EVENTS IN TIME (BIBLE PROPHECY LITERALLY FULFILLED)(BY GOD)

I WRITE NEWS ABOUT AND PUT NEWS ARTICLES ABOUT ISRAEL AND JERUSALEM PERTAINING TO BIBLE PROPHESY HAPPENINGS.JOEL 3:20 But Judah (ISRAEL) shall dwell for ever, and Jerusalem from generation to generation.(THATS ISRAEL-JERUSALEM WILL NEVER BE DESTROYED AGAIN)-WE CHRISTIANS ARE ALL WAITING PATIENTLY FOR THE PRE-TRIBULATION RAPTURE TO OCCUR.SO WE CAN GO TO JESUS AND GET OUR NEVER DYING BODIES.SO WE CAN RULE OVER CITIES OURSELVES.WHILE JESUS RULES FROM DAVIDS THRONE FOREVER IN JERUSALEM.

Tuesday, November 08, 2016

THE DOW WAS UP 371 POINTS MONDAY-YESTERDAY

2016 OVERALL PRESIDENTIAL RESULTS FROM ALL 50 STATES.THE ELECTION RESULT TRUMP VS CLINTON FOR PRESIDENT.TUE NOV 08,2016

JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.GET SAVED NOW- CALL ON JESUS TODAY.THE ONLY SAVIOR OF THE WHOLE EARTH - NO OTHER. 1 COR 15:23-JESUS THE FIRST FRUITS-CHRISTIANS RAPTURED TO JESUS-FIRST FRUITS OF THE SPIRIT-23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.ROMANS 8:23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.(THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE)

2016 OVERALL PRESIDENTIAL RESULTS FROM ALL 50 STATES.THE ELECTION RESULT TRUMP VS CLINTON FOR PRESIDENT.TUE NOV 08,2016

ECV = ELECTORAL C0LLEGE VOTES
** DOES NOT CAST ELECTORAL VOTES
TOTAL ELECTORAL COLLEGE VOTES 538 NEEDED TO WIN THE PRESIDENCY 270 ECV

AL - ALABAMA PRIMARIES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 09)
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 1,306,925 62.9% - WINNER STATES 01 - ECV 09 - TOT 09
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 718,084 34.6%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 43,869 02.1%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 9,287 00.4%
SENATE RESULTS - REP - SHELBY - HOUSE RESULTS REP 06 - DEM 01

AK - ALASKA CAUCUSES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 03)
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 130,415 52.9% - WINNER STATES 02 - ECV 03 - TOT 12
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 93,007 37.7%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 14,593 05.9%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 4,445 01.8%
SENATE RESULTS - REP - MURKOWSK1 - HOUSE RESULTS REP 01 - DEM 00

AS - AMERICAN SAMOA CAUCUS TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 00) **
REP - DONALD TRUMP -VOTES - WINNER 00
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON -VOTES - WINNER 00

AZ - ARIZONA PRIMARIES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 11)
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 1,021,154 49.5% - WINNER STATES 03 - ECV 11 - TOT 23
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 936,250 45.4%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 80,151 03.9%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 25,255 01.2%
SENATE RESULTS - REP - MCCAIN - HOUSE RESULTS REP 05 - DEM 04

AR - ARKANSAS PRIMARIES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 06)
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 677,904 60.4% - WINNER STATES 04 - ECV 06 - TOT 29
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 378,729 33.8%
SENATE RESULTS - REP - BOOZMAN - HOUSE RESULTS REP 04 - DEM 00

CA - CALIFORNIA PRIMARIES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 55)
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 5,931,283 61.6% - WINNER STATES 01 - ECV 55 - TOT 55
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 3,184,721 33.1%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 308,392 03.2%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 166,311 01.7%
SENATE RESULTS - DEM - HARRIS - HOUSE RESULTS REP 14 - DEM 39

CO - COLORADO STATE ASSEMBLIES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 09)
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 1,212,209 47.3% - WINNER STATES 02 - ECV 09 - TOT 64
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 1,137,455 44.4%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 129,451 05.0%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 33,147 01.3%
SENATE RESULTS - DEM - BENNET - HOUSE RESULTS REP 04 - DEM 03

CT - CONNECTICUT PRIMARIES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 07)
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 884,432 54.5% - WINNER STATES 03 - ECV 07 - TOT 71
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 668,266 41.2%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 48,051 03.0%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 22,793 01.4%
SENATE RESULTS - DEM - BLUMEMTHAL - HOUSE RESULTS REP 00 - DEM 05

DE - DELAWARE PRIMARIES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 03)
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 235,581 53.4% - WINNER STATES 04 - ECV 03 - TOT 74
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 185,103 41.9%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 14,751 03.3%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 6,100 01.4%
SENATE RESULTS - NONE - HOUSE RESULTS REP 00 - DEM 01

DA - DEMOCRATES ABROAD PRIMARY TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 00) **
REP - DONALD TRUMP -VOTES - WINNER 00
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON -VOTES - WINNER 00

DC - DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CAUCUS TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 03)
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 260,223 92.8% - WINNER STATES 05 - ECV 03 - TOT 77
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 11,553 04.1%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 4,501 01.6%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 3,995 01.4%
SENATE RESULTS - NONE - HOUSE NONE REP 00 - DEM 00

FL - FLORIDA PRIMARIES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 29)
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 4,605,515 49.1% - WINNER STATES 05 - ECV 29 - TOT 58
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 4,485,745 47.8%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 206,007 02.2%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 64,109 00.7%
SENATE RESULTS - REP - RUBIO - HOUSE RESULTS REP 16 - DEM 11

GA - GEORGIA PRIMARIES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 16)
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 2,068,623 51.3% - WINNER STATES 06 - ECV 16 - TOT 74
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 1,837,300 45.6%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 123,641 03.1%
SENATE RESULTS - REP - ISAKSON - HOUSE RESULTS REP 10 - DEM 04

GU - GUAM (CONVENTION) TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 00) **
REP - DONALD TRUMP -VOTES - WINNER 00
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON -VOTES - WINNER 00

HI - HAWAII CAUCUS TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 04)
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 266,827 62.2% - WINNER STATES 06 - ECV 04 - TOT 81
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 128,815 30.0%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 15,949 03.7%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 12,727 03.0%
SENATE RESULTS - DEM - SCHATZ - HOUSE RESULTS REP 00 - DEM 02

ID - IDAHO PRIMARY TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 04)
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 407,199 59.2% - WINNER STATES 07 - ECV 04 - TOT 78
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 189,677 27.6%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 28,256 04.1%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 8,464 01.2%
SENATE RESULTS - REP - CRAPO - HOUSE RESULTS REP 02 - DEM 00

IL - ILLINOIS PRIMARIES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 20)
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 2,977,498 55.4% - WINNER STATES 07 - ECV 20 - TOT 101
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 2,118,179 39.4%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 204,491 03.8%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 74,112 01.4%
SENATE RESULTS - DEM - DUCKWORTH - HOUSE RESULTS REP 07 - DEM 11

IN - INDIANA PRIMARIES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 11)
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 1,556,220 57.2% - WINNER STATES 08 - ECV 11 - TOT 89
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 1,031,953 37.9%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 133,856 04.9%
SENATE RESULTS - REP - YOUNG - HOUSE RESULTS REP 07 - DEM 02

IA - IOWA CAUCUSES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 06)
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 798,923 51.8% - WINNER STATES 09 - ECV 06 - TOT 95
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 650,790 42.2%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 57,322 03.7%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 11,119 00.7%
SENATE RESULTS - REP - GRASSLEY - HOUSE RESULTS REP 03 - DEM 01

KS - KANSAS CAUCUSES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 06)
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 656,009 57.2% - WINNER STATES 10 - ECV 06 - TOT 101
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 414,788 36.2%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 53,648 04.7%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 22,698 02.0%
SENATE RESULTS - REP - MORAN - HOUSE RESULTS REP 04 - DEM 00

KY - KENTUCKY CAUCUSES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 08)
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 1,202,942 62.5% - WINNER STATES 11 - ECV 08 - TOT 109
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 628,834 32.7%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 53,749 02.8%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 13,913 00.7%
SENATE RESULTS - REP - PAUL - HOUSE RESULTS REP 05 - DEM 01

LA - LOUISIANA PRIMARIES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 08)
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 1,178,004 58.1% - WINNER STATES 12 - ECV 08 - TOT 117
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 779,535 38.4%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 37,950 01.9%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 14,018 00.7%
SENATE RESULTS - REP - KENNEDY - HOUSE RESULTS REP 04 - DEM 02

ME - MAINE CAUCUS TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 04) (C-3 T-1)
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 354,873 47.9% - WINNER STATES 08 - ECV 03 - TOT 104
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 334,838 45.2% - WINNER STATES 12 - ECV 01 - TOT 118
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 37,764 05.1%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 14,075 01.9%
SENATE RESULTS - NONE - HOUSE RESULTS REP 01 - DEM 01

MD - MARYLAND PRIMARIES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 10)
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 1,497,951 60.5% - WINNER STATES 09 - ECV 10 - TOT 114
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 873,646 35.3%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 71,107 02.9%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 31,839 01.3%
SENATE RESULTS - DEM - VAN HOLLEN - HOUSE RESULTS REP 01 - DEM 07

MA - MASSACHUSETTS PRIMARIES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 11)
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 1,964,768 60.8% - WINNER STATES 10 - ECV 11 - TOT 125
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 1,083,069 33.5%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 136,784 04.2%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 46,910 01.5%
SENATE RESULTS - NONE - HOUSE RESULTS REP 00 - DEM 09

MI - MICHIGAN PRIMARIES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 16)
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 2,279,210 47.6% - WINNER STATES 13 - ECV 16 - TOT 133
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 2,267,373 47.3%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 173,021 03.6%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 51,686 01.1%
SENATE RESULTS -NONE - HOUSE RESULTS REP 09 - DEM 05

MN - MINNESOTA CAUCUSES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 10)
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 1,366,676 46.9% - WINNER STATES 11 - ECV 10 - TOT 135
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 1,322,891 45.4%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 112,944 03.9%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 36,957 01.3%
SENATE RESULTS - NONE - HOUSE RESULTS REP 03 - DEM 05

MS - MISSISSIPPI PRIMARIES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 06)
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 678,457 58.3% - WINNER STATES 14 - ECV 06 - TOT 139
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 462,001 39.7%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 13,789 01.2%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 3,580 00.3%
SENATE RESULTS - NONE - HOUSE RESULTS REP 03 - DEM 01

MO - MISSOURI PRIMARIES TUE NOV 08,16 (ECV 10)
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 1,585,753 57.1% - WINNER STATES 15 - ECV 10 - TOT 149
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 1,054,889 38.0%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 96,404 03.5%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 25,086 00.9%
SENATE RESULTS - REP - BLUNT - HOUSE RESULTS REP 06 - DEM 02

MT - MONTANA PRIMARIES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 03)
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 274,120 56.5% - WINNER STATES 16 - ECV 03 - TOT 152
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 174,521 36.0%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 27,264 05.6%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 7,669 01.6%
SENATE RESULTS - NONE - HOUSE RESULTS REP 01 - DEM 00

NE - NEBRASKA PRIMARY TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 05)
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 485,819 60.3% - WINNER STATES 17 - ECV 05 - TOT 157
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 273,858 34.0%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 37,615 04.7%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 8,346 01.0%
SENATE RESULTS - NONE - HOUSE RESULTS REP 03 - DEM 00

NV - NEVADA CAUCUSES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 06)
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 537,753 47.9% - WINNER STATES 12 - ECV 06 - TOT 141
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 511,319 45.5%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 37,299 03.3%
SENATE RESULTS - DEM - CORTEZ MASTO - HOUSE RESULTS REP 01 - DEM 03

NH - NEW HAMPSHIRE PRIMARIES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 04)
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 348,126 47.6% - WINNER STATES 13 - ECV 04 - TOT 145
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 345,598 47.3%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 30,530 04.2%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 6,374 00.9%
SENATE RESULTS - DEM - HASSAN - HOUSE RESULTS REP 00 - DEM 02

NJ - NEW JERSEY PRIMARIES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 14)
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 2,021,756 55.0% - WINNER STATES 14 - ECV 14 - TOT 159
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 1,535,513 41.8%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 68,695 01.9%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 35,949 01.0%
SENATE RESULTS - NONE - HOUSE RESULTS REP 05 - DEM 07

NM - NEW MEXICO PRIMARIES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 05)
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 380,724 48.3% - WINNER STATES 15 - ECV 05 - TOT 164
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 315,875 40.0%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 73,669 09.3%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 9,729 01.2%
SENATE RESULTS - NONE - HOUSE RESULTS REP 01 - DEM 02

NY - NEW YORK PRIMARIES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 29)
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON -VOTES - 4,143,874 58.8% - WINNER STATES 16 - ECV 29 - TOT 193
REP - DONALD TRUMP -VOTES - 2,640,570 37.5%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 99,895 01.4%
SENATE RESULTS - DEM - SCHUMER - HOUSE RESULTS REP 09 - DEM 18

NC - NORTH CAROLINA PRIMARIES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 15)
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 2,339,603 50.5% - WINNER STATES 18 - ECV 15 - TOT 172
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 2,162,074 46.7%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 127,794 02.8%
SENATE RESULTS - REP - BURR - HOUSE RESULTS REP 10 - DEM 03

ND - NORTH DAKOTA STATE CONVENTION TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 03)
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 216,133 64.1% - WINNER STATES 19 - ECV 03 - TOT 175
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 93,526 27.8%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 21,351 06.3%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 3,769 01.1%
SENATE RESULTS - REP - HOEVEN - HOUSE RESULTS REP 01 - DEM 00

MP - NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS CAUCUS TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 00) **
REP - DONALD TRUMP -VOTES - WINNER 00
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON -VOTES - WINNER 00

OH - OHIO PRIMARIES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 18)
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 2,771,984 52.1% - WINNER STATES 20 - ECV 18 - TOT 193
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 2,317,001 43.5%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 168,599 03.2%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 44,310 00.8%
SENATE RESULTS - REP - PORTMAN - HOUSE RESULTS REP 12 - DEM 04

OK - OKLAHOMA PRIMARIES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 07)
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 947,934 65.3% - WINNER STATES 21 - ECV 07 - TOT 200
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 419,788 28.9%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 83,334 05.7%
SENATE RESULTS - REP - LANKFORD - HOUSE RESULTS REP 05 - DEM 00

OR - OREGON PRIMARIES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 07)
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 934,631 51.7% - WINNER STATES 17 - ECV 07 - TOT 200
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 742,506 41.1%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 86,306 04.8%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 45,132 02.5%
SENATE RESULTS - DEM - WEYDEN - HOUSE RESULTS REP 01 - DEM 04

PA - PENNSYLVANIA PRIMARIES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 20)
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 2,912,941 48.8% - WINNER STATES 22 - ECV 20 - TOT 220
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 2,844,705 47.6%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 142,653 02.4%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 48,912 00.08%
SENATE RESULTS - REP - TOOMEY - HOUSE RESULTS REP 13 - DEM 05

PR - PUERTO RICO PRIMARY TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 00) **
REP - DONALD TRUMP -VOTES - WINNER 00
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON -VOTES - WINNER 00

RI - RHODE ISLAND PRIMARIES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 04)
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON -V - 249,902 55.4% - WINNER STATES 18 - ECV 04 - TOT 204
REP - DONALD TRUMP -V - 179,421 39.8%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 14,643 03.2%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 6,155 01.4%
SENATE RESULTS - NONE - HOUSE RESULTS REP 00 - DEM 02

SC - SOUTH CAROLINA PRIMARIES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 09)
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 1,143,611 54.9% - WINNER STATES 23 - ECV 09 - TOT 229
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 849,469 40.8%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 48,715 02.3%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 12,917 00.06%
SENATE RESULTS - REP - SCOTT - HOUSE RESULTS REP 06 - DEM 01

SD - SOUTH DAKOTA PRIMARIES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 03)
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 227,701 61.5% - WINNER STATES 24 - ECV 03 - TOT 232
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 117,442 31.7%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 20,845 05.6%
SENATE RESULTS - REP - THUNE - HOUSE RESULTS REP 01 - DEM 00

TN - TENNESSEE PRIMARIES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 11)
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 1,517,402 61.1% - WINNER STATES 25 - ECV 11 - TOT 243
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 867,110 34.9%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 70,084 02.8%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 15,919 00.6%
SENATE RESULTS - NONE - HOUSE RESULTS REP 07 - DEM 02

TX - TEXAS PRIMARIES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 38)
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 4,681,590 52.6% - WINNER STATES 26 - ECV 38 - TOT 281
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 3,867,816 43.4%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 282,524 03.2%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 71,307 00.08%
SENATE RESULTS - NONE - HOUSE RESULTS REP 25 - DEM 11

UN - UNASSIGNED DEMOCRAT TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 00) **
REP - DONALD TRUMP -VOTES - WINNER 00
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON -VOTES - WINNER 00

VI - U.S VIRGIN ISLANDS CAUCUS TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 00) **
REP - DONALD TRUMP -VOTES - WINNER 00
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON -VOTES - WINNER 00

UT - UTAH CAUCUSES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 06)
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 419,031 46.3% - WINNER STATES 27 - ECV 06 - TOT 287
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 250,981 27.7%
IND - MCMULLIN - V - 189,154 20.9%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 29,921 03.3%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 6,680 00.07%
SENATE RESULTS - REP - LEE - HOUSE RESULTS REP 04 - DEM 00

VT - VERMONT PRIMARIES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 03)
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 178,179 61.1% - WINNER STATES 19 - ECV 03 - TOT 207
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 95,053 32.6%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 10,047 03.4%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 6,748 02.3%
SENATE RESULTS - DEM -LEAHY - HOUSE RESULTS REP 00 - DEM 01

VA - VIRGINIA PRIMARIES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 13)
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 1,916,845 49.9% - WINNER STATES 20 - ECV 13 - TOT 220
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 1,731,756 45.0%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 116,600 03.0%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 27,272 00.07%
SENATE RESULTS - NONE - HOUSE RESULTS REP 07 - DEM 04

WA - WASHINGTON PRIMARY TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 12)
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 1,523,720 55.1% - WINNER STATES 21 - ECV 12 - TOT 232
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 1,043.068 37.7%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 131,779 04.8%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 46,016 01.7%
SENATE RESULTS - DEM - MURRY - HOUSE RESULTS REP 04 - DEM 06

WV - WEST VIRGINIA PRIMARIES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 05)
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 486,198 68.7% - WINNER STATES 28 - ECV 05 - TOT 292
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 187,457 26.5%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 22,798 03.2%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 8,000 01.1%
SENATE RESULTS - NONE - HOUSE RESULTS REP 03 - DEM 00

WI - WISCONSIN PRIMARIES TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 10)
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 1,409,467 47.9% - WINNER STATES 29 - ECV 10 - TOT 302
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 1,382,210 46.9%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 106,442 03.6%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 30,980 01.1%
SENATE RESULTS - REP - JOHNSON - HOUSE RESULTS REP 05 - DEM 03

WY - WYOMING CONVENTION TUE NOV 08,16 - (ECV 04)
REP - DONALD TRUMP - V - 174,248 70.1% - WINNER STATES 30 - ECV 04 - TOT 306
DEM - HITLARY CLINTON - V - 55,949 22.5%
LIB - GARY JOHNSON - V - 13,285 05.3%
GP - JILL STEIN - V - 2,512 01.0%
SENATE RESULTS - NONE - HOUSE RESULTS REP 01 - DEM 00

OVERALL VOTES AS OF TUE NOV 08,2016
DEM-HITLER 2ND CLINTON - V - 60,981,118 47.8%
REP-DONALD TRUMP - V - 60,350,241 47.3%
OVERALL COLLEGE VOTES AS OF TUE NOV 08,2016
DONALD TRUMP - 306
HITLER 2ND CLINTON - 232
SENATE RESULTS
REPUBLICANS - 52
DEMOCRATS - 48
HOUSE RESULTS
REPUBLICANS - 238
DEMOCRATS - 193

ISLAMIC STATE IN IRAQ AND SYRIA TELLS AMERICA-GET READY FOR ELECTION DAY SLAUGHTER OF INFIDELS.ALSO NETANYAHU SAYS INFLUX OF JEWS TO ISRAEL IS FULFILLMENT OF BIBLICAL PROPHECY.

LUKE 21:28-29
28 And when these things begin to come to pass,(ALL THE PROPHECY SIGNS FROM THE BIBLE) then look up, and lift up your heads; for your redemption (RAPTURE) draweth nigh.
29 And he spake to them a parable; Behold the fig tree,(ISRAEL) and all the trees;(ALL INDEPENDENT COUNTRIES)
30 When they now shoot forth, ye see and know of your own selves that summer is now nigh at hand.(ISRAEL LITERALLY BECAME AND INDEPENDENT COUNTRY JUST BEFORE SUMMER IN MAY 14,1948.)

JOEL 2:3,30
3 A fire devoureth (ATOMIC BOMB) before them;(RUSSIAN-ARAB-MUSLIM ARMIES AGAINST ISRAEL) and behind them a flame burneth: the land is as the garden of Eden before them, and behind them a desolate wilderness; yea, and nothing shall escape them.
30 And I will shew wonders in the heavens and in the earth, blood, and fire, and pillars of smoke.(ATOMIC BOMB AFFECT)

ZECHARIAH 14:12-13
12 And this shall be the plague wherewith the LORD will smite all the people that have fought against Jerusalem; Their flesh shall consume away while they stand upon their feet,(DISOLVED FROM ATOMIC BOMB) and their eyes shall consume away in their holes,(DISOLVED FROM ATOMIC BOMB) and their tongue shall consume away in their mouth.(DISOLVED FROM ATOMIC BOMB)(BECAUSE NUKES HAVE BEEN USED ON ISRAELS ENEMIES)(GOD PROTECTS ISRAEL AND ALWAYS WILL)
13 And it shall come to pass in that day, that a great tumult from the LORD shall be among them; and they shall lay hold every one on the hand of his neighbour, and his hand shall rise up against the hand of his neighbour.(1/2-3 BILLION DIE IN WW3)(THIS IS AN ATOMIC BOMB EFFECT)

EZEKIEL 20:47
47 And say to the forest of the south, Hear the word of the LORD; Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I will kindle a fire in thee, and it shall devour every green tree in thee, and every dry tree: the flaming flame shall not be quenched, and all faces from the south to the north shall be burned therein.

ZEPHANIAH 1:18
18 Neither their silver nor their gold shall be able to deliver them in the day of the LORD'S wrath; but the whole land shall be devoured by the fire of his jealousy: for he shall make even a speedy riddance of all them that dwell in the land.

MALACHI 4:1
1 For, behold, the day cometh, that shall burn as an oven;(FROM ATOMIC BOMBS) and all the proud, yea, and all that do wickedly, shall be stubble: and the day that cometh shall burn them up, saith the LORD of hosts, that it shall leave them neither root nor branch.

And here are the bounderies of the land that Israel will inherit either through war or peace or God in the future. God says its Israels land and only Israels land. They will have every inch God promised them of this land in the future.
Egypt east of the Nile River, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, The southern part of Turkey and the Western Half of Iraq west of the Euphrates. Gen 13:14-15, Psm 105:9,11, Gen 15:18, Exe 23:31, Num 34:1-12, Josh 1:4.ALL THIS LAND ISRAEL WILL DEFINATELY OWN IN THE FUTURE, ITS ISRAELS NOT ISHMAELS LAND.12 TRIBES INHERIT LAND IN THE FUTURE

Ryan joins Pence to urge Republicans to ‘come home’ for Trump-House speaker, who has publicly been at odds with his GOP party’s nominee, says free speech, gun rights and health care are at stake-By Scott Bauer November 5, 2016, 9:36 pm-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL

MUKWONAGO, Wis. (AP) — House Speaker Paul Ryan and Donald Trump’s running mate, Mike Pence, joined Saturday in a gesture of Republican unity at a rally in Wisconsin’s most conservative county, a month after Ryan said he would no longer defend or campaign with Trump.Both Pence and Ryan said it was time for Republicans to “come home” and vote for Trump. Pence heaped praise on Ryan, calling him a friend and great conservative leader, just days after he declined to say whether Ryan should be re-elected speaker.Both are possible White House hopefuls in the future. Another potential 2020 contender, Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, also came to the rally. The governor warmed to the divisive nominee after dropping his own presidential campaign.Pence and Ryan hugged before being joined by Walker and others.Pence called Ryan a friend who as speaker would help Trump enact his agenda as president.“Paul Ryan is one of the great conservative leaders in America and Wisconsin should be proud,” Pence said.Ryan’s awkward relationship with Trump hit a low point a month ago when the speaker canceled Trump’s appearance at what was to be a Republican unity rally in Wisconsin. That followed the disclosure of a 2005 video in which Trump made crude comments about imposing himself on women. Ryan, who was booed at that event, said then he would not defend or campaign with the nominee.The only booing Saturday was directed at Hillary Clinton. Ryan told the crowd he voted early for Trump “because it is time to come home and go out and vote.” Ryan said free speech, gun rights and health care are at stake.“When Donald Trump says that he wants a special session to repeal and replace Obamacare, let me tell you as speaker of the House we are ready, we are willing and we have a plan to do that,” Ryan said. “But that only happens if we win this election.”Saturday’s rally was in deeply Republican Waukesha County.

Trump pressing into Democratic territory in final days-Republican candidate heads to battleground states in last push before election-By Lisa Lerer and Steve Peoples November 6, 2016, 1:50 am-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL

PEMBROKE PINES, Fla. (AP) — Fighting as a party of one, Donald Trump vowed Saturday to press into Democratic strongholds over the campaign’s final days as Hillary Clinton looked to an army of A-list celebrities and politicos to defend her narrowing path to the presidency.The divisive Republican outsider conceded he was largely on his own — even as he promised to march into Minnesota, a state that hasn’t backed a GOP presidential nominee in more than four decades.“Hillary Clinton has all of these celebrities and failed politicians out campaigning for her,” a defiant Trump declared in North Carolina, one of four battleground states he was visiting on Saturday. “I just have me, but I have my family.”Responding to Trump’s push, Democrat Clinton announced plans to devote valuable attention to Michigan, another unlikely battleground where both she and President Obama planned to campaign on Monday.The Democratic nominee faced dark skies Saturday in Florida, fighting intense rain and wind in a key battleground state before a Pennsylvania appearance with pop singer Katy Perry. Clinton was preparing to campaign Sunday with basketball superstar Lebron James, having shared the stage the night before with music diva Beyoncé and hip hop mogul husband Jay Z.“My personal favorite part — Beyoncé had her backup singers in pantsuits” Clinton said with a laugh in Pembroke Pines, Florida.The final-days scramble highlighted sharp differences between the campaigns in a turbulent 2016 campaign season.Backed by President Barack Obama and her party’s political elite, Clinton spent much of the last year fighting to unify Obama’s coalition of minorities and younger voters, aided at times by Trump’s deep unpopularity among women in both parties.Trump has courted working-class white voters on the strength of his own celebrity, having scared off many would-be Republican allies during a campaign marred by extraordinary gaffes and self-created crises. Just four weeks ago, a video emerged in which a married Trump admitted to kissing women and grabbing their genitalia without their permission.Even with the damaging video, Clinton faced extraordinary challenges of her own in recent days after the FBI confirmed plans to renew its focus on the former secretary of state’s email practices. The development is seen as particularly threatening for Clinton in states, like Michigan, Pennsylvania and New Hampshire that don’t offer early voting.At least 41 million Americans across 48 states have already cast ballots, according to an Associated Press analysis. That’s significantly more votes four days before Election Day than voted early in the 2012.House Speaker Paul Ryan campaigned Saturday alongside Trump’s running mate, Mike Pence — a rare show of unity, but not with Trump himself.The speaker encouraged Republicans to “come home” to support Trump in Ryan’s home-state Wisconsin, ignoring for a day his icy relationship with the Republican nominee.Trump has frustrated party leaders in many ways, particularly by ignoring the hard work that fuels most successful modern-day campaigns.The Republican outsider has done little to collect data on prospective supporters. He has no significant staffing presence on the ground in key states. And he has been unwilling to invest in a major advertising campaign to keep pace with his Democratic rival.Clinton’s campaign has spent more than $267 million in television advertising through Election Day. Trump, who claims a net worth of roughly $10 billion, has invested $93 million, according to data collected by Kantar Media.His entire campaign strategy has hinged on an aggressive schedule packed with massive rallies. The path of his luxury campaign jet has been fueled by somewhat risky ambition at times, however.Rather than hunkering down in must-win Florida this weekend, Trump flew Saturday to Democratic-leaning territory: Wilmington, North Carolina, then Reno, Nevada, and Denver. And as defiant as ever, he promised to make subsequent appearances in Pennsylvania, Michigan and Minnesota.Minnesota hasn’t cast its electoral votes for a Republican since 1972. A Republican nominee hasn’t won Michigan or Pennsylvania since 1988.“We’re going into what they used to call Democrat strongholds, where we’re now either tied or leading,” he said in Florida.Later in the day in North Carolina appearance, he mocked Clinton’s schedule: “She doesn’t have what it takes to do rallies all over the place. She wants to go home and go to sleep.”Trump may not have Clinton’s celebrities, but he has relied on his family for public support at times.On Saturday, he made a rare campaign stop with his wife, Melania Trump, whose appearance came as The Associated Press revealed more details about her early employment in the U.S.The AP found that Melania Trump was paid for modeling jobs in the United States worth $20,056 that occurred in the seven weeks before she had legal permission to work in the country, according to detailed accounting ledgers, contracts and related documents from 20 years ago.While showering his wife with affection, Trump also boasted Saturday that he doesn’t need stars to fill his venues.He campaigned Saturday with retired football coach Lou Holtz and actor Joe Piscopo. An event with New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie that was scheduled for Saturday was canceled after two of his top aides were found guilty Friday on all counts for their roles in the George Washington Bridge lane-closure scandal.“We do it the old-fashioned way,” Trump said.

PM hails ‘tremendous’ contribution of Israel’s immigrants-On eve of first ‘Aliyah Day’ holiday, Netanyahu says influx of Jews is ‘fulfillment of biblical prophecy’-By Times of Israel staff November 7, 2016, 6:35 pm

A day before Israel marks its first official “Aliyah Day” holiday to honor its immigrants, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday praised their “tremendous contribution” to the country.The Knesset passed the National Aliyah Day into law in June, with 21 Knesset members in favor and five opposed. Literally “ascension,” aliyah is a Hebrew term used to refer to Jewish immigration to Israel.Nearly all Israelis, if not immigrants themselves, are the descendants of immigrants, many of whom fled Europe before and after the Holocaust, or were expelled from Arab countries in the early 1950s.“The contribution of so many different communities is so broad and deep,” Netanyahu said at a meeting of his Likud party’s MKs. The prime minister also praised immigrants’ contribution to Israel’s relationship with the countries from which they emigrated.“I see it in Russia, in Ukraine, in France. They don’t just contribute to Israel, they contribute to Israel’s foreign relations,” he said.“Aliyah is the foundation of the state of the Jews and the fulfillment of the biblical prophecy of the Jewish people returning to its land and building it.”The new holiday, which will be celebrated on Tuesday this year, was the result of a bill by MKs Robert Ilatov (Yisrael Beytenu) of the former Soviet Union, Avraham Neguise (Likud), Israel’s sole Ethiopian-born Israeli in parliament, Hilik Bar (Zionist Union), Micky Zohar (Likud) and other lawmakers.As part of Tuesday’s events, Jewish Agency chairman Natan Sharansky and Immigration Minister Sofa Landver will take part in a special meeting of the Immigration Committee to mark the day.The day will be marked by celebrations in the Knesset, a special cabinet session, and events at the President’s Residence, in schools, the army, and the police force, the law stipulates.Marissa Newman contributed to this report.

Canadian Jews press government to accept Yazidi refugees-Yazidi families fleeing IS brutality are being privately sponsored by Jewish donors to come to Canada-By Emily Rose November 6, 2016, 10:03 pm-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL

In June, the Jewish Federation of Winnipeg, Manitoba, launched Operation Ezra, which brought the first privately sponsored Yazidi family of refugees to Canada. Now it has taken on the mission to lead the charge in refugee relief and press the government to take in more families.Yazidis are an ethnically Kurdish religious minority who have suffered brutality at the hands of the radical Islamic State group. During a systematic campaign against the Yazidis in 2014 in Sinjar, near Mosul, an estimated 3,000 to 5,000 civilians were killed and 5,000 to 7,000 abducted and enslaved, most of them women and children, according to the Global Yazidi Organization.According to assessments, there are currently some 400,000 Yazidis in northern Iraq and Syria who are still in danger of murder and enslavement at the hands of IS terrorists.The Operation Ezra coalition of Winnipeg, founded for the purpose of helping Yazidis fleeing prosecution, recently announced that it had “raised just under $300,000” to help them.“The monies collected go directly to supporting the families being sponsored through Operation Ezra,” the organization announced, and stated that “to date, the organization has submitted applications for a total of seven families, or 42 people altogether.”The Canadian government allows for private sponsorship of refugees, but dictates that sponsors are 100% financially responsible for the refugees for the first 12 months after their arrival in the country. After that, the government bears financial responsibility for the family if needed. Operation Ezra also aims to help integrate those families into the community so that they can eventually sustain themselves.Michel Aziza, a member of the Winnipeg Jewish Community and a co-founder of the Operation Ezra coalition of Winnipeg, said he was inspired to help the Yazidis because their plight reminded him of that suffered by European Jews during the Holocaust.“Our group reached out to the Yazidi Community in March 2015, ” he told The Times of Israel, “to learn more about their plight and see what we, as a small group of individuals, could do to help.”Shortly after launching Operation Ezra as a grassroots project, Aziza reached out to both the Jewish Federation of Winnipeg and Jewish Child and Family Services and asked if they would take the lead, allowing them to make the project a community-wide endeavor with far greater reach.“This is ultimately what happened,” Aziza said, “and over the weeks and months that followed, we formed a coalition of 22 agencies and organizations.”Now the organization is focused on changing Canadian policy and pressuring the government to accept more refugees. Last month, Canadian MPs voted unanimously to declare IS persecution against the Yazidis a genocide and vowed to bring Yazidi refugees fleeing persecution to Canada within four months.“We reached out to as many MP’s as we could,” Aziza said, “and reached out to senior members of the current government. We held meetings with them, we had calls with them, we developed concepts and ideas for the government to consider. We even attended a parliamentary committee dealing with the plight of refugees in Ottawa last July.”“We are the only organized effort focused on rescuing Yazidi refugees in North America. No one else has done what we have been able to accomplish so far,” Aziza said.He said that The Jewish community of Winnipeg had rallied in order to help the refugees who were brought through Operation Ezra, helping them to adjust to their new home. He was happy to report that the family he had sponsored was doing well and that the kids were all enrolled in public school.“We set up a small house for them and furnished the home with donated goods from the Community as well as corporate sponsors like the Salvation Army and even IKEA,” Aziza said.He said Operation Ezra constituted a community-wide effort to save lives.“The Yazidi people we work with are infinitely grateful for what we have done,” he said. “We are the only community to have reached out to them and taken the lead in helping them save their own people. It is an amazing feeling.”

PM insists on impartiality, as Herzog warns against meddling in US election-Opposition leader accuses Netanyahu proxies of interference, says ‘Israeli politicians should stay out of American business’-By Raoul Wootliff November 7, 2016, 4:55 pm-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday reiterated his impartial stance on the US elections, telling a meeting of his Likud faction that bilateral ties would remain intact whoever wins on Tuesday.“Whatever the result, the relationship between Israel and the US will remain strong and steadfast,” the prime minister said, a day after instructing cabinet ministers to refrain from commenting on the election.Stressing that the relationship was based on both “joint values” and “joint interests,” Netanyahu said the American public views Israel as its strongest ally.“A recent Gallup poll showed that the US support for Israel gets stronger and stronger ever year,” he said. “I’ll repeat what I said in Congress last year: Israel has no better friend than the US and the US has no better friend than Israel.”The prime minister’s comments came shortly after opposition leader Isaac Herzog urged him not to take sides in the elections. Such Israeli interference, Herzog said at a meeting of his Zionist Union faction, “will only damage the Israeli public.”Calling the race between Democrat Hillary Clinton and Republican Donald Trump “the most important election in the world,” Herzog said all Israeli politicians should stay out of America’s business.“Recently there have again been reports of Israeli leaders interfering in the elections through overseas proxies,” he said.“I call on Netanyahu to instruct those close to him to make sure no damage is done,” he said, without elaborating or naming any alleged culprits.During the previous US elections in 2012 Netanyahu was accused of leaning toward Republican candidate Mitt Romney and, in subtle ways, trying to aid his campaign for the White House.At the same Zionist Union meeting, the first after Saturday’s Tel Aviv rally in memory of slain Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, Herzog said that if hatred and incitement had been dealt with appropriately 21 years ago, the assassination could have been prevented.“I will not allow anyone to spread hatred – not the head of the coalition, not a minister, no one,” he said, referencing coalition chair David Bitan’s statement that Rabin’s assassination was “not political.” Denouncing Bitan’s comments, which came shortly before the rally, became the central theme of the memorial.“Twenty-one years after that terrible night we continue to hear incitement against soldiers, journalist judges, police — anyone who doesn’t think like those spreading the hate,” Herzog said. “We will petition the attorney general, the relevant courts and the Supreme Court to stop this disease.”Stuart Winer contributed to this report.

Iran to ink $6 billion gas deal with France’s Total-In first major signing in Western company since nuclear deal, Tehran to develop offshore field with consortium that includes China-By AFP November 7, 2016, 5:51 pm-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL

TEHRAN — Iran will sign a deal with France’s Total on Tuesday for the development of gas production at a major offshore field in the Gulf, the Iranian oil ministry said.The Heads of Agreement (HOA) for the development of Phase 11 of the important South Pars field is worth $6 billion, a ministry spokesman told AFP.The accord must be finalized within six months, the spokesman added.The agreement involves a consortium led by Total, which includes the China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) and Iran’s Petropars.The deal will be the first of its kind between Iran and a Western petroleum company since a nuclear deal with world powers took effect in January, lifting some international sanctions.It also marks the return of Total to Iran, years after it left the Islamic republic in 2012 when France took part in European Union sanctions, including an oil embargo.Total reached a general agreement in 2004 with Iran for the development of Phase 11 and a gas plant. But it was never finalized.In June 2009 Tehran signed a nearly $5-billion agreement with CNPC for the development of that phase. That contract was also cancelled in early 2013, because the Chinese side didn’t honor its commitments.The offshore South Pars field, shared by Iran and Qatar in the Gulf, contains some 14,000 billion cubic meters of gas — 8 percent of the world’s known reserves.

Luxembourg FM comapres Turkey crackdown to Nazi Germany-Ankara’s EU affairs minister counters that Hitler’s army would be ‘like schoolchildren’ compard to alleged coup plotters-By Geir Moulson November 7, 2016, 5:34 pm-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL

BERLIN, Germany (AP) — Luxembourg’s foreign minister accused Turkish authorities on Monday of using methods reminiscent of those employed by Nazis in a crackdown following July’s coup attempt.In a German radio interview, Jean Asselborn suggested that Turkey’s strong economic ties with the European Union could be used to exert pressure on Ankara over human rights issues.Turkey brushed off the accusation, arguing that the movement led by a US-based cleric whom the government accuses of masterminding the failed coup is worse than the Nazis. It insisted it would not be deterred from its efforts to go after cleric Fethullah Gulen’s network of followers.Opposition parties in Turkey and human rights groups accuse the government of clamping down on all critics, not just alleged coup plotters.Asselborn told Germany’s Deutschlandfunk radio that people who’ve been fired have their names published, have their passports destroyed, have no chance of finding another job and no income, and risk hunger.“These are methods, one must say this bluntly, that were used during Nazi rule,” said Asselborn, who has a record of making outspoken comments. “And there has been a really, really bad evolution in Turkey since July that we as the European Union cannot simply accept.”Turkey’s EU Affairs Minister Omer Celik retorted that “the issue does not resemble Nazi-era practices, rather the struggle against the Nazis after they were chased from power.”“Compared to the (Gulen movement) Nazis would resemble apprentices. They would appear like schoolchildren next to the (Gulen movement),” he said.“No one should think that we would step back from our struggle against an organization that used warplanes, tanks, battleships and helicopters against its own people.”Asselborn said that Turkey’s strong economic ties with the EU are “absolutely a means of pressure.”“At a certain moment we will not be able to get around using this means of pressure to counteract the unspeakable state of human rights,” he added.Germany, the EU’s most populous country, sounded unenthusiastic about that idea.“The German government is not participating now in a debate about sanctions,” said Chancellor Angela Merkel’s spokesman, Steffen Seibert.He said Europe needs to make clear to Turkey “what effects the repression of the press and the repression of the opposition have on relations … and for that it is important to keep open channels of communication.”

Islamic State threatens US election day ‘slaughter’-As Iraqi forces battle jihadist group in Mosul, its propaganda arm denounces Muslim Americans who vote as ‘apostates’-By Times of Israel staff November 6, 2016, 5:36 am

The Islamic State on Friday threatened a “slaughter” and “dreadful calamity” against the United States during Tuesday’s elections in an anti-democratic screed published by the group’s propaganda arm.The English-language text published by the Al Hayat media center entitled “The Murtadd [apostate] vote” rails against American democracy and denounces American Muslims who take part in the electoral process.Friday’s publication came as the Islamic State battled with Iraqi and Kurdish forces for control of Mosul, as troops pushed into the city following a two-weeks offensive. The jihadist group captured Iraq’s second largest city two years ago and separate forces of Iraqi regulars, Kurdish fighters and Shiite militias launched a campaign last month to retake the stronghold.Iraqi special forces threw themselves back into battle Saturday after a first foray into Mosul was blunted by stiffer than expected resistance from jihadists defending the birthplace of their “caliphate.”Rita Katz, head of the SITE intelligence group that published the document, said that the incitement to attacks on Election Day were “an attempt to disrupt the election process and gain media attention.”1)Breaking: #ISIS special Hayat media doc calls for attacks on voters on #ElectionDay demands Muslims not participate in Democratic process pic.twitter.com/w2UKmsQIxo— Rita Katz (@Rita_Katz) November 5, 2016-“We denounce your democratic kufr [disbelief in Islam],” the jihadist group said Friday as counter-terrorism forces made their first real push into the streets of Mosul. “Indeed, we have come to slaughter you and smash your ballot boxes.”Muslims who participate in democracy “while claiming to support ‘Islam'” are apostates, the group said, “whose blood is obligatory to spill unless he repents.”“The blood of Crusader voters is even more deserving of being spilled than the blood of Crusader combatants,” the organization added, with particular emphasis on violence against women who go to the ballot in Tuesday’s much-anticipated presidential election.Concerning the two presidential candidates, Republican Donald Trump and Democrat Hillary Clinton, the Islamic State said that the only differences between the two in terms of their policies vis-a-vis Muslims are that “Clinton is more skilled in ‘political correctness,’ giving her leverage in the sorcery of hypocrisy… and that Trump is impulsive and unpredictable.”“May Allah make this year’s US presidential election a dreadful calamity like no other to have struck America throughout its pathetic history,” the article said in closing.The essay was released the same day the FBI and New York Police Department said they are assessing the credibility of information they received of a possible al-Qaeda terror plot against the US on the eve of Election Day.Officials said counterterrorism investigators are reviewing the information that mentioned New York, Texas and Virginia as potential target sites.It wasn’t immediately clear how the intelligence came to investigators’ attention. An NYPD spokesman said in a statement that the information “lacks specificity.”The FBI said it was working closely with law enforcement agencies and sharing intelligence reports.AP contributed to this report.

Monday, November 07, 2016

LAW ENFORCEMENT BEGS THE WORLD:READ HILLARY E-MAILS TO FIND CHILD RAPE EVIDENCE.

Law Enforcement Begs World: Read Hillary Emails to Find Child Rape Evidence-Hillary linked to child sex ring, emails suggest-Kit Daniels - November 5, 2016-INFOWARS.COM

The Clinton campaign and its associates sought out underage children for “entertainment” at a hot tub party and made strange references to “hot dogs” and “Beanie Babies” in emails which may contain code for pedophilia or other illegal activities, according to investigative researchers.Law enforcement sources have asked the public to point out potential code words for “weapons, drugs and people” in the emails released by Wikileaks – and evidence of child sex trafficking would explain why the FBI reopened their investigation into Hillary Clinton despite severe political blowback.Be warned: while these emails could refer to non-sensical, inside jokes, that’s not the conclusion of many of those who’ve seen these bizarre emails – and there’s hundreds.An Oct. 2015 email inviting members of the campaign to a rural getaway pointed out that three children ages 11, 9 and almost 7 would be supplied for entertainment.According to the email:With enormous gratitude to Advance Man Extraordinaire Haber, I am popping up again to share our excitement about the Reprise of Our Gang’s visit to the farm in Lovettsville. And I thought I’d share a couple more notes:We plan to heat the pool, so a swim is a possibility. Bonnie will be Uber Service to transport Ruby, Emerson, and Maeve Luzzatto (11, 9, and almost 7) so you’ll have some further entertainment, and they will be in that pool for sure. And with the forecast showing prospects of some sun, and a cooler temp of lower 60s, I suggest you bring sweaters of whatever attire will enable us to use our outdoor table with a pergola overhead so we dine al fresco (and ideally not al-CHILLo).The FBI and NYPD have reportedly opened up an investigation into sex crimes linked to Hillary Clinton.Remember, all this started after the FBI and NYPD began looking into Clinton insider Anthony Weiner’s alleged sex crimes – and the investigation hasn’t stopped at Weiner.The NYPD was ready to make arrests in the Weiner case and wanted to do a press conference announcing the warrants and the additional arrests they were making , but received “huge pushback” from the Justice Department, according to Blackwater founder Erik Price who had insider intel.And it’s worth noting that Clinton campaign chair John Podesta practices bizarre occult rituals, including “spirit cooking” involving blood and semen which is described as “a sacrament in the religion of Thelema that was founded by English occultist Aleister Crowley.Another email in particular about a “Beanie Baby” fire sell sent to the Clinton campaign from the Georgetown Law announcements board seems innocent at first, but raises questions upon investigation:Georgetown Law Faculty and Staff, My parents are visiting this weekend, and I need to sell my enormous collection of beanie babies! I’ve approximately 480 little creatures of joy, and I’m selling each one for $20.00. You must buy all 480, though. It is a collection (not an auction)… They are very respectful and amicable with one another, and they are (for the most part) cat and dog friendly. Some are sassier than others, naturally. Please let me know! My parents can’t find out.If you take the email at face value, a middle-aged lawyer wants $9600 up front for 480 stuffed animals who are “cat and dog friendly” and have human personalities (“some are sassier than others”) because his “parents are visiting this weekend” and they “can’t find out.”But here’s the thing: the Beanie Baby fad died out over a decade ago. Most Beanie Babies are now worth way less than $20 a piece, which is the advertised price in this email.This would be like someone buying 500 baseball cards at $20 a piece without knowing if any of them are even valuable. One card might be worth $100, and the rest only a penny.And typically, when someone is selling an entire lot of collectable items, such as baseball cards or rare Beanie Babies, he’ll list a few of the most rare, collectable ones in the lot, but you don’t see that in this email.Ask youself, would you pay $9600 for a collection of baseball cards that the seller could have just easily picked up at the grocery store for $10? Of course not.“Random beanie babies (since author didn’t bother to mention any specific dolls to justify the valuation) – in a large lot like that would barely fetch $1000,” one researcher said.-beanies-Besides, who in the hell is going to spend nearly $10K all at once for a load of 90s-era stuffed animals which could fill a small apartment? Unless you’re reselling them on eBay, but like I said, most of them aren’t worth $20.Another red flag: the asking price is just below $10K, and according to the Bank Secrecy Act, anyone who receives more than $10K in a cash transaction must report the exchange to the IRS.This is what got former House Speaker – and admitted child molester – Dennis Hastert caught when he attempted to make a payoff to keep someone quiet about his crimes.Going back to the email, it’d also seem easier to just rent out a storage unit to store “Beanie Babies” instead of trying to sell nearly 500 of them all at once to middle-aged political insiders – a very narrow range of potential buyers who probably don’t collect stuffed animals like their grandmothers.The seller attached a picture of a Beanie Baby collection to the email, but using a reverse image search, the image appeared to be a publicly-available photo that appeared on several blogs as far back as Oct. 2014 and perhaps even earlier. The seller’s email was dated June 2015.A Vietnam-era political activist said the email was similar to the “code word” ads he used to place in newspaper classifieds.“We frequently had to move ‘packages’ of different types (political materials, stolen/copied files from gov’t agencies, and some groups moved draft dodgers through Boston going to Canada, of course), and we’d place our ads in the classified sections of free newspapers and on bulletin boards,” he said. “Heck, I still remember my group’s code words. The more things change, the more they stay the same.”As far as the 480 Beanie Babies for sale, he said 480 was likely also a code word and not an actual quantity.“I went with 48 rather than 480 because back in the day we’d add a 0 to things as a code for a ‘priority item’ – if something absolutely positively HAD to get there overnight [or dumped in a hurry due to a police raid,] it was 0. If this could wait a day, it would have been 481, 2 days 482, etc.”“The ’48’ was, for us, typically a type of item.”And a former weed dealer said this is how he’d translate the email (the original shown first):Georgetown Law Faculty and Staff, My parents are visiting this weekend, and I need to sell my enormous collection of beanie babies! I’ve approximately 480 little creatures of joy, and I’m selling each one for $20.00. You must buy all 480, though. It is a collection (not an auction)… They are very respectful and amicable with one another, and they are (for the most part) cat and dog friendly. Some are sassier than others, naturally. Please let me know! My parents can’t find out.Georgetown, the heat is on this weekend, and I need to get rid of my stash. I’ve got about 48 little “creatures” (I don’t even want to speculate) and they go for $20,000 each. You must get all 48, they’re priced as a lot, not per item. They’re ok to keep together, (cats and dogs only makes me think men and women), and some are intense. Hit me up on the down low.Other strange emails sent to Podesta include cryptic references to “pizza,” “hot dogs,” “pasta” and “walnuts,” which are fueling speculation they are code words from criminal activity – including child molestation:Please read this Podesta email. Is this code for something SICK? #Trump #MAGA pic.twitter.com/3gRlCQVbJH— GuthDaddy (@mediumsexy) November 3, 2016-Simple, either Podesta feeds everyone walnut sauce or he arranges orgies with Black boys-So many cryptic emails like this#PodestaEmails28 pic.twitter.com/JcEAnDcpZw— Jared Wyand (@JaredWyand) November 3, 2016-“Cheese pizza” in particular is an on-line code word for child pornography, and strange out-of-place references to pizza keep appearing in the Podesta and other leaked government emails.For example, an email from the 2012 Stratfor email leak said the following:RE: Get ready for “Chicago Hot Dog Friday”-If we get the same “waitresses,” I’m all for it!!!-Aaric S. Eisenstein-STRATFOR-SVP Publishing-700 Lavaca St., Suite 900-Austin, TX 78701-512-744-4308-512-744-4334 fax——————————————————————From: Fred Burton [mailto:burton@stratfor.com]-Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 2:39 PM-To: ‘Don Kuykendall’-Cc: ‘Aaric Eisenstein’; ‘Darryl O’Connor’; ‘Copeland Susan’-Subject: RE: Get ready for “Chicago Hot Dog Friday”I think Obama spent about $65,000 of the tax-payers money flying in-pizza/dogs from Chicago for a private party at the White House not long ago, assume we are using the same channels? ———————————————————————From: Don Kuykendall [mailto:kuykendall@stratfor.com]-Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 1:59 PM-To: ‘stratforaustin’-Subject: Get ready for “Chicago Hot Dog Friday”-To celebrate all you hot dogs out there. Aaric, you can participate as
well!-Don R. Kuykendall-President-STRATFOR-512.744.4314 phone-512.744.4334 fax-kuykendall@stratfor.com-It’s also worth noting that Salon.com, a left-wing media site, promoted “pedophile rights” in a 2015 article by a self-described pedophile asking Americans to “learn to accept” pedophiles and be “understanding and supportive” of their “sexual orientation.”“So, please, be understanding and supportive,” pedophile Todd Nickerson wrote. “It’s really all we ask of you.”It certainly appears that leftist authoritarians in the government and media are now pushing pedophilia as a new, avant-garde movement the public should just accept without question.Facebook: RealKitDaniels-Follow @KitDaniels1776

IF YOU DON'T LIKE EITHER CANDIDATE, THEN VOTE FOR TRUMPS POLICIES.

FOR THESE CHRISTIANS THAT THINK THEY CAN NOT LOSE THEIR SALVATION. I GOT NEWS FOR YOU. IF YOU WORSHIP A GODLESS LEADER LIKE CLINTON. AND AGREE WITH HER GODLESS BELIEFS. AND GO AGAINST GODS WORDS. YOUR NO CHRISTIAN. YOUR JUST AS MUCH INTO THE WORLDS THINKING. AND YOU CAN LOSE YOUR SALVATION. BY AGREEING WITH THE WORLD. WHICH IS SATANS BELIEFS. AND NOT SELECTING A LEADER THAT AT LEAST LINES UP TO GODS WORDS. AND THIS END OF THE WORLD GODLESS BELIEF. IS ANOTHER WAY TO BE DECIEVED AND LOSE YOUR SALVATION ALSO. WHAT YOU PUT IN YOUR HEART. COMES OUT AS GODLYNESS. OR GODLESSNESS. AND IF ITS ANYTHING AGAINST THE BIBLE. YOU BETTER EVALUATE YOUR SALVATION.

HEBREWS 6:1-8
1 Therefore leaving the principles of the doctrine of Christ, let us go on unto perfection; not laying again the foundation of repentance from dead works, and of faith toward God,
2 Of the doctrine of baptisms, and of laying on of hands, and of resurrection of the dead, and of eternal judgment.
3 And this will we do, if God permit.
4 For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost,
5 And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come,
6 If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame.
7 For the earth which drinketh in the rain that cometh oft upon it, and bringeth forth herbs meet for them by whom it is dressed, receiveth blessing from God:
8 But that which beareth thorns and briers is rejected, and is nigh unto cursing; whose end is to be burned.

SO IF YOU THINK YOU CAN ACT LIKE THE DEVIL AFTER YOUR SAVED. AND YOU DECIEVE YOURSELF YOUR STILL SAVED. YOU WERE NOT SAVED IN THE FIRST PLACE. REPENT AND GET SAVED.

MATTHEW 5:18-23
18 Hear ye therefore the parable of the sower.
19 When any one heareth the word of the kingdom, and understandeth it not, then cometh the wicked one, and catcheth away that which was sown in his heart. This is he which received seed by the way side.
20 But he that received the seed into stony places, the same is he that heareth the word, and anon with joy receiveth it;
21 Yet hath he not root in himself, but dureth for a while: for when tribulation or persecution ariseth because of the word, by and by he is offended.
22 He also that received seed among the thorns is he that heareth the word; and the care of this world, and the deceitfulness of riches, choke the word, and he becometh unfruitful.
23 But he that received seed into the good ground is he that heareth the word, and understandeth it; which also beareth fruit, and bringeth forth, some an hundredfold, some sixty, some thirty.

MATTHEW 7:20-24
20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?
23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
24 Therefore whosoever heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them, I will liken him unto a wise man, which built his house upon a rock:

WELL GOD IS TESTING THE SO CALLED LOVING-FORGIVING CHRISTIANS IN AMERICA. TO SEE IF THEY TRUELY ARE THE KIND OF CHRISTIANS THEY CLAIM TO BE. OR ARE THEY JUST A BUNCH OF HYPOCRITES LIKE THE LEFT. THAT PLAY CHURCH-AND CLAIM PEACE-LOVE-JOY. YET WILL GLADLY VOTE FOR CLINTON WHO IS AN OCCULT-LIAR LEADER-BABY MURDERER-ABORTIONIST THAT IS AGAINST EVERYTHING IN GODS WORD. AND USE WILL DESERVE WHO USE VOTE IN. IF USE VOTE HITLER 2ND. AND CHRISTIANS START BEING FREE SPEECH KILLED. THEM LOCKED UP IN INTERNMENT CAMPS. AND KILLED. WELL USE SO CALLED LOVING CHRISTIANS VOTED FOR PERSECUTION AND LOSS OF CHRISTIANS FREE SPEECH. USE WILL GET YOUR WISH WITH CLINTON AS PRESIDENT. AND SINCE THE END OF THE WORLD CROWD. AND THE HOARD FOOD-GUNS-BUNKER CROWD BELIEVE THE GOVERNMENT IS GONNA LOCK THEM UP AND BE KILLED. THE CHARISMATIC PROPHET-WATCHERS CHRISTIAN CROWD ARE ALREADY BELIEVING THIS PARANOID LIE. AND SINCE THEY BELIEVE IT ALREADY. THEY WILL GLADLY MAKE IT COME TO PASS BY VOTING FOR THE GODLESS HILLARY SATANIC WORSHIPPER CLINTON. YES CHRISTIANS USE DECIDE VOTE TRUMP AND PROTECT CHRISTIANS RIGHT-EVEN WITH TRUMP NOT BEING PERFECT. WHICH NON OF US ARE. OR YOU VOTE FOR GODLESSNESS-CORRUPTION-LIES AND CHRISTIAN PERSECUSSION BY VOTING HILLARY CLINTON. USE CHOOSE. AND USE LIVE WITH THE FINAL CONSEQUENCES USE VOTED FOR. AND HERES HOW MUCH OF SCHEMER CLINTON IS. HER ADMINISTRATION WANTS TO INFILTRATE CATHOLICS AND DESTROY THEM. IN E-MAILS. AND OH JUST LIKE MAGIC. CLINTON GETS TIM KAINE A LIBERAL CATHOLIC JESUIT AS HER VICE PRESIDENT. WHAT A BETTER WAY TO INFILTRATE CATHOLICS. AND GET THEM TO VOTE FOR HER. THEN AFTER SHE WINS THE ELECTION. HER ADMINISTRATION WILL KILL THEIR FREE SPEECH. THEN HAVE CATHOLICS AND ALL CHRISTIANS PERSECUTED AND LOCKED UP AND KILLED. SO CLINTON IS RIGHT IN CONTROL OF WHAT WAS LEAKED IN THE SECRET CLINTON E-MAILS ABOUT THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN. TO SECRETLY INFILTRATE. THEN DESTROY CATHOLICS AND THE VATICAN. AND CHRISTIANITY AS A WHOLE. AND WITH THE MEDIA BEHIND CLINTON IN THIS. GUESS WHO WILL BE DECIEVED. AND BELIEVE THE DELUTION THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN IS PULLING ON CHRISTIANS.CAN YOU SAY THE END OF THE WORLD-BUNKER CROWD THAT ARE ALREADY DECIEVED TO BELIEVE THEY WILL BE LOCKED UP AND KILLED FOR THEIR FAITH ALREADY. SO YES-YOUR CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE BELIEF SYSTEM DOES COUNT ON WHO YOU VOTE FOR THIS ELECTION. AND IF YOU GET DECIEVED BY CLINTONS LIES OR NOT.

CLINTON AND MEDIA TEAM UP TO DESTROY TRUMP
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2016/10/updates-how-beast-media-protects-whore_20.html

JD FARAG ON 2016 ELECTIONS-VOTE TRUMP CHRISTIANS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0UECFIWxjGc

If You Don’t Like Either Candidate, Then Vote for Trump’s Policies-Wayne Grudem-Posted: Oct 19, 2016 12:14 AM

Sudden media attention-After I saw the shocking 2005 video with Trump talking about his sexual aggression against women, I wrote, “There is no morally good presidential candidate in this election.” I condemned Trump’s immoral conduct and said I did not know how I would vote. I asked Townhall.com to remove my earlier article, “Why Voting for Donald Trump Is a Morally Good Choice.” I urged Trump to withdraw, hoping we could get a better candidate.The liberal media loved this. “Evangelical theologian calls on Trump to withdraw.” I suddenly had more requests for interviews from mainstream news organizations than ever in my lifetime. I turned them all down.And Trump did not withdraw.Now, how should I vote? Voting for Clinton and her ultraliberal policies is not an option for me as an evangelical Christian. Therefore I am left with two options: (1) vote for Trump, or (2) vote for a third-party candidate whose hopes of winning belong to fantasy, not reality.And if these are my only two options, then voting for a third-party candidate has the clear effect of helping to elect Clinton, because it is taking my vote away from Trump. That is why the liberal media loved it when I said I was finding it hard to decide.It also means that my two options are actually this: (1) vote for Trump, or (2) help Hillary Clinton get elected.Once I put the choice in those stark terms, there is a good way to make a decision. Since I find both candidates morally objectionable, I am back to the old-fashioned basis on which I have usually decided how to vote for my entire life: Whose policies are better? Do I agree more with Trump’s policies or with Clinton’s? It isn’t even close. I overwhelmingly support Trump’s policies and believe that Clinton’s policies will seriously damage the nation, perhaps forever. On the Supreme Court, abortion, religious liberty, sexual orientation regulations, taxes, economic growth, the minimum wage, school choice, Obamacare, protection from terrorists, immigration, the military, energy, and safety in our cities, I think Trump is far better than Clinton (see below for details). Again and again, Trump supports the policies I advocated in my 2010 book Politics According to the Bible.A caution: There are still three weeks until the election. Given the questionable backgrounds of both candidates, there may still be another major “October surprise” about either Trump or Clinton – or both.But there is also a positive possibility, because Trump claims he is a changed person from who he was in 2005 and he has apologized for how he acted back then. There is a possibility he has really changed, and I hope it is true. I don’t know. Therefore what I write here is my best judgment as of October 18, 2016, given the information we know now.Moral objections to voting for Trump-Several Christian friends tell me they still have some moral objections to voting for Trump. They say evangelicals should vote for a third-party candidate. Here is why I am not persuaded by their objections: (1) “My conscience won’t let me vote for Trump.”Answer: I fail to see how your conscience lets you help Hillary Clinton get elected, for that is the result of withholding your vote from Trump. Does it not trouble your conscience to help advance the terrible harm that she will bring to the nation? (See details below.)-(2) “Voting for Trump means you approve of his immoral treatment of women.”Answer: No, it absolutely does not. In my Oct. 9 opinion piece, I proclaimed to all the world that his treatment of women was morally wrong. And so did every other evangelical leader who is supporting him. (3) “When faced with the lesser of two evils, choose neither one.”Answer: I agree with this principle when facing a choice between doing two evil actions. For example, when faced with a choice between stealing and telling a lie, I should choose neither one. But this is not that kind of situation. We are not talking about doing something evil. We are talking about voting.Yes, it is morally evil to commit adultery. It is also morally wrong to approve of committing adultery. But that does not mean it is morally evil to vote for someone who has committed adultery. In a world affected by sin, voting for morally flawed people is unavoidable. Voting for the candidate you think will be best for the country (or do the least harm to the country) is not a morally evil action, so this objection does not apply. (4) “If you vote for Trump you’ll never have credibility in the future when you say that character matters.”Answer: I disagree. The current chaos over Trump’s candidacy (and Clinton’s) is mostly because of character issues, and character will continue to matter in future elections, perhaps even more so because of this election.On the other hand, if you refuse to vote for Trump, how can you ever have credibility in the future when you say that the policy differences between candidates and between political parties matter? I have read the Republican platform and the Democratic platform for this year. In my opinion, the Republican platform is more consistent with biblical moral principles than any platform I have ever read. And the Democratic platform is more antithetical to Christian principles than any platform I have read. This is important, because most elected officials vote consistently with their party’s platform most of the time. Policy differences do ultimately determine the future of the nation. (5) “We have to send the Republican party a message that a candidate like Trump is unacceptable.”Answer: You don’t have to. You want to, perhaps thinking that it will demonstrate moral courage and heroism. But the leadership of the Republican party already knew that Trump was the most unacceptable of all the choices we had. They fought tooth and nail against Trump in the primaries, and he won anyway.Is it worth turning the country over to a corrupt Clinton political machine that is hostile to Christian values, just to “send a message” that the party leaders already agree with? That’s a steep price to pay.And why not vote to help defeat Clinton and send the entire nation the message that a candidate like Clinton is even more unacceptable? (6) “It is wrong for Christians to place their trust in a morally compromised man.”Answer: Our ultimate trust of course should be in God alone. But the question in this election is not whether we trust Trump or God. The question is whether we trust Trump or Clinton.When the apostle Paul was on trial before the Roman governor Festus, he saw that things were going badly, so he said, “I appeal to Caesar” (Acts 25:11). But “Caesar” was the emperor Nero, an immoral and corrupt person. This doesn’t mean that Paul was trusting in Nero instead of in God, but it means he wisely decided that he would have a better chance for a fair trial under Nero than under Festus.Similarly, I think we have a much better chance for good government under Trump than under Clinton. (7) “I could never tell my friends that I voted for Trump.”Answer: Why not? Are you acting out of a misplaced fear of what your friends will think? The future of the country is at stake. Is it worth it for you to pay the price of disapproval from your friends? (8) “We should vote for neither one and trust a sovereign God to bring about his good purposes for the nation.”Answer: Every time I hear this objection, I think of the story of a man who climbed up to the roof of his house in a flood and prayed for God to save him. A man with a boat came along and urged him to get in, but he refused, saying, “God will save me.” Another boat came and he gave the same response. Finally, as the waters were lapping at his feet, a helicopter came and dropped a rescue harness to him. He waved it away, yelling out, “God will save me!”Then he drowned in the flood, and when he got to heaven, he asked God, “Why didn’t you save me when I prayed to you?” God replied, “I sent two boats and a helicopter.”The moral of the story is that God often works through human means to answer our prayers. And I think that the ballot box in this election is still the human means that God has given in answer to our prayers that he would deliver us from the increasing opposition to Christian values brought on by the Democratic Party and the Obama administration. Why not vote for the candidate whose policies are best, and also trust God for the future of the nation? Please don’t wave away the helicopter – even a faulty helicopter – and later say to God, “Why didn’t you save us?” (9) “Are there no limits to what you will tolerate in a candidate?”Answer: This is the question that set me back on my heels and threw me into a few days of uncertainty after the release of the Trump video.In the end, I decided it is useless at this point to speculate about all possible future elections. The question facing us is how we should vote in this election, given what we know now. The question is whether Clinton or Trump would be a better president. My conclusion is that, because I agree with his policies, Trump is the far better choice. (10) “My vote doesn’t really matter. I don’t even live in a battleground state.”Answer: This election is unlike any other in our lifetimes, and it is possible that the polls are more wrong than they have ever been. Individual votes matter. George W. Bush became president because of only 537 votes in Florida in 2000.In addition, your vote sends a signal. Every vote in every state affects the margin of victory for the winning candidate. A large nationwide victory gives a strong political mandate and a lot of political clout going forward. A small victory gives a weak mandate and less political clout going forward.In future years, people will ask, “In 2016, did you do what you could to stop Hillary Clinton or did you vote in a way that helped and encouraged her?” If we fail to vote to stop Clinton and her support for abortion rights, government imposition of gender confusion on our children, hate speech laws used to silence Christians, and government-sanctioned exclusion of thousands of Christians from their lifelong occupations because they won’t bow to the homosexual agenda -- will our failure to oppose these evils destroy our Christian witness for the future? Will our grandchildren ask us why we failed to at least vote to try to stop the imminent triumph of anti-Christian liberal tyranny when we had the ability to do so? (11) “I can’t trust Trump to do what he promises.”Answer: This objection carries no weight with me. It asks me to believe that Clinton will be a better president than Trump even though Clinton promises to do what I consider bad things for the country while Trump promises to do good things. This objection says I should vote third-party and help the person who promises to do bad things rather than vote for the person who promises to do good things. This is nonsense.Of course we cannot know Trump or Clinton’s future conduct with 100% certainty, but we should decide based on the most likely results. And the most likely result is that both Trump and Clinton will do most or all of what they have promised. That’s what elected officials always do, or they lose the support of their own party and become totally ineffective. Their policy differences matter a lot.Yes, Trump has changed his mind, but notice how he has changed his mind. His policy statements continue to move in a more conservative direction, and he has chosen a very conservative vice president and list of judicial appointments. His transition team includes many solid conservatives, and they will determine many of his appointments and much of what his administration will do. Just as he succeeded in business by listening to the best experts to solve each problem, I suspect that he has been learning from the best experts in conservative political thought and has increasingly found that conservative solutions really work. We should applaud these changes.His choice of Indiana governor Mike Pence as his vice presidential running mate is an especially significant indication that he will govern as a conservative. Pence was outstanding when he debated Tim Kaine in the vice presidential debate. Trump could have picked a moderate but instead picked a lifelong solid conservative who is a thoughtful, gracious policy wizard. Pence is a lawyer and former talk radio host who served 12 years in Congress and had significant congressional leadership positions, so he will be immensely helpful in working with Congress. He is a committed evangelical Christian. He is a former board member of the Indiana Family Institute, a conservative Christian lobbying group in Indiana. (12) Conclusion on moral objections-Trump has a morally tainted past. I will be voting for him, not with joy but reluctantly because of his deplorable past mistreatment of women. I wish the Republican candidate were someone with a spotless moral reputation (such as Mike Pence). But because anything I do will help elect either Trump or Clinton, these moral objections raised against voting for Trump are not finally persuasive to me. Most of them become even stronger arguments for voting to stop Clinton.Two different futures for the nation-In the rest of this article, I will compare the results we could expect from a Clinton presidency with what we could expect from a Trump presidency. (The remainder of this article is an updated form of the political policy sections of my earlier article, “Why Voting for Donald Trump Is a Morally Good Choice.”)-The Supreme Court with Clinton as president-Hillary Clinton would quickly replace Justice Scalia with another liberal like Breyer, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan. This would give liberals a 5-4 majority on the Supreme Court even without Justice Kennedy, and 6-3 when he votes with them.But that is not all. Justice Ginsburg is 83, and she has had colon cancer, pancreatic cancer, and has a heart stent. Justice Kennedy is 80. Justice Breyer is 78. A President Clinton could possibly nominate three or four justices to the Supreme Court, locking in a far left activist judiciary for perhaps 30 or more years. She could also add dozens of activist judges to federal district courts and courts of appeals, the courts where 99% of federal lawsuits are decided. Judicial tyranny of the type we have seen when abortion rights and same-sex marriage were forced on the nation would gain a permanent triumph.The nation would no longer be ruled by the people and their elected representatives, but by unelected, unaccountable, activist judges who would dictate from the bench about whatever they were pleased to decree. And there would be nothing in our system of government that anyone could do to stop them.That is why this election is not just about Hillary Clinton. It is about defeating the far left liberal agenda that any Democratic nominee would champion. Liberal Democrats are now within one Supreme Court justice of their highest goal: gaining permanent control of the nation with a five vote majority on the Supreme Court, and then systematically imposing every liberal policy on the nation not through winning elections but through a relentless parade of one Supreme Court decision after another.Even if Clinton were to drop out of the race (perhaps due to additional shocking email disclosures, for example), our choice in the election would be just the same, because any other Democratic nominee would appoint the same kind of liberal justices to the Court.Abortion-On abortion, a liberal court would probably find the ban on partial-birth abortion to be unconstitutional (it was upheld by only a 5-4 majority in Gonzalez v. Carhart, 2007). This would allow babies in the ninth month of pregnancy to be partially delivered out of the birth canal, and then have their skulls crushed so that they are not born alive. Hillary Clinton supports protection of this horrendous practice.In addition, the court could find an absolute “right to abortion” in the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution and then sweep away with one decision most or all of the restrictions on abortion that pro-life advocates have worked for tirelessly over the last 43 years, including ultrasound requirements, waiting periods, parental consent requirements, and prohibitions on non-doctors performing abortions.Voters should not doubt the power of the Supreme Court to abolish all these laws restricting abortions. Think of the power of the Obergefell v. Hodges 5-4 decision in June, 2015. It instantly nullified all the work that thousands of Christians had done over many years in persuading the citizens of 31 states to pass constitutional amendments defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman. But no one is campaigning for such laws or amendments anymore, because it would be futile. The Supreme Court has spoken, and therefore the issue is settled in the political system of the United States. We lost – not at the ballot box, but because we had a liberal Supreme Court that nullified the democratic process regarding the definition of marriage.So it would certainly be with any efforts to place legal limitations on abortion. Nobody would campaign any more for laws to limit abortions, because any such laws would be unconstitutional. The legislative lobbying work of pro-life advocacy groups would be totally and utterly defeated. Millions of unborn children would continue to die.Religious liberty-The current liberal agenda often includes suppressing Christian opposition to its views. So a liberal court would increasingly nullify rights of conscience with respect to forced participation in same-sex marriage ceremonies or expressing moral objections to homosexual conduct. Already Christians are being pushed out of many occupations. Florists, bakers, and professional photographers have had their businesses destroyed by large fines for refusal to contribute their artistic talents to a specific event, a same-sex wedding ceremony to which they had moral objections.What about protecting people’s religious freedom? Clinton recently said, about Christians who oppose abortion, “Deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs, and structural biases have to be changed.”Fire Chief Kelvin Cochran in Atlanta was removed from his job because of self-publishing a religious book that briefly mentioned the Bible’s teachings regarding non-marital sexual conduct, including homosexuality, amidst a host of other topics. His situation holds ominous implications for any Christians who hold public sector jobs. In our military services, many high-ranking officers have quietly been forced to resign because they were unwilling to give support to the homosexual agenda.Mozilla/Firefox CEO Brendan Eich was pushed out from his own company merely because he had donated money to Proposition 8 in California, supporting marriage between one man and one woman. This event has troubling implications for Christians in any corporate executive role who dare to support a political position contrary to the liberal agenda.Last year Boston urologist Paul Church, a Harvard Medical School faculty member, lost his hospital privileges at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center because he had expressed concerns about the medical dangers associated with same-sex activity.Are my predictions about this kind of loss of religious liberty too grim? The three conservative justices still on the Supreme Court expressed similar concerns just last month. The case concerned a Washington pharmacy that has been owned for 70 years by the Stormans family, who are committed Christians. They will likely now be put out of business by the Washington State Pharmacy Board for refusing to dispense an abortion-causing prescription drug. On June 28, 2016, the Supreme Court refused to hear the Stormans’ appeal, in spite of the strong dissent written by Justice Alito (joined by Roberts and Thomas):“At issue are Washington State regulations that are likely to make a pharmacist unemployable if he or she objects on religious grounds to dispensing certain prescription medications. . . . . there is much evidence that the impetus for the adoption of the regulations was hostility to pharmacists whose religious beliefs regarding abortion and contraception are out of step with prevailing opinion in the State . . . . If this is a sign of how religious liberty claims will be treated in the years ahead, those who value religious freedom have cause for great concern.”Christian business owners-If Clinton appoints just one more liberal justice, it is likely that many Christian business owners will be targeted. Hobby Lobby won its 2014 Supreme Court case (again 5-4), so it was not compelled to dispense abortifacients to its employees, but that case could be reversed (the four liberal justices in the minority, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, are still on the court). If that case is overturned, it would force Hobby Lobby out of business, because the Green family had said they would shut down the company of 23,000 employees and over $3 billion in annual sales if they lost the decision. The implications for other Christian business owners with pro-life convictions are ominous.These incidents show that it is not an exaggeration to say that, under a liberal Supreme Court resulting from Hillary Clinton’s election, Christians would increasingly experience systematic exclusion from hundreds of occupations, with thousands of people losing their jobs. Step-by-step, Christians would increasingly be marginalized to the silent fringes of society. Is withholding a vote from Donald Trump important enough to pay this high a price in loss of freedom? Some Christians have even hinted to me that “persecution would be good for us.” But the Bible never encourages us to seek persecution or hope for it. We should rather work to prevent such oppression of Christians, just as Jesus taught us to pray, “Lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil” (Matthew 6:13). Paul did not encourage us to pray that God would give us bad rulers but good ones who would allow us to “lead a peaceful and quiet life, godly and dignified in every way” (1Tim. 2:2).-Christian schools and colleges-A liberal Supreme Court would also impact education. Christian colleges would likely be found guilty of “discrimination” if they required adherence to the Bible’s standards regarding sexual conduct, or even required affirmation of primary Christian beliefs. Campus ministries like Cru and InterVarsity have already been forced off of many university campuses following the 5-4 Supreme Court decision CLS v. Martinez (2010), which upheld the exclusion of the Christian Legal Society from the campus of Hastings College of Law in San Francisco. And we will likely see more bills like the early form of California’s SB 1146, which would have prohibited Christian colleges from requiring students or employees to hold Christian beliefs or abide by biblical moral standards regarding sexual conduct, and would prohibit colleges from assigning housing based on a student’s biological sex if a student claimed to be transgender. Colleges like Biola and Azusa Pacific could not long survive under those regulations.With regard to elementary and high schools, laws promoting school choice or tuition voucher programs would likely be declared unconstitutional if they allowed such funding to go to Christian schools. A tax credit program for scholarships to private schools, including Christian institutions, was only upheld by a 5-4 Supreme Court decision in Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn in 2011, and all four liberal justices who voted against it are still on the court. Another possible target of the liberal agenda would be laws that allow for home schooling, if the secular/ liberal governmental hostility to home schooling in European countries is any indicator.-Churches-Churches would not be exempt from the impact of a liberal Supreme Court. The court could rule that any school district is allowed to ban churches from renting school buildings on Sundays, an action that could severely hinder the work of small churches and church planting in general. (This was already the ruling of the Second Circuit in the Bronx Household of Faith case regarding New York City public schools.) And some churches in Iowa have now been told that they have to make their bathrooms open to people on the basis of their “gender identity” if the churches are going to be open to the public at all.-Freedom of speech-Freedom of speech would be increasingly restricted in the public square. In 2014, the Supreme Court ruled that prayers of visiting pastors who prayed “in Jesus’ name” when they opened a city council meeting were allowed under the Constitution, but again it was a 5-4 decision (Town of Greece v. Galloway) and all four liberals who wanted to restrict such prayers are still on the court.-Criminalizing dissent-Another troubling possibility is that liberal activists, once in power, would further entrench themselves by criminalizing much political dissent. We have already seen it happen with the IRS targeting of conservative groups and with some state attorneys general taking steps to prosecute groups who dare to disagree with activists’ claims about the danger of man-made global warming. We have now seen what no one thought possible – the political corruption of both the IRS and the FBI under the Obama administration. A Clinton administration would be even worse.-The Supreme Court with Trump as president-By contrast, I continue to believe that many positive results would come from a Trump presidency.On September 23, Trump released an expanded list of 21 possible Supreme Court justices and promised, “This list is definitive, and I will choose only from it in picking future justices of the United States Supreme Court.” I’m confident that Republicans in the Senate will hold Trump to this promise. A lawyer familiar with many of these names has told me that they constitute a “dream list” of outstanding judges who would uphold the original meaning of the Constitution and would not create new laws from the bench. They would uphold the “original meaning” view so strongly exemplified by Justice Scalia before his death.If Trump would appoint a replacement for Scalia from his list of 11, and probably one or two other Supreme Court justices, then we could see a 5-4 or even 6-3 majority of conservative justices on the Supreme Court. The results for the nation would be overwhelmingly good.Such a Supreme Court would finally return control of the nation to the people and their elected representatives, removing it from dictatorial judges who repeatedly make law from the bench.-Abortion-Such a court would likely overturn Roe v. Wade and return abortion laws and the regulation of abortion to the states.-Religious liberty-A conservative court would vigorously uphold the First Amendment, protecting freedom of religion and freedom of speech for Christian colleges, Christian ministries, and churches.Such a court would likely overturn the horribly destructive decision in Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971) that changed the meaning of the First Amendment and ruled that a government action “must not have the primary effect of either advancing or inhibiting religion” (note: not a specific denomination but “religion” in general). A conservative court would likely declare that the First Amendment was only intended to prohibit the establishment of a state-sponsored church or denomination.Such a decision would once again allow the nonsectarian affirmation of personal belief in God in public schools, would once again allow coaches to pray with their football teams before a game, and would allow visiting clergy to be invited to give a prayer at high school graduation ceremonies. It would also imply that nativity scenes without Santa Claus and Buddha should be allowed in government-owned parks and buildings at Christmas time. It wouldn’t require these things, but would allow them if local officials chose to approve them. It would restore true freedom of religion as the First Amendment intended.It would also protect freedom of conscience for Christians who object to participating in abortions, or dispensing abortifacient medicines, or who do not wish to participate in same-sex wedding ceremonies. It is also possible that a conservative Supreme Court would eventually return control of marriage to the states.-Freedom for Christian influence in politics-Significantly, Trump has pledged to work to repeal the 1954 Johnson Amendment to the IRS code, which has been used for 62 years as a threat to silence pastors from speaking about political issues, for fear of losing their tax-exempt status. This would be a great victory for freedom of religion and freedom of speech.In short, a Trump-appointed Supreme Court, together with dozens of lower court judges appointed by him, would probably result in significant advances in many of the policy areas important to Christians. It would also open the door to huge expansion of influence for the many Christian lobbying groups known as “family policy councils” in various states, especially enabling them to work for further legal protections for life, for marriage and family, and for religious liberty.But the Supreme Court is not the only issue in this election. I agree with Trump and not Clinton on several other issues as well.-Taxes and jobs-Trump has pledged to cut taxes significantly, while Clinton wants to raise them. Trump is advocating a 15% tax rate for corporations rather than the current 35%. Lower corporate taxes would lead to business expansion and a massive increase in available jobs and higher pay levels. For individual taxpayers, Trump favors a top rate of 25%, but Clinton 45%. Most small businesses file under this individual rate, so once again Trump’s lower taxes would result in substantial expansion of businesses and many more jobs. Finally our economy would snap out of its eight years of anemic growth.In my judgment, Christians should support lower tax rates that would lead to more jobs, because Obama’s economic policies for the last eight years have hurt lower income and low-middle income families the most. Many can’t even find jobs, and others can’t find full-time jobs. Those who have jobs struggle to survive with no meaningful pay raises year after year. It is no surprise that these are the people who are supporting Trump in overwhelming numbers.Tax rates are also a good indicator of government control. Higher tax rates mean greater government control of our lives, while lower tax rates indicate greater freedom.-Restoring economic growth-Under the current Democratic administration, our once-powerful economy has limped along at an anemic 2% annual growth in GDP, whereas it should have been 4% or more. Hillary Clinton’s solution is more of the same. She wants to spend more government money to “stimulate” the economy, even though this hasn’t worked for eight years as we go further and further in debt. I think Clinton’s view is complete foolishness. (Democrats never seem to understand that for every dollar the government spends it has to take a dollar away from us, the citizens, hurting economic growth more than helping it.)-Trump wants to lower taxes to revitalize the economy, help businesses grow, and provide more good jobs. Trump’s plan is the only one that will work. (And here I speak as the co-author of a book on sustainable solutions to world poverty.)-Minorities-Two of the deepest causes of poverty among minority groups and racial tensions in our country are failing public schools in our inner cities and lack of available jobs. Trump expressed a commitment to solve these problems at several points in his acceptance speech at the Republican convention. He pledged to reduce taxes and regulations, leading to many more jobs. And he said,“Nearly 4 in 10 African-American children are living in poverty, while 58% of African-American youth are not employed . . . . This administration has failed America’s inner cities. It’s failed them on education. It’s failed them on jobs. It’s failed them on crime . . . . Every action I take, I will ask myself: does this make life better for young Americans in Baltimore, Chicago, Detroit, Ferguson who have as much of a right to live out their dreams as any other child in America? . . . . We will rescue kids from failing schools by helping their parents send them to a safe school of their choice.”By contrast, Clinton will bow to the teachers’ unions and oppose school choice at every turn, and she will continue to strangle businesses with high taxes and regulations, preventing job growth.-School choice-Clinton and the Democrats want to keep taxpayers’ money going to support only public schools controlled by powerful teachers’ unions, even where those schools are failing horribly. Trump wants to let parents decide where their child’s share of the money goes, so that poor children will have the ability to choose between public, private, and Christian or other religious schools. I strongly agree with Trump’s position, because all children, especially inner-city children from poor families, need the opportunity to get better education so that they will find good jobs and no longer be trapped in poverty.-The military-Trump has promised to rapidly rebuild our depleted military forces, but Clinton would continue the liberal policy of eviscerating them through denying funding. This is dangerous in light of increasing threats from China, Russia, Iran, and ISIS.-Borders-Clinton will not secure our borders, but will continue to allow in what she thinks will be thousands of future Democratic voters. She actually said (privately, but now exposed through WikiLeaks) that she wants “open borders.” Trump has repeatedly promised that he will finally secure our borders, an urgent need to protect the nation from ever more terrorists and drug smugglers. I think we should continue to admit millions of immigrants to this great nation, but they should come in legally and fairly.-ISIS and terrorism-Trump has pledged to aggressively attack and utterly defeat ISIS. Clinton will continue the anemic Obama policy of periodic bombing runs and drone attacks, under which ISIS has continued to thrive.-China and Russia-Trump will not let China and Russia and Iran push us around anymore, as Obama has done, with Hillary Clinton’s support when she was Secretary of State. If Trump is anything, he is tough as nails, and he won’t be bullied.-Israel-Trump has promised to vigorously defend and support Israel, while Clinton will most likely continue the Obama administration’s criticism, snubbing, and marginalization of Israel.-Energy-Trump has said he will approve the Keystone oil pipeline and grant more oil drilling permits leading to lower energy costs and providing thousands of jobs. Lower energy costs help everybody, but the poor most of all. Clinton, by contrast, will make fracking nearly impossible and essentially abolish the coal industry, causing energy prices to skyrocket.-Executive orders and bathrooms-Trump has promised to rescind many of the most objectionable executive orders given by President Obama, so he will likely end the compulsory moral degradation forced on us by a liberal agenda, including orders forcing schools to allow boys in girls’ bathrooms and locker rooms, in defiance of the will of the vast majority of Americans. But Hillary Clinton would likely perpetuate and expand these policies.-Health care-Trump will work to repeal Obamacare, which is now imploding and also ruining the nation’s health care system, and replace it with an affordable free market system in which companies have the ability to sell insurance across state lines, thus substantially lowering insurance prices especially in those states that currently allow only high-priced “Cadillac” insurance plans. But Clinton would continue to work relentlessly toward federal government control of our entire health care industry.-Where I disagree with Trump-I don’t agree with Trump on everything. I didn’t like his earlier plan to immediately deport all undocumented immigrants, but he could never get it through Congress, and he has backed away from that and now only talks about deporting those convicted of crimes and those who have overstayed their visas. I also disagree with his views on free trade. But those differences are far outweighed by the huge areas where I agree with him.-The unprotected-Christian voters should consider one other factor. Trump promises to recognize and protect what Wall Street Journal writer Peggy Noonan calls “the unprotected” in America -- people in lower income areas who cannot find good jobs, cannot find good schools for their children, do not feel protected from crime, and find their retirement savings are not enough because for years they have been earning no interest in the bank. Trump said in his acceptance speech, “Every day I wake up determined to deliver for the people I have met all across the nation that have been neglected, ignored, and abandoned . . . . I have joined the political arena so that the powerful can no longer beat up on people that cannot defend themselves.”These American citizens may not have college degrees but their old-fashioned common sense tells them that America would be a much better place if we no longer had to be afraid to say “Merry Christmas,” or that boys are different from girls, or that Islamic terrorists are Islamic terrorists, or that we still love this country. They’re sick and tired of being condescended to by the snobbish moralism of the liberal elites who dominate the power centers in our nation. That is why they cheer when Trump repeatedly violates the canons of politically correct speech. They have found in him someone who gives them hope, and they are supporting him by the thousands.-Christians should seek what is best for the nation-Some people urge me not to be so concerned about politics. I admit it would be easy just to teach my seminary classes and write academic articles and books.But the apostle Peter says Christians are “exiles” on this earth (1 Peter 1:1). Therefore I take seriously the prophet Jeremiah’s exhortation to the Jewish people living in exile in Babylon:“Seek the welfare of the city where I have sent you into exile, and pray to the LORD on its behalf, for in its welfare you will find your welfare” (Jeremiah 29:7).By way of modern application, I think Christians today have a similar obligation to vote in such a way that will “seek the welfare” of the United States. The overriding question in deciding how to vote is, Which vote is most likely to bring the best results for the nation? In addition, I seek to obey Jesus’ command, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself” (Matthew 22:39). This means that I have a moral obligation to seek a good government for my neighbor, and to prevent an anti-Christian liberal tyranny from taking power. If I love my neighbor as myself, then it does matter whether unborn babies are killed or not, whether Christians are forced out of their lifelong occupations are not, whether impressionable children are subjected to gender-reeducation propaganda in their schools or not, whether Christian schools and colleges can continue to operate freely or not, whether my neighbors are protected from terrorists or not, whether poor children are able to go to good schools or not, and whether my neighbor is are able to find a good job or not. If I didn’t care about these things at all, I don’t think I would be loving my neighbor as myself.My conclusion is that the most likely result of voting for Trump is that he will govern for the most part in the way he promises to do, bringing good to the nation in many areas.But the most likely result of not voting for Trump is that we will be abandoning thousands of unborn babies who will be put to death under Hillary Clinton’s Supreme Court, thousands of Christians who will be excluded from their lifelong occupations because they won’t affirm same-sex marriage, thousands of the poor who will never again be able to find high-paying jobs in an economy crushed by government hostility toward business, thousands of inner-city children who will never be able to get a good education, thousands of the sick and elderly who will never get adequate medical treatment when the government is the nation’s only healthcare provider, thousands of people who will be killed by an unchecked ISIS, and millions of Jews in Israel who will find themselves alone and surrounded by hostile enemies. And we will be contributing to a permanent loss of the American system of government due to a final victory of unaccountable judicial tyranny.This article represents the opinion of the author and should not be understood to represent the opinion of Phoenix Seminary.