2020 AMERICAN ELECTION RESULTS BY STATE TRUMP VS LOSER LIBERAL SLEEPY (SLOPPY JOE) BIDEN.
ON D-38 OF THE TRUMP WIN OF THE PRESIDENCY. THU DEC 10,20. TRUMP HAS CONVINCED TEXAS TO LOOK INTO VOTER FRAUD IN 4 STATES.
Liberty University’s Falkirk Center Celebrates One-Year Anniversary as Fellows Promote ‘Stolen Election’ Falsehoods and COVID-19 Conspiracy Theories-By Peter Montgomery | December 10, 2020 10:42 am
Liberty University’s Falkirk Center celebrated its one-year anniversary this week. The Center describes its purpose as “educating, inspiring, and mobilizing Christians in the battle to preserve American liberty and rally citizens in an effort to shape government policies, national institutions, and American society through a Biblical worldview.”Like its bullying co-founders Jerry Falwell, Jr. and Charlie Kirk, the Center takes an aggressive posture in defense of a Christian nationalist vision and in opposition to secularism. “I don’t care what the winds of wokeism tell us,” said Executive Director Ryan Helfenbein in an article on Liberty’s website. “We don’t just want to be an organization that barks; we want to be an organization that bites.”“The function and the moral mission of the Falkirk Center is to go on the offense in the name of Christian principles and in the name of exceptional, God-given American liberties,” says the Center’s website. “Accomplishing this end requires more than adding noise to the echo chamber. It requires an army of bold ambassadors equipped with Biblical and Constitutional knowledge to speak truth to believers and unbelievers alike in every professional field and public forum.”The leaders of Falkirk’s “army of bold ambassadors” are its fellows, who include:Kirk, head of right-wing youth organizing group Turning Point USA and a vocal ally of Christian nationalist and dominionist religious-right leaders. Kirk recently tweeted, “There is more evidence of systemic voter fraud in America than ‘systemic racism’ yet which one do you think Democrats are more worried about?” He has portrayed public health restrictions on church gatherings as a Democratic plot against Christianity.Sebastian Gorka, a Steve Bannon acolyte, pugnacious right-wing pundit, and former Trump White House aide.Eric Metaxas, author and pundit and promoter of pro-Trump conspiracy theories who will emcee a right-wing rally on the National Mall Dec. 12.Jenna Ellis, an attorney for Trump and the Trump campaign who has been joined at the hip with Rudy Giuliani as they press false and unsubstantiated claims that have been tossed out of one court after another; as special counsel to the religious-right Thomas More Law Center, she has represented churches defying COVID-19-related public health restrictions.David Brat, former member of Congress from Virginia.Darrell Harrison, a podcaster and dean of social media at Grace to You, a ministry of controversial outspoken evangelist John MacArthur.Virgil Walker, a pastor and seminary student who co-hosts Harrison’s “Just Thinking” podcast.David Harris, Jr., a right-wing social media figure who is on the board of Black Voices for Trump and Candace Owens’ BLEXIT.Erika Frantzve, a model, podcast host, “social entrepreneur,” and Liberty University doctoral student who recently became engaged to Kirk.Among the first-year accomplishments cited by the Falkirk Center was its day-long “faith summit” called “Get Louder,” which featured Christian Reconstructionist Gary DeMar as a speaker on a panel moderated by Metaxas.The celebratory post, written by Liberty communications staffer Logan Smith, mentioned that “Falkirk Podcast” guests have included Trump lawyer and national punchline Giuliani and Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis, who teaches that genuine Christians must adhere to a belief in a literal six-day Creation and a universe that is thousands of years old.It also placed the Falkirk Center firmly on the side of right-wing evangelicals who believe that conversations about social justice and racism within the church are dangerous, evil, and enemies of the Gospel. The article quotes a Liberty University parent praising Falkirk for “drawing attention to leftist thinking that is attacking the Church.”“The Falkirk Center fills a need deeply felt during this time of increasing wokeness and social justice inside the church, calling Christians and pastors to return to the true doctrine of God’s Word,” said Grant May, one of a growing number of Falkirk Center ambassadors from across the country, according to the Liberty blog post. “The center has inspired and encouraged me during the rising fad of cultural Christianity to truly dive into the Word and remember what Christ’s commands for the Church were, not modern-day pastors’ advice on how to be culturally relevant.”The post also celebrates that the Falkirk Center “has consistently encouraged churches and pastors to defy” pandemic “lockdown orders.”The anniversary blog post included no mention of the Falkirk Center’s co-founder Jerry Falwell, Jr., the university’s disgraced former president. The Falkirk moniker is a fusion of Falwell’s name and that of cofounder Charlie Kirk, who heads the right-wing youth organizing project Turning Point USA, as well as a reference to the battle of Falkirk, memorialized in the movie Braveheart.
The Supreme Court refuses to overturn Trump’s Pennsylvania election loss-Bench, 3 whose 9 justices were appointed by outgoing president, doesn’t explain its ruling and none of its members express dissent-By AFP-DEC 10,20-Today, 12:30 pm
WASHINGTON — The US Supreme Court dealt the latest blow Tuesday to President Donald Trump’s effort to overturn his election loss when it denied his allies’ attempt to block the certification of votes in key state Pennsylvania.The nation’s highest court, which includes three Trump-appointed justices out of nine, did not explain its decision, and none of the members expressed dissent.More than a month since the November 3 election, Trump still refuses to concede to Democrat Joe Biden — who has a seven million-vote lead — and continues to make baseless claims of fraud.Trump and his allies have filed dozens of lawsuits in several key states, almost all of which have been thrown out by the courts.One of them, brought by Republican congressman Mike Kelly, challenged the legality of mail-in ballots in Pennsylvania, a crucial battleground state.Biden carried Pennsylvania in November’s vote, four years after Trump won the state.After the case was rejected by the state supreme court, the plaintiffs turned to the national Supreme Court, asking it to freeze all electoral operations while they developed their arguments.In dismissing the case, the Court put an end to the procedure and signaled that it was not inclined to get involved in post-election litigation.Trump had hoped that the high court, whose bench he has tipped solidly to the right, would intervene in his favor.In 2000, the Supreme Court halted a recount in Florida, where George W. Bush was only 537 votes ahead of Democrat Al Gore, allowing the Republican to win the election.The Republican-led state of Texas filed another appeal Tuesday to the Supreme Court, requesting the invalidation of results in four key states, but experts were not optimistic regarding its chance of success.
CBS News-The last long-shot chance for Trump allies to challenge election results-Audrey McNamara DEC 10,20
Tuesday marked "safe harbor" day — election results certified by states by this date are viewed as final and any subsequent court challenges are almost certain to be denied. On December 14, state electors will meet and cast their ballots. President Trump has in recent weeks summoned state leaders to the White House with the apparent aim of pressuring them to defy the will of voters and seat their own electors. No legislature has said it would replace its electors. There remains one last-ditch chance for electoral votes to be tossed. On January 6, the Senate and the House will convene to count the electoral votes and officially declare the winner of the election. The joint session of Congress is required by law to ratify presidential results, but also allows "members to object to the returns from any individual state as they are announced," according to the Congressional Research Service (CRS). Procedure calls for Vice President Pence to open each state's "certificate of ascertainment" — documents prepared by the state after it has completed its vote count and ascertained the official results. He will then present the certificate to four "tellers," who announce result tallies. Once a candidate reaches 270 electoral college votes, Pence will declare the winner.Lawmakers may object to the results — even if it's not their home state — leaving the door open for representatives who support Mr. Trump's unproven claims of widespread election fraud to interrupt the typically ceremonial process. According to a Washington Post survey, only 25 congressional Republicans have acknowledged President-elect Biden's victory. And 222 Republicans — in the House and Senate — will not say who won the election. Some may lodge their objections during the January 6 session. Alabama Congressman Mo Brooks has already said he would challenge Georgia and Pennsylvania's results, claiming flawed election systems, Politico first reported.Utah GOP Senator Mitt Romney called the idea of a congressional challenge to the Electoral College "madness" on Tuesday. "We have a process," he said. "Recounts are appropriate. Going to the court is appropriate. Pursuing every legal avenue is appropriate. But trying to get electors not to do what the people voted to do is madness." The objections only carry weight if they're signed by both a member of the House and Senate. "Objections to individual state returns must be made in writing by at least one Member each of the Senate and House of Representatives," according to CRS. Together, two Trump allies from separate houses, such as Congressman Matt Gaetz and Senator Ted Cruz, could object, for instance. In that case, "the joint session recesses and the two houses separate and debate the question in their respective chambers for a maximum of two hours," according to CRS. Under federal law, each session cannot last more than two hours, "and no member of either house may speak for more than five minutes.""The two houses then vote separately to accept or reject the objection," if both the Senate and the House agree, then that state's votes are tossed and the threshold to electoral victory would shrink. The House is still controlled by Democrats, albeit by a slimmer margin, so even if the GOP-controlled Senate were to reject a state, there's essentially no chance that the House would. According to CRS, lawmakers can object to individual electoral votes and state returns as a whole. Justin Levitt, a constitutional law expert and professor at Loyola Law School, said it's "simply not conceivable" that either chamber would reject any of the electoral votes "because there is no reason to reject any of the votes." So far, there are no GOP senators who have said they would join Brooks' challenge.Votes have been recounted and certified in several battleground states that President Trump continues to contest. Georgia has now reconfirmed Biden's victory for the third time, and, after completing a state canvass and determination of the local recounts, the Wisconsin Election Commission confirmed his win in the state last week. Levitt called any objections on January 6 simply a chance for "political theater." Jason Harrow, executive director and chief counsel at non-profit Equal Citizens, said there are no grounds for an objection because all 50 states have certified their election results, and any objection "will only serve to delay." Hawaii certified its election results on Tuesday, The Associated Press reports, making the 50th state the last to do so. "There could be shenanigans on January 6, but I think that they're theater," Harrow said, echoing Levitt. If objections are voiced, it wouldn't be the first time in recent memory. In the 2017 joint session confirming President Trump's electoral college victory, Democratic House members, led by Sheila Jackson Lee of Texas and Barbara Lee of California, challenged the results, only to be foiled by then-Vice President Biden.Massachusetts Congressman Jim McGovern objected to Alabama's results on the grounds that its electors were not lawfully certified, "especially given the confirmed and illegal activities engaged by the government of Russia, designed to interfere with our election and widespread violations of the voting rights act that unlawfully suppressed thousands of votes in the state of Alabama."Mr. Biden quickly shot down the objection by asking if its written form had been signed by both a member of the House and Senate.When McGovern confirmed that he did not have a senator's support for the challenge, Biden responded, "In that case the objection cannot be entertained," which prompted applause from Republican lawmakers.Several other Democratic lawmakers lodged objections — all unsuccessful — because they, too, did not meet the two-chamber requirement. "It is over," Biden said to Representative Pramila Jayapal after she could not produce a senator's signature, drawing a standing ovation from Republicans.Steve Chabot, Dean Heller, Darin LaHood, Bruce Poliquin, Ted Cruz, John Moolenaar, Leonard Lance, John Hoeven, John Boozman, Glenn Thompson, Ted Yoho, Tom MacArthur, Bradley Byrne, Evan Jenkins, Chuck Fleischmann standing in front of a crowd posing for the camera: Republican lawmakers applaud after an objection to a ballot count was overturned during a joint session of Congress to count Electoral College votes in Washington, Friday, Jan. 6, 2017. Congress certified Donald Trump's presidential victory over the objections of a handful of House Democrats, with Vice President Joe Biden pronouncing, © Provided by CBS News Republican lawmakers applaud after an objection to a ballot count was overturned during a joint session of Congress to count Electoral College votes in Washington, Friday, Jan. 6, 2017. Congress certified Donald Trump's presidential victory over the objections of a handful of House Democrats, with Vice President Joe Biden pronouncing,An objection has only been successfully brought to debate twice, after the 1968 and 2004 elections, and both were voted down, according to Harrow. The first was spurred by an unfaithful elector, and the second began as a challenge from Democrats.Claiming widespread irregularities in the race between President George W. Bush and Democratic opponent John Kerry, a group of lawmakers objected to Ohio's 20 crucial electoral votes, potentially putting the election in the balance. Kerry himself did not support the effort. "While I am deeply concerned about the issues being highlighted by my colleagues in Congress and citizens across the country and support their efforts to highlight the need to ensure voting rights," Mr. Kerry said, the New York Times reported at the time, "I will not be joining the protest of the Ohio electors."President Trump tweeted support for Brooks after his announcement that he would challenge battleground states' electoral votes.The statute allowing objection, outlined in the Electoral Count Act, exists because of another contested election, explained Lawrence Lessig, the Roy L. Furman Professor of Law and Leadership at Harvard Law School. In the 1876 presidential election, three states submitted competing slates of electors, with each candidate "claiming victory in violent and confused elections," according to the U.S. House Archives. To settle the dispute, Congress created an "Electoral Commission: a bipartisan committee of House Members, Senators, and Supreme Court Justices who would determine the final disposition of the yet-unassigned electoral votes." The New York Times reported at the time that "there was a great desire to witness a fair count, and curiosity was increased by the expectation that the new law would afford some new diversion to the formality of the counting." Over a hundred years later, Congress is still charged with the ultimate count of the electoral votes, practically guaranteeing some politics in the process, usually quickly dispensed with. "We do not have one presidential election on November 3, we have 51 — 50 states and the District of Columbia. You have to think about it that way," Harrow said. "There's no absolute uniformity, we just do the best we can."
ARIZONA - 11 - UNDER REVUE -
GEORGIA - 16 - UNDER REVUE -
NEVADA - 6 - UNDER REVUE -
NORTH CAROLINA - 15 - UNDER REVUE -
PENNSYLVANIA 20 - UNDER REVUE -
BIDEN TOTAL - 253 + 20 = 273 (FALSE WIN)
DONALD TRUMP - 214
2020 PRESIDENT DONALD J TRUMP 271 ELECTORAL VOTES.(AFTER ALL THE LIBERAL STALLING,CRYING AND THERAPY GETTING ALREADY. AND TRUMP IS NOT DECLARED WINNER YET) (D6 USA ELECTION) SUN NOV 08,20
The United States of America is a federal republic[1] consisting of 50 states, a federal district (Washington, D.C., the capital city of the United States), five major territories, and various minor islands.[2][3] The 48 contiguous states and Washington, D.C., are in North America between Canada and Mexico, while Alaska is in the far northwestern part of North America and Hawaii is an archipelago in the mid-Pacific. Territories of the United States are scattered throughout the Pacific Ocean and the Caribbean Sea.States possess a number of powers and rights under the United States Constitution, such as regulating intrastate commerce, running elections, creating local governments, and ratifying constitutional amendments. Each state has its own constitution, grounded in republican principles, and government, consisting of three branches: executive, legislative, and judicial.[4] All states and their residents are represented in the federal Congress, a bicameral legislature consisting of the Senate and the House of Representatives. Each state is represented by two senators, while representatives are distributed among the states in proportion to the most recent constitutionally mandated decennial census.[5] Additionally, each state is entitled to select a number of electors to vote in the Electoral College, the body that elects the president of the United States, equal to the total of representatives and senators in Congress from that state.[6] Article IV, Section 3, Clause 1 of the Constitution grants to Congress the authority to admit new states into the Union. Since the establishment of the United States in 1776, the number of states has expanded from the original 13 to the current total of 50, and each new state is admitted on an equal footing with the existing states.[7] As provided by Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, Congress exercises "exclusive jurisdiction" over the federal district, which is not part of any state. Prior to passage of the 1973 District of Columbia Home Rule Act, which devolved certain Congressional powers to an elected mayor and council, the district did not have an elected local government. Even so, Congress retains the right to review and overturn laws created by the council and intervene in local affairs.[8] As it is not a state, the district does not have representation in the Senate. However, since 1971, its residents have been represented in the House of Representatives by a non-voting delegate.[9] Additionally, since 1961, following ratification of the 23rd Amendment, the district has been entitled to select three electors to vote in the Electoral College.
Number of electoral votes for each state
Alabama - 9 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Alaska - 3 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Arizona - 11 electoral votes - (LIBERAL CRY BABY STALLING) -
Arkansas - 6 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
California - 55 electoral votes - BIDEN
Colorado - 9 electoral votes - BIDEN
Connecticut - 7 electoral votes - BIDEN
Delaware - 3 electoral votes - BIDEN
District of Columbia - 3 electoral votes - BIDEN
Florida - 29 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Georgia - 16 electoral votes - (LIBERAL CRY BABY STALLING)
Hawaii - 4 electoral votes - BIDEN
Idaho - 4 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Illinois - 20 electoral votes - BIDEN
Indiana - 11 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Iowa - 6 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Kansas - 6 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Kentucky - 8 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Louisiana - 8 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Maine - 4 electoral votes - BIDEN
Maryland - 10 electoral votes - BIDEN
Massachusetts - 11 electoral votes - BIDEN
Michigan - 16 electoral votes - (LIBERAL CRY BABY STALLING) - BIDEN
Minnesota - 10 electoral votes - BIDEN
Mississippi - 6 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Missouri - 10 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Montana - 3 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Nebraska - 5 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Nevada - 6 electoral votes - (LIBERAL CRY BABY STALLING)
New Hampshire - 4 electoral votes - BIDEN
New Jersey - 14 electoral votes - BIDEN
New Mexico - 5 electoral votes - BIDEN
New York - 29 electoral votes - BIDEN
North Carolina - 15 electoral votes - (LIBERAL CRY BABY STALLING)
North Dakota - 3 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Ohio - 18 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Oklahoma - 7 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Oregon - 7 electoral votes - BIDEN
Pennsylvania - 20 electoral votes - (LIBERAL CRY BABY STALLING)
Rhode Island - 4 electoral votes - BIDEN
South Carolina - 9 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
South Dakota - 3 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Tennessee - 11 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Texas - 38 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Utah - 6 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Vermont - 3 electoral votes - BIDEN
Virginia - 13 electoral votes - BIDEN
Washington - 12 electoral votes - BIDEN
West Virginia - 5 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
Wisconsin - 10 electoral votes - (LIBERAL CRY BABY STALLING) - BIDEN
Wyoming - 3 electoral votes - DONALD TRUMP
TOTALS FOR PRESIDENT 2020
DONALD J TRUMP - 214
LOSER LIBERAL BIDEN - 253
WITH 5 STATES TO COME - TRUMP LEADING IN 4 OF THEM (LIBERALS FLOCK TO THERAPY ALREADY) (CRY ROOMS ETC) THAT WAS TUESDAY NIGHT ELECTION NIGHT.
