KING JESUS IS COMING FOR US ANY TIME NOW. THE RAPTURE. BE PREPARED TO GO.
CONTEXT WITH LORNA DUECK
http://www.contextwithlornadueck.com/
RAHEEL RAZA AND NADAR FAWZY ARE 2 CANADIANS THAT THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD IN EGYPT WANT KILLED FOR ALLEDGEDLY BEING INVOLVED IN THE FILM THAT SPARKED OUTRAGE BY THE MUSLIMS THANKS TO AMERICA FOR BLAMING THE FILM ON THE KILLING OF THE 4 AMERICAN EMBASSY WORKERS IN BENGHAZI LIBYA ON SEPT 11,12.THERE ARE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD MEMBERS LIVING IN CANADA HERE THAT WILL TRY TO KILL THESE 2 AS THERE IS A ASSASSINATION FATWA OUT FOR THEIR LIVES.SO THIS BRINGS HOME THAT HERE IN CANADA ISLAM IS TRYING TO KILL CITIZENS FOR SPEAKING TRUTH AGAINST THESE TERRORISTS ALSO.AND FOR FALSE ALLIGATIONS AGAINST THESE 2 INNOCENT CANADIANS.CANADIANS WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO ABOUT IT.MAYBE BAN ANY MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD MEMBERS FROM CANADA TO TRY TO STOP INNOCENT CANADIANS FROM GETTING FATWAS AGAINST US CANADIANS THAT WANT TO SPEAK OUT AGAINST THE HORRORS OF ISLAM.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PL9DLSKu7q0q8XXdUOdzJKtdcgg_VqZFp0&v=BgDqQx-4tcQ&feature=player_embedded
FATWA - MURDER BY FIAT OF ISLAM
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/05/fatwa_islams_murder_by_fiat.html
http://www.muslim.org/sa-case/evidence/s18.htm
www.ContextwithLorna.com | Violence...in the name of God. Nader Fawzy is a human rights activist and is one of two Canadians accused by the government of Egypt of promoting an anti-Islamic film that has sparked riots. Raheel Raza is the President of Muslims Facing Tomorrow. She is a leading Canadian voice for reform within Islam.
The fatwa decree, more often, shackles the person against whom it
has been issued. It imposes restrictions on the will and the freedom
of individual choice. In other words, he cannot express himself
freely or choose the way of life he wants to pursue. Since such
(fatwa) edict emanates from religious teachings, it becomes
irrevocable.When the clergy, headed by the Grand Mufti, pronounces a fatwa
against an offender, an apostate or a marked target, it becomes
binding and enforceable. The life of the person in question hangs in
the balance. The religious authority working with the state
ostracizes him. He becomes a marked person, condemned and doomed. If
the condemned is married, the clergy dissolve his marriage. He loses
his spouse, his children and his wealth. Everything he owns is
transferred to his wife and family. He loses all his assets. He is
left with nothing except the clothes on his back. He loses his civic
rights. More frighteningly, he loses custodianship on his life and
the right of police protection, a risk to his personal safety, in
public.In the case of a marked target, the Islamic organisation concerned,
in coordination with its member network, scheme discreetly to attack
and destroy the marked target, without warning, to inflict maximum
damage and loss of life in execution of the Fatwa. The mujahideen
and their supporters pride themselves on such barbaric acts by
parading in the streets, expressing satisfaction for the execution
of their fatwa and in jubilation of the success of their destructive
mission.If the person against whom a fatwa has been issued happens to be
living within the realm of the Abode of Peace, he will be arrested
on sight. He will be held under custody, in isolation of interns,
for his own personal safety. Government authority, under the
guidance of the religious shari’ah court, will give him every chance
to forgo beliefs that stray from the interpreted Islamic teachings,
or repent of his misdeed. The authority will make every effort to
point out to him that he has made a grievous error and try to
convince him to reconsider and return to the religion of Allah and
his prophet. He is repeatedly warned that his refusal to repent will
lead to severe punishment or execution. Should he persist in his
refusal, he will be put in complete isolation, barred from being
visited by anyone. His family will eventually be obliged to deny him
and distance themselves from him. While still in custody, very
little will be heard about him and eventually be forgotten. How and
when the sentence would be carried out, is decided between the state
and the clergy. In most cases, rarely a third party is allowed to
intervene.If living in the Abode of War, in a non-Muslim country, outside the
Islamic realm, in hiding or under an assumed name, the order for his
execution becomes direct. Depending on the circumstances, his
elimination will be carried out overtly or in clandestine. The call,
by the Islamic clergy, would be for any “good” Muslim who chances
the person against whom the edict has been issued is to be killed on
sight.Being marked by the clergy as an apostate, killing such a person is
not considered homicidal. The killer’s action is in response to the
religious call for enforcement of the (fatwa) edict. It is the duty
of every “good” Muslim to purge such a person from amongst them. A
blasphemer or apostate, by pursuing another religion, demeans and
repudiates the Islamic faith. It is an unpardonable insult to the
religion and the prophet.Some fatwas remain binding and enforceable indefinitely, until
fulfilled. The executioner is exonerated. He is absolved from crime
and from all acts of sin and guilt. He is vindicated and venerated
by his community. The (Fatwas) religious edicts issued against
British author Salman Rushdie and the Bangladeshi writer Taslima
Nasreen are two living examples.Depending on the interpretation and classification of the acts,
pronounced fatwas vary in their degree of severity. Some are very
lenient and humane, others exceedingly harsh. Some are pardonable
while others are not, and carry the death sentence even if the
offender shows remorse and repents.Fatwas are pronounced anywhere in the world and for any reason or
against persons of any religion, that has insulted Islam. Members of
the Islamic clergy act as the defenders of Islam, and their word is
final.Like the Spanish Inquisition of the Medieval Ages that controlled
the secular life of the public, and suppressed intellectual freedom
of expression, the religious edict (fatwa) restricts the individual
Muslim to a certain code of ethics. It makes sure that he or she
remains in the fold, observe the Islamic rites and rituals and at no
time steps out of line, else he or she would be meted out with
corporal punishment, regardless of age and gender. The religious
edict (fatwa) is not only a constant reminder but also a threat to
those who might dare break away and choose a different way of life.
Without the religious edict (fatwa), the clerics would have
difficulty controlling Islamic society. Pluralism and democracy are
seen as enemies and a threat to Islam.
SO FOR CANADIANS WHO THINK WERE IMMUNE FROM ISLAMIC FATWAS GOOD LUCK.WE CANADIANS HAVE TO BE ON GUARD AGAINST ISLAM.JUST THINK ABOUT POOR ISRAEL HAVING TO LIVE AMOUNG THESE MURDERER ARAB/MUSLIM COUNTRIES THAT ALWAYS PUTS FATWAS OUT ON EVERY ISRAELI LIFE.WERES THE OUTRAGE WORLD IS MY QUESTION.
CONTEXT WITH LORNA DUECK
http://www.contextwithlornadueck.com/
RAHEEL RAZA AND NADAR FAWZY ARE 2 CANADIANS THAT THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD IN EGYPT WANT KILLED FOR ALLEDGEDLY BEING INVOLVED IN THE FILM THAT SPARKED OUTRAGE BY THE MUSLIMS THANKS TO AMERICA FOR BLAMING THE FILM ON THE KILLING OF THE 4 AMERICAN EMBASSY WORKERS IN BENGHAZI LIBYA ON SEPT 11,12.THERE ARE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD MEMBERS LIVING IN CANADA HERE THAT WILL TRY TO KILL THESE 2 AS THERE IS A ASSASSINATION FATWA OUT FOR THEIR LIVES.SO THIS BRINGS HOME THAT HERE IN CANADA ISLAM IS TRYING TO KILL CITIZENS FOR SPEAKING TRUTH AGAINST THESE TERRORISTS ALSO.AND FOR FALSE ALLIGATIONS AGAINST THESE 2 INNOCENT CANADIANS.CANADIANS WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO ABOUT IT.MAYBE BAN ANY MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD MEMBERS FROM CANADA TO TRY TO STOP INNOCENT CANADIANS FROM GETTING FATWAS AGAINST US CANADIANS THAT WANT TO SPEAK OUT AGAINST THE HORRORS OF ISLAM.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PL9DLSKu7q0q8XXdUOdzJKtdcgg_VqZFp0&v=BgDqQx-4tcQ&feature=player_embedded
FATWA - MURDER BY FIAT OF ISLAM
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/05/fatwa_islams_murder_by_fiat.html
http://www.muslim.org/sa-case/evidence/s18.htm
www.ContextwithLorna.com | Violence...in the name of God. Nader Fawzy is a human rights activist and is one of two Canadians accused by the government of Egypt of promoting an anti-Islamic film that has sparked riots. Raheel Raza is the President of Muslims Facing Tomorrow. She is a leading Canadian voice for reform within Islam.
The Religious Edict (Fatwa)
In the Islamic states of the Abode of Peace (Dar Al-Silm), the Grand
Mufti heads the Islamic Religious Court. He exercises a large
concession of power by the hereditary right of his title. His
legitimacy to power stems from the fact that he is the official
expounder of the Islamic law. In the absence of a recognised
Khalipha, the Grand Mufti gains the legitimacy of the custodianship
of the title, interpretation of the Koran and the Hadeeth that helps
to formulate Islamic law. His sectarian edicts overrule any other
civil law.The teachings of the Koran and the Hadeeth, throughout the ages, has
led to the conservative elements in Islam to a narrowed and radical
interpretation, which see the use of violence as a normal and
acceptable means to attaining their Umma Nation’s global dominance.
Their quest for global dominance, through Jihad, resembles the
struggle of a stray man in a desert running about in empty circles,
in an effort to finding his way out of his wilderness to quench his
thirst. Yet, his attempts are all but a wasteful effort in chasing a
mirage.In an Islamic state, a decree issued by a civil court is secular
judgement. A decree issued by a religious court is a religious edict
(fatwa). This religious pronouncement is issued by the Religious
Shari’ah Court made up of the theologians: expounders of the Islamic
law (Ayatollahs, Ulama, Fuqaha’, Mojtahidoun, Muftis and Imams).
They are jurisprudents, scholars and religious legists, versed in
Islamic law. By virtue of the title of the Grand Mufti and the power
vested in him as the legal interpreter of the Koran and the Hadeeth,
the decisions issued by him stand.The Mufti is also able to exercise this Fatwa as a judicial decision
for or against a person or event. Because of the religious nature of
the religious shari’ah court, any fatwa that the religious court
pronounces becomes official and binding. Depending on the
circumstances and the elements involved, a fatwa may absolve or
convict a committed act, and the person implicated in the act, is
judged accordingly. Once issued, the fatwa must be enforced.
SO FOR CANADIANS WHO THINK WERE IMMUNE FROM ISLAMIC FATWAS GOOD LUCK.WE CANADIANS HAVE TO BE ON GUARD AGAINST ISLAM.JUST THINK ABOUT POOR ISRAEL HAVING TO LIVE AMOUNG THESE MURDERER ARAB/MUSLIM COUNTRIES THAT ALWAYS PUTS FATWAS OUT ON EVERY ISRAELI LIFE.WERES THE OUTRAGE WORLD IS MY QUESTION.
