JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.GET SAVED NOW- CALL ON JESUS TODAY.THE ONLY SAVIOR OF THE WHOLE EARTH - NO OTHER. 1 COR 15:23-JESUS THE FIRST FRUITS-CHRISTIANS RAPTURED TO JESUS-FIRST FRUITS OF THE SPIRIT-23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.ROMANS 8:23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.(THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE)
J6 WAS A LIBERAL PUPPET STOOG PAYOFF OF DRUGGIES-AND TAKE ADVANTAGE OF BRAIN WASHED MENTALLY ILL DEMOLIBNUTS.
Poll: 39% of Israelis don’t believe election results will be accurate-Survey also finds only 37% of respondents optimistic about future of democracy in Jewish state-By Michael Horovitz-Today, 11:07 pm - OCT 28,22
A poll published Wednesday found a large share of Israelis do not have faith that upcoming election results will be accurate.The monthly Israeli Voice Index by the Israel Democracy Institute found that 39% of Israelis — the second highest rate ever counted by the study — believe the published election results will not properly reflect the public’s vote.When broken down according to ethnicity, the study found that 36% of Jewish Israelis do not trust election results, while a majority of 51.5% of Arab Israelis do not believe the votes will be tallied accurately.The highest rate of distrust, 44%, was recorded in August 2019, a month before the second round of a series of elections held.In March 2021, shortly before the last round of elections, 28% of Israelis lacked faith in the election results.Israelis head to the polls on November 1.It is the fifth election since 2019 — the result of several deadlocked results that failed to produce a government, as well as two shortlived governing coalitions.Last week, President Isaac Herzog penned a letter to party leaders, urging them to reign in incitement, and to ensure their supporters have confidence in the election results, “whatever they may be.”Herzog’s call appeared to be a plea to avoid a repetition of the situation in the US, where former US president Donald Trump’s baseless refusal to accept the results of the election has continued to undermine the American political system.The IDI study also found a minority of 37% of Israelis are optimistic about the future of democracy.Among Jewish Israelis, 38% have a positive outlook on democracy, but the number drops to 30% among Arab Israelis.Additionally, the survey asked respondents if they thought security officials’ support for the recent maritime border deal with Lebanon was influenced by political considerations, finding mixed responses.“Half the sample believe that this support was indeed also influenced by political considerations; one-third, that the agency heads’ decision was entirely professional; and 17% said that they don’t know,” the report said, adding that the rate of those who thought political considerations influenced security officials was higher among Jewish Israelis.Citing the urgent need to sign the deal and constraints on the Lebanese side, the outgoing government approved the deal, but did not bring it to the Knesset for a vote.
Man accused of attacking Pelosi’s husband had spread conspiracy theories about Jews-Police identify suspect as David DePape who has propagated online the theory that Jews are to blame for the war in Ukraine and Holocaust denial-By Ron Kampeas-OCT 28,22-Today, 11:40 pm 0
JTA — The man arrested for beating US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s husband with a hammer after breaking into their San Francisco home in search of her had spread the theory online that Jews are to blame for the war in Ukraine.San Francisco police arrested David DePape on Friday after Paul Pelosi struggled with a home invader who was attacking him.DePape was allegedly yelling, “Where is Nancy?” Nancy Pelosi was in Washington, DC, at the time of the attack.Paul Pelosi, 82, was hospitalized but is expected to recover.A picture of DePape that emerged after police named him as the alleged attacker suggests that he was actively engaged online with a slew of conspiracy theories, including ones about Pelosi, who has been a target of supporters of former US president Donald Trump, and about Jews.One of two websites DePape apparently administered includes a category entitled “DaJewbs,” devoted to antisemitic conspiracy theories, including Holocaust denial.Numerous recent entries accuse Jews of being behind Russia’s war against Ukraine as a means of buying up the land.“That’s some pretty sick Jewing going on if true,” said a post from Monday featuring an antisemitic caricature of a Jew. “Bomb the country into shit so the residents leave. Buy the land up for cheap.”A post on Tuesday said, “The more Ukrainians die NEEDLESSLY the cheaper the land will be for Jews to buy up.”A blog run by David Depape, the Berkley man accused of attacking Paul Pelosi with a hammer, has articles titled 'Hitler did nothing wrong,' 'Black pilled,' and 'Pedophile normalization.' pic.twitter.com/BNkfV46CyC — Mikael Thalen (@MikaelThalen) October 28, 2022-DePape’s Facebook page appears to no longer be available, but CNN reported that it was replete with posts embracing the election denial lie peddled by Trump and his supporters, as well as transphobic content and unfounded theories about the coronavirus vaccines.The network also spoke to people who knew DePape, including family members, who said that he was disconnected from reality and from his family.David DePape ?????? Pelosi attacker identified. pic.twitter.com/ANvjSxHa5h — Carl owns a hammer ????? (@replyndelete) October 28, 2022-DePape, whom police said would be charged with attempted homicide and other crimes, joins a growing list of alleged perpetrators of attacks fueled by conspiracy theories that spread online.The alleged gunman who killed 10 people in Buffalo, New York, in May, for example, ascribed to the “great replacement theory” which posits that Jews are behind an effort to replace white people with immigrants of color.The man identified as being the perpetrator of a recent shooting outside an LGBTQ bar in Bratislava, Slovakia, did as well; both men called for the murder of Jews.
THE J6 SCAM BY THE DEOMCRAPS ARE STARTING TO UNFOLD HOW THEY TRYED TO SET TRUMP UP. GET DRUGGIES OR AUTISM OR STOOGES. TELL THEM THEIR ON A SPECIAL MISSION. DEMOCRAPS AND FBI AND DOJ TELLS THESE PUPPETS WE WILL BE GIVING YOU SECRET IMFORMATION. OF WHAT TO DO ON J6. AND PAY USE FOR DOING IT. AND MAKE SURE IF POSSIBLE TO KEEP USE OUTTA JAIL. OR IF YOU GET ARRESTED. WE DEMOCRATES QNON SECRET INFO FROM THE SETUP CREW WILL GET YOU OUTTA JAIL. THIS IS HOW THE SCAM SETUP WAS DONE AGAINST DONALD JOHN TRUMP AND HIS SUPPORTERS TO GET THEM IN JAIL. FOR THIS DAY AND NIGHT DEMOLIBNUTS J6 SCAM. AND WHATEVER HAPPENED TO THAT DEMOLIBNUT WOMAN BOMBER. IF IT WAS A TRUMP SUPPORTER. A FEW HOURS LATER THE BOMBERS NAME AND PICTURE WOULD BE ALL OVER TV. AND THE DEMOLIBNUTS WOULD HAVE BEEN SAYING THOSE EXTREMIST TERRORIST TRUMP SUPPORTERS SET UP A BOMB NEAR THE J6 BUILDING. BUT SINCE IT WAS A DEMOLIBNUTCASE WOMAN I BELIEVE IT WAS. NOT A MAN.OH 2 YEARS LATER THE LIBERAL PUPPET PAID STOOGE IS NOT EVEN MENTIONED IN THE BRAIN DEAD LIBERAL NEWS. OR CAUGHT YET. SO OF COURSE IT WAS A PAID OFF STOOGE LIBERAL PUPPET. MAYBE IT WAS A LIBERAL SPECIAL. A TRANNY. A MAN TURNED INTO A WOMAN. WHO SET THE BOMB THEIR. THEN ONES WHO THINK THE BOMBER WAS A MAN IS RIGHT. AND I WOULD BE RIGHT CALLING IT A WOMAN.
Jan. 6 rioter gets probation not prison after judge finds autism played a role-U.S. District Court Judge Trevor McFadden concluded that severe mental illness significantly mitigated ‘the blameworthiness’ of the defendant.Judge Trevor McFadden said Asperger’s syndrome made Nicholas Rodean (right) susceptible to the influence of the mob. | Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP Photo-By Kyle Cheney-10/26/2022 01:30 PM EDT
A Jan. 6 rioter who wielded a hatchet and smashed two windows with a flagpole will serve no jail time, a federal judge ruled Wednesday, finding that Asperger’s syndrome made him susceptible to the influence of the mob.Nicholas Rodean of Frederick, Md., attempted to address U.S. District Court Judge Trevor McFadden Wednesday and visibly struggled to complete thoughts and sentences while explaining and apologizing for his Jan. 6 conduct. At one point, he clutched his head in frustration.McFadden ultimately chose to sentence Rodean to 240 days of home confinement. But he said he was convinced that Rodean’s severe mental illness significantly mitigated “the blameworthiness of your conduct.”“I’m giving you a real break here,” McFadden said, noting that similar cases of property destruction connected to the Capitol breach had merited lengthier jail sentences.Brutality on the ground: Jan. 6 witnesses reveal the stoking of a riot.It was an unexpected turn for a defendant whose health struggles were largely discussed under seal during his nearly two-year criminal case. Rodean was charged on Jan. 11, 2021 for his role in the Capitol breach. McFadden found him guilty during a bench trial in July of shattering two Capitol windows with a flagpole, as well as other crimes associated with breaking into the building and disrupting congressional proceedings.Rodean famously stood alongside Jan. 6 defendant Jacob Chansley — who wore a horned helmet and face paint — in a standoff with Capitol police that occurred amid a frantic effort to evacuate then-Vice President Mike Pence and senators from the Capitol.Rodean’s attorney, Charles Burnham — who also represents Donald Trump associates Jeffrey Clark and John Eastman in ongoing Jan. 6 matters — said Rodean had become fixated on politics during the pandemic, when he was isolated and without his typical support structure. He said Rodean was particularly susceptible to the influence of “assertive male figures” like Trump. And once inside the Capitol, he added, Rodean was similarly drawn in by Chansley, who commanded the attention of the crowd that day.Rodean’s parents sat in the courtroom during the sentencing proceedings, and his sister Kimberly addressed McFadden, during which she expressed worry that prison would devastate her brother’s mental health and sideline his newly successful dog-walking business.“Autistic people do not fare well in prison,” she said.But it was Rodean’s own statement to the judge that appeared to be most affecting. For nearly 15 minutes, Rodean struggled to articulate his conduct on Jan. 6, describing how he consumed an intense amount of media about the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests that, at times, led to rioting. On Jan. 6, he took an Uber to the Stop the Steal rally at which Trump appeared, and then marched along with the crowd. Someone then handed him an object that he used to smash the two windows that had already been struck by other rioters.“I am really sorry about breaking the window,” he said. “I am really sorry about other crimes that I did.”“Are you ever going to do anything like this again?” McFadden asked him.“No,” Rodean replied.A day earlier, McFadden sentenced Jan. 6 defendant Hunter Seefried to 24 months in prison for similarly joining the early breach of the building and engaging in the same standoff with police outside the Senate chamber.Prosecutors had initially recommended a 57-month sentence for Rodean.“There is no indication that he holds any regrets regarding his participation in the riot that day,” the Justice Department wrote in a sentencing recommendation filed last week.But in his own sentencing memo, Burnham urged McFadden to consider Rodean’s mental health and a doctor’s evaluation that found prison would be uniquely dangerous for his client.Burnham said Rodean is susceptible to being taken advantage of, easily triggered by loud noises and other stimuli and would likely be put in protective custody by corrections officials who may not have the training for someone with Asperger’s syndrome — forcing him into prolonged periods of isolation.“We submit that Nicholas’ ‘history and personal characteristics’ make this a unique case among the hundreds of prosecutions to come out of that day,’ Burnham wrote.
THE PAYERS WILL BE GEORGE SOROS, THE DNC AND THE LIBERALS IN THE FBI, DOJ AND PELOSI AND SCHUMER AND SHIFFTY SHIFF OF COURSE. NOT NO REPUBLICAN BIG MONEY. WHEN IT COMES TO BRAIN DEAD GREEDY SLITHERY SNAKE LIBERALS ITS SIMPLE FOLLOW THE MONEY. YOU GET TO THE LIBERAL GARBAGE DUMP STINK.
New clues emerge about the money that might have helped fund the Jan. 6 insurrection-March 11, 20225:00 AM ET
Eight months into the investigation of the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, the financial story is one of the most closely held parts of the probe. But the House select committee investigating the 2021 attack has shared some clues through its subpoenas and court filings.The latest peek into questions around the money that might have helped fuel the attack arrived with the Republican National Committee's lawsuit to thwart a subpoena from the committee.The filing reveals that the Democratic-led panel quietly subpoenaed an RNC vendor, San Francisco-based Salesforce, last month.After the suit became public, the committee quickly defended the effort, saying it was looking into a new push led by former President Donald Trump asking for donations after he lost his 2020 bid for reelection."Ever since Watergate, one of the central adages in ... congressional investigations of presidential wrongdoing has been 'follow the money,' " said Norm Eisen, a former House lawyer in Trump's first impeachment case. "The 1/6 committee investigation has been sweeping in all of its dimensions, and this is no exception."The committee's Feb. 23 subpoena of Salesforce emphasized its interest in the company's hosting of Trump emails that asked for new donations and included false claims of election fraud.Ronna McDaniel, chairwoman of the Republican National Committee, speaks during the RNC's winter meeting on Feb. 4 in Salt Lake City. The RNC has sued the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol attack over a subpoena of Salesforce.It's part of a central question the panel hopes to answer: Did Trump find new ways to keep the money coming in after his loss by shifting from a presidential campaign to a Stop the Steal effort?"I think the level of grift that was involved with the Trump campaign and people close to the former president, how the Jan. 6 efforts were for many of them, this is what they were doing to make money," said Rep. Pete Aguilar, D-Calif., a member of the Jan. 6 panel. "We are looking into that."The committee's investigators are divided into highly skilled teams with core areas of focus, including one focused on money.Aguilar says each team has been making "significant progress," with regular presentations to the full committee on its findings. Each has been charged with devising a strategy for depositions and hearings."The committee has not tipped its hand of everything they have," Eisen said. "They dedicated significant resources to the money trails. And I'm certain that in the hearings and in the final report, there's going to be much more evidence revealed."The committee hopes this spring to hold its first hearings illustrating the findings so far and issue an interim report by the summer and a final report this fall.-Questions of crimes committed-While it investigates, the panel is also documenting possible crimes.Although it has no criminal jurisdiction, the committee can issue criminal referrals to the Justice Department, as it has done in cases of some witnesses who have refused to cooperate.Last week, the committee detailed possible crimes Trump might have committed related to the Jan. 6 attack in a court filing involving attorney John Eastman, who was advising Trump's Stop the Steal efforts.Eastman is also fighting another subpoena in a case in which the panel raised potential crimes that could tie into the financial probe as well: conspiracy to defraud and common law fraud.Eisen argues that following the money is one of the classic ways of establishing the parameters of a broad conspiracy."These are questions. They're allegations. They're not yet determined," Eisen notes. However, some examples of these questions are "were false representations made in order to fleece people of their funds? Was it wire fraud? Was it money laundering?"The Eastman court filing could become part of a much larger path forward if the committee issues criminal referrals against Trump by the conclusion of its probe.With the White House in the background, President Donald Trump speaks at a rally on Jan. 6, 2021. The House committee investigating the attack on the Capitol is probing the funding for the rally and other events that preceded the deadly insurrection.Among the challenges: The committee will have to prove intent behind the efforts. And such a criminal referral could be laced with political landmines, putting pressure on the Justice Department's independent and impartial role.Panel members have conceded there are pros and cons."Certainly, I think a referral from Congress gets the attention of the Department of Justice," said Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., another committee member and the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, who was the lead House manager during Trump's first impeachment. "At the same time, the Congress has to be careful not to play into any narrative that a prosecution — if the Justice Department were to bring one — is politically motivated in any way."That political concern, Schiff argues, can be addressed through the panel's methodical approach to the probe, while not criminal in nature. That can be accomplished by focusing on finding all the facts and remaining objective along the way, Schiff said.Kimberly Guilfoyle speaks in support of President Donald Trump on Jan. 6, 2021, at the Save America rally in Washington, D.C. The House committee investigating the Capitol insurrection has subpoenaed Guilfoyle as it probes who funded the day's events.In the coming days, the committee could unearth another rash of financial details with information from a newly subpoenaed witness.Kimberly Guilfoyle, Donald Trump Jr.'s fiancée, is due to turn over documents to the panel Friday and testify next week. Last year, ProPublica reported that Guilfoyle bragged in text messages that she helped raise $3 million for the Jan. 6 rally at the Ellipse, where she was one of the speakers.It's a reminder that more than a year later, it's still unclear how much money was funneled to the Jan. 6 rally or events that preceded it and who got paid along the way.The panel has also shared in letters to certain subpoenaed witnesses that it's trying to track down appearance fees for that rally — that is, whether any of the speakers collected payment that day."If funds were raised for the Jan. 6 event by an organized group, then there might be an opportunity for us to know who it was and what was paid," said Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., who chairs the House select committee.The committee has also quietly sought banking records, including in the case of Taylor Budowich, a Trump spokesman who sued to keep his financial institution from complying with a subpoena."There's no doubt that there is a very big moneymaking operation component to this story," said Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., another committee member, who was also the lead manager of the House team during Trump's second impeachment.Anna Massoglia, an editorial and investigations manager for the nonpartisan, nonprofit group OpenSecrets, is also trying to track the money trail.Massoglia says a combination of dark-money groups, nonprofits and super PACs funded the rally before the attack but not necessarily the insurrection. She says the committee will be key to filling in many of the blanks that remain."There's those unknowns of the groups on social media that didn't have as much of an official role," she said. "But there is a lot of unknown about even these groups that are listed. There's a lot of money that is still unaccounted for."OpenSecrets has identified at least nine groups that may have contributed to funding the rally, including Stop the Steal, Women for America First, Tea Party Patriots and Turning Point Action. Massoglia says tax returns due later this year could also shed more light on those who may have funneled or made money connected to that day.Raskin says the financial story behind the attack remains a critical chapter to the overall story that the committee hopes to tell the public later this year."There are powerful indications that have surfaced, and every day that passes we get more testimony shedding light on what exactly was taking place," Raskin said. "We should not discount the financial motive and imperative in the events leading up to Jan. 6."
