EVENTS IN TIME (BIBLE PROPHECY LITERALLY FULFILLED)(BY GOD)

I WRITE NEWS ABOUT AND PUT NEWS ARTICLES ABOUT ISRAEL AND JERUSALEM PERTAINING TO BIBLE PROPHESY HAPPENINGS.JOEL 3:20 But Judah (ISRAEL) shall dwell for ever, and Jerusalem from generation to generation.(THATS ISRAEL-JERUSALEM WILL NEVER BE DESTROYED AGAIN)-WE CHRISTIANS ARE ALL WAITING PATIENTLY FOR THE PRE-TRIBULATION RAPTURE TO OCCUR.SO WE CAN GO TO JESUS AND GET OUR NEVER DYING BODIES.SO WE CAN RULE OVER CITIES OURSELVES.WHILE JESUS RULES FROM DAVIDS THRONE FOREVER IN JERUSALEM.

Tuesday, July 21, 2015

PLANNED PARENTHOOD NOT ONLY MURDERS GODS CREATED CHILDREN.BUT SELLS THE BODY PARTS OF THE ABORTED CHILDREN.

THE BLUE-WHITE ISRAELI COLOURED BLUE JAYS THAT EAT MY BREAD.-pic-talismancoins.com
-pic-animalpictures.com
HERES THE CUTE CHIPMUNKS THAT EAT MY BREAD-pic-dailymail.co.uk
HERES THE BLACK SQUIRRELS THAT EAT MY BREAD-pic-pinterest.com
HERES THE GREY SQUIRREL THAT EATS MY BREAD-pic-northrup.org
THE BLACK BIRDS THAT EAT MY BREAD-pic-thezt2roundtable.com
THERES 2 RABBITS THAT LOOK LIKE THIS OUT BACK.BUT THEY NEVER COME TO EAT BREAD.THEY RUN LIKE LIGHTENING TO GET TO THEIR SPOT.-pic-chickensmoothie.com

GREECES BANKS REOPEN.CITIZENS ALLOWED TO TAKEOUT $400.00 A WEEK ONLY.

Monday, July 20, 2015

THE HATERS ARE AFTER EZRA LEVANT THE ISRAELI AGAIN.LYING ABOUT HIM.AT A CLIMATE CHANGE PROTEST.

JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.GET SAVED NOW- CALL ON JESUS TODAY.THE ONLY SAVIOR OF THE WHOLE EARTH - NO OTHER. 1 COR 15:23-JESUS THE FIRST FRUITS-CHRISTIANS RAPTURED TO JESUS-FIRST FRUITS OF THE SPIRIT-23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.ROMANS 8:23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.(THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE)

UPDATE-JULY 20,2015-12:00AM
THE HATERS ARE AFTER EZRA LEVANT THE ISRAELI AGAIN.LYING ABOUT HIM.AT A CLIMATE CHANGE PROTEST.
EZRA LEVANT GETS LIED ABOUT HIM.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jYwqN9rZec
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GBHjU3x8Sdg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_2-wRHy4SY
OTHER EZRA CONFRONTS ENVIROMENTALISTS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xz6FxhUE6jk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nARIP90l9Q
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KSqFKwU7RoM

Toronto Star’s story about Ezra Levant is fiction — and our video proves it-Posted by Ezra Levant on July 7, 2015 in TheRebel.Media

Maybe you’ve read Toronto Star columnist Catherine Porter’s account of my encounter with her and her daughter at Sunday’s Queen’s Park protest. The trouble is, the central facts of Porter’s story are made up. And we have the video to prove it.Ms. Porter writes that her 9-year-old daughter Lyla saw me disagreeing with someone about global warming, and that Lyla “was preparing to brawl with Levant.”But that’s not true.Ms. Porter tried to set up some sort of teachable moment between her daughter and me, but it just didn’t happen. So she made up the facts she wanted.It doesn’t really matter to me – I’ve had worse lies told about me, by better people than Catherine Porter.As I said in my earlier report, I had a great time at the protest. I met a lot of colourful people. I had some lively debates. But no fights.I met some really weird people, too.But to be honest, the weirdest person I met was Catherine Porter, who demanded I talk to her young daughter, and then lied about it in the newspaper.Ezra Levant is a lawyer, author, newspaper columnist and founder of TheRebel.media.

My daughter's run-in with Ezra Levant at her first protest: Porter-As my daughter attends the Jobs, Justice and Climate march, she is incredulous to learn the right-wing broadcaster doesn’t believe in human-caused climate change.Catherine Porter's daughter, Lyla, stands on the lawn before Queen's Park, preparing for her first march.By: Catherine Porter Columnist, Published on Mon Jul 06 2015-the toronto star

My daughter’s first protest started off with a fight.We were standing in a crowd of vegans on the lawn before Queen’s Park, watching right-wing broadcasting bully Ezra Levant cross-examine a man dressed up like a chicken. (See note below regarding Levant’s response to this column) Lyla asked what he was doing. I told her that he was belittling him, because Levant doesn’t believe climate change is being caused by humans.“ That’s like calling a blue car yellow,” she responded. “How can he not believe in climate change?”She picked up her placard — a green car she designed, with sunflowers for headlights — and marched over to ask him why.I let her go. I haven’t decided if this was a good parenting decision or a bad one. In fact, part of me wondered if bringing Lyla to the Jobs, Justice and Climate march would backfire as well.When I was a kid, everything my mother pushed me toward repelled me on principle. Maybe Lyla’s inaugural protest would confirm in her mind that protests were futile. Maybe, when she is wrinkled and arthritic-kneed, she will tell her biographer that her climb to the pinnacle of Unfettered Capitalism began right here, at a protest her hippy mother dragged her to.The reason I’d brought her: Returning from the zoo one day last spring, we got to talk talking about polar bears and climate change and what our family could do to stop it.“Protests don’t change anything,” she’d replied to my suggestion.Since then, I’ve been working to convince her otherwise.We visited the Greenpeace warehouse in Leslieville twice so she could make her placard alongside some other young activists. This was a success. The activists were welcoming and fun, and she loves art. This was a warehouse full of art supplies! And now we were here at Queen’s Park, surrounded by thousands of people with signs and banners and costumes and drums, and my 9-year-old was preparing to brawl with Levant, arguably the one person in the crowd who would confirm her doubts.Instead he honed his microphone onto me. Did I own a car? Were my clothes made from synthetics? See, I was a hypocrite! Why did I think I was better than everyone else? “You’re being mean to my mom,” Lyla whispered before Levant walked away.The vegans rallied around us.“We are not perfect,” one told Lyla. “But we’re trying.”“He’s entitled to his opinions. But we all think otherwise,” another said.I realized two things. One, I couldn’t control Lyla’s experience at the protest any more than I could control her time at recess. And two, why waste this precious time arguing? You can do that every day on the subway. The whole point of coming here was to be surrounded by like-minded people.See, we are not the only people worrying in our basement about future floods and fleeing migrants and dying polar bears! There were thousands of others, spilling down Queen’s Park as far we could see. What a hopeful sight.The power of a protest is not just the result, but also the process.We marched down the middle of the grand avenue with a giant sea serpent swimming behind us, and Gloria Gaynor belting out “I Will Survive” from speakers attached to the back of one marcher’s bike.Oh, what fun. We were in a parade! “Hey, ho, Stephen Harper has got to go,” the women behind us chanted, and Lyla joined in. “This is what democracy looks like.”But still she had questions. My kid has a dogged mind.“Will this protest change something?” she asked, while we were walking down Dundas St. W.I turned to other parents in the crowd to give her their responses.One father told her it will convince politicians that climate change is a big issue for the upcoming election. (Good point.) Another, walking with his two sons, said he thought it would encourage other people to get involved — people who are worried but haven’t done anything yet. (Agreed.) Change doesn’t happen swiftly. It builds up, I told her. You never know which crack will unleash the dam.Parenting is similar.We got to Allan Gardens, where volunteers offered us water and bananas, and a woman on stilts danced to the drumming of a samba band. An elder with the Chippewa of the Thames First Nations offered his eagle feather fan for Lyla to touch.The city felt like a small, picturesque village.We found a patch of grass in the shade, where Lyla did cartwheels and I lay down, listening to Joel Plaskett strum his acoustic guitar and sing.A magician with a glass ball came by to tell us that a kids’ craft table had been set up.Could you think of a better way to pass a Sunday with your kid? “I like protests,” Lyla said, before settling down beside me. I thought of a snapshot of me, at her age, lying beside my mom — who, in the end, I agree with on most things.Maybe I am doing something right.Note – July 8, 2015: See Ezra Levant’s response to this column, “Ezra Levant begs to differ.”Catherine Porter can be reached at cporter@thestar.ca .

Catherine Porter, Ezra Levant and journalism standards-What happened at the climate change protest point to a journalistic failure regarding accuracy and fairness.Star columnist Catherine Porter asked Ezra Levant to answer her daughter's question at a climate change protest.By: Kathy English Public Editor, Published on Fri Jul 17 2015-TORONTO STAR

It is an understatement to say there are ideological differences between Toronto Star columnist Catherine Porter and conservative commentator Ezra Levant.Porter, a National Newspaper Award-winning journalist, is a “social justice activist/columnist” for the Star. Levant, a well-known — and certainly controversial — former host with the now-defunct Sun News Network, describes himself as a “lawyer, author and all-round trouble-maker” who is now “rebel commander” of therebel.media, his start-up “news, opinion and activism” website.Given the vast chasm in perspectives between these two, it is not hard to imagine that sparks might fly should this columnist and that commentator engage in debate at a climate change protest.Indeed, as Porter’s July 7 column, headlined, “My daughter’s run-in with a right-wing bully” and Levant’s subsequent letter to the editor rebutting her column, titled “Ezra Levant begs to differ,” make clear, things did not go at all well when the two met at the recent “Jobs, Justice and Climate” protest march outside Queen’s Park.That too is an understatement. Porter’s column and Levant’s letter provide two opposing narratives on what happened between the pair when Porter took her nine-year-old daughter, Lyla, to her first protest.That’s not particularly surprising: ask a half dozen people to describe what they believe happened at a traffic accident in which they were involved or witnessed and you’re likely to receive as many different narratives with each storyteller fixed on contradictory details and omitting or confusing relevant information. Discerning the “truth” in such situations is never easy.In the case of this run-in, however, there is video evidence that tells its own truth, at least when the camera was turned on. As we’ve seen in widely circulated videos that have captured wayward police in action, video can provide powerful evidence of what happened when trying to sort out conflicting narratives. But, it doesn’t always tell the entire story, and as you will see, what is not captured on camera remains a significant issue of serious journalistic concern.But, what is not in question here is that Porter’s column fell short of the Star’s journalistic standards regarding accuracy and fairness. It misled readers in omitting key facts captured on the video, portraying Levant as having been mean to her daughter when the video evidence makes clear that was just not so. This controversy also raises significant questions about Star standards regarding the need for journalists to clearly identify themselves to those they write about and newsroom policies regarding columnists, advocacy and journalists involving their children in their work.Porter acknowledges she fell short here: “I made some mistakes,” she told me.Editor Michael Cooke concurs: “Catherine Porter especially regrets these failings, and I apologize on behalf of the paper. Lessons learned. The hard way,” he said.“The public editor’s column and an up-coming column by Catherine Porter herself are the Star’s best efforts to correct this.”The video that captured Porter and Levant at the protest was shot by Levant’s team, posted on his website (with his own commentary) and on YouTube, where it has received more than 21,000 views. Given that the video presents a significantly different view of events than Porter presented in her Star column about her daughter’s first protest, it is not surprising that we’ve heard from more than 100 readers questioning the column’s accuracy and fairness. This is of serious concern to the Star, but as Porter left for a wilderness canoe trip immediately after her column was published, we could not talk with her about these issues until this week.To be fair to Levant, even before her return, the Star gave him the opportunity to respond in a prominent letter to the editor that pointed readers to his video.To some extent, even with the video evidence, this remains a classic case of a “he said, she said” dispute because not everything of concern was captured on video and both journalists continue to have their own interpretation of what the camera shows and what elements matter most.I was not there so I cannot pronounce judgment on whose version is “the truth.” But, as public editor, it is my role to consider matters of accuracy, fairness and the Star’s journalistic standards and to tell you where I believe the Star fell short.I have looked at these issues closely. I have carefully read Porter’s column and viewed three videos Levant has posted. I’ve talked many times to Porter and her editors and with Levant on telephone this week. Levant has been nothing but polite and civil with me. At my request, he provided the Star with what he assures me was the “unedited, raw” videotape starting from 15 minutes before the encounter with Porter and ending about a minute after.For me, the most important matter regarding Star policy is the critical question of whether Porter identified herself to Levant as a Toronto Star journalist on assignment for the Star. This is one of the most basic fundamentals not only of the Star, but of journalism: the “contract” between a journalist and a subject of a potential story. Star policy decrees that Star journalists must always identify themselves as journalists, except in rare circumstances when “undercover” reporting is approved by senior editors.Porter is adamant she told Levant she was a Star journalist. He is just as adamant she did not.He told me he had no idea she was a Star journalist until her column was published. Previous to that, he said, he viewed her simply as mother who asked him to talk to her child at the rally. In his initial report of the protest, edited, he said, before Porter’s column was published, he refers to her in this way.“I had no idea who she was,” he said. “If I knew I was dealing with a Toronto Star journalist things would have gone down quite different. Do you really think I would not have made hay with that from the outset?”There is no video evidence that shows Porter identifying herself as a journalist; on camera we see her stating her name only. But, Levant acknowledges that the camera was not turned on in the minute or so before Porter states her name. She believes that was when she told him she writes a column for the Star and that her daughter was waiting to ask a question.“It is possible Ezra did not hear me say I was a columnist at the Toronto Star. We were at a protest. It was noisy,” Porter said. “I most absolutely told him that.”Both Porter and Levant can offer up witnesses who they believe can support their version of what happened in regard to this critical point. I have not talked to any of them because I see little point in engaging in further “he said, she said” competing narratives. I don’t see how it can resolve this matter with any certainty.Bottom line: I believe — and so do Porter’s editors — that it was her responsibility to make certain Levant clearly understood she was a Star journalist. Such an understanding seems not to have come about, despite her recollection of telling him so. She acknowledges she did not have her journalist’s notebook in hand; nor did she think to give him her card identifying herself as a journalist.On the question of accuracy, Porter’s column has a clear factual error, which she now acknowledges. She reported that before Levant walked away, her daughter whispered, “You’re being mean to my mom.” In fact, as we see and hear on camera, Lyla said, “You’re talking to my mommy, you know that, right?”Porter, who wrote the column the day after the protest, did not take any notes during her encounter with Levant – an issue for me. She wrote from memory and misremembered what her daughter had said at that particular time.While Porter told me Lyla did say the words she reported at some point after the encounter, that’s not what the camera shows. In journalism, the words within quotation marks must be the exact words stated so this misquote is a journalistic lapse caused, I believe by not doing the proper due diligence of taking careful notes on assignment for the Star. Certainly journalists need notes to support what they publish, especially when it puts someone in a bad light.On the issue of fairness, Porter’s column distorts what the camera shows us in telling readers in the first sentence that, “My daughter’s first protest started off with a fight.” From this, the reasonable reader would likely conclude that Levant, whom Porter described as a “right-wing broadcasting bully” had brawled with a nine-year-old girl. As the video shows, Levant was kind and gentle to Lyla, engaging with her in a charming manner. Porter column is misleading in not telling readers that Levant played nice with her daughter. She omitted this entirely.Porter says her opening sentence was meant to refer to what she saw as her fight with Levant, witnessed by her daughter, standing by her side. Porter regarded her exchange with Levant as a disturbing incident that left her and her daughter shaken. That encounter remained top of mind the next day when she sat down to write her column and, she says, that’s why she opened her piece by referring to a “fight” with the well-known Levant.The column also misleads by not telling readers that Levant was reluctant to talk to Porter’s daughter at all because he prefers not to interview children. She also omits the fact that she asked him to talk with her daughter, when the little girl could not get Levant’s attention.The raw video shows, as Porter wrote, that her daughter did indeed go over to talk with Levant, placard in hand. It clearly captures Lyla hovering in the background, waiting to talk to Levant as he interviewed others. But it also clearly shows him saying that he does not want a “little person” on film.Porter should have been straight-up about what the camera also captured – her calling to Levant and saying “she has a question for you” and then stating on camera (in response to his request to her to grant him explicit permission to talk to her daughter): “My name is Catherine Porter and I give you permission to talk to my daughter, Lyla Burt.”In fairness to Porter, I don’t think Levant has been fair to her on this point either. He has reported repeatedly that Porter called him over to talk to her daughter, stating that Porter “made up” the fact that Lyla went over to him, without telling his audience what the camera also shows – Lyla walking over to him with her placard in hand and waiting to talk to him. Even if he did not notice the girl at the time, the raw video does not support his subsequent charge that Porter lied about her daughter going over to him.From the outset, Porter made clear that it was Lyla, not her, who initiated contact with Levant. She said she then interjected on Lyla’s behalf, calling out to Levant because her daughter wanted to ask him a question about climate change. As Porter wrote, she and Lyla were watching Levant interview a man in a chicken costume when mom told daughter that Levant does not believe in climate change.“Lyla and I have been speaking a lot about climate change deniers. ‘How can they not believe, she keeps asking?’ I tell her I’m not sure, but I think they just don’t believe in it. So, when she said she wanted to ask Ezra Levant why he doesn’t believe in climate change, I thought — why not? “That was very stupid,” she added. “I was naïve, totally naïve.”This matter also raises questions regarding other Star journalistic standards and policies. Foremost, given the Star’s standards regarding journalistic impartiality, I grow uncomfortable at seeing video footage of a Star journalist marching in a protest carrying a sign – whatever the cause. Certainly had any news reporter put themselves in such a situation, it would be a clear violation of Star policy.But, Porter is a columnist and the policy is murky about whether Star columnists – who have wide latitude to express their own opinions — can act in public in line with those opinions, so long as they are fully transparent.While many other columnists have told me they would never participate in such public events, believing in the impartiality principle that “it is not proper for journalists to be both actors and critics,” Porter is a columnist who is also a social justice advocate and newsroom leaders have endorsed that role for her.Porter is right in her understanding that she has explicit permission – and encouragement – to take a public stand and act in line with her views on social justice issues. Certainly the editors who asked her to write about the climate change rally understood that she was participating in the protest as a means of introducing her daughter to the power of protest.Second, this leads to questions about whether Porter let her ideology get in the way of the accuracy and fairness demanded of any journalist. Did she only see what she wanted to see and not see that Levant was charming to her daughter because that was not in line with their ideological differences? Another example that puzzles me and many others: Porter wrote that she saw Levant “belittling” the man dressed up like a chicken. What I saw on the video didn’t seem to me to Levant belittling the guy. But, that’s her perspective.Readers have also raised questions about whether the columnist “used” her daughter as “bait” to set-up a “gotcha” column about Levant. I don’t believe there was any such intention on Porter’s part and I hope she’ll write her own column to address this troubling matter.A few points are important to me on this issue: There is nothing in the Star’s policy to address questions about a parent involving a family member on an assignment, beyond the need for transparency. And, certainly Porter is not the first Star journalist to write about her children. Indeed, as editor Cooke made clear to me, columnists are often expected to write about their own lives and broader experiences.As well, Porter had been very clear in recent columns about her intention to expose her daughter to protests after Lyla had told her she didn’t think protests work. “I planned to show her otherwise,” she said.“The point of me taking my daughter to the march, from my perspective, was to show her the power you can feel there. I wanted her to get a whiff of camaraderie and agency that protests inspire,” Porter told me.It is certainly well outside the scope of my role to express judgment on Porter’s parenting decisions. What I do question however is whether her role as a good mom intent on looking out for her daughter at her first protest took precedence here over her responsibilities as a Toronto Star journalist.publiced@thestar.ca

OTHER EZRA STORIES I DONE
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2015/02/champion-of-freedom-of-speech-ezra.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2015/02/join-our-favorite-israeli-ezra-evantas.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2015/02/sun-news-network-removed-from-tvno.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2014/11/ezra-levant-loses-defamation-lawsuite.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2014/10/christian-phobes-at-amaruk-wont-hire.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2014/09/christian-street-preacher-david-lynn-in.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2014/09/remembering-911-ezra-levant-talks-to.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2014/08/the-true-peaceful-face-of-islamic.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jylvnac1Kek#t=233
http://www.ezralevant.com/charges-laid-against-anti-israel-rioters/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4v5svdTrtw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HoyHZG18nQc
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2014/08/lets-help-ezra-levant-catch-these-arab.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2014/07/israeli-ezra-levant-sticks-up-for.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2014/07/ezra-levant-goes-to-nanaimo-to-fight.html

BILL COSBYS SEXUAL ESCAPADES COME OUT IN COURT PAPERS-THE FULL DOCUMENTS.

HOWS HAMAS GETTING SUPPLIES FOR ROCKETS AND TUNNELS.

JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.GET SAVED NOW- CALL ON JESUS TODAY.THE ONLY SAVIOR OF THE WHOLE EARTH - NO OTHER. 1 COR 15:23-JESUS THE FIRST FRUITS-CHRISTIANS RAPTURED TO JESUS-FIRST FRUITS OF THE SPIRIT-23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.ROMANS 8:23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.(THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE)

ISRAEL SATAN COMES AGAINST

1 CHRONICLES 21:1
1 And Satan stood up against Israel, and provoked David to number Israel.

GENESIS 12:1-3
1 Now the LORD had said unto Abram, Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father’s house, unto a land that I (GOD) will shew thee:
2 And I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing:
3 And I will bless them that bless thee,(ISRAELIS) and curse (DESTROY) him that curseth thee:(DESTROY THEM) and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.

ISAIAH 41:11
11 Behold, all they that were incensed against thee (ISRAEL) shall be ashamed and confounded: they shall be as nothing;(DESTROYED) and they that strive with thee shall perish.(ISRAEL HATERS WILL BE TOTALLY DESTROYED)

ISRAELS TROUBLE

JEREMIAH 30:7
7 Alas! for that day is great, so that none is like it: it is even the time of Jacob’s trouble;(ISRAEL) but he shall be saved out of it.

DANIEL 12:1,4
1 And at that time shall Michael(ISRAELS WAR ANGEL) stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people:(ISRAEL) and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation(May 14,48) even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.
4 But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro,(WORLD TRAVEL,IMMIGRATION) and knowledge shall be increased.(COMPUTERS,CHIP IMPLANTS ETC)

Security Council session on Iran deal to include discussion on Israel-Malaysia asks to reintroduce perceived mistreatment of Palestinians on meeting’s agenda MondayBy Tamar Pileggi July 20, 2015, 12:52 am 3-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL

The UN Security Council session on Monday on the new nuclear deal between Iran and the world powers is expected to include a discussion on Israel.In addition to the council’s expected endorsement of the Iranian nuclear deal, the 15-member body will also reportedly discuss Israel’s treatment of Palestinians.Malaysia, a non-permanent member of the Security Council, proposed adding the discussion to the agenda, according to a report in the Hebrew-language website NRG on Sunday.The Foreign Ministry said the expected discussion was “an ugly and cynical attempt to further cement the Palestinian issue on the agenda of the international community.”The ministry rejected the use of multilateral organizations such as the UN to coerce it into any sort of action vis-à-vis the Palestinians, and said that progress in peace talks can only be achieved in direct bilateral negotiations.Continued discussions of Israel’s perceived mistreatment of Palestinians, it said, was a waste of agency resources given the ongoing and fierce violence in the region.“Its absurd that while attacks are taking place at the hands of radical Islamists throughout the Middle East, a special discussion on Israel is to take place,” a Foreign Ministry statement read.Malaysia’s initiative to put the Israeli-Palestinian conflict on the council’s agenda came after France announced last month that it wouldn’t propose a resolution on Palestinian statehood to the Security Council if the United States was certain to would veto it.Malaysia, a Muslim-majority country, welcomed the nuclear deal signed between Iran and world powers last week, calling it “historic” and a “positive step and augurs well for international efforts aimed at enhancing nuclear security.”Congress has 60 days to review the Iran deal. While lawmakers can’t block the agreement itself, they can try to pass new sanctions on Iran or block the president from waiving existing penalties.Israel is expected to focus its diplomatic efforts on lobbying US lawmakers not to support the nuclear deal.The 10-year agreement struck in Vienna last week calls for a lifting of punishing international sanctions on Iran in exchange for measures to ensure Iran does not build nuclear weapons.According to diplomats, the resolution endorsing the deal should pass the Security Council with little difficulty, since the five veto-wielding permanent members of the Security Council — Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States — were among those countries that negotiated the accord.If passed, the new resolution would replace the existing framework of seven sets of Security Council sanctions imposed since 2006 on Iran, enshrining a new set of restrictions.AP contributed to this report.

Carter: We won’t change Israel’s view on Iran deal-US defense chief in Israel for talks on bolstering defense ties after nuclear accord which he says does not ‘prevent military option’By Times of Israel staff and AP July 19, 2015, 11:43 pm 12

US Defense Secretary Ash Carter said Sunday he has no expectation of changing Israel’s opposition to the Iran nuclear deal. Instead, he announced as he headed to the Jewish state, he would use his meetings with Israeli leaders to discuss ways of deepening military ties.“I’m not going to change anybody’s mind in Israel. That’s not the purpose of my trip,” Carter told members of the media en route to Israel, Reuters reported. Carter touched down in Tel Aviv on Sunday night and is scheduled to meet with his Israeli counterpart on Monday, followed by a meeting Tuesday with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. He is the first member of Obama’s Cabinet to visit Israel since the Iran deal was clinched last week. After talks in Israel, he was to head to Jordan and Saudi Arabia.Carter previewed the message he will convey to Israeli, Jordanian and Saudi leaders on behalf of President Barack Obama.“This is a good deal,” Carter said. “It removes a critical element of danger, threat and uncertainty from the region,” and does so in a way that can be verified not only by the US but by the international community.Asked whether he thinks the accord makes it more likely that Israel will launch a pre-emptive military strike on Iran, Carter noted that the US has discussed military options with Israel for a number of years.“One of the reasons this deal is a good one is that it does nothing to prevent the military option — the US military option, which I’m responsible for” and which will be improved and preserved, he said.Carter acknowledged that Netanyahu is staunchly opposed to the deal. The Israeli leader believes the pact will enable Iran to become a nuclear power. Carter said he and Netanyahu will have to agree to disagree on that.“Friends can disagree but we have decades of rock-solid cooperation with Israel,” the defense secretary told reporters.Meanwhile, Channel 2 reported Sunday that the US is considering providing an extensive military package to Israel in the wake of the Iranian nuclear accord.Sources in Washington indicated they will provide the Jewish state with advanced weaponry and technology, apparently to compensate for the boost the deal will give Iran.Netanyahu rejected the notion of a reimbursement package Sunday, saying that no amount of compensation would be enough to confront a nuclear armed Iran “sworn to our destruction.”“Why should we need to be compensated if the deal is supposed to make us safer?” he asked. “The deal endangers our security, our survival even, and the security of the Middle East and the world,” Netanyahu said, during a US media blitz in the wake of the deal.

How’s Hamas getting supplies for rockets and tunnels? Through Israel-Dual-purpose materials essential for the terrorist group’s activity are being smuggled into the Gaza Strip through the Kerem Shalom crossing By Avi Issacharoff July 20, 2015, 4:40 am 1-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL

The Muslim holy month of Ramadan ended on Friday, signaling the start of Eid al-Fitr celebrations for Gaza’s inhabitants. The faithful fasted from dawn to dusk each day for a month in the heat of June and July, not knowing what the future held for the Gaza Strip.The members of Hamas did the same. They have received only a few hundred shekels instead of their full salaries for the past four months because of Hamas’s financial hardship. Full salaries are supposed to be paid out this month due to Iranian President Hassan Rouhani’s decision to resume transferring grants from Iran in light of his agreement with the P5+1.Yet despite the hunger, heat and financial hardship, the hundreds of workers digging tunnels under the Israeli border, inside the Gaza Strip and on the Egyptian border, kept on with their labor. That they worked at a slower pace was not because of the fast. Hundreds of Palestinians, members of Hamas, continued building the network, including new attack tunnels to reach Israel in the next war and smuggling tunnels to Sinai. The problem they have encountered over the past few weeks, causing a slowdown in the pace of digging, is a severe shortage of some of the materials critically important for the tunnel industry.Quite a few reports on these tunnels have been published recently in both Israeli and Hamas media. Some in the Israeli defense establishment have a working assumption that, a year after Operation Protective Edge, it is likely that Hamas already has one or more tunnels crossing the border fence and reaching inside Israel.Hamas’s intense focus on its tunnel project can only bolster this assumption. Hamas is putting an enormous amount of effort, personnel and money into digging with heavy engineering equipment.So what has been delaying progress in the digging on the Gazan side lately? Mainly Israel’s discovery that material vital to the tunnel industry is being smuggled from Israel into the Gaza Strip through the Kerem Shalom border crossing. Some of it is dual-use material, some material illegal for import that was hidden in aboveboard supply deliveries.Material for rocket manufacture has also been brought into the Strip via Israel in this way.Excavating tunnels requires — along with working hands and some shovels — steel cables. Tons of steel cables. And engines, pulley blocks, batteries, concrete or wooden panels, metal pallets and various chemicals.The manufacture of rockets, meanwhile, requires electrodes, explosive materials and rocket fuel, among other things.Hamas was managing to smuggle all those things into the Gaza Strip until fairly recently — not through tunnels from Sinai or by sea, but from Israel via Kerem Shalom.Egypt’s intensive anti-smuggling effort on the border with Gaza and at sea off the coast of Rafah had led Hamas to search for other ways to continue supplying its military industry and its military wing in general. One of the solutions Hamas found was to smuggle in various materials and dual-use items from Israel.The items it required could seem like innocent components of civilian equipment, but could easily be repurposed for arms manufacture and for digging tunnels. So Hamas set up an entire hierarchy of funds and personnel for purchasing and acquisition in Israel and the West Bank. This apparatus receives orders from all of Hamas’s various departments: the military wing, of course, and military outposts, installations, tunnels and arms-manufacturing plants.Hamas also set up a network of Palestinian merchants in Gaza to buy the goods; some know nothing of their role in the organization while others are well aware of it. Their job is to supply Hamas indirectly or directly with everything it needs: electronics and communications equipment, construction materials and anything else. This network of merchants works directly with Israeli merchants, who receive orders from them which appear completely innocent. One example is refrigerator motors, which the tunnel excavators can put to their own use. The Israeli merchants might also receive an order for wooden pallets, which were brought into Gaza in large numbers until somebody figured out that they were being used to replace the concrete walls in the tunnels.A series of recent inspections and seizures at the Kerem Shalom border crossing uncovered an attempt to smuggle enough rocket fuel for 4,480 20-kilometer-range rockets. The fuel had been concealed in bags containing a different material.In another case, also at a border crossing to Gaza, one ton of “solidifying material,” an ingredient used in rocket production, was seized. The amount discovered was enough for 50 80-kilometer-range rockets.Electrodes, supposedly a simple item used in industry and construction, became one of the most vital components in Hamas’s rocket-production industry. Thousands of electrodes were seized on their way to Gaza — and the source, of course, was Israel and the West Bank. In one case, Hamas used a butter-production facility in Ramallah, hiding electrodes inside butter containers bound for the Gaza Strip. Another original smuggling method was to conceal electrodes in marble slabs from Hebron’s marble industry. These, too, were discovered at the Kerem Shalom border crossing. The discoveries gave rise to a debate in Israel’s defense establishment: What to do? Do we stop the transfer of goods into Gaza in order to strike at Hamas’s ability to manufacture arms for use against Israel — an act that would increase the hardship in Gaza and increase the risk of a conflict? Or do we continue allowing products to flow into Gaza, with the understanding that there will be a military price to pay? For now, the transfer of goods is continuing, and at greater intensity. Roughly 600 enormous trucks filled with goods from Israel enter the Gaza Strip every day. But at the same time, the defense establishment has heightened its efforts to prevent those dual-purpose materials from getting into the Strip. Wooden pallets are no longer allowed in, leading Hamas to begin chopping down trees in Gaza and taking over civilian wood factories. Hamas’s purchasing and acquisitions department is currently suffering from a shortage of electrodes and chemical materials. A package of electrodes that until recently cost 60 shekels in Gaza now costs 800 shekels. The price for explosives smuggled into Gaza, once $10,000 per ton, has soared to $70,000.But even if the price increase has slowed the pace of rocket manufacture and tunnel excavation, it has not stopped them completely. Some of the materials continue to arrive.The money that the Hamas military industry is spending on supplies, enormous sums in Gaza’s terms, could have been used to pay the salaries of Hamas’s civilian workers — teachers, physicians and so on. The funds for these purchases come from the pockets of Gaza’s inhabitants in the form of bizarre taxes that Hamas has imposed over the past year on anything that moves. According to Israeli statistics, Hamas has spent $30 million on steel over the past two years. In the communications industry, the spending reached nine million shekels per year. Hamas also pays warehouse owners and moving companies some 1.5 million shekels per month (indirectly).And even as Hamas calls for the lifting of the Israeli blockade on Gaza, it pays millions of shekels per month to business owners in Israel who send it merchandise, completely unaware of the goods’ destination.-The effect of the nuclear agreement on Hamas-Hamas’s motivation to engage in future conflict is linked to several factors, its military capability apparently first among them. In other words, if Hamas had sufficient means and capability, it apparently would not hesitate to act against Israel. The more it gathers strength, the greater its motivation will be to go to war. This means that if Israel succeeds in reducing the amount of dual-purpose materials and stopping the smuggling to Gaza, the motivation that is closely linked to Hamas’s military capability will lessen.But a slowdown of the entry of goods will intensify hardship in Gaza, leading the population to pressure Hamas to act to change the situation — mostly likely by taking military action rather than stopping the smuggling for its military industry.There is almost full agreement on the Israeli side about one thing, at least: the construction of a seaport off the Gaza coast, as Hamas is demanding, or of an airport, even with international supervision, will speed up Hamas’s empowerment process many times over.Inside Hamas, there is no doubt that its military wing has been setting the tone since the end of Operation Protective Edge. So has the more radical faction within Hamas. Figures such as Yahya Sinwar and Rawhi Mushtaha, who dance somewhere on the borderline between Izz ad-Din al-Qassam and the political bureau and take a more militant line, grow stronger. The military wing, which is still commanded by Mohammed Deif, and its representatives in the political wing, is arguing with political bureau chief Khaled Mashaal, Ismail Haniyeh and others about tactics and even about strategy.One of the issues being debated is Hamas’s relationship with the Palestinian Authority and the possibility of reconciliation. While Mashaal, Haniyeh and others see the Gaza Strip as part of Hamas’s larger project — a takeover of the PLO and the West Bank even at the price of temporary reconciliation with Fatah and the Palestinian Authority and giving up control of Gaza, the military wing does not accept that. In its view (Sinwar and Mushtaha, together with Fathi Hamad and others, side with the military wing), Gaza is a critically important project in and of itself, and control over it must not be relinquished at any stage.Another issue in the dispute is the direction Hamas will take. Should it grow closer with the Sunni axis headed by Saudi Arabia or the Shiite axis led by Iran? It is quite likely that the agreement reached in Vienna last week on Iran’s nuclear program tipped the scales in favor of the military wing, which wants the more intensive funds and assistance offered by Iran.A final issue has to do with Israel. While the military wing makes more moderate and pragmatic noises from time to time about the need to reconsider the path of jihad, the members of Izz al-Din al-Qassam view holy war as the only way to accomplish Hamas’s goals, which include wiping Israel off the map. The agreement of the P5+1 with Iran could have a critical, negative influence on this issue as well.

U.S. aims to shift Israel focus to security ties after Iran deal-Reuters By Phil Stewart-JULY 20,15-YAHOONEWS

TEL AVIV (Reuters) - U.S. Defense Secretary Ash Carter said it plainly just before landing in Israel, where officials are fuming over the Iran nuclear deal: "I'm not going to change anybody's mind in Israel. That's not the purpose of my trip."Carter, making the first visit by a U.S. cabinet official to Israel since last week's landmark agreement to curb Iran's nuclear program, aims instead to move away from political tensions over the accord to more cool-headed, nuts-and-bolts discussions on deepening security ties.Increased U.S. military-related support is expected to be on the table. But Israeli and U.S. officials have played down the prospects of any looming announcements."Friends can disagree but we have decades of rock-solid cooperation with Israel," Carter told reporters traveling with him.Carter's mission will not be an easy one.The United States and Israel fundamentally differ on whether the Iran nuclear deal makes both countries safer. President Barack Obama says it does; Prime Minister Benjamin Neta says it does not.Israel fears that Tehran's economic gains from a lifting of Western sanctions could boost Iranian-backed guerrillas in Lebanon and the Palestinian territories. It could also lead to an arms race with Arab states unfriendly to Israel.Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the highest authority in Iran, did little to alleviate those concerns in a fiery speech marking the end of the holy month of Ramadan on Saturday.Khamenei said the nuclear deal would not change Iran's policy in supporting allies in Syria, Iraq, Bahrain, Yemen,Lebanon and among the Palestinians.Obama has stressed that taking the threat of an Iranian nuclear weapon off the table increases the security of Israel, the United States and its allies. U.S. officials have also signaled they are not changing a longstanding U.S. defense strategy that is underpinned by the threat of a hostile Iran."Neither the deal nor everything else we're doing to advance our military strategy in the region assumes anything about Iranian behavior," Carter said."There’s nothing in those 100 pages that places any limitations on the United States or what it does to defend ...its friends and allies including Israel."Carter also cited the U.S. commitment to allies to guard against potential Iranian aggression.-'DON'T ANTICIPATE A SHIFT'-A senior U.S. defense official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Iran was likely to keep trying to take advantage of fragile states in the Middle East, saying: "I don't anticipate a shift in their activities."Israel has a strong army, is believed to have the region's only nuclear arsenal, and receives about $3 billion a year in military-related support from the United States. That amount is expected to increase following the Iran deal, and Carter cited a range of security issues to discuss."We don’t have any big package or announcement or thing to bring to the Israelis that we’re bargaining over," the senior U.S. defense official said.After Israel, Carter will head this week to Jordan and Saudi Arabia. Iran is the minant Shi'ite Muslim power, hostile not only to Israel but to Washington's Sunni Muslim-ruled Arab friends, particularly Saudi Arabia.Allies of Riyadh and Tehran have fought decades of sectarian proxy wars in Syria, Lebanon, Iraq and Yemen.Saudi Arabia's Prince Bandar bin Sultan, a former head of the kingdom's intelligence services, wrote last week that the nuclear deal would allow Iran to "wreak havoc in the region."But Saudi Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir signaled a willingness during a visit last week in Washington to discuss ways to strengthen security ties.Carter said he aimed to work on advancing commitments made to Gulf leaders in May when Obama hosted them at Camp David.(Reporting by Phil Stewart; Editing by Peter Cooney and Howard Goller)

Obama sends Iran deal to wary Congress, Israel urges rejection-Reuters By Gernot Heller and Doina Chiacu-JULY 20,15-YAHOONEWS

TEHRAN/WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama's administration sent a nuclear agreement with Tehran to Congress on Sunday and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu urged U.S. lawmakers to reject a deal he said would only feed an "Iranian terror machine".In a first concrete sign of European determination to quickly rebuild economic and political ties with Iran after a 12-year standoff, German Economy Minister Sigmar Gabriel arrived in Tehran with an economic delegation. Other European powers were expected to follow.Obama has promised to exercise his veto if Congress rejects the deal, which curbs Iran's nuclear program while allowing an easing of economic sanctions.Overriding it would require a two-thirds majority of both the House of Representatives and Senate, so the administration is working to win over enough of Obama's fellow Democrats to offset strong Republican opposition.In an unusual move, Obama took three Democratic congressman golfing with him: Joe Courtney of Connecticut, Ed Perlmutter of Colorado and John Yarmuth of Kentucky. The president more often taps aides and friends for weekend golfing."I think the right thing to do is merely not to go ahead with this deal," Netanyahu said on CBS's "Face the Nation" as he continued a string of U.S. media interviews denouncing the deal reached on Tuesday between Iran and six major powers."There are many things to be done to stop Iran's aggression and this deal is not one of them," he said.U.S. Defense Secretary Ash Carter, arriving in Israel on the first visit by a U.S. cabinet official since the agreement, told reporters on his aircraft: "I'm not going to change anybody's mind in Israel. That's not the purpose of my trip."Friends can disagree but we have decades of rock-solid.-cooperation with Israel."Carter is also touring Jordan and Saudi Arabia, which both eye the prospect of increasing Iranian influence in the region with some suspicion.-IRANIAN RECOGNITION OF ISRAEL-Tehran denies Western and Israeli accusations it has been using a research program as cover for ambitions to develop atomic weapons. President Hassan Rouhani said on Saturday he expected the deal would lead to closer relations with Tehran's neighbors in the Gulf region, while Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said Iran remained at odds with the West.It was on Khamenei's words that Netanyahu seized, speaking to his cabinet on Sunday."The Iranians are not even trying to hide the fact they will take advantage of the hundreds of billions they will receive via the agreement to arm their terror machine," he said. "And they say explicitly they will continue their struggle against the United States and its allies, Israel of course above all."Germany's Gabriel, due to meet President Hassan Rouhani and several ministers, told German newspaper Bild he would use his three-day trip to suggest Germany could serve as a mediator between Iran and arch-enemy Israel. He said he would insist the Iranian government recognize Israel's right to exist."Really stable, good relationships with Germany will only be able to develop if this is accepted in Iranian politics. I will keep making that clear during my trip to Iran," Gabriel said in comments due to be published on Monday.British Prime Minister David Cameron said world powers could now press Tehran on other issues such as its involvement in Syria in support of President Bashar al-Assad. "We shouldn't be naïve or starry eyed in any way about the regime that we're dealing with," he said in an interview with NBC News. Opponents of the deal argue it does not provide enough supervision of Iran's nuclear program. Secretary of State John Kerry, who led the U.S. delegation to the talks with Iran, was asked on “Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace” why the deal did not provide for inspections anywhere anytime.“The fact is, that in arms control, there is no country anywhere on this planet that has ‘anywhere, anytime’," he said. "There is no such standard. There is no such standard within arms control inspections."(Additional reporting Michael Flaherty in Washington, Alex Wilts, Phil Stewart in Tel Aviv; Writing by Ralph Boulton)

EVENTS IN TIME (BIBLE PROPHECY LITERALLY FULFILLED)(BY GOD)

IMPORTANT LINKS

Tuesday, July 21, 2015

PLANNED PARENTHOOD NOT ONLY MURDERS GODS CREATED CHILDREN.BUT SELLS THE BODY PARTS OF THE ABORTED CHILDREN.

GREECES BANKS REOPEN.CITIZENS ALLOWED TO TAKEOUT $400.00 A WEEK ONLY.

Monday, July 20, 2015

THE HATERS ARE AFTER EZRA LEVANT THE ISRAELI AGAIN.LYING ABOUT HIM.AT A CLIMATE CHANGE PROTEST.

BILL COSBYS SEXUAL ESCAPADES COME OUT IN COURT PAPERS-THE FULL DOCUMENTS.

HOWS HAMAS GETTING SUPPLIES FOR ROCKETS AND TUNNELS.

GREECE GETS 7BN DOLLAR LOAN TODAY.

Sunday, July 19, 2015

TORAH PORTION FROM JULY 19-25,2015

ALLTIME