KING JESUS IS COMING FOR US ANY TIME NOW. THE RAPTURE. BE PREPARED TO GO.
ALL MY REPORTS ON THIS STORY SO FAR
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/06/duffy-and-ford-scandals-still-hot.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/05/some-say-rob-ford-must-resign-now.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/05/2nd-killer-in-rob-ford-drug-video.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/05/another-calls-for-fords-resignation.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/05/ontario-mayorcanada-senate-scandals.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/05/now-doug-ford-drug-selling-allegations.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/05/rob-ford-no-answers-to-drug-alligations.html
ALL MY REPORTS ON THIS STORY SO FAR
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/06/duffy-and-ford-scandals-still-hot.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/05/some-say-rob-ford-must-resign-now.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/05/2nd-killer-in-rob-ford-drug-video.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/05/another-calls-for-fords-resignation.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/05/ontario-mayorcanada-senate-scandals.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/05/now-doug-ford-drug-selling-allegations.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/05/rob-ford-no-answers-to-drug-alligations.html
Rob Ford: Visiting Portuguese dignitary raised mayor’s cocaine scandal with city councillor Ana Bailao
Councillor Bailao assured visiting
culture secretary from Portugal that meeting with Ford would happen
despite crack video controversy
A visiting Portuguese dignitary who met with Toronto Mayor Rob Ford is aware of the scandal surrounding him, says Ward 18 Councillor Ana Bailão.Bailão told reporters
Monday that, at an event Saturday marking 60 years of Portuguese
immigration to Canada, Conceição Estudante, regional secretary of
Culture, Tourism and Transport for the Madeira region, mentioned the
ongoing Ford turmoil.“She knew that we were
meeting (with Ford) on Monday and she said ‘Well, hopefully, with
everything that is going on the visit will still go ahead and there will
be no problems,’ ” Bailão said, adding there was no doubt what she was
referring to. Bailão said she assured the dignitary all would be fine.The Monday morning
meeting and photos in Ford’s office, with Ford, Bailão, Estudante,
Councillor Cesar Palacio and Júlio Vilela, Portugal’s consul general to
Toronto, went off without a hitch or mention of the controversy, Bailão
said.Ford is working hard to project an air of business as usual at City Hall despite lingering questions and calls for his resignation.But turmoil in Ford’s
office, including his firing of his chief of staff and the ensuing
resignation of five other staffers, have helped keep a public and media
focus on the scandal.Bailão, who herself
weathered controversy that ended with an impaired driving conviction in
January, said Torontonians deserve some kind of resolution about the
Ford video.If people manipulated a
video to impugn the mayor, they need to be held accountable, she said.
Asked if Ford has done enough to address the questions, she said: “I
don’t think so.”Bailão did not join
colleagues Jaye Robinson, a member of Ford’s executive committee, and
Josh Matlow in calling for Ford to temporarily step down so that
business at city hall can get back to normal. But councillors would
support such a decision by the mayor.“If the mayor came and said . . . he needs time to step aside and deal with this, we would be supportive,” she said.
Rob Ford crack story: Is seeing believing?
With the video yet to surface, debate turns to journalistic ethics
CBC News Posted: Jun 3, 2013 1:51 PM ET Last Updated: Jun 3, 2013 2:16 PM ET
Both
the Toronto Star and the U.S. gossip website Gawker published stories
last month claiming their journalists have viewed a video of Ford
smoking what appears to be crack cocaine.The story set off a media frenzy, but it has been more than two weeks since it came to light.With the alleged tape yet to surface, questions are turning to how news organizations have covered the story.The Toronto mayor and his brother, Coun. Doug Ford, have admonished
the coverage of the story while denying the tape exists. Last week, Doug
Ford said the stories about his brother are proof journalism has sunk
“to an all-time low.”The coverage prompted Rob Ford to call the news media a “bunch of maggots,” a statement he later apologized for.
But have news organizations fallen short of their own ethical standards in covering this story? Monday’s edition of The Current on CBC Radio One tackled the issue, with host Anna Maria Tremonti speaking to a panel that included:
The Gawker story essentially forced the Star to publish what they had gathered the next day. According to the Star's account, Doolittle and another reporter were shown the video on a cellphone by people asking $100,000 for it, a price the Star wouldn’t pay.Gawker raised $200,000 to buy the video in an online campaign, but were unable to complete the purchase, saying it had lost contact with the person possessing it. The Star has also reported difficultly in trying to re-establish contact with the person who showed them the tape.The use of so-called “chequebook journalism," while common in other countries, is controversial in Canada.CBC does not pay sources for information related to a story. (CBC does pay fees at recognized rates to specialists for an expert report or a scientific analysis of a story).Unnamed sources a 'necessary evil'?
Doolittle said most people she has spoken to about the Ford video story are angry the Star didn’t purchase the video.“The biggest backlash that I’ve had is, ‘Why didn’t you guys buy the tape? [Why didn't you] give $100,000 to drug dealers for the greater good of the city?'”Another issue is the use of unnamed sources.
In the days following the original Gawker and Star stories about the tape, the Star dug up other details, including a story alleging the mayor knew in which apartment the video was stashed. On their weekly radio show Sunday, the Fords demanded that the Star apologize for that story.Shapiro said unnamed sources make editors uncomfortable, but said they are often an “necessary evil” for any journalist working to uncover information others want to suppress.“I’ve never met a reporter who likes to use anonymous sources,” he said. “I don’t think anyone should be expected to kill a story because their sources can’t be named.”
But have news organizations fallen short of their own ethical standards in covering this story? Monday’s edition of The Current on CBC Radio One tackled the issue, with host Anna Maria Tremonti speaking to a panel that included:
- Star reporter Robyn Doolittle.
- Ivor Shapiro, chair of the Ryerson University School of Journalism.
- National Post columnist Matt Gurney.
News consumer want to see the goods
Shapiro said the advent of social media means news consumers now want to see material with their own eyes, instead of simply trusting reporters’ accounts.“The expectations of audiences is raised and therefore the skepticism of audiences is raised,” he said. “That’s not a bad thing in a democracy, that the public is skeptical. It raises an unfortunate situation when the video isn’t available.”Gurney agreed.“During the Boston [Marathon] bombing, media scrambled to catch up with what people were tweeting. [People] expect to see it with their own eyes and have some of the gaps filled by followup reporting.”Gurney said he believes the video does exist, adding he’s doubtful three journalists from two different organizations would falsify or get wrong a story on which their journalistic reputation hinges.Chequebook journalism?
Also at issue is the question of whether it’s right to pay for such a video.Doolittle said the Star had been pursuing the story for weeks prior to the Gawker’s scoop about the tape that came to light May 16.The Gawker story essentially forced the Star to publish what they had gathered the next day. According to the Star's account, Doolittle and another reporter were shown the video on a cellphone by people asking $100,000 for it, a price the Star wouldn’t pay.Gawker raised $200,000 to buy the video in an online campaign, but were unable to complete the purchase, saying it had lost contact with the person possessing it. The Star has also reported difficultly in trying to re-establish contact with the person who showed them the tape.The use of so-called “chequebook journalism," while common in other countries, is controversial in Canada.CBC does not pay sources for information related to a story. (CBC does pay fees at recognized rates to specialists for an expert report or a scientific analysis of a story).Unnamed sources a 'necessary evil'?
Doolittle said most people she has spoken to about the Ford video story are angry the Star didn’t purchase the video.“The biggest backlash that I’ve had is, ‘Why didn’t you guys buy the tape? [Why didn't you] give $100,000 to drug dealers for the greater good of the city?'”Another issue is the use of unnamed sources.
In the days following the original Gawker and Star stories about the tape, the Star dug up other details, including a story alleging the mayor knew in which apartment the video was stashed. On their weekly radio show Sunday, the Fords demanded that the Star apologize for that story.Shapiro said unnamed sources make editors uncomfortable, but said they are often an “necessary evil” for any journalist working to uncover information others want to suppress.“I’ve never met a reporter who likes to use anonymous sources,” he said. “I don’t think anyone should be expected to kill a story because their sources can’t be named.”