EVENTS IN TIME (BIBLE PROPHECY LITERALLY FULFILLED)(BY GOD)

I WRITE NEWS ABOUT AND PUT NEWS ARTICLES ABOUT ISRAEL AND JERUSALEM PERTAINING TO BIBLE PROPHESY HAPPENINGS.JOEL 3:20 But Judah (ISRAEL) shall dwell for ever, and Jerusalem from generation to generation.(THATS ISRAEL-JERUSALEM WILL NEVER BE DESTROYED AGAIN)-WE CHRISTIANS ARE ALL WAITING PATIENTLY FOR THE PRE-TRIBULATION RAPTURE TO OCCUR.SO WE CAN GO TO JESUS AND GET OUR NEVER DYING BODIES.SO WE CAN RULE OVER CITIES OURSELVES.WHILE JESUS RULES FROM DAVIDS THRONE FOREVER IN JERUSALEM.

Thursday, July 16, 2015

WE CHRISTIANS BETTER START FIGHTING FOR GODS WORDS.AND STICK UP FOR JESUS AND ISRAEL.AND AGAINST THE WORLDS FILTHY IMAGINATIONS DISQUISED AS GET ALONG WITH ALL LIBERAL-DEMOCRAT GODLESS VIEWS.

AMERICA PRESENTS IRAN DRAFT RESOLUTION TO THE USELESS UNITED NATIONS.

JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.GET SAVED NOW- CALL ON JESUS TODAY.THE ONLY SAVIOR OF THE WHOLE EARTH - NO OTHER. 1 COR 15:23-JESUS THE FIRST FRUITS-CHRISTIANS RAPTURED TO JESUS-FIRST FRUITS OF THE SPIRIT-23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.ROMANS 8:23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.(THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE)

ISRAEL SATAN COMES AGAINST

1 CHRONICLES 21:1
1 And Satan stood up against Israel, and provoked David to number Israel.

GENESIS 12:1-3
1 Now the LORD had said unto Abram, Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father’s house, unto a land that I (GOD) will shew thee:
2 And I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing:
3 And I will bless them that bless thee,(ISRAELIS) and curse (DESTROY) him that curseth thee:(DESTROY THEM) and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.

ISAIAH 41:11
11 Behold, all they that were incensed against thee (ISRAEL) shall be ashamed and confounded: they shall be as nothing;(DESTROYED) and they that strive with thee shall perish.(ISRAEL HATERS WILL BE TOTALLY DESTROYED)

ISRAELS TROUBLE

JEREMIAH 30:7
7 Alas! for that day is great, so that none is like it: it is even the time of Jacob’s trouble;(ISRAEL) but he shall be saved out of it.

DANIEL 12:1,4
1 And at that time shall Michael(ISRAELS WAR ANGEL) stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people:(ISRAEL) and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation(May 14,48) even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.
4 But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro,(WORLD TRAVEL,IMMIGRATION) and knowledge shall be increased.(COMPUTERS,CHIP IMPLANTS ETC)

Netanyahu on Iran deal: The more you read it, the worse it gets-Inspections clause is farcical, sanctions snap-back clause is incomprehensible, and a major Iranian terror chief, Qassem Soleimani, has been removed from the terror list, PM protests-By Avi Lewis July 15, 2015, 3:50 pm 70-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Wednesday that perusal of the previous day’s nuclear deal with Iran yields a picture that grows ever bleaker.The agreement is “filled with absurdities,” Netanyahu said, scolding world leaders for caving in to Iran’s “charm offensive” and crediting Israel with leading the fight against an Iranian bomb.He called on the Knesset to present a united front in the fight against the “bad in every respect” pact. “The agreement that was signed in Vienna is not the final word. We will continue to fight,” Netanyahu pledged.Iran and the world powers signed an agreement Tuesday in Vienna that mandates the Islamic Republic scale back some of its nuclear capabilities in exchange for a rollback of economic sanctions.“When we examine this agreement — which is bad in every aspect — when we read this agreement, the picture becomes more bleak and we discover it’s filled with absurdities,” Netanyahu said.“For example, the agreement gives Iran 24 days’ [notice] before an inspection; it’s like giving a criminal organization that produces drugs a 24-hour warning before performing a search,” he said.“In addition, the sanction snap-back mechanism is so complicated and serpentine that one needs a PhD to understand it. One clause creates a huge incentive to invest in Iran because it says that the reinstatement of sanctions will not apply to agreements that have [already taken place]. Another section includes the people that were removed from the sanctions list, one of them being Qassem Soleimani, head of Iran’s global terror arm. It is absurd, terror [meets] nuclear [power],” he said, referring to the commander of Iran’s elite Quds force.According to Netanyahu, Western leaders were too easily beguiled by the Iranian regime, and if not for Israel’s efforts, Tehran would already possess a bomb.“There is a willingness in the West to accept despotic regimes and seek peace at any price. Not all of them have internalized the lessons of history. Even today, the powers are won over by a charm offensive. I am not saying that we are in 1938 for two reasons; firstly, back then, no precedent existed for what was to occur, while today that [precedent] exists; secondly, today we have a state, while then we didn’t, and its purpose is to to act against those that threaten it,” Netanyahu said.“If not for the efforts made by Israel, Iran would have already had the ability to arm itself with nuclear bombs. We exposed the Iranian issue on the international stage. We led the implementation of biting sanctions that brought Iran to the negotiating table. We set before Iran a red line on the issue of uranium enrichment which it has not yet crossed,” he said.“One who speaks truth about this agreement is the president of Iran, who said that Iran has achieved all its objectives,” Netanyahu said, referring to President Hassan Rouhani who said Tuesday following the deal that “all the four objectives have been achieved.”“We are not committed to this agreement and will continue to oppose it. For existential [threats] there is no coalition or opposition. We need a united front to ensure our survival,” Netanyahu said.

US presents draft Iran resolution to Security Council-Diplomats say vote to back new deal could come Monday or Tuesday, would pass easily with support of permanent members-By AFP July 16, 2015, 12:49 am-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL

The United States Wednesday put forward a draft resolution to the UN Security Council seeking backing for a historic deal curtailing Iran’s nuclear program as a first step for international approval of the accord.The draft text seeks formal UN endorsement for the hard-won, ground-breaking agreement reached in Vienna on Tuesday after 18 straight days of talks which capped almost two years of momentous negotiations.The new resolution would also replace the existing framework of seven sets of Security Council sanctions imposed since 2006 on Iran, enshrining a new set of restrictions.“We have now formally introduced this Iran resolution into the Security Council,” a US diplomat said.Under the deal, hammered out by six world powers and Iran, a web of sanctions will be gradually lifted as Tehran takes steps to dismantle and mothball much of its nuclear program to ensure it cannot build a bomb.A vote on the resolution could come as early as Monday or Tuesday, a diplomat said.But a UN embargo on conventional arms sales and exports is to stay in place for five years, while trade in ballistic missiles capable of being armed with a nuclear warhead will remain for eight years.The draft resolution should pass with little difficulty since the five veto-wielding permanent members of the UN Security Council — Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States — were among those countries which negotiated the Vienna accord.“It was negotiated. All of them know and supported every element of it. There is no uncertainty,” a US official familiar with the dossier said.The draft text was put forward by the US ambassador to the United Nations, Samantha Power during closed door talks on Wednesday.In order to lift the sanctions, the UN’s nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, will have to report that Iran is meeting its commitments under the deal, and that it has fully answered concerns that prior to 2003, and perhaps later, it may have sought nuclear arms.However, the deal also sets out a so-called “snapback” mechanism to put the old sanctions back in place. It establishes a joint commission which would examine any complaints if world powers feel Iran has not met its commitments under the Vienna deal.If a protest is made via the joint commission, then the UN Security Council would have to vote on whether to continue the sanctions lifting.“It seems counterintuitive, but if we veto that resolution, sanctions will snapback and all the past resolutions would come back into force,” the diplomat said.Once the UN Security Council resolution is agreed, that will start the clock ticking on the first deadline known as Adoption Day, some 90 days after the UN endorses the agreement.Under the deal, all parties from that day must begin to make the necessary legal and administrative preparations to implement the full deal later on.

In Iran deal, Obama sees validation for diplomatic gamble-Success of curbing Tehran’s nuclear ambitions with diplomacy and economic pressure will shape president’s legacy-By Julie Pace July 16, 2015, 3:15 am-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL

WASHINGTON (AP) — To President Barack Obama, the historic nuclear accord with Iran is a validation of an arduous, politically fraught diplomatic gamble, one he foreshadowed before winning the White House and one that will shape his legacy long after he leaves.The deal to curb Iran’s nuclear program may prevent Tehran from developing a bomb or being the target of US military action during Obama’s presidency. But whether the agreement succeeds in stemming Iran’s nuclear ambitions after his tenure is a far murkier question.The sheer amount of time and political capital Obama invested in the Iran talks has fueled speculation that he had too much at stake to walk away from the negotiating table, no matter the compromises in a final deal. Obama authorized secret talks with Iran in 2012, followed by nearly two years of formal negotiations alongside Britain, France, Germany, Russia and China. His rapprochement with Iran sent US relations with Israel plummeting to near-historic lows and deepened tensions with CongressEven with the high-stakes implications of an Iranian nuclear program, the talks over time seemed to represent more than just the quest for a deal. They were a referendum on Obama’s belief that even America’s most ardent enemies can be brought in line by wielding diplomacy and economic pressure instead of military might.“It represents the core of who he is and what his presidency stands for,” said Julianne Smith, a former Obama White House and Pentagon official. “He needs it to validate that approach.”With the deal now in hand, one of Obama’s top priorities is selling its virtues to skeptical lawmakers and world leaders, as well as the American public. He spent much of Tuesday calling leaders in Europe and the Middle East, including Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.Netanyahu, a fierce opponent of the deal, said his country is not bound by the terms of the agreement and “will reserve our right to defend ourselves against all of our enemies.” Obama was also poised to defend the deal in a news conference Wednesday, while dispatching Vice President Joe Biden to Congres to meet with House Democrats.“I’m here to answer questions and explain what the deal is and I’m confident they’ll like it when they understand it all,” Biden told reporters as he entered the closed-door session.Senior US officials say Obama is sensitive to the perception he was desperate for a deal. With big gaps remaining as a June 30 deadline neared for a final agreement, officials said the president urged his team to send clear messages to Iran both publicly and privately that the US was ready to end the talks without an agreement.“He did not want people to have the impression that this is something we needed to have,” one official said, adding that Obama was frequently among the most pessimistic members of his national security team about the prospects for a deal.Officials also pointed to a video conference Obama convened with Kerry and other negotiators last week as an example of his willingness to forgo a deal. With momentum for an agreement building in Vienna and a deadline to limit congressional oversight looming, officials said Obama essentially rejected the deal at hand because timetables for keeping restrictions on Iran’s nuclear program and a UN arms embargo in place were insufficient.The officials insisted on the condition of anonymity in order to discuss the president’s thinking.Obama first planted the seeds for engagement with Iran as a presidential candidate, saying in a 2007 Democratic primary debate that he would be willing to meet with Iranian leaders without preconditions.The president’s opening months in office included public and private overtures to Tehran, all with a more conciliatory tone aimed at signaling a shift from predecessor George W. Bush, who cast Iran as part of an “axis of evil.”Obama has taken a similar approach — clandestine diplomacy, prioritizing negotiations over military action — to other foreign policy challenges, with mixed results. Plans to negotiate an end to Syria’s bloody civil war have gone nowhere. A resumption of diplomatic relations with Cuba after a half-century of hostilities is moving along largely as planned.-The Associated Press.

Obama: Netanyahu yet to provide alternative to Iran deal-President says agreement prevents Iranian nuke, which would compound Israel’s ‘legitimate’ concerns; skewers PM for saying Tehran seeks to ‘take over the world’-By Daniel Bernstein July 15, 2015, 9:40 pm Updated: July 15, 2015, 10:49 pm 56-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL

US President Barack Obama on Wednesday delivered a detailed defense of the world powers’ landmark nuclear accord with Iran, and lambasted Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and other vociferous critics inside the US for what he said was their failure to present a viable alternative to it.Taking a direct jab at Netanyahu, Obama said some critics claim Iran wants to “take over the world,” referencing a speech the prime minister made earlier in the month in which he claimed Iran has “the ultimate true aim of taking over the world.” This was “news to the Iranians,” Obama quipped during a press conference on the deal with reporters in the White House.But Obama agreed that “Israel has legitimate concerns about its security relative to Iran.” The regime in Tehran, he noted, “has proclaimed that Israel shouldn’t exist… has denied the Holocaust… has financed Hezbollah, and as a consequence there are missiles that are pointed toward Tel Aviv.”Therefore, he said, “I think there are very good reasons why Israelis are nervous about Iran’s position in the world generally, and I’ve said this to Prime Minister Netanyahu, I’ve said it directly to the Israeli people.”Still, he continued, “all those threats are compounded if Iran gets a nuclear weapon.There really are only two alternatives here: either the issue of Iran attaining a nuclear weapon is resolved diplomatically through negotiation, or it’s resolved through force, through war’Under the deal announced Tuesday, Iran’s nuclear program will be scaled back and closely monitored as the US and world powers seek to cut off its ability to develop an atomic weapon. In exchange, Iran will see biting economic sanctions gradually lifted, freeing up tens of billions of dollars in oil revenue and frozen assets. But Netanyahu and other critics say the deal should have neutralized and dismantled Iran’s military nuclear facilities, and warn that the deal paves Iran’s path to the bomb and will send billions into its coffers which it will use to promote its violent agenda in the region and beyond.Obama said he had been hearing that it is a “bad deal, a historically bad deal” — Netanyahu had branded it just that on Tuesday — “that this will threaten Israel, the world and the United States.” Said Obama: “What I haven’t heard is what is your preferred alternative?”“If 99 percent of the world’s community and the majority of nuclear experts look at this thing and they say this will prevent Iran from getting a nuclear bomb, and you are arguing either that it does not, or that even if it does, it’s temporary, or that because they’re going to get a [financial] windfall… they’ll cause more problems,” said Obama, “then you have to have some alternative to present.”In fact, he asserted, “I haven’t heard that, and the reason is because there really are only two alternatives here: either the issue of Iran attaining a nuclear weapon is resolved diplomatically through negotiation, or it’s resolved through force, through war. Those are the options.”Earlier on Wednesday, Netanyahu reiterated his biting critique of the agreement, claiming it is “filled with absurdities,” and scolded world leaders for caving in to Iran’s “charm offensive.” Addressing the Knesset, he insisted Israel was not bound by the agreement, suggesting it could still take military action against Iran’s nuclear program even if the deal proceeds. Obama urged critics Wednesday to read the deal before attacking it; Netanyahu had said hours earlier that he had read, and that the more he read, the worse it got.But Obama asserted that a so-called “better deal” — as repeatedly demanded by Netanyahu — was unrealistic. “You’ll hear some critics say, well, we could have negotiated a better deal. Okay, what does that mean?” he asked.“I think the suggestion among a lot of the critics has been that a better deal, an acceptable deal, would be one in which Iran has no nuclear capacity, peaceful or otherwise. The problem with that position is that there is nobody who thinks that Iran would or could ever accept that, and the international community does not take the view that Iran can’t have a peaceful nuclear program. They agree with us that Iran can’t have a nuclear weapon.”The US, he said, does not have “diplomatic leverage to eliminate every vestige of a peaceful nuclear program in Iran. What we do have the leverage to do is to make sure they don’t have a weapon. That’s exactly what we’ve done.”If the alternative sought by the deal’s opponents “is that we should bring Iran to heel by military force,” he said, speaking directly to some Congressional Republican critics, “then those critics should say so, and that would be an honest debate.”The president addressed specific Israeli objections to the agreement, noting that sanctions and other measures targeting Iran’s support for the Lebanese terror group Hezbollah movement are “still in place.”He further insisted that criticism of the accord was based only on “speculation” and “misinformation.”But while the president maintained that the nuclear accord would make the world more secure, he said “profound differences” with the Islamic Republic will remain, and that “unlike the Cuba situation, we’re not normalizing diplomatic relations here.” Obama said he hoped the deal would encourage the Iranian regime to “behave differently” and stop sponsoring terrorist actors in the Middle East, but noted that he wasn’t “betting on it.”In the absence of a deal, however, the international economic sanctions that brought Iran to the negotiating table would have unraveled, he said, and the world community would not have been able to put the sanctions regime back together.Responding to criticism of the deal’s provisions on inspections of Iran’s nuclear facilities, Obama said Iran will be subject to a more vigorous inspection regime than before the nuclear deal, and “will not be in a position to develop a nuclear bomb,” but would still pose challenges to Western interests and values.Still, he added, “this is not something that you hide in the closet or you wheel off somewhere. If there is nuclear material on that site, your high school physics will remind us that that leaves a trace, so we’ll know that in fact there is a violation of the agreement.”In the absence of a deal, he contended, the region — which he termed “the most dangerous in the world” — would see “even more war” and a nuclear arms race in the short term, as “other countries in the Middle East would feel compelled to develop their own nuclear weapons.”His remarks were aimed in good part at Congress, where lawmakers are discussing legislation to try to stop the deal’s implementation. “I expect the debate to be robust, and that’s how it should be,” Obama said, imploring lawmakers skeptical of the deal to “remember the alternative.”The United States Wednesday presented a draft resolution to the UN Security Council asking it to endorse the historic deal, which could be voted on as early as Monday or Tuesday, diplomats said.The draft text seeks formal UN approval for the agreement and would also replace the existing framework of Security Council sanctions with the restrictions set out in the deal, under which Iran has dismantle or mothball much of its nuclear industry.Times of Israel staff, AP and AFP contributed to this report.

AIPAC tells Congress to reject Iran deal; J Street to support it-Pro-Israel lobbying group says lawmakers should oppose ‘bad deal'; liberal rival says it serves security interests of US and Israel alike-By Ron Kampeas July 16, 2015, 2:00 am 4-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL

WASHINGTON (JTA) — AIPAC called on Congress to reject the Iran nuclear deal, saying it does not meet critical markers that the influential pro-Israel lobby outlined in recent weeks. But the liberal Jewish Middle East lobby J Street announced a multimillion-dollar campaign to support the agreement.The American Israel Public Affairs Committee made its case against in a statement Wednesday delivered after President Barack Obama conducted a news conference of more than an hour defending the deal achieved a day earlier.“We strongly believe that the alternative to this bad deal is a better deal,” AIPAC said in its statement. “Congress should reject this agreement, and urge the administration to work with our allies to maintain economic pressure on Iran while offering to negotiate a better deal that will truly close off all Iranian paths to a nuclear weapon.”Under the law, Congress may disapprove the deal. AIPAC’s call to reject the agreement achieved between six world powers and Iran will make it likelier that Congress will send Obama a “no,” although it is unlikely that opponents will have the numbers to override the veto that Obama has pledged to deliver. Disapproval requires a simple majority in the House of Representatives and the Senate; overriding a veto requires two-thirds majorities in both chambers.On Tuesday, AIPAC had expressed skepticism about the deal, but held back from calling for its rejection until its details became clearer. A number of other major Jewish groups have expressed reservations about the pact, but only a handful have come out absolutely on either side.Israel rejected the deal immediately and plans to lobby the Congress to reject it. In a show of national unity, Yitzhak Herzog, the leader of the opposition Zionist Union party, is coming to Washington next week to lobby against the deal.AIPAC said the deal did not meet key markers that it has circulated since June. Among other complaints, AIPAC noted that the agreement does not grant inspectors immediate access to sites, lifts restrictions as early as eight years, does not require the dismantling of centrifuges and allows sanctions relief before compliance, although Obama administration officials have said that sanctions will not be lifted until Iran meets certain markers.The lobby appeared to challenge claims by Obama – made as recently as his Wednesday news conference – that the likeliest alternative to the deal was war.“Proponents of the proposed agreement will argue that the only alternative to this agreement is military conflict,” AIPAC said. “In fact, the reverse is true. A bad agreement such as this will invite instability and nuclear proliferation. It will embolden Iran and may encourage regional conflict.”J Street, announcing its campaign on Wednesday, said it will make the case to lawmakers that the agreement “advances both US and Israeli security interests.” The lobby has raised $2 million thus far for the drive, a source said.“J Street wants Congress to know that, despite some loud opposition to the deal coming from Jewish organizational leaders, our polling suggests that a clear majority of Jewish Americans agrees with us and backs the deal,” the group said in a statement.The campaign will launch this week with a 30-second TV advertisement highlighting the unprecedented inspections and monitoring of Iran’s nuclear and military sites under the agreement, along with more broadcast and print ads over the next 60 days.Obama in his news conference asked lawmakers not to heed lobbyists in considering the deal. Earlier Wednesday, his vice president, Joe Biden, had met Democratic lawmakers in a closed session to persuade them to back a deal. Republicans overwhelmingly oppose the deal.The president seemed eager to counter criticism of the deal.“With this deal we cut off every one of Iran’s pathways to a nuclear program, a nuclear weapons program,” he said.

Air raid sirens blare in South as rocket fired from Gaza-Projectile hits open area, no injuries or damage confirmed; IDF investigating incident-By Times of Israel staff July 16, 2015, 2:12 am 1

Rocket alert sirens rang out early Thursday morning in towns near the Gaza Strip after a missile was fired from the Palestinian territory.The IDF said one rocket fired from the coastal enclave struck an open area of southern Israel after Code Red alerts went off in the southern city of Ashkelon and in communities nearby. There were no immediate reports of injuries or damage. IDF soldiers were scouring the area for remains of the projectile and were investigating the incident.It wasn’t immediately clear who was responsible for the rocket fire.Earlier this week, rocket sirens sounded across northern Israel in what turned out to be a false alarm. Sunday’s incident was the latest in a string of false alarms in recent weeks in which sirens sounded in southern Israel and the Golan Heights.The rocket was the latest to hit southern Israel. Earlier this month, an Islamic State-affiliated group fired three rockets into southern Israel from Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula, causing no injuries or damage.

Turkey to build stadium in Gaza-15 July 2015 08:15 (Last updated 15 July 2015 08:16)-Turkish Cooperation and Coordination Agency (TIKA) plans to build 20,000-seat stadium in Gaza Strip

GAZA, Palestine- Turkey will build a 20,000-seat stadium according to international standard in the Gaza Strip to support sports in Palestine, officials revealed on Tuesday.A member of the Higher Council of Youth and Sports in the Gaza Strip, Abd al-Salam Haniyeh, said the Turkish Cooperation and Coordination Agency (TIKA) would build the stadium. "The approval for the stadium's construction by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan is one of the best contributions Turkey has provided to Palestinian sports," he said. Haniyeh added the stadium would be named Erdogan Stadium.Haniyeh said, earlier on Sunday, that TIKA held an iftar (breaking of fast) program for 700 Palestinian athletes and donated $225,000 to the Palestinian sports institutes. According to the data provided by the Palestinian Ministry of Sports, a total of 30 sports facilities were destroyed and 32 athletes were killed in the Israeli offensive in Gaza last summer. Over 2,160 Palestinians were killed and thousands injured in the onslaught – mostly civilians – while hundreds of homes and broad swathes of infrastructure were reduced to rubble across the territory, according to the UN.At least 73 Israelis – 68 soldiers and five civilians – were also killed during the 51-day conflict.

Wednesday, July 15, 2015

EU BACKS SHORT TERM FUNDING TO GREECE.

JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.GET SAVED NOW- CALL ON JESUS TODAY.THE ONLY SAVIOR OF THE WHOLE EARTH - NO OTHER. 1 COR 15:23-JESUS THE FIRST FRUITS-CHRISTIANS RAPTURED TO JESUS-FIRST FRUITS OF THE SPIRIT-23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.ROMANS 8:23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.(THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE)

HOARDING OF GOLD AND SILVER

DOCTOR DOCTORIAN FROM ANGEL OF GOD
then the angel said, Financial crisis will come to Asia. I will shake the world.

JAMES 5:1-3
1 Go to now, ye rich men, weep and howl for your miseries that shall come upon you.
2 Your riches are corrupted, and your garments are motheaten.
3 Your gold and silver is cankered; and the rust of them shall be a witness against you, and shall eat your flesh as it were fire. Ye have heaped treasure together for the last days.

REVELATION 18:10,17,19
10 Standing afar off for the fear of her torment, saying, Alas, alas that great city Babylon, that mighty city! for in one hour is thy judgment come.
17 For in one hour so great riches is come to nought. And every shipmaster, and all the company in ships, and sailors, and as many as trade by sea, stood afar off,
19 And they cast dust on their heads, and cried, weeping and wailing, saying, Alas, alas that great city, wherein were made rich all that had ships in the sea by reason of her costliness! for in one hour is she made desolate.

EZEKIEL 7:19
19 They shall cast their silver in the streets, and their gold shall be removed:(CONFISCATED) their silver and their gold shall not be able to deliver them in the day of the wrath of the LORD: they shall not satisfy their souls, neither fill their bowels: because it is the stumblingblock of their iniquity.

LUKE 2:1-3
1 And it came to pass in those days, that there went out a decree from Caesar Augustus, that all the world should be taxed.
2 (And this taxing was first made when Cyrenius was governor of Syria.)
3 And all went to be taxed, every one into his own city.

REVELATION 13:16-18
16 And he(THE FALSE POPE WHO DEFECTED FROM THE CHRISTIAN FAITH) causeth all,(IN THE WORLD ) both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:(MICROCHIP IMPLANT)
17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark,(MICROCHIP IMPLANT) or the name of the beast,(WORLD DICTATORS NAME INGRAVED ON YOUR SKIN OR TATTOOED ON YOU OR IN THE MICROCHIP IMPLANT) or the number of his name.(THE NUMBERS OF HIS NAME INGRAVED IN THE MICROCHIP IMLPLANT)-(ALL THESE WILL TELL THE WORLD DICTATOR THAT YOUR WITH HIM AND AGAINST KING JESUS-GOD)
18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast:(WORLD LEADER) for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.(6-6-6) A NUMBER SYSTEM (6006006)OR(60020202006)(SOME KIND OF NUMBER IMPLANTED IN THE MICROCHIP THAT TELLS THE WORLD DICTATOR AND THE NEW WORLD ORDER THAT YOU GIVE YOUR TOTAL ALLIGIENCE TO HIM AND NOT JESUS)(ITS AN ETERNAL DECISION YOU MAKE)(YOU CHOOSE YOUR OWN DESTINY)(YOU TAKE THE DICTATORS NAME OR NUMBER UNDER YOUR SKIN,YOUR DOOMED TO THE LAKE OF FIRE AND TORMENTS FOREVER,NEVER ENDING MEANT ONLY FOR SATAN AND HIS ANGELS,NOT HUMAN BEINGS).OR YOU REFUSE THE MICROCHIP IMPLANT AND GO ON THE SIDE OF KING JESUS AND RULE FOREVER WITH HIM ON EARTH.YOU CHOOSE,ITS YOUR DECISION.

EU commission proposes 'difficult' €7bn loan for Greece-By EUOBSERVER-JULY 15,15

Today, 12:30-The European Commission Wednesday proposed giving Greece a €7bn bridge loan to cover its July financing needs using the European Financial Stability Mechanism. "This is not an easy option," said vice-president Dombrovskis, referring to the fact that it is an EU-wide fund and non-euro states have raised "serious concerns".

French parliament votes in favour of Greek bailout deal-By EUOBSERVER-JULY 15,15

Today, 18:52-The French National Assembly Wednesday voted in favour of the bailout agreement between Greece and its creditors, by 412 votes against 69 and 49 abstentions. The Senate also approved the deal by 260 votes against 23 and 60 abtsentions. France was the first country to vote on the agreement.

Eurogroup to talk Greece bridge financing by phone-By EUOBSERVER-JULY 15,15

Today, 09:29-The Eurogroup of finance ministers will discuss bridge financing for Greece in a teleconference Wednesday, said Austrian finance minister Schelling. He said if a "reasonable proposition" is presented, then euro finance ministers don't need to meet in person to approve it. Greece needs €7bn to get it through July.

US treasury chief to meet Draghi, Schaeuble, Sapin-By EUOBSERVER-JULY 15,15

Today, 09:24-US treasury secretary Jack Lew is to meet ECB chief Mario Draghi on Wednesday and then German finance minister Wolfgang Schäuble in Berlin and France's Michel Sapin in Paris on Thursday to discuss Greece. He will discuss "the path forward for Greece within the eurozone", said his office.

Tsipras asks Greek MPs to approve 'bad deal' By Eric Maurice-JULY 15,15-EUOBSERVER

BRUSSELS, Today, 09:27-Greek prime minister Alexis Tsipras faces a crucial vote in the Greek parliament Wednesday (15 July) to adopt measures needed to open negotiations with creditors on a new bailout.In a TV interview Tuesday evening, he called on lawmakers to pass the list of "prior actions" set out in the agreement reached at a euro summit Sunday and Monday, even if it is "a bad deal in several aspects"."Greece must stick to the fiscal adjustment the deal foresees," Tsipras said, adding that "alternatives during the summit were: agreement or disorderly bankruptcy"."I am fully assuming my responsibilities, for mistakes and for oversights, and for the responsibility of signing a text that I do not believe in, but that I am obliged to implement."In accordance with creditors' demands, the bill contains pensions, VAT, and tax reforms, as well as new governance of the Greek office of statistics.The retirement age is raised to 67 years or 40 years of work.New VAT rates include a 23 percent rate on restaurants, medical services, and transportation. Energy, water and fresh food will be taxed at 13 percent and medicines, books and theater tickets at 6 percent.The VAT discount for Aegean islands is abolished except for remote islands, where it will abolished from 2016 only.The corporate tax is raised to 28 percent and the luxury tax to 13 percent, while a solidarity tax is raised to 0.8 percent of the income, with retroactivity from 1 January 2015.-Rebellion-The bill, which includes measures Greek voters rejected at the referendum on 5 July, is controversial in Tsipras' government and far-left Syriza party.The minister of productive reconstruction and Syriza's Left Platform chief, Panagiotis Lafazanis, asked Tsipras to withdraw the agreement and called Greece's creditors “brutal blackmailers and financial assassins”.Defence minister Panos Kammenos, the head of Anel, the nationalist coalition partner of Syriza, said his party could not back the measures, but said he continued to support the prime minister.The deputy minister of European affairs, Nikos Hountis, resigned from the cabinet in protest against the euro summit agreement.Syriza parliamentary group spokesman Nikos Filis, for his part, said the party rebels would help Europe's "coup plotters" if they voted No."The government came under threat from economic and political forces that do not forgive the Greek people for making a different choice", he said Tuesday."I think that, often, we facilitate these plans. We cannot end with a left interregnum with the complicity of people of the left."Tsipras himself called on his MPs to be realistic.“The safety of ideological pureness is not compatible with moments of crisis,” he said in his TV interview on Tuesday.As the bill should be approved with votes from opposition parties - the conservative New Democracy, the socialist Pasok, and the centrist To Potami - the main issue is the size of the Syriza rebellion and whether a new government will be formed.-No resignation-Analysts say that if more than 40 Syriza MPs vote against the bill, Tsipras will have to form a national unity government or call new elections."Elections are not in my immediate intentions", Tsipras said in his interview. But he did not answer questions about a government reshuffle.He also ruled out his own resignation.“The worst thing a captain could do while he is steering a ship during a storm, as difficult as it is, would be to abandon the helm", he said.He explained that he "never had a plan B" and that Greece did not have enough cash reserves to leave the euro and go back to the drachma.He nevertheless defended the agreement.“To be frank, [Greece's creditors] are not only forced to give fresh money, but to give €82 billion, and are accepting the restructuring of the debt”, he said.He also chastised his former finance minister Yanis Varoufakis."You can be a good academic and not necessarily a good politician", he said.While the Greek parliament debates and votes on so-called prior actions, the US secretary of treasury, Jack Lew, will be in Frankfurt to discuss the Greek crisis with the European Central Bank chief Mario Draghi. Lew will also be in Berlin and Paris on Thursday to meet German and French finance ministers Wolfgang Schäuble and Michel Sapin.The US has been putting pressure on EU leaders to solve the crisis out of concern for the economic situation in Europe and the geopolitical consequences of Greece leaving the eurozone. 

EU commission proposes controversial short-term funding for Greece By Eric Maurice-JULY 15,15-EUOBSERVER

BRUSSELS, Today, 17:42-The EU commission has proposed providing Greece with a bridging loan from a bailout fund in spite of strong opposition from London and Prague.For the short term, the Commission proposed that the €7 billion Greece needs to get it through July come from the European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism (EFSM).Created in 2010, the EFSM was used to bail out Ireland and Portugal and has not been used since the creation of a permanent bailout fund, the eurozone-only European Stability Mechanism (ESM), in 2012.The money will be lent to Greece for three months, and will be repaid when the ESM bailout Greece requested last week is in place.The commission hopes the bailout negotiations will be concluded by 17 August, just two days before Greece will need another €5 billion to meet its debt commitments.The bailout talks, according to the agreement reached at the euro summit Monday morning (13 July), will start as soon as the Greek Parliament votes a series of "prior actions" and several national parliaments approve the opening of negotiations.The EFSM is guaranteed by all EU 28 member states, not only by eurozone countries, and the idea of using EFSM money for bridge financing has been opposed by several member states, especially Britain and the Czech Republic."Leaders from across the EU agreed in 2010 that the EFSM would not be used again for those in the euro area and that remains the prime minister’s view," a UK government spokesperson told the Guardian.British PM David Cameron told parliament Wednesday: "It's not for Britain to bailout eurozone countries, and we wouldn't do that.""This is not an easy option," Commission vice-president Valdis Dombovskis admitted at a press conference and said experts are working on trying to make sure there are "no negative consequences" for non-euro states."Given the political, legal, financial and time constraints" he said that it was either the EFSM or a bilateral loan.But given that "there are currently no prospects for any bilateral help, […], the best possible avenue left is the EFSM programme," he said.The EFSM loan will have to be approved by the 28 finance ministers, probably at a conference call.It will be decided by a qualified majority, where the UK's opposition could be overruled.The commission also presented a longer term "plan for jobs and growth for Greece" of more than €35 billion.Some €20 billion will come for the European Structural and Investment Funds and €15 billion from the Common Agricultural Policy. The rest will come from the Youth Guarantee programme and EU budget pots.The focus for investment will be on innovation and research as well as infrastructure works, funding for SMEs as well as help for training for young unemployed.These funds "will not solve Greece's liquidity problem but can provide a basis for an exit of the crisis," regional commissioner Corina Cretu said.As the Greek parliament is set to vote a first series of reforms on Wednesday, Crete noted that "these reforms alone cannot bring Greece back to the path of growth and jobs. The reforms must be coupled with an investment plan".The €35 billion plan comes from the 2014-2020 EU budget, where funds were already available for Greece.But the country will get some favourable conditions.The commission will speed up reimbursement of spendings from the 2007-2013 programmes. It will also increase the rate of pre-financing for 2014-2020 programmes by 7 percent.

National parliaments gear up for Greek bailout vote By Nikolaj Nielsen-JULY 15,15-EUOBSERVER

BRUSSELS, Today, 09:29-The German Bundestag on Friday morning (17 July) will hold a special plenary to decide on whether to back a third bailout package for Greece.Bild - a German tabloid that wants a Grexit - reports resistance is already emerging against the bailout in the governing centre-right CDU and its small Bavarian sister party, the CSU.Klaus-Peter Willsch, a CDU deputy, told Bild he was "definitely" going to say No to further aid for Greece while Mark Hauptmann, another deputy from the party, said: "Greece said 'Oxi' to reforms, that's why I am saying 'Oxi' to further credit".The Bundestag's go-ahead, along with 17 other eurozone governments or parliaments, is needed for Greece to open talks on a three-year €86 billion bailout.The Eurogroup and board of governors of the ESM – the eurozone bailout fund - will then discuss the outcome and take a formal decision on whether negotiations should kick off with creditors.Much will depend on whether the Greek parliament on Wednesday (15 July) manages to pass a first raft of laws to streamline VAT, broaden the tax base, and reform pensions.The country, which continues to suffer with high unemployment and a 175 percent GDP to debt ratio, agreed Monday to a further round of harsh austerity demands largely pushed through by Germany’s chancellor Angela Merkel and her finance minister Wolfgang Schäuble.Italy’s minister of finance Pier Carlo Padoan told Italian media Il Sole 24 Ore that only Cyprus, France, and Italy backed a compromise deal with the Greeks at the euro summit. The rest fell behind Germany.Not all decisions will be made by national parliament plenaries. Some will be taken at committee level or only by the government.But by the time the German Bundestag vote is over, many other parliaments or governments should have their positions finalised.France will be among the first, with a debate and vote in the national assembly on Wednesday.The European affairs committee of the Latvian parliament will also meet on Wednesday but a vote remains unclear at this stage.“It is not necessarily said that there should be vote by the parliament. It could just be a decision of the government”, spokesperson from the Latvian parliament told this website on Tuesday (14 July).Estonia’s parliament will convene on Thursday. It is not yet clear if there will be a vote, but the PM is expected to make a presentation.In Finland and the Netherlands - both seen as in the same tough camp as Germany - there will be committee level votes in their parliaments on Thursday. Austria’s parliament will vote on Friday.Meanwhile, the decision on whether to open negotiations for a third Greek bailout will be made at the government level in Belgium, Ireland, Italy, Lithuania, Slovakia and probably Spain.

Finance ministers fail to decide bridge financing for Greece By Eric Maurice-JULY 15,15-EUOBSERVER

BRUSSELS, 14. Jul, 18:53-EU finance ministers agreed on Tuesday (14 July) to deepen and strengthen the European monetary union but failed to make progress on the urgent issue of bridge financing for Greece."Different options are (being) explored" to provide Greece with up to €7 billion before next Monday (20 July), EU Commission vice-president Valdis Dombrovskis said after the Ecofin meeting of 28 ministers."It has to be said that pretty much all options are quite difficult, with legal, political or financial complications," he said.The money is needed to get Greece through the coming weeks, including covering the €3.5bn owed Monday to the European Central Bank (ECB).Using money from the European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism (EFSM) is the most controversial option.Sweden, Denmark, the Czech Republic and the UK voiced their opposition to the idea because the EFSM is guaranteed by all 28 EU member states, not only eurozone countries."The eurozone needs to foot its own bill," said Britain's chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne.Other solutions include the use of profits on Greek bonds made by the ECB and national central banks and bilateral loans to Greece.German finance minister Wolfgang Schäuble, for his part, proposed that Greece issues IOUs to pay its domestics bills and save money to repay its debt.This solution would be tantamount to start creating a parallel currency to the euro.A working group of experts have been tasked "to find out a proper mechanism", Dombrovskis said, but no date for a decision by finance ministers has been set.-EMU-Speaking a day after euro leaders agreed conditions for a new Greek bailout, he noted that "market reaction has been so far quite limited beyond Greece"."Thanks to the existing tools of banking union and ESM we were able to handle the Greek crisis in an efficient way," said Luxembourg's finance minister Pierre Gramegna, whose country holds the six-month presidency of the Council,During their meeting, the ministers discussed the "five presidents" report on "Completing Europe's Economic and monetary union (EMU)" published in June."There is an objective need to strengthen the EMU. We can see that we need to deepen cooperation," Gramegna said.He asked for "concrete proposals by the Commission very quickly" and said treaty changes were expected to implement medium and long term proposals from the report."But it is important to implement what has already been agreed," he said.He underlined the fact that all member states had to implement the directive on bank recovery and resolution and that the microeconomic imbalance procedure should be strengthened.He also pointed out that member states should "not neglect the social dimension of the EMU which is key to (its) acceptance amongst our populations".Romania singled out-The Ecofin also issued country specific recommendations on member states economic, employment and fiscal policies.Along the lines set out by the Commission in March, the recommendations focus on investment, structural reforms and fiscal discipline."This year's recommendations are streamlined and more focussed," Dombrovskis said.Romania was singled out during the meeting. "It is regrettable that the review of Romania's balance of payments programme could not, once again, be concluded," Dombrovskis said."It is very important that Romania continues to implement the needed reforms and that the country ensures sound fiscal policies."

Iran deal complicates EU-Israel relations By Andrew Rettman-JULY 15,15-EUOBSERVER

BRUSSELS, Today, 09:29-EU and US leaders have said the Iran deal paves the way for broad co-operation with the Islamic Republic, widening their differences with the Israeli government.EU foreign relations chief Federica Mogherini, who chaired the final stages of talks in Vienna, said on Tuesday (14 July), the accord “will ensure that Iran’s nuclear programme will be exclusively peaceful” and that it creates “conditions for building trust and opening a new chapter in our relationship”.Also speaking on behalf of the 28 EU member states, Council chief Donald Tusk noted: “The agreement could be a turning point in relations between Iran … paving the way to new avenues of co-operation”.The statements were echoed by individual leaders, commissioners, and MEPs.German chancellor Angela Merkel called the accord a “substantial gain” for peace in the Middle East and an “important success” for international diplomacy.France’s Francois Hollande warned: “Now that Iran will have bigger financial capabilities, as there will no longer be sanctions, we must be extremely vigilant.”But his foreign minister, Laurent Fabius, told Le Monde: “If Iran, an important country, a great civilization, a major actor in the region, clearly makes the choice of co-operation, we will pay tribute to this evolution … Its contribution would be useful to solve numerous crises”.Barack Obama, the US president, said stopping the Iranian nuclear enrichment programme averts “a nuclear arms race in the most volatile region of the world”.Like EU leaders, he urged Iran to follow up on the accord by pursuing a more pro-Western foreign policy and by becoming less repressive at home.“The path of violence and rigid ideology, a foreign policy based on threats to attack your neighbours or eradicate Israel - that’s a dead end”, he said.The Vienna breakthrough saw the EU immediately extend the suspension of some its sanctions until January next year.The rest of the sanctions - which include blacklists, curbs on oil and gas exportation, curbs on investment and technology transfer, as well as broader economic measures, and an arms embargo - will be relaxed in the first half of 2016, pending UN Security Council approval and Iranian implementation.Some of them - on arms and on transfer of nuclear know-how - are to stay in place for five to eight years.But the sanctions wind-down will see hundreds of bilions of dollars blocked in US and EU banks released to the Iranian treasury.They are also likely to see a gold rush by Western companies keen to invest in the Iranian market.-Disquiet-The developments have caused disquiet for Iran’s principal adversaries - Saudi Arabia and Israel - which fear not just that the non-proliferation deal isn’t tight enough, but also that Iran’s new wealth will help it seek regional hegemony via proxy forces in Bahrain, Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, and Yemen.With the Iran deal in the bag, the US and the EU are also more likely to redouble pressure on Israel to reach lasting terms with Palestine.For his part, Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu, who already had lousy ties with Obama, said the Iran deal is “an historic mistake for the world”.“Iran will receive hundreds of billions of dollars with which it can fuel its terror machine and its expansion and aggression throughout the Middle East and across the globe”.The critics note that the mechanism to “snap-back” UN sanctions in case of Iranian non- compliance is too cumbersome.They say international inspections of Iranian military facilities are equally bound up in red tape.They also say limits on further nuclear research are too weak and that when the arms embargoes are lifted, in five to eight years, it will help Iran to build up the arsenals of Hezbollah and Hamas, its allies in Lebanon and Gaza, which are designated as terrorist entites by the West.-Russia-Meanwhile, the Iran deal has implications for Russian-Western relations.For his part, Russian leader Vladimir Putin said on Tuesday: “We are confident that the world today breathed a sigh of relief”.Obama, in his press conference acknowledged that “Russia was a help on this”.“I’ll be honest with you. I was not sure given the strong differences we are having with Russia right now around Ukraine, whether this would sustain itself”, he added.EU diplomats note that Russia didn’t try to use the Iran talks to gain EU and US sanctions relief because Middle East non-proliferation is equally in its own interest.But the Russian foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, said there should be quid pro quo on US and Nato plans to build a missile defence system in Europe.“We all probably remember how in April 2009, giving a speech in Prague … Obama said that if Iran’s nuclear program is successfully regulated, then the aim of the European segment of the missile defense will be dropped”, Lavrov noted.“Today, we drew the attention of our American colleagues to this fact. We will expect a reaction”.

GREECE DEBT SITUATION ON WORLD MARKETS
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2015/07/eu-backs-short-term-funding-to-greece.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2015/07/uk-to-block-greeces-short-term-funding.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2015/07/greece-must-do-more-for-eurozone-ecb-70.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2015/07/cosby-accuser-asks-to-have-complete.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2015/07/ecb-tightens-noose-on-greek-banks.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2015/07/after-greeces-no-vote-by-61whats-next.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2015/07/greece-overwhelmingly-votes-no-to.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2015/07/today-greece-votes-yes-or-no-to.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2015/07/david-sweat-i-was-mastermind-behind.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2015/06/this-is-daygreece-will-default-on-their.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2015/06/the-stock-markets-in-chaosas-greece-has.html
CHINESE STOCK MARKET CRASHES-NYSE GLITCH
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2015/07/has-russia-or-china-or-both-tryed-to.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2015/07/the-chinese-stock-market-falls-35-in-3.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2015/07/ecb-tightens-noose-on-greek-banks.html

Tuesday, July 14, 2015

THE FAKE - FALSE IRAN DECEPTION DEAL HAS BEEN MADE.ISRAEL HAS TO BUNKER BUSTER BOMB IRAN NOW-TO STOP IRAN.

JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.GET SAVED NOW- CALL ON JESUS TODAY.THE ONLY SAVIOR OF THE WHOLE EARTH - NO OTHER. 1 COR 15:23-JESUS THE FIRST FRUITS-CHRISTIANS RAPTURED TO JESUS-FIRST FRUITS OF THE SPIRIT-23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.ROMANS 8:23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.(THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE)

OTHER IRAN DEAL NEWS
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2015/07/israel-bacing-for-bad-iran-us-5-deal.html

JEREMEIAH 49:35-37 (IN IRAN AT THE BUSHEHR OR ARAK NUKE SITE SOME BELIEVE)
35 Thus saith the LORD of hosts; Behold, I will break the bow of Elam,(IRAN/BUSHEHR NUCLEAR SITE) the chief of their might.(MOST DANGEROUS NUKE SITE IN IRAN)
36 And upon Elam will I bring the four winds from the four quarters of heaven,(IRANIANS SCATTERED OR MASS IMIGARATION) and will scatter them toward all those winds; and there shall be no nation whither the outcasts of Elam shall not come.(WORLD IMMIGRATION)
37 For I will cause Elam (IRAN-BUSHEHR NUKE SITE) to be dismayed before their enemies, and before them that seek their life: and I will bring evil upon them, even my fierce anger,(ISRAELS NUKES POSSIBLY) saith the LORD; and I will send the sword after them, till I have consumed them:(IRAN AND ITS NUKE SITES DESTROYED)

ZECHARIAH 14:12-13
12 And this shall be the plague wherewith the LORD will smite all the people that have fought against Jerusalem; Their flesh shall consume away while they stand upon their feet,(DISOLVED FROM ATOMIC BOMB) and their eyes shall consume away in their holes,(DISOLVED FROM ATOMIC BOMB) and their tongue shall consume away in their mouth.(DISOLVED FROM ATOMIC BOMB)(BECAUSE NUKES HAVE BEEN USED ON ISRAELS ENEMIES)(GOD PROTECTS ISRAEL AND ALWAYS WILL)
13 And it shall come to pass in that day, that a great tumult from the LORD shall be among them; and they shall lay hold every one on the hand of his neighbour, and his hand shall rise up against the hand of his neighbour.(1/2-3 BILLION DIE IN WW3)(THIS IS AN ATOMIC BOMB EFFECT)

PSALMS 83:3-7
3 They (ARABS,MUSLIMS) have taken crafty counsel against thy people,(ISRAEL) and consulted against thy hidden ones.
4 They have said, Come, and let us cut them off from being a nation; that the name of Israel may be no more in remembrance.
5 For they (MUSLIMS) have consulted together with one consent: they are confederate against thee:(TREATIES)
6 The tabernacles of Edom,(JORDAN) and the Ishmaelites;(ARABS) of Moab, PALESTINIANS,JORDAN) and the Hagarenes;(EGYPT)
7 Gebal,(HEZZBALLOH,LEBANON) and Ammon,(JORDAN) and Amalek;(SYRIA,ARABS,SINAI) the Philistines (PALESTINIANS) with the inhabitants of Tyre;(LEBANON)

UPDATED JULY 14,2015-01:00PM
A DEAL HAS BEEN REACHED WITH IRANS NUKE SITES.OBAMA SAYS HE WILL VETO THE CONGRESS AND SENATE IF THEY REJECT THIS NUKE DEAL IN 2 MONTHS.THE 2 HEADS OF GOVERNMENT HAVE 2 MONTHS TO AGREE OR REJECT THE DEAL.THE ONLY TROUBLE IS.IN 2 MONTHS IRAN WILL HAVE ENOUGH STUFF MADE TO HAVE AN ATOMIC BOMB.ISRAEL HAS TO ATTACK IRANS NUKE SITES IN THE NEXT WEEK. I SAY.THE ISLAMIC SHIITE ISRAEL HATERS WILL BE GETTING BETWEEN 100 BILLION TO 500 BILLION DOLLARS FROM AMERICA AND THE OTHER 5 IN ORDER FOR IRAN TO STOP BUILDING THE BOMB FOR A FEW YEARS.THE EUROPEAN UNION WAS LEADING THIS 6+ IRAN DEAL.

NUKE DEAL TEXT
http://www.timesofisrael.com/full-text-of-iran-nuke-deal-shows-enrichment-curbs-easing-of-sanctions/

Full text of Netanyahu’s response to nuke deal: It will fuel Iran’s efforts to destroy Israel-WATCH: ‘Leading international powers have bet our collective future on a deal with the foremost sponsor of international terrorism,’ says Israeli prime minister By Times of Israel staff July 14, 2015, 6:56 pm 1
Full text of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s statement on the nuclear deal with Iran, July 14, 2015:The world is a much more dangerous place today than it was yesterday.The leading international powers have bet our collective future on a deal with the foremost sponsor of international terrorism. They’ve gambled that in ten years’ time, Iran’s terrorist regime will change while removing any incentive for it to do so. In fact, the deal gives Iran every incentive not to change.In the coming decade, the deal will reward Iran, the terrorist regime in Tehran, with hundreds of billions of dollars. This cash bonanza will fuel Iran’s terrorism worldwide, its aggression in the region and its efforts to destroy Israel, which are ongoing.Amazingly, this bad deal does not require Iran to cease its aggressive behavior in any way. And just last Friday, that aggression was on display for all to see.While the negotiators were closing the deal in Vienna, Iran’s supposedly moderate president chose to go to a rally in Tehran and at this rally, a frenzied mob burned American and Israeli flags and chanted ‘Death to America, Death to Israel!’Now, this didn’t happen four years ago. It happened four days ago.Iran’s Supreme Leader, the Ayatollah Khamenei, said on March 21 that the deal does not limit Iran’s aggression in any way. He said: ‘Negotiations with the United States are on the nuclear issue and on nothing else.’And three days ago he made that clear again. ‘The United States’, he said, ’embodies global arrogance, and the battle against it will continue unabated even after the nuclear agreement is concluded.’ Here’s what Hassan Nasrallah, the head of Iran’s terrorist proxy Hezbollah, said about sanctions relief, which is a key component of the deal. He said: ‘A rich and strong Iran will be able to stand by its allies and friends in the region more than at any time in the past.’Translation: Iran’s support for terrorism and subversion will actually increase after the deal.In addition to filling Iran’s terror war chest, this deal repeats the mistakes made with North Korea.There too we were assured that inspections and verifications would prevent a rogue regime from developing nuclear weapons.And we all know how that ended.The bottom line of this very bad deal is exactly what Iran’s President Rouhani said today: ‘The international community is removing the sanctions and Iran is keeping its nuclear program.’By not dismantling Iran’s nuclear program, in a decade this deal will give an unreformed, unrepentant and far richer terrorist regime the capacity to produce many nuclear bombs, in fact an entire nuclear arsenal with the means to deliver it.What a stunning historic mistake! Israel is not bound by this deal with Iran and Israel is not bound by this deal with Iran because Iran continues to seek our destruction.We will always defend ourselves.Thank you.

16 reasons nuke deal is an Iranian victory and a Western catastrophe-Has Iran agreed to ‘anywhere, anytime’ inspections, an end to R&D on faster centrifuges, and the dismantling of its key nuclear sites? No, no, and noBy David Horovitz July 14, 2015, 4:51 pm 48-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL

Iran’s President Hassan Rouhani on Tuesday unsurprisingly hailed the nuclear agreement struck with US-led world powers, and derided the “failed” efforts of the “warmongering Zionists.” His delight, Iran’s delight, is readily understandable.The agreement legitimizes Iran’s nuclear program, allows it to retain core nuclear facilities, permits it to continue research in areas that will dramatically speed its breakout to the bomb should it choose to flout the deal, but also enables it to wait out those restrictions and proceed to become a nuclear threshold state with full international legitimacy. Here’s how.1. Was the Iranian regime required, as a condition for this deal, to disclose the previous military dimensions of its nuclear program — to come clean on its violations — in order both to ensure effective inspections of all relevant facilities and to shatter the Iranian-dispelled myth that it has never breached its non-proliferation obligations? No. (This failure, arguably the original sin of the Western negotiating approach, is expertly detailed here by Emily B. Landau.) Rather than exposing Iran’s violations, the new deal solemnly asserts that the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty which Iran has failed to honor “remains the cornerstone” of ongoing efforts to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons. The deal provides for a mechanism “to address past and present issues of concern relating to its nuclear programme,” but Iran has managed to dodge such efforts for years, and the deal inspires little hope of change in that area, blithely anticipating “closing the issue” in the next few months.2. Has the Iranian regime been required to halt all uranium enrichment, including thousands of centrifuges spinning at its main Natanz enrichment facility? No. The deal specifically legitimizes enrichment under certain eroding limitations.3. Has the Iranian regime been required to shut down and dismantle its Arak heavy water reactor and plutonium production plant? No. It will convert, not dismantle the facility, under a highly complex process. Even if it honors this clause, its commitment to “no additional heavy water reactors or accumulation of heavy water in Iran” will expire after 15 years.4. Has the Iranian regime been required to shut down and dismantle the underground uranium enrichment facility it built secretly at Fordow? No. (Convert, not dismantle.) 5. Has the Iranian regime been required to halt its ongoing missile development? No. 6. Has the Iranian regime been required to halt research and development of the faster centrifuges that will enable it to break out to the bomb far more rapidly than is currently the case? No. The deal specifically legitimizes ongoing R&D under certain eroding limitations. It specifically provides, for instance, that Iran will commence testing of the fast “IR-8 on single centrifuge machines and its intermediate cascades” as soon as the deal goes into effect, and will “commence testing of up to 30 IR-6 and IR-8 centrifuges after eight and a half years.” 7. Has the Iranian regime been required to submit to “anywhere, anytime” inspections of any and all facilities suspected of engaging in rogue nuclear-related activity? No. Instead, the deal describes at considerable length a very protracted process of advance warning and “consultation” to resolve concerns. 8. Has the international community established procedures setting out how it will respond to different classes of Iranian violations, to ensure that the international community can act with sufficient speed and efficiency to thwart a breakout to the bomb? No. 9. Has the Iranian regime been required to halt its arming, financing and training of the Hezbollah terrorist army in south Lebanon? No. (This kind of non-nuclear issue was not discussed at the negotiations.)-10. Has the Iranian regime been required to surrender for trial the members of its leadership placed on an Interpol watch list for their alleged involvement in the bombing, by a Hezbollah suicide bomber, of the AMIA Jewish community center offices in Buenos Aires in 1994 that resulted in the deaths of 85 people? No. (This kind of non-nuclear issue was not discussed at the negotiations.)-11. Has the Iranian regime undertaken to close its 80 estimated “cultural centers” in South America from which it allegedly fosters terrorist networks? No. (This kind of non-nuclear issue was not discussed at the negotiations.) 12. Has the Iranian leadership agreed to stop inciting hatred among its people against Israel and the United States and to stop its relentless calls for the annihilation of Israel? No. (This kind of non-nuclear issue was not discussed at the negotiations.)-13. Has the Iranian regime agreed to halt executions, currently running at an average of some three a day, the highest rate for 20 years? No. (This kind of non-nuclear issue was not discussed at the negotiations.)-14. Does the nuclear deal shatter the painstakingly constructed sanctions regime that forced Iran to the negotiating table? Yes. 15. Will the deal usher in a new era of global commercial interaction with Iran, reviving the Iranian economy and releasing financial resources that Iran will use to bolster its military forces and terrorist networks? Yes.-16. Does the nuclear deal further cement Iran’s repressive and ideologically rapacious regime in power? Yes.No wonder Iran and its allies are celebrating. Nobody else should be.

JUST LIKE THE WORLD.BLAME BENJAMIN NETANYAHU AND ISRAEL.JUST LIKE USUAL-NOTHING NEW FROM THE ISRAEL HATERS.

Thanks, Netanyahu-As the Iran deal is finalized, some politicians fault the prime minister, rather than world powers, for the ‘dangerous’ accord-By Marissa Newman July 14, 2015, 2:56 pm-THE TIMES

With the Iran nuclear deal all but clinched by late Monday night, the Hebrew press ramps up the anticipation, knowing full well that late-morning readers may find the reports outdated (as it appears they are).“Western diplomats last night assessed that the announcement by the foreign ministers would be made overnight, followed by a press conference. At the moment this paper went to print, it was not clear if the sides indeed managed to reach a deal,” Haaretz reports.With an accord in sight, some Israeli politicians revert to name-calling and accusations, pointing a finger at Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as the culprit responsible for the “dangerous” deal.Kicking off the blame game, Yedioth Ahronoth features comments by Zionist Union leader Isaac Herzog, and Yesh Atid leader Yair Lapid who criticize the deal as Netanyahu’s personal failing.“Although the coalition and opposition share the conclusion that this is a deal that is dangerous to Israel — in the opposition, an accusatory finger was pointed at Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu,” Yedioth reports.In Israel Hayom, columnist Haim Shine rushes to Netanyahu’s defense.“Isaac Herzog and Yair Lapid, in blaming Benjamin Netanyahu for the US signing a deal with Iran, proved unequivocally what the public has known even before the last election. The two are political wheeler-dealers stirring the pot for the sake of short-lived headlines,” he writes.“At this time, Netanyahu is gearing up for a huge fight for the state’s future and security. Anyone with a brain who is not chronically naive understands that a nuclear terror state endangers world peace in general and Israel in particular. The State of Israel and the prime minister must explain in the streets, in the homes, in the radio stations, on TV, and most importantly, in Congress the dangers of the deal. During this period, one would expect from the heads of the opposition that even if they aren’t willing to be on board, at least they would’t disturb and harm the security of the state. Those who blame Netanyahu for the deal are allowing Obama to avoid responsibility.”In Israel Hayom, the prime minister is quoted as saying Israel did not commit to “stopping or preventing a deal, certainly not one that the world powers are ready to sign at any price. We are committed to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear power — and indeed, without our efforts in the past few years, Iran would have long been able to arm itself with atomic bombs. Our commitment was to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons, and it remains in effect today more than ever.”Over in Yedioth Ahronoth, the tabloid spotlights several photos of a cheerful Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif on the balcony in Vienna, captioned “laughing all the way to a deal.” Both Yedioth and Israel Hayom also note the “symbolic” location of the hotel in Theodor Herzl plaza.Meanwhile, in Haaretz, Chemi Shalev predicts a “political Gog and Magog war” between Netanyahu and President Barack Obama, as the prime minister sets out to convince Congress to block the deal.“The fight would seemingly be tempered: Both sides have too much to lose. Netanyahu can’t allow himself to cut ties entirely with the US administration, which has 18 more months in power, and Obama has no interest in creating an irreversible rift between American Jewry and the Democratic party, especially during an election year. But as the cliche goes, everyone knows how a war starts but not how it ends, particularly for battles between two sides for whom failure is not an option,” he writes.In a thoroughly unfunny column in Haaretz, satirical writer B. Michael suggests Israel plant one of its nuclear bombs on Iranian soil, if only to prove Netanyahu right.“My heart goes out to Benjamin Netanyahu. With one cold, cruel stroke of the pen, the rulers of the world have taken away his most beloved toy – the apple of his eye and the joy of his heart, the rock of his existence and the source of his strength, and above all, the rock of his refuge and safe haven. Or in short, the Iranian bomb,” he writes.Should Israel give Iran the bomb, “everyone will once again be happy. The Iranians, because they have the bomb. The world, because it reached an agreement with the Iranians. And of course Benjamin Netanyahu, who will once again be able to cling to the Iranian bomb, to frighten everyone around him with it and to dream at night about commando operations that will return him to the days of his youth. And when he’s alone at home, he’ll once again be able to stick a cigar in the corner of his mouth, stand in front of the mirror and declaim aloud: “I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, sweat and tears” (and for a change, this time, he’ll even be telling the truth).“And in fact, why deny it? Even I would be a bit calmer. The knowledge that at least one of those 200 bombs of ours had been put into slightly more judicious hands would give me a tiny smidgen of neurotic serenity.”

Iran deal reached, Obama hails step toward 'more hopeful world'-Reuters By Parisa Hafezi, Louis Charbonneau, John Irish and Arshad Mohammed-JULY 14,15-YAHOONEWS

VIENNA (Reuters) - Iran and six major world powers reached a nuclear deal on Tuesday, capping more than a decade of negotiations with an agreement that could transform the Middle East.U.S. President Barack Obama hailed a step toward a "more hopeful world" and Iran's President Hassan Rouhani said it proved that "constructive engagement works". But Israel pledged to do what it could to halt what it called an "historic surrender".The agreement will now be debated in the U.S. Congress, but Obama said he would veto any measure to block it."This deal offers an opportunity to move in a new direction," Obama said. "We should seize it."Under the deal, sanctions imposed by the United States, European Union and United Nations will be lifted in return for Iran agreeing long-term curbs on a nuclear program that the West has suspected was aimed at creating a nuclear bomb.Iran will mothball for at least a decade the majority of its centrifuges used to enrich uranium and sharply reduce its low-enriched uranium stockpile.The agreement is a political triumph for both Obama, who has long promised to reach out to historic enemies, and Rouhani, a pragmatist elected two years ago on a vow to reduce the isolation of his nation of almost 80 million people.Both face scepticism from powerful hardliners at home in nations that referred to each other as "the Great Satan" and a member of the "Axis of Evil"."Today is the end to acts of tyranny against our nation and the start of cooperation with the world," Rouhani said in a televised address. "This is a reciprocal deal. If they stick to it, we will. The Iranian nation has always observed its promises and treaties."Delighted Iranians took to the streets, honking car horns and flashing victory signs in celebration after the announcement a deal they hope will end years of sanctions and isolation.For Obama, the diplomacy with Iran, begun in secret more than two years ago, ranks alongside his normalization of ties with Cuba as landmarks in a legacy of reconciliation with foes that tormented his predecessors for decades."History shows that America must lead not just with our might but with our principles," he said in a televised address. "Today's announcement marks one more chapter in our pursuit of a safer, more helpful and more hopeful world."-REPUBLICAN OPPOSITION-Republicans lined up to denounce the deal. Presidential candidate Lindsey Graham, a senator from South Carolina, called it a terrible deal that would make matters worse. Former senator Rick Santorum, another candidate, said the administration had capitulated to Iran.The Republican-controlled Congress has 60 days to review the accord, but if it votes to reject it Obama can use his veto, which can be overridden only by two-thirds of lawmakers in both houses. That means dozens of Obama's fellow Democrats would have to rebel against one of their president's signature achievements to kill it, an unlikely prospect. Leading Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton called the deal "an important step that puts the lid on Iran's nuclear programs".While the main negotiations were between the United States and Iran, the four other U.N. Security Council permanent members, Britain, China, France and Russia, are also parties to the deal, as is Germany.Enmity between Iran and the United States has loomed over the Middle East for decades.Iran is the predominant Shi'ite Muslim power, hostile both to Israel and to Washington's Sunni Muslim-ruled Arab friends, particularly Saudi Arabia. Allies of Riyadh and Tehran have fought decades of sectarian proxy wars in Syria, Lebanon, Iraq and Yemen.But there are also strong reasons for Washington and Tehran to cooperate against common foes, above all Islamic State, the Sunni Muslim militant group that has seized swathes of Syria and Iraq. Washington has been bombing Islamic State from the air while Tehran aids Iraqi militias fighting it on the ground.British Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond told reporters that the deal was about more than just the nuclear issue:"The big prize here is that, as Iran comes out of the isolation of the last decades and is much more engaged with Western countries, Iranians hopefully begin to travel in larger numbers again, Western companies are able to invest and trade with Iran, there is an opportunity for an opening now."-"HISTORIC MISTAKE"-Still, Washington's friends in the region were furious, especially Israel, whose prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, has cultivated a close relationship with Obama's Republican opponents in Congress."Iran will get a jackpot, a cash bonanza of hundreds of billions of dollars, which will enable it to continue to pursue its aggression and terror in the region and in the world," he said. "Iran is going to receive a sure path to nuclear weapons."His deputy foreign minister, Tzipi Hotovely, denounced an "historic surrender" and said Israel would "act with all means to try and stop the agreement being ratified", a clear threat to use its influence to try and block it in Congress.Some diplomats in Vienna said the strong Israeli response could actually help, by making it easier for Rouhani to sell the agreement back in Iran.While Saudi Arabia did not denounce the deal publicly as Israel did, its officials expressed doubt in private."We have learned as Iran's neighbors in the last 40 years that goodwill only led us to harvest sour grapes," a Saudi official who asked to remain anonymous told Reuters.Nor were hardliners silent in Iran: “Celebrating too early can send a bad signal to the enemy,” conservative lawmaker Alireza Zakani said in parliament, according to Fars News agency. Iran's National Security Council would review the accord, "and if they think it is against our national interests, we will not have a deal".It will probably be months before Iran receives the benefits from the lifting of sanctions because of the need to verify the deal's fulfillment. Once implementation is confirmed, Tehran will immediately gain access to around $100 billion in frozen assets, and can step up oil exports that have been slashed by almost two-thirds.The deal finally emerged after nearly three weeks of intense negotiation between U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif - unthinkable for decades, since Iranian revolutionaries stormed the U.S. embassy in Tehran in 1979 and held 52 Americans hostage for 444 days.Hatred of the United States is still a central tenet of Iran's ruling system, on display only last week at an annual protest day, with crowds chanted "Death to Israel!" and "Death to America!".But Iranians voted overwhelmingly for Rouhani in 2013 on a clear promise to revive their crippled economy by ending Iran's isolation. Hardline Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei did not block the negotiations.-"NEW CHAPTER OF HOPE"-"Today could have been the end of hope on this issue, but now we are starting a new chapter of hope," Zarif, who studied in the United States and developed a warm rapport with Kerry, told a news conference.Kerry said: "This is the good deal we have sought."European Union foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini said:"I think this is a sign of hope for the entire world."Obama first reached out to Iranians with an address in 2009, only weeks into his presidency, offering a "new beginning". But he followed this up with a sharp tightening of financial sanctions, which, combined with sanctions imposed by the EU, have imposed severe economic hardship on Iranians since 2012.Tehran has long denied seeking a nuclear weapon and has insisted on the right to nuclear technology for peaceful means. Obama never ruled out military force if negotiations failed, and said on Tuesday that future presidents would still have that option if Iran quit the agreement.France said the deal would ensure Iran's "breakout time" - the time it would need to build a bomb if it decided to break off the deal - would be one year for the next decade. This has been a main goal of Western negotiators, who wanted to ensure that if a deal collapsed there would be enough time to act.Obama said Iran had accepted a "snapback" mechanism, under which sanctions would be reinstated if it violated the deal. A U.N. weapons embargo is to remain in place for five years and a ban on buying missile technology will remain for eight years.Alongside the main deal, the United Nations nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, announced an agreement with Iran to resolve its own outstanding issues by the end of this year. The main deal depends on the IAEA being able to inspect Iranian nuclear sites and on Iran answering its questions about possible military aims of previous research.For Iran, the end of sanctions could bring a rapid economic boom by lifting restrictions that have shrunk its economy by about 20 percent, according to U.S. estimates. The prospect of a deal has already helped push down global oil prices because of the possibility that Iranian supply could return to the market.Oil prices tumbled more than a dollar on Tuesday after the deal was reached. [O/R]-(Additional reporting by Shadia Nasralla, Bozorgmehr Sharafedin Nouri and Jeff Mason; Writing by Peter Graff; Editing by Kevin Liffey and Giles Elgood)

EU expected to announce Iran deal-Mogherini and Zarif press conference to be followed by declassification of the 500-pge accord-By Andrew Rettman-july 14,15-euobserver

BRUSSELS, Today, 09:25-Iran and world powers have reached a nuclear deal with the potential to transform Middle East politics, sources report."All the hard work has paid off and we sealed a deal. God bless our people”, an Iranian diplomat, who asked not to be named, told the Reuters news agency in Vienna on Tuesday (14 July) morning.The Bloomberg news agency and other leading Western media corroborated the report.The news came amid a final meeting of the foreign ministers of Iran, France, Germany, Russia, the UK, and US, as well as the EU’s foreign policy chief, Federica Mogherini, at the Coburg Palace in the Austrian capital.Mogherini and Iranian minister Mohammad Zarif are expected to announce the accord at a press conference later on Tuesday.The negotiators are also expected to publish all or part of the complicated agreement, said to run to almost 500 pages, including technical annexes.The breakthrough comes after two weeks of negotiations, culminating in a 17-hour, all-night meeting on Monday, which recalls the EU’s arduous talks on the Greek bailout.Reuters on Monday said the accord includes visits by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), a UN non-proliferation body, to Iranian military sites, including its Parchin facility.The Associated Press says that a special arbitration board, composed of officials from Iran and the five world powers, will oversee the IAEA inspections.The details flesh out an earlier agreement, in April, which imposed a 15-year freeze on Iran's uranium enrichment and a massive reduction of its stockpile of enriched material.The comprehensive deal is to be ratified by the UN Security Council, likely in July, and to lead to the lifting of sanctions, both economic and military, in early 2016.It must also be ratified by Congress, where the Republican party has vowed to oppose it, but where opposition can be vetoed by the White House.The talks, described by one EU diplomat as “the Mount Everest of international relations”, end a 13-year long standoff on Iran’s nuclear energy programme, which it says is for exclusively peaceful purposes.They also represent the closing of a chapter in history books which began with the Islamic Revolution in 1979, in which Iran overthrew an Anglo-US puppet government, creating a near-east Cold War.The deal is disliked by Israel, with its defence minister, Moshe Yaalon, earlier this week again threatening unilateral military strikes.It is disliked by Saudi Arabia, a Sunni Muslim power and Western ally, which fears it will help Iran, a Shia Muslim state, to create a Shia hegemony in the region.It has also been criticised on human rights grounds, due to Iran’s repressive regime.But Iranian diplomats note that Western values haven't stopped the US or EU from forging an alliance with Saudi Arabia, which doesn’t hold elections, which also executes people by the dozen, and which promotes radical Islamic movements in the region and inside Europe.The West and Iran have already become de facto military allies in the fight against Islamic State in Iraq and Syria.But strategic issues aside, the detente will reshape energy markets and trade relations.Oil prices began to fall on Monday amid expectations of higher Iranian exports in the wake of the deal.Iranian MPs have said they want to supply gas to Europe, via Turkey, in future, reducing the EU’s dependence on Russia.The opening up of trade relations with Iran, a technologically-advanced market of 77.5 million people, is also likely to prompt a scramble by Chinese, European, Russian, and US firms trying to establish a foothold.Meanwhile, the co-operation between the EU, the US, and Russia on Iran comes despite the Ukraine crisis.A senior EU diplomat told EUobserver that Russia never tried to use the Iran talks as leverage on Ukraine.“The Russians also don’t want a nuclear arms race in the Middle East or the establishment of an Islamic caliphate [Islamic State] in its southern neighbourhood, drawing in, or supporting, Islamic radicals from Russia’s northern Caucasus region”, the source said.