GOVERNMENT TO WATCH OUR EVERY MOVE IN CANADA IF THIS BILL IS PASSED

FALSE FLAGS (SET UP OR STAGED BY SOMEONE)
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=3409375633223151728#docid=-6703838290529161821
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=3409375633223151728#docid=8697248641166616573
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=3409375633223151728#

False flag-From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.False flag operations are covert operations designed to deceive the public in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by other entities. The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one's own. False flag operations are not limited to war and counter-insurgency operations, and can be used in peace-time.(NOTICE EVERY TIME THERES A REAL TERRORIST ATTACK,THE GOVERNMENT ALWAYS IS DOING A FAKE DRILL WHICH MEANS THEY CAN SAY IT WAS ONLY A DRILL IF THE ATTACK DOES NOT GO OVER WITH THE PUBLIC OR IF THE GOVERNMENT MUFFED UP THEIR OWN FALSE FLAG CONTROL FREAK,GET MORE CONTROL OF PEOPLES RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS.)

REVELATION 13:16-18
16 And he(FALSE POPE) causeth all,(WORLD SOCIALISM) both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:(CHIP IMPLANT)
17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.(6-6-6) A NUMBER SYSTEM

Lawful Access

Lawful Access is the deceptively innocuous term given to the government's attempts to expand its power to spy on Internet activity. It does so by providing new ways by which law enforcemet and other state agents can lawfully access and intercept online activity and information. CIPPIC is working with other groups and individuals concerned about increasing government surveillance to assess and respond to the Canadian government's lawful access proposals. CIPPIC is concerned that attempts to update lawful access capabilities are far from targeted and will have serious detrimental impact on Canadians' civil liberties.

WELL JUST LIKE I SAID A WEEK OR SO AGO.THAT PORNO BUST IS A FALSE FLAG TO STEAL OUR PRIVACY RIGHTS EVERYWHERE.THEY CAN WATCH OUR EVERY MOVE ON THE INTERNET,TELOPHONE IN REAL TIME IF THEY WANT TO IF THIS BILL IS PASSED.LOOK OUT CANADA WE ARE IN TROUBLE.THE CONTROL FREAKS WANT TO WATCH OUR EVERY MOVE.WE WILL HAVE NO RIGHTS AT ALL IN PRIVACY IF THIS BILL PASSES.
http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/6316/125/

READ THE BILL
http://www.scribd.com/doc/81598609/Bill-C-30

Should police have access to ISP customer data without a warrant? February 14, 2012 7:05 AM |By Community Team

The Conservative government is expected to introduce a bill Tuesday to give police new powers to access Canadians' electronic communications.Public Safety Minister Vic Toews said the lawful access bills will bring our laws into the 21st century and provide police with the lawful tools we need.Public Safety Minister Vic Toews said the lawful access bills will bring our laws into the 21st century and provide police with the lawful tools we need.(Canadian Press)The lawful access bill is expected to include provisions that were included in previous bills that died when last year's election was called.One of those provisions would require internet service providers to give subscriber data to police and national security agencies without a warrant, including names, unlisted phone numbers and IP addresses.Another is expected to allow police to get warrants to obtain information transmitted over the internet and data related to its transmission, including locations of individuals and transactions.

In September, Public Safety Minister Vic Toews said the government has no plans to allow police to intercept private internet communications without a warrant.On Monday, Liberal public safety critic Francis Scarpaleggia alleged during question period Monday that the government is preparing to read Canadians' emails and track their movements through cellphone signals, in both cases without a warrant.Toews replied that Scarpaleggia can either stand with us or with the child pornographers.
Should police have access to ISP customer data without a warrant? Does this legislation go too far or do police need it to keep up with technology? Let us know what you think.

Proposed bill for expanded surveillance tabled in Commons By Sarah Schmidt, Postmedia News February 14, 2012 11:08 AM

The Conservative government isn't backing down from a plan to require telecommunications companies to hand over customer information to police without a court order despite strong objections from Canada's privacy watchdogs. The so-called lawful access legislation, tabled in the House of Commons on Tuesday and expected to pass under a Conservative majority government, means Internet service providers and cellphone companies won't be able to say no to law enforcement if they ask them to cough up the basic subscriber information of any of their customers.

The Conservative government isn't backing down from a plan to require telecommunications companies to hand over customer information to police without a court order despite strong objections from Canada's privacy watchdogs. The so-called lawful access legislation, tabled in the House of Commons on Tuesday and expected to pass under a Conservative majority government, means Internet service providers and cellphone companies won't be able to say no to law enforcement if they ask them to cough up the basic subscriber information of any of their customers.
Photograph by: Chris Wattie, Reuters

OTTAWA — The Conservative government isn't backing down from a plan to require telecommunications companies to hand over customer information to police without a court order despite strong objections from Canada's privacy watchdogs.The lawful access legislation — newly branded by the government as the Protecting Children from Internet Predators Act — was tabled in the House of Commons on Tuesday. It is expected to pass under a Conservative majority government despite objections from the opposition parties.When enacted, the law will mean Internet service providers and cellphone companies won't be able to say no to law enforcement if they ask them to cough up the basic subscriber information of any of their customers.This provision, contained in a previous bill that died when the federal election was called last year, resulted in a sustained campaign by the federal and provincial commissioners to get warrantless access to subscriber info scrapped from the bill before the Conservatives re-introduced it.

More than 80,000 Canadians have also signed a petition sponsored by Openmedia.ca calling on the government to stop online spying.But Public Safety Minister Vic Toews, when pressed Monday by opposition MPs, said new measures are needed to catch criminals in the 21st century. He singled out child pornography cases, saying people can either stand with us or with the child pornographers.On Tuesday, the Opposition rejected Toews' characterization.Holding up his BlackBerry, NDP digital critic Charlie Angus said the bill would undermine the privacy of average Canadians.Now, every single Canadian citizen is walking around with an electronic prisoner's bracelet,Angus said after the tabling of the bill.I say to Vic Toews, Stop hiding behind the boogey man. Stop using the boogey man to attack the basic rights of Canadian citizens.' Is Vic Toews saying that Stockwell Day supports child pornography? Is Vic Toews saying that every privacy commissioner in this country who has raised concerns about this government's attempt to erase the basic obligation to get a judicial warrant, is he saying that they're for child pornography?

Stockwell Day, who served as public safety minister from 2006 to 2008, assured the public during his tenure that the government would not introduce legislation forcing Internet service providers to give customer information without a warrant.In addition to a name, address, phone number and email address, the bill will require companies to hand over the Internet protocol address and a series of device-identification numbers, allowing police to build a detailed profile on a person using their digital footprint and to facilitate the tracking of a person's movement through the location of their cellphone.The bill will also require ISPs and cellphone companies to install equipment for real-time surveillance and create new police powers designed to obtain access to the surveillance data.Meanwhile, internal Public Safety records released to Postmedia News under access-to-information flag non-criminal matters as a rationale for warrantless access to subscriber information.

Canada's privacy commissioners banded together last year to complaint to Toews about this proposed system of expanded surveillance, saying police shouldn't have unrestricted access to basic subscriber information held by telecommunications companies. This, along with other new powers, adds significant new capabilities for investigators to track and search and seize digital information about individuals.
Jennifer Stoddart, Canada's privacy commissioner, and Ann Cavoukian, Ontario's privacy commissioner, followed up with two separate public pleadings last fall to reiterate their concerns.At a minimum, the untenable proposal for warrantless access to subscriber information should be withdrawn,Cavoukian argued.The internal records show that department officials said this wasn't tenable because it could limit the ability of police to access basic subscriber information in non-emergencies and warrants are generally granted for criminal investigations. Requiring a warrant would be problematic when police undertake non-criminal, general policing duties, such as contacting next-of-kin after a traffic accident or returning stolen property, the records state.But senior departmental officials also criticized Toews, who previously served as attorney general of Canada and Manitoba, for failing to state in his public response to Cavoukian that there are provisions of the Criminal Code that allow police to read emails without a warrant in special cases.In a letter to the editor, he wrote in part: Let me be clear. No legislation proposed in the past, present or future by a Conservative government will create powers for police to read emails without a warrant.

This is problematic because Section 184.4 of the Criminal Code currently provides for that, the director of national security technologies at Public Safety wrote to colleagues after reading the letter.University of Ottawa law professor Michael Geist, who reviewed the internal records, said the government appears to want to have it both ways.While Toews publicly says the bill is designed to go after users of child pornography, internal records refer to other issues, says Geist.You just can't be serious. On one hand, we'd got Vic Toews screaming about child pornography cases and on the other hand, it's pretty clear that one of their main justifications is that this has to do with non-emergency situations that aren't even criminal situations. To say that you're going to drop key privacy protections because you want to return a kid's bike is just absurd,Geist said.The records also show that one of the cases flagged by the RCMP to help Public Safety build its case in favour of the bill, known as Operation Carole, involved images that did not meet the Criminal Code definition of child pornography. As a result, production orders or search warrants could not be obtained, the RCMP summary states.The point here is that you're not supposed to get a warrant and access this information for content that isn't even illegal. What they're saying is, this is content that wasn't illegal and so that was why they couldn't get a warrant, so now they need to change the law on the mandatory basis to get that same information? That just invites fishing expeditions and other forays into personal information without proper justification, said Geist.

The records also said that to require the police to obtain a warrant to access basic subscriber information would literally collapse an already over-burdened judicial system.Information provided by the RCMP at the department's request shows about 94 per cent of requests for basic subscriber information is provided voluntarily by ISPs. The telecoms refuse in six per cent of the cases, RCMP statistics provided to the department state.with files from Jordan Press, Postmedia News
sschmidt@postmedia.com
Twitter.com/SarahSchmidtPN
Read more: http://www.canada.com/news/Proposed+bill+expanded+surveillance+tabled+Commons/6150148/story.html#ixzz1mNQIiF7t
http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/6316/125/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=gO5B1378P54
AND HE IS A CALL FOR A GLOBAL TAX.THEY WILL CONTROL EVERY ASPECT OF OUR LIVES THROUGHT THIS WORLD GOVERNMENT(GOVERNENCE)DICTATORSHIP.

Obama’s CFR Economic Council Director Calls for Global Tax Kurt Nimmo Infowars.com February 14, 2012

Gene the Machine Sperling has called for a global minimum tax on corporations. Obama’s director of the National Economic Council linked the call to the so-called Buffett Rule, a scheme based on statements made by investor Warren Buffett who said government should confiscate more money from the rich in order to reduce the tax burden on the poor.Following Sperling’s comments yesterday and heated response in the blogosphere, officialdom responded by saying there’s no United Nations-imposed duty in the works,as Politico phrased it.Sperling said the government is looking for shared sacrifice in its quest for more revenue. He was referring to our proposal in the Blueprint for an American Built to Last that removes tax incentives for companies that ship jobs overseas,a White House official said.The Cato Institute did some fact checking after Obama’s SOTU teleprompter reading. Cato points out that the government encourages sending American jobs to slave labor hellholes like China and Vietnam and imposes a 40 percent tax rate on corporations that invest in the United States.

Obama’s Blueprint for an American Built to Last is cynical class warfare rhetoric for the ill-informed who will vote him back into office in November. The so-called 1% never pay taxes. They put their money into tax-exempt securities and move it offshore.In other words, the genuinely rich are likely to be the least harmed by high tax rates in the top brackets, writes Thomas Sowell. People who are looking for jobs are likely to be the most harmed, because they cannot equally easily transfer themselves overseas to take the jobs that are being created there by American investments that are fleeing from high tax rates at home.Likewise, small business – the real engine of job creation in America – is unable to transfer themselves overseas and escape the tax collectors.Officialdom insists Obama’s blueprint wasn’t cooked up at the United Nations. Instead, it was conceived by the globalists at the Council on Foreign Relations, where Mr. Sperling is on staff as Senior Fellow for Economic Policy.The CFR, Federal Reserve, Geithner’s Treasury where Sperling works, the IMF, World Bank, the Trilateral Commission, and the United Nations all work for the international bankers who are installing world government and a centralized global banking structure, so any dismissals by the White House are irrelevant.