IS WAR CLOSE IN THE MIDEAST

I OVIOUSLY GOT TRUTHFUL STUFF IN THIS STORY AS SOON AS I PUT IT TOGETHER GOOGLE OR MICROSOFT IS TRYING TO STOP ME FROM PUBLISHING IT AGAIN.FOR THE LAST 15 MINUTES MY COMPUTER IS RUNNING ON AND ON AGAIN AND ON.YOU OVIOUSLY CAN'T GET TRUTH OUT WITHOUT PERSECUTION LIKE THE BIBLE SAYS WILL HAPPEN TO CHRISTIANS IN THE LAST DAYS FOR SPEAKING TRUTH OF GODS WORDS.

DEUTERONOMY 32:8-9
8 When the most High divided to the nations their inheritance, when he separated the sons of Adam, he set the bounds of the people according to the number of the children of Israel.
9 For the LORD'S portion is his people; Jacob(ISRAEL)is the lot of his inheritance.

ISRAELS INHERITED LAND IN THE FUTURE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ytWmPqY8TE0&feature=player_embedded

DEUTERONOMY 7:7-8
7 The LORD did not set his love upon you, nor choose you, because ye were more in number than any people;(ISRAEL) for ye were the fewest of all people:
8 But because the LORD loved you,(ISRAEL) and because he would keep the oath which he had sworn unto your fathers, hath the LORD brought you out with a mighty hand, and redeemed you out of the house of bondmen, from the hand of Pharaoh king of Egypt.

ZECHARIAH 2:8
8 For thus saith the LORD of hosts; After the glory hath he sent me unto the nations which spoiled you: for he that toucheth you toucheth the apple of his eye.

JEREMIAH 3:14
14 Turn, O backsliding children, saith the LORD; for I am married unto you:(ISRAEL) and I will take you one of a city, and two of a family, and I will bring you to Zion:

ISAIAH 42:1
1 Behold my servant, whom I uphold; mine elect,(ISRAEL) in whom my soul delighteth; I have put my spirit upon him: he shall bring forth judgment to the Gentiles.

ISAIAH 45:4
4 For Jacob my servant’s sake, and Israel mine elect, I have even called thee by thy name: I have surnamed thee, though thou hast not known me.

ISAIAH 65:9,22
9 And I will bring forth a seed out of Jacob, and out of Judah an inheritor of my mountains: and mine elect (ISRAEL) shall inherit it, and my servants shall dwell there.
22 They shall not build, and another inhabit; they shall not plant, and another eat: for as the days of a tree are the days of my people, and mine elect (ISRAEL) shall long enjoy the work of their hands.

ISAIAH 56:5
5 Even unto them (ISRAELIS) will I give in mine house and within my walls a place and a name better than of sons and of daughters: I will give them an everlasting name,(ISRAEL) that shall not be cut off.

And here are the bounderies of the land that Israel will inherit either through war or peace or God in the future. God says its Israels land and only Israels land. They will have every inch God promised them of this land in the future.
Egypt east of the Nile River, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, The southern part of Turkey and the Western Half of Iraq west of the Euphrates. Gen 13:14-15, Psm 105:9,11, Gen 15:18, Exe 23:31, Num 34:1-12, Josh 1:4.ALL THIS LAND ISRAEL WILL DEFINATELY OWN IN THE FUTURE, ITS ISRAELS NOT ISHMAELS LAND.

12 TRIBES INHERIT LAND IN THE FUTURE

MATTHEW 23:39
39 For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.

ROMANS 11:25
25 For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.(JUNE 6-10,1967)(ISRAEL RECAPTURED JERUSALEM)

LUKE 21:24
24 And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled.(JUNE 6-10,1967)(ISRAEL RECAPTURES JERUSALEM)

LUKE 21:31-32
31 So likewise ye, when ye see these things come to pass,(PROPHECEY-SIGNS)(ISRAEL IN THEIR OWN LAND AND RECAPTURE JERUSALEM) know ye that the kingdom of God is nigh at hand.
32 Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass away, till all be fulfilled.

GENESIS 12:1-3
1 Now the LORD had said unto Abram,(THE 1ST HEBREW JEW) Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father’s house, unto a land that I will shew thee:
2 And I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing:
3 And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse(DESTROY)him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.

JAN MARKELL-1ST HALF HOUR-HOW TO GET ISRAELIS SAVED THROUGH CHRIST THE ONLY WAY.
JAN MARKELL-2ND,3RD HALF HOUR-HOW CLOSE TO WAR AGAINST ISRAEL BECAUSE OF EGYPTS FALL
http://olivetreeradio.com/OTM2011_02_05A.mp3
http://olivetreeradio.com/OTM2011_02_05B.mp3
http://www.olivetreeviews.org/radio/mp3/

RELATED STORIES ON EGYPT-MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD
http://israndjer.blogspot.com/2011/01/radical-muslims-infiltrate-eypt.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.com/2011/02/radical-muslim-brotherhood-charter-in.html
OTHER MIDEAST STORIES RELATED
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20110206/wl_mideast_afp/lebanonpoliticsgovernment
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110207/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_jordan_protest
http://news.yahoo.com/nphotos/slideshow/photo//110207/ids_photos_wl/r1328806632.jpg/
http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/meast/02/03/yemen.protests/index.html?section=cnn_latest
http://rss.nfowars.net/20110207_Mon_Alex.mp3

THIS IS QUITE OVIUOSLY WHY THEY WANT ELBARADEI IN EGYPT TO BE THE HEAD OF EGYPTS NUKES,SINCE ELBARADEI WAS THE CEO OF THE NUKE AGENCY.ISRAEL BE PREPARED FOR ANYTHING IF ELBARADEI IS PRESIDENT OF EGYPT.

Feb 7, 2011 Egypt’s WMD article by MSNBC
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/41452744/ns/world_news-mideastn_africa
Concerns grow over Egypt’s WMD researchU.S. has been quiet about Cairo’s weapons programs, but revolt changes the calculus
By Robert Windrem Senior investigative producer

With Egypt in revolt and the country’s future uncertain, concern is growing over whether a new government in the Arab world’s most militarily and industrially advanced country could accelerate an arms race in one of the world’s most volatile regions.At the heart of the concern is intelligence indicating that Egypt has quietly carried out research and development on weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear, chemical, biological and missile technology. The research and development has continued virtually without pause over the past three decades, according to interviews with U.S. officials and a review of intelligence and other government documents by NBC News.Specifically, the intelligence indicates that Egypt has carried out experiments in plutonium reprocessing and uranium enrichment, helped jump-start Saddam Hussein’s missile and chemical weapons programs in Iraq, and worked with Kim il-Jung on North Korea’s missile program. If we found another country doing what they’ve done, we would have been all over them, said a former U.S. intelligence official, speaking on condition of anonymity.

Related story: What do we know about Egypt’s arsenal? NBC News has obtained more than a dozen documents from the United States, Russia and Israel that shed some light on several Egyptian weapons of mass destruction programs, including its nuclear potential and details of a joint North Korean-Egyptian missile development agreement.The reason the U.S. didn’t move, officials say, was Egypt’s role as a staunch U.S. ally and stabilizing force in the Middle East and later as a key player in U.S. counterterrorism efforts.If Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak is forced to step down, new leadership in Cairo could mean a radical change in that relationship, analysts say.

Withdraw from nuke treaty?
In fact, at least one nuclear proliferation analyst believes that a shift may already be under way in Egyptian policy and that the U.S. may have to deal with Cairo withdrawing from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which it signed and ratified in 1968.They hint that if something isn’t done about Israel’s nuclear weapons program or Iran’s nuclear ambitions, they may be prepared to leave the (treaty), said David Albright, president of the Institute for Science and International Security and a former inspector with the International Atomic Energy Agency.The Egyptians have pushed for a U.N. conference next year on weapons of mass destruction, or WMD, in the Middle East, and would like to see constraints placed on Israeli and Iranian arms programs.But these requirements are hard to meet, Albright said. (The conference) may not end well, and that could be a catalyst for them to leave the (Non-Proliferation Treaty).

1.Related content
1.Mubarak hangs on after mass protests
2.What you need to know about the crisis in Egypt
3.Map interactive: Turmoil in the Middle East
4.Live updates: Latest from the World Blog
5.North Korean nukes: Big fears, few facts
6.Pakistan expanding its nuclear capability
7.Ahmadinejad refuses to rule out weapons

So far, the international community has not made the conference a priority. Seven months after the agreement to hold the conference, the U.N. has yet to establish a venue, an agenda or a facilitator to organize it.If Egypt was to withdraw from the treaty, there would be no restraints on its development of nuclear technology, whether for energy or for weapons.And Cairo already has given indications that it may harbor nuclear ambitions, according to analysts inside and outside the U.S. government.The International Atomic Energy Agency criticized Egypt in February 2005 for failing to report a variety of nuclear experiments over 20 or more years.The agency noted the Egypt had used small amounts of nuclear material to conduct experiments related to producing plutonium and enriched uranium, both of which can be used to make nuclear weapons. (The agency was then led by Mohamed ElBaradei, now an opposition figure and potential candidate to become at least an interim leader of a post-Mubarak government.)

Uranium, plutonium experiments
While the plutonium experiments appear to have taken place at least 20 years ago, the uranium experiments were more recent.According to the IAEA report, Egypt used its two research reactors at Inshas in the Nile Delta between 1990 and 2003 to irradiate small amounts of natural uranium, conducting a total of 16 experiments.
According to the IAEA, none of the experiments fully succeeded, but in each case, Egypt failed to report them to the agency as required by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Act.Egypt eventually acknowledged that it had not fully disclosed the extent of its nuclear facilities, failed to declare the pilot plant used for the plutonium and uranium-separation experiments and did not provide design information for a new facility under construction, also at Inshas.The IAEA declared the lapses a matter of concern but stopped short of accusing Egypt of having a clandestine nuclear weapons program.

What do we know about Egypt’s arsenal?

In a statement responding to the IAEA, Egypt played down the violations, claiming that differing interpretations of its obligations under the treaty had led to the problems.But Albright said the experiments triggered concerns that Egypt was interested in the nuclear fuel cycle — the full development of fuel that can be used to power reactors or build bombs.For 15 years, they have made credible moves to build up their nuclear fuel cycle capability, he said.Egypt has admitted that it pursued nuclear weapons in the 1960s as it first learned about Israel’s nuclear program, which by 1966 had produced its first atomic bombs. At that point, at least some of those weapons would have targeted Egyptian cities.

Mubarak on the record
And Mubarak himself has occasionally raised the possibility of a nuclear Egypt.In an October 1998 interview, Mubarak said that Egypt could, if need be, develop nuclear weapons or buy the technology.If the time comes when we need nuclear weapons, then we will not hesitate, he told London’s al-Hayat newspaper. Acquiring material for nuclear weapons has become very easy, and it can be bought.As always, he then dismissed the idea.I say, if we have to, because this is the last thing we think about, he told al-Hayat. We do not think now of joining the nuclear club.The U.S. now believes that Mubarak’s reference to being able to buy nuclear technology was not just an off-hand remark.The statement appears to coincide with a secret offer by Pakistan’s A.Q. Khan to help Egypt develop nuclear arms, an offer that was rejected by Cairo, say U.S. intelligence officials.Despite these such hints, some observers do not believe that a new government would risk withdrawing from the non-proliferation treaty and moving to develop nuclear weapons. James Russell, a nuclear non-proliferation expert at the Naval Post-Graduate School in Monterey, Calif., and a former Pentagon official, thinks re-entering the nuclear race would be politically risky and economically unwise.He noted that the Egyptian government abandoned its nuclear ambitions after the 1967 war with Israel because of the cost and the lack of scientific expertise.

We don’t know
The question is, would a follow-on regime want to revisit this? he said. Would it look at the set of calculations and pursue not a peaceful program but consider constructing an illicit program? The answer is that we don’t know, but we do have an idea of what the costs of doing that would be … and the prospect that they’d have a pretty damn difficult time trying to hide it.I have a hard time seeing the costs (for) mounting such a program. The calculus argues for not doing this … even for an Islamic regime, he added.But as Russell and others note, the Egyptians don’t have a clean record” in other areas of arms proliferation. And if the Egyptians lost part or all of their U.S. military aid, they could be expected to try to make up those losses by developing and exporting more weapons technology.A revealing example of that occurred when Egypt helped Iraq develop its chemical weapons capability before the Gulf War.A CIA report in 2005 indicated that the Egyptian arms industry was sophisticated enough to permit Egypt to help Iraq make technological leaps in the 1980s, as Arab Iraq was battling Persian Iran.The 350,000-word report, little noticed until the Associated Press wrote of it in March 2005, stated that in 1981, after the outbreak of war with Iran, the Iraqi government paid Egypt $12 million in return for assistance with production and storage of chemical weapons agents.It said the assistance included making modifications to rocket systems to permit the warheads to store and disperse chemical agents and helping Saddam’s scientists develop sarin munitions.The sarin development is the best indicator of the Egyptian chemical weapons capabilities, say military experts. Sarin is a nerve agent, one of the more advanced military chemicals in the world.

A lesson from assistance to Iraq
Before the mid-1980s, Iraq was limited to mustard gas and other disfiguring agents. But not long after the Egyptian scientists arrived, Iraqi sarin production soared — from 5 tons in 1984 to 209 tons in 1987 and 394 tons in 1988, the report says. During that period, sarin was used extensively by Iraq to kill Kurdish dissidents in the north as well as Iranian soldiers in the south.The Egyptians also were critical to the development of an Iraqi missile program, Begun during the Iran-Iraq War in the mid-1980s.With financing from Iraq, Egypt set up a secret $750 million missile development project in the foothills of the Andes, just south of Cordoba, Argentina. Called the Condor-II, it was an advanced, mobile, two-stage, solid-fuel ballistic missile that could carry a half-ton warhead more than 600 miles.By 1985, it was well along in development and the centerpiece of an international consortium run by Egypt’s Ministry of Defense. U.S. pressure on Argentina and Egypt stopped the project, say U.S. intelligence officials. And that is not the only example of Egypt working with a rogue state.Also in the mid-1980s, Egypt secretly cooperated with North Korea to improve both countries’ missile arsenals.Egypt’s shipped at least two of its Soviet-supplied Scuds to North Korea for reverse-engineering. In return, Pyongyang agreed to help Cairo build Scuds on its own. North Korea provided technical documents, drawings and extensive access to North Korea’s own Scud production program.The cooperation led to North Korea’s development of its Nodong and Taepo-dong missiles. The former was later sent to Pakistan in exchange for nuclear technology, and deployment of the latter led the U.S. to install its “Star Wars” anti-missile system in Alaska, U.S. intelligence officials said.

It is this backdrop — and the fact that Egypt still has considerable expertise in missiles and chemical weapons — that has some analysts concerned about the path that a new Egyptian government might take.If an Islamic-dominated government emerges in the wake of Mubarak’s departure, then all bets are off as far as pursuit of WMDs, said Russell, the former Pentagon official. That also would be true of Egyptian-Israeli relations, he said.If the military retains power and installs another one of its own as leader, the analysts said, the issue will be to what extent Egypt’s relationship with the U.S. is damaged by the Obama administration’s efforts to exert its influence in the crisis.The only outcome that would entirely calm concerns about Egypt’s WMD ambitions would be if ElBaradei emerged as a central figure in a successor government, they said. He is, after all, a Nobel Peace Prize laureate because of his efforts to stop nuclear proliferation.

New sense of nationalism expected
But no matter the outcome, Egypt is likely to become newly sovereign, or more nationalistic, in the post-Mubarak era, the analysts said.Egypt would face great costs — including loss of U.S. aid and the ability to buy U.S. military equipment — if it became too open in its dealings with rogue states, or if it pressed hard on a nuclear agenda, notes Judith Yaphe, a 20-year veteran of the CIA who is now senior research fellow and Middle East project director at the National Defense University.

But that doesn’t necessarily mean that a new government might not decide that perilous times call for high-risk actions.Will it change? Who knows? she said. The Egyptian military has important things it has to protect. It would like to protect its relationship with the United States. … Those close ties are something they value. They value highly the training, the weaponry.Still, we shouldn’t be terribly surprised they are playing with things. Israel is still there, and the Iranians have ambitions. Call it the Iran Effect, if you want. Everyone else has given up on the Egyptians as great leaders, but the Egyptians haven’t.

Arab unrest complicates counterterrorism efforts By STEPHEN BRAUN, Associated Press – Sun Feb 6, 2:55 pm ET

WASHINGTON – The unrest engulfing Arab streets and threatening authoritarian governments in the Mideast is complicating U.S. counterterrorism efforts, scrambling the volatile battleground against al-Qaida in Yemen and raising concerns about the durability of Egypt's stance against militants.U.S. counterterrorism officials need to move quickly to firm up relationships with veteran Mideast intelligence and security services in the aftermath of momentous changes, experts say. Lingering confusion over who will take the reins of power could hamper instant decision-making in the short term.Over the longer term, will the U.S. be able to work as closely against al-Qaida and other terrorist groups if important allies such as Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak and Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh cede power to Islamist groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood? Right now the situation is so fluid it's just about impossible to make any determinations about long-term repercussions, said Roger Cressey, a former counterterrorism deputy in the Clinton and second Bush administrations. The counterterrorism community has to be cautious about even jumping six months ahead.

Uncertainty about whether the U.S. can depend on Arab allies to join against militants comes amid growing American concerns following a string of failed attacks plotted in Yemen and al-Qaida's home base inside Pakistan. Less reliance on Mideast partners could force the U.S. to strike back on its own there, if a future terrorist attack were to succeed.The next time American interests are attacked and there's a return address in Yemen, the U.S. may have to act unilaterally, said Christopher Boucek, an expert with the Washington-based Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.U.S. counterterrorism officials worry that continuing demonstrations in the Yemeni capital in Sana'a could led the country's security forces to focus more on protecting the government, giving breathing room to al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula, suspected in plots against the U.S. in recent months.Some street protests have come from pro-democracy elements, Boucek said. Others have been stirred by Islamic fundamentalist and secessionist groups already arrayed against Saleh's government.In a sign of the mounting alarm about Yemen's role as a terrorist staging, President Barack Obama told Saleh on the phone this past week about the need for forceful action against the al-Qaida affiliate. Obama did praise the significant reform measures that Saleh ordered to defuse the protests.

Obama also took the unusual step of publicly chiding Saleh for releasing Abd-Ilah al-Shai, a sympathizer of the al-Qaida group who had been sentenced to five years for his ties with it. Al-Shai had met in 2009 with Anwar al-Awlaki, a fugitive militant cleric who is suspected by American authorities of involvement in the Christmas Day plot that year to bomb a Detroit-bound jet and the October 2010 scheme to send mail bombs on planes from Yemen to the U.S.Saleh, who's kept power despite battling three separate insurrections, often has to wire-walk between U.S. officials pressing for more leeway to take the battle against al-Qaida and powerful Yemeni tribes suspicious of his dealings with the Americans. Diplomatic cables released this year by WikiLeaks described the gap between Saleh's public posturing and private utterances — telling top U.S. counterterror adviser John Brennan at one point that he would pretend that a series of U.S. airstrikes had been carried out by Yemeni forces.Saleh's good at dancing in the snake pit, said Juan Zarate, a former top Bush administration counterterror official who is now with the Center for Strategic and International Studies. The unrest he's dealing with now poses some dangers, but he's pretty adept at getting out of trouble.Egypt once had to contend with its own breed of hardcore Islamic militants. But three decades of brutal repression by the country's security services — most recently led by new Vice President Omar Suleiman — largely eliminated them as a threat. The secretive Egyptian Islamic Jihad organization has been headed by al-Qaida's second-in-command, Ayman al-Zawahri since 1991, but Egypt's secret police crushed the group, expelling al-Zawahri and imprisoning its members.In a classified diplomatic cable written on April 13, 2009, the U.S. ambassador to Egypt, Margaret Scobey, wrote that Cairo's active opposition to Islamist terrorism and effective intelligence and security services makes Egypt an unattractive safe haven for terror groups, and there is no evidence to suggest there are any active foreign terrorist groups in the country.

During the uprising last week, there were numerous reports that some Islamic Jihad inmates were among hundreds let out during a mass jailbreak. Egyptian authorities said they rounded up many of those who escaped, but it was not clear whether all of them were back in custody. As long as the military and security apparatus is in control, I still don't see Egyptian militants as a real threat, Cressey said.The greater concern in Egypt, Zarate said, is tending to the strong ties between American and Egyptian counterterrorism officials that both sides cultivated over the past three decades. U.S. officials clearly want to shore up their relations with the security services to make sure our counterterrorism relations survive the changes, Zarate said. They need to be prepared to tailor their relations as the structure changes. If Suleiman takes control, that means there are new top security people we need to deal with.Some U.S. leaders worry that the likelihood that the fundamentalist Islamic Muslim Brotherhood — long ago locked out of power in Egypt — will wield power in a freer, decentralized government that might lead to a weakened stance against al-Qaida and other terror groups.My concern is their ties to terror groups and their adherence to (Islamic) Shariah law, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said last week. Am I worried about the result that the Muslim Brotherhood might gain power? Yeah, I'm scared to death. But the option of holding off on democracy is not an option.Counterterrorism experts say the Muslim Brotherhood and al-Qaida are hardly joined at the hip. The groups have been foes for years, quarreling over ideological and tactical differences — often over the Brotherhood's willingness to work within political systems instead of toppling them violently. They just don't like each other,Cressey said. Al-Qaida sees itself as more militant, and they believe the Brotherhood isn't willing to take on the Egyptian security services.

Egypt's toughest counterterrorism challenge ahead may come as U.S. officials are forced to work with a new government that includes the Muslim Brotherhood, seeking common ground against terrorist enemies even if the Islamic faction tries to distance Egypt from its neighbor, Israel. American political leaders have long fused counterterror aims with support for Israel, and contending with an altered Mideast landscape with rising Islamic factions could force hard choices.We'll have to struggle with this politically, especially as we go into an election year, said Phillip Mudd, a former CIA and FBI official who was deputy director of the CIA's Counterterrorist Center and now is a senior adviser with Oxford Analytica, a consulting firm. The tension is between the need to work with these groups to continue the fight against (al-Qaida) and other extreme elements and the possibility that they may go against our wishes when it comes to Israel. Europe is less political and more realistic when it comes to that tension but it may be more of a problem here.Despite the likely tensions looming, Mudd and some other terrorism experts say the turbulence in Cairo, Sana'a and elsewhere in the Mideast and North Africa raises hopes that al-Qaida's momentum may be overtaken by democratic impulses. Al-Qaida sees themselves as revolutionaries, Mudd said. But the rise of the pro-democracy protests on the Arab street might take the air out of the balloon in terms of their recruiting. It siphons off their youth recruits.Associated Press writer Lolita C. Baldor contributed to this report.

Mideast turmoil makes peace imperative: Peres
– Sun Feb 6, 2:18 pm ET

JERUSALEM (AFP) – The turmoil engulfing the Middle East makes it urgent that Israel and the Palestinians return to negotiations and make peace, Israeli President Shimon Peres said on Sunday.The veteran Israeli politician said that while the Israeli-Palestinian conflict was not the cause of much of the problems affecting the region, it was being manipulated by the enemies of both the Israelis and the Palestinians.

The dramatic events of recent days raise the need to remove the Israeli- Palestinian conflict from the daily agenda as soon as possible because the conflict is being exploited to the detriment of both sides, Peres said at a conference in the seaside town of Herzliya north of Tel Aviv.Peres spoke of the uprisings in Egypt and Tunisia, the political turmoil in Lebanon, the north-south split in Sudan and Iran's nuclear programme.His comments echo those of the Middle East diplomatic Quartet -- the United States, European Union, Russia and the United Nations, which met in the German city of Munich on Saturday.History has lost its patience, it is happening at a gallop. Either we gallop with it or it will leave without us. There are those who say we need to wait for the storm to subside, no one knows when it will end, Peres said.Talks between Israel and the Palestinians, relaunched on September 2 after a long hiatus, fell apart weeks afterwards after Israel refused to renew a temporary ban on building settlements in the West Bank.The Palestinian leadership refuses to resume negotiations as long as Israel builds on land wanted for a Palestinian state.