TOMORROWS NEWS.MAY 13,26

JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.GET SAVED NOW- CALL ON JESUS TODAY.THE ONLY SAVIOR OF THE WHOLE EARTH - NO OTHER. 1 COR 15:23-JESUS THE FIRST FRUITS-CHRISTIANS RAPTURED TO JESUS-FIRST FRUITS OF THE SPIRIT-23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.ROMANS 8:23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.(THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE)

TOMORROWS NEWS.MAY 13,26

DEMOCRAT CALIFORNIA MAYOR RESIGNS AFTER BEING OUTED AS A CHINESE SPY.

COMMITTEE ON THE COVID SCAM. WHISTLE BLOWER TELLS ALL.

COMEY, BRENNAN,FAUCI T-RUMP D-ERANGEMENT S-YNDROME HATERS ARE IN HOT WATER.

CIA officers questioned amid FBI’s John Brennan Russiagate probe: sources-NY Post-Josh Christenson-Tue, May 12, 2026 at 11:30 AM EDT

WASHINGTON — Current and former CIA employees are being interviewed as part of an FBI probe into ex-agency Director John Brennan’s handling of a 2016 investigation of purported collusion between then-GOP candidate Donald Trump’s presidential campaign and Russia, The Post has learned.Agents from the bureau’s Miami field office sat down with the workers at the CIA’s headquarters in McLean, Va., last week, with more interviews expected in the next few weeks, Justice Department sources said.Several of the CIA employees had worked on a controversial intelligence report produced under Brennan that assessed that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to benefit Trump, the sources added. Reuters first reported on the sit-downs.
Current and former CIA employees are being interviewed as part of an FBI criminal probe into ex-agency Director John Brennan, The Post has learned. AP-South Florida US Attorney Jason Reding Quiñones has been overseeing a sprawling investigation into Brennan and other officials in the Obama administration who were involved in the 2017 intelligence assessment, as well as investigating alleged collusion between Trump’s campaign and Russia.Both Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard and House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) made criminal referrals to the DOJ last year regarding Brennan’s role in the investigation.Gabbard released more than 100 internal government documents showing President Barack Obama ordered the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment after having heard from national security officials that Moscow and other foreign adversaries’ cyberattacks didn’t alter the presidential contest between Trump and Hillary Clinton.The criminal referrals cited evidence that Brennan falsely testified to Congress in 2023 that the CIA was “very much opposed” to using information from a now-discredited dossier, authored by ex-MI6 spy Christopher Steele, in the assessment.In fact,veteran CIA officials warned Brennan about the risks of releasing a “substandard” intelligence product, but Brennan pushed back in a December 2016 email exchange to the agency’s deputy director of analysis, saying of the Steele dossier: “I believe that the information warrants inclusion.”Both Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan made criminal referrals to the DOJ last year regarding Brennan’s role in the Obama-era Trump-Russia probe. AP-Asked about the dossier’s failure to meet “basic tradecraft standards,” a House Intelligence Committee investigation found, Brennan responded, “Yes, but doesn’t it ring true?”The ex-CIA director told the House Judiciary Committee on May 11, 2023, that “the CIA was very much opposed to having any reference or inclusion of theSteele dossier in the Intelligence Community Assessment.”That statement falls within the five-year statute of limitations should prosecutors charge Brennan with lying to Congress while under oath.The Obama-ordered ICA determined that “Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability” and that Russian President Vladimir Putin had a “clear preference for President-elect Trump.”A 2020 House Intelligence Committee report contradicted this, noting that Putin’s “principal motivations in these operations were to undermine faith in the US democratic process.”The Russian president also expected Clinton to win in 2016 and held back on “some compromising material for post-election use against the expected Clinton administration,” the House report stated.President Trump has railed against Brennan, former FBI Director James Comey, ex-DNI James Clapper and others for perpetrating a “hoax” on the American people by pushing the 2017 intelligence assessment.As of July 2025, Brennan claimed that the FBI hadn’t contacted him or his lawyers about the investigation.His defense lawyers, in a December letter to South Florida US District Chief Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga, confirmed that Brennan was a target of a probe into “the circumstances surrounding the production of the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment about Russian efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election in the United States.”Brennan’s lawyer did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The FBI declined to comment. Reps for the DOJ did not respond to a request for comment.

CIA whistleblower will allege ‘deep state still hiding origins’ of COVID at hearing, says Sen. Rand Paul-NY Post-Steven Nelson-Tue, May 12, 2026 at 6:38 PM EDT

WASHINGTON — Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) told The Post that a longtime CIA employee will allege an ongoing “deep state” conspiracy to cover up the origins of COVID-19 during a public hearing Wednesday.The two-decade CIA veteran was detailed to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), where he worked on a recently disbanded “director’s initiative group” that studied the how the pandemic started in Wuhan, China, Paul said in an interview.“He believes that there are people still within the CIA that were trying to obscure the truth, trying to withhold documents, and he will also testify that the CIA actually were spying on his group and eavesdropping on his group,” Paul said.It’s unclear when the CIA allegedly spied on the ODNI review group or what evidence may be presented.The witness also is expected to testify that the CIA’s leadership in 2021 quashed an expert assessment that COVID-19 likely leaked from a Wuhan lab — resulting in the spy agency not making that finding until last year long after public interest subsided.“I think it was six to one that the virus, they believed, came from the lab. Their conclusion was then overridden by mid-level or senior people,” Paul said.“At two in the morning, the conclusions of the document were changed.”Paul did not share the man’s name and The Post was unable to verify his allegations, which the Kentucky senator summarized ahead of the hearing of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, which he chairs.Spokespeople for the CIA and ODNI did not immediately respond to The Post’s requests for comment.“He has an impeccable record and reputation,” Paul said of the soon-to-be public figure.“It’s hard to testify publicly from the intelligence community because they don’t take it very well. So he comes forward at great risk to his career.”The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in more than 1 million American deaths after emerging in late 2019 in Wuhan, China, where the US government helped finance risky “gain of function” research that genetically modified bat coronaviruses.“The intelligence community is very intricately involved with this research,” Paul told The Post.“I think that the deep state still exerts a great deal of power no matter who the president is and that the deep state is still hiding the origins of this virus.”Paul said that he’s been frustrated in his own attempts to acquire documents about the pandemic, despite a 2023 law authorizing the declassification of records.The congressional hearing will happen as President Trump arrives in China for the first state visit by an American leader in nearly a decade.Paul said he doesn’t see much hope that Trump could persuade Chinese President Xi Jinping to provide greater transparency into the pandemic’s origins when they meet in Beijing.“I think that there’s very little that Chinese will ever admit to,” Paul said.“I think at this point, they’re never going to reveal it, short of a defector that got out with evidence.”

 DOJ weighing new criminal case against Dr. Anthony Fauci — despite Biden’s autopen pardon and statute of limitations running out-By Steven Nelson-Published May 11, 2026, 6:38 p.m. ET

WASHINGTON — Dr. Anthony Fauci on Monday survived a five-year legal deadline to face criminal charges for allegedly lying to Congress about funding risky research in Wuhan, China — but he isn’t out of the woods, The Post has learned.Fauci testified to a Senate committee on May 11, 2021, that he did not fund “gain of function” research that genetically altered coronaviruses in the same city where the COVID-19 pandemic started — as he tried to tamp down the now-dominant “lab leak” theory. Evidence later proved he did.The country’s former top infectious disease official still could face other potential charges for lesser-known contested testimony, or for alleged conduct stretching closer to the present day, such as for conspiracy, insiders said, even though his best-known alleged crime went uncharged.Those potential cases aren’t necessarily as clean-cut for public consumption as the lab-funding denial, but could still give the controversial doctor a day in court. Moreover, a federal prosecution would put to the legal test former President Joe Biden’s pardon of the once-famed doc that was signed by autopen.“Accountability for pandemic-era misconduct is non-negotiable,” a Trump administration official told The Post.“This administration is aggressively exploring every legal avenue to hold every possible individual, entity, organization, and government official accountable for COVID-era wrongdoing.” Pressure to prosecute Fauci intensified last month when the famous doctor’s former senior adviser David Morens was indicted for allegedly breaking the law to conceal the origins of COVID-19. Morens faces one count of conspiracy, two counts of destruction, alteration, or falsification of records and two counts of concealment, removal, or mutilation of records.Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), to whom Fauci allegedly lied about financing Wuhan Institute of Virology experiments that modified at least three coronaviruses distinct from COVID-19, tweeted repeatedly about the deadline in the past week.Paul referred Fauci three times to the Justice Department for criminal prosecution and garnered significant social media attention and frustration from anti-Fauci public figures who said he was escaping justice.“Whether the DOJ decides to charge Fauci or not, I’m not letting up,” Paul tweeted Monday. “In fact, later this week I’m holding a hearing with a whistleblower. Maybe the American people will finally get the answers they’ve been looking for.”One issue complicating Fauci’s possible prosecution is the fact that Biden on Jan. 19, 2025, granted him a pardon for offenses spanning the preceding 10 years.President Trump in December declared the pardon, and others signed by autopen, null and void, but the Justice Department has not tested that assertion, which hinges on an argument that Biden was so mentally diminished that he could not have authorized it. The final period during which Fauci could have been charged for his testimony to Paul featured a leadership shakeup at the Justice Department, with Trump firing Pam Bondi as attorney general and replacing her with acting attorney general Todd Blanche on April 2.It’s unclear how that shuffle may have impacted the analysis of Fauci’s liability.While critics of the non-prosecution grumble that Blanche didn’t bring a case by the deadline, one source said that within the administration, Fauci isn’t viewed as a top target of Trump, whose political adversaries have seen indictments over the past year for alleged crimes.Some within the administration see Fauci as less culpable than his former superior, Dr. Francis Collins, who was director of the National Institutes of Health, and Dr. Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance, who subcontracted $750,000 from Fauci’s agency to the Wuhan Institute of Virology.Justin Goodman, a vice president at the White Coat Waste Project, which clashed with Fauci over allegedly inhumane experimentation on beagles, told The Post he believes the doctor could face federal charges for allegedly lying to Congress about his use of his personal email.“There’s still hope for prosecuting Fauci. While the five year statute has run out on his gain of function lies, he also could be charged for lying to Congress in 2024 about not using his personal email for NIH business,” Goodman said.“White Coat Waste obtained emails through the Freedom of Information Act proving that he told a Washington Post reporter covering the beaglegate scandal to get his personal Gmail address to discuss [the topic]. The five-year statute for lying to Congress in 2024 would end in 2029.”Goodman said that “at the federal and state level, there are still opportunities to hold him criminally accountable for the COVID coverup,” and that state officials also could have opportunities to charge Fauci for his remarks to them over the years.State offenses are not covered by federal pardons.What do you think? Post a comment.“There are other opportunities. We just need people who have the political will to pursue them to take the reins,” Goodman said.The Post requested comment from a number previously associated with Fauci, but received no response.

Comey says DOJ must be the ‘guardian’ of U.S. principles of justice-NBC Universal-Kyla Guilfoil-Tue, May 12, 2026 at 7:04 PM EDT

Former FBI Director James Comey said Tuesday that the Justice Department can’t fulfill its role to uphold the rule of law in the U.S. while it also fixates on those who criticize President Donald Trump.“I think it’s really important for the Department of Justice to be just and to make decisions just based on facts and law,” Comey said in an interview with NBC News.Comey said the Justice Department “has to be the guardian” of making decisions “without regard to race or wealth or politics.”The Justice Department has sought to prosecute many of Trump’s political enemies, including New York Attorney General Letitia James, Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and former CIA Director John Brennan.Justice Department officials also sought to indict six members of Congress, including Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., after they encouraged service members to ignore illegal orders. A grand jury refused to indict the lawmakers.“The department cannot target people like an Adam Schiff or Letitia James or Sen. Kelly because the president doesn’t Like what they say,” Comey said. “It just can’t be that way and still have it uphold the rule of law in this country.”The Justice Department didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.A judge dismissed indictments of Comey and James in November, determining that the federal prosecutor had been unconstitutionally appointed.Comey had been indicted on charges of making a false statement to Congress and obstructing a congressional investigation. He pleaded not guilty. James had been indicted on charges of bank fraud and making a false statement to a financial institution. She also pleaded not guilty. The Justice Department is appealing.Last month, Justice officials indicted Comey again, this time over a May 2025 Instagram photo of seashells. The shells were arranged to spell out “8647,” which the administration argues was a threat against Trump.Comey has said it wasn’t a threat. The term “86” is widely considered to be restaurant speak for being out of something. The number 47 is a reference to Trump, the 47th president.instagram post from james comey in may 2025 (@comey via Instagram)-The Justice Department has accused Comey of threatening President Donald Trump in this Instagram post. (@comey via Instagram)(@comey via Instagram)-Comey said Tuesday that he believes Trump’s continued efforts to prosecute him are an effort to silence criticism and to send a message to others who might do the same.“I don’t wake up in the middle of the night thinking about him, but he does thinking about me,” Comey said. “It’s one, he wants to try and silence my criticism, and two, he wants to send a message to others who might consider speaking, that this is what will happen if you speak out.”Trump said recently that Comey was a “dirty cop” and a “crooked man.”Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said this month that there was a “body of evidence” against Comey that goes beyond just the Instagram post, but he said he isn’t “permitted” to share it at this point.Comey said Tuesday that while he isn’t sure whether the Trump administration is pursuing any other indictments against him, he and other Trump critics need to be ready to become targets.“I think we should all be prepared that they will continue to use the power of the Justice Department to please Donald Trump and try to meet his desire for retribution against people who have spoken out,” he said.

Ex-FBI director claims Donald Trump has an ‘obsession’ with revenge-Wonderwall.com Editors-Updated Tue, May 12, 2026 at 4:48 PM EDT

Former FBI Director James Comey said during an interview on MSNBC’s Deadline: White House that President Donald Trump remains “obsessed” with seeking revenge against him.Speaking with host Nicolle Wallace, Comey was asked whether he feared additional indictments from the Trump-led Department of Justice.Comey replied that he “maybe” expects more charges, adding, “I think Donald Trump wakes up at 3:00 in the morning thinking about me. I do not — the reverse does not happen.”He said he has warned his family that the legal pressure will continue “as long as Donald Trump is in the White House thinking about me in the middle of the night.”Comey’s remarks followed a new indictment from the Trump DOJ tied to an Instagram photo showing seashells arranged to read “86 47.” Prosecutors argued the image constituted a threat against the president.Legal analysts across multiple outlets described the case as “weak” or “fatally flawed.”Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker, also appearing on Deadline: White House, criticized the indictment as an attack on free expression. He said the DOJ was “literally trying to prosecute somebody who is guilty of one thing… putting out his First Amendment views,” adding that the case “is going to be thrown out.”Pritzker noted that Comey removed the image because he thought it “might be rude or improper,” not because he believed it threatened the president.Comey on past investigations and the possibility of more-Wallace asked whether other jurisdictions were exploring charges against him. Comey said he had only “read stuff in the media” and did not know whether the reporting was accurate.She also raised the possibility of prosecutors revisiting a previously failed case in the Eastern District of Virginia involving Comey’s congressional testimony. Comey confirmed the matter related to statements made to Congress and said investigators may still be reviewing the testimony.“There are no false statements… I don’t think that’s going to be productive. But they’ll continue working on it because that’s what the boss wants,” he said.Comey added that the statute of limitations for false statements is five years and said prosecutors “had to hurry on the last one” because they were “running out of time.”Wallace referenced Comey’s earlier comparison of Trump’s first-term inner circle to a “mob family” and asked how he viewed the current administration.Comey said the administration no longer appears to include officials willing to defend institutional norms or the rule of law. He argued Trump “spotted” such people during his first term and “wanted to make sure it didn’t happen again,” citing the departure of former adviser Pam Bondi as an example.He concluded that Trump “has found the crew that he was looking for.”Asked what that means for the country, Comey said the United States faces a “very difficult” period. He pointed to the judiciary and upcoming elections as stabilizing forces but warned the coming years would be challenging.He linked the current political climate to the January 6 attack and false claims about the 2020 election, saying the present situation was “in some ways predictable.”Wallace also asked about Trump repeatedly calling him a “dirty cop.” Comey said he finds the fixation “a little bit humorous,” adding, “It’s crazy that I’m in a place where I’m 65 years old and I actually find it a little bit humorous to have this obsession by this 80-year-old man with me.”He added that he considers himself an honest person who was raised “to stand up and speak out,” saying he cannot behave otherwise.