Showing posts with label BABY MURDER BY ABORTION. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BABY MURDER BY ABORTION. Show all posts

Monday, January 11, 2021

DEMOLIBNUTS BLAME TRUMP FOR MURDER BUT THE LEFT HITLERS MURDERED 57 MILLION BY ABORTION SINCE 1973

JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.GET SAVED NOW- CALL ON JESUS TODAY.THE ONLY SAVIOR OF THE WHOLE EARTH - NO OTHER. 1 COR 15:23-JESUS THE FIRST FRUITS-CHRISTIANS RAPTURED TO JESUS-FIRST FRUITS OF THE SPIRIT-23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.ROMANS 8:23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.(THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE)

 2020 AMERICAN ELECTION RESULTS BY STATE TRUMP VS LOSER LIBERAL SLEEPY (SLOPPY JOE) BIDEN.

ON D-72 OF THE TRUMP WIN OF THE PRESIDENCY. TUE JAN 12, 21.

Key dates for the Electoral College and what they mean-AEIdeas-DECEMBER 14,20

What are the key dates for the workings of the Electoral College?

November 3 — Election Day

Election Day is November 3. We may or may not know the winner of the presidential contest on election night, but we certainly will not have a final tally and certified results until weeks later. States vary widely in the time they allot for certifying their election results. Some may give a final certification the week after Election Day. Others may take over 30 days. And there is the possibility of recounts and judicial contests of elections which could extend the time to determine an official winner of a state.
Ballots are passed out to 16 Electors on the Michigan Senate floor for them to cast their formal votes for the president and vice president of the United States in Lansing, Michigan, U.S., December 19, 2016. REUTERS/Rebecca Cook

December 8 — Safe Harbor

December 14 — The meeting of the Electors

Two key dates loom in December. On December 14, presidential electors must have been selected by the states and will meet as a group in their states to cast electoral votes for president and vice president. But December 8 is also a significant date, the so-called “safe harbor” date. The Electoral Count Act sets this date as an important date for states to make their official selection of electors, as those electoral votes will be given greater protection from challenge when Congress counts the electoral votes in January. The Supreme Court in Bush v. Gore assigned great significance to this date in Bush v. Gore.

January 3 — The convening of the new Congress

January 6 — Congress counts the votes

January 20 — Inauguration Day. The new presidential term begins at noon.

On January 3rd, the new Congress will take office, and on January 6th it will meet to count the electoral votes and declare a president- and vice president-elect. On January 20th at noon, the current presidential term will end and the next one will begin.This is excerpted from the new fourth edition of After the People Vote, edited by John Fortier, senior fellow at the Bipartisan Policy Center and a member of AEI’s Election Watch team.John C. Fortier-AEI Adjunct Scholar-SENOIRFELLOWKarlyn Bowman-Senior Fellow

THE CLINTON COMMUNIST HITLER PROPAGANDA NEWS NETWORK CNN IS HARD AT IT. BLAMING TRUMP AND 130 OTHER GOP HOUSE AND SENATE MEMBERS. FOR THE FBI WARNS OF PROTESTS BEING PLANNED AT ALL 50 STATE CAPITALS AND IN WASHINGTON DC. AND THE SETUP BY CNN-DEMOLIBNUTS IN THE HOUSE AND SENATE AS WELL AS THE CLINTONS AND OBAMAS TO DESTROY TRUMP FOREVER. THESE LEFT EXTREMISTS BARE ALL THE BLAME FOR THE PROTEST UPHEAVAL BECAUSE THEIR BEHIND IT ALL. THIS EXTREME NUTJOB DUNG MIXTURE OF LUNATICS CLAIM THERE WILL BE PROTESTS AGAINST WASHINGTON FROM JAN 16-20. AND CLAIM THEIR GOING AFTER PELOSI-HARRIS AND BIDEN THE LUNATIC LEFT NUTJOBS. AND THE CNN HITLERS ALSO CLAIM FROM JAN 17-20 THERE WILL BE PROTESTS AT THE OTHER 49 STATE CAPITALS. AND 2 CAPITAL SECURITY POLICE ARE SUSPENDED AND 17 OTHER ARE SUSPECTED OF BEING INVOLVED IN THE PEACEFUL PROTESTS LAST WEDNESDAY. AND THE DEMOLIBNUTJOB EXTREME HITLERS OF CNN AND COMPANY OF MIXTURE OF DUNG TIN FOIL HATS AND CONSPIRACY THEORIES CLAIM TRUMP KILLED THE 4 PROTESTERS AND 1 POLICE OFFICER. SO THESE LEFT EXTREME HITLERS WANNA PUT BLAME FOR MURDER ON TRUMP. THESE EXTREME HITLERS MURDERED 57 MILLION BABIES BY ABORTION IN AMERICA SINCE 1973. 1,900 A DAY. 137 AN HOUR AND 2 EVERY MINUTE. AND THESE EXTREME LEFT HITLER MURDER DEMOLIBNUTJOBS ARE BLAMING TRUMP FOR 5 BEING KILLED LAST WEDNESDAY. YOU TELLME WHOS THE HITLERS OF MURDER IN AMERICA. NOT TRUMP-HES NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OTHER PEOPLES ACTIONS AND DEEDS.

The Consequences of Roe v. Wade-“And God said, Let us make man in our own image, in our likeness, … So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him, male and female created he them.” – Genesis 1:26a & 27-Every human life that is conceived is a miracle and a gift from God. How heartbreaking that thousands of these little miracles of God are being destroyed every day. Here at Right to Life of Holland Area we want to be a VOICE for the VOICELESS!! Since abortion was made legal in 1973, nearly 57 million pre-born babies have been violently destroyed; have been denied the most basic of all rights, the right to life. Our Declaration of Independence calls this an unalienable right.

Abortion Statistics
Psychological and Social Consequences of Abortion: Women who have had an abortion frequently suffer from anxiety, guilt, pain, depression, irritability, anger, sleep difficulties, nightmares, withdrawal from relatives and friends, pessimism, drug or alcohol abuse and suicidal thoughts or actions.Hard Cases of Rape and Incest: Women and girls who have been raped are victims of a horrible crime. Abortion, however, does not help a women who finds herself pregnant due to rape or incest, and the child is VALUABLE regardless of how he/she was conceived; the child is not at fault.Pain of the Unborn Child: While an unborn child can not verbally express the pain he/she feels, all indicators suggest that babies in the womb are capable of feeling pain by 20 weeks! Planned Parenthood:   From 2012-2103 Annual Report, PP performed 327,166 abortion  and their revenue exceeded $1.2 Billion. Only 2,197 patients were referred to other agencies for adoptions (that’s nearly 149 to 1). PP downplays the significance of abortions stating that it represents 3% of it service is for abortions. But the reality is that PP accounts for more that a QUARTER of all abortions in the United States of America.The annual number of abortions went from 744,600 in the first of year of legalization, to a high of over 1.6 million in 1990. In 2008, there were 1,212,400.For every 1,000 live births, there were 510 abortions in 2008.There were more than 88,000 second and third trimester abortions in 2005.In 2000, more children died from abortion than Americans died in the Revolutionary War, the Civil War, World Wars I and II, the Korean, Vietnam and Gulf Wars combined.Women have cited ‘social reasons’, not mother’s health or rape/incest as their motivation in approximately 93% of all abortions.A June, 1999 Wirthlin Poll found that 62% of respondents support legal abortion in only three or fewer circumstances when the pregnancy results from rape or incest, or when it threatens the life of the mother.At an average cost of $413, the abortion business is a $500 million a year industry. Nearly half of all abortions are obtained by women who have already had at least one abortion. In 2005, women who had already had 3 or more abortions obtained 19% or over 47,000 abortions each year.African/American women represented 12.6% of the U.S. population of women of child bearing age in 2013 but accounted for 30% of all abortions performed that year in America.Hispanic/American women represented 13% of the U. S. population of women of child bearing age in 2005 but accounted for 19% of all abortions performed that year in America.At least 56% of all abortions are performed on unmarried women.58% of the women are in twenties.61% of the women have 1 or more children.69% are NOT economically challenged.74% of women claim a RELIGIOUS affliation.50% of US women obtaining abortions are younger than 25; women aged 20-24 obtain 33% of all US abortions and teenagers obtain 17%. Adolescents under 15 years obtained less than 1% of all abortions, but have the highest abortion ratio, 773 abortions for every 1,000 live births.47% of women who have had abortions had at least one previous abortion.Black women are more than 4.8 times more likely than non-Hispanic white women to have an abortion, and Hispanic women are 2.7 times as likely.43% of women obtaining abortions identify themselves as Protestant, and 27% identify themselves as Catholic.Note: Statistics taken from the Alan Guttmacher Institute (an arm of Planned Parenthood) and the CDC: Center for Disease Control.Abortion Statistics: State of Michigan-According to the Michigan Department of Community Health:In 2012, the total number of abortions in Michigan was 22,699.In 2012, 51% of the abortions preformed on Michigan women were repeat abortions.IN 2012. 295 abortions were performed in Michigan after the baby was at 20 weeks! The number of abortions performed on teenagers dropped again in 2012. Only 13.5% of abortions performed on Michigan women were performed on women younger than 20. In the early 80’s this age group had more than 30% of Michigan’s abortions.In 2009, 89.4% of women obtain abortions in Michigan were unmarried.2012 saw 326 abortions performed on women who lived in either Allegan or Ottawa Counties, down from 358 in 2009.In 2012, 44.8% of women obtaining an induced abortion were white (down from 51.4% in 2007), 48.0% were black (down from 41.9% in 2007), and 1.9% were Asian/Pacific Islander (down from 2.3% in 2007), less than 3% were American Indian, multracial or of some other race and 3.4% of the women were of Hispanic ancestry.Think about this:1 baby is aborted-~every 26 seconds~137 every hour-~3,304 every day-~23,196 every week~100,516 every month-~1,206,192 every year.in the United States alone! abortionfastfacts.

Friday, December 18, 2020

SEVERAL COVID-19 VACCINES ARE MADE USING ABORTED FETAL CELLS

JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.GET SAVED NOW- CALL ON JESUS TODAY.THE ONLY SAVIOR OF THE WHOLE EARTH - NO OTHER. 1 COR 15:23-JESUS THE FIRST FRUITS-CHRISTIANS RAPTURED TO JESUS-FIRST FRUITS OF THE SPIRIT-23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.ROMANS 8:23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.(THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE)

 DEATHS OR LIFE INJURIES FROM THESE SCAM VACCINE PFIZAR AND MODERNA

VACCINES STARTED IN CANADA DEC 15,20

FIRST THE CBC FINALLY ADMITS THE STATISTICS ABOUT COVID-19 ARE NOT THE RIGHT STATISTICS. THE REGION PLAYS WITH THE STATS. LIKE I SAID BEFORE. THEY PROBABLY ADD EVERY ONE WITH A COLD IN THE COVID CASES. PROBABLY EVERY DEATH THAT OCCURS. THEY ADD IT TO THE COVID DEATHS.THIS IS ALL JUST A SCAM TO CONTROL ALL OF US. AND TO KILL OR MAMINED US BELIEVING SHEEPLE. SO THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE WORLD CAN BE OUR SAVIORS. BY BRINGING ABOUT A WORLD GOVERNMENT. AND MY SISTER TOLD ME YESTERDAY. THAT THE VACCINES HAVE SOME THING IN THEM FROM ABORTED-MURDERED BABIES.IT APPEARS PFIZER AND MODERNA DO NOT USE ABORTED BABY PARTS IN THEIR VACCINE.I STILLWON'T BE TAKING IT. AND AT LEAST ONE PERSON HAD AN ALERGIC ATTACK FROM THE PFIZER VACCINE. PREGNANT WOMEN ARE WARNED NOT TO TAKE IT. IF THE LIBERAL WOMEN THINK THEY CAN HELP PEOPLE BY ABORTING-MURDERING BABIES FOR THE VACCINES THEY SURELY WILL. YOU CASN COUNT ON AND TAKE THAT TO THE BANK.

Several COVID-19 Vaccines Are Made Using Aborted Fetal Cells-December 15, 2020 Randolph Jason    

In addition to standard concerns over the safety of COVID-19 vaccines is the moral dilemma of taking vaccines made with aborted fetal cells. For many, this alone is a cause for objection. Several of the vaccine candidates, including AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 vaccine, are made using aborted fetal cell lines.1,2-Several fact checkers — including Politifact,3 The Associated Press4 and Snopes5 — have labeled the claim as “false,” but is it? As it turns out, fact checkers are relying on semantics to “debunk” this claim. In reality, most thinking individuals are able to determine the truth of the matter once the details are explained.
Semantics and Technicalities Used to ‘Debunk’ the Truth-A common mistake by less experienced citizen journalists is to use rather general terms, assuming people will “get the gist” without having to be overly specific, and this is precisely what self-declared fact checkers home in on when rating something false or misleading.Fact checkers routinely rely on semantics and technicalities to break apart a given claim, and unless you carefully read their explanation, you’re likely to miss this and simply write it off based on the headline claiming something to be false. The case of COVID-19 vaccines containing aborted fetal cells is a perfect example of this, so let’s go through some of what you need to know before discounting this claim off-hand.Commonly Used Fetal Cell Lines-There are several cell lines commonly used in vaccine development that originate from aborted fetuses, including:-HEK2937,8,9,10,11 — human embryonic cell line originally derived from kidney tissue obtained from a female fetus aborted in the Netherlands in 1972-MRC512 — human embryonic cell line originally derived from the lung tissue of a 14-week-old male fetus aborted in 1966.PER.C613 — human embryonic cell line originally derived from the retina of an 18-week-old male fetus aborted in the Netherlands in 1985. WI3814 — human embryonic cell line originally derived from the lung tissue of a 12-week-old female fetus aborted in 1961. Vaccine makers using at least one of these fetal cell lines in the development of their COVID-19 vaccines include:15,16,17-AstraZeneca (HEK293)-Jansen Research and Development (owned by Johnson & Johnson), (PER.C6)-CanSino Biologics (HEK293)-University of Pittsburgh (HEK293)-ImmunityBio (HEK293)-Altimmune (PER.C6)-Vaccine makers using either “ethically derived” cell lines, meaning cell lines that do not originate from aborted human fetuses, or no cell lines at all, include Moderna, Merck, Novavax, Sanofi Pasteur, Pfizer, Inovio Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline and Sinovac.18

Global News-What’s in Pfizer’s vaccine? A look at the ingredients-Rachael D'AmoreDEC 17,20

The newness of the novel coronavirus coupled with the quick development of a vaccine has put Pfizer and BioNTech's shots under the proverbial microscope — particularly about the ingredients it uses.a hand holding a bottle: LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM - DECEMBER 14: A dose of the Pfizer/BioNtech covid-19 vaccine at the Hurley Clinic in London, as hundreds of Covid-19 vaccination centres run by local doctors begin opening across England, on December 14, 2020 in London, England. GP practices in more than 100 locations will have the vaccine delivered to them on Monday, with some opening their clinics later in the afternoon. (Photo by Aaron Chown - WPA Pool/Getty Images) © Provided by Global News LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM - DECEMBER 14: A dose of the Pfizer/BioNtech covid-19 vaccine at the Hurley Clinic in London, as hundreds of Covid-19 vaccination centres run by local doctors begin opening across England, on December 14, 2020 in London, England. GP practices in more than 100 locations will have the vaccine delivered to them on Monday, with some opening their clinics later in the afternoon. (Photo by Aaron Chown - WPA Pool/Getty Images)-While there's no question this happened at warp speed, experts agree the listed ingredients are pretty standard.In fact, they're "almost simpler and more straightforward than any other vaccine," according to Kyle Anderson, an assistant professor of biochemistry, microbiology and immunology at the University of Saskatchewan."That's because it's a revolution in vaccine making," he said. "There's nothing in this vaccine that rings any alarm bells."Pfizer's vaccine was approved by Health Canada on Dec. 9. Canadians across the country have rolled up their sleeves this week to be among the first to receive the shot, which touts a 95 per cent effectiveness rate and no serious side effects.Its ingredients might look complicated, said Anderson, but they can be easily organized into four basic categories:Active ingredient-30 mcg of a nucleosidemodified messenger RNA (modRNA) encoding the viral spike (S) glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2.This is the only active ingredient in the vaccine.U.K. advises people with serious allergies to avoid Pfizer-BioNTech’s COVID-19 vaccine-The mRNA — messenger RNA technology — sends tiny snippets of genetic code to cells, telling them to build proteins. In this case, it triggers the immune system to produce protective antibodies without using actual bits of the virus. "Old-fashioned" types of vaccines, required scientists having to express it in cells or chicken eggs to get the proteins right, Anderson said."And then we had to do all this clean-up," he said. "If we had problems with cleaning and purifying it, we could get adverse reactions or add things like mercury compounds to stabilize that. ... These are completely avoided with these mRNA-based vaccines."The mRNA-based vaccines may have more science behind them, but they're more efficient, Anderson said."Essentially, the message is telling your body how to make this one virus protein, and how to recognize it," he said.From there, the other ingredients form a "bubble" around the message, Anderson said, helping it become stable enough to get where it needs to go.Fats-lipids (0.43 mg (4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate), 0.05 mg 2[(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide, 0.09 mg 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3- phosphocholine, and 0.2 mg cholesterol)-The lipid molecule in Pfizer's vaccine contains four components."Each is necessary for the mRNA — the medicinal ingredient — to gain entry into cells and be expressed," said Roderick Slavcev, a professor at the University of Waterloo's School of Pharmacy. Slavcev and a team are currently developing a DNA-based vaccine.The molecule essentially protects the mRNA. Without it, the vital active ingredient could be broken down before getting that genetic code to the cell.This connection of fat is particularly delicate, experts say, which is why the Pfizer vaccine requires a subzero temperature for storage.Of all the ingredients, it's the lipids that have been misunderstood, Anderson believes.This is, in part, due to two vaccine recipients in the U.K. experiencing an adverse allergic reaction. It's been suggested that the reactions may have been caused by polyethylene glycol, or PEG, which helps stabilize the shot and is used in some other vaccines.But the ingredient is already widely used, Slavcevs said, and there is no reason to be concerned.PEG is found in a range of pharmaceutical, cosmetic and food products. It is also safely used at higher concentrations as a laxative. Slavcev said there have been some minor side effects recorded with PEG, but they're often as a result of taking high concentrations.The 0.05 mg of PEG in Pfizer's vaccine is "such a small quantity," Anderson said."It's like the carrier of the message. It's the envelope that your letter came in, and then you recycle the paper," he continued."If you eat, say, a steak, you're getting a lot of these fats and in far higher quantities, but they're digested and you just don't think about it."Lipids might also have a bad rap because "they have such long, complicated, really unpronounceable names," he added."It kind of reads like a shampoo bottle," he said with a laugh."All these Xs and Ys and Zs and numbers, it looks like an alien language. And it is to most of us. But it's just essentially a fat droplet."Salts-0.01 mg potassium chloride-0.01 mg monobasic potassium phosphate-0.36 mg sodium chloride-0.07 mg dibasic sodium phosphate dihydrate-Salts, like fats, are nothing new to vaccines, the experts agree. They're there for two reasons — to balance and to stabilize.Having salt components allows cells to retain their proper shape, Anderson said."If you get an IV at the hospital, there are salts and sugars in there. It makes your cells a little happier. They're there to help balance it out," he said.Components like potassium phosphate and dibasic sodium phosphate are there to make sure the pH — the acidity of a solution — is stable.They're actually variants of salt natural to the body that keep the pH balanced, Anderson said. The combination of these particular salts helps the body absorb the solution while also protecting the fat molecule and mRNA."It's going to last longer from the time of thawing it to injecting it in you," he explained."If there happened to be something slightly acidic in the syringe being using, that could destroy the vaccine. So this is really a protective measure that pH is going to be balanced across the time it actually reaches your cells.Sugar-6 mg sucrose-The sugar-water mixture is there to protect and to stabilize the vaccine during freezing.Pfizer's vaccine needs to be stored at an ultracold -70 C. The sugar helps keep things stable under this temperature, the experts said.It is, again, another common addition to a vaccine and other drug and pharmaceutical products."We're more likely to not trust something that we haven't seen or heard of before," Anderson said."Sucrose, we know it's sugar. But we don't necessarily think about all these fats in our body that have these complicated names, and there are hundreds more with complicated names."-Sign of the times-Ultimately, there's nothing in that ingredient list that is questionable or unnecessary, Slavcev said."Potentials for allergic responses or other adverse responses are always possible. It's impossible to predict how every human will react," he said, adding that all adverse reactions are and will continue to be documented.As for the speed of the vaccine's development? Get used to it."This is the future of vaccines," Anderson said."There comes a time in the complexity of how things are made — whether it's a computer program, a car, a drug, food — where you need to trust that there are experts who are critical enough to inspect this and ensure safety."He added: "This is one of the most scrutinized vaccines ever made. It hasn't been rushed, but there has been no delay."-- with files from the Associated Press and Reuters

USA TODAY-Pfizer and Moderna use mRNA in their COVID-19 vaccines. This never-before-used technology could transform how science fights diseases.Karen Weintraub, USA TODAY 11/23/2020

The success of two COVID-19 candidate vaccines marks a turning point in the long history of vaccines and could lead to major advances against a variety of diseases.Vaccines developed by Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna are more than 95% effective against COVID-19, trials show. Both depend on a technology never before used in a commercial vaccine that could upend the way future ones are made.This new messenger RNA technology, as well another method that depends on viruses to deliver vaccines, are transforming the field, said Brendan Wren, a professor of vaccinology at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
a laptop computer sitting on top of a table: Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine is being shipped in specially designed, insulated containers that hold between 195 and 975 five-dose vials and are about the size of a carry-on suitcase. The vials are stored in flat, pizza box-sized compartments, each of which holds 195 vials. A fully-loaded thermal container, which is reusable, contains five of these and weighs about 70 pounds. These "shippers" as Pfizer calls them have space at the top for dry ice, which can keep the vaccine at the necessary temperature for ten days if unopened, or five days as long as it’s opened no more than twice a day for very short periods of time © Pfizer Inc. Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine is being shipped in specially designed, insulated containers that hold between 195 and 975 five-dose vials and are about the size of a carry-on suitcase. The vials are stored in flat, pizza box-sized compartments, each of which holds 195 vials. A fully-loaded thermal container, which is reusable, contains five of these and weighs about 70 pounds. These "shippers" as Pfizer calls them have space at the top for dry ice, which can keep the vaccine at the necessary temperature for ten days if unopened, or five days as long as it’s opened no more than twice a day for very short periods of timeIt could be quite a new era for vaccines and vaccinology," he said. "We seemed to move ahead in this one year 10 years."These technologies had advanced enough that they were ready – in time for this year’s burst of COVID-19-related funding and attention – to be proved in human trials.It’s a silver lining of sorts to the pandemic. Without the urgency to find a solution to COVID-19, the money and the collaboration between government, academia and industry required for the breakthrough might not have come together for years, if ever."COVID is what made RNA jump to the head of the pack," said Dr. Drew Weissman, a professor of medicine at the University of Pennsylvania's Perelman School of Medicine. Though messenger RNA technology hasn't grabbed headlines before now, a handful of researchers, including Weissman, have been working on it for decades."Actually, it feels like my entire life," said Weissman, who helped launch and lead the field since the 1980s.Messenger RNAs are part of the body's toolkit – used to turn a DNA blueprint into the proteins needed for every cellular activity. Weissman and other researchers tried for years to get the technology to work, but every time they injected an experimental mRNA vaccine into an animal, it triggered dangerous inflammation. However, advances in the science – some credited to Weissman and his academic colleagues, others to government scientists or those in private industry – have finally brought mRNA vaccines to the finish line.The success serves as a reminder of the importance of basic science, said Dr. Barney Graham, a government researcher whose office has been collaborating with Moderna for nearly four years to advance their mRNA vaccine technology."Investment in basic science only helps," Graham said. "Even if it looks like some arcane idea that doesn't make sense, that kind of knowledge and basic understanding of biology and how things work are really informative to this kind of program." AstraZeneca: COVID-19 vaccine candidate developed by Oxford 'highly effective' in trials-The success of the companies' mRNA vaccines proves the technology is sound. Pfizer's completed trial of 44,000 people and Moderna's nearly finished trial of 30,000 found the approach to be safe, causing no major health issues, and effective, protecting more than 95% of those vaccinated."All the boxes have now been checked. The platform clearly works," Anthony Fauci, head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said in a news conference announcing Moderna's effectiveness results. He said he would have been satisfied had the mRNA vaccines been 70%-75% effective."Our aspirations have been met, and that's really very good news," Fauci said. "Help is on the way."-How mRNA vaccines work and why they do so wellAdvocates say messenger RNA vaccines have several advantages over traditional technologies.They aren't grown in eggs or cells and don't have to go through the arduous purification of most vaccines, said Graham, deputy director of the Vaccine Research Center at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases."The more you can simplify things and just use exactly what you need and not anything more, overall it makes products safer and more likely to work," he said.The mRNA vaccines can be developed quickly.Moderna was ready to test its mRNA-1273 candidate vaccine in people about two months after receiving the genetic code of the virus from Chinese scientists. That's orders of magnitude faster than any vaccine ever before.Infected again or endless COVID-19? How the 'reinfection phenomenon' could impact vaccines, herd immunity and human behaviorIn clinical trials, the mRNA vaccines caused temporary side effects in 80%-90% of trial participants, but they were mild: Most had sore arms or felt cruddy for a day or two. No one fell seriously ill. Though that could change when vaccines are given to billions of people, the early results suggest bad reactions will be rare.Messenger RNA vaccines contain only a fraction of the virus, so unlike some vaccines, they can't give people the disease they're trying to prevent or trigger allergies to eggs or other traditional vaccine ingredients.Most of the COVID-19 vaccines under development introduce copies of the same "spike" protein found on the surface of the virus that causes COVID-19. They train the immune system to recognize this protein and attack in case of infection. The mRNA vaccines direct the machinery of human cells to manufacture that spike protein. The downside is mRNA molecules are fragile. To keep them from falling apart, researchers spent years figuring out how to encase the mRNAs in tiny droplets of fat.In Pfizer/BioNTech's vaccine, that fat has to stay at super-cold temperatures, so it maintains its shape and shields the mRNA.Moderna figured out how to maintain droplets for longer at warmer temperatures, so its vaccine needs to be stored at only normal freezing temperatures, or for up to a month in a fridge.The fat droplet boosts the effectiveness of the vaccine, turning more cells into spike-protein-producing machines, Weissman said, which may be why they proved so effective against COVID-19."I am incredibly enthusiastic about these results," he said.Messenger RNA past and promise-It took years of work for Weissman and a Penn colleague, Katalin Karikó, to find that if they swapped out one of the building blocks of RNA – called a nucleoside – not only would they solve their inflammation problem, the mRNA would make much more of the desired protein."We thought at that point it would be a great therapeutic," said Weissman, whose research is funded by BioNTech.Weissman and Karikó used their modified mRNA to make a hormone called erythropoietin, the absence of which causes a lack of red blood cells, leading to anemia. "It worked beautifully," Weissman said. So far, the results are confined to a lab dish, mice and macaque monkeys. Someday, he hopes to test similar approaches against diseases in people. In their lab, Weissman and his colleagues tested experimental vaccines against about 30 diseases. "It's looked great in just about all," he said.Experimental mRNA vaccines have protected mice and ferrets against all types of flu. They appeared effective against genital herpes and malaria. They produced proteins that have gone missing in a wide variety of diseases, such as cystic fibrosis.In addition to tackling COVID-19, Moderna has been developing mRNA vaccines against infectious diseases such as Zika and chikungunya, as well as others to fight cancer.Now that COVID-19 vaccines have proved the mRNA approach can work, there should be much more enthusiasm – and money – to pursue other mRNA vaccines and therapies."The potential is just enormous," Weissman said.a woman talking on a cell phone: Katelyn Evans, 16, gets the first of two shots as part of a trial testing of Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine in minors. © Cincinnati Children's Hospital Katelyn Evans, 16, gets the first of two shots as part of a trial testing of Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine in minors.Over the next few years, he and other scientists will work to reduce side effects from mRNA vaccines and therapies, while making them cheaper to manufacture, more stable at warmer temperatures and more potent – so they can hopefully be given in one dose, instead of the two shots needed against COVID-19. "My expectation is that those practical aspects, such as the temperature storage and stability over time at different temperatures, will continue to improve moving forward," said Dr. Dan Barouch, a professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and director of the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, both in Boston.Barouch and others dream of a vaccine that could be dispatched within a few months of a new outbreak."This (pandemic) would have evolved very differently if we had been able to immunize back in March," noted Dr. Bruce Walker, who directs the Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard, which focuses on immunology and vaccine development."As we get more experience with these vaccines and as we learn from this pandemic how to actually scale up rapidly," he said, "I think more and more time can be shaved off."A year ago, people would have said getting a vaccine developed and ready for the public within a year would be impossible. But two COVID-19 vaccines are likely to receive federal approval next month, and several more aren’t far behind."We've shown that's possible," Walker said. "And now we have to set our aspirations even higher."Contact Karen Weintraub at kweintraub@usatoday.com.Health and patient safety coverage at USA TODAY is made possible in part by a grant from the Masimo Foundation for Ethics, Innovation and Competition in Healthcare. The Masimo Foundation does not provide editorial input.This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Pfizer and Moderna use mRNA in their COVID-19 vaccines. This never-before-used technology could transform how science fights diseases.

Pfizer vs. Moderna COVID-19 vaccines - What's the difference? Over 50,000 doses of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine have made it to the Badger State, this week alone.By: Julia Fello-8:00 AM, Dec 18, 2020

WAUWATOSA — Over 50,000 doses of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine have made it to the Badger State, this week alone.With more vaccines possibly being approved down the pipeline, such as Moderna’s, a Doctor Mary Beth Graham, Infectious Disease Specialist at Froedtert and The Medical College of Wisconsin shares how each of the vaccines works in our bodies to protect us.“Is there a difference between the Pfizer vaccine and the Moderna vaccine?” asked TMJ4’s Julia Fello.Dr. Graham replied, “They’re basically the same type of vaccines.”Dr. Graham assures, “It cannot incorporate into your cell or change the DNA of your cell or mutate or do anything weird inside of you.”Dr. Graham says both the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines require two doses, “You will have your maximal antibody response and maximal immune response if you get the two-shot series. So the first shot, and the second shot in about three weeks.”Pfizer’s vaccine will be available to hospital workers and senior citizens living in assisted living centers first.CNBC reports Moderna’s vaccine could be approved by the FDA as early as Friday. The vaccine was backed by an expert panel Thursday afternoon.

Tuesday, December 15, 2020

LIBERAL BABY MURDERERS SACRIFICING INNOCENT BABIES ON THE ALTAR OF FORNICATION.

JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.GET SAVED NOW- CALL ON JESUS TODAY.THE ONLY SAVIOR OF THE WHOLE EARTH - NO OTHER. 1 COR 15:23-JESUS THE FIRST FRUITS-CHRISTIANS RAPTURED TO JESUS-FIRST FRUITS OF THE SPIRIT-23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.ROMANS 8:23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.(THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE)

LIBERAL BABY MURDERERS SACRIFICING INNOCENT BABIES ON THE ALTAR OF FORNICATION.
LIBERAL BABY MURDERERS
PARTIAL ABORTION - VERY GRAPHIC CONTENT
PARTIAL BIRTH ABORTION
A BABIES POINT OF VIEW THREW ABORTION
A BABIES POINT OF VIEW BEFORE-DURING-AFTER AN ABORTION
MIRACLE BABY AFTER ABORTION
HOW GOD PERSERVED AN ABORTED BABY THREW AN ABORTION

13 Thou shalt not kill.(Murder)(THAT INCLUDES ABORTION)

MATTHEW 18:6
6  But whoso shall offend (HURT) one of these little ones (CHILDREN) which believe in me,(JESUS) it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.(THATS THE DEATH PENALTY FOLKS)

EXODUS 21:12
12 He that smiteth (MURDER)a man,(OR BABY) so that he die, shall be surely put to death.(THATS THE DEATH PENALTY PEOPLE)

REVELATION 9:20-21
20 And the rest of the men which were not killed by these plagues yet repented not of the works of their hands, that they should not worship devils,(OCCULT) and idols of gold, and silver, and brass, and stone, and of wood: which neither can see, nor hear, nor walk:
21 Neither repented they of their murders, nor of their sorceries,(DRUG ADDICTIONS) nor of their fornication,(SEX OUTSIDE OF MARRIAGE) nor of their thefts.(STEALING)

Five Reasons Abortion is Murder: The Killing of an Innocent Human Being-by Dr. Doug Potter

For whatever reason, I missed taking an ethics class in college. My speech class came with a list of topics we could not give a speech on. Abortion was at the top of the list which was not alphabetical. Every other class that might have touched on the topic, avoided the issue as well. Regardless of my inadequate undergraduate education, abortion is still a very controversial issue today. However, just because someone is uninformed about something controversial, does not mean there is no objectively true understanding of the issue.With individual human lives at risk, the stakes could not be higher. There are no less than ten methods of abortion that can legally be done in most states corresponding to various stages of pregnancy.In the U.S. alone, since the legalization of abortion in 1973 by the U.S. Supreme Court, there have been over 61.8 million surgical abortions. That is about 2,362 abortions per day, 98 abortions per hour, or 1 abortion every 96 seconds (Guttmacher Institute).I first heard reasons for and against abortion from my seminary ethics professor Dr. Frank Beckwith. I learned that many arguments rested on the question of when, not life, but a living human being exists. If what is in the womb is not human until some point in its development, then abortion may be permissible in some instances before that point. However, if all that constitutes a human being is present at any point, then abortion should be prohibited from that point on. Both positions must first argue the question of the point when a human being exists, or they are just begging the question or assuming what they should be proving. Everything depends on the point.I learned from my philosophy and theology professor, the late Dr. Norman Geisler, that to fully answer any complex question, one must not just rely on one area of inquiry such as law or the Bible but must consider every and any area that touches on the truth of the matter. Only then can a systematic argument be made. This is simply because the truth about what is right or wrong is ultimately unified or non-contradictory.Hence, I offer five reasons that, when combined, point to why the existence of a living human being begins at conception, and therefore all methods of abortion at every stage of pregnancy are morally wrong and should be legally prohibited and socially rejected, that is rejected by our society as an acceptable means of birth control.Reason from Philosophy-Philosophically what constitutes a human person? According to the Aristotelian-Thomistic tradition a human person is composed of an immaterial rational soul (that which separates us from non-rational animals) that informs, i.e., a principle of organization for a material body constituting a functional unity of an organism. The person is not identical to the soul or the body, but both, in union constitute the human person. The central question of abortion, put in philosophical terms, is when does union or harmonization of soul-body take place? All one should say at this point is that for a human rational soul to be present, it is necessary for there to be a material substance (i.e., body) with the potential for a rational soul’s operation.Further important clarification is between internal and external causes. A house for example is put together by builders using material such as wood and metal, based on a plan. The house cannot put itself together. The house has no internal active principle that grows and develops it fully into what it is. The house requires an external cause, i.e., the builder. However, a natural living substance must contain an intrinsic cause or immaterial form that moves the substances’ matter in potentiality towards its developmental ends. For a human being, this form must be the rational soul present if there is an organized material body with the potentiality for rational thought to be moved to the actuality of rational thought. This does not negate the need for outside support for development (such as a womb providing nutrients from another person) but does reveal that an immaterial soul must be present once the material body has all it needs for the development to be what it is.In short, only the active potential for rational operations in the substance need be present to constitute a human being. The actual rational operation need not be there, such as when I sleep, I do not cease to be human. As such, there must be an immaterial internal form that guides the development of essential bodily matter (i.e., organs). The question of if and when such is present must come from another area of study, namely biology.Reason from Biology-Biologically what constitutes a human being? The chemical deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was first discovered in 1869 and its genetic function in 1943. However, it was the work of James Watson and Francis Crick in the 1950s (popularly published in the book The Double Helix in 1968) who first discovered its double helix structure that solved the mystery of how genetic instruction could be held in an organism and passed on to another through reproduction. Since then we have not only known that but also how all genetic information is present in the human zygote. At the moment of conception when the male sperm, with twenty-three chromosomes, and female ovum, with twenty-three chromosomes, unite, to form a forty-six-chromosome human being existing with all the genetic information (DNA) needed to develop. No additional or new genetic information is added. In the words of my ethics professor:At conception, the genotype—the inherited characteristics of an individual human being—is established and will remain in force for the entire life of this individual. The unborn individual, sharing the same nature with all human beings, is unlike any individual who has been conceived before and is unlike any individual who will ever be conceived again (unless she is an identical twin).[1] The question reasoned from philosophy now has an answer. The active internal efficient causation for rational operations (i.e., an immaterial soul) is present at the point of conception given the biological understanding of DNA to guide the development of essential material organs.Reason from Law-Should human laws have an essential connection to morality? Human law consists of certain ordinances, rules, or principles that are reasoned and promoted to be good for everyone. According to Thomas Aquinas, human law, to be good or right, must be derived from natural law. Natural law is grounded in a unifying undeniable principle that enables a human being to flourish according to its nature. In short, “Good is to be done and pursued, and evil avoided” (Summa Theologica Ia-IIae.94.2). All human law must be derived from natural law, otherwise, it is a perversion. Since the complete human being is present at the moment of conception, all human law should promote good being done to all unborn humans and avoid any and all evils that could be done.Such an unfortunate perversion of human law occurred in a series of U.S. Supreme Court decisions beginning in 1973 (five years after the how of DNA became widely known). The first was Roe v. Wade in which the court decided that a woman has a right to an abortion on demand during the first trimester. Although this decision left open to the states to prohibit abortion after viability, a second case Doe v. Bolton (1973) quickly opened the door to abortion after the first trimester by expanding the health of the mother to virtually anything, thus allowing abortion at any stage of pregnancy.Justice Blackmun who wrote the opinion of the court in Roe v. Wade admitted two things: 1) the court did not decide when life begins:We need not resolve the difficult question of when life begins. When those trained in the respective disciplines of medicine, philosophy, and theology are unable to arrive at any consensus, the judiciary, at this point in the development of man’s knowledge, is not in a position to speculate as to the answer [160].And 2) he admitted if the personhood of the unborn is established, the U.S. Constitution would guarantee the right to life:If this suggestion of personhood is established, the appellant’s case [for abortion], of course, collapses, for the fetus’ right to life would then be guaranteed specifically by the [14th] Amendment [156-157].From philosophy and biology, the judiciary finds its answer. Given the above reasons, a philosophical and moral realism recognizes an essential relationship between law and morality. Hence, perverted laws that are not moral should be legally overturned.Reason from the Bible-Does the Bible agree with the above truth about the unborn? Regardless if you hold the Bible to be the word of God or just a book reflecting ancient cultural views, you should agree that it presents a consistent view of the fetus from the point of conception as fully human. First, the Bible prohibits the taking of innocent human life in the sixth commandment “You shall not murder” (Exodus 20:13). This divine law reflects and makes explicit the natural law reasoned above. In Exodus 20:22-23, the life of the unborn is protected by the same punishment for the injury and death of an adult.If men struggle with each other and strike a woman with child so that she gives birth prematurely [live birth of the child], yet there is no injury, he shall surely be fined as the woman’s husband may demand of him, and he shall pay as the judges decide. But if there is any further injury [child or woman dies], then you shall appoint as a penalty life for life. . . (NASB)Second, the biblical writers consistently attribute the same characteristics of the person outside the womb to the unborn in the womb. In one of the earliest books of the Bible, we read in Job 3:3 two lines of poetry:“Let the day perish on which I was to be born,And the night which said, ‘A boy is conceived.’” (NASB) In this poetic parallelism, the second line emphasizes the first by restating it with different words. The child “born” and “boy” are the same person and speaks of this at “conception.”In Jeremiah 1:5 (cf. Isaiah 49:1) we see that God knows the unborn in the same way he knows a person outside the womb.Before I formed you in the womb I knew you,And before you were born I consecrated you;I have appointed you a prophet to the nations. (NASB)-Psalm 139: 13-16 (cf. Psalm 51:5) refers to the earliest stages of pregnancy when God “formed my inward parts,” “wove me in my mother’s womb,” “I was made in secret,” “[I] was skillfully wrought,” consisting of “my unformed substance.” Given the personal pronounce, antecedents, and descriptions of that which is in the womb it is unmistakable that he or she from conception on is a human being known by God because it is a work of God.For You formed my inward parts;You wove me in my mother’s womb.I will give thanks to You, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made;Wonderful are Your works,And my soul knows it very well.My frame was not hidden from You,When I was made in secret,And skillfully wrought in the depths of the earth;Your eyes have seen my unformed substance;And in Your book were all written-The days that were ordained for me,When as yet there was not one of them. (NASB)-Finally, following the Old, the New Testament uses the same term “baby” for that which is in and outside the womb (Luke 1:41, 44; 2:12, 16) showing the continuity in person “from the womb to tomb” as my late professor would put it. Jesus Christ was fully human at the moment of His conception by the Holy Spirit in Mary’s womb (Matthew 1:20-21) and the apostle Paul was known and called by God while in the womb (Galatians 1:15). Taken together all of these passages entails the complete substance of a human being existing while in the womb and being the object of God’s love from the moment of conception.The biblical reader should at least acknowledge that Jesus of Nazareth held to the truth (John 17:17) of the Old Testament teachings (Matthew 4:4; 5:18; Luke 11:50-51) in all that it affirms and promised this same divine source of truth to his immediate disciples (John 16:13). Hence, it follows that Jesus of Nazareth held that a living human being exists at the point of conception. And this position of Jesus is surely reflected in his teaching not to murder (Matthew 5:21-22) and love your neighbor (Matthew 22:37-40) which should apply even if she or he is in a womb.Reason from Theology-Does the theologian unify truth found in the Bible with that found elsewhere? Even if you are not a person of faith you should still be able to acknowledge the unity of truth in Reasons 1-4 above and therefore conclude abortion is murder. But if you grant Theism is true, that One transcendent, eternal, omnibenevolent, omnipotent, and omniscient being exists who created everything according to its nature, then it follows that God is the efficient and continuing cause of the soul. While there are different theological views on whether God directly or indirectly creates the soul, both views see God as the efficient and sustaining cause. Both views now agree, it is at the moment of conception (Reasons 1-4). Hence, abortion is the intentional destruction of an intact innocent unborn human being which constitutes an attack on the work of God that bears His image (Geneses 1:27). In short, from the integration of philosophy, biology, law, and the Bible, abortion is murder and therefore a sin in violation of God’s eternal law.A Final Plea-Reason and truth may not convince everyone. But given the above five reasons, I hope that people of reason and faith will unite, set aside differences, and recognize the genocide that is being permitted by governments around the world against a group of human beings because of their developmental size, location, and timing. The question of when a human being begins may or may not have been clear in the past to some, but it is crystal clear today to all who want to learn. The most important areas of human study and inquiry that have something to say about when a human being begins, point to the same conclusions: the moment of conception.Even if somehow you think something in the five reasons above are found to be lacking, thus making it unsure or unknown to you the point of when a human being exists, follow my professors’ plea and support to the extent you are able all legal, social, religious, and political efforts to stop the killing of unborn human beings. As every hunter knows, if you are not sure what is behind the rustling bush, don’t shoot. If somehow you are still not sure when a human being exists, then don’t abort! Every human effort within legal means should be used to change the laws permitting abortion in every nation they exist. For the Psalmist (9:18-20 NASB) warns,For the needy will not always be forgotten,Nor the hope of the afflicted perish forever.Arise, O Lord, do not let man prevail Let the nations be judged before You.Put them in fear, O Lord;Let the nations know that they are but men.[1] Francis J. Beckwith, Politically Correct Death: Answering Arguments for Abortion Rights (Grand Rapids: MI: Baker, 1993), 42.

ALLTIME