Thursday, September 05, 2013

EU WANTS DIPLOMATIC SOLUTION TO SYRIA

KING JESUS IS COMING FOR US ANY TIME NOW. THE RAPTURE. BE PREPARED TO GO.

BREAKING NEWS ATTENTION ALERT.
WE KNOW BY THE BIBLE THIS WILL NOT BE WW3.SO WE HAVE TO BE WORRIED,ABOUT ISRAELS SAFETY-BUT NOT ABOUT BEING FULL BLOWN WW3.SO PRAY FOR THE PEACE OF JERUSALEM-ALL. WE KNOW WW3 DOES NOT HAPPEN TILL JERUSALEM IS DIVIDED BY THE BIBLE.THIS OBAMA LIMITED STRIKE.MIGHT STIR UP SOME ARAB-MUSLIMS AGAINST ISRAEL.BUT IF THEY DO GO AGAINST ISRAEL-I PREDICT-ISRAEL WILL GET SOME OF THEIR PROMISED LAND BY GOD GIVIN TO THEM.BY DEFEATING THOSE ARAB-MUSLIMS THAT COME AGAINST ISRAEL.IN THIS LIMITED WAR.THIS MIGHT BE THE TIME THAT ISA 17:1 IS FULFILLED -THOUGH.THAT DAMASCUS WHICH IS ALMOST A HEAP OF RUBBLE ALREADY.MIGHT BE FINISHED OFF.AND NO MORE WILL ANYBODY EVER LIVE IN DAMASCUS AGAIN.BUT AS I SAY THIS WILL NOT BE WW3 YET BY THE BIBLE.

And here are the bounderies of the land that Israel will inherit either through war or peace or God in the future. God says its Israels land and only Israels land. They will have every inch God promised them of this land in the future.

Egypt east of the Nile River, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, The southern part of Turkey and the Western Half of Iraq west of the Euphrates. Gen 13:14-15, Psm 105:9,11, Gen 15:18, Exe 23:31, Num 34:1-12, Josh 1:4.ALL THIS LAND ISRAEL WILL DEFINATELY OWN IN THE FUTURE, ITS ISRAELS NOT ISHMAELS LAND.

12 TRIBES INHERIT LAND IN THE FUTURE

JOEL 3:2 (WW3 OCCURS WHEN JERUSALEM IS DIVIDED-NOT BEFORE)
2 I will also gather all nations, and will bring them down into the valley of Jehoshaphat, and will plead with them there for my people (ISRAEL) and for my heritage Israel, whom they have scattered among the nations, and parted my land.(JERUSALEM)(WW3 STARTS BECAUSE JERUSALEM IS DIVIDED AND ISRAELIS UPROOTED FROM THEIR GOD GIVIN LAND BRINGS 3 DEAD BILLION IN WW3)

REVELATION 9:13-18 (HERES THE BEGGINIG OF WW3 IN THE FUTURE)
13 And the sixth angel sounded, and I heard a voice from the four horns of the golden altar which is before God,
14 Saying to the sixth angel which had the trumpet, Loose the four(DEMONIC WAR) angels which are bound in the great river Euphrates.(4 WINDS OF THE WORLD-WORLDWIDE WAR)(TURKEY-IRAQ-SYRIA)(EUPHRATES RIVER CONSISTS OF 760 MILES IN TURKEY,440 MILES IN SYRIA AND 660 MILES IN IRAQ)
15 And the four(DEMONIC WAR) angels were loosed,(COULD ALSO MEAN THE 4 CORNERS OF THE EARTH OR WORLDWIDE WAR) which were prepared for an hour, and a day, and a month, and a year, for to slay the third part of men.(1/3 Earths Population die in WW 3 2ND WAVE)
16 And the number of the army of the horsemen were two hundred thousand thousand:(200 MILLION MAN ARMY FROM CHINA AND THE KINGS OF THE EAST) and I heard the number of them.
17 And thus I saw the horses in the vision, and them that sat on them, having breastplates of fire, and of jacinth, and brimstone: and the heads of the horses were as the heads of lions; and out of their mouths issued fire and smoke and brimstone.(NUCLEAR BOMBS)
18 By these three was the third part of men killed, by the fire, and by the smoke, and by the brimstone, which issued out of their mouths.(NUCLEAR BOMBS)

REVELATION 16:12-16 (HERES WW3 SETUP AGAIN)
12 And the sixth angel poured out his vial upon the great river Euphrates;(WERE WW3 STARTS IN IRAQ OR SYRIA OR TURKEY) and the water thereof was dried up, that the way of the kings of the east might be prepared.
13 And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon,(SATAN) and out of the mouth of the beast,(WORLD DICTATOR) and out of the mouth of the false prophet.(FALSE POPE)
14 For they are the spirits of devils, working miracles, which go forth unto the kings of the earth and of the whole world, to gather them to the battle of that great day of God Almighty.(WERE 2 BILLION DIE FROM NUKE WAR)
15 Behold, I come as a thief. Blessed is he that watcheth, and keepeth his garments, lest he walk naked, and they see his shame.
16 And he gathered them together into a place called in the Hebrew tongue Armageddon.(ITS AT THIS TIME I BELIEVE WHEN AMERICA GETS NUKED BY RUSSIA ON THE WAY TO THE MIDEAST ALSO)


ISAIAH 17:1
1 The burden of Damascus. Behold, Damascus is taken away from being a city, and it shall be a ruinous heap.

AMOS 1:5
5  I will break also the bar of Damascus, and cut off the inhabitant from the plain of Aven, and him that holdeth the sceptre from the house of Eden:(IRAQ) and the people of Syria shall go into captivity unto Kir,(JORDAN) saith the LORD.

JEREMEIAH 49:23-27
23  Concerning Damascus.(SYRIA) Hamath is confounded, and Arpad: for they have heard evil tidings: they are fainthearted; there is sorrow on the sea;(WAR SHIPS WITH NUKES COMING ON SYRIA) it cannot be quiet.
24  Damascus is waxed feeble, and turneth herself to flee, and fear hath seized on her: anguish and sorrows have taken her, as a woman in travail.
25  How is the city of praise not left, the city of my joy!
26  Therefore her young men shall fall in her streets, and all the men of war shall be cut off in that day, saith the LORD of hosts.
27  And I will kindle a fire (NUKES OR BOMBS) in the wall of Damascus, and it shall consume the palaces of Benhadad.(ASSADS PALACES POSSIBLY IN DAMASCUS)

COUNTRIES WITH ISRAEL (THE WEST)(SAUDIA ARABIA WITH WEST)

EZEKIEL 38:10-19
10 Thus saith the Lord GOD; It shall also come to pass, that at the same time shall things come into thy mind, and thou shalt think an evil thought:
11 And thou shalt say,(RUSSIA,ARAB,MUSLIMS) I will go up to the land of unwalled villages; I will go to them that are at rest, that dwell safely, all of them dwelling without walls, and having neither bars nor gates,
12 To take a spoil, and to take a prey; to turn thine hand upon the desolate places that are now inhabited, and upon the people that are gathered out of the nations, which have gotten cattle and goods, that dwell in the midst of the land.
13 Sheba, and Dedan,(SAUDIA ARABIA) and the merchants of Tarshish,(ENGLAND) with all the young lions thereof,(USA,CANADA,AUSTRALIA,NEW ZEALAND,EU,ENGLAND,ENGLISH SPEAKING shall say unto thee, Art thou come to take a spoil? hast thou gathered thy company to take a prey? to carry away silver and gold, to take away cattle and goods, to take a great spoil?
14 Therefore, son of man, prophesy and say unto Gog, Thus saith the Lord GOD; In that day when my people of Israel dwelleth safely, shalt thou not know it?
15 And thou shalt come from thy place out of the north parts, thou, and many people with thee, all of them riding upon horses, a great company, and a mighty army:
16 And thou shalt come up against my people of Israel, as a cloud to cover the land; it shall be in the latter days, and I will bring thee against my land, that the heathen may know me, when I shall be sanctified in thee, O Gog, before their eyes.
17 Thus saith the Lord GOD; Art thou he of whom I have spoken in old time by my servants the prophets of Israel, which prophesied in those days many years that I would bring thee against them?
18 And it shall come to pass at the same time when Gog shall come against the land of Israel, saith the Lord GOD, that my fury shall come up in my face.
19 For in my jealousy and in the fire of my wrath have I spoken, Surely in that day there shall be a great shaking in the land of Israel;

(COUNTRIES AGAINST THE WEST)(NOTICE GERMANY-TURKEY IN THE AGAINST)

EZEKIEL 38:1-7
1 And the word of the LORD came unto me, saying,
2 Son of man, set thy face against Gog,(RULER) the land of Magog,(RUSSIA) the chief prince of Meshech(MOSCOW)and Tubal,(TOBOLSK) and prophesy against him,
3 And say, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I am against thee, O Gog,(LEADER OF RUSSIA) the chief prince of Meshech(MOSCOW) and Tubal:TOBOLSK)
4 And I will turn thee back, and put hooks into thy jaws,(GOD FORCES THE RUSSIA-MUSLIMS TO MARCH) and I will bring thee forth, and all thine army, horses and horsemen, all of them clothed with all sorts of armour, even a great company with bucklers and shields, all of them handling swords:
5 Persia,(IRAN,IRAQ) Ethiopia, and Libya with them; all of them with shield and helmet:
6 Gomer,(GERMANY) and all his bands; the house of Togarmah (TURKEY) of the north quarters, and all his bands:(SUDAN,AFRICA) and many people with thee.
7 Be thou prepared, and prepare for thyself, thou, and all thy company that are assembled unto thee, and be thou a guard unto them.

2 MILLION SYRIAN REFUGEES FLEE TO:
LEBANON-711,920
JORDAN-515,512
TURKEY-458,837
IRAQ-159,503
EGYPT-110,088

CANADA I KNOW WILL BE TAKING SOME SYRIAN REFUGEES IN.AND HOW MANY MORE MILLIONS OF SYRIANS WILL FLEE WHEN OBAMA STARTS TOMAHAWKING SYRIA IN A WEEK OR 2. 

IMPORTANT DATES FOR THE NEXT WEEK ON SYRIA1-SEPT 04 Senate Committee approves limited force in syria
2-SEPT 06 Obama comes back to Washington
3-SEPT 09 Congress returnes to Capital Hill
4-SEPT 11 Vote on Syria bill expected.
5-SEPT 11 Russian deligation to visit Capital Hill (ON THE 12TH ANNIVERSARY OF 911)

A PREVIEW OF VOTES ON SYRIA WARMONGERING BILL
SENATE-YES-24 N0-16 WITH 58 UNDECIDED OR UNKNOWN
CONGRESS-YES-27 NO-91 WITH 300+ UNDECIDED OR UNKNOWN 

ONE THING I FOUND INTERESTING AT ONE OF KERRYS CONVINCING CONGRESS AND THE WORLD TO GO TO WAR IN SYRIA YAPS.I THINK IT WAS A COUPLE A DAYS OR MORE.I NOTICED IN THE BACKROUND.THERE WERE 2 WOMEN HOLDING THEIR HANDS IN THE AIR WITH RED PAINT ALL OVER THEIR HANDS.THEN IT JUST STRUCK ME THEIR TELLING KERRY HES A WARMONGERER WITH BLOOD ON HIS HANDS IF THEY GO INTO SYRIA.YOU MIGHT CALL KERRY THE SECRETARY OF WARMONGERING AGAINST ANOTHER USELESS UNITED NATIONS MEMBER.BUT WHY DID THE USELESS U.N NOT DO ANY DIPLOMATIC ACTION WITH ASSAD TO TRY TO STOP THIS SYRIAN MASSACRE-CHEMICAL POISONING TWO YEARS AGO ALREADY.BUT NOW THE USELESS U.N JUST WANTS DIPLOMATIC NEGOTIATIONS FROM AMERICA TO ASSAD INSTEAD OF AMERICA TOMAHAWKING SYRIA WITH 200 PLUS MISSLES.200 MILLION AND 40 THOUSAND DOLLARS THE U.S WILL SHOOT INTO SYRIA IN JUST THE INITIAL MISSLES.MUCH LESS ALL THE 5 WARSHIPS OFF SHORE WITH GROUND TROOPS AND THEM AIR DINGIES TO GET THE AMERICAN GROUND TROOPS INTO SYRIA AFTER THE MISSLES START FLYING.AND AMERICA IS LYING WHEN THEY SAY THEY DON'T HAVE TROOPS IN SYRIA.WHOS PAYING FOR THE OPPOSITION-WHICH ARE TROOPS ON THE GROUND IN SYRIA-AMERICA. CHINAS BRINGING A WARSHIP TO SYRIA.RUSSIA HAS 3 WARSHIPS IN SYRIA.READY TO STICK UP FOR SYRIA. 

NOW WE FINALLY HEAR THE TRUTH IS STARTING TO COME OUT.2 BOMBERS B-2 AND B-52 PLANES WE NOW KNOW WILL BE INVOLVED IN THE SYRIA ATTACK ON ASSAD.NOW WE KNOW ITS A LARGE BATTLE IN SYRIA.NEXT WE WILL HEAR THAT ASSAD WILL BE OUSTED.

BRUTALITY OF SYRIAN REBELS IS TROUBLE FOR THE WEST-1,000 REBEL GROUPS
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/05/world/middleeast/brutality-of-syrian-rebels-pose-dilemma-in-west.html?hp&_r=0 

AT THE EU SUMMIT.THE EUROPEAN UNION WANTS A DIPLOMATIC SOLUTION OVER SYRIA.THE EU DOES NOT WANT ANYBODY BOMBING SYRIA.WELL THIS FITS INTO PROPHECY.IT WILL BE THE EUROPEAN UNION THAT SIGNS DIPLOMATICALLY  TO GUARENTEE ISRAELS SECURITY FOR A 7 YEAR PEACE TREATY WITH THE ARABS AND MANY MUSLIMS OF DANIEL 9:27. 

Syria at heart of EU talks in Vilnius

"Events at the G20 talks are likely to set our agenda," an EU diplomat told AFP ahead of the two-day EU meeting which US Secretary of State John Kerry will attend for his first time since taking on the US diplomatic brief. The twice-yearly informal talks are seen as a rare opportunity for Europe's foreign ministers to get together for in-depth debate on non-urgent subjects. But with Syria dominating the global agenda, the foreign ministers of France, Germany and possibly Britain are expected to join heads of state and government at the G20 talks before heading to Vilnius for a meeting that may once more highlight Europe's diplomatic divisions. Most EU nations stand opposed to the military options favoured by Washington and Paris as reprisal for alleged chemical weapons attacks blamed on President Bashar al-Assad that left hundreds dead last month. An EU diplomat close to the matter told AFP that France stood isolated among its peers in its determination to strike Assad, with Britain on the sidelines after its parliament voted against military action. The sceptics say any retaliatory strike could have unpredictable and dangerous consequences and stress the need for a coordinated response backed by the UN. "What would be the consequences in Syria and in the region? What would be the consequences of acting without the consent of the UN Security Council?," said influential Belgian Foreign Minister Didier Reynders. Belgium, which joined military action in Libya and in Mali, doubts the merits of intervening in Syria and wants proof that Damascus used chemical weapons against its people. "I am not yet convinced. What we want is to receive information showing the use of these arms," Reynders said Wednesday. Many EU nations, including Austria, Ireland, the Netherlands and some Scandinavian states are reticent about resorting to military action. Denmark and Cyprus are among those hesitating, concerned about the make-up of any "coalition of the willing" while Italy and Belgium want proper legal justification for the use of force. Germany meanwhile wants to back the United States and France but is sceptical about the merit of limited surgical strikes. "Only a political solution can end the terrible bloodshed, the destruction of Syria. It is time for the international community to put aside their differences and bring the parties to the conflict to the negotiations table," EU president HermanBSE 0.00 % Van Rompuy said on Wednesday. EU defence ministers gather in Vilnius on Thursday ahead of their foreign affairs counterparts to hone joint defence strategies. They will also host NATO chief Anders Fogh Rasmussen, who has condemned the use of chemical weapons but who also stresses the need for a political solution in Syria.

SWEDISH REPORTER ASKS OBAMA ABOUT BEING A NOBEL PEACE PRIZE WINNER.BUT YET WARMONGERING INTO SYRIA-THE BLAZE -SEPT 4,13
A Swedish reporter confronted President Barack Obama about reconciling a pending attack on Syria with his 2009 Nobel Peace Prize that he won almost immediately after taking office.
Swedish journalist confronts Obama on being a Nobel Peace Prize winner and wanting to strike Syria
US President Barack Obama (L) answers a question on Syria during a joint press conference with Swedish Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt following their bilateral meeting at the Rosenbad Building in Stockholm on September 4, 2013. Credit: AFP/Getty Images
Obama and Sweden’s Prime Minister Frederik Reinfeldt held a joint press conference Wednesday in Stockholm as part of the first ever bilateral meeting between the nation’s two top leaders.The reporter asked, “I was wondering, could you describe the dilemma to being a Nobel Peace Prize winner and getting ready to attack Syria?”Obama first referred the reporter to look at his speech accepting the prize, in which he said he was undeserving compared to past recipients but also said the use of military force is sometimes necessary.“What I also described is the challenge all of us face, when we believe in peace but we confront a world that is full of violence,” Obama said. “The question then becomes what are our responsibilities. So, I’ve made every effort to end the war in Iraq, to wind down the war in Afghanistan, to strengthen our commitment to multilateral action, to promote diplomacy as a solution to problems. The question though, that all of us face as political leaders: At what point do we need to confront actions that are violating our common humanity?”Answering his own question, Obama said, “I would argue when I see 400 children subjected to gas, over 1,400 civilians dying senselessly in an environment where you already have tens of thousands killed, and we have the opportunity to take some action that is meaningful even if it doesn’t solve the entire problem, may at least mitigate this particular problem, then the moral thing to do is not to stand by and do nothing.”
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/09/04/swedish-journalist-confronts-obama-on-being-a-nobel-peace-prize-winner-and-getting-ready-to-attack-syria/




Russia: Strike on Syria could mean nuke disaster

Moscow to warn UN nuclear watchdog of ‘catastrophic’ consequences if atomic facilities hit

September 5, 2013, 11:52 am 3-The Times of Israel

Before and after satellite images of the Syrian nuclear reactor at al-Kibar, which was reportedly struck by Israel in 2007 (AP/DigitalGlobe)
Before and after satellite images of the Syrian nuclear reactor at al-Kibar, which was reportedly struck by Israel in 2007 (AP/DigitalGlobe)
VIENNA — Russia is warning that a US strike on Syria’s atomic facilities might result in a nuclear catastrophe and is urging the UN to present a risk analysis of such a scenario.The warning comes from Russia’s Foreign Ministry spokesman, Alexander Lukashevich. He said in a statement Wednesday that a strike on a miniature reactor near Damascus or other nuclear installations could contaminate the region with radioactivity, adding: “The consequences could be catastrophic.”IAEA spokeswoman Gill Tudor told the AP in an email Thursday that her agency is ready to “consider the questions raised” by Lukashevich if it receives a formal request to do so from Moscow.Russia’s Interfax news agency says that Moscow intends to bring up the issue at next week’s 35-nation IAEA board meeting.Meanwhile, the United Nations’ and the Arab League’s special representative to Syria, Lakhdar Brahimi, was making his way Thursday to St-Petersburg as the G-20 summit gets underway to back up efforts by UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon to organize a peace conference on Syria.“The Secretary General has just announced that the Joint Special Representative for Syria, Lakhdar Brahimi, is on his way to Russia to help him push, on the margins of the G-20 summit in Saint Petersburg, for the International Conference on Syria,” a UN spokesperson said in a statement.
Russia has been a staunch supporter of the Assad regime since the war in Syria — which began as a popular uprising — started in 2011. Moscow has rejected US claims that the Syrian regime had used chemical weapons in an attack near Damascus on August 21 which the US says killed 1,429 people.Russian officials, including President Vladimir Putin have warned the West against taking any action in Syria in response to the reported attack without UN approval.In September 2007, the Syrian nuclear reactor at al-Kibar in Deir ez-Zor region was bombed in an attack that has been widely attributed to Israel.
Before and after pictures of the Syrian building struck during Operation Orchard in Syria, released by the US government. (Photo credit: US government/Wikipedia)
Before and after pictures of the Syrian building struck during Operation Orchard in Syria, released by the US government. (Photo credit: US government/Wikipedia)
American intelligence later confirmed that the site was a nuclear facility with a military purpose.
In 2011, the IAEA confirmed that it was a covertly built nuclear reactor. In a news conference that year,  IAEA chief Yukiya Amano said: ”The facility that was … destroyed by Israel was a nuclear reactor under construction,” in response to a question.Israel has never publicly commented on the strike or even acknowledged carrying it out.Syria had denied allegations of any covert nuclear activity or interest in developing nuclear arms.






US sure to ‘suffer loss’ if it acts in Syria, says Iran’s Khamenei

Supreme leader: America using chemical claims as pretext for war; Rouhani warns ‘US friends’ could be harmed; Syrian adviser blames al-Qaeda for attack

September 5, 2013, 2:28 pm 3-The Times of Israel
The new Iranian president, Hassan Rouhani tweeted on Thursday that any military action in Syria would be harmful to the region and to “US friends.”Earlier Thursday, Syrian President Bashar Assad’s political and media adviser pointed the finger at al-Qaeda for the chemical attack.Bouthaina Shaaban said the terror organization was responsible just as just as it was responsible for “killing Syrian people, raping women, [and] kidnapping Christian clerics.”“The same people who were on the London Tube and who killed British people, the same people who on 9/11 in New York killed American people, they are the same people in Mali, the same people in Libya, the same people in Iraq, the same people in Syria,” she stated as reported by Iran’s Press TV.She called on the US to provide proof that the regime was behind the attack, saying Washington was “using the same lies, the same fabrications, the same claims, in order to target our country and our people.”The Syrian regime has denied using chemical weapons, calling US claims “blatant lies.” The Syrian opposition has been consistently backed by Russia, which has warned the US against any action that wasn’t UN-backed, and by Iran.Iran has remained a staunch ally of the Syrian regime and has actively helped Syrian troops loyal to Assad on the battlefield. The Iranian-backed Lebanese terror group Hezbollah has also been an active player on the side of Assad in the civil war that has raged in the country for two-and-a-half years, claiming the lives of over 100,000 people, according to the latest UN figures.On Wednesday, the commander of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards’ Quds force said Iran would defend Syria “until the end,” according to a report in the Fars news agency. Kassem Sulemenai reportedly also said that the majority of Syrian rebels are foreigners and that the US has attempted repeatedly to topple Assad, unsuccessfully.Meanwhile, a Senate panel on Wednesday approved a resolution authorizing US President Barack Obama to order a limited military strike in Syria. Obama is also seeking congressional approval for a military response.

Senate Panel Votes in Favor of Syria Military Strike

Senate Foreign Relations Committee votes 10-7 in favor of using force in Syria in response to a chemical weapons attack.-By Elad Benari, Canada-First Publish: 9/4/2013, 11:22 PM-INN

President Barack Obama
President Barack Obama-Flash 90
President Barack Obama has cleared his first hurdle in his push for a military strike in Syria.
On Wednesday afternoon (local time) a key Senate panel voted to authorize the use of force in response to a chemical attack in Damascus on August 21.The Senate Foreign Relations Committee voted 10-7, with one senator voting present, to approve a military strike in response to the attack last month, reported Fox News.
The full Senate is expected to vote on the measure next week.The vote came after Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) raised objections to an earlier draft which set a 60-day limit on military action in Syria, with a possibility for a single 30-day extension subject to conditions. That draft was agreed upon Tuesday night by Democratic Sen. Bob Menendez of New Jersey and Republican Sen. Bob Corker of Tennessee.
McCain’s objections forced lawmakers to renegotiate the measure, with the Arizona Republican ultimately winning tougher language clarifying that U.S. action would be aimed in part at changing the momentum on the ground. McCain was among the 10 who voted for the final resolution, reported Fox News.The resolution specifically would permit Obama to order a limited military mission against Syria, as long as it doesn't exceed 90 days and involves no American troops on the ground for combat operations.The vote marked the first time lawmakers have voted to authorize military action since the October 2002 votes giving President George W. Bush the authority to invade Iraq.The measure goes next to the full Senate.The tougher climb for the Obama administration may be on the House side, where it's still unclear whether a coalition exists to pass such a resolution.A testy House committee hearing Wednesday on Obama's request for authorization showed deep divisions in that chamber over the question of getting more deeply involved in the Syrian conflict. Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle questioned whether a "limited" military strike could pull the U.S. into some additional military intervention.Secretary of State John Kerry and other administration officials warned that if the U.S. does not respond to the chemical weapons strike, it would embolden America's enemies to use chemical weapons and pursue other weapons of mass destruction.Obama said earlier on Wednesday that the United States’ credibility, as well as that of the international community, are on the line over its response to the use of chemical weapons in Syria.Obama spoke at a press conference in Sweden during a stopover that was intended to build support for intervention in the Middle East.
He said, “My credibility is not on the line. The international community’s credibility is on the line.”Meanwhile, Russian President Vladimir Putin, a strong supporter of Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad, hinted on Wednesday his country may support a UN resolution on punitive military strikes in Syria, provided that it is proved that Damascus used poison gas on its own people.At the same time, Putin warned the West against taking one-sided action in Syria.(Arutz Sheva’s North American Desk is keeping you updated until the start of Rosh Hashanah in New York. The time posted automatically on all Arutz Sheva articles, however, is Israeli time.)

Report: Hezbollah Admitted that Assad Was Behind Chemical Attack

German intelligence says it intercepted a phone call in which Hezbollah official admitted that Assad gassed his own people.-By Elad Benari, Canada-First Publish: 9/5/2013, 1:01 AM-INN

Hezbullah flag
Hezbullah flag-Reuters
German intelligence says that an official with the Hezbollah terror group admitted that Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad ordered a poison gas attack last month.According to a report in the Reuters news agency on Wednesday, Hezbollah considered the move a mistake which showed Assad was losing his grip.
Participants at a confidential meeting of German lawmakers on Monday said the head of the BND foreign intelligence agency told them it had intercepted a phone call believed to be between a high-ranking member of Hezbollah and the Iranian Embassy in Damascus."The BND referred to a phone call they had heard between a Hezbollah official and the Iranian embassy in which he spoke about Assad having ordered the attack," one of the participants told Reuters on Wednesday.In the phone call, the Hezbollah official says Assad's order for the attack was a mistake and that he was losing his nerve, the participants reported the BND briefing as saying.A BND spokesman declined to comment on Monday's briefing, saying German intelligence speaks only to the government and to parliamentary committees on highly sensitive matters.
A Hezbollah spokesman was not available for comment.The German weekly Der Spiegel reported this week that the BND has enough evidence in its possession to conclude that Assad ordered the suspected chemical attack in Syria on August 21.According to Der Spiegel, BND President Gerhard Schindler voiced his support for U.S. allegations that Assad‘s government ordered the attack on the eastern Damascus suburb of Ghouta.The intelligence agency’s chief said that following a thorough analysis his ministry assumes that the regime is the perpetrator of the chemical attack which killed hundreds of people.The U.S. government said about 1,400 people, hundreds of them children, died in what it says was a sarin gas attack by the Syrian government.On Sunday, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said that the administration had new evidence that sarin gas was used in the chemical attack."We know that the regime ordered this attack," he said. "We know they prepared for it. We know where the rockets came from. We know where they landed. We know the damage that was done afterwards."French intelligence has also shown the chemical attack came from government forces.A dossier shared with the French parliament this week reportedly includes satellite images showing a large offensive on the Damascus neighborhood of Ghouta coming from government controlled areas to the east and west of the area held by rebel forces.One participant at the Berlin meeting told Reuters German lawmakers of all parties were skeptical about a military intervention in Syria and had quizzed the BND over faulty intelligence on weapons of mass destruction in Iraq used to justify the U.S.-led invasion of 2003. No such weapons were found.Some German lawmakers also expressed concern that German intelligence on Syria could be used by the United States to justify military intervention without a UN mandate.
Berlin has ruled out participation in a military intervention in Syria, which would be deeply unpopular at home.(Arutz Sheva’s North American Desk is keeping you updated until the start of Rosh Hashanah in New York. The time posted automatically on all Arutz Sheva articles, however, is Israeli time.)

Israel offered intact settlements as part of peace deal’

Palestinian official says Israeli proposals seek to keep about 40% of West Bank because of security concerns

September 5, 2013, 12:34 am 29-The Times of Israel

RAMALLAH, West Bank (AP) — Israel has proposed leaving intact dozens of Jewish settlements and military bases in the West Bank as part of a package to establish a Palestinian state in provisional borders, a Palestinian official told The Associated Press on Wednesday, in the first detailed glimpse at recently relaunched peace talks.The official said the proposal is unacceptable to the Palestinians, underscoring the tough road ahead as the sides try to reach an agreement ending decades of conflict.The official spoke on condition of anonymity because Israel and the Palestinians have pledged to US Secretary of State John Kerry not to discuss the content of their talks with the media — a pledge that has largely held up until now.
For their future state, the Palestinians seek the West Bank, East Jerusalem and Gaza Strip, territories captured by Israel in the 1967 Mideast war.With Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu opposed to a return to the pre-1967 lines, the idea of a Palestinian state in temporary borders has gained appeal with the Israelis.Such a deal could give the Palestinians independence, while leaving the thorniest issues, such as the fate of Jerusalem and the status of millions of Palestinian refugees and their descendants, to later negotiations. The Palestinians reject any notion of a provisional agreement, fearing that a temporary arrangement that falls short of their dreams will become permanent.Talks resumed in late July after a nearly five-year break stemming largely from Israeli settlement construction. The Palestinians have objected to Israeli construction in the West Bank and east Jerusalem. The Palestinians say these settlements, now home to more than 500,000 Israelis, make it increasingly difficult to partition the land between two people.After months of US mediation, the Palestinians agreed to resume talks. Although Israel did not pledge to freeze settlement construction, US officials have said they expect both sides to avoid provocative moves. Negotiators have been quietly meeting once or twice a week for the past month or so.The Palestinian official said formal talks on borders have not yet started, and that negotiations have focused on security matters. He said the Israelis want to retain control of the West Bank’s border with Jordan, keep early-warning stations on hilltops, and retain military bases near the Jordanian border.“Israel is using the issue of security to take land,” he said. “From the general discussions we had in the last couple of weeks, the Israelis have shown no intention to dismantle any settlement.” He said the current proposals indicated that Israel would seek to retain control over about 40 percent of the West Bank.“They said, ‘Let’s discuss a state with provisional borders.’ We said, ‘Let’s agree on a state based on the 1967 borders first, and then we can agree on having this state in phases.”In the previous round of talks, conducted in 2008 under then-prime minister Ehud Olmert, Israel offered to withdraw from roughly 94 percent of the West Bank, and compensate the Palestinians with the equivalent of 6 percent through a “land swap” that would allow Israel to keep major settlements. Olmert also proposed international administration of Jerusalem’s holy sites.The official said the Palestinians have proposed resuming peace talks from the point they broke off. Netanyahu has said he is not obligated to accept Olmert’s proposals.A senior Israeli official refused comment on the Israeli proposal, citing the commitment to keep the talks secret.“It was agreed between the sides that all public discussion about the negotiations would be through the Americans,” the Israeli official said, speaking on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to talk to the media about the issue.Netanyahu’s office declined comment, citing the pledge not to discuss the negotiations in public. Likewise, there was no immediate US comment.In a statement released for the Jewish new year holiday that began Wednesday evening, Netanyahu said he hoped the talks would succeed.“We seek to advance peace with the Palestinians while maintaining our security and ensuring that the peace will be a real and enduring peace. Not a ceremony, not an agreement that we celebrate for two minutes and then collapse,” the statement said. “We want a real, genuine and enduring peace and this must be anchored in recognition of Israel as a Jewish state and in our security. This is what ultimately is needed.”
Yasser Abed Rabbo, a top aide to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, would not discuss the specifics of the talks. But speaking on the Voice of Palestine radio station, he said, “Until now, there are no signs of progress. The Israeli position has not changed. It’s the one that we know on the ground, through daily settlement expansion.”He urged the US to put pressure on Israel. Otherwise, he said, “there will be no progress.”Earlier Wednesday, Israeli police arrested seven Palestinians after clashes between stone-throwing demonstrators and Israeli security forces in Jerusalem’s Old City.Police spokesman Micky Rosenfeld said the clashes erupted when about 300 Palestinians tried to block a group of visitors from reaching a sensitive hilltop compound revered by both Jews and Muslims. He said masked demonstrators began to throw stones, prompting security forces to move in.He said some demonstrators sought refuge inside the nearby Al Aqsa Mosque. Police did not enter the mosque, and no one was injured.The compound, known to Jews as the Temple Mount, is the holiest site in Judaism. Known to Muslims as the “Noble Sanctuary,” it is Islam’s third-holiest site.Rosenfeld said security has been heightened for the Jewish New Year holiday.

RECENT OTHER SYRIAN NEWS
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/america-might-bomb-syria-quick-but-will.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/syria-threatens-surprises-for-western.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/500-syrian-scud-missles-aimed-at-israel.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/hackers-try-to-wipe-israel-off-map.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/iran-zionists-israel-will-burn-i-say-u.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/arab-muslim-countries-scared-if-syria.html 
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/me-and-stockwell-day-fell-virtually.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/france-on-board-with-usa-on-syria.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/update-on-syria-happenings.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/will-obama-attack-today-in-syria-or.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/obama-to-get-vote-from-congress-before.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/09/syria-brags-obamas-done-before-he-got.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/09/standstill-in-america-about-syria-till.html 

http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/09/mccain-graham-want-tough-attack-on-assad.html 
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/09/60-to-90-day-timeline-for-obama-to-take.html 
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/09/syria-and-war-powers-act.html 

SYRIA AND THE WAR POWERS ACT

KING JESUS IS COMING FOR US ANY TIME NOW. THE RAPTURE. BE PREPARED TO GO.

ISAIAH 17:1
1 The burden of Damascus. Behold, Damascus is taken away from being a city, and it shall be a ruinous heap.

AMOS 1:5
5  I will break also the bar of Damascus, and cut off the inhabitant from the plain of Aven, and him that holdeth the sceptre from the house of Eden:(IRAQ) and the people of Syria shall go into captivity unto Kir,(JORDAN) saith the LORD.

JEREMEIAH 49:23-27
23  Concerning Damascus.(SYRIA) Hamath is confounded, and Arpad: for they have heard evil tidings: they are fainthearted; there is sorrow on the sea;(WAR SHIPS WITH NUKES COMING ON SYRIA) it cannot be quiet.
24  Damascus is waxed feeble, and turneth herself to flee, and fear hath seized on her: anguish and sorrows have taken her, as a woman in travail.
25  How is the city of praise not left, the city of my joy!
26  Therefore her young men shall fall in her streets, and all the men of war shall be cut off in that day, saith the LORD of hosts.
27  And I will kindle a fire (NUKES OR BOMBS) in the wall of Damascus, and it shall consume the palaces of Benhadad.(ASSADS PALACES POSSIBLY IN DAMASCUS)

COUNTRIES WITH ISRAEL (THE WEST)(SAUDIA ARABIA WITH WEST)

EZEKIEL 38:10-19
10 Thus saith the Lord GOD; It shall also come to pass, that at the same time shall things come into thy mind, and thou shalt think an evil thought:
11 And thou shalt say,(RUSSIA,ARAB,MUSLIMS) I will go up to the land of unwalled villages; I will go to them that are at rest, that dwell safely, all of them dwelling without walls, and having neither bars nor gates,
12 To take a spoil, and to take a prey; to turn thine hand upon the desolate places that are now inhabited, and upon the people that are gathered out of the nations, which have gotten cattle and goods, that dwell in the midst of the land.
13 Sheba, and Dedan,(SAUDIA ARABIA) and the merchants of Tarshish,(ENGLAND) with all the young lions thereof,(USA,CANADA,AUSTRALIA,NEW ZEALAND,EU,ENGLAND,ENGLISH SPEAKING shall say unto thee, Art thou come to take a spoil? hast thou gathered thy company to take a prey? to carry away silver and gold, to take away cattle and goods, to take a great spoil?
14 Therefore, son of man, prophesy and say unto Gog, Thus saith the Lord GOD; In that day when my people of Israel dwelleth safely, shalt thou not know it?
15 And thou shalt come from thy place out of the north parts, thou, and many people with thee, all of them riding upon horses, a great company, and a mighty army:
16 And thou shalt come up against my people of Israel, as a cloud to cover the land; it shall be in the latter days, and I will bring thee against my land, that the heathen may know me, when I shall be sanctified in thee, O Gog, before their eyes.
17 Thus saith the Lord GOD; Art thou he of whom I have spoken in old time by my servants the prophets of Israel, which prophesied in those days many years that I would bring thee against them?
18 And it shall come to pass at the same time when Gog shall come against the land of Israel, saith the Lord GOD, that my fury shall come up in my face.
19 For in my jealousy and in the fire of my wrath have I spoken, Surely in that day there shall be a great shaking in the land of Israel;

(COUNTRIES AGAINST THE WEST)(NOTICE GERMANY-TURKEY IN THE AGAINST)

EZEKIEL 38:1-7
1 And the word of the LORD came unto me, saying,
2 Son of man, set thy face against Gog,(RULER) the land of Magog,(RUSSIA) the chief prince of Meshech(MOSCOW)and Tubal,(TOBOLSK) and prophesy against him,
3 And say, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I am against thee, O Gog,(LEADER OF RUSSIA) the chief prince of Meshech(MOSCOW) and Tubal:TOBOLSK)
4 And I will turn thee back, and put hooks into thy jaws,(GOD FORCES THE RUSSIA-MUSLIMS TO MARCH) and I will bring thee forth, and all thine army, horses and horsemen, all of them clothed with all sorts of armour, even a great company with bucklers and shields, all of them handling swords:
5 Persia,(IRAN,IRAQ) Ethiopia, and Libya with them; all of them with shield and helmet:
6 Gomer,(GERMANY) and all his bands; the house of Togarmah (TURKEY) of the north quarters, and all his bands:(SUDAN,AFRICA) and many people with thee.
7 Be thou prepared, and prepare for thyself, thou, and all thy company that are assembled unto thee, and be thou a guard unto them. 

AT THE HEARINGS TODAY SEPT 4,13.I HEARD THERES 34 NATIONS AND ORGANISAZTIONS THAT ARE WITH AMERICA ON THIS SYRIA WAR BOMBING. KERRY JUST GAVE THE BIG NAMES. TURKEY, BRITTAIN,FRANCE,CANADA WITH AIDE,THE ARAB LEAGUE,SAUDI ARABIA,THE ARAB EMERITES.WE AMERICA ARE JOING THE 134 NATIONS THAT ARE AGAINST CHEMICAL WEAPONS THEY SIGNED. ITS A WORLD MATTER-NOT JUST AN AMERICAN MATTER.SAYS KERRY.OBAMA SAID MY CREDABILITY IS NOT SHOT.I DID NOT SET A RED LINE-THE WORLD DID.TED POE SAID WE BETTER HAVE SOMETHING IN THIS BILL THAT COMES TO CONGRESS THAT SAYS THAT IF IRAN GETS TO A CERTAIN POINT WITH ITS NUCLEAR WEAPONS PROGRAM.THEY GET THE SAME PUNISHMENT THAT SYRIAS ASSAD WILL BE GETTING SHORTLY.

R-TOM COTTON WANTS A REGIME CHANGE IN SYRIA AND WILL GO WITH THE ASSAD MISSLING THIS TIME.MR GEORGE HOLDING ASKES IS RUSSIA STILL A SUPER POWER.THE ANSWER FROM THE GENERAL-RUSSIA RUSSIA STILL HAS ELEMENTS THAT QUALIFY THEM AS A SUPER POWER.THEY STILL HAVE A INCEDIBLE STATEGIC ARSENAL.BUT A TRUE SUPERPOWER IS MILITARY-AND ECONOMICAL AND DIPLOMATICAL.BUT CONVENTIONALLY I WOULD NOT PUT RUSSIA IN THAT CLASS.MR HOLDING-SYRIA AND RUSSIA ARE ALLIES.IF RUSSIA DECIDED TO STRIKE US IN THAT THEATRE.WHAT ARE THE TOP 3 OPTIONS THAT THEY WOULD HAVE TO STRIKE US IN RETATIATION FOR US STRIKING SYRIA-THERE CLOSEST ALLY.GENERAL.IT WOULD NOT BE HELPFUL IN THIS SETTING (TO TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT RUSSIA.AND LET THE AMERICAN CITIZENS KNOW THE TRUTH.)IN THAT KIND OF HYPOTHETICAL.BUT I HAVE VIEWS I CAN TELL YOU IN A CLASSIFIED ENVIROMENT.MR HOLDING-SO WE CAN SAY THAT RUSSIA WOULD HAVE OPTIONS TO STRIKE US,DO WE NOT.IN RETALIATION FOR US STRIKING SYRIA.GENERAL-RUSSIA HAS CAPABILITIES THAT RANGE FROM CYBER ALL THE WAY UP TO NUCLEAR WEAPONS.(WHICH MEANS YES THEY COULD CYBER-EMP -THEN NUKE US.).BUT AGAIN IT WOULD NOT BE HELPFUL IN THIS SETTING TO TALK ABOUT THAT.

JEREMIAH 51:29-32 (CYBER ATTACK 1ST)
29  And the land shall tremble and sorrow: for every purpose of the LORD shall be performed against Babylon,(AMERICA-NEW YORK) to make the land of Babylon (AMERICA) a desolation without an inhabitant.
30  The mighty men of Babylon (AMERICA) have forborn to fight, they have remained in their holds: their might hath failed; they became as women: they have burned her dwellingplaces; her bars are broken.
31  One post shall run to meet another, and one messenger to meet another, to shew the king of Babylon (NEW YORK) that his city is taken at one end,
32  And that the passages are stopped,(THE WAR COMPUTERS HACKED OR EMP'D) and the reeds they have burned with fire, and the men of war are affrighted.(DON'T KNOW WHAT TO DO)

COMPLETE SILENCE AFTER AN EMP GOES OFF
REVELATION 8:1
1 And when he had opened the seventh seal, there was silence in heaven about the space of half an hour.

JEREMIAH 50:3,24 RUSSIA SNEAK NUKE ATTACK ON AMERICA)
3 For out of the north (RUSSIA) there cometh up a nation against her, which shall make her land desolate, and none shall dwell therein: they shall remove, they shall depart, both man and beast.
24 I have laid a snare for thee, and thou art also taken, O Babylon,(AMERICA) and thou wast not aware: thou art found, and also caught, because thou hast striven against the LORD. (RUSSIA A SNEAK CYBER,EMP ATTACK,THEN NUKE ATTACK ON AMERICA)

THE SENATE COMMITEE HAS PASSED THE BILL TO ATTACK SYRIA.AND IT GOES TO THE SENATE NEXT WEEK
 
ONE OF THE LAW MAKERS SAID AT LEAST 25% UP TO 50% OF THE SO CALLED OPPOSITION OR AMERICAS FIGHTERS ARE AL-QUEDA,HEZZBOLLAH AND BROTHERHOOD MEMBERS.SO THAT MEANDS 50% OF THE OPPOSITION ARE ISRAE-WEST HATERS AND AMERICA IS GIVING THEM TONS OF CASH AND WEAPONS TO FIGHT ASSAD.THIS DOES NOT MAKE SENSE TO ME.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V1zkSwihbPg

Rumsfeld: Either oust Assad or stay out of Syria





GRAND RAPIDS, Michigan — President Barack Obama should either oust Syrian President Bashar Assad or not bother getting involved in the civil war-torn Middle Eastern nation, former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld told a Michigan audience Tuesday.Rumsfeld spoke in response to a question during a speech at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Museum in Grand Rapids.The 81-year-old served as defense secretary under Ford and President George W. Bush."You either ought to change the regime or you ought to do nothing," Rumsfeld said. "Why would you go in and fire a shot across the bow? All it does is make a splash."What have you achieved? What you've probably achieved is the embarrassment of the United States for being feckless and ineffective. The last thing we ought to be sending out is a signal that there is a red line (about chemical weapons use) and we fired a shot across the bow. ... If you decide that it's in our national interest to do anything, it's to change the regime."Rumsfeld said that if the U.S. defers action until the United Nations gives the green light, it means the U.S. "won't do anything" unless Russian President Vladimir Putin agrees.
"The Chinese and the Russians are supporting the use of chemical weapons" with their opposition to intervention, he said.Rumsfeld dismissed the idea that Obama was obligated to go to Congress before attacking Syria."The debate about whether the president has the authority to use force is silly," he said. "When was the last time war was declared? It was World War II. You can't have 535 members of Congress making decisions that a commander in chief needs to make. You just can't do it. It doesn't work."Earlier, Rumsfeld told MLive.com (http://bit.ly/14h6GyV ) that Obama lost a lot of credibility through indecisiveness in responding to the killing last year of America's Libyan ambassador.A militant attack Sept. 11, 2012, on a diplomatic outpost in Benghazi, Libya, killed U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.
"You can't be persuasive unless you're believable," Rumsfeld said. "To the extent that a leader says things that in a week or two or three turn out to not be the case — if a leader does that they lose credibility.
"It seems to me that what the people in the White House need to do is recognize that they've lost a good deal of credibility and that's harmful. What they need to do is get people in the room to find out what ground truth is and make sure they're standing on a piece of concrete and not mush."

Fox Analyst's Position On War Powers Act Depends On How He Can Attack Obama

Blog ››› ››› MATT GERTZ
Fox News senior judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano is criticizing President Obama for seeking congressional authorization for a military strike on Syria after previously criticizing Obama for not seeking congressional authorization for a military strike on Libya.Obama said he would seek Congressional authorization for a military strike on Syria during a September 1 speech. He stated that he believed the nation's power is rooted "in our example as a government of the people, by the people, and for the people," adding: "[W]hile I believe I have the authority to carry out this military action without specific congressional authorization, I know that the country will be stronger if we take this course, and our actions will be even more effective. We should have this debate, because the issues are too big for business as usual."Napolitano criticized Obama for seeking legislative approval of military action in Syria during a September 3 appearance on Fox & Friends, calling his actions "mystifying legally why the president is asking Congress for authority to do something that it has already given him authority to do," citing the executive power granted under the War Powers Act to use U.S. forces in some circumstances for 90 days without congressional authorization. Napolitano and co-host Steve Doocy agreed this indicated Obama was treating Syria as a political issue.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3rhjKdhDrk
While Napolitano is now criticizing Obama's effort to seek congressional authorization for a military strike, he previously criticized Obama for preparing a military strike without that authorization. In March 2011, when President Obama was considering military action against Libya without seeking congressional authorization, Napolitano warned that Obama could use "a terrible law called the War Powers Act," asking Sen. Mike Lee whether Obama was "planning to do something like that, whether the American people or the Congress wants it or not? Even though the Constitution says only Congress shall declare war?"
From the March 7, 2011, edition of Fox News' Glenn Beck:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kMG8XNqRlU0#t=449
NAPOLITANO: Senator Lee, it's interesting that Senator Paul said that he's reluctant to vote. You know as well as I that under a terrible law called the War Powers Act, the president can commit to us a land war, or an air war, whatever he wants to do, for 90 days and then renew it for another 90 days and there's nothing the Congress can do about it.
Is he planning to do something like that, whether the American people, whether the Congress wants it or not? Even though the Constitution says only Congress shall declare war?


WAR POWERS ACT-http://www.loc.gov/law/help/war-powers.php


Overview


This guide is intended to serve as an introduction to research on the War Powers Resolution, Public Law 93-148, 87 Stat. 555, passed over President Nixon's veto on November 7, 1973. The War Powers Resolution is sometimes referred to as the War Powers Act, its title in the version passed by the Senate. This Joint Resolution is codified in the United States Code ("USC") in Title 50, Chapter 33, Sections 1541-48.The term "Resolution" can be misleading; this law originated as a Joint Resolution and was passed by both Houses of Congress pursuant to the Legislative Process, and has the same legal effect as a Bill which has passed and become a law. For more information on Bills and Joint Resolutions see this explanation of Congressional Forms of Action.The Constitution of the United States divides the war powers of the federal government between the Executive and Legislative branches: the President is the Commander in Chief of the armed forces (Article II, section 2), while Congress has the power to make declarations of war, and to raise and support the armed forces (Article I, section 8). Over time, questions arose as to the extent of the President's authority to deploy U.S. armed forces into hostile situations abroad without a declaration of war or some other form of Congressional approval. Congress passed the War Powers Resolution in the aftermath of the Vietnam War to address these concerns and provide a set of procedures for both the President and Congress to follow in situations where the introduction of U.S. forces abroad could lead to their involvement in armed conflict.Conceptually, the War Powers Resolution can be broken down into several distinct parts. The first part states the policy behind the law, namely to "insure that the collective judgment of both the Congress and the President will apply to the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities," and that the President's powers as Commander in Chief are exercised only pursuant to a declaration of war, specific statutory authorization from Congress, or a national emergency created by an attack upon the United States (50 USC Sec. 1541).

The second part requires the President to consult with Congress before introducing U.S. armed forces into hostilities or situations where hostilities are imminent, and to continue such consultations as long as U.S. armed forces remain in such situations (50 USC Sec. 1542). The third part sets forth reporting requirements that the President must comply with any time he introduces U.S. armed forces into existing or imminent hostilities (50 USC Sec. 1543); section 1543(a)(1) is particularly significant because it can trigger a 60 day time limit on the use of U.S. forces under section 1544(b).

The fourth part of the law concerns Congressional actions and procedures. Of particular interest is Section 1544(b), which requires that U.S. forces be withdrawn from hostilities within 60 days of the time a report is submitted or is required to be submitted under Section 1543(a)(1), unless Congress acts to approve continued military action, or is physically unable to meet as a result of an armed attack upon the United States. Section 1544(c) requires the President to remove U.S. armed forces that are engaged in hostilities "without a declaration of war or specific statutory authorization" at any time if Congress so directs by a Concurrent Resolution (50 USC 1544). Concurrent Resolutions are not laws and are not presented to the President for signature or veto; as a result the procedure contemplated under Section 1544(c) is known as a "legislative veto" and is constitutionally questionable in light of the decision of the United States Supreme Court in INS v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919 (1983). Further sections set forth expedited Congressional procedures for considering proposed legislation to authorize the use of U.S. armed forces, as well as similar procedures regarding proposed legislation to withdraw U.S. forces under Section 1544(c) (50 U.S. 1545-46a).The fifth part of the law sets forth certain definitions and rules to be used when interpreting the War Powers Resolution (50 USC 1547). Finally, the sixth part is a "separability provision" and states that if any part of the law is held (by a court) to be invalid, on its face or as applied to a particular situation, the rest of the law shall not be considered invalid, nor shall its applicability to other situations be affected (50 USC 1548).U.S. Presidents have consistently taken the position that the War Powers Resolution is an unconstitutional infringement upon the power of the executive branch. As a result, the Resolution has been the subject of controversy since its enactment, and is a recurring issue due to the ongoing worldwide commitment of U.S. armed forces. Presidents have submitted a total of over 120 reports to Congress pursuant to the Resolution. Some examples of the Resolution's effect on the deployment of U.S. armed forces include:1975: President Ford submitted a report to Congress as a result of his order to the U.S. armed forces to retake the Mayaguez, a U.S. merchant vessel which had been seized by Cambodia. This report is the only report to have cited Section 4(a)(1) (50 USC Sec. 1543(a)(1)) of the Resolution, triggering the 60-day time limit; however the operation was completed before 60 days had expired.

1981: President Reagan deployed a number of U.S. military advisors to El Salvador but submitted no report to Congress. Members of Congress filed a federal lawsuit in an attempt to force compliance with the Resolution, but the U.S. District Court hearing the suit declined to become involved in what the judge saw as a political question, namely whether U.S. forces were indeed involved in hostilities.

1982-83: President Reagan sent a force of Marines to Lebanon to participate in peacekeeping efforts in that country; while he did submit three reports to Congress under the Resolution, he did not cite Section 4(a)(1), and thus did not trigger the 60 day time limit. Over time the Marines came under increasing enemy fire and there were calls for withdrawal of U.S. forces. Congress, as part of a compromise with the President, passed Public Law 98-119 in October 1983 authorizing U.S. troops to remain in Lebanon for 18 months. This resolution was signed by the President, and was the first time a President had signed legislation invoking the War Powers Resolution.

1990-91: President George H.W. Bush sent several reports to Congress regarding the buildup of forces in Operation Desert Shield. President Bush took the position that he did not need "authority" from Congress to carry out the United Nations resolutions which authorized member states to use "all necessary means" to eject Iraq from Kuwait; however he did ask for Congressional "support" of U.S. operations in the Persian Gulf. Congress passed, and the President signed, Public Law 102-1 authorizing the President to use force against Iraq if the President reported that diplomatic efforts had failed. President Bush did so report, and initiated Operation Desert Storm.

1993-99: President Clinton utilized United States armed forces in various operations, such as air strikes and the deployment of peacekeeping forces, in the former Yugoslavia, especially Bosnia and Kosovo. These operations were pursuant to United Nations Security Council resolutions and were conducted in conjunction with other member states of NATO. During this time the President made a number of reports to Congress "consistent with the War Powers Resolution" regarding the use of U.S. forces, but never cited Section 4(a)(1), and thus did not trigger the 60 day time limit. Opinion in Congress was divided and many legislative measures regarding the use of these forces were defeated without becoming law. Frustrated that Congress was unable to pass legislation challenging the President's actions, Representative Tom Campbell and other Members of the House filed suit in the Federal District Court for the District of Columbia against the President, charging that he had violated the War Powers Resolution, especially since 60 days had elapsed since the start of military operations in Kosovo. The President noted that he considered the War Powers Resolution constitutionally defective. The court ruled in favor of the President, holding that the Members lacked legal standing to bring the suit; this decision was affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. See Campbell v. Clinton, 203 F.3d 19 (D.C. Cir. 2000). The U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal from this decision, in effect letting it stand.

2001: In the wake of the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, Congress passed Public Law 107-40 (PDF), authorizing President George W. Bush to "use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons." For the first time, "organizations and persons" are specified in a Congressional authorization to use force pursuant to the War Powers Resolution, rather than just nations.

2002: Congress authorized President George W. Bush to use force against Iraq, pursuant to the War Powers Resolution, in Public Law 107-243 (PDF).

Constitutional Provisions

1. Constitution of the United States, Article I, Section 8: Gives Congress the power to declare war and raise and support the armed forces. Available online.

2. Constitution, Article II, Section 2: President as Commander in Chief. Available online

Back to Top
Legislation

1. The War Powers Resolution, Pub. L. No. 93-148, 87 Stat. 555 (November 7, 1973). Available online. It is codified in Title 50, Chapter 33, Sections 1541-48 of the United States Code. Available online.

2. Authorization for use of Military Force, Pub. L. No. 107-40, 115 Stat. 224 (September 18, 2001). Available online (PDF).

3. Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-243, 116 Stat. 1498 (October 16, 2002). Available online (PDF).

Judicial Decisions

1. INS v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919 (1983). Available online.

2. Campbell v. Clinton, 203 F.3d 19 (D.C. Cir. 2000). Available online.

RECENT OTHER SYRIAN NEWS
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/america-might-bomb-syria-quick-but-will.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/syria-threatens-surprises-for-western.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/500-syrian-scud-missles-aimed-at-israel.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/hackers-try-to-wipe-israel-off-map.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/iran-zionists-israel-will-burn-i-say-u.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/arab-muslim-countries-scared-if-syria.html 
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/me-and-stockwell-day-fell-virtually.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/france-on-board-with-usa-on-syria.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/update-on-syria-happenings.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/will-obama-attack-today-in-syria-or.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/08/obama-to-get-vote-from-congress-before.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/09/syria-brags-obamas-done-before-he-got.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/09/standstill-in-america-about-syria-till.html 

http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/09/mccain-graham-want-tough-attack-on-assad.html 
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2013/09/60-to-90-day-timeline-for-obama-to-take.html 

Wednesday, September 04, 2013

ROSH-HASHANA DAY 1 AND 2 HAPPENINGS-HAPPY NEW YEAR ISRAEL

KING JESUS IS COMING FOR US ANY TIME NOW. THE RAPTURE. BE PREPARED TO GO.

LAND FOR PEACE (THE FUTURE 7 YEARS OF HELL ON EARTH)

JOEL 3:2
2 I will also gather all nations, and will bring them down into the valley of Jehoshaphat, and will plead with them there for my people(ISRAEL) and for my heritage Israel, whom they have scattered among the nations, and parted my land.(UPROOTED ISRAELIS AND DIVIDED JERUSALEM)(THIS BRINGS ON WW3 BECAUSE JERUSALEM IS DIVIDED,WARNING TO ARABS-MUSLIMS AND THE WORLD).

THE WEEK OF DANIEL 9:27 WE KNOW ITS 7 YRS

Heres the scripture 1 week = 7 yrs Genesis 29:27-29
27 Fulfil her week, and we will give thee this also for the service which thou shalt serve with me yet seven other years.
28 And Jacob did so, and fulfilled her week: and he gave him Rachel his daughter to wife also.
29 And Laban gave to Rachel his daughter Bilhah his handmaid to be her maid.

DANIEL 11:21-23
21 And in his estate shall stand up a vile person, to whom they shall not give the honour of the kingdom: but he shall come in peaceably, and obtain the kingdom by flatteries.
23 And after the league made with him he shall work deceitfully: for he shall come up, and shall become strong with a small people.
24 He shall enter peaceably even upon the fattest places of the province; and he shall do that which his fathers have not done, nor his fathers' fathers; he shall scatter among them the prey, and spoil, and riches: yea, and he shall forecast his devices against the strong holds, even for a time.

DANIEL 9:26-27
26 And after threescore and two weeks(62X7=434 YEARS+7X7=49 YEARS=TOTAL OF 69 WEEKS OR 483 YRS) shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary;(ROMAN LEADERS DESTROYED THE 2ND TEMPLE) and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.(THERE HAS TO BE 70 WEEKS OR 490 YRS TO FUFILL THE VISION AND PROPHECY OF DAN 9:24).(THE NEXT VERSE IS THAT 7 YR WEEK OR (70TH FINAL WEEK).
27 And he ( THE ROMAN,EU PRESIDENT) shall confirm the covenant (PEACE TREATY) with many for one week:(1X7=7 YEARS) and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease,(3 1/2 yrs in TEMPLE ANIMAL SACRIFICES STOPPED) and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

JEREMIAH 6:14
14 They have healed also the hurt of the daughter of my people slightly, saying, Peace, peace; when there is no peace.

JEREMIAH 8:11
11 For they have healed the hurt of the daughter of my people slightly, saying, Peace, peace; when there is no peace.

1 THESSALONIANS 5:3
3 For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape.

ISAIAH 33:8
8  The highways lie waste, the wayfaring man ceaseth: he hath broken the covenant,(7 YR TREATY) he hath despised the cities, he regardeth no man.(THE WORLD LEADER-WAR MONGER CALLS HIMSELF GOD)

ISAIAH 28:14-19 (THIS IS THE 7 YR TREATY COVENANT OF DANIEL 9:27)
14 Wherefore hear the word of the LORD, ye scornful men, that rule this people which is in Jerusalem.
15 Because ye have said, We have made a covenant with death, and with hell are we at agreement; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, it shall not come unto us: for we have made lies our refuge, and under falsehood have we hid ourselves:
16 Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD, Behold, I lay in Zion for a foundation a stone, a tried stone, a precious corner stone, a sure foundation: he that believeth shall not make haste.
17 Judgment also will I lay to the line, and righteousness to the plummet: and the hail shall sweep away the refuge of lies, and the waters shall overflow the hiding place.
18 And your covenant with death shall be disannulled, and your agreement with hell shall not stand; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, then ye shall be trodden down by it.
19 From the time that it goeth forth it shall take you: for morning by morning shall it pass over, by day and by night: and it shall be a vexation only to understand the report.

ITS ON DAY 1 OF ROSH-HASHAN WHENEVER.THAT I BELIEVE THE 7 YEAR FINAL PEACE TREATY WILL BE SIGNED.

Reading for First Day Rosh Hashanah
The Birth of Isaac
Exactly a year after the three angels visited Abraham and Sarah and delivered G-d's promise that a son shall be born to them (as related in Genesis 18), G-d remembered Sarah as He had said, and G-d did to Sarah as He had spoken.Sarah conceived, and bore Abraham a son in his old age, at the set time of which G-d had spoken to him.The boy is named Yitzchak ("will laugh"), because, as Sarah declared, "G-d has made laughter for me, so that all that hear will laugh with me."Abraham circumcised his son Isaac being eight days old, as G-d had commanded him. Abraham was a hundred years old, when his son Isaac was born to him.The Torah then tells of a great feast that Abraham made "on the day that Isaac was weaned."

The Banishment of Hagar and Ishmael
Abraham already had a son, Ishmael, born 14 years earlier to Hagar, the Egyptian maid whom Sarah urged him to marry in her barren years. As had been predicted, Ishmael grows to become "a wild man, his hand against every man, and every man's hand against him." Sarah, fearing Ishmael's negative influence upon her son, urges Abraham to "Banish this maidservant and her son: for the son of this maidservant shall not be heir with my son, with Isaac."Abraham is reluctant to do so until G-d intervenes, telling him: "In all that Sarah says to you, hearken to her voice; for in Isaac shall thy seed be called."Abraham rose up early in the morning, and took bread, and a bottle of water, and gave it to Hagar, putting it on her shoulder, and the child, and sent her away: and she departed, and wandered in the wilderness of Be'er-Sheva.Their water, however, runs out quickly in the desert heat, and soon Ishmael is faint with heat and thirst; Hagar cast the child under one of the shrubs. And she went off...the distance of a bowshot; for she said, "Let me not see the death of the child." And she sat over against him, and lifted up her voice, and wept.And G-d heard the voice of the lad; and the angel of G-d called to Hagar out of heaven, and said to her "What ails you, Hagar? Fear not, for G-d has heard the voice of the lad where he is..."And G-d opened her eyes, and she saw a well of water; and she went, and filled the bottle with water, and gave the lad drink.And G-d was with the lad; and he grew, and dwelt in the wilderness, and became an archer. And he dwelt in the wilderness of Paran: and his mother took him a wife out of the land of Egypt.

The Covenant with Avimelech
Avimelech the king of the Philistines, who had earlier driven Abraham from his country, now comes seeking a covenant of peace with the Hebrew. "G-d is with you in all that you do," says the king, "let us swear to each other that neither of us will show hostility to the other or the other's offspring."Abraham agrees, and gives Avimelech seven sheep as a testimony to the resolution of a past controversy between them over a well that Abraham had dug. The place is thus named Be'er Sheva ("Well of the Oath" and "Well of the Seven").
Abraham establishes an eshel (wayside inn) at Be'er Sheva, where he "called the name of G-d, G-d of the world."
Reading for Second Day of Rosh Hashanah
The Binding of Isaac
And it came to pass after these things, that G-d did test Abraham. And He said to him: "Abraham!"And he said: "Here I am!"And He said: "Please, take your son, your only son, the one whom you love, Isaac; and get thee into the land of Moriah; and offer him there for a burnt offering upon one of the mountains which I will tell thee of."And Abraham rose up early in the morning, and saddled his donkey, and took two of his young men with him, and Isaac his son, and broke up the wood for the burnt offering, and rose up, and went to the place of which G-d had told him.Then on the third day Abraham lifted up his eyes, and saw the place afar off. And Abraham said to his young men: "Stay here with the ass; and I and the lad will go yonder and worship, and come again to you."And Abraham took the wood of the burnt offering, and laid it upon Isaac his son; and he took the fire in his hand, and the knife; and they went both of them together.And Isaac spoke to Abraham his father, and said, "My father!" and he said, "Here I am, my son."And he said: "Behold the fire and the wood: but where is the lamb for a burnt offering?"And Abraham said: "G-d will provide himself a lamb for a burnt offering, my son." And they went both of them together.And they came to the place which G-d had told him of; and Abraham built an altar there, and laid the wood in order, and bound Isaac his son, and laid him on the altar upon the wood.And Abraham stretched out his hand, and took the knife to slay his son.And an angel of G-d called to him out of heaven, and said: "Abraham! Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am!"And he said: "Lay not your hand upon the lad, neither do anything to him: for now I know that you do fear G-d, seeing that you have not withheld your son, your only son, from Me."And Abraham lifted up his eyes, and looked; and behold, behind him a ram caught in the thicket by his horns: and Abraham went and took the ram, and offered him up for a burnt offering in place of his son.And Abraham called the name of that place Adonai-Yireh ("G-d will be revealed"); as it is said to this day: "On the mount G-d will appear."The reading concludes with report of a granddaughter born to Abraham's brother, Nachor, named Rebecca (destined to become Isaac's wife).

ISRAELI COMMENTARY ON THE SCRIPTURES OF ROSH-HASHANA

G-d remembered Sarah (Genesis 21:1)
"Remembrance" is one of the three primary themes of Rosh Hashanah (the other two being "Kingship" and "Shofarot"). For it is the day on which "the remembrance of all of existence comes before You." In the words of the U'nesaneh Tokef prayer:"On this day... You will remember all that was forgotten. You will open the Book of Memory--it will read itself, and everyone's signature is in it... and all mankind will pass before You like sheep. Like a shepherd inspecting his flock, making his sheep pass under his staff, so shall You run by, count, calculate, and consider the soul of all the living; You will apportion the fixed needs of all Your creatures, and inscribe their verdict."On Rosh Hashanah it will be inscribed, and on Yom Kippur it will be sealed: How many shall pass on, and how many shall be born; who will live and who will die; who will die at his predestined time and who before his time; who by water and who by fire, who by sword, who by beast, who by famine, who by thirst, who by storm, who by plague, who by strangulation, and who by stoning; who will rest and who will wander, who will live in harmony and who will be harried; who will enjoy tranquility and who will suffer; who will be impoverished and who will be enriched; who will be degraded and who will be exalted..."

And Sarah said: G-d has made laughter for me, so that all that hear will laugh (yitz'chak) with me (21:6)
The concept of Rosh Hashanah as the day of G-d's "coronation" as king of the universe explains a most puzzling paradox in the nature of the day. On the one hand, Rosh Hashanah is when we stand before the Supreme King and tremulously accept the "yoke of His sovereignty." On the other hand, it is a festival (yom tov), celebrated amidst much feasting and rejoicing--a day on which we are enjoined to "Eat sumptuous foods and drink sweet beverages, and send portions to those for whom nothing is prepared, for the day is holy to our L-rd; do not be distressed, for the joy of the L-rd is your strength" (Nehemiah 8:10).But such is the nature of a coronation: it is an event that combines trepidation and joy, awe and celebration. For true kingship, as opposed to mere rulership, derives from the willful submission of a people to their sovereign. So the coronation of a king includes a display of reverence and awe on the part of the people, conveying their submission to the king; as well as the joy that affirms that their submission is willful and desirous.
(From the Chassidic Masters)

In all that Sarah says to you, hearken to her voice (21:12)
This teaches us that Sarah was superior to Abraham in prophecy.
(Rashi)

And G-d heard the voice of the lad (21:17)
This teaches us that a person's prayer for himself is preferable to others praying for him, and is sooner to be accepted. (For though the verse speaks of Hagar's weeping, it tells us that it was Ishmael's cry which G-d heard).
(Midrash Rabbah; Rashi)

For G-d has heard the voice of the lad where he is (21:17)
The ministering angels hastened to indict him, exclaiming: "Sovereign of the Universe! Would You bring up a well for one who will one day slay Your children with thirst?" "What is he now?" asked G-d. "Righteous," said the angels. Said G-d: "I judge man only as he is at the moment."
(Midrash Rabbah; Rashi)

And his mother took him a wife out of the land of Egypt (21:21)
Said Rabbi Yitzchak: Throw a stick into the air, and it will fall back to its place of origin (the ground). It is written, "And she had a handmaid, an Egyptian, whose name was Hagar" (Genesis 16:1); therefore, "his mother took him a wife out of the land of Egypt."
(Midrash Rabbah)

Abraham established an eshel at Beer Sheva; there he called the name of G-d, G-d of the world (21:33)
When Abraham's guests wished to bless him for his generosity, he would say to them: "Has the food you have eaten been provided by myself? You should thank, praise and bless He who spoke the world into being!"If they refused Abraham would demand payment for the food they had eaten. "How much do I owe you?" they would ask. "A jug of wine is one furlin," Abraham would say; "a pound of meat, one furlin; a loaf of bread, one furlin." When the guest would protest these exorbitant prices, Abraham would counter: "Who supplies you with wine in the middle of the desert? Who supplies you with meat in the desert? Who supplies you with bread in the desert?" When the guest would realize the predicament he was in he would relent and proclaim: "Blessed be the G-d of the world, from whose providence we have eaten."
(Midrash Rabbah; Tosofot Shantz on Sotah 10)
What value, we might ask, was there in such an unwilling proclamation, extracted under duress? Was this not a mere mouthing of words, devoid of any conviction as to the truth of the One G-d or any desire to thank Him for His providence? But Abraham had a vision of humanity which convinced him that every positive deed, word or thought does have value, no matter how "superficial" or "hypocritical" it might seem to a less discerning eye. When Abraham looked at his guests, he did not see pagans and idolaters; he saw creatures of G-d, men and women who had been created in the Divine image and possessed a potential, inherent to the very essence of their being, to recognize their Creator and serve His will.Most often, a kind word and a helping hand will bring to light this inner potential. At times, however, a soul might be so encrusted by negative influences and a corrupted character that a certain degree of "pressure" must be applied to quell its resistance to a G-dly deed. (Of course, any use of such "pressure" must conform to the dictates of G-d's Torah, whose "ways are ways of pleasantness, and all its pathways are peace"--as in the case of Abraham's fully legitimate demand for payment.)
Abraham understood that no human acknowledgment of G-d can ever be "hypocritical." On the contrary: a denial of G-d is the ultimate hypocrisy, for it is at variance with the person's quintessential being. When a creature of G-d proclaims "Blessed be the G-d of the world from whose providence we have eaten," nothing can be more consistent with his or her innermost self.
(From the teachings of the Lubavitcher Rebbe)

And it came to pass after these things, that G-d did test Abraham (22:1)
Said Rabbi Jonathan: A potter does not examine defective vessels, because he cannot give them a single blow without breaking them. What then does he examine? Only the sound vessels, for he will not break them even with many blows. Similarly, the Holy One, blessed be He, tests not the wicked but the righteous.
(Midrash Rabbah)
Isaac and Ishmael were engaged in a controversy. Said Ishmael to Isaac: "I am more beloved to G-d than you, since I was circumcised at the age of thirteen, but you were circumcised as a baby and could not refuse." Isaac retorted: "All that you gave up to G-d was three drops of blood. But lo, I am now thirty-seven years old, yet if G-d desired of me that I be slaughtered, I would not refuse. Said the Holy One, blessed be He: "This is the moment!"
(Midrash Rabbah)
Jewishness is not a matter of historical conscious, outlook, ethics, or even behavior; it is a state of being. This is the deeper significance of the debate between Ishmael and Isaac. When the Jew is circumcised on the eighth day of life, he is completely unaware of the significance of what has occurred. But this "non-experience" is precisely what circumcision means. With circumcision the Jew says: I define my relationship with G-d not by what I think, feel or do, but by the fact of my Jewishness--a fact which equally applies to an infant of eight days and a sage of eighty years.
(From the teachings of the Lubavitcher Rebbe)

And he saddled his donkey (22:3)
This is the very same donkey which Moses Rode to Egypt (cf. Exodus 4:20); and this is the very same donkey upon which the Messiah will arrive (cf. Zechariah 9:9).
(Pirkei d'Rabbi Eliezer, ch. 25)

And he bound Isaac his son (22:9)
Can one bind a man thirty-seven years old without his consent?
But when Abraham made to sacrifice his son Isaac, Isaac said to him: Father, I am a young man and am afraid that my body may tremble through fear of the knife and I will grieve you, whereby the slaughter may be rendered unfit and this will not count as a real sacrifice; therefore bind me very firmly."
(Midrash Rabbah)

And Abraham called the name of that place Adonai-Yireh (22:14)
Shem (the son of Noah) called it Salem, as it is written "And Melchizedek king of Salem" (Genesis 14: 18). Said the Holy One, blessed be He: If I call it Yireh as did Abraham, then Shem, a righteous man, will resent it; while if I call it Salem as did Shem, Abraham, the righteous man, will resent it. Hence I will call it Jerusalem, including both names, Yireh Salem.-(Midrash Rabbah)

GIANT EARTHQUAKES AROUND THE WORLD AT THE SAME TIME THE BIBLE SAYS

KING JESUS IS COMING FOR US ANY TIME NOW. THE RAPTURE. BE PREPARED TO GO.

DEAD ANIMALS

HOSEA 4:1-3
1 Hear the word of the LORD, ye children of Israel: for the LORD hath a controversy with the inhabitants of the land,(EARTH) because there is no truth, nor mercy, nor knowledge of God in the land.
2  By swearing, and lying, and killing, and stealing, and committing adultery, they break out, and blood toucheth blood.
3  Therefore shall the land mourn, and every one that dwelleth therein shall languish, with the beasts of the field, and with the fowls of heaven; yea, the fishes of the sea also shall be taken away.

ZEPHANIAH 1:2-3
2  I will utterly consume all things from off the land, saith the LORD.
3  I will consume man and beast; I will consume the fowls of the heaven, and the fishes of the sea, and the stumblingblocks with the wicked; and I will cut off man from off the land, saith the LORD.

66,000 DEAD FISH BLOCK CHINA RIVER PICTURES
http://photos.mercurynews.com/2013/09/03/photos-over-66000-pounds-of-dead-fish-block-the-fuhe-river-in-china/

EARTHQUAKES

ISAIAH 42:15
15  I will make waste mountains and hills, and dry up all their herbs; and I will make the rivers islands, and I will dry up the pools.

MATTHEW 24:7-8
7 For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places.
8 All these are the beginning of sorrows.

MARK 13:8
8 For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom:(ETHNIC GROUP AGAINST ETHNIC GROUP) and there shall be earthquakes in divers places, and there shall be famines and troubles: these are the beginnings of sorrows.

LUKE 21:11
11 And great earthquakes shall be in divers places,(DIFFERNT PLACES AT THE SAME TIME) and famines, and pestilences; and fearful sights and great signs shall there be from heaven.

1 Day, Magnitude 2.5+ Worldwide

41 earthquakes - DownloadUpdated: 2013-09-04 09:26:30 UTC-04:00Showing event times using Local System Time (UTC-04:00)
  1. 4.8 35km SW of Brooklyn, New Zealand 2013-09-04 08:04:10 UTC-04:00 20.3 km
  2. 4.2 76km SE of Akutan, Alaska 2013-09-04 07:14:18 UTC-04:00 36.5 km
  3. 4.9 83km SE of Akutan, Alaska 2013-09-04 06:41:40 UTC-04:00 10.3 km
  4. 5.0 78km SSW of Unalaska, Alaska 2013-09-04 06:04:06 UTC-04:00 10.7 km
  5. 2.6 37km SSW of Ferndale, California 2013-09-04 05:32:23 UTC-04:00 19.1 km
  6. 5.1 98km SSW of Atka, Alaska 2013-09-04 05:16:28 UTC-04:00 24.3 km
  7. 4.8 11km SE of Sarimatondang, Indonesia 2013-09-04 05:11:57 UTC-04:00 163.9 km
  8. 4.7 89km SSW of Atka, Alaska 2013-09-04 04:16:53 UTC-04:00 28.6 km
  9. 4.3 65km SW of Atka, Alaska 2013-09-04 03:42:26 UTC-04:00 50.8 km
  10. 5.2 80km SSW of Atka, Alaska 2013-09-04 02:54:16 UTC-04:00 41.6 km
  11. 6.2 88km SW of Atka, Alaska 2013-09-04 02:27:05 UTC-04:00 32.8 km
  12. 5.9 87km SSW of Atka, Alaska 2013-09-04 02:16:50 UTC-04:00 25.2 km
  13. 4.7 71km ENE of Ndoi Island, Fiji 2013-09-04 01:47:10 UTC-04:00 469.6 km
  14. 4.3 58km WSW of Jiquilillo, Nicaragua 2013-09-04 01:37:52 UTC-04:00 31.7 km
  15. 5.2 80km SW of Atka, Alaska 2013-09-04 01:15:56 UTC-04:00 44.8 km
  16. 2.5 47km NNW of Searles Valley, California 2013-09-04 00:53:22 UTC-04:00 0.1 km
  17. 2.5 48km NNW of Searles Valley, California 2013-09-04 00:53:18 UTC-04:00 5.8 km
  18. 5.5 78km SSW of Atka, Alaska 2013-09-04 00:16:31 UTC-04:00 34.6 km
  19. 3.3 6km NW of Borrego Springs, California 2013-09-04 00:04:54 UTC-04:00 13.3 km
  20. 3.0 45km SSW of Anchor Point, Alaska 2013-09-03 22:35:51 UTC-04:00 13.7 km
  21. 6.5 77km SSW of Atka, Alaska 2013-09-03 22:32:33 UTC-04:00 39.9 km
  22. 4.5 52km S of Tanaga Volcano, Alaska 2013-09-03 20:43:17 UTC-04:00 49.1 km
  23. 3.4 41km ESE of Sterling, Alaska 2013-09-03 20:26:33 UTC-04:00 0.0 km
  24. 5.9 163km SW of Bella Bella, Canada 2013-09-03 20:23:12 UTC-04:00 9.9 km
  25. 6.5 Izu Islands, Japan region 2013-09-03 20:18:24 UTC-04:00 407.0 km
  26. 5.3 38km E of Sarangani, Philippines 2013-09-03 19:46:55 UTC-04:00 137.4 km
  27. 3.4 80km E of Old Iliamna, Alaska 2013-09-03 19:40:42 UTC-04:00 135.6 km
  28. 4.6 260km S of Sidorukun, Indonesia 2013-09-03 19:28:25 UTC-04:00 10.2 km
  29. 4.2 179km WSW of Bella Bella, Canada 2013-09-03 19:07:08 UTC-04:00 10.0 km
  30. 5.0 188km SW of Bella Bella, Canada 2013-09-03 18:29:32 UTC-04:00 9.8 km
  31. 4.3 30km WNW of Putian, China 2013-09-03 18:23:27 UTC-04:00 15.4 km
  32. 4.8 183km SW of Bella Bella, Canada 2013-09-03 17:25:18 UTC-04:00 10.2 km
  33. 4.6 181km SW of Bella Bella, Canada 2013-09-03 17:05:58 UTC-04:00 10.5 km
  34. 6.0 191km WSW of Bella Bella, Canada 2013-09-03 16:19:06 UTC-04:00 1.0 km
  35. 4.4 33km S of Npongge, Indonesia 2013-09-03 15:10:22 UTC-04:00 116.0 km
  36. 4.8 237km W of Hihifo, Tonga 2013-09-03 15:01:12 UTC-04:00 327.2 km
  37. 2.9 41km N of Culebra, Puerto Rico 2013-09-03 14:51:43 UTC-04:00 65.0 km
  38. 4.4 132km SSE of Putre, Chile 2013-09-03 13:48:10 UTC-04:00 129.1 km
  39. 4.6 138km SSW of Bambanglipuro, Indonesia 2013-09-03 13:06:43 UTC-04:00 41.1 km
  40. 4.9 Ascension Island region 2013-09-03 10:41:52 UTC-04:00 10.0 km
  41. 4.8 12km ENE of Benzilan, China 2013-09-03 10:32:39 UTC-04:00 31.2 km

ALLTIME