AZT KILLER-THE BEGGING OF THE DEATH KILL SHOT AND PILLS.

JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.GET SAVED NOW- CALL ON JESUS TODAY.THE ONLY SAVIOR OF THE WHOLE EARTH - NO OTHER. 1 COR 15:23-JESUS THE FIRST FRUITS-CHRISTIANS RAPTURED TO JESUS-FIRST FRUITS OF THE SPIRIT-23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.ROMANS 8:23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.(THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE)

  AZT KILLER-THE BEGGING OF THE DEATH KILL SHOT AND PILLS.

DISEASES-ANIMAL TO HUMAN ( 500 million Dead )

REVELATION 6:7-8
7 And when he had opened the fourth seal, I heard the voice of the fourth beast say, Come and see.
8 And I looked, and behold a pale horse:(CHLORES GREEN) and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth,(2 billion) of (8 billion) to kill with sword,(WEAPONS)(500 million) and with hunger,(FAMINE)(500 million) and with death,(INCURABLE DISEASES)(500 million) and with the beasts of the earth.(ANIMAL TO HUMAN DISEASE)(500 million).

DRUG PUSHERS AND ADDICTS

1 PET 5:8
8 Be sober,(NOT DRUGED UP OR ALCOHOLICED) be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour:

REVELATION 18:23
23 And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries (DRUGS) were all nations deceived.

REVELATION 9:21 (RAGE OF THE LAST DAYS AGE SATAN WORSHIP AND DRUG SELLING AND JUNKIES)(THEY REFUSE TO REPENT OF THESE SINS)
21 Neither repented they of their murders,(KILLING) nor of their sorceries (DRUG ADDICTS AND DRUG PUSHERS), nor of their fornication,(SEX OUTSIDE MARRIAGE OR PROSTITUTION FOR MONEY) nor of their thefts.(STEALING)

WHO MAY 2024 SOVERIGNTY STEALING CONTROL
https://apps.who.int/gb/inb/pdf_files/inb4/A_INB4_3-en.pdf
https://apps.who.int/gb/inb/pdf_files/inb5/A_INB5_6-en.pdf

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director general of WHO, at a press conference in Geneva.World Health Organization-Global pandemic agreement at risk of falling apart, WHO warns-The accord, aimed at preventing another health catastrophe, is losing momentum due to ‘lies and conspiracy theories’AFP in Geneva-Mon 22 Jan 2024 20.02 GMT

Plans for a global pandemic preparedness agreement risk falling apart amid wrangling and disinformation, according to the chief of the World Health Organization, who has warned that future generations “may not forgive us”.Shaken by the Covid-19 pandemic, the WHO’s 194 member states decided more than two years ago to start negotiating an international accord aimed at ensuring countries are better equipped to deal with the next health catastrophe, or to prevent it altogether.The plan was to seal the agreement at the 2024 World Health Assembly, the WHO’s decision-making body, which convenes on 27 May.However, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the WHO’s director-general, said the momentum had been slowed down by entrenched positions and “a torrent of fake news, lies, and conspiracy theories”.He warned that if nobody was prepared to seize the initiative or give ground, the whole project risked going nowhere.Tedros told the WHO’s executive board in Geneva on Monday: “Time is very short. And there are several outstanding issues that remain to be resolved.”Failure to strike an agreement would be “a missed opportunity for which future generations may not forgive us”, he said.Tedros said all countries needed the capacity to detect and share pathogens presenting a risk, and timely access to tests, treatments and vaccines.He called for a “strong agreement that will help to protect our children and grandchildren from future pandemics”.Tedros said claims that the accord would cede sovereignty to the WHO or give it the power to impose lockdowns and vaccine mandates were “completely false”.“We cannot allow this historic agreement, this milestone in global health, to be sabotaged.”WHO member states decided in December 2021 to create a new international instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response, aimed at ensuring the flaws that turned Covid-19 into a global crisis could never happen again.The WHO emergencies director, Michael Ryan, reminded countries how the pandemic “ripped apart our social, economic and political systems and became a multi-trillion dollar problem”.In the midst of major geopolitical conflicts, “this is one thing the world agrees on”, he said.Roland Driece, who is co-chairing the negotiations, said the project had condensed a seven-year process into two years.He said the accord should be ambitious, innovative and with clear commitments.On the disagreements, he said European countries wanted more money invested in pandemic prevention, while Africa wanted the knowledge and financing to make that work, plus proper access to pandemic “countermeasures” such as vaccines and treatments.He said there were two sessions of two weeks left to do an “extreme” amount of work.Parallel negotiations are also going on to reform the international health regulations (IHR), which many countries felt had been found badly wanting.Under these, Tedros declared Covid-19 a public health emergency of international concern on 30 January 2020 – the highest level of alert available under the regulations.boy in front of a mural about covid-But it was not until March 2020 when he described the worsening situation as a pandemic – a word that does not exist in the IHR vocabulary – that the world jolted into action, by which time the virus was already widespread.Tedros declared an end to the international emergency in May 2023.Ashley Bloomfield, the chief executive of New Zealand’s health ministry during the pandemic, is co-chairing the IHR negotiations.Like Tedros, he criticised a “coordinated and sophisticated campaign” of misinformation and disinformation attempting to undermine the process.He said there were 300 proposed amendments to plough through during the talks.Well, 2023 didn’t exactly go to plan, did it?Here in the UK, the prime minister, Rishi Sunak, had promised us a government of stability and competence – not forgetting professionalism, integrity and accountability – after the rollercoaster ride of Boris Johnson and Liz Truss. Remember Liz? These days she seems like a long forgotten comedy act. Instead, Sunak took us even further through the looking-glass into the Conservative psychodrama. Elsewhere, the picture has been no better. In the US, Donald Trump is now many people’s favourite to become president again. In Ukraine, the war has dragged on with no end in sight. The danger of the rest of the world getting battle fatigue and losing interest all too apparent. Then there is the war in the Middle East and not forgetting the climate crisis …But a new year brings new hope. There are elections in many countries, including the UK and the US. We have to believe in change. That something better is possible. The Guardian will continue to cover events from all over the world and our reporting now feels especially important. But running a news gathering organisation doesn’t come cheap. So this year, I am asking you – if you can afford it – to give money. Well, not to me personally – though you can if you like – but to the Guardian. The average monthly support in Canada is around CA$4, however much you give, all that matters is you’re choosing to support open, independent journalism.With your help, we can make our journalism free to everyone. You won’t ever find any of our news reports or comment pieces tucked away behind a paywall. We couldn’t do this without you. Unlike our politicians, when we say we are in this together we mean it.Happy new year! John Crace-Guardian columnist

WHO ‘Pandemic Treaty’ Draft Reaffirms Nations’ Sovereignty to Dictate Health Policy-By Catalina Jaramillo-Posted on March 2, 2023-SciCheck Digest-Members of the World Health Organization are in the process of developing a new agreement to prevent, prepare for and respond to pandemics. A preliminary draft presented in February reaffirms nations’ sovereign right to make their own health policies during global pandemics, contrary to false claims online.

An intergovernmental negotiating body formed by member states of the World Health Organization is gathering this week to continue the discussions on a new pandemic-related agreement.WHO members acknowledged the need for what the organization called “a new international treaty for pandemic preparedness and response” in 2021, although whether the agreement will formally be a treaty, which requires approval by the Senate, remains to be seen. In a preliminary draft presented by the WHO on Feb. 1, members recognized the “catastrophic failure of the international community in showing solidarity and equity in response to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic.” The 32-page draft, also known as the “Zero Draft,” proposes mechanisms to prevent and prepare for future pandemics, while ensuring a better coordinated response and equal access to vaccines, treatments, and diagnostics. The draft, which is a preliminary version to start negotiations, explicitly reaffirms each nation’s sovereign right “in addressing public health matters” and will be discussed for over a year. A first draft is expected by June.“This is a once-in-a-generation chance to fix some of the big weaknesses that we saw during COVID-19,” Suerie Moon, co-director of the Global Health Centre at the Geneva Graduate Institute in Switzerland, told Nature. It could “make a tremendous difference for the next pandemic,” she added. As we explained in 2022, the WHO has no authority to dictate U.S. health policy or to interfere in any nation’s sovereignty. Neither the accord nor amendments proposed to the legally binding agreement that defines countries rights and obligations during health emergencies, known as the International Health Regulations, would give the WHO control over how the U.S. governs domestic health policies.Yet, once again, conservatives are falsely claiming the agreement will do exactly that, while also giving the wrong impression that it is about to be ratified. A widely shared article published in the Epoch Times, a conservative media outlet owned by a Chinese religious group, falsely claims the Biden administration “is preparing to sign up” the U.S. to an accord that “would give the Geneva-based United Nations health agency the authority to dictate America’s policies during a pandemic.”The Gateway Pundit, another conservative news site, takes the Epoch Times’s article further in a post titled: “END OF AMERICAN SOVEREIGNTY: Biden Regime Negotiates ‘Legally Binding’ Deal To Give Chinese-Backed World Health Organization Full Authority Over US Pandemic Policies – No Senate Approval Needed.”The false allegations are also spreading in social media. According to an incorrect Instagram post, “194 countries, all of the member states of the U.N., would give up their sovereignty to the World Health Organization over healthcare,” which is what former Republican congresswoman Michele Bachmann said during a conservative Christian show that aired on Feb. 20. And a viral video posted on YouTube falsely claims: “BREAKING: US To Sign Over Sovereignty To W.H.O.”Lawrence O. Gostin, a global health law professor at Georgetown University, told us all of these claims are “utterly untrue and unfounded.”Gostin, who is on the IHR review committee and is involved in the drafting of the agreement, told us the WHO can provide guidance, give recommendations and technical advice to member nations. But countries, he said, retain “all of their sovereign right to make their own domestic health policies, ranging from treatment to mass mandates and lockdowns and everything in between.” In addition, the agreement is far from ratification. The intergovernmental negotiating body is currently meeting from Feb. 27 to March 3 to discuss the Zero Draft for the first time. Experts have said it is highly likely the draft will go through numerous modifications before reaching its final version. The goal is to present a final draft to the World Health Assembly in May 2024.The third meeting of the intergovernmental negotiating body at the World Health Organization headquarters in Geneva on Dec. 5, 2022. Photo by Christopher Black/WHO.Gostin told us in an interview that there is no indication right now that the U.S. would even sign it. And he added that it would probably need to be approved by the Senate. A spokesperson for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services confirmed the claims spreading online are baseless. “It is false to claim that the World Health Organization has now, or will have by virtue of these activities, any authority to direct U.S. health policy or national health emergency response actions,” HHS said in a statement, adding that “actions at the national level will remain reserved to sovereign states, including the United States.”Although the legal nature of the accord has not been decided yet, the Zero Draft stipulates that it “should be legally binding and contain both legally binding as well as non-legally binding elements.” But again, that doesn’t mean member states won’t be able to govern themselves.The draft, which has 38 articles and eight chapters, starts by “[r]eaffirming the principle of sovereignty of States Parties in addressing public health matters, notably pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and health systems recovery,” (emphasis is in the draft text). Sovereignty is also defined as one of its guiding principles and rights.“States have, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and the principles of international law, the sovereign right to determine and manage their approach to public health, notably pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems, pursuant to their own policies and legislation, provided that activities within their jurisdiction or control do not cause damage to their peoples and other countries. Sovereignty also covers the rights of States over their biological resources,” reads Article 4 of the Zero Draft. The text, as presented now, establishes what members “should,” “shall,” or are “encouraged” to do in the case of a health emergency. That is the norm for any international treaty, Gostin told us. The mandates, he said, have to do with international obligations, such as reporting of outbreaks, but not with domestic policies. And there are no enforcement mechanisms that would allow the WHO to keep member nations accountable — which is why critics have said the rules lack teeth. “The precursor to this draft, the conceptual zero draft, provides important ideas, including about equity, intellectual property rights, and benefit sharing. However, it contains little on holding countries accountable for the obligations they sign up to, suggesting instead that the governing body of the accord should agree to accountability measures after the accord is implemented,” health policy analysts wrote in a letter published in the Lancet. Emphasis on Equity, Cooperation-One of the main focuses of the Zero Draft is a more equitable distribution of pandemic-related products such as vaccines, therapeutics and diagnostics.It proposes creating a WHO Global Pandemic Supply Chain and Logistics Network in response of a need for a more “adequate, equitable, transparent, robust, agile, effective and diverse global supply chain and logistics network.”The network would, for example, determine the demand and build a reliable supply of pandemic-related products, as well as develop ways to ensure an equitable distribution. Among other things, the draft encourages nations to promote and incentivize transfer of technology and know-how for production of these products to “capable manufacturers” in developing countries. During a pandemic, measures include supporting temporary waivers of intellectual property rights to accelerate or scale up the production of products, such as vaccines. And to encourage holders of patents, especially manufacturers with public funding, to waive payments of royalties. The preliminary draft also states that members “shall establish” a global compensation mechanism for injuries resulting from vaccines. In addition, the Zero Draft proposes creating a WHO Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing System, a “multilateral, fair, equitable and timely system” for sharing of pathogens and genomic sequences in a “rapid, systematic and timely manner.” The benefits of this access should be shared, according to the draft. One of the options of doing that would be to give the WHO “real-time access” to 20% of the production of pandemic-related products so that it can distribute it to poorer countries — 10% of them as a donation and the other 10% at affordable prices.Some of the other chapters propose measures for strengthening and sustaining health systems, particularly in developing countries, and to promote coordination, collaboration and cooperation. Article 17, for example, stipulates that member nations should strengthen pandemic and public health literacy and “tackle false, misleading, misinformation or disinformation.” All of these measures will be discussed during the fourth meeting of the intergovernmental negotiating body. At the opening session on Feb. 27, Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the WHO director-general, said that although there are divisions on some issues, negotiations should focus on addressing the gaps highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic. “This pandemic accord should have all the lessons that we have learned from this pandemic. Because the key indicator should be that we should not repeat the same mistake again,” he said in his opening remarks, adding that to repeat them would “be unforgivable.”Editor’s note: SciCheck’s articles providing accurate health information and correcting health misinformation are made possible by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The foundation has no control over FactCheck.org’s editorial decisions, and the views expressed in our articles do not necessarily reflect the views of the foundation.Sources-“Global leaders unite in urgent call for international pandemic treaty.” WHO. Press release. 30 Mar 2021.World Health Assembly agrees to launch process to develop historic global accord on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.” WHO. Press release. 1 dec 2021. Rigby, Jennifer, and Gabrielle Tétrault-Farber. “Draft WHO pandemic deal pushes for equity to avoid COVID ‘failure’ repeat.” Reuters. 2 Feb 2023. “Zero draft of the WHO CA+ for the consideration of the Intergovernmental  Negotiating Body at its fourth meeting.” WHO. 1 Feb 2023.Lei Ravelo, Jenny. “Pandemic treaty zero draft wins NGO approval, compliance will be key.” Devex. 2 Feb 2023. Mallapaty, Smriti. “What the WHO’s new treaty could mean for the next pandemic.” Nature. 7 Feb 2023.
Jaramillo, Catalina. “‘WHO Has No Authority to Dictate U.S. Health Policy.’’ FactCheck.org. 25 May 2023. International Health Regulations. WHO website. Accessed 28 Feb 2023. Tolentino, Jia. “Stepping Into the Uncanny, Unsettling World of Shen Yun.” The New Yorker. 19 Mar 2019. Gostin, Lawrence O. Phone interview with FactCheck.org. 23 Feb 2023. Intergovernmental Negotiating Body. WHO website. Accessed 1 Mar 2023. Hanbali, Layth, et al. “Independent monitoring for the pandemic accord: a non-negotiable provision.” The Lancet. 31 Jan 2023. Imparato, Sergio, and Sarosh Nagar. ‘The WHO’s new pandemic treaty is good for the world — and the U.S.” Stat. 20 Jan 2023. Friedman, Eric A., et al. “Pandemic Treaty: The Conceptual Zero Draft.” O’Neill Insititue for National & Global Health. Georgetown Law. 5 Dec 2022.

ANTHONY FAUCCI MURDERS 250K GAYS WITH AZT
An Open Letter to Dr. Anthony Fauci-"You are responsible for all government funded AIDS treatment research. In the name of right, you make decisions that cost the lives of others. I call the decisions you are making acts of murder."Larry Kramer "An Open Letter to Dr. Anthony Fauci"San Francisco Examiner, June 26, 1988

Anthony Fauci, you are a murderer and should not be the guest of honor at any event that reflects on the past decade of the AIDS crisis. Your refusal to hear the screams of AIDS activists early in the crisis resulted in the deaths of thousands of Queers. Your present inaction is causing today's increase in HIV infection outside of the Queer community. We are outraged that Project Inform, an organization that supposedly works on behalf of the infected community, would insult us by bringing you to our city. You can't hide the fact that you are nothing but a despicable Reagan-era holdover and drug company mouthpiece. With 270,000 dead from AIDS and millions more infected with HIV, you should not be honored at a dinner. You should be put before a firing squad.Clinical trials: government sanctioned mass murder of PWAs-Anthony Fauci, you are a murderer because you oversee government sponsored clinical trials that test and retest combinations of immunosuppressive, toxic therapies that kill people with HIV. The majority of U.S. clinical trials involve worthless antivirals like AZT combined with some other drug (generally another toxic antiviral). What these tests have proven is that you are able to piss away billions of dollars testing dangerous compounds that DO NOTHING to improve the quality of life, to stop opportunistic infections or to extend survival for people with HIV. AZT, 3TC, ddI, ddC, d4T and the current crop of protease inhibitors are nothing but poison. Ten years of the plague has shown us that trying to kill the virus kills people with AIDS, and you, Dr. Fauci, know it.How long will it take you to start focusing on the immune system, how to boost it and how to prevent the opportunistic infections that are killing people with AIDS? Even you admit that "the immune response against HIV is extremely powerful and is clearly more effective than any of the therapeutic approaches currently available in controlling virus replication." Still , you give your blessing to clinical trials of highly profitable toxins that destroy PWAs' already compromised immune systems.CD4s and viral load: a marketing exec's wet dream-Anthony Fauci, you are a liar because you have known for years that CD4 counts are a travesty of a surrogate marker that, through drug company coercion, have been elevated to the status of "a standard." Now that everyone else knows it too, you and your corporate drug company cronies are urging researchers to foist another useless marker, peripheral blood viral load counts, on our frightened, desperate community. Peripheral blood viral load fluctuates in blood circulation and offers virtually no indication of the health or disease progression in HIV+ people. According to a recent article in the April 1995 issue of Lancet concerning viral replication, "the principle that virus suppression will produce a major clinical benefit must remain an article of faith." Information like that isn't stopping doctors of death like Marcus Conant from insisting that "patients should be treated earlier with combination therapy, and we should be using markers such as PCR and branched DNA to measure viral load as surrogate markers in clinical trials."Your scheme isn't too difficult to figure out; promote another invalid surrogate marker that has no relation to health or life expectancy of PWAs; develop a test that costs $200-$300 to measure this invalid marker; encourage the creation of more deadly drugs that effect this invalid marker; and then compare the pathetic results you get from these deadly drugs to the more pathetic results you got from AZT and other nukes. In the eyes of the
government everybody wins. Companies that sell drugs and market tests get rich and PWAs who sacrifice their bodies in your trials of death are eliminated from the face of the earth.The fact that your clinical trials aren't meant to save our lives is no secret. A December 1994 BETA article "A Remarkable Combination: AZT plus 3TC"reports that the Phase II/III studies of these drugs were "designed to evaluate the effect of the combination on laboratory markers of HIV disease progression, such as viral load and CD4 counts, not critical endpoints, such as opportunistic infections and survival."AIDS activists from ACT UP San Francisco and DNCB Now! have been screaming for over a year that HIV+ people need to activate their cell mediated immunity and raise their CD8 counts. These activists were invited to the NIH to present a forum and share their knowledge and experience with researchers.Finally some researchers are coming around and hearing our voices. Doctors like Susan Buchbinder who in the August 1994 issue of AIDS stated that "elevated levels of CD8 cells in healthy long-term HIV+ individuals suggest that these cells play an important role in delaying disease progression."Because of your 1995 Annual Review of Immunology article we know that you know this, Dr. Fauci, but still you prattle on about those CD4s that tell us nothing at all.Selling out: from "Murderer" to "Tony"One thing that 10 years of the plague has taught us is how easily people and organizations can be bought off. You are one of those people, Dr. Fauci.Project Inform is one of those organizations. During this time of crisis you are complacent; part of a government bureaucracy that values thriving pharmaceutical company entrepreneurism over the health of people with HIV. You are a pill-pushing pimp that cooperates with drug companies in forcing dangerous concoctions down the throats of a desperate community that is brainwashed into believing that taking a pill, any pill, will help them. AIDS drugs are not sold to help people, they are sold to make a profit. The situation is so out of control that drug companies now create and sell drugs like Marinol, a synthetic derivative of the natural compound marijuana.The conflict of interest, so apparent between you and the pharmaceutical corporations, has now been embraced by those in the AIDS community who claim that they are leaders. In their present state, organizations like Project Inform, San Francisco AIDS Foundation, and ACT UP Golden Gate are all so embroiled in conflict of interest that they must be viewed as enemies by PWAs. Project Inform is still pushing AZT. San Francisco AIDS Foundation's BETA reads like a promo piece for Glaxo. And many of today's so-called AIDS activists are nothing more than public relations representatives whose job it is to create a demand for the latest overpriced cure du jour. In the meantime, grassroots efforts like the AIDS Cure Act are assailed by these sellout AIDS organizations that have no desire to ever see a cure.Ten years of hope? F- that. Try a decade of death and greed. Go back to Washington you bastard.Description:Letter to Anthony Fauci condemning the way he has dealt with the AIDS epidemic and its sufferers.Creators / Group:Act Up San Francisco-Date:1988-06-26

The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security hosted the Clade X pandemic tabletop exercise on May 15, 2018, in Washington, DC. The purpose of the exercise was to illustrate high-level strategic decisions and policies that the United States and the world will need to pursue in order to prevent a pandemic or diminish its consequences should prevention fail.

About Clade X-Clade X was a day-long pandemic tabletop exercise that simulated a series of National Security Council–convened meetings of 10 US government leaders, played by individuals prominent in the fields of national security or epidemic response.Drawing from actual events, Clade X identified important policy issues and preparedness challenges that could be solved with sufficient political will and attention. These issues were designed in a narrative to engage and educate the participants and the audience.Lessons learned were distilled and shared broadly following the exercise.Purpose-Faced with a rapidly evolving biological threat landscape, government leaders in the United States and abroad are eager to identify long-term policy commitments that will strengthen preparedness and mitigate risk. Clade X illustrated high-level strategic decisions and policies needed to prevent a severe pandemic or diminish its consequences should prevention fail.Similar to findings from the Center's two previous exercises, Dark Winter and Atlantic Storm, key takeaways from Clade X will educate senior leaders at the highest level of the US government, as well as members of the global policy and preparedness community and the general public. This is distinct from many other forms of tabletop exercises that test protocols or technical policies of a specific organization.In addition, exercises like Clade X are a particularly effective way to help policymakers gain a fuller understanding of the urgent challenges they could face in a dynamic, real-world crisis.Clade X logo-When/where-Tuesday, May 15, 2018-9 a.m. - 5 p.m.Mandarin Oriental Hotel-Washington, DC-Audience-An invitation-only audience of nearly 150 people attended the exercise, and a livestream of the event on Facebook was available to everyone.Exercise team Eric Toner, MD, is the exercise team lead.Exercise team members are Tom Inglesby, MD; Anita Cicero, JD; Randy Larsen, USAF (retired); Crystal Watson, DrPH, MPH; Gigi Kwik Gronvall, PhD; Jennifer Nuzzo, DrPH, SM; Monica Schoch-Spana, PhD; Tara Kirk Sell, PhD, MA; Amesh Adalja, MD; Caitlin Rivers, PhD, MPH; Christopher Hurtado, MHS; Diane Meyer, RN, MPH; Sanjana Ravi, MPH; Matthew Shearer, MPH; Michael Snyder, MALD; Matthew Watson; Richard E. Waldhorn, MD; Jackie Fox; Andrea Lapp; Nick Alexopulos, MBA; and Julia Cizek.Clade X is supported by funding from the Open Philanthropy Project

DISEASE X IS PART HIV, PART XMRV AND PART SARS.

JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.GET SAVED NOW- CALL ON JESUS TODAY.THE ONLY SAVIOR OF THE WHOLE EARTH - NO OTHER. 1 COR 15:23-JESUS THE FIRST FRUITS-CHRISTIANS RAPTURED TO JESUS-FIRST FRUITS OF THE SPIRIT-23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.ROMANS 8:23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.(THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE)

 DISEASE X IS PART HIV, PART XMRV AND PART SARS. COVID AND EVERY OTHER LAB MADE DISEASE IS MADE OF THESE.COMING ON US.

TETROS SAYS IN MAY 2024. THE WORLD MUST HAVE THE DISEASE X SOLUTION.

JUDY MIKOVITS DISEASE X
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZYe3EepGdbPW/

IN 2010 FAUCCI AND MASS MURDER CREWS STARTED COMING AGAINST DR JUDY.

Detection of an Infectious Retrovirus, XMRV, in Blood Cells of Patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome-Vincent C. Lombardi, Francis W. Ruscetti, Jaydip Das Gupta, Max A. Pfost, Kathryn S. Hagen, Daniel L. Peterson, Sandra K. Ruscetti, Rachel K. Bagni, Cari Petrow-Sadowski, [...] , and Judy A. Mikovits +3 authors Authors Info & Affiliations-Science-8 Oct 2009-Vol 326, Issue 5952-pp. 585-589-DOI: 10.1126/science.1179052729407-

Viral Link to Chronic Fatigue-Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a complex and debilitating disorder that is often linked to immune system dysfunction but whose cause(s) remain mysterious. Lombardi et al. (p. 585, published online 8 October; see the Perspective by Coffin and Stoye) now present a tantalizing new lead. In blood samples from 101 patients with well-documented CFS, over two-thirds (68) contained DNA from a recently described human gammaretrovirus, xenotropic murine leukemia virus–related virus (XMRV), which possesses sequence similarity to a murine leukemia virus. Cell culture assays confirmed that XMRV derived from CFS patient plasma and from T and B lymphocytes was infectious. Although the correlation with CFS is striking, whether the virus plays a causal role in the disorder remains to be determined. Interestingly, nearly 4% of the 218 healthy donors tested were positive for XMRV, which suggests that this virus—whose pathogenic potential is unknown—may be present in a significant proportion of the general population.Abstract-Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a debilitating disease of unknown etiology that is estimated to affect 17 million people worldwide. Studying peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from CFS patients, we identified DNA from a human gammaretrovirus, xenotropic murine leukemia virus–related virus (XMRV), in 68 of 101 patients (67%) as compared to 8 of 218 (3.7%) healthy controls. Cell culture experiments revealed that patient-derived XMRV is infectious and that both cell-associated and cell-free transmission of the virus are possible. Secondary viral infections were established in uninfected primary lymphocytes and indicator cell lines after their exposure to activated PBMCs, B cells, T cells, or plasma derived from CFS patients. These findings raise the possibility that XMRV may be a contributing factor in the pathogenesis of CFS.

Response to Comments on “Detection of an Infectious Retrovirus, XMRV, in Blood Cells of Patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome”Judy A. Mikovits and Francis W. RuscettiAuthors Info & Affiliations-Science-14 May 2010-Vol 328, Issue 5980-p. 825-DOI: 10.1126/science.1184548-168

Abstract
We reported the detection of the human gammaretrovirus XMRV in 67% of 101 patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and in 3.7% of 218 healthy controls, but we did not claim that XMRV causes CFS. Here, we explain why the criticisms of Sudlow et al., Lloyd et al., and van der Meer et al. regarding the selection of patients and controls in our study are unwarranted.Our study (1) documented the presence of a recently discovered human retrovirus, XMRV, in a high proportion of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) in comparison with healthy controls. Sudlow et al. (2), Lloyd et al. (3), and van der Meer et al. (4) raise concerns about the cases and controls described in our study and thus the validity of our results. First, we wish to emphasize that our study was not intended to be a detailed clinical description of CFS or an epidemiological study that would relate particular symptoms, demographics, duration, pattern of onset, and the like to the presence or viral load of XMRV. The study was not, nor was it designed to be, a case-control study as Sudlow et al. (2) imply, for it was the first demonstration of the replication and production of infectious XMRV in human blood cells. The fact that a number of the patients tested were from regions of CFS outbreaks does not invalidate the clinical diagnosis. We hope that our report will stimulate the performance of many case-control studies that use appropriate virus detection. We certainly recognize that such studies will be required to determine what role XMRV plays in the pathogenesis of CFS.Samples included in our study (1) were from CFS patients who fulfilled both the Fukuda criteria and the Canadian Consensus Criteria (CCC), regardless of severity. We regret that a sentence in the original supporting online material in (1) implied that immunological abnormalities were part of the CFS diagnosis; indeed, while many such patients do exhibit such abnormalities (5, 6), they were not required for diagnosis. All patients that met Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and CCC criteria were accepted; none were excluded. Patient samples were obtained from 2006 to 2009 and stored in the Whittemore Peterson Institute (WPI) repository. We did not state in Lisbon (7) or elsewhere that the samples analyzed in (1) were only from patients from documented outbreaks of CFS, nor did we state that the 101 patients described in (1) exhibited all the immunological abnormalities described in our Lisbon conference presentation. In fact, only 25 samples in (1) came from patients identified during the 1984 to 1988 CFS outbreak in Incline Village, Nevada. The remaining 76 samples included patients with sporadic cases from 12 U.S. states and Canada, including California, New York, North Carolina, Wisconsin, Michigan, Oregon, New Mexico, New Jersey, North Dakota, Texas, and Florida. Patients in the study were 67% female, reflecting the reported gender incidence of CFS, with an age distribution of 19 to 75 years of age (mean of 55). The healthy control population, which was similar in age and gender to the patients, was composed of healthy people who visited doctors’ offices in the western United States between 2006 and 2008. The great majority, although not all, of the patients analyzed were matched in geographic location with controls. As this was not an epidemiological case-control study, we did not attempt to discern where the patients believed they contracted CFS; at the time of sample collection, some were undoubtedly living in an area different from the location where they first became ill.The information we provide here and in the accompanying Supporting Online Material (8) should lay to rest any concerns about “bias” or “confounding.” Again, the primary aim of the work described in (1) was not to characterize this clinical condition or to prove a cause for CFS but to demonstrate the existence of an infectious gammaretrovirus in patients who had been diagnosed with CFS. We achieved our goal using four different experimental strategies. The original description of HTLV-1 and HIV-1 involved only one or two patients (9–12), whereas we detected XMRV in 75 individuals.We did not state that our study (1) proves the cause of CFS. A large number of infectious and noninfectious agents have been implicated in CFS, and it is that fact that makes the puzzle of CFS all the more difficult to solve. At no time have we wished to raise false hopes among a group of patients who, in general, have not been treated well by the medical research community. We are aware that many different pathogens have previously been reported to be associated with CFS but have not been proven to be causal.We further note that no cytokine profiles were presented in (1), nor did we state that abnormal cytokine levels, altered natural killer cell activity, or particular RNase L profiles were a requirement for inclusion in the study. Unpublished comments made during a medical conference (7) exploring hypothetical connections with immune system defects, viral reactivation, and malignancies should not be used to judge the merits of the science in the published paper. Regarding the concern raised by Sudlow et al. (2) about potential “expectation bias,” we point out that the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the Cleveland Clinic, whose scientists independently performed experiments and coauthored (1), were certainly not “established” as laboratories for the purpose of studying CFS. All samples were blinded, as mandated by the NCI and WPI institutional review board approvals. All experimental procedures were done by the same personnel, in the same physical laboratory space, under identical protocols. Investigators at NCI received 100 samples from individuals without knowing their health status; furthermore, the samples were sent to NCI directly without passing through the WPI laboratory space. Laboratory workers at the NCI and the WPI who performed the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and immunological studies used coded, blinded samples that did not reveal the CFS status of the individuals. The WPI has examined all 218 control and 101 patient samples by both PCR and serological methods for the presence of XMRV nucleic acid and antibodies. In addition, NCI used plasma from all 100 samples they received in infection experiments with LNCaP cells. It was not feasible to examine all 101 patient and 218 control samples with all four XMRV detection methods described in (1), due to time and resource constraints.Of the technologies used to identify and isolate XMRV in patients with CFS, PCR from DNA or cDNA from unstimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells is the least sensitive method. We contend that the three recently published negative PCR studies (13–15) do not qualify as being studies that fail to replicate our study, as neither the same PCR methodologies were used nor did these studies draw on the additional cell culture and immunological methods that we employed to observe XMRV nucleic acids and proteins. Although we offer to send samples in which we have detected XMRV, the groups that published these results neither requested nor analyzed any samples we had found positive for XMRV in our laboratories.Sudlow et al. erroneously state that we did not consider alternative explanations for the findings, namely that patients with poor general health may be more susceptible to viral and other infections. On the contrary, we raised as a question for future study: “Is XMRV infection a causal factor in the pathogenesis of CFS or a passenger virus in the immunosuppressed CFS patient population?” (1). We recognize that the presence of XMRV could be due to enhanced susceptibility to retroviral infection after development of CFS. A causal role of XMRV in CFS is an intriguing possibility, given the known immunosuppressive, neurotropic, and serious consequences of infection with other known retroviruses.16-Patent applications were submitted for XMRV detection methods in CFS by the WPI, a not-for-profit 501c3. J.A.M. has signed over any personal rights she may have on royalties from these patents to the WPI.

Researcher who linked chronic fatigue syndrome to mouse virus is arrested
BMJ 2011; 343 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d7573 (Published 22 November 2011) Cite this as: BMJ 2011;343:d7573

Judy Mikovits, the researcher who led the team that linked a mouse virus with chronic fatigue syndrome, has been arrested at her home in Ventura, California.The arrest follows a lawsuit filed against her by her former employer, the Whittemore-Peterson Institute for Neuro-Immune Disease in Reno, Nevada, which alleges that after she had been fired by the institute in September she had removed laboratory notebooks and other information that the institute claims it owns (BMJ 2011;343:d6541, 11 Oct, doi:10.1136/bmj.d6541).Through her lawyer, Lois Hart, Dr Mikovits has denied the charges. “All of the allegations of theft, misappropriation, withholding of data and various intellectual property, and items, are incorrect and untruthful,” Ms Hart wrote in a letter to …

/ www.sciencexpress.org / 8 October 2009 / Page 1/ 10.1126/science.1181349
A retrovirus associated with cancer is linked to chronic fatigue syndrome. There is little consensus in the medical community on whether chronic fatigue syndrome is a distinct disease. As its name implies, the condition is characterized by debilitating fatigue persisting for many years, and it affects as much as 1% of the world’s population. Although chronic inflammation is often found in these patients, no infectious or toxic agent has been clearly implicated in this disease, which is diagnosed largely by excluding other conditions that cause similar symptoms (1). In this week’s Science Express, Lombardi et al. (2) describe the detection of xenotropic murine leukemia virus–related virus (XMRV) in about two-thirds of patients diagnosed with chronic fatigue syndrome. Both laboratory and epidemiological studies are now needed to determine whether this virus has a causative role, not only in this disease, but perhaps in others as well. Chronic fatigue syndrome is not the first human disease to which XMRV has been linked. The virus first was described about 3 years ago in a few prostate cancer patients (3), and recently detected in nearly a quarter of all prostate cancer biopsies (4). It has been isolated from both prostate cancer and chronic fatigue syndrome patients, and is similar to a group of endogenous murine leukemia viruses (MLVs) found in the genomes of inbred and related wild mice. Although a half century of studies on MLVs and other gammaretroviruses have led to important discoveries on which much of our current understanding of cancer rests, there has been no clear evidence demonstrating human infection with gammaretroviruses, or associating these agents with any human disease. Endogenous viruses, such as xenotropic MLV, arise when retroviruses infect germline cells. The integrated viral DNA, or provirus, is passed on to offspring as part of the host genome (see the figure). Endogenous proviruses form a large part of the genetic complement of modern mammals—about 8% of the human genome, for example. Xenotropic proviruses first entered the mouse germ line about a million years ago, but cannot infect cells of the mice that carry them because of a mutation in the cellular receptor for the virus presumed to have arisen after viral entry into the germ line. The propensity of xenotropic MLVs to infect rapidly dividing human cells has made it a common contaminant in cultured cells, particularly in certain human tumor cell lines (5). There is more than 90% DNA sequence identity between XMRV and xenotropic MLV, and their biological properties are virtually indistinguishable (6–9), leaving little doubt that the former is derived from the latter by one or more cross-species transmission events. There are several lines of evidence that transmission happened in the outside world and was not a laboratory contaminant. One is that XMRVs from disparate locations and from both chronic fatigue syndrome and prostate cancer patients are nearly identical: The viral genomes differ by only a few nucleotides, whereas there are hundreds of sequence differences between XMRVs and xenotropic murine leukemia proviruses of laboratory mice. Other evidence includes the presence of XMRV and high amounts of antibodies to XMRV and other MLVs in chronic fatigue syndrome and prostate cancer patients. There is still much that we do not understand. Whether the virus plays a causative role in either chronic fatigue syndrome or prostate cancer is unknown. For example, XMRV infection might, coincidentally, be more frequent in the same geographical region as a cluster of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. And individuals with either disease might be more readily infected due to immune activation. XMRV might prefer to grow in rapidly dividing prostate cancer cells (10), and the presence of rapidly dividing cells in either condition might make infection more readily detectable. We do not know how the virus is transmitted, and the suggestion, based on indirect evidence, that there is sexual transmission (8) is premature. Given that infectious virus is present in plasma and in blood cells, blood-borne transmission is a possibility. Furthermore, we do not know the prevalence or distribution of this virus in either human or animal populations, and animal models for infection and pathogenesis are badly needed. Two characteristics of XMRV are particularly noteworthy. One is the near genetic identity of isolates from different diseases and from individuals in different parts of the United States. The two most distantly related genomes sequenced to date differ by fewer than 30 out of about 8000 nucleotides. Thus, all of the XMRV isolates are more similar to each other than are the genomes isolated from any one individual infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. In this respect, XMRV more closely resembles human T cell lymphotropic viruses (HTLVs) isolated from the same geographic region (11). As in the case with HTLV, the lack of diversity implies that XMRV recently descended from a A New Virus for Old Diseases? John M. Coffin1 and Jonathan P. Stoye21 Department of Molecular Microbiology, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111, USA. E-mail: john.coffin@tufts.edu 2 National Institute for Medical Research, Mill Hill, London NW7 1AA, UK./ www.sciencexpress.org / 8 October 2009 / Page 2/ 10.1126/science.1181349-common ancestor, and that the number of replication cycles within one infected individual is limited. Another notable feature of XMRV is that the frequency of infection in nondiseased controls is remarkably high—about 4% in both normal individuals from the same geographic region as infected patients with chronic fatigue syndrome, and in nonmalignant prostates. If these figures are borne out in larger studies, it would mean that perhaps 10 million people in the United Sates and hundreds of millions worldwide are infected with a virus whose pathogenic potential for humans is still unknown. However, it is clear that closely related viruses cause a variety of major diseases, including cancer, in many other mammals. Further study may reveal XMRV as a cause of more than one well-known “old”disease, with potentially important implications for diagnosis, prevention, and therapy. References-1. L. D. Devanur, J. R. Kerr, J. Clin. Virol. 37, 139 (2006). 2. V. C. Lombardi et al., Science 8 October 2009-(10.1126/science.1179052). 3. A. Urisman et al., PLoS Pathog. 2, e25 (2006). 4 R. Schlaberg, D. J. Choe, K. R. Brown, H. M. Thaker, I. R.Singh, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 16351 (2009) 5. R. A. Weiss, in RNA Tumor Viruses, R. A. Weiss, N. Teich, H. E. Varmus, J. M. Coffin, Eds. (Cold Spring Harbor laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 1982). 6. B. Dong et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 1655 (2007). 7. B. Dong, R. H. Silverman, E. S. Kandel, PLoS One 3,
e3144 (2008). 8. S. Hong et al., J. Virol. 83, 6995 (2009). 9. S. Kim et al., J. Virol. 82, 9964 (2008). 10. E. C. Knouf et al., J. Virol. 83, 7353 (2009). 11. S. Van Dooren et al., Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 603 (2004). Published online 8 October 2009; 10.1126/science.1181349
Include this information when citing this paper. Path to human infection. Although xenotropic murine leukemia virus (MLV)—derived from exogenous MLVs that became established as proviruses in the mouse germ line—can no longer infect mice, it can infect humans, apparently leading to one or more cross-species infection events to become XMRV.

Infectious Diseases Dominate WHO's List of 2019 Health Threats-January 23, 2019-Michaela Fleming

WHO has compiled a list of the top 10 threats to global health in 2019 and 6 of them are infectious disease-related.While the world is facing many public health threats, the World Health Organization (WHO) has compiled a list of the top 10 threats to global health to focus on in 2019.The list contains a number of serious issues from climate change to inadequate health care facilities. Unsurprisingly, more than half of the list is made up of infectious disease challenges, both emerging and historic.

Here is a recap, in no particular order:
1. Global Influenza Pandemic-As flu season settles in across the world, many clinicians and patients are questioning just how severe the strains will be this season.The WHO acknowledges that another flu pandemic is unavoidable, but the severity and time frame are unknown.The WHO continues to recommend receiving the influenza vaccine each season and continues to monitor antiviral treatment throughout the world.In August of 2018, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices indicated that vaccination options for the current flu season include the intranasally-administered live attenuated influenza vaccine and recombinant influenza vaccine as quadrivalent vaccines, and inactivated influenza vaccines as both a high-dose IIV trivalent and adjuvanted IIV trivalent.In the latest Contagion® flu update featuring mid-season estimates from the CDC, it was reported that there have been approximately 7 million influenza infections in the US thus far, resulting in an estimated 84,000 hospitalizations.Further, of the 4460 respiratory specimens that tested positive for influenza in public health and clinical laboratories around the country, 97.1% were identified as influenza A and 2.5% were influenza B. Influenza A (H1N1) pdm09 is currently the most predominant subtype.

2. Antimicrobial Resistance-Unlike the looming influenza pandemic, antibiotic resistance is happening, and it’s happening now.As the WHO points out, resistance to rifampicin, the most effective first-line antibiotic for tuberculosis, occurred in approximately 600,000 cases in 2017. Of those cases, approximately 82% were resistant to multiple treatment options.The WHO also points out the need to address the overuse of antibiotics in animals and has indicated a project to confront this issue by implementing a global action plan focused on awareness of prudent use of antimicrobials.The WHO is not the only entity addressing resistance. In September of 2018, the US Food and Drug Administration announced a comprehensive plan to combat antimicrobial resistance in the United States.This 3-tiered strategy includes creating more incentives for antibiotics that tackle resistant pathogens by “develop[ing] innovative payment mechanisms that allow companies to capture a greater upfront share of the social value of antibiotic drug development.”The remainder of the plan focuses on enhanced stewardship initiatives in veterinary medicine, and an expansion of the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System, which is designed to track drug resistance in Salmonella, Escherichia coli, and other harmful foodborne bacteria.

3. Ebola and high-threat pathogens, including disease X-Ebola is back in the mainstream news as the North Kivu outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, approaches its 6th month. As of January 20, 2019, the WHO reported 640 confirmed cases and 373 confirmed deaths.In the current outbreak, the threat of insecurity and violence has impacted the epidemiologic response, with CDC health workers being removed from the outbreak zone to prevent any exposure concerns. Additionally, WHO health workers have been attacked by rebel groups, leading to temporary evacuations in November, which has resulted in disruptions in vaccination and contact tracing.The hard-to-contain outbreak is a threat for global health, as the highly transmissible pathogen can spread more easily to other continents through air travel. Earlier this year an American was monitored for symptoms of Ebola following potential exposure in the outbreak zone. He has since been released by Nebraska Medical, after determining he was not infected.It raised the concern though: Are American facilities prepared to accept Ebola patients? In a 2017 survey, described in a new report by the Office of the Inspector General, 14% of hospital administrators felt their facilities were unprepared for a patient with Ebola or an emerging infectious disease. Conversely, 71% of hospital administrators reported that their facilities were unprepared to receive an Ebola patient in 2014.The WHO also notes that preparation for disease X, an unknown pathogen that could cause a severe epidemic, should also be a focus.A simulation designed to pinpoint the challenges in preparedness and current policies that need to be addressed in order to prevent a severe pandemic indicates that the United States is far from ready for a widespread pandemic with a novel pathogen. The Clade X simulation was conducted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in May 2018 as an exercise focused on high-level strategies, decisions, and policies that are needed to prevent a pandemic from spiraling out of control.

4. Vaccine hesitancy-Vaccine hesitancy is something that made Contagion®’s own list of infectious disease concerns to follow in 2019. The growing hesitancy to vaccinate children is a threat that could lead to the re-emergence of infectious diseases that were previously eliminated in the United States.Measles is notably making a comeback in the United States, despite the fact that the disease was considered eliminated by the CDC in 2000.State health officials are currently monitoring measles outbreaks in New York, New Jersey, and Washington State.“[Say] an American child who has not been [vaccinated] goes on a trip abroad and acquires measles,” William Schaffner, MD, infectious disease specialist at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, and the former president of the National Foundation for Infectious Diseases, told Contagion® in a previous interview. “They bring it back and then you have an outbreak of measles, a disease that was totally eliminated.”Additionally, the European Centers for Disease Control are monitoring measles outbreaks in more than 30 European countries.

5. Dengue-Dengue, a mosquito-borne viral infection, is a leading cause of illness and death in the tropics and subtropics, affecting up to 400 million people annually, according to the CDC.More than 12,000 cases of dengue infection occurred in Puerto Rico in 2010, prior to the equally devastating Zika virus outbreak that affected the country.Furthermore, dengue was the second most commonly transmitted mosquito-borne disease in the continental United States according to data reported to the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System between 2004 and 2016.The WHO notes that a high number of cases occur in the rainy seasons of countries such as Bangladesh and India. And as the season lengthens, dengue-related death rates are rising.In response, the WHO has issued a Dengue control strategy, which aims to reduce dengue-related deaths by 50% by 2020.

6. HIV-Many advancements have been made in the field of HIV since the virus was first recognized. Some of these achievements include the introduction of antiretroviral therapy, which when taken daily can suppress HIV to levels that are undetectable while preventing sexual transmission of the virus.Additional advancements include a range of options to prevent the acquisition of HIV, including pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), which can reduce the risk of acquiring HIV by up to 95% when taken daily, or emergency post-exposure prophylaxis, which can prevent infection if taken 3 days after exposure for a 28-day period.Although the WHO is encouraging the integration of HIV treatment with other health services, the organization is also providing a reminder to all that being aware of your individual HIV status is critical. According to the WHO, 1 in 4 individuals living with HIV are unaware of their status.To address the gaps, the WHO has partnered with international organizations to support a self-testing initiative in several African countries, which not only provides testing but also links individuals with treatment and prevention services, which was announced in observance of World AIDS Day 2018 in December.With 6 of the 10 threats on the WHO’s list having to do with infectious disease, one thing is for sure—2019 will be another big year for fighting infectious diseases and Contagion® will bring you each milestone along the way.

THE EU'S 10 POINT PEACE PLAN FOR ISRAEL-ARABS PEACE.

JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.GET SAVED NOW- CALL ON JESUS TODAY.THE ONLY SAVIOR OF THE WHOLE EARTH - NO OTHER. 1 COR 15:23-JESUS THE FIRST FRUITS-CHRISTIANS RAPTURED TO JESUS-FIRST FRUITS OF THE SPIRIT-23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.ROMANS 8:23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.(THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE)

 THE EU'S 10 POINT PEACE PLAN FOR ISRAEL-ARABS PEACE.

WEEK OF DANIEL 9:27 WE KNOW ITS 7 YRS

Heres the scripture 1 week = 7 yrs Genesis 29:27-29
27 Fulfil her week, and we will give thee this also for the service which thou shalt serve with me yet seven other years.
28 And Jacob did so, and fulfilled her week:(7 YEARS) and he gave him Rachel his daughter to wife also.
29 And Laban gave to Rachel his daughter Bilhah his handmaid to be her maid.

DANIEL 9:26-27
26 And after threescore and two weeks(62X7=434 YEARS+7X7=49 YEARS=TOTAL OF 69 WEEKS OR 483 YRS) shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary;(ROMAN LEADERS DESTROYED THE 2ND TEMPLE) and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.(THERE HAS TO BE 70 WEEKS OR 490 YRS TO FUFILL THE VISION AND PROPHECY OF DAN 9:24).(THE NEXT VERSE IS THAT 7 YR WEEK OR (70TH FINAL WEEK).
27 And he ( THE ROMAN,EU PRESIDENT) shall confirm the covenant (PEACE TREATY) with many for one week:(1X7=7 YEARS) and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease,(3 1/2 yrs in TEMPLE ANIMAL SACRIFICES STOPPED) and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

JEREMIAH 6:14
14 They have healed also the hurt of the daughter of my people slightly, saying, Peace, peace; when there is no peace.
JEREMIAH 8:11
11 For they have healed the hurt of the daughter of my people slightly, saying, Peace, peace; when there is no peace.

 1 THESSALONIANS 5:3
3 For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape.
 
ISAIAH 33:8
8  The highways lie waste, the wayfaring man ceaseth: he hath broken the covenant,(7 YR TREATY) he hath despised the cities, he regardeth no man.(THE WORLD LEADER-WAR MONGER CALLS HIMSELF GOD)

JERUSALEM DIVIDED
GENESIS 25:20-26
20  And Isaac was forty years old (A BIBLE GENERATION NUMBER=1967 + 40=2007+) when he took Rebekah to wife, the daughter of Bethuel the Syrian of Padanaram, the sister to Laban the Syrian.
21  And Isaac intreated the LORD for his wife, because she was barren: and the LORD was intreated of him, and Rebekah his wife conceived.
22  And the children (2 NATIONS IN HER-ISRAEL-ARABS) struggled together within her; and she said, If it be so, why am I thus? And she went
to enquire of the LORD.
23  And the LORD said unto her, Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels;(ISRAEL AND THE ARABS) and the one people shall be stronger than the other people;(ISRAEL STRONGER THAN ARABS) and the elder shall serve the younger.(LITERALLY ISRAEL THE YOUNGER RULES (ISSAC)(JACOB-LATER NAME CHANGED TO ISRAEL) OVER THE OLDER ARABS (ISHMAEL)(ESAU)
24  And when her days to be delivered were fulfilled, behold, there were twins in her womb.
25  And the first came out red, all over like an hairy garment; and they called his name Esau.(THE OLDER AN ARAB)
26  And after that came his brother out, and his hand took hold on Esau's heel; and his name was called Jacob:(THE YOUNGER-ISRAELI) and Isaac was threescore (60) years old when she bare them.(1967 + 60=2027)(COULD BE THE LAST GENERATION WHEN JERUSALEM IS DIVIDED AMOUNG THE 2 TWINS)(THE 2 TWINS WANT JERUSALEM-THE DIVISION OF JERUSALEM TODAY)(AND WHOS IN CONTROL OF JERUSALEM TODAY-THE YOUNGER ISSAC-JACOB-ISRAEL)(AND WHO WANTS JERUSALEM DIVIDED-THE OLDER,ESAU-ISHMAEL (THE ARABS)

ISAIAH 28:14-19 (THIS IS THE 7 YR TREATY COVENANT OF DANIEL 9:27)
14 Wherefore hear the word of the LORD, ye scornful men, that rule this people which is in Jerusalem.
15 Because ye have said, We have made a covenant with death, and with hell are we at agreement; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, it shall not come unto us: for we have made lies our refuge, and under falsehood have we hid ourselves:
16 Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD, Behold, I lay in Zion for a foundation a stone, a tried stone, a precious corner stone, a sure foundation: he that believeth shall not make haste.17 Judgment also will I lay to the line, and righteousness to the plummet: and the hail shall sweep away the refuge of lies, and the waters shall overflow the hiding place.
18 And your covenant with death shall be disannulled, and your agreement with hell shall not stand; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, then ye shall be trodden down by it.
19 From the time that it goeth forth it shall take you: for morning by morning shall it pass over, by day and by night: and it shall be a vexation only to understand the report.

DANIEL 8:23-25
23 And in the latter time of their kingdom, when the transgressors are come to the full, a king (EU DICTATOR) of fierce countenance, and understanding dark sentences,(FROM THE OCCULT) shall stand up.
24 And his power shall be mighty, but not by his own power:(SATANS POWER) and he shall destroy wonderfully, and shall prosper, and practise, and shall destroy the mighty and the holy people.
25 And through his policy also he shall cause craft to prosper in his hand; and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by peace shall destroy many: he shall also stand up against the Prince of princes;(JESUS) but he shall be broken without hand.DANIEL 11:36-40
36 And the king shall do according to his will;(EU PRESIDENT) and he shall exalt himself, and magnify himself above every god, and shall speak marvellous things against the God of gods, and shall prosper till the indignation be accomplished: for that that is determined shall be done.
37 Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers,(THIS EU DICTATOR IS A EUROPEAN JEW) nor the desire of women, nor regard any god: for he shall magnify himself above all.
38 But in his estate shall he honour the God of forces:(HES A MILITARY GINIUS) and a god whom his fathers knew not shall he honour with gold, and silver, and with precious stones, and pleasant things.
39 Thus shall he do in the most strong holds (CONTROL HEZBOLLAH,AL-QUAIDA MURDERERS ETC) with a strange god, whom he shall acknowledge and increase with glory: and he shall cause them to rule over many,(HIS ARMY LEADERS) and shall divide the land for gain.
40 And at the time of the end shall the king of the south(EGYPT) push at him:(EU DICTATOR PROTECTING ISRAELS SECURITY) and the king of the north(RUSSIA) shall come against him like a whirlwind, with chariots, and with horsemen, and with many ships; and he shall enter into the countries, and shall overflow and pass over.

ZECHARIAH 14:12-13
12 And this shall be the plague wherewith the LORD will smite all the people that have fought against Jerusalem; Their flesh shall consume away while they stand upon their feet, and their eyes shall consume away in their holes, and their tongue shall consume away in their mouth.
13 And it shall come to pass in that day, that a great tumult from the LORD shall be among them; and they shall lay hold every one on the hand of his neighbour, and his hand shall rise up against the hand of his neighbour.(1/2-3 BILLION DIE IN WW3)

NOW WE GOT THE RIGHT PEACE PLAYER GETTING IN THE PEACE PROCESS. THE EU HAS TO BE THE ONE WHO GUARENTEES ISRAEL SECURITY FOR A 7 YEAR PEACE DEAL. ANY OTHER DEAL BUT A 7 YEAR CONTRACT. WON'T WORK. ITS GOT TO BE A 7 YEAR CONTRACT TO BE THE BIBLE PROPHECY DEAL. AND NO-NO OTHER COUNTRY INVOLVED BUT THE EU WILL WORK.ITS GOT TO BE THE EU LEAD ISRAEL AND MANY ISLAMIC COUNTRIES 7 YEAR PEACE CONTRACT. AND NOW ISRAEL IS MAD AT RUSSIA AND RUSSIA IS MAD AT GERMANY FOR STICKING UP FOR ISRAEL AT THE ICC. WELL THIS RUSSIA-GERMAN COMBINATION WON'T BE AT ODDS FOR LONG. BECAUSE THE BIBLE SAYS RUSSIA AND GERMANY WILL BE WITH EACH OTHER WHEN THE EZEKIEL 38@39 WAR AGAINST ISRAEL IS COME.BUT I BELIEVE GERMANY MUST GET BOOTED OUT OF THE EU AT SOME POINT. BEFORE THE FINAL MARCH TO ISRAEL.BECAUSE WHEN RUSSIA, MUSLIMS MARCH AGAINST ISRAEL. GERMANY WILL ALSO BE DESTROYED IN THAT WAR FOR COMING AGAINST ISRAEL.AND THEN IN MARCH THE 500 MILLION BIRD MIGRATION IS IN ISRAEL. THAT IMPORTANT ALSO, BECAUSE THESES RUSSIA, GERMANM MUSLIM ARMIES WILL EAT THE FLESH OF THIS ARMY AFTER GOD AND ISRAEL WORK TOGETHER TO DESTROY THEM. SO PROPHECY IS IN FULL GEAR NOW.

 Revealed: Josep Borrell's 10-point peace roadmap for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict-Josep Borrell has prepared a 10-point roadmap to resolve the decades-long Israeli-Palestinian conflict.By Maria Psara & Jorge Liboreiro-Published on 19/01/2024 - 17:15•Updated 17:33

Euronews had early access to the 10-point roadmap that Josep Borrell, the European Union's foreign policy chief, has prepared to pave the way for a "credible, comprehensive solution" to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.The document, which has not yet been made public and is set to be discussed by the bloc's foreign ministers during a meeting on Monday, outlines a series of procedural steps that Borrell believes could eventually bring peace to the Gaza Strip, establish an independent Palestinian state, normalise relations between Israel and the Arab world, and guarantee long-term security in the region.Its centrepiece is a "Preparatory Peace Conference" involving "key actors" such as the EU, the US, Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, the Arab League and the United Nations. The participants would be in constant touch with Israeli and Palestinian officials, referred to as "the conflict parties," but the two would not initially "be compelled to sit with each other."The Gaza Strip and the West Bank would be represented by the Palestinian Authority (PA) and Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), rather than Hamas, which has ruled the strip since its 2007 takeover and is designated a terrorist organisation by the EU and the US-The Conference would have one year to design the framework for a peace plan, taking into account the feedback from all involved parties, UN resolutions, European Council conclusions and previous mediation efforts. Once ready, the plan would be presented to the "conflict parties" and be used as the main basis for the final negotiations."In view of the current situation and despite the evident difficulties and uncertainties, the time to prepare for (a) comprehensive Israeli-Palestinian peace is now," the paper, as seen by Euronews, says in its introduction.The revelation comes a day after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu delivered a blistering rejection of the two-state solution and vowed to continue the military offensive in Gaza until the destruction of Hamas and the release of all hostages."We will not settle for anything short of an absolute victory," Netanyahu said. Netanyahu's remarks cast a shadow over Borrell's proposal and the upcoming meeting of EU foreign ministers, where the Israel-Hamas war will be top of the agenda. Despite repeated pleas from Western allies, Israel has not made any overture that indicates it is ready to cease hostilities and give diplomacy a serious chance.The offensive, launched in reaction to the 7 October attacks by Hamas, has killed more than 24,000 Palestinians, including over 10,000 children, according to the Hamas-run health ministry in Gaza. The war has also caused widespread devastation and a severe humanitarian crisis in the densely-populated enclave."At this point in time, Israeli officials don't talk about the two-state solution. They only talk about the war. They only talk about the military objective of destroying Hamas," a senior EU official said on Friday, reflecting the thinking in Brussels."We have to deal with that. It's our responsibility, our duty, to look beyond that."Borrell's scheme attempts to put that duty on paper.Although the roadmap does not pre-judge the substance of a potential peace plan, it does provide a coherent timeline to organise a potential peace process. Its goal is not just ending the present war but addressing root causes that have fuelled the Israeli-Palestinian conflict for the past seven decades.However, it is far from certain that the 27 member states will embrace the blueprint, as capitals remain divided over how to tackle, or even speak about, the conflict.

Roadmap for peace-In the document seen by Euronews, the 10 points are envisioned as such:
1-The process should lead to an independent Palestinian State "living side by side" with Israel and "full normalization" of relations between Israel and the Arab world.

2-International actors should help the two parties prepare the groundwork for peace and help build a "revitalized political alternative" to Hamas.

3-International actors should "at the earliest" hold a Preparatory Peace Conference to settle the ongoing war and, especially, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

4-The Conference should bring together foreign ministers and directors of international organisations to discuss the peace process while they "near-simultaneously" hold separate meetings with the conflict parties.

5-The Conference should set up working groups and design the "initial framework" for a peace plan within one year.

6-The plan should touch upon "as practically as possible" the central elements for a comprehensive peace, building upon previous UN resolutions and mediation efforts.

7-The plan should provide "robust security assurances" for Israel and the future Palestinian state, "conditional upon full mutual diplomatic recognition and integration of both Israel and Palestinian in the region."

8-The Conference should consult the conflict parties "at every step and at any time" while the peace plan is being crafted. Crucially, if either side decides to pull out, the work should continue nevertheless.

9-Once ready, the plan should be presented to Israelis and Palestinians. "It will be for them to negotiate the final text," the document says.

10-In parallel to the process, the participants in the Conference should strive to mitigate the ongoing humanitarian crisis, secure the release of Israeli hostages, prevent regional escalation, strengthen the Palestinian Authority's democratic legitimacy and support the reconstruction of Gaza, among other goals.In addition, the European Union’s foreign policy chief Josep Borrell will present a ten-point plan for peace between Israel and the Palestinians.

EU foreign ministers to meet Israeli, Palestinian counterparts-By Lazar Berman and Agencies-JAN 22,24

EU foreign ministers will hold separate talks later today with their Israeli and Palestinian counterparts on the prospects for lasting peace after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu rejected calls for a future Palestinian state.The 27 EU ministers will first meet with Israel’s foreign minister Israel Katz, before sitting down separately with the Palestinian Authority’s top diplomat Riyad al-Maliki.Katz and Maliki are not expected to meet each other.Katz and Maliki will also separately address the European Union Foreign Affairs Council meeting in Brussels today, which will also be attended by his counterparts from Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Egypt, and the Arab League Secretary-General.The meeting is largely devoted to the Middle East but also taking stock of the war in Ukraine.In addition, the European Union’s foreign policy chief Josep Borrell will present a ten-point plan for peace between Israel and the Palestinians.The EU has struggled for a united stance on the conflict in Gaza as staunch backers of Israel such as Germany have rejected demands for an immediate ceasefire made from the likes of Spain and Ireland.EU officials have sketched out broad conditions for “the day after” the current war ends in Gaza, calling for a cessation to hostilities, the return of the Israeli hostages, an end to Hamas’s rule and a role for the Palestinian Authority in running Gaza.At the heart of the plan is a call for a “preparatory peace conference” to be organized by the EU, Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and the League of Arab States, with the United States and United Nations also invited to be conveners of the gathering.The conference would go ahead even if Israelis or Palestinians declined to take part. But both parties would be consulted at every step of the talks as delegates seek to draw up a peace plan, the document suggests.The internal document, seen by multiple news organizations including Reuters, makes clear one key goal of a peace plan should be the establishment of an independent Palestinian state, “living side by side with Israel in peace and security”.In a letter to member states, Borrell wrote that his roadmap will “elaborate, with practical proposals, on the agreed principle that only a political, sustainable, long-term solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict will bring peace to the two peoples and stability to the region.”According to Euronews, Borrell’s plan calls for full normalization between Israel and Arab states and would create an “initial framework” for Israeli-Palestinian peace within one year. There would be “robust security assurances” for both states, and the agreement would be “conditional upon full mutual diplomatic recognition and integration of both Israel and Palestinian in the region.”Given the division, the 27 EU member states are unlikely to support Borrell’s roadmap.A high-ranking EU official said there were no expectations of any breakthroughs from the “complex ballet” of diplomacy on Monday.“The idea is to have a full discussion with all the participants, the Israelis, Palestinians, the Arabs, to exchange points of view and to try to understand better where everybody is,” the official said.

EU’s Borrell outlines 10-point peace plan to end Israel-Palestine conflict-By Alexandra Brzozowski and Aurélie Pugnet | EURACTIV- Jan 20, 2024

EU's chief diplomat Josep Borrell in Brussels, Belgium, 13 December 2023. [EPA-EFE/Olivier Matthys]-Euractiv is part of the Trust Project >The EU has drafted a 10-point plan for a “credible, comprehensive solution” to the Israel-Palestine conflict, according to a draft document, seen by Euractiv, though securing EU member states’ and regional buy-in will be hard-fought.“In view of the current situation and despite the evident difficulties and uncertainties, the time to prepare for (a) comprehensive Israeli-Palestinian peace is now,” the draft document, as seen by Euractiv, says in its introduction.The EU’s effort comes as the bloc’s foreign ministers on Monday (22 January) meet to discuss the situation in Gaza and its wider implications for the region with some of the key stakeholders in the region.It outlines a series of steps that could eventually bring peace to the Gaza Strip, establish an independent Palestinian state, normalise relations between Israel and the Arab world, and guarantee long-term security in the region, according to the non-paper, prepared by the EU’s diplomatic service (EEAS).The draft roadmap is meant to “elaborate, with practical proposals, on the agreed principle that only a political, sustainable, long-term solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict will bring peace to the two peoples and stability to the region”, the EU’s chief diplomat Josep Borrell wrote in an accompanying letter to member states.The EU’s Special Representative for the Middle East Peace Process, Sven Koopmans, has been conducting preliminary consultations with Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, the League of Arab States, and other key partners, “to find common ground to revive the peace process”.Koopmans also had proposed “to dedicate an ad hoc meeting to discuss this non-paper and those consultations” with EU member states’ officials “at the earliest opportunity”.Before the Hamas attacks on Israel on 7 October 2023, the EU had planned to help lead a new ‘incentives’-focused Middle East peace initiative, dubbed the ‘Peace Day Effort’, aimed at re-starting talks between Israel and Palestine.A meeting in September in New York on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly had gathered almost 50 foreign ministers from Europe and the Middle East, to develop it further.However, with the Gaza war, those plans had to be put on hold.Borrell in November had also laid out a draft framework for post-war Gaza, calling for no long-term Israeli occupation, an end to Hamas’s rule, and a role for the Palestinian Authority in running the territory.10-point roadmap-A future peace process should lead to an independent Palestinian State “living side by side” with Israel and “full normalization” of relations between Israel and the Arab world, according to the newly drawn-up plan.“It is unrealistic to assume that Israelis and Palestinians (the latter represented by the PLO and the PA), will in the near future directly engage in bilateral peace negotiations to achieve comprehensive peace, let alone conclude such negotiations, without strong international involvement,” it states.“Palestinians will need a revitalized political alternative to Hamas, while Israelis will need to find the political will to engage in meaningful negotiations towards the two-state solution,” it adds.A key element of the EU’s future peace roadmap is a “Preparatory Peace Conference” involving the EU, the US, Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, the Arab League and the United Nations.Its participants would be in constant touch with Israeli and Palestinian officials “at every step and at any time”, referred to as “the conflict parties”, but the two would not initially “be compelled to sit with each other”.The Gaza Strip and the West Bank would be represented by the Palestinian Authority (PA) and Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), rather than Hamas, which has ruled the strip since its 2007 takeover and is designated a terrorist organisation by the EU and the US.The peace conference would have one year to design the framework for a peace plan, taking into account the feedback from all involved parties, UN resolutions, European Council conclusions and previous mediation efforts.Once drafted, the plan would be presented to the “conflict parties” and be used as the main basis for the final negotiations.“It will be for them to negotiate the final text,” the document says.“An essential element of the Peace Plan should be the development of robust security assurances for Israel and the future independent State of Palestine, conditional upon full mutual diplomatic recognition and integration of both Israel and Palestine in the region,” according to the proposal.The plan “should also include the Peace Supporting Package envisioned in the Peace Day Effort” as an incentive for the two conflict parties.“This means that it should state, as clearly and to the extent possible, which regional and global political and security mechanisms and other agreements and projects will be made available the day the parties conclude their peace agreement,” the draft roadmap continues.Buy-in questionable-However, it is unclear whether EU member states and regional stakeholders will be willing to embrace the bloc’s peace plan blueprint.The EU has struggled for a united stance on the conflict in Gaza as staunch backers of Israel such as Germany have rejected calls for an immediate ceasefire voiced by countries like Spain and Ireland.The European Parliament earlier this week in a close-run vote had called for a “permanent cease-fire” in Israel’s war against Hamas, but said this must be conditional on Hamas releasing the hostages it took in the October 7 attacks as well as the full demilitarization of Gaza.The October events caught European officials and diplomats off-guard and the patchy and messy European response over the first week of the conflict had impacted the bloc’s credibility in the region, which is only slowly being repaired since then, according to EU diplomats.With Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz and his Palestinian counterpart Riyad al-Maliki expected to join Monday’s discussions separately, EU diplomats said they aim to sound out each side over ways to end the violence on the ground and the next steps towards a longer-term peace solution.EU member states – along with the United States – believe the creation of a Palestinian state remains the only viable way to secure a lasting peace.However, Israel’s right-wing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Thursday (18 January) flatly rejected the idea and vowed to continue the military offensive in Gaza until the destruction of Hamas and the release of all hostages.“We will not settle for anything short of an absolute victory,” Netanyahu said.[Edited by Nathalie Weatherald]

Gallant: Khan Younis operation will continue to expand-Netanyahu: No full Palestinian state, no ‘surrender’ in exchange for Gaza hostages-PM pushes back on White House vision of pathway to two-state solution and reports of a grand bargain that would end war, though he doesn’t rule out demilitarized Palestinian state-By Lazar Berman-21 January 2024, 11:55 pm

As US President Joe Biden’s administration calls for the war against Hamas to wind down alongside a pathway toward a two-state solution at the end of the fight, Israel’s leadership presented a vision at odds with that of the White House on Sunday.Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu doubled down in a video message on his determination not to allow a full-fledged, militarized Palestinian state to emerge.“I will not compromise on full Israeli security control over all the territory west of the Jordan [River],” he said, echoing recent comments.“As long as I am prime minister, I will continue to firmly stand by this,” he pledged, boasting that he had withstood international and domestic pressure over the years to move toward a two-state solution.Netanyahu has made similar statements over the past week, though he appears to have been careful not to categorically reject all forms of Palestinian statehood.Speaking after a report on Wednesday that the Biden administration is looking past the premier to advance a two-state solution — and hours after US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said Israel cannot achieve “genuine security” without a pathway to a Palestinian state — Netanyahu said Israel must maintain “security control” of all territory west of the Jordan River in any future arrangement.After he spoke with Netanyahu on Friday, Biden expressed hope that a two-state solution could be achieved with Netanyahu in office if it is demilitarized. A CNN report the next day indicated that Netanyahu told Biden that he was not ruling out a Palestinian state entirely. (A US official has confirmed the CNN report to The Times of Israel.)-The prime minister pushed back on that as well, tweeting on Saturday night that “I will not compromise on full Israeli security control over all the territory west of the Jordan River — and this runs contrary to a Palestinian state.”But Netanyahu’s video statement Sunday could be seen as leaving the door open slightly for a demilitarized Palestinian state.He also rejected the idea that a deal could emerge that leaves Hamas in power, insisting that Israel will achieve “total victory,” after which “there will be no entity in Gaza that finances terrorism, educates for terrorism or sends our terror.”Netanyahu demanded that Gaza be demilitarized under Israel’s full security control.Earlier Sunday, The Wall Street Journal reported that the US, Egypt and Qatar are pushing Israel and Hamas to accept a comprehensive plan that would end the war, see the release of hostages held in Gaza, and ultimately lead to full normalization for Israel with its neighbors and talks for the establishment of a Palestinian state.In his video statement, Netanyahu said that Israel completely rejects Hamas’s demands for “surrender” in exchange for releasing the remaining 136 hostages in Gaza.“So far, we have brought home 110 hostages, and we are committed to bringing them all back,” said Netanyahu. “I am working on this around the clock. But let it be clear: I reject outright the terms of surrender of the Hamas monsters.”The prime minister said that in exchange for releasing the hostages, “Hamas is demanding the end of the war, the exit of our forces from Gaza, releasing all the murderers and rapists of the Nukhba [forces] and leaving Hamas intact.”Netanyahu added that “if we agree to this, our soldiers will have fallen in vain. If we agree to this, we cannot guarantee security for our citizens. We cannot bring the evacuees home safely, and the next October 7 will be just a matter of time. I am not able to agree to such a fatal blow to Israeli security, and therefore I cannot agree to that.”The prime minister said he had made Israel’s stance on this issue clear to Biden when they spoke over the weekend.Under pressure from US progressives, and worried about an escalation that could draw the country into the war, the Biden administration has been calling for the war to end “as quickly as possible” for over a month.While Israel said earlier in January that it has begun a new, less intensive phase in its war against Hamas, that only seems to be the case in the northern half of the Strip.Defense Minister Yoav Gallant said on Sunday that the IDF will further expand its ground offensive in southern Gaza’s Khan Younis.“We are carrying out an intensive operation in the Khan Younis area, and it will continue to expand,” said Gallant following a flight over the Strip with the Israeli Air Force’s 100th Squadron.“The plumes of smoke from the tanks, artillery and Air Force planes, will continue to cover the skies of the Gaza Strip, until we achieve our goals, chief among them, the defeat of Hamas and the return of hostages to their homes,” he added.War erupted after Hamas-led terrorists invaded southern Israeli communities, massacring some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and kidnapping 253 others. Israel then launched a massive military operation aimed at vanquishing Hamas and freeing the hostages.It is believed that 132 hostages abducted by Hamas on October 7 remain in Gaza — not all of them alive — after 105 civilians were released from Hamas captivity during a weeklong truce in late November, another was rescued alive and bodies of others were extricated. Four more hostages are believed to have been held in the Strip since 2014 or 2015.

ISRAEL-RUSSIA-GERMANY DUOLS.

JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.GET SAVED NOW- CALL ON JESUS TODAY.THE ONLY SAVIOR OF THE WHOLE EARTH - NO OTHER. 1 COR 15:23-JESUS THE FIRST FRUITS-CHRISTIANS RAPTURED TO JESUS-FIRST FRUITS OF THE SPIRIT-23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.ROMANS 8:23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.(THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE)

WORLD TERRORISM

GENESIS 6:11-13
11 The earth also was corrupt before God, and the earth was filled with violence.(WORLD TERRORISM,MURDERS)(HAMAS IN HEBREW IS VIOLENCE)
12 And God looked upon the earth, and, behold, it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth.
13 And God said unto Noah, The end of all flesh is come before me; for the earth is filled with violence (TERRORISM)(HAMAS) through them; and, behold, I will destroy them with the earth.

STRONGS CONCORDANCE FOR VIOLENCE IN THE BIBLE-SEE IT FOR YOURSELVES.
2554. chamas - Strong's Concordance - chamas: to treat violently or wrong - Part of Speech: Verb - Transliteration: chamas -Phonetic Spelling: (khaw-mas') - Definition: to treat violently or wrong - make bare, shake off, violate, do violence, take away violently, wrong -A primitive root; to be violent; by implication, to maltreat -- make bare, shake off, violate, do violence, take away violently, wrong, imagine wrongfully.

GENESIS 16:11-12
11 And the angel of the LORD said unto her,(HAGAR) Behold, thou art with child, and shalt bear a son, and shalt call his name Ishmael;(FATHER OF THE ARAB/MUSLIMS) because the LORD hath heard thy affliction.
12 And he (ISHMAEL-FATHER OF THE ARAB-MUSLIMS) will be a wild (DONKEY-JACKASS) man;(ISLAM IS A FAKE AND DANGEROUS SEX FOR MURDER CULT) his hand will be against every man,(ISLAM HATES EVERYONE) and every man's hand against him;(PROTECTING THEMSELVES FROM BEING BEHEADED) and he (ISHMAEL ARAB/MUSLIM) shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren.(LITERAL-THE ARABS LIVE WITH THEIR BRETHERN JEWS)

ISAIAH 14:12-14
12  How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer,(SATAN) son of the morning!(HEBREW-CRECENT MOON-ISLAM) how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!
13  For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north:
14  I (SATAN HAS EYE TROUBLES) will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.(AND 1/3RD OF THE ANGELS OF HEAVEN FELL WITH SATAN AND BECAME DEMONS)

JOHN 16:2
2 They shall put you out of the synagogues: yea, the time cometh, that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service.(ISLAM MURDERS IN THE NAME OF MOON GOD ALLAH OF ISLAM)

SECOND ANGEL: The Middle East DR DOCTORIAN
Then Isawthat the second angel had a sickle in his hand,such asis used in harvesting. The second angelsaid, “Harvest time has come in Israel and the countries all the wayto Iran.” Isawthose countriesin a fewsplitseconds. “All of Turkey and those other countries that have refused me and refused my message of love shall hate each other and kill one another.” I saw the angel raise the sickle and come down on all the Middle East countries.I saw Iran, Persia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, all of Georgia – Iraq, Syria,Lebanon,Jordan, Israel, all of Asia Minor – full of blood. Isaw blood all over these countries. And I saw fire; nuclear weapons were used in many of those countries. Smoke rising from everywhere. Sudden destruction – men destroying one another. I heard these words, “Israel, Oh Israel, the great judgment has come.”The angel said, “The chosen, the church, the remnant, shall be purified. The Spirit of God shall prepare the children of God.” I saw fires rising to heaven.The angel said, “This is the final judgment My church shall be purified, protected and ready for the final day. Men will die from thirst. Watershall be scarce all over the Middle East. Rivers shall dry up, and men will fight for water in those countries.” The angelshowed me that the United Nationsshall be broken in pieces because of the crisisin the Middle East. There shall be no more United Nations. The angel with the sickle shall reap the harvest.

ZECHARIAH 14:12-13
12 And this shall be the plague wherewith the LORD will smite all the people that have fought against Jerusalem; Their flesh shall consume away while they stand upon their feet,(DISOLVED FROM ATOMIC BOMB) and their eyes shall consume away in their holes,(DISOLVED FROM ATOMIC BOMB) and their tongue shall consume away in their mouth.(DISOLVED FROM ATOMIC BOMB)(BECAUSE NUKES HAVE BEEN USED ON ISRAELS ENEMIES)(GOD PROTECTS ISRAEL AND ALWAYS WILL)
13 And it shall come to pass in that day, that a great tumult from the LORD shall be among them; and they shall lay hold every one on the hand of his neighbour, and his hand shall rise up against the hand of his neighbour.(1/2-3 BILLION DIE IN WW3)(THIS IS AN ATOMIC BOMB EFFECT)

ISAIAH 54:3
03-King James Bible-For thou shalt break forth on the right hand and on the left; and thy seed shall inherit the Gentiles, and make the desolate cities to be inhabited.

The right hand was a symbol of strength-Exodus 15:6, ” Your right hand, O LORD, is majestic in power. Your right hand, O LORD, shatters the enemy.”

EZEKIEL 17:15-24 (MUSLIM COUNTRIES HISTORY)
15 But he rebelled against him in sending his ambassadors into Egypt, that they might give him horses and much people. Shall he prosper? shall he escape that doeth such things? or shall he break the covenant, and be delivered?
16 As I live, saith the Lord God, surely in the place where the king dwelleth that made him king, whose oath he despised, and whose covenant he brake, even with him in the midst of Babylon he shall die.
17 Neither shall Pharaoh with his mighty army and great company make for him in the war, by casting up mounts, and building forts, to cut off many persons:
18 Seeing he despised the oath by breaking the covenant, when, lo, he had given his hand, and hath done all these things, he shall not escape.
19 Therefore thus saith the Lord God; As I live, surely mine oath that he hath despised, and my covenant that he hath broken, even it will I recompense upon his own head.
20 And I will spread my net upon him, and he shall be taken in my snare, and I will bring him to Babylon, and will plead with him there for his trespass that he hath trespassed against me.
21 And all his fugitives with all his bands shall fall by the sword, and they that remain shall be scattered toward all winds: and ye shall know that I the Lord have spoken it.
22 Thus saith the Lord God; I will also take of the highest branch of the high cedar, and will set it; I will crop off from the top of his young twigs a tender one, and will plant it upon an high mountain and eminent:
23 In the mountain of the height of Israel will I plant it: and it shall bring forth boughs, and bear fruit, and be a goodly cedar: and under it shall dwell all fowl of every wing; in the shadow of the branches thereof shall they dwell.
24 And all the trees of the field shall know that I the Lord have brought down the high tree, have exalted the low tree, have dried up the green tree, and have made the dry tree to flourish: I the Lord have spoken and have done it.

PSALMS 83:3-7
3 They (ARABS,MUSLIMS) have taken crafty counsel against thy people,(ISRAEL) and consulted against thy hidden ones.
4 They have said, Come, and let us cut them off from being a nation; that the name of Israel may be no more in remembrance.
5 For they (MUSLIMS) have consulted together with one consent: they are confederate against thee:(TREATIES)
6 The tabernacles of Edom,(JORDAN) and the Ishmaelites;(ARABS) of Moab, PALESTINIANS,JORDAN) and the Hagarenes;(EGYPT)
7 Gebal,(HEZBOLLAH, LEBANON) and Ammon,(JORDAN) and Amalek;(SYRIA,ARABS,SINAI) the Philistines (PALESTINIANS) with the inhabitants of Tyre;(LEBANON)
8 Assyria (SYRIA) also has joined with them; They have helped the children of Lot. Selah
9 Deal with them as with Midian, As with Sisera, As with Jabin at the Brook Kishon,
10 Who perished at En Dor, Who became as refuse on the earth.
11 Make their nobles like Oreb and like Zeeb, Yes, all their princes like Zebah and Zalmunna,
12 Who said, “Let us take for ourselves The pastures of God for a possession.”
13 O my God, make them like the whirling dust, Like the chaff before the wind!
14 As the fire burns the woods, And as the flame sets the mountains on fire,
15 So pursue them with Your tempest, And frighten them with Your storm.
16 Fill their faces with shame, That they may seek Your name, O Lord.
17 Let them be [e]confounded and dismayed forever; Yes, let them be put to shame and perish,
18 That they may know that You, whose name alone is the Lord, Are the Most High over all the earth.

And here are the bounderies of the land that Israel will inherit either through war or peace or God in the future. God says its Israels land and only Israels land. They will have every inch God promised them of this land in the future.
Egypt east of the Nile River, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, The southern part of Turkey and the Western Half of Iraq west of the Euphrates. Gen 13:14-15, Psm 105:9,11, Gen 15:18, Exe 23:31, Num 34:1-12, Josh 1:4.ALL THIS LAND ISRAEL WILL DEFINATELY OWN IN THE FUTURE, ITS ISRAELS NOT ISHMAELS LAND.12 TRIBES INHERIT LAND IN THE FUTURE.

Israel blasts Russia over Holocaust distortion, criticism of Germany for defense of Israel at ICJ-By ToI Staff-JAN 22,24

Israel hits back at Russia over the foreign ministry spokesperson’s comments earlier today appearing to downplay the Holocaust’s impact on the Jewish people, characterizing it as a mass extermination of “various ethnic and social groups,” and slamming Germany for intervening on behalf of Israel as a third party in the International Court of Justice’s “genocide” case.“Israel thanks Germany for its unequivocal support and its stand against South Africa’s baseless claim,” the Israeli Foreign Ministry says in a statement cited by Hebrew media.The ministry says the Russian spokesperson’s comments were a “distortion of the Holocaust” and “harmful to victims and survivors.”At a media conference earlier, the Kremlin’s Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova criticized what she labeled as Berlin’s “unfettered support” for the Jewish state, and accused it of systematically ignoring the plight of non-Jewish European minorities, particularly Slavic peoples in the then-Soviet Union, who were massacred during the Holocaust.“It seems that Germany has once again forgotten that under UN General Assembly Resolution A/RES/60/7 and several other international instruments, the Holocaust is defined as the persecution and mass extermination of people representing various ethnic and social groups by the Nazis. There is also the OSCE’s Berlin Declaration setting forth the need to promote the importance of respecting all ethnic and religious groups without any distinction,” she said.The UN resolution, passed in 2005 to establish International Holocaust Memorial Day on January 27, stressed the impact of the Jews during the genocide, noting that it “resulted in the murder of one-third of the Jewish people, along with countless members of other minorities.”“Berlin persists in its refusal to recognize Nazi crimes against our people as genocide,” Zakharova said, citing Berlin’s refusal to pay reparations to non-Jewish victims of the nearly two-and-a-half-year Siege of Leningrad during World War II.“Russian investigative bodies and courts have compiled a wide body of evidence exposing war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide by the Third Reich troops across various regions of our country,” she said.“Germany has surpassed other countries in the European Union in zealously defending the [Kyiv] regime which has made the glorification of Nazi accomplices a key domestic and foreign policy tenet,” she stated, referencing Berlin’s support of Ukraine in the face of Russia’s invasion since 2022.Russian leaders have repeatedly tried to justify their invasion of Ukraine as a struggle against neo-Nazism, though it has not presented evidence to back this up and despite the Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelensky, being Jewish.“All this leads to the conclusion that in the context of the ongoing proceedings at the International Court of Justice, Berlin decided to single out the Holocaust issue by setting it apart from all other aspects of its guilty historical acts against humanity. Moreover, it refuses to view it in a holistic manner. Instead, Berlin adjusts its perspective as it deems fit to suit its momentary considerations,” Zakharova claimed.

AnalysisIran tries to sow discord between the US and Israel-Iran runs amok as Israel’s neighbors continue to face crises-In this round-up of current challenges facing the Mideast, Iran attacks Iraq, Syria, and Pakistan while Lebanon’s leadership calls for peace – but is unable to control Hezbollah-By Ksenia Svetlova Today, 1:01 am-JAN 22,24

Iran showed off its military capabilities last week by attacking Iraq and Syria before moving on to Pakistan with little concern for retaliation or escalation from any military force.While Pakistan responded by recalling its ambassador from Tehran and attacked targets in the Islamic Republic’s territory on Thursday, Syria would not dare react in any way because of its dependency on Iranian aid to the government for the civil war. The same is true for Iraq where protests were held by activists in the country calling to boycott Iranian products, but the nation is still reliant on Iran in many ways.Last week, there were also reports that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps was responsible for attacking Israeli ships in the Red Sea at the beginning of January.Meanwhile, Iran also tried to sow discord between the United States and Israel. Speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Iranian Foreign Minister Hussein Amir Abdollahian said that Israel was holding the US hostage and that if Israel kept its distance, Iran would be more likely to reach a good deal with the US regarding nuclear weapons.Iran seems to believe that the US is not interested in expanding the war between Hamas and Israel beyond Gaza and that the US wants to prevent it from reaching Lebanon where the US is warning Israel against expansive military operations against Hezbollah. Regarding Yemen, the 11-country coalition set up by the US is aimed at safeguarding ships from being attacked by Houthis and is working carefully to contain rising tensions in the Red Sea.With the absence of a credible “responsible adult” who can threaten Tehran with a war that will end the Islamic regime — or at least significantly damage its infrastructure — Iran is free to provoke Israel, its Arab neighbors, and other countries like Pakistan or even the US.It seems like no one in the world currently has a solution for Iran as it continues to enrich uranium and race toward a nuclear bomb, while doing its best to maintain its proxy in Gaza in the form of Hamas, which the Islamic regime has funded and trained for years.Lebanon: High-stakes diplomatic efforts-As Israel continues to fight its war in the South against Hamas while simultaneously holding off and responding to attacks from Hezbollah in the North, Lebanese interim Prime Minister Najib Mikati told Arab interviewers at the Economic Forum at Davos last week that he and his nation are “choosing peace,” adding that “everyone loses in war, and everyone gains in peace.”In other interviews, Mikati praised Hezbollah, who he said was being “wise,” in a supposed attempt to convince the world that there is a chance for diplomacy in Lebanon and that a war with Israel leading to severe irreversible damage can be prevented.Before these interviews, Mikati had sent a letter to the United Nations in which he stated that his country is willing to apply Resolution 1701 which states that only the Lebanese army is allowed to be active in the south of Lebanon.However, Hezbollah, which is not Lebanon’s military, has consistently violated the terms of the resolution. Since October 8, a day after Hamas went on a killing spree in southern Israel, Hezbollah has engaged in cross-border fire on a near-daily basis, launching rockets, drones and missiles at northern Israel in a campaign it says is in support of Hamas.The attacks forced most residents within several kilometers of the border to evacuate. Israel has responded with its own strikes on Hezbollah targets and has warned it will not be able to tolerate the terrorists’ continued presence on the border.The problem is that Mikati, who is unable to control Hezbollah, cannot ensure the application of the resolution, and Lebanon’s lack of a president makes the situation all the more complex. After former president Michel Aoun ended his term in October 2022, the country found itself facing a power vacuum as more than 10 rounds of voting in over a year have failed to produce a clear winner between Hezbollah-backed Sleiman Frangieh and Jihad Azour, who is the favorite amid Hezbollah’s opposition.A diplomatic resolution between Israel and Hezbollah would likely require the involvement of a Lebanese president who could get Hezbollah to withdraw from the South of Lebanon. For this to be achieved, a president would have to be elected who isn’t reliant on Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah’s support and has widespread public approval.Even then, Hezbollah would be unlikely to withdraw further than the Litani River, which runs parallel to and 29 k.m. (18 miles) from the Israeli border, but as American negotiator Amos Hochstein suggested, the terrorist organization would likely opt for 7-8 k.m. (4-5 miles) away from the border.At the moment, however, even this achievement seems to be impossible for the foreseeable future, and in the meantime, Hezbollah’s attacks on Israel are preventing tens of thousands of Israelis from returning to their homes up north.Gaza: Palestinians must pay a fortune to leave-Meanwhile, many Palestinians in Gaza are also desperate to get out of the line of fire as the Israel-Hamas war wages on, and according to a Bloomberg report, they are forced to sell all their belongings, take out loans, and pay thousands of dollars to Egyptian smugglers and Hamas to leave Gaza. Some of them are even using crowdsourcing websites to be able to afford the exorbitant prices.Even in peacetime, leaving Gaza through the Egyptian Rafah comes at a high price. Many Gazans have said they have had to bribe Hamas officials for a permit to leave. To get out of Gaza, the residents need a foreign passport, an entry visa to the US or one of the Arab countries, and influence that could help get them and their families onto lists that are approved by Hamas, Egypt, Israel, or the US.One of the people who had no trouble getting the required approvals is Wael Dahdouh, one of the senior reporters at the Qatari publication Al-Jazeera. At the beginning of the war, Dahdouh’s wife and some of his kids were killed in Israeli airstrikes, and about a week ago, another son, who was seemingly a Palestinian Islamic Jihad terrorist, was also killed.Dahdouh was able to cross the border to Egypt last week and was flown from there to Qatar. In the eyes of the Gazan public, Dahdouh is a hero who lost his family to the struggle against Israel.For years, Al-Jazeera has been a Hamas mouthpiece in Gaza and has even aided the terrorist organization in spreading its propaganda and gaining support, both within the Strip and from outside of it. Today, while many Gazans are trapped there and are suffering the consequences of Hamas’s war, Dahdouh gets special treatment and has been flown to Qatar while many others, who also lost their families and suffered injuries, cannot fund the means to get themselves out and have no choice but to stay.Syria: Farmers are forced to leave the fields-In Syria, civil war and ISIS are forcing farmers to leave their land alongside climate-related issues like heatwaves, and drought. Since the civil war began in Syria in 2011, the rural population in the country has been reduced by half.Many of them have become refugees and escaped from Syrian President Bashar Assad’s army or ISIS terrorists. Others have been forced to neglect their agricultural work as conditions of heavy heat and decreasing rain have made farming unbearable.The Raqqa area in the northern part of Syria has always been considered the country’s bread basket. Now, many farmers are abandoning their families’ fields because of the severe neglect and a lack of investment from the ruling regime as well as a lack of water and quality pesticides among other difficulties.Many of the farmers are leaving their villages and moving to the big cities and they usually do not come back. Meanwhile, the West has slapped many sanctions on Syria, and as long as Assad and his regime continue to control the country, they will not be canceled. Therefore, Syria needs more domestic industry to support its people.However, because of the sanctions, it cannot import the machines needed to aid the farmers in dealing with climate change. The politics in Syria are stalling the farmers and will eventually lead to a rise in the cost of living and maybe even famine in the destroyed country that is ruled by a cruel dictator.Times of Israel staff contributed to this report.