KING JESUS IS COMING FOR US ANY TIME NOW. THE RAPTURE. BE PREPARED TO GO.
A spokesman for the White House had no comment. State Department spokesman Mark Toner said the emails and the reports that followed "are simply further indication of the fluidity in reporting that night and in the days that followed.""An independent board is conducting a thorough review of the assault on our post in Benghazi," Toner said in an emailed statement. "Once we have the board's comprehensive account of what happened, findings and recommendations, we can fully address these matters."
MISSIVES FROM LIBYA
The records obtained by Reuters consist of three emails dispatched by the State Department's Operations Center to multiple government offices, including addresses at the White House, Pentagon, intelligence community and FBI, on the afternoon of September 11.The first email, timed at 4:05 p.m. Washington time - or 10:05 p.m. Benghazi time, 20-30 minutes after the attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission allegedly began - carried the subject line "U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi Under Attack" and the notation "SBU", meaning "Sensitive But Unclassified."The text said the State Department's regional security office had reported that the diplomatic mission in Benghazi was "under attack. Embassy in Tripoli reports approximately 20 armed people fired shots; explosions have been heard as well."The message continued: "Ambassador Stevens, who is currently in Benghazi, and four ... personnel are in the compound safe haven. The 17th of February militia is providing security support."A second email, headed "Update 1: U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi" and timed 4:54 p.m. Washington time, said that the Embassy in Tripoli had reported that "the firing at the U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi had stopped and the compound had been cleared." It said a "response team" was at the site attempting to locate missing personnel.A third email, also marked SBU and sent at 6:07 p.m. Washington time, carried the subject line: "Update 2: Ansar al-Sharia Claims Responsibility for Benghazi Attack."The message reported: "Embassy Tripoli reports the group claimed responsibility on Facebook and Twitter and has called for an attack on Embassy Tripoli."While some information identifying recipients of this message was redacted from copies of the messages obtained by Reuters, a government source said that one of the addresses to which the message was sent was the White House Situation Room, the president's secure command post.Other addressees included intelligence and military units as well as one used by the FBI command center, the source said.It was not known what other messages were received by agencies in Washington from Libya that day about who might have been behind the attacks.Intelligence experts caution that initial reports from the scene of any attack or disaster are often inaccurate.
By the morning of September 12, the day after the Benghazi attack, Reuters reported that there were indications that members of both Ansar al-Sharia, a militia based in the Benghazi area, and al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, the North African affiliate of al Qaeda's faltering central command, may have been involved in organizing the attacks.One U.S. intelligence official said that during the first classified briefing about Benghazi given to members of Congress, officials "carefully laid out the full range of sparsely available information, relying on the best analysis available at the time."The official added, however, that the initial analysis of the attack that was presented to legislators was mixed."Briefers said extremists were involved in attacks that appeared spontaneous, there may have been a variety of motivating factors, and possible links to groups such as (al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb and Ansar al-Sharia) were being looked at closely," the official said.(Additional reporting by Susan Cornwell; Editing by Mary Milliken and David Storey)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=gteHUvz1_x8
http://www.examiner.com/video/bomb-threat-posted-on-youtube-promises-attack-on-november-5
Hacker claiming ties to Anonymous posts bomb threat for November 5 on YouTube
On Monday, a video was posted to YouTube claiming that a bomb would detonate in a government building on November 5, one day before the general election. According to Tech News Daily, the threat was allegedly made by an offshoot of the hacker collective Anonymous that claimed credit for a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack on HSBC bank last week."Dear citizens of the world, We are Anonymous (sic)," the group said in a statement posted to Pastebin."As of today 200 kilograms of composite Nitroglycerin and commercial explosives have effectively been concealed in a government building, situated in the united states of America. On the 5th of November 2012 the device will detonate remotely via the transmission control protocol, leaving behind severe consiquences (sic)," the statement adds.
"We would like to advise that the contraption is built inside a tamper proof apparatus sensitive to physical intrusions or attempted disarmament, thus resulting in the desired effect, if the military grade device is found before the 5th of November. There is no intention, risks or circumstances what so ever to cause harm to innocent people, but we can not, say the same for the people who are the real terrorists, oppressors and war creators (sic)." The video concludes with a warning:
Moreover, Tech News Daily said the "mention of the
'transmission control protocol,' or TCP, may be a clue to other hackers
that the whole thing is a joke. TCP is one of the underlying networking protocols of the Internet."Commenters on the YouTube video say the message is fake, while some claim the government is behind the threat."November 5th is a significant date, as it is the date that Guy Fawkes attempted to blow up the Parliament building in England as part of the Gunpowder Plot in 1605. The incident, as well as the infamous Guy Fawkes mask, has been memorialized in movies such as 'V for Vendetta.' Anonymous has adopted the Fawkes mask as one of the collective’s symbols," Breitbart.com reported.
False flag-From
Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.False flag operations are covert
operations designed to deceive the public in such a way that the
operations appear as though they are being carried out by other
entities. The name is derived from the military concept of flying false
colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one's own.
False flag operations are not limited to war and counter-insurgency
operations, and can be used in peace-time.(NOTICE EVERY TIME THERES A
REAL TERRORIST ATTACK,THE GOVERNMENT ALWAYS IS DOING A FAKE DRILL WHICH
MEANS THEY CAN SAY IT WAS ONLY A DRILL IF THE ATTACK DOES NOT GO OVER
WITH THE PUBLIC OR IF THE GOVERNMENT MUFFED UP THEIR OWN FALSE FLAG
CONTROL FREAK,GET MORE CONTROL OF PEOPLES RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS.)
THIS
TELLS ME THE MOVIE WAS A BLATANT SETUP BY THE WHITEHOUSE TO GET THE
ARAB/MUSLIMS AROUND THE WORLD BEHEADING,BURNING,RIOTING WHEN THEY KNEW
THE LIBYA ATTACK WAS AL-QUIDA 2 HOURS AFTER IT HAPPENED ALREADY.THE RACE
CARD IS ON AGAIN BY THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION.NEXT TO FALSE FLAG TERROR
ATTACKS OBAMAS GREATEST CONTROL ATTACK IS THE RACE CARD.I GUESS OUR
MUSLIM COMMUNIST OBAMA NEEDED A DECEPTION OR DIVERSION FROM THE FACT
THAT THIS WAS A REAL AL-QUIDA ATTACK AND NOT ONE SETUP BY THE WHITEHOUSE
OR A WHITEHOUSE GROUP OR NEW WORLD ORDER NUTCASES THIS TIME.
Emails: White House told of militant claim two hours after Libya attack
By Mark Hosenball | Reuters – 38 mins ago OCT 24,12
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Officials at the White House and State Department were advised two hours after attackers assaulted the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi,
Libya, on September 11 that an Islamic militant group had claimed
credit for the attack, official emails show.One of the emails, obtained
by Reuters from government sources not connected with U.S. spy agencies
or the State Department and who requested anonymity, specifically mentions that the Libyan group called Ansar al-Sharia
had asserted responsibility for the attacks.The brief emails also show
how U.S. diplomats described the attack, even as it was still under way,
to Washington.U.S. Ambassador
Christopher Stevens and three other Americans were killed in the
Benghazi assault, which President Barack Obama and other U.S. officials
ultimately acknowledged was a "terrorist" attack carried out by
militants with suspected links to al Qaeda affiliates or sympathizers.
Administration spokesmen, including White House
spokesman Jay Carney, citing an unclassified assessment prepared by the
CIA, maintained for days that the attacks likely were a spontaneous
protest against an anti-Muslim film.While officials did
mention the possible involvement of "extremists," they did not lay
blame on any specific militant groups or possible links to al Qaeda or
its affiliates until intelligence officials publicly alleged that on September 28.There were indications that extremists with possible al
Qaeda connections were involved, but also evidence that the attacks
could have erupted spontaneously, they said, adding that government
experts wanted to be cautious about pointing fingers prematurely.U.S. intelligence officials have emphasized since
shortly after the attack that early intelligence reporting about the
attack was mixed.A spokesman for the White House had no comment. State Department spokesman Mark Toner said the emails and the reports that followed "are simply further indication of the fluidity in reporting that night and in the days that followed.""An independent board is conducting a thorough review of the assault on our post in Benghazi," Toner said in an emailed statement. "Once we have the board's comprehensive account of what happened, findings and recommendations, we can fully address these matters."
MISSIVES FROM LIBYA
The records obtained by Reuters consist of three emails dispatched by the State Department's Operations Center to multiple government offices, including addresses at the White House, Pentagon, intelligence community and FBI, on the afternoon of September 11.The first email, timed at 4:05 p.m. Washington time - or 10:05 p.m. Benghazi time, 20-30 minutes after the attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission allegedly began - carried the subject line "U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi Under Attack" and the notation "SBU", meaning "Sensitive But Unclassified."The text said the State Department's regional security office had reported that the diplomatic mission in Benghazi was "under attack. Embassy in Tripoli reports approximately 20 armed people fired shots; explosions have been heard as well."The message continued: "Ambassador Stevens, who is currently in Benghazi, and four ... personnel are in the compound safe haven. The 17th of February militia is providing security support."A second email, headed "Update 1: U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi" and timed 4:54 p.m. Washington time, said that the Embassy in Tripoli had reported that "the firing at the U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi had stopped and the compound had been cleared." It said a "response team" was at the site attempting to locate missing personnel.A third email, also marked SBU and sent at 6:07 p.m. Washington time, carried the subject line: "Update 2: Ansar al-Sharia Claims Responsibility for Benghazi Attack."The message reported: "Embassy Tripoli reports the group claimed responsibility on Facebook and Twitter and has called for an attack on Embassy Tripoli."While some information identifying recipients of this message was redacted from copies of the messages obtained by Reuters, a government source said that one of the addresses to which the message was sent was the White House Situation Room, the president's secure command post.Other addressees included intelligence and military units as well as one used by the FBI command center, the source said.It was not known what other messages were received by agencies in Washington from Libya that day about who might have been behind the attacks.Intelligence experts caution that initial reports from the scene of any attack or disaster are often inaccurate.
By the morning of September 12, the day after the Benghazi attack, Reuters reported that there were indications that members of both Ansar al-Sharia, a militia based in the Benghazi area, and al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, the North African affiliate of al Qaeda's faltering central command, may have been involved in organizing the attacks.One U.S. intelligence official said that during the first classified briefing about Benghazi given to members of Congress, officials "carefully laid out the full range of sparsely available information, relying on the best analysis available at the time."The official added, however, that the initial analysis of the attack that was presented to legislators was mixed."Briefers said extremists were involved in attacks that appeared spontaneous, there may have been a variety of motivating factors, and possible links to groups such as (al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb and Ansar al-Sharia) were being looked at closely," the official said.(Additional reporting by Susan Cornwell; Editing by Mary Milliken and David Storey)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=gteHUvz1_x8
http://www.examiner.com/video/bomb-threat-posted-on-youtube-promises-attack-on-november-5
Hacker claiming ties to Anonymous posts bomb threat for November 5 on YouTube
On Monday, a video was posted to YouTube claiming that a bomb would detonate in a government building on November 5, one day before the general election. According to Tech News Daily, the threat was allegedly made by an offshoot of the hacker collective Anonymous that claimed credit for a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack on HSBC bank last week."Dear citizens of the world, We are Anonymous (sic)," the group said in a statement posted to Pastebin."As of today 200 kilograms of composite Nitroglycerin and commercial explosives have effectively been concealed in a government building, situated in the united states of America. On the 5th of November 2012 the device will detonate remotely via the transmission control protocol, leaving behind severe consiquences (sic)," the statement adds.
"We would like to advise that the contraption is built inside a tamper proof apparatus sensitive to physical intrusions or attempted disarmament, thus resulting in the desired effect, if the military grade device is found before the 5th of November. There is no intention, risks or circumstances what so ever to cause harm to innocent people, but we can not, say the same for the people who are the real terrorists, oppressors and war creators (sic)." The video concludes with a warning:
We are anonymousWe are legionWe do not forgetWe do not forgive...On the 5th of November, You will expect us.
In response, another group posted a message at Pastebin saying that the threat does not come from Anonymous."Let us be perfectly clear: Anonymous is not a terrorist
organization. Anonymous does not use bombs. Anonymous does not condone
violence in any way. Anonymous supports justice and universal equal
rights. We support peaceful protest," the Pastebin statement read."At this time, we are not sure whether or not
@FawkesSecurity is trying to troll, or if he's trying to discredit the
name of Anonymous in the eyes of the world. Maybe @FawkesSecurity's
twitter and YouTube account was hacked. Perhaps this is the FBI's way of
trying to label Anonymous as terrorists so they can begin using the
NDAA against us," the statement added.Tech News Daily said that the online threat "seems out of step with the Anonymous ethos."
