AMERICA GETS ITS BED TO LIE IN FOREVER

KING JESUS IS COMING FOR US ANY TIME NOW. THE RAPTURE. BE PREPARED TO GO.

THIS IS SAD.YOU WOULD THINK THE AMERICAN CITIZENS WOULD LEARN THAT OBAMA IS A VICIOUS DICTATOR THAT HATES GOD AND ISRAEL.AND WILL THROW ISRAEL UNDER THE BUS FOR SURE NOW.AND NO LOOK INTO OBAMAS TRUE BACK ROUND.AMERICANS NEW WHAT TO EXPECT IF OBAMA WON.WELL NOW GODLESS AMERICA,YOU MADE YOUR CHOICE FOR A RUTHLESS CONTROL FREAK TO WIN.NOW USE PAY THE CONSEQUINCES OF THIS WIN BY OBAMA.CHIP IMPLANTS. SKYROCKETS FOOD PRICES.CARBON TAXES GALORE.AN NOW SINCE OBAMA KNOWS HE CAN DO WHAT HE WANTS.YOU WILL HAVE A ROARING LION DEVOURING EVERY CITIZEN AND LAW IN AMERICA TO BRING THE FINAL DEMISE OF AMERICA TO ITS KNEES.YOU GOT YOUR HOMOSEXUALS RIGHTS NOW.USE GOT YOUR ABORTION (MURDERING OF GODS CREATED BEINGS )NOW.YOU GOT YOUR MAN AND WOMAN BEING THE LEGAL MARRIAGE COUPLE BEING FRYED NOW.WELL NOW FOR SURE GOD IS OUT OF THE AMERICANS VOCABULARY.SO LET THE JUDGEMENT ON AMERICA BEGIN.SHAME ON AMERICAN CITIZENS FOR LETTING A FRAUD,GODLESS,MUSLIM,ISRAEL HATER TO INFILTRATE THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.THE NEW TERM FOR AMERICA WILL BE THE UNITED SHEEPLE SLAVES UNDER A CONTROL FREAK DICTATOR LEADER.AND THE NEW MOTTO UNDER OBAMA WE TRUST. SHAME, SHAME, SHAME ON AMERICA IS ALL I HAVE TO SAY.I PRAY GOD PROTECTS ISRAEL-WHICH WE KNOW WILL HAPPEN-BECAUSE OBAMA WILL THROW ISRAEL UNDER THE BUS IN EVERY WAY NOW FOR SURE.

2012 ELECTION RESULTS
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2012/11/election-results-2012-in-america.html 

Second time around, Obama victory fails to enthuse Arab world

Hamas tells president to stop favoring Israel, Iran says he should strip Israel of its ‘nuclear weapons’

By Elhanan Miller November 7, 2012, 3:14 pm 4-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL

A T-shirt on sale in Jerusalem's old city depicts Obama donning traditional Arab headgear (photo credit: Abir Sultan/Flash 90)

Arab commentators were divided Wednesday on whether Barack Obama’s victory in the US presidential race bodes well for future Arab-American relations.The leaders of Egypt and the Palestinian Authority rushed to congratulate Obama on his victory, but Islamist officials were more reserved in their public statements.Sami Abu-Zuhri, a spokesman for Hamas, called on the newly reelected US president to reassess his “biased” position in favor of Israel. Hamas government spokesman Taher Nunu appealed to Obama to adopt “a moral policy, devoid of double standards” towards regional issues.“We heard moderate speech from Obama following his first term victory, but his policy was inconsistent with the speeches he gave in Egypt and Turkey,” Nunu told the press. “He now has an opportunity to implement those promises to the nations of the region, far from pressures by the Israel lobby and politicized money.”

Abdel Bari Atwan, the Arab nationalist editor of London-based daily Al-Quds Al-Arabi, understood Obama’s call in his victory speech ”to free ourselves from foreign oil’ as a blow to Saudi Arabia, the largest oil exporter to the United States

Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood official Issam Al-Aryan was pessimistic Wednesday that Obama’s foreign policy would change significantly during his second term in office.“Accepting the will of the Arab people is the most important change,” wrote Aryan on his Facebook page.“We must rely on ourselves and on our resources and build our country. In the absence of direct American influence, Egypt can affect and lead the process of building a democratic and constitutional regime that will become a dream for African and the southern hemisphere.”Abdel Bari Atwan, the Arab nationalist editor of London-based daily Al-Quds Al-Arabi, understood Obama’s call in his victory speech ”to free ourselves from foreign oil” as a “worrying warning to the government of Saudi Arabia,” the largest exporter of oil to the US.In comments on his Twitter account, Atwan added that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also has cause for concern, as he “has placed all of his eggs in Romney’s basket,” displaying “striking political stupidity.”“No sense of exhilaration,” tweeted British Iraqi political commentator Anas Al-Tikriti. “Just somber contentment that a worse outcome was avoided.”Meanwhile, Iranian parliament member Muhammad Karim Abidi, deputy head of the parliament’s human rights committee, told the Arabic-language television channel Al-Alam that Obama must fulfill promises made during his first term in office. He cited issues such as closing the American prison in Guantanamo Bay; correcting US policy toward [the oppression of Shiites in] Bahrain; and reducing support for “capitalists.”Abidi also called on Obama to reduce his country’s nuclear arsenal and rid Israel of its “nuclear and chemical weapons of mass destruction.”

Well done, now support our statehood bid, Palestinians tell Obama

Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt says US influence is not needed in the region

By Stuart Winer November 7, 2012, 11:54 am 0-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas on Wednesday issued a statement congratulating US President Barack Obama on his election victory and encouraging him to continue his efforts to achieve peace in the Middle East.Chief Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat said he hoped Obama’s second term in office would see the establishment of a Palestinian state. Erekat added that, with the Palestinians determined to bid for nonmember state status at the UN this month, he expected the president to show support for the move.

“We have decided to take the Palestinian issue to the UN and we hope that Obama will stand by this Palestinian right,” Erekat said. “What Obama needs to do is stop the Israeli settlement policy and not act to stop the Palestinian activity at the UN.”Palestinian rival Hamas called on Obama to alter his country’s foreign policy concerning Arab and Palestinian affairs. The group’s spokesman  urged the president to stop favoring Israel and examine the “Palestinians’ legal rights.”Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi said he trusted Obama would use his second term to act in the best interests of the US and Egypt.In a telegram of congratulations released by the official news agency MENA, Morsi said he hoped for a “strengthening of the friendship between the two countries to serve their common interests, namely justice, freedom and peace.”

“We congratulate the American people on their choice and hope that the chosen government will work in the joint interest of both peoples,” said a spokesman for the president’s bureau, Yassar Ali.In contrast, a senior member of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, Issam al-Aryan, said he didn’t expect any significant changes in Washington’s policy towards the Arabs.Aryan asserted that without the influence of the US, Egypt would be able to democratize the region.

Sources: Israel Plans to Stop Annual PA 'Statehood Circus'

Israel is again preparing to marshal its resources to prevent the recognition of the PA as a state by the UN

By David Lev First Publish: 11/6/2012, 4:24 PM-INNEWS

Foreign MInister Avigdor Lieberman-Flash 90

As the PA is apparently gearing up to once again demand that the United Nations recognize its bid for statehood, Israel is again preparing to marshal its resources to prevent that recognition from taking place, sources in the government and Foreign Ministry were quoted as saying. But, the sources said, Israel was working to ensure that this is the last time the PA ties to bypass the Oslo Accords and appeal directly to the UN.A report on Channel 10 Tuesday said that Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman intends to aggressively oppose the latest PA statehood bid, when the PA approaches the Security Council with a request for recognition later this month. Speaking to the AFP news agency, Foreign Ministry spokesperson Yigal Palmor was quoted as saying that “Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman convened Israel's 27 ambassadors in Europe for an urgent meeting this week in Vienna. The ambassadors will seek to define a diplomatic course with the Europeans intended to counter this initiative and to this end Lieberman will go to Vienna.”

PA chief Mahmud Abbas has said he will table the resolution later this month, on either November 15 or 29, according to officials. Such a move is likely to be voted through easily, requiring only a simple majority in the 193-member General Assembly, as it was last year. However, the resolution must then be approved by the Security Council, which rejected it last year.In the hope of preventing the PA's bid from turning into an annual event, Channel 10 said, Israel plans to aggressively oppose it. Channel 10 reported Monday that Lieberman had cautioned EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton that the Jewish state would respond harshly to such a bid, and that she should use her good offices to talk Abbas out of the bid. The continued attempts to seek statehood recognition, completely bypassing the Oslo process that the PA is supposed to be committed to, is unacceptable, and Israel will refuse to accept this kind of behavior by the PA, Lieberman was quoted as saying.A spokesperson for Lieberman would not confirm the report or the comments attributed to the Foreign Minister.

Four more years: Obama claims decisive win

Today @ 08:37 NOV 7,12 By Benjamin Fox

Florida - Barack Obama has been re-elected as President of the United States after claiming a close but decisive victory over Republican challenger Mitt Romney.With Florida the only close state yet to be formally declared, Obama had secured 303 electoral college votes to Romney's 203, comfortably above the 270 mark needed for victory.Florida is set for a recount with Obama claiming a narrow provisional win of around 60,000 votes, comfortably within the 0.5% which automatically triggers a recount. Meanwhile, the popular vote remains in a dead-heat, with Obama likely to win by around 1 million votes on a turnout projected to be between 125-130 million.In his acceptance speech made from Chicago, Obama told party supporters that he would meet with Mitt Romney and Republican leaders in the coming weeks in a bid to bridge the divide between Democrats and Republicans. "The American family would rise and fall together as one nation", he said, adding that "tonight you voted for action not politics.""Our economy is recovering, a decade of war is ending, and whether I earned your vote or not, I have listened to you, I have learned, and will return to the White House more inspired and determined than ever," he said.Nonetheless, Obama faces a bitterly divided America with his first policy challenge to reach a budget deal to take control of the country's national debt.
An attempt to reach a bipartisan agreement on a package of tax rises on the wealthy and spending cuts collapsed in the summer, the most obvious sign of political deadlock between the parties that became particularly acute after the Republicans claimed a shock victory in congressional elections in 2010. The deadlock in Congress could continue. While the Democrats strengthened their grip on the Senate, picking up seats in Massachusetts and Indiana, they failed to make inroads on the Republican majority in the House of Representatives.Psephologists are projecting that white voters backed Romney by a comfortable margin, with Obama set to win under 40 percent. Despite this, Obama had the changing face of America, which is estimated to cease being a white-majority country between 2040 and 2050. He took 70 percent of the Hispanic vote, and a majority of women voters, as well as an overwhelming majority of African-Americans.
Conceding defeat from his campaign headquarters in Boston, Massachusetts, Mitt Romney said that "the nation is at a crucial juncture, and can't risk partisan bickering and political posturing." "Democrats and Republicans at all levels of government should put the people before the politics", he said.Floridian Republicans had started the evening confident of victory. Among several hundred campaign workers and candidates In the Picasso ballroom of the St Petersburg Hilton, Cecilia, a local canvassing co-ordinator, was upbeat. The turnout is strong and if her "community reflects the mood of the nation then it will be a landslide" she says.But their early optimism soon faded as Romney quickly fell behind in Ohio and Florida, both of which he needed to win to have a chance of claiming a majority in the electoral college. Privately, Republican campaigners admitted that the Democrat 'ground game' had been the determining factor in claiming Florida .
Obama's victory was quickly welcomed by European Commission president Jose Barroso and European Council president Herman van Rompuy. In a joint statement they called on the US to "unlock the unparalleled potential of the transatlantic market".We are also ready to continue our intense cooperation in foreign policy issues and in the promotion of our common values, they added.

For Obama and Netanyahu, four more years of mutual dislike and suspicion? Not so fast

The two leaders are unlikely to suddenly become best buddies, but history has defied conventional wisdom more than once about which US presidents are good or bad for Israel

By Raphael Ahren November 7, 2012, 10:58 am 8-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL

A second term for President Barack Obama is the last thing Benjamin Netanyahu was hoping for. Ever since he moved into the Prime Minister’s Office in March 2009, three months after Obama was inaugurated, Netanyahu was waiting for the day he could govern without Obama on his back. There was never any love lost between the two, and no one should expect the relationship between the two of them to improve in January if, or almost certainly when, Netanyahu matches Obama and gets reelected.Still, what exactly a second Obama term means for Israel is not as clear as some may believe. The critics argue he will pay less heed to Israeli concerns about Iran, and tighten the screws on the Palestinian front, possibly forcing Jerusalem to make dire concessions regarding the stalled peace process. Others doubt he will significantly change course. But one thing seems certain: Obama’s victory will shake up domestic Israeli politics.Let’s first look at how, if at all, Washington-Jerusalem relations will change as Obama enters his second term. It needs to be said, first, that the commander-in-chief is not the only decision-maker when it comes to US foreign policy. And in Congress, staunch support for Israel is a bipartisan matter of course.“The Oval Office is extremely important, but so is the Congress and more than anything else the public on both sides, the Israeli nation and the American nation,” said Yoram Ben-Zeev, who for many years was in charge of Israel-US relations at the Israeli Foreign Ministry’s North America department. “I don’t think that personal relations between two leaders can constitute the anchor for the relations between the two nations.”Still, some pundits fear a reelected Obama will seek revenge on Netanyahu. Revenge for the obstinacy on the peace process, revenge for being too pushy on the Iranian question, revenge for openly challenging him during a heated election campaign — and revenge, of course, for Netanyahu’s alleged meddling in the US elections politics, by being overly warm to Mitt Romney.After all, these pundits argue, Obama only played nice to Israel during his first term (and “nice” is a relative term) because he knew he would never stand a chance of reelection if he vexed the powerful pro-Israel camp. But now that Obama has a free hand to do as he pleases, no longer dependent on voters, the fear is that he could seek to justify the Nobel Peace Prize he received in 2009 and increase pressure on Israel to make difficult concessions to restart the peace process.

‘The Oval Office is extremely important, but so is the Congress and more than anything else the public on both sides, the Israeli nation and the American nation’

“Things are going to be tough [between Jerusalem and Washington] — because of the personal mistrust and animosity [Obama] feels toward Netanyahu, but also because there are going to be some sharp disagreements, for example about Iran,” said Bar-Ilan University’s Eytan Gilboa, an expert on American-Israeli relations and US Middle East policies.Soon after the elections, the White House will enter direct negations with the Islamic Republic over its nuclear program, Gilboa said. “Israel is quite concerned about these negotiations because it thinks the Iranians are going to manipulate the Americans and perhaps even get an agreement that would allow them to continue with a nuclear weapons program, under one disguise or another.”Others are convinced, by contrast, that Obama during his second term will look exactly like Obama in his first term.“He is not going to kiss Netanyahu when they meet, but I don’t think his policies will change very much,” said Gabriel Sheffer, a professor emeritus of political science at the Hebrew University. “He will continue to pursue his politics concerning the peace process and the Iranian issue on the one hand, and continue to support Israel in the military arena, giving Israeli additional money and missile defense systems, and so on.”For all the personal tensions, and the differences over Iranian red lines, settlements, et al., between Washington in Jerusalem during the last four years, no one can deny the fact that security coordination between the two nations is at an all-time high.“This administration under President Obama is doing in regard to our security more than anything that I can remember in the past,” Defense Minister Ehud Barak said in July.Considering the annual military aid of $3 billion to help Israel maintain a qualitative edge in the region, plus $275 million in supplemental funding for the Iron Dome missile defense system, even Netanyahu would be hard-pressed to deny that.Yet security cooperation is not everything. On a personal and on a political level, the relationship between Obama and Netanyahu was always frosty and at times even almost hostile.It seemed that one meeting was more awkward than the next — when there were meetings scheduled at all. During Netanyahu’s last trip to the US this September, Obama cited scheduling issues in explaining why he couldn’t find a few minutes to receive the Israeli prime minister.Back in 2010, Netanyahu left Washington humiliated after talks about the stalled peace process and a possible settlement freeze ended without results. According to media reports, Obama walked out on a meeting with Netanyahu to have dinner and did not pose for a photo-op with his Israeli guest, which was widely seen as a diplomatic snub.In May 2011 Netanyahu humiliated Obama, in turn, when he delivered what The Wall Street Journal called a “rare public rebuke” of the president, subjecting him to a personal history lesson in the Oval Office. Obama had said that the “borders of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps.” Netanyahu rebuffed the president’s idea, declaring flatly that Israel “cannot go back to the 1967 lines — because these lines are indefensible.”Later that year, Obama was overheard speaking to the then-president of France, Nicolas Sarkozy, who said he couldn’t stand Netanyahu. “You are fed up with him, but I have to deal with him even more often than you,” Obama replied.Then, last summer, at the height of a public debate about a possible Israeli military strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities, two things happened that made a bad relationship even worse.In July, Netanyahu welcomed his old friend Romney with such overt warmth that some considered it an improper meddling in the US politics. Netanyahu never explicitly took sides in the presidential race. But whoever wanted to read between the lines could easily discern that Netanyahu preferred the Republican challenger to the incumbent.

Benjamin Netanyahu meets with Mitt Romney in Jerusalem, July 29, 2012 (photo credit: Marc Israel Sellem/GPO/Flash90)

“I heard some of your remarks a few days ago — you said that the greatest danger facing the world is of the ayatollah regime possessing nuclear weapons capability,” Netanyahu told Romney in Jerusalem. “Mitt, I couldn’t agree with you more, and I think it’s important to do everything in our power to prevent the ayatollahs from possessing the capability.”Fearing Tehran would soon reach a nuclear weapons capability, Netanyahu then publicly demanded the administration set red lines which, if crossed by the regime, would prompt a military response. But the White House rejected his call, insisting that sanctions are still the best way to stop Iran.“We’re not setting deadlines,” Secretary of State Hillary Clinton insisted, leading Netanyahu to utter a sentence, on September 11 in Jerusalem, that further highlighted the troubled relations: “Those in the international community who refuse to put red lines before Iran don’t have a moral right to place a red light before Israel.”The diplomatic tensions between Washington have subsided somewhat in recent weeks, as the US election came closer and Netanyahu announced, at the United Nations General Assembly in September, that there was still some time — until spring or “at most by next summer” — before Iran would be able to build a nuclear weapon.Campaign promises and saber-rattling aside, the White House’s position on Iran would hardly have looked different even if Romney had won. Both Romney and Obama agree that Tehran must not acquire nuclear weapons, that sanctions and diplomacy are the best way to stop the process, and that a military option remains on the table if all else fails. True, some analysts believe that a president Romney would be more inclined than Obama to allow an Israeli attack without US participation. Now, we’ll never know.What about the peace process? While Romney was caught on tape saying he believes peace between Israelis and Palestinians is “almost unthinkable,” it is not outlandish to think Obama might want to initiate another attempt at ending the conflict.“Obama would like to restart Israeli-Palestinians negotiations and could demand from Israel to make some concessions that would bring [Palestinian Authority President] Mahmoud Abbas to the table,” Bar-Ilan University’s Gilboa said. But it’s also plausible to assume Obama will focus on other issues (the economy?), as the chances for a lasting peace in the Holy Land are slim, and Obama might not want to waste his time working for an unattainable goal, Gilboa mused.

With Obama reelected, Olmert and Livni likely to run for Knesset

But Iran and the peace process may not be the only areas where the prime minister and the president are likely to clash.“Obama will probably try to intervene in the Israeli elections,” which take place on January 22 — one day after the presidential inauguration — Gilboa predicted. If a center-left party opposing Netanyahu’s right-wing bloc had a serious candidate for the premiership, Obama could invite him or her to the White House, thus unofficially endorsing Netanyahu’s opponent, Gilboa said. It wouldn’t be the first time Washington tried to influence an Israeli election, he added.Even if the old-new president prefers not to interfere in Israeli politics, his reelection undoubtedly will affect the election campaign here.The right-wingers will say that now more than ever Israel needs a strong leader who can stand up for Israel’s interests regardless of what the Americans say. The left-wingers will argue that Netanyahu ruined Israel’s relations with its most important ally and that a fresh face and a new policy is required.Former prime minister Ehud Olmert and ex-foreign minister Tzipi Livni have indicated they would decide whether to run in the upcoming elections depending on the outcome of the presidential elections. With Obama remaining in the Oval Office, the former Kadima leaders may be encouraged to throw their hats in the ring. Expect announcements soon.

Olmert this week slammed Netanyahu over his handling of the Iranian question. While Netanyahu says Israel has the right to defend itself and dare not entrust its future to others, even to the United States, Olmert mockingly asked which military equipment Israel intends to use for any attack on Iranian facilities, hinting that US aid and coordination is crucial to the IDF’s ability to wage war.So is Obama’s reelection good for Israel? Many left-leaning Israelis will celebrate while many to the right will mourn. But history shows that the complexities of the Middle East often defy simplistic and stereotypical notions.Many Israelis would describe Jimmy Carter, for example, as one of the most pro-Arab presidents in history. Today, Carter — the author of “Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid” — endorses the Palestinians’ unilateral bid for statehood and is one of the fiercest critics of Netanyahu’s government. Yet his defenders would argue that it was that same Jimmy Carter who, during his time in the White House, urged Menachem Begin to sign a peace treaty with Egypt in 1979, a milestone regarded as one of the most important diplomatic and strategic achievements in Israel’s history.

George W. Bush, on the other hand, is hailed by many right-wingers as one of the friendliest presidents to Israel. However, one could argue, his political legacy vis-à-vis Israel is rather meager. During his two terms, peace was elusive as ever, and his war in Iraq destabilized the region, allowing Iran to strive for regional hegemony. He opposed the 2007 strike on Syria’s nuclear reactor. And he didn’t halt Iran’s nuclear drive.

Is Obama good for Israel? The definitive answer belongs with the historians of the future. One thing’s for sure. On Tuesday, the American people gave him four more years to be good for the United States.

THIS JUST FLORES ME.7 OUT OF 10 JEWS VOTE FOR OBAMA,AFTER ALL THE WAYS HES AGAINST ISRAEL AND WANTS JERUSALEM DIVIDED.THIS TELLS ME THERES A LOT MORE GODLESS JEWS THAN THERE IS GOD WORSHIPPING JEWS.SAD,SAD,SAD.

Obama wins big among Jews, with 69%-30% victory over Romney

Despite millions of dollars spent and unprecedented grassroots work by Republican Jewish groups, exit polls of Jewish voters show only slight decline in support for Democrats

By Haviv Rettig Gur November 7, 2012, 11:16 am 2-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL

The Jewish vote remained solidly in the Democratic camp, according to early exit polls from Tuesday’s US election.According to polls cited by both CNN and CBS News, Jews represented two percent of the national electorate and supported Obama 69% to 30%, with 1% going to a third candidate.In the key swing state of Florida, exit polls showed the Jews as 5% of the electorate and breaking for Obama 66%-30%, with 4% going to a third candidate.Jewish Democratic activists were quick to celebrate Tuesday night.

“We now know that the Jewish community today was once again solidly behind President Barack Obama, and that the only so-called ‘Jewish problem’ he has is that there aren’t more Jewish voters in America, given the overwhelming support for the President in our community,” National Jewish Democratic Council head David A. Harris said.Comparing the results with a study that pegged 2008’s Jewish vote at 74% for Obama, the NJDC noted that “statistically there is no difference between tonight’s results and the Jewish vote share for the President in 2008,” since the 5-point gap was within the margin of error.The NJDC’s Republican counterpart, the Republican Jewish Coalition, which had spent millions of dollars on billboards, television ads and canvassing in the Jewish community and claimed Jews would abandon Obama in this election, remained mum Tuesday night. The group did not respond to emails seeking comment.But not so Democrats, who reveled in the apparent Republican failure to gain a substantially greater share of the Jewish vote.“The powerful support given to the President today by American Jews shows that the more than $15 million campaign undertaken by Republicans to woo Jewish voters with negative advertising, scare tactics, and outright lies simply did not work,” said Harris.In an NJDC press release, the group even named names of Republicans who had claimed Jewish support for Obama was weakening.“Tonight’s results run counter to the false claims made about the President’s strong Jewish support – claims made by Republican leaders like House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA), former Senator and GOP presidential candidate Rick Santorum, Ari Fleischer, former GOP presidential candidate Herman Cain, Emergency Committee for Israel Board member and former GOP presidential candidate Gary Bauer, and leaders of the Republican Jewish Coalition, among many, many others,” the release read.The nonpolitical Jewish organized world responded quickly on Tuesday night and throughout the early morning hours of Wednesday, with a seemingly universal message calling on post-election Washington to get back to work.William Daroff, the influential former Republican operative now working as the vice president for public policy of the Jewish Federations of North America, the Jewish philanthropic world’s nonpartisan Washington lobbyist, hopes Washington can get back to business.“The remarkable thing is that after spending hundreds of millions of dollars, it is likely that Washington will look exactly the same,” with Obama still in the White House, Democrats still controlling the Senate and Republicans holding on to the House, Daroff said.And that has its advantages, according to Daroff.“The advantage will be that tomorrow all the players know where they stand, and we’ll be able to shift away from the election era that has paralyzed governing for the last many months and deal with the fiscal cliff,” he said.The 1,700-member Conservative Rabbinical Assembly said early Wednesday that its rabbis “congratulate President Obama on winning a second term,” and called for bipartisanship in Washington.

“Just as we come together to build consensus as an organization representing all political streams and points of view, our government must work together, across both sides of the aisle and the political spectrum, to improve the economy and opportunities for all Americans,” a Rabbinical Assembly statement said.

Hadassah National President Marcie Natan extended “sincere congratulations” to Obama for his victory, and said “Hadassah is eager to continue working with President Obama… as well as with Congress.”Closely watched races with Jewish candidates showed mixed results for members of the tribe.Josh Mandel, the 35-year-old Republican Ohio state treasurer, lost his Senate bid to incumbent Democratic Senator Sherrod Brown. An Iraq vet, Mandel has pushed divestment from Iran as an Ohio state representative. He is considered a rising star among Jewish Republicans.Brown defeated Mandel 50%-45%.For its part, NJDC welcomed Brown’s victory over his Jewish opponent, saying Brown “has been a staunch defender of America’s middle class and a true ally of the Jewish community on a variety of domestic issues, and when it comes to ensuring a strong and secure Israel as well.”Jewish Democrat Alan Grayson had a better night. The Harvard-trained attorney and businessman from Florida, who campaigned against the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan but has voted with Republicans on fiscal restraint measures, won Florida’s 9th Congressional District House seat 62% to 38%, defeating Republican Todd Long.Grayson is a multi-millionaire who made his fortune in his law practice and in the telecommunications industry. This victory ushers in Grayson’s second nonconsecutive term in the House. He served in 2008-10 as a representative from Florida’s 8th Congressional District.Two Jewish candidates, both veteran politicians, competed for Florida’s 22nd Congressional District, with Democratic former mayor of West Palm Beach Lois Frankel defeating Republican former state legislator Adam Hasner 55%-45%. The district, which includes the cities of West Palm Beach and Boca Raton and is currently (before the post-2010 redistricting) represented in the House by Allen West, is heavily Jewish.In Hawaii, former governor and Jewish Republican Linda Lingle has likely lost her bid for the Senate to Democrat Mazie Hirono by a large margin of 36% to 64%.California’s closely watched race between two strongly pro-Israel Jewish Democrats, locked in a bitter contest due to redistricting, looked in early returns to be tilting away from longtime Foreign Affairs Committee ranking member Howard Berman and toward relatively new (only 16 years in Congress to Berman’s 30) Congressman Brad Sherman.The only rabbi running for Congress, Republican candidate (and Times of Israel contributor) Shmuley Boteach in New Jersey’s 9th Congressional District, suffered a decisive defeat to Democrat Bill Pascrell. While the district has not sent a Republican to Congress in 30 years, Boteach had said polls showed a shift in his favor a few weeks before the election.Meanwhile, two members of Congress who held far-right positions when it came to Israeli-Palestinian negotiations, openly opposing the establishment of a Palestinian state, will likely not be coming back to Congress.Illinois Congressman Joe Walsh, a Republican Tea Party favorite who has written publicly against Palestinian statehood in the West Bank, lost decisively in Illinois’s 8th Congressional District in suburban Chicago to Democrat Tammy Duckworth by a vote of 45%-55%.Florida Congressman Allen West is currently locked in a tight photo-finish race with Democrat Patrick Murphy for Florida’s 18th Congressional District, but appears to be losing by a few thousand votes. West is seen as a rising star on right end of the Republican Party, and has said the Palestinians are not a distinct people and do not want peace.The only member of Congress still subscribing to that view will likely be Republican Michael Grimm, the co-chair of the House Republican Israel Caucus and a representative from New York’s 11th Congressional District, which includes the flood-hit area of Staten Island.Grimm, a former Marine and FBI agent, was reelected by a large margin Tuesday night. He has said he opposes the creation of a Palestinian state in the West Bank and has called for the release of Jonathan Pollard.All three are not Jewish.

Grave Disconnect as Orthodox Leaders Refused to Support Romney

70% of the Jewish population voting for Obama may show a grave disconnect between Israel and the Jewish population abroad.By Annie Lubin First Publish: 11/7/2012, 4:41 PM-INNEWS

For many, election results show a grave disconnect-Flash 90

As election results have been confirmed and statistics from national polls emerge, showing that American Jews overwhelmingly supported Barack Obama - with 70% of the Jewish population voting for Obama - questions emerge about the the true sentiments of this population towards Israel and the disconnect between Jews in Israel and those abroad.David Bedein, founder of the Israel Resource News Agency and  Director of the Center for Near East Policy Research finds the disconnect between the religious in Israel and the U.S. particularly startling, saying many Republican supporters were shocked by the refusal of Orthodox leaders to throw their support behind the pro-Israel Mitt Romney. "Those who think that orthodox Jews supported Romney and secular Jews supported Obama are wrong. This is simply not true," said Bedein. "In New Jersey they established the organization 'Rabbis for Romney,' and they turned to all sectors of Orthodox Jews, and there are a million Jews like that, but their rabbis refused to join."In his opinion, Jewish support for Obama indicates a grave detachment from the land of Israel. "We approached the Young Israel organization, which represents hundreds of synagogues, we approached the Council of Rabbis in the U.S., the Chabad organization, Agudath Israel, all of them refused - they told us they wanted to protect their ties to the current government. We need to understand that the difference (in votes for) Obama and Romney was very slight in the key states, and if those rabbis and leaders would have done something, if they would have emphasized how dangerous Obama is for Israel, it would have changed the entire picture and Romney would have been put in the White House."Bedein believes that orthodox Jews who put on tefillin and pray three times a day but voted for Obama, pose contradictory questions based on their behavior. "He is the President who did terrible things, who appointed anti-Semites, who supported Islam and here there are Jews who pray three times a day, who learn daf yomi (Talmud page), who have close relatives in Israel and they vote for Obama. All this should inspire us to think about the relationship between the religious in Israel and the religious there and why there is such a disconnect."

Press freedom under attack inside EU, advocates say

06.11.12 @ 17:26 By Nikolaj Nielsen

BRUSSELS - Media advocates are calling on EU lawmakers to speak out against the roll-back of press freedoms in some EU member states."There is not a single member state that has not taken a step back on press freedom," said Olivier Basille, secretary general of the Paris-based Reporters Without Borders (RSF) at a hearing in the European Parliament on Tuesday (6 November).Basille, along with a panel of media experts and advocates, laid out troubling trends in European media, with journalists coming under increasing pressure from political heavyweights to cede critical reporting.Romanian Liberal MEP Renate Weber, who drafted the European Parliament's position on media freedom in the EU, said the European Commission cannot shy away from taking a position."It is not good enough to invoke bureaucratic difficulties - be they legal powers in the sense of a specific legislation - to justify the lack of willingness of the commission [to speak out]," said Weber.The protection of sources and the protection against defamation claims by public figures are among some of the standards that are not being wholly respected.William Horsley of the Association of European Journalists (AEJ) pointed out that reporters are routinely intimidated, receive threats of violence by police and suffer arbitrary arrests in countries such as Greece, Romania, Bulgaria and in soon-to-join-the-EU Croatia.Bulgarian journalist Yavor Dachkov, who co-edits the Galeria newspaper in Sofia, told this website in July that a bomb exploded in front of his office soon after they published a phone call in January 2011 that allegedly incriminates Bulgaria's Prime Minister Borisov in a scandal involving a national beer company."It was close to taking the life of one of our colleagues," wrote Dachkov in a letter addressed to European Parliament president Martin Schulz.Meanwhile, concentrated ownership of media outlets in the hands of the few has created its own sets of problems.Owners of some media outlets in Romania and Bulgaria have links to organised crime, said the AEJ's Horsely: "This is corrupting the free flow of information within the borders of the European Union to an extent that EU lawmakers should understand and act on."He added that the commission and the parliament have known about the extent of abuse and press freedom violations for some time but "have clearly not acted."For its part, the New York-based Open Society Foundations (OSF), says there is an urgent need to address media ownership concentration.
The group has surveyed the impact of digitisation and digital media on media pluralism, diversity, accessibility and independence in 60 countries including 13 EU member states.Their study found that media concentration impacts editorial independence given the shady ties that are sometimes formed between owners and the political and business elite.They attribute some of this trend to the deregulation of media ownership rules and in some cases, to the removal of market share thresholds, as in the Netherlands, Romania and Slovenia.
"This has consolidated agenda-setting power in particular entities—including individual proprietors—which harms pluralism and undermines democracy," said OSF.Member state funding of publicly run media outlets is also raising concern and in particular, official advertising, which "supports politically friendly media and discriminates against others."

DOCTOR DOCTORIAN FROM ANGEL OF GOD
then the angel said, Financial crisis will come to Asia. I will shake the world.

JAMES 5:1-3
1 Go to now, ye rich men, weep and howl for your miseries that shall come upon you.
2 Your riches are corrupted, and your garments are motheaten.
3 Your gold and silver is cankered; and the rust of them shall be a witness against you, and shall eat your flesh as it were fire. Ye have heaped treasure together for the last days.

REVELATION 18:10,17,19
10 Standing afar off for the fear of her torment, saying, Alas, alas that great city Babylon, that mighty city! for in one hour is thy judgment come.
17 For in one hour so great riches is come to nought. And every shipmaster, and all the company in ships, and sailors, and as many as trade by sea, stood afar off,
19 And they cast dust on their heads, and cried, weeping and wailing, saying, Alas, alas that great city, wherein were made rich all that had ships in the sea by reason of her costliness! for in one hour is she made desolate.

EZEKIEL 7:19
19 They shall cast their silver in the streets, and their gold shall be removed: their silver and their gold shall not be able to deliver them in the day of the wrath of the LORD: they shall not satisfy their souls, neither fill their bowels: because it is the stumblingblock of their iniquity.

REVELATION 13:16-18
16 And he(THE FALSE POPE WHO DEFECTED FROM THE CHRISTIAN FAITH) causeth all,(IN THE WORLD ) both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:(MICROCHIP IMPLANT)
17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark,(MICROCHIP IMPLANT) or the name of the beast,(WORLD DICTATORS NAME INGRAVED ON YOUR SKIN OR TATTOOED ON YOU OR IN THE MICROCHIP IMPLANT) or the number of his name.(THE NUMBERS OF HIS NAME INGRAVED IN THE MICROCHIP IMLPLANT)-(ALL THESE WILL TELL THE WORLD DICTATOR THAT YOUR WITH HIM AND AGAINST KING JESUS-GOD)
18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast:(WORLD LEADER) for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.(6-6-6) A NUMBER SYSTEM (6006006)OR(60020202006)(SOME KIND OF NUMBER IMPLANTED IN THE MICROCHIP THAT TELLS THE WORLD DICTATOR AND THE NEW WORLD ORDER THAT YOU GIVE YOUR TOTAL ALLIGIENCE TO HIM AND NOT JESUS)(ITS AN ETERNAL DECISION YOU MAKE)(YOU CHOOSE YOUR OWN DESTINY)(YOU TAKE THE DICTATORS NAME OR NUMBER UNDER YOUR SKIN,YOUR DOOMED TO THE LAKE OF FIRE AND TORMENTS FOREVER,NEVER ENDING MEANT ONLY FOR SATAN AND HIS ANGELS,NOT HUMAN BEINGS).OR YOU REFUSE THE MICROCHIP IMPLANT AND GO ON THE SIDE OF KING JESUS AND RULE FOREVER WITH HIM ON EARTH.YOU CHOOSE,ITS YOUR DECISION.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYUgVL9PdxM&list=UU4SH8rh0OjYV3zwqnIfqNbA&index=1&feature=plcp
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9PX-vW4VccY&feature=player_embedded#!
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/markets/indexes/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfPX59y4KxE&feature=related

HALF HOUR DOW RESULTS WED NOVEMBER 07,2012

09:30 AM  -2.43
10:00 AM  -197.70
10:30 AM  -245.00
11:00 AM  -308.61
11:30 AM  -361.20
12:00 PM  -315.16
12:30 PM  -300.70
01:00 PM  -260.61
01:30 PM  -255.98
02:00 PM  -273.34
02:30 PM  -270.10
03:00 PM  -293.53
03:30 PM  -243.61
04:00 PM  -312.95 12,932.73

S&P 500 1394.53 -33.86

NASDAQ 2937.29 -74.64

GOLD 1,719.40 +4.40

OIL 84.62 -4.00

TSE 300 12,330.59 -130.61

CDNX 1290.71 -12.43

S&P/TSX/60 699.20 -8.80

MORNING,NEWS,STATS

YEAR TO DATE PERFORMANCE
Dow -205 points at 4 minutes of trading today.
Dow -361 points at low today.
Dow -1 points at high today so far.
GOLD opens at $1,726.10.OIL opens at $87.30 today.

AFTERNOON,NEWS,STATS
Dow -369 points at low today so far.
Dow -1 points at high today so far.

WRAPUP,NEWS,STATS
Dow -369 points at low today.
Dow -1 points at high today.

GOLD ALLTIME HIGH $1,902.60 (NOT AT CLOSE)

CRUDE OIL +1.8 MILLION BARRELS
GASOLINE +2.9 MILLION BARRELS
DISTILLATE INVENTORIES +131,000 BARRELS

Ballooning deficit to up pressure for Spanish bailout

Today @ 09:44 NOV 7,12 By Valentina Pop

The EU commission on Wednesday (7 November) is likely to forecast a larger-than-expected deficit for Spain, adding pressure on the country to ask for a bailout.Spain's public deficit for this year - already adjusted twice in recent months - is now expected to reach eight percent of the country's gross domestic product, according to draft figures seen by AFP.This will be almost two percent more than a previous estimate when Spain obtained a year extra to bring its deficit below the three-percent threshold under EU rules.In addition, recession is to last until 2014, making it difficult for the Spanish government to push for more austerity measures to bring the deficit down.But the European Commission has in the past few weeks indicated it will not suggest Madrid be sanctioned for missing its deficit target this year so long as it sticks to the 2014 deadline of bringing the public finance gap below three percent.Part of the extra expenditure is the bank bailout which is to be reimbursed from the eurozone bailout fund in the coming months. Up to €100 billion had been earmarked from the eurozone fund, but an audit has since said only about €60 billion will be needed.Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy tried to be positive about the future. "In 2014, there'll be growth in Spain. The worst year will have been 2012 and next year will be better," he said in a radio interview on Tuesday."All the measures we're taking are aimed at economic recovery ... it's very difficult to create jobs when you owe so much."But with one in four workers out of a job and regions asking for bailouts from the government, the pressure on the government to ask for a full-blown eurozone bailout is set to increase.

Greece

Meanwhile, the Greek parliament is due to vote on the €13.5 billion worth of spending cuts demanded by the troika of international lenders in order to disburse the next tranche of bailout money. Without this tranche, Greece faces the prospect of bankruptcy by mid-November.But Greeks - with the country in its fifth year of recession - have little appetite for more cuts. A general strike, started Tuesday, in protest at the continuing austerity measure has virtually closed the country down.Meanwhile, support within the ruling coalition for the cuts is also shaky. But Prime Minister Antonis Samaras has indicated he is confident that MPs from the opposition will back the bill, securing enough votes to pass it.The rest of Europe is watching the debate closely. "Our Greek friends don't have different options or another choice. They have to do it," Eurogroup chief Jean-Claude Juncker said during a lecture in Singapore also on Tuesday.