Wednesday, November 30, 2011

STOCK RESULTS NOV 30,11

http://homelandsecurityus.com/archives/5395
Connecting the dots on the National Defense Authorization Act November 29, 2011 By Director By Douglas J. Hagmann

It was a year ago last week that I warned that the Department of Homeland Security was making a list of U.S. citizens who protested and urged others to protest TSA policies. I disclosed the existence of a written directive issued through DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano and TSA head John Pistole, both acting on behalf of the Obama administration, instructed TSA officials to collect the names and other relevant information of anyone who interfered with enhanced TSA screening procedures by speaking out against them. They were to be classified as domestic extremists in this data mining operation. For my assertions here and on various national news programs, I was attacked by media lapdogs, investigative reporters, and members of both sides of the political spectrum.

Later, my credibility was called into question when an enterprising reporter filed a FOI request and was informed that no such document exits. Case closed. What a surprise.Today, some of the same people who doubted the veracity of the report are suddenly uncomfortable, concerned, or even a bit outraged that the anti-terror apparatus is now turning inward and being set up to be used against U.S. citizens. Again, what a surprise.I am referring to Senate Bill 1867, titled the National Defense Authorization Act (for fiscal year 2012) secretly drafted (in committee) by Senators Carl Levin and John McCain. The bill made it out of committee, sans hearing, and is pending a full senate vote this week.While much of the bill deals with the mundane, sections 1031 and 1032 are raising the concerns of many, including some unlikely allies. In plain speak, those sections of the bill broadly classifies certain U.S. citizens as terrorists, and allow for military intervention against such citizens on U.S. soil.The language of the bill is cumbersome and difficult to assess, thus creating some plausible deniability for those who support this piece of draconian legislation. Representative Justin Amash (D-MI) apparently agrees. According to Rep. Amash, the language of the bill is carefully crafted to mislead the public.

To those who assert that the ambiguity of the bill’s language has been fixed and addressed, he counters that it [still] does not preclude U.S. citizens from being detained indefinitely, without charge or trial, it simply makes such detention discretionary.I contacted my intelligence source who possessed the written directive that was the subject of contentious ridicule for insight into the current activities of our national security apparatus and assessment of the proposed NDAA. According to this source, the DHS is broadening their attention to include anyone who is or will be engaged or encouraging domestic unrest, whatever the reason. The net is being cast over such groups as the Tea Party, which has been under actual and electronic surveillance by the FBI and other intelligence agencies, as well as the various occupy groups.Additionally and perhaps most ominous is that according to my source, active measures are now being taken in the event of bank holidays, closures and associated unrest.Connect the dots. Look at who this bill will ultimately benefit and protect, and who it is intended to stifle. Follow the money, or what’s left of it, before it disappears.

A UK tale of health care and airport scanners
- Anna Grayson Tuesday, November 29, 2011 CAN FREE PRESS


London, England - A new report out by the Equality and Human Rights Commission has thrown a light on the abuses that invariably come when you socialise healthcare. This one focused on home care for the elderly run by local councils. The chronic disregard of pensioners was found to be so appalling many have been left wanting to die. Of the 500k people that are under government care, 250k experienced horrendous neglect. Here are some examples of what carers get up to:
-Refusal to heat food in a microwave and serve due to health and safety concerns
-Soiled sheets unchanged for weeks
-The frail put to bed at 2:45pm
-Lack of time to carry out vital tasks like washing and dressing
-Physical abuse such as rough handling and shouting
-Systematic theft of money
-Leaving food out for a blind and deaf man and not telling him where it is

And it is no better in hospitals, where a study earlier this year exposed similar abuses, like leaving food out of reach, so that patients starved and were so thirsty they couldn’t cry out for help. Hot off the press yesterday, we learn that botched operations are now in the tens of thousands each year, post-operative infections are at an all time high and the death rate due to NHS care is ‘alarmingly high’.

Some elderly with means are even hiring private nurses and having them pose as friends and relatives to ensure they are bathed and fed while in hospital. It is so surreally absurd and obscene, it almost sounds like a comedy sketch, but sadly it is all too real and the tragic result of a human rights culture. And it will be the fate of America if Obamacare is not repealed.When left to the devises of man, a right becomes a politicised tool to manipulate for purposes of greed, power or some other nefarious intent. When passed into law, personal responsibility is abrogated and it is left to the courts to fight out whether a right has been denied based on evidence gathered.Take the simple concept of clean drinking water which the UN Human Rights Council says should be a right recognised under international law. Now since we can’t live without it for more than a few days and we all support that everyone should have it, wouldn’t this be a reasonable law? No it would not. Just because we call something a ‘right’ does not make it so. The thinking gets muddled when we fail to distinguish the difference between a right and a necessity. Water is necessary to human life, so our governments should ensure their citizens have access to it. Unfortunately some governments fail to do so as in developing nations where water access is unsafe or scarce. In 2003 Kerala, India suffered extreme water shortages when corrupt officials granted water rights to a foreign soft drinks manufacturer allowing them to extract a million gallons a day. To combat this kind of poor government judgment, the UN resolution seeks to let the responsibility fall to the international community, which usually means taxing richer nations to supply that water in various programs. But much of that money will inevitably end up funding a new Mercedes or palatial residence for the local despot. The status quo remains as the tyranny of taxation hampers the ability of private sector initiatives to take action.

It’s the same with health care. In Europe no politician will renounce social health care for fear of losing his votes. In fact the best way to gain votes is to denounce its privatization. Money continues to be thrown at services no longer fit for purpose and when that’s gone, the inevitable efficiency cuts come.Billions have been spent here in the UK on commissions and reports by outside agencies producing endless reports on how to fix the NHS. Many point to competition being a key to improvement. Yet the country remains frozen into non-action over this sacred cow because of our deeply imbedded rights culture. Even Socialist Sweden was able to lift itself from health care hell into market led reforms that have transformed their health service. In former communist Slovakia nearly half of health care is privately serviced.The British clearly haven’t suffered enough yet, as they cling to the proposition that universal health care is a right and proper way to equalize resources and makes society fair for everyone. In the process, free market principles are obliterated forcing people who want other non-government alternatives to fund them themselves while still paying tax to for a universal system. And the basic human interaction of one person helping another in need through the choice that a well developed conscience dictates, is replaced by the state and bureaucratic decisions based on statistics and budgets. Taxation and the appeal to our innate sense of fairness is the oxygen that feeds this system, and it inhibits the freedom for civil society to take action because money is squeezed from that sector. And when a right is designated to another party to administer, the culture gets lazy about doing the decent thing. Need can only be truly addressed on an individual basis by people whose objectives are driven by personal charity and not personal greed or power.

Rights culture turns into tyranny when we fillet out moral virtue and conscience. When you leave the judgement of decent behaviour to another – a politician, a court or a human rights commission, you set up a value system that encourages self-centred thinking devoid of personal responsibility. Western civilization was built on Christian values and its attendant rule of law based on Mosaic Law or the Ten Commandants - the ultimate guideline for personal responsibility. Follow these and you have moral order which in turn leads to societal order. Honour your father and your mother, takes care of our elders. If you can’t, then someone in your family will and if they can’t, then it falls to our neighbours, which is way the Christian moral ethic operates. If we swept out government intervention tomorrow, civil society would pick up the baton. Faith groups and others would set up homes for the elderly where volunteers, religious and others would band together supported by private fundraising to do what a culture powered by love does. We see this ethic in operation time after time, especially in America after natural disasters. People pitch in and help their neighbour.America’s founding made this culture of love endemic and is the reason why so many want to flee to its shores, many of whom don’t even understand why this principle works, but they do get that the freedom it spawns does work. The founding fathers also knew the role of government must be to protect this freedom out of which personal responsibility flourishes. This was all placed under God in the Declaration of Independence which recognized the fundamental rights of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.The culture of rights claims to protect, but it can never succeed. Firstly, take God out of the equation and we will never agree on what a right is. It becomes a euphemism for decency. Bloated on luxurious budgets at the expense of ordinary people, the EU unceasingly dreams up new goodies to throw into the rights bag, as we saw this summer with one member putting forward a bill for the right to a summer holiday.

Secondly, where one right is enforced, another will be violated. Take airport scanners. In the UK we will soon be required to do a full body scan without a pat down option if a passenger is selected for screening. If we refuse, we lose our right to fly. Flying is not a right, but in a free society a bought service. We choose this service based on how safe they make it, the food, seat comfort, etc. The individual airlines in turn should be able to provide the necessary security as they see fit.Decency dictates that appearing nude to a stranger while being bombarded with ionizing radiation would warrant another method more valid. But despite the unusual move by the EU to direct its member states not to use this type of scanner, the UK is going ahead because of the significant terror threats we face and our rights be damned.In a free society airlines should be able to choose their methods of security and market them accordingly. Israeli airline EL AL would be the first port of call for consultation as they have cornered the market in determining who poses a threat by psychological profiling, suspect terrorist intelligence and good old fashioned common sense backed by gun wielding marshals on board. Now that’s a service I would gladly pay for and relax on the flight.And the rest who still feel violated? Since the majority of terrorists taking to the skies these days are Islamofacists, we could create flights based on Imam-defined rules of safety where Muslims might feel happier about not being profiled. The market would operate freely, we all have our dignity and rights intact and we would see who did the better business. Similarly, a free market health care system weeds out the good hospitals from the bad and the impetus to decency of the individual would see to the needs of the truly destitute.

The Malleable Mexican-American Border
- Richard B. Jones Tuesday, November 29, 2011 CAN FREE PRESS


The Mexican-American border is more than the Rio Grande or a fence in the desert; it’s a mobile frontier where cultures have struggled for centuries. Forces of mayhem are currently dominant because governments on both sides don’t care, don’t appreciate the terror or are making money off the situation.Politicians don’t understand that this is more than a debate point during election season; it’s an active international disaster that threatens national security.America must defeat major criminal forces and provide a firm, regulated path for international exchange with Latin America or we will lose this war; those forces will overtake us. Our rule of law will end and their rule of man will dominate as it does in most of Latin America.The border is inherently unstable. Americans go there for entertainment illegal at home, thinking Mexico has no laws; Mexicans cross to America thinking the same thing. It’s common for families on both sides to recover their relatives from foreign jails.A vast criminal economy thrives on this reputation, reaching far beyond the obvious sins into corrupt officials and milking social services. Armies of gang soldiers fight wars over money, soldiers as devoted to their cause as any American military hero. They only know force; the physical border means little to them.When not stopped at the border they reach up into America and everyone feels the danger, the insecurity. Americans used to feel it when they visited border towns then feel secure upon return—now it’s much farther north.

We discuss it, a strong, invisible sensation affecting us all alike. It isn’t cultural prejudice. Friends from Mexico say it’s stronger for them, a sense of being subject to the whims of local strongmen, of not having a set of laws to protect them. It drives them to emigrate to AmericaThe American rule of law attracts people of little opportunity from deep in Latin America. At home, they cannot attain the security afforded the general American public, and so they come, danger increasing as they approach the border.Danger also increases as governments and economies weaken. The more desperate people, the more criminals there are to prey on them. When governments turn their back predators pounce. Conditions are worsening.In places the sense of security has extended into Mexico. Algodones, on the Colorado River across from Yuma, easily accessible from California, has been a haven for Americans for many years. Kept absolutely safe by Mexican authorities, retirees wintering in the area shop, dine, and meet all their medical needs in complete security.Cannon balls have flown over the Rio Grande at the south tip of Texas but usually they are at peace. Now, however, as in all border towns, you cross into Mexico at your own risk; the nature of the border changes.Ojinaga was our regional secret for years. Far from other border towns, it escaped the usual filth. It felt like a Mexican city far below the border, safe, beautiful and friendly, right on the Rio Grande.

Today, Ojinagans with family on both sides of the river advise not to visit. Rural areas are safe but the city is insecure. What a tragedy. This tears at the heart of Mexico and at the hearts of all who love Mexican culture.

The El Paso area is fascinating, unique in its cooperation between authorities. Two national governments are involved, two American states, one Mexican state, El Paso County, two American cities (El Paso and Las Cruces, NM) and several municipalities and colonias. They have a vast reservoir of border knowledge, of solving problems, yet who is going to those functionaries and gathering information? Corruption in Texas has made the American side of the border so insecure at times that Texans moved to Mexico. When Ma Ferguson was elected governor in 1933, famed Texas Ranger Frank Hamer quit the Rangers in disgust and rode with the Rurales in Mexico.Anglos were first drawn to Texas by freedoms afforded under the Mexican Constitution of 1824. That’s why 1824 was on the Alamo flag. They rebelled against the dictator Santa Anna, not against Mexico, because he had rescinded that Constitution.Before Santa Anna marched north, the line between the rule of law and the rule of man was about two hundred miles south of the current border, below Monterrey and Saltillo. Northern Mexico is still culturally and politically distinct from Central Mexico, more conservative and business oriented.With Santa Anna’s defeat at San Jacinto in 1836, the line retreated to the Rio Grande according to Texans, to the Nueces River according to Mexicans, and the land between those rivers became a war zone for decades, finally secured for the United States through force of arms.Border power fluctuates along the highway from Southern California to San Felipe in Mexico, on the Gulf of California. It’s a gold mine for Mexican traffic cops.The highway also runs north from Mexico to almost unlimited work in the Imperial Valley.When Mexican cops put too much pressure on tourists going to San Felipe, American cops put the hammer on Mexicans headed north to work. After a few days everyone backs off and the cycle starts over.

The border might be a designated line but it’s actually malleable, a perception of authority. The powers of evil pace themselves to our government’s varying level of concern, like Ho Chi Minh manipulating President Johnson, and they will win using the same tactic.North American civilization is gradually eroding, as in the current discussion of resident tuition rates for long-term illegal aliens. Even conservative politicians are confused, willing to negate Federal Law to avoid the discussion.
Decision makers accept facts as fed to them and agree to pass the buck, ignoring standard methods of determining justice: contrasting people’s behaviors under like circumstances.A significant body of illegal alien students foresee the residency problem and resolve it before they apply to college. We never hear of them because they come from self-reliant families, hard-working people, the best of the American dream. Mexico might someday save America from moral and economic collapse because of these people.Should the system be changed? No. Illegal alien students should take care of their residency status ahead of time, like their peers. This is not a government problem; it’s an individual problem, but no politicians on the federal level are willing to take the risk to say so.If politicians ignore the law to accommodate noncompliance more exceptions will be sought—mayhem will increase.
Enemies of civilization encourage whining because it unsettles incompetent authority, benefits the forces of evil. The corny phrase forces of evil applies here—come visit.To cease suffering, just as to cease war, there is no substitute for victory. Are our leaders willing to step up to the task? Stabilizing the border will take a firm hand.

DOCTOR DOCTORIAN FROM ANGEL OF GOD
then the angel said, Financial crisis will come to Asia. I will shake the world.

JAMES 5:1-3
1 Go to now, ye rich men, weep and howl for your miseries that shall come upon you.
2 Your riches are corrupted, and your garments are motheaten.
3 Your gold and silver is cankered; and the rust of them shall be a witness against you, and shall eat your flesh as it were fire. Ye have heaped treasure together for the last days.

REVELATION 18:10,17,19
10 Standing afar off for the fear of her torment, saying, Alas, alas that great city Babylon, that mighty city! for in one hour is thy judgment come.
17 For in one hour so great riches is come to nought. And every shipmaster, and all the company in ships, and sailors, and as many as trade by sea, stood afar off,
19 And they cast dust on their heads, and cried, weeping and wailing, saying, Alas, alas that great city, wherein were made rich all that had ships in the sea by reason of her costliness! for in one hour is she made desolate.

EZEKIEL 7:19
19 They shall cast their silver in the streets, and their gold shall be removed: their silver and their gold shall not be able to deliver them in the day of the wrath of the LORD: they shall not satisfy their souls, neither fill their bowels: because it is the stumblingblock of their iniquity.

REVELATION 13:16-18
16 And he(FALSE POPE) causeth all,(WORLD SOCIALISM) both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:(CHIP IMPLANT)
17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.(6-6-6) A NUMBER SYSTEM

WORLD MARKET RESULTS
http://money.cnn.com/data/world_markets/
CNBC VIDEOS
http://www.cnbc.com/id/15839263/?tabid=15839796&tabheader=false

HALF HOUR DOW RESULTS WED NOVEMBER 30,2011

09:30 AM +2.43
10:00 AM +410.70
10:30 AM +396.16
11:00 AM +428.99
11:30 AM +406.95
12:00 PM +416.75
12:30 PM +413.34
01:00 PM +415.47
01:30 PM +394.34
02:00 PM +388.68
02:30 PM +390.90
03:00 PM +394.50
03:30 PM +408.07
04:00 PM +490.05 12,045.68

S&P 500 1246.95 +51.76

NASDAQ 2620.34 +104.83

GOLD 1,750.90 +32.00

OIL 100.37 +0.58

TSE 300 12,204.11 +471.61

CDNX 1548.45 +43.44

S&P/TSX/60 692.55 +25.96

MORNING,NEWS,STATS

YEAR TO DATE PERFORMANCE
Dow +318 points at 4 minutes of trading today.
Dow +1 points at low today.
Dow +430 points at high today so far.
GOLD opens at $1,747.60.OIL opens at $101.11 today.

AFTERNOON,NEWS,STATS
Dow +1 points at low today so far.
Dow +490 points at high today so far.

WRAPUP,NEWS,STATS
Dow +1 points at low today.
Dow +490 points at high today.

GOLD ALLTIME HIGH $1,902.60 (NOT AT CLOSE)

CRUDE OIL +3.9 MILLION BARRELS
GASOLINE +200,000 BARRELS
DISTILLATE INVENTORIES +5.5 MILLION BARRELS

ALLTIME