen’s University and has completed the Directors Education Program of the Institute of Corporate Directors at the Rotman School of Management as well as an executive education course through the Harvard Business School.

LifeLabs Medical Laboratory Services Information
LifeLabs has operated in Canada for nearly 50 years. It is a leading provider of laboratory testing and management services, contributing to the treatment and prevention of disease by enabling healthcare providers to operate more efficiently and effectively. Following the acquisition of BC Biomedical on April 2, 2013 and CML Healthcare on October 1st, 2013, LifeLabs nearly doubled in size, now providing more than 100 million diagnostic tests for approximately 19 million patients visits annually. Information from these tests plays a vital role in predicting, diagnosing, treating and monitoring disease. LifeLabs operates the largest community medical laboratory network in Canada, together with our hospital and healthcare partners. LifeLabs also partners with healthcare providers to transform and manage laboratory organizations to better meet the complex healthcare challenges of today and tomorrow.

 CML HealthCare gets friendly $1.22-billion takeover offer from LifeLabs Medical

Two of Canada's largest medical diagnostics laboratory operators — LifeLabs Medical Laboratory Services and CML Healthcare Inc. — are joining forces in a friendly $1.22 billion takeover deal-Armina Ligaya-Published Jun 25, 2013
Two of Canada’s largest medical diagnostics laboratory operators — LifeLabs Medical Laboratory Services and CML Healthcare Inc. — are joining forces in a friendly $1.22-billion takeover deal, a move that would make the new company the dominant player in Ontario.As part of the acquisition, which is subject to approval, LifeLabs would assume $225-million of Mississauga-based CML’s outstanding debt and pay $10.75 per share in cash, the companies said Tuesday. That represents a 49.3% premium on its closing price of $7.20 on Monday, CML added.Tracker dslogo-Thomas Wellner, president and CEO of CML, said the amalgamation of the “two strong businesses” would allow them to leverage their capabilities across both organizations to “increase our scale and also expand our retail footprint nationally.”“The combined entity will also be better positioned to successfully navigate the increasingly challenging healthcare funding landscape,” he told analysts on a conference call. “For patients, and referring physicians, they will have continued access to ever broadening menu of specialized testing services in addition to the excellent quality laboratory standard tests offered.”CML’s stock rose 47.4% on the TSX on Tuesday and closed at $10.61 per share — the highest level since April last year.The deal has the “full support” of the board of directors of both companies and the price offered is “fair” and “in the best interest” of shareholders, Mr. Wellner said. The acquisition has the approval of the Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System (OMERS), which owns LifeLabs through its investment arm Borealis Infrastructure.The deal would make LifeLabs the “dominant player” in Ontario with two-thirds of the market, said Philippa Flint, a healthcare analyst with Bloom Burton & Co. in Toronto.“We expect the newly combined company to increase operational efficiencies, have more government negotiating leverage and be able to expand nationally,” she wrote in a research note to clients Tuesday.The deal is subject to approval by shareholders, and a special meeting is scheduled for Sept. 3. Shareholders will also receive an already scheduled dividend before the deal closes.Mr. Wellner said he believed the transaction would “move forward and achieve all the necessary regulatory and competition bureau requirements” but did not specify whether it would require Ontario approval due to the major foothold LifeLabs would attain.When asked for details on CML’s prior discussions with Queen’s Park, Mr. Wellner said it had spoken to the Ontario government and “we are attentive to any concerns that the government would have, as we do through the normal course of operations.”Specific details will be provided in the circular available in early August, he added.Ms. Flint said “the Ontario ownership of LifeLabs (through OMERS) would make the transaction more likely to be accepted by regulators.”CML Healthcare had been a long-stable business, but its performance began to erode once it touched areas outside its expertise and geography.In the first quarter this year, CML’s net earnings slipped to $12.1-million (including a pre-tax restructuring charge of $3.1-million) from $18.1-million during the same period in 2012.LifeLabs has facilities in both B.C. and Ontario, serving roughly 10 million patients and 20,000 physicians in Canada annually. CML has 112 Client C.A.R.E. Centres in Ontario, and 82 imaging centres in Ontario and British Columbia, but is  in the process of divesting its diagnostic imaging business.

Revera CEO Tom Wellner shares candid perspective on leading during the pandemic

Unprecedented: Canada’s Top CEOs on Leadership During COVID-19 published today
MISSISSAUGA, Canada –APRIL 12, 2022 – In a frank and personal account, Revera CEO Tom Wellner shares his experience at the helm of Canada’s leading senior living organization during the pandemic in a compelling new business book published today. Unprecedented: Canada’s Top CEOs on Leadership During Covid-19, which includes first-hand perspectives by 29 senior leaders from across industries, was compiled and edited by Steve Mayer, President of Greenhill Canada and Vice Chairman of Greenhill & Co, and Andrew Willis, business columnist for The Globe & Mail. Net proceeds from the sales of Unprecedented are being donated to United Way Centraide Canada for COVID recovery across Canada. Tom’s account offers a unique view of the extraordinary and heartbreaking journey experienced in senior living, particularly long-term care, during the first two waves of the pandemic. It provides insight into the daunting challenges faced by the organization and sector throughout the crisis, and the thinking behind Revera’s decisions to help address them. It also discusses clear gaps in the system that the pandemic revealed.“The pandemic has been the most difficult, tragic period of our collective experience, and for seniors’ care, has shown areas, like staffing and capacity, where profound improvements must be made,” said Tom. “We owe the best to the seniors of today and tomorrow, and we owe the best to the incredibly compassionate and dedicated frontline employees who have shown such courage through the past two years. They are true heroes.”About Revera-Revera is a leading Canadian-owned and -headquartered, owner, investor, developer and operator in the senior living sector. Through its portfolio of partnerships, Revera owns or operates more than 500 properties across Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom serving more than 45,000 seniors. Revera offers seniors’ apartments, independent living, assisted living, memory care, and long term care. With over 45,000 employees dedicated to providing exceptional care and service, Revera is helping seniors live life to the fullest. Find out more at ReveraLiving.com.
For further information please contact:Larry Roberts-Revera Inc.289-997-5721-Larry.Roberts@reveraliving.com

The doctor is out: With Fauci gone, who could be in line to replace him? by Jerry Dunleavy, Justice Department Reporter |-January 21, 2023 05:00 AM

Dr. Anthony Fauci left his four-decade position as director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases in December, and NIAID has commenced a search for who will replace the controversial doctor at the helm of the key federal agency.Since the controversial top doctor left his post at the end of 2022, his former deputy Hugh Auchincloss has been performing the role of acting NIAID director.FAUCI SUGGESTED FBI BE WARNED OF POSSIBLE WUHAN LAB LEAK-Applications for a permanent replacement following the National Institutes of Health's "nationwide search" were due Tuesday. As the search for a permanent NIAID director continues, no big names have yet been publicly raised for the job, and it is possible that Auchincloss could get the permanent position given his longtime leadership under Fauci.“The National Institutes of Health is seeking exceptional candidates for the position of Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases,” the NIH announced in November 2022. “This position offers a unique and exciting opportunity for an exceptional leader to serve as the chief executive for NIAID who will provide visionary leadership” in combating global diseases and pandemics.Whoever is picked for the NIH director position will require confirmation by the Senate Health Committee and then a majority vote in the full Senate. The NIAID gig, which falls under the NIH, does not need Senate confirmation.“Dr. Hugh Auchincloss has agreed to serve as acting director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases,” the NIH announced this week. “He has served as NIAID’s principal deputy director since joining NIH in 2006. He has played a key role in research planning and implementation activities.”Auchincloss, who is also the father of second-term Rep. Jake Auchincloss (D-MA), is wrapped up in the Wuhan lab controversy, and his name has been repeatedly raised by Republican investigators.The NIH provided millions of dollars to Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance over the years, and Daszak maintained a long working relationship with Wuhan lab "bat lady" Shi Zhengli, sending her lab at least $600,000 in NIH funding. Daszak was part of the WHO-China team that dismissed the lab leak hypothesis as “extremely unlikely” in 2021.Fauci sent an email to Auchincloss on Feb. 1, 2020, with an attachment and the subject line “IMPORTANT.” Fauci wrote, “Hugh: It is essential that we speak this AM. ... Read this paper as well as the e-mail that I will forward to you now. You will have tasks today that must be done.”The email from Fauci included an attached research article published in 2015 in Nature Medicine titled “A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronavirus shows potential for human emergence" that was authored in part by Shi Zhengli of the Wuhan lab.Auchincloss replied, “The paper you sent me says the experiments were performed before the gain of function pause but have since been reviewed and approved by NIH. Not sure what that means since [NIH official Emily Erbelding] is sure that no Coronavirus work [has] gone through the P3 framework. She will try to determine if we have any distant ties to this work abroad.” Fauci replied, “OK. Stay tuned.”Critics of Fauci were unhappy when the news initially leaked in December 2022 that Auchinloss would likely be replacing Fauci.“Auchincloss — the cipher who ran Fauci's errands and followed Fauci's instructions like 'you will have tasks today that must be done' — now has been appointed acting director of NIAID,” Dr. Richard Ebright, the lab director for the Waksman Institute of Microbiology at Rutgers University, tweeted in December.Justin Goodman, senior vice president of advocacy and public policy for the White Coat Waste Project, said Auchincloss "has lobbied to build more risky biolabs and has been Fauci’s right-hand man for the last 16 years."Fauci gave some advice to whoever ends up holding his former position. "The message is to stick with the science — the data, the evidence — and don't get involved in politics," Fauci said in December. "There's a big difference between policy and politics.A scientist who worked closely with a US-funded Wuhan lab has claimed that Covid was genetically engineered and leaked from the Chinese facility.Dr Andrew Huff, the former vice president of EcoHealth Alliance, called the pandemic 'one of the greatest cover-ups in history' and the 'biggest US intelligence failure since 9/11.'In his expert opinion, whistleblower Huff believes that grant funding provided by Anthony Fauci by way of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to EcoHealth Alliance, was linked to the 'creation of SARS-CoV-2.'-He claims NIH '[funded] gain-of-function work and the US intelligence community was aware of and appeared to have been involved' with this work.Gain-of-function (GOF) work has been widely believed to have created SARS-CoV-2, Huff stressing that it was key in creating the aggressive and contagious disease.Dr Andrew Huff, the former vice president of EcoHealth Alliance, has claims that SARS-CoV-2 was genetically engineered and leaked from a facility in China-Led by Dr Peter Daszak (left) there were concerns about the ties between Wuhan and EcoHealth Alliance - there most recent grant coming from Anthony Fauci in September 2021-Huff points to China's gain-of-function (GOF) experiments, which he believes were carried out within relaxed biosecurity environments and led to the leak at the US-funded Wuhan Institute of Virology-The pandemic swept across the globe and has so far claimed the lives of 6.64 million people after first being reported as a cluster of cases of pneumonia in Wuhan, China in late 2019.The Wuhan Institute of Virology, a high security lab specializing in coronaviruses, has been cast into the spotlight over the past two years, many questioning whether it could be the source of the highly contagious disease.Both China and the lab have vehemently denied allegations, but evidence of a lab leak, have been gaining traction as scientists, researchers and governments hunt for answers.Experts have suggested Covid may have escaped from the Wuhan facility through an infected researcher, improper disposal of waste or potential breaches in security at the site.In explosive allegations made in his new book, The Truth About Wuhan, Huff claims that the pandemic was the result of the US government funding of dangerous genetic engineering of coronaviruses in China.Speaking to The Sun, Huff said that 'the US government is to blame for the transfer of dangerous biotechnology to the Chinese.' He points to China's GOF experiments, which he believes were carried out within relaxed biosecurity environments which led to a lab leak at the US-funded Wuhan Institute of Virology.Huff said that it shouldn't be a surprise that China lied about the outbreak and then went to 'extraordinary lengths to make it appear as if the disease emerged naturally'-In September, Fauci, who has spent over five decades in the federal government and has been the face of the coronavirus pandemic response, awarded EcoHealth more money-'EcoHealth Alliance and foreign laboratories did not have the adequate control measures in place for ensuring proper biosafety, biosecurity, and risk management, ultimately resulting in the lab leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology,' he said.The army veteran, from Michigan, said the organization taught the Wuhan lab the 'best existing methods to engineer bat coronaviruses to attack other species' for many years.'China knew from day one that this was a genetically engineered agent,' he said.'I was terrified by what I saw. We were just handing them bioweapon technology.'In his book, the infectious diseases expert claims 'greedy scientists killed millions of people globally,' and goes as far as to claim the US government covered it all up.Huff said that it shouldn't be a surprise that China lied about the outbreak and then went to 'extraordinary lengths to make it appear as if the disease emerged naturally.''The shocking part of all of this is how the United States government lied to all of us,' he said.The organization received a $653,392 grant to analyze 'the potential for future bat coronavirus emergence in Myanmar, Laos and Vietnam'-EcoHealth Alliance had been studying different coronaviruses in bats for more than ten years with funding from the NIH - and developed close working ties with the Wuhan lab.In September, Anthony Fauci, who has spent over five decades in the federal government and has been the face of the coronavirus pandemic response, awarded EcoHealth more money. -The organization received a $653,392 grant to analyze 'the potential for future bat coronavirus emergence in Myanmar, Laos and Vietnam,' according to the Wall Street Journal.NIH have identified the region as 'high risk for future emergence of novel coronaviruses and the potential site where SARS-CoV-2 first 'spilled over' from bats to people.'While the NIH is promoting EcoHealth Alliance's claim that Covid-19 emerged through a 'spill over' from animals.Many scientists disagree and have said the circumstantial and biological evidence suggests a lab leak.Huff, who worked at EcoHealth Alliance from 2014 to 2016, serving as vice president from 2015, said he worked on the classified side of the research program as a US government scientist.Former intelligence chiefs and diplomats have already claimed Covid was leaked from a Wuhan lab in the 'cover-up of the century.'America's former top diplomat in East Asia, David Stilwell, telling The Sun in September 2021 that 'this makes Watergate look easy.''People are for some reason bent on insisting on having a slam-dunk, air-tight case that China produced this virus,' he said at the time.'Of course, the PRC is not going to let you in there to see their labs, but so many people have used that problem to stop further inquiry.'This isn't a legal case, we are not looking for indisputable evidence; there is enough circumstantial evidence.'In 2019, the Wuhan lab started working with the EcoHealth Alliance on a USAID program called PREDICT, which focuses on emerging pandemic threats.PREDICT had been designed to detect and find zoonotic viruses with pandemic potential – including coronaviruses.EcoHealth Alliance states on their website that zoonotic diseases–those that can be transmitted between animals and humans–represent approximately 75 percent of the newly emerging diseases currently affecting people.Shi Zhengli, the Wuhan virologist who famously became known as 'Batwoman' had hoped the program would create an early-warning system for pandemics.Huff said he has no proof that the leak was deliberate however does claim in his explosive tell-all book that biosecurity at the Chinese facility was compromisedHuff alleges the US were using the project to assess the bioweapon capabilities of foreign labs - including the Wuhan Institute of VirologyBut in 2014, Huff was asked to review a funding proposal which revealed that GOF work was being carried out to create SARS-CoV-2 - which causes Covid.GOF work sees viruses accelerated to more easily infect humans to help researchers test scientific theories, develop new technologies and find treatments for infectious diseases.The risky research method can pose safety and security concerns - and is banned in many countries.It was originally banned in the US in 2014 but was reintroduced by the NIH in 2017.Huff realized the EcoHealth Alliance was working closely with the Wuhan lab on this type of research, with the support of USAID - a US government department.He claims that the virus would never occur in nature and had been developed into a much more powerful pathogen in the lab.'EcoHealth Alliance developed SARS-CoV-2 and was responsible for the development of the agent SARS-CoV-2 during my employment at the organization,' he said.He said that he has no evidence China deliberately released the virus but believes the US-funded project was 'mostly a global fishing expedition for coronaviruses' to carry out GOF work or for intelligence collection - rather than preventing future pandemics.'At the time, I felt like the project seemed more like intelligence collection than scientific research and development,' he said in his book.The scientist said the PREDICT program wasn't collecting the data it should have been and Huff told The Sun that it appeared to be a 'giant intelligence operation'.He alleges the US were using the project to assess the bioweapon capabilities of foreign labs - including the Wuhan Institute of Virology.Huff claims the US-funded project was 'mostly a global fishing expedition for coronaviruses' to carry out GOF work or for intelligence collection - rather than preventing future pandemics-The pandemic swept across the globe and has so far claimed the lives of 6.64 million people after first being reported as a cluster of cases of pneumonia in Wuhan, China in late 2019-Shortly after, a novel coronavirus was eventually identified, the first case outside China recorded in January 2020 in Thailand-During a meeting with top executives in 2015 and 2016 Huff claims that he tried to sound the alarm over the biosafety and biosecurity risks in contract labs.'I was concerned that EcoHealth Alliance did not have enough visibility or firsthand knowledge of what was happening at foreign laboratories contracted and managed by EcoHealth Alliance,' he said.Huff said US government officials again issued warnings in January 2018 about the Wuhan lab - including the major shortage of experts needed to safely manage research on deadly coronaviruses.'It could be reasonably argued that EcoHealth Alliance set up China to fail,' he said.And when Covid emerged in late 2019, he said China 'and some of their US government collaborators at the Department of State, USAID, and the Department of Defense went into full cover-up mode.'What did Fauci get wrong? From telling people not to wear masks to claiming vaccines stopped infections-Dr Anthony Fauci is due to step down from his position as one of America's top infectious disease advisors at the end of this year.Below are listed some of his key blunders when the virus struck-Don't wear masks, do wear masks As global concern for Covid was surfacing in March 2020, Fauci told Americans that there was 'no need' to wear a face mask.He said they may only help people 'feel a little better', and 'might even block a droplet' — but would not provide good protection.Less than a month later, he was forced into an embarrassing climbdown after it emerged the virus spread via droplets in the air.Dr Fauci later insisted he advised people not to wear masks to ensure there were enough available for hospitals and healthcare centers.Covid did not come from a lab-Dr Fauci has also repeatedly insisted that Covid did not leak from a lab in China.He called the theory a 'shiny object that will go away', and brushed aside claims from other top experts as an 'opinion'.Dr Fauci has now backpedalled, saying instead that he keeps an 'open mind' although insisting that it remains 'most likely' that the virus spilled over from animals to humans.Two jabs will stop you catching Covid When the Covid vaccine roll-out was in full swing, Dr Fauci said the immunity from shots made doubly-vaccinated people a 'dead end' for the virus, and even suggested they may no longer need to wear masks.Schools shutdown-Schools were closed from March through to August 2020, something Dr Fauci later expressed regret about.But he said last month that he 'should have realized' there would be 'deleterious collateral consequences'.Children are now bearing the brunt of the US's tripledemic, after lockdowns left them without proper immune defense.Funding Wuhan lab-In 2014, Dr Facui's agency issued a $3.7million grant to EcoHealth Alliance, which some allege was used to support gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV). Huff said he believes that the US government was alerted to the outbreak in August or October of 2019 months before the first clusters were starting to emerge.He quit EcoHealth Alliance in 2016 'due to a large number of ethical concerns with the scientific work and EcoHealth Alliance as a whole.'But in late 2019, he was suddenly offered a position at Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) - and was told he would need top security clearance and a polygraph for the job.Huff now believes he was approached for the role to keep him quiet about the origins of Covid.'It is my belief that people working within the US government potentially identified me as a risk to knowing first-hand that the SARS-CoV-2 disease emergence event was a consequence of the US government's sponsorship of the genetic engineering of SARS-CoV-2 domestically and abroad,' he said in his book.'If I would have accepted the position, then I suspect that DARPA would have disclosed restricted information to me, which would have consequently prevented me from discussing any of this information publicly, like I have been and am doing now.'About a month after the pandemic began in the early months of 2020, Huff said he was 'adamant that SARS-CoV-2 was a manmade agent.''I suddenly realized what the potential motivation and persistence for recruiting me were,' he said.'The intelligence community realized that I was the only person in a senior position that had left EHA, and the fact I was working outside the government's control made me a threat to their agenda.'Huff believes government officials offered him the role so he could be 'sworn into silence for the rest of my life.'As he began to unravel the alleged cover-up by the US government, he claims that authorities have launched a massive campaign of harassment against him.He claimed military-grade drones would often appear at his home, he was stalked at the supermarket, and he was followed by unknown vehicles.Huff has since filed a lawsuit with Renz Law LLC against EcoHealth Alliance in the state of New York.In September, Huff tweeted: 'Below is link to the copy of the report about the REAL Origin of SARS-CoV2 sent to the US Senate and Congress.'My declaration in the document was provided under oath with penalty of perjury.'The document issued by Renz Law LLC states: 'Donald Trump, Senator Ron Johnson, Senator Rand Paul, Rep. Jim Jordan and others were right.'As early as later April or early May 2020 former President Trump spoke of the creation of SARS-CoV-2 in a lab in Wuhan, China.'Since that time both the investigation and the cover-up have continued but the evidence provided herein clearly demonstrates that SARS-CoV-2 was indeed created in a lab in Wuhan China by EcoHealth Alliance and with funding from Anthony Fauci's NIH/NIAID.The document goes on to say that the evidence gathered hopes to back five statements of claim.'SARS-CoV-2 was created in lab in Wuhan China, Anthony Fauci funded the creation of SARS-CoV-2 and lied to Congress about funding gain-of-function work, the US intelligence community was aware of and appeared to have been involved with the funding of said gain-of-function work,' it read.'A number of well-connected public and private partners were involved in gain-of-function work that resulted in the creation and release of SARS-CoV-2 and Anthony Fauci and other coordinated to cover-up the funding of the gain-of-function work which resulted in SARS-CoV-2.' It goes on to say that the expectations are that there will be a 'immediate investigation that will see bi-partisan support in light of this newly compiled information.''Renz Law and Make Americans Free Again (MAFA) will provide any and all support possible in such an investigation and prosecutions,' the document continues.Official records show EcoHealth Alliance has received seven grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) since June 2020 for research into animal-borne viruses in Asia and Africa 'Further, with the additional high-profile revelations that certain segments of the government have promoted censoring this information, presumably as part of the cover up, we will voluntarily support any good faith efforts by the media to correct the record.'[We] will continue to seek truth and justice in this matter for all that have been impacted by the worst man-made pandemic in human history.'Huff provided a declaration alongside the documents stating that he would attest a true and accurate representation of facts and experiences.In October, DailyMail.com revealed that EcoHealth Alliance had been handed nearly $7 million in taxpayer's money during the pandemic.Official records show EcoHealth Alliance has received seven grants from the NIH since June 2020 for research into animal-borne viruses in Asia and Africa.Four of those grants were handed to the non-profit after it was uncovered EcoHealth Alliance channeled funds to the Chinese laboratory in Wuhan, the epicenter of the pandemic.It also collaborated on controversial virus-tinkering research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which some scientists fear led to the Covid crisis.Dr Peter Daszak, a British zoologist who was accused of trying to cover-up serious inquiry into the so-called lab leak theory, is listed as the project lead on a majority of the research programs.Tennessee Republican Senator Marsha Blackburn told DailyMail.com: 'EcoHealth Alliance has still not answered key questions about its role in the pandemic.'They should be held to account and not be receiving taxpayers' dollars until a full investigation is complete.'Who IS Peter Daszak? The frog-focused zoologist and friend of Dr Anthony Fauci-One of the most stringent deniers of the man-made hypothesis is British zoologist Dr Peter Daszak (pictured), who is known among friends as a 'funny northerner' but considered a potential orchestrator of the pandemic by advocates of the lab-leak theory-The debate around the origins of Covid has been ongoing since the virus first began causing chaos in early 2020.Some top virologists believe the coronavirus spread to humans from an infected animal, potentially in a wet market in the Chinese city of Wuhan.Others think it leaked from a secretive laboratory in the same city. Whether or not it was deliberate or accidental is an even more contentious part of the 'lab leak' theory.One of the most stringent deniers of the man-made hypothesis is British zoologist Dr Peter Daszak, who is known among friends as a 'funny northerner' but considered a potential orchestrator of the pandemic by advocates of the lab-leak theory.He became renowned for his role in facilitating 'risky' coronavirus research in China through EcoHealth Alliance, the non-profit he is president of.The New York-based organisation has secured $60million (£53million) of US Government funds for scientific research over the past decade.Some of this cash, it has emerged, has since ended up in the pocket of researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), the lab at the centre of lab leak claims. Some of this research involved manipulating Covid-like viruses.Now, it has been revealed that EcoHealth Alliance has gained another $650,000 (£580,000) from the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) to trawl through caves in Southeast Asia looking for bats carrying coronaviruses, despite fears similar work sparked the pandemic.The new contract gives the green light to project leader Dr Daszak and his team to analyse the behaviour and environmental risk factors for coronaviruses to spillover into humans from animals.It warns that that part of the world has a 'high diversity of wildlife coronaviruses' and a large proportion of the population is regularly exposed to wildlife that could be infected. Myanmar, Laos and Vietnam are particularly high risk, according to the project details published by the US National Institutes of Health. Over the course of five years, the team will identify cases where people become infected with coronaviruses, assess the risk and drivers of community transmission and spread and test public health interventions to contain an outbreak.Scientists argue such research is vital to contain diseases like Covid. But others have raised alarm over its potential involvement in outbreaks.The latest contract puts the spotlight back on Dr Daszak, who hails from the mining town Dukinfield, on the outskirts of Manchester.The researcher, who grew up with a younger brother, Ukrainian father and Welsh mother, studied zoology at the University of Bangor in Wales and the University of East London.The expert in zoonosis — the spread of viruses from animals to humans — has authored more than 300 scientific papers over his career, which has spanned more than three decades, and seen him become friendly with Dr Anthony Fauci, chief medical advisor to the US President. Dr Daszak, who lives in New York with his wife Janet, joined EcoHealth — formerly The Wildlife Trust — in 2001. His early career focused on diseases spread by frogs.But he has also worked with researchers in China for 15 years, including Dr Shi Zhengli, a virologist at the WIV nicknamed 'Bat Woman'.EcoHealth, which originally focused on conservation, now works around the world to find out the origins of viruses, map where they have spread and analyse them to find out where the next outbreak could occur. Records show Dr Daszak raked in millions of dollars' worth of grants from US Government bodies on behalf of EcoHealth alliance and was paid $354,000 (£314,000) in 2019.This funding was often dished out to other laboratories, including the WIV, to conduct research in mines to examine bat coronaviruses.The partnership saw researchers sample thousands of bats and determine that Sars originated in horseshoe bats, which are common in southern and central China and traded in wet markets.And two years before Covid emerged, Dr Daszak proposed working with WIV scientists to alter coronaviruses and release them into bats as part of a plan to inoculate them against the virus. The most recent NIH grant awarded to EchoHealth Alliance came on September 21. The $653,392 package went towards studying Covid-like viruses in bats across Asia and Africa.That five-year experiment will likely investigate 'the potential for future bat coronavirus emergence', with scientists set to trawl caves in Myanmar, Laos and Vietnam in the hunt to prevent another viral crisis.Senator Joni Ernst, an Iowa Republican, told DailyMail.com: 'Giving taxpayer money to EcoHealth to study pandemic prevention is like paying a suspected arsonist to conduct fire safety inspections.' Daszak is a close friend of the US' top Covid doctor Fauci and even thanked him for publicly downplaying theories that Covid may have been created in a lab.EcoHealth Alliance has been receiving federal research funding since 2002.Daszak, who has maintained the view that the coronavirus jumped to humans from animal reservoirs, has a checkered history when it comes to the kind of research that his critics argue helped pave the way for highly transmissible SARS-CoV-2 to escape the safety of a lab.He has been slammed by Republicans in Congress for taking part in GOF research.Those who believed there was a chance the virus escaped from the WIV were cast aside as fringe thinkers, in part due to Daszak's influence in the community of epidemiologists and infectious disease experts.He and fellow infectious disease experts Ralph Baric and Linfa Wang circulated a statement that was later published in The Lancet in which 27 prominent scientists from nine countries to strongly condemned 'conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin.'But Daszak appeared to want to distance himself from the letter after a Freedom of Information Request revealed that he and his fellows 'should not sign this statement, so it has some distance from us and therefore doesn't work in a counterproductive way.'Dr Richard Horton, editor of The Lancet, said in December 2021 that it took 16 months to publish an official conflict of interest statement in which he revealed Daszak had links to the Wuhan Institute of Virology.Despite charges of having a conflict of interest, given that his organization had worked with the WIV on coronavirus research in the past, Daszak was appointed to the World Health Organization's team charged with going to China to investigate the origin of the virus.The WHO dispelled those claims though, saying that 'all declared interests were assessed and found not to interfere with the independence and transparency of the work.'Officials in the Trump and Biden administrations have said the Chinese government worked to thwart investigations into the origins of the virus and hoodwinked WHO investigators when they arrived.Daszak revealed in March 2021 that he and the team took China's word for it when officials there insisted that the virus could not have escaped from their lab.'We met with them. We said, 'Do you audit the lab?' And they said, 'Annually.' 'Did you audit it after the outbreak?' 'Yes.' 'Was anything found?' 'No.' 'Do you test your staff?' 'Yes.' No one was —' Daszak said.In response to Lesley Stahl, who said he was taking the Chinese researcher's word for it, Daszak said, 'Well, what else can we do?''We asked them tough questions. They weren't vetted in advance. And the answers they gave, we found to be believable, correct and convincing,' Daszak said.In April 2020, former President Donald Trump chose to axe Daszak's grant awarded in 2019 over unsubstantiated claims that the virus leaked from the Wuhan lab that employs a Chinese virologist who had been receiving funding from the grant.'NIH got it right when it canceled the funding for the experiments EcoHealth Alliance was conducting with China's state-run Wuhan Institute,' Ernst said.She added, 'In addition to violating multiple federal laws, EcoHealth has still not turned over documents about these dangerous studies that NIH has requested on multiple occasions that could offer vital clues to the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic.'Source: dailymail.co.uk

2ND MASS SHOOTING IN 2 DAYS IN LIBERALLY DEMOCRAPS CALIFORNIA-17 DEAD 11 INJURED IN THE 2 MASS MURDERERS SO FA

JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.GET SAVED NOW- CALL ON JESUS TODAY.THE ONLY SAVIOR OF THE WHOLE EARTH - NO OTHER. 1 COR 15:23-JESUS THE FIRST FRUITS-CHRISTIANS RAPTURED TO JESUS-FIRST FRUITS OF THE SPIRIT-23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.ROMANS 8:23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.(THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE)

 2ND MASS SHOOTING IN 2 DAYS IN LIBERALLY DEMOCRAPS CALIFORNIA-17 DEAD 11 INJURED IN THE 2 MASS MURDERERS SO FAR.

‘Disgruntled’ Farm Worker Accused of Killing 7 in Latest Mass Shooting Horror-Brett Bachman, AJ McDougall-Mon, January 23, 2023 at 8:47 PM EST·
At least seven people are dead after yet another mass shooting—this one in Half Moon Bay, California, a small town just south of San Francisco.

The shooting occurred around 2:20 p.m. at two separate locations, police said. Four victims were found at a mushroom farm off Highway 92, while two more people were killed at another agricultural facility between one and three miles away. A third victim at this second location was rushed to the hospital in critical condition and later died.A fourth person there was shot and hospitalized with “life-threatening injuries,” police said.The San Mateo County Sheriff's Office said a suspect, a 67-year-old Half Moon Bay resident named Zhao Chunli, turned himself in to authorities around 4:40 p.m. Police released what they identified as Zhao’s driver’s license photo shortly after.The weapon used in the shooting was found in Zhao’s vehicle, with Sheriff Christina Corpus describing it as a “semi-automatic handgun” in a press conference on Monday evening.Corpus said that Zhao was fully cooperating with authorities. A motive in the shooting had not yet been established, she added, but said that he was “believed to be a worker” at one of the targeted businesses.Zhao was characterized as a “disgruntled worker” by David Pine, the president of San Mateo County Board of Supervisors, according to the Associated Press.“This is a devastating tragedy for this community, and the families touched by this unspeakable act of violence,” said Corpus, who was sworn in as county sheriff just a few weeks ago. She said she hadn’t spoken with any of the victims’ relatives yet, with police waiting for positive identifications to be made by the coroner’s office. #UPDATE Sources tell our @nbcbayarea investigative unit 7 people were killed. 4 people at the farm. 3 at a trucking company, about 2 miles away. https://t.co/k9wQc9ZzA9— Janelle Wang (@janellewang) January 24, 2023-Local media outlets, including KGO-TV, were on hand to film the arrest, which was made without incident in the parking lot of a sheriff substation. Footage shows a man in a white baseball hat being pulled to the ground by officers, who then place him in handcuffs, haul him up, and lead him away.“There is no ongoing threat to the community at this time,” the sheriff’s office wrote in a tweet minutes later.Debbie Ruddock, a city councilwoman representing Half Moon Bay’s population of roughly 12,000 people, said the victims were all Chinese farmworkers.An investigation into the shooting was ongoing Monday night, with the FBI assisting the San Mateo County Sheriff’s Office, the federal agency said on Twitter.A family reunification center was set up at the IDES Hall in Half Moon Bay, on Main Street.The country's latest deadly mass shooting took place less than two days after 11 people were killed at a ballroom dance studio in Monterey Park, around 380 miles away, in the midst of the community’s Lunar New Year celebrations. The suspect in that Saturday night shooting died of a self-inflicted gunshot after a standoff with a SWAT team.In the 23 days of the new year, there have been 38 mass shootings in the United States, according to data collected by the Gun Violence Archive. Monday’s marked the sixth instance of what the non-profit research group called “mass murders,” which it defined as a shooting with four or more victims, in 2023 so far.A suspect is now in custody in the Half Moon Bay shootings. Here's the intense moment it happened - caught on video by our @abc7newsbayarea camera pic.twitter.com/1ZGcLh8Byz— Liz Kreutz (@ABCLiz) January 24, 2023-Speaking at the Monday evening press conference, Pine, the president of the board of supervisors, condemned the recent spate of gun violence in particularly fierce terms.“Gun violence in this country is at completely unacceptable levels,” he said. “It’s really hit home tonight. Our hearts are broken... But in the end, there are simply too many guns in this country. And there has to be a change. this is not an acceptable way for a modern society to live, to conduct its affairs.”Elected officials at the state and local level alike had been quick to join in on grieving the shooting in the hours that followed the attack.“At the hospital meeting with victims of a mass shooting when I get pulled away to be briefed about another shooting,” California Gov. Gavin Newsom had tweeted on Monday afternoon. “This time in Half Moon Bay. Tragedy upon tragedy.”“Two hours ago I joined my colleagues on the Capitol steps for a vigil for the victims of the shooting in Monterey Park,” tweeted Marc Berman, a Democrat serving on the California State Assembly. “Before we’ve even had a chance to mourn them, there is yet another mass shooting — this time in Half Moon Bay. In my district.”President Joe Biden had been briefed on the shooting by Dr. Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall, his Homeland Security adviser, the White House said.Biden “has asked federal law enforcement to provide any necessary assistance to the local authorities,” Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre tweeted. “As more details become available, the President will be updated.”

Monday, January 23, 2023

MY MOHAWK RACEWAY PREDICTIONS 2023 RD 013 MON JAN 23, 2023

    MOHAWK STANDARDBREAD HARNESS RACEWAY 2023 - RESULTS AS OF MON JAN-23, 2023 - DAY-013

MOHAWK PICKS
01-7-5-3-0 P-5.20 - 5.20
02-6-2-3-0
03-6-3-7-8 MEX-37.00 - 42.20
04-5-6-7-4 4TH (11-1), MEX-11.60 - 53.80
05-9-2-7-6 4TH WBP (2-1)
06-7-3-6-1 S-3.50, 4TH WBP (5-1) - 57.30
07-6-1-3-2 W-2.90, 4TH WBP (11-1) - 60.20
08-1-5-2-0
09-4-2-3-6 P-4.10, 4TH WBP (5.2), MSUP-77.10 - 141.40
10-8-7-3-2 4TH WBP (9-1)
11-9-5-10-8-1 4TH (7-1)
MOHAWKS TONIGHTS TOTAL $141.40 OVERALL TOTAL $3,259.70

STANS PICKS
01-5-2-7-3-4 MEX-42.20 - 42.20
02-6-5-2-1-7 P-6.00, 4TH (11-1) - 48.20
03-3-6-7-4-5 W-9.20, P-4.70, 4TH WBP (6-1), SEX-37.00, MSUP-374.65 - 473.75
04-5-7-6-9-4
05-9-5-6-2-7 4TH WBP (8.5)
06-3-7-2-1-5 W-10.60, 4TH WBP (5-1) - 484.35
07-6-7-3-1-10 W-2.90, DD-24.30 - 511.55
08-5-2-1-6-7 W-6.70, P-8.60, 4TH WBP (9.5), SEX-51.40, MSUP-165.90, DD-7.50, P3-38.50 - 790.15
09-4-3-1-6-5 4TH WBP (5.2)
10-1-2-3-7-6
11-1-9-7-5-8 4TH WBP (1-1)
HI-5 MONEY BEFORE TONIGHT = $175,467.90
STANS TONIGHTS TOTAL $790.15 OVERALL TOTAL $6,246.85

ACTUAL RACE RESULTS
01-2 (9.2)-5 (9.2)-8 (16-1)-7 (8.5) (6-SCR) (5-1P2 FOR INT)
02-7 (3-1)-5 (7-1)-6 (6.5)-1 (11-1) (4-SCR)
03-3 (7.2)-6 (7.2)-4 (6-1)-7 (8-1)
04-6 (7.2)-5 (4.5)-1 (75-1)-4 (11-1) (10-REF-SCR)
05-6 (2-1)-7 (9.2)-2 (8.5)-1 (58-1)
06-3 (4-1)-1 (5-1)-6 (9.2)-5 (3-1)
07-6 (2.5)-2 (11-1)-8 (39-1)-7 (41-1)
08-5 (2-1)-2 (9-1)-6 (9.5)-1 (5-1) (3-SCR)
09-6 (5.2)-2 (9.2)-4 (3.5)-3 (8-1)
10-2 (9-1)-8 (6-1)-6 (7-1)-1 (8-1)
11-5 (1-1)-7 (4-1)-2 (40-1)-8 (7-1)-10 (11-1) (4-SCR)

MOHAWK PREDICTIONS)-RECORD 2023

01-037-BIG-$10.20 (JAN 06-11TH) (4-1), $08.60 (JAN 21-11TH) (3-1), $08.20 (JAN 20-3RD) (3-1),   
02-024-BIG-$08.20 (JAN 14-6TH) (10-1), $06.60 (JAN 02-10TH) (5-1), $06.20 (JAN 06-7TH) (6-1),
03-029-BIG-$08.20 (JAN 21-8TH) (19-1), $05.30 (JAN 20-6TH) (7-1), $05.10 (JAN 02-2ND) (7-1),
04-016-BIG-24-1 (JAN 19-1ST), 20-1 (JAN 16-3RD), 16-1 (JAN 13-2ND), 13-1 (JAN 02-7TH),
04-047-W B P-BIG-19-1 (JAN 06-4TH), 16-1 (JAN 21-4TH), 13-1 (JAN 05-3RD), 12-1 (JAN 09-2ND),
S EX-015-BIG-$39.10 (JAN 06-7TH)
M EX-011-BIG-$43.70 (JAN 05-10TH)
S TRI-007-BIG-$59.75 (JAN 20-3RD)
M TRI-008-BIG-$45.95 (JAN 09-11TH)
S SUP-001-BIG-$24.00 (JAN 13-2ND)
M SUP-007-BIG-$480.15 (JAN 20-7TH)
DD-1,2-01-BIG-$19.10 (JAN 06-1ST)
DD-2,3-00-BIG-$
DD-3,4-00-BIG-$
DD-4,5-00-BIG-$
DD-5,6-02-BIG-$12.80 (JAN 05-6TH)
DD-6,7-02-BIG-$09.10 (JAN 07-7TH)
DD-7,8-02-BIG-$13.30 (JAN 07-8TH)
DD-8,9-01-BIG-$19.60 (JAN 21-9TH)
DD-9,10-01-BIG-$08.70 (JAN 16-10TH)
DD-10,11-00-BIG-$
DD-11,12-01-BIG-$63.90 (JAN 21-12TH)
DD-12,13-00-BIG-$
P3 (1-3)-00-BIG-$
P3 (2-4)-00-BIG-$
P3 (3-5)-00-BIG-$
P3 (4-6)-00-BIG-$
P3 (5-7)-01-BIG-$11.95 (JAN 07-7TH)
P3 (6-8)-01-BIG-$11.65 (JAN 07-8TH)
P3 (7-9)-01-BIG-$15.80 (JAN 21-9TH)
P3 (8-10)-00-BIG-$
P3 (9-11)-00-BIG-$
P3 (10-12)-00-BIG-$
P3 (11-13)-00-BIG-$
P4 (4-7)-00-BIG-$
P4 (7-10)-00-BIG-$
P5 (1-5)-00-BIG-$
P5 (6-10)-00-BIG-$
10TH -P5 (HF)-S-00-BIG-$
10TH -P5 (HF)-M-00-BIG-$
11TH -P5 (HF)-S-00-BIG-$
11TH -P5 (HF)-M-01-BIG-$124.00 (JAN 20-11TH)
12TH -P5 (HF)-S-00-BIG-$
12TH -P5 (HF)-M-00-BIG-$
13TH -P5 (HF)-S-00-BIG-$
13TH -P5 (HF)-M-00-BIG-$
5-1+ LONG-(02)-47
5-1+ LONG TOT-(12)-147-32.0%
LONGEST LONG-
LONGS THIS NIGHT T3-0
4TH PLACE PICKED CORRECT-0
4TH PLACE WRONG BUT PICKED 5-1+ ONLY-0
PICK 4 PLACINGS-28-44
OA PICK 4 PLAC TOT-315-480-65.6%
TOTAL RACES-(11)-120
TOP 4 PICKS EACH RACE-01-02,02-01,03-03,04-03,05-03,06-03,07-02,08-03,09-04,10-02,11-02,12-00,13-00=28-44-OATOT-315-480-65.6%


(STANS PREDICTIONS)-RECORD AT MOHAWK 2023

01-031-BIG-$34.30 (JAN 02-10TH) (16-1), $20.60 (JAN 14-8TH) (9-1), $12.00 (JAN 05-9TH) (5-1),
02-019-BIG-$07.30 (JAN 16-3RD) (9-1), $06.10 (JAN 02-2ND) (10-1), $06.00 (JAN 23-2ND) (7-1),
03-015-BIG-$06.50 (JAN 05-7TH) (9-1), $06.00 (JAN 14-11TH) (9-1), $05.10 (JAN 20-1ST) (9-1),
04-016-BIG-50-1 (JAN 05-1ST), 28-1 (JAN 21-4TH), 28-1 (JAN 16-4TH), 26-1 (JAN 06-4TH),
04-048-W B P-BIG-38-1 (JAN 21-8TH), 35-1 (JAN 02-6TH), 22-1 (JAN 19-1ST), 14-1 (JAN 05-2ND),
S EX-009-BIG-$51.40 (JAN 23-08TH)
M EX-007-BIG-$42.20 (JAN 23-1ST)
S TRI-001-BIG-$14.00 (JAN 09-9TH)
M TRI-005-BIG-$72.30 (JAN 14-6TH)
S SUP-001-BIG-$40.00 (JAN 09-9TH)
M SUP-006-BIG-$2,709.00 (JAN 20-6TH)
DD-1,2-01-BIG-$12.30 (JAN 21-2ND)
DD-2,3-00-BIG-$
DD-3,4-00-BIG-$
DD-4,5-01-BIG-$13.90 (JAN 20-5TH)
DD-5,6-00-BIG-$
DD-6,7-01-BIG-$24.30 (JAN 23-7TH)
DD-7,8-01-BIG-$08.20 (JAN 21-8TH)
DD-8,9-02-BIG-$91.60 (JAN 14-9TH)
DD-9,10-01-BIG-$82.90 (JAN 05-10TH)
DD-10,11-00-BIG-$
DD-11,12-00-BIG-$
DD-12,13-00-BIG-$
P3 (1-3)-00-BIG-$
P3 (2-4)-00-BIG-$
P3 (3-5)-00-BIG-$
P3 (4-6)-00-BIG-$
P3 (5-7)-00-BIG-$
P3 (6-8)-01-BIG-$38.50 (JAN 23-8TH)
P3 (7-9)-01-BIG-$15.80 (JAN 21-9TH)
P3 (8-10)-00-BIG-$
P3 (9-11)-00-BIG-$
P3 (10-12)-00-BIG-$
P3 (11-13)-00-BIG-$
P4 (4-7)-00-BIG-$
P4 (7-10)-00-BIG-$
P5 (1-5)-00-BIG-$
P5 (6-10)-00-BIG-$
10TH -P5 (HF)-S-00-BIG-$
10TH -P5 (HF)-M-00-BIG-$
11TH -P5 (HF)-S-00-BIG-$
11TH -P5 (HF)-M-02-BIG-$1,151.25 (JAN 14-11TH)
12TH -P5 (HF)-S-00-BIG-$
12TH -P5 (HF)-M-00-BIG-$
13TH -P5 (HF)-S-00-BIG-$
13TH -P5 (HF)-M-00-BIG-$
5-1+ LONG-(03)-44
5-1+ LONG TOT-(12)-147-29.9%
LONGEST LONG-75-1 (JAN 21-3RD),
LONGS THIS NIGHT T3-75-1 (JAN 21-3RD),
4TH PLACE PICKED CORRECT-0
4TH PLACE WRONG BUT PICKED 5-1+ ONLY-0
PICK 4 PLACINGS-29-44
OA PICK 4 PLAC TOT-286-480-59.6%
TOTAL RACES-(11)-120
TOP 4 PICKS EACH RACE-01-03,02-03,03-04,04-02,05-02,06-02,07-02,08-04,09-03,10-02,11-02,12-00,13-00=29-44-OATOT-286-480-59.6%

Sunday, January 22, 2023

10 DEAD IN MASS SHOOTING AT CHINESE NEW YEAR PARTY IN CALIFORNIA.

JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.GET SAVED NOW- CALL ON JESUS TODAY.THE ONLY SAVIOR OF THE WHOLE EARTH - NO OTHER. 1 COR 15:23-JESUS THE FIRST FRUITS-CHRISTIANS RAPTURED TO JESUS-FIRST FRUITS OF THE SPIRIT-23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.ROMANS 8:23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.(THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE)

 10 DEAD IN MASS SHOOTING AT CHINESE NEW YEAR PARTY IN CALIFORNIA.

NBC News-10 people killed in mass shooting at dance club near Los Angeles after Lunar New Year celebrations-Linda Takahashi and Cristian Santana and Leila Sackur-Sun, January 22, 2023 at 7:56 AM EST

LOS ANGELES — At least 10 people were killed and at least 10 more injured in a mass shooting in Monterey Park, Calif., late Saturday, the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department said.“Investigators are working every lead on this case,” Capt. Andrew Meyer from the department’s homicide division said at a news conference early Sunday, adding that they were reviewing CCTV footage from near the scene at a ballroom dance club.“We have 10 that are deceased at the scene,” he said, adding that he believed at least 10 people had been taken to hospital with “critical to stable injuries.”Meyer said people were “pouring out of the location screaming” when officers arrived on the scene at around 10:30 p.m. local time (1:30 a.m. ET). He said officers then went into the dance ballroom as firefighters treated the wounded.Police and fire units could be seen swarming the area in video posted to social media. Others showed victims being transferred to ambulances.Meyer said the male suspect fled the scene and remains at large. More information about the suspect would be provided once it became available, he said.He did not say why investigators gave no information on the incident for hours while the shooter remained on the run.“As far as the suspect knowing any of the victims, it’s too early the investigation to know that,” he said, adding that it was also too early to know what the motive is.He said police were investigating another incident in the nearby city of Alhambra to see whether it was connected.The shooting came after thousands of people had gathered for a Lunar New Year Festival in the small city around 10 miles east of Los Angeles of about 60,000 people with a large Asian population.The two-day event features “food booths with various types of delectable items, amusement rides, and lots of live entertainment,” according to the city’s website.Meyer said that police “will look at every angle as far as whether it was a hate crime or not,” but added that it was too early in the investigation to know whether the incident was racially motivated.The event was canceled Sunday out of respect for the victims, Chief Scott Wiese of the Monterey Park Police Department, told the news conference.Simu Liu, who portrays the warrior Shang-Chi in Marvel’s first Asian superhero movie, tweeted that he was “shocked and saddened” by the incident.“It’s home of Asian American families, parents, grandparents, siblings, sons and daughters, aunts and uncles. All of whom were looking forward to celebrating the New Year this weekend,” he said.The latest violence comes two months after five people were killed at a Colorado Springs nightclub.Linda Takahashi reported from Los Angeles, Cristian Santana from New York and Leila Sackur from London.This article was originally published on NBCNews.com

ALLTIME