ANIMAL RIGHTS NUTS CRY WOLF

SARAH PALINS OFFICE SITE
http://gov.state.ak.us/

ALASKA OUTDOOR COUNCIL
http://www.alaskaoutdoorcouncil.org/about.html

ANIMAL RIGHTS NUTCASE ASHLEY JUDD PROMOTING HATE AGAINST SARAH PALIN - VIDEO
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yFdijgMytUA&eurl=http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/deadlineusa/2009/feb/03/sarah-palin-ashley-judd-wolf-killing&feature=player_embedded

Ashley Judd says women voting for Palin are suicidal
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BySATfll-BQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BySATfll-BQ&feature=related
Actress Ashley Judd criticizes the McCain/Palin ticket
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MEu5fnFVJAI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MEu5fnFVJAI&feature=related

ASHLEY JUDD NUTCASE ASKING FOR MONEY TO FIGHT SARAH PALIN,THIS IS NOTHING BUT A SCAM BY JUDD TO GET MONEY TO PROMOTE HERSELF.
http://www.eyeonpalin.org/

AT LEAST ELISABETH HASSELBACK FROM THE VIEW STUCK UP FOR PALIN,SHE SAID ALSO ABOUT ALL THE ABORTED INNOCENT BABBIES AND NOTHING SAID.
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x89s4z_the-view-elisabeth-hasselbeck-on-wo_shortfilms
http://www.wowowow.com/post/elisabeth-hasselbeck-wonders-why-judd-doesnt-fight-abortion-199060
http://abc.go.com/daytime/theview/cohosts#
http://abc.go.com/player/index?pn=index&showId=167365
http://abc.go.com/daytime/theview/info?pn=hottopics
http://abc.go.com/daytime/theview/video

OBAMA CLAIM TO BE THE ONE,JUDD LOVES OBAMA.AHMADINEJAD CLAIMED THE LIGHT TO.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mopkn0lPzM8&eurl=http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2179144/posts&feature=player_embedded

POOR SARAH THE GODLESS ENVIROMENTAL NUTCASES ARE AFTER HER NOW,THESE SICKOS PROTECT ANIMALS,BUT MILLIONS UPON MILLIONS OF INNOCENT BABBIES ARE MURDERED BECAUSE OF LUST AND PROMISCUITY AND THESE NUTCASES THINK THATS OK,BUT SHOOT A WOLF OR A SPOTTED OWL AND YOUR THE SCUM OF THE EARTH. THESE SICKO ENVIROMENTALISTS AND ANIMAL RIGHTS NUTCASES BETTER GET THEIR MORALS STRAIGHT.

JUST LIKE THE GAYS THIS ASHLEY JUDD IS PROUD TO GO AGAINST SARAH,MY BIBLE SAYS THE PROUD WILL BE BROUGHT DOWN FROM THEIR NOSE IN THE AIR PROUDNESS.IT SEEMS MUSLIMS AND ANIMAL RIGHTS AND ENVIROMENTALCASES CAN SAY ANYTHING AND DO ANYTHING THEY WANT,BUT LET A CHRISTIAN QUOTE A SCRIPTURE TO THESE GODLESS PEOPLE ABOUT JESUS AND HELL AND GAYS AND ABORTION AND WERE CLASSIFIED AS HATERS.......INTERESTING JUSTICE IN THIS WORLD THESE DAYS.

Friday, February 06, 2009 Ashley Judd: Clown in Wolf Guardian's Clothing
by Michelle Malkin

Actress Ashley Judd has finally earned her Hollywood stripes and provided award-winning comic relief. With Washington poised to shove a trillion-dollar stimulus pork pie down our throats, we need all the distractions we can get. I give Judd's unintentionally entertaining performance in a new Sarah Palin-bashing animal rights ad two diversionary thumbs up.The Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund sponsored the YouTube video starring Judd. They've dubbed their campaign, launched this week, Eye on Palin. With all the serious, socially responsible celebrity earnestness she could muster, Judd decried the aerial hunting of wolves in Alaska, the GOP governor's state. It is time to stop Sarah Palin and stop this senseless savagery, Judd intoned.

Casting herself as an environmental expert, Judd attacked Palin for casting aside science and championing the slaughter of wildlife. The video shows a wolf being shot, writhing in pain, with an ominous soundtrack throbbing and menacing photos of Palin flashing across the screen. Riddled with gunshots, biting at their backs in agony, they die (pause for quiver) a brutal death, Judd enunciates slowly as wolf squeals punctuate the video. Defenders of Wildlife assails Gov. Palin for proposing a $150 bounty for every wolf killed by aerial hunters. She's cruel and bloodthirsty, and she must be stopped! It's a compelling black-and-white storyline. But like the world Judd inhabits, this plot is make-believe.

Fact is, the policy is intended to protect other animals -- moose and caribou -- from overpopulation of wolves. Alaskans rely on caribou and moose for food. Not all Americans care to live on environmentally correct starlet diets of tofu salad and Pinkberry yogurt. Neither Palin nor the aerial hunters in those scary low-flying planes that have Judd quivering promote the program out of malice and animal insensitivity. On the contrary, they are the true compassionate conservationists. The bounty helped state biologists collecting wolf age data and provided incentives to reduce the wolf population when wildlife management efforts had fallen behind. This is about predator control. But to liberal, gun-control zealots thousands of miles away, it's all heartless murder. Federal law makes specific exceptions to aerial hunting for the protection of land, water, wildlife, livestock, domesticated animals, human life or crops. Targets are not limited to wolves. And, as Alaska wildlife officials note, the process is tightly controlled and designed to sustain wolf populations in the future.No matter. As Judd proclaimed, It is time to stop Sarah Palin. That is the true aim of left-wing lobbying groups and their allies in Hollywood. Palin is a threat not to Alaska's wolves, but to the liberal establishment's wolves. Defenders of Wildlife isn't targeting the ads in states affected by these policies. They're running the Judd-fronted ads across battleground states. It's about electoral interests, not wildlife interests. The eco-Kabuki theater is just plain laughable.

On a deadly serious note, Judd's selective concern for savagery is not lost on longtime observers of the activist entertainer's political forays. A militant, pro-choice feminist, Judd lashed out at the Republican ticket during the campaign: [A] woman voting for McCain and Palin is like a chicken voting for Colonel Sanders. Yet, not a peep has been heard from Judd about the serial predators of Planned Parenthood who have been caught on tape urging young girls to cover up statutory rape to facilitate abortion procedures. And she won't be starring in any YouTube ads decrying grisly late-term abortion procedures. In a starlet's world, senseless savagery only applies to the poster pet of the month.

February 6, 2009 Why does Sarah Palin support shooting wolves in Alaska?
If we really want more moose, we should be shooting bears instead, says a Vermont wildlife biologist By Brendan Borrell

The state of Alaska may no longer loom as large in the American consciousness as it did during the presidential election, but enviros won't let us forget failed GOP veep candidate Gov. Sarah Palin's support for aerial wolf hunting. Conservation watchdog Defenders of Wildlife this week launched the Eye on Palin Web site to spotlight the moose-hunting Alaska chief exec's Anti-Wolf, Anti-Wildlife Agenda.I am outraged by Sarah Palin's promotion of this cruel, unscientific and senseless practice, which has no place in modern America, actress and animal activist Ashley Judd said in a press release. Because she is apparently determined to continue and expand this horrific program, I am grateful that Defenders will aggressively fight to stop her. I am proud to be a part of that effort.

Palin took the attack as an affront to her state's livelihood.

Alaskans depend on wildlife for food and cultural practices which can't be sustained when predators are allowed to decimate moose and caribou populations, she said in a statement, Our predator-control programs are scientific and successful at protecting vulnerable wildlife.According to the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, predators kill more than 80 percent of the moose and caribou that die there in a given year. To keep predator populations in check, the state currently has five wolf-control programs covering about 9.4 percent of the state's land area. Successful programs allow humans to take more moose, its Web site claims, and healthy populations of wolves continue to thrive in Alaska.The agency lumps bears and wolves together as effective and efficient predators of caribou, moose, deer and other wildlife, but it fails to explain why only wolves are targeted—or exactly how the predators affect moose, the most sought after big game animal in Alaska.To find out more, we asked Shawn Haskell, a wildlife biologist at the Vermont Fish & Wildlife Department in Saint Johnsbury, who has studied caribou and wolf populations in Alaska and now manages Vermont deer populations.

Why do we need to manage wildlife populations?
We are humans, and we have existed for hundreds of thousands of years as just a small part of nature—but in the past couple hundred years we've become a large part of nature. We influence nature simply by existing. That's the reason wildlife management is now necessary to conserve the wildlife populations we affect.

How do biologists determine if a population needs to be culled?
First, there's the biological carrying capacity. Animals, including humans—though we don't always recognize it—sometimes become too numerous for their own good. That's when they eat themselves out of house and home: Their body condition goes down, reproductive rates go down, and fawns and calves starve to death during their first week of life because their dams [mothers] have no milk.Then, there's what we call cultural carrying capacity, when animal populations become too numerous or too few for human liking. Deer become too many when they are eating your gardens excessively, and you're hitting them with your cars excessively. They become too few when you can't find any to hunt. So, there's a happy medium somewhere from a cultural perspective.

Why do Sarah Palin and her Alaskan neighbors want to shoot their wolves?
My guess is the areas where they want to aerial hunt and cull wolves are areas where rural residents are saying We used to have more moose, we used to have more caribou.

They want caribou and moose to eat, and predators can be their direct competition. It really is that simple. You'll find lots of scientific studies driven by data that show you can increase prey populations by shooting predators. You can look at the habitat and say that a range could support three moose per square mile, yet we have less than one. It's a no-brainer really.Wolves, however, aren't necessarily the big problem. Bears can be a bigger issue than wolves when it comes to the survival of moose young.

Bears? Why aren't people shooting bears from planes?
The whole predator control focus seems to be aimed at wolves from a general standpoint. I'm not sure that's always appropriate.Bears are held to a different standard. You have to hire a guide to hunt a bear if you are a nonresident—it's a big business in Alaska. They are also less visible. Wolves exist in packs. They howl at night when they are hunting. When I'm out moose hunting in the Alaska range, I hear wolves but not the bears. Bears are a very good predator. They are very smart and capable. They are omnivores, which is one reason they don't get as much attention. Black bears and grizzly bears know when the fawn crop hits the ground. They kill a lot of moose calves. Studies have shown that bears are as big or a bigger issue for moose in south central Alaska.Wolves are more tied to caribou. When a caribou calf hits the ground, its up and running. If you've ever seen the Planet Earth videos, you'll see a wolf chasing a three-week old caribou calf for miles on end. The little sucker can run. A bear can't catch them. Moose calves have a hider strategy. They hide in the vegetation, and that makes them susceptible to bears.

That's why I find it very interesting that people want to increase moose populations, but they talk about culling wolves. I've questioned that myself. It doesn't have to do with science, it's just the way it is.

So it might make sense to kill wolves if managers were just interested in boosting caribou populations?
It's actually possible that culling the wolf colony on the North Slope of Alaska created conditions that gave rise to the caribou now called the Central Arctic Herd. They didn't used to exist until wolves were moved from that area. Wolves and caribou calving grounds don't mix. Wolves exhibit surplus killing behavior. They kill every calf they find, even if they don't eat them.Alaska had an aerial wolf eradication campaign in the 1950s; the oil fields came in with exploration in the 1960s, and then the government established the native village of Nuiqsut in the 1970s. This reduced the wolf population on the North Slope to the point where all of the sudden it became feasible for it to be a caribou calving ground. It's speculation, but it's very interesting.But caribou herds also migrate: They come and go in space and time in very big ways. You can manage them but they are certainly a lot less manageable than moose populations.