KING JESUS IS COMING FOR US ANY TIME NOW. THE RAPTURE. BE PREPARED TO GO.
WHILE I WAS WORKING ON PUTTING THESE STORIES TOGETHER,A NON COINCIDENCE HAPPENED.WHEN I STARTED WORKING ON THE SMART METER STORIES.SUDDENLY MY HYDRO WENT OUT FOR 5 MINUTES.THERES NO STORM OR ANYTHING GOING ON.TO ME THIS IS PROOF THERE WATCHING MY EVERY MOVE.AS THE HYDRO JUST GOES OFF SUDDENLY AND UNEXPECTEDLY WHILE WRITING ABOUT SMART METERS.NO ACCIDENT. PEOPLE BEWARE YOUR HOMES ARE WATCHED AND TRACKED 24 HOURS A DAY WITH THESE SMART METERS. AND THEY CAN TURN YOUR HYDRO OFF ON USE LIKE THEY ARE GIVING ME A WARNING TO SHUT UP ABOUT THE SMART METERS.
NATIONAL WIND WATCH
https://www.wind-watch.org/
The message by itself will not stop the province from approving the proposed Port Ryerse Wind Farm or other projects.But councillors hope the province will take heed of the growing chorus of municipalities asking to put the brakes on Ontario’s push for wind energy.Premier Kathleen Wynne has said her government will not impose wind turbines on areas that aren’t willing hosts. In response, Norfolk has joined 17 municipalities that have declared themselves unwilling hosts.When wind turbines first came to Norfolk about a decade ago, Ontario needed more electricity, Port Dover Coun. John Wells told county council during debate on May 14.
But times have changed.Back then Coun. Wells supported green energy. Now he’s not so sure it’s a good thing.Ontario now has more power than it knows what to do with, he told council.And residents want to know more about possible health effects.“I support the citizens of Norfolk County and what they’re saying is ‘John, let’s wait for more information,’” Coun. Wells said.“What’s the hurry to build more (turbines) when there is not a need?”Port Rowan Coun. Betty Chanyi said turbines in her Houghton neighbourhood have not affected her health.But the neighbourhood is changing, she said. All but one neighbour has moved since turbines arrived.Roads have been “totally destroyed” by large equipment bringing in parts for the turbines, she said.Becoming an unwilling host is worth a try, Simcoe Coun. Charlie Luke said.“If we don’t complain, we will miss our chance and let our residents down,” he said.Coun. Luke said his son-in-law recently saw a steel graveyard of thousands of abandoned wind turbines in California.Dotting Norfolk’s forest, shoreline, small villages and rural setting with steel structures poking out of the natural beauty is “not what I envision this county is about,” Coun. Luke said.Waterford Coun. Harold Sonnenberg said continuing to subsidize wind farms is insanity.County council twice has called for a provincewide moratorium on new wind farms until health effects are known.It also has called for provincial and federal health studies, which are now underway.
Council also is refusing to endorse any new wind projects. Mayor Dennis Travale said provincial legislation says nothing about municipalities being willing or unwilling hosts.However, he said county council will send a clear message by declaring itself an unwilling host.Haldimand soon will declare itself an unwilling host, Mayor Travale said.Source: By DAVID JUDD | Port Dover Maple Leaf | www.portdovermapleleaf.com
TORONTO -- The best approach to dealing with Premier Kathleen
Wynne's first -- and, let us hope, last Liberal budget -- is to treat it
as a work of fiction.It promises not to raise taxes -- for now
-- but makes it clear new "revenue tools" (taxes and tolls) are on their
way, allegedly to pay for transit infrastructure.
It promises the Liberals will balance the budget by 2017-18, but projects the current $9.8-billion provincial deficit will increase by almost 20%, to $11.7 billion, this year.It promises fiscal responsibility, but projects Ontario's total debt will increase by $42 billion, to $323 billion, a 15% increase over the next three years.
It promises to invest in public services, but projects paying interest on debt will be the government's fastest-growing expense, at 5.5% annually, rising to $12.2 billion annually by 2015-16. That will be the government's largest single expenditure, outside of funding health care and education.
It "proposes" an average 15% cut on auto insurance rates for good drivers, but provides no timeline, other than the Liberals' hope premiums will start to fall within a year to 18 months.It promises to listen "to people's ideas and (act) on their concerns," while the Liberals ram industrial wind turbines down the throats of rural Ontarians.It comes from a leader of the Liberal party, Wynne, who claims to know nothing about why her party's political decision to cancel two natural gas plants has cost the public at least $585 million.
If Wynne doesn't know what happened, it's because she chose not to know, to be able to claim "plausible deniability."That's the oldest political trick in the book.What it isn't, is leadership.Finance Minister Charles Sousa told the legislature his first budget "speaks to the priorities and values of our new government and of Ontario's new premier."But Wynne's first budget could have been written by former Liberal premier Dalton McGuinty, who came to power in 2003 by lying to voters, promising not to raise taxes and then imposing the largest single tax grab in Ontario's history.
A decade later, we know this is how Liberals govern.They will say anything, including things they know are untrue when they say them, to get elected and, when caught in their own lies, refuse to take responsibility for them.Now that they need NDP Leader Andrea Horwath's support to ensure their political survival, nothing they say can be trusted.When Horwath first floated her idea of a 15% rate cut on auto insurance rates over one year, Wynne rejected it, claiming the best way to reduce rates was the old insurance industry dodge of reducing fraud, which hasn't worked.But that was then and this is now.Now Wynne is for the very thing she was against a few months ago, provided it wins the support of the NDP, who accuse the minority Liberal government of political corruption every day, while continuing to support it.Simply put, the Liberals are liars and their pants are on fire.Nothing they promise can, or should, be trusted by anyone with a modicum of common sense.After 10 years in power, the Liberals have become so politically corrupt and are trailing so much political baggage -- eHealth, Ornge, cancelled gas plants, skyrocketing hydro bills due to their reckless green energy policies -- that voters need to send them on a long trip.Back to the opposition benches.
And while it will cost us $92 million for an election, it will be well worth it.After all, the Liberals can spill that much over lunch. SMART METERS-DRAMATIC INCREASE IN BILL RATES http://www.stopsmartmetersbc.ca/html/?page_id=3157 RELATED NEWS-SMART METER SCAMS http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Fndf2EciSg http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=csvmw2frBws#! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-b2ZqtW1v4
A
device that can control other energy devices such as thermostats,
lighting, direct load control devices, or distributed energy resource
within the customer premise. These devices may also receive information or control signals from utilities or third-party energy service providers. These devices can help customers manage electricity usage automatically by utilizing information from service providers or preferences set by the customer. "The Smart Grid will enable third parties to peer into your home", says commissioner Ann Cavoukian. (Privacy and Information Commissioner of Ontario) "You can imagine how tempting the marketing opportunities will be."
"A so-called smart grid that is as vulnerable as what we've got is not a smart grid at all. It's a really, really, stupid grid."' former CIA director, James Woolsey. Sept. 2011 (energynow.com/video/2011/08/10/preview-mix-james-woolsey)
"I can state today that under the current circumstances the truth about the biological effects of RF radiation is heavily suppressed with all means – including criminal ones." Professor Franz Adlkofer, coordinator of the European Community's Reflex report http://stopsmartmeters.ca/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UsiTahuKoNI&feature=player_embedded
Although Smart Meters are promoted as energy efficiency components, the actual intent of these meters is to track your use of energy in real time across every 24hr. period, which will allow the provider to bill you for that period at the highest energy rate for the day.They have another purpose: thanks to Smart Meters, every appliance in your home will be monitored.As you will be rationed only so much energy for any 24 hr. period, opening and closing your refridgerator too many times during the daily billing cycle can cause your power to be disrupted. Your use of lights, appliances and even your time on the Net will be charged against your daily allowance of power.Have you seen the ads for the appliances that call for help when they need repairs? Like I need my stove sending out an SOS and having a “repair” man show up because the back burner made an appointment. I don’t want anything in my house that is sending and retrieving messages without my knowledge or consent. And what if the repair man shows up and you don’t want the appliance fixed at that time? Ummmm. No one seems to have the answer to this.Smart Meters are not about energy efficiency or any such nonsense. They are a real-time tracking device that monitors your household and what you do in it as part of the total surveillance system being put in place by the government. This is just another invasion of privacy. Your individual power supply can be disrupted at any time, as well as your whole neighborhood, community or state.Welcome to Smart Grid!
For more information on Smart Meters go to: www.W4AR.com http://stopsmartmeters.org
Video with information regarding health protection against radiation:
http://youtu.be/Ik_jYFlkaQM
http://www.refusesmartmeters.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-nmaY...
WHILE I WAS WORKING ON PUTTING THESE STORIES TOGETHER,A NON COINCIDENCE HAPPENED.WHEN I STARTED WORKING ON THE SMART METER STORIES.SUDDENLY MY HYDRO WENT OUT FOR 5 MINUTES.THERES NO STORM OR ANYTHING GOING ON.TO ME THIS IS PROOF THERE WATCHING MY EVERY MOVE.AS THE HYDRO JUST GOES OFF SUDDENLY AND UNEXPECTEDLY WHILE WRITING ABOUT SMART METERS.NO ACCIDENT. PEOPLE BEWARE YOUR HOMES ARE WATCHED AND TRACKED 24 HOURS A DAY WITH THESE SMART METERS. AND THEY CAN TURN YOUR HYDRO OFF ON USE LIKE THEY ARE GIVING ME A WARNING TO SHUT UP ABOUT THE SMART METERS.
NATIONAL WIND WATCH
https://www.wind-watch.org/
The high cost of wind power
Credit: The Chronicle Journal |
May 23, 2013 |
www.chroniclejournal.com ~~
First of all, I must identify myself as an employee of Ontario
Power Generation, and declare that the views and opinions expressed in
this statement are my own and do not represent OPG in any way.
After reading Bill Scollie’s letter concerning the high cost of wind
power (Wind Farm — We All Pay, May 16), I did a little research.
The weekend of May 11-12 was very windy in most of Ontario, from 7 p.m.
on Friday, May 10 through to midnight of May 12. The Independent
Electricity System Operator (IESO) showed wind produced 58,165 megawatts
of power, beating the old production record several times.
This power cost taxpayers $135 per megawatt, totalling $7,852,276.
At the same time, because wind power has priority over cheaper forms of
electricity production, Ontario had to export 127,361 megawatt hours at
$20.40 per megawatt.
But by far the worst fact about that weekend is that OPG spilled (or
wasted) clean renewable hydro power because of wind priority on the
grid. Here in the Northwest, where 90 per cent or more of our power
comes from water, you can be sure we were spilling water here too.
We could have generated the same amount of power from water for $1,186,500.
The auditor general has stated that wind power is produced out of sync
with demand and that the government did not do a business case study for
its renewable energy program. If they had, would it make any
difference?
Most people understand dollars and cents. People may now realize that
this whole energy fiasco will one day come home to roost. . . in our
wallets.Denis Beaupre-Slate River Norfolk declares itself unwilling to host new wind farms
Credit: By DAVID JUDD |
Port Dover Maple Leaf |
www.portdovermapleleaf.com ~~
Norfolk County has declared itself unwilling to host new industrial wind farms.County council voted 8-1 last Tuesday to notify the provincial
government that it wants no more wind turbines approved for Norfolk.The message by itself will not stop the province from approving the proposed Port Ryerse Wind Farm or other projects.But councillors hope the province will take heed of the growing chorus of municipalities asking to put the brakes on Ontario’s push for wind energy.Premier Kathleen Wynne has said her government will not impose wind turbines on areas that aren’t willing hosts. In response, Norfolk has joined 17 municipalities that have declared themselves unwilling hosts.When wind turbines first came to Norfolk about a decade ago, Ontario needed more electricity, Port Dover Coun. John Wells told county council during debate on May 14.
But times have changed.Back then Coun. Wells supported green energy. Now he’s not so sure it’s a good thing.Ontario now has more power than it knows what to do with, he told council.And residents want to know more about possible health effects.“I support the citizens of Norfolk County and what they’re saying is ‘John, let’s wait for more information,’” Coun. Wells said.“What’s the hurry to build more (turbines) when there is not a need?”Port Rowan Coun. Betty Chanyi said turbines in her Houghton neighbourhood have not affected her health.But the neighbourhood is changing, she said. All but one neighbour has moved since turbines arrived.Roads have been “totally destroyed” by large equipment bringing in parts for the turbines, she said.Becoming an unwilling host is worth a try, Simcoe Coun. Charlie Luke said.“If we don’t complain, we will miss our chance and let our residents down,” he said.Coun. Luke said his son-in-law recently saw a steel graveyard of thousands of abandoned wind turbines in California.Dotting Norfolk’s forest, shoreline, small villages and rural setting with steel structures poking out of the natural beauty is “not what I envision this county is about,” Coun. Luke said.Waterford Coun. Harold Sonnenberg said continuing to subsidize wind farms is insanity.County council twice has called for a provincewide moratorium on new wind farms until health effects are known.It also has called for provincial and federal health studies, which are now underway.
Council also is refusing to endorse any new wind projects. Mayor Dennis Travale said provincial legislation says nothing about municipalities being willing or unwilling hosts.However, he said county council will send a clear message by declaring itself an unwilling host.Haldimand soon will declare itself an unwilling host, Mayor Travale said.Source: By DAVID JUDD | Port Dover Maple Leaf | www.portdovermapleleaf.com
South Huron an “unwilling host” to wind turbines
Credit: By Scott Nixon, Times-Advocate Staff |
May 22, 2013 |
www.southwesternontario.ca ~~
SOUTH HURON — The Municipality of South Huron has officially declared itself an “unwilling host” to industrial wind turbines.Council passed a motion at its May 13 meeting declaring itself an
unwilling host to wind turbines, while also requesting the province give
more say to municipalities regarding municipal planning and site plan
control for future wind and solar projects.As reported in last week’s Times-Advocate, council declined at its
May 6 meeting to declare itself an unwilling host to wind turbines, but
at its May 13 meeting, in front of about 25 anti-wind turbine
protesters, council unanimously declared itself an unwilling host.The audience applauded council for its decision.Coun. Tom Tomes put forth the original motion that council requested
greater say on future turbine projects, explaining that many concerns
about turbines have been raised. He also expressed concern over the
province’s Green Energy Act which took away municipal planning powers
regarding wind and solar projects.“I think the premier made a mistake,” Tomes said.Coun. Bill Francis requested that the motion include the fact that
South Huron is an unwilling host to turbine projects. Tomes agreed and
the motion, which will be sent to Premier Kathleen Wynne and the
Ministry of the Environment, was passed. Source: By Scott Nixon, Times-Advocate Staff |
May 22, 2013 |
www.southwesternontario.ca Green energy projects
HAMILTON TOWNSHIP - Hamilton
Township municipal councillors have voted unanimously to declare the
township an "unwilling host" for any future large, green-energy, solar
and wind projects.It joins Alnwick/Haldimand which took similar action last February.
Alnwick/Haldimand council's motion addresses only industrial wind
turbine farms located on the Oak Ridges Moraine. It also requests a
moratorium on all industrial wind installations until such time as low
frequency noise and infrasound study is reviewed “and mitigated through
the Renewable Energy Approval process” along with “conclusive and
independent clinical health studies that eliminate the potential of
adverse impacts to health, safety and well-being of the public.
Hamilton Township declared itself an “unwilling host” during Tuesday's council session even before holding a much-promised public meeting to ascertain what its citizens actually want. But it has already received criticism about on-going construction of a private, mega-solar farm near Community Centre and Payne roads.The provincial government's Green Energy Act means the ultimate decisions still remain with the government, Deputy Mayor Isobel Hie said, drawing attention to the reality of the power of the motion.
Despite comments made by Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne shortly after assuming office, that people would be consulted first about future infrastructure, no new regulations have been put specifically in place, although municipal "support" for a project now provides a greater score on applications that receive it.
If township residents say at the upcoming public information meeting that they want large solar and wind projects, "we can rescind" the motion about being an "unwilling host," said Councillor Donna Cole who introduced the motion and has been pushing for the designation for months.Cole argued council needs to make its intentions known now before any other contracts are signed.There was significant discussion about whether all solar and wind projects would be unacceptable, even small solar rooftop and small field installations, but Cole finally identified those larger megawatt projects as the ones the township wants to avoid (the exact number was estimated at 10 megawatts – but is to be checked and changed, if necessary).
Mayor Mark Lovshin pointed out that policing small installations, about which council gets no notification, would be impossible."It's showing our due diligence" in letting developers and the provincial government know "our point of view" in passing the motion now, Councillor John Davidson said in supporting Cole's motion.Deputy Mayor Isobel Hie noted that proposals for mega solar and wind projects have already pitted families and neighbours against one another.She was referring to Clean Breeze's now defunct wind tower projects near Grafton and Centreton which a grassroots organization has fought for the past several years, including filing a lawsuit over potential property devaluation due to the proposals."What would it mean to our project here?" asked Councillor Gary Woods, referring to the 2,000-square-foot, $450,000 municipal office expansion at Camborne. Its building committee is examining the installation of solar panels as a way of reducing energy costs and staff are evaluating different options. The solar options for the municipal expansion would not be affected because of the size involved, councillors were told.Cole called for a recorded vote which meant the mayor, who was chairing the meeting and normally only votes in a tie situation, had to vote. Mayor Lovshin joined the rest of council in supporting the "unwilling host" designation.Asked if this motion would impede the township's deal with Northumberland Community Power Co-Operative INC to install a rooftop solar project on the Baltimore Recreation Centre and rent the space for it, chief administrative officer John Baird said this was already in progress and the motion addresses only future projects. The Co-Operative project is expected to generate 217 kilowatts of power and the lease will bring the township $9,796 annually.At the moment, the Co-Operative's board of directors is not contemplating large green energy projects, said one of its spokesmen, Richard Tyssen. There are no other projects proposed in the township at this time, he said.Like Baird, Tyssen did not see the township's "unwilling host" designation by its council as impeding the Baltimore Recreation Centre rooftop project that has received initial notification from the Ontario Power Authority that it is eligible. It will be another 60 days before it knows it has won the competition for connecting the project to the power grid.valerie.macdonald@sunmedia.ca
twitter.com/NT_vmacdonald
Hamilton Township declared itself an “unwilling host” during Tuesday's council session even before holding a much-promised public meeting to ascertain what its citizens actually want. But it has already received criticism about on-going construction of a private, mega-solar farm near Community Centre and Payne roads.The provincial government's Green Energy Act means the ultimate decisions still remain with the government, Deputy Mayor Isobel Hie said, drawing attention to the reality of the power of the motion.
Despite comments made by Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne shortly after assuming office, that people would be consulted first about future infrastructure, no new regulations have been put specifically in place, although municipal "support" for a project now provides a greater score on applications that receive it.
If township residents say at the upcoming public information meeting that they want large solar and wind projects, "we can rescind" the motion about being an "unwilling host," said Councillor Donna Cole who introduced the motion and has been pushing for the designation for months.Cole argued council needs to make its intentions known now before any other contracts are signed.There was significant discussion about whether all solar and wind projects would be unacceptable, even small solar rooftop and small field installations, but Cole finally identified those larger megawatt projects as the ones the township wants to avoid (the exact number was estimated at 10 megawatts – but is to be checked and changed, if necessary).
Mayor Mark Lovshin pointed out that policing small installations, about which council gets no notification, would be impossible."It's showing our due diligence" in letting developers and the provincial government know "our point of view" in passing the motion now, Councillor John Davidson said in supporting Cole's motion.Deputy Mayor Isobel Hie noted that proposals for mega solar and wind projects have already pitted families and neighbours against one another.She was referring to Clean Breeze's now defunct wind tower projects near Grafton and Centreton which a grassroots organization has fought for the past several years, including filing a lawsuit over potential property devaluation due to the proposals."What would it mean to our project here?" asked Councillor Gary Woods, referring to the 2,000-square-foot, $450,000 municipal office expansion at Camborne. Its building committee is examining the installation of solar panels as a way of reducing energy costs and staff are evaluating different options. The solar options for the municipal expansion would not be affected because of the size involved, councillors were told.Cole called for a recorded vote which meant the mayor, who was chairing the meeting and normally only votes in a tie situation, had to vote. Mayor Lovshin joined the rest of council in supporting the "unwilling host" designation.Asked if this motion would impede the township's deal with Northumberland Community Power Co-Operative INC to install a rooftop solar project on the Baltimore Recreation Centre and rent the space for it, chief administrative officer John Baird said this was already in progress and the motion addresses only future projects. The Co-Operative project is expected to generate 217 kilowatts of power and the lease will bring the township $9,796 annually.At the moment, the Co-Operative's board of directors is not contemplating large green energy projects, said one of its spokesmen, Richard Tyssen. There are no other projects proposed in the township at this time, he said.Like Baird, Tyssen did not see the township's "unwilling host" designation by its council as impeding the Baltimore Recreation Centre rooftop project that has received initial notification from the Ontario Power Authority that it is eligible. It will be another 60 days before it knows it has won the competition for connecting the project to the power grid.valerie.macdonald@sunmedia.ca
twitter.com/NT_vmacdonald
Drowning in debt Ontario Liberals need to go - 7:09 pm, May 2nd, 2013
It promises the Liberals will balance the budget by 2017-18, but projects the current $9.8-billion provincial deficit will increase by almost 20%, to $11.7 billion, this year.It promises fiscal responsibility, but projects Ontario's total debt will increase by $42 billion, to $323 billion, a 15% increase over the next three years.
It promises to invest in public services, but projects paying interest on debt will be the government's fastest-growing expense, at 5.5% annually, rising to $12.2 billion annually by 2015-16. That will be the government's largest single expenditure, outside of funding health care and education.
It "proposes" an average 15% cut on auto insurance rates for good drivers, but provides no timeline, other than the Liberals' hope premiums will start to fall within a year to 18 months.It promises to listen "to people's ideas and (act) on their concerns," while the Liberals ram industrial wind turbines down the throats of rural Ontarians.It comes from a leader of the Liberal party, Wynne, who claims to know nothing about why her party's political decision to cancel two natural gas plants has cost the public at least $585 million.
If Wynne doesn't know what happened, it's because she chose not to know, to be able to claim "plausible deniability."That's the oldest political trick in the book.What it isn't, is leadership.Finance Minister Charles Sousa told the legislature his first budget "speaks to the priorities and values of our new government and of Ontario's new premier."But Wynne's first budget could have been written by former Liberal premier Dalton McGuinty, who came to power in 2003 by lying to voters, promising not to raise taxes and then imposing the largest single tax grab in Ontario's history.
A decade later, we know this is how Liberals govern.They will say anything, including things they know are untrue when they say them, to get elected and, when caught in their own lies, refuse to take responsibility for them.Now that they need NDP Leader Andrea Horwath's support to ensure their political survival, nothing they say can be trusted.When Horwath first floated her idea of a 15% rate cut on auto insurance rates over one year, Wynne rejected it, claiming the best way to reduce rates was the old insurance industry dodge of reducing fraud, which hasn't worked.But that was then and this is now.Now Wynne is for the very thing she was against a few months ago, provided it wins the support of the NDP, who accuse the minority Liberal government of political corruption every day, while continuing to support it.Simply put, the Liberals are liars and their pants are on fire.Nothing they promise can, or should, be trusted by anyone with a modicum of common sense.After 10 years in power, the Liberals have become so politically corrupt and are trailing so much political baggage -- eHealth, Ornge, cancelled gas plants, skyrocketing hydro bills due to their reckless green energy policies -- that voters need to send them on a long trip.Back to the opposition benches.
And while it will cost us $92 million for an election, it will be well worth it.After all, the Liberals can spill that much over lunch.
Energy Management Device
"A so-called smart grid that is as vulnerable as what we've got is not a smart grid at all. It's a really, really, stupid grid."' former CIA director, James Woolsey. Sept. 2011 (energynow.com/video/2011/08/10/preview-mix-james-woolsey)
"I can state today that under the current circumstances the truth about the biological effects of RF radiation is heavily suppressed with all means – including criminal ones." Professor Franz Adlkofer, coordinator of the European Community's Reflex report
Smart Meters: We can monitor everything you do in your home (Video)
Marti Oakley Activist Post June 29, 2011-infowars.comhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UsiTahuKoNI&feature=player_embedded
Although Smart Meters are promoted as energy efficiency components, the actual intent of these meters is to track your use of energy in real time across every 24hr. period, which will allow the provider to bill you for that period at the highest energy rate for the day.They have another purpose: thanks to Smart Meters, every appliance in your home will be monitored.As you will be rationed only so much energy for any 24 hr. period, opening and closing your refridgerator too many times during the daily billing cycle can cause your power to be disrupted. Your use of lights, appliances and even your time on the Net will be charged against your daily allowance of power.Have you seen the ads for the appliances that call for help when they need repairs? Like I need my stove sending out an SOS and having a “repair” man show up because the back burner made an appointment. I don’t want anything in my house that is sending and retrieving messages without my knowledge or consent. And what if the repair man shows up and you don’t want the appliance fixed at that time? Ummmm. No one seems to have the answer to this.Smart Meters are not about energy efficiency or any such nonsense. They are a real-time tracking device that monitors your household and what you do in it as part of the total surveillance system being put in place by the government. This is just another invasion of privacy. Your individual power supply can be disrupted at any time, as well as your whole neighborhood, community or state.Welcome to Smart Grid!
For more information on Smart Meters go to: www.W4AR.com
Video with information regarding health protection against radiation:
http://youtu.be/Ik_jYFlkaQM
http://www.refusesmartmeters.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-nmaY...
