Friday, September 16, 2011

ITS AMERICA-CHRISTIANITY AND FREEDOM

DOUG AND LAURIE FRI'S 6-9 PM EST ABOUT THE ISSUES OF THE DAY
http://www.usaradio.com/listen_live_usa2.php
LAURIE ROTH SHOW ARCHIVES 2011-DOUG-LAURIE ON MOST FRIDAYS FOR 3 HRS
http://therothshow.com/show-archives/january-2011/
http://therothshow.com/show-archives/february-2011/
http://therothshow.com/show-archives/march-2011/
http://therothshow.com/show-archives/april-2011/
http://therothshow.com/show-archives/may-2011/
http://therothshow.com/show-archives/june-2011/
http://therothshow.com/show-archives/july-2011/
http://therothshow.com/show-archives/august-2011/
http://therothshow.com/show-archives/september-2011/
http://therothshow.com/show-archives/october-2011/
http://therothshow.com/show-archives/november-2011/
http://therothshow.com/show-archives/december-2011/
HAGMANN & HAGMANN-JUDI MCLEOD REPORT SAT'S 8-10PM ON BLOGTALK RADIO
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/cfp-radio

LAURIE ROTHS SITE
http://therothshow.com/
DOUG HAGMANNS SITES
http://homelandsecurityus.com/
https://hagmann-pi.com/Home.html
http://theneinblog.blogspot.com/
CANADA FREE PRESS-JUDI MCLEOD
http://www.canadafreepress.com/
I-Q'S SITE
http://www.al-rassooli.com/
OLIVE TREE MINISTRIES SHOWS
http://olivetreeradio.com/OTM2011_09_17A.mp3
http://olivetreeradio.com/OTM2011_09_17B.mp3
http://olivetreeradio.com/OTM2011_09_10A.mp3
http://olivetreeradio.com/OTM2011_09_10B.mp3
http://olivetreeradio.com/OTM2011_09_03A.mp3
http://olivetreeradio.com/OTM2011_09_03B.mp3
JACK VAN IMPES LATEST SHOWS-VIDEO)
http://wm.thegospel.com/jvi/jvi1139.wmv (SEPT 28,11)
http://wm.thegospel.com/jvi/jvi1138.wmv (SEPT 21,11)
http://wm.thegospel.com/jvi/jvi1137.wmv (SEPT 14,11)
http://wm.thegospel.com/jvi/jvi1136.wmv (SEPT 07,11)
http://wm.thegospel.com/jvi/jvi1135.wmv (AUG 31,11)
http://wm.thegospel.com/jvi/jvi1134.wmv (AUG 24,11)
http://wm.thegospel.com/jvi/jvi1133.wmv (AUG 17,11)
http://wm.thegospel.com/jvi/jvi1132.wmv (AUG 10,11)
http://wm.thegospel.com/jvi/jvi1131.wmv (AUG 03,11)
http://wm.thegospel.com/jvi/jvi1130.wmv (JULY 27,11)
http://wm.thegospel.com/jvi/jvi1129.wmv (JULY 20,11)
http://wm.thegospel.com/jvi/jvi1128.wmv (JULY 13,11)
http://wm.thegospel.com/jvi/jvi1127.wmv (JULY 06,11)
http://wm.thegospel.com/jvi/jvi1126.wmv (JUN 29,11)
http://wm.thegospel.com/jvi/jvi1125.wmv (JUN 22,11)
http://wm.thegospel.com/jvi/jvi1124.wmv (JUN 15,11)
http://wm.thegospel.com/jvi/jvi1123.wmv (JUN 08,11)

It’s America, Christianity and freedom not Internationalism, Chrislam and the new world worder By LAURIE OTH, on September 13th, 2011

Everywhere we look today Politicians, Media and Global elite are severing the traditional and important boundaries of Religion, Sovereignty, laws and freedoms fought for. Our country and heritage is now lying, practically lifeless on Frankenstein’s laboratory of sell out, anti God, politically correct lies.The fire breathing Doctors are rapidly ripping off American body parts and slapping on international, U.N. environmentally perverted legs and arms. If something major is not done soon our crippled country won’t even be able to walk.

Let’s talk sovereignty and borders

Long before Obama and his cut the U.S. throat agenda, we saw the bold flipping off of U.S. sovereignty, borders and law with Bush, Clinton and Bush senior. Remember how former George President Bush was calling the nation to vigilance after 9/11, yet he called the Minute Men vigilantes for using their own money, saving lives of illegal immigrants, supporting our border patrol, borders and law. This sea of volunteer teachers, firefighters, retired patriots, Pastors and Moms were simply an unwanted mob and in the way. Then we saw Bush support all kinds of back room meetings and special conversations with Canada and Mexico, pushing the super highway up from Mexico and the North American Union. Sovereignty be damned.George Bush had a golden opportunity for 8 years to stop the 200 billion a year drug trade and millions of mystery people flying across our borders, breaking laws, taking U.S. jobs and compromising national security. He did little or nothing. Why? Because his worldview, just like his Fathers was tied up with the new world order and internationalism, not sovereignty, U.S. law and our borders. Remember when Bush senior talked with reverence in one of his speeches about the new world order? This was all about assuring in a world religion, internationalism, opening up borders and a kind of socialism. Now, Obama continues the madness and national betrayal in this area. Like Bush, he is an internationalist and Universalist. There is no such thing as that arrogant thing called borders and U.S. sovereignty.

Changing religion to reflect the international code

Real history shows that the miraculous, United States of America was founded by devout Christians. A few were reported agnostic believers of God but over 90% were out spoken Christians. They built our constitution, Declaration of Independence and other founding documents on Christian principles as outlined in the one and only, Holy Bible, not any other religious type book.Universalists and internationalists have long sought to not only water down our borders, sovereignty and freedoms but morph and transform Christianity, our main faith reflecting most of America, into a Frankenstonian hybrid of many religions. If that pesky Holy Bible is true, then all freedom is a gift from God, all people have equal worth under God. Christ died on the cross for all and rose again. There is no surfer class, slave class, female under class, fancy or powerful class. Worth is defined as belonging to all, including the unborn and imperfect in society. If God defines how people are to live, draws us back to Himself through the Bible and requires a response, that flies in the face of internationalists and the new world order crowd. They want to hold the power and act as God. Obama and the progressive’s dream is to be the provider, messiah, one who controls power and money. They also want to be worshipped. God and Jesus are simply in the way and drawing worshiping attention from them. Naturally, Obama and today’s ‘religious changing Marxists’ loan out freedom and throw dog bones of money to their seduced and controlled followers and fans. All others are defined and promoted as enemies of the Government, country and specified, special groups. These special groups are developed , given tons of money and media attention to simply manipulate the masses and steal financial and voting empathy. You are made to feel like a mentally compromised, racist jerk if you don’t like all the special and funded groups.

Our new set of socially approved faiths

Worshipping mother earth and environmentalism. The Gaians, new age and environmentalism and some eastern religions have merged to control people and change their focus from the living and Real God of the Holy Bible to animals, nature and the planet. Humans aren’t on top anymore. In fact, they are quickly being moved to the bottom of the pile.Then there is the attempt to merge Islam and Christianity. We have big time Pastors, such as Pastor Rick Warren of the Saddleback church diving into the sewage of political correctness and compromise. He talks of a Christian and Islamic partnership. He was one of the main speakers at the North America’s annual conference (ISNA.) He calls Christians and Muslims to work with each other and focus on a social doctrine, namely, spiritual emptiness, corrupt leadership, extreme poverty, disease and illiteracy. Apparently, in our new found religion of chrislam we are to ignore the gospel of Christ, which doesn’t include Muhammad’s vision and oppressive teaching? At the very least, we are to water down and push to the back room, the unique, gospel message of Jesus. Are we to pretend fundamentalist Islam doesn’t want a worldwide caliphate, preach Jihad and death to infidels, Christians and Jews? The Interfaith Movement that states that all religions are the pathway to God. What about that verse in the Holy Bible: John 14:6 Jesus said I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father but by me.We are told by Obama and his progressives that we are the same as all other countries and certainly all religions have their place, except Christianity and Judaism of course. Forget American exceptionalism, being a light on a hill and reflecting Christian values. That is old school. We have bigger fish to fry. We must worship trees, animals, and Mohamed while working closely with Islam to stop social suffering.Working with other faiths, religions and countries is nice. I’m all for getting along but we are an exclusive, sovereign nation, governed by our U.S. constitution and laws, not the UN. We are a Christian nation, whose vast majority worship and serve the God and Christ of the Holy Bible not Muhammad. I love nature and am an animal freak more than anyone but I don’t worship mother earth, tree bark or my Chow Chow. God did make people above animals and nature. We are to serve and protect and not to destroy. We certainly aren’t to worship God’s creation.Let’s stop rewriting our history, the Holy Bible and tradition. It is what it is. Everyone else can kiss my grits.

Progressivism – the face lift of Communism
By LAURIE ROTH on September 15th, 2011


For well over 100 years big and central Government fans have railed against freedom, states rights and human rights. Many of us middle aged types remember growing up with the fear of a nuclear exchange between us and the dreaded, Communist Russia. There was no way, that controlling monster would ever be brought down, so we lived in danger and the cold war.Then the seeming impossible happened. After the wishy washy Jimmy Carter practically ruined our country while being stuck with 21% interest rates, a miracle happened. Ronald Reagan was elected and had a bold and strong vision for America. He was not timid or afraid to confront evil. You saw it. The Berlin wall came down and Communist Russia disbanded. What do you think happened to all the big Government addicts of control? Did they just enfold themselves and their money into freedom for the masses? Sadly, not. In fact, they have only gotten more funded, more organized, sneakier and changed their name many times while you weren’t looking. In fact, the term Communism has the ring now of a a fossil a museum piece. You almost sound paranoid and fringe to even talk about the dangers of communism. Certainly to talk about the dangers of Islamic fundamentalism renders you mentally ill. You are an islamaphobe for noticing the unending, international murders and push for a caliphate.Progressivism is the name now that represents big Government, societal, business and personal controls, It is communism and thinks the people are stupid and must be controlled. Progressivism sounds so forward thinking and open to progress and people doesn’t it? The truth is, when going back an unfolding its cancerous core you see it everywhere and backed by big name people in our history and currently in the White House.

You can see part of the push away from capitalism, individuality and freedom with Edward Bellamy’s novel, Looking Backward in 1888. It was an amazingly popular futuristic book talking about an organized military battalion of unified workers that obeyed a strict hierarchy of authority. There were no rich and poor, no prosperity, no capitalism. It was painted and defined as paradise. People were unified, entertained while working together. Read the many historical articles outlining the growth and names connected with progressivism at www.discoverthenetworks.org. After Bellamy’s hit book hit the seen, tons of ‘Nationalist Clubs’ formed up. People and Pastors were preaching about this book reflecting the teachings of Jesus Christ. Bellamy’s cousin was a Pastor who preached a sermon Jesus, the Socialist.To this day many Christians confuse and distort Christ’s message with socialism. Wrong! I have read the Bible and am a Christian. Jesus and the Bible models reward for work, honors excelling, being good stewards of talents and abilities while helping others. Jesus calls us to Him and to be the best we can be. That is capitalism to me.As the years unfolded into the 1920s, people and noted leaders and celebrities combined and merged socialism with utopia and paradise. That should be the goal of the country we were told. Just a few of these progressive notables on our way to Obama and his minions; H.G. Wells was a huge progressive and talked about the need for us to all become liberal fascists and enlightened Nazis.It is stunning that anyone could ever call a Nazi enlightened but many have. When Wells was challenged about all the negatives of totalitarianism, he would talk of the need for liberalism and a phoenix rebirth. Perhaps today they could all go on a Talk show and work it all out.

Just a few of the other big names pushing and manipulating controls and socialism were poet Wallace Stevens, historian Charles Beard, who wrote positively of Mussolini (who murdered way more than Hitler.) The huge McClure’s magazine founder, Samuel McClure talked of the wonder and importance of Italian fascism….it was a big step forward; NAACP co-founder W.E.B. DuBois, FDR adviser Rexford Guy Tugwell and New Republic editor George Soule all talked of the glories of large scale Government. Playwright George Bernard Shaw talked of Stalin, Hitler and Mussolini as great progressive leaders who stood against putrefying corpses of democracies.
Today, we have the Executive Branch, much of congress, media and Hollywood enraptured with the Big Government, progressive push and controls. The working class masses are thought to be too stupid to have much power and real freedom. Just give them enough bones and rewards for compliance so they think they have freedom, own their property and control their own life. Live a mirage not a life.Obama has long believed along with his progressive supporters, that Big Government and European socialism is the wave of the future for the U.S. He wrote in depth in his book Dreams from my Father about his Father’s goals and life and championed the redistribution of wealth, world view his twisted Father did.What does the push for progressivism (communism) mean today? It means we cannot be exceptional and lead in business, military and freedom. We must be squeezed down, made to submit through the back door by endless regulations, taxation and litigation. While seducing and manipulating the nation to submit to Obama’s controls, we must be entertained and distracted by contrived crises, enemies and causes.

Issues of manipulation, lies and distraction

The Palestinian people are suffering at the hands of apartheid Israel give Hamas 900 million and turn against Israel and the Jews.The Tea Party groups want a race war, want to hang black people from trees, are terrorists, un-American and destroying America.The Minute Men are vigilantes, hate Mexicans and don’t support the border patrol.

We create more jobs by raising more taxes of employers and achievers

We have a healthier society by forcing all at the risk of fines and other penalties to have Government approved Health insurance.Freedom and our constitution is secure by having leadership bypass congress and extend the Obama dictatorship with his czars.The battle continues and is in our face and country. Progressivism attacks our constitution, the people and our freedom from the Executive Branch down. Our country never did need Big Government. Big and controlling Government has always been the vehicle to steal money from the masses, keep controls and wealth with the global elite and shred our freedom.Progressivism is evil and must be fought and overcome at the ballot box in November 2012. America and her greatness will rise again but it will be the battle of our life time to do it. Bring it on. Join me on my national radio show www.therothshow.com. Join up with the Roth Revolution and let your voice be heard.

DOCTOR DOCTORIAN FROM ANGEL OF GOD
then the angel said, Financial crisis will come to Asia. I will shake the world.

JAMES 5:1-3
1 Go to now, ye rich men, weep and howl for your miseries that shall come upon you.
2 Your riches are corrupted, and your garments are motheaten.
3 Your gold and silver is cankered; and the rust of them shall be a witness against you, and shall eat your flesh as it were fire. Ye have heaped treasure together for the last days.

REVELATION 18:10,17,19
10 Standing afar off for the fear of her torment, saying, Alas, alas that great city Babylon, that mighty city! for in one hour is thy judgment come.
17 For in one hour so great riches is come to nought. And every shipmaster, and all the company in ships, and sailors, and as many as trade by sea, stood afar off,
19 And they cast dust on their heads, and cried, weeping and wailing, saying, Alas, alas that great city, wherein were made rich all that had ships in the sea by reason of her costliness! for in one hour is she made desolate.

EZEKIEL 7:19
19 They shall cast their silver in the streets, and their gold shall be removed: their silver and their gold shall not be able to deliver them in the day of the wrath of the LORD: they shall not satisfy their souls, neither fill their bowels: because it is the stumblingblock of their iniquity.

REVELATION 13:16-18
16 And he(FALSE POPE) causeth all,(WORLD SOCIALISM) both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:(CHIP IMPLANT)
17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.(6-6-6) A NUMBER SYSTEM

WORLD MARKET RESULTS
http://money.cnn.com/data/world_markets/
CNBC VIDEOS
http://www.cnbc.com/id/15839263/?tabid=15839796&tabheader=false

HALF HOUR DOW RESULTS FRI SEPTEMBER 16,2011

09:30 AM +2.43
10:00 AM +61.53
10:30 AM +5.24
11:00 AM -23.43
11:30 AM +4.58
12:00 PM +43.82
12:30 PM +56.12
01:00 PM +78.41
01:30 PM +59.41
02:00 PM +52.37
02:30 PM +70.04
03:00 PM +75.25
03:30 PM +48.62
04:00 PM +75.91 11,509.09

S&P 500 1216.01 +6.90

NASDAQ 2622.31 +15.24

GOLD 1,814.20 +32.80

OIL 87.90 -1.50

TSE 300 12,273.80 -151.16

CDNX 1782.85 -1.45

S&P/TSX/60 696.26 -11.90

MORNING,NEWS,STATS

YEAR TO DATE PERFORMANCE
Dow +47 points at 4 minutes of trading today.
Dow -23 points at low today.
Dow +62 points at high today so far.
GOLD opens at $1,788.10.OIL opens at $89.23 today.

AFTERNOON,NEWS,STATS
Dow -23 points at low today so far.
Dow +62 points at high today so far.

WRAPUP,NEWS,STATS
Dow -23 points at low today.
Dow +62 points at high today.

GOLD ALLTIME HIGH $1,902.60 (NOT AT CLOSE)

DANIEL 7:23-24
23 Thus he said, The fourth beast(THE EU,REVIVED ROME) shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth,(7TH WORLD EMPIRE) which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces.(TRADE BLOCKS)
24 And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise:(10 NATIONS-10 WORLD REGIONS) and another shall rise after them;(#11 SPAIN) and he shall be diverse from the first, and he shall subdue three kings.(BE HEAD OF 3 KINGS OR NATIONS).

Deal reached on EU economic governance laws
Today SEPT 15,11 @ 14:51 By Honor Mahony


After months of fraught negotiations, a deal has been reached on six new laws - the so-called Six-Pack - designed to keep eurozone member states' budgets in check and to prevent a repetition of the current debt crisis.The agreement, hammered out by European Parliament and Polish EU presidency and European Commission officials late on Wednesday (14 September), still has a few formalities to complete before it becomes EU law.It will come up for discussion by eurozone finance ministers at an informal gathering in Poland, beginning Friday. A final meeting of parliament, presidency and commission delegates is expected Monday to tie up loose ends. MEPs will then vote on the agreement in a plenary session at the end of September.Under the deal, sanctions for countries that run up an excessive budget deficit will become easier to impose, though are not as automatic as some in the parliament would have liked.

Deficit sinners will be subject to a two-step procedure.The commission will first issue a warning to the country, which has to be adopted by a qualified majority of eurozone members.If after one month the warning has either been rejected by member states or simply ignored, then the commission can insist again on the warning. This time round, however, the warning is considered automatically adopted unless a majority of eurozone states - nine - say otherwise.The commission can eventually impose a fine of up 0.1 percent of GDP for countries not acting to correct their deficit, while those countries falsifying their statistics could see a fine of 0.2 percent of GDP.The slightly messy compromise is the result of haggling between MEPs and governments over how automatic to make sanctions. The current system was dealt a fatal blow when France and Germany in 2003 broke the rules on keeping budget deficits under 3 percent of GDP and went unpunished.We have struck a realistic balance between the will of member states and what we considered necessary, said one parliamentary source.The deal also saw new language, pushed by the Socialists and Greens in the EU assembly, forcing the commission to look at export deficits (in places such as Germany, which exports more than it consumes) as well as current account deficits (as in Greece, which imports more than it exports) when drafting macroeconomic outlooks for the eurozone.In addition, both sides agreed that finance ministers may be invited to appear before the parliament's economic affairs committee to explain when things are going awry. The ministers can turn down the meeting, but language stressing that attendance is voluntary has been removed.

The agreement was welcomed by conservative deputies but criticised by those on the left.The compromise agreement reached makes it possible to lay solid foundations of economic governance, said French centre-right MEP Jean-Paul Gauzes.German Socialist deputy Udo Bullmann said It fails to provide any incentives for growth and jobs. This could actually make things worse for the European economy which is facing the risk of recession.Green deputy Philippe Lambert said the deal falls short of what is needed to get Europe out of the crisis: This Six-Pack will fail to provide the basis for a robust and sustainable system of economic governance for Europe.However, although deputies may disagree on the details, the fact there is any kind of agreement is of great symbolic importance.Its slow progress through Brussels' legislative labyrinth saw politicians fret about what markets think on the EU's ability to react to the debt crisis.

China to EU: We'll back the euro if you open your markets 15.09.11 @ 13:29 By Andrew Rettman

China has offered to help save the euro in return for getting EU recognition as a market economy - a new status that would help it to export more cheap goods to Europe.Chinese premier Wen Jiabao made the offer at a meeting of business leaders and officials organsied by the World Economic Forum in Dalian, China, on Wednesday (14 September).European countries are facing sovereign debt problems and we've expressed our willingness to give a helping hand many times. We will continue to expand our investment there, he said. Based on WTO rules, China's full market economy status will be recognised by 2016. If EU nations can demonstrate their sincerity several years earlier, it would be the way a friend treats a friend, he added.A European Commission spokeswoman on Thursday played down the importance of the remarks.Wen in a recent phonecall with commission head Jose Manuel Barroso made no linkage whatsoever between eurozone support and the new status, she said.She added that commission officials are working intensively on the market economy negotiations.The new status would change the way the EU calculates whether or not it is entitled to impose tariffs on Chinese exports in order to protect EU manufacturers.Currently, the EU compares Chinese export prices with those of other low-cost exporters to see if it is dumping excessively cheap goods. If it becomes a market economy, the EU will have to compare its export prices with domestic Chinese prices instead, meaning fewer products will make the dumping grade.

The EU as of June had 55 anti-dumping measures in place against China. The EU-China trade deficit hit €169 billion last year.Wen spoke out the same day that the US think-tank, the German Marshall Fund, published a survey showing that Europeans are less afraid of China than Americans.Forty six percent of Europeans - the biggest segment of those polled - see China as more of an economic opportunity than a threat and 62 percent do not think it poses a military danger. In contrast, 63 percent of Americans see it as an economic threat and 47 percent see it is a military adversary.
The most pro-China EU countries out of the 12 covered by the study are Romania, Bulgaria, the Netherlands, France, Portugal, the UK and Spain. Germany, Italy and Slovakia were at the other end of the scale.Despite its China-wariness, Italian officials last week met with China's sovereign wealth fund, the China Investment Corporation, in Rome, amid speculation that China will buy Italian government-owned assets.They are interested in buying real stuff ... this is completely different from their approach in the US which was to invest in treasuries [government bonds], an unnamed Italian official told the FT on Tuesday.

EU economic growth is coming to a stand-still
15.09.11 @ 15:27 By Leigh Phillips


There will be no double-dip recession but EU economic growth is coming to a stand-still the European Commission has warned, amid bleak news on the US recovery and world trade.GDP growth is now expected to remain subdued in the second half of the year, coming close to stand-still at year-end the commission's interim economic forecast said on Thursday (15 September). The EU economy as a whole is expected to grow just 0.2 percent in the third and fourth quarers, while the eurozone is to grow by just 0.2 percent and 0.1 percent, respectively.The expectations for the second half of the year have been ratcheted down considerably - by half a percentage point - from the bloc’s spring forecast.The situation looks better from a full-year perspective, where a positive first quarter will see the EU economy grow 1.7 percent and the eurozone 1.6 percent in 2011 as a whole.Unlike the fully-fledged spring and autumn reports, Thursday's interim report assesses only the performance of the seven largest EU economies. The figures in the interim paper point to downward revisions across all seven, meaning there is a common factor dragging the economies down.

The two best performers, Germany and Poland, will see overall 2011 growth of 2.9 percent and 4.0 percent, respectively. The two worst, Spain and Italy, are to see just 0.8 percent and 0.7 percent.The two engines of growth, exports and domestic demand, are in trouble: net exports are becoming less dynamic the paper fears, while demand will be weakened in the second half of the year and possibly beyond.The report places the blame for the downward revision on a more extensive weakening of global demand and world trade. The recovery lost steam in the US, the report said, while indicators for world trade suggest a further weakening in the third quarter. The EU study also pointed to a decline in financial market conditions on the back of contagion of the sovereign debt concerns in the euro area and concerns over the US.
The outlook for the European economy has deteriorated. Recoveries from financial crises are often slow and bumpy, EU economy chief Olli Rehn said, announcing the results.He added that a lot of austerity measures are still to kick in and when they do, the demand side of the equation will be hit even harder.He called for EU countries to steadfastly stick to the existing strategy, however, saying: To get the recovery back on track, it is crucial to safeguard financial stability and put budgets on a path that is sustainable beyond doubt.Asked whether other strategies, involving fiscal stimulus, might be considered, he argued that high levels of public spending caused the market turbulence in the first place.Due to the still elevated levels of public debt and the related stress in financial markets, which is now leading to deterioration of economic growth, it has already had a very negative impact on economic recovery and sustainable growth, he said.Mentioning Spain, he added: Considering the stress of health of public finances, it would certainly be counterproductive to engage with fiscal stimulus at this juncture.

Slight change in language

The economy chief's message contained a slight nuance compared to previous statements.Rehn is now calling for a differentiated austerity strategy, meaning that core eurozone countries like Germany which are under less pressure from markets, should not cut back any more on welfare programmes, unemployment payments and other forms of social assistance.The slight change in message from the previous one of pure austerity first appeared in the commissioner’s language on Tuesday.

WW3 THE 3 WAVES THAT MARCH TO ISRAEL
http://israndjer.blogspot.com/2005/11/questions-ww3-whats-coming.html (WW3 COMPLETE HAPPENINGS)

AMOS 9:10
10 All the sinners of my people shall die by the sword, which say, The evil shall not overtake nor prevent us.

DANIEL 11:40-45
40 And at the time of the end shall the king of the south( EGYPT) push at him:(EU DICTATOR IN ISRAEL) and the king of the north (RUSSIA AND MUSLIM HORDES OF EZEK 38+39) shall come against him like a whirlwind, with chariots, and with horsemen, and with many ships; and he shall enter into the countries, and shall overflow and pass over.
41 He shall enter also into the glorious land, and many countries shall be overthrown: but these shall escape out of his hand, even Edom, and Moab, and the chief of the children of Ammon.(JORDAN)
42 He shall stretch forth his hand also upon the countries: and the land of Egypt shall not escape.
43 But he shall have power over the treasures of gold and of silver, and over all the precious things of Egypt: and the Libyans and the Ethiopians shall be at his steps.
44 But tidings out of the east(CHINA 2ND WAVE OF WW3) and out of the north(RUSSIA, MUSLIMS WHATS LEFT FROM WAVE 1) shall trouble him:(EU DICTATOR IN ISRAEL) therefore he shall go forth with great fury to destroy, and utterly to make away many.( 1/3RD OF EARTHS POPULATION)
45 And he shall plant the tabernacles of his palace between the seas in the glorious holy mountain; yet he shall come to his end, and none shall help him.

REVELATION 14:18-20
18 And another angel came out from the altar, which had power over fire; and cried with a loud cry to him that had the sharp sickle, saying, Thrust in thy sharp sickle, and gather the clusters of the vine of the earth; for her grapes are fully ripe.
19 And the angel thrust in his sickle into the earth, and gathered the vine of the earth, and cast it into the great winepress of the wrath of God.
20 And the winepress was trodden without the city,(JERUSALEM) and blood came out of the winepress, even unto the horse bridles, by the space of a thousand and six hundred furlongs.(200 MILES) (THE SIZE OF ISRAEL)

The Third and Final Wave of WW3 is when all Nations march to Jerusalem, but JESUS bodily returns to earth and destroys them,sets up his KINGDOM OF RULE FOR 1000 YEARS THEN FOREVER.

2ND WAVE CHINA AND KINGS OF THE EAST MARCH TO ISRAEL

REVELATION 16:12
12 And the sixth angel poured out his vial upon the great river Euphrates; and the water thereof was dried up, that the way of the kings of the east might be prepared.(THIS IS THE ATATURK DAM IN TURKEY,THEY CROSS OVER).

DANIEL 11:44 (2ND WAVE OF WW3)
44 But tidings out of the east(CHINA) and out of the north(RUSSIA, MUSLIMS WHATS LEFT FROM WAVE 1) shall trouble him:(EU DICTATOR IN ISRAEL) therefore he shall go forth with great fury to destroy, and utterly to make away many.( 1/3RD OF EARTHS POPULATION)

REVELATION 9:12-18
12 One woe is past; and, behold, there come two woes more hereafter.
13 And the sixth angel sounded, and I heard a voice from the four horns of the golden altar which is before God,
14 Saying to the sixth angel which had the trumpet, Loose the four angels which are bound in the great river Euphrates.(IRAQ-SYRIA)
15 And the four angels were loosed, which were prepared for an hour, and a day, and a month, and a year, for to slay the third part of men.(1/3 Earths Population die in WW 3 2ND WAVE)
16 And the number of the army of the horsemen were two hundred thousand thousand:(200 MILLION MAN ARMY FROM CHINA AND THE KINGS OF THE EAST) and I heard the number of them.
17 And thus I saw the horses in the vision, and them that sat on them, having breastplates of fire, and of jacinth, and brimstone: and the heads of the horses were as the heads of lions; and out of their mouths issued fire and smoke and brimstone.(NUCLEAR BOMBS)
18 By these three was the third part of men killed, by the fire, and by the smoke, and by the brimstone, which issued out of their mouths.(NUCLEAR BOMBS)

Poland warns of war in 10 years as EU leaders scramble to contain panic 14.09.11 @ 17:58 By Leigh Phillips

Germany, France and the European Commission are scrambling to contain panic and quash rumours about a eurozone break-up amid repeated off-piste messages from other senior EU politicians.But even amid their desperate efforts, the finance minister of Poland, the country that currently represents the EU to the world as holder of the bloc’s rotating presidency, warned of war on the continent within 10 years if the eurozone collapses.Speaking to MEPs in Strasbourg on Wednesday morning (14 September) he warned of the need to act rapidly to prevent grave danger for the EU. Making reference to a recent report entitled Euro Break Up - The Consequences by Swiss financial giant UBS, he declared: There is no doubt we are in danger. Europe is in danger.The paper by UBS, normally known for its highly sober analysis, warned that historically, monetary unions do not break up without civil war or some other form of authoritarian reaction. The risk of civil disorder questions the rule of law, and as such basic issues such as property rights. Even those countries that avoid internal strife and divisions will likely have to use administrative controls to avoid extreme positions in their markets, it said.The Polish minister went on to warn of a doubling of unemployment within two years even in the rich countries.

He concluded his comments by recollecting a recent conversation he had with an old friend who is now head of a major bank: We were talking about the crisis in eurozone. He told me You know, after all these political shocks, economic shocks, it is very rare indeed that in the next 10 years we could avoid a war. A war ladies and gentlemen. I am really thinking about obtaining a green card for my kids in the United States.He went further in his comments to reporters after his speech to parliament, saying that he had chosen his words in a very careful way. He said that the prospect of war is not likely within a four-year legislative time frame ... Not in the months ahead, but maybe over a 10-year time frame, this could place us in a context that is almost unimaginable at the moment.It is up to all of us Europeans to take the lessons of an anecdote of that kind to ensure the errors of the past do not come back to haunt us.For their part, French President Nicolas Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angela Merkel are to hold an evening conference call with Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou where they will discuss the crisis.No new political or economic measures are expected to be unveiled, said one EU official. Instead the two European powerhouses will offer a robust backing to the efforts of Papandreou. There will be a strong political message to quash rumours and speculation, the EU contact said.The aim is to draw a line under comments from a variety of sources suggesting finance ministries are bracing themselves for a Greek default.German vice chancellor and economy minister Philipp Roesler this week talked publicly about the scenario of an orderly insolvency for the Hellenic Republic. Merkel quickly hit back at Roesler, also the head of the free-market-liberal junior partner in the chancellor’s coalition, demanding: Everyone should weigh their words very carefully.

But even as she was trying to corral her ministers behind a more optimistic line, on Wednesday, transport minister Peter Ramsauer told Die Zeit it would not be the end of the world if Greece were kicked out of the single currency.On Tuesday, Dutch finance minister Jan Kees de Jager said that his ministry is exploring all scenarios including a possible default within the single currency. He told broadcaster RTL Z he could not comment on whether eurozone officials were preparing for a Greek default. I can't do that in public, he said.I'm not denying it, but I can't confirm it either.On Wednesday, the Dutch finance ministry stepped back from the comments, saying that default is only a scenario.European Commission chief Jose Manuel Barroso on Wednesday also demanded an end to the cacaphony of proposals and rumours coming from various European quarters.In the cacophony of criticisms, counter-criticisms, magic bullets and miracle panaceas that are proposed on a daily basis, the truth has been drowned out that they [anti-crisis measures] have been agreed upon. But they have taken too long and have not yet been fully delivered, he told the European Parliament.He went on to say that both borrowers and lenders involved in the new measures must now deliver on their promises.All these states [making economic reforms] must now demonstrate in a convincing way that they are serious. It is not enough to make plans. It is action that counts, he said.And those euro area member states that are providing the assistance so crucial for the survival and the stability of the euro must show even more clearly that they are determined to deliver support to countries that implement their programmes, as they have agreed, he said, in a veiled reference to Germany, the Netherlands and Finland.Supporting the euro is not just an act of solidarity towards others. It is an act of self-interest.

EUROPEAN UNION ARMY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ytWmPqY8TE0&feature=player_embedded

DANIEL 7:23-25
23 Thus he said, The fourth beast (EU,REVIVED ROME) shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth,(7TH WORLD EMPIRE) which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces.(TRADING BLOCKS)
24 And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings(10 NATIONS) that shall arise: and another shall rise after them;(#11 SPAIN) and he shall be diverse from the first, and he shall subdue three kings.( BE HEAD OF 3 NATIONS)
25 And he (EU PRESIDENT) shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time.(3 1/2 YRS)

DANIEL 8:23-25
23 And in the latter time of their kingdom, when the transgressors are come to the full, a king (EU DICTATOR) of fierce countenance, and understanding dark sentences,(FROM THE OCCULT) shall stand up.
24 And his power shall be mighty, but not by his own power:(SATANS POWER) and he shall destroy wonderfully, and shall prosper, and practise, and shall destroy the mighty and the holy people.
25 And through his policy also he shall cause craft to prosper in his hand; and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by peace shall destroy many: he shall also stand up against the Prince of princes;(JESUS) but he shall be broken without hand.

DANIEL 11:36-39
36 And the king (EU DICTATOR) shall do according to his will; and he shall exalt himself, and magnify himself above every god, and shall speak marvellous things against the God of gods, and shall prosper till the indignation be accomplished: for that that is determined shall be done.
37 Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers,(THIS EU DICTATOR IS JEWISH) nor the desire of women, nor regard any god: for he shall magnify himself above all.(CLAIM TO BE GOD)
38 But in his estate shall he honour the God of forces:(WAR) and a god whom his fathers knew not shall he honour with gold, and silver, and with precious stones, and pleasant things.
39 Thus shall he do in the most strong holds with a strange god,(DESTROY TERROR GROUPS) whom he shall acknowledge and increase with glory: and he shall cause them to rule over many,(HIS ARMY LEADERS) and shall divide the land for gain.

REVELATION 19:19
19 And I saw the beast,(EU LEADER) and the kings of the earth, and their armies, gathered together to make war against him that sat on the horse,(JESUS) and against his army.(THE RAPTURED CHRISTIANS)

Commission pushes for europeanisation of border controls Today SEPT 15,11 @ 09:28 By Valentina Pop

Brussels - The EU commission is pressing ahead with a controversial draft bill on 'europeanising' the way border checks are introduced, allowing national governments to act on their own for only five days.The draft, seen by EUobserver, has already irked France, Germany and Spain who jointly oppose the idea of giving the EU commission a veto right over what so far has been the exclusive competence of national governments.Initially scheduled for the beginning of the week, the publication has been delayed until Friday (16 September), one day after the general elections in Denmark where border controls are a favourite topic of the populist Danish People's Party.Since the free movement of persons within the area without internal borders is a key Union achievement, the benefits of which are enjoyed by all the persons living in this area, it should as a general rule require a decision to be taken at the Union level, rather than for such decision to be taken unilaterally at the national level, the paper reads.The proposal comes after member states earlier this year asked for clarification on when and how border checks can be reintroduced, following a Franco-Italian spat over Tunisian migrants crossing their common border.Home affairs ministers could not agree, however, what role to give Brussels in the decision-making process, so the EU executive stepped into the breach.

In the commission's view, unilateral national initiatives, in isolation, can never be an effective response to common threats in the EU, where more than a billion people cross freely from one country to another every year.Therefore, the main rule laid out in the proposal is that any decision on the reintroduction of internal border controls would be taken by the commission as an implementing act involving the member states accordingly.The European Parliament would be informed of such measures, which would be for renewable periods of up to 30 days, with a maximum length of six months.

Greece clause

Additionally, the EU commission and the bloc's border control agency Frontex, would organise snap checks of the 25 members of the Schengen area to see how they are managing the borders.If shortcomings are found, governments will have to fix them. Failure to comply may trigger, as last resort, the reintroduction of border checks with that particular country. There is no time limit foreseen in that case.No countries are mentioned specifically in the proposal, but last year Greece had to appeal to the EU and fellow Schengen states to help out with guarding its land-border to Turkey, the main entry point of migrants from the Middle East and north Africa.The kick-out clause is also meant to reassure enlargement-sceptic countries that once Bulgaria and Romania are admitted in Schengen, the process is not irreversible.Motives for reintroducing border checks can vary from a terrorist attack to football championships or high-level summits. An unexpected inflow of migrants can also trigger the reintroduction of border controls, provided there is a risk assessment proving that they may be a public safety concern.In urgent cases, member states can set up border checks on their own, but only for a maximum of five days, after which they have to come up with a detailed assessment of why the measure is necessary and ask for permission from the EU commission.Foreseeable events for which checks are needed have to be flagged up at least six weeks in advance with all relevant information relating to the reasons for doing so, and regarding the planned scope and duration.Since the Schengen border code came into force in 2006, border checks have been introduced 26 times and never for longer than 30 days. In most cases, it was because of major sporting events, political rallies or high-level summits.However, the information member states are required to provide to other member states and the commission often does not arrive in sufficient time, or contain sufficient details, to enable the commission to usefully issue an opinion concerning the notification, the draft reads.But since Germany, France and Spain on Tuesday clearly indicated they do not agree with ceding sovereignty to the EU in this area, the proposal is likely to be watered down in negotiations with member states and the European Parliament.

LAND FOR PEACE (THE FUTURE 7 YEARS OF HELL ON EARTH)

JOEL 3:2
2 I will also gather all nations, and will bring them down into the valley of Jehoshaphat, and will plead with them there for my people and for my heritage Israel, whom they have scattered among the nations, and parted my land.

THE WEEK OF DANIEL 9:27 WE KNOW ITS 7 YRS

Heres the scripture 1 week = 7 yrs Genesis 29:27-29
27 Fulfil her week, and we will give thee this also for the service which thou shalt serve with me yet seven other years.
28 And Jacob did so, and fulfilled her week: and he gave him Rachel his daughter to wife also.
29 And Laban gave to Rachel his daughter Bilhah his handmaid to be her maid.

DANIEL 11:21-23
21 And in his estate shall stand up a vile person, to whom they shall not give the honour of the kingdom: but he shall come in peaceably, and obtain the kingdom by flatteries.
23 And after the league made with him he shall work deceitfully: for he shall come up, and shall become strong with a small people.
24 He shall enter peaceably even upon the fattest places of the province; and he shall do that which his fathers have not done, nor his fathers' fathers; he shall scatter among them the prey, and spoil, and riches: yea, and he shall forecast his devices against the strong holds, even for a time.

DANIEL 9:26-27
26 And after threescore and two weeks(62X7=434 YEARS+7X7=49 YEARS=TOTAL OF 69 WEEKS OR 483 YRS) shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary;(ROMAN LEADERS DESTROYED THE 2ND TEMPLE) and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.(THERE HAS TO BE 70 WEEKS OR 490 YRS TO FUFILL THE VISION AND PROPHECY OF DAN 9:24).(THE NEXT VERSE IS THAT 7 YR WEEK OR (70TH FINAL WEEK).
27 And he( THE ROMAN,EU PRESIDENT) shall confirm the covenant with many for one week:(1X7=7 YEARS) and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease,(3 1/2 yrs in TEMPLE SACRIFICES STOPPED) and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

JEREMIAH 6:14
14 They have healed also the hurt of the daughter of my people slightly, saying, Peace, peace; when there is no peace.

JEREMIAH 8:11
11 For they have healed the hurt of the daughter of my people slightly, saying, Peace, peace; when there is no peace.

1 THESSALONIANS 5:3
3 For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape.

ISAIAH 28:14-19 (THIS IS THE 7 YR TREATY COVENANT OF DANIEL 9:27)
14 Wherefore hear the word of the LORD, ye scornful men, that rule this people which is in Jerusalem.
15 Because ye have said, We have made a covenant with death, and with hell are we at agreement; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, it shall not come unto us: for we have made lies our refuge, and under falsehood have we hid ourselves:
16 Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD, Behold, I lay in Zion for a foundation a stone, a tried stone, a precious corner stone, a sure foundation: he that believeth shall not make haste.
17 Judgment also will I lay to the line, and righteousness to the plummet: and the hail shall sweep away the refuge of lies, and the waters shall overflow the hiding place.
18 And your covenant with death shall be disannulled, and your agreement with hell shall not stand; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, then ye shall be trodden down by it.
19 From the time that it goeth forth it shall take you: for morning by morning shall it pass over, by day and by night: and it shall be a vexation only to understand the report.

Egypt PM: Israel Treaty 'Not Sacred'-Egyptian prime minister Essam Sharaf told Turkish television the 1979 Egypt-Israel Peace Treaty wasn't sacred and was subject to change.By Gavriel Queenann First Publish: 9/15/2011, 8:19 PM

Egyptian Prime Minister Essam Sharaf on Thursday said the 1979 Egypt-Israel Peace Treaty is not sacred and is subject to change.The Camp David agreement depends on what benefits the region, Sharaf said in an interview on Turkish television, adding, Egypt will make changes to the treaty if necessary.Sharaf's statements follow the popular sentiments of the street in Cairo, but altering the treaty would require the consent of all three signatories - Egypt, Israel, and the United States.Contrary to Sharaf's rhetoric, however, Egypt's caretaker junta has consistently downplayed the chances of such a move due to sharp opposition from US officials, and Israel.Making such a move without Israeli or US consent would likely lead to a loss of the billions in US aid dollars underwriting Egypt's regional muscle and could lead to a war with Israel over the Sinai.Meanwhile, the last three Israeli diplomats left Cairo today and landed in Tel Aviv . According to media reports in Egypt, they were the acting ambassador, the security officer and deputy.These were the last remaining Israeli diplomats in the country after the dramatic evacuation from last Friday's attack on the embassy and completed its final evacuation.Earlier this week, Egyptian security forces detained 92 protesters who had allegedly been involved in the Israeli Embassy assault in Cairo on Friday night. In total, police and soldiers arrested 130 protesters, according to state television.

Reports in Egypt say that some of the detainees are suspected of trying to break into another building, located several hundred meters from the embassy building.
Egyptian Information Minister Osama Hassan Khaykl appeared on Egyptian television and said that the protesters who were arrested will face charges.Egypt will take legal measures, said Khaykl who condemned the embassy attack, to see the persons involved charged for their actions in court.

EU effort fails to avert UN confrontation on Palestine 15.09.11 @ 13:39 By EUOBSERVER

Palestine's FM al-Malki has said Palestine will on 23 September submit a bid to become a full UN member. The US is set to veto it while France is expected to vote in favour. EU envoy Ashton has spent this week in the Middle East trying to avert the confrontation.

UN Chief Calls PA to Return to Negotiations-UN chief Ban Ki-moon says PA should return to talks with Israel, says the peace deadlock is harming the whole Middle East.By Elad Benari First Publish: 9/16/2011, 12:12 AM

United Nations chief Ban Ki-moon called the Palestinian Authority on Thursday to return to talks with Israel, the Al-Arabiya network reported.Ban was quoted as saying the peace deadlock between the two sides is harming the whole Middle East. He added both sides must make concessions to get back into talks.I am asking them to enter into meaningful negotiations and the international community has a duty to create some conditions favorable to this, Ban told a press conference.He said Israel’s approval for construction of new homes in the Jewish communities in Judea and Samaria has not been helpful, but added, At the same time, Palestinians should also try to sit together with Israeli people.I am deeply concerned that with the lack of progress in Israeli-Palestinian negotiations, Ban was quoted as saying. We are now experiencing very deteriorating, rapidly deteriorating situations between and among many important players in the region.The UN leader referred to the downgrade in the relations between Israel and Turkey and last week’s attack on the Israeli Embassy in Cairo, saying the Israeli-Turkish relationship is now going in a very negative way and adding the embassy attack was very worrisome.Ban called for strong regional leadership for lasting peace and security in the Middle East.

Ban’s comments came after PA Foreign Minister Riad al-Malki announced Thursday that the entity plans to submit its bid for full UN membership with the Security Council on Friday, September 23.The announcement ended speculation that Abbas would consider alternate plans forwarded by various diplomats who had frantically tried to dissuade the PA from pursuing a unilateral course via the UN.Last week, Ban reaffirmed his support for an independent Palestinian state, but said UN membership for the PA was an issue for member states to decide.One member, the United States, has already announced it will veto any statehood bid by the PA.

Lieberman Orders Embassies to Protest PA Apartheid State-FM Lieberman has instructed Israeli embassies around the world to protest remarks by a PA official that Palestine will be Judenrein By David Lev First Publish: 9/15/2011, 2:18 PM

Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman has instructed Israeli embassies in Europe and the U.S. to file strong protests with the governments of their host countries against comments by the Palestinian Authority representative delegation's United Nations observer, who said that the Arab state the PA plans to declare in Judea, Samaria and Jerusalem will be free of Jews.In response to a reporter's question Tuesday, the PA official, Maen Areikat, said that after a military occupation of 44 years, I think it would be best for the two nations to split. He added that Jews would not be welcome to live in the PA state. The implication, said Lieberman, was that more than 350,000 Jews who live in areas the PA claims for its state would have to leave their homes.The Palestine Liberation Organization, however -- tasked with making the formal request to the United Nations for recognition of the PA as a new Arab country, and accepting the entity into its ranks as a full member -- has announced that the new state would welcome all faiths.Lieberman said Thursday that Areikat's comments were similar to other statements made directly by Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas, who has spoken of the need to deport all Jews from PA controlled areas. Both Areikat's and Abbas' statements, said Lieberman, prove that the PA plans to make its state Judenrein, borrowing a term describing the Nazis' policy of destroying Jews and murdering them. The nations of the world should take these comments into account when deciding how to vote on the PA's demand to set up a state, Lieberman said.

In June, Abbas himself made a similar statement. Telling reporters that he would under no conditions recognize Israel as a Jewish state, Abbas said that he would agree to an international force to ensure enforcement of a peace agreement between Israel and the PA state to prevent terrorism. But, he said, I will not agree to allowing Jews to participate in this force, and I will not agree to allow even one Israeli to live among us on Palestinian land.Earlier, Yuli Edelstein, in charge of the government's public information efforts, said that after endless attempts by the PA to delegitimize Israel and attempts to brand us as an apartheid state, it turns out that the Palestinians are the ones who are interested in apartheid.

Op-Ed: Judenrein State, Part I: Western Hypocrisy
Published: Thursday, September 15, 2011 5:51 PM


Nothing illustrates the hypocrisy better than a comparison of their demand that Israel accept an Arab right of return with their ambition for a state that would be ethnically cleansed of all Jews.Matthew M. Hausman, Att'y

Part I: Western Hypocrisy

In seeking to impose a Palestinian state on Israel, the Obama Administration, European Union, and western media have displayed a cynical contempt for history that is astounding in its breadth and scope. Pressure is brought to bear solely on Israel, who is expected to sacrifice sovereignty and security in the name of an ideal that is premised on a repudiation of the Jews’ right to self-determination in their ancient homeland. The Palestinians are expected to concede nothing – not even their oft-stated goal of the phased destruction of Israel. Nothing illustrates the hypocrisy better than a comparison of their demand that Israel accept an Arab right of return with their ambition for a state that would be ethnically cleansed of all Jews. Like the Nazis with whom the Mufti and other Arab leaders were so closely allied during the Second World War, they seek to create a Judenrein state as a springboard for the elimination of a Jewish presence in the Mideast. Ironically, western progressives are enabling the process, even though it entails human rights violations that would certainly be illegal in liberal democracies. The continuing support for the Palestinian cause by the United States and European Union – and their contribution of billions of dollars that fund anti-Semitic propaganda masquerading as school curriculum, line the pockets of the corrupt Abbas regime or end up in the coffers of Hamas – would indicate an abdication of reason if the true goal were to achieve a lasting, substantive peace.

However, such behavior is not incongruous if the real purpose is political realignment with the Arab-Muslim world at the expense of Israel’s integrity as a democratic, Jewish nation. Although Obama and the EU claim only to support the rights of the Palestinians as an indigenous people, they have adopted the cause by uncritically promoting a revisionist narrative that is built on a denial of Jewish history. However, the Jews’ rights as an indigenous people were recognized historically and under international law long before the term Palestinian was ever used to refer to an Arab population that accreted largely through immigration during the sunset years of the Ottoman Empire. The Jewish people originated in ancient Israel; the Palestinians did not.The Arab-Muslim world’s true intentions regarding peace with Israel should be apparent from its centuries-long oppression and subjugation of Jews in Arab lands and its stated refusal to recognize Israel as a Jewish nation. The two-state solution is proffered as a ruse for the destabilization of Israel, and western apologists are complicit in the charade by their refusal to insist on Arab recognition of Jewish historical rights, and by their failure to condemn the Palestinian goal of state building through ethnic cleansing. The Jews’ rights as an indigenous people were recognized historically and under international law long before the term Palestinian was ever used.
Whereas any perceived attempt by Israel to transfer Arab populations would certainly inspire international condemnation, the Palestinians’ open and notorious aim of expelling Jews from historically Jewish lands – lands that were never part of any sovereign Arab nation – is met with conspicuous silence or tacit approval. Indeed,

President Obama’s demand last year for a building freeze in Jerusalem was a blatant attempt to coerce Israel to implement apartheid-like measures against her own citizens in order to limit the Jewish population of her capital.Jewish habitation in Judea, Samaria, and Israel proper, including Jerusalem, was a fact from antiquity into modern times – until Jordan conquered the territories and dispossessed their Jewish inhabitants during Israel’s War of Independence.When Jordan (then known as Transjordan) conquered Judea and Samaria in 1948, it expelled the Jews living there, collectively dubbed these territories the West Bank, and annexed them in violation of international law. Israel’s subsequent acquisition of these lands in 1967 in truth effectuated their liberation from foreign occupation; and renewed Jewish habitation thereafter constituted nothing more than repatriation. Israel’s liberation and administration of Judea and Samaria were perfectly legitimate under prevailing standards of international law, despite Palestinian claims to the contrary. In fact, it is Palestinian land-claims that are dubious, based as they are on Jordan’s transfer of its negotiating rights over these territories to the Palestinian Authority as part of the Oslo process. Because Jordan seized these lands illegally, however, it never possessed lawful title in the first place, and accordingly had no legitimate rights to convey to the PA.

In consideration of these facts, it is reasonable to question why Israel should even entertain the notion of a two-state solution, particularly as it requires her to discount the indigenous heritage of her own people and surrender ancestral lands to those who unapologetically call for her destruction. One must also question the wisdom of negotiating with the PA, which could easily be displaced by Hamas through open revolt or by an Islamist-influenced election such as occurred in Gaza. This is a particular concern in view of the political upheavals currently sweeping across the Arab world, where popular unrest has reinforced the legitimacy of military juntas and strengthened the political profile of Islamist groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood.

Op-Ed: Judenrein State, Part II: Alternatives
Published: Thursday, September 15, 2011 5:12 PM


The political unrest now rocking the Arab world emphasizes the risk that an independent Palestinian state would be subject to the same destabilizing influences and form a terror haven on what are now Israel's security buffers. The other choices.

Part II: Alternatives

In determining the permanent status of Judea and Samaria, many advocates believe Israel instead should be guided by the principles laid out at the San Remo Conference of 1920, during which the Supreme Council of Principal Allied Powers made decisions implicating the future of the territories they liberated from the Ottoman Empire during the First World War. The Council, among other things, incorporated the Balfour Declaration into its program and recognized that the Jews comprised a people defined not solely by religion, but by nationality and descent as well. Moreover, it recognized that the Jews were indigenous to the Land of Israel and, accordingly, that they had the right to self-determination in their homeland. The Mandate for Palestine of 1922 further guaranteed the right of close settlement, which recognized that Jews could settle anywhere west of the Jordan. No similar recognition was accorded Palestinian-Arab nationality at that time because it simply did not exist.

Rather, the local Arabs considered themselves to be culturally part of the greater Syrian community, and much of their population had accrued through late migration into the area only after the Jews had begun rehabilitating the land and creating economic opportunities that did not exist elsewhere in the Mideast. The acceptance of the San Remo program by the League of Nations – and the restatement of its ambitions in the 1922 Mandate for Palestine – evidenced an acknowledgment of the Jews’ status as an indigenous people and their right to settle anywhere in their homeland, including Judea and Samaria, and thus underscored the legal basis for the reestablishment of the Jewish state. Consequently, traditional recognition of the Jews’ indigenous rights should inform any proposals for resolving the Arab-Israeli conflict. This would be consistent with the ideals set forth in the Declaration on Rights of Indigenous Peoples, voted on by the U.N. in 2007. Of particular relevance is the language contained in Article 10, which states:Indigenous peoples shall not be forcibly removed from their lands or territories. No relocation shall take place without the free, prior and informed consent of the indigenous peoples concerned and after agreement on just and fair compensation and, where possible, with the option of return.

Though the true intent of this nonbinding declaration may have been to promote the Palestinian cause at Israel’s expense, it cannot be divorced from the long-standing recognition under international legal conventions that the Jews are indigenous to the Land of Israel. Accordingly, it implicitly reinforces the Jewish connection to lands the Palestinians now attempt to claim as their own, and provides justification for potential resolutions that are premised on legally-cognizable Jewish claims, rather than on politically-motivated or apocryphal Palestinian pretensions.If a state of Palestine were to be created, any policies requiring the ethnic cleansing of Jewish inhabitants would violate international law as recognized at San Remo and under the original Mandate for Palestine, which the United Nations is currently bound to honor by virtue of Section 80 of the U.N. Charter.Such ethnic cleansing would also contravene the precepts set forth in the Declaration on Rights of Indigenous Peoples and other conventions. In order to exist in compliance with international law, such a state would have to provide for the Jews – as indigenous people – to remain on their ancestral lands in Judea and Samaria. It would also need to recognize the Jewish right of close settlement. Jewish residents of such a state would have to retain Israeli citizenship and be governed by Israeli law, and the Arab state subsuming their communities would have to recognize Israeli sovereignty within their enclaves.

Jews wishing to travel to Israel proper would have to be free to do so without harassment. Such arrangements exist in other parts of the world, for example, in North America, where Alaskans cut off from the mainland United States are permitted to travel through Canada in order to visit the lower Forty-Eight, or in Europe where citizens of EU countries are permitted to travel across national borders unimpeded. Indeed, the Quartet seeks to impose just such an arrangement on Israel by demanding that Gaza be connected by a corridor to a Palestinian State in Judea and Samaria.It is unlikely, however, that a Palestinian state would recognize any Jewish rights or permit Jewish residency. It is equally unlikely that it would recognize Jewish autonomy or Israeli sovereignty. A more realistic scenario – if there is to be a Palestinian entity – might be the creation of a federation or confederation in which some of the territories currently under Israeli administration would be linked with Jordan, where a majority of the population already identifies as Palestinian. A confederation could be created by ceding some territory for a semi-autonomous region that would then be joined with Jordan under an umbrella government of general, limited powers. The concept of confederation provides that Jordan and a Palestinian entity would each maintain individual sovereignty and would exercise unilateral powers outside the scope of the general government’s jurisdiction. The authority of the general government would be limited to those powers specifically agreed upon by the constituent entities.The risk of confederation, however, is that the entities could elect to separate in order to establish an independent Palestinian state.

A similar but distinct concept is federation, in which sovereign authority would be constitutionally allocated among the member states and the general government, but in which the structure of government could not be altered by the unilateral acts of its constituents. That is, neither entity could dissolve the union in order to establish an independent Palestinian state. Such a federation would consist of Jordan and a Palestinian entity created on land transferred from Judea and Samaria, but would not include Jewish towns or population centers. Likewise, Israel would retain control of all land necessary to ensure her security and to protect her water rights in the Jordan valley. These same constraints on land transfers would apply to a confederation as well.Regardless of the technical form, the resulting Palestinian-Jordanian entity would be independent from Israel and would include no land or power sharing in Jerusalem, which would remain exclusively under Israel’s dominion and control. Jerusalem was never the capital of any sovereign Arab nation, and Jordan’s illegal occupation from 1948 to 1967 does not provide a legal basis for Palestinian claims over the city.In contrast, Israel does have a lawful historical claim to Jerusalem, in which Jews have constituted the majority population for generations, since long before Israeli independence to the present day. Moreover, Jerusalem was the ancient capital of Jewish kingdoms that were the only sovereign nations ever to occupy the land. Consequently, there can be no justification for dividing the city. Arabs residing in Jerusalem would remain subject to Israeli civil and criminal law, and Israel would continue to protect and facilitate access to all religious sites and shrines as she always has done. Israel could enforce a similar arrangement between Gaza and Egypt, after which Israel would sever any remaining connection to Gaza. Thus, Egypt would be solely responsible for servicing Gaza’s infrastructure, utility, and humanitarian needs, leaving Israel to concentrate on consolidating and enhancing her security presence along her southern border.

These concepts are not new or unique, but rather were the subject of analysis and debate in the 1990s by the late Daniel J. Elazar, founder of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, and others. Proposals involving these and similar models were put forth as alternatives to a free-standing Palestinian state. A federal model was considered by many to be a more workable paradigm than independent Palestinian statehood for protecting Israeli security, particularly by those who recognized that the Oslo process tended to sacrifice Israeli rights and security concerns. Proponents of some kind of Arab federal union believed that the costs of administering a hostile population would continue to grow, but that an independent state of Palestine would threaten Israel’s security and pose an existential challenge to her long-term survival.These ideas are regaining currency today in part because the political unrest now rocking the Arab world emphasizes the risk that an independent Palestinian state would be subject to the same destabilizing influences. It is likely that such a state would quickly become a terrorist haven and a hostile military threat, particularly if it were to be created from lands that currently provide Israel with strategic security buffers.Not everyone believes that the creation of such entities will resolve the Arab-Israeli conflict. In fact, there is growing support in some segments of Israeli society for formal annexation of Judea and Samaria, in whole or in part, or for de facto annexation through the extension of Israeli civil law into these territories.Although there may be disagreement regarding the most appropriate strategy, there is increasing consensus among Israelis that they must create their own solutions based on their own needs and concerns, instead of waiting passively while a two-state plan is foisted upon them by outside powers who have no regard for Israeli sovereignty.

There is increasing consensus among Israelis that they must create their own solutions based on their own needs and concerns.Despite international pressure for the creation of a Palestinian state devoid of Jews, Israel must be guided by her own priorities, and must not lose sight of the rights of Jews as indigenous people in their homeland, including those rights recognized at San Remo and reinforced by the Mandate. A Palestinian state created by dispossessing Jews from their ancestral lands would be in violation of international law and would represent a repudiation of history.Unfortunately, American and European support for a Judenrein Arab state illustrates that international law is not applied equitably when the net effect would be the validation of historical Jewish rights or Israeli national integrity.
Therefore, Israel must resist all calls for her to sacrifice her security needs and Jewish character, and should work instead to expose the double standard underlying the international community’s unjust and unreasonable demands.

Beinisch Rules: If It's Not State Land - Demolish It-Supreme Court President Dorit Beinisch rules: Anything not declared state land in Judea and Samaria is private land which should be razed.By Elad Benari First Publish: 9/16/2011, 4:09 AM

Supreme Court President Dorit Beinisch has ruled that any area in Judea and Samaria that has not been declared state land is considered private land and all buildings in such areas must be demolished.Beinisch made this ruling in a hearing that was held this week in the Supreme Court about homes in the Jewish neighborhood of Givat HaYovel in Eli north of Jerusalem.12 homes in the neighborhood were slated to be demolished last year, including the homes of fallen IDF soldiers Roi Klein and Eliraz Peretz. Defense Minister Ehud Barak petitioned the Supreme Court to postpone the destruction just two weeks before it was scheduled to take place.There are other homes in danger of being razed in Haresha, located in the Talmonim bloc between the city of Modiin and Beit El. The communities are being targeted by leftist groups such as Peace Now which claim that the homes were built on property belonging to PA Arabs.In her ruling this week, a copy of which was obtained by Arutz Sheva’s Haggai Huberman, Beinisch stated, The State shall notify the court within 60 days which lands in HaYovel and Haresha are private land, as opposed to state land. In the statement filed on the State’s behalf regarding the lands that have not been declared state land, and are thus in the category of private land, the State shall determine what is the timetable for the demolition of structures built in these lands, subject to a hearing to be held during this time period to the current holders of these lands, with the exception of the Peretz family.A thorough check by Huberman revealed that of all the homes in HaYovel, only two homes are on land not defined as state land, one of them being the home of Eliraz Peretz, in which case Peace Now has withdrawn the petition it filed. This leaves only one home in HaYovel that is not defined as being on state land.

Huberman notes that this one home is a case similar to the case of the three homes in Migron which were recently demolished in the middle of the night. In the case of Migron, Peace Now withdrew its petition after realizing that the case was faultily prepared and it could not prove Arab ownership for these specific homes.In the case of HaYovel as well, notes Huberman, there is no Arab claim on the home, but the State Attorney’s Office and the Deputy Attorney General have explained that the State does not intend to declare the land on which the home stands as state land because there are old signs of processing of the land that were found in the area.
Huberman explains that this decision leaves an opening for leftist groups to someday file another petition to the Supreme Court, claiming that the land is Arab land.
Beinisch has come under fire by nationalists recently, particularly after she allowed the nighttime destruction in Migron and ignored the fact that children were left homeless as a result. This latest ruling is sure to add to the criticism of her.
National Union Chairman MK Yaakov Ketzaleh Katz responded to Beinisch’s ruling Thursday, saying, As she nears retirement, Judge Beinisch is not asking for a list of tens of thousands of housing units illegally built by Arabs and Bedouin in the Galilee, Negev, Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria in order to destroy them, but is only interested in the list of Jewish homes.A few months before leaving the job she is eager to fulfill her desire to see Judea and Samaria free of Jews and to build the Arab nation in the land Israel,he added.Katz said that he intends to submit a bill to the Knesset stating that any land, in which the State was involved in its construction, should be expropriated and retroactively declared state land.

Jordan: Only 300 at Million Man March on Israeli Embassy-Protesters in Jordan call to shut down Israeli embassy, burn Israeli flag. No violent incidents.By Elad Benari First Publish: 9/16/2011, 1:11 AM

The planned million man march on the Israeli Embassy in Jordan fizzled to only about 300 young protesters on Thursday, The Associated Press reported.According to the report, the demonstration was small and peaceful, possibly because the Muslim Brotherhood accounted for only about 100 of the protesters, while others were mostly youths.The protesters chanted, We want to get rid of the (Israeli) embassy, and burned an Israeli flag about a mile (1.5 kilometers) down the hill from the Israeli Embassy.One protester told AP, We reject the peace treaty (signed between Jordan and Israel in 1994) and we don’t want an Israeli Embassy in Jordan.According to the news agency, police formed several lines and set up metal fences to prevent the protesters from marching toward the embassy. In one incident, a handful of demonstrators pushed one of the fences against policemen, but they were quickly pushed back. Dozens of riot police also stood guard blocks away from the protest and near the embassy.On Wednesday, it was reported that Jordanian activists were planning a million man march, in which they would demand that the Israeli Embassy in Amman be shut down.The call to protest was welcomed among many political parties, among them the Coordination Committee of the Jordanian opposition parties, which includes seven parties, and the Islamic Action Front Party which represents the extreme Muslim Brotherhood in Jordan.Israel subsequently decided to evacuate its embassy in Amman, fearing that the protest might escalate to a violent riot such as the one in the Israeli Embassy in Cairo last week.

ALLTIME