2020 AMERICAN ELECTION RESULTS BY STATE TRUMP VS LOSER LIBERAL SLEEPY (SLOPPY JOE) BIDEN.
THE MEDIA GOT IT WRONG BY ELECTING BIDEN AS PRESIDENT. THIS IMFORMATION SAYS PENNSYVANIA IS AN AUTOMATIC RECOUNT. WHICH MEANS THERES NO WAY BIDEN COULD BE PRESIDENT UNTIL THE RECOUNT IS COMPLETE.DONALD TRUMP WILL SOMEHOW BECOME PRESIDENT OF UNITED STATES.I HAVE NO DOUBT ABOUT IT. SOME HOW BIDEN AND THE LIBERALS HAVE RIGGED THIS ELECTION AGAINST TRUMP. BUT GOD WILL REVEAL TO THE WORLD HOW THIS ELECTION WAS RIGGED AGAINST TRUMP. AND TRUMP WILL GET A SECOND TERM IN OFFICE.I PREDICT. GOD TOLD 4 OR 5 CHRISTIANS I LISTENED (I WILL NOT USE THE TERM PROPHERTS)TO-THAT TRUMP WILL HAVE A 2ND - 4 YEAR TERM. TRUMP WILL SOMEHOW BE ELECTED PRESIDENT.
Factbox: Rules for recounts in presidential battleground states-By Disha Raychaudhuri-NOV 8,20
(Reuters) – U.S. President Donald Trump’s campaign has called for a recount in Wisconsin, filed lawsuits to stop vote counting in Michigan and Pennsylvania, and asked a judge in Georgia to order late-arriving ballots to be separated and secured so that they cannot be counted.Below is a roundup of recount laws in some battleground states:GEORGIA-Automatic recount: No-Recount law: A candidate can request a recount if the margin of victory is less than or equal to 0.5 percentage point.Deadline: A recount must be requested within two business days after results have been certified.Who pays: State law does not specify who is responsible for recount costs.MICHIGANAutomatic recount: Yes-Recount law: A recount is required if the margin of victory is less than or equal to 2,000 votes.Deadline: Request for a recount should be made within 48 hours of the vote canvass.Who pays: The candidate requesting the recount.NEVADAAutomatic recount: No-Recount law: A candidate who has been defeated can request a recount, regardless of the margin of victory.Deadline: A recount must be requested within three business days after the state’s vote canvass.Who pays: The candidate asking for the recount.PENNSYLVANIA-Automatic recount: Yes-Recount law: A recount is automatic if the margin of victory is less than or equal to 0.5 percentage point. Two other avenues for requesting recounts include requiring at least three voter signatures that attest to an error in the vote tally, and going to state court to file petitions alleging fraud and error.Deadline: By 5 p.m. on the second Thursday following the election, for automatic recounts. If a recount is requested, the deadline is five days after the election.Who pays: The candidate requesting the recount.WISCONSINAutomatic recount: No-Recount law: A full or partial recount can be requested if the margin of victory is less than or equal to 1 percentage point.Deadline: For presidential elections, the request must be made by 5 p.m. on the first business day after the state’s vote canvass.Who pays: The candidate requesting the recount, if the margin is more than 0.25 percentage point of the total vote.(Reporting by Disha Raychaudhuri; Editing by Noeleen Walder and Peter Cooney)
Trump just quietly passed an executive order that could destroy a future Biden administration-‘Through this order, President Trump has declared war on the professional civil service by giving himself the authority to fill the government with his political cronies who will pledge their unwavering loyalty to him, not to America’Andrew Feinberg-Washington DC-Friday 30 October 2020 18:03
Donald Trump’s latest executive order could give him the power to mount a scorched-earth campaign which would cripple a future Biden administration.In the event the incumbent president loses his re-election bid, this order could give him largely unfettered authority to fire experts like Dr Anthony Fauci while leaving behind a corps of embedded loyalists to undermine his successor, according to federal employment law experts.The order, which the White House released late Wednesday evening, would strip civil service protections from a broad swath of career civil servants if it is decided that they are in “confidential, policy-determining, policy-making, or policy-advocating positions” — a description previously reserved for the political appointees who come and go with each change in administration. It does that by creating a new category for such positions that do not turn over from administration to administration and reclassifying them as part of that category. The Office of Personnel Management — essentially the executive branch’s human resources department — has been charged with implementing the order by publishing a “preliminary” list of positions to be moved into the new category on what could President Donald Trump’s last full day in office: January 19, 2021.The range of workers who could be stripped of protections and placed in this new category is vast, experts say, and could include most of the non-partisan experts — scientists, doctors, lawyers, economists — whose work to advise and inform policymakers is supposed to be done in a way that is fact-driven and devoid of politics. Trump has repeatedly clashed with such career workers on a variety of settings, ranging from his desire to present the Covid-19 pandemic as largely over, to his attempts to enable his allies to escape punishment for federal crimes, to his quixotic insistence that National Weather Service scientists back up his erroneous claim that the state of Alabama was threatened by a hurricane which was not heading in its direction.Creating the new category — known as “Schedule F” — and moving current civil servants into it could allow a lame-duck President Trump to cripple his successor’s administration by firing any career federal employees who’ve been included on the list. It also could allow Trump administration officials to skirt prohibitions against “burrowing in” — the heavily restricted practice of converting political appointees (known as “Schedule C” employees) into career civil servants — by hiring them under the new category for positions which would not end with Trump’s term. Another provision orders agencies to take steps to prohibit removing “Schedule F” appointees from their jobs on the grounds of “political affiliation,” which could potentially prevent a future administration from firing unqualified appointees because of their association with President Trump.“It's a two-pronged attack — a Hail Mary pass to enable them to do some burrowing in if they lose the election,” said Walter Shaub, who ran the US Office of Government Ethics during the last four years of the Obama administration and first six months of the Trump administration. “But if they win the election, then anything goes for the destruction of the civil service… [This could] take us back to the spoils system and all the corruption that comes with it.”Shaub explained that at the core of it, a non-partisan civil service is one of the most basic anti-corruption measures that any government can implement “because they free federal employees to disobey illegal orders, be ethical, and resist fraud, waste, and abuse”.“Taking those away creates a cadre of people who are either too intimidated by or loyal to a politician instead of the rule of law and the Constitution,” he said. “That’s the goal here.”The head of the largest federal employee union, American Federation of Government Employees National President Everett Kelley, decried the move in a statement on Thursday, calling it “the most profound undermining of the civil service in our lifetimes”.“Through this order, President Trump has declared war on the professional civil service by giving himself the authority to fill the government with his political cronies who will pledge their unwavering loyalty to him, not to America,” Kelley added. “By targeting federal workers whose jobs involve government policies, the real-world implications of this order will be disastrous for public health, the environment, the defense of our nation, and virtually every facet of our lives.”Virginia Democratic Representative Gerry Connolly, who chairs the House of Representatives subcommittee overseeing civil service issues, called the order “yet another attack on federal employees that addresses absolutely none of the issues that can hinder effective federal recruitment and hiring”. He added that he saw it as “a cheap ploy to let the Trump administration replace talent and acumen with fealty and self-dealing.” And Max Stier, president and CEO of the nonpartisan Partnership for Public Service, called the order “deeply troubling” and warned that it “has the potential to impact wide swathes of federal employees over the next few months without engagement from Congress, civil servants and other key stakeholders”.“Being able to place any number of existing career positions into this new Schedule F not only blurs the line between politics and the neutral competency of the career civil service, it obliterates it,” he added.A Republican source who served as a top federal personnel executive under previous Republican administrations offered a far more succinct review of Trump’s latest executive action: “It's just bad no matter how you view it.”Administration sources say this latest directive is largely the brainchild of James Sherk, a top Trump aide whose work on the Domestic Policy Council has been largely focused on devising methods by which the Trump administration can undermine government employee unions and render toothless the civil service system. Such endeavors are longstanding goals of the American conservative movement, which has for years viewed the largely unionized, highly educated, racially diverse federal workforce as a hostile occupying army loyal to the more reliably pro-union Democratic Party.But while past Republican presidents were willing to at least pay lip service to the advantages of having a skilled, professionalized and non-political federal workforce, advocates of gutting the civil service have found a willing ally in Trump, who has regularly attacked the federal workforce as a Democrat-aligned “deep state” that has worked to undermine his presidency.Earlier this year, then-White House Deputy Press Secretary Hogan Gidley said the White House planned on taking steps to remove what he said were “people in the bowels of the federal government working against this president” and pursuing “their own selfish political agenda” rather than showing loyalty to Trump.“It’s not a secret that we want people in positions that work with this president, not against him, and too often we have people in this government — I mean the federal government is massive, with millions of people — and there are a lot people out there taking action against this president and when we find them we will take appropriate action,” said Gidley, who left the White House in July and is now the national press secretary for Trump’s re-election campaign.The administration’s disdain for career civil servants has only hardened under the pressure of running for a second term bid amid Covid-19.Trump has reserved a special level of rage for scientists like Dr Fauci, the nation’s leading infectious disease expert. On a call with campaign staffers last week, the president reportedly complained that he could not fire Fauci because doing so would be a PR “bomb”.But should he lose his re-election bid in just under two weeks, New Jersey Chief Innovation Officer Beth Noveck — an NYU professor who served as the first US Deputy Chief Technology Officer — said the order appears to be designed to enable him to exact revenge on Fauci and any other federal officials he blames for his loss.“It's the twin danger of both firing Fauci and replacing him with Eric Trump's wedding planner permanently,” said Noveck. She compared the order to the fictional “infinity gauntlet” weapon made famous by the Avengers films, citing the way it could enable Trump to get rid of countless tenured federal workers with the stroke of a pen.“There's definitely a ‘snap your fingers and get rid of half the civil service’ quality to this,” she added, noting that the order lays out vague and subjective criteria for determining whether an employee reclassified under “Schedule F” can be fired for “poor performance”.Noveck added that such vagueness made it possible that Trump could use the “preliminary” list he has ordered OPM to prepare to cripple a Biden administration’s Covid plans by targeting Fauci and other scientists or the administration as a whole by removing large numbers of experienced workers.“It's unclear whether this becomes… a blunt instrument in order to do some surgical removal of people they don't like, or whether they're going to actually attempt some sort of bloodletting or purge,” she explained.As for the possibility that Trump could use the order to install scores of cronies to sabotage Biden, a former top Department of Health and Human Services official says it is already happening.Dr Rick Bright — the former Director of the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority and Deputy Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response who left government service after Trump officials demoted him for contradicting the President’s attempts to downplay the Covid-19 pandemic — said the Trump administration has already been seeding the government with unqualified loyalists.“With an administration change, there are rules in place that say you really don't embed any people, especially in the last period of time, whether it’s a year or six months or so,” he said. “But what we've seen over the last three years is them embedding people all along. So when the [Trump administration] Schedule C's and their other political appointees all go away, there will still be this base of [Trump] people that are in the federal service.”“Many of those who were brought in,” Bright said, are “friends and family” of Trump administration officials who initially showed up as contractors: “And then the next thing you know, they’ve changed their business card and their email address and they’re federal employees.”Although Trump and his advisors have often struggled with a steep learning curve when it comes to the arcane rules and regulations which govern the federal bureaucracy, both Noveck and Shaub said the order’s dense language was meant to deliberately obscure the purpose of it. They believe it is a sign that Trumpworld is finally getting the hang of manipulating the government it leads to its own ends.And while Connolly and other critics of the move presented the harm it would do as “potential,” Shaub said the 90-day clock appeared deliberately timed to give Trump a way to fire a parting shot at his successor should he lose next month. He also suggested that, given the White House’s stated intent to purge disloyal civil servants, there might already be a list of people to fire waiting for use.“I think there's a very realistic chance that they could have everything ready to go and cause harm,” he said, “and in the case of a new administration standing up, their actions may not be noticed by the people who can fix it until the harm has really taken effect.”
ARIZONA - 11 - UNDER REVUE
GEORGIA - 16 - UNDER REVUE
NEVADA - 6 - UNDER REVUE
NORTH CAROLINA - 15 - UNDER REVUE
PENNSYLVANIA 20 - UNDER REVUE - IM STILL SAYING TRUMP IN A WHILE TO BE PRESIDENT. THE LIBERAL CHEERS WILL BE TEARS AGAIN. LIKE VAN JONES-HE CRYED BECAUSE CLINTON LOST TO TRUMP. NOW HE CRYS BECAUSE HE GOT HIS PUPPET IN. OR SO HE THINKS.
BIDEN TOTAL - 253 + 20 = 273 (FALSE WIN)
DONALD TRUMP - 214
2020 PRESIDENT DONALD J TRUMP 271 ELECTORAL VOTES.(AFTER ALL THE LIBERAL STALLING,CRYING AND THERAPY GETTING ALREADY. AND TRUMP IS NOT DECLARED WINNER YET) (D6 USA ELECTION) SUN NOV 08,20
The United States of America is a federal republic[1] consisting of 50 states, a federal district (Washington, D.C., the capital city of the United States), five major territories, and various minor islands.[2][3] The 48 contiguous states and Washington, D.C., are in North America between Canada and Mexico, while Alaska is in the far northwestern part of North America and Hawaii is an archipelago in the mid-Pacific. Territories of the United States are scattered throughout the Pacific Ocean and the Caribbean Sea.States possess a number of powers and rights under the United States Constitution, such as regulating intrastate commerce, running elections, creating local governments, and ratifying constitutional amendments. Each state has its own constitution, grounded in republican principles, and government, consisting of three branches: executive, legislative, and judicial.[4] All states and their residents are represented in the federal Congress, a bicameral legislature consisting of the Senate and the House of Representatives. Each state is represented by two senators, while representatives are distributed among the states in proportion to the most recent constitutionally mandated decennial census.[5] Additionally, each state is entitled to select a number of electors to vote in the Electoral College, the body that elects the president of the United States, equal to the total of representatives and senators in Congress from that state.[6] Article IV, Section 3, Clause 1 of the Constitution grants to Congress the authority to admit new states into the Union. Since the establishment of the United States in 1776, the number of states has expanded from the original 13 to the current total of 50, and each new state is admitted on an equal footing with the existing states.[7] As provided by Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, Congress exercises "exclusive jurisdiction" over the federal district, which is not part of any state. Prior to passage of the 1973 District of Columbia Home Rule Act, which devolved certain Congressional powers to an elected mayor and council, the district did not have an elected local government. Even so, Congress retains the right to review and overturn laws created by the council and intervene in local affairs.[8] As it is not a state, the district does not have representation in the Senate. However, since 1971, its residents have been represented in the House of Representatives by a non-voting delegate.[9] Additionally, since 1961, following ratification of the 23rd Amendment, the district has been entitled to select three electors to vote in the Electoral College.
Number of electoral votes for each state
Alabama - 9 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Alaska - 3 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Arizona - 11 electoral votes - (LIBERAL CRY BABY STALLING) -
Arkansas - 6 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
California - 55 electoral votes - BIDEN
Colorado - 9 electoral votes - BIDEN
Connecticut - 7 electoral votes - BIDEN
Delaware - 3 electoral votes - BIDEN
District of Columbia - 3 electoral votes - BIDEN
Florida - 29 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Georgia - 16 electoral votes - (LIBERAL CRY BABY STALLING)
Hawaii - 4 electoral votes - BIDEN
Idaho - 4 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Illinois - 20 electoral votes - BIDEN
Indiana - 11 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Iowa - 6 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Kansas - 6 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Kentucky - 8 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Louisiana - 8 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Maine - 4 electoral votes - BIDEN
Maryland - 10 electoral votes - BIDEN
Massachusetts - 11 electoral votes - BIDEN
Michigan - 16 electoral votes - (LIBERAL CRY BABY STALLING) - BIDEN
Minnesota - 10 electoral votes - BIDEN
Mississippi - 6 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Missouri - 10 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Montana - 3 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Nebraska - 5 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Nevada - 6 electoral votes - (LIBERAL CRY BABY STALLING)
New Hampshire - 4 electoral votes - BIDEN
New Jersey - 14 electoral votes - BIDEN
New Mexico - 5 electoral votes - BIDEN
New York - 29 electoral votes - BIDEN
North Carolina - 15 electoral votes - (LIBERAL CRY BABY STALLING)
North Dakota - 3 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Ohio - 18 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Oklahoma - 7 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Oregon - 7 electoral votes - BIDEN
Pennsylvania - 20 electoral votes - (LIBERAL CRY BABY STALLING)
Rhode Island - 4 electoral votes - BIDEN
South Carolina - 9 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
South Dakota - 3 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Tennessee - 11 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Texas - 38 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Utah - 6 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Vermont - 3 electoral votes - BIDEN
Virginia - 13 electoral votes - BIDEN
Washington - 12 electoral votes - BIDEN
West Virginia - 5 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Wisconsin - 10 electoral votes - (LIBERAL CRY BABY STALLING) - BIDEN
Wyoming - 3 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
TOTALS FOR PRESIDENT 2020
DONALD J TRUMP - 214
LOSER LIBERAL BIDEN - 253
WITH 5 STATES TO COME - TRUMP LEADING IN 4 OF THEM (LIBERALS FLOCK TO THERAPY ALREADY) (CRY ROOMS ETC) THAT WAS TUESDAY NIGHT ELECTION NIGHT.
