KING JESUS IS COMING FOR US ANY TIME NOW. THE RAPTURE. BE PREPARED TO GO.
JEREMEIAH 49:35-37 (IN IRAN AT THE BUSHEHR OR ARAK NUKE SITE SOME BELIEVE)
35 Thus saith the LORD of hosts; Behold, I will break the bow of Elam,(IRAN/BUSHEHR NUCLEAR SITE) the chief of their might.(MOST DANGEROUS NUKE SITE IN IRAN)
36 And upon Elam will I bring the four winds from the four quarters of heaven,(IRANIANS SCATTERED OR MASS IMIGARATION) and will scatter them toward all those winds; and there shall be no nation whither the outcasts of Elam shall not come.(WORLD IMMIGRATION)
37 For I will cause Elam (IRAN-BUSHEHR NUKE SITE) to be dismayed before their enemies, and before them that seek their life: and I will bring evil upon them, even my fierce anger,(ISRAELS NUKES POSSIBLY) saith the LORD; and I will send the sword after them, till I have consumed them:(IRAN AND ITS NUKE SITES DESTROYED)
PSALMS 83:3-7
3 They (ARABS,MUSLIMS) have taken crafty counsel against thy people,(ISRAEL) and consulted against thy hidden ones.
4 They have said, Come, and let us cut them off from being a nation; that the name of Israel may be no more in remembrance.
5 For they (MUSLIMS) have consulted together with one consent: they are confederate against thee:(TREATIES)
6 The tabernacles of Edom,(JORDAN) and the Ishmaelites;(ARABS) of Moab, PALESTINIANS,JORDAN) and the Hagarenes;(EGYPT)
7 Gebal,(HEZZBALLOH,LEBANON) and Ammon,(JORDAN) and Amalek;(SYRIA,ARABS,SINAI) the Philistines (PALESTINIANS) with the inhabitants of Tyre;(LEBANON)
JOEL 2:3,30
3 A fire devoureth (ATOMIC BOMB) before them;(RUSSIAN-ARAB-MUSLIM ARMIES AGAINST ISRAEL) and behind them a flame burneth: the land is as the garden of Eden before them, and behind them a desolate wilderness; yea, and nothing shall escape them.
30 And I will shew wonders in the heavens and in the earth, blood, and fire, and pillars of smoke.(ATOMIC BOMB AFFECT)
ZECHARIAH 14:12-13
12 And this shall be the plague wherewith the LORD will smite all the people that have fought against Jerusalem; Their flesh shall consume away while they stand upon their feet,(DISOLVED) and their eyes shall consume away in their holes,(DISOLVED) and their tongue shall consume away in their mouth.(DISOLVED)(BECAUSE NUKES HAVE BEEN USED ON ISRAELS ENEMIES)(GOD PROTECTS ISRAEL AND ALWAYS WILL)
13 And it shall come to pass in that day, that a great tumult from the LORD shall be among them; and they shall lay hold every one on the hand of his neighbour, and his hand shall rise up against the hand of his neighbour.(1/2-3 BILLION DIE IN WW3)(THIS IS AN ATOMIC BOMB EFFECT)
JEREMEIAH 49:35-37 (IN IRAN AT THE BUSHEHR OR ARAK NUKE SITE SOME BELIEVE)
35 Thus saith the LORD of hosts; Behold, I will break the bow of Elam,(IRAN/BUSHEHR NUCLEAR SITE) the chief of their might.(MOST DANGEROUS NUKE SITE IN IRAN)
36 And upon Elam will I bring the four winds from the four quarters of heaven,(IRANIANS SCATTERED OR MASS IMIGARATION) and will scatter them toward all those winds; and there shall be no nation whither the outcasts of Elam shall not come.(WORLD IMMIGRATION)
37 For I will cause Elam (IRAN-BUSHEHR NUKE SITE) to be dismayed before their enemies, and before them that seek their life: and I will bring evil upon them, even my fierce anger,(ISRAELS NUKES POSSIBLY) saith the LORD; and I will send the sword after them, till I have consumed them:(IRAN AND ITS NUKE SITES DESTROYED)
PSALMS 83:3-7
3 They (ARABS,MUSLIMS) have taken crafty counsel against thy people,(ISRAEL) and consulted against thy hidden ones.
4 They have said, Come, and let us cut them off from being a nation; that the name of Israel may be no more in remembrance.
5 For they (MUSLIMS) have consulted together with one consent: they are confederate against thee:(TREATIES)
6 The tabernacles of Edom,(JORDAN) and the Ishmaelites;(ARABS) of Moab, PALESTINIANS,JORDAN) and the Hagarenes;(EGYPT)
7 Gebal,(HEZZBALLOH,LEBANON) and Ammon,(JORDAN) and Amalek;(SYRIA,ARABS,SINAI) the Philistines (PALESTINIANS) with the inhabitants of Tyre;(LEBANON)
JOEL 2:3,30
3 A fire devoureth (ATOMIC BOMB) before them;(RUSSIAN-ARAB-MUSLIM ARMIES AGAINST ISRAEL) and behind them a flame burneth: the land is as the garden of Eden before them, and behind them a desolate wilderness; yea, and nothing shall escape them.
30 And I will shew wonders in the heavens and in the earth, blood, and fire, and pillars of smoke.(ATOMIC BOMB AFFECT)
ZECHARIAH 14:12-13
12 And this shall be the plague wherewith the LORD will smite all the people that have fought against Jerusalem; Their flesh shall consume away while they stand upon their feet,(DISOLVED) and their eyes shall consume away in their holes,(DISOLVED) and their tongue shall consume away in their mouth.(DISOLVED)(BECAUSE NUKES HAVE BEEN USED ON ISRAELS ENEMIES)(GOD PROTECTS ISRAEL AND ALWAYS WILL)
13 And it shall come to pass in that day, that a great tumult from the LORD shall be among them; and they shall lay hold every one on the hand of his neighbour, and his hand shall rise up against the hand of his neighbour.(1/2-3 BILLION DIE IN WW3)(THIS IS AN ATOMIC BOMB EFFECT)
Ex-IDF intel chief: Regional war unlikely if Israel strikes Iran
Overstating the threat of Iranian retaliation only increases the likelihood of an Israeli attack, Amos Yadlin warns
November 18, 2013, 11:47 am
6-The Times of Israel
A regional war, coupled with a
closure of the Strait of Hormuz and a series of terror attacks — the
horror scenario commonly depicted by Western powers if Israel were to
launch a limited strike against Iran — is highly unlikely,
a former head of military intelligence wrote this week in advance of a
third round of nuclear talks between Iran and the six world powers. He
also said talk of such a scenario was harmful to global diplomacy
and, ironically, increased the likelihood of Israeli military action.“Those
who overestimate the threat of regional escalation damage the
credibility of the military option and encourage a situation in which
this becomes the only available option for preventing Iran from
acquiring a nuclear weapon,” wrote Maj. Gen. (ret) Amos Yadlin, the
director of the INSS think tank, and research assistant Avner Golov in a recent issue of Strategic Assessment (PDF).The comments come amid stiff Israeli criticism
of the emerging deal being hammered out between Iran and the so-called
P5+1 — the United States, Russia, China, France, Great Britain and
Germany — and against the backdrop of recent comments by Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu’s newly retired national security adviser, Yaakov
Amidror, who told the Financial Times on Sunday
that there was “no question” that Israel would be willing to strike
Iran unilaterally and that such an attack could set back the Iranian
nuclear program “for a very long time.”Yadlin and Golov described five possible
Iranian responses to a strike, ranging from total military restraint to
full-blown regional war, and asserted that the most likely scenarios
were two gradations of a limited response. The first, “the classic
reactive strategy,” would be a tit-for-tat strike in which “a
significant number of missiles would be launched from Iran and Lebanon
in the direction of Dimona or any other target in Israel perceived as
‘nuclear-associated,’” the two wrote.A more significant reaction, but one Yadlin
and Golov also considered to have “a high likelihood” of being chosen,
would include one or two missile volleys at Israeli cities, a strike
against Saudi and Western interests in the Gulf, and air and sea suicide
missions.
A more robust and deadly response, in which
Iran launched dozens of missiles a day against Israeli cities — as a
declaration of outrage against the violation of its sovereignty or as a
means of deterring Israel from any future action — “would lead to a
significant Israeli response and could lead to escalation of the
conflict… which could threaten the continued survival of the regime.” So
long as a Western strike focused solely on the nuclear program and not
wider regime assets, the two wrote, the regime would likely refrain from
such a response.The full-blown regional war scenario, most
frequently advanced by Western officials and experts — including former
White House counter-terror chief Richard Clarke, who told The Times of Israel in June
that on the scale of possible Iranian reactions to an attack, “I’m more
on the apocalyptic side” — was both “highly questionable,” the two
wrote, and “not grounded in rational evaluation.”Yadlin accurately envisaged Russian
involvement in the Syrian chemical weapons crisis several week in
advance of that development in September, and served as head of the
IDF’s military intelligence in September 2007 when Israel allegedly
risked war by obliterating Syria’s heavy water reactor in Dir a-Zur.He said that a Western or Israeli attack
solely targeting Iran’s nuclear facilities should be seen not as a spark
to all-out war, but as an integral part of a comprehensive approach to
disarming Iran’s nuclear program. “A strike should be seen as a tool to
promote the goal of stopping Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons through
diplomatic means, to the extent possible,” the paper argued, “and not
as a solution in and of itself.”Israel can strike Iran alone, says PM’s former security aide
Yaakov Amidror, who stepped down earlier this month, warns there is ‘no question’ Netanyahu is prepared to act if necessary
November 18, 2013, 3:30 am
6
Netanyahu’s former national security adviser,
who stepped down earlier this month, said that there was “no question”
the prime minister would make the unilateral decision to use military
force should it become necessary.“We don’t need permission from anyone – we are
an independent state,” he said, adding “we have our own sovereignty. If
Israel is in a position in which Israel must defend itself, Israel will
do it.”Amidror’s statements came just as world powers
are set to resume nuclear talks with Iran in Geneva on Wednesday which,
according to reports, are expected to lead to a deal — a deal
vehemently opposed by Netanyahu, who has spoken relentlessly against the
agreement that would ease some sanctions while still leaving Iran with
uranium-enrichment capabilities, as it was emerging last weekend.The prime minister has been increasingly vocal
in recent days about his opposition to the potential deal, saying he
utterly rejects the brewing agreement. His government has been lobbying
American allies in Congress to keep up sanctions.“It is clear that this agreement is good only for Iran, and bad for the world,” Netanyahu said Sunday at a press conference with visiting French President Francois Hollande,
who is also against the deal with Iran in its present terms. “The
choice today is not between a bad deal or war,” he stressed; on the
contrary, he asserted, with each passing day Iran is under economic
pressure that grows and grows.In last week’s talks in Geneva between Iran
and the US, Russia, China, France, Britain and Germany — the so-called
P5+1 — Paris’s tough position on Iran was said to have prevented the
global powers from signing an interim agreement with Tehran, one that
would have included limited sanctions relief in return for a partial
freeze of the country’s nuclear program.“With patience and determination, you can get a
good deal,” Netanyahu told Hollande. “This means maintaining pressure
and increasing it, achieving a deal that would peacefully dismantle
Iran’s military nuclear program, and would cause them to dismantle the
centrifuges and plutonium-production heavy water reactor.”“When someone says they are out to destroy
you, we have learned in our Jewish history to take them seriously,” he
said. ”It is my duty to prevent anyone from credibly threatening or
executing another holocaust against the Jewish people. This is my
obligation, but I also believe it’s our common obligation for the sake
of mankind, for the sake of our common future.”Over the past two weeks, Netanyahu and other senior officials have openly sparred with the US over the emerging Iran deal.
Earlier on Sunday, CNN broadcast an interview
with the prime minister in which he acknowledged “differences of
opinion” with the Obama administration over the way to best thwart
Iran’s nuclear weapons ambitions and over the terms offered by the P5+1
nations. Netanyahu said “the best of friends” can have differences, and
emphasized his conviction that the Iranian program poses an existential
threat to Israel.
Netanyahu restated the government’s opposition
to Iran maintaining a heavy water reactor (at Arak) and its maintenance
of centrifuges that could be used to enrich uranium even to low levels.
The Geneva offer reportedly allows Iran to continue enriching uranium
to 3.5%. The Iranian regime has contended that it seeks nuclear energy
for domestic programs, not for the development of nuclear weapons.