Friday, January 30, 2009
23 Thus he said, The fourth beast(THE EU,REVIVED ROME) shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth,(7TH WORLD EMPIRE) which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces.(TR BLOCKS)
24 And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise:(10 NATIONS) and another shall rise after them;(#11 SPAIN) and he shall be diverse from the first, and he shall subdue three kings.(BE HEAD OF 3 KINGS OR NATIONS).
THE REAL FACE OF THE EU - VIDEO
SPAIN IS OUT TO LUNCH CHARGING ISRAEL.
Spain opens war-crimes case against Israel 30/01 13:40 CETworld news
The High Court in Spain is starting a war-crimes investigation into a former Israeli defence minister and six of his military officials. Binyamin Ben-Eliezer was in charge in 2002 when Israel bombed a building in the Gaza Strip killing 14 civilians and a Hamas comander. Spanish law allows the prosecution of foreigners for war-crimes committed abroad. Israel said the case was delusional. Spain’s Foreign Minister Miguel Angel Moratinos replied: Israel’s reaction is Israel’s reaction. The Spanish government’s reaction is to respect the law, and together we must help everyone to build peace in the region. That is the Spanish government’s obligation – respect the law and work for peace.The case was brought by the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights, which is based in Gaza, on behalf of the civilian families of those killed in the attack. The commander who was killed, Salah Shehada, was leader of the Hamas military wing. Israel had him on a ‘most-wanted’ list. His death is not part of the Spanish investigation. At the time, the EU said Israel had damaged chances of a deal to end a wave of suicide bombings. America described it as heavy-handed. 96 people were wounded, and nine of the 14 civilian dead were children or babies.
Iceland could be EU member by 2011
HONOR MAHONY Today JAN 30,09 @ 12:29 CET
The small North Atlantic state of Iceland could become a member of the EU within the next two years if it takes the step of formally applying for membership of the 27-nation bloc.EU enlargement commissioner Olli Rehn has indicated that the EU would look favourably upon a membership application and would be prepared to make it an EU member within record time, probably at the same time as Croatia in 2011.The EU prefers two countries joining at the same time rather than individually. If Iceland applies shortly and the negotiations are rapid, Croatia and Iceland could join the EU in parallel, said Mr Rehn, according to UK daily the Guardian.On Iceland, I hope I will be busier. It is one of the oldest democracies in the world and its strategic and economic positions would be an asset to the EU, he continued.The encouraging words from the EU come as Iceland grapples with financial meltdown caused by the global economic crisis.The government last week became the first to fall due to the global economic situation after weeks of demonstrations in Reykjavik as people's savings and pensions eroded. The country has also had a bailout by the International Monetary Fund.Elections are expected to be held in May. Until then, the country is expected to be led by a caretaker centre-left government of Social Democrats, the senior coalition partner, and the more eurosceptic Left-Greens.
While the Social Democrats generally favour EU membership, the Left-Greens party rejects participation in the European Union and emphasizes simple, bilateral treaties concerning trade and co-operation, according to its website. Finnur Dellsen, a political advisor in the Left-Green party, told EUobserver that his party wants a referendum on whether to open negotiation talks with the EU and then another one on actual membership.But he noted that EU question is not really a part of the current negotiations on forming a government.However, the question of membership is expected to feature strongly in pre-election campaigning, as will the issue of whether the battered Icelandic Krona should be replaced by the euro.Icelanders themselves remain unsure of EU membership. A recent Capacent Gallup poll found that 38 percent want to join the EU, down from over 50 percent in October.Speaking about possible EU membership, European Commission president Jose Manuel Barroso on Friday (30 January) did not reject the idea. Iceland is a very friendly country - a member of the European economic space.
Solana optimistic about Gaza ceasefire ELITSA VUCHEVA 29.01.2009 @ 17:45 CET
EUOBSERVER / BRUSSELS – EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana on Thursday (29 January) expressed hopes that a lasting cease-fire between Israel and Hamas could be reached as early as next week.I hope that around 4 or 5 February – this is the objective – a ceasefire can be established… And then from that date on until let's say 24 or 25 February to get an agreement of a more political nature, Mr Solana told a seminar organised by the centre-right EPP-ED party in the European Parliament in Brussels.This is [something] that should be done and I hope that it will be done, he added.Israel and Hamas on 18 January agreed to stop hostilities, but these are for the moment two unilateral statements by the two sides, without the true connotation of a ceasefire, the diplomat explained.Many issues are still to be resolved, but the situation is moving, said Mr Solana, who returned from a Middle East visit on Thursday morning.Speaking to a group of journalists later on, he said that he wished without any doubt that the Middle East peace process could restart within a year.
In order for this to be achieved, Mr Solana backed the idea of forming an interim unity government between the Palestinian Authority and Hamas that would stay in power for a few months – the time necessary to launch the reconstruction of Gaza and organise new elections.It is not for the EU to negotiate such a government, Mr Solana said, but he added: it is good that we give a signal this is something we can live with.Governance of the two occupied Palestinian territories has been split between Islamist Hamas and its secular rival Fatah since June 2007.Egypt has been the mediator between Fatah and Hamas trying to renew dialogue between them, which is seen as an essential step for Gaza's reconstruction by the international community.
Both the EU and the US refuse direct contact with Hamas which they consider a terrorist organisation.Mr Solana's words came in the aftermath of the three-week Gaza conflict during which some 1,300 Palestinians were killed by Israeli forces and more than 5,000 others were injured – many of whom women and children. Three Israeli civilians and 10 soldiers were also killed in the conflict.The statements also come just days after the new US administration illustrated that it will put the Middle East conflict high on its political agenda when President Barack Obama phoned Arab and Israeli leaders on his first full day in office.It then appointed George Mitchell - known for his work on the Northern Ireland peace process - as special envoy to the region in a move welcomed by the EU.
23 Thus he said, The fourth beast shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth, which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces.
24 And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise: and another shall rise after them; and he shall be diverse from the first, and he shall subdue three kings.
25 And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time.
4 But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased.
1 And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.
1 And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.
2 And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.
3 And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast.
7 And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations.
8 And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.
12 And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed.
16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.
3 So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns.
7 And the angel said unto me, Wherefore didst thou marvel? I will tell thee the mystery of the woman, and of the beast that carrieth her, which hath the seven heads and ten horns.
9 And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth.
10 And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space.
12 And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast.
18 And the woman which thou sawest is that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth.
BROWN ADMITS AND CALLS FOR NEW WORLD ORDER
GERALD CELENTE PREDICTIONS - VIDEO,AUDIO
BRIGITTE GABRIEL VIDEO
ADDMITED MICROCHIP ALL
THE THIRD JIHAD - INFORMATION
3RD JIDAD - VIDEO ENGLISH
VIDEO - http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7961200236915885171&ei=Unl3SYqPApPSjgKmzbilDw&q=fitna
Time for a new world order: PM Phillip Coorey Chief Political Correspondent
January 31, 2009
KEVIN RUDD has denounced the unfettered capitalism of the past three decades and called for a new era of social capitalism in which government intervention and regulation feature heavily.In an essay to be published next week, the Prime Minister is scathing of the neo-liberals who began refashioning the market system in the 1970s, and ultimately brought about the global financial crisis.The time has come, off the back of the current crisis, to proclaim that the great neo-liberal experiment of the past 30 years has failed, that the emperor has no clothes, he writes of those who placed their faith in the corrective powers of the market.Neo-liberalism and the free-market fundamentalism it has produced has been revealed as little more than personal greed dressed up as an economic philosophy. And, ironically, it now falls to social democracy to prevent liberal capitalism from cannibalising itself.Mr Rudd writes in The Monthly that just as Franklin Roosevelt rebuilt US capitalism after the Great Depression, modern-day social democrats such as himself and the US President, Barack Obama, must do the same again. But he argues that minor tweakings of long-established orthodoxies will not do and advocates a new system that reaches beyond the 70-year-old interventionist principles of John Maynard Keynes.
A system of open markets, unambiguously regulated by an activist state, and one in which the state intervenes to reduce the greater inequalities that competitive markets will inevitably generate, he writes.He urges a new contract for the future that eschews the extremism of both the left and right.He mocks neo-liberals who now find themselves tied in ideological knots in being forced to rely on the state they fundamentally despise to save financial markets from collapse.He advocates tighter regulation and policing of global finances, and identifies the immediate challenge as restoring global growth by 3 per cent of gross domestic product, the amount it is expected to fall in 2009. Next week, as Parliament resumes, his Government will chip in with a second economic stimulus package.Mr Rudd commits to keeping budgets in surplus over the cycle, meaning deficits should be temporary. In a further sign the Government is not contemplating additional tax cuts, which would deliver a permanent hit to revenue, he stresses that stimulus measures have to be paid for when the economy recovers.
Mr Rudd singles out Thatcherism as a culprit, as well as the former Howard government. His essay implicitly attacks the Opposition Leader, Malcolm Turnbull, who this week urged the free market be allowed to dictate commercial property values as he slammed a Government measure to prop them up.Mr Rudd's essay follows the blast Mr Obama gave Wall Street bankers yesterday for awarding themselves $28 billion in bonuses last year at the same time as they were being bailed out by taxpayers.In a message to Mr Obama and the US Congress, Mr Rudd counselled against erecting trade barriers. Soft or hard, protectionism is a sure-fire way of turning recession into depression as it exacerbates the collapse in global demand.The message was reinforced in Davos yesterday when the Trade Minister, Simon Crean, described the buy American provisions of the new Obama stimulus package as very worrying. On the face of it, it looks like it contravenes commitments made to the World Trade Organisation, he said.with Paola Totaro
A VERY REAL NEW WORLD ORDER By Chuck Baldwin January 27, 2009
It is hard to believe, but a majority of Americans (including Christians and conservatives) seem oblivious to the fact that there is a very real, very legitimate New World Order (NWO) unfolding. In the face of overwhelming evidence, most Americans not only seem totally unaware of this reality, they seem unwilling to even remotely entertain the notion.On one hand, it is understandable that so many Americans would be ignorant of the emerging New World Order. After all, the mainstream media refuses to report, or even acknowledge, the NWO. Even conservative commentators and talk show hosts such as Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Michael Savage, or Joe Scarborough refuse to discuss it. And when listeners call these respective programs, these conservative hosts usually resort to insulting the caller as being some kind of conspiracy kook. One host even railed that if anyone questions the government line on 9/11, we should lock them up and throw away the key. So much for freedom of speech!This is an area--perhaps the central area--where liberals and conservatives agree: they both show no patience or tolerance for anyone who believes that global government (in any form) is evolving. One has to wonder how otherwise intelligent and thoughtful people can be so brain dead when it comes to this issue. It makes one wonder who is really pulling their strings, doesn't it? The list of notable personalities who have openly referenced or called for some kind of global government or New World Order is extremely lengthy. Are all these people kooks or conspiracy nuts? Why would world leaders--including presidents, secretaries of state, and high government officials; including the media, financial, and political elite--constantly refer to something that doesn't exist? Why would they write about, talk about, or openly promote a New World Order, if there is no such thing?
Many of us recall President George Herbert Walker Bush talking much about an emerging New World Order. For example, in 1989, Bush told the students of Texas A&M University, Perhaps the world order of the future will truly be a family of nations.
Later, Bush, Sr. said, We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations a new world order . . .. When we are successful, and we will be, we have a real chance at this new world order, an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the U.N.'s founders.Bush, Sr. also said, What is at stake is more than one small country, it is a big idea--a new world order.Bush, Sr. further said, The world can therefore seize the opportunity to fulfill the long-held promise of a new world order . . .What was President G.H.W. Bush talking about, if there is no such thing as an emerging New World Order? Was he talking out of his mind? Was he hallucinating?
England's Prime Minister, Tony Blair, said, We are all internationalists now, whether we like it or not. He continued saying, On the eve of a new Millennium we are now in a new world. We need new rules for international co-operation and new ways of organizing our international institutions. He also said, Today the impulse towards interdependence is immeasurably greater. We are witnessing the beginnings of a new doctrine of international community.In 1999, Tony Blair said, Globalization has transformed our economies and our working practices. But globalism is not just economic. It is also a political and security phenomenon.What is Tony Blair talking about, if there is no emerging New World Order? What does he mean by a new doctrine of international community? What does he mean by new world? How can one have globalism, which includes a political and security phenomenon, without creating a New World Order? Is Tony Blair hallucinating? Likewise, former President George W. Bush penned his signature to the Declaration of Quebec back on April 22, 2001, in which he gave a commitment to hemispheric integration and national and collective responsibility for improving the economic well-being and security of our people.
By our people, Bush meant the people of the Western Hemisphere, not the people of the United States. Phyllis Schlafly rightly reminded us that G.W. Bush pledged that the United States will build a hemispheric family on the basis of a more just and democratic international order.Remember, too, that it was G.W. Bush who, back in 2005, committed the United States to the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP), which is nothing more than a precursor to the North American Community or Union, as outlined in CFR member Robert Pastor's manual, Toward a North American Community.If there is no such thing as an emerging New World Order, what was G.W. Bush talking about when he referred to a hemispheric family and an international order? The public statements of notable world leaders regarding an emerging New World Order are copious. Consider the statements of former CBS newsman, Walter Cronkite.In his book, A Reporter's Life, Walter Cronkite said, A system of world order--preferably a system of world government--is mandatory. The proud nations someday will see the light and, for the common good and their own survival, yield up their precious sovereignty . . . Cronkite told BBC newsman Tim Sebastian, I think we are realizing that we are going to have to have an international rule of law. He added, We need not only an executive to make international law, but we need the military forces to enforce that law. Cronkite also said, American people are going to begin to realize that perhaps they are going to have to yield some sovereignty to an international body to enforce world law.If there is no emerging New World Order, what is Walter Cronkite talking about? Can there be any doubt that Cronkite is talking about global government? Absolutely not! Now, when Bush, Sr. talks about fulfilling the promise and vision of the U.N.'s founders, he was talking about the same thing former UN Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali was talking about when he said, The time for absolute and exclusive sovereignty . . . has passed.
The United Nations has been on the forefront of promoting the New World Order agenda since its very inception. In 1995, the UN released a manual entitled, Our Global Neighborhood. It states, Population, consumption, technology, development, and the environment are linked in complex relationships that bear closely on human welfare in the global neighborhood. Their effective and equitable management calls for a systematic, long-term, global approach guided by the principle of sustainable development, which has been the central lesson from the mounting ecological dangers of recent times. Its universal application is a priority among the tasks of global governance.If there is no emerging New World Order, what is global governance all about? Who are the movers and shakers promoting global government? you ask. Obviously, it is the international bankers who are the heavyweights behind the push for global government. Remember, one cannot create a global economy without a global government to manage, oversee, and control it.In a letter written to Colonel E. Mandell House, President Franklin D. Roosevelt said, The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government of the U.S. since the days of Andrew Jackson.Old Hickory did his best to rid the United States from the death grip that the international bankers were beginning to exert on this country. He may have been the last President to actually oppose the bankers. In discussing the Bank Renewal bill with a delegation of bankers in 1832, Jackson said, Gentlemen, I have had men watching you for a long time, and I am convinced that you have used the funds of the bank to speculate in the breadstuffs of the country. When you won, you divided the profits amongst you, and when you lost, you charged it to the bank. You tell me that if I take the deposits from the bank and annul its charter, I shall ruin ten thousand families. That may be true, gentlemen, but that is your sin! Should I let you go on, you will ruin fifty thousand families, and that would be my sin! You are a den of vipers and thieves. I intend to rout you out, and by the eternal God, I will rout you out.Unfortunately, the international bankers proved themselves to be too formidable for President Jackson. And in 1913, with the collaboration of President Woodrow Wilson, the bankers were given charge over America's financial system by the creation of the Federal Reserve.Ever since the CFR and Trilateral Commission were created, they have filled the key leadership positions of government, big media, and of course, the Federal Reserve.In his book, With No Apologies, former Republican Presidential nominee Barry Goldwater wrote, The Trilateral Commission is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power-- political, monetary, intellectual and ecclesiastical. What the Trilateral Commission intends is to create a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nation-states involved. As managers and creators of the system, they will rule the future. Was Goldwater a prophet or what?
And again, the goals of the global elite have been publicly stated. Back in 1991, the founder of the CFR, David Rockefeller praised the major media for their complicity in helping to facilitate the globalist agenda by saying, "We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. . . . It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.How could Rockefeller be any plainer? He acknowledged the willful assistance of the major media in helping to keep the elitists' agenda of global government from the American people. To this day, the major media has not deviated from that collaboration. And this includes the aforementioned conservative talking heads. They know if they want to keep their jobs, they dare not reveal the New World Order. The NWO, more than anything else, is the Third Rail to the national media.Is it any wonder that President Barack Obama has stacked his government with numerous members of the CFR? Among these are Robert Gates, Janet Napolitano, Eric Shinseki, Timothy Geithner, and Tom Daschle. Other CFR members include CFR President Richard Haass, CFR Director Richard Holbrooke, and founding member of the Trilateral Commission and CFR member Paul Volcker. Obama even asked a CFR member, Rick Warren, to deliver the inaugural prayer.Still not convinced? Just a few days ago, when asked by a reporter what he thought the most important thing was that Barack Obama could accomplish, former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger said, I think his task will be develop an overall strategy for America in this period when, really, a New World Order can be created. It's a great opportunity; it isn't just a crisis.This is the same Henry Kissinger, you will recall, who said back in 1991, Today, America would be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow, they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were [sic] an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government.Even Gideon Rachman, the chief foreign affairs commentator for the Financial Times, wrote an editorial expressing his support for world government. In his column he said, I have never believed that there is a secret United Nations plot to take over the US. . . . But, for the first time in my life, I think the formation of some sort of world government is plausible.A world government would involve much more than co-operation between nations. It would be an entity with state-like characteristics, backed by a body of laws. The European Union has already set up a continental government for 27 countries, which could be a model. The EU has a supreme court, a currency, thousands of pages of law, a large civil service and the ability to deploy military force.
So could the European model go global? There are three reasons for thinking that it might.Rachman then goes on to explain the reasons why he believes world government is plausible.Do you now see why it does not matter to a tinker's dam whether it is a Republican or Democrat who resides at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue? For the most part, both major parties in Washington, D.C., have been under the dominating influence of the international bankers who control the Federal Reserve, the CFR, and the Trilateral Commission. And this is also why it does not matter whether one calls himself conservative or liberal. For the most part, both conservatives and liberals in Washington, D.C., are facilitating the emerging New World Order. It is time we wake up to this reality.Presidents Bush, Sr., Bill Clinton, and Bush, Jr. have thoroughly set the table for the implementation of the NWO, as surely as the sun rises in the east. All Obama has to do is put the food on the table--and you can count on this: Barack Obama will serve up a New World Order feast like you cannot believe! That a New World Order is emerging is not in question. The only question is, What will freedom-loving Americans do about it? Of course, the first thing they have to do is admit that an emerging New World Order exists! Until conservatives, Christians, pastors, constitutionalists, and others who care about a sovereign, independent United States acknowledge the reality of an emerging New World Order, they will be incapable of opposing it. And right now, that is exactly what they are not doing.2009 Chuck Baldwin.