JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.
JOEL 3:2 (WW3 OCCURS WHEN JERUSALEM IS DIVIDED)
2 I will also gather all nations, and will bring them down into the valley of Jehoshaphat, and will plead with them there for my people (ISRAEL) and for my heritage Israel, whom they have scattered among the nations, and parted my land.(JERUSALEM)(WW3 STARTS BECAUSE JERUSALEM IS DIVIDED AND ISRAELIS UPROOTED FROM THEIR GOD GIVIN LAND BRINGS 3 DEAD BILLION IN WW3)
ISRAEL SATAN COMES AGAINST
1 CHRONICLES 21:1
1 And Satan stood up against Israel, and provoked David to number Israel.
ISRAELS TROUBLE
JEREMIAH 30:7
7 Alas! for that day is great, so that none is like it: it is even the time of Jacob’s trouble;(ISRAEL) but he shall be saved out of it.
DANIEL 12:1,4
1 And at that time shall Michael(ISRAELS WAR ANGEL) stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people:(ISRAEL) and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation(May 14,48) even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.
4 But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro,(WORLD TRAVEL,IMMIGRATION) and knowledge shall be increased.(COMPUTERS,CHIP IMPLANTS ETC)
JOEL 3:2 (WW3 OCCURS WHEN JERUSALEM IS DIVIDED)
2 I will also gather all nations, and will bring them down into the valley of Jehoshaphat, and will plead with them there for my people (ISRAEL) and for my heritage Israel, whom they have scattered among the nations, and parted my land.(JERUSALEM)(WW3 STARTS BECAUSE JERUSALEM IS DIVIDED AND ISRAELIS UPROOTED FROM THEIR GOD GIVIN LAND BRINGS 3 DEAD BILLION IN WW3)
ISRAEL SATAN COMES AGAINST
1 CHRONICLES 21:1
1 And Satan stood up against Israel, and provoked David to number Israel.
ISRAELS TROUBLE
JEREMIAH 30:7
7 Alas! for that day is great, so that none is like it: it is even the time of Jacob’s trouble;(ISRAEL) but he shall be saved out of it.
DANIEL 12:1,4
1 And at that time shall Michael(ISRAELS WAR ANGEL) stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people:(ISRAEL) and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation(May 14,48) even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.
4 But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro,(WORLD TRAVEL,IMMIGRATION) and knowledge shall be increased.(COMPUTERS,CHIP IMPLANTS ETC)
170,000 rockets are aimed at Israel’s cities, says IDF intel head
Aviv Kochavi lists missile threat ahead of Iran nuke program; says in time, though, cyberwarfare will prove most dramatic change on battlefield
January 29, 2014, 4:44 pm
0-The Times of Israel
The head of Israel’s most
powerful intelligence agency depicted Wednesday a changing battlefield
in which offensive cyber capabilities will, in the near future,
represent the greatest shift in combat doctrine in over 1,000 years. For
now, though, he said, the 170,000 rockets and missiles pointed by enemy
states at Israel represented the most pressing threat, a danger he
placed even above Iran’s rogue nuclear program.“Cyber,
in my humble opinion, and you don’t have to agree with me, will be
revealed in a not very long time as a revolution greater than the
creation of gunpowder or the usage of the aerial space at the start of
the past century,” said Maj. Gen. Aviv Kochavi, the head of the IDF’s
Military Intelligence Directorate. Kochavi,
a former infantry officer, called the possibilities inherent in cyber
warfare “nearly limitless, and that is not a metaphor.”He revealed that the IDF’s Military
Intelligence Directorate, already the largest of the army’s corps, has
recently expanded further and shifted both its methodology and, more
significantly, its approach. Where once, he said, a state’s intelligence
service was expected to describe reality, today it must also “take
part” and alter it.Like his predecessor Amos Yadlin,
Kochavi, speaking at the INSS think tank’s annual conference in Tel
Aviv, described a Middle East in a historic flux, producing an array of
challenges and opportunities.He listed four central challenges. The first,
notably listed ahead of Iran’s nuclear program, are rockets, he said.
Kochavi asserted that Israel faces 170,000 rockets and missiles, and
that, “for the first time in many decades, the enemy has the ability to
drop considerable amounts of munitions on the cities of Israel.” In the
past the threat was countered by the IAF, he said; today it is Israel’s
enemies’ primary weapon and it represents an enormous intelligence
challenge to counter.Kochavi, who has reportedly voiced opinions
that did not dovetail with the political leadership’s interpretation of
the changes in Iran, for instance highlighting the potential
significance of Hassan Rouhani’s election to the presidency, steered
clear of that topic in this address. He said only that the Iranian
military nuclear program continues in a manner that enables Supreme
Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, should he decide to give the order, to
sprint ahead “to one bomb or more.”
He revealed that the cyber threats facing
Israel are growing “exponentially” and said that during the past year
the state has faced hundreds of attacks and the intelligence community
has faced dozens of attacks, “the vast majority of which were thankfully
unsuccessful.”And finally, he noted the “near 360 degree”
presence of Jihadist elements along Israel’s borders. A slide depicting
areas under the control of militant, Salafist elements covered what
looked like half of Syria and had a presence in nearly every country in
the region, including Turkey, he noted. Aside from creating friction
along the border regions and melting the traditional state lines, he
said that the rise of sub-state groups also mean that today “90 percent
of Israel’s future battlefields are in urban areas.”In the sort of wide-ranging presentation that
the head of military intelligence typically gives once a year, Kochavi
also focused on positive developments. The decline in the popularity and
legitimacy of the radical axis of Hezbollah and Bashar Assad, alongside
“the erosion” in the Muslim Brotherhood’s popularity in the Middle
East, was a positive development. Additionally, he said, “the moderate
Sunni states, represent a significant opportunity.”Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Egypt and the Gulf
states, “when you look in depth,” all share priorities that “are in
confluence” with Israel’s most pressing interests.This new reality in the Middle East, he said
several times, has dictated significant changes in the way Israel’s
intelligence community operates. Without being overly specific, he said
that intelligence had to move faster and farther out into the
battlefield, so that what is known in HQ in Tel Aviv also “appears on
the computers of the company commanders” in the field and at sea, and
the collection of the material has to increase and grow more diverse.He repeatedly stressed the role of cyber war,
both offensive and defensive, but concluded with the soldiers. “All of
the good intelligence we have is because of them,” he said, showing a
slide of several soldiers’ backs, hunched over computers. “They work a
lot, work hard, and have extraordinary achievements.” Hamas to allow 120 Fatah leaders back into Gaza
Diplomatically isolated by Egypt, Hamas tries to break the ice with Fatah and forge ‘reconciliation’ government
January 29, 2014, 6:06 pm
0-The Times of Israel
Hamas will allow more than 120
Fatah officials banished from the Gaza Strip during the Islamist group’s
violent takeover in 2007 to return to the Palestinian enclave in a bid
to advance reconciliation efforts with its Ramallah-based rival.Prime
Minister Ismail Haniyeh told satellite news channel Al-Kitab Monday
evening that Hamas would soon let some Fatah leaders return to the
Strip, and release a number of Fatah political prisoners from Hamas
prisons, in a bid to push forward the reconciliation process.The two Palestinian movements have been unable
to implement the terms of two reconciliation agreements signed in 2012;
the first in Doha, Qatar, in February and the second in Cairo in May,
paving the way for the establishment of a unity government headed by PA
President Mahmoud Abbas ahead of national elections.Nearly all of Fatah’s security and political
officials were forced to flee Gaza following Hamas’s takeover of the
Gaza Strip in June 2007. Both Palestinian governments suppress the
activities of their rivals in the territory they control.Breaking a long freeze in talks, Fatah’s chief
negotiator with Hamas Azzam Al-Ahmad secretly resumed talks with
Hamas’s political No. 2, Moussa Abu Marzouk, earlier this month.On January 8, Qatari news channel Al Jazeera, a
station close to Hamas, reported that the secretary general of one of
Gaza’s smaller factions has been engaged in mediation efforts between
the two movements. Haniyeh called Abbas in early January, updating the
Ramallah leader on the “goodwill gestures” Hamas has undertaken in Gaza,
Hamas leader Salah Bardawil told Al Jazeera.Under increasingly growing political pressure
from Egypt, Hamas’s interest in realizing reconciliation is higher than
than that of Fatah, which enjoys the diplomatic support of both Egypt
and Jordan.A diplomatic source speaking to The Times of
Israel on condition of anonymity said that Abbas had little will to cut a
deal with Hamas, preferring “to see the Islamic movement sweat.”
Netanyahu: Israel not obligated by US peace plan
Prime minister refrains from directly responding to Naftali Bennett on the prospect of settlers remaining in future Palestine
January 28, 2014, 10:19 pm
7-The Times of Israel
Israel is not bound to agree to
all points of an imminent US proposal for a peace agreement with the
Palestinians, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a speech Tuesday
night.“The
Americans are working to solidify American positions,” he said at the
Institute for National Security Studies conference. “Israel does not
have to accept every American position.” He said the American proposal
would be presented soon.Netanyahu also reiterated his position that he
does not “want a bi-national state and… this reflects the desires of
most Israelis.” However, he qualified, neither does he want another
“state sponsored by Iran” next door to Israel — a reference to the
Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip and Lebanon — so “the Palestinian state must be
demilitarized, and therefore some symbols of [its] sovereignty must be
limited.”
Netanyahu also expressed some doubt as to
“whether the Palestinians are really ready to grapple with the
concessions they will have to make” in order to reach a peace agreement.
He did give some grudging praise to the Palestinian Authority, however,
saying it does not use terrorism in pursuit of its goals, unlike Hamas.
“We stand on two basic principles [that we
require of the Palestinians],” he said. “The first is recognition of the
State of Israel as the national state of the Jewish people. This is the
root of the conflict. The conflict is not about the settlements, its
not about the settlers, and it’s not about a Palestinian state. The
Zionist movement agreed to recognize a Palestinian state.“The conflict is over the Jewish state… We are
asked to recognize a national Palestinian state, so can we not also
demand [that they] recognize a national Jewish state?” he said.
The second principle, Netanyahu said, was
demilitarization. Elaborating, he said, constant incitement against
Israel among the Palestinians had created a climate in which Israel
required a substantial “security presence” in order to protect itself.
That included a “long-term” presence in the Jordan Valley and other
areas. (In a filmed address to the conference broadcast earlier Tuesday,
Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas said all Israeli troops
would have to leave Palestinian territory within years after a permanent
accord was signed.) The best formulation to summarize Israel’s
vision for a viable two-state solution, said the prime minister, was
that the Palestinians establish “a demilitarized Palestinian state that
recognizes the Jewish state.”
Despite speaking about two states for two
peoples, the prime minister refrained from directly broaching the hot
topic of allowing West Bank settlers to choose whether they want to
relocate to sovereign Israeli territory or remain under Palestinian rule
under a future peace agreement. Economy and Trade Minister Naftali
Bennett had continued his campaign against the proposal in an earlier
speech he made at the same conference.“Do you know why? Why Jews cannot live under
Palestinian rule? Do you know why? Why Palestinians can’t rule over
Jews?” Bennett said, reiterating a point he’d made on Facebook earlier
in the day. “Because they will kill them. And do you know how I know
this? Because it has already happened.”
Netanyahu did say that Israel did not want to
make the Palestinians citizens of Israel — as Bennett suggests for
70,000 Palestinians in West Bank areas he would annex — and that Israel
does not want “to rule over” the Palestinians.Bennett has been caught up
in a war of words
with the Prime Minister’s Office since a PMO official, elaborating on a
statement Netanyahu made in Switzerland Friday, told The Times of Israel
on Sunday that the prime minister does not intend to uproot Jewish
settlements anywhere in the West Bank as part of a permanent peace deal
with the Palestinians, and wants to allow settlers the choice of
remaining under Palestinian rule.That comment elicited a flurry of
criticism
from right-wing politicians, including Bennett and many members of the
prime minister’s own Likud party.An unnamed PMO official told Israel
Radio on
Monday that Likud MKs who spoke out against Netanyahu’s proposal were
welcome to relinquish their posts. Another official took Bennett to task
for behaving in a “nationally irresponsible” manner for the sake of
making headlines, and hindering the prime minister’s effort “to reveal
the true face of the Palestinian Authority” as an unwilling peace
partner.The proposal was roundly dismissed by the Palestinian Authority,
prompting a sharp condemnation from the PMO.“Nothing shows the
Palestinian Authority’s
unwillingness to reach an accord with Israel more than their extreme and
reckless reaction to an unofficial report,” Netanyahu’s office said
late Sunday. “An accord will only be reached when the Palestinians
recognize the Jewish state and when the essential interests to the
security of Israeli citizens are guaranteed.”In the wake of that
exchange, Israel’s chief
negotiator, Justice Minister Tzipi Livni, implied that, rather than
pursue a peace agreement in earnest, some Israeli officials have been
baiting the Palestinians so as to elicit responses that could be
construed as rejectionist.Times of Israel staff contributed to this report.