STOCK RESULTS DEC 21,11

DOCTOR DOCTORIAN FROM ANGEL OF GOD
then the angel said, Financial crisis will come to Asia. I will shake the world.

JAMES 5:1-3
1 Go to now, ye rich men, weep and howl for your miseries that shall come upon you.
2 Your riches are corrupted, and your garments are motheaten.
3 Your gold and silver is cankered; and the rust of them shall be a witness against you, and shall eat your flesh as it were fire. Ye have heaped treasure together for the last days.

REVELATION 18:10,17,19
10 Standing afar off for the fear of her torment, saying, Alas, alas that great city Babylon, that mighty city! for in one hour is thy judgment come.
17 For in one hour so great riches is come to nought. And every shipmaster, and all the company in ships, and sailors, and as many as trade by sea, stood afar off,
19 And they cast dust on their heads, and cried, weeping and wailing, saying, Alas, alas that great city, wherein were made rich all that had ships in the sea by reason of her costliness! for in one hour is she made desolate.

EZEKIEL 7:19
19 They shall cast their silver in the streets, and their gold shall be removed: their silver and their gold shall not be able to deliver them in the day of the wrath of the LORD: they shall not satisfy their souls, neither fill their bowels: because it is the stumblingblock of their iniquity.

REVELATION 13:16-18
16 And he(FALSE POPE) causeth all,(WORLD SOCIALISM) both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:(CHIP IMPLANT)
17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.(6-6-6) A NUMBER SYSTEM

WORLD MARKET RESULTS
http://money.cnn.com/data/world_markets/
CNBC VIDEOS
http://www.cnbc.com/id/15839263/?tabid=15839796&tabheader=false

HALF HOUR DOW RESULTS WED DECEMBER 21,2011

09:30 AM -2.43
10:00 AM -53.43
10:30 AM -46.25
11:00 AM -53.47
11:30 AM -71.25
12:00 PM -67.51
12:30 PM -88.09
01:00 PM -70.46
01:30 PM -59.41
02:00 PM -37.20
02:30 PM -44.80
03:00 PM -30.01
03:30 PM -12.11
04:00 PM +4.16 12,107.74

S&P 500 1243.72 +2.42

NASDAQ 2577.97 -25.76

GOLD 1,618.10 +0.50

OIL 98.91 +1.67

TSE 300 11,753.53 +36.65

CDNX 1439.75 -0.54

S&P/TSX/60 666.41 +2.24

MORNING,NEWS,STATS

YEAR TO DATE PERFORMANCE
Dow -33 points at 4 minutes of trading today.
Dow -73 points at low today.
Dow -1 points at high today so far.
GOLD opens at $1,612.30.OIL opens at $97.51 today.

AFTERNOON,NEWS,STATS
Dow -91 points at low today so far.
Dow +4 points at high today so far.

WRAPUP,NEWS,STATS
Dow -91 points at low today.
Dow +4 points at high today.

GOLD ALLTIME HIGH $1,902.60 (NOT AT CLOSE)

CRUDE OIL -10.6 MILLION BARRELS
GASOLINE -412,000 BARRELS
DISTILLATE INVENTORIES -2.4 MILLION BARRELS

Euro is irreversible and permanent, says ECB chief
19.12.11 @ 20:59 By Valentina Pop

BRUSSELS - The euro is irreversible and will overcome the crisis, European Central Bank chief Mario Draghi said in his first appearance in front of the European Parliament's economics committee on Monday (19 December), while making the case for austerity and fiscal discipline.In line with Berlin and the ECB's own stance so far, Draghi rejected calls for his institution to step in majorly to alleviate the borrowing costs of Italy and Spain, which in turn would help them restore economic growth and jobs.Pressed by MEPs to explain why the ECB puts its credibility higher than actually boosting economic growth and jobs in troubled eurozone countries, similar to what the US Federal Reserve or the British central bank are doing, Draghi insisted that his institution does not have the mandate for such intervention.The Fed's mandate is different, it is also geared on growth and jobs. We are much more restricted to monetary stability, he explained.As for the current crisis, the ECB chief said he has no doubt in the strength, permanence and irreversibility of the euro,dismissing as morbid speculation any eurozone break-up scenarios.Austerity, however, cannot be avoided, Draghi said, welcoming the fact that EU leaders earlier this month pledged more fiscal discipline measures, dubbed a fiscal compact.To restore trust, we need the elements contained in the compact. On top of this we then need structural reforms to ensure growth, he added.His most pressing concern was linked to a potential credit crunch in 2012, with banks wary of lending to each other, to households and to small enterprises, which in turn could trigger a deeper recession than expected.

Banks will face a significant funding constraint especially in the first quarter, but the whole year is going to be difficult for banks. We want to avoid the possible recession and if we can relieve funding pressure, it is already a good part of the answer,he said, in reference to the eurozone's temporary bail-out fund (EFSF) which from 1 January will be able to help out struggling banks with the technical assistance of the ECB.Meanwhile, warnings by big rating agencies that France and other eurozone countries may have their top rating downgraded in the coming months should not be given too much importance, he said.Ratings agencies were underestimating the weaknesses of some eurozone countries before the 2009 financial crisis, whereas now they are overshooting the actual risk and forcing the borrowing costs up.However, the days of one-size-fits-all premium ratings for all euro-countries are over and will never return, Draghi said.We have to get used to spreads, to riskiness. In a way it is healthy, as it sends a message to national and EU politicians they have to speed up processes,he said in reference to record-high borrowing costs for Italy and Spain compared to Germany.

New treaty in force when 9 countries have ratified
16.12.11 @ 18:19 By Honor Mahony

BRUSSELS - The first draft of a new treaty meant to tighten economic governance in eurozone countries was circulated Friday (16 December) with the aim to have the text finalised by January and coming into force once nine countries have ratified it.The ratification threshold would allow the treaty to go into place even if some euro states - such as Ireland which may have to hold a referendum - are having problems getting domestic approval.A euro country that rejected the treaty after it had already come into place will not be bound by it.If you go into the political aspect, I don't think it will be a very comfortable situation, said one EU official dealing with the issue.Non-euro countries, who agree to sign up to the treaty, will be bound by the agreement as soon as they take on the single currency, but can put in place some of the details immediately.Containing just 14 articles, the text obliges those that have ratified it to introduce into their constitutions a balanced-budget rule. The treaty also says that those countries that are in excessive deficit will have to submit economic partnership plans to the commission and council.Sanctions will also be more automatic for fiscal miscreants while the text says that major economic policy reforms should be coordinated at the euro level.It also makes what is seen as an oblique reference to tax harmonisation - a bug bear of countries such as Slovakia - by saying that countries where appropriate and necessary will use a fast-track integration process known as enhanced cooperation.We put into the legal form the elements of substance that were contained in the statement of the 9 December (EU summit). We did nothing more. We did nothing less,said the EU official.Negotiations on the text will start next week in the euro working group - which brings together senior treasury officials from across the member states.

Following the UK's refusal to allow full-blown treaty change, the pact is an intergovernmental treaty for the 17 euro states plus up to nine of the non-euro countries who have all indicated they will attempt to come on board.But in a bid to draw a line under the potentially damaging rift between London and the rest of member states, all 27 countries will be at the negotiation table, although London will only have observer status.The next negotiating meeting is set for the first week of January while the officials are hoping the text will be finalised by the end of January, and signed in March.

A treaty with bite?

By opting to go the international treaty route, negotiators are hemmed in by the fact that they are not allowed to alter the EU treaty in any way.The same situation has raised legal questions about the legal capacity of the European Commission and European Court of Justice to enforce its provisions. This issue has exercised the finest legal minds in Brussels in the days since last week's summit.The draft contains only vague language asking the treaty members to undertake to support proposals by the commission if they are in excessive deficit.The European Court will judge whether the balanced budget rule has been properly transposed into national law.Meanwhile member states would have to take each other to the European court - a politically awkward idea - if they considered that the excessive deficit rules were being broken.

Doubts increase over usefulness of new fiscal treaty
Today DEC 20,11 @ 23:04 By Honor Mahony

BRUSSELS - Just a few days into the making of a new intergovernmental treaty on fiscal discipline, serious questions are being raised about whether the slight draft offered to date is either useful or necessary.Following the first day of negotiation on the proposed 14-article treaty, first circulated at the end of last week, the three MEPs at the table noted that virtually all the provisions could be done using the current EU treaties.It is for political, symbolic reasons that they want to do this agreement,said Guy Verhofstadt, Belgian liberal MEP, while his Socialist counterpart Italian MEP Roberto Gualtieri noted that "most, if not everything, could have been done through secondary legislation.Both MEPs, briefing colleagues on Tuesday evening (20 December,) noted that the legal services could give no answer when specifically asked what in the draft pact could not be achieved under current EU law.The idea for an intergovernmental agreement came about after a spat at a European summit earlier this month which saw 26 member states opt for an economic governance pact, outside EU law, after Britain refused to allow a full change of the EU treaties.Since then there have been political and legal misgivings about the nature of such an agreement, especially the extent to which EU institutions can be involved and how its contents should be enforced.

The six-pack and not much more

Meanwhile, the draft treaty is remarkably similar to, or at times is in conflict with, six pieces of legislation, in force since 13 December, that dramatically increase budgetary surveillance at the EU level.If you read the draft treaty, then many of the demands contained there are actually asking for less than what the six-pack contains,said German centre-right MEP Elmar Brok.Gualtieri spoke about overlapping rules and competences pointing out that specific percentage targets also differ between the draft new treaty and the fresh legislation involving economic convergence.How the new treaty will be enforced is also a matter of concern.There are legal doubts about whether an article in the EU treaty which suggests that if member states are in dispute over points of EU law the European Court of Justice can adjudicate, can be used as a model for the intergovernmental pact.But the political barrier is possibly higher. Verhofstadt pointed out that there has never been an incidence of member states fighting over application of EU law to the stage that it goes before court.Meanwhile, a suggestion in the draft pact that member states should police each others efforts to enforce the rules - for example Belgium bringing Germany to court for breaking the deficit rules - was similarly criticised.

The current such article in the normal EU treaty has been used just six times in the last 60 years. By contrast the European Commission has brought legal cases for breach of EU law over 2000 times in the same period.As a general goal, the European Parliament is keen to see that it has democratic oversight and that such intergovernmental pacts do not becoming the norm for rule-making in this area.

A higher threshold for ratification

While throwing up lots of questions about the relevance of the treaty, Tuesday's meeting at the same time showcased the determination of Berlin to get its contents agreed.According to one source, Berlin is insisting on linking approval of the permanent bailout fund (ESM), supposed to be ratified next year, with all euro countries agreeing to put a debt brake into national constitutions.Berlin would also be in favour of raising the minimum number of countries needed for the treaty to go into force (currently nine of the 17 euro currency states) to make sure all of the southern, and troubled, single currency countries are on board.The first meeting saw negotiators get no further than Article One. This is going to be a slightly longer exercise than expected by those who suggested it, said Gualtieri.Under the proposed plan, the final draft is expected to be ready by 20 January with signature by member states to follow in March. A next meeting of the 'working group' of national diplomats, MEPs and other EU officials is scheduled for the first week of January.

EU states fail to cobble together €200bn for IMF
Today DEC 20,11 @ 09:35 By Valentina Pop

BRUSSELS - Eurozone countries on Monday (19 December) agreed to pay €150bn to a special IMF fund but failed to reach their total ceiling of 200bn among all EU states, as pledged at a summit on 9 December, with Britain refusing to contribute to the euro-saving scheme.After a three-hour long conference organised by Jean-Claude Juncker, Luxembourg's Prime Minister and head of the informal group of eurozone finance ministers, only the contributions of the euro countries were clearly spelled out, amounting to a total of €150 billion.Germany will be the largest contributor, with €41.5 billion, followed by France (€31.4bn), Spain (€14.8bn) and the Netherlands (€13.6bn). Euro-countries already under an EU-IMF bail-out - Greece, Ireland and Portugal - are not listed as contributors. IMF- supported EU countries outside the common currency - Hungary, Romania and Latvia - will also not be coughing up. Lithuania, still recovering from the financial crisis, and Bulgaria, the EU's poorest member, are not participating, either.Britain refused to contribute to this special IMF fund to be set up for the eurozone rescue, saying it will top up its share to the general IMF reserves.The UK has always been willing to consider further resources for the IMF, but for its global role and as part of a global agreement,British finance minister George Osborne said in a statement.EU countries, except Britain, had on 9 December pledged to come up with €200 billion within 10 days for a special IMF fund designed to help the troubled eurozone.

British Prime Minister David Cameron later on told the Parliament that the IMF is there to save countries, not currencies and that London is happy to help boost the general IMF reserves, but not the special eurozone fund.Britain's refusal to take part puts pressure on other euro-outs to top up their share of the remaining €50bn to be raised, with Sweden, Denmark, Poland and Czech Republic the only non-euro EU contributors in line to fill this gap.EUobserver has calculated that they are short of €24 billion, in view of their public statements so far.Prague has said it would contribute €3.5 billion, Denmark pledged to contribute €5.5bn, while Polish finance minister Jacek Rostowski on Monday gave the figure of €6bn for his country.Swedish finance minister Anders Borg on Monday night refused to say how much Stockholm will end up paying, after it previously had floated the figure of €11bn, Svenska Dagebladet reports.Parliamentary approval is needed in several of these contributing countries.

EU made mistakes in euro-crisis response, says Polish minister 20.12.11 @ 18:01 By Valentina Pop

BRUSSELS - EU ministers made a mistake when pressing for investors to take a loss in the second Greek bail-out and obliging banks to boost their cash reserves before a substantial bailout fund was in place, Polish finance minister Jacek Rostowski said Tuesday (20 December) while rounding-up his six months at the helm of fellow finance ministers' meetings.The mistake was to engage in private sector involvement (PSI) without a proper firewall. If we had a proper firewall in place, PSI would have achieved the aim of reducing moral hazard in the private sector without the risks that it created,Rostowski told this website after talking to MEPs in the economics committee.A failed experiment, private sector involvement was formally buried at an EU summit on 9 December, after much wrangling and negotiations with bondholders on accepting a 50 percent loss on their Greek investments in an upcoming second rescue package for the troubled euro-state.Fears that similar haircuts will be forced upon investors in other countries have contributed to sky-rocketing borrowing costs for Spain and Italy, which only aggravated the current crisis. Obliging private investors to take a loss was pushed strongly by Germany.

Our first approach to private sector involvement, which had a very negative effect on the debt markets, is now officially over, EU council chief Herman Van Rompuy wrote on his Twitter page after the summit.European Central Bank chief Mario Draghi said in an interview with the Financial Times on Monday that private sector participation in the Greek case was a political answer rather than the ideal sequencing which should have started with the firewall, then moved to enforce bank recapitalisation and only at a last stage considered private bondholders to take losses.The other mistake, asking banks to secure a certain level of capital during the current crisis while again having no firewall in place risked creating a vicious circle, Rostowski told MEPs. Cash-strapped banks would then have to turn to governments, already struggling with large deficits, which in turn would increase the costs of government debt and make it even harder for banks to lend to one another.This mistake was made, we should have put the firewall in place first. It was a wrong order and we should not go around trying to pretend we have not done this mistake,he said, while admitting that ad-hoc measures are still better than nothing and that EU processes take too long, forcing countries to struggle in their response to the crisis.As for the new inter-governmental treaty currently being drafted by 26 member states except for Great Britain, the Polish minister said it is to a large extent what the sixpack was intended to be,in reference to six pieces of economic governance legislation that came into force earlier in December.Rostowski expressed scepticism about the need for treaty change, arguing that the European Central Bank can step in and salvage the eurozone under the current rules. He also said the new inter-governmental treaty raises question marks related to the democratic oversight, as well as the extent to which EU institutions can be used if Britain does not agree to it.

I think there is a real problem with democratic legitimacy. If there is to be a mechanism for disciplining eurozone states - almost a purely automatic one, the problem is that rules cannot anticipate everything. If it's discretion, then authority to hand out sanctions has to be given to some EU institution, which requires democratic legitimacy.He insisted that the upcoming Danish EU presidency be given full participation in the meetings of finance ministers and euro-area meetings - something Poland, also a non-euro country, unsuccessfully fought for.We had this problem, on occasions, that we couldn't say what the discussion was like in the Eurogroup, because we were not in the room, he told MEPs.Rostowski also defended his previous comments about a war in ten years if the eurozone was to break up, explaining that the Polish presidency felt the need to infuse the sense of that danger.Unity and stability of the EU are not just an economic issue, they are also a national security issue for us, he stressed.

Special program: Fraud & the Obama ballot challenge
December 17, 2011 By DOUG HAGMANN

Obama’s impeachable offenses

Our nation currently faces some of the most perilous dangers since becoming a nation. We did not arrive here overnight, nor by accident. Issues that were once banished to back rooms as conspiracy nonsense have suddenly become reality. Yet the corporate media continues to ignore some of the most pressing issues and questions that remain unanswered, instead deliberately diverting the public’s attention. Meanwhile, we have a man occupying the Oval Office whose past remains seriously in question.Our group of professional investigators, many who have spent their careers conducting background investigations of potential leaders of the largest corporations in America, remain dissatisfied with the numerous unanswered questions that surround Barack Hussein Obama. Other investigators who have spent years conducting background checks for the various intelligence agencies have concluded that the background of Barack Hussein Obama has serious problems,and that Obama has failed to provide sufficient proof that would be accepted in a court of law – an uncorrupted court, that is.

Who really is Barack Hussein Obama? What is the truth and what is currently being done to secure answers to the most important questions of our time? Tonight, The Hagmann & Hagmann Report is pleased to have as our very special guest retired army Captain Pamela Barnett, who is suing Barack Hussein Obama to compel him to disclose all of his records that will reveal all of his different citizenships. Ms. Barnett is behind the information-rich site Obama Ballot Challenge, and attended the court martial of LTC Terrence Lakin as well as the Columbia treason trial in Harlem, NY.
Ms. Barnett is also a plaintiff in a legal suit against the California Secretary of State and Jerry brown for election fraud in the 2008 general election and the 2010 primary. She is also active in other litigation and legal processes designed to obtain vital information about the self-proclaimed most transparent president in history.Link: Archived show (Download in mp3 format)
Link: Website of Pamela Barnett (www.obamaballotchallenge.com)

Related:Link: http://article2legaldefensefund.com/
Link: www.unlawfulpresident.com

Great news! Judge Malihi granted my motion to add presidential candidate Laurie Roth as an additional plaintiff and granted extension of time till January 7, 2012

This is the case where I represent a voter in GA David Farrar and 4 presidential candidates: Democrats Leah Lax, Cody Robert Judy, Republican U.S. Army Veteran Thomas MacLeran and now also syndicated talk show host, candidate from the American Independent Party Dr. Laurie Roth. I asked for extension of time, as I scheduled the deposition of the Director of Health of the state of HI Loretta Fuddy for January 5, 2012 and the hearing before Judge Nishimura is on January 6, so by January 7 I will have more information to submit to judge Malihi for the upcoming trial scheduled for January 16-18.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?attachment_id=29358

VOTE LAURIE ROTH AS PRESIDENT AND CONVINCE RON PAUL TO BE LAURIE ROTHS VICE PRESIDENT.GO LAURIE GO.GOD(KING JESUS) IS WITH YOU.WE NEED MORALITY IN THE WHITE HOUSE NOT A FRAUD OBAMA AKA BARRY SOETORO MUSLIM HATER OF CHRISTIANITY.WE NEED GODS INFLUENCE IN THE WHITE HOUSE.

Dr. Laurie Roth for President? Outsider, fringe and impossible, or real ideas, real guts and completely possible By LAURIE ROTH, on December 17th, 2011

The national crisis and American challenge we face

We have a worldview clash with Barack Hussein Obama. He has come against the very history, core and backbone of our country, surrounded by his progressives and leftists. The far left manages to destroy all the good words that used to have meaning. Have you noticed? Gay is now homosexual and Progressivism sounds so enlightened. It makes you think that you are simply moving forward. In truth, it is the new, face lifted name for socialist/Marxist communism. Obama has fought against capitalism, American independence and achievement by taking over huge chunks of the auto industry, forcing unconstitutional health care on the American people with threat of fines or worse, shutting down many coal plants, and imposing ridiculous regulations on power plants. He is thrilled our utility rates and cost of energy is sky rocketing.He has sided with despots, such as Zelaya of Honduras, Chavez, Hamas, Muslim Brotherhood, Islam in general as he has insulted and maligned Christians, Israel and Tea Party conservatives. He started viciously attacking Americans from the first accidental release of the Miac report from Homeland security back in Spring 2008 identifying pro second amendment, pro life, pro state and federal sovereignty, returning vets and other conservatives as potential domestic terrorists. The insults and slander has only sky rocketed from there.

Obama is wrong for America, Judeo Christian values and our constitution. He has apologized numerous times for our country, while telling Turkish parliament and others we aren’t even a Christian nation. In fact, in between bowing low to Saudi Kings he has said we were one of the largest Muslim nations on earth.The real Obama and his motives are revealed in his own books, background and who he continues to surround himself with. From his mysterious not to be known college days on we see him surrounding himself with Communists, on boards and making friends with William Ayers, former member of the Weather Underground terrorist group, intent on attacking, killing, controlling and transforming America into a Communist regime. We have seen Obama surround himself with a multitude of czars who are radical leftists, some believing and writing about the wonders of abortion even after birth for toddlers, animals being able to sue people and writing of putting forced birth control in Americas water system so women can’t become pregnant. We also have a President who has many members of the Islamic terrorist group, Muslim brotherhood working in high level positions under him and with Hillary Clinton. He has backed and supported Muslim Brotherhood instead of our long term Alley Hosni Mubarak of Egypt during the Arab Spring uprising. Mubarak was certainly not perfect but a faithful alley, friend and moderate Muslim with a long standing treaty with Israel. Now he is on trial, Muslim Brotherhood is winning the first round of elections, Coptic Christians are being murdered and Cathedrals are burning to the ground. Oh yeah….and Israel is being threatened, treaties and years of peace are in the process of being crushed.

There has been nothing Arab Spring about the uprising throughout the Middle East. Instead it would be more accurate to call what is going on there radical regime change.Libya, Tunisia, Egypt, Syria, are all leaning more radical, more Sharia, more dangerous to Israel and America. Obama must be thrilled. The Islamic Caliphate moves forward.Obama has managed to extend with his czars his dictatorial reach and completely bypass congress. With czars now managing, manipulating and ruining vast amounts of America, Obama bypasses congress. With his illegal war in Libya he completely bypassed congress and got his direction from the UN. With his forced Health care bill he has created with the progressive left an entirely unconstitutional health care plan with threat of fines if we don’t obey. 26 states and 2 Federal judges have already ruled against this and now we wait upon the Supreme Court. Will they judge rightly and for the people or not? We shall see.We are a nation under an aggressive attack from within. Our Senate recently voted to allow our military the right to pick up US citizens without charges on vague terrorist suspicions. They can detain us without trial indefinitely. At least 72 FEMA camps are being activated all across the country. Why? Obama is positioning for total control.

Other attacks against America

Obama is not the only danger fighting against America. Global elitism, environmentalism our moral collapse and distance from the Holy Bible is delivering all the other crushing blows that threaten to destroy us. Sustainability, Agenda 21, Greens, obsessions with carbon emissions and warming, are all fronts for Marxism and Communistic take overs. At their core, these groups don’t believe in land ownership, growing what we want and achieving. They want to reign us in, allow us only so much food, water and freedom. Some only want us to drive so far in our cars then find a way to make the car stop. Smart Grid now is digitally tracking our use of power in our house. The Feds could turn off your power if you went over an amount they saw as too much. Do you like the idea of the Feds telling you in the privacy of your own home, what your rate will be, how much heat, air conditioning and electricity you can use before you are turned off?

Who am I and what will I do if elected President

Undo and Correct the damage of Obama
I will work within my power as President to undo the following:
I will stand against and work to destroy the unconstitutional Health care bill.
I will come against any Federal support and push of environmentalism, Sustainability, Agenda 21, Cap and trade, land and environmental controls that threatens our freedom and business.
I will stop all Federal funding anywhere that supports and/or funds abortion and Planned Parenthood.
I will work within my power to undo the Start treaty that Obama signed with Russia, threatening the lead of our Nuclear program and ability to respond in kind if attacked.
I will restore and repair our relationship with Israel and stand against Hamas, Hesbola, Muslim Brotherhood and other radical Islamic sects with a history of attacks, threats and murder.
I will fire all Czars that Obama has appointed.
I will audit every department in the Federal Government and demand fiscal responsibility and accountability.
I will push for an outside audit of the Federal Reserve.
I will fight to reverse the Senate ruling that gave our Military the right to arrest and apprehend US citizens on vague terrorist charges, then hold them without charges and indefinitely. I will stop the activation of all FEMA camps.
I will stop the shutting down of Cole plants and overbearing regulations on Power plants.

What will I do while cleaning up the above nightmare and mess Obama has left us.

I will immediately craft a bill and get supporters to pass a 2% point of purchase tax and eradication of all Federal tax including income tax.
I will draw all leaders in all kinds of energy and develop bold plans to build infrastructure in all 50 states for oil, nuclear, natural gas, solar and alternative fuels. Once the 2% consumption tax is voted into law I will talk to the American people about our national wallet available to pay our bills. I will offer grants for energy infrastructure projects that will make us energy independent within 4 years and create millions of jobs.
I will put 20-50,000 National Guard troops on our borders to help secure them. I will also use satellite technology, fly overs, virtual and real fences to stop the illegal alien flow and drug trade.
I will bring our troops home from Libya which in my view is an illegal war and violation of the 1973 War powers act.
I will review critically Iraq and Afghanistan and work with our Generals and leaders to incrementally bring our troops home in a safe and systematic manner. We cannot turn victories into defeats.
I will get our country completely out of debt within 4 years.

There is much to fix and undo and much to do to make America a light on a hill again. We can do this together. With God all things are possible.Join me and help me make this dream and miracle happen. Sign up as a volunteer. Offer a donation and spread the word. www.laurieroth2012.com www.youtube.com/teamlaureiroth2012 www.therothshow.com www.rothrevolution.ning.com